Next Article in Journal
CuO Nanoparticle-Mediated Seed Priming Improves Physio-Biochemical and Enzymatic Activities of Brassica juncea
Previous Article in Journal
Potential of Bioassays to Assess Consequences of Cultivation of Acacia mangium Trees on Nitrogen Bioavailability to Eucalyptus Trees: Two Case-Studies in Contrasting Tropical Soils
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of the Fungicidal Effect of Some Commercial Disinfectant and Sterilizer Agents Formulated as Soluble Liquid against Sclerotium rolfsii Infected Tomato Plant
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in Alternative Measures in Plant Protection

1
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
2
Agency for Radwaste Management, Litostrojska 58A, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(4), 805; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040805
Submission received: 3 January 2023 / Accepted: 21 January 2023 / Published: 10 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Alternative Measures in Plant Protection)
Food production, along with the constant demand for higher yields, is an imperative of contemporary agricultural production. In order to accomplish this goal, it is necessary to control pests, weeds, and the causative agents of plant diseases, which implies the application of plant protection products. However, the intensive and/or unsuitable application of synthetic pesticides has led to a series of consequences for agricultural production itself and for the environment, non-target organisms, and for human health as well. The presence of resistant populations, side effects on pollinators and other beneficial organisms, and pesticide residues in food, water, and soil are just some of the consequences. The fact that in recent years the number of active substances approved for use in agricultural production is rapidly decreasing, all of the above requires continuous and comprehensive studies of the response of the living organism (beneficial and harmful effects) to various new agrochemicals and to products of biotechnology, followed by the mandatory risk assessment of the effect on humans and animals as well as the environment.
In order to minimize the use of chemical pesticides, the Special Issue “Advances in Alternative Measures in Plant Protection” intends to offer an insight into the alternative measures of plant protection in contemporary agriculture. Special Issue contains twenty-two scientific articles: sixteen original research articles and six original reviews. With these research and reviews, authors contribute to the development of new, biological ways of controlling pests in agricultural production.
As an alternative to synthetic pesticides for the control of plant diseases, especially for the management of plant pathogenic fungi, bioactive metabolites derived from algae/plant extracts, essential oils, and other materials can be used. The extract of seaweed Gracilariopsis persica has drawn attention for its biologically active compounds which show antifungal activities against Botrytis cinerea, Aspergillus niger, Penicillium expansum, and Pyricularia oryzae on the mycelial growth. The antifungal activity is most likely associated with its phenolic compounds, such as rosmarinic, oleic, and palmitic acid and quercetin, whose antifungal activity has already been reported [1]. The antifungal effect of phenolic compounds is potentially reflected in the reduction in the wood mass loss and restriction of wood biodegradation caused by Ganoderma boninense in inoculated oil palm woodblocks [2]. The hydromethanolic extract of Rubia tinctorum root also shows antifungal activity, alone or in combination with chitosan oligomers or with stevioside, against three Botryosphaeriaceae taxa by the inhibition of their mycelial growth. Considering the complexity of the extracts' chemical composition, the activity most likely should be ascribed to the combination of a group of them [3]. In addition to the antifungal effects, phenolic compounds play a notable role in the resistance of plants to diseases. The phenolic compound content usually increases after powdery mildew disease occurs, which leads to the conclusion that hybrids/cultivars with high phenolic contents should be recommended for the development of new superior cultivars as a source of resistance to fungal grape diseases [4].
An important part of sustainable pest management is natural enemies. Root fungal endophytes isolated from solanaceous plant species expressed activity in the control of a late blight of potato incited by Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary [5]. When it comes to the natural regulation of pests, it is particularly important to provide suitable conditions for beneficial organisms. Field margin plant species are considered to be food and shelter for specific pests; therefore, it is crucial to study the biology of the host plants and how they interact with pests [6].
For the management of plant pathogens, as an environmentally friendly method of plant disease control, microorganisms can be used usually because of their capability of counteracting the growth. Species belonging to the bacterial genus Pseudomonas have a high potential in the control of plant pathogens. They can be used as an alcoholic extract derived from bacterial isolate, which manifests exceptional activity against some of the most common pre- and post-harvest fungal diseases [7].
Indoor agricultural production is particularly challenging due to conditions affordable for pests. As an alternative to chemical products, the control of causal agents of the major tomato diseases in greenhouse production was undertaken by Bacillus spp. or B. subtilis and the foliar application of Reynoutria sachalinensis, Melaleuca alternifolia, harpin αβ proteins, and bee honey. The use of these biorational products in the control of these diseases in greenhouse production has the potential to be incorporated into an integrated program for the management of the examined diseases in tomatoes [8]. Moreover, in the same conditions, the control of Sclerotium rolfsii, a destructive disease for many plants, including tomatoes, could be successfully undertaken using some antiseptic and disinfectant agents [9].
Plant extracts can indicate an herbicide effect as well. Thymus vulgaris hydrolate showed an inhibitory effect on the weed species, including Amaranthus retroflexus (L.), Chenopodium album (L.), Portulaca oleracea (L.), Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv., Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers., and Solanum nigrum L., through the inhibition of the seed germination and seedling growth. T. vulgaris hydrolate had the least negative phytotoxic effect on the germination of soybean, sunflower, and maize [10].
Understanding the plant–plant interaction is also one of the Advances in Alternative Measures in Plant Protection. The phytotoxic substances released by Ambrosia trifida L. have an allelopathic influence on the oxidative stress parameters and phenolic compounds in maize, soybean, and sunflower. The sunflower was the most sensitive crop to A. trifida allelochemicals, maize showed a mild sensitivity, while the soybean did not demonstrate sensitivity [11]. The phytotoxic effect could perhaps be reduced using some biostimulants. L-α-amino acid-based biostimulants show a protective effect against the stress caused by the application of the imazamox herbicide in sunflower plants, followed by the protection of the photosynthetic activity and reduction in the oxidative stress in the plant [12]. Furthermore, even some strains of entomopathogenic fungi can act as biostimulants for some crops by their ability to infect insect pests and to promote plant growth. For example, the isolate of Metarhizium robertsii (2693) causes the death of 73% Tenebrio molitor larvae, but also significantly increases the maize root length [13].
Aside from plants, microorganisms, insects, and nematodes, micronutrients have to be considered as a source of bioactive compounds. Recently, some micronutrients are recognized as an alternative to synthetic fungicides. Due to the influence of Selenium on the inhibition of the development of a Fusarium proliferatum, the addition of low concentrations of Se could improve conventional fungicides and decrease their side effects [14]. One of the most significant economic and ecologic forest tree species in Europe, the sessile oak, is highly threatened by the powdery mildew caused by Erysiphe alphitoides (Griffon and Maubl.). Evaluating the influence of the irrigation levels (overhead sprinklers) on the damage caused by powdery mildew to Quercus petraea in a nursery setting, it was showed that controlling the irrigation rate can become an effective component of integrated protection strategies against this pathogen [15]. The negative impact on the citrus production caused by pests Tetranychus urticae Koch 1836 could be successfully controlled by eco-friendly approaches, such as black soap and detergents, without having a negative impact on predators [16].
Furthermore, the authors review the latest knowledge regarding the importance of plant-parasitic nematodes in agricultural production [17] and genetically based plant resistance underlying plant–nematode interactions [18] as a safe alternative to chemical nematocides and describe the potential of using Photorhabdus spp. as biocontrol agents against a broad range of insect pests [19]. As an effective source of biofungicide, the authors provide recent knowledge of actinomycetes and their potential as biocontrol agents of phytopathogenic fungi [20].
Finally, the utility of biocontrol agents composed of microorganisms, plant-based compounds, as well RNAi-based technology has to be emphasized [21], not only in an organic agriculture, where they represent the exclusive measure of plant protection, but also in integrated and conventional agriculture. However, the main task in the field of plant protection, and the most challenging at the same time, is still finding alternative sources of compounds with pesticide activity and the improvement of their formulation [22].
As Guest Editors, we are grateful to all the authors for choosing this Special Issue to publish their research. We hope that together we have contributed to the understanding of the importance of alternative measures in plant protection and opened up new possibilities for the improvement of this field.

Author Contributions

The authors contributed equally to this article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all authors for the excellent papers in Special Issue “Advances in Alternative Measures in Plant Protection”. We also would like to express our gratitude to all of the reviewers, for their valuable recommendations leading to the improvement of all manuscripts. Finally, we would like to acknowledge the help and support provided by Managing Editor and Plants.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pourakbar, L.; Moghaddam, S.S.; Enshasy, H.A.E.; Sayyed, R.Z. Antifungal Activity of the Extract of a Macroalgae, Gracilariopsis persica, against Four Plant Pathogenic Fungi. Plants 2021, 10, 1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Surendran, A.; Siddiqui, Y.; Ahmad, K.; Fernanda, R. Deciphering the Physicochemical and Microscopical Changes in Ganoderma boninense-Infected Oil Palm Woodblocks under the Influence of Phenolic Compounds. Plants 2021, 10, 1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Langa-Lomba, N.; Sánchez-Hernández, E.; Buzón-Durán, L.; González-García, V.; Casanova-Gascón, J.; Martín-Gil, J.; Martín-Ramos, P. Activity of Anthracenediones and Flavoring Phenols in Hydromethanolic Extracts of Rubia tinctorum against Grapevine Phytopathogenic Fungi. Plants 2021, 10, 1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Atak, A.; Göksel, Z.; Yılmaz, Y. Changes in Major Phenolic Compounds of Seeds, Skins, and Pulps from Various Vitis spp. and the Effect of Powdery and Downy Mildew Diseases on Their Levels in Grape Leaves. Plants 2021, 10, 2554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. El-Hasan, A.; Ngatia, G.; Link, T.I.; Voegele, R.T. Isolation, Identification, and Biocontrol Potential of Root Fungal Endophytes Associated with Solanaceous Plants against Potato Late Blight (Phytophthora infestans). Plants 2022, 11, 1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ndakidemi, B.J.; Mbega, E.R.; Ndakidemi, P.A.; Belmain, S.R.; Arnold, S.E.J.; Woolley, V.C.; Stevenson, P.C. Field Margin Plants Support Natural Enemies in Sub-Saharan Africa Smallholder Common Bean Farming Systems. Plants 2022, 11, 898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Librizzi, V.; Malacrinò, A.; Li Destri Nicosia, M.G.; Barger, N.; Luzzatto-Knaan, T.; Pangallo, S.; Agosteo, G.E.; Schena, L. Extracts from Environmental Strains of Pseudomonas spp. Effectively Control Fungal Plant Diseases. Plants 2022, 11, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Esquivel-Cervantes, L.F.; Tlapal-Bolaños, B.; Tovar-Pedraza, J.M.; Pérez-Hernández, O.; Leyva-Mir, S.G.; Camacho-Tapia, M. Efficacy of Biorational Products for Managing Diseases of Tomato in Greenhouse Production. Plants 2022, 11, 1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hussien, R.A.A.; Gnedy, M.M.A.; Sayed, A.A.S.; Bondok, A.; Alkhalifah, D.H.M.; Elkelish, A.; Tawfik, M.M. Evaluation of the Fungicidal Effect of Some Commercial Disinfectant and Sterilizer Agents Formulated as Soluble Liquid against Sclerotium rolfsii Infected Tomato Plant. Plants 2022, 11, 3542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Konstantinović, B.; Popov, M.; Samardžić, N.; Aćimović, M.; Šućur Elez, J.; Stojanović, T.; Crnković, M.; Rajković, M. The Effect of Thymus vulgaris L. Hydrolate Solutions on the Seed Germination, Seedling Length, and Oxidative Stress of Some Cultivated and Weed Species. Plants 2022, 11, 1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Šućur, J.; Konstantinović, B.; Crnković, M.; Bursić, V.; Samardžić, N.; Malenčić, Đ.; Prvulović, D.; Popov, M.; Vuković, G. Chemical Composition of Ambrosia trifida L. and Its Allelopathic Influence on Crops. Plants 2021, 10, 2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Navarro-León, E.; Borda, E.; Marín, C.; Sierras, N.; Blasco, B.; Ruiz, J.M. Application of an Enzymatic Hydrolysed L-α-Amino Acid Based Biostimulant to Improve Sunflower Tolerance to Imazamox. Plants 2022, 11, 2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Praprotnik, E.; Lončar, J.; Razinger, J. Testing Virulence of Different Species of Insect Associated Fungi against Yellow Mealworm (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and Their Potential Growth Stimulation to Maize. Plants 2021, 10, 2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Troni, E.; Beccari, G.; D’Amato, R.; Tini, F.; Baldo, D.; Senatore, M.T.; Beone, G.M.; Fontanella, M.C.; Prodi, A.; Businelli, D.; et al. In Vitro Evaluation of the Inhibitory Activity of Different Selenium Chemical Forms on the Growth of a Fusarium proliferatum Strain Isolated from Rice Seedlings. Plants 2021, 10, 1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kasprzyk, W.; Baranowska, M.; Korzeniewicz, R.; Behnke-Borowczyk, J.; Kowalkowski, W. Effect of Irrigation Dose on Powdery Mildew Incidence and Root Biomass of Sessile Oaks (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.). Plants 2022, 11, 1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Assouguem, A.; Kara, M.; Mechchate, H.; Al-Mekhlafi, F.A.; Nasr, F.; Farah, A.; Lazraq, A. Evaluation of the Impact of Different Management Methods on Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) and Their Predators in Citrus Orchards. Plants 2022, 11, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abd-Elgawad, M.M.M. Optimizing Safe Approaches to Manage Plant-Parasitic Nematodes. Plants 2021, 10, 1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abd-Elgawad, M.M.M. Understanding Molecular Plant–Nematode Interactions to Develop Alternative Approaches for Nematode Control. Plants 2022, 11, 2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Abd-Elgawad, M.M.M. Photorhabdus spp.: An Overview of the Beneficial Aspects of Mutualistic Bacteria of Insecticidal Nematodes. Plants 2021, 10, 1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Torres-Rodriguez, J.A.; Reyes-Pérez, J.J.; Quiñones-Aguilar, E.E.; Hernandez-Montiel, L.G. Actinomycete Potential as Biocontrol Agent of Phytopathogenic Fungi: Mechanisms, Source, and Applications. Plants 2022, 11, 3201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kumar, J.; Ramlal, A.; Mallick, D.; Mishra, V. An Overview of Some Biopesticides and Their Importance in Plant Protection for Commercial Acceptance. Plants 2021, 10, 1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Šunjka, D.; Mechora, Š. An Alternative Source of Biopesticides and Improvement in Their Formulation—Recent Advances. Plants 2022, 11, 3172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Šunjka, D.; Mechora, Š. Advances in Alternative Measures in Plant Protection. Plants 2023, 12, 805. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040805

AMA Style

Šunjka D, Mechora Š. Advances in Alternative Measures in Plant Protection. Plants. 2023; 12(4):805. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040805

Chicago/Turabian Style

Šunjka, Dragana, and Špela Mechora. 2023. "Advances in Alternative Measures in Plant Protection" Plants 12, no. 4: 805. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040805

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop