Next Article in Journal
Development of Novel Detection Method for Rutinosidase in Tartary Buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.)
Next Article in Special Issue
Genome Mining and Gene Expression Reveal Maytansine Biosynthetic Genes from Endophytic Communities Living inside Gymnosporia heterophylla (Eckl. and Zeyh.) Loes. and the Relationship with the Plant Biosynthetic Gene, Friedelin Synthase
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Association Study of Healthful Flavonoids among Diverse Mandarin Accessions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antagonistic Activity of Fungal Strains against Fusarium Crown Rot
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 3
10.3390/plants11030318
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of Volatile Organic Compounds Emitted by Two Beneficial Endophytic Pseudomonas Strains from Olive Roots

by
Nuria Montes-Osuna
1,
Tomislav Cernava
2,
Carmen Gómez-Lama Cabanás
1,
Gabriele Berg
2,3,4 and
Jesús Mercado-Blanco
1,*
1
Departamento de Protección de Cultivos, Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible, Agencia Estatal Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n, Campus “Alameda del Obispo”, 14004 Cordoba, Spain
2
Institute of Environmental Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Petersgasse 12/I, 8010 Graz, Austria
3
Leibniz-Institute for Agricultural Engineering Potsdam, Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469 Potsdam, Germany
4
Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24/25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(3), 318; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030318
Submission received: 21 December 2021 / Revised: 18 January 2022 / Accepted: 23 January 2022 / Published: 25 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interaction of Plants and Endophytic Microorganisms: Molecular Aspects, Biological Functions, Community Composition, and Practical Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The production of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) represents a promising strategy of plant-beneficial bacteria to control soil-borne phytopathogens. Pseudomonas sp. PICF6 and Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 are two indigenous inhabitants of olive roots displaying effective biological control against Verticillium dahliae. Additionally, strain PICF7 is able to promote the growth of barley and Arabidopsis thaliana, VOCs being involved in the growth of the latter species. In this study, the antagonistic capacity of these endophytic bacteria against relevant phytopathogens (Verticillium spp., Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici) was assessed. Under in vitro conditions, PICF6 and PICF7 were only able to antagonize representative isolates of V. dahliae and V. longisporum. Remarkably, both strains produced an impressive portfolio of up to twenty VOCs, that included compounds with reported antifungal (e.g., 1-undecene, (methyldisulfanyl) methane and 1-decene) or plant growth promoting (e.g., tridecane, 1-decene) activities. Moreover, their volatilomes differed strongly in the absence and presence of V. dahliae. For example, when co incubated with the defoliating pathotype of V. dahliae, the antifungal compound 4-methyl-2,6-bis(2-methyl-2-propanyl)phenol was produced. Results suggest that volatiles emitted by these endophytes may differ in their modes of action, and that potential benefits for the host needs further investigation in planta.

1. Introduction

Soil-borne phytopathogens constitute a major threat affecting crops around the world, compromising global food production and security. Some of them can survive in soils for many years in the absence of host plants due to different resistance structures (i.e., microsclerotia, sclerotia, chlamydospores or oospores), hindering their effective control [1]. Examples of important soil-borne fungi causing serious yield losses in a broad crop range are some species of the genus Verticillium [2,3], Fusarium oxysporum (different formae speciales) [4,5], Rhizoctonia solani Kühn [6,7] or Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary [8]. For instance, to name an example of particular interest in our study, Verticillium wilt (Verticillium dahliae Kleb.) is considered one of the most threatening biotic constrains for olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivation and the main limiting factor for olive oil production [9]. These phytopathogenic fungi were traditionally managed by crop rotations and soil treatments. Today, under intense conditions, management is usually performed by conventional chemical methods which imply the application of broad-spectrum fungicides. Nevertheless, the lack of specificity, their negative impacts on soil microbiota and/or the possibility to generate resistance are, among others, undesirable side effects in crop protection [10,11]. Thus, more environmentally friendly alternatives to control plant diseases are gaining attraction. Among them, biological control represents an interesting option within integrated management strategies.
Phytobiome studies have revealed that many plant-associated microorganisms (especially fungi and bacteria) contribute to protect plants against biotic and abiotic stresses [12,13,14,15,16]. Among these microorganisms, those that are able to develop an endophytic lifestyle without causing deleterious effects in their hosts [17,18] pose interesting perspectives from the agro-biotechnological point of view [19,20]. For example, olive roots constitute an important reservoir of beneficial endophytic and epiphytic microorganisms [21,22,23]. Some of them have demonstrated their effectiveness as biological control agents (BCAs) or plant growth promoters (PGPs), thereby constituting an eco-friendly alternative to the traditional chemically-based plant disease control and intensive crop fertilization approaches [24,25,26,27]. A collection of bacteria originating from the rhizosphere/roots of nursery-produced olive plants was generated in the frame of previous studies [28,29]. Using a holistic strategy based on in vitro antagonism tests, phenotypic and metabolic characterization, in silico identification of genetic factors involved in plant-bacteria interactions and in planta bioassays, the ability of some of these rhizobacteria to counteract V. dahliae in olive plants has been demonstrated [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Among them, Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 [33,35] stands out as a well-known and versatile BCA and/or PGP, not only in its natural host (olive) but also in distant plant species such as Arabidopsis thaliana, barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and banana (Musa acuminata L. AAA group, cv. Cavendish) [27,36,37,38]. In contrast, the available information for another beneficial olive-derived rhizobacterium, Pseudomonas sp. PICF6, is still very limited except for its effectiveness to antagonize V. dahliae in vitro and to control Verticillium wilt of olive (VWO) [28]. Interestingly, both PICF6 and PICF7 are able to colonize the interior of olive roots [39,40].
Biological control is a multifaceted process in which competition for nutrients and niches, synthesis of extracellular enzymes or production of inhibitory compounds like antibiotics or volatile organic compounds (VOCs) can be involved [41]. In specific cases, the prevailing interference of beneficial microorganisms with phytopathogens can be based on bioactive VOCs [42,43,44,45,46]. VOCs are small organic molecules with a high vapor pressure which have been recognized as key players in the control of several plant pathogens [16,47,48]. The diversity of VOCs produced by PGPs microorganisms is high and some of these molecules are unique to particular bacterial or fungal species [49]. Numerous examples of the inhibitory effects of VOCs produced by different Pseudomonas spp. are available in the literature. For instance, Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. aureofaciens SPS-41 inhibited the mycelial growth and spore germination of Ceratocystis fimbriata through VOCs production [50]. Similarly, the inhibitory potential of Pseudomonas fluorescens ZX against Penicillium italicum was assayed in different media showing that diverse VOCs produced by this BCA hindered the mycelial growth and conidial germination of P. italicum [51]. Likewise, VOCs produced by three different isolates of P. fluorescens (strains 1–112, 2–28 and 4–6) completely inhibited the spore germination of the fungal pathogen Penicillium expansum [52]. In addition to antimicrobial activity, there is increasing interest in the understanding of volatile signaling in the plant-associated microbiota [14].
So far, no information is available on volatiles emitted by Pseudomonas sp. PICF6 and P. simiae PICF7, nor whether these compounds could be involved in the control of VWO. Consequently, the objectives of this study were: (i) to first assess whether strains PICF6 and PICF7 antagonize selected plant pathogens causing important losses in relevant crops, (ii) to elucidate the volatilomes of these two olive root endophytes in the absence/presence of V. dahliae, and (iii) to determine whether VOCs emitted by these strains are involved in the in vitro antagonism against the olive defoliating pathotype of V. dahliae.

2. Results

2.1. Assessment of In Vitro Antagonism against Selected Fungal Phytopathogens

Results from in vitro antagonism tests showed that Pseudomonas sp. PICF6 and P. simiae PICF7 only inhibited the growth of Verticillium longisporum ELV25 and V. dahliae V937I (Table 1 and Supplementary Figure S1). In contrast, Paenibacillus polymyxa PIC73, another beneficial olive rhizobacteria used in this study for comparative purposes due to its broad antagonist activity [24], effectively inhibited S. sclerotiorum, R. solani and V. longisporum ELV25 in both assayed media (Table 1 and Supplementary Figure S1). The only exception was F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici Fol 007 that was not inhibited in NA medium (Table 1).

2.2. Elucidation of the Volatilomes of Strains PICF6 and PICF7

Analysis by Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction (HS-SPME) Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) of VOCs profiles of Pseudomonas sp. PICF6 and P. simiae PICF7 cultivated alone or in the presence of V. dahliae V937I, as well as the VOCs profile of this representative of the defoliating (highly-virulent) pathotype causing severe VWO, indicated that both the endohytic bacteria and the pathogen are able to produce diverse compounds (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure S2).
On the one hand, four VOCs, namely 2-methyl-1-propanol, 3-methyl-1-butanol, 2-methyl-1-butanol and 2-phenylethanol were exclusively detected in the VOC profile of V. dahliae V937I. On the other hand, several compounds were emitted by the endophytic BCAs here studied and their production varied depending on the experimental conditions (i.e., presence/absence of V. dahliae). Indeed, fourteen compounds were detected when Pseudomonas sp. PICF6 was cultivated alone. However, in the presence of the pathogen, 20 compounds were detected for this olive endophyte, 13 of them being produced in both conditions (Table 2). Some of them (e.g., dimethyltrisulfane, tridecane, 1-decene, 1,10-undecadiene, etc.) have been earlier described in the literature for their antimicrobial activity or for their involvement in plant growth promotion (Table 2). For P. simiae PICF7, 15 different VOCs were identified. Twelve of these compounds were also produced when this BCA was incubated in the presence of V. dahliae V937I. However, other compounds such as bis(methylsulfanyl)methane, 4-methyl-2-pentanone and 2-decyloxiranese (produced by PICF7 but not by PICF6) were identified only when the bacterium was incubated alone, while 4-methyl-2,6-bis(2-methyl-2-propanyl)phenol was identified when PICF7 was incubated in the presence of isolate V937I (Table 2).
Results showed that strains PICF6 and PICF7 shared 12 VOCs when they were incubated alone. However, in the presence of V. dahliae V937I, only 11 VOCs were emitted. 4-methyl-2-pentanone was produced by PICF7 but not by PICF6, regardless of whether or not the latter BCA was incubated alone or in the presence of V. dahliae V937I. In addition, bis(methylsulfanyl)methane and 2-decyloxirane were produced by PICF6, but only in the absence of the pathogen. 2,6,11-trimethyldodecane and methyl thiocyanate were exclusively produced by strain PICF6, independently of the absence or presence of the pathogen. 1-tridecyne, 2-undecanone (antifungal activity), 2-undecanol (antifungal and nematicidal activity), 2-nonanol (nematicidal activity) and 10-methyl-1-undecene were only identified when strain PICF6 was incubated with V. dahliae V937I (Table 2). Interestingly, tridecane (a compound related to plant growth promotion), (3Z)-3-dodecene and 2,5-dimethylpyrazine (antifungal activity) were produced by PICF6 and PICF7 only when they were incubated alone. However, these compounds were only detected for strain PICF6 when incubated with the pathogen. Finally, 4-methyl-2,6-bis (2-methyl-2-propanyl)phenol (antifungal activity) and 3,7-dimethyl-1-octene were only detected when each BCA was grown in the presence of V937I (Table 2).

2.3. Evaluation of the Antagonistic Effect of VOCs Emitted by Pseudomonas sp. PICF6 and Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 against Verticillium dahliae

The Two Clamp VOCs Assay (TCVA) performed revealed that bacterial volatiles were not involved in the observed in vitro antagonistic effect of strains PICF6 and PICF7 against the defoliating pathotype of V. dahliae. Indeed, V. dahliae colonies confronted with these root endophytes showed a similar size to that scored for control plates. Statistical analysis showed no significant differences among treatments, either on potato dextrose agar (PDA) or nutrient agar (NA) culturing media (Table 3).

3. Discussion

A relevant outcome of this study was to demonstrate that the two selected endophytic Pseudomonas strains from olive roots can produce an impressive portfolio of VOCs including those with antifungal, nematicidal and plant growth promoting effects. In addition, under in vitro experimental conditions, PICF6 and PICF7 were only able to inhibit the growth of V. dahliae V937I and V. longisporum ELV25 to some extent. Nevertheless, their effectiveness as true BCA against V. longisporum will need further in planta confirmation, in contrast to the abundant information available regarding biocontrol of VWO exerted by these strains [28,30,32,35]. This result suggested that in vitro antagonism of both olive root endophytes was specific and effective only against representatives of Verticillium spp.
Volatile compounds released by beneficial rhizobacteria have been identified as a mechanism to antagonize soil-borne pathogens without physical contact between the BCA and its target [42,48]. Additionally, some VOCs produced by microorganisms are also able to stimulate the plant’s growth and to induce systemic disease resistance ([65], and references therein). In the present study, we characterized for the first time the volatilomes of the olive root endophytes PICF6 and PICF7. Many of the VOCs produced by these strains have been earlier described either for their antifungal activity or the capacity to promote plant growth. The use of these natural substances produced at large scale could be a promising alternative to the traditional use of synthetic fungicides, thereby contributing to more sustainable strategies for the control of phytopathogens [48]. For instance, direct application of some of these compounds (e.g., S-methyl ethanethioate, (methyldisulfanyl)methane, dimethyltrisulfane and 1-undecene), which are produced by PICF6 and PICF7, was earlier proven to be effective against Alternaria alternata, Botrytis cinerea, Cochliobolus heterostrophus, Phytophthora infestans, Ralstonia solanacearum or R. solani [47,54,55,60,66,67]. Moreover, (methyldisulfanyl)methane (also known as dimethyl disulfide) elicited a protective response in tobacco and corn plants against B. cinerea and C. heterostrophus under greenhouse conditions [55], and was able to promote growth of A. thaliana [47]. Remarkably, 4-methyl-2,6-bis(2-methyl-2-propanyl) phenol (also known as butylated hydroxytoluene) was detected in the olive rhizobacteria tested here, but only when they were co-incubated with V. dahliae. Recently, it has been shown that this compound, also produced by P. polymyxa CF05, presented a strong inhibitory effect against the pathogenic fungus Rhizopus stolonifera [61]. It is worth mentioning that the emission of different compounds when a BCA and a pathogen are co-incubated may be related to species-specific responses when both microorganisms share the same (micro)habitat [68]. The implications of these pathogen-induced alterations on the olive rhizobacteria volatilomes deserve further in-depth analysis.
Concerning VOCs that were shown to be specifically produced by strain PICF6, four compounds (2-undecanone, methyl thiocyanate, 2-undecanol and 2-nonanol) were detected in the presence of V. dahliae. Among them, 2-undecanone might be of interest because of its antifungal activity. Indeed, the volatilomes of different strains of Burkholderia ambifaria showed the presence of 2-undecanone. In vitro experiments demonstrated that high concentrations of this compound affect the growth of A. alternata and R. solani when pure 2-undecanone was used [47]. Similarly, methyl thiocyanate produced by Pseudomonas donghuensis has been reported to be involved, among other VOCs, in the strong antimicrobial activity exerted by this bacterium against the fungal pathogens Fusarium culmorum PV, R. solani and V. dahliae JR, and the oomycete Pythium ultimum P17 [54]. Mycelial growth of V. dahliae and F. oxysporum was inhibited by 2-undecanol produced by P. polymyxa KM2501-1 or Bacillus velezensis CT32 which is also one of the most active compounds, along with 2-nonanol, against the pathogenic nematode Meloidogyne incognita [63,64].
Several VOCs (i.e., tridecane, 2,5-dimethylpyrazine, 1-decene or 2-decyloxirane) produced by P. simiae PICF7 have been earlier reported to display antimicrobial activity against different phytopathogens (e.g., Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola ES4326, Penicillium italicum, Sclerotinia minor, Pythium ultimum, R. solani or B. cinerea) [51,57,58]. Despite the fact that different compounds that are potentially implicated in plant pathogen control were identified in the volatilomes of strains PICF6 and PICF7, the involvement of VOCs produced by these root endophytes in the antagonism towards V. dahliae could not be proven by the implemented Two Clamp VOCs Assay (Table 3). We thus conclude that growth inhibition of Verticillium spp. must be a consequence of bacterial metabolites that diffuse through the medium (Table 1 and Supplementary Figure S1), instead of bioactive VOCs. However, some relevant aspects need to be considered that may influence/alter VOCs emission by the endophytes tested here. For example, Zhang et al. [50] showed that the antifungal action of volatiles emitted by P. chlororaphis subsp. aureofaciens SPS-41 against Ceratocystis fimbriata was strongly influenced by the initial bacteria concentration. These authors evaluated the effect of different inoculation strategies and concentrations of strain SPS-41 on the antifungal activity of the VOCs towards the pathogen C. fimbriata which causes black rot disease in sweet potato tuber roots. Their study revealed that the antifungal activity of the VOCs was augmented after the inoculum concentration and the inoculation volume of strain SPS-41 were increased [50]. Therefore, we cannot completely rule out that the observed lack of inhibition towards V. dahliae by PICF6 and PICF7 volatilomes could be due to insufficient bacterial biomass needed to produce inhibitory amounts of a specific VOCs. It would thus be interesting to test some of these VOCs individually and at a higher concentration against V. dahliae. Besides, different studies have shown that the production of certain VOCs is highly dependent on the culturing medium, thereby resulting in the characterization of an unique volatilome produced under specific growing conditions [69,70]. This may have important consequences for their activity in terms of pathogen inhibition and/or plant growth promotion. For instance, significant changes in VOCs-mediated pathogen inhibition by Lysobacter spp. due to the culturing media used have been reported. VOCs emitted by Lysobacter antibioticus, L. capsici, L. enzymogenes and L. gummosus grown on NA inhibited the mycelial growth of Phytophthora infestans. Conversely, when PDA was used, the VOCs produced by these Lysobacter spp. did not affect the growth of the oomycete [71]. Therefore, it would be interesting to explore whether the lack of inhibitory effect of PICF6 and PICF7 against V. dahliae through VOCs can be overcome when the olive rhizobacteria are grown in culturing media other than the ones utilized in our study.
Regarding the potential involvement of VOCs produced by PICF6 and PICF7 in plant growth promotion, 1-decene, a compound elsewhere reported to increase the fresh weight of A. thaliana [59], was found in the volatilomes of both strains (Table 2). Interestingly, Desrut et al. [36] have recently reported the ability to promote the growth of A. thaliana seedlings by volatiles (not determined) emitted by strain PICF7. As mentioned above for the case of pathogen inhibition, attention should be called here since results may also vary depending on the culturing medium used. In the latter study, Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium was used. However, Blom et al. [69] did not observe growth promotion of A. thaliana by P. chlororaphis or Pseudomonas putida ISOf through the action of volatiles when MS medium was employed. In contrast, plant growth was enhanced when Luria–Bertani (LB) and Methyl Red Vogues Proskauer (MR-VP) were used, media that favored the production of the volatile butanediol. Whether 1-decene is produced by strain PICF7 in MS medium (as here reported for NA and PDA media), and whether this compound is the responsible of the growth of A. thaliana seedlings [36] remains to be elucidated.
In summary, results here reported confirmed that Pseudomonas sp. PICF6 and P. simiae PICF7 only antagonized Verticillium spp. suggesting that the mechanisms involved in in vitro antagonism of strains PICF6 and PICF7 are specific to a certain degree, or at least more effective, against representatives of this genus. Moreover, the characterization of the volatilomes of strains PICF6 and PICF7 allowed the identification of several compounds with known antimicrobial activity against different phytopathogens. However, the TCVA experiments indicated that none of the bacterial strains were able to inhibit the growth of V. dahliae by the action of volatiles, at least under our experimental conditions. Nevertheless, it must be stressed that the TCVA shows the effect of the total volatilome of bacterial strains and does not dissect the effect of individual compounds. From an agro-biotechnological point of view, and considering the antecedents available in the literature, the potential inhibitory effect against Verticillium spp. of specific compounds detected in the volatilomes of these beneficial rhizobacteria deserves further in-depth analysis.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Microorganisms and Growth Conditions

Olive root endophytic bacteria and fungal pathogens used in this study, including main features and references/source, are compiled in Table 4. Starting cultures of Pseudomonas sp. PICF6, P. simiae PICF7 and P. polymyxa PIC73 (Table 4), which belong to the culture collection of the Laboratory of Plant-Microorganism Interactions, Crop Protection Department, Institute for Sustainable Agriculture (IAS, Córdoba, Spain), were grown as described by Montes-Osuna et al. [35]. In all cases, inocula were spectrophotometrically (A600 nm) adjusted at 1·108 cfu/mL. Fungi were previously grown at 25 °C in the dark in PDA medium (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK).

4.2. In Vitro Antagonism Assays

Pseudomonas sp. PICF6 and P. simiae PICF7 were tested against several relevant soil-borne fungal pathogens (Table 4). In addition, P. polymyxa PIC73 (Table 4) was included in the assays as reference due to its known broad-spectrum antagonistic activity against different plant pathogens [24]. Mycelial plugs (3-mm diameter) of each phytopathogen were obtained from 7-day-old colonies grown on PDA and placed in the center of Petri dishes (9 cm of diameter) with PDA or NA (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) media. Subsequently, four equidistant (2.5 cm from the center of the plate) 10 μL-drops of overnight cultures of each tested bacteria were inoculated around each pathogen. Additionally, Petri dishes inoculated only with mycelial plugs of each phytopathogen were used as controls. Plates were incubated at 25 °C until the pathogen covered the distance between microorganisms in the control plates (approximately 4 days for R. solani and S. sclerotiorum, 6 days for F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici Fol 007 and 14 days for V. longisporum ELV25 and V. dahliae V937I). The percentage of pathogen growth inhibition (relative inhibition index, PI) was calculated according to Gómez-Lama Cabanás et al. [25]. Experiments were performed twice with three biological replicates per each interaction and used medium.

4.3. Identification of the Volatilomes of Strains PICF6 and PICF7

The volatilomes of the olive root endophytes Pseudomonas sp. PICF6 and P. simiae PICF7 were identified by HS-SPME GC-MS. Moreover, VOCs produced by these bacterial strains in the presence of V. dahliae V937I (co-incubated with the fungus in separated vials) were also determined to assess potential differences due to the presence of the target pathogen. In the latter case, and in order to discard possible compounds produced by V. dahliae V937I in the dual cultures, VOCs exclusively emitted by this fungal isolate were examined separately and used as control. Mycelial plugs (3 mm diameter) of V. dahliae V937I were placed in headspace vials (20 mL; 75.5 × 22.5 mm; Chromtech, Idstein, Germany) previously filled with 8 mL of PDA medium (Figure 1A). Bacterial isolates were streaked out in vials containing NA medium in parallel lines to assure equal distribution (Figure 1B). Vials with the BCA were connected to vials with the pathogen by the top of the container and sealed in this area with parafilm (Figure 1C). Three replicated vials were used for each BCA/pathogen combination, BCA or pathogen sample. In order to detect compounds that exclusively originated from the culturing media, vials filled only with PDA or NA were analyzed under the same conditions and used as controls. Vials were incubated at 25 °C for 5 days. Separation and detection of VOCs were performed on a system combining a GC 7890A with a quadrupol MS 5975C (Agilent Technologies GmbH, Waldbronn, Germany) as described by Mülner et al. [42]. For identification of microbial VOCs, the NIST MS Search 2.2 included in the Software-Package of the NIST 2014 database was used. Further verification was done by calculating the Kovats index (KI) and comparing it to database entries in the online database Chemspider (http://www.chemspider.com/, accessed on 17 February 2021).

4.4. Effect of Bacterial Volatiles on Mycelial Growth of Verticillium dahliae V937I

The ability of Pseudomonas sp. PICF6 and P. simiae PICF7 to inhibit the mycelial growth of V. dahliae V937I was examined by using the Two Clamp VOCs Assay (TCVA), according to Cernava et al. [74]. Petri dish bottoms of a 6-well plate (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany) were filled with 4 mL of either PDA or NA per well. Mycelial plugs (3 mm diameter) obtained from 7-day-old colonies grown on PDA were placed in the center of the wells of a 6-well plate containing PDA medium (Figure 2A). Subsequently, each bacterial sample was streaked out on the same position of a 6-well plate placed opposite to the plate with the pathogen (Figure 2B). Under this setup, the bacteria were tested on two different media, PDA and NA. A silicone perforated foil was placed between both 6-well plates to facilitate their fixing in combination with the usual clamps as shown in Figure 2C. As a control, wells containing V. dahliae were connected to wells filled only with PDA or NA (without any bacteria). Plates were incubated at 25 °C for 6 days. Subsequently, the largest and smallest diameters of the V. dahliae colonies were measured. Six replicates per each Verticillium-bacteria and Verticillium-medium (control) combination were performed.

4.5. Data Analysis

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine statistical differences using the ANOVA module of Statistix 10 program (NH Analytical Software, Roseville, MN, USA). Data were tested for normality, homogeneity of variances and subjected to whiskers and graphic boxes in order to detect the outlier, which proved their suitability for the statistical analysis in all experiments. When analysis of variance showed significant differences among treatments, means were compared according to Tukey honestly-significant-difference (HSD) test at p = 0.05.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11030318/s1, Figure S1. In vitro antagonistic activity of Pseudomonas sp. PICF6 and Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 against Verticillium longisporum ELV25, Figure S2. Representative gas chromatography spectra of Pseudomonas sp. PICF6 and Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 (alone and in the presence of Verticillium dahliae V937I), V. dahliae 937I, PDA and NA media.

Author Contributions

J.M.-B., T.C. and G.B. designed the study. N.M.-O. performed all experiments and conducted statistical analyses. T.C. and G.B. supervised the experiments. N.M.-O., C.G.-L.C. and J.M.-B. wrote the manuscript. T.C. and G.B. contributed to the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad/Agencia Estatal de Investigación, grant number AGL2016-75729-C2-1-R, and Junta de Andalucía (Consejería de Economía, Innovación y Ciencia), grant number P12-AGR-0667, both co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). The international short-term stay performed by N-M.-O at Institute of Environmental Biotechnology in Graz University of Technology (Technische Universität Graz) was supported by the University of Córdoba (“Ayudas de movilidad internacional para el fomento de tesis con mención internacional o en régimen de cotutela”).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data required to reproduce the results presented in this study can be found in the article.

Acknowledgments

We thank Angelika Schäfer (Graz) for her excellent assistance and support to conduct HS-SPME GC-MS analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mihajlovic, M.; Rekanovic, E.; Hrustic, J.; Grahovac, M.; Brankica, T. Methods for management of soilborne plant pathogens. Pestic. Fitomed. 2017, 32, 9–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Depotter, J.R.L.; Deketelaere, S.; Inderbitzin, P.; Tiedemann, A.V.; Höfte, M.; Subbarao, K.V.; Wood, T.A.; Thomma, B.P.H.J. Verticillium longisporum, the invisible threat to oilseed rape and other brassicaceous plant hosts. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016, 17, 1004–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Pegg, G.F.; Brady, B.L. Verticillium Wilts; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  4. Husaini, A.M.; Sakina, A.; Cambay, S.R. Host-pathogen interaction in Fusarium oxysporum infections: Where do we stand? Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2018, 31, 889–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. McGovern, R.J. Management of tomato diseases caused by Fusarium oxysporum. Crop Prot. 2015, 73, 78–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Goudjal, Y.; Toumatia, O.; Yekkour, A.; Sabaou, N.; Mathieu, F.; Zitouni, A. Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani damping-off and promotion of tomato plant growth by endophytic actinomycetes isolated from native plants of Algerian Sahara. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 169, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sturrock, C.J.; Woodhall, J.; Brown, M.; Walker, C.; Mooney, S.J.; Ray, R.V. Effects of damping-off caused by Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group 2-1 on roots of wheat and oil seed rape quantified using X-ray computed tomography and real-time PCR. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kamal, M.M.; Savocchia, S.; Lindbeck, K.D.; Ash, G.J. Biology and biocontrol of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary in oilseed brassicas. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2016, 45, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Montes-Osuna, N.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Verticillium Wilt of olive and its control: What did we learn during the last decade? Plants 2020, 9, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Colla, P.; Gilardi, G.; Gullino, M.L. A review and critical analysis of the european situation of soilborne disease management in the vegetable sector. Phytoparasitica 2012, 40, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Eljounaidi, K.; Lee, S.K.; Bae, H. Bacterial endophytes as potential biocontrol agents of vascular wilt diseases–review and future prospects. Biol. Control 2016, 103, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Berendsen, R.L.; Pieterse, C.M.J.; Bakker, P.A.H.M. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 478–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Berg, G.; Rybakova, D.; Grube, M.; Köberl, M. The plant microbiome explored: Implications for experimental botany. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 995–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Berg, G.; Rybakova, D.; Fischer, D.; Cernava, T.; Vergès, M.-C.C.; Charles, T.; Chen, X.; Cocolin, L.; Eversole, K.; Corral, G.H.; et al. Microbiome definition re-visited: Old concepts and new challenges. Microbiome 2020, 8, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Berg, G.; Kusstatscher, P.; Abdelfattah, A.; Cernava, T.; Smalla, K. Microbiome modulation—Toward a better understanding of plant microbiome response to microbial inoculants. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gouda, S.; Kerry, R.G.; Das, G.; Paramithiotis, S.; Shin, H.-S.; Patra, J.K. Revitalization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable development in agriculture. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 206, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Compant, S.; Saikkonen, K.; Mitter, B.; Campisano, A.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Editorial special issue: Soil, plants and endophytes. Plant Soil 2016, 405, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hardoim, P.R.; van Overbeek, L.S.; Berg, G.; Pirttilä, A.M.; Compant, S.; Campisano, A.; Döring, M.; Sessitsch, A. The hidden world within plants: Ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. MMBR 2015, 79, 293–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. White, J.F.; Kingsley, K.L.; Zhang, Q.; Verma, R.; Obi, N.; Dvinskikh, S.; Elmore, M.T.; Verma, S.K.; Gond, S.K.; Kowalski, K.P. Review: Endophytic microbes and their potential applications in crop management. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 2558–2565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mercado-Blanco, J.; Lugtenberg, B.J. Biotechnological applications of bacterial endophytes. Curr. Biotechnol. 2014, 3, 60–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Aranda Ocampo, S.; Montes Borrego, M.; Jiménez-Díaz, R.M.; Landa, B.B. Microbial communities associated with the root system of wild olives (Olea europaea L. subsp. europaea var. sylvestris) are good reservoirs of bacteria with antagonistic potential against Verticillium dahliae. Plant Soil 2011, 343, 329–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Fernández-González, A.J.; Villadas, P.J.; Gómez-Lama Cabanás, C.; Valverde-Corredor, A.; Belaj, A.; Mercado-Blanco, J.; Fernández-López, M. Defining the root endosphere and rhizosphere microbiomes from the World Olive Germplasm Collection. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 20423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Müller, H.; Berg, C.; Landa, B.B.; Auerbach, A.; Moissl-Eichinger, C.; Berg, G. Plant genotype-specific archaeal and bacterial endophytes but similar Bacillus antagonists colonize mediterranean olive trees. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Gómez-Lama Cabanás, C.; Ruano-Rosa, D.; Legarda, G.; Pizarro-Tobías, P.; Valverde-Corredor, A.; Triviño, J.C.; Roca, A.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Bacillales members from the olive rhizosphere are effective biological control agents against the defoliating pathotype of Verticillium dahliae. Agriculture 2018, 8, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Gómez-Lama Cabanás, C.; Legarda, G.; Ruano-Rosa, D.; Pizarro-Tobías, P.; Valverde-Corredor, A.; Niqui, J.L.; Triviño, J.C.; Roca, A.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Indigenous Pseudomonas spp. strains from the olive (Olea europaea L.) rhizosphere as effective biocontrol agents against Verticillium dahliae: From the host roots to the bacterial genomes. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Markakis, E.A.; Tjamos, S.E.; Antoniou, P.P.; Paplomatas, E.J.; Tjamos, E.C. Biological control of Verticillium Wilt of olive by Paenibacillus alvei, strain K165. BioControl 2016, 61, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mercado-Blanco, J.; Alós, E.; Rey, M.D.; Prieto, P. Pseudomonas fluorescens PICF7 displays an endophytic lifestyle in cultivated cereals and enhances yield in barley. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, fiw092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Mercado-Blanco, J.; Rodríguez-Jurado, D.; Hervás, A.; Jiménez-Díaz, R.M. Suppression of Verticillium Wilt in olive planting stocks by root-associated fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Biol. Control 2004, 30, 474–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ruano-Rosa, D.; Valverde-Corredor, A.; Gómez-Lama Cabanás, C.; Sesmero, R.; Mercado-Blanco, J. What lies beneath: Root-associated bacteria to improve the growth and health of olive trees. In Soil Biological Communities and Ecosystem Resilience; Lukac, M., Grenni, P., Gamboni, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Germany, 2017; pp. 107–122. ISBN 978-3-319-63335-0. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gómez-Lama Cabanás, C.; Schilirò, E.; Valverde-Corredor, A.; Mercado-Blanco, J. The biocontrol endophytic bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens PICF7 induces systemic defense responses in aerial tissues upon colonization of olive roots. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gómez-Lama Cabanás, C.; Sesmero, R.; Valverde-Corredor, A.; López-Escudero, F.J.; Mercado-Blanco, J. A split-root system to assess biocontrol effectiveness and defense-related genetic responses in above-ground tissues during the tripartite interaction Verticillium dahliae-olive-Pseudomonas fluorescens PICF7 in roots. Plant Soil 2017, 417, 433–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Maldonado-González, M.M.; Schilirò, E.; Prieto, P.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Endophytic colonization and biocontrol performance of Pseudomonas fluorescens PICF7 in olive (Olea europaea L.) are determined neither by pyoverdine production nor swimming motility. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 17, 3139–3153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Martínez-García, P.M.; Ruano-Rosa, D.; Schilirò, E.; Prieto, P.; Ramos, C.; Rodríguez-Palenzuela, P.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas fluorescens strain PICF7, an indigenous root endophyte from olive (Olea europaea L.) and effective biocontrol agent against Verticillium dahliae. Stand. Genom. Sci. 2015, 10, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Schilirò, E.; Ferrara, M.; Nigro, F.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Genetic responses induced in olive roots upon colonization by the biocontrol endophytic bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens PICF7. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Montes-Osuna, N.; Gómez-Lama Cabanás, C.G.-L.; Valverde-Corredor, A.; Berendsen, R.L.; Prieto, P.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Assessing the involvement of selected phenotypes of Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 in olive root colonization and biological control of Verticillium dahliae. Plants 2021, 10, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Desrut, A.; Thibault, F.; Mercado-Blanco, J.; Coutos-Thévenot, P.; Vriet, C. Transcriptional regulation of plant sugar transporter genes by beneficial rhizobacteria. J. Plant Interact. 2021, 16, 443–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gómez-Lama Cabanás, C.; Fernández-González, A.J.; Cardoni, M.; Valverde-Corredor, A.; López-Cepero, J.; Fernández-López, M.; Mercado-Blanco, J. The banana root endophytome: Differences between mother plants and suckers and evaluation of selected bacteria to control Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cubense. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Maldonado-González, M.M.; Bakker, P.A.H.M.; Prieto, P.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Arabidopsis thaliana as a tool to identify traits involved in Verticillium dahliae biocontrol by the olive root endophyte Pseudomonas fluorescens PICF7. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Montes-Osuna, N.; Gómez-Lama Cabanás, C.; Valverde-Corredor, A.; Legarda, G.; Prieto, P.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Evaluation of indigenous olive biocontrol rhizobacteria as protectants against drought and salt stress. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Prieto, P.; Navarro-Raya, C.; Valverde-Corredor, A.; Amyotte, S.G.; Dobinson, K.F.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Colonization process of olive tissues by Verticillium dahliae and its in planta interaction with the biocontrol root endophyte Pseudomonas fluorescens PICF7. Microb. Biotechnol. 2009, 2, 499–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Li, C.; Ma, Y. Antifungal and plant growth promotion activity of volatile organic compounds produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. MicrobiologyOpen 2019, 8, e00813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Mülner, P.; Bergna, A.; Wagner, P.; Sarajlić, D.; Gstöttenmayr, B.; Dietel, K.; Grosch, R.; Cernava, T.; Berg, G. Microbiota associated with sclerotia of soilborne fungal pathogens. A novel source of biocontrol agents producing bioactive volatiles. Phytobiomes J. 2019, 3, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Mulero-Aparicio, A.; Cernava, T.; Turrà, D.; Schaefer, A.; Di Pietro, A.; López-Escudero, F.J.; Trapero, A.; Berg, G. The role of volatile organic compounds and rhizosphere competence in mode of action of the non-pathogenic Fusarium oxysporum FO12 toward Verticillium wilt. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Kai, M.; Effmert, U.; Berg, G.; Piechulla, B. Volatiles of bacterial antagonists inhibit mycelial growth of the plant pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Arch. Microbiol. 2007, 187, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Rybakova, D.; Rack-Wetzlinger, U.; Cernava, T.; Schaefer, A.; Schmuck, M.; Berg, G. Aerial warfare: A volatile dialogue between the plant pathogen Verticillium longisporum and its antagonist Paenibacillus polymyxa. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Rybakova, D.; Wikström, M.; Birch-Jensen, F.; Postma, J.; Ehlers, R.U.; Schmuck, M.; Kollmann, R.; Köhl, J.; Berg, G. Verticillium Wilt in oilseed rape—the microbiome is crucial for disease outbreaks as well as for efficient suppression. Plants 2020, 9, 866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Groenhagen, U.; Baumgartner, R.; Bailly, A.; Gardiner, A.; Eberl, L.; Schulz, S.; Weisskopf, L. Production of bioactive volatiles by different Burkholderia ambifaria strains. J. Chem. Ecol. 2013, 39, 892–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tilocca, B.; Cao, A.; Migheli, Q. Scent of a killer: Microbial volatilome and its role in the biological control of plant pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Jishma, P.; Hussain, N.; Chellappan, R.; Rajendran, R.; Mathew, J.; Radhakrishnan, E.K. Strain-specific variation in plant growth promoting volatile organic compounds production by five different Pseudomonas spp. as confirmed by response of Vigna radiata seedlings. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 123, 204–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, Y.; Li, T.; Liu, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, C.; Feng, Z.; Peng, X.; Li, Z.; Qin, S.; Xing, K. Volatile organic compounds produced by Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. aureofaciens SPS-41 as biological fumigants to control Ceratocystis fimbriata in postharvest sweet potatoes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 3702–3710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, Z.; Zhong, T.; Chen, K.; Du, M.; Chen, G.; Chen, X.; Wang, K.; Zalán, Z.; Takács, K.; Kan, J. Antifungal activity of volatile organic compounds produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens ZX and potential biocontrol of blue mold decay on postharvest citrus. Food Control 2021, 120, 107499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wallace, R.L.; Hirkala, D.L.; Nelson, L.M. Postharvest biological control of blue mold of apple by Pseudomonas fluorescens during commercial storage and potential modes of action. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2017, 133, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Guevara-Avendaño, E.; Bejarano-Bolívar, A.A.; Kiel-Martínez, A.-L.; Ramírez-Vázquez, M.; Méndez-Bravo, A.; von Wobeser, E.A.; Sánchez-Rangel, D.; Guerrero-Analco, J.A.; Eskalen, A.; Reverchon, F. Avocado rhizobacteria emit volatile organic compounds with antifungal activity against Fusarium solani, Fusarium sp. associated with Kuroshio shot hole borer, and Colletotrichum Gloeosporioides. Microbiol. Res. 2019, 219, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ossowicki, A.; Jafra, S.; Garbeva, P. The antimicrobial volatile power of the rhizospheric isolate Pseudomonas donghuensis P482. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0174362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Huang, C.-J.; Tsay, J.-F.; Chang, S.-Y.; Yang, H.-P.; Wu, W.-S.; Chen, C.-Y. Dimethyl disulfide is an induced systemic resistance elicitor produced by Bacillus cereus C1L. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2012, 68, 1306–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Raza, W.; Ling, N.; Liu, D.; Wei, Z.; Huang, Q.; Shen, Q. Volatile organic compounds produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens WR-1 restrict the growth and virulence traits of Ralstonia solanacearum. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 192, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Vlassi, A.; Nesler, A.; Perazzolli, M.; Lazazzara, V.; Büschl, C.; Parich, A.; Puopolo, G.; Schuhmacher, R. Volatile organic compounds from Lysobacter capsici AZ78 as potential candidates for biological control of soilborne plant pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Huang, R.; Che, H.J.; Zhang, J.; Yang, L.; Jiang, D.H.; Li, G.Q. Evaluation of Sporidiobolus pararoseus strain YCXT3 as biocontrol agent of Botrytis cinerea on post-harvest strawberry fruits. Biol. Control 2012, 62, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lee, S.; Behringer, G.; Hung, R.; Bennett, J. Effects of fungal volatile organic compounds on Arabidopsis thaliana growth and gene expression. Fungal Ecol. 2019, 37, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hunziker, L.; Bönisch, D.; Groenhagen, U.; Bailly, A.; Schulz, S.; Weisskopf, L. Pseudomonas strains naturally associated with potato plants produce volatiles with high potential for inhibition of Phytophthora infestans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 821–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Wu, F.; Tong, X.; Zhang, L.; Mei, L.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Y. Suppression of Rhizopus fruit rot by volatile organic compounds produced by Paenibacillus polymyxa CF05. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2020, 30, 1351–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Amavizca, E.; Bashan, Y.; Ryu, C.-M.; Farag, M.A.; Bebout, B.M.; de-Bashan, L.E. Enhanced performance of the microalga Chlorella sorokiniana remotely induced by the plant growth-promoting bacteria Azospirillum brasilense and Bacillus pumilus. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Cheng, W.; Yang, J.; Nie, Q.; Huang, D.; Yu, C.; Zheng, L.; Cai, M.; Thomashow, L.S.; Weller, D.M.; Yu, Z.; et al. Volatile organic compounds from Paenibacillus polymyxa KM2501-1 control Meloidogyne incognita by multiple strategies. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Li, X.; Wang, X.; Shi, X.; Wang, B.; Li, M.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, S. Antifungal effect of volatile organic compounds from Bacillus velezensis CT32 against Verticillium dahliae and Fusarium oxysporum. Processes 2020, 8, 1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tahir, H.A.S.; Gu, Q.; Wu, H.; Raza, W.; Hanif, A.; Wu, L.; Colman, M.V.; Gao, X. Plant growth promotion by volatile oorganic compounds produced by Bacillus subtilis SYST2. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. De Vrieze, M.; Pandey, P.; Bucheli, T.D.; Varadarajan, A.R.; Ahrens, C.H.; Weisskopf, L.; Bailly, A. Volatile organic compounds from native potato-associated Pseudomonas as potential anti-oomycete agents. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Rojas-Solís, D.; Zetter-Salmón, E.; Contreras-Pérez, M.; Rocha-Granados, M.C.; Macías-Rodríguez, L.; Santoyo, G. Pseudomonas stutzeri E25 and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia CR71 endophytes produce antifungal volatile organic compounds and exhibit additive plant growth-promoting effects. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 13, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wheatley, R.E. The consequences of volatile organic compound mediated bacterial and fungal interactions. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 2002, 81, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Blom, D.; Fabbri, C.; Connor, E.C.; Schiestl, F.P.; Klauser, D.R.; Boller, T.; Eberl, L.; Weisskopf, L. Production of plant growth modulating volatiles is widespread among rhizosphere bacteria and strongly depends on culture conditions. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 13, 3047–3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rath, M.; Mitchell, T.R.; Gold, S.E. Volatiles produced by Bacillus mojavensis RRC101 act as plant growth modulators and are strongly culture-dependent. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 208, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lazazzara, V.; Perazzolli, M.; Pertot, I.; Biasioli, F.; Puopolo, G.; Cappellin, L. Growth media affect the volatilome and antimicrobial activity against Phytophthora infestans in four Lysobacter type strains. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 201, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Collado-Romero, M.; Mercado-Blanco, J.; Olivares-García, C.; Valverde-Corredor, A.; Jiménez-Díaz, R.M. Molecular variability within and among Verticillium dahliae vegetative compatibility groups determined by fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism and polymerase chain reaction markers. Phytopathology 2006, 96, 485–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Messner, R.; Schweigrofler, W.; Ibl, M.; Berg, G.; Prillinger, H. Molecular characterization of the plant pathogen Verticillium dahliae Kleb. using RAPD-PCR and sequencing of the 18SrRNA-gene. J. Phytopathol. 1996, 144, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Cernava, T.; Aschenbrenner, I.A.; Grube, M.; Liebminger, S.; Berg, G. A Novel assay for the detection of bioactive volatiles evaluated by screening of lichen-associated bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Plants 11 00318 g001 550
Figure 1. Culture headspaces sampling setup to characterize the volatile organic compounds of antagonistic olive root endophytes and Verticillium dahliae V937I. (A) Verticillium dahliae V937I, (B) bacteria and (C) bacteria in the presence of V. dahliae.
Figure 1. Culture headspaces sampling setup to characterize the volatile organic compounds of antagonistic olive root endophytes and Verticillium dahliae V937I. (A) Verticillium dahliae V937I, (B) bacteria and (C) bacteria in the presence of V. dahliae.
Plants 11 00318 g001
Plants 11 00318 g002 550
Figure 2. Evaluation of the ability of olive root bacterial endophytes to inhibit the mycelial growth of Verticillium dahliae V937I using the Two Clamp VOCs Assay (TCVA). Panel (A) shows the bacterial cultures placed on the top. Panel (B) shows the mycelial plugs of V. dahliae placed on the bottom. Panel (C) shows both plates (fungus and bacteria) connected by the perforated silicone foil and fixed with clamps.
Figure 2. Evaluation of the ability of olive root bacterial endophytes to inhibit the mycelial growth of Verticillium dahliae V937I using the Two Clamp VOCs Assay (TCVA). Panel (A) shows the bacterial cultures placed on the top. Panel (B) shows the mycelial plugs of V. dahliae placed on the bottom. Panel (C) shows both plates (fungus and bacteria) connected by the perforated silicone foil and fixed with clamps.
Plants 11 00318 g002
Table
Table 1. Percentage of growth inhibition exerted over different fungal pathogens by Pseudomonas sp. PICF6 and Pseudomonas simiae PICF7.
Table 1. Percentage of growth inhibition exerted over different fungal pathogens by Pseudomonas sp. PICF6 and Pseudomonas simiae PICF7.
PathogensSsRsFol 007ELV25V937I
MediaPDANAPDANAPDANAPDANAPDANA
Bacterial strains
Paenibacillus polymyxa
PIC7372.62 a68.44 a59.23 a51.15 a52.94 a-66.89 a56.25 aNd 1Nd 1
Pseudomonas
PICF6------33.78 b21.88 b40.96 a29.72 a
PICF7------31.08 b20.00 b41.49 a21.70 a
Ss, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum; Rs, Rhizoctonia solani; Fol 007, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici Fol 007; ELV25, Verticillium longisporum ELV25; V937I, Verticillium dahliae V937I; PIC73, Paenibacillus polymyxa PIC73; PICF6, Pseudomonas sp. PICF6; PICF7, Pseudomonas simiae PICF7. Values followed by different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey HSD Test in each column. At least three biological replicates for each dual confrontation and culturing medium were performed. PDA, Potato Dextrose Agar; NA, Nutrient Agar; -, no inhibition observed. This experiment was performed twice with similar results; Nd 1, not determined in this study. In vitro antagonism of this bacterium against V. dahliae isolates infecting olive has been previously demonstrated [24].
Table
Table 2. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by the olive root endophytes Pseudomonas sp. PICF6 and Pseudomonas simiae PICF7, alone and during co-incubation with Verticillium dahliae V937I.
Table 2. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by the olive root endophytes Pseudomonas sp. PICF6 and Pseudomonas simiae PICF7, alone and during co-incubation with Verticillium dahliae V937I.
VOCs in the Absence of V. dahliae V937IVOCs in the Presence of V. dahliae V937I
Predicted Compound (IUPAC)PICF6PICF7PICF6PICF7Kovats IndexReported Biological FunctionsReferences
Methanethiolxxxx401n.a
(Methylsulfanyl)methaneoxox520n.a
S-Methyl ethanethioatexoxx700Antifungal activity[53,54]
4-Methyl-2-pentanone-x-x735n.a
(Methyldisulfanyl)methanexxxx746Antifungal activity, PGP[47,55,56]
Bis(methylsulfanyl)methane-x--862n.a
(3E)-3-Nonenexxxx889n.a
2,5-Dimethylpyrazinexxo-917Antifungal activity[57]
Dimethyltrisulfaneoxxx970Antifungal activity[47]
1-Decenexxxx989Antifungal activity, PGP[58,59]
1,10-Undecadienexxxx1081n.a
1-Undecenexxxx1091Antifungal activity[60]
4-Methyl-2,6-bis(2-methyl-2-propanyl)phenol--xx1513Antifungal activity[61]
3,7-Dimethyl-1-octene--xx963n.a
Tridecaneoxx-1300PGP[62]
(3Z)-3-Dodecenexoo-1185n.a
2-Decyloxirane-x--1307Antifungal activity[51]
2,6,11-Trimethyldodecaneo-o-1275n.a
Methyl thiocyanatex---702Antifungal activity[54]
1-Tridecyne--o-1297n.a
2-Undecanone--x-1294Antifungal activity[47]
2-Undecanol--x-1308Antifungal activity, nematicidal activity[63,64]
2-Nonanol--o-1101Nematicidal activity[63]
10-Methyl-1-undecene--x-1157n.a
Compound names according to International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). The Kovats index (KI) of the compounds was calculated with an alkane series. n.a, information not available or unknown function; PGP, plant growth promotion; x, the compound was detected in the three technical replicas; o, the compound was detected in two out of the three technical replicas; -, the compound was never detected.
Table
Table 3. Effect of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by Pseudomonas sp. PICF6, Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 on the mycelial growth of Verticillium dahliae V937I evaluated using the Two Clamp VOCs Assay (TCVA).
Table 3. Effect of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by Pseudomonas sp. PICF6, Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 on the mycelial growth of Verticillium dahliae V937I evaluated using the Two Clamp VOCs Assay (TCVA).
PDANA
Control1.96 a2.23 a
PICF61.73 a1.91 a
PICF71.83 a1.90 a
Data on mycelial growth (cm) are the means (n = 6), per each dual confrontation and media, between the largest and smallest diameters of the V. dahliae colony. Within each column, the same letter after mean values indicates no significant difference among treatments according to ANOVA test. PDA, Potato Dextrose Agar; NA, Nutrient Agar.
Table
Table 4. Bacteria and fungi used in this study.
Table 4. Bacteria and fungi used in this study.
MicroorganismsDescriptionReference/Source
Bacterial strains
Paenibacilluspolymyxa PIC73BCA[24]
Pseudomonas sp. PICF6BCA[28,39]
Pseudomonas simiae PICF7BCA/PGPR [33,35]
Fungal pathogens
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici Fol 007Isolated from tomato roots (Solanum lycopersicum)Graz University of Technology
Rhizoctonia solani Kühn Isolated from potato tubers (Solanum tuberosum) Graz University of Technology
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary 1884Isolated from a bait system with sclerotia in potato tubersGraz University of Technology
Verticillium dahliae V937IRepresentative of the defoliating pathotype, originating from a diseased olive tree[72]
Verticillium longisporum ELV25Isolated from oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. ssp. oleifera) (Karin Zeise, Rostock)[73]
BCA, biological control agent; PGPR, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Fungal pathogens labelled with “Graz University of Technology” are part of the culture collection of the Institute of Environmental Biotechnolgy.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Montes-Osuna, N.; Cernava, T.; Gómez-Lama Cabanás, C.; Berg, G.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Identification of Volatile Organic Compounds Emitted by Two Beneficial Endophytic Pseudomonas Strains from Olive Roots. Plants 2022, 11, 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030318

AMA Style

Montes-Osuna N, Cernava T, Gómez-Lama Cabanás C, Berg G, Mercado-Blanco J. Identification of Volatile Organic Compounds Emitted by Two Beneficial Endophytic Pseudomonas Strains from Olive Roots. Plants. 2022; 11(3):318. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030318

Chicago/Turabian Style

Montes-Osuna, Nuria, Tomislav Cernava, Carmen Gómez-Lama Cabanás, Gabriele Berg, and Jesús Mercado-Blanco. 2022. "Identification of Volatile Organic Compounds Emitted by Two Beneficial Endophytic Pseudomonas Strains from Olive Roots" Plants 11, no. 3: 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030318

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop