Next Article in Journal
Antioxidants and Phytohormones Act in Coordination to Regulate Sage Response to Long Term Ozone Exposure
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrodistillation and Microwave Extraction of Volatile Compounds: Comparing Data for Twenty-One Veronica Species from Different Habitats
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 7
10.3390/plants11070903
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Near-Isogenic Barley Lines Show Enhanced Susceptibility to Powdery Mildew Infection Following High-Temperature Stress

by
Judit Kolozsváriné Nagy
,
Ildikó Schwarczinger
,
Lóránt Király
*,
Renáta Bacsó
,
Attila L. Ádám
and
András Künstler
Centre for Agricultural Research, Plant Protection Institute, ELKH, 15 Herman Ottó Str., 1022 Budapest, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(7), 903; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070903
Submission received: 3 March 2022 / Revised: 23 March 2022 / Accepted: 25 March 2022 / Published: 28 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Mechanisms of Resistance to Plant Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Barley cultivation is adversely affected by high-temperature stress, which may modulate plant defense responses to pathogens such as barley powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei, Bgh). Earlier research focused mainly on the influence of short-term heat stress (heat shock) of barley on Bgh infection. In this study, our aim was to investigate the effects of both short- and long-term heat stress (35 °C from 30 s to 5 days) on Bgh infection in the barley cultivar Ingrid and its near-isogenic lines containing different powdery mildew resistance genes (Mla12, Mlg, and mlo5) by analyzing symptom severity and Bgh biomass with RT-qPCR. The expression of selected barley defense genes (BAX inhibitor-1, Pathogenesis- related protein-1b, Respiratory burst oxidase homologue F2, and Heat shock protein 90-1) was also monitored in plants previously exposed to heat stress followed by inoculation with Bgh. We demonstrated that pre-exposure to short- and long-term heat stress negatively affects the resistance of all resistant lines manifested by the appearance of powdery mildew symptoms and increased Bgh biomass. Furthermore, prolonged heat stress (48 and 120 h) enhanced both Bgh symptoms and biomass in susceptible wild-type Ingrid. Heat stress suppressed and delayed early defense gene activation in resistant lines, which is a possible reason why resistant barley became partially susceptible to Bgh.

1. Introduction

Plants in nature must simultaneously face several different stresses as abiotic and biotic stressors act in concert and both have a significant impact on plant health [1,2]. In fact, the interplay of abiotic and biotic factors may have a key influence on plant–pathogen interactions, in particular on the outcome of a given infection [3,4]. Heat is one of the most severe abiotic environmental stress factors that limit crop growth and productivity [5,6]. Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is the fourth most relevant cereal crop worldwide [7], and environmental stresses such as heat stress have a profound impact on barley production [8]. Importantly, numerous studies have shown that heat stress usually negatively affects key plant disease-resistance mechanisms [1]. Powdery mildew diseases are caused by a wide variety of obligate biotrophic fungal pathogens, generally with limited host ranges. Barley powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei; Bgh) is one of the very few of these pathogens capable of infecting a monocot grass species, barley, and causing serious economical yield losses worldwide [9,10]. Barley plants employ several types of preformed and inducible defenses to prevent, or at least limit, infections when attacked by Bgh. An effective defense of barley plants to Bgh is mediated by homozygous recessive alleles of the Mildew locus o (Mlo) [11]. This resistance is non-race specific and is effective against almost all powdery mildew isolates [12,13]. The resistance reaction is tightly linked to rapid cell wall remodeling and accumulation of the reactive oxygen species (ROS) hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in epidermal cells in response to attempted fungal penetration [12,14,15]. Barley mlo mutants exhibit pleiotropic phenotypes that can negatively affect harvest yields [16]. However, it has been demonstrated recently that wheat Tamlo-R32 mutants with a 304-kilobase pair-targeted deletion in the Mlo-B1 locus retain crop growth and yields while conferring robust powdery mildew resistance [17]. Furthermore, in barley, a number of race-specific, dominant, and semi-dominant R genes (e.g., Mla and Mlg) [18] may also confer resistance to Bgh and are associated with the activation of the hypersensitive response (HR), i.e., localized cell death at attempted infection sites [19]. The interaction between Bgh and different R genes containing resistant and susceptible (Mlo) barley genotypes has been described by Hückelhoven and his coworkers [20]. After the first 16 h of infection, the fungus penetrates epidermal barley cells in susceptible and resistant Mla12 plants. During compatible interactions, cell wall penetration is followed by haustorium and elongated secondary hyphae formation [21]. However, in the epidermal cells of resistant Mla12 genotypes, a spreading HR of mesophyll cells directly below the attacked epidermal cell arrests fungal development. On the other hand, in the mlo5-mediated resistance response, pathogen penetration is inhibited by effective and rapid cell wall remodeling (i.e., papilla formation). Furthermore, in cells of Mlg genotypes, the papilla formation is associated with a single-cell HR [20]. Because the defense reactions mediated by these R genes (mlo5, Mlg, and Mla12) act differently during Bgh infection, it is conceivable that high-temperature stress may cause distinct effects based on the presence of a given R gene.
The duration of high-temperature stresses is another fundamental factor of plant–pathogen interactions. Heat shock (a short-term exposure to high temperatures), e.g., submerging plants in 49 °C water for 20 seconds (s) one day before Bgh inoculation, resulted in the susceptibility of near-isogenic lines of barley (H. vulgare cv. Ingrid) containing different resistance genes (mlo5, Mlg, Mla12). The same heat shock further increased susceptibility to Bgh in genetically susceptible barley (cv. Ingrid Mlo) [22]. We have shown that a similar heat shock (49 °C for 45 s) can partially suppress the symptomless nonhost resistance of barley to wheat powdery mildew (B. graminis f. sp. tritici) [23]. On the other hand, in certain cases, a short-term exposure to elevated temperatures may increase the plant’s resistance to pathogens. In barley (cv. Golden Promise), a heat shock of 50 °C for 60 s induces resistance against Bgh [24,25]. However, more prolonged high temperatures generally appear to decrease disease resistance in barley. For example, an exposure to 36 °C for 30 minutes (min), 60 min, and 120 min prior to pathogen inoculation confers enhanced susceptibility to Bgh in both genetically resistant (containing different mlo alleles) and susceptible barley cultivars [26]. Interestingly, wheat powdery mildew (B. graminis f. sp. tritici) growth was inhibited following an exposure to high temperatures (26–30 °C) for several days, and no typical powdery mildew symptoms were observed [27]. However, in this case, the absence of powdery mildew symptoms is likely due to the inhibition of pathogen growth at constant high temperatures rather than the activation of plant defense responses. We found that prolonged heat stress pre-exposure (24, 48, and 120 h at 35 °C) confers enhanced susceptibility to Bgh in a genetically susceptible barley line (MvHV 118-17), while a resistant line (MvHV 07-17) retains its pathogen resistance [28]. A robust reactivation of heat-suppressed defense gene expression in the barley line MvHV07-17 is a likely reason for retaining Bgh resistance even after a prolonged pre-exposure to 35 °C [28].
In plant cells, high temperatures may often interfere with several interconnected signaling pathways that cause, e.g., an initially enhanced ROS production contributing both to antioxidant induction (controlling ROS) and elevated expression of heat shock protein (HSP) genes that encode molecular chaperones stabilizing/protecting, e.g., antioxidant enzymes and immune receptors. Furthermore, heat-induced extracellular Ca2+ influxes through plasma membranes may activate heat shock transcription factors (HSFs) that regulate HSP expression. Ca2+ is also responsible for the activation of membrane-bound NADPH oxidases that produce ROS and contribute to the development of plant disease resistance. Importantly, the development of heat tolerance has been associated with the proper functioning of HSPs and antioxidant enzymes in several plant species (see [1,29] and references within). Although several responses can be identified that are common between heat stress and combined (heat and pathogen infection) stresses, generally, plant transcriptional responses induced by a combination of heat stress and pathogen infection are specific and unpredictable from responses to heat-stress application alone [1].
Recently, we found that prolonged heat stress pre-exposure confers enhanced susceptibility to Bgh in a genetically susceptible barley line, while pathogen resistance is retained in a resistant line [28]. Therefore, we hypothesized that prolonged heat stress may similarly increase the Bgh susceptibility of wild-type Ingrid (Mlo genotype), a genetically well-characterized barley cultivar. Furthermore, we assumed that cv. Ingrid near-isogenic lines containing different R genes may react differentially to high-temperature stress. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the influence of short- and long-term heat stress (35 °C from 30 s to five days) on resistant and susceptible near-isogenic lines (Mlo, mlo5, Mla12, Mlg) of barley cv. Ingrid infected with Bgh race A6.

2. Results

2.1. Determination of the Effect of Heat Stress on Powdery Mildew Infection in Near-Isogenic Barley Lines

Resistant (Mla12, Mlg, mlo5) and susceptible (wildtype, Mlo) near-isogenic barley lines of cv. Ingrid were used in our experiments to determine how heat stress influences the defense responses of barley to powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei A6, Bgh). Barley plants were exposed to a high temperature (35 °C) for different durations (30 s, 1 min, 1 hour [h], 2 h, 6 h, 24 h, 48 h, 120 h) immediately before inoculation with Bgh. Disease symptoms were visually evaluated at seven days after powdery mildew inoculation. Our results showed that a significant increase in the proportion of leaf area covered by powdery mildew was detectable in plants previously exposed to 35 °C, as compared to plants maintained at 20 °C (Figure 1).
In the susceptible (WT) and one of the resistant lines (Mlg), only long-term (24, 48, and 120 h) heat stress could increase powdery mildew coverage, and no significant enhancement of powdery mildew symptoms was observed following heat exposure for less than 24 h at 35 °C (Figure 1). In contrast, in the resistant lines Mla12 and mlo5, shorter durations of heat treatment (from 30 s to 6 h) increased the powdery mildew coverage significantly. Moreover, along with the increase in the duration of heat stress, powdery mildew coverage also increased in both resistant and susceptible lines. In the barley lines Mla12, mlo5, and WT, exposure to high temperatures (35 °C) resulted in the appearance of powdery mildew symptoms not only on the leaf but also on the stem (Figure 2).
In Mla12 barley, optimal temperatures (20 °C) activate a defense mechanism, the hypersensitive response (HR), which is characterized by a rapid cell death (local necrotic symptoms) at the point of pathogen ingress (Figure 2). However, in heat-stressed plants, HR symptoms are suppressed and fewer and smaller necrotic spots are observed, parallel to the appearance of powdery mildew symptoms (Figure 2). Overall, the proportion of powdery mildew-covered areas significantly increased at high temperatures in all investigated lines. The largest increase in powdery mildew coverage was observed in the Mla12 line while the Mlg line displayed the smallest effect in response to heat stress. In addition to symptom assessment, the quantification of Bgh was also performed by RT-qPCR. Results of the RT-qPCR assay supported the findings of the symptom assessment. Our results showed that significant increases in Bgh biomass are detectable in all investigated lines previously exposed to 35 °C, as compared to plants kept at 20 °C (Figure 3).
Importantly, a significant increase in Bgh biomass was detectable in the susceptible line (WT) previously exposed to 35 °C for at least 48 and 120 h. In contrast, even shorter durations (from 1 min in Mla12, 1 h in mlo5, and 2 h in Mlg lines) of heat stress successfully increased powdery mildew biomass in resistant lines (Figure 3A). Remarkably, in Mla12, Bgh biomass was substantially higher than in the other two resistant lines (Mlg, mlo5) following each specific treatment (Figure 3B). In fact, the amount of fungal biomass in Mla12 barley is significantly higher even at 20 °C (without heat stress) as compared to the other two resistant lines (Figure 3B). The partial (incomplete) resistance provided by the Mla12 gene and manifested as a spreading mesophyll HR, may explain this phenomenon [20].

2.2. Expression of Barley Defense/Stress Genes in Response to Heat Stress and/or Bgh Infection

In order to assess the combined effects of heat stress and powdery mildew infection on activities of well-characterized barley stress/defense-associated genes related to Bgh infection such as Pathogenesis related 1-b (HvPR1-b), Heat shock protein 90-1 (HvHsp90-1), BAX inhibitor-1 (HvBI-1), and Respiratory burst oxidase homologue F2 (HvRBOHF2), we assayed their expression in both resistant and susceptible plants inoculated with Bgh and previously exposed to 35 °C for 48 h. As controls, the defense gene expression was also assayed in plants that received only heat treatment but no Bgh inoculation and inoculated plants that were held at an optimal temperature (20 °C). Defense gene expression was detected following 48 h of heat stress treatment because this duration of heat stress has a significant impact on increasing Bgh symptoms and biomass in all investigated lines (see Figure 1 and Figure 3). In the Bgh-inoculated susceptible line (WT) held at 20 °C, the expression of Pathogenesis related-1b (HvPR1-b) did not change significantly in response to Bgh infection (Figure 4). In contrast, the resistant lines showed an enhanced HvPR1-b expression at 6, 24, and 48 h after inoculation, as compared to 0 h controls (Figure 4).
Heat stress and heat stress followed by Bgh inoculation significantly reduced the expression of HvPR1-b in both susceptible and resistant lines at early time points (from 0 to 24 h). However, 48 h after heat stress, the expression of HvPR1-b increased in all investigated lines. In fact, heat stress followed by Bgh infection further increased the expression of HvPR1-b at 48 h but only in resistant lines (Figure 4).
In the Bgh-inoculated susceptible WT line maintained at 20 °C, the expression of HvHsp90-1 was suppressed during the first 48 h of infection. On the other hand, in the resistant lines (Mla12, Mlg, and mlo5), the expression of HvHsp90-1 was transiently induced 2 h after Bgh inoculation as compared to the zero-hour plants. After 2 h of early induction, HvHsp90-1 expression was significantly suppressed by Bgh infection at later time points (Figure 5).
Heat stress and heat stress followed by Bgh inoculation doubled the expression of HvHsp90-1 in both resistant and susceptible lines at 0-h time points (after 48 h of heat stress) compared to plants held at 20 °C. The expression of HvHsp90-1 was drastically suppressed at later time points (2, 4, 6, 24, and 48 h) in all investigated lines (Figure 5). Presumably, heat stress amplified the suppression of HvHsp90-1 caused by Bgh infection.
Respiratory burst oxidase homologue genes encoding NADPH oxidase enzymes are a major source of the reactive oxygen species superoxide (O2•−) in plants. In the Bgh-inoculated susceptible line (WT) held at 20 °C, the expression of HvRBOHF2 did not change significantly in response to Bgh infection (Figure 6). Conversely, the resistant lines showed an early and enhanced HvRBOHF2 expression at 2, 6, 24, and 48 h in the mlo5 line and at 6, 24, and 48 h after inoculation in Mlg and Mla12 plants (Figure 6).
Heat stress and heat stress followed by Bgh inoculation significantly suppressed and/or delayed the expression of HvRBOHF2 in all investigated lines, compared to plants held at 20 °C (Figure 6).
The expression of the cell death regulator BAX inhibitor-1 (HvBI-1) showed a similar trend to that observed for HvRBOHF2. However, in the Bgh-inoculated susceptible line (WT) held at 20 °C, the expression of HvBI-1 increased slightly but significantly at later time points (24 and 48 h) (Figure 7). Conversely, the resistant lines showed an early and enhanced HvBI-1 expression starting at 2 h after inoculation (Figure 7). Heat stress and heat stress followed by Bgh inoculation suppressed the expression of HvBI-1 at 0, 2, and 6 h after inoculation in both susceptible and resistant lines, as compared to plants held at an optimal temperature (20 °C) (Figure 7).
Overall, in Bgh-resistant barley plants held at an optimal temperature (20 °C), the expression of the investigated stress/defense genes was activated at early time points after Bgh inoculation, while in the susceptible line, the expression of these genes either did not change or was suppressed during this initial stage (2 and 6 h) of pathogen infection. However, heat stress suppressed and/or delayed the expression of all mentioned genes, and this delay in defense gene expression may contribute to an enhanced susceptibility to Bgh (i.e., an increase in Bgh symptoms and biomass) in all investigated lines.

3. Discussion

Heat stress may have a profound influence on plant–pathogen interactions [1]. Our results showed that pre-exposure to 35 °C heat stress for different durations significantly increase powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei A6, Bgh) symptoms and biomass in resistant near-isogenic lines of barley (Hordeum vulgare) cv. Ingrid containing different resistance genes (Mla12, Mlg, mlo5). Furthermore, heat stress enhanced susceptibility in the susceptible line (WT). Heat stress of shorter durations (from 1 min in Mla12, 1 h in mlo5, and 2 h in Mlg lines) successfully increased Bgh biomass in resistant lines, however, in the susceptible line (WT), only the effect of prolonged (48 h and 120 h) heat stress increased the intensity of symptoms and biomass. In line with our experiments, others have demonstrated that a short-term pre-exposure to a high temperature (heat shock, e.g., submerging plants in 49 °C water for 20 s) may also confer enhanced susceptibility of these Bgh-resistant near-isogenic barley lines to Bgh [22]. In contrast, in susceptible barley, a heat shock (30–40 s at 50 °C) followed by immediate Bgh inoculation significantly reduced powdery mildew infection [24,25]. However, these results cannot be directly compared with the results obtained by us, as both the applied temperature and the method of heat treatment differed. A heat shock (55 °C for 45 s, 30 min before inoculation) transiently inhibited Mla-mediated HR to Bgh in barley coleoptiles [30]. We experienced something similar in Mla12 barley cv. Ingrid, where heat stress at 35 °C reduced local necrotic symptoms (HR) and, simultaneously, powdery mildew symptoms appeared in first leaves inoculated with Bgh. Schwarzbach [26] reported that exposure to a high temperature (36 °C for 30 min, 60 min, and 120 min durations) confers an enhanced susceptibility to Bgh in both genetically resistant (mlo) and susceptible barley cultivars [26]. Although our results confirmed that exposures to one and two hours of heat stress at 35 °C breaks mlo-mediated resistance, we have also shown that only a prolonged (48 and 120 h) heat stress may enhance susceptibility in the genetically susceptible Mlo line. Importantly, in our assays, we used intact barley plants as opposed to the experiments of Schwarzbach [26], where leaf segments were placed on agar medium, a likely cause of differential reactions of heat-stressed barley (35–36 °C for 1 and 2 h) to Bgh in the susceptible line. Recently, we found that prolonged heat stress pre-exposure (35 °C for 24, 48, and 120 h) confers enhanced susceptibility to Bgh in a susceptible barley line, while a resistant line retains its pathogen resistance [28]. Defense gene expression patterns following heat stress and Bgh inoculation were markedly different in the resistant and susceptible lines. In contrast, in the present investigation, heat stress converted powdery mildew resistance to susceptibility in Mla12, Mlg, and mlo5 lines and further enhanced susceptibility in WT plants. Accordingly, the expression of defense genes displayed a similar trend in the resistant and susceptible lines following heat stress and Bgh inoculation.
Interestingly, we found that the amount of fungal biomass in Mla12 barley is significantly higher even at 20 °C (without heat stress) than in the other two resistant lines (Mlg and mlo5). Higher Bgh biomass in Mla12 barley is presumably related to the slowness of HR as compared to other forms of resistance mediated by Mlg and mlo5 resistance genes. It is known that Bgh penetrates the epidermal cells of Mla12 and susceptible Mlo barley, while effective papillae formation in Mlg and mlo5 lines prevent fungal penetration during the first 16 h of infection [20]. However, in Mla12 lines, Bgh can infect the surrounding cells and HR can only stop pathogen spread at ca. 36 h after infection [20]. This phenomenon could explain our observation that higher levels of Bgh biomass can be detected in the Mla12 line as compared to Mlg and mlo5 plants even without heat stress. Furthermore, this distinct difference between Mla12 and the other two resistant lines is also evident at high temperatures.
Plant transcriptomes undergo extensive changes to cope with the influence of high temperatures, affecting not only physiology and growth but also the plant host’s ability to cope with pathogens [31,32]. Therefore, we investigated the expression of various plant defense genes in Bgh-infected resistant and susceptible barley plants pre-exposed to heat stress.
Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are ubiquitous proteins found in plant and animal cells that accumulate rapidly under rising temperatures to minimize damage caused by heat [32]. Heat shock proteins were originally described in connection with heat stress [33,34]; however, they play an equally important role in pathogen-initiated plant defense signaling and disease resistance [35]. It has been described that Bgh inoculation induces the expression of the Hsp90 homologue HvGRP94 at early time points in barley cv. Pallas containing the Mla resistance gene [36]. Similarly, in our study, the expression of HvHsp90-1 was induced transiently at two hours after inoculation in cv. Ingrid Mla12. However, we have also shown that the transient induction of HvHSP90-1 is induced not only in the line containing the Mla12 resistance (R) gene but also in Ingrid barley containing Mlg and mlo5 R genes but not in the susceptible (WT) line. Others demonstrated that silencing of Hsp90 breaks the Mla13-mediated resistance to Bgh in barley, indicating a functional role of Hsp90 in resistance to Bgh [37]. Our results showed that 48 h of heat stress at 35 °C induces the expression of HvHsp90-1 in barley, however, the expression drops drastically within 2 h after heat stress regardless of the presence or absence of powdery mildew. The lack of the transient induction of HvHsp90-1 following heat stress is associated with the appearance of Bgh symptoms in resistant plants. The initial step of the defense signaling pathway is the recognition of pathogens by different plant receptors. Most of the plant resistance genes encode nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich repeat-containing (NLR) proteins that function as immune receptors. It has been found that Required for Mla12 resistance 1, Suppressor of the g2 allele of skp1, and Hsp-90 are indispensable for normal pathogen recognition due to the stabilization of NLR proteins such as the product of the Mla12 resistance gene [38]. In our experiments, the early transient induction of HvHsp90-1 observed in different barley cv. Ingrid lines resistant to BghA6 may play a similar role by activating the NLR receptor(s) recognizing Bgh.
Heat stress often leads to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plant tissues [39,40]. Furthermore, ROS play an important signaling role during pathogen infection [41,42,43]. Therefore, controlling ROS during simultaneous pathogen infection and heat stress could be critical for successful plant survival. Respiratory burst oxidase homologue (RBOH) genes encode plasma membrane-bound proteins with NADPH-oxidase activity, and both pathogen recognition [44] and the sensing of high-temperature stress [39] is associated with RBOH-dependent ROS generation. In the present study, we have shown that in Bgh-infected plants held at a normal temperature (20 °C), an early induction of the barley HvRBOHF2 gene is characteristic of the Bgh-resistant lines (Mla12, Mlg, and mlo5) but not the susceptible (WT) line. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that a prolonged heat stress with or without Bgh infection suppresses and delays the expression of the barley HvRBOHF2 gene in both Bgh-resistant and -susceptible barley lines, as compared to Bgh-infected plants held at 20 °C. In line with our results, heat stress suppressed the expression of TaRBOHF in wheat [45]. Furthermore, transgenic barley with a silenced HvRBOHF2 gene showed an enhanced susceptibility to the penetration of Bgh [46,47], demonstrating the role of HvRBOHF2 in the resistance of barley to Bgh. In fact, in tobacco kept at higher temperatures (30 °C) a reduced ROS generation and down-regulation of NtRBOHD, a functional homolog of HvRBOHF2, is correlated with the suppression of resistance to Tobacco mosaic virus [48]. This suggests that a reduced or delayed expression of HvRBOHF2 during prolonged heat stress in both resistant and susceptible barley lines contributes to susceptibility to Bgh.
Programmed cell death (PCD) is defined as a sequence of genetically controlled developmental and stress-responsive events that direct the plant cell to die [49]. Pathogen infection induces PCD [50,51,52] as well as unfavorable environmental conditions such as heat stress [40,53]. The BAX Inhibitor-1 (BI-1) protein is a universal PCD inhibitor in eukaryotes including plants [54,55]. Our results showed that the expression of HvBI-1 in response to Bgh is only slightly induced in the susceptible line (WT) held at 20 °C. On the other hand, in the resistant lines, an early, significant induction of HvBI-1 was characteristic starting at 2 h after inoculation. Hückelhoven et al. [56] obtained similar results since an early enhancement of HvBI-1 expression following Bgh infection was evident in resistant barley cultivars, especially in those genotypes (Mla12, Mlg) that undergo a hypersensitive resistance (HR) associated with PCD [56]. Furthermore, barley BI-1 functions as a Bgh susceptibility factor, likely due to the suppression of plant PCD, since Bgh is an obligate biotrophic pathogen preferring live host tissues [57,58,59]. Here we demonstrate that heat stress suppresses and delays early HvBI-1 expression in both resistant and susceptible barley lines regardless whether or not the plants are infected with Bgh, implying that BI-1 may contribute to plant tolerance to heat stress. In fact, Arabidopsis BI mutants display an enhanced sensitivity to heat-shock-induced PCD [60], and overexpressing the CaBI-1 gene of pepper (Capsicum annuum) in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) significantly improved tolerance to abiotic stresses such as high temperature, salinity, and drought [61]. It is plausible that heat stress induces PCD in both the resistant and susceptible barley lines used in our study. Interestingly, we did not observe the appearance of necrotic symptoms characteristic of PCD on heat-treated plants. However, HvBI-1 is activated in all lines between 24 and 48 h after heat stress regardless of Bgh infection; therefore, HvBI-1 induction may contribute to the absence of necrotic symptoms. Nevertheless, our results suggest that the primary role of HvBI-1 expression in both Bgh-resistant and -susceptible barley lines is the suppression of PCD, rather than controlling pathogen resistance. However, in certain plant–pathogen interactions BI-1 may play a role not only in PCD-inhibition but also in conferring disease resistance [62]. For example, the silencing of wheat BI-1 turned an HR-type resistance into partial susceptibility during infection by the rust pathogen Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici [63].
The activation of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes and the accumulation of PR-encoded proteins in pathogen-attacked plants are well-known [64]. Based on their biochemical and biological functions, PR proteins are classified into 17 families [65]. Enhanced expression of several PR genes, e.g., PR1, is induced in infected wheat plants resistant to powdery mildew but not in susceptible cultivars [66]. Furthermore, plant PR1 proteins exhibit sterol binding activity, and inhibiting fungal sterols can also be potentially effective against pathogenic fungi such as powdery mildew [64]. The barley PR1-b protein has been shown to contribute to penetration resistance to Bgh, since transient silencing of PR1-b enhanced the penetration efficiency of powdery mildew in attacked epidermal cells [67]. In addition, another PR protein, PR17c, is also required for penetration resistance of barley to Bgh [68]. CSEP0055, a Bgh effector candidate, interacts with both PR1-b and PR17c, thus contributing to enhanced virulence and implying a possible suppression of these PR proteins by Bgh [68]. In the present study, we have shown that a prolonged heat stress drastically reduced and delayed the expression of HvPR1-b in both resistant and susceptible barley lines. The heat-stress-induced suppression of HvPR1-b may contribute to the appearance of Bgh symptoms in resistant lines and the enhanced Bgh symptoms in susceptible WT plants.
Overall, high-temperature stress enhanced powdery mildew symptoms and biomass in both susceptible (WT) and resistant (Mla12, Mlg, and mlo5) cv. Ingrid barley near-isogenic lines. A possible reason for this increased pathogen susceptibility is the heat-induced suppression and delay in barley defense gene expression. Our findings may have profound implications in the face of global climate change tendencies, implying that breeding crops for tolerance to combined stresses (i.e., abiotic and biotic) should certainly be a primary task in the near future.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Powdery Mildew Infection

Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivar Ingrid and its near-isogenic lines containing different powdery mildew resistance genes (mlo5; Mla12; Mlg) were used in our experiments. Mla12, mlo5, and Mlg lines are resistant to barley powdery mildew Blumeria graminis (DC) Speer f. sp. hordei Em. Marchal, race A6 (Bgh) while the wildtype (WT) Mlo line is susceptible. Plants grown from ca. 30 seeds sown into two pots per treatment were kept in versatile environmental chambers (20 °C, 60% relative humidity, 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod with a light intensity of 100 μmol m−2 s−1). For Bgh inoculation, conidia from heavily infected barley were dusted equally onto the primary leaves of 13 day-old barley seedlings of the genotypes listed above [7]. Inoculated plants displayed an inoculation density of about 50 conidia mm−2. Bgh was maintained on susceptible barley host plants (cv. Ingrid Mlo) in versatile environmental chambers under the conditions described above.

4.2. Heat Stress

Barley plants were artificially exposed to a temperature of 35 °C (heat stress) at 80–85% relative humidity with daily watering prior to inoculation with Bgh in versatile environmental chambers with a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod and a light intensity of 100 μmol m−2 s−1. As a control, plants were kept at a constant 20 °C as described previously [22,26]. The reason for selecting 35 °C is that this temperature occurs rather often under field conditions in Central Europe, typically in growth periods when barley is exposed to Bgh (i.e., in May and June). The duration of heat stress varied between 30 s and 5 days (30 s, 1 min, 1 h, 2 h, 6 h, 24 h, 48 h, 120 h). During the 8 h dark period, the temperature was always decreased to 25 °C in order to better simulate field conditions. Powdery mildew inoculation of heat-stressed plants was performed as described above, immediately following heat treatment.

4.3. Evaluation of Powdery Mildew Symptoms Caused by Bgh

The formation of powdery mildew symptoms on 10 randomly selected primary leaves per treatment of Bgh-inoculated plants was visually evaluated 7 days after inoculation (DAI). Disease severity was estimated as the percentage of area with powdery mildew symptoms per leaf. Inoculated primary leaves for each plant were evaluated. Three independent biological experiments were conducted, and 360 plants per experiment were assessed in the following arrangement: four barley lines (wild type, Mla12, mlo5, and Mlg) and nine different heat treatments (20 °C and 35 °C for 30 sec, 1 min, 1 h, 2 h, 6 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 120 h), with ten plants/treatment/barley line.

4.4. Quantitative Analyses of Powdery Mildew Biomass

For the quantification of Bgh biomass, barley leaf tissue samples (5 primary leaves from 5 individual plants randomly selected and pooled per treatment) were sampled from plants at 7 DAI, following symptomatic evaluation, in liquid nitrogen. To analyze Bgh biomass, a protocol of reverse transcription followed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was used as described previously for barley-Bgh and wheat-Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici interactions [28,69]. Collected leaf tissue was ground in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA (including plant and Bgh RNAs) was isolated by the Plant Total RNA Extraction Miniprep System Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Viogene, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Following RNA isolation, samples were subjected to DNAse I treatment with RQ1 RNase-Free DNase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Analysis of RNA quantity and quality (260/280 and 260/230 ratios) was conducted by a MaestroNano Spectrophotometer (Maestrogen, Hsinchu City, Taiwan) and total RNA degradation was also checked by formaldehyde agarose gel electrophoresis. One microgram of total RNA per sample was used for reverse transcription (RT). RT was carried out with a RevertAid™ H− cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Baltics UAB, Vilnius, Lithuania) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. As a negative control, a pool of randomly selected RNA samples was applied to which no reverse transcriptase was added. Assaying the relative expression of Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (BgGAPDH) as an optimal Bgh gene for RT-qPCR during the infection cycle [70], along with the barley reference gene Ubiquitin (HvUbi), was conducted with the 2X SYBR FAST Readymix reagent (KAPA Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA). The qPCR reactions were carried out as described by Höller et al. [71]. In brief, the PCR reaction mix contained 7.5 μL KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR Master Mix (2X), 0.75 μL of 5 μM forward and reverse primers each, 3.5 μLof PCR-grade water, and 2.5 μL of 20-fold diluted cDNA in a total reaction volume of 15 μL. DNA amplifications were performed in a Bio-Rad CFX-96 real-time thermocycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), running a standard program (95 °C for 2 min, 40 cycles at 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 10 s, and 72 °C for 10 s) followed by a melting curve analysis to determine amplicon specificity using a temperature range of 65 to 95 °C with increments of 0.5 °C. Gene expression was normalized to a barley Ubiquitin gene (HvUbi) as a reference. Previous research has demonstrated that HvUbi is a reliable reference gene for detecting gene expression changes in barley exposed to either powdery mildew infection, heat, or drought stress [7,46,70,72,73]. Testing the suitability of HvUbi as a reference gene was performed by analysis of cycle threshold (CT) variation in response to heat treatments and Bgh infection. Significant changes were not observed in CT values (mean ± standard deviation, SD) for HvUbi during treatments. All reactions were performed using three independent biological experiments with three technical replicates per biological sample. In each run, water-only controls and non-reverse-transcribed RNA were used as negative controls. The primer efficiencies for the genes tested were between 101–104%. Changes in gene expression were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method [74]. For primers used in qPCR, see Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers specific to HvUbi were designed with the aid of the Primer Premier 5 program (PREMIER Biosoft International, San Francisco, CA, USA), while primers for BgGAPDH have been described previously [70].

4.5. Quantitative Analyses of Plant Defense Gene Expression

Samples for assaying barley defense gene expression (5 primary leaves from 5 individual plants randomly selected and pooled per treatment) were taken at five time points after heat stress immediately followed by Bgh inoculation (i.e., 0, 2, 6, 24, and 48 h after Bgh inoculation) and stored at −70 °C. To analyze the defense gene expression of barley. a protocol of reverse transcription followed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was used. Methods used during the analysis (RNA isolation, RT, and qPCR) are described in detail in the previous section. During qPCR assay, the defense gene expression of barley was normalized to a barley Ubiquitin gene (HvUbi) as a reference. Changes in gene expression were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method [74]. For primers used in qPCR, see Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers (HvUbi, HvBI-1, HvPR1-b, and HvRBOHF2) were designed with the aid of the Primer Premier 5 program (PREMIER Biosoft International, San Francisco, CA, USA) except for HvHSP90-1 [75].
Table
Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers used in qPCR.
Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers used in qPCR.
Accession
Number		GeneSequence
5′-3′		Amplicon
Length		Primer
Efficiency
CAUH01004767Glyceraldehyde
3-phosphate
dehydrogenase (BgGAPDH)		FwGGAGCCGAGTACATAGTAGAGT105 bp104%
RevGGAGGGTGCCGAAATGATAAC
M60175Ubiquitin
(HvUbi)		FwACCCTCGCCGACTACAACAT240 bp102%
RevCAGTAGTGGCGGTCGAAGTG
XM045113197Heat shock protein 90-1
(HvHsp90-1)		FwACAAGAACGACAAGTCCGTCAA119 bp104%
RevGAGCATGCGGTGGATCCT
AJ290421BAX inhibitor-1
(HvBI-1)		FwATGTTCTCGGTGCCAGTCT409 bp101%
RevGGGCGTGCTTGATGTAGTC
X74940Pathogenesis related -1b
(HvPR1-b)		FwGGACTACGACTACGGCTCCA150 bp104%
RevGGCTCGTAGTTGCAGGTGAT
EU566856.1Respiratory burst oxidase homologue F2 (HvRBOHF2)FwTGCTCGGTCAGCACTC175 bp104%
RevTCCGCAATAGAACACTCC
Abbreviations: Bg, Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei; Hv, Hordeum vulgare; Fw, forward primer; Rev, reverse primer.

4.6. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistica 13 software (TIBCO Software, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Powdery mildew coverage of leaves and relative gene expression values were log-transformed to achieve homogeneity of variances (assessed by Bartlett’s test). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post-hoc test were employed, and differences at p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K. and L.K.; methodology, A.K., L.K. and I.S.; investigation, J.K.N., I.S., R.B., A.K. and L.K.; data analysis and interpretation, A.K., L.K., R.B. and A.L.Á.; writing—review and editing, I.S., J.K.N., A.K. and L.K.; visualization, J.K.N., I.S., A.K. and A.L.Á.; supervision, A.K. and L.K.; project administration, A.K.; funding acquisition, A.K. and L.K.; J.K.N. and I.S. contributed equally to this work and are considered co-first authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Hungarian National Research, Development, and Innovation Office, Grant Numbers: NKFIH FK131401 and K128868.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The support of the Bolyai Scholarship program (BO/719/21) is gratefully acknowledged. The barley cultivar Ingrid and its near-isogenic lines and the Bgh race A6 used in this study was kindly supplied by Karl-Heinz Kogel (Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Desaint, H.; Aoun, N.; Deslandes, L.; Vailleau, F.; Roux, F.; Berthomé, R. Fight hard or die trying: When plants face pathogens under heat stress. New Phytol. 2021, 229, 712–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Atkinson, N.J.; Urwin, P.E. The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: From genes to the field. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 3523–3544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Suzuki, N.; Rivero, R.M.; Shulaev, V.; Blumwald, E.; Mittler, R. Abiotic and biotic stress combinations. New Phytol. 2014, 203, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Onaga, G.; Wydra, K.; Koopmann, B.; Chebotarov, D.; Séré, Y.; Von Tiedemann, A. High temperature effects on Pi54 conferred resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae in two genetic backgrounds of Oryza sativa. J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 212, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Bita, C.E.; Gerats, T. Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: Scientific fundamentals and production of heat stress-tolerant crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Jagadish, S.V.K.; Way, D.A.; Sharkey, T.D. Plant heat stress: Concepts directing future research. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 1992–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cantalapiedra, C.P.; García-Pereira, M.J.; Gracia, M.P.; Igartua, E.; Casas, A.M.; Contreras-Moreira, B. Large differences in gene expression responses to drought and heat stress between elite barley cultivar Scarlett and a Spanish landrace. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Challinor, A.J.; Watson, J.; Lobell, D.B.; Howden, S.M.; Smith, D.R.; Chhetri, N. A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2014, 4, 287–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dean, R.; van Kan, J.A.L.; Pretorius, Z.A.; Hammond-Kosack, K.E.; Di Pietro, A.; Spanu, P.D.; Rudd, J.J.; Dickman, M.; Kahmann, R.; Ellis, J.; et al. The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 13, 414–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hacquard, S.; Kracher, B.; Maekawa, T.; Vernaldi, S.; Schulze-Lefert, P.; Van Themaat, E.V.L. Mosaic genome structure of the barley powdery mildew pathogen and conservation of transcriptional programs in divergent hosts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E2219–E2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Jørgensen, J.H. Discovery, characterization and exploitation of Mlo powdery mildew resistance in barley. Euphytica 1992, 63, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Freialdenhoven, A.; Peterhansel, C.; Kurth, J.; Kreuzaler, F.; Schulze-Lefert, P. Identification of genes required for the function of non-race-specific mlo resistance to powdery mildew in barley. Plant Cell 1996, 8, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Büschges, R.; Hollricher, K.; Panstruga, R.; Simons, G.; Wolter, M.; Frijters, A.; Van Daelen, R.; Van der Lee, T.; Diergaarde, P.; Groenendijk, J.; et al. The barley Mlo gene: A novel control element of plant pathogen resistance. Cell 1997, 88, 695–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Von Röpenack, E.; Parr, A.; Schulze-Lefert, P. Structural analyses and dynamics of soluble and cell wall-bound phenolics in a broad spectrum resistance to the powdery mildew fungus in barley. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 9013–9022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Hückelhoven, R.; Trujillo, M.; Kogel, K.-H. Mutations in Ror1 and Ror2 genes cause modification of hydrogen peroxide accumulation in mlo-barley under attack from the powdery mildew fungus. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2000, 1, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kusch, S.; Panstruga, R. Mlo-based resistance: An apparently universal ‘weapon’ to defeat powdery mildew disease. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2017, 30, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Li, S.; Lin, D.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, M.; Chen, Y.; Lv, B.; Li, B.; Lei, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, L.; et al. Genome-edited powdery mildew resistance in wheat without growth penalties. Nature 2022, 602, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jørgensen, J.H.; Wolfe, P.M. Genetics of powdery mildew resistance in barley. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1994, 13, 97–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Freialdenhoven, A.; Scherag, B.; Hollricher, K.; Coilingelb, D.B.; Thordal-Christensenlb, H.; Schulze-Leferta, P. Nar-1 and Nar-2, two loci required for Mla12-specified race-specific resistance to powdery mildew in barley. Plant Cell 1994, 6, 983–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hückelhoven, R.; Fodor, J.; Preis, C.; Kogel, K.-H. Hypersensitive cell death and papilla formation in barley attacked by the powdery mildew fungus are associated with hydrogen peroxide but not with salicylic acid accumulation 1. Plant Physiol. 1999, 119, 1251–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Jaswal, R.; Kiran, K.; Rajarammohan, S.; Dubey, H.; Singh, P.K.; Sharma, Y.; Deshmukh, R.; Sonah, H.; Gupta, N.; Sharma, T.R. Effector biology of biotrophic plant fungal pathogens: Current advances and future prospects. Microbiol. Res. 2020, 241, 126567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Barna, B.; Harrach, B.D.; Viczián, O.; Fodor, J. Heat induced susceptibility of barley lines with various types of resistance genes to powdery mildew. Acta Phytopathol. Entomol. Hung. 2014, 49, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Künstler, A.; Bacsó, R.; Albert, R.; Barna, B.; Király, Z.; Hafez, Y.M.; Fodor, J.; Schwarczinger, I.; Király, L. Superoxide (O2.-) accumulation contributes to symptomless (type I) nonhost resistance of plants to biotrophic pathogens. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 128, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Schweizer, P.; Vallélian-Bindschedler, L.; Mösinger, E. Heat-induced resistance in barley to the powdery mildew fungus Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 1995, 47, 51–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vallélian-Bindschedler, L.; Schweizer, P.; Mösinger, E.; Métraux, J.P. Heat-induced resistance in barley to powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei) is associated with a burst of active oxygen species. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 1998, 52, 185–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Schwarzbach, E. Heat induced susceptibility of mlo-barley to powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis D.C. f. sp. hordei Marchal). Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 2001, 37, 82–87. [Google Scholar]
  27. Matić, S.; Cucu, M.A.; Garibaldi, A.; Gullino, M.L. Combined effect of CO2 and temperature on wheat powdery mildew development. Plant Pathol. J. 2018, 34, 316–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Schwarczinger, I.; Kolozsváriné Nagy, J.; Király, L.; Mészáros, K.; Bányai, J.; Kunos, V.; Fodor, J.; Künstler, A. Heat stress pre-exposure may differentially modulate plant defense to powdery mildew in a resistant and susceptible barley genotype. Genes 2021, 12, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Driedonks, N.; Xu, J.; Peters, J.L.; Park, S.; Rieu, I. Multi-level interactions between heat shock factors, heat shock proteins, and the redox system regulate acclimation to heat. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hazen, B.E.; Bushnell, W.R. Inhibition of the hypersensitive reaction in barley to powdery mildew by heat shock and cytochalasin B. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 1983, 23, 421–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pandey, P.; Senthil-Kumar, M. Plant-pathogen interaction in the presence of abiotic stress: What do we know about plant responses? Plant Physiol. Rep. 2019, 24, 541–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bourgine, B.; Guihur, A. Heat shock signaling in land plants: From plasma membrane sensing to the transcription of small heat shock proteins. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 710801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ritossa, F. A new puffing pattern induced by temperature shock and DNP in Drosophila. Experientia 1962, 18, 571–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Boston, R.S.; Viitanen, P.V.; Vierling, E. Molecular chaperones and protein folding in plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 1996, 32, 191–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Park, C.-J.; Seo, Y.-S. Heat shock proteins: A review of the molecular chaperones for plant immunity. Plant Pathol. J. 2015, 31, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Walther-Larsen, H.; Brandt, J.; Collinge, D.B.; Thordal-Christensen, H. A pathogen-induced gene of barley encodes a HSP90 homologue showing striking similarity to vertebrate forms resident in the endoplasmic reticulum. Plant Mol. Biol. 1993, 21, 1097–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hein, I.; Barciszewska-Pacak, M.; Hrubikova, K.; Williamson, S.; Dinesen, M.; Soenderby, I.E.; Sundar, S.; Jarmolowski, A.; Shirasu, K.; Lacomme, C. Virus-induced gene silencing-based functional characterization of genes associated with powdery mildew resistance in barley. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138, 2155–2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Shirasu, K. The HSP90-SGT1 chaperone complex for NLR immune sensors. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2009, 60, 139–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Suzuki, N.; Mittler, R. Reactive oxygen species and temperature stresses: A delicate balance between signaling and destruction. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 126, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Medina, E.; Kim, S.H.; Yun, M.; Choi, W.G. Recapitulation of the function and role of ros generated in response to heat stress in plants. Plants 2021, 10, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Künstler, A.; Bacsó, R.; Hafez, Y.M.; Király, L. Reactive oxygen species and plant disease resistance. In Reactive Oxygen Species Oxidative Damage Plants under Stress; Gupta, D.K., Palma, J.M., Corpas, F.J., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 269–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lee, D.H.; Lal, N.K.; Lin, Z.J.D.; Ma, S.; Liu, J.; Castro, B.; Toruño, T.; Dinesh-Kumar, S.P.; Coaker, G. Regulation of reactive oxygen species during plant immunity through phosphorylation and ubiquitination of RBOHD. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Marcec, M.J.; Tanaka, K. Crosstalk between calcium and ROS signaling during flg22-triggered immune response in Arabidopsis leaves. Plants 2022, 11, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Marino, D.; Dunand, C.; Puppo, A.; Pauly, N. A burst of plant NADPH oxidases. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Navathe, S.; Singh, S.; Singh, V.K.; Chand, R.; Mishra, V.K.; Joshi, A.K. Genome-wide mining of respiratory burst homologs and its expression in response to biotic and abiotic stresses in Triticum aestivum. Genes Genom. 2019, 41, 1027–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Proels, R.K.; Oberhollenzer, K.; Pathuri, I.P.; Hensel, G.; Kumlehn, J.; Hückelhoven, R. RBOHF2 of barley is required for normal development of penetration resistance to the parasitic fungus Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2010, 23, 1143–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Torres, D.P.; Proels, R.K.; Schempp, H.; Hückelhoven, R. Silencing of RBOHF2 causes leaf age–dependent accelerated senescence, salicylic acid accumulation, and powdery mildew resistance in barley. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2017, 30, 906–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Király, L.; Hafez, Y.M.; Fodor, J.; Király, Z. Suppression of Tobacco mosaic virus-induced hypersensitive-type necrotization in tobacco at high temperature is associated with downregulation of NADPH oxidase and superoxide and stimulation of dehydroascorbate reductase. J. Gen. Virol. 2008, 89, 799–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bostancioglu, S.M.; Tombuloglu, G.; Tombuloglu, H. Genome-wide identification of barley MCs (metacaspases) and their possible roles in boron-induced programmed cell death. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2018, 45, 211–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mittler, R.; Simon, L.; Lam, E. Pathogen-induced programmed cell death in tobacco. J. Cell Sci. 1997, 110, 1333–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dickman, M.B.; Fluhr, R. Centrality of host cell death in plant-microbe interactions. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2013, 51, 543–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ye, C.; Zheng, S.; Jiang, D.; Lu, J.; Huang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, H.; Zhuang, C.; Li, J. Initiation and execution of programmed cell death and regulation of reactive oxygen species in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Fagundes, D.; Bohn, B.; Cabreira, C.; Leipelt, F.; Dias, N.; Bodanese-Zanettini, M.H.; Cagliari, A. Caspases in plants: Metacaspase gene family in plant stress responses. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2015, 15, 639–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hückelhoven, R. BAX Inhibitor-1, an ancient cell death suppressor in animals and plants with prokaryotic relatives. Apoptosis 2004, 9, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Watanabe, N.; Lam, E. Bax inhibitor-1, a conserved cell death suppressor, is a key molecular switch downstream from a variety of biotic and abiotic stress signals in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 3149–3167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hückelhoven, R.; Dechert, C.; Trujillo, M.; Kogel, K.-H. Differential expression of putative cell death regulator genes in near-isogenic, resistant and susceptible barley lines during interaction with the powdery mildew fungus. Plant Mol. Biol. 2001, 47, 739–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hückelhoven, R.; Dechert, C.; Kogel, K.-H. Overexpression of barley BAX inhibitor 1 induces breakdown of mlo-mediated penetration resistance to Blumeria graminis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 5555–5560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Eichmann, R.; Dechert, C.; Kogel, K.H.; Hückelhoven, R. Transient over-expression of barley BAX Inhibitor-1 weakens oxidative defence and MLA12-mediated resistance to Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2006, 7, 543–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Babaeizad, V.; Imani, J.; Kogel, K.H.; Eichmann, R.; Hückelhoven, R. Over-expression of the cell death regulator BAX inhibitor-1 in barley confers reduced or enhanced susceptibility to distinct fungal pathogens. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 118, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Watanabe, N.; Lam, E. Arabidopsis Bax inhibitor-1 functions as an attenuator of biotic and abiotic types of cell death. Plant J. 2006, 45, 884–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Isbat, M.; Zeba, N.; Kim, S.R.; Hong, C.B. A BAX inhibitor-1 gene in Capsicum annuum is induced under various abiotic stresses and endows multi-tolerance in transgenic tobacco. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166, 1685–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lu, P.-P.; Yu, T.-F.; Zheng, W.-J.; Chen, M.; Zhou, Y.-B.; Chen, J.; Ma, Y.-Z.; Xi, Y.-J.; Xu, Z.-S. The wheat Bax inhibitor-1 protein interacts with an aquaporin TaPIP1 and enhances disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Wang, X.; Tang, C.; Huang, X.; Li, F.; Chen, X.; Zhang, G.; Sun, Y.; Han, D.; Kang, Z. Wheat BAX inhibitor-1 contributes to wheat resistance to Puccinia striiformis. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 4571–4584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Breen, S.; Williams, S.J.; Outram, M.; Kobe, B.; Solomon, P.S. Emerging insights into the functions of pathogenesis-related protein 1. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 871–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Van Loon, L.C.; Rep, M.; Pieterse, C.M.J. Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2006, 44, 135–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Xin, M.; Wang, X.; Peng, H.; Yao, Y.; Xie, C.; Han, Y.; Ni, Z.; Sun, Q. Transcriptome comparison of susceptible and resistant wheat in response to powdery mildew infection. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2012, 10, 94–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Schultheiss, H.; Dechert, C.; Király, L.; Fodor, J.; Michel, K.; Kogel, K.H.; Hückelhoven, R. Functional assessment of the pathogenesis-related protein PR-1b in barley. Plant Sci. 2003, 165, 1275–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, W.-J.; Pedersen, C.; Kwaaitaal, M.; Gregersen, P.L.; Mørch, S.M.; Hanisch, S.; Kristensen, A.; Fuglsang, A.T.; Collinge, D.B.; Thordal-Christensen, H. Interaction of barley powdery mildew effector candidate CSEP0055 with the defence protein PR17c. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 13, 1110–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ma, L.; Qiao, J.; Kong, X.; Zou, Y.; Xu, X.; Chen, X.; Hu, X. Effect of low temperature and wheat winter-hardiness on survival of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici under controlled conditions. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0130691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pennington, H.G.; Li, L.; Spanu, P.D. Identification and selection of normalization controls for quantitative transcript analysis in Blumeria graminis. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016, 17, 625–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Höller, K.; Király, L.; Künstler, A.; Müller, M.; Gullner, G.; Fattinger, M.; Zechmann, B. Enhanced glutathione metabolism is correlated with sulfur-induced resistance in Tobacco mosaic virus-infected genetically susceptible Nicotiana tabacum plants. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2010, 23, 1448–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Trujillo, M.; Altschmied, L.; Schweizer, P.; Kogel, K.H.; Hückelhoven, R. Respiratory burst oxidase homologue A of barley contributes to penetration by the powdery mildew fungus Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 3781–3791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Eichmann, R.; Bischof, M.; Weis, C.; Shaw, J.; Lacomme, C.; Schweizer, P.; Duchkov, D.; Hensel, G.; Kumlehn, J.; Hückelhoven, R. Bax inhibitor-1 is required for full susceptibility of barley to powdery mildew. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2010, 23, 1217–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Schmittgen, T.D.; Livak, K.J. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Chaudhary, R.; Baranwal, V.K.; Kumar, R.; Sircar, D.; Chauhan, H. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of Hsp70, Hsp90, and Hsp100 heat shock protein genes in barley under stress conditions and reproductive development. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2019, 19, 1007–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 11 00903 g001 550
Figure 1. Evaluation of powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei A6, Bgh) symptoms in resistant (Mla12, Mlg, mlo5) and susceptible (WT) near-isogenic lines of Hordeum vulgare cv. Ingrid seven days after inoculation. Barley plants were exposed to high-temperature stresses (35 °C) for different periods of time (30 s to 120 h) before powdery mildew inoculation. Control plants were kept at 20 °C. Symptoms were calculated as the percentage of area covered by powdery mildew symptoms per leaf. The graphs show the average of three experiments. Error bars represent standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate statistically significant differences between non-heat-treated and heat-treated plants within the respective barley genotypes at p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Evaluation of powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei A6, Bgh) symptoms in resistant (Mla12, Mlg, mlo5) and susceptible (WT) near-isogenic lines of Hordeum vulgare cv. Ingrid seven days after inoculation. Barley plants were exposed to high-temperature stresses (35 °C) for different periods of time (30 s to 120 h) before powdery mildew inoculation. Control plants were kept at 20 °C. Symptoms were calculated as the percentage of area covered by powdery mildew symptoms per leaf. The graphs show the average of three experiments. Error bars represent standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate statistically significant differences between non-heat-treated and heat-treated plants within the respective barley genotypes at p < 0.05.
Plants 11 00903 g001
Plants 11 00903 g002 550
Figure 2. Powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei A6) symptoms in resistant (Mla12, Mlg, mlo5) and susceptible (WT) near-isogenic lines of Hordeum vulgare cv. Ingrid seven days after inoculation. Barley plants were exposed to high-temperature stresses at 35 °C for 48 h (h) before powdery mildew inoculation. Control plants were kept at 20 °C.
Figure 2. Powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei A6) symptoms in resistant (Mla12, Mlg, mlo5) and susceptible (WT) near-isogenic lines of Hordeum vulgare cv. Ingrid seven days after inoculation. Barley plants were exposed to high-temperature stresses at 35 °C for 48 h (h) before powdery mildew inoculation. Control plants were kept at 20 °C.
Plants 11 00903 g002
Plants 11 00903 g003 550
Figure 3. Relative powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei A6, Bgh) biomass (A) in resistant (Mla12, Mlg, mlo5) and susceptible (WT) lines of Hordeum vulgare cv. Ingrid seven days after inoculation. Barley plants were exposed to high-temperature stresses (35 °C) for different periods of time (30 s to 120 h) before powdery mildew inoculation. Control plants were kept at 20 °C. The graphs show the average of three experiments. Error bars represent standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate statistically significant differences between non-heat-treated and heat-treated plants within the respective barley genotypes at p < 0.05. (B) Relative Bgh biomass in resistant lines (Mla12, Mlg, mlo5) of H. vulgare cv. Ingrid seven days after inoculation. Asterisks (*) indicate statistically significant differences between Mla 12 and the two other resistant lines (Mlg, mlo5) within the respective treatment at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Relative powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei A6, Bgh) biomass (A) in resistant (Mla12, Mlg, mlo5) and susceptible (WT) lines of Hordeum vulgare cv. Ingrid seven days after inoculation. Barley plants were exposed to high-temperature stresses (35 °C) for different periods of time (30 s to 120 h) before powdery mildew inoculation. Control plants were kept at 20 °C. The graphs show the average of three experiments. Error bars represent standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate statistically significant differences between non-heat-treated and heat-treated plants within the respective barley genotypes at p < 0.05. (B) Relative Bgh biomass in resistant lines (Mla12, Mlg, mlo5) of H. vulgare cv. Ingrid seven days after inoculation. Asterisks (*) indicate statistically significant differences between Mla 12 and the two other resistant lines (Mlg, mlo5) within the respective treatment at p < 0.05.
Plants 11 00903 g003
Plants 11 00903 g004 550
Figure 4. Expression of the barley Pathogenesis related-1b (HvPR1-b) gene as detected by RT-qPCR in resistant (Mlg, mlo5, Mla12) and susceptible (WT) Hordeum vulgare cv. Ingrid near-isogenic lines at early time points (0 h, 2 h, 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h) following powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei A6, Bgh) inoculation and/or heat stress. Heat stress treatments at 35 °C for 48 h were applied immediately before Bgh inoculation. Inoculated but not heat-treated (20 °C Bgh) and heat-treated but not inoculated (35 °C for 48 h) plants were used as controls. The graphs show the average of three experiments. Error bars represent standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate statistically significant differences from 0 h for each specific treatment at p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Expression of the barley Pathogenesis related-1b (HvPR1-b) gene as detected by RT-qPCR in resistant (Mlg, mlo5, Mla12) and susceptible (WT) Hordeum vulgare cv. Ingrid near-isogenic lines at early time points (0 h, 2 h, 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h) following powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei A6, Bgh) inoculation and/or heat stress. Heat stress treatments at 35 °C for 48 h were applied immediately before Bgh inoculation. Inoculated but not heat-treated (20 °C Bgh) and heat-treated but not inoculated (35 °C for 48 h) plants were used as controls. The graphs show the average of three experiments. Error bars represent standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate statistically significant differences from 0 h for each specific treatment at p < 0.05.
Plants 11 00903 g004
Plants 11 00903 g005 550
Figure 5. Expression of the barley Heat shock protein 90-1 (HvHsp90-1) gene as detected by RT-qPCR in resistant (Mlg, mlo5, Mla12) and susceptible (WT) Hordeum vulgare cv. Ingrid near-isogenic lines at early time points (0 h, 2 h, 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h) following powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei A6, Bgh) inoculation and/or heat stress. Heat stress treatments at 35 °C for 48 h were applied immediately before Bgh inoculation. Inoculated but not heat-treated (20 °C Bgh) and heat-treated but not inoculated (35 °C for 48 h) plants were used as controls. The graphs show the average of three experiments. Error bars represent standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate statistically significant differences from 0 h for each specific treatment at p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Expression of the barley Heat shock protein 90-1 (HvHsp90-1) gene as detected by RT-qPCR in resistant (Mlg, mlo5, Mla12) and susceptible (WT) Hordeum vulgare cv. Ingrid near-isogenic lines at early time points (0 h, 2 h, 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h) following powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei A6, Bgh) inoculation and/or heat stress. Heat stress treatments at 35 °C for 48 h were applied immediately before Bgh inoculation. Inoculated but not heat-treated (20 °C Bgh) and heat-treated but not inoculated (35 °C for 48 h) plants were used as controls. The graphs show the average of three experiments. Error bars represent standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate statistically significant differences from 0 h for each specific treatment at p < 0.05.
Plants 11 00903 g005
Plants 11 00903 g006 550
Figure 6. Expression of the barley Respiratory burst oxidase homologue F2 (HvRBOHF2) gene as detected by RT-qPCR in resistant (Mlg, mlo5, Mla12) and susceptible (WT) Hordeum vulgare cv. Ingrid near-isogenic lines at early time points (0 h, 2 h, 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h) following powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei A6, Bgh) inoculation, and/or heat stress. Heat stress treatments at 35 °C for 48 h were applied immediately before Bgh inoculation. Inoculated but not heat-treated (20 °C Bgh) and heat-treated but not inoculated (35 °C for 48 h) plants were used as controls. The graphs show the average of three experiments. Error bars represent standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate statistically significant differences from 0 h for each specific treatment at p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Expression of the barley Respiratory burst oxidase homologue F2 (HvRBOHF2) gene as detected by RT-qPCR in resistant (Mlg, mlo5, Mla12) and susceptible (WT) Hordeum vulgare cv. Ingrid near-isogenic lines at early time points (0 h, 2 h, 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h) following powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei A6, Bgh) inoculation, and/or heat stress. Heat stress treatments at 35 °C for 48 h were applied immediately before Bgh inoculation. Inoculated but not heat-treated (20 °C Bgh) and heat-treated but not inoculated (35 °C for 48 h) plants were used as controls. The graphs show the average of three experiments. Error bars represent standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate statistically significant differences from 0 h for each specific treatment at p < 0.05.
Plants 11 00903 g006
Plants 11 00903 g007 550
Figure 7. Expression of the barley Bax inhibitor-1 (HvBI-1) gene as detected by RT-qPCR in resistant (Mlg, mlo5, Mla12) and susceptible (WT) Hordeum vulgare cv. Ingrid near-isogenic lines at early time points (0 h, 2 h, 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h) following powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei A6, Bgh) inoculation and/or heat stress. Heat stress treatments at 35 °C for 48 h were applied immediately before Bgh inoculation. Inoculated but not heat-treated (20 °C Bgh) and heat-treated but not inoculated (35 °C for 48 h) plants were used as controls. The graphs show the average of three experiments. Error bars represent standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate statistically significant differences from 0 h for each specific treatment at p < 0.05.
Figure 7. Expression of the barley Bax inhibitor-1 (HvBI-1) gene as detected by RT-qPCR in resistant (Mlg, mlo5, Mla12) and susceptible (WT) Hordeum vulgare cv. Ingrid near-isogenic lines at early time points (0 h, 2 h, 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h) following powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei A6, Bgh) inoculation and/or heat stress. Heat stress treatments at 35 °C for 48 h were applied immediately before Bgh inoculation. Inoculated but not heat-treated (20 °C Bgh) and heat-treated but not inoculated (35 °C for 48 h) plants were used as controls. The graphs show the average of three experiments. Error bars represent standard deviation. Asterisks (*) indicate statistically significant differences from 0 h for each specific treatment at p < 0.05.
Plants 11 00903 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kolozsváriné Nagy, J.; Schwarczinger, I.; Király, L.; Bacsó, R.; Ádám, A.L.; Künstler, A. Near-Isogenic Barley Lines Show Enhanced Susceptibility to Powdery Mildew Infection Following High-Temperature Stress. Plants 2022, 11, 903. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070903

AMA Style

Kolozsváriné Nagy J, Schwarczinger I, Király L, Bacsó R, Ádám AL, Künstler A. Near-Isogenic Barley Lines Show Enhanced Susceptibility to Powdery Mildew Infection Following High-Temperature Stress. Plants. 2022; 11(7):903. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070903

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kolozsváriné Nagy, Judit, Ildikó Schwarczinger, Lóránt Király, Renáta Bacsó, Attila L. Ádám, and András Künstler. 2022. "Near-Isogenic Barley Lines Show Enhanced Susceptibility to Powdery Mildew Infection Following High-Temperature Stress" Plants 11, no. 7: 903. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070903

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop