Next Article in Journal
The Plant Communities of the Class Isoëto-Nanojuncetea in Sicily
Next Article in Special Issue
Polyphenols and Flavonoids Composition, Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Properties of Andean Baccharis macrantha Extracts
Previous Article in Journal
Glycine Betaine and β-Aminobutyric Acid Mitigate the Detrimental Effects of Heat Stress on Chinese Cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis) Seedlings with Improved Photosynthetic Performance and Antioxidant System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antioxidant Phenylpropanoid Glycosides from Ginkgo biloba Fruit and Identification of a New Phenylpropanoid Glycoside, Ginkgopanoside
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/plants11091215
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chemometric Analysis Based on GC-MS Chemical Profiles of Three Stachys Species from Uzbekistan and Their Biological Activity

by
Haidy A. Gad
1,†,
Elbek A. Mukhammadiev
2,†,
Gokhan Zengen
3,
Nawal M. Al Musayeib
4,
Hidayat Hussain
5,
Ismail Bin Ware
5,
Mohamed L. Ashour
1,* and
Nilufar Z. Mamadalieva
2,5,6,*
1
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt
2
Institute of the Chemistry of Plant Substances, Academy of Sciences of RUz, Mirzo Ulugbek Str. 77, Tashkent 100170, Uzbekistan
3
Department of Biology, Selcuk University, 42130 Konya, Turkey
4
Department of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11495, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Bioorganic Chemistry, Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Weinberg 3, D-06120 Halle, Germany
6
Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of RUz, Durmon Yuli Str. 32, Tashkent 100125, Uzbekistan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2022, 11(9), 1215; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11091215
Submission received: 27 March 2022 / Revised: 24 April 2022 / Accepted: 26 April 2022 / Published: 29 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antioxidant Activity of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The chemical composition of the essential oils (EOs) of Stachys byzantina, S. hissarica and S. betoniciflora growing in Uzbekistan were determined, and their antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory activity were assessed. A gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis revealed the presence of 143 metabolites accounting for 70.34, 76.78 and 88.63% of the total identified components of S. byzantina, S. hissarica and S. betoniciflora, respectively. Octadecanal (9.37%) was the most predominant in S. betoniciflora. However, n-butyl octadecenoate (4.92%) was the major volatile in S. byzantina. Benzaldehyde (5.01%) was present at a higher percentage in S. hissarica. A chemometric analysis revealed the ability of volatile profiling to discriminate between the studied Stachys species. The principal component analysis plot displayed a clear diversity of Stachys species where the octadecanal and benzaldehyde were the main discriminating markers. The antioxidant activity was evaluated in vitro using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2-azino bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS), cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC), ferric reducing power (FRAP), chelating and phosphomolybdenum (PBD). Moreover, the ability of the essential oils to inhibit both acetyl/butyrylcholinesterases (AChE and BChE), α-amylase, α-glucosidase and tyrosinase was assessed. The volatiles from S. hissarica exhibited the highest activity in both the ABTS (226.48 ± 1.75 mg Trolox equivalent (TE)/g oil) and FRAP (109.55 ± 3.24 mg TE/g oil) assays. However, S. betoniciflora displayed the strongest activity in the other assays (174.94 ± 0.20 mg TE/g oil for CUPRAC, 60.11 ± 0.36 mg EDTA equivalent (EDTAE)/g oil for chelating and 28.24 ± 1.00 (mmol TE/g oil) for PBD. Regarding the enzyme inhibitory activity, S. byzantina demonstrated the strongest AChE (5.64 ± 0.04 mg galantamine equivalent (GALAE)/g oil) and tyrosinase inhibitory (101.07 ± 0.60 mg kojic acid equivalent (KAE)/g) activity. The highest activity for BChE (11.18 ± 0.19 mg GALAE/g oil), amylase inhibition (0.76 ± 0.02 mmol acarbose equivalent (ACAE)/g oil) and glucosidase inhibition (24.11 ± 0.06 mmol ACAE/g oil) was observed in S. betoniciflora. These results showed that EOs of Stachys species could be used as antioxidant, hypoglycemic and skincare agents.

1. Introduction

The genus Stachys L. is one of the largest genera in the family Lamiaceae (Labiatae) that includes about 300 species of herbaceous annuals and perennial plants in the subtropical and tropical regions of the world [1]. The species name comes from Greek and means ‘‘an ear of grain”, referring to the shape of the inflorescence spike that is present in many members [2].
Stachys plants (known as mountain tea) have traditionally been consumed in various countries as decoction or infusion teas. These extracts were used to treat various ailments, such as vaginal tumors, sclerosis of the spleen, asthma, cough, ulcers, abdominal pains, fever, diarrhea, sore mouth and throat, internal bleeding, and weaknesses of the liver and heart in addition to inflammatory and rheumatic disorders [3,4,5,6].
Many Stachys species are known as alimentary plants that are consumed for preparing foods such as yoghourt or jelly to improve the taste and flavor [7]. In Poland, various organs of S. palustris are used as soup and vodka additives [3]. The tubers can also be dried and crushed into a powder for making bread [8] due to their nutritional value as a rich source of carbohydrates, even for diabetic people, not only for humans but also for wild pigs [9,10,11].
The literature reported the pharmacological activities of different Stachys species as antimicrobial [6,12], anticancer [13,14], antioxidant [15,16,17], antitumor [6,18], antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory [19], with anti-Alzheimer, antidiabetic and anti-obesity potential [20] in addition to the treatment of anxiety [5].
The wide range of applications of various Stachys species, either as food or medicinal remedies, is mainly attributed to the major volatile components. Many studies reported the principal active metabolites present in the ethereal oil of different Stachys species worldwide [4]. Essential oils of the aerial parts of many Stachys species collected from Iran were determined, where the main identified components were linalool, α-terpineol, germacrene D, α/β-pinene and α/β-phellandrene [16,20,21,22,23]. Similar results were obtained for those species growing in Turkey [7,24]. In Greece, the major identified components were caryophyllene, caryophyllene oxide and α-calacorene, [25,26,27]. Comparable results were obtained by analyzing the Stachys essential oils in Serbia and Montenegro [28,29].
Regarding S. byzantina K. Koch., (syn. Stachys lanata) commonly known as “lamb’s ear” or “lamb’s tongue”, growing in the north and north-west of Iran, Turkey, Caucasia and Afghanistan [30]. Leaf infusions have traditionally been used as anti-inflammatories in Brazil [31]. However, leaf decoctions have been applied to infected wounds and cuts in Iran [32,33].
The genus Stachys is well-distributed in Uzbekistan [34]. Stachys betoniciflora Rupr and Stachys hissarica Rgl. are widely used as traditional remedies in Uzbekistan. S. betoniciflora has been used in traditional medicine for the treatment of diarrhea, genital tumors, hemorrhage, inflammation, heart disease, cough, ulcers, menstrual irregularities, bleeding, hysteria, hypertension, epilepsy, fainting, gout, jaundice and rheumatism [34]. A tea made from the herb is used to treat gastrointestinal pain, hemoptysis, respiratory disease, inflammation of the kidneys and bladder, and is also used as a sedative. An infusion of the roots is used as a laxative [35]. However, the folklore uses have never been scientifically evaluated, and other medicinal benefits of these plants are unknown.
The aim of this study was to investigate the essential oils of different Stachys species growing in Uzbekistan via GC-MS. S. byzantina, S. hissarica and betoniciflora were investigated, and this was the first such investigation for the two later species. In addition, the principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) were applied to discriminate various Stachys species based on their chemical profiles rather than their growing location, which could be used as a tool for the proper use of the plants and prevent adulteration. Furthermore, the volatile oils obtained from different Stachys species were investigated for their antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory activities for the first time for these species.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemical Composition of Volatile Compounds

The chemical composition of the volatile oils of three fully grown Stachys species present in Uzbekistan, namely S. byzantina, S. hissarica and S. betoniciflora, were investigated via GC-MS analyses (Table 1). The yields of these species were 0.3, 0.04 and 0.03% w/w, respectively. The selection of spring was made to ensure the full maturity and maximum yields for the oils. The samples comprised 143 constituents that represented 70.34, 76.78 and 88.63% of the total identified compositions in S. byzantina, S. hissarica and S. betoniciflora, respectively. Octadecanal (9.37%), eucalyptol (6.89%), linalool (6.66%) and p-cymene (5.2%) were the most predominant components in S. betoniciflora. Eucalyptol (6.89%), α-thujene (1.44%), α-pinene (3.98%) and D-limonene (2.4%) were among the components that were only detected in S. betoniciflora. Regarding S. hissarica, benzaldehyde (5.01%), n-hexadecanoic acid (4.68%) and pulegone (4.68%) were the chief compounds detected. In addition, thymol (2.74%), 2-hexenal (2.61%), dihydroactinidiolide (2.27%), tetradecanoic acid (2.05%) and eugenol (2.05%) were present in S. hissarica at higher levels compared to the other species. However, n-butyl octadecenoate (4.92%) and n-triacontane (4.25%) displayed the maximum percentage in S. byzantina. Furthermore, cis-3-hexenol (3.71%), hexahydrofarnesyl acetone (3.63%), 9,12,15-octadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester (3.42%), n-hexadecanoic acid (3.16%) and (+)-δ-cadinene (3.13%) were among the constituents identified in S. byzantina.
Our results were close to those reported for the essential oil composition of the aerial parts of S. byzanthina in Iran, where α-copaene (16.5%), spathulenol (16.1%), β-caryophyllene (14.3%) and β- cubebene (12.6%) were the major components [36,37]. In another study, α-thujone (25.9%), α-humulene (24.9%), β-caryophyllene (12.6%) and viridiflorol (10.5%) were reported as main components [38]. On the contrary, the dried flowering aerial parts of S. byzantina oil showed a different pattern, where piperitenone (9.9%), 6,10,14-trimethyl pentadecan-2-one (6.4%) and n-tricosane (6.4%) were predominant [39]. However, germacrene D (9.6%), menthone (6.9%) and 1,8-cineole (14.8%) were the major identified components in S. byzantina collected from Urmia, Azerbaijan [40]. It is noteworthy to point out that the essential oil components can be affected by such factors as geographical, climatic, seasonal and experimental conditions. However, our main aim was not to assess the effect of these factors but to use the difference in discriminating the species themselves [16].
S. byzantina showed significant levels of antioxidants in addition to cholinesterase enzymes, lipase, tyrosinase and α-glucosidase inhibition [20]. In Brazil, the essential oil of S. byzanthina showed strong antimicrobial activity against Candida albicans, where γ-muurolene (65%), valeranone (15.42%), β-elemene (6.83%) and cis-β-ocimene (1.39%) were the main components responsible for the antifungal activity [31]. In another study, hexahydrofarnesyl acetone (20.41%) was the main compound in S. byzantina with antimicrobial and antioxidant properties [17]. However, no previous studies reported the major active components present in S. betoniciflora and S. hissarica.

2.2. Chemometric Analysis Based on GC-MS Analysis

Due to the complexity of the GC-MS-based data comprising the qualitative and quantitative discrepancies of various Stachys species, the multivariate analysis was applied using a principal component analysis (PCA) and a hierarchal cluster analysis (HCA) to discriminate between closely related Stachys species as well as to detect any significant relationship between these species. A matrix of all samples and their replicates (9 samples) multiplied by 143 variables (GC/MS peak area %) was constructed in MS Excel®, then subjected to a multivariate analysis (PCA and HCA). Owing to the large number of variables, PCA was applied to reduce the dimensionality of the multiple data sets in addition to removing the redundancy in the variables, where the 1st PC accounts for a maximal amount of total variable variance in the observed data, and the 2nd PC accounts for a maximal amount of variance in the data set that was not accounted for by the first component. No transformation was performed, and the model was constructed utilizing raw data (peak area % for each compound as in Table 1). Figure 1a,b represent the PCA score and loading plots based on the GC-MS chemical profiles of the volatile components in the three Stachys species, respectively.
The result of this study indicated that there is a significant variance among the different Stachys species. The first two principal components explained about 97% of the variation in the dataset, with PC1 accounting for 63% and PC2 accounting for 34% of the variance. The three Stachys samples were clearly dispersed along the PCs in the PCA plot. S. byzantina and S. hissarica, in particular, exhibited negative PC1 scores and were positioned on the left side of the figure, while S. betoniciflora was plotted on the other side with a positive PC1 score.
Within the most discriminating compounds on positive PC1, octadecanal and eucalyptol were identified in S. betoniciflora. However, n-butyl octadecenoate and n-triacontane were the main differentiating markers in S. byzantina. Nevertheless, benzaldehyde (5.01%), n-hexadecanoic acid (4.68%) and pulegone were the major distinctive bioactive compounds discriminating S. hissarica.
An HCA clustering was performed to have a better insight into species classification. Figure 2 shows the HCA dendrogram based on the GC-MS aromatic profiles. The HCA dendrogram clustered the Stachys species into three main clusters. Clusters I, II and III displayed S. betoniciflora, S. byzantina and S. hissarica, respectively. The dendrogram confirmed the results obtained from the PCA, revealing the closeness of S. byzantina and S. hissarica.

2.3. Antioxidant Activity of Stachys Species

The antioxidant potential of the essential oil (EO) samples was assessed in vitro according to various assays comprising the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2-azino bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS), cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC), ferric reducing power (FRAP), chelating and phosphomolybdenum (PBD) assays. The results are presented in the form of Trolox equivalent (TE) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid equivalent (EDTAE).
The results displayed in Table 2 revealed that the studied samples showed moderate antioxidant potential in the assays. Most of the species showed antioxidant potential in the performed assays, except for the DPPH assay where only S. hissarica exhibited activity (13.04 ± 0.97 mg TE/g oil). Concerning the ABTS and FRAP assays, S. hissarica displayed the best activity (226.48 ± 1.75 and 109.55 ± 3.24 mg TE/g oil), followed by S. betoniciflora (128.54 ± 1.32 mg and 56.94 ± 0.75 mg TE/g oil), respectively. On the contrary, S. betoniciflora displayed the strongest activity in the other assays (174.94 ± 0.20 mg TE/g oil for CUPRAC, 60.11 ± 0.36 mg EDTAE/g oil for chelating and 28.24 ± 1.00 mmol TE/g oil for PBD), followed by S. hissarica (162.62 ± 1.15 mg TE/g oil for CUPRAC, 24.30 ± 1.50 mg EDTAE/g oil for chelating and 5.69 ± 0.21 mmol TE/g oil for PBD. It was observed that S. byzantina exhibited the lowest antioxidant activity in all applied experiments. The obtained results could be explained by the chemical components of the tested essential oils. For example, the antioxidant properties of S. hissarica essential oil could be attributed to the presence of pulegone. Consistent with our observation, Torres-Martínez et al. [41] reported the significant antioxidant properties of pulegone. In addition, the presence of eucalyptol, linalool and p-cymene was linked to the antioxidant properties of S. betoniciflora. In previous studies [42,43,44], these compounds were described as remarkable radical scavengers and reductive agents. However, because higher levels of hydrocarbons (such as n-butyl octadecenoate and n-triacontane) were present in S. byzantina essential oil, it exhibited the weakest antioxidant properties.
Concerning S. byzantina, few studies reported the oxidation inhibition properties of its essential oil by various assays. S. byzantina exhibited a slight DPPH scavenging potential, with the value of 1.03 mg TEs/g EO. For the phosphomolybdenum test, it displayed 1.96 mmol TEs/g EO. Concerning the CUPRAC and FRAP assays, S. byzantina showed a high reducing power potential (81.79 and 44.77 mg TEs/g EO, respectively). In the chelating experiment, it revealed 15.65 mg EDTAEs/g EO [20].

2.4. Enzyme Inhibitory Activity of Stachys Species

The enzyme inhibitory potentials of the Stachys essential oils were assessed against various enzymes, including acetylcholinesterase (AChE), butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), tyrosinase, amylase and glucosidase. The enzymes were chosen to assess the potential of the tested essential oils in global health problems, the prevalence of which is increasing by the day. For example, cholinesterases are the main target in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. In addition, amylase and glucosidase are the major players in controlling blood sugar levels in diabetics. The results (Table 3) are presented in the form of galantamine equivalent (GALAE), kojic acid equivalent (KAE) and acarbose equivalent (ACAE).
In this study, Stachys EOs exerted a valuable cholinesterase inhibitory potential. The best AChE inhibitory potential was found in S. byzantina with 5.64 mg GALAE/g oil, followed by S. hissarica (5.05 mg GALAE/g oil) and S. betoniciflora (4.09 mg GALAE/g oil). However, the order for BChE was S. betoniciflora (13.81 mg GALAE/g oil) > S. hissarica (11.82 mg GALAE/g oil) > S. byzantina (11.18 mg GALAE/g oil). Nevertheless, our results were in accordance with those reported for S. byzantina, where the enzyme inhibition potential of S. byzantina essential oil was investigated to be 5.06 and 6.62 mg GALAEs/g EO against BChE and AChE, respectively [20]. Concerning tyrosinase inhibition, S. byzantina exhibited the strongest activity (101. 07 mg KAE/g oil), followed by S. hissarica (92.26 mg KAE/g oil) and S. betoniciflora (75.77 mg KAE/g oil). Concerning tyrosinase, S. byzantina EOs exhibited lower potency compared to our results, with 25.26 mg KAEs/g EO [20]. With regards to α-amylase activity, the highest and lowest activity were associated with S. betoniciflora and S. byzantina with values 0.76 and 0.59 mmol ACAE/g oil, respectively. Meanwhile, S. hissarica displayed an intermediate value (0.68 mmol ACAE/g oil). On the other side, the measurement of the α-glucosidase inhibition activity of the tested oils revealed that the strongest effect was presented by S. betoniciflora (24.89 mmol ACAE/g oil) compared to other Stachys species. With reference to α-amylase activity, S. byzantina displayed an approximately similar value with 0.74 mmol ACEs/g EO. On the other hand, the measurement of the α-glucosidase inhibition activity of the EOs showed S. byzantina with 4.56 mmol ACEs/g EO [20]. Similar to the antioxidant properties, the enzyme inhibitory properties can be linked to the chemical components of the tested essential oils. For example, Aazza et al. [45] reported that the cholinesterase inhibition abilities of several volatile compounds, including eucalyptol, which is found in S. betoniciflora. In addition, Basak and Ferda [46] reported the amylase and glucosidase inhibitory properties of eucalyptol. In a study performed by Matailo et al. [47], the BChE inhibitory effect of pulegone was described. However, we must take into account the presence of other compounds, even at low concentrations, because the essential oils are complex mixtures, and their constituents may exhibit different synergetic or antagonistic interactions.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Material

Aerial parts of Stachys byzantina K. Koch (syn. Stachys lanata Jacq.) (N2016017) were collected from the botanical field of the Institute of the Chemistry of Plant Substances (Near Tashkent, Tashkent region, Uzbekistan). Stachys hissarica Regel (N2016023) was collected from Chimgan (Tashkent region), while Stachys betoniciflora Rupr. ex O. Fedtsch. et B. Fedtsch. (Syn. Betonica betoniciflora Rupr. ex O. Fedtsch. and B. Fedtsch. Sennikov) (N2016030) was collected from Aksay (Near Tashkent, Pskem Mountain Range, Uzbekistan). All the plants were collected in the fully grown stage during spring to ensure the maximum yields. The plants were identified by Dr. Olim Nigmatullaev and the voucher samples were deposited at the Herbarium of the Institute of Chemistry of Plant Substances, Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan.

3.2. Essential Oil Isolation

The plant samples were air-dried at a temperature not exceeding 30 °C and then powdered before use. The preparation of the volatile samples of the powdered Stachys (100 g of powder in 1 L of distilled water) was performed by hydrodistillation for 2 h using a Clevenger-type apparatus. The oil samples were dried by passing over anhydrous sodium sulphate to remove the moisture and were maintained at 30 °C in dark brown and air-tight closed vials until their analyses.

3.3. GC-MS Analysis

The GC-MS characterization of volatile components was performed on an Agilent 7890 B gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Rotterdam, The Netherlands) equipped with a VF-Wax CP 9205 fused silica column (100% polyethylene glycol, 30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm). It was coupled with a 5977A mass selective detector (Agilent Technologies). The interface temperature: 280 °C; MS source temperature: 230 °C; ionization energy: 70 eV; scan range: 45–950 atomic mass units. The sample (0.5 μL) was automatically injected into the chromatograph using a GC auto sampler. The oven temperature was kept at 50 °C for 5 min, then rising from 50 °C to 280 °C at 5 °C/min, and was finally held isothermally at 280 °C for 15 min; injector temperature 250 °C; detector temperature 270 °C; carrier gas helium (0.9 mL/min); with split mode (split ratio, 1:20). C7–C40 standard saturated alkanes were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck, Germany). Enhanced ChemStation software, version MSD F.01.01.2317 (Agilent Technologies) was used for recording and integrating the chromatograms. The compounds were identified by comparison of their mass-spectral data and retention indices (RIs) with those of the Wiley Registry of Mass Spectral Data (9th Ed.), NIST Mass Spectral Library (2011), references [48,49] and our own laboratory database [50].

3.4. Antioxidant and Enzyme Inhibitory Assays

Different procedures were applied to investigate the antioxidant activities of the tested Stachys oils. These procedures included free radical scavenging (DPPH and ABTS), reducing power (CUPRAC and FRAP), metal chelating and phosphomolybdenum. The experimental details were as previously described [51,52]. A similar method was applied for the inhibitory effects of the Stachys oils that were tested against different enzymes (tyrosinase, amylase, glucosidase and cholinesterase) [52,53]. Both the antioxidant and enzyme inhibition assays were described by standard equivalents (Trolox and EDTA for antioxidant, galantamine for cholinesterase, kojic acid for tyrosinase, and acarbose for amylase and glucosidase activity). All samples were analyzed in triplicate in three independent experiments.

3.5. Statistical Analysis

Unless otherwise specified in the technique, all tests were repeated three times. Continuous variables were expressed as means ± SD. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine statistical significance, followed by a multiple comparison test (Tukey’s post hoc test) with a significance level of p < 0.05.

3.6. Multivariate Analysis

The data obtained from the GC-MS were subjected to a chemometric analysis. A principal component analysis (PCA) was applied as an initiative phase in the data investigation to afford an overview of all sample groupings and to identify the markers responsible for this grouping. A hierarchal cluster analysis (HCA) was used to allow the clustering of samples. Hierarchical clustering techniques are based on the creation of branched structures, called dendrograms, which are qualitative in nature and permit the visualization of clusters and correlations amongst samples [54]. The clustering patterns were built by applying the complete linkage method. This exhibition is more effective when the distance between the samples (points) is computed by the squared Euclidean method. PCA and HCA were accomplished using CAMO’s Unscrambler® X 10.4 software (Computer-Aided Modeling, AS, Norway).

4. Conclusions

Stachys species are used as pleasant and fragrant medicinal herbal teas due to their volatiles and bioactive principles. In the present study, a comparative investigation of the EOs obtained from three popular Stachys species, namely, S. byzantina, S. hissarica and S. betoniciflora, indicated that they showed modest natural antioxidant agents. Their major bioactive components were identified as octadecanal, eucalyptol, linalool, n-butyl octadecenoate, n-triacontane, benzaldehyde, n-hexadecanoic acid and pulegone. In addition, the EOs exhibited moderate enzyme inhibitory activities, demonstrating the health benefits of various Stachys species, such as neuroprotective, hypoglycemic and fat adsorption preventive effects. Accordingly, these EOs could be considered as promising candidates that could be used for many therapeutic conditions. However, more clinical trials are needed to validate their potential uses. This is the first report comparing S. hissarica and S. betoniciflora to S. byzantina growing in Uzbekistan utilizing a multivariate analysis based on GC-MS chemical profiles in addition to reporting their antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory activities.

Author Contributions

N.Z.M. and E.A.M. contributed to conceptualization, collection of the plants, isolation of the volatiles and performing GC-MS analysis and revising the manuscript; H.A.G. identified the volatile compounds, conducted the chemometric analysis and wrote the manuscript; G.Z. performed the biological assessments; H.H. revised the first draft; I.B.W. revised the statistics; N.M.A.M. and M.L.A. supervised the study and wrote and revised the whole manuscript; N.Z.M. performed the biological studies, supervised the study and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by King Saud University Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2021/294), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request from the first author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the King Saud University Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2021/294), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The authors N.Z.M. and H.H. thank the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for providing the opportunity to perform work in Germany. N.Z.M. thanks the Ministry of Innovative Development of the Republic of Uzbekistan (project А-FА-2021-144).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Salmaki, Y.; Zarre, S.; Govaerts, R.; Bräuchler, C. A taxonomic revision of the genus Stachys (Lamiaceae: Lamioideae) in Iran. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2012, 170, 573–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Demiray, H.; Tabanca, N.; Estep, A.S.; Becnel, J.J.; Demirci, B. Chemical composition of the essential oil and n-hexane extract of Stachys tmolea subsp. Tmolea Boiss., an endemic species of Turkey, and their mosquitocidal activity against dengue vector Aesdes aegypti. Saudi Pharm. J. 2019, 27, 877–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Conforti, F.; Menichini, F.; Formisano, C.; Rigano, D.; Senatore, F.; Arnold, N.A.; Piozzi, F. Comparative chemical composition, free radical-scavenging and cytotoxic properties of essential oils of six Stachys species from different regions of the Mediterranean Area. Food Chem. 2009, 116, 898–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gören, A. Use of Stachys Species (Mountain Tea) as Herbal Tea and Food. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2014, 8, 71–82. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kumar, D.; Bhat, Z.A.; Kumar, V.; Khan, N.A.; Chashoo, I.A.; Zargar, M.I.; Shah, M.Y. Effects of Stachys tibetica essential oil in anxiety. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 2012, 4, e169–e176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ramak, P.; Talei, G.R. Chemical composition, cytotoxic effect and antimicrobial activity of Stachys koelzii Rech.f. essential oil against periodontal pathogen Prevotella intermedia. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 124, 272–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Goren, A.C.; Piozzi, F.; Akcicek, E.; Kılıç, T.; Çarıkçı, S.; Mozioğlu, E.; Setzer, W.N. Essential oil composition of twenty-two Stachys species (mountain tea) and their biological activities. Phytochem. Lett. 2011, 4, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Senatore, F.; Formisano, C.; Rigano, D.; Piozzi, F.; Rosselli, S. Chemical Composition of the Essential Oil from Aerial Parts of Stachys palustris L. (Lamiaceae) Growing Wild in Southern Italy. Croat. Chem. Acta 2007, 80, 135–139. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gören, A.C.; Akçicek, E.; Dirmenci, T.; Kilic, T.; Mozioğlu, E.; Yilmaz, H. Fatty acid composition and chemotaxonomic evaluation of species of Stachys. Nat. Prod. Res. 2012, 26, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xianfeng, Z.; Guidong, H.; Yan, C.; Chaobo, L.; Zeyuan, D.; Xiaojuan, M. Optimization of extracting stachyose from Stachys floridana Schuttl. ex Benth by response surface methodology. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 50, 942–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Łuczaj, Ł.; Svanberg, I.; Köhler, P. Marsh woundwort, Stachys palustris L. (Lamiaceae): An overlooked food plant. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2011, 58, 783–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Stegăruș, D.I.; Lengyel, E.; Apostolescu, G.F.; Botoran, O.R.; Tanase, C. Phytochemical Analysis and Biological Activity of Three Stachys Species (Lamiaceae) from Romania. Plants 2021, 10, 2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Amirghofran, Z.; Bahmani, M.; Azadmehr, A.; Javidnia, K. Anticancer effects of various Iranian native medicinal plants on human tumor cell lines. Neoplasma 2006, 53, 428–433. [Google Scholar]
  14. Nasrollahi, S.; Ghoreishi, S.M.; Ebrahimabadi, A.H.; Khoobi, A. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis and antimicrobial, antioxidant and anti-cancer activities of essential oils and extracts of Stachys schtschegleevii plant as biological macromolecules. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 128, 718–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Venditti, A.; Bianco, A.; Nicoletti, M.; Quassinti, L.; Bramucci, M.; Lupidi, G.; Vitali, L.A.; Petrelli, D.; Papa, F.; Vittori, S.; et al. Phytochemical analysis, biological evaluation and micromorphological study of Stachys alopecuros (L.) Benth. subsp. divulsa (Ten.) Grande endemic to central Apennines, Italy. Fitoterapia 2013, 90, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ebrahimabadi, A.H.; Ebrahimabadi, E.H.; Djafari-Bidgoli, Z.; Kashi, F.J.; Mazoochi, A.; Batooli, H. Composition and antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil and extracts of Stachys inflata Benth from Iran. Food Chem. 2010, 119, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kiashi, F.; Hadjiakhoondi, A.; Tofighi, Z.; Khanavi, M.; Ajani, Y.; Ahmadi Koulaei, S.; Yassa, N. Compositions of Essential Oils and Some Biological Properties of Stachys laxa Boiss. & Buhse and S. byzantina K. Koch. Res. J. Pharmacogn. 2021, 8, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shakeri, A.; D’Urso, G.; Taghizadeh, S.F.; Piacente, S.; Norouzi, S.; Soheili, V.; Asili, J.; Salarbashi, D. LC-ESI/LTQOrbitrap/MS/MS and GC–MS profiling of Stachys parviflora L. and evaluation of its biological activities. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2019, 168, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Barreto, R.S.S.; Quintans, J.S.S.; Amarante, R.K.L.; Nascimento, T.S.; Amarante, R.S.; Barreto, A.S.; Pereira, E.W.M.; Duarte, M.C.; Coutinho, H.D.M.; Menezes, I.R.A.; et al. Evidence for the involvement of TNF-α and IL-1β in the antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activity of Stachys lavandulifolia Vahl. (Lamiaceae) essential oil and (-)-α-bisabolol, its main compound, in mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 191, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bahadori, M.B.; Maggi, F.; Zengin, G.; Asghari, B.; Eskandani, M. Essential oils of hedgenettles (Stachys inflata, S. lavandulifolia, and S. byzantina) have antioxidant, anti-Alzheimer, antidiabetic, and anti-obesity potential: A comparative study. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 145, 112089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Norouzi-Arasi, H.; Yavari, I.; Alibabaeii, M. Chemical Constituents of the Essential Oil of Stachys schtschegleevii Sosn. from Iran. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2004, 16, 231–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pirbalouti, A.G.; Mohammadi, M. Phytochemical composition of the essential oil of different populations of Stachys lavandulifolia Vahl. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2013, 3, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Rezazadeh, S.; Hamedani, M.; Dowlatabadi, R.; Yazdani, D. Chemical composition of the essential oils of Stachys schtschegleevii Sosn. and Stachys balansae Boiss & Kotschy from Iran. Flavour Fragr. J. 2006, 21, 290–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Flamini, G.; Luigi Cioni, P.; Morelli, I.; Celik, S.; Suleyman Gokturk, R.; Unal, O. Essential oil of Stachys aleurites from Turkey. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2005, 33, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Skaltsa, H.D.; Demetzos, C.; Lazari, D.; Sokovic, M. Essential oil analysis and antimicrobial activity of eight Stachys species from Greece. Phytochemistry 2003, 64, 743–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Skaltsa, H.D.; Mavrommati, A.; Constantinidis, T. A chemotaxonomic investigation of volatile constituents in Stachys subsect. Swainsonianeae (Labiatae). Phytochemistry 2001, 57, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kukić, J.; Petrović, S.; Pavlović, M.; Couladis, M.; Tzakou, O.; Niketić, M. Composition of essential oil of Stachys alpina L. ssp. dinarica Murb. Flavour Fragr. J. 2006, 21, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Radulović, N.; Lazarević, J.; Ristić, N.; Palić, R. Chemotaxonomic significance of the volatiles in the genus Stachys (Lamiaceae): Essential oil composition of four Balkan Stachys species. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2007, 35, 196–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lazarević, J.S.; Đorđević, A.S.; Kitić, D.V.; Zlatković, B.K.; Stojanović, G.S. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Stachys officinalis (L.) Trevis. (Lamiaceae). Chem. Biodivers. 2013, 10, 1335–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Asnaashari, S.; Delazar, A.; Alipour, S.; Nahar, L.; Williams, A.; Pasdaran, A.; Mojarab, M.; Azad, F.; Sarker, S. Chemical composition, free-radical-scavenging and insecticidal activities of the aerial parts of Stachys byzantina. Arch. Biol. Sci. 2010, 62, 653–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Duarte, M.C.T.; Figueira, G.M.; Sartoratto, A.; Rehder, V.L.G.; Delarmelina, C. Anti-Candida activity of Brazilian medicinal plants. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 97, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Farzaneh, N.; Mahmoud, M.; Mohammadi Motamed, S.; Ghorbani, A. Labiatae Family in Folk Medicine in Iran: From Ethnobotany to Pharmacology. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2005, 2, 63–79. [Google Scholar]
  33. Aminfar, P.; Abtahi, M.; Parastar, H. Gas chromatographic fingerprint analysis of secondary metabolites of Stachys lanata (Stachys byzantine C. Koch) combined with antioxidant activity modelling using multivariate chemometric methods. J. Chromatogr. A 2019, 1602, 432–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mamadalieva, N.; Mamedov, N.; Craker, L.; Tiezzi, A. Ethnobotanical uses and cytotoxic activities of native plants from the Lamiaceae family in Uzbekistan. Acta Hortic. 2014, 1030, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Eisenman, S.W.; Zaurov, D.E.; Struwe, K. Medicinal Plants of Central Asia: Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  36. Khanavi, M.; Hadjiakhoondi, A.; Shafiee, A.; Masoudi, S.; Rustaiyan, A. Chemical composition of the essential oil of Stachys byzanthin C. Koch. from Iran. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2003, 15, 77–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khanavi, M.; Sharifzadeh, M.; Hadjiakhoondi, A.; Shafiee, A. Phytochemical investigation and anti-inflammatory activity of aerial parts of Stachys byzanthina C. Koch. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 97, 463–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mirza, M.; Baher, Z. Essential oil of Stachys lanata Jacq from Iran. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2003, 15, 46–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Morteza-Semnani, K.; Akbarzadeh, M.; Changizi, S. Essential oils composition of Stachys byzantina, S. inflata, S. lavandulifolia and S. laxa from Iran. Flavour Fragr. J. 2006, 21, 300–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mostafavi, H.; Mousavi, S.H.; Zalaghi, A.; Delsouzi, R. Chemical composition of essential oil of Stachys byzantina from North-West Iran. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2013, 16, 334–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Torres-Martínez, R.; García-Rodríguez, Y.M.; Ríos-Chávez, P.; Saavedra-Molina, A.; López-Meza, J.E.; Ochoa-Zarzosa, A.; Garciglia, R.S. Antioxidant Activity of the Essential Oil and its Major Terpenes of Satureja macrostema (Moc. and Sessé ex Benth.) Briq. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2018, 13, S875–S880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, X.; Zuo, G.-L.; Wang, C.-Y.; Kim, H.Y.; Lim, S.S.; Tong, S.-Q. An Off-Line DPPH-GC-MS Coupling Countercurrent Chromatography Method for Screening, Identification, and Separation of Antioxidant Compounds in Essential Oil. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Seol, G.-H.; Kang, P.; Lee, H.S.; Seol, G.H. Antioxidant activity of linalool in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. BMC Neurol. 2016, 16, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. de Oliveira, T.M.; de Carvalho, R.B.; da Costa, I.H.; de Oliveira, G.A.; de Souza, A.A.; de Lima, S.G.; de Freitas, R.M. Evaluation of p-cymene, a natural antioxidant. Pharm. Biol. 2015, 53, 423–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Aazza, S.; Lyoussi, B.; Miguel, M.G. Antioxidant and antiacetylcholinesterase activities of some commercial essential oils and their major compounds. Molecules 2011, 16, 7672–7690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Sahin Basak, S.; Candan, F. Chemical composition and in vitro antioxidant and antidiabetic activities of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. essential oil. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2010, 7, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Matailo, A.; Bec, N.; Calva, J.; Ramírez, J.; Andrade, J.M.; Larroque, C.; Vidari, G.; Armijos, C. Selective BuChE inhibitory activity, chemical composition, and enantiomer content of the volatile oil from the Ecuadorian plant Clinopodium brownei. Rev. Bras. De Farmacogn. 2020, 29, 749–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Quadrupole Mass Spectroscopy, 4th ed.; Allured Pub Corp: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 2007; Volume 1, p. 456. [Google Scholar]
  49. Babushok, V.I.; Linstrom, P.J.; Zenkevich, I.G. Retention Indices for Frequently Reported Compounds of Plant Essential Oils. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 2011, 40, 043101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Gad, H.A.; Mamadalieva, N.Z.; Böhmdorfer, S.; Rosenau, T.; Zengin, G.; Mamadalieva, R.Z.; Al Musayeib, N.M.; Ashour, M.L. GC-MS Based Identification of the Volatile Components of Six Astragalus Species from Uzbekistan and Their Biological Activity. Plants 2021, 10, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zengin, G.; Aktumsek, A. Investigation of antioxidant potentials of solvent extracts from different anatomical parts of Asphodeline anatolica E. Tuzlaci: An endemic plant to Turkey. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 11, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Mamadalieva, N.Z.; Böhmdorfer, S.; Zengin, G.; Bacher, M.; Potthast, A.; Akramov, D.K.; Janibekov, A.; Rosenau, T. Phytochemical and biological activities of Silene viridiflora extractives. Development and validation of a HPTLC method for quantification of 20-hydroxyecdysone. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 129, 542–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zengin, G. A study on in vitro enzyme inhibitory properties of Asphodeline anatolica: New sources of natural inhibitors for public health problems. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 83, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chemometrics, Data Analysis for the Laboratory and Chemical Plant. Brereton, R.G. (Ed.) John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
Plants 11 01215 g001 550
Figure 1. Principal component analysis score plot (a) and loading plot (b) of GC-MS aromatic profiles of different Stachys species, based on the identification of compounds shown in Table 1. S. hissarica (Sh), S. betoniciflora (Se) and S. byzantia (Sz).
Figure 1. Principal component analysis score plot (a) and loading plot (b) of GC-MS aromatic profiles of different Stachys species, based on the identification of compounds shown in Table 1. S. hissarica (Sh), S. betoniciflora (Se) and S. byzantia (Sz).
Plants 11 01215 g001
Plants 11 01215 g002 550
Figure 2. HCA dendrogram of different Stachys species based on the identification of compounds shown in Table 1. S. hissarica (Sh), S. betoniciflora (Se) and S. byzantina (Sz).
Figure 2. HCA dendrogram of different Stachys species based on the identification of compounds shown in Table 1. S. hissarica (Sh), S. betoniciflora (Se) and S. byzantina (Sz).
Plants 11 01215 g002
Table
Table 1. Chemical composition of the volatile oils of the aerial parts of three Stachys species growing in Uzbekistan, namely Stachys byzantina, S. hissarica and S. betoniciflora (n = 3).
Table 1. Chemical composition of the volatile oils of the aerial parts of three Stachys species growing in Uzbekistan, namely Stachys byzantina, S. hissarica and S. betoniciflora (n = 3).
No.Rt.Compoundm/z ValuesRetention IndixPeak Area (%)
Cal.Rep.S. BetonicifloraS.
Byzantina		S.
Hissarica
1.6.45α-Thujene *136.23102310251.44--
2.7.67α-Pinene *136.23103110303.98--
3.8.23β-Thujene *136.23113011330.541.49
4.8.4β-Pinene *136.23113411370.42--
5.8.543-Carene *136.23114811490.47--
6.9.14D-Limonene *136.23120112032.40--
7.9.54Eucalyptol154.24120712086.89--
8.9.752-Hexenal *98.14121512160.740.682.61
9.10.34β-cis-Ocimene136.23122412250.19--
10.10.59γ-Terpinene136.23123012321.140.32
11.10.89β-trans-Ocimene136.23123812400.51--
12.11.39p-Cymene *134.22126712685.200.25-
13.11.72-methyl-,2-methylbutyl ester Butanoic acid172.26127412761.33--
14.11.91n-Octanal128.21128512870.18--
15.12.17iso-Amyl isovalerate172.26129212941.17--
16.12.261-Octen-3-one126.1912961298--1.66
17.12.642,4-Nonadienal138.20130413050.49--
18.12.743-Hexen-1-ol, acetate142.19131113130.210.39-
19.12.833-Methyl-cyclohexanone112.1613301333--0.16
20.13.336-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one126.19134013421.34-0.14
21.13.821-Hexanol102.1713571359-0.70-
22.14.4Allo-Ocimene136.23137013720.820.18-
23.14.69cis-3-Hexenol100.1513781379-3.71-
24.14.92Nonanal142.23139013902.262.09-
25.15.082,4-Hexadienal96.12139413950.22-1.60
26.15.28(E)-2-Hexen-1-ol100.1514011402-0.48-
27.15.54Butyl hexanoate172.26141314140.24-0.26
28.15.83trans-2-Octenal126.19142714270.21-0.15
29.16.06p-Cymenene *132.20143414350.51--
30.16.19cis-Linalool oxide170.24144514451.800.990.35
31.16.471-Octen-3-ol128.2114521453-0.470.69
32.16.611-Heptanol116.20145514560.740.340.40
33.16.96trans-Linalool oxide170.24146414661.55-0.14
34.17.4trans-p-Menthan-3-one154.2414871486--0.86
35.17.51(E,E)-2,4-Heptadienal110.15149314931.310.430.31
36.17.71n-Decanal156.2614981498-0.10-
37.17.99Camphor *152.23150615050.630.120.29
38.18.24Benzaldehyde *106.12152115201.310.995.01
39.18.52(Z)-2-Nonenal140.22153215320.18-0.13
40.18.77Pinocamphone152.23156515660.23-0.09
41.18.96Linalool *154.24155315546.660.451.04
42.19.473,5-Octadiene-2-one124.18156815690.571.200.25
43.19.79Iso pulegone152.2315731574--0.40
44.19.84Bornyl acetate *196.28157915790.110.090.09
45.19.97(E)-6-Methyl-3,5-heptadien-2-one124.18158115820.651.09-
46.20.08trans-Caryophyllene204.35158815890.290.100.28
47.20.234-Terpineol *154.24159915980.590.240.83
48.20.34Undecanal170.29160316041.550.34-
49.20.43Aromadendrene *204.35160816080.22-0.24
50.20.52Butyl octanoate200.31161716190.40--
51.20.66β-Cyclocitral152.23162316240.19-0.35
52.20.81-Terpineol154.2416291628--0.11
53.20.87Myrtenal *150.21163016320.280.220.13
54.21.36Pulegone *152.23164316440.11-4.68
55.21.621-Nonanol144.25165516560.20.520.31
56.21.7Germacrene D204.35167616780.480.170.41
57.21.82α-Humulene204.35168016810.260.37-
58.21.954-Vinylanisole134.17167216701.28-0.25
59.22.19Neral *152.23167716790.26--
60.22.27δ-Terpineol154.24168416840.20-0.67
61.22.33γ-Muurolene204.35170217030.382.23-
62.22.44α-Terpineol154.2417111712-0.420.68
63.22.55Borneol *154.24171417151.74-0.52
64.22.62Verbenone150.21172217230.26--
65.22.78Isoborneol154.24169516960.230.74-
66.22.83Dodecanal184.31172017220.130.230.14
67.22.92Butyl nonanoate214.34172317250.151.190.56
68.23.12Piperitone *152.23172817290.620.590.44
69.23.21β-Bisabolene204.35173317330.430.260.26
70.23.54Naphthalene, 1,2-dihydro-1,1,6-trimethyl-172.26174817480.140.190.12
71.23.59Epoxylinalool170,24175017500.27--
72.23.86(+)-δ-Cadinene204.35175217520.313.130.40
73.23.991-Decanol158.28176117630.13-0.99
74.24.33p-Cumic aldehyde148.20178217830.350.220.31
75.24.68α-Cadinene204.35178417850.070.69-
76.24.83trans-p-Mentha-1(7),8-dien-2-ol152.23179217930.11--
77.24.932,4-Decadienal152.23179617970.24-0.55
78.25.14β-Damascenone190.28181418150.360.140.16
79.25.2β-Damascone192.2918221824-0.360.52
80.25.48trans-Calamenene202.33184418450.280.26-
81.25.74Geraniol *154.24185518560.31-0.24
82.25.85n-Hexanoic acid116.15186018610.78-0.49
83.26(Z)-Geranyl acetone194.31186718680.13-0.53
84.26.32exo-2-Hydroxycineole170.24186918700.680.170.24
85.26.57Benzyl alcohol108.13188418850.57-1.13
86.26.89(E)-2-Dodecenal182.3018871887-0.510.36
87.27.22α-Calacorene200.31191519160.180.330.82
88.27.43Tetradecanal212.37192019210.11--
89.27.56Phenylethyl alcohol122.16192619270.331.45-
90.27.68trans-β-Ionone192.29193019310.370.400.87
91.27.73cis-Jasmone164.2419371938--0.43
92.27.92,6-Dimethyl-3,7-octadiene-2,6-diol170.24194519450.270.490.15
93.28.022-Ethyl-hexanoic acid144.21195419540.321.050.66
94.28.55cis-Caryophyllene oxide *220.35195319550.380.950.36
95.28.76β-Ionone epoxide208.29196619670.380.310.79
96.28.92trans-Caryophyllene oxide220.35199219930.53-0.55
97.29.06Eicosane282.54200020000.30-0.93
98.29.15Methyl eugenol178.22200120030.19-1.03
99.29.35Methyl tetradecanoate242.39201220140.16-0.23
100.29.55Cinnamaldehyde132.15202220240.221.121.05
101.29.92Pentadecanal226.39204120420.040.250.09
102.30.17Octanoic acid144.21205120520.790.680.48
103.30.55Viridiflorol222.3620802081-0.570.64
104.31.35(+) Spathulenol220.35212121211.180.731.28
105.31.4Hexahydrofarnesyl acetone268.47213021311.513.631.02
106.31.62-Hydroxy-4-methoxy-benzaldehyde152.1421332135-0.25-
107.31.84α-Bisabolol222.36217821790.180.510.86
108.32.01Eugenol *164.20218521860.170.362.05
109.32.19Nonanoic acid158.23219221920.390.690.93
110.32.51Thymol *150.21219721981.160.602.74
111.33.04Carvacrol *150.21220522060.700.571.88
112.33.11Methyl hexadecanoate270.4522102210-0.160.45
113.33.21Elemicin208.25221322150.330.190.74
114.33.28Butyl myristate284.47222722290.091.900.54
115.33.72Ethyl hexadecanoate284.4722402241-0.470.49
116.34.11Decanoic acid172.26226222640.16-1.15
117.34.67n-Tricosane324.62230023000.180.490.51
118.35.11Dihydroactinidiolide180.2423212324--2.27
119.35.41Octadecanal268.47234023439.370.230.48
120.35.994-Vinylphenol120.14237823790.380.990.95
121.36.13Isoelemicin208.2523892390--0.58
122.36.33n-Tetracosane338.65239423960.220.291.29
123.36.91Butyl hexadecanoate312.53241624190.160.290.26
124.37.69Dodecanoic acid200.31245024510.16-0.54
125.37.849,12-Octadecadienoic acid, methyl ester2194.47245724590.140.41-
126.38.03n-Pentacosane352.68246524690.190.720.82
127.38.8Vanillin152.1425412545-0.490.22
128.38.929,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester292.45254725500.313.420.10
129.39.441-Octadecanol270.4925802581-1.860.11
130.39.65n-Hexacosane366.7025952597-0.331.02
131.40.3n-Butyl octadecanoate340.5826542655-4.92-
132.41.03Tetradecanoic acid228.37269826980.870.862.05
133.42.6Pentadecanoic acid242.39281928190.060.380.40
134.42.67n-Octacosane394.76282628280.070.290.55
135.44.17n-Hexadecanoic acid256.42289628991.393.164.68
136.45.289-Hexadecenoic acid254.40295429570.06-0.29
137.45.5n-Triacontane422.8130003000-4.250.22
138.46.35Squalene410.7130553058--0.10
139.46.86n-Hentriacontane436.83310231000.100.180.34
140.47.02Octadecanoic acid284.47310331040.05-0.22
141.47.429-Octadecenoic acid282.46315331570.100.200.42
142.48.149,12-Octadecadienoic acid280.44316531680.11-0.65
143.49.059,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid278.42319231930.23-1.30
Total identified compounds %88.6370.3476.78
All the compounds were identified based on the compounds’ mass spectral data and retention indices compared with those of the NIST Mass Spectral Library (December 2011), the Wiley Registry of Mass Spectral Data, 8th edition, and the compounds with * were identified by comparing with many authentic standards. The content (%) was calculated using the normalization method based on the GC-MS data. The presented data are the averages of three independent populations of each species from the same collection area, The standard deviations did not exceed 4% in all identified compounds.
Table
Table 2. Antioxidant activities of the volatile oils of Stachys species according to the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate (DPPH), 2,2-azino bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS), cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC), ferric reducing power (FRAP), chelating and phosphomolybdenum (PBD) assays.
Table 2. Antioxidant activities of the volatile oils of Stachys species according to the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate (DPPH), 2,2-azino bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS), cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC), ferric reducing power (FRAP), chelating and phosphomolybdenum (PBD) assays.
Samples DPPH
(mg TE/g oil) 		ABTS
(mg TE/g oil) 		CUPRAC
(mg TE/g oil) 		FRAP
(mg TE/g oil) 		Chelating
(mg EDTAE/g oil) 		PBD
(mmol TE/g oil)
S. byzantinaNa13.64 ± 0.02 c33.17 ± 0.88 c18.98 ± 0.36 c12.32 ± 1.76 c1.45 ± 0.10 c
S. hissarica13.04 ± 0.97226.48 ± 1.75 a162.62 ± 1.15 b109.55 ± 3.24 a24.30 ± 1.50 b5.69 ± 0.21 b
S. betonicifloraNa128.54 ± 1.32 b174.94 ± 0.20 a56.94 ± 0.75 b60.11 ± 0.36 a28.24 ± 1.00 a
Values are reported as means ± S.D. of three parallel measurements. TE: Trolox equivalent; EDTAE: EDTA equivalent; Na: not active. Different letters (a–c) in same column indicate significant differences in the tested essential oils.
Table
Table 3. Enzyme inhibitory effects of the volatile oils of Stachys species.
Table 3. Enzyme inhibitory effects of the volatile oils of Stachys species.
Samples AChE Inhibition
(mg GALAE/g oil) 		BChE Inhibition
(mg GALAE/g oil) 		Tyrosinase Inhibition (mg KAE/g oil) Amylase Inhibition (mmol ACAE/g oil) Glucosidase Inhibition (mmol ACAE/g oil)
S. byzantina5.64 ± 0.04 a11.18 ± 0.19 bc101.07 ± 0.60 a0.59 ± 0.01 c24.11 ± 0.06 c
S. hissarica5.05 ± 0.01 b11.82 ± 0.20 b92.26 ± 2.48 b0.68 ± 0.02 b24.56 ± 0.10 b
S. betoniciflora4.09 ± 0.01 c13.81 ± 0.80 a75.77 ± 2.24 c0.76 ± 0.02 a24.89 ± 0.03 a
Values are reported as means ± S.D. of three parallel measurements. GALAE: Galantamine equivalent; KAE: Kojic acid equivalent; ACAE: Acarbose equivalent; Na: not active. Different letters (a–c) in same column indicate significant differences in the tested essential oils.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gad, H.A.; Mukhammadiev, E.A.; Zengen, G.; Musayeib, N.M.A.; Hussain, H.; Bin Ware, I.; Ashour, M.L.; Mamadalieva, N.Z. Chemometric Analysis Based on GC-MS Chemical Profiles of Three Stachys Species from Uzbekistan and Their Biological Activity. Plants 2022, 11, 1215. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11091215

AMA Style

Gad HA, Mukhammadiev EA, Zengen G, Musayeib NMA, Hussain H, Bin Ware I, Ashour ML, Mamadalieva NZ. Chemometric Analysis Based on GC-MS Chemical Profiles of Three Stachys Species from Uzbekistan and Their Biological Activity. Plants. 2022; 11(9):1215. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11091215

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gad, Haidy A., Elbek A. Mukhammadiev, Gokhan Zengen, Nawal M. Al Musayeib, Hidayat Hussain, Ismail Bin Ware, Mohamed L. Ashour, and Nilufar Z. Mamadalieva. 2022. "Chemometric Analysis Based on GC-MS Chemical Profiles of Three Stachys Species from Uzbekistan and Their Biological Activity" Plants 11, no. 9: 1215. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11091215

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop