Next Article in Journal
Diversity of Molluscan Assemblage in Relation to Biotic and Abiotic Variables in Brown Algal Forests
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluating the Rhizosphere and Endophytic Microbiomes of a Bamboo Plant in Response to the Long-Term Application of Heavy Organic Amendment
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Divergence of Chromosome Structures and 45S Ribosomal DNA Organization in Cucumis debilis Inferred by Comparative Molecular Cytogenetic Mapping
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research Progress on the Leaf Morphology, Fruit Development and Plant Architecture of the Cucumber

1
College of Horticulture, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
2
Key Laboratory for Evaluation and Utilization of Gene Resources of Horticultural Crops (Vegetables, Tea, etc.), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Changsha 410128, China
3
Key Laboratory for Vegetable Biology of Hunan Province, Changsha 410128, China
4
Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan
5
College of Horticulture, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100107, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2022, 11(16), 2128; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162128
Submission received: 9 June 2022 / Revised: 9 August 2022 / Accepted: 11 August 2022 / Published: 16 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Developmental Biology of Cucurbitaceae)

Abstract

:
Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) is an annual climbing herb that belongs to the Cucurbitaceae family and is one of the most important economic crops in the world. The breeding of cucumber varieties with excellent agronomic characteristics has gained more attention in recent years. The size and shape of the leaves or fruit and the plant architecture are important agronomic traits that influence crop management and productivity, thus determining the crop yields and consumer preferences. The growth of the plant is precisely regulated by both environmental stimuli and internal signals. Although significant progress has been made in understanding the plant morphological regulation of Arabidopsis, rice, and maize, our understanding of the control mechanisms of the growth and development of cucumber is still limited. This paper reviews the regulation of phytohormones in plant growth and expounds the latest progress in research regarding the genetic regulation pathways in leaf development, fruit size and shape, branching, and plant type in cucumber, so as to provide a theoretical basis for improving cucumber productivity and cultivation efficiency.

1. Introduction

Cucumber occupies a large cultivation area and has many economic benefits around the world, which are closely related to people’s daily lives [1,2,3]. Cucumber fruits, whether immature or mature, raw or processed, as vegetables or as sweets, are widely consumed globally. The cucumber is also a model plant for the study of the vascular system, fruit development, and plant architecture [4,5,6].
The morphology of the leaves and fruits and the plant architecture, as the key agronomic traits of cucumber, directly affect its final yield and quality [7]. In cucumber production, suitable compact plant varieties for once-over mechanical harvesting and high-density planting are favored in the adult plant stage. In fresh markets, architectural traits such as an indeterminate growth habit, no branching, powerful main stems, and moderate leaf size are desired. Proper plant architecture may boost agricultural productivity while lowering labor expenses, which is critical given the limited arable area available. The leaf morphology and plant architecture, including plant height and branches, have great influences on the fruit weight and yield. The appearance of cucumber fruit largely influences the preference of consumers, including the fruit length and diameter and the fruit shape [8]. The identification of the key genes and molecular mechanisms controlling the leaf and fruit size, as well as the plant height and branching, is critically important for the effective transformation of the plant morphology with the required structural characteristics.
In this review, we outline recent advances in scientific understanding of the genetic regulatory networks controlling the leaf morphology, fruit development, branch extension, and growth characteristics of cucumber.

2. Cell Proliferation and Expansion in Plant Growth and Development

Plant organs develop from the shoot apical meristem (SAM) through cell division and differentiation [9,10]. From the meristematic primordium to the ultimate, developed size, the development of lateral organs may be considered a progressive process, beginning with founder cell recruitment to the primordium, followed by two phases of growth: first, cell proliferation (cell growth associated with division), and then cell expansion (cell growth without division) [11,12]. In the early stage, cell division mainly functions to increase the number of cells, and in the later stage, cell differentiation and cell growth mainly function to increase the cell volume, thus forming the final organ size [13,14]. For example, in cucumber, a small and cordate leaf mutant exhibits alterations in both the leaf size and shape of cucumber. When compared to wild-type leaves, the mutant has fewer numbers of epidermal pavement cells [15], while a little leaf mutant, which has a small organ size, exhibited a reduction in both the cell number and cell size [16]. In the cucumber short fruit mutant, whose fruit length is significantly lower than of the WT, one can observe a larger cell area but significant fewer numbers of cells [17]. Another longer fruit mutant exhibits a larger cell area [18].

3. The Roles of Phytohormones in Growth and Development

The growth of plant organs is precisely regulated by both environmental stimuli and internal signals. Indeed, plant hormones play fundamental roles in organ growth [19,20]. Phytohormones are a class of small organic molecules that function as essential regulators of plant growth, and all living cells are responsive to hormones. Phytohormones have substantial physiological effects at low concentrations, influencing plant development and stress resistance, mainly including cell division, elongation, and differentiation, as well as seed germination, rooting, flowering, fruiting, sex determination, dormancy, and organ shedding [21,22,23]. A single type of phytohormone can be involved in multiple aspects of development; furthermore, multiple phytohormones can collaborate in regulating a specific developmental process. In addition to the five classical phytohormones (auxin, CK, ethylene (ETH), gibberellin (GA), and abscisic acid (ABA)), the roles of other small molecules, such as brassinosteroid (BR), jasmonic acid (JA), salicylic acid (SA), and strigolactone (SL), in plant growth and development are becoming apparent.
The leaf morphology is the end result of the activities of different phytohormones. The leaves originate from the PZ (peripheral zone) cells, which are easy to differentiate [24]. Auxin plays a key role in these processes, as only PZ cells that overlap with the periodic auxin maxima eventually develop into leaves. Leaves are the main organs involved in photosynthesis in green plants, and light regulates the leaf initiation by activating CK signaling and affecting outflow-dependent auxin gradients [25]. GAs and BRs promote leaf growth by increasing the cell proliferation and expansion. Mutants deficient in BR biosynthesis or signal transduction have a reduced leaf size [26]. ABA has a critical role in the regulation of the rate of water loss through stomatal transpiration [27]. In cucumber, a mutant that exhibits a vascular configuration and abnormal organ morphology has a high auxin accumulation in the leaf veins [28]. Meanwhile, the plants are more resistant to downy mildew and accumulate more SA. In a mango fruit mutant, the leaves have a butterfly-like shape and substantial growth defects in the mediolateral axis. This phenotype is caused by the polar transport of auxin [29].
During fruit development, plant hormones participate in cell proliferation and jointly promote fruit growth. Auxin mainly functions to promote cell elongation and volume expansion. In cucumber, the endogenous hormone contents of different inbred line cucumber fruits have been studied and it was discovered that the indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) concentration of the fruit is positively correlated with the fruit size and cell proliferation at distinct developmental stages [30]. When ectopically expressing the CsYUC11 coding sequence in Arabidopsis, as the expression level of CsYUC11 increases, the pedicel length and the IAA content increase progressively, implying that CsYUC11 promotes pedicel elongation through auxin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis [31]. Enhanced expression of an auxin-synthesizing gene (DefH9-iaaM) in cucumber significantly enhances its parthenocarpy ability [32]. GA can promote cell expansion and participate in the regulation of the fruit shape. The expression pattern of the cucumber GA receptor gene, CsGID1a, has been found to be closely correlated with fruit locule formation. Silencing CsGID1a leads to the phenotype of fruits exhibiting abnormal carpels and locules, while the overexpression of CsGID1a in the Arabidopsis double mutant (gid1a gid1c) exhibits “cucumber locule-like” fruits [33]. CK plays a decisive role in the final size of the fruit after it is transported to the fruit. In cucumbers, tZR diminishes during the early stages of fruit development and is primarily engaged in cell division during the early stages of ovary development [34]. In cucumber seedlings, transient treatment with physiological concentrations of ETH stimulates cell division and alters cell division polarity [35]. ETH is involved in regulating cucumber fruit shape development. The application of exogenous 1-aminocyclopropane-l-carboxylic acid (ACC) to straight fruit promotes fruit bending in cucumber. Overexpressing CsERF025 in cucumber leads to an increase in the bending fruit rate by enhancing the production of ETH [36]. In cucumber, the exogenous application of BR induces parthenocarpic fruit formation, by inducing cell division, whereas its inhibitor abolishes the natural parthenocarpic capacity in a parthenocarpic cucumber [37].
Stem elongation is controlled by several hormones, including GAs, BRs, auxin, and SLs. The cucumber dwarf mutant exhibits short internodes due to decreased endogenous GA3 levels [38]. At present, two BR-deficient dwarfing mutants (scp-1 and scp-2) have been obtained by EMS mutation in cucumber. The dwarfing phenotype of scp-1 can be completely restored to the wild-type phenotype after exogenous BR treatment, while the dwarfing phenotype of scp-2 can only be partially restored after exogenous BR treatment [39,40]. SLs has been proven to directly or indirectly inhibit the germination of the plant lateral buds [41,42]. However, little research has been conducted on cucumber.
In addition to their physiological functions in plant growth, some phytohormones, such as SAs, JAs, and SLs, are usually induced by biotic or abiotic stress [43,44,45]. For example, in cucumber, the content of JAs and SAs significantly increases with T. longibrachiatum H9 inoculation [46]. These hormone responses provide a signal pathway for environmental factors to regulate plant growth, and it can be further concluded that phytohormones widely participate in determining the growth and size of the plant organs.

4. Genetic and Molecular Regulation Mechanisms of Leaf Morphology

Leaves are flat, lateral appendages on plants that act as solar panels, capturing sunlight and generating glucose and oxygen. In addition, leaves can serve as interfaces for monitoring environmental cues, such as light, temperature, water, insects, and microbes [47]. Cucumber is one of the typical dicotyledonous plant species with alternate leaves. Specifically, a petiole connects a single leaf blade to the node [48]. Typically, cucumber has palmate leaves with five major veins, from the petiole at the leaf base to the leaf edge, producing lobed leaves. In recent years, several mutants with aberrant leaf morphology have been identified, and multiple genes have been mapped and thoroughly described (Figure 1).

4.1. Molecular Regulation Mechanisms of Cucumber Leaf Shape

(1) PID
PINOID (PID) belongs to the plant-specific AGCV III subfamily of the large AGC protein kinase family, which mediates phosphorylation/dephosphorylation by encoding serine/threonine protein kinases. The PID gene family regulates the phosphorylation status of the auxin efflux transporter PIN-FORMED (PIN) and participates in the regulation of Polar Auxin Transport (PAT) [49,50,51,52]. PIN proteins can transport auxin out of the cell in the direction of PIN [53,54], and the polarity localization of PIN is mainly in specific plasma membrane regions and is primarily controlled by PID [55,56,57].
In cucumber, CsPID has been identified in some leaf mutants, mainly in the round leaf (rl) mutant [58,59], suggesting that CsPID plays a major role in the leaf shape formation. CsPID is believed to regulate lateral organ morphogenesis by modulating the expression of the genes related to auxin transport and signaling [59]. However, the specific regulatory mechanism of CsPID in cucumber has not been thoroughly studied. By referring to the well-established molecular mechanism of polar auxin transport in other model crops [60], one can observe that the IAA content of the rl mutant is different from that of the wild type, suggesting that CsPID is involved in the control of polar auxin transport in cucumber. Additionally, it has been proven that the transcriptional regulation of CsPIN1 is regulated by DEFORMED FLORAL BUD1-PHABULOSA (CsDFB1-CsPHB), thereby affecting the distribution of auxin in cucumber [61].
(2) WOX
The Wuschel-related homeobox (WOX) belongs to the homeodomain (HD) super family, which has a typical DNA-binding domain of ~60 amino acids [62,63]. WOX comprises a large group of transcription factors, and WOX-HD is slightly larger (~65–70 aa) because of the extension at the HD C-terminus [64]. Previous research has identified three clades of WOX genes based on their phylogenetic connections and conserved domains: the ancient clade, the intermediate clade, and the WUS/modern clade [62,64]. Previous research has shown that WOX family members are required for embryonic patterning, stem cell maintenance, and organ creation [65].
The WOX gene activities of cucumber are closely connected to shoot meristem maintenance and sexual differentiation, and also have a significant impact on cucumber growth, development, and production [66]. Cucumber has 11 putative CsWOX genes that have been identified and described, and they are also classified into three primary clades [67,68]. The expression patterns of these CsWOX genes reveal that a number of them are primarily expressed in distinct organs, indicating that these genes may be involved in various developmental processes [67]. In cucumber, the mango fruit (mf) mutant has been identified, exhibiting narrower, wrinkled, downward-cupped, and dark-green cotyledons, as well as significantly reduced blade expansion of the true leaves [69]. Map-based cloning has shown that MF encodes a WOX1-type transcriptional regulator (CsWOX1), which lacks the conserved Wuschel (WUS) box in the mf mutant. This study showed that CsWOX1 may influence early reproductive organ development and modify auxin signaling in cucumber via the SPOROCYTELESS (CsSPL)-mediated pathway. In another study, it was confirmed that CsWOX1 controls auxin transport through CsPID1 and further plays a role in leaf vein development [29]. During later leaf morphogenesis, CsWOX1 can upregulate the expression of CsPID1 and participate in the establishment of a cucumber leaf vein model, depending on the auxin polar transport process [29]. CsWOX1 can also directly activate the expression of CsPIN2 and participate in the development of the distal region of the leaf. In addition, CsWOX1 regulates leaf cell proliferation by forming a feedback regulation mechanism with the CIN-TCP transcription factor. However, WOX1 only has an effect on the leaf width and does not affect the blade length or complexity.
(3) Other genes
Hanaba Taranu (CsHAN) encodes a GATA3-type transcription factor that is involved in floral organ development, SAM organization, and embryo development. In cucumber, the overexpression and RNAi of CsHAN1 transgenic cucumber results in delayed growth after early embryogenesis and generates strongly lobed leaves, suggesting that CsHAN1 is crucial for SAM formation [70]. CsHAN1 has also been discovered to regulate the WUS and Shoot Meristemless (STM) pathways in cucumber and to govern leaf formation through a complex gene regulatory network. Irregular vasculature patterning (CsIVP) and YABBY 5 (CsYAB5) are two transcription factors existing in the vascular tissues, which influence the leaf shape in cucumber [28]. The leaves in CsIVP-RNAi plants curl downward, and the bilateral leaf edges overlap, owing to the larger major veins and increased number of secondary veins, whereas CsYAB5-RNAi plants have a comparable leaf phenotype. CsIVP can directly bind the promoter of CsYAB5 to enhance its expression and influence the leaf shape [28]. In short, whether there are additional genes involved in the regulation of the cucumber leaf shape remains to be further investigated.

4.2. Molecular Regulation Mechanisms of Cucumber Leaf Size

At present, few genes regulating leaf size have been identified in cucumber. The little leaf (ll) mutant, with small leaf sizes, has been identified [16], and CsLL has been demonstrated to be an ortholog of Arabidopsis Sterile Apetala (SAP), encoding a WD40 repeat domain-containing protein. The small organ size in ll can be attributed to reductions in both the cell number and cell size [16]. In addition, a small and cordate leaf 1 (scl1) mutant, with fewer numbers of epidermal pavement cells, has also been researched, and it has been proven that CsSCL leads to alterations in both the leaf size and shape of cucumber [15].

5. Genetic and Molecular Regulation Mechanisms of Cucumber Fruit Development

Fruits can preserve growing seeds, corresponding to the plants’ ovaries, and provide food and nutrition for people. Cucumber fruit is widely recognized for its wide variations in fruit size and shape, which are also key agronomic features affecting the crop output and external quality [71]. Four physiological stages of early development govern classic fruit morphogenesis: ovary growth, fruit set, fast cell division, and subsequent cell expansion. In particular, the fruit size and shape are two major agronomic traits influencing cucumber production and external quality, which vary widely among cucumber cultivars due to long-term selection during domestication and breeding [72]. Because of the wide variation of the fruit length, it plays a significant role in influencing fruit size and form [73]. For cucumber, appropriate fruit length is also an essential breeding aim, because it is one of the most prominent identifying factors used to define market groups in commercial production. Generally, cucumbers have simple fruit shapes (round, oblong/oval, or cylindrical). Cucumber fruit size and shape are complex traits influenced by numerous factors, including the genotype (Figure 2) and environment [5]. This study’s results indicate that the variations in cucumber fruit size and shape result from differences in the cell numbers and shape in the longitudinal and cross-sections, driven in turn by differences in the orientation, timing, and duration of cell division and expansion [71].

5.1. Molecular Regulation Mechanisms of Fruit Shape

A variety of QTLs regulating the fruit size (FS), shape (FSI), and fruit weight (FW) have been evaluated in cucumber, melon, and watermelon [74]. Approximately 150 consensus QTLs have been identified for these traits, and 253 homolog genes related to grain size/weight have been cloned in Arabidopsis, tomato, and rice through the genome-wide investigation of three cucurbit genomes [74]. The proteins encoded by these genes contain a cell number regulator (CNR), cell size regulator (CSR), Cytochrome P450 (CYP78A), SUN, OVATE, Tonneau1 recruiting motif (TRM), YABBY, and WOX.
A total of 135 QTLs affecting the fruit shape have been genetically mapped in cucumber, with some QTLs/genes already having been discovered or cloned [75]. In a QTL analysis of FS/FSI using segregating populations resulting from a hybrid between WI7238 (long fruit) and WI7239 (round fruit), the round fruit shape has been shown to be regulated by two QTLs, FS1.2 and FS2.1, which encode the tomato homologs SUN (CsSUN25-26-27a) and SlTRM5 (CsTRM5), respectively [76,77]. SUN encodes an IQD family protein that contains a conserved IQD and is involved in CaM binding. The protein encoded by SUN is a growth regulator that results in elongated fruit and is believed to affect hormone or secondary metabolite levels [78]. The IQD is a 67-amino acid conserved region that comprises up to three IQ motifs that increase CaM binding in the presence of Ca2+. In tomato, after pollination for 7–10 days, SUN controls the tomato morphology in accordance with the cell division stage, and the cell elongation and division along the proximo–distal axis increase [79].
Another frequently studied gene affecting the fruit shape is the OVATE gene [77]. The OVATE gene was first identified in tomato and is assumed to be related to the fruit shape, since its mutation results in an elongated fruit phenotype, while the overexpression of OVATE in the pear-shaped tomato leads to round fruit [80]. The OVATE gene encodes a protein with a ~70-amino acid conserved C-terminal domain, which is known as the OVATE domain, and the proteins containing this domain are referred to as OVATE family proteins (OFPs) [81,82]. OFPs serve a variety of roles in plant growth and development by inhibiting the transcription of target genes [80,83,84]. In melon, a gene designated as CmFSI8/CmOFP13 has been identified as controlling the fruit shape and being associated with the FSI, which is determined by two varieties: B8, with long-horn fruit, and HP22, with flat, round fruit [85]. In cucumber, 19 CsOFPs have been identified and distributed on seven chromosomes that can be divided into four subgroups, named OFP I to OFP IV [86]. Most of the CsOFPs were expressed in the reproductive organs. When CsOFP11 was overexpressed in Arabidopsis, the transgenic lines showed shorter but blunt siliques, indicating that CsOFPs may regulate cucumber fruit development. However, there is no research on the molecular mechanism. This research may provide ideas for the regulation of OVATE in cucumber fruit shapes in light of the study of the gene in other plants. For example, it has been found to interact with TRMs and, together, they regulate the cell division patterns in tomato fruit development [84].

5.2. Molecular Regulation Mechanisms of Fruit Size

The fruit size is determined by the fruit length (FL) and fruit diameter (FD). At present, only a few genes controlling the cucumber fruit size have been cloned and functionally verified, namely, Short Fruit 1 (SF1), SF2, SF3, and Fruitfull1 (CsFUL1A). The sf1, sf2, and sf3 mutants in cucumber all have short fruit phenotypes, but they encode different proteins. Among them, both SF1 and SF2 regulate the fruit size through epigenetic modifications. SF1 encodes a cucurbit-specific RING-type E3 ligase that ubiquitinates and degrades both itself and ACS2 to regulate ETH production, which has a dose-dependent influence on cell division and fruit elongation [87]. SF2 encodes a Histone Deacetylase Complex 1 (HDC1) protein. A deficient sf2 allele inhibits HDAC, targeting to chromatin, resulting in increased histone acetylation. SF2 regulates the fruit cell proliferation by directing the manufacturing and metabolism of CK and the polyamines [17]. SF3 encodes a katanin p60 subunit, which is a homolog of KTN1 (CsKTN1). The shorter fruit in the mutant is caused by reduced cell numbers, as determined through histological examination. Additionally, hormone quantitation and RNA-seq analysis suggest that CsKTN1 may regulate the fruit length by affecting the metabolic levels of auxin and GA [88]. CsFUL1 is a MADS-box gene [18]. It directly targets the Superman (SUP), which is known to be a regulator of cell division and expansion, to repress its expression and then negatively regulate fruit elongation in cucumber [18].

6. Genetic and Molecular Regulation Mechanisms of Cucumber Plant Architecture

Cucurbitaceae crops progress through vegetative and reproductive development simultaneously across most of their lives. Branching, plant type, and stem growth are also important traits for cucumber breeding objectives, and several genes have been identified (Figure 3). Because the plant type has a significant influence on the crop management and productivity, it has been exposed to severe selection throughout the processes of crop domestication and development. Shoot branching is an important aspect of plant development and fitness that is connected to crop yield. Hence, it has been focused on as a selection target during domestication [89].
The Cucumber Lateral Suppressor (CLS) gene has been cloned, and its transcripts are found in the leaf axils, where the axillary meristem is formed [90]. The ectopic expression of CsCLS in the las mutant of Arabidopsis could fully complement the reduced number of axillary buds, demonstrating that CsCLS has a conserved function in cucumber bud initiation [90]. CsBRC1-RNAi (Branched1-RNAi) cucumber lines show increased shoot branching and decreased auxin accumulation in the lateral buds. Biochemical data show that CsBRC1 can bind to the promoter of PIN-Formed3 (CsPIN3), the auxin efflux carrier, and inhibit its expression. The high expression of CsPIN3 can result in increased lateral branching and decreased auxin accumulation in buds [91].
Flowering plants have two forms of inflorescence architecture: the indeterminate and the determinate. The main axis of indeterminate plants develops infinitely and only produces blooms on its sides. The main axis of plants with a determinate inflorescence is finite, and the shoot apical meristem transforms into a flower. Almost all Cucurbitaceae crops are indeterminate plants. The flower occurrence is influenced by the growth of the main axis. A non-synonymous SNP in Terminal Flower1 (CsTFL1) causes a determinate growth habit, according to map-based cloning of the determinate (de) locus [92]. CsTFL1 knockdown results in the determinate growth and the development of terminal flowers in cucumber. CsTFL1 has been found to compete with Flowering Locus T (CsFT) for interaction with Negative on TATA less2-FD Paralog (CsNOT2a-CsFDP) to impede the determinate development and terminal flower formation. LEAFY (CsLFY) interacts with CsWUS to regulate shoot meristem maintenance and flower development in cucumber via activating APETALA3 (CsAP3) and Cucumber MADS box gene 1 (CsCUM1). CsLFY-RNAi transgenic cucumbers exhibit a transformation from indeterminate to determinant growth [93]. In addition to the determinate growth phenotype, some dwarf mutants have also been identified in cucumber, such as Cucumber dwarf (Csdw), compact (cp), compact-1 (cp-1), super compact-1 (scp-1), super compact-2 (scp-2), and short internode (si) [39,40,94,95]. The Csdw mutant exhibits short internodes due to decreased endogenous GA3 levels and decreased cell counts in the main stem (Figure 3).

7. Conclusions and Perspectives

Recent advances in research have extended our understanding of how phytohormones and genes influence plant organ sizes and shapes. The main purpose of plant breeding is to develop plants with excellent agronomic and economic qualities and yields, which involves enhancing the leaf and fruit outputs of many plants. A subset of plants may alter the geometry of their leaves and the angle established between the leaf and the main stem to optimize light energy uptake, resulting in better photosynthetic yields and biomass outputs. However, many difficult questions need to be solved in order to understand how plant size is controlled. Cells and organs both have different sizes. How we accomplish the complex calculation and execution of the correct sizes is both an intellectually compelling and critical crop science problem. For example, leaves are the main site for photosynthesis, which provide energy for crop growth and are closely related to the yield. Larger leaves are more beneficial in improving photosynthetic efficiency. However, in the limited cultivation space, reasonably close planting requires smaller leaves, which is also very important in production. Therefore, how we accurately control the leaf size to achieve optimal production is still a problem to be solved. Shoot branching is also an important agronomic trait that directly determines the plant architecture and affects crop productivity. In production, axillary branches need to be manually removed to promote crop yields and qualities for the fresh market, especially in cucumber. Mutants with less branches can reduce labor costs significantly. However, less branches greatly affect the yields of the towel gourd and pumpkin, which are mainly produced from lateral branches. Therefore, how we balance the relationship between the number of lateral branches and the yield remains a question to be studied.
Despite the guidance that can be derived from the genetic information contained in each plant cell, phytohormone levels and phytohormone signaling pathways are also required for organ development and morphogenesis. Moreover, the roles of different phytohormones are not separate entities, but instead partially overlap. For example, both auxins and CKs are indispensable for SAM development and maintenance, but they play distinct roles. The formation and organogenesis of the leaf require auxins, while CKs promote meristem maintenance. However, they do not exist or function independently from the phytohormones. Many studies have revealed that auxins and CKs interact in a variety of cells, tissues, and organs in both antagonistic and synergistic ways [96,97,98]. Therefore, a more thorough and precise understanding of plant development can be obtained by studying the interactions among phytohormones.
A great deal of research over the last few decades has considerably enhanced our understanding of plant organ development mechanisms by employing a range of biotechnological approaches, most frequently in the model plant Arabidopsis. At present, many genes regulating the size and shape of cucumber fruits have been identified, but the specific mechanism of action has not been thoroughly studied. The rapid expansion period of cucumber fruit cells is an important factor, leading to the rapid growth of the fruits. At present, only through transcriptome or fluorescence quantitative analysis has it been discovered that some cell expansion genes are upregulated during the rapid expansion period of fruits or participate in the development of cucumber fruits and affect the shape of the fruits [99]. Further study of the genes related to fruit cell expansion and their regulatory mechanisms is required [99]. Many genes regulating leaf development, such as TCP (TEOSINTE BRANCHED1/CYCLOIDEA/PCF), KNOX (KNOTTED1-like homeobox), and ANT(ANTEGUMENTA) exist and have been identified in Arabidopsis, tomato, and other crops [100,101,102]. miRNA is also reported to regulate the leaf size [103]. However, there are few reports or in-depth studies on cucumber, or even on cucurbitaceae crops. Furthermore, additional receptors of certain essential genes in cucurbits have yet to be found. To fully comprehend the physiological mechanisms underlying plant organ development, various components and their interactions must be examined holistically rather than separately.
With the advancement of molecular breeding methods, crop agriculture features may now be modulated by selecting or modifying target genes. Identifying and understanding the organ size regulators in cucumber can help to enhance Cucurbitaceae crops through the breeding of high-yield crops with perfect organ sizes, as well as unique vegetable types with ideal leaf and plant sizes.

Author Contributions

J.L. wrote the original draft manuscript; J.C. and C.W. drew the figures; N.H. and X.Z. revised the manuscript; M.L. and T.W. conceived the original idea for the review. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The pictures in this manuscript were created on BioRender.com (accessed on 9 June 2022). This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31972429 and 31972407), the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2021JJ10032), the Youth Project of the Educational Department of Hunan Province (21B0180), and the Hunan High-level Talents Gathering Project-Innovative Talents (2021RC5006).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data are included in the present study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huang, S.; Li, R.; Zhang, Z.; Li, L.; Gu, X.; Fan, W.; Lucas, W.J.; Wang, X.; Xie, B.; Ni, P.; et al. The genome of the cucumber, Cucumis sativus L. Nat. Genet. 2009, 41, 1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Guo, J.; Xu, W.; Hu, Y.; Huang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, L.; Huang, C.H.; Ma, H. Phylotranscriptomics in cucurbitaceae reveal multiple whole-genome duplications and key morphological and molecular innovations. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1117–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Khomyakov, A.; Neznamova, E.; Tereshchenko, N.; Tuev, V. The influence of the light spectrum on the growth and development of greenhouse plants on the example of cucumber culture (Cucumissativus L., Cucurbitaceae family). J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1862, 012005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sui, X.; Nie, J.; Liu, H.; Lin, T.; Yao, X.; Turgeon, R. Complexity untwined: The structure and function of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) shoot phloem. Plant J. 2021, 106, 1163–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gao, Z.; Zhang, H.; Cao, C.; Han, J.; Li, H.; Ren, Z. QTL mapping for cucumber fruit size and shape with populations from long and round fruited inbred lines. Hortic. Plant J. 2020, 130, 573–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, X.; Yan, J.; Zhang, Z.; Lin, T.; Xin, T.; Wang, B.; Wang, S.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, Z.; Lucas, W.J.; et al. Regulation of plant architecture by a new histone acetyltransferase targeting gene bodies. Nat. Plants 2020, 6, 809–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Feng, S.; Zhang, J.; Mu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wen, C.; Wu, T.; Yu, C.; Li, Z.; Wang, H. Recent progress on the molecular breeding of Cucumis sativus L. in China. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2020, 133, 1777–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, T.; Li, X.; Yang, Y.; Guo, X.; Feng, Q.; Dong, X.; Chen, S. Genetic analysis and QTL mapping of fruit length and diameter in a cucumber (Cucumber sativus L.) recombinant inbred line (RIL) population. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 250, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xue, Z.; Liu, L.; Zhang, C. Regulation of Shoot Apical Meristem and Axillary Meristem Development in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zeng, Y.; Tang, Y.; Shen, S.; Zhang, M.; Chen, L.; Ye, D.; Zhang, X. Plant-specifific small peptide AtZSP1 interacts with ROCK1 to regulate organ size in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2022, 234, 1696–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hepworth, J.; Lenhard, M. Regulation of plant lateral-organ growth by modulating cell number and size. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 17, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Vercruysse, J.; Baekelandt, A.; Gonzalez, N.; Inzé, D. Molecular networks regulating cell division during Arabidopsis leaf growth. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 2365–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. D’Ario, M.; Sablowski, R. Cell Size Control in Plants. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2019, 53, 45–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Guo, M.; Simmons, C.R. Cell number counts-the fw2.2 and CNR genes and implications for controlling plant fruit and organ size. Plant Sci. 2011, 181, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gao, D.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, S.; Hu, B.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, S. Mutation in a novel gene SMALL AND CORDATE LEAF 1 affects leaf morphology in cucumber. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2017, 59, 736–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, L.; Liu, H.; Zhao, J.; Pan, Y.; Cheng, S.; Lietzow, C.D.; Wen, C.; Zhang, X.; Weng, Y. LITTLELEAF (LL) encodes a WD40 repeat domain-containing protein associated with organ size variation in cucumber. Plant J. 2018, 95, 834–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Z.; Wang, B.; Wang, S.; Lin, T.; Yang, L.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Huan, S.; Yang, X. Genome-wide target mapping shows histone deacetylase complex1 regulates cell proliferation in cucumber fruit. Plant Physiol. 2020, 182, 167–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhao, J.; Jiang, L.; Che, G.; Pan, Y.; Li, Y.; Hou, Y.; Zhao, W.; Zhong, Y.; Ding, L.; Yan, S.; et al. A functional allele of CsFUL1 regulates fruit length through repressing CsSUP and inhibiting auxin transport in cucumber. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 1289–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sharma, A.; Shahzad, B.; Kumar, V.; Kohli, S.K.; Sidhu, G.P.S.; Bali, A.S.; Handa, N.; Kapoor, D.; Bhardwaj, R.; Zheng, B. Phytohormones regulate accumulation of osmolytes under abiotic stress. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sami, F.; Siddiqui, H.; Hayat, S. Interaction of glucose and phytohormone signaling in plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 135, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sharma, M.; Singh, D.; Saksena, H.B.; Sharma, M.; Tiwari, A.; Awasthi, P.; Botta, H.K.; Shukla, B.N.; Laxmi, A. Understanding the Intricate Web of Phytohormone Signalling in Modulating Root System Architecture. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liao, C.; Wang, P.; Yin, Y.; Bassham, D.C. Interactions between autophagy and phytohormone signaling pathways in plants. FEBS Lett. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhao, B.; Liu, Q.; Wang, B.; Yuan, F. Roles of phytohormones and their signaling pathways in leaf development and stress responses. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 3566–3584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, H.; Kong, F.; Zhou, C. From genes to networks: The genetic control of leaf development. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 1181–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yoshida, S.; Mandel, T.; Kuhlemeier, C. Stem cell activation by light guides plant organogenesis. Genes Dev. 2011, 25, 1439–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhiponova, M.K.; Vanhoutte, I.; Boudolf, V.; Betti, C.; Dhondt, S.; Coppens, F.; Mylle, E.; Maes, S.; González-García, M.P.; Caño-Delgado, A.I.; et al. Brassinosteroid production and signaling differentially control cell division and expansion in the leaf. New Phytol. 2013, 197, 490–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lim, C.W.; Baek, W.; Jung, J.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, S.C. Function of ABA in Stomatal Defense against Biotic and Drought Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 15251–15270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yan, S.; Ning, K.; Wang, Z.; Liu, X.; Zhong, Y.; Ding, L.; Zi, H.; Cheng, Z.; Li, X.; Shan, H.; et al. CsIVP functions in vasculature development and downy mildew resistance in cucumber. PLoS Biol. 2020, 18, e3000671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, H.; Niu, H.; Li, C.; Shen, G.; Liu, X.; Weng, Y.; Wu, T.; Li, Z. WUSCHEL-related homeobox1(WOX1)regulates vein patterning and leaf size in Cucumis sativus. Hortic. Res. 2020, 7, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, S.; Wang, C.; Zhou, X.; Liu, D.; Liu, C.; Luan, J.; Qin, Z.; Xin, M. The curvature of cucumber fruits is associated with spatial variation in auxin accumulation and expression of a YUCCA biosynthesis gene. Hortic. Res. 2020, 7, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yan, S.; Che, G.; Ding, L.; Chen, Z.; Liu, X.; Wang, H.; Zhao, W.; Ning, K.; Zhao, J.; Tesfamichael, K.; et al. Different cucumber CsYUC genes regulate response to abiotic stresses and flower development. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yin, Z.M.; Malinowski, R.; Ziolkowska, A.; Sommer, H.; Plcader, W.; Malepszy, S. The DefH9-iaaM-containing construct efficiently induces parthenocarpy in cucumber. Cell Mol. Biol. Lett. 2006, 11, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, B.; Liu, X.; Yang, S.; Chen, C.; Xue, S.; Cai, Y.; Wang, D.; Yin, S.; Gai, X.; Ren, H. Silencing of the gibberellin receptor homolog, CsGID1a, affects locule formation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus) fruit. New Phytol. 2015, 210, 551–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, C.; Cao, J.; Hao, N.; Wu, T. Genetic and Molecular Regulation Mechanisms in the Formation and Development of Vegetable Fruit Shape. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kazama, H.; Dan, H.; Imaseki, H.; Wasteneys, G.O. Transient exposure to ethylene stimulates cell division and alters the fate and polarity of hypocotyl epidermal cells. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1614–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, C.; Xin, M.; Zhou, X.; Liu, C.; Li, S.; Liu, D.; Xu, Y.; Qin, Z. The novel ethylene-responsive factor CsERF025 affects the development of fruit bending in cucumber. Plant Mol. Biol. 2017, 95, 519–531. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11103-017-0671-z (accessed on 9 June 2022). [CrossRef]
  37. Fu, F.; Mao, W.; Shi, K.; Zhou, Y.; Asami, T.; Yu, J. A role of brassinosteroids in early fruit development in cucumber. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 2299–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, Y.; Yang, L.; Pathak, M.; Li, D.; He, X.; Weng, Y. Fine genetic mapping of cp: A recessive gene for compact (dwarf) plant architecture in cucumber, Cucumis sativus L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2011, 123, 973–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hou, S.; Niu, H.; Tao, Q.; Wang, S.; Gong, Z.; Li, S.; Weng, Y.; Li, Z. A mutant in the CsDET2 gene leads to a systemic brassinosteriod deficiency and super compact phenotype in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2017, 130, 1693–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wang, H.; Li, W.; Qin, Y.; Pan, Y.; Wang, X.; Weng, Y.; Chen, P.; Li, Y. The cytochrome P450 gene CsCYP85A1 is a putative candidate for Super Compact-1 (Scp-1) plant architecture mutation in Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hu, J.; Ji, Y.; Hu, X.; Sun, S.; Wang, X. BES1 Functions as the Co-regulator of D53-like SMXLs to Inhibit BRC1 Expression in Strigolactone-Regulated Shoot Branching in Arabidopsis. Plant Commun. 2020, 1, 100014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, L.; Wang, B.; Yu, H.; Guo, H.; Lin, T.; Kou, L.; Wang, A.; Shao, N.; Ma, H.; Xiong, G.; et al. Transcriptional regulation of strigolactone signalling in Arabidopsis. Nature 2020, 583, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yang, T.; Lian, Y.; Wang, C. Comparing and contrasting the multiple roles of butenolide plant growth regulators: Strigolactones and Karrikins in plant development and adaptation to abiotic stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shindo, M.; Yamamoto, S.; Shimomura, K.; Umehara, M. Strigolactones decrease leaf angle in response to nutrient deficiencies in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sedaghat, M.; Tahmasebi-Sarvestani, Z.; Emam, Y.; Mokhtassi-Bidgoli, A. Physiological and antioxidant responses of winter wheat cultivars to strigolactone and salicylic acid in drought. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 119, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yuan, M.; Huang, Y.; Ge, W.; Jia, Z.; Song, S.; Zhang, L.; Huang, Y. Involvement of jasmonic acid, ethylene and salicylic acid signaling pathways behind the systemic resistance induced by Trichoderma longibrachiatum H9 in cucumber. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Du, F.; Guan, C.; Jiao, Y. Molecular mechanisms of leaf morphogenesis. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 1117–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Song, M.; Cheng, F.; Wang, J.; Wei, Q.; Fu, W.; Yu, X.; Li, J.; Chen, J.; Lou, Q. A leaf shape mutant provides insight into PINOID Serine/Threonine Kinase function in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2018, 61, 1000–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Christensen, S.K.; Dagenais, N.; Chory, J.; Weigel, D. Regulation of auxin response by the protein kinase PINOID. Cell 2000, 100, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Benjamins, R.; Quint, A.; Weijers, D.; Hooykaas, P.; Offringa, R. The PINOID protein kinase regulates organ development in Arabidopsis by enhancing polar auxin transport. Development 2001, 128, 4057–4067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zourelidou, M.; Absmanner, B.; Weller, B.; Barbosa, I.C.; Willige, B.C.; Fastner, A.; Streit, V.; Port, S.A.; Colcombet, J.; Bentem, S.D.L.F.V.; et al. Auxin efflux by PIN-FORMED proteins is activated by two different protein kinases, D6 PROTEIN KINASE and PINOID. eLife Sci. 2014, 3, 02860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Satoshi, N. Polar transport in plants mediated by membrane transporters: Focus on mechanisms of polar auxin transport. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2017, 40, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wisniewska, J.; Xu, J.; Seifertová, D.; Brewer, P.B.; Ruzicka, K.; Blilou, I.; Rouquié, D.; Benková, E.; Scheres, B.; Friml, J. Polar PIN iocalization directs auxin flow in plants. Science 2008, 312, 883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Michniewicz, M.; Zago, M.K.; Abas, L.; Weijers, D.; Schweighofer, A.; Meskiene, I.; Heisler, M.G.; Ohno, C.; Jing, Z.; Fang, H.; et al. Antagonistic regulation of PIN phosphorylation by PP2A and PINOID directs auxin flux—Sciencedirect. Cell 2007, 130, 1044–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Friml, J.; Yang, X.; Michniewicz, M.; Weijers, D.; Quint, A.; Tietz, O.; Benjamins, R.; Ouwerkerk, P.B.F.; Ljung, K.; Sandberg, G.; et al. A PINOID-dependent binary switch in apical-basal PIN polar targeting directs auxin efflux. Science 2004, 306, 862–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Leea, S.H.; Cho, H.-T. PINOID positively regulates auxin efflux in Arabidopsis root hair cells and tobacco cells. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 1604–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kleine-Vehn, J.; Fang, H.; Naramoto, S.; Jing, Z.; Michniewicz, M.; Offringa, R.; Friml, J. PIN auxin efflux carrier polarity is regulated by PINOID kinase-mediated recruitment into GNOM-independent trafficking in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 3839–3849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, C.; Chen, F.; Zhao, Z.; Hu, L.; Liu, H.; Cheng, Z.; Weng, Y.; Chen, P.; Li, Y. Mutations in CsPID encoding a Ser/Thr protein kinase are responsible for round leaf shape in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018, 131, 1379–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, X.; Hao, N.; Li, H.; Ge, D.; Du, Y.; Liu, R.; Wen, C.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wu, T. PINOID is required for lateral organ morphogenesis and ovule development in cucumber. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 5715–5730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jeong, N.; Suh, S.J.; Kim, M.H.; Lee, S.; Moon, J.K.; Kim, H.S.; Jeong, S.C. Ln is a key regulator of leaflet shape and number of seeds per pod in soybean. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 4807–4818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nie, J.; Shan, N.; Liu, H.; Yao, X.; Wang, Z.; Bai, R.; Guo, Y.; Duan, Y.; Wang, C.; Sui, X. Transcriptional control of local auxin distribution by the CsDFB1-CsPHB module regulates floral organogenesis in cucumber. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2023942118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Graaff, E.; Laux, T.; Rensing, S.A. The WUS homeobox-containing (WOX) protein family. Genome Biol. 2009, 10, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Bürglin, T.R.; Affolter, M. Homeodomain proteins: An update. Chromosoma 2016, 125, 497–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Haecker, A.; Groß-Hardt, R.; Geiges, B.; Sarkar, A.; Breuninger, H.; Herrmann, M.; Laux, T. Expression dynamics of WOX genes mark cell fate decisions during early embryonic patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 2004, 131, 657–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, C.; Zhao, B.; He, L.; Zhou, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, W.; Guo, S.; Wang, R.; Bai, Q.; Li, Y.; et al. The WOX family transcriptional regulator SlLAM1 controls compound leaf and floral organ development in Solanum lycopersicum. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 72, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, Q.; Cao, C.; Zhang, C.; Zheng, S.; Wang, Z.; Wang, L.; Ren, Z. The identification of Cucumis sativus Glabrous 1 (CsGL1) required for the formation of trichomes uncovers a novel function for the homeodomain-leucine zipper I gene. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 2515–2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gu, R.; Song, X.; Liu, X.; Yan, L.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, X. Genome-wide analysis of CsWOX transcription factor gene family in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 6216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Han, N.; Tang, R.; Chen, X.; Xu, Z.; Ren, Z.; Wang, L. Genome-wide identifification and characterization of WOX genes in Cucumis sativus. Genome 2021, 64, 761–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Niu, H.; Liu, X.; Tong, C.; Wang, H.; Li, S.; Lu, L.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, X.; Weng, Y.; Li, Z. The WUSCHEL-related homeobox1 gene of cucumber regulates reproductive organ development. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 5373–5387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ding, L.; Yan, S.; Jiang, L.; Liu, M.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, W.; Han, Y.Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, X. HANABA TARANU regulates the shoot apical meristem and leaf development in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 7075–7085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Colle, M.; Weng, Y.; Kang, Y.; Ophir, R.; Sherman, A.; Grumet, R. Variation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) fruit size and shape results from multiple components acting pre-anthesis and post-pollination. Planta 2017, 246, 641–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Che, G.; Zhang, X. Molecular basis of cucumber fruit domestication. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2019, 47, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Bo, K.; Ma, Z.; Chen, J.; Weng, Y. Molecular mapping reveals structural rearrangements and quantitative trait loci underlying traits with local adaptation in semi-wild Xishuangbanna cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. var. xishuangbannanesis Qi et Yuan). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2015, 128, 25–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Pan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Mcgregor, C.; Liu, S.; Luan, F.; Gao, M.; Weng, Y. Genetic architecture of fruit size and shape variation in cucurbits: A comparative perspective. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2020, 133, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Weng, Y.; Colle, M.; Wang, Y.; Yang, L.; Grumet, R. QTL mapping in multiple populations and development stages reveals dynamic quantitative trait loci for fruit size in cucumbers of different market classes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2015, 128, 1747–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Pan, Y.; Liang, X.; Gao, M.; Liu, H.; Meng, H.; Weng, Y.; Cheng, Z. Round fruit shape in WI7239 cucumber is controlled by two interacting quantitative trait loci with one putatively encoding a tomato SUN homolog. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2017, 130, 573–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wu, S.; Zhang, B.; Keyhaninejad, N.; Rodríguez, G.R.; Kim, H.J.; Chakrabarti, M.; Illa-Berenguer, E.; Taitano, N.K.; Gonzalo, M.J.; Díaz, A.; et al. A common genetic mechanism underlies morphological diversity in fruits and other plant organs. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Xiao, H.; Jiang, N.; Schaffner, E.; Stockinger, E.J.; Knaap, E. A retrotransposon-mediated gene duplication underlies morphological variation of tomato fruit. Science 2008, 319, 1527–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Clevenger, J.P.; Houten, J.V.; Blackwood, M.; Rodríguez, G.; Jikumaru, Y.; Kamiya, Y.; Kusano, M.; Saito, K.; Visa, S.; van der Knaap, E. Network analyses reveal shifts in transcript profiles and metabolites that accompany the expression of SUN and an elongated tomato fruit. Plant Physiol. 2015, 168, 1164–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Liu, J.; Eck, J.V.; Cong, B.; Tanksley, S.D. A new class of regulatory genes underlying the cause of pear-shaped tomato fruit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 13302–13306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, S.; Chang, Y.; Guo, J.; Zeng, Q.; Ellis, B.E.; Chen, J. Arabidopsis Ovate Family Proteins, a Novel Transcriptional Repressor Family, Control Multiple Aspects of Plant Growth and Development. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e23896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Liu, D.; Sun, W.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, N.; Hayward, A.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y. Phylogenetic analyses provide the first insights into the evolution of OVATE family proteins in land plants. Ann. Bot. 2014, 113, 1219–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Wang, S.; Chang, Y.; Ellis, B. Overview of OVATE FAMILY PROTEINS, a novel class of plant-specific growth regulators. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Snouffer, A.; Kraus, C.; Knaap, E. The shape of things to come: Ovate family proteins regulate plant organ shape. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2019, 53, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ma, J.; Li, C.; Zong, M.; Qiu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, J. CmFSI8/CmOFP13 encoding an OVATE family protein controls fruit shape in melon. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 1370–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Han, L.; Song, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, X.; Yan, L.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, X. Genome-wide analysis of OVATE family proteins in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). J. Integr. Agric. 2022, 21, 1321–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Xin, T.; Zhang, Z.; Li, S.; Zhang, S.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, S.; Yang, X. Genetic regulation of ethylene dosage for cucumber fruit elongation. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 1063–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wang, H.; Sun, J.; Yang, F.; Weng, Y.; Chen, P.; Du, S.; Wei, A.; Li, Y. CsKTN1 for a katanin p60 subunit is associated with the regulation of fruit elongation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2021, 134, 2429–2441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Paran, I.; Knaap, E. Genetic and molecular regulation of fruit and plant domestication traits in tomato and pepper. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 3841–3852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yuan, L.; Pan, J.; Wang, G.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, W.; Zheng, L.; He, H.; Yang, Z.; Cai, R.; Zhu, L. The cucumber lateral suppressor gene (CLS) is functionally associated with axillary meristem initiation. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010, 28, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Shen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ge, D.; Wang, Z.; Song, W.; Gu, R.; Che, G.; Cheng, Z.; Liu, R.; Zhang, X. CsBRC1 inhibits axillary bud outgrowth by directly repressing the auxin efflux carrier CsPIN3 in cucumber. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 17105–17114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Wen, C.; Zhao, W.; Liu, W.; Yang, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Xu, Y.; Ren, H.; Guo, Y.; Li, C.; et al. CsTFL1 inhibits determinate growth and terminal flower formation through interaction with CsNOT2a in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Development 2019, 146, 180166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Zhao, W.; Chen, Z.; Liu, X.; Che, G.; Gu, R.; Zhao, J.; Wang, Z.; Hou, Y.; Zhang, X. CsLFY is required for shoot meristem maintenance via interaction with WUSCHEL in cucumber (Cucumis sativus). New Phytol. 2018, 218, 344–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Liu, X.; Chen, J.; Zhang, X. Genetic regulation of shoot architecture in cucumber. Horticutral Res. 2021, 8, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Xu, L.; Chao, W.; Cao, W.; Zhou, S.; Wu, T. CLAVATA1-type receptor-like kinase CsCLAVATA1 is a putative candidate gene for dwarf mutation in cucumber. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2018, 293, 1393–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Schaller, G.E.; Bishopp, A.; Kieber, J.J. The Yin-Yang of hormones: Cytokinin and auxin interactions in plant development. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 44–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. El-Showk, S.; Ruonala, R.; Helariutta, Y. Crossing paths: Cytokinin signalling and crosstalk. Development 2013, 140, 1373–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wolters, H.; Jürgens, G. Survival of the flexible: Hormonal growth control and adaptation in plant development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10, 305–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ando, K.; Carr, K.M.; Grumet, R. Transcriptome analyses of early cucumber fruit growth identifies distinct gene modules associated with phases of development. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Ali, S.; Khan, N.; Xie, L. Molecular and hormonal regulation of leaf morphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Czesnick, H.; Lenhard, M. Size control in plants-lessons from leaves and flowers. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015, 7, 019190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Kierzkowski, D.; Runions, A.; Vuolo, F.; Strauss, S.; Lymbouridou, R.; Routier-Kierzkowska, A.-L.; Wilson-Sánchez, D.; Jenke, H.; Galinha, C.; Mosca, G.; et al. A growth-based framework for leaf shape development and diversity. Cell 2019, 177, 1405–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Zhang, H.; Guo, Z.; Zhuang, Y.; Suo, Y.; Du, J.; Gao, Z.; Pan, J.; Li, L.; Wang, T.; Xiao, L.; et al. MicroRNA775 regulates intrinsic leaf size and reduces cell wall pectin levels by targeting a galactosyltransferase gene in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2021, 33, 581–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Genetic and molecular regulation mechanisms of cucumber leaf morphology. The grey box indicates the genes/proteins related to leaf morphology identified in cucumber. The yellow box indicates the gene or protein regulated by the target gene. The gray oval box indicates the corresponding leaf phenotype. The arrows indicate the regulatory relationship between the two genes. Abbreviations in figure, WOX: Wuschel-related homeobox; LL: little leaf; SCL: small and cordate leaf; HAN: Hanaba Taranu; IVP: irregular vasculature patterning; SPL: SPOROCYTELESS; PID1: PINOID 1; PIN2: PIN-FROMED 2; STM: Shoot Meristemless).
Figure 1. Genetic and molecular regulation mechanisms of cucumber leaf morphology. The grey box indicates the genes/proteins related to leaf morphology identified in cucumber. The yellow box indicates the gene or protein regulated by the target gene. The gray oval box indicates the corresponding leaf phenotype. The arrows indicate the regulatory relationship between the two genes. Abbreviations in figure, WOX: Wuschel-related homeobox; LL: little leaf; SCL: small and cordate leaf; HAN: Hanaba Taranu; IVP: irregular vasculature patterning; SPL: SPOROCYTELESS; PID1: PINOID 1; PIN2: PIN-FROMED 2; STM: Shoot Meristemless).
Plants 11 02128 g001
Figure 2. Genetic and molecular regulation mechanisms of cucumber fruit development. The grey box indicates the genes/proteins related to fruit development identified in cucumber. The blue-green boxes indicate hormonal pathways. SUN and TRM5 regulate round fruit by cell proliferation. SF1, SF2, and SF3 regulate short fruit by cell proliferation via the levels of ETH, CK/polyamines, and auxin/GA, respectively. CsFUL1 targets SUP and negatively regulates fruit elongation by cell proliferation and expansion. Abbreviations in figure, TRM5: Tonneau1 recruiting motif 5; SF1/2/3: Short Fruit; FUL1: Fruitfull 1; SUP: Superman.
Figure 2. Genetic and molecular regulation mechanisms of cucumber fruit development. The grey box indicates the genes/proteins related to fruit development identified in cucumber. The blue-green boxes indicate hormonal pathways. SUN and TRM5 regulate round fruit by cell proliferation. SF1, SF2, and SF3 regulate short fruit by cell proliferation via the levels of ETH, CK/polyamines, and auxin/GA, respectively. CsFUL1 targets SUP and negatively regulates fruit elongation by cell proliferation and expansion. Abbreviations in figure, TRM5: Tonneau1 recruiting motif 5; SF1/2/3: Short Fruit; FUL1: Fruitfull 1; SUP: Superman.
Plants 11 02128 g002
Figure 3. Genetic and molecular regulation mechanisms of the cucumber plant architecture. TFL1’s interaction with CsNOT2a-CsFDP impedes terminal flower formation, and LFY interacts with CsWUS to regulate shoot meristem maintenance in cucumber via activating CsAP3 and CsCUM1 to regulate cucumber towards a determined growth pattern. BRC1 regulates lateral branching by influencing auxin accumulation, while CLS influences bud initiation. Dwarf regulates the internodes by the regulation of endogenous GA3 levels and cell counts in the main stem. Abbreviations in figure, LFY: LEAFY; AP3: APETALA3; CUM1: Cucumber MADS box gene 1; TFL: Terminal Flower1; NOT2a-FDP: Negative on TATA less2-FD Paralog; BRC1: Branched1; CLS: Cucumber Lateral Suppressor.
Figure 3. Genetic and molecular regulation mechanisms of the cucumber plant architecture. TFL1’s interaction with CsNOT2a-CsFDP impedes terminal flower formation, and LFY interacts with CsWUS to regulate shoot meristem maintenance in cucumber via activating CsAP3 and CsCUM1 to regulate cucumber towards a determined growth pattern. BRC1 regulates lateral branching by influencing auxin accumulation, while CLS influences bud initiation. Dwarf regulates the internodes by the regulation of endogenous GA3 levels and cell counts in the main stem. Abbreviations in figure, LFY: LEAFY; AP3: APETALA3; CUM1: Cucumber MADS box gene 1; TFL: Terminal Flower1; NOT2a-FDP: Negative on TATA less2-FD Paralog; BRC1: Branched1; CLS: Cucumber Lateral Suppressor.
Plants 11 02128 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J.; Cao, J.; Wang, C.; Hao, N.; Zhang, X.; Liu, M.; Wu, T. Research Progress on the Leaf Morphology, Fruit Development and Plant Architecture of the Cucumber. Plants 2022, 11, 2128. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162128

AMA Style

Li J, Cao J, Wang C, Hao N, Zhang X, Liu M, Wu T. Research Progress on the Leaf Morphology, Fruit Development and Plant Architecture of the Cucumber. Plants. 2022; 11(16):2128. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162128

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Jie, Jiajian Cao, Chunhua Wang, Ning Hao, Xiaolan Zhang, Mingyue Liu, and Tao Wu. 2022. "Research Progress on the Leaf Morphology, Fruit Development and Plant Architecture of the Cucumber" Plants 11, no. 16: 2128. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162128

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop