Next Article in Journal
Assessment of the Hormetic Effect of Arsenic on Growth and Physiology of Two Cultivars of Maize (Zea mays L.)
Next Article in Special Issue
Elicitation of Stilbenes and Benzofuran Derivatives in Hairy Root Cultures of White Mulberry (Morus alba)
Previous Article in Journal
Stimulating the Growth, Anabolism, Antioxidants, and Yield of Rice Plants Grown under Salt Stress by Combined Application of Bacterial Inoculants and Nano-Silicon
Previous Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Sprouted Plantlets of Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad Shown to Possess Interesting Levels of Cucurbitacins and Other Bioactives against Pathogenic Fungi
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Integral Boosting Effect of Selenium on the Secondary Metabolism of Higher Plants

MedBio Cluster, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, 236041 Kaliningrad, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(24), 3432; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243432
Submission received: 14 November 2022 / Revised: 30 November 2022 / Accepted: 6 December 2022 / Published: 8 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Biotechnology Applications in Secondary Metabolite Production)

Abstract

:
Selenium is a micronutrient with a wide range of functions in animals, including humans, and in microorganisms such as microalgae. However, its role in plant metabolism remains ambiguous. Recent studies of Se supplementation showed that not only does it increase the content of the element itself, but also affects the accumulation of secondary metabolites in plants. The purpose of this review is to analyze and summarize the available data on the place of selenium in the secondary metabolism of plants and its effect on the accumulation of some plant metabolites (S- and N-containing secondary metabolites, terpenes, and phenolic compounds). In addition, possible molecular mechanisms and metabolic pathways underlying these effects are discussed. It should be noted that available data on the effect of Se on the accumulation of secondary metabolites are inconsistent and contradictory. According to some studies, selenium has a positive effect on the accumulation of certain metabolites, while other similar studies show a negative effect or no effect at all. The following aspects were identified as possible ways of regulating plant secondary metabolism by Se-supplementation: changes occurring in primary S/N metabolism, hormonal regulation, redox metabolism, as well as at the transcriptomic level of secondary metabolite biosynthesis. In all likelihood, the confusion in the results can be explained by other, more complex regulatory mechanisms in which selenium is involved and which affect the production of metabolites. Further study on the involvement of various forms of selenium in metabolic and signaling pathways is crucial for a deeper understanding of its role in growth, development, and health of plants, as well as the regulatory mechanisms behind them.

1. Introduction

Selenium (Se) is a metalloid with atomic number 34 and an atomic mass of 78.96. It is located in the 16th group of the periodic table—the chalcogen family. Selenium was discovered by Jöns J. Berzelius in 1817, but the study of its role in living organisms began after 1957 when Schwarz and Foltz showed that supplementing the diet with selenium prevents muscular dystrophy and liver cirrhosis in rats [1]. Selenium is chemically similar to sulfur, it can form covalent bonds with carbon, and is found in various organoselenium compounds, including selenoamino acids such as selenocysteine (SeCys) and selenomethionine (SeMet), as well as selenoproteins [2]. Selenium acts as the catalytic site of several selenoproteins, notably glutathione peroxidase (GSHPx), thioredoxin reductase, and iodothyronine deiodinase. Hence it is important for free radical scavenging, oxidative stress protection, and boosting the immune system [3].
The importance of Se was demonstrated for animals, humans, and some microorganisms, including microalgae [4,5,6,7,8,9]. However, in relation to plants, its essentiality is still controversial and has not been confirmed, despite the significant amount of experimental data showing that selenium can improve plant growth and development, as well as increase plant resistance to various abiotic and biotic stress factors [10,11,12,13]. Most researchers attribute the benefits of selenium to its effect on the antioxidant defense system of plants. Selenium was shown to stimulate the accumulation of low molecular weight antioxidants (ascorbate, glutathione, proline, phenolics) and the antioxidant enzymes activity (superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione peroxidase, peroxidase). However, the exact mechanisms behind these improvements are complex and not fully understood [14,15,16,17,18].
Given that, selenium is essential for cellular function in many species and can be highly toxic, its presence is nuanced. It is generally found to be beneficial when present in trace amounts [2,3,19]. The most beneficial selenium concentrations, as well as the ways of its absorption, transport, and metabolism are largely determined by the plant species.
Based on the ability to accumulate selenium, plants are divided into three groups. The first group is selenium hyperaccumulators, capable of tolerating selenium concentrations in tissues in the range of 1000–15,000 μg Se per gram of dry weight (g−1 DW). They actively accumulate selenium up to these concentrations when grown on natural selenium-containing soils. This group includes some species of Stanleya (Brassicaceae) and Astragalus (Fabaceae).
The second group is selenium accumulators, capable of accumulating up to 1000 μg of Se g−1 DW and growing on both non-selenium and selenium-containing soils. The concentration of selenium in their tissues directly indicates the phytoavailability of selenium in the soil. Such plants are, for example, mustard (Brassica juncea), rapeseed (Brassica napus), broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica), arugula (Eruca sativa), and other members of the cruciferous family (Cruciferae), as well as plants of the Allium family (garlic, onion, leek).
The third group is selenium non-accumulators, which do not tolerate concentrations above 100 µg Se g−1 DW. This group includes such important crops as rice (Oryza sativa), wheat (Triticum aestivum), lettuce (Lactuca sativa), tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum) and many others [2,19,20,21,22,23].
The hyperaccumulators are actively studied in order to identify the mechanisms of their tolerance to high concentrations of selenium, as well as their possible use for phytoremediation [24,25,26,27,28]. Both selenium-accumulating and non-accumulating plants are objects of biofortification research given their importance in the human diet [7,29,30]. Recent studies of selenium supplementation showed that not only does it increase the content of the element itself, but also affects the accumulation of other nutrients, secondary metabolites, and bioactive substances (for example, phenolics, glucosinolates, vitamin C and carotenoids) in plants [29,31]. That said, the mechanisms behind this improved accumulation of secondary metabolites are poorly researched, and the available data are inconsistent and contradictory.
Various review papers on selenium in plants were published in recent years. The main topics explored in these articles are the absorption, transport, and metabolism of selenium in plants [2,11,19,32,33,34], its role in the “soil-microorganisms-plant” system [35,36], its beneficial and toxic effects on plants [13,26,37], its part in increasing plant resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses [38,39,40,41,42], as well as the potential use of selenium in phytoremediation [25,26,28] and biofortification, including its effect on the accumulation of other nutrients [29,30,31,43,44,45,46]. However, this review article is focused on the generalization and analysis of the available data on the effect of selenium on the accumulation of secondary metabolites (sulphur and nitrogen-containing secondary metabolites, terpenes, and phenolics) in plants. In addition, possible molecular mechanisms and metabolic pathways underlying these effects will be discussed.

2. Selenium Uptake and Metabolism in Plants

Selenium absorption occurs in the rhizosphere solution through the root cells (Figure 1). Phytoavailable forms of selenium include selenates (SeO42−), selenites (SeO32−, HSeO3−, H2SeO3), and organoselenium compounds such as SeCys and SeMet, in contrast to selenides or colloidal elemental Se, which cannot be taken up by plants. In well-aerated oxygenated soils, selenate is the most abundant water-soluble form of selenium, while anaerobic soils with neutral to acidic pH are usually rich in selenite. In addition, soils usually contain small amounts of organoselenium compounds resulting from the decomposition of organic material and biological activity [47].
The intake of selenium, regardless of the form, leads to a change in the expression profile of plant cells directly responsible for the element absorption [48]. It should be noted that each of the forms induces a unique set of genes determining the success of absorption, transformation, and transfer of the compounds throughout the plant.
The transfer of selenate is carried out by symport transport systems, such as sulfate transporters (HAST), which include H+/sulfate symporters AtSULTR1;1 and AtSULTR1;2 [49]. Using Arabidopsis model plants (Arabidopsis thaliana [L.] Heynh.), it was shown that AtSULTR1;1 and AtSULTR1;2 catalyze the inflow of selenate into root cells. However, the degree of their involvement is directly correlated with the initial level of sulfur: when the level of S is high, most of the Se uptake is catalyzed by AtSULTR1;2, but if the level of S in the plant is too low for optimal growth, the contribution of AtSULTR1;1 increases instead. The expression of homologous genes in other Se non-accumulators is similar, while AtSULTR1;1 and AtSULTR1;2 in Se hyperaccumulators are constitutively expressed more strongly. As for Se-accumulators, they are characterized by a relatively high expression of both homologous genes and a preference for selenate, regardless of the initial level of sulfur [50]. This fact suggests that such plants are likely to show an increased content of selenium.
Another form of selenium, selenite, is taken up as HSeO3 by the roots, then transferred by Pht1 (a member of the phosphate transporter family) and absorbed as H2SeO3 via aquaporins. It was shown that rice plants use namely aquaporin transport systems during the transfer of selenites, which leads to an increase in the expression of the OsNIP2;1 gene. Selenite is rapidly converted to organoselenium compounds in the root, whereas selenate is immediately delivered to the xylem [51,52].
Organic forms of selenium, in particular SeCys and SeMet, are taken up by plant root cells via transporters that catalyze the uptake of Cys and Met, respectively [52]. However, the share of organoselenium compounds and selenites in overall selenium absorption is miniscule in comparison with selenates.
Investigating the pathways of intake and transformation of various forms of selenium is the key to understanding the role of this element in the metabolism of an autotrophic organism. There seems to be no single mechanism for its assimilation. This is indicated by the fact that selenium uptake and tolerance vary widely among different plant species (hyperaccumulation and non-accumulation described above).
Selenate absorbed by the root passes through the root cylinder and is loaded into the xylem for further transport to the shoot, while selenite requires rapid conversion into organoselenium compounds [52]. Then, a member of the ALMT family of transporters (organic acid transporters) is believed to load selenate into the xylem, although AtSULTR2;1, AtSULTR2;2 and AtSULTR3;5 are also involved in modulating this process by catalyzing the uptake of selenate into the parenchymal cells of pericycle and xylem [53,54]. Plastids are the central point for the conversion of selenate into organoselenium compounds [55]. The sulfate transporter AtSULTR3;1 is localized in the chloroplast membrane and seems to be capable of catalyzing the transport of selenate into plastids [56]. It is worth noting that the expression of key genes such as APS and several SULTR genes responsible for the assimilation of selenium into organic forms is regulated by the expression of microRNA (miRNA), such as miRNA395 [57].
Selenate is first activated by adenosine triphosphate sulfurylase (ATPS) to form adenosine 5-phosphoselenate (APSe), which is then reduced to selenite by adenosine 5-phosphosulfate reductase (APR) using reduced glutathione (GSH) as an electron donor (Figure 2) [58]. The conversion of selenate to selenite appears to be the rate-limiting step in the assimilation of Se into organic compounds [59]. This is indicated by the high level of organic selenium in the transgenic plant leaves with overexpression of genes encoding ATPS or APR [60,61]. A number of authors conclude that this stage affects the rate of selenium metabolism in non-hyperaccumulators more than in hyperaccumulators [20]. Afterward, selenite is reduced to selenide enzymatically by sulfite reductase, or non-enzymatically by reduced glutathione [59,62].
As already noted, the reduction of selenates to selenites is the rate-limiting step at the very first stage of selenium assimilation [63]. Selenium-hyperaccumulators can achieve this in at least three different ways: by replacing sulfate in the sulfate reduction pathway (reduction by ATP-sulphurylase/adenosine-5-phosphosulfate reductase (APS)), by replacing nitrate in the nitrate pathway (microbial nitrate reductases exhibit ability to reduce selenate) or via specific selenate reductase [2,48,64].
For non-hyperaccumulators, there is strong evidence that selenate reduction occurs by replacing sulfate in the ATP-sulphurylase/APS-reductase system, which is the rate-limiting step in this case [48,63]. This transformation proceeds in two stages. Initially, ATP-sulphurylase catalyzes the interaction of ATP and selenate to form adenosine phosphoselenate. Then, under the action of APS-reductase, selenite is formed [63]. Interestingly, both reactions can occur in the cytosol as well as in the plastids of the cell due to the presence of isoforms of the enzymes indicated above [2,20]. According to other research, this stage occurs mainly in plastids and only a small part of selenium undergoes modification in the cytosol [2,63]. A number of articles mention the possible conversion of selenium into selenolipids or selenoglutathione via adenosine phosphoselenate [65].
The next step in selenium metabolism is the reduction of selenite to selenide. This step can proceed enzymatically in the presence of sulfite reductase. However, it is not completely clear whether this enzyme has selenite reductase activity [66]. Non-enzymatic interaction of selenite with reduced glutathione is also possible, resulting in the formation of selenodiglutathione GSSeSG. GSSeSG is then converted to GSSe, which is transformed into selenide by NADPH-dependent glutathione reductase [48,67].
The final step in the selenium assimilation is the conversion of selenide to selenocysteine (SeCys). This stage involves the conjugation of O-acetylserine with selenide by a multienzyme complex of cysteine synthase [63,66].
The resulting SeCys can undergo transformations in three known ways. One of them is the formation of elemental selenium by selencysteine lyase [68]. The second pathway involves the methylation of SeCys with the formation of methyl-SeCys by specific methyltransferase, which is most active in Se-hyperaccumulators [8,63]. In some hyperaccumulators, methyl-SeCys is additionally converted to the volatile dimethyl selenide compound [63]. In addition to dimethyl diselenide escaping into the atmosphere, a number of plants form γ-glutamylmethyl-SeCys, which acts as the main form of selenium storage in seeds. The third pathway consists of two stages. First, γ-homocystathionine synthase catalyzes the interaction of SeCys with O-phosphomoserine. As a result, selenocystathionine is formed, which is later degraded in the presence of cystathionine β-lyase to release selenohomocysteine. Both of these enzymes are localized in chloroplasts. The second stage of this pathway takes place in the cytosol, where methionine synthase initiates the formation of selenomethionine SeMet. In turn, SeMet can be additionally methylated to form methyl-SeMet, which is also converted into dimethyl selenide [63].
When there is an excess of selenium in the environment, non-accumulators tend to store selenate in the vacuoles of leaf cells, whereas hyperaccumulators modify inorganic selenium into less toxic organic forms or volatile compounds that are released as a result of gas exchange. Selenium assimilation leads to the formation of two amino acids, SeCys and SeMet, which can be incorporated into protein molecules.

3. Effect of Selenium on the Accumulation of Secondary Metabolites in Plants

3.1. Nitrogen-and Sulphur Containing Compounds

3.1.1. Alkaloids

Plant alkaloids are an extensive group of secondary plant metabolites, structurally distinguished by the presence of a nitrogen atom in the molecule, outside the amide and peptide bonds. Natural precursors of alkaloids are derivatives of various metabolites formed during the glycolysis and shikimate pathways (mainly amino acids). In plants, alkaloids are allelopathic compounds whose function is closely related to seed formation and defense against pests [69].
There is little data on the effect of selenium on the biosynthesis of alkaloids, which indicates that this issue has not been sufficiently studied (Table 1).
Studies of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) biofortification with selenium showed that the addition of 100 µM of Na2SeO4 to the nutrient medium led to an increase in the concentration of the gramine alkaloid [70]. Another study investigating the effect of selenite-based foliar treatment, on the contrary, showed that selenium exposure leads to a decrease in the content of alkaloids in the seeds of white lupine (Lupinus albus L., variety Degas) [72].
In recent research involving foliar treatment of Iranian Borage plants with Na2SeO3 and Na2SeO4, it was found that the effect of selenium on the accumulation of alkaloids depended both on the selected form of selenium, its concentration, and the stage of flowering. The maximum increase in the content of alkaloids both in the leaves and in the petals of Iranian Borage plants was observed at the stages of initial flowering and termination of flowering, with a concentration of sodium selenate solution of 4 mg L−1. More specifically, when plants of the initial phase of flowering were treated with Na2SeO4, the content of alkaloids in flowers increased by 19.8% compared with the control sample. Spraying the plants with Na2SeO3 only led to an 8.5% alkaloid content increase [71]. To date, there is no clear understanding of the role of selenium in the biosynthesis of alkaloids. So far, it can be concluded that the role of selenium compounds in secondary metabolism reactions leading to the formation of alkaloids is most likely indirect. The relationship between the effect of selenium supplementation and the flowering stage suggests that this effect may be the result of various mechanisms, such as regulation of the hormonal signal or modulation of the thioredoxin system.

3.1.2. Cyanogenic Glycosides

Cyanogenic glycosides, or α-hydroxynitrile glycosides, are a unique class of natural compounds containing a nitrile group, capable of releasing hydrogen cyanide (hydrocyanic acid) as a result of enzymatic decomposition. Similar to many other secondary metabolites, cyanogenic glycosides act as a defense against herbivores, releasing toxic hydrogen cyanide when tissue is damaged. Some plant species are lethal to humans due to their high content of cyanogenic glycosides [80]. The biosynthesis of cyanogenic glycosides is carried out using amino acids in a series of successive stages. These stages are catalyzed by two types of multifunctional enzymes—representatives of the cytochrome P450 family, and UDP-glucosyltransferase in combination with NADPH-dependent cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase [81].
The study of the effect of selenium treatment on the accumulation of cyanogenic glycosides is rarely performed (Table 1). This can be explained by various reasons. First, cyanogenic glycosides are not as common in plants as, for example, phenolic compounds. In addition, plants prone to the accumulation of cyanogenic glycosides are not suitable objects for selenium biofortification. For example, the order Brassicales is often used in studies of selenium biofortification. One of the widespread features of these species is the biosynthesis of glucosinates, another class of N-containing secondary metabolites. However, the joint presence of glucosinates and cyanogenic glycosides in the same plant is very rare [82]. A decrease in the accumulation of a cyanogenic glycoside, namely, 3,4-dihydroxymandelonitrile-β-glucoside, was observed in a study by Mimmo et al. [70], who carried out the non-targeted metabolic screening of strawberries during its biofortification with selenium.

3.1.3. Glucosinolates

Glucosinolates are nitrogen- and sulfur-containing secondary metabolites and the so-called “molecular markers” of the Brassicales plants. The precursors in their biosynthesis are derivatives of various amino acids (methionine, valine, leucine, phenylalanine, tryptophan, etc.). Glucosinolates and the products of their degradation, primarily isocyanates, play a major role in the defense against phytophages [83,84].
Selenium is easily accumulated in Brassica species because Brassicaceae plants have the ability to metabolize Se into non-protein sulfurous amino acids, producing Se-methylselenocysteine (MeSeCys), γ-glutamyl-Se-methylselenocysteine (GGMeSeCys) and selenocystionine [85]. In this case, the close connection of selenium and sulfur metabolism explains the effect of selenium on the accumulation of glucosinolates, the biosynthesis of which is closely related to the metabolism of sulfur. Unlike the case of alkaloids and cyanogenic glycosides discussed above, there is a lot of research (including experimental) exploring the effect of selenium treatment on the accumulation of glucosinolates, but the results themselves are contradictory.
Broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) is the experimental object most frequently used to study the effect of selenium biofortification on the accumulation of glucosinolates (Table 1). Tian et al. [73] treated the broccoli plants with sodium selenate solution at a concentration of 25 μM. It was found that selenium supplementation led to a decrease in the glucosinolates content in broccoli inflorescences and leaves, especially glucoraphanin. Notably, the suppression of glucosinolates accumulation was not associated with the absorption of sulfur by plants, the amount of which was not changed in the experiment. The inhibitory effect of selenium was explained by a decrease in the content of glucosinolates precursors—methionine and phenylalanine; expression of glucosinolates biosynthesis genes also significantly decreased after selenium exposure. In a study of the effect of various forms of selenium (100 μmol L−1 selenite and selenate) on the accumulation of glucosinolates in three varieties of broccoli sprouts, it was shown that selenium treatment did not lead to a significant change in the total content of glucosinolates (in two out of three varieties) but increased the content of sulforaphane and the activity of myrosinase (an enzyme catalyzing the hydrolysis of glucosinolates). For the third variety, a slight increase in the total content of glucosinolates was observed when plants were treated with selenate, accompanied by a decrease in the level of sulforaphane and myrosinase activity [74]. Similar results were obtained in a study on the joint effect of sulfur (as sulfate) and selenium (as selenite) on the metabolism of glucosinolates. Sulforaphane yield, myrosinase activity, and expression of the MY gene encoding myrosinase were significantly increased by the combined use of 4 mM S and 100 μM Se. In addition, the concentrations of glucoraphanin (a precursor of sulforaphane) and methionine (a substrate of glucoraphanin) did not change significantly after the application of Se [75]. In a study of the effect of various concentrations of selenate (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.6 mmol L−1) on the content of selenium, glucosinolates, and flavonoids in broccoli inflorescences, on the contrary, a sharp increase in the total glucosinolates content was found when using selenate at a concentration of 0.4 mM [76]. An increase in the total glucosinolates content in broccoli florets was determined in another study where plants were treated with selenium yeast and sodium selenite at concentrations of 0.1–1.6 mM [77].
The effect of selenium on the accumulation of glucosinolates was also studied on radishes (Raphanus sativus). Two experiments were carried out using different selenium treatments: foliar (0.5, 10, and 20 mg Se per plant) and hydroponics (0.5, 10, 20, or 40 μM), for 1 week. When using foliar treatment, the total level of glucosinolates in the roots was 35% higher compared to the control due to the increase in the level of glucoraphanin. When selenium was added to the nutrient medium, the level of glucosinolates in the roots did not change significantly. At the same time, a decrease in glucosinolates was observed in the leaves [78]. The addition of selenium to the nutrient medium (as selenate of 5–40 μM) during the hydroponic cultivation of two rocket species (Eruca sativa Mill. and Diplotaxis tenuifolia), a decrease in both the total content of glucosinolates and individual representatives of this class was observed compared to control plants [79].
Generally, the change in the level of glucosinolates in selenium-treated plants can be due to several reasons: changes in the content of amino acids that act as precursors in the biosynthesis of glucosinolates; changes in the expression of genes involved in it, or a change in the activity of myrosinase.

3.2. Terpenes

Terpenes are the largest and most diverse class of secondary metabolites. In plants, they act as informational and protective molecules used by plants for antagonistic and mutualistic interactions [86]. All terpenes in plants are produced from the five carbon precursors: dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP) and its isomer isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP). Terpenes can be present as single unit molecules (hemiterpene (5C), mono-(C10), sesqui-(C15), di- (C20), sisters- (C25), tri- (C30), tetra- (C40)) or as polyterpenes, the number of units in which is more than eight and can reach 103–4 [87]. General studies on the effect of selenium on the accumulation of terpene-like secondary metabolites show that the authors mainly evaluate the effect of selenium on the total accumulation of essential oils and their qualitative composition, as well as on the accumulation of tetraterpenes, namely carotenoids. Therefore, this section will focus on the effect of selenium on the accumulation of essential oils, the main components of which are mono- and sesquiterpenes, as well as carotenoids.

3.2.1. Essential Oils

Essential oils are trivially thought of as oily liquids composed of volatile compounds that are released by physical action (such as pressing or distillation). Essential oils are complex mixtures of monoterpene and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons and their oxygen-containing derivatives (alcohols, aldehydes, ketones), as well as phenylpropanoids. In some cases, essential oils may include other chemical groups such as fatty acids, oxides, and sulfur derivatives [88]. Essential oil components are synthesized through three biosynthetic pathways: mevalonate, methylerythritol phosphate and shikimate. These substances are used to protect plants against herbivores, as well as to attract pollinators [89].
In the previously mentioned Iranian Borage study, the change in the essential oil formation under Se application was also examined [71]. The main components of its oils (more than 60%) are α-pinene and δ-cadinene. During foliar treatment with Na2SeO3, a gradual increase in the content of both α-pinene and δ-cadinene is observed with increasing Se concentration. However, when Na2SeO4 is added, the content of these isoprenoids first increases and then noticeably decreases [71].
Another study compared the yield of essential oil extracted from Ocimum basilicum L. plants depending on the treatment, such as different levels of Se in the nutrient medium and the methods of its application [90]. The results showed that the addition of selenium in the form of Na2SeO4 to the nutrient medium had a greater impact on the yield of essential oils than the foliar treatment. However, in both cases, an increase in the yield was observed with an increase in the Se concentration from 0 to 10 μM [90]. One more study examined the effect of selenium supplementation on the essential oil formation in Ocimum basilicum L. plants in the field conditions. The plant varieties were sprayed with Na2SeO4 (50 mg Se m−2) and then were used for water distillation of essential oils. Interestingly, there were no significant differences between control and treated plants [91]. Although, when considering the results of a similar study by the same authors [92], a clear difference in the yield of essential oils is found. For instance, at the first stage of the Red Rubin sampling, an increase (when using 25 mg m−2 of Se) in the oil content is observed, followed by a decrease with a higher selenium level (50 mg m−2). At the same time, there is a gradual increase in the oil content for the Dark Green variety. However, at the second stage of Red Rubin sampling, the impact of selenium remains causing a decrease in the Dark Green’s oil yield [92].
When studying the effect of selenium on the composition of essential oils isolated from Melissa officinalis, it was shown that the addition of 5 μM of Na2SeO3 leads to an increased formation of citral, z-citral, and geranyl acetate. That said, an increase in the content of caryophyllene and its oxide was observed at relatively low Se concentrations (0.2 μM). The authors explain this difference by the fact that citral, z-citral, and geranyl acetate are the main components of Melissa officinalis essential oils and have antioxidant properties. When exposed to a high concentration of selenium, plants experience oxidative stress, and these compounds are necessary to maintain the redox potential of cells [93]. These findings appear to be consistent and confirm the results of similar studies on the relationship between the level of applied selenium (regardless of the form and method of application) and the final yield of essential oil.
The data on the effect of selenium on the essential oil accumulation in plants are summarized in Table 2.

3.2.2. Carotenoids

Carotenoids are tetraterpene pigments of yellow-to-purple colour. Carotenoids include carotenes (actually hydrocarbons) and xanthophylls (functional derivatives containing oxygen). Plants synthesize carotenoids via both the mevalonate and non-mevalonate pathways of isoprenoid biosynthesis. These compounds perform a number of physiologically important functions other than the photosynthetic function. Such “auxiliary” functions include but are not limited to photoprotective, attractant, antioxidant, as well as phytohormones production [101].
The function of selenium in the formation and accumulation of carotenoids does not seem obvious at first, but the research presented below highlights its fundamental role in carotenoid level modulation. For example, the effect of selenium on the content of carotene and xanthophyll in the seedlings of rice Oryza sativa L. of two varieties (Satabdi и Khitish) was studied [95]. The treatment of seedlings with Na2SeO4 at relatively low concentrations (<2 µM) resulted in an increase in the content of pigments (cv. Satabdi), while the use of a more concentrated Na2SeO4 solution led to their gradual decrease in both varieties [94] (Table 2). A decrease in the level of β-carotene (from 4.1 to 1.96 mg g−1) was also established in the study of Solanum lycopersicu plants treated with a solution of selenate (Na2SeO4 1 mg L−1), while the levels of lycopene and lutein did not change significantly [96]. It should be noted that the effect of selenium on the accumulation of carotenoids is determined not only by the plant species or Se concentration, but also by the selected form of selenium. For example, it was shown that the treatment of the same plant seedlings with selenite (20 mg L−1) caused an increase in the content of carotenoids compared to control plants [95]. A study dedicated to the effect of selenium on the accumulation of carotenoids in the leaves of Lycium chinense also demonstrated that the introduction of selenium into the nutrient medium in the form of Na2SeO3 (from 0.01 to 0.05 g kg−1) led to an increase in the content of carotenoids by 200–400% [97].
The data on the effect of selenium on gene expression and the activity of key enzymes of carotenoid biosynthesis is also extremely controversial. Previously, using the model plants of Arabidopsis thaliana, it was shown that in the presence of 10 mmol Na2SeO4, the expression of the gene that controls the key enzyme of carotenoid synthesis, phytoensynthase, is suppressed, resulting in a decrease in the content of lutein and, as a consequence, a decrease in the total carotenoid content [85]. On the other hand, research with a different outcome should be also considered. A field study examining the effect of selenium on the chemical composition of Zea mays L. showed that during selenite fertigation (Na2SeO3 200 g ha−1), the content of β-carotene did not change significantly, while the content of lutein and zeaxanthin increased compared to control plants. The authors attribute this increase to the probable ability of selenium to enhance the expression of phytoensynthase genes in corn plants [98,99]. At the same time, the authors attribute the insignificant change in β-carotene level to the fact that its content is primarily based on the ontogenetic development of the plant and the stage of fruit/grain maturity [96,99].
The effects of selenium on carotenoid synthesis were also shown in large-scale field studies. When the soil was treated with selenium dioxide (25 μM) in Brassica rapa ssp. rapa, a decrease in lutein content was observed [100]. The evaluation of the expression profile confirmed that the selenium treatment led to a significant increase in the expression level of a number of genes (CYE, CXB, NCED), the protein products of which are responsible for the biosynthesis of carotenoids [100].

3.3. Phenolic Compounds

Phenolic compounds are a large group of plant secondary metabolites, which include hydroxycinnamic acids, flavonoids, stilbenes, tannins, lignins, and lignans. They can be biosynthesized either by the shikimate or acetate-malonate pathway. The variety of structures explains the wide range of functions they perform in the plant body. Some of them are involved in mechanical support, others protect plants from excessive ultraviolet radiation or moisture loss. Other notable functions of phenolics include attracting pollinators and protecting against pathogens [102]. Phenolic compounds are highly labile substances, the level of which can change significantly along with fluctuations in plant growth conditions. That includes the presence of selenium, which impacts not only the phenolic content but also the phenolic profile of plants.
For example, selenate treatment was shown to increase the content of hydroxycinnamic acids in basil leaves (Ocimum basilicum L.). Moreover, foliar treatment had a significant effect on their accumulation: at 10 μM Se, the content of hydroxycinnamic acids was 1.6 times higher than in control plants. However, when considering the effect on the accumulation of anthocyanins, a different trend is observed. The medium supplementation had the greatest effect on the anthocyanin accumulation, whereas foliar treatment did not significantly change its level. It should be noted, that according to the data presented, the type of treatment and the concentration of selenium did not significantly affect the content of flavonoids in the leaves of Ocimum basilicum L. [90] (Table 3). This study also showed that plants treated with a 10 μM Se solution (regardless of the application technique) expressed the maximum total content of phenolic compounds [90].
Nutrient medium supplementation of Oryza sativa L. cv. Chainat 1 seedlings led to a change in the level of the studied phenolic compounds as well. For instance, when treated with Na2SeO3 (10 and 20 mg Se L−1), the plants expressed the highest level of the total content of phenolics. However, as selenium concentration in the nutrient medium increased to 40 mg Se L−1, the content of phenolic compounds decreased and became indistinguishable from the level in the control group plants. In addition, this study examined the activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, a key enzyme in the phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway. The authors showed that the content of phenolic compounds directly correlates with the activity of this enzyme. However, the maximum activity of the enzyme is observed at a selenium concentration of 20 mg L−1, and the greatest content of polyphenols is observed at a selenium concentration of 10 mg L−1. Researchers attribute this difference to the significant use of phenolic compounds due to their antioxidant properties as plant growth intensifies [95].
A similar effect of selenium was also observed with Spinacia oleracea L. plants. The authors showed that selenite enrichment of the medium tended to increase the total content of phenolic compounds in plant stems. The highest content was found at 10 mg Se L−1 (66% increase). Interestingly, the reverse trend was observed for the roots: an increase in the concentration of selenium led to a decrease in the amount of phenolic compounds. However, exposure to low concentrations of selenium (1–4 mg Se L−1) led to an increase in the total phenolics content by about 2 times [103].
Another field study addressed the effect of selenium on the biosynthesis of anthocyanins in wheat plants of the 202w17 variety (purple-grain). Selenium at a concentration of 37.5 g ha−1 (as Se4+) was applied in two different ways: soil supplementation and spraying. It was found that soil supplementation has the greatest effect on the content of anthocyanins compared to spraying (42 and 26% increase, respectively, compared with the control samples). The study also showed a positive correlation between the content of anthocyanins and the total protein and free amino acid content [104].
A study by Linling et al. [109] showed that selenium can influence the level of expression of genes encoding key enzymes involved in anthocyanin pigment biosynthesis pathways. For example, spraying the leaves of Ginkgo biloba with a solution of sodium selenite (10 mg mL−1), led to an observable increase in the level of expression of genes encoding chalcone synthase, flavonol synthase, flavanoid-O-methyltransferase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase. Although, supplementing the roots with sodium selenite did not cause a significant increase in gene expression [109].
In another study, it was shown that the addition of selenium (0.1 mmol L−1) to the soil of Brassica oleracea L. var. italica resulted in a significant increase in flavonoid levels. However, a further increase in concentration (up to 0.4 mmol L−1) led to a sharp decrease in the content of flavonoids in the experimental plants, associated with a sharp increase in the content of glycosinolates. The authors explain this phenomenon by the fact that although glucosinolates and phenylpropanoids are biosynthesized by different biochemical pathways, there is a cross-interaction between their biosynthetic pathways. This interaction manifests itself in the accumulation of glucosinolate intermediates, which limit the formation of phenylpropanoids. Analysis of the metabolome and transcriptome confirms this assumption [76].

4. Possible Pathways of Regulating the Biosynthesis of Secondary Metabolites via Selenium Supplementation

4.1. Selenium Impact on Primary Sulphur and Nitrogen Metabolisms of Plants

Since selenium and sulfur compete for the same metabolic pathways, selenium accumulation has an effect on gene expression similar to sulfur deficiency. The presence of Se affects the expression of key genes encoding S-transporters and enzymes that regulate S-metabolism. The absorption and assimilation of sulfur by plants are coordinated with the absorption and assimilation of nitrogen. Thus, by influencing sulfur metabolism, selenium also affects nitrogen metabolism. In addition, selenium can interfere with nitrogen metabolism by interfering with the absorption of molybdenum, which is a cofactor for nitrate reductase (an enzyme responsible for nitrogen assimilation). The change in N assimilation has serious consequences for the synthesis of all nitrogen-containing metabolites, including amino acids, proteins, and nucleotides, as well as secondary metabolites, including phytohormones, phenylpropanoids, alkaloids, glucosinolates, phytoalexins, etc. The mechanisms behind the selenium effect on sulfur and nitrogen metabolism are described in more detail by White [2], and Schiavon et al. [110].

4.2. Selenium Impact on Hormonal Regulation in Plants

An essential factor in the development, primary and secondary metabolism of plants is hormonal regulation. Unlike animals, plants appear to use fewer hormones. Nine plant hormones are known: auxin, cytokinins, ethylene, gibberellins, abscisic acid, brassinosteroids, jasmonate, salicylic acid, and strigolactones; they are found in all land plants [111]. Studies on the regulation of the biosynthesis of various classes of secondary metabolites showed that various hormone-signaling pathways are involved in the regulation. Examples of such pathways are the induction of flavonoid biosynthesis by abscisic acid, jasmonate, or cytokinins, and its repression by gibberellic acid, ethylene, or brassinosteroids [112].
Selenium compounds can modulate the signal from plant hormonal stimuli significantly. For example, selenium was shown to inhibit the biosynthesis of auxin and ethylene in rice seedlings, changing their primary metabolism and the architecture of the root [113]. The mechanism of such an effect is not fully understood. It is believed that Se induces changes in the interactions between auxin and ethylene to mediate the control of primary and lateral root development in rice. It was previously shown that Se at low concentrations can stimulate primary root elongation by triggering the biosynthesis and transport of auxins in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) [114]. However, with an increase in selenium concentration to 40 μM in experimental Arabidopsis plants, a decrease in the expression of the auxin-sensitive DR5::GUS gene was observed, while the expression of the cytokinin-induced ARR5::GUS gene and the ACS8::GUS gene, responsible for ethylene biosynthesis, increased instead [115]. Data on the effect of selenium compounds on the expression of genes for auxin-sensitive proteins, including the transporters of auxin itself, also look contradictory. Therefore, selenium makes a significant contribution to the distortion of the normal signal from auxin and ethylene, and also distorts the coordination between these two regulatory systems.
In addition, the relationship between selenium metabolism and hormonal systems is confirmed by studies of the mechanisms behind the acquisition of selenium resistance in some plants. In particular, in a transcriptome study conducted to identify selenate-responsive genes, the expression of many ethylene and/or jasmonic acid (JA)-responsive genes was induced by selenate treatment [116,117]. Arabidopsis plants treated with selenite also showed an accumulation of salicylic acid [116].
Thus, selenium can indirectly affect the overall metabolism (both primary and secondary) of plants through the modulation of the hormonal signal. It should also be noted, that selenium affects the root architecture of the plant, interfering with the uptake of other nutrients from the soil medium.

4.3. Selenium Impact on the Participants of Plant Redox Metabolism

One of the mechanisms affecting the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites in plants is redox regulation. It is known that ROS act as secondary messengers and actively interact with other signaling molecules, such as mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), phosphatases, calcium (Ca2+), and activator proteins [118]. Then, the signals are transmitted by a number of intermediaries (such as JAZ, MYC2, and EIN3) to downstream transcription factors. These transcription factors bind directly to cis-elements of gene promoters to regulate gene expression and subsequent biosynthesis of secondary metabolites [119]. Some genes, the protein products of which are involved in the synthesis of secondary metabolites, and transcription factors that regulate secondary metabolism, are sensitive to the concentration of ROS and the redox status of the cell. For example, among the genes that respond to changes in the concentration of H2O2 in cells, there are a relatively large number of genes encoding UDP-glucuronosyl/UDP-glucosyltransferases (UGT) [120]. UGT catalyzes the glucose transfer (as UDP-glucose) to a wide range of acceptor molecules, including plant hormones and all major classes of plant secondary metabolites, such as hydroxycinnamic acids, flavonoids, anthocyanins, glucosinolates, cyanogenic glycosides, and others [121]. Redox control is thought to influence MYB protein activity because of the presence of a pair of conserved Cys residues. These residues are included in the R2-MYB motif of most proteins of the 3R- and R2R3-MYB classes, which are involved in the regulation of the biosynthesis of flavonoids and glucosinolates. When oxidized, these two Cys-residues form an intramolecular S-S bond in the protein, which significantly changes the structure of the MYB domain, preventing DNA binding [122]. Selenium can affect the redox metabolism of plants and, as a result, the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites in several ways.
First, selenium, or rather some of its organic derivatives, can act as antioxidants, reacting with ROS directly. Such antioxidant effect was shown for selenocysteine and selenomethione, which can be explained by the nucleophilic properties of ionized selenol (RSe, prevailing over the neutral form at physiological pH values) and the ease of oxidation of these selenium-containing amino acids [123]. In addition, high antioxidant activity, in particular the ability to neutralize O2•−, DPPH, ABTS+• radicals, was established for selenium-containing proteins and peptides isolated from plants [124,125]. Studies of selenoproteins/selenopeptides showed that they contribute more to antioxidant activity than conventional proteins. Antioxidant abilities are also correlated with increased content of Se in proteins [124]. For example, a selenopeptide with the SeMet-Pro-Ser sequence showed higher antioxidant activity compared to the Met-Pro-Ser peptide [126]. Studies comparing the antioxidant activity of SeMet and Met showed that these amino acids react with hydroxyl radicals with the same mechanism. However, SeMet’s lower redox potential allows it to oxidize more easily than Met [127]. Thus, being present in plant tissues, organoselenium compounds are capable of exerting a direct antioxidant effect, thereby changing the redox status and regulating the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites.
Second, selenium can influence the metabolism of glutathione and the enzymes involved in maintaining redox homeostasis in cells. Genes and proteins associated with glutathione metabolism play an important role in plant selenium assimilation and tolerance [128]. However, the results of studies on the effect of selenium on the level of glutathione and the expression of genes involved in its metabolism vary greatly depending on the type of plant, the form, and the concentration of selenium. For example, transcriptome analysis of Cardamine violifolia plants treated with selenium (as selenate; 0, 0.25, 1.0, 4.0, 16.0, 64.0, 256.0 mg L−1) revealed a decrease in the expression of genes related to glutathione metabolism, such as genes encoding glutathione gamma-glutamyl-cysteinyl-transferase 1, glutathione S-transferase F12, glutamate-glyoxylate aminotransferase 1, and glutamine amidotransferase class-I, which ultimately led to a decrease in glutathione levels in cells [129]. At the same time, the results of transcriptomic analysis of tea plants treated with selenium (as selenite, 0, 0.015, 0.025, 0.050, 0.100, 0.200, 0.400 mM) showed that the roots had significantly higher expression of 121 genes encoding glutathione S-transferase (GST), glutathione synthetase, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase and glutaredoxin [117]. Among the enzymes listed above, researchers pay particular attention to the relationship between selenium and glutathione peroxidase. It is known that in animals this enzyme contains selenium in its active center and, as a result, its activity is directly related to the presence of this microelement. Generally, the increase of GPs activity upon the addition of Se was observed in multiple experiments, which indicates the decisive role of this enzyme in counteracting oxidative stress in plants [68]. Moreover, the activity of other antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), catalase (CAT), and glutathione reductase (GR), was also found to increase after the addition of selenium in various plant species [2].
Third, selenium and its derivatives, on the contrary, can act as prooxidants themselves, provoking oxidative stress in plant cells and thereby triggering protective mechanisms, including the biosynthesis of some secondary metabolites, such as phenolics. Despite the fact that this assumption is in some contradiction with the previously described antioxidant properties of organoselenium compounds, there is a sufficient amount of experimental data confirming the link between the treatment of plants with selenium, the following development of oxidative stress in them, and the resulting changes in biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. This property of selenium is manifested very clearly when it is applied at high concentrations and/or in experiments with non-accumulators. For example, in studies on kale sprouts, the increased lutein biosynthesis was associated with the need to maintain low levels of ROS and prevent lipid peroxidation in the thylakoid membrane, which is triggered at high levels of selenium [130]. Similar results were obtained for lettuce plants, which showed the maximum content of phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and ascorbic acid when grown at the highest selenium concentration, at which the plants developed oxidative stress [131]. An enhanced biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids as a result of selenium-induced changes in the H2O2 and/or NO concentration was also observed in peanut [132], rice [133], wheat [106], and green basil seedlings [134]. It is believed that what causes ROS accumulation and oxidative stress in plants treated with selenium is a disturbance of glutathione metabolism, leading to a decrease in its content [37], abnormal incorporation of Se into proteins and, as a result, disruption of their functions [135], as well as selenium-induced spontaneous dismutation of the superoxide radical (O2•−) into H2O2 [136].
Some authors note not only selenium-induced oxidative stress but also nitrosative stress (stress that stimulates the production of reactive forms of nitrogen, in particular, NO and peroxynitrite) [137]. It is also known that NO is an important signaling molecule and, together with salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and ROS, it is involved in the regulation of the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites in plants [138]. Thus, disruption of homeostasis of reactive nitrogen species under the action of selenium can also lead to changes in secondary metabolism.

4.4. Selenium Impact on the Expression of Genes for the Biosynthesis of Secondary Metabolites and Transcription Factors

In Section 3, when considering the effect of selenium on the accumulation of secondary metabolites, it was mentioned that the treatment of various plant species with selenium led to a change in the expression of genes involved in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites.
For example, in a study on the effect of selenium treatment on the biosynthesis of glucosinolates in broccoli, selenium was shown to significantly reduce the expression of BCAT4 and MAM1, which are involved in chain elongation; CYP79B2, CYP79F1, CYP83B1, and CYP83A1, which are involved in the formation of the core glucosinolate structure; and UGT74B1 and FMO2, which are involved in secondary modifications. In addition, exposure to selenate dramatically suppressed genes encoding the transcription factors MYB28 and MYB34, which regulate aliphatic- and indole-glucosinolate synthesis [73]. At the same time, data on the effect of selenium on the expression of genes for the biosynthesis of glucosinolates are contradictory even in experiments on the same plant species—broccoli. Mao et al. [75] found no significant changes in the expression of BCAT3, MAM1, CYP79F1, CYP83A1, SUR1, UGT74C1, and MYB76 when plants were treated with selenium. However, a significant increase in the expression of MY, the gene encoding myrosinase, and a decrease in the expression of Myb28 were found [75]. In a study on radish plants, a tissue-specific transcriptome reaction to the treatment of plants with selenium was demonstrated. The leaves showed a decrease in the expression of transcription factor Myb28, glucosyltransferase Ugt74b1, MY, and an increase in the expression of the sulfate transporter gene Sultr2;1 when treated with selenium at a concentration of 40 μM. Changes in the expression of other studied genes were not significant. The roots, on the contrary, showed a more pronounced reaction at the transcriptome level. Expression of the genes encoding Sultr2;1 Atps1, Myb28, Ugt74b1, Myr, and Eps was higher in plants treated with selenium, especially at high concentrations (40 μM) [78].
Other experimental studies showed that selenium also affects the expression of carotenoid biosynthesis genes. In particular, an increase in the transcriptional level of the CYE (phytoene synthase), CXB, and NCED (9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase) genes in rapeseed leaves and CYE in corn was found [99,100]. In addition, in Arabidopsis plants, the gene controlling phytoene synthase (PSY) was suppressed by the presence of Se [85].
There are more experimental data confirming the effect of selenium on the expression of key genes for the biosynthesis of phenolic compounds. For example, in a study based on the treatment of Ginkgo biloba leaves with a solution of sodium selenite, an increase in the expression level of the PAL, CHS, FLS, and FOMT genes was observed. Expression of MYB1 and MYB2 (transcription factors that play a key role in flavonoid biosynthesis) was also higher when plants were treated with Se. These data indicate that MYB1 and MYB2 are involved in the positive regulation of flavonoid accumulation upon Se treatment [109].
Rao et al. (2021), using a combined transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis, found that the sulfate transporter genes Sultr3;1, Sultr4;2 and some cytochrome P450 genes (e.g., CYP71B21, CYP72C1, and CYP81F1) may be involved in the regulation of the biosynthesis of glucosinolates and flavonoids in broccoli. It is known that sulfate transporters homologous to AtSULTR4;1 and AtSULTR4;2 are present in the tonoplast of plant cells and catalyzes the movement of selenate from/to the vacuole [50]. Expression of the AtSULTR4;1 and AtSULTR4;2 genes increases both with an excess of Se and with a deficiency of S in the medium [139]. It is believed that the sulfate transporter AtSULTR3;1 is localized in the chloroplast membrane and can probably catalyze the transport of selenate into plastids [56]. It is in plastids that selenate is converted into organic forms of selenium, which later become parts of the metabolic pathways of plants. Thus, the effect of selenium on the secondary metabolite level may be mediated by changes in the activity of sulfate transporters and the involvement of organic forms of selenium in metabolism.
Another possible way selenium affects secondary metabolism may be associated with plant epigenetic regulatory strategies, in particular DNA methylation. It is known that DNA methylation can be considered a precise protective mechanism for the regulation of gene expression. Generally, hypermethylation correlates with gene silencing, while hypomethylation is associated with active transcription. One of the triggers for methylation is reactive oxygen species. It was shown that the treatment of plants with selenium can lead to both an increase and a decrease in the level of ROS, depending on the selenium concentration and type of plant [37]. This way, by changing the concentration of ROS in cells, selenium can indirectly affect the degree of DNA methylation, which ultimately leads to changes in gene expression, including those responsible for the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites [99,140].
Thus, changes in gene expression of selenium-treated plants can be mediated both by changes in their primary metabolism and hormonal regulation and by the effect of selenium on redox metabolism in cells (Figure 3).

5. Conclusions and Research Perspectives

Molecular research, including omics technologies such as transcriptomics-, proteomics-, and metabolomics-based methods, made it possible to achieve significant success in the study of plant metabolism and the role of selenium in it. To date, a fairly large array of experimental data was accumulated, showing the effect of selenium not only on the primary metabolism of plants but also on the accumulation of various secondary metabolites (alkaloids, cyanogenic glucosides, glucosinolates, terpenes, phenolic compounds) in various plant species. However, these data are extremely contradictory and often difficult to compare, since studies are carried out on different types of plants, different stages of ontogenesis, and growing substrates, with different methods of treatment with selenium, in different forms and at different concentrations. This leads to the fact that some studies show a stimulating effect of selenium on the accumulation of metabolites, in others—an inhibitory effect, and in others—no effect at all. This heterogeneity of approaches has not yet made it possible to draw an unambiguous conclusion about the significance of selenium as a nutrient. This problem can be solved, for example, by conducting experiments under the same conditions, but with plants characterized by a different ability to accumulate selenium and, accordingly, a different intensity of selenium participation in primary and secondary metabolism.
In this review article, the following aspects were identified as possible ways of regulating plant secondary metabolism by selenium-supplementation: changes occurring in primary S/N metabolism, hormonal regulation, redox metabolism, as well as at the transcriptomic level of secondary metabolite biosynthesis. However, most likely, these are not the only regulatory mechanisms in which selenium is involved and which cause changes in the accumulation of secondary metabolites. We attempted to evaluate each of the known pathways separately. Secondary metabolite levels can be influenced by a large group of factors; therefore, only the correct setting of the experiment would allow a targeted assessment of the role of Se.
The relative unification of experimental approaches, as well as the later expansion of the testing range, would make it possible to assess both the adaptogenic and metabolism-enhancing potential of Se and the toxic nature of this element. This approach can provide more precise results even at the level of field experiments. In addition, Se has the potential as an agent for biofortification or phytofortification that improves the nutritional quality of food and feed, however, only a few crops have been studied in this aspect. The study of Se-mediated metabolic pathways, the involvement of various forms of selenium in signaling pathways, including the search for intermediates (messengers, activator proteins, transcription factors) that can directly bind to selenium or its derivatives can provide a deeper understanding of existing data and make a certain contribution to understanding the actual role of Se in the growth, development, and productivity of plant organisms.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.S. and P.F.; methodology, P.M.; formal analysis, A.R. and D.K.; investigation, M.A., D.K. and T.S.; resources, L.S.; data curation, T.S., M.A., A.R. and D.K.; writing—original draft preparation, L.S., P.F., A.G. and P.M.; writing—review and editing, P.F. and A.R.; visualization, P.F.; supervision, L.S.; project administration, L.S.; funding acquisition, L.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Russian Science Foundation, grant number 22-14-00106, https://rscf.ru/en/project/22-14-00106/ (accessed on 10 November 2022).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Schwarz, K.; Foltz, C.M. Selenium as an integral part of factor 3 against dietary necrotic liver degeneration. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 3292–3293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. White, P.J. Selenium metabolism in plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Gen. Subj. 2018, 1862, 2333–2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gupta, M.; Gupta, S. An Overview of Selenium Uptake, Metabolism, and Toxicity in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 7, 2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Schomburg, L. Dietary Selenium and Human Health. Nutrients 2017, 9, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Kieliszek, M. Selenium–Fascinating Microelement, Properties and Sources in Food. Molecules 2019, 24, 1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. dos Reis, A.R.; El-Ramady, H.; Santos, E.F.; Gratão, P.L.; Schomburg, L. Overview of Selenium Deficiency and Toxicity Worldwide: Affected Areas, Selenium-Related Health Issues, and Case Studies. In Selenium in Plants: Molecular, Physiological, Ecological and Evolutionary Aspects; Pilon-Smits, E.A.H., Winkel, L.H.E., Lin, Z.-Q., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 209–230. ISBN 978-3-319-56249-0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hossain, A.; Skalicky, M.; Brestic, M.; Maitra, S.; Sarkar, S.; Ahmad, Z.; Vemuri, H.; Garai, S.; Mondal, M.; Bhatt, R.; et al. Selenium Biofortification: Roles, Mechanisms, Responses and Prospects. Molecules 2021, 26, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shahid, M.; Niazi, N.K.; Khalid, S.; Murtaza, B.; Bibi, I.; Rashid, M.I. A critical review of selenium biogeochemical behavior in soil-plant system with an inference to human health. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 234, 915–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Araie, H.; Shiraiwa, Y. Selenium Utilization Strategy by Microalgae. Molecules 2009, 14, 4880–4891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Banerjee, A.; Roychoudhury, A. Role of Selenium in Plants Against Abiotic Stresses: Phenological and Molecular Aspects. In Molecular Plant Abiotic Stress; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 123–133. ISBN 9781119463665. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wen, D. Selenium in horticultural crops. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 289, 110441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kumari, V.V.; Banerjee, P.; Verma, V.C.; Sukumaran, S.; Chandran, M.A.S.; Gopinath, K.A.; Venkatesh, G.; Yadav, S.K.; Singh, V.K.; Awasthi, N.K. Plant Nutrition: An Effective Way to Alleviate Abiotic Stress in Agricultural Crops. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xiang, J.; Rao, S.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, W.; Cheng, S.; Cong, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, X.; Xu, F. Research Progress on the Effects of Selenium on the Growth and Quality of Tea Plants. Plants 2022, 11, 2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rady, M.M.; Belal, H.E.E.; Gadallah, F.M.; Semida, W.M. Selenium application in two methods promotes drought tolerance in Solanum lycopersicum plant by inducing the antioxidant defense system. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 266, 109290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jawad Hassan, M.; Ali Raza, M.; Khan, I.; Ahmad Meraj, T.; Ahmed, M.; Abbas Shah, G.; Ansar, M.; Awan, S.A.; Khan, N.; Iqbal, N.; et al. Selenium and Salt Interactions in Black Gram (Vigna mungo L.): Ion Uptake, Antioxidant Defense System, and Photochemistry Efficiency. Plants 2020, 9, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ulhassan, Z.; Khan, A.R.; Sheteiwy, M.S.; Azhar, W.; Hamid, Y.; Hussain, S.; Salam, A.; Kamran, M.A.; Hakeem, K.R.; Aftab, T.; et al. Selenium-Mediated Regulation of Antioxidant Defense System and Improved Heavy Metals Tolerance in Plants. In Antioxidant Defense in Plants: Molecular Basis of Regulation; Aftab, T., Hakeem, K.R., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2022; pp. 369–382. ISBN 978-981-16-7981-0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Das, S.; Majumder, B.; Biswas, A.K. Selenium alleviates arsenic induced stress by modulating growth, oxidative stress, antioxidant defense and thiol metabolism in rice seedlings. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2022, 24, 763–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hawrylak-Nowak, B.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Matraszek-Gawron, R. Mechanisms of Selenium-Induced Enhancement of Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. In Plant Nutrients and Abiotic Stress Tolerance; Hasanuzzaman, M., Fujita, M., Oku, H., Nahar, K., Hawrylak-Nowak, B., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 269–295. ISBN 978-981-10-9044-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pilon-Smits, E.A.H. On the Ecology of Selenium Accumulation in Plants. Plants 2019, 8, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lima, L.W.; Pilon-Smits, E.A.H.; Schiavon, M. Mechanisms of selenium hyperaccumulation in plants: A survey of molecular, biochemical and ecological cues. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Gen. Subj. 2018, 1862, 2343–2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Santiago, F.E.M.; Silva, M.L.S.; Cardoso, A.A.S.; Duan, Y.; Guilherme, L.R.G.; Liu, J.; Li, L. Biochemical basis of differential selenium tolerance in arugula (Eruca sativa Mill.) and lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 157, 328–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hawrylak-Nowak, B. Biological Activity of Selenium in Plants: Physiological and Biochemical Mechanisms of Phytotoxicity and Tolerance. In Selenium and Nano-Selenium in Environmental Stress Management and Crop Quality Improvement; Hossain, M.A., Ahammed, G.J., Kolbert, Z., El-Ramady, H., Islam, T., Schiavon, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 341–363. ISBN 978-3-031-07063-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Galić, L.; Vinković, T.; Ravnjak, B.; Lončarić, Z. Agronomic Biofortification of Significant Cereal Crops with Selenium—A Review. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Domokos-Szabolcsy, É.; Fári, M.; Márton, L.; Czakó, M.; Veres, S.; Elhawat, N.; Antal, G.; El-Ramady, H.; Zsíros, O.; Garab, G.; et al. Selenate tolerance and selenium hyperaccumulation in the monocot giant reed (Arundo donax), a biomass crop plant with phytoremediation potential. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 31368–31380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. El Mehdawi, A.F.; Pilon-Smits, E.A.H. Ecological aspects of plant selenium hyperaccumulation. Plant Biol. 2012, 14, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.B.; Raza, A.; Hawrylak-Nowak, B.; Matraszek-Gawron, R.; Nahar, K.; Fujita, M. Selenium Toxicity in Plants and Environment: Biogeochemistry and Remediation Possibilities. Plants 2020, 9, 1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Li, S.; Liu, C. Use of Selenium Accumulators and Hyperaccumulators in Se-Phytoremediation Technologies: Recent Progress and Future Perspectives. In Selenium and Nano-Selenium in Environmental Stress Management and Crop Quality Improvement; Hossain, M.A., Ahammed, G.J., Kolbert, Z., El-Ramady, H., Islam, T., Schiavon, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 365–381. ISBN 978-3-031-07063-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Reynolds, R.J.B.; Pilon-Smits, E.A.H. Plant selenium hyperaccumulation—Ecological effects and potential implications for selenium cycling and community structure. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Gen. Subj. 2018, 1862, 2372–2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. D’Amato, R.; Regni, L.; Falcinelli, B.; Mattioli, S.; Benincasa, P.; Dal Bosco, A.; Pacheco, P.; Proietti, P.; Troni, E.; Santi, C.; et al. Current Knowledge on Selenium Biofortification to Improve the Nutraceutical Profile of Food: A Comprehensive Review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 4075–4097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Schiavon, M.; Nardi, S.; dalla Vecchia, F.; Ertani, A. Selenium biofortification in the 21st century: Status and challenges for healthy human nutrition. Plant Soil 2020, 453, 245–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Newman, R.; Waterland, N.; Moon, Y.; Tou, J.C. Selenium Biofortification of Agricultural Crops and Effects on Plant Nutrients and Bioactive Compounds Important for Human Health and Disease Prevention—A Review. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2019, 74, 449–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, N.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, T. Selenium transformation and selenium-rich foods. Food Biosci. 2021, 40, 100875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hu, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Peng, J.; Huang, T.; Yang, X.; Jeong, B.R.; Yang, Q. Seleno-Amino Acids in Vegetables: A Review of Their Forms and Metabolism. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 804368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, L.; Chu, C. Selenium Uptake, Transport, Metabolism, Reutilization, and Biofortification in Rice. Rice 2022, 15, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, Z.; Huang, W.; Pang, F. Selenium in Soil–Plant-Microbe: A Review. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2022, 108, 167–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kushwaha, A.; Goswami, L.; Lee, J.; Sonne, C.; Brown, R.J.C.; Kim, K.-H. Selenium in soil-microbe-plant systems: Sources, distribution, toxicity, tolerance, and detoxification. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 52, 2383–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.B.; Raza, A.; Hawrylak-Nowak, B.; Matraszek-Gawron, R.; Al Mahmud, J.; Nahar, K.; Fujita, M. Selenium in plants: Boon or bane? Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 178, 104170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mechora, Š. Selenium as a Protective Agent against Pests: A Review. Plants 2019, 8, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lai, X.; Yang, X.; Rao, S.; Zhu, Z.; Cong, X.; Ye, J.; Zhang, W.; Liao, Y.; Cheng, S.; Xu, F. Advances in physiological mechanisms of selenium to improve heavy metal stress tolerance in plants. Plant Biol. 2022, 24, 913–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ghorai, M.; Kumar, V.; Kumar, V.; Al-Tawaha, A.R.; Shekhawat, M.S.; Pandey, D.K.; Batiha, G.E.-S.; Bursal, E.; Jha, N.K.; Gadekar, V.S.; et al. Beneficial Role of Selenium (Se) Biofortification in Developing Resilience Against Potentially Toxic Metal and Metalloid Stress in Crops: Recent Trends in Genetic Engineering and Omics Approaches. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2022, 22, 2347–2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Garcia, P.; Zulfiqar, F.; Parvin, K.; Ahmed, N.; Fujita, M.; Nahar, K. Selenium supplementation and crop plant tolerance to metal/metalloid toxicity. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 12, 792770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jiang, H.; Lin, W.; Jiao, H.; Liu, J.; Chan, L.; Liu, X.; Wang, R.; Chen, T. Uptake, transport, and metabolism of selenium and its protective effects against toxic metals in plants: A review. Metallomics 2021, 13, mfab040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Golubkina, N.; Moldovan, A.; Kekina, H.; Kharchenko, V.; Sekara, A.; Vasileva, V.; Skrypnik, L.; Tallarita, A.; Caruso, G. Joint Biofortification of Plants with Selenium and Iodine: New Field of Discoveries. Plants 2021, 10, 1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sarwar, N.; Akhtar, M.; Kamran, M.A.; Imran, M.; Riaz, M.A.; Kamran, K.; Hussain, S. Selenium biofortification in food crops: Key mechanisms and future perspectives. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2020, 93, 103615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Trippe, R.C.; Pilon-Smits, E.A.H. Selenium transport and metabolism in plants: Phytoremediation and biofortification implications. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 404, 124178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhou, X.; Yang, J.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Shi, W. Selenium Biofortification and Interaction with Other Elements in Plants: A Review. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 586421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. White, P.J.; Broadley, M.R. Biofortification of crops with seven mineral elements often lacking in human diets—Iron, zinc, copper, calcium, magnesium, selenium and iodine. New Phytol. 2009, 182, 49–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. White, P.J. Selenium accumulation by plants. Ann. Bot. 2016, 117, 217–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. White, P.J. The Genetics of Selenium Accumulation by Plants. In Selenium in Plants: Molecular, Physiological, Ecological and Evolutionary Aspects; Pilon-Smits, E.A.H., Winkel, L.H.E., Lin, Z.-Q., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 143–163. ISBN 978-3-319-56249-0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gigolashvili, T.; Kopriva, S. Transporters in plant sulfur metabolism. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Ximénez-Embún, P.; Alonso, I.; Madrid-Albarrán, Y.; Cámara, C. Establishment of Selenium Uptake and Species Distribution in Lupine, Indian Mustard, and Sunflower Plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 832–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Li, H.-F.; McGrath, S.P.; Zhao, F.-J. Selenium uptake, translocation and speciation in wheat supplied with selenate or selenite. New Phytol. 2008, 178, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Takahashi, H.; Kopriva, S.; Giordano, M.; Saito, K.; Hell, R. Sulfur Assimilation in Photosynthetic Organisms: Molecular Functions and Regulations of Transporters and Assimilatory Enzymes. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2011, 62, 157–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kawashima, C.G.; Yoshimoto, N.; Maruyama-Nakashita, A.; Tsuchiya, Y.N.; Saito, K.; Takahashi, H.; Dalmay, T. Sulphur starvation induces the expression of microRNA-395 and one of its target genes but in different cell types. Plant J. 2009, 57, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pilon-Smits, E.A.H.; Womg, M. Plant selenium metabolism–genetic manipulation, phytotechnological applications, and ecological implications. In Environmental Contamination; Wong, M.H., Ed.; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2012; pp. 293–311. [Google Scholar]
  56. Cao, M.-J.; Wang, Z.; Wirtz, M.; Hell, R.; Oliver, D.J.; Xiang, C.-B. SULTR3;1 is a chloroplast-localized sulfate transporter in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2013, 73, 607–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Paul, S.; Datta, S.K.; Datta, K. miRNA regulation of nutrient homeostasis in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Schiavon, M.; Pilon, M.; Malagoli, M.; Pilon-Smits, E.A.H. Exploring the importance of sulfate transporters and ATP sulphurylases for selenium hyperaccumulation—A comparison of Stanleya pinnata and Brassica juncea (Brassicaceae). Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Pilon-Smits, E.A.H.; Quinn, C.F.; Tapken, W.; Malagoli, M.; Schiavon, M. Physiological functions of beneficial elements. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pilon-Smits, E.A.H.; Hwang, S.; Mel Lytle, C.; Zhu, Y.; Tai, J.C.; Bravo, R.C.; Chen, Y.; Leustek, T.; Terry, N. Overexpression of ATP Sulfurylase in Indian Mustard Leads to Increased Selenate Uptake, Reduction, and Tolerance1. Plant Physiol. 1999, 119, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Huysen, T.; Terry, N.; Pilon-Smits, E.A.H. Exploring the Selenium Phytoremediation Potential of Transgenic Indian Mustard Overexpressing ATP Sulfurylase or Cystathionine-γ-Synthase. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2004, 6, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Terry, N.; Zayed, A.M.; De Souza, M.P.; Tarun, A.S. Selenium in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2000, 51, 401–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pilon-Smits, E.A.H.; Quinn, C.F. Selenium Metabolism in Plants. In Cell Biology of Metals and Nutrients; Hell, R., Mendel, R.-R., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 225–241. ISBN 978-3-642-10613-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pilon-Smits, E.A.H. Selenium in Plants. In Progress in Botany; Lüttge, U., Beyschlag, W., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 76, pp. 93–107. ISBN 978-3-319-08807-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Duncan, E.G.; Maher, W.A.; Jagtap, R.; Krikowa, F.; Roper, M.M.; O’Sullivan, C.A. Selenium speciation in wheat grain varies in the presence of nitrogen and sulphur fertilisers. Environ. Geochem. Health 2017, 39, 955–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. González-Morales, S.; Pérez-Labrada, F.; García-Enciso, E.L.; Leija-Martínez, P.; Medrano-Macías, J.; Dávila-Rangel, I.E.; Juárez-Maldonado, A.; Rivas-Martínez, E.N.; Benavides-Mendoza, A. Selenium and Sulfur to Produce Allium Functional Crops. Molecules 2017, 22, 558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Guignardi, Z.; Schiavon, M. Biochemistry of Plant Selenium Uptake and Metabolism. In Selenium in Plants: Molecular, Physiological, Ecological and Evolutionary Aspects; Pilon-Smits, E.A.H., Winkel, L.H.E., Lin, Z.-Q., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 21–34. ISBN 978-3-319-56249-0. [Google Scholar]
  68. Chauhan, R.; Awasthi, S.; Srivastava, S.; Dwivedi, S.; Pilon-Smits, E.A.H.; Dhankher, O.P.; Tripathi, R.D. Understanding selenium metabolism in plants and its role as a beneficial element. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 49, 1937–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gutiérrez-Grijalva, E.P.; López-Martínez, L.X.; Contreras-Angulo, L.A.; Elizalde-Romero, C.A.; Heredia, J.B. Plant Alkaloids: Structures and Bioactive Properties. In Plant-Derived Bioactives: Chemistry and Mode of Action; Swamy, M.K., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 85–117. ISBN 978-981-15-2361-8. [Google Scholar]
  70. Mimmo, T.; Tiziani, R.; Valentinuzzi, F.; Lucini, L.; Nicoletto, C.; Sambo, P.; Scampicchio, M.; Pii, Y.; Cesco, S. Selenium Biofortification in Fragaria × ananassa: Implications on Strawberry Fruits Quality, Content of Bioactive Health Beneficial Compounds and Metabolomic Profile. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Hosseinzadeh Rostam Kalaei, M.; Abdossi, V.; Danaee, E. Evaluation of foliar application of selenium and flowering stages on selected properties of Iranian Borage as a medicinal plant. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 12568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Seregina, I.I.; Tsygutkin, A.S.; Dmitrevskaya, I.I.; Belopukhov, S.L.; Vigilyansky, Y.M. Productivity and grain quality indicators of white lupine (Lupinus albus L.) variety Degas when using sodium selenite. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 843, 12039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tian, M.; Yang, Y.; Ávila, F.W.; Fish, T.; Yuan, H.; Hui, M.; Pan, S.; Thannhauser, T.W.; Li, L. Effects of Selenium Supplementation on Glucosinolate Biosynthesis in Broccoli. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 8036–8044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tian, M.; Xu, X.; Liu, Y.; Xie, L.; Pan, S. Effect of Se treatment on glucosinolate metabolism and health-promoting compounds in the broccoli sprouts of three cultivars. Food Chem. 2016, 190, 374–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Mao, S.; Wang, J.; Wu, Q.; Liang, M.; Yuan, Y.; Wu, T.; Liu, M.; Wu, Q.; Huang, K. Effect of selenium–sulfur interaction on the anabolism of sulforaphane in broccoli. Phytochemistry 2020, 179, 112499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Rao, S.; Gou, Y.; Yu, T.; Cong, X.; Gui, J.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, W.; Liao, Y.; Ye, J.; Cheng, S.; et al. Effects of selenate on Se, flavonoid, and glucosinolate in broccoli florets by combined transcriptome and metabolome analyses. Food Res. Int. 2021, 146, 110463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Gui, J.-Y.; Rao, S.; Gou, Y.; Xu, F.; Cheng, S. Comparative study of the effects of selenium yeast and sodium selenite on selenium content and nutrient quality in broccoli florets (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 1707–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Schiavon, M.; Berto, C.; Malagoli, M.; Trentin, A.; Sambo, P.; Dall’Acqua, S.; Pilon-Smits, E.A.H. Selenium Biofortification in Radish Enhances Nutritional Quality via Accumulation of Methyl-Selenocysteine and Promotion of Transcripts and Metabolites Related to Glucosinolates, Phenolics, and Amino Acids. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Dall’Acqua, S.; Ertani, A.; Pilon-Smits, E.A.H.; Fabrega-Prats, M.; Schiavon, M. Selenium Biofortification Differentially Affects Sulfur Metabolism and Accumulation of Phytochemicals in Two Rocket Species (Eruca Sativa Mill. and Diplotaxis Tenuifolia) Grown in Hydroponics. Plants 2019, 8, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Yulvianti, M.; Zidorn, C. Chemical Diversity of Plant Cyanogenic Glycosides: An Overview of Reported Natural Products. Molecules 2021, 26, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gleadow, R.M.; Møller, B.L. Cyanogenic glycosides: Synthesis, physiology, and phenotypic plasticity. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2014, 65, 155–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Blažević, I.; Montaut, S.; Burčul, F.; Rollin, P. Glucosinolates: Novel Sources and Biological Potential. In Glucosinolates; Mérillon, J.-M., Ramawat, K.G., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 3–60. ISBN 978-3-319-25462-3. [Google Scholar]
  83. Blažević, I.; Montaut, S.; Burčul, F.; Olsen, C.E.; Burow, M.; Rollin, P.; Agerbirk, N. Glucosinolate structural diversity, identification, chemical synthesis and metabolism in plants. Phytochemistry 2020, 169, 112100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Grubb, C.D.; Abel, S. Glucosinolate metabolism and its control. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sams, C.E.; Panthee, D.R.; Charron, C.S.; Kopsell, D.A.; Yuan, J.S. Selenium Regulates Gene Expression for Glucosinolate and Carotenoid Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2011, 136, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ninkuu, V.; Zhang, L.; Yan, J.; Fu, Z.; Yang, T.; Zeng, H. Biochemistry of Terpenes and Recent Advances in Plant Protection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Tetali, S.D. Terpenes and isoprenoids: A wealth of compounds for global use. Planta 2019, 249, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Saad, N.Y.; Muller, C.D.; Lobstein, A. Major bioactivities and mechanism of action of essential oils and their components. Flavour Fragr. J. 2013, 28, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kubeczka, K.-H. History and sources of essential oil research. In Handbook of Essential Oils; Baser, K.H.C., Buchbauer, G., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020; pp. 3–39. ISBN 1351246461. [Google Scholar]
  90. Skrypnik, L.; Novikova, A.; Tokupova, E. Improvement of Phenolic Compounds, Essential Oil Content and Antioxidant Properties of Sweet Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) Depending on Type and Concentration of Selenium Application. Plants 2019, 8, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Mezeyova, I.; Hegedűsová, A.; Hegedűs, O.; Farkaš, J.; Šlosár, M. Qualitative parameters of less grown basils depending on nutrition in the form of selenium. Int. J. Agric. For. Life Sci. 2018, 2, 164–170. [Google Scholar]
  92. Mezeyová, I.; Hegedusova, A.; Andrejiová, A.; Hegedus, O.; Golian, M. Phytomass and content of essential oils in Ocimum basilicum after foliar treatment with selenium. J. Int. Sci. Publ 2016, 4, 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  93. Tavakoli, S.; Enteshari, S.; Yousefifard, M. Investigation of the effect of selenium on growth, antioxidant capacity and secondary metabolites in Melissa officinalis. Iran. J. Plant Physiol. 2020, 10, 3125–3134. [Google Scholar]
  94. Das, D.; Seal, P.; Biswas, A.K. Influence of selenium on growth, antioxidants production and physiological parameters of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings and its possible reversal by coapplication of sulphate. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 2236–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Chomchan, R.; Siripongvutikorn, S.; Puttarak, P.; Rattanapon, R. Influence of selenium bio-fortification on nutritional compositions, bioactive compounds content and anti-oxidative properties of young ricegrass (Oryza sativa L.). Funct. Foods Heal. Dis. 2017, 7, 195–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Pezzarossa, B.; Rosellini, I.; Borghesi, E.; Tonutti, P.; Malorgio, F. Effects of Se-enrichment on yield, fruit composition and ripening of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants grown in hydroponics. Sci. Hortic. 2014, 165, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Dong, J.Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S.H.; Yin, L.P.; Xu, G.J.; Zheng, C.; Lei, C.; Zhang, M.Z. Selenium increases chlorogenic acid, chlorophyll and carotenoids of Lycium chinense leaves. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 310–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. D’Amato, R.; De Feudis, M.; Guiducci, M.; Businelli, D. Zea mays L. Grain: Increase in Nutraceutical and Antioxidant Properties Due to Se Fortification in Low and High Water Regimes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 7050–7059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Bocchini, M.; D’Amato, R.; Ciancaleoni, S.; Fontanella, M.C.; Palmerini, C.A.; Beone, G.M.; Onofri, A.; Negri, V.; Marconi, G.; Albertini, E.; et al. Soil Selenium (Se) Biofortification Changes the Physiological, Biochemical and Epigenetic Responses to Water Stress in Zea mays L. by Inducing a Higher Drought Tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Thiruvengadam, M.; Chung, I.-M. Selenium, putrescine, and cadmium influence health-promoting phytochemicals and molecular-level effects on turnip (Brassica rapa ssp. rapa). Food Chem. 2015, 173, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Maoka, T. Carotenoids as natural functional pigments. J. Nat. Med. 2020, 74, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Saltveit, M.E. Synthesis and metabolism of phenolic compounds. In Fruit and Vegetable Phytochemicals: Chemistry and Human Health; Yahia, E.M., Ed.; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; Volume 2, pp. 115–124. [Google Scholar]
  103. SaffaryazdI, A.; Lahouti, M.; Ganjeali, A.; Bayat, H. Impact of Selenium Supplementation on Growth and Selenium Accumulation on Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) Plants. Not. Sci. Biol. 2012, 4, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Xia, Q.; Yang, Z.; Shui, Y.; Liu, X.; Chen, J.; Khan, S.; Wang, J.; Gao, Z. Methods of Selenium Application Differentially Modulate Plant Growth, Selenium Accumulation and Speciation, Protein, Anthocyanins and Concentrations of Mineral Elements in Purple-Grained Wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Groth, S.; Budke, C.; Neugart, S.; Ackermann, S.; Kappenstein, F.-S.; Daum, D.; Rohn, S. Influence of a Selenium Biofortification on Antioxidant Properties and Phenolic Compounds of Apples (Malus domestica). Antioxidants 2020, 9, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Islam, M.Z.; Park, B.-J.; Kang, H.-M.; Lee, Y.-T. Influence of selenium biofortification on the bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of wheat microgreen extract. Food Chem. 2020, 309, 125763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Saeedi, M.; Soltani, F.; Babalar, M.; Izadpanah, F.; Wiesner-Reinhold, M.; Baldermann, S. Selenium Fortification Alters the Growth, Antioxidant Characteristics and Secondary Metabolite Profiles of Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) Cultivars in Hydroponic Culture. Plants 2021, 10, 1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Skrypnik, L.; Styran, T.; Savina, T.; Golubkina, N. Effect of Selenium Application and Growth Stage at Harvest on Hydrophilic and Lipophilic Antioxidants in Lamb’s Lettuce (Valerianella locusta L. Laterr.). Plants 2021, 10, 2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Linling, L.I.; Jie, Y.U.; Honghui, Y.; Sanxing, Z.H.A.; Kun, D.; Xian, X.; Yanyan, L.U.O.; Cheng, S.; Cheng, H. High-density kinetic analysis of the metabolomic and transcriptomic response of Ginkgo biloba flavonoids biosynthesis to selenium treatments. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. 2019, 47, 792–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Schiavon, M.; Lima, L.W.; Jiang, Y.; Hawkesford, M.J. Effects of Selenium on Plant Metabolism and Implications for Crops and Consumers. In Selenium in Plants: Molecular, Physiological, Ecological and Evolutionary Aspects; Pilon-Smits, E.A.H., Winkel, L.H.E., Lin, Z.-Q., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 257–275. ISBN 978-3-319-56249-0. [Google Scholar]
  111. Cutler, S.R.; Nelson, D.C. Plant Hormones. In eLS; Hetherington, A.M., Ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Xu, W.; Dubos, C.; Lepiniec, L. Transcriptional control of flavonoid biosynthesis by MYB–bHLH–WDR complexes. Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Malheiros, R.S.P.; Costa, L.C.; Ávila, R.T.; Pimenta, T.M.; Teixeira, L.S.; Brito, F.A.L.; Zsögön, A.; Araújo, W.L.; Ribeiro, D.M. Selenium downregulates auxin and ethylene biosynthesis in rice seedlings to modify primary metabolism and root architecture. Planta 2019, 250, 333–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Jia, H.; Song, Z.; Wu, F.; Ma, M.; Li, Y.; Han, D.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Cui, H. Low selenium increases the auxin concentration and enhances tolerance to low phosphorous stress in tobacco. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 153, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Lehotai, N.; Kolbert, Z.; Pető, A.; Feigl, G.; Ördög, A.; Kumar, D.; Tari, I.; Erdei, L. Selenite-induced hormonal and signalling mechanisms during root growth of Arabidopsis thaliana L. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 5677–5687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Tamaoki, M.; Freeman, J.L.; Marquès, L.; Pilon-Smits, E.A.H. New insights into the roles of ethylene and jasmonic acid in the acquisition of selenium resistance in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2008, 3, 865–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Cao, D.; Liu, Y.; Ma, L.; Jin, X.; Guo, G.; Tan, R.; Liu, Z.; Zheng, L.; Ye, F.; Liu, W. Transcriptome analysis of differentially expressed genes involved in selenium accumulation in tea plant (Camellia sinensis). PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0197506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Kohli, S.K.; Khanna, K.; Bhardwaj, R.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Ahmad, P.; Corpas, F.J. Assessment of Subcellular ROS and NO Metabolism in Higher Plants: Multifunctional Signaling Molecules. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Meraj, T.A.; Fu, J.; Raza, M.A.; Zhu, C.; Shen, Q.; Xu, D.; Wang, Q. Transcriptional Factors Regulate Plant Stress Responses Through Mediating Secondary Metabolism. Genes 2020, 11, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Sewelam, N.; Jaspert, N.; Van Der Kelen, K.; Tognetti, V.B.; Schmitz, J.; Frerigmann, H.; Stahl, E.; Zeier, J.; Van Breusegem, F.; Maurino, V.G. Spatial H2O2 Signaling Specificity: H2O2 from Chloroplasts and Peroxisomes Modulates the Plant Transcriptome Differentially. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 1191–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Vogt, T.; Jones, P. Glycosyltransferases in plant natural product synthesis: Characterization of a supergene family. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5, 380–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Dubos, C.; Stracke, R.; Grotewold, E.; Weisshaar, B.; Martin, C.; Lepiniec, L. MYB transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Rahmanto, A.S.; Davies, M.J. Selenium-containing amino acids as direct and indirect antioxidants. IUBMB Life 2012, 64, 863–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Zhu, S.; Du, C.; Yu, T.; Cong, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, S.; Li, Y. Antioxidant Activity of Selenium-Enriched Peptides from the Protein Hydrolysate of Cardamine violifolia. J. Food Sci. 2019, 84, 3504–3511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Zhang, X.; He, H.; Xiang, J.; Yin, H.; Hou, T. Selenium-Containing Proteins/Peptides from Plants: A Review on the Structures and Functions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 15061–15073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Liu, K.; Du, R.; Chen, F. Antioxidant activities of Se-MPS: A selenopeptide identified from selenized brown rice protein hydrolysates. LWT 2019, 111, 555–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Mishra, B.; Sharma, A.; Naumov, S.; Priyadarsini, K.I. Novel Reactions of One-Electron Oxidized Radicals of Selenomethionine in Comparison with Methionine. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 7709–7715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ren, H.; Li, X.; Guo, L.; Wang, L.; Hao, X.; Zeng, J. Integrative Transcriptome and Proteome Analysis Reveals the Absorption and Metabolism of Selenium in Tea Plants [Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze]. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 848349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Rao, S.; Yu, T.; Cong, X.; Lai, X.; Xiang, J.; Cao, J.; Liao, X.; Gou, Y.; Chao, W.; Xue, H.; et al. Transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome reveal the mechanism of tolerance to selenate toxicity in Cardamine violifolia. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 406, 124283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ortega-Hernández, E.; Antunes-Ricardo, M.; Cisneros-Zevallos, L.; Jacobo-Velázquez, D.A. Selenium, Sulfur, and Methyl Jasmonate Treatments Improve the Accumulation of Lutein and Glucosinolates in Kale Sprouts. Plants 2022, 11, 1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Ríos, J.J.; Rosales, M.A.; Blasco, B.; Cervilla, L.M.; Romero, L.; Ruiz, J.M. Biofortification of Se and induction of the antioxidant capacity in lettuce plants. Sci. Hortic. 2008, 116, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Wang, G.; Wu, L.; Zhang, H.; Wu, W.; Zhang, M.; Li, X.; Wu, H. Regulation of the Phenylpropanoid Pathway: A Mechanism of Selenium Tolerance in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Seedlings. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 3626–3635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. D’Amato, R.; Fontanella, M.C.; Falcinelli, B.; Beone, G.M.; Bravi, E.; Marconi, O.; Benincasa, P.; Businelli, D. Selenium Biofortification in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Sprouting: Effects on Se Yield and Nutritional Traits with Focus on Phenolic Acid Profile. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 4082–4090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Pannico, A.; El-Nakhel, C.; Graziani, G.; Kyriacou, M.C.; Giordano, M.; Soteriou, G.A.; Zarrelli, A.; Ritieni, A.; De Pascale, S.; Rouphael, Y. Selenium Biofortification Impacts the Nutritive Value, Polyphenolic Content, and Bioactive Constitution of Variable Microgreens Genotypes. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Maassoumi, N.; Ghanati, F.; Zare-Maivan, H.; Gavlighi, H.A. Metabolic changes network in selenium-treated Astragalus cells derived by glutathione as a core component. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2022, 149, 455–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Feng, R.; Wei, C.; Tu, S. The roles of selenium in protecting plants against abiotic stresses. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013, 87, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Kolbert, Z.; Lehotai, N.; Molnár, Á.; Feigl, G. “The roots” of selenium toxicity: A new concept. Plant Signal. Behav. 2016, 11, e1241935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Maojun, X. Nitric oxide: A potential key point of the signaling network leading to plant secondary metabolite biosynthesis. Prog. Nat. Sci. 2007, 17, 1397–1404. [Google Scholar]
  139. Van Hoewyk, D.; Garifullina, G.F.; Ackley, A.R.; Abdel-Ghany, S.E.; Marcus, M.A.; Fakra, S.; Ishiyama, K.; Inoue, E.; Pilon, M.; Takahashi, H.; et al. Overexpression of AtCpNifS Enhances Selenium Tolerance and Accumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139, 1518–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  140. Kumar, M.; Bijo, A.J.; Baghel, R.S.; Reddy, C.R.K.; Jha, B. Selenium and spermine alleviate cadmium induced toxicity in the red seaweed Gracilaria dura by regulating antioxidants and DNA methylation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 51, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Pathways of Se uptake by plants classified as Se-hyperaccumulator and Se-non-hyperaccumulator.
Figure 1. Pathways of Se uptake by plants classified as Se-hyperaccumulator and Se-non-hyperaccumulator.
Plants 11 03432 g001
Figure 2. Metabolism of Se in plants.
Figure 2. Metabolism of Se in plants.
Plants 11 03432 g002
Figure 3. Effect of Se on the expression of genes and transcription factors involved in the secondary metabolism biosynthesis.
Figure 3. Effect of Se on the expression of genes and transcription factors involved in the secondary metabolism biosynthesis.
Plants 11 03432 g003
Table 1. Effect of Se application on the accumulation of alkaloids, cyanogenic glycosides, and glucosinolates.
Table 1. Effect of Se application on the accumulation of alkaloids, cyanogenic glycosides, and glucosinolates.
Plant/Cultivars/Plant OrganSe Application (Type of Treatment, Form, Concentration)Secondary MetabolitesChangesReference
Alkaloids
Fragaria × ananassa
fruits
nutrient solution (hydroponics), Na2SeO4, 10 and 100 μMgramine1 100 μM[70]
Echiuma moenum Fisch. & Mey. (Iranian borage)
leaves, petals
foliar application, Na2SeO3/Na2SeO4
2, 4, 8 and 16 mg L−1
total alkaloids content↑ 4 mg L−1 Na2SeO4[71]
Lupinus albus L.
seeds
foliar application, Na2SeO3, 0.01%total alkaloids content[72]
Cyanogenic Glycosides
Fragaria × ananassa
fruits
nutrient solution (hydroponics), Na2SeO4, 10 and 100 μM3,4-dihydroxymandelonitrile-β-glucoside↓ 10 μM[70]
Glucosinolates
Brassica oleracea L. var. italic (broccoli)
sprouts, young leaves, florets
nutrient solution or soil irrigation, Na2SeO4, 25 μMtotal glucosinolate contentNS (sprouts)
↓ (leaves and florets)
[73]
glucoraphaninNS (sprouts)
↓ (leaves and florets)
hydroxyglucobrassicinNS (sprouts, leaves, and florets)
glucobrassicinNS (sprouts, leaves, and florets)
methoxyglucobrassicinNS (sprouts, leaves, and florets)
neoglucobrassicinNS (sprouts)
↓ (leaves and florets)
glucoerucinNS (sprouts, leaves, and florets—n.d.)
Brassica oleracea L. var. italic (broccoli)
three cultivars (Fenglei 60, Wenxing 90, and Shenglv 120)
sprouts
spraying, Na2SeO3/Na2SeO4,
100 μmol L−1
total glucosinolate contentNS (Fenglei 60, Shenglv 120)
↑ Na2SeO4 (Wenxing 90)
[74]
sulforaphane↑ Na2SeO3 (Fenglei 60, Wenxing 90)
↑ Na2SeO4 (Shenglv 120)
Brassica oleracea L. var. italic (broccoli)
florets
foliar application, Na2SeO3, (S mM/Se μM: 1/0, 1/50, 1/100, 1/150, 4/0, 4/50, 4/100, and 4/150)total glucosinolate content↓ 1/150 (S mM/Se μM)[75]
glucoiberin↑ 1/100–150 and 4/150 (S mM/Se μM)
glucoraphanin↓ 1/150 (S mM/Se μM)
gluconapinNS
glucoibervirin↑ 1/50–100 (S mM/Se μM)
↓ 4/50–150 (S mM/Se μM)
glucoerucin↑ 4/50–150 (S mM/Se μM)
n-hexyl-glucosinolatesNS
4-hydroxyglucobrassicin↑ 1/150 and 4/50–150 (S mM/Se μM)
glucobrassicin↓ 1/150 (S mM/Se μM)
4-methoxyglucobrassicin↓ 1/100–150 (S mM/Se μM)
neoglcobrassincin↓ 1/50–150 (S mM/Se μM)
gluconasturtiin↓ 1/50–150 (S mM/Se μM)
↑ 4/50 and 4/150 (S mM/Se μM)
sulforaphane↑ 1/100 and 4/50–100 (S mM/Se μM)
Brassica oleracea L. var. italic (broccoli)
florets
soil irrigation, Na2SeO4, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.6 mmol L−1total glucosinolate content↑ 0.4 mmol/L[76]
Brassica oleracea L. var. italic (broccoli)
florets
soil irrigation, Se yeast/Na2SeO3, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8 and 1.6 mmol L−1total glucosinolate content[77]
Raphanus sativus (radish)
leaves, roots
foliar, Na2SeO4, 5, 10, and 20 mg Se per plant
nutrient solution (hydroponics), Na2SeO4, 5, 10, 20, or 40 μM
total glucosinolate content↑ (foliar, 20 mg plant−1, roots)
↓ (nutrient solution, 40 μM, leaves)
[78]
glucoraphanin↑ (foliar, 20 mg plant−1, roots)
glucoraphasatin↓ (foliar, 10–20 mg plant−1, leaves; nutrient solution, 5–40 μM, leaves)
↑ (foliar, 20 mg plant−1, roots)
glucobrassicin↑ (foliar, 5 mg plant−1, leaves)
↓ (nutrient solution, 5–40 μM, leaves)
neoglucobrassicin↑ (foliar, 20 mg plant−1, leaves, roots)
dimeric-4 mercaptobutyl (DMB-GLS)↑ (foliar, 20 mg plant−1, roots; nutrient solution, 20 μM, roots)
↓ (foliar, 10 mg plant−1, roots)
Eruca Sativa Mill. (salad rocket)
leaves
nutrient solution (hydroponics), Na2SeO4, 5, 10, 20, 40 μMtotal glucosinolate content↓ 20–40 μM[79]
glucoraphanin↓ 20–40 μM
glucocheirolinNS
glucoerucin↓ 20 μM
DMB-GLS↓ 10–40 μM
glucosativinNS
neoglucobrassicinNS
Diplotaxis tenuifolia (wild rocket)
leaves
nutrient solution (hydroponics), Na2SeO4, 5, 10, 20, 40 μMtotal glucosinolate content↓ 20–40 μM[79]
glucoraphanin↓ 20–40 μM
glucocheirolinNS
glucoerucinNS
DMB-GLSNS
glucosativinNS
neoglucobrassicin↓ 20 μM
1 The arrows ↑ and ↓ indicate increases and decreases in secondary metabolite content, respectively. NS—not significant changes.
Table 2. Effect of Se application on the accumulation of terpenes.
Table 2. Effect of Se application on the accumulation of terpenes.
Plant/Cultivars/Plant OrganSe Application (Type of Treatment, Form, Concentration)Secondary MetabolitesChangesReference
Essential oils/Mono- and Sesquiterpenes
Echiuma moenum Fisch. & Mey. (Iranian borage)
leaves, petals
foliar application, Na2SeO3/Na2SeO4, 2, 4, 8 and 16 mg L−1β-cadinene
1 (2–16 mg L−1 Na2SeO3)
↑ (2–8 mg L−1 Na2SeO4)
[71]
α-pinene↑ (2–16 mg L−1 Na2SeO3)
↑ (2–8 mg L−1 Na2SeO4)
Ocimum basilicum L. (basil)
leaves
foliar application/nutrient solution (hydroponics), Na2SeO4, 2.0, 5.0, and 10.0 μMessential oil content↑ (2–10 μM, nutrient solution)
↑ (5–10 μM, foliar application)
[90]
Ocimum basilicum L. (basil)
three cultivars (Red Rubin, Purple Ruffles, Dark Green)
shoots
soil fertilization, Na2SeO4, 50 mg Se m−2essential oil contentNS[91]
Ocimum tenuiflorum L. (Tulsi basil)
shoots
soil fertilization, Na2SeO4, 50 mg Se m−2essential oil contentNS[91]
Ocimum basilicum L. (basil)
two cultivars (Red Rubin, Dark Green), two harvest
shoots
soil fertilization, Na2SeO4, 25 and 50 mg Se m−2essential oil content↑ (Red Rubin 25 mg Se/m2)
↓ (Red Rubin 50 mg Se/m2)
↑ (Dark Green, 1st harvest)
↓ (Dark Green, 2nd harvest)
[92]
Melissa officinalis L.nutrient solution (hydroponics), Na2SeO3, 2.0, 5.0 and 10.0 μMcitral↓ 0.2 μM
↑ 5.0 μM
[93]
z-citral↓ 0.2 μM
↑ 5.0 μM
caryophyllene↑ 0.2 μM
↓ 5.0 μM
caryophyllene oxide
geranyl acetate↑ (5.0 μM)
Carotenoids
Oryza sativa L. (rice)
two cultivars Satabdi and Khitish
seedlings
nutrient solution (hydroponics), Na2SeO4, 2, 10, 20, 50 μMcarotene↑ 2 μM (Satabdi)
↓ 10–50 μM (Satabdi)
↓ 2–50 μM (Khitish)
[94]
xanthophyll↑ 2 μM (Satabdi)
↓ 10–50 μM (Satabdi)
↓ 2–50 μM (Khitish)
Oryza sativa L. (rice)
seedlings
nutrient solution (hydroponics), Na2SeO3, 10, 20, 30, 40 mg Se L−1total carotenoids content↑ 20 mg Se/L[95]
Solanum lycopersicu L. (tomato)
fruits
nutrient solution (hydroponics), Na2SeO4, 1 mg Se L−1lycopeneNS[96]
luteinNS
β-carotene
Lycium chinense L.
leaves
perlites, Na2SeO3, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04, and 0.05 g kg−1total carotenoids content[97]
Arabidopsis thaliana
shoots
nutrient solution (hydroponics), Na2SeO4, 10 μMlutein[85]
b-caroteneNS
violaxanthinNS
neoxanthinNS
Zea mays L. (maize)
grains
soil fertilization, Na2SeO3, 200 g of Se ha−1lutein[98]
zeaxanthin
β-caroteneNS
Zea mays L. (maize)
grains
soil fertilization, Na2SeO3, 50 mg of Se kg−1total carotenoids content[99]
Brassica rapa ssp. rapa (turnip)
plant
soil irrigation, SeO2, 25 μMlutein[100]
1 The arrows ↑ and ↓ indicate increases and decreases in secondary metabolite content, respectively. NS—not significant changes.
Table 3. Effect of Se application on the accumulation of phenolic compounds.
Table 3. Effect of Se application on the accumulation of phenolic compounds.
Plant/Cultivars/Plant OrganSe Application (Type of Treatment, Form, Concentration)Secondary MetabolitesChangesReference
Ocimum basilicum L. (basil)
leaves
foliar application/nutrient solution (hydroponics), Na2SeO4, 2.0, 5.0, and 10.0 μMthe total hydroxycinnamic acid content1[90]
total anthocyanin content↑ (5–10 μM, nutrient solution)
total flavonoid contentNS
total phenolic compound content↑ (2–10 μM, nutrient solution, 5–10 μM foliar application)
Oryza sativa L. (rice)
seedlings
nutrient solution (hydroponics), Na2SeO3, 10, 20, 30, 40 mg Se L−1total extractable phenolic content↑ 10–20 mg Se/L[95]
Spinacia oleracea L. (spinach)
shoots, roots
nutrient solution (hydroponics), Na2SeO3, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 10 mg L−1total phenolic compound content↑ 4–10 mg Se/L (shoots)
↑ 1–4 mg Se/L (roots)
[103]
Wheat
two cultivars (202w17 and Shannong 129)
grain
soil/foliar applications, Se4+, 50 mg kg−1/50 mg Se L−1total anthocyanins↑ (cv. 202w17)
NS (Shannong 129)
[104]
Brassica oleracea L. var. italic (broccoli)
florets
soil irrigation, Na2SeO4, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.6 mmol L−1flavonoid content↑ 0.1 mmol/L
↓ 0.4 mmol/L
[73]
Malus domestica
two cultivars (Golden Delicious, Jonagold)
fruits
spraying, Na2SeO3/Na2SeO4, 0.15 kg Se per hectare and meter canopy heighttotal phenolic contentNS[105]
chlorogenic acidNS
epicatechinNS
procyanidin trimerNS
caffeoyl glucosideNS
Raphanus sativus (radish)
leaves, roots
foliar, Na2SeO4, 5, 10, and 20 mg Se per plant
nutrient solution (hydroponics), Na2SeO4, 5, 10, 20, or 40 μM
kaempferol-3-glucoside[84]
kaempferol-7-O-rhamnosideNS
caffeic acid↑ (5–10 mg per plant)
↓ (20 mg per plant)
kaempferol-3-rhamnosil glucoside↑ (20 mg per plant, leaves)
NS (roots)
kaempferol-3-O-arabinoside-7-O-rhamnoside↑ (20 mg per plant, leaves)
kaempferol-3,7-dirhamnoside
coumaric acidNS (leaves)
↓ (roots)
sinapic acid↑ (5 mg per plant, leaves)
ferulic acid↓ (10–20 mg per plant, leaves, roots)
feruilmalate↓ (20 mg per plant)
sinapoilmalate↓ (20 mg per plant)
Triticum aestivum L. (winter wheat)
microgreens
nutrient solution (hydroponics), Na2SeO3, 0.125, 0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 mg L−1total phenolic content↑ (0.25–0.5 mg/L)[106]
total flavonoid content↑ (0.5 mg/L)
anthocyanin content↑ (0.25 mg/L)
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis (cauliflower)
two cultivars (Clapton, Graffiti)
floret
foliar application, Na2SeO4, 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 mg L−1total phenolic compounds↑ (10–20 mg/L)[107]
Valerianella locusta L. Laterr. (lamb’s lettuce)
three harvest (38, 52 and 66 DAS)
shoots
nutrient solution (hydroponics), Na2SeO4, 5.0, 10.0, and 20.0 µMchlorogenic acid↑ 5 µM[108]
the total hydroxycinnamic acid content↑ 5 µM
total flavonoid content↑ (10–20 µM at 38 and 52 DAS, 5 µM at 66 DAS)
total phenolics↑ (5 µM at 38 and 66 DAS, 5–20 µM at 52 DAS)
1 The arrows ↑ and ↓ indicate increases and decreases in secondary metabolite content, respectively. NS—not significant changes; DAS—days after sowing.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Skrypnik, L.; Feduraev, P.; Golovin, A.; Maslennikov, P.; Styran, T.; Antipina, M.; Riabova, A.; Katserov, D. The Integral Boosting Effect of Selenium on the Secondary Metabolism of Higher Plants. Plants 2022, 11, 3432. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243432

AMA Style

Skrypnik L, Feduraev P, Golovin A, Maslennikov P, Styran T, Antipina M, Riabova A, Katserov D. The Integral Boosting Effect of Selenium on the Secondary Metabolism of Higher Plants. Plants. 2022; 11(24):3432. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243432

Chicago/Turabian Style

Skrypnik, Liubov, Pavel Feduraev, Anton Golovin, Pavel Maslennikov, Tatiana Styran, Maria Antipina, Anastasiia Riabova, and Dmitriy Katserov. 2022. "The Integral Boosting Effect of Selenium on the Secondary Metabolism of Higher Plants" Plants 11, no. 24: 3432. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243432

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop