Next Article in Journal
Spermine-Salicylic Acid Interplay Restrains Salt Toxicity in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
Next Article in Special Issue
Grapefruit Root and Rhizosphere Responses to Varying Planting Densities, Fertilizer Concentrations and Application Methods
Previous Article in Journal
A Tight Interaction between the Native Seagrass Cymodocea nodosa and the Exotic Halophila stipulacea in the Aegean Sea Highlights Seagrass Holobiont Variations
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Variations of Leaf δ13C and Its Response to Environmental Changes of Arbuscular and Ectomycorrhizal Plants Depend on Life Forms
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/plants12020351
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Physiological and Ultrastructural Responses to Excessive-Copper-Induced Toxicity in Two Differentially Copper Tolerant Citrus Species

by
Xin-Yu Li
1,
Mei-Lan Lin
1,
Fei Lu
1,2,
Xin Zhou
1,
Xing Xiong
1,
Li-Song Chen
1 and
Zeng-Rong Huang
1,2,*
1
College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
2
Key Lab of Soil Ecosystem Health and Regulation, Fujian Province University (Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University), Fuzhou 350002, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(2), 351; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020351
Submission received: 21 December 2022 / Revised: 5 January 2023 / Accepted: 10 January 2023 / Published: 11 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Ecophysiology of Root Systems-Environment Interaction)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Over-applied copper (Cu)-based agrochemicals are toxic to citrus trees. However, less information is available discussing the ultrastructural alterations in Cu-stressed citrus species. In the present study, seedlings of Citrus sinensis and Citrus grandis that differed in Cu-tolerance were sandy-cultured with nutrient solution containing 0.5 µM Cu (as control) or 300 µM Cu (as Cu toxicity) for 18 weeks. At the end of the treatments, the physiological parameters and ultrastructural features of the citrus leaves and roots were analyzed. The results indicate that Cu toxicity significantly decreased the ratio of shoot biomass to dry weight, the Cu translocation factor and the total chlorophyll of two citrus species. The anatomical and ultrastructural alterations verified that excessive Cu resulted in starch granules accumulated in the leaves and roots of the two citrus species. Under Cu toxicity, increased root flocculent precipitate and thickened root cell wall might reduce the Cu translocation from citrus roots to the shoots. Compared with C. sinensis, C. grandis maintained a relatively integral root cellular structure under Cu toxicity, which provided a structural basis for a higher Cu tolerance than C. sinensis. The present results increase our understanding of the physiological and ultrastructural responses to Cu toxicity in citrus species.

1. Introduction

The soil copper (Cu) contamination induced by the over-application of Cu-based agrochemicals is a primary environmental and toxicological concern for sustainable agriculture [1,2]. In citrus orchard management, Cu-plus fungicides (such as Bordeaux mixture) and micronutrient fertilizers are frequently foliar-sprayed for pathogen controlling and nutrient adjustment, respectively [3,4]. The Cu-containing solution dripped from the trees or washed by precipitation increased the Cu concentration of the topsoil. Accordingly, old citrus orchards often had a significantly higher soil Cu concentration than younger ones [5,6]. Similar results were also reported in vineyards soils [7] and apple orchards [8].
It has been generally accepted that Cu concentrations (extracted with DPTA) above 5.0 μg/g [9] and 20.0 μg/g [10,11] represent excessive Cu levels in citrus orchard soil and citrus leaves, respectively. According to our previous investigation of the mineral nutrients in pummelo orchards in the Fujian province of China (309 samples), 28.3% of tested soils and 70.0% of pummelo leaves had excessive Cu [12], which induced potential Cu toxicity in citrus. Excessive Cu absorption by citrus roots resulted in oxidative stress, which inhibited root elongation and decreased the number of root branches [13]. Citrus leaves suffering from Cu toxicity are yellowish with lower chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate [14]. Moreover, Cu phytotoxicity decreased the fruiting number of citrus species [15] and caused visible damage on the fruit surface, which reduced its profitability markedly.
Revealing the Cu-tolerant mechanisms of citrus species is crucial for optimized Cu-nutrient management and for improving environmental quality in the sustainable development of citrus production. For those purposes, we have investigated the Cu tolerance of citrus seedlings at the biochemical and physiological [16], transcriptional [17], proteomic [18] and metabolomic levels [19]. Our previous findings indicate that activated antioxidative defenses [19] promote Cu retention by the root cell wall [20] and secretion of root exudates [21] represented the most critical responses to Cu toxicity in citrus species. Despite versatile Cu-tolerant mechanisms of a biochemical or molecular basis being unveiled, evidence regarding ultrastructural alterations of citrus species under Cu toxicity is still missing.
The alterations of plant tissues and organs provide visible and direct evidence for a better understanding of plant physiological responses to Cu toxicity. For instance, Sánchez-Pardo et al. [22] revealed that a higher Cu tolerance of soybean than white lupin was associated with the size of palisade parenchyma and epidermal cells, which accounted for the Cu micro localization. Likewise, de Freitas et al. [23] have reported that Cu toxicity caused membrane and endoderm ruptures, inhibiting the root nutrient uptake and translocation from roots to shoots in Inga subnuda based on anatomical and ultrastructural analyses. Furthermore, using TEM, Minkina et al. [24] revealed that Cu toxicity disorganized the thylakoid membranes of leaves and damaged the integrity of the root cell wall and cytoplasmic membrane in barley (Hordeum sativum). The existing studies identified that the ultrastructural alteration of plant tissues exposing Cu toxicity varied with plant species and Cu tolerance. Therefore, the anatomical and ultrastructural investigations would offer vital insights into the Cu tolerance of citrus species.
The present study aimed to explore the anatomical and ultrastructural alterations in the leaves and roots of C. sinensis and C. grandis that were subjected to 300 µM Cu toxicity for 18 weeks. At the end of treatments, the physiological parameters, including biomass distribution, the Cu translocation and leaf total chlorophyll content, were measured. The anatomical features of citrus leaves and roots were examined under SEM. Additionally, the ultrastructural characteristics of citrus leaves and roots were observed by TEM. The results of the present study would extend our understanding of the physiological responses of citrus species conferring Cu toxicity on an ultrastructural basis.

2. Results

2.1. Cu Toxicity Downregulated Seedling Height, Induced Leaf Chlorosis and Hampered Root Development of C. sinensis and C. grandis

The citrus seedlings exposed to 300 μM Cu toxicity were significantly lower than the control seedlings in two citrus species (Figure 1A,D). The toxicity of 300 μM Cu decreased the leaf area and caused obvious leaf chlorosis compared with the control of two citrus species (Figure 1B,E). Moreover, the yellowish leaves were observed mainly on the upper leaves compared with the lower leaves under 300 μM Cu in both citrus species. The fresh roots of control seedlings were bright and vigorous. However, citrus roots that suffered from Cu toxicity were dark, with fewer root branches. Remarkably, the root development was inhibited by 300 μM Cu toxicity of two citrus species (Figure 1C,F).

2.2. Cu Toxicity Altered the Biomass Distribution, Decreased the Cu Translocation Factor and Total Chlorophyll Content of C. sinensis and C. grandis

As shown in Table 1, 300 μM Cu toxicity decreased the ratio (shoot biomass/dry weight) by 7.42% and 4.12% in C. sinensis and C. grandis compared with the control, respectively. Contrastingly, the ratio (root biomass/dry weight) increased by 40.86% and 27.45% under 300 μM Cu toxicity in C. sinensis and C. grandis compared with the control. The comparison between two citrus species indicated that C. sinensis had a significantly lower ratio of shoot biomass to dry weight but a significantly higher ratio of root biomass to dry weight than C. grandis, both under control and 300 μM Cu toxicity. Moreover, the control seedlings of C. grandis had a noticeably higher Cu translocation from the lateral roots to the leaves than C. sinensis. However, the Cu translocation factors of two citrus species decreased significantly under Cu toxicity compared with the control. Under Cu toxicity, no significant difference was found between the two citrus species. Likewise, the total chlorophyll content of the two citrus species was decreased remarkably by Cu toxicity compared with the control without a significant difference between the two citrus species under Cu toxicity.

2.3. Cu Toxicity Disrupted the Anatomical Structure of Leaves and Roots of C. sinensis and C. grandis

The SEM revealed that the epidermal cells of the leaves of C. sinensis from the control group were well-structured by a single layer in a rectangular-like shape. The palisade parenchyma could be found under the epidermis, consisting of layers of parenchymal cells in a regular column (Figure 2A). The spongy parenchyma adjacent to the lower leaf epidermis was irregularly distributed, containing a small number of starch granules (Figure 2B). Excessive Cu enlarged the epidermal cells and shrank the palisade parenchyma. Strikingly, the number of starch granules increased in the palisade and spongy parenchyma (Figure 2C,D). Compared with C. sinensis, C. grandis had a thicker epidermis and shorter palisade parenchyma under control. The number of starch granules in the palisade and spongy parenchyma was less than that in C. sinensis (Figure 2E,F). Cu toxicity disrupted the arrangement of spongy parenchyma and significantly increased the number of starch granules in the palisade and spongy parenchyma of C. grandis leaves (Figure 2G,H).
The cell layer in the root exodermis of control C. sinensis was well-structured in the transversal and longitudinal sections under SEM (Figure 3A and Figure 4A). The distorted vessels and impaired structure at the cross-section of C. sinensis roots were found under Cu toxicity (Figure 3C). The xylem of control C. sinensis was almost empty (Figure 3B and Figure 4B). However, the cross-section of the root xylem was covered by flocculent precipitate under Cu toxicity in C. sinensis (Figure 4D). Increased accumulation of starch granules was observed in roots of excessive Cu-treated C. sinensis (Figure 3D). Compared with C. sinenis under control, C. grandis had a thicker xylem and the inner ring was clear (Figure 4E,F). The accumulated starch granules, disrupted vessels and flocculent precipitate at the longitudinal section were also found to be in excess of Cu-treated C. grandis (Figure 3H and Figure 4H). Compared with C. sinensis under Cu toxicity, C. grandis had a more apparent flocculent precipitate on the cross sections under SEM.

2.4. Cu Toxicity Destroyed the Ultrastructure of the Leaves and Roots of C. sinensis and C. grandis

Ultrastructural observation under TEM revealed an integral cellular structure of C. sinensis leaf under control. As found in Figure 5A, the control leaf cell had an approximately round shape and the membrane structure was clearly visible. The organelles were pushed by a center-located vacuole and closely distributed at the inner side of the plasma membrane. The thylakoids were stacked closely and the lamellar structure was observed inside the chloroplast. Moreover, several starch granules and osmiophilic globules were occasionally found in the chloroplast. The bilayer structure and inner cristae structure of mitochondria were also clearly visible under control (Figure 5B) as was excessive Cu-induced plasmolysis of C. sinensis leaf cells (Figure 5C). Moreover, the cellular structure was impaired. The vacuole was broken and replaced by many spherical vesicles. The size of mitochondria decreased, and the bilayer structure was difficult to find under Cu toxicity. The integrity of the chloroplast was destroyed, and the stacked thylakoids were loose (Figure 5D). Strikingly, Cu toxicity increased the number and volume of starch granules in C. sinensis leaves.
The control leaf cells of C. grandis were presented in an oval-like shape (Figure 5E). The organelles were well-organized. The stroma lamella of chloroplast and bilayer structure of the mitochondria were apparent in the enlargement in Figure 5F. Under Cu toxicity, the vacuole disappeared. The chloroplasts occupied most of the protoplast. The enlarged starch granules could be found in each chloroplast. The mitochondria of C. grandis leaf under Cu toxicity were smaller than in the control (Figure 5F). Compared with C. sinensis, C. grandis had a relatively integral chloroplast structure.
In the root, the vacuole almost took up the protoplast of the control cell in C. sinensis (Figure 6A) and C. grandis (Figure 6E). The mitochondria were distributed on the plasma membrane’s inner side (Figure 6B,F). Under Cu toxicity, the vacuole disappeared in C. sinensis roots. The mitochondrial structure was also difficult to observe (Figure 6C,D). Differentially, C. grandis maintained a relatively integral structure of the root cell, supported by an intact structure of mitochondria and a clear edge between the plasma membrane and cell wall (Figure 6G). Interestingly, both citrus cell wall thicknesses increased under Cu toxicity compared with the control.

3. Discussion

Heavy metal (HM) stress had detrimental effects on seed germination and membrane stability of horticultural plants, which inhibited plant growth and crop yield [25]. Similarly, Cu toxicity decreased the leaf chlorophyll content and depressed the shoot and the root development of citrus species, which is in line with our previous reports [26,27]. Additionally, Cu toxicity significantly downregulated the shoot biomass to dry weight ratio whereas it upregulated the root biomass to dry weight of the two citrus species (Table 1). The changes in biomass distribution might be due, at least in part, to the limited nutrient transport to the shoots. The Cu-toxicity-induced increased ratio of root biomass to shoot biomass agreed with that in excessive-Cu treated Hymenaea courbaril L. (Caesalpinioideae), a promising woody species for phytoremediation [28]. Cu toxicity significantly decreased the total chlorophyll content of the two citrus species (Table 1). The decrement was also reported in Cu-stressed falx leaves [29]. Coherently, the total chlorophyll content of soybean leaf decreased with the increasing level of soil Cu [30].
Cu immobilized by the roots contributed to Cu detoxification of horticultural plants [31]. The present results indicate that C. grandis had a significantly higher TF than C. sinensis under control. However, no significant difference in TF was found between the two citrus species under Cu toxicity (Table 1). This finding suggests that a potential strategy governing Cu mobility might exist in C. grandis under Cu toxicity. This hypothesis was evidenced by the upregulation of genes involved in Cu-binding in excessive-Cu-treated roots of C. grandis [20]. Beyond the transcriptional evidence, it has also been reported that tiny crystals accumulated in the root xylem of Cu-stressed Moso Bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens), which block the Cu transport in the vascular tissue of the root xylem [32]. In the present study, citrus roots that received Cu excess had similar amorphous material accumulated on the xylem (Figure 4D,H). Interestingly, much more flocculent precipitate was found in C. grandis than in C. sinensis.
The anatomical investigation provided essential information for understanding the Cu-adaptation of citrus species. Herein, we found Cu toxicity increased starch granules accumulation in the leaf palisade and spongy parenchymatous tissues (Figure 2C,D,G,H) and root cells (Figure 3D,H) of two citrus species compared with control. Li et al. [26] demonstrated the increased starch accumulation in the leaves and roots of two citrus species. It has been proposed that Cu-toxicity-induced starch accumulation in cucumber leaves is related to a decreased phloem loading [33], leading to feedback inhibition of photosynthesis. Meanwhile, the accumulated starch in the root has been considered an osmotic regulation in turgor pressure under stress [34,35]. Those findings, and an increased ratio of root biomass to plant dry weight, imply a crucial role of starch accumulation in citrus roots conferring Cu toxicity. Likewise, the enhanced starch content has also been reported in excessive Cd-treated poplar species [36] and apple seedlings [37]. Additionally, Cu toxicity enhanced the thickness of the leaf epidermis of two citrus species compared with the control (Figure 2C,G). The leaf thickening has also been observed in Cu-stressed oregano leaves [38] and Al-treated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) leaf [39]. Bouazizi et al. [40] have proposed that the Cu-toxicity-induced cell wall lignification contributes to cell wall thickening, which ultimately strengthens the Cu tolerance of bean leaves. Further studies have focused on phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity (PAL, EC 4.3.1.5), a rate-limited enzyme in lignin synthesis, and research on the lignin deposited on the cell wall should be carried out to disclose the structural modification of Cu toxicity on citrus leaves and roots.
Based on TEM observation, we believe that the ultrastructural alterations reflect the status of plant organelles under heavy metal toxicity, which are complementary to the plant’s physiological parameters [41]. For instance, our previous report has proven that Cu toxicity resulted in oxidative damage of citrus leaves by overproduction of reactive oxygen species [19]. It has also been further reported that oxidative stress accounted for the membrane damage of plant cells exposed to excess Cu [42]. Therefore, the present results, in which Cu-toxicity induced damage to the membrane structure of citrus leaves, verify our previous findings and extend our knowledge of the response to Cu toxicity in citrus roots and leaves. Additionally, it was striking to find a severely disrupted structure of chloroplast and increased starch granules in Cu-stressed C. sinensis leaves (Figure 5D). Studies have proposed that heavy metal stress decreased the leaf chlorophyll content by downregulating the activities of enzymes involved in chlorophyll synthesis [43,44]. Similarly, the inhibited alpha-amylase and invertase isoenzymes have been reported for their restricted breakdown of starch granules, leading to starch accumulation under Cu toxicity [45]. The increasing number of starch granules has also been found in excessive-Mn-treated leaves of Xanthium strumarium L., a candidate species for Mn-phytoremediation [46]. Compared with Cu-treated C. sinensis roots, C. grandis had a relatively robust chloroplast structure (Figure 5C,G).
The thickening of the cell wall is significant for plant roots conferring heavy metal toxicity [47]. Primarily composed of polysaccharides (such as pectin, cellulose and lignin), the cell wall had numerous negatively charged groups, such as hydroxyl (–OH−) and carboxyl (–COOH−) groups. Thickening the cell wall increased the negative charge, which restricted the translocation of the toxic cation. In the present study, the observation under stereoscopic microscopy verified that Cu toxicity expanded the fibrous roots of two citrus species (Figure S1). Furthermore, the TEM observation of citrus roots indicated that the root cell wall’s increased thickness might account for the root tips’ expansion (Figure 6D,H). Our previous finding that Cu toxicity increased the ratio of cell wall biomass to the dry weight of citrus roots is in line with present results [20]. Similar findings have also been reported in excessive-Cu treated roots of Pinus pinaster Ait (Arduini et al., 1995), Arabidopsis thaliana [48] and Allium cepa L. [49]. The comparison between Figure 6C,G implies that C. grandis maintained a much more integral vacuole structure.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Treatments

Surface-sterilized seeds of C. sinensis and C. grandis were germinated in moist sand in a greenhouse of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Jinshan campus (26°5′ N, 119°14′ E) in March 2020. Six weeks after germination, the uniformly sized seedlings (about 10 cm) were selected and precultured with 1/4 strength modified Hoagland nutrient solution, which contained 2.5 mM KNO3, 2.5 mM Ca(NO3)2, 0.5 mM KH2PO4, 1 mM MgSO4, 10 µM H3BO3, 2 µM MnCl2, 2 µM ZnSO4, 0.5 µM CuCl2, 0.065 µM(NH4)6Mo7O24 and 20 µM Fe-EDTA. Six weeks after preculture, the citrus seedlings were treated with nutrient solution (pH = 4.30–4.50) containing 0.5 µM CuCl2 (as control) or 300 µM CuCl2 (as Cu toxicity) daily for 18 weeks. By the end of the treatments, citrus leaves, stems and roots were sampled separately. For sampling, the citrus roots were first washed with tap water to remove excess sandy particles, followed by soaking in 0.5 M EDTA-Na2 for 10 min (three times) to remove Cu residue on the root surface. After being washed with distilled water three times, fresh lateral roots of citrus seedlings were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde–1.5% paraformaldehyde solution (fixing solution) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution (PBS, pH = 7.2) to prepare the sample for microscopic observation. There were three replicates for each treatment. After being cleaned with distilled water, the remaining fresh citrus leaves were collected for chlorophyll content measurement. The remaining tissues of citrus seedlings were dried before biomass analyses and Cu quantification. There were four replicates of each treatment for biomass analyses.

4.2. Measurements of Cu Translocation Factor and Leaf Total Chlorophyll Contents of Two Citrus Species

The Cu concentration of plant tissues and the leaf chlorophyll content were measured according to Li et al. [16]. The Cu translocation factor was expressed as the ratio of Cu concentration in the leaves to the lateral roots [50]. The leaf total chlorophyll content was calculated as: 7.15 × A663 + 18.71 × A646, in which, A663 and A646 represented the absorbances of leaf pigment extractant under the wavelength of 663 and 646, respectively. There were four replicates of each treatment.

4.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Analyses of Citrus Leaves and Roots

The pretreatment of citrus leaves and roots was performed according to Huang et al. [51]. Briefly, the citrus leaf and root samples were vacuumed in a syringe filled with fixing solution under 4 °C for 3 h, followed by three rinses in PBS, each lasting 15 min. The samples were then post-fixed with 1% OsO4–1.5% potassium hexacyanoferrate for 2 h and washed with distilled water three times. Thereafter, the citrus leaf and root samples were dehydrated in an increasing concentration of ethanol (30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95% and 100%) three times.
SEM observation: The dehydrated samples were rinsed in epoxypropane twice and dried by an HCP-2 critical point dryer (HITACHI Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Further, the samples were mounted on brass stubs coated with gold in Eiko IB-5 ion-coater (Eiko Engineering, Ibaragi, Japan). The images of citrus tissues were obtained using a JEOL JSM-6380LV electron microscope (JEOL, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). There were three replicates of each treatment.
TEM observation: The dehydrated samples were rinsed with acetone for 10 min twice, and then replaced by a mixture of resin and acetone on a shaker at the ratios of 1:1 and 3:1 for 2 h, respectively. The samples were then dried with filter paper to remove excess acetone on the surface and infiltrated in resin overnight. After being embedded in epoxy resin 618, the individual leaf and root blocks were cut into sections of approximately 80-nm thickness with an ultra-microtome LEICA EM UC6 (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). The sections were stained with 2% uranyl acetate before observations with a TEM HITACHI HT7700 (HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a digital camera. There were three replicates of each treatment.

4.4. Statistical Analysis

The data in the study represent mean ± SE (n = 4). Four means (two citrus species × two treatments) were analyzed by two ANOVAs followed by Duncan’s multiple range tests at p < 0.05 using SPSS (Version 22.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

5. Conclusions

Cu toxicity induced by 300 μM Cu significantly decreased the ratio of shoot biomass to dry weight, the Cu translocation factor and the total chlorophyll of two citrus species. By contrast, the ultrastructural alterations demonstrated that the starch granules in the leaves and roots, the root flocculent precipitate and the thickness of the root cell wall all increased under Cu stress in the two citrus species. The increased root flocculent precipitate and thickened root cell wall might reduce the Cu translocation from roots to the shoots of the two citrus species. Compared with C. sinensis, C. grandis maintained a relatively integral root cellular structure under Cu toxicity, which provided a structural basis for a higher Cu tolerance than C. sinensis. The present results increase our understanding of the morphological alteration of citrus leaves and roots under Cu toxicity. Further study regarding root metabolites under Cu toxicity should be undertaken to reveal the Cu-tolerant mechanisms of citrus species underlying the structural alteration.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12020351/s1, Figure S1: The root tip morphology of two citrus species under 0.5 µM and 300 µM Cu stress. The image was taken with stereoscopic microscopy SMZ18 (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

Author Contributions

Data curation, X.X.; investigation, M.-L.L.; methodology, F.L.; project administration, L.-S.C.; software, X.Z.; writing—original draft, X.-Y.L.; writing—review & editing, Z.-R.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (2022J01603) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31801950).

Data Availability Statement

Data are archived in L.-S. Chen’s lab and are available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cesco, S.; Pii, Y.; Borruso, L.; Orzes, G.; Lugli, P.; Mazzetto, F.; Genova, G.; Signorini, M.; Brunetto, G.; Terzano, R. A smart and sustainable future for viticulture is rooted in soil: How to face Cu toxicity. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rehman, M.; Liu, L.; Wang, Q.; Saleem, M.H.; Bashir, S.; Ullah, S.; Peng, D. Copper environmental toxicology, recent advances, and future outlook: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 18003–18016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gohel, N.M.; Prajapati, B.K.; Srivastava, J.N. Major diseases of citrus and their management. In Diseases of Horticultural Crops; Apple Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 155–167. [Google Scholar]
  4. El-Gioushy, S.F.; Sami, R.; Al-Mushhin, A.A.; Abou El-Ghit, H.M.; Gawish, M.S.; Ismail, K.A.; Zewail, R.M. Foliar application of ZnSO4 and CuSO4 affects the growth, productivity, and fruit quality of Washington Navel orange trees (Citrus sinensis L.) Osbeck. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Triantafyllidis, V.; Zotos, A.; Kosma, C.; Kokkotos, E. Environmental implications from long-term citrus cultivation and wide use of Cu fungicides in Mediterranean soils. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2020, 231, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. He, Z.L.; Yang, X.E.; Stoffella, P.J. Trace elements in agroecosystems and impacts on the environment. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2005, 19, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rusjan, D.; Strlič, M.; Pucko, D.; Korošec-Koruza, Z. Copper accumulation regarding the soil characteristics in Sub-Mediterranean vineyards of Slovenia. Geoderma 2007, 141, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fu, C.; Tu, C.; Zhang, H.; Li, Y.; Li, L.; Zhou, Q.; Scheckel, K.G.; Luo, Y. Soil accumulation and chemical fractions of Cu in a large and long-term coastal apple orchard, North China. J. Soils Sediments 2020, 20, 3712–3721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Junior, D.M.; Quaggio, J.A.; Cantarella, H.; Boaretto, R.M.; Zambrosi, F.C.B. Nutrient management for high citrus fruit yield in tropical soils. Better Crops 2012, 96, 4–7. [Google Scholar]
  10. Morgan, K.T.; Kadyampakeni, D.M. Nutrition of Florida Citrus Trees; University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  11. Khattak, R.A.; Hussain, Z. Evaluation of soil fertility status and nutrition of orchards. Soil Environ. 2007, 26, 22–32. [Google Scholar]
  12. Li, Y.; Han, M.; Lin, F.; Ten, Y.; Lin, J.; Zhu, D.; Guo, P.; Weng, Y.B.; Chen, L. Soil chemical properties, ‘Guanximiyou’ pummelo leaf mineral nutrient status and fruit quality in the southern region of Fujian province, China. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2015, 15, 615–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Hippler, F.W.R.; Boaretto, R.M.; Dovis, V.L.; Quaggio, J.A.; Azevedo, R.A.; Mattos-Jr, D. Oxidative stress induced by Cu nutritional disorders in Citrus depends on nitrogen and calcium availability. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Chen, X.; Hua, D.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, J.; Huang, W.; Chen, H.; Huang, Z.; Yang, L.; Ye, X.; Chen, L. Boron-mediated amelioration of copper-toxicity in sweet orange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck cv. Xuegan] seedlings involved reduced damage to roots and improved nutrition and water status. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 234, 113423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Smith, P.F. Effects of high levels of copper, zinc, and manganese on tree growth and fruiting of Valencia orange in sand culture. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1955, 67, 202–209. [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, Q.; Chen, H.; Qi, Y.; Ye, X.; Yang, L.; Huang, Z.; Chen, L. Excess copper effects on growth, uptake of water and nutrients, carbohydrates, and PSII photochemistry revealed by OJIP transients in Citrus seedlings. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 30188–30205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, F.; Huang, H.; Peng, M.; Lai, Y.; Ren, Q.; Zhang, J.; Huang, Z.; Yang, L.; Rensing, C.; Chen, L. Adaptive responses of Citrus grandis leaves to copper toxicity revealed by RNA-Seq and physiology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, W.; Wu, F.; Huang, H.; Huang, W.; Deng, C.; Yang, L.; Huang, Z.; Chen, L. Excess copper-induced alterations of protein profiles and related physiological parameters in citrus leaves. Plants 2020, 9, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Huang, H.; Ren, Q.; Lai, Y.; Peng, M.; Zhang, J.; Yang, L.; Huang, Z.; Chen, L. Metabolomics combined with physiology and transcriptomics reveals how Citrus grandis leaves cope with copper-toxicity. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 223, 112579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ren, Q.; Huang, Z.; Huang, W.; Huang, W.; Chen, H.; Yang, L.; Ye, X.; Chen, L. Physiological and molecular adaptations of Citrus grandis roots to long-term copper excess revealed by physiology, metabolome and transcriptome. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2022, 203, 105049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, H.; Chen, X.; Zheng, Z.; Huang, W.; Guo, J.; Yang, L.; Chen, L. Characterization of copper-induced-release of exudates by Citrus sinensis roots and their possible roles in copper-tolerance. Chemosphere 2022, 308, 136348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sánchez-Pardo, B.; Fernández-Pascual, M.; Zornoza, P. Copper microlocalisation and changes in leaf morphology, chloroplast ultrastructure and antioxidative response in white lupin and soybean grown in copper excess. J. Plant Res. 2014, 127, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. de Freitas, T.A.; França, M.G.C.; de Almeida, A.F.; de Oliveira, S.J.R.; de Jesus, R.M.; Souza, V.L.; Dos Santos Silva, J.V.; Mangabeira, P.A. Morphology, ultrastructure and mineral uptake is affected by copper toxicity in young plants of Inga subnuda subs. luschnathiana (Benth.) TD Penn. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 15479–15494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Minkina, T.; Rajput, V.; Fedorenko, G.; Fedorenko, A.; Mandzhieva, S.; Sushkova, S.; Morin, T.; Yao, J. Anatomical and ultrastructural responses of Hordeum sativum to the soil spiked by copper. Environ. Geochem. Health 2020, 42, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Noor, I.; Sohail, H.; Sun, J.; Nawaz, M.A.; Li, G.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Liu, J. Heavy metal and metalloid toxicity in horticultural plants: Tolerance mechanism and remediation strategies. Chemosphere 2022, 303, 135196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Cai, L.; Zhang, J.; Ren, Q.; Lai, Y.; Peng, M.; Deng, C.; Ye, X.; Yang, L.; Huang, Z.; Chen, L. Increased pH-mediated alleviation of copper-toxicity and growth response function in Citrus sinensis seedlings. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 288, 110310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, X.; Lin, M.; Hu, P.; Lai, N.; Huang, Z.; Chen, L. Copper toxicity differentially regulates the seedling growth, copper distribution, and photosynthetic performance of Citrus sinensis and Citrus grandis. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 42, 3333–3344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Marques, D.M.; Veroneze Júnior, V.; Da Silva, A.B.; Mantovani, J.R.; Magalhães, P.C.; de Souza, T.C. Copper toxicity on photosynthetic responses and root morphology of Hymenaea courbaril L. (Caesalpinioideae). Water Air Soil Pollut. 2018, 229, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Saleem, M.H.; Kamran, M.; Zhou, Y.; Parveen, A.; Rehman, M.; Ahmar, S.; Malik, Z.; Mustafa, A.; Anjum, R.M.A.; Wang, B.; et al. Appraising growth, oxidative stress and copper phytoextraction potential of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) grown in soil differentially spiked with copper. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 257, 109994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gomes, D.G.; Lopes-Oliveira, P.J.; Debiasi, T.V.; da Cunha, L.S.; Oliveira, H.C. Regression models to stratify the copper toxicity responses and tolerance mechanisms of Glycine max (L.) Merr. plants. Planta 2021, 253, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wan, H.; Yang, F.; Zhuang, X.; Cao, Y.; He, J.; Li, H.; Qin, S.; Lyu, D. Malus rootstocks affect copper accumulation and tolerance in trees by regulating copper mobility, physiological responses, and gene expression patterns. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 287, 117610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, J.; Peng, D.; Shafi, M.; Li, S.; Wu, J.; Ye, Z.; Yan, W.; Lu, K.; Liu, D. Effect of copper toxicity on root morphology, ultrastructure, and copper accumulation in Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens). Z. Nat. C 2014, 69, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Alaoui-Sossé, B.; Genet, P.; Vinit-Dunand, F.; Toussaint, M.; Epron, D.; Badot, P. Effect of copper on growth in cucumber plants (Cucumis sativus) and its relationships with carbohydrate accumulation and changes in ion contents. Plant Sci. 2004, 166, 1213–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Velázquez-Márquez, S.; Conde-Martínez, V.; Trejo, C.; Delgado-Alvarado, A.; Carballo, A.; Suárez, R.; Mascorro, J.O.; Trujillo, A.R. Effects of water deficit on radicle apex elongation and solute accumulation in Zea mays L. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 96, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Anjum, S.A.; Tanveer, M.; Hussain, S.; Shahzad, B.; Ashraf, U.; Fahad, S.; Hassan, W.; Jan, S.; Khan, I.; Saleem, M.F. Osmoregulation and antioxidant production in maize under combined cadmium and arsenic stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 11864–11875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. He, J.; Ma, C.; Ma, Y.; Li, H.; Kang, J.; Liu, T.; Polle, A.; Peng, C.; Luo, Z. Cadmium tolerance in six poplar species. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 20, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhou, J.; Wan, H.; He, J.; Lyu, D.; Li, H. Integration of cadmium accumulation, subcellular distribution, and physiological responses to understand cadmium tolerance in apple rootstocks. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Panou-Filotheou, H.; Bosabalidis, A.M.; Karataglis, S. Effects of copper toxicity on leaves of oregano (Origanum vulgare subsp. hirtum). Ann. Bot. 2001, 88, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Jesus, D.D.S.D.; Martins, F.M.; Azevedo Neto, A.D.D. Structural changes in leaves and roots are anatomical markers of aluminum sensitivity in sunflower. Pesqui. Agropecu. Trop. 2016, 46, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bouazizi, H.; Jouili, H.; Geitmann, A.; El Ferjani, E. Cell wall accumulation of Cu ions and modulation of lignifying enzymes in primary leaves of bean seedlings exposed to excess copper. Biol. Trace Element Res. 2011, 139, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Giannakoula, A.; Therios, I.; Chatzissavvidis, C. Effect of lead and copper on photosynthetic apparatus in citrus (Citrus aurantium L.) plants. The role of antioxidants in oxidative damage as a response to heavy metal stress. Plants 2021, 10, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Saleem, M.H.; Fahad, S.; Khan, S.U.; Din, M.; Ullah, A.; Sabagh, A.E.; Hossain, A.; Llanes, A.; Liu, L. Copper-induced oxidative stress, initiation of antioxidants and phytoremediation potential of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) seedlings grown under the mixing of two different soils of China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 5211–5221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ulhassan, Z.; Gill, R.A.; Huang, H.; Ali, S.; Mwamba, T.M.; Ali, B.; Huang, Q.; Hamid, Y.; Khan, A.R.; Wang, J. Selenium mitigates the chromium toxicity in Brassicca napus L. by ameliorating nutrients uptake, amino acids metabolism and antioxidant defense system. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 145, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Handa, N.; Kohli, S.K.; Sharma, A.; Thukral, A.K.; Bhardwaj, R.; Abd Allah, E.F.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Ahmad, P. Selenium modulates dynamics of antioxidative defence expression, photosynthetic attributes and secondary metabolites to mitigate chromium toxicity in Brassica juncea L. plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 161, 180–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mir, A.R.; Pichtel, J.; Hayat, S. Copper: Uptake, toxicity and tolerance in plants and management of Cu-contaminated soil. Biometals 2021, 34, 737–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Pan, G.; Yan, W.; Zhang, H.; Xiao, Z.; Li, X.; Liu, W.; Zheng, L. Subcellular distribution and chemical forms involved in manganese accumulation and detoxification for Xanthium strumarium L. Chemosphere 2019, 237, 124531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Menna, A.; Dora, S.; Sancho-Andrés, G.; Kashyap, A.; Meena, M.K.; Sklodowski, K.; Gasperini, D.; Coll, N.S.; Sánchez-Rodríguez, C. A primary cell wall cellulose-dependent defense mechanism against vascular pathogens revealed by time-resolved dual transcriptomics. BMC Biol. 2021, 19, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lequeux, H.; Hermans, C.; Lutts, S.; Verbruggen, N. Response to copper excess in Arabidopsis thaliana: Impact on the root system architecture, hormone distribution, lignin accumulation and mineral profile. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 673–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Macar, T.K.; Macar, O.; Yalçın, E.; Çavuşoğlu, K. Resveratrol ameliorates the physiological, biochemical, cytogenetic, and anatomical toxicities induced by copper (II) chloride exposure in Allium cepa L. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 657–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhou, H.; Zeng, M.; Zhou, X.; Liao, B.; Peng, P.; Hu, M.; Zhu, W.; Wu, Y.; Zou, Z. Heavy metal translocation and accumulation in iron plaques and plant tissues for 32 hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Plant Soil 2015, 386, 317–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Huang, J.; Cai, Z.; Wen, S.; Guo, P.; Ye, X.; Lin, G.; Chen, L. Effects of boron toxicity on root and leaf anatomy in two Citrus species differing in boron tolerance. Trees 2014, 28, 1653–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 12 00351 g001 550
Figure 1. The effects of Cu toxicity on seedling growth (A,D), leaf morphology (B,E) and root development (C,F) of two citrus species (C. sinensis: (A–C); C. grandis: (D–F)).
Figure 1. The effects of Cu toxicity on seedling growth (A,D), leaf morphology (B,E) and root development (C,F) of two citrus species (C. sinensis: (A–C); C. grandis: (D–F)).
Plants 12 00351 g001
Plants 12 00351 g002 550
Figure 2. The SEM images of 0.5 µM (A,B,E,F) and 300 µM Cu-treated (C,D,G,H) leaves of two citrus species. C. sinensis: (A–D); C. grandis: (E–H). Images (A,C,E,G) show epidermis and palisade tissues of citrus leaves. Images (B,D,F,H) show the spongy tissue. The granules in cells labeled by arrows are starch granules. The two-way arrow represents the average thickness of the leaf epidermis. The scales in the figures represent 10 μm.
Figure 2. The SEM images of 0.5 µM (A,B,E,F) and 300 µM Cu-treated (C,D,G,H) leaves of two citrus species. C. sinensis: (A–D); C. grandis: (E–H). Images (A,C,E,G) show epidermis and palisade tissues of citrus leaves. Images (B,D,F,H) show the spongy tissue. The granules in cells labeled by arrows are starch granules. The two-way arrow represents the average thickness of the leaf epidermis. The scales in the figures represent 10 μm.
Plants 12 00351 g002
Plants 12 00351 g003 550
Figure 3. The SEM images of the longitudinal section of 0.5 µM (A,B,E,F) and 300 µM Cu-treated (C,D,G,H) roots of two citrus species. C. sinensis: (A–D); C. grandis: (E–H). The right figures are partial enlargements of the left figures. The granules in cells labeled by arrows are starch granules. The scales in figures (A,C,E,G) represent 100 μm. The scales in figures (B,D,F,H) represent 10 μm.
Figure 3. The SEM images of the longitudinal section of 0.5 µM (A,B,E,F) and 300 µM Cu-treated (C,D,G,H) roots of two citrus species. C. sinensis: (A–D); C. grandis: (E–H). The right figures are partial enlargements of the left figures. The granules in cells labeled by arrows are starch granules. The scales in figures (A,C,E,G) represent 100 μm. The scales in figures (B,D,F,H) represent 10 μm.
Plants 12 00351 g003
Plants 12 00351 g004 550
Figure 4. The SEM images of cross-section of 0.5 µM (A,B,E,F) and 300 µM Cu-treated (C,D,G,H) roots of two citrus species. C. sinensis: (A–D); C. grandis: (E–H). The right figures are partial enlargements of the left figures. Images (A,C,E,G) show epidermis, exodermis, cortex, endodermis, pericycle, xylem and phloem. Images (B,D,F,H) show the xylem of the roots. The arrows represent the blocked xylem of roots by flocculent precipitate in (D) and (H). The scales in figures (A,C,E,G) represent 100 μm. The scales in figures (B,D,F,H) represent 5 μm.
Figure 4. The SEM images of cross-section of 0.5 µM (A,B,E,F) and 300 µM Cu-treated (C,D,G,H) roots of two citrus species. C. sinensis: (A–D); C. grandis: (E–H). The right figures are partial enlargements of the left figures. Images (A,C,E,G) show epidermis, exodermis, cortex, endodermis, pericycle, xylem and phloem. Images (B,D,F,H) show the xylem of the roots. The arrows represent the blocked xylem of roots by flocculent precipitate in (D) and (H). The scales in figures (A,C,E,G) represent 100 μm. The scales in figures (B,D,F,H) represent 5 μm.
Plants 12 00351 g004
Plants 12 00351 g005 550
Figure 5. The TEM images of 0.5 µM (A,B,E,F) and 300 µM Cu-treated (C,D,G,H) leaves of two citrus species. C. sinensis: (A–D); C. grandis: (E–H). The right figures are partial enlargements of the left figures. Chl: chloroplast; CW: cell wall; Cyt: cytoplasm; ER: endoplasmic reticulum; Mi: mitochondrion; OG: osmiophilic globule; PM: plasmalemma; Sg: starch granules; SL: stroma lamella; V: vacuole. The scales in figures (A,C,E,G) represent 5 μm. The scales in figures (B,D,F,H) represent 1 μm.
Figure 5. The TEM images of 0.5 µM (A,B,E,F) and 300 µM Cu-treated (C,D,G,H) leaves of two citrus species. C. sinensis: (A–D); C. grandis: (E–H). The right figures are partial enlargements of the left figures. Chl: chloroplast; CW: cell wall; Cyt: cytoplasm; ER: endoplasmic reticulum; Mi: mitochondrion; OG: osmiophilic globule; PM: plasmalemma; Sg: starch granules; SL: stroma lamella; V: vacuole. The scales in figures (A,C,E,G) represent 5 μm. The scales in figures (B,D,F,H) represent 1 μm.
Plants 12 00351 g005
Plants 12 00351 g006 550
Figure 6. The TEM images of 0.5 µM (A,B,E,F) and 300 µM Cu-treated (C,D,G,H) roots of two citrus species. C. sinensis: (A–D); C. grandis: (E–H). CW: cell wall; Cyt: cytoplasm; ER: endoplasmic reticulum; Mi: mitochondrion; PL: plasmalemma; V: vacuole. The two-way arrow represents the average thickness of the cell wall. The scales in figures (A,C,E,G) represent 5 μm. The scales in figures (B,D,F,H) represent 1 μm.
Figure 6. The TEM images of 0.5 µM (A,B,E,F) and 300 µM Cu-treated (C,D,G,H) roots of two citrus species. C. sinensis: (A–D); C. grandis: (E–H). CW: cell wall; Cyt: cytoplasm; ER: endoplasmic reticulum; Mi: mitochondrion; PL: plasmalemma; V: vacuole. The two-way arrow represents the average thickness of the cell wall. The scales in figures (A,C,E,G) represent 5 μm. The scales in figures (B,D,F,H) represent 1 μm.
Plants 12 00351 g006
Table
Table 1. The effects of excessive Cu on biomass distribution, Cu translocation factor (TF, defined as the ratio of Cu concentration in the leaves to the lateral roots) and total chlorophyll content of two citrus species. The values represent means ± SE of four replicates. Significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between treatments are indicated by different letters.
Table 1. The effects of excessive Cu on biomass distribution, Cu translocation factor (TF, defined as the ratio of Cu concentration in the leaves to the lateral roots) and total chlorophyll content of two citrus species. The values represent means ± SE of four replicates. Significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between treatments are indicated by different letters.
SpeciesTreatmentsShoot Biomass/Dry Weight
(%)		Root Biomass/Dry Weight
(%)		Cu TF
(%)		Total Chlorophyll
(μg/cm2)
C. sinensisCu 0.5 μM84.63 ± 0.26 b15.37 ± 0.26 b27.08 ± 0.08 b73.22 ± 1.27 a
Cu 300 μM78.35 ± 0.90 c21.65 ± 0.90 a0.53 ± 0.04 c66.16 ± 1.09 bc
C. grandisCu 0.5 μM86.97 ± 0.85 a13.03 ± 0.85 c40.46 ± 3.65 a68.73 ± 2.82 ab
Cu 300 μM83.39 ± 0.83 b16.61 ± 0.83 b0.52 ± 0.06 c61.59 ± 2.89 c
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.-Y.; Lin, M.-L.; Lu, F.; Zhou, X.; Xiong, X.; Chen, L.-S.; Huang, Z.-R. Physiological and Ultrastructural Responses to Excessive-Copper-Induced Toxicity in Two Differentially Copper Tolerant Citrus Species. Plants 2023, 12, 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020351

AMA Style

Li X-Y, Lin M-L, Lu F, Zhou X, Xiong X, Chen L-S, Huang Z-R. Physiological and Ultrastructural Responses to Excessive-Copper-Induced Toxicity in Two Differentially Copper Tolerant Citrus Species. Plants. 2023; 12(2):351. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020351

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xin-Yu, Mei-Lan Lin, Fei Lu, Xin Zhou, Xing Xiong, Li-Song Chen, and Zeng-Rong Huang. 2023. "Physiological and Ultrastructural Responses to Excessive-Copper-Induced Toxicity in Two Differentially Copper Tolerant Citrus Species" Plants 12, no. 2: 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020351

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop