Next Article in Journal
Identification of Spring Wheat with Superior Agronomic Performance under Contrasting Nitrogen Managements Using Linear Phenotypic Selection Indices
Next Article in Special Issue
Phytochemical Composition, Antioxidant, Antibacterial, and Enzyme Inhibitory Activities of Various Organic Extracts from Apocynum hendersonii (Hook.f.) Woodson
Previous Article in Journal
Anticancer Potential and Other Pharmacological Properties of Prunus armeniaca L.: An Updated Overview
Previous Article in Special Issue
Caryocar coriaceum Wittm. (Caryocaraceae): Botany, Ethnomedicinal Uses, Biological Activities, Phytochemistry, Extractivism and Conservation Needs
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 14
10.3390/plants11141886
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Computational Preventive Potential of the Rare Flavonoid, Patuletin, Isolated from Tagetes patula, against SARS-CoV-2

by
Ahmed M. Metwaly
1,2,*,
Eslam B. Elkaeed
3,
Bshra A. Alsfouk
4,
Abdulrahman M. Saleh
5,
Ahmad E. Mostafa
1 and
Ibrahim H. Eissa
5,*
1
Pharmacognosy and Medicinal Plants Department, Faculty of Pharmacy (Boys), Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11884, Egypt
2
Biopharmaceutical Products Research Department, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute, City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications (SRTA-City), Alexandria 21934, Egypt
3
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, AlMaarefa University, Riyadh 13713, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
5
Pharmaceutical Medicinal Chemistry & Drug Design Department, Faculty of Pharmacy (Boys), Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11884, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(14), 1886; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11141886
Submission received: 27 June 2022 / Revised: 16 July 2022 / Accepted: 18 July 2022 / Published: 20 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Phytochemicals on Crop Protection and Drug Development)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The rare flavonoid, patuletin, was isolated from the flowers of Tagetes patula growing in Egypt. The rarity of the isolated compound inspired us to scrutinize its preventive effect against COVID-19 utilizing a multi-step computational approach. Firstly, a structural similarity study was carried out against nine ligands of nine SARS-CoV-2 proteins. The results showed a large structural similarity between patuletin and F86, the ligand of SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). Then, a 3D-Flexible alignment study of patuletin and F86 verified the proposed similarity. To determine the binding opportunity, patuletin was docked against the RdRp showing a correct binding inside its active pocket with an energy of −20 kcal/mol that was comparable to that of F86 (−23 kcal/mol). Following, several MD simulations as well as MM-PBSA studies authenticated the accurate binding of patuletin in the RdRp via the correct dynamic and energetic behaviors over 100 ns. Additionally, in silico ADMET studies showed the general safety and drug-likeness of patuletin.

1. Introduction

Since the oldest historical records, nature granted humans their primary needs including treatments, food, as well as cosmetical products [1,2]. Modern science relates the biological activities of natural products to the presence of various sorts of secondary metabolites such as hydrocarbons [3,4,5], isochromenes [6], α-pyrones [7,8], diterpenes [9], sesquiterpenes [10,11], steroids [12,13], and saponins [14,15,16]. The computational (computer-based or in silico) chemistry approaches are efficient tools that have been employed to examine the biological activities of compounds virtually. These approaches have been effectively utilized in drug design and drug discovery. The computational chemistry methods were employed to determine the biological activities of natural, synthesized, and semi-synthesized compounds. The huge advancement that occurred in software in the last decade enabled researchers to apply the structure–activity relationship principles to precisely predict the biological activity of a new compound based on its physical and chemical properties. Our team employed computer-based chemistry strategies to disclose the potential inhibitive effects of the several secondary metabolites against SARS-CoV-2 that have been isolated from Asteriscus sp. [17], Monanchora sp. [18], and Artemisia spp. [19,20,21]. Additionally, we presented a well-designed in silico approach to select the most relevant inhibitor compound among a huge set of compounds and we applied that method to introduce several opportune anti-COVID-19 compounds from 69 isoflavonoids [22], semi-synthetic compounds [23], 310 natural antivirals [24,25], and 3009 FDA-approved compounds [26,27].
Patuletin is a rare flavonol that has been isolated for the first time from Tagetes patula in 1941 [28]; then, it was isolated a few times from other plant species such as Eriocaulon sp. [29] and Urtica urens [30]. Later, patuletin was employed as a chemotaxonomic marker for Tagetes patula [31]. Despite the rarity of patuletin, it exhibited several promising biological activities such as anti-inflammatory [32,33], cytotoxic [34,35], antimicrobial [36], and neuroprotective [37].
Here in this study, we report the isolation of the rare flavonol, patuletin, from the flowers of Tagetes patula. Due to being a rare flavonol, its potential effect as a treatment for COVID-19 was examined. The start point of our work was the chemical structures of diverse ligands of different SARS-CoV-2 proteins. Our study indicated the great structural similarity of patuletin and F86, the co-crystallized ligand of RdRp (PDB ID: 7BV2), expecting an efficient binding to patuletin in the active site of RdRp. This correct binding was confirmed by applying molecular docking as well as MD simulations and MM-PBSA.

2. Results

2.1. Isolation and Characterization

A total of 2 kg of Tagetes patula L. flowers were extracted with 70% ethanol three times to afford 210 gm of total extract. The extract was suspended in water and fractionated against hexane, CH2Cl2, and n-butanol. Then, the butanol fraction was subjected to a silica gel column to provide 8 different fractions. Fraction 3 was further purified with Sephadex LH-20 to furnish 110 mg of patuletin (Figure 1). The 1H NMR spectrum of patuletin showed one singlet aromatic signal at δH 6.54 ppm for H-8 in addition to three other multiplied aromatic signals resonating at 7.70 ppm d (J = 2 Hz, H-2′), 6.92 ppm d (J = 8 Hz, H-5′), and 7.56 ppm dd (J = 2 Hz, J = 8 Hz, H-6′). Furthermore, a signal of a methoxy group was detected at δH 3.79 ppm (s). Additionally, the distinctive chelated proton signal of the OH of C-5 resonated as a sharp singlet at δH 12.62 ppm (because of the formation of an intramolecular hydrogen bond (H-B) with the carbonyl group) (see Table 1). The 13C spectral data indicated the existence of 15 carbon atoms in addition to a methoxy group. The obtained data was completely consistent with the previously published spectral data of patuletin [38].

2.2. Molecular Similarity

Our key point in this investigation is the co-crystallized ligand. The co-crystallized ligand is a molecule that can bind efficiently with a particular protein and crystallize it [39]. The structure–activity relationship rules indicate that any two compounds that have a resemblance in chemical structures, are expected to show similar biological activities through binding with the same receptor [40]. The molecular similarity study describes and compares the whole structures of the reference compound as well as the examined compound, using descriptors such as steric, topological, electronic, and/or physical characteristics [41]. Accordingly, a molecular similarity study was conducted to compare the chemical structure of patuletin with those of nine co-crystallized ligands of vital proteins of SARS-CoV-2 (Figure 2). Our aim is to investigate the structural similarity that may be associated with the binding affinity. Accordingly, we utilized a 2D molecular similarity assay to examine the similarity.
The structural similarity between patuletin and the considered ligands was checked by applying the software, Discovery studio. The subsequent structural characteristics were investigated and compared in patuletin and the examined ligands; molecular weight (M-W) [42], partition coefficient (ALog p) [43], H-B donors (H.B-D) [44], H-B acceptors (H.B-A) [45], molecular fractional polar surface area (MFP-SA) [46], number of rotatable bonds (N-RB) [47], number of rings (N-R) and aromatic rings (N-AR) [48]. The outputs indicated the existence of a great degree of structural similarity between patuletin and the co-crystallized ligand F86, of RdRp, (PDB ID: 7BV2) (Table 2 and Figure 3).

2.3. Flexible Alignment

To substantiate the obtained results, a 3D-Flexible alignment of patuletin with F86 was directed. The result revealed the general good overlapping. Interestingly, as shown in Figure 4, patuletin showed the same spatial orientation as F86. In detail, the pyrocatechol moiety of patuletin showed the same orientation as the 4-aminopyrrolo [2,1-f][1,2,4] triazine moiety of F86. Additionally, the 3,5,7-Trihydroxy-6-methoxy-4H-chromen-4-one moiety of patuletin exhibited close orientation to the ((2R,3S,4R,5R)-5-cyano-3,4-dihydroxytetrahydrofuran-2-yl)methyl dihydrogen phosphate moiety of F86.

2.4. Docking Studies

To investigate the binding interactions of patuletin with the RdRp’s active pocket, docking studies were performed using F86 as a reference. The binding free energy (∆G) between patuletin and RdRp’s active pocket, besides to the correct binding mode were the factors of evaluation.
At first, verification of the docking process was carried out through the re-docking procedure for F86 against the active pocket of RdRp. The the validity of the docking process was confirmed as the obtained RMSD value between the generated pose and the original one was 1.61 °A (Figure 5).
Regarding F86, it exhibited a binding free energy value of −23.71 kcal/mol. Compound F86 exhibited five H-Bs, six hydrophobic interactions (H-I), and three electrostatic interactions (E-I). The 4-aminopyrrolo [2,1-f][1,2,4] triazine moiety oriented to the 1st pocket of the active site forming two H-Bs with Urd10. In addition, it formed six H-I with Urd20, Ade11, Arg555, and Val557. Additionally, it formed an electrostatic attraction with Arg555. The sugar moiety formed two H-Bs with Ser757 and Asp623. The phosphate derivative moiety formed one H-B with Arg555, and two E-Is with Asp760 and Arg555 (Figure 6).
The binding mode of patuletin showed a binding free energy value of −20.30 kcal/mol. The pyrocatechol moiety was oriented into the first pocket of the receptor to form two H-Bs with Cys622 and Thr680. In addition, it was incorporated in two E-Is with Cys622 and Asp623. Furthermore, the 3,5,7-Trihydroxy-6-methoxy-4H-chromen-4-one moiety formed five H-Bs with Urd20, Urd10, and Arg555. In addition, it formed three H-I with Urd20 and Ade11. Additionally, it formed two electrostatic attractions with Arg555 (Figure 7).

2.5. In Silico ADMET Analysis

In order to prevent late drug withdrawals, the analysis of the ADMET properties of any new compound should be conducted early in drug discovery. Despite the fact that various in vitro studies can investigate ADMET properties, in silico studies are still more advantageous given the limitations of cost, time, effort, and strict regulations regarding animal lives [49]. The ADMET profile of patuletin was determined using discovery studio against remdesivir, F86, as a reference.
As Figure 8 illustrates, patuletin displayed a very low potential to penetrate the BBB. Patuletin presented a good aqueous solubility as well as moderate intestinal absorption levels. The ability of patuletin to inhibit the cytochrome P450, CYP2D6, and to bind to the plasma protein were predicted as non-inhibitory and less than 90%, respectively. The results of remdesivir were similar to those of patuletin except for the poor absorption level.

2.6. In Silico Toxicity Studies

The in silico approach has had an essential contribution in toxicity, prediction through drug development in order to avoid ethical regulations, resource availability, as well as time-wasting in usual in vitro and in vivo studies [50]. The purpose of in silico toxicity prediction is to predict toxicity using the structure–activity relationship (SAR) through comparing basic chemical structural properties of the molecules with the structures of thousands of compounds of known safety and toxicity [51].
Seven models of toxicity were predicted to patuletin using discovery studio against remdesivir, F86, as a reference (Table 3). The examined models are: Ames prediction (A-C), carcinogenic potency in rats (R-TD50), rat maximum tolerated dose (R-MTD), Rat Oral LD50 (R- LD50), chronic LOAEL in rats (R- LOAEL), eye, ocular, irritation model (O-Ir), and skin irritation model (S-Ir).

2.7. MD Simulations

A molecular docking study is an in silico study that can reveal a ligand’s exact location inside a protein based on its structure. However, docking studies have the disfavor that they describe the interaction of proteins as a rigid (fixed) unit disregarding the conformational changes in the protein and ligand structures after binding [52]. Contradictory, the MD simulations experiments can provide a thorough understanding of how proteins behave at a cellular and atomic level as well as how their structure changes over time [53]. Accordingly, MD simulations can be used to describe exactly ligands’ effects on protein conformation from both dynamic and energy perspectives [54]. As a result of the interaction of a compound inside a protein’s active site, structural changes have occurred [55]. The RdRp’s active site is a complex of active polymerase protein (composed of amino acids) and nucleotides triphosphate [56]. The obtained conformational changes have been explored as RMSD for RdRp (protein and nucleotides), patuletin, and the patuletin–RdRp complex in order to evaluate the stability of the patuletin–RdRp complex after binding. Intriguingly, low RMSD values were recorded with no major fluctuations in the patuletin–RdRp complex as well as its single components (Figure 9A).
The flexibility of the patuletin–RdRp complex was examined in terms of RMSF to predict the degree of fluctuation of RdRp in the MD simulation experiment. Stimulatingly, the binding of patuletin did not cause significant changes in the RdRp flexibility (Figure 9B).
The radius of gyration, Rg, which describes the RMSD of a weighted mass unit of RdRp’s atoms from their mass center, provides accurate information about the 3D changes in the enzyme alongside its compactness. The degree of fluctuation, Rg value, during simulation time is inversely proportional to compactness and stability. Captivatingly, the patuletin–RdRp complex Rg was found to be less than the starting time (Figure 9C) indicating a good degree of stability.
The interaction of the patuletin–RdRp complex with the circumferential solvents was also computed by SASA during the simulation time. Engagingly, the SASA values of the patuletin–RdRp complex were lower than the starting period (Figure 9D), which implies a reduction in the surface area and, subsequently, higher stability.
It is clear that H-bonding is a critical factor in stabilizing the patuletin–RdRp complex, so MD simulation experiments were conducted to indicate that the highest number of conformations of the complex formed three H-Bs (Figure 9E).
The conformational changes that occurred because of the binding of patuletin to RdRp were examined during the first and 100th nanoseconds of the MD run as explained in Figure 10. It was confirmed that conformational changes have occurred in the patuletin–RdRp complex, as well as the binding stability and integrity of the patuletin–RdRp complex were indicated as patuletin was bonded perfectly to the RdRp’s active pocket through the 100 ns of the run.

2.8. MM-PBSA

As we mentioned, the RdRp’s active site is a complex of active polymerase protein and nucleotides triphosphate [56]. The average free binding energy of both types of bindings (patuletin–amino acids and patuletin–nucleotides) was based on MD trajectories from the last stable 20 ns of MD production run at a time interval of 100 ps. Figure 11A presents the average free binding energy of patuletin–amino acids of RdRp showing a very low binding free energy of −25 KJ/mol (−6 kcal/mol). Additionally, the binding energy remained stable throughout the examination run time indicating the accurate binding of the complex.
Next, the total binding free energy of the patuletin–amino acids of RdRp was analyzed in order to establish which of the amino acid residues participated most in the binding with patuletin. Three amino acids (Figure 11B) of the polymerase residues contributed more than −5 KJ/mol (−1.2 kcal/mol) regarding the binding energy and were considered essential (vital) residues.
The average free binding energy of patuletin–nucleotides is illustrated in Figure 12A. Interestingly, the average free binding energy of patuletin–nucleotides of RdRp showed a very low binding free energy of −120 KJ/mol (−28.7 kcal/mol). Additionally, the binding energy was stable among all the examination run times showing the precise binding of the complex.
Next, the total binding free energy of the patuletin–nucleotides of RdRp was analyzed in order to establish which of the nucleotides participated most in the binding with patuletin. Five nucleotides (Figure 12B) of the RdRp contributed more than −5 KJ/mol (−1.2 kcal/mol) regarding the binding energy and were considered vital nucleotides.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Isolation of Patuletin

Extraction, isolation, and identification of patuletin were addressed scrupulously in the supporting data (Supplementary Materials).

3.2. Molecular Similarity

Molecular similarity of patuletin was accomplished using Discovery Studio 4.0 [24,57] and was addressed scrupulously in the supporting data.

3.3. Docking Studies

Docking of patuletin against RdRp was accomplished using MOE2014 and outputted files were visualized using Discovery Studio 4.0 software [58,59,60] and were addressed scrupulously in the Supporting Data.

3.4. ADMET

ADMET patuletin was accomplished using Discovery Studio 4.0 [61,62] and was addressed scrupulously in the Supporting Data.

3.5. Toxicity Studies

Toxicity prediction of patuletin was accomplished using Discovery studio 4.0 [63,64,65] and was addressed scrupulously in the Supporting Data.

3.6. MD Simulations

MD simulations of the patuletin–RdRp system were accomplished using the web-based CHARMM-GUI [66,67,68] and were addressed scrupulously in the Supporting Data.

4. Conclusions

This study presented the isolation and characterization of the rare flavonoid, patuletin, from the flowers of Tagetes patula growing in Egypt. Patuletin exhibited a high degree of structural similarity with F86, the ligand of SARS-CoV-2 RdRp. This similarity was verified by a 3D-Flexible alignment study. A molecular docking study indicated the excellent binding of patuletin inside the active pocket of RdRp with an energy of −20 kcal/mol that was almost the same as that of F86 (−23 kcal/mol). Then, five MD simulation studies, over 100 ns, confirmed the accurate binding of patuletin in RdRp via the correct dynamic and energetic changes. Additionally, in silico ADMET studies indicated the general safety and drug-likeness of patuletin.

Supplementary Materials

Full method, spectral data and toxicity report can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11141886/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.M. and I.H.E.; Funding acquisition, E.B.E. and B.A.A.; Investigation, A.E.M.; Methodology, A.M.M.; Project administration, A.M.M. and I.H.E.; Software, A.M.S.; Writing—review & editing, E.B.E. and B.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2022R142), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The authors extend their appreciation to the Research Center at AlMaarefa University for funding this work.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Metwaly, A.M.; Ghoneim, M.M.; Eissa, I.H.; Elsehemy, I.A.; Mostafa, A.E.; Hegazy, M.M.; Afifi, W.M.; Dou, D. Traditional ancient Egyptian medicine: A review. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 5823–5832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Han, X.; Yang, Y.; Metwaly, A.M.; Xue, Y.; Shi, Y.; Dou, D. The Chinese herbal formulae (Yitangkang) exerts an antidiabetic effect through the regulation of substance metabolism and energy metabolism in type 2 diabetic rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 239, 111942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Suleimen, Y.M.; Van Hecke, K.; Ibatayev, Z.A.; Iskakova, Z.B.; Akatan, K.; Martins, C.; Silva, T. Crystal Structure and Biological Activity of Matricaria Ester Isolated from Tripleurospermum Inodorum (L.) Sch. Bip. J. Struct. Chem. 2018, 59, 988–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Suleimen, E.; Zhanzhaksina, A.S.; Sisengalieva, G.; Iskakova, Z.B.; Ishmuratova, M.Y. Constituent composition and biological activity of essential oil from Cousinia alata. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2018, 54, 595–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhunusova, M.; Suleimen, E.; Iskakova, Z.B.; Ishmuratova, M.Y.; Abdullabekova, R. Constituent composition and biological activity of the CO2 extract of dipsacus strigosus. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2018, 54, 784–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Metwaly, A.M.; Kadry, H.A.; Atef, A.; Mohammad, A.-E.I.; Ma, G.; Cutler, S.J.; Ross, S.A. Nigrosphaerin A a new isochromene derivative from the endophytic fungus Nigrospora sphaerica. Phytochem. Lett. 2014, 7, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Metwaly, A.M.; Fronczek, F.R.; Ma, G.; Kadry, H.A.; Atef, A.; Mohammad, A.-E.I.; Cutler, S.J.; Ross, S.A. Antileukemic α-pyrone derivatives from the endophytic fungus Alternaria phragmospora. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014, 55, 3478–3481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Metwaly, A.M.; Wanas, A.S.; Radwan, M.M.; Ross, S.A.; ElSohly, M.A. New α-pyrone derivatives from the endophytic fungus Embellisia sp. Med. Chem. Res. 2017, 26, 1796–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhanzhaxina, A.; Suleimen, Y.; Metwaly, A.M.; Eissa, I.H.; Elkaeed, E.B.; Suleimen, R.; Ishmuratova, M.; Akatan, K.; Luyten, W. In Vitro and In Silico Cytotoxic and Antibacterial Activities of a Diterpene from Cousinia alata Schrenk. J. Chem. 2021, 2021, 5542455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Imieje, V.O.; Zaki, A.A.; Metwaly, A.M.; Eissa, I.H.; Elkaeed, E.B.; Ali, Z.; Khan, I.A.; Falodun, A. Antileishmanial Derivatives of Humulene from Asteriscus hierochunticus with in silico Tubulin Inhibition Potential. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2021, 16, 150–171. [Google Scholar]
  11. Jalmakhanbetova, R.; Elkaeed, E.B.; Eissa, I.H.; Metwaly, A.M.; Suleimen, Y.M. Synthesis and Molecular Docking of Some Grossgemin Amino Derivatives as Tubulin Inhibitors Targeting Colchicine Binding Site. J. Chem. 2021, 2021, 5586515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Suleimen, Y.M.; Metwaly, A.M.; Mostafa, A.E.; Elkaeed, E.B.; Liu, H.-W.; Basnet, B.B.; Suleimen, R.N.; Ishmuratova, M.Y.; Turdybekov, K.M.; Van Hecke, K. Isolation, Crystal Structure, and In Silico Aromatase Inhibition Activity of Ergosta-5, 22-dien-3β-ol from the Fungus Gyromitra esculenta. J. Chem. 2021, 2021, 5529786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhunusova, M.; Suleimen, E.; Iskakova, Z.B.; Ishmuratova, M.Y.; Abdullabekova, R. Constituent composition and biological activity of CO2-extracts of Scabiosa isetensis and S. ochroleuca. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2017, 53, 775–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yassin, A.M.; El-Deeb, N.M.; Metwaly, A.M.; El Fawal, G.F.; Radwan, M.M.; Hafez, E.E. Induction of apoptosis in human cancer cells through extrinsic and intrinsic pathways by Balanites aegyptiaca furostanol saponins and saponin-coated silvernanoparticles. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2017, 182, 1675–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sharaf, M.H.; El-Sherbiny, G.M.; Moghannem, S.A.; Abdelmonem, M.; Elsehemy, I.A.; Metwaly, A.M.; Kalaba, M.H. New combination approaches to combat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Metwaly, A.M.; Lianlian, Z.; Luqi, H.; Deqiang, D. Black Ginseng and Its Saponins: Preparation, Phytochemistry and Pharmacological Effects. Molecules 2019, 24, 1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Imieje, V.O.; Zaki, A.A.; Metwaly, A.M.; Mostafa, A.E.; Elkaeed, E.B.; Falodun, A. Comprehensive In Silico Screening of the Antiviral Potentialities of a New Humulene Glucoside from Asteriscus hierochunticus against SARS-CoV-2. J. Chem. 2021, 2021, 5541876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. El-Demerdash, A.; Metwaly, A.M.; Hassan, A.; El-Aziz, A.; Mohamed, T.; Elkaeed, E.B.; Eissa, I.H.; Arafa, R.K.; Stockand, J.D. Comprehensive virtual screening of the antiviral potentialities of marine polycyclic guanidine alkaloids against SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). Biomolecules 2021, 11, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jalmakhanbetova, R.I.; Suleimen, Y.M.; Oyama, M.; Elkaeed, E.B.; Eissa, I.; Suleimen, R.N.; Metwaly, A.M.; Ishmuratova, M.Y. Isolation and In Silico Anti-COVID-19 Main Protease (Mpro) Activities of Flavonoids and a Sesquiterpene Lactone from Artemisia sublessingiana. J. Chem. 2021, 2021, 5547013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Suleimen, Y.M.; Jose, R.A.; Suleimen, R.N.; Arenz, C.; Ishmuratova, M.Y.; Toppet, S.; Dehaen, W.; Alsfouk, B.A.; Elkaeed, E.B.; Eissa, I.H. Jusanin, a New Flavonoid from Artemisia commutata with an In Silico Inhibitory Potential against the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease. Molecules 2022, 27, 1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Suleimen, Y.M.; Jose, R.A.; Suleimen, R.N.; Arenz, C.; Ishmuratova, M.; Toppet, S.; Dehaen, W.; Alsfouk, A.A.; Elkaeed, E.B.; Eissa, I.H.; et al. Isolation and In Silico Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Papain-Like Protease Potentialities of Two Rare 2-Phenoxychromone Derivatives from Artemisia spp. Molecules 2022, 27, 1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Alesawy, M.S.; Abdallah, A.E.; Taghour, M.S.; Elkaeed, E.B.; Eissa, I.H.; Metwaly, A.M. In Silico Studies of Some Isoflavonoids as Potential Candidates against COVID-19 Targeting Human ACE2 (hACE2) and Viral Main Protease (Mpro). Molecules 2021, 26, 2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Alesawy, M.S.; Elkaeed, E.B.; Alsfouk, A.A.; Metwaly, A.M.; Eissa, I.H. In silico screening of semi-synthesized compounds as potential inhibitors for SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease: Pharmacophoric features, molecular docking, ADMET, toxicity and DFT studies. Molecules 2021, 26, 6593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Eissa, I.H.; Khalifa, M.M.; Elkaeed, E.B.; Hafez, E.E.; Alsfouk, A.A.; Metwaly, A.M. In silico exploration of potential natural inhibitors against SARS-CoV-2 nsp10. Molecules 2021, 26, 6151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Elkaeed, E.B.; Youssef, F.S.; Eissa, I.H.; Elkady, H.; Alsfouk, A.A.; Ashour, M.L.; El Hassab, M.A.; Abou-Seri, S.M.; Metwaly, A.M. Multi-Step In Silico Discovery of Natural Drugs against COVID-19 Targeting Main Protease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Eissa, I.H.; Alesawy, M.S.; Saleh, A.M.; Elkaeed, E.B.; Alsfouk, B.A.; El-Attar, A.-A.M.; Metwaly, A.M. Ligand and structure-based in silico determination of the most promising SARS-CoV-2 nsp16-nsp10 2′-o-Methyltransferase complex inhibitors among 3009 FDA approved drugs. Molecules 2022, 27, 2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Elkaeed, E.B.; Elkady, H.; Belal, A.; Alsfouk, B.A.; Ibrahim, T.H.; Abdelmoaty, M.; Arafa, R.K.; Metwaly, A.M.; Eissa, I.H. Multi-Phase In Silico Discovery of Potential SARS-CoV-2 RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase Inhibitors among 3009 Clinical and FDA-Approved Related Drugs. Processes 2022, 10, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rao, P.S.; Seshadri, T. The colouring matter of the flowers ofTagetes patula: Isolation of a new flavonol, patuletin and its constitution. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.-Sect. A 1941, 14, 643–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bate-Smith, E.; Harborne, J. Quercetagetin and patuletin in Eriocaulon. Phytochemistry 1969, 8, 1035–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nencu, I.; Vlase, L.; Istudor, V.; Mircea, T.Ă. Preliminary research regarding Urtica urens L. and Urtica dioica L. Amino Acids 2015, 63, 710–715. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang, Y.-M.; Ran, X.-K.; Riaz, M.; Yu, M.; Cai, Q.; Dou, D.-Q.; Metwaly, A.M.; Kang, T.-G.; Cai, D.-C. Chemical constituents of stems and leaves of Tagetespatula L. and its fingerprint. Molecules 2019, 24, 3911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Jabeen, A.; Mesaik, M.A.; Simjee, S.U.; Bano, S.; Faizi, S. Anti-TNF-α and anti-arthritic effect of patuletin: A rare flavonoid from Tagetes patula. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2016, 36, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zarei, M.; Mohammadi, S.; Komaki, A. Antinociceptive activity of Inula britannica L. and patuletin: In vivo and possible mechanisms studies. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 219, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Alvarado-Sansininea, J.J.; Sánchez-Sánchez, L.; López-Muñoz, H.; Escobar, M.L.; Flores-Guzmán, F.; Tavera-Hernández, R.; Jiménez-Estrada, M. Quercetagetin and patuletin: Antiproliferative, necrotic and apoptotic activity in tumor cell lines. Molecules 2018, 23, 2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Azhar, M.; Farooq, A.D.; Haque, S.; Samina, B.; Zaheer, L.; Faizi, S. Cytotoxic and genotoxic action of Tagetes patula flower methanol extract and patuletin using the Allium test. Turk. J. Biol. 2019, 43, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Faizi, S.; Siddiqi, H.; Bano, S.; Naz, A.; Lubna; Mazhar, K.; Nasim, S.; Riaz, T.; Kamal, S.; Ahmad, A. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of different parts of Tagetes patula.: Preparation of patuletin derivatives. Pharm. Biol. 2008, 46, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Liu, L.; Luo, S.; Yu, M.; Metwaly, A.M.; Ran, X.; Ma, C.; Dou, D.; Cai, D. Chemical constituents of tagetes patula and their neuroprotecting action. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2020, 15, 1934578X20974507. [Google Scholar]
  38. Abdel-Wahhab, M.A.; Said, A.; Huefner, A. NMR and radical scavenging activities of patuletin from Urtica urens. Against aflatoxin B1. Pharm. Biol. 2005, 43, 515–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hassell, A.M.; An, G.; Bledsoe, R.K.; Bynum, J.M.; Carter, H.L.; Deng, S.-J.; Gampe, R.T.; Grisard, T.E.; Madauss, K.P.; Nolte, R.T. Crystallization of protein–ligand complexes. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2007, 63, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nantasenamat, C.; Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya, C.; Naenna, T.; Prachayasittikul, V. A practical overview of quantitative structure-activity relationship. World J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 5, 427–437. [Google Scholar]
  41. Maggiora, G.; Vogt, M.; Stumpfe, D.; Bajorath, J. Molecular similarity in medicinal chemistry: Miniperspective. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 3186–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sullivan, K.M.; Enoch, S.J.; Ezendam, J.; Sewald, K.; Roggen, E.L.; Cochrane, S. An adverse outcome pathway for sensitization of the respiratory tract by low-molecular-weight chemicals: Building evidence to support the utility of in vitro and in silico methods in a regulatory context. Appl. Vitr. Toxicol. 2017, 3, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Turchi, M.; Cai, Q.; Lian, G. An evaluation of in-silico methods for predicting solute partition in multiphase complex fluids–A case study of octanol/water partition coefficient. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2019, 197, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Altamash, T.; Amhamed, A.; Aparicio, S.; Atilhan, M. Effect of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors on CO2 absorption by deep eutectic solvents. Processes 2020, 8, 1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wan, Y.; Tian, Y.; Wang, W.; Gu, S.; Ju, X.; Liu, G. In silico studies of diarylpyridine derivatives as novel HIV-1 NNRTIs using docking-based 3D-QSAR, molecular dynamics, and pharmacophore modeling approaches. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 40529–40543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Zhang, H.; Ren, J.-X.; Ma, J.-X.; Ding, L. Development of an in silico prediction model for chemical-induced urinary tract toxicity by using naïve Bayes classifier. Mol. Divers. 2019, 23, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Escamilla-Gutiérrez, A.; Ribas-Aparicio, R.M.; Córdova-Espinoza, M.G.; Castelán-Vega, J.A. In silico strategies for modeling RNA aptamers and predicting binding sites of their molecular targets. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 2021, 40, 798–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kaushik, A.C.; Kumar, A.; Bharadwaj, S.; Chaudhary, R.; Sahi, S. Ligand-Based Approach for In-silico Drug Designing. In Bioinformatics Techniques for Drug Discovery; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 11–19. [Google Scholar]
  49. Norinder, U.; Bergström, C.A. Prediction of ADMET properties. ChemMedChem Chem. Enabling Drug Discov. 2006, 1, 920–937. [Google Scholar]
  50. Idakwo, G.; Luttrell, J.; Chen, M.; Hong, H.; Zhou, Z.; Gong, P.; Zhang, C. A review on machine learning methods for in silico toxicity prediction. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part C 2018, 36, 169–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kruhlak, N.; Benz, R.; Zhou, H.; Colatsky, T. (Q) SAR modeling and safety assessment in regulatory review. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2012, 91, 529–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sousa, S.F.; Fernandes, P.A.; Ramos, M.J. Protein–ligand docking: Current status and future challenges. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 2006, 65, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Liu, X.; Shi, D.; Zhou, S.; Liu, H.; Liu, H.; Yao, X. Molecular dynamics simulations and novel drug discovery. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2018, 13, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hansson, T.; Oostenbrink, C.; van Gunsteren, W. Molecular dynamics simulations. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2002, 12, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kuzmanic, A.; Zagrovic, B. Determination of ensemble-average pairwise root mean-square deviation from experimental B-factors. Biophys. J. 2010, 98, 861–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Gong, P.; Peersen, O.B. Structural basis for active site closure by the poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 22505–22510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Elkaeed, E.B.B.; Yousef, R.G.G.; Elkady, H.; Gobaara, I.M.M.M.M.; Alsfouk, B.A.A.; Husein, D.Z.Z.; Ibrahim, I.M.M.; Metwaly, A.M.M.; Eissa, I.H.H. Design, Synthesis, Docking, DFT, MD Simulation Studies of a New Nicotinamide-Based Derivative: In Vitro Anticancer and VEGFR-2 Inhibitory Effects. Molecules 2022, 27, 4606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Amer, H.H.; Alotaibi, S.H.; Trawneh, A.H.; Metwaly, A.M.; Eissa, I.H. Anticancer activity, spectroscopic and molecular docking of some new synthesized sugar hydrazones, Arylidene and α-Aminophosphonate derivatives. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 103348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. El-Adl, K.; Sakr, H.M.; Yousef, R.G.; Mehany, A.B.; Metwaly, A.M.; Elhendawy, M.A.; Radwan, M.M.; ElSohly, M.A.; Abulkhair, H.S.; Eissa, I.H. Discovery of new quinoxaline-2 (1H)-one-based anticancer agents targeting VEGFR-2 as inhibitors: Design, synthesis, and anti-proliferative evaluation. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 114, 105105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Eissa, I.H.; Ibrahim, M.K.; Metwaly, A.M.; Belal, A.; Mehany, A.B.; Abdelhady, A.A.; Elhendawy, M.A.; Radwan, M.M.; ElSohly, M.A.; Mahdy, H.A. Design, molecular docking, in vitro, and in vivo studies of new quinazolin-4 (3H)-ones as VEGFR-2 inhibitors with potential activity against hepatocellular carcinoma. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 107, 104532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yousef, R.G.; Sakr, H.M.; Eissa, I.H.; Mehany, A.B.; Metwaly, A.M.; Elhendawy, M.A.; Radwan, M.M.; ElSohly, M.A.; Abulkhair, H.S.; El-Adl, K. New quinoxaline-2 (1 H)-ones as potential VEGFR-2 inhibitors: Design, synthesis, molecular docking, ADMET profile and anti-proliferative evaluations. New J. Chem. 2021, 45, 16949–16964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Eissa, I.H.; El-Helby, A.-G.A.; Mahdy, H.A.; Khalifa, M.M.; Elnagar, H.A.; Mehany, A.B.; Metwaly, A.M.; Elhendawy, M.A.; Radwan, M.M.; ElSohly, M.A. Discovery of new quinazolin-4 (3H)-ones as VEGFR-2 inhibitors: Design, synthesis, and anti-proliferative evaluation. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 105, 104380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. El-Adl, K.; El-Helby, A.-G.A.; Ayyad, R.R.; Mahdy, H.A.; Khalifa, M.M.; Elnagar, H.A.; Mehany, A.B.; Metwaly, A.M.; Elhendawy, M.A.; Radwan, M.M. Design, synthesis, and anti-proliferative evaluation of new quinazolin-4 (3H)-ones as potential VEGFR-2 inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2021, 29, 115872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. El-Helby, A.-G.A.; Sakr, H.; Ayyad, R.R.; Mahdy, H.A.; Khalifa, M.M.; Belal, A.; Rashed, M.; El-Sharkawy, A.; Metwaly, A.M.; Elhendawy, M.A. Design, synthesis, molecular modeling, in vivo studies and anticancer activity evaluation of new phthalazine derivatives as potential DNA intercalators and topoisomerase II inhibitors. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 103, 104233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Eissa, I.H.; Metwaly, A.M.; Belal, A.; Mehany, A.B.; Ayyad, R.R.; El-Adl, K.; Mahdy, H.A.; Taghour, M.S.; El-Gamal, K.M.; El-Sawah, M.E. Discovery and antiproliferative evaluation of new quinoxalines as potential DNA intercalators and topoisomerase II inhibitors. Arch. Pharm. 2019, 352, 1900123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jo, S.; Kim, T.; Iyer, V.G.; Im, W. CHARMM-GUI: A web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM. J. Comput. Chem. 2008, 29, 1859–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Brooks, B.R.; Brooks, C.L., III; Mackerell, A.D., Jr.; Nilsson, L.; Petrella, R.J.; Roux, B.; Won, Y.; Archontis, G.; Bartels, C.; Boresch, S.; et al. CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program. J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 1545–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lee, J.; Cheng, X.; Swails, J.M.; Yeom, M.S.; Eastman, P.K.; Lemkul, J.A.; Wei, S.; Buckner, J.; Jeong, J.C.; Qi, Y.; et al. CHARMM-GUI Input Generator for NAMD, GROMACS, AMBER, OpenMM, and CHARMM/OpenMM Simulations Using the CHARMM36 Additive Force Field. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 11 01886 g001 550
Figure 1. Patuletin’s chemical structure.
Figure 1. Patuletin’s chemical structure.
Plants 11 01886 g001
Plants 11 01886 g002 550
Figure 2. The co-crystallized ligands of SARS-CoV-2 proteins and patuletin.
Figure 2. The co-crystallized ligands of SARS-CoV-2 proteins and patuletin.
Plants 11 01886 g002
Plants 11 01886 g003 550
Figure 3. The results of similarity analysis of the considered ligands and patuletin.
Figure 3. The results of similarity analysis of the considered ligands and patuletin.
Plants 11 01886 g003
Plants 11 01886 g004 550
Figure 4. Flexible alignment of patuletin (pink) with F86 (turquoise).
Figure 4. Flexible alignment of patuletin (pink) with F86 (turquoise).
Plants 11 01886 g004
Plants 11 01886 g005 550
Figure 5. Superimposition of docked F86 (green) and the original one (pink) in RdRp’s active pocket.
Figure 5. Superimposition of docked F86 (green) and the original one (pink) in RdRp’s active pocket.
Plants 11 01886 g005
Plants 11 01886 g006a 550Plants 11 01886 g006b 550
Figure 6. (A) The 3D, (B,C) surface mapping of F86 in RdRp’s active site.
Figure 6. (A) The 3D, (B,C) surface mapping of F86 in RdRp’s active site.
Plants 11 01886 g006aPlants 11 01886 g006b
Plants 11 01886 g007a 550Plants 11 01886 g007b 550
Figure 7. (A) The 3D, (B) 2D, and (C) surface mapping of patuletin in RdRp’s active site.
Figure 7. (A) The 3D, (B) 2D, and (C) surface mapping of patuletin in RdRp’s active site.
Plants 11 01886 g007aPlants 11 01886 g007b
Plants 11 01886 g008 550
Figure 8. ADMET study of patuletin and remdesivir.
Figure 8. ADMET study of patuletin and remdesivir.
Plants 11 01886 g008
Plants 11 01886 g009 550
Figure 9. MD’s results; (A) RMSD values of the patuletin–RdRp complex, (B) RMSF of the patuletin–RdRp complex, (C) Rg of the patuletin–RdRp complex, (D) SASA of the patuletin–RdRp complex, (E) H-bonding of the patuletin–RdRp complex.
Figure 9. MD’s results; (A) RMSD values of the patuletin–RdRp complex, (B) RMSF of the patuletin–RdRp complex, (C) Rg of the patuletin–RdRp complex, (D) SASA of the patuletin–RdRp complex, (E) H-bonding of the patuletin–RdRp complex.
Plants 11 01886 g009
Plants 11 01886 g010a 550Plants 11 01886 g010b 550
Figure 10. Conformational structures for the patuletin and RdRp at the first (A) and 100th (B) nanoseconds of the MD run.
Figure 10. Conformational structures for the patuletin and RdRp at the first (A) and 100th (B) nanoseconds of the MD run.
Plants 11 01886 g010aPlants 11 01886 g010b
Plants 11 01886 g011 550
Figure 11. MM-PBSA patuletin–amino acids of RdRp.
Figure 11. MM-PBSA patuletin–amino acids of RdRp.
Plants 11 01886 g011
Plants 11 01886 g012 550
Figure 12. MM-PBSA patuletin–nucleotides of RdRp.
Figure 12. MM-PBSA patuletin–nucleotides of RdRp.
Plants 11 01886 g012
Table
Table 1. 1H and 13C data of patuletin (DMSO).
Table 1. 1H and 13C data of patuletin (DMSO).
Positionδ 1Hδ 13CPositionδ 1H (J = Hz)δ 13C
2-147.110-103.3
3-135.61′-122.1
4-176.22′7.70 d (J = 2)115.8
5-152.03′-145.4
6-131.04′-147.9
7-151.65′6.92 d (J = 8)115.1
86.54 (s)93.96′7.56 dd (J = 2, J = 8)120.3
9-157.3O-CH33.79 (s)60.3
Table
Table 2. Structural properties of patuletin with the co-crystallized ligands.
Table 2. Structural properties of patuletin with the co-crystallized ligands.
CompoundALog pM-WH.B-AH.B-DN-RBN-RN-ARMFP-SAMinimum Distance
F86−1.502371.2431154320.6120.758059
Patuletin1.614332.262852320.4480.00
PRD_0022142.453680.7918518320.2731.5254
GWS2.171218.295213210.1791.44878
X772.622403.477426430.221.19065
VXG0.711233.263312210.2371.31639
1N70.231631.8848612400.2561.46363
SAM−4.254399.445947320.4831.015
Y953.084390.435344330.2830.911118
XT73.873504.687559530.2241.35497
Table
Table 3. Toxicity (predicted) of patuletin and remdesivir.
Table 3. Toxicity (predicted) of patuletin and remdesivir.
TestPatuletinRemdesivir
A-CNon-MutagenMutagen
R-TD50 (mg/kg)7.458371.01218
R-MTD (g/kg)1.055970.234965
R- LD50 (g/kg)0.9021020.308859
R- LOAEL (g/kg)0.1886160.0037911
O-IrMildNone
S-IrMildMild
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Metwaly, A.M.; Elkaeed, E.B.; Alsfouk, B.A.; Saleh, A.M.; Mostafa, A.E.; Eissa, I.H. The Computational Preventive Potential of the Rare Flavonoid, Patuletin, Isolated from Tagetes patula, against SARS-CoV-2. Plants 2022, 11, 1886. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11141886

AMA Style

Metwaly AM, Elkaeed EB, Alsfouk BA, Saleh AM, Mostafa AE, Eissa IH. The Computational Preventive Potential of the Rare Flavonoid, Patuletin, Isolated from Tagetes patula, against SARS-CoV-2. Plants. 2022; 11(14):1886. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11141886

Chicago/Turabian Style

Metwaly, Ahmed M., Eslam B. Elkaeed, Bshra A. Alsfouk, Abdulrahman M. Saleh, Ahmad E. Mostafa, and Ibrahim H. Eissa. 2022. "The Computational Preventive Potential of the Rare Flavonoid, Patuletin, Isolated from Tagetes patula, against SARS-CoV-2" Plants 11, no. 14: 1886. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11141886

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop