Next Article in Journal
ROS-Scavenging Enzymes as an Antioxidant Response to High Concentration of Anthracene in the Liverwort Marchantia polymorpha L
Next Article in Special Issue
Rapid Generation and Analysis of a Barley Doubled Haploid Line with Higher Nitrogen Use Efficiency Than Parental Lines by F1 Microspore Embryogenesis
Previous Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Activity of Extracts from the Humiria balsamifera (Aubl)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Morphological Formation, Fatty Acid Profile, and Molecular Identification of Some Landraces of Ethiopian Brassica as a Promising Crop to Support Breeding Programs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Three Types of Ion Beam Irradiation on Gerbera (Gerbera hybrida) In Vitro Shoots with Mutagenesis Efficiency

1
Department of Agriculture, Graduate School of Integrated Science and Technology, Shizuoka University, Shizuoka 422-8529, Japan
2
Faculty of Agriculture, Shizuoka University, Shizuoka 422-8529, Japan
3
Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institutes of Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(7), 1480; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071480
Submission received: 14 June 2021 / Revised: 1 July 2021 / Accepted: 14 July 2021 / Published: 19 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Advances in Plant Breeding)

Abstract

:
Gerbera in vitro shoots were irradiated using three types of ion beams with different line energy transfers (LETs) to investigate the effective LET and absorbed doses for mutagenesis. Furthermore, genomic mutation analyses were conducted on the obtained mutants. Survival rate analysis showed a lower lethal dose 50% (LD50) with ion beams with higher LETs. Trait/morphological mutations exhibited changes in the color and shape of petals and male sterility. Irradiation conditions with the highest growth change and trait/morphological mutation rates in each ion were C irradiation at 10 Gy, Ar irradiation at 5 Gy, and Fe irradiation at 5 Gy, with a range of absorbed dose of around LD50 to about 10 Gy lower. The highest trait/morphological mutation rate was 14.1% with Ar irradiation at 5 Gy, which was one of the criteria for ion beam irradiation of gerbera in vitro shoots. Furthermore, the genomic mutation in the flower color, petal shape, and male sterile mutants were confirmed by genotype analysis using Genotyping by Random Amplicon Sequencing-Direct technology. This is the first study to report the efficient production of gerbera mutants that could be analyzed. Our findings may lead to more efficient gerbera mutant production and analysis technology.

1. Introduction

Gerbera (Gerbera hybrida) is a perennial plant of the genus Gerbera of the Asteraceae family. It produces an important cut flower in the global floricultural industry that has various flower colors and shapes. The United States has a cut flower market price of 375 million US dollars and is one of the world’s largest, with gerbera production valued at 32.7 million US dollars, accounting for 8.7% of the cut flower industry [1]. Gerbera is also a popular flower in Japan, with a production value of 3.8 billion yen (equivalent to around 38 million US dollars) [2]. The Shizuoka prefecture, which is the largest production area in Japan, is responsible for 42% of Japan’s total gerbera production [2].
The most of gerbera cultivars are generated as a result of repeated hybridization between Gerbera viridifolia Schultz-Bip from the Transvaal in South Africa and Gerbera jamesonii Bolus ex Hook. f. [3]. Most of the gerbera cultivars currently available in the world are produced in the Netherlands by crossbreeding [4,5]. However, growth of these cultivars in Japan required heating to ≥18 °C at night in winter, and malformed flowers, such as double stems and dead flower buds, are thought to be caused by high temperatures during the day in summer. Consumers have wide preferences for flower color and flower shape and distribution varieties change rapidly. Therefore, there is a need for rapid breeding of original varieties that meet the requirements of producers and consumers.
Mutagenesis by ion beam irradiation has recently attracted attention as an alternative breeding method to crossbreeding. Ion beam technology was developed in Japan and is characterized by high mutagenesis efficiency, even at low doses, with minimal adverse effects on growth because it can deliver higher amounts of energy more locally than X-rays and γ-rays [6], which have been used for conventional mutagenesis [7,8]. There are many examples of mutants created by ion beam irradiation in plants, such as torenia [9,10], verbena [11,12], gentian [13], cyclamen [14], petunia [15], tricyrtis hirta [16], carnation [17,18], and Colocasia [19]. And the most common case of mutant production by ion beam irradiation is in chrysanthemum [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29], which are in the same family as gerbera, but it has not been reported in gerbera.
Ion beams can control the absorbed dose as well as the line energy transfer (LET). Recent studies using model plants have reported that irradiation with high LET is more likely to induce large-scale mutations, such as insertion and deletions of ≥100 bp and chromosomal rearrangements; this indicates the possibility of obtaining diverse mutants by changing the LET [7,30]. However, few studies have compared the effects of different LETs on horticultural crops. In mutation breeding of highly heterogeneous horticultural crops, the mutation phenotype cannot be fixed in progeny plants by self-breeding. Therefore, mutants obtained by irradiation of cultured tissue are often propagated in culture. Moreover, mutants produced by ion beam irradiation of chrysanthemum, a member of the same family as gerbera, were obtained by irradiation of cultured tissues [8], suggesting that mutant of gerbera can also be efficiently obtained by this process.
The present study examined irradiated cultured gerbera in vitro shoots using three different ion beams of different LETs to explore mutation breeding of gerbera. We investigated the survival, growth change, and trait/morphology mutation rates and examined the necessary ion and absorbed doses are effective for mutagenesis of gerbera (Figure 1). And Genotyping of the mutants was also performed to verify whether mutations were induced in the genomes of the gerbera mutants obtained by ion beam irradiation.

2. Results

2.1. Survival Rate

The relative survival rate was lower at the highest absorbed dose for each irradiated ion. And at all absorbed doses, the relative survival rate was highest for C irradiation, followed by Ar and Fe. The LD50 value was calculated by making a sigmoid curve, and the result was C irradiation at 21.7 Gy, Ar irradiation at 8.5 Gy, and Fe irradiation at 4.4 Gy (Figure 2).

2.2. Growth Change Rate

The negative growth change rate was higher with C and Fe irradiation compared with the positive growth change rate. The positive growth change rate was higher with Ar irradiation at 1, 2, and 25 Gy (Figure 3). In plants treated with C and Ar irradiation, the negative growth change rate tended to increase as the absorbed dose increased, and then decreased when the absorbed dose exceeded a certain level for each irradiated ion (Figure 3). Following Ar irradiation, the positive growth change rate tended to decrease as the absorbed dose increased (Figure 3). The total positive and negative growth change rate in each irradiated ions were highest with C irradiation at 10 Gy (2.4%), Ar irradiation at 5 Gy (8.3%), and Fe irradiation at 5 Gy (11.9%) (Figure 3).

2.3. Trait/Morphological Mutation Rate

During the initial growth stage, malformations, such as splitting of leaf veins, were observed in the ion beam irradiated plants; however, no malformations were observed in the newly developed leaves after irradiation. Furthermore, no plants with stable changed leaf traits and morphology were observed compared with the unirradiated plants (data not shown). Conversely, many traits and morphological variations were observed in the floral organs, such as darker red petals (Figure 4B–D), petal shape change (Figure 4E–G), semidouble flowering (Figure 4H), and male sterility (in which no pollen was seen even after flowering; Figure 4I,J) compared with the wild type flower shape of white peach petals and single flowers (Figure 4A). These were single mutations with one type of changes occurring in the same plant. Complex mutations within the same plant were also observed, including flower color/petal slender shape, flower color/petal sword shape (Figure 4K), flower color/receptive shape (Figure 4L), flower color/semidouble (Figure 4L), flower color/male sterility, and petal fineness/male sterility (Figure 4N) were confirmed. In addition, chimeric mutations (Figure 4O,P), in which petal colors were sparsely present in one inflorescence, were observed following Ar and Fe irradiation.
For a single mutation, a total of 34 plants (1.4% of the total number of irradiated plants) were obtained (Table 1). Although the degree of petal coloring was different, flower color mutants were obtained with all ion beam irradiations, and 21 plants (0.9% of the total number of irradiated plants) were obtained (Table 1). The petal shape change occurred in four patterns: slender shape, sword shape, receptive shape, and semidouble.
A total of three petal slender and petal sword shape mutants were obtained using Ar irradiation, and four petal receptive shape mutants were obtained using C and Fe irradiation. One semidouble flower mutant with change from tubular flower to ligulate flower were obtained with Ar irradiation. In addition, a total of five male sterile plants were obtained using Ar and Fe irradiation. These traits and morphological mutations were stably maintained in the later flower buds.
In terms of complex mutations, many mutations appeared at the same time as the flower color change, and a total of seven plants (0.3% of the total number of irradiated plants) were obtained (Table 1). Among these, two plants with flower color/petal slender shape mutations were obtained with C and Fe irradiation, one plant with a flower color/receptive shape mutation was obtained with C irradiation, two plants with flower color/semidouble mutations were obtained with Ar and Fe irradiation, and one plant with a flower color/male sterility mutation was obtained with Ar irradiation. One plant with petal slender/male sterility was obtained following Fe irradiation. Moreover, Ar and Fe irradiation produced three chimeric mutants with sparsely colored petals in a single inflorescence. These complex and chimeric mutations were not stable, and the presence or absence of the mutant phenotype varied in each subsequent flower bud.
The total number of trait/morphological mutants was seven following C irradiation, 23 following Ar irradiation, and 14 following Fe irradiation (Table 1). The trait/morphological mutation rate increased as the absorbed dose increased and tended to decrease when the absorbed dose exceeded a certain level for each irradiated ion and was highest with C irradiation at 10 Gy (2.2%), Ar irradiation at 5 Gy (14.1%), and Fe irradiation at 5 Gy (4.6%) (Figure 5).

2.4. Genotype Analysis of Gerbera Mutants Obtained by Ion Beam Irradiation

Genotype analysis using GRAS-Di technology was performed to confirm whether the mutations were induced in the genome of the trait/morphological mutants of flower color Fe 2 Gy- 87, petal slender Ar 5 Gy- 29, and male sterile mutant Fe 5 Gy- 34 (Figure 4). The number of sequenced bases was 534 Mbp in the wild type, 541 Mbp in the flower color mutant, 542 Mbp in the petal slender mutant, and 510 Mbp in the male sterile mutant (Table 2). The number of genomic markers obtained was analyzed by comparing the wild type and mutants with the highly reliable base sequence, and 1 marker for flower color mutants, 6 markers for petal slender mutants, and 31 markers for male sterile mutants were identified (Table 2).

3. Discussion

In the present study, cultured gerbera in vitro shoots were irradiated with ion beams with different LETs to investigate the effective irradiation condition for mutation.
The survival rate of gerbera in vitro shoots irradiated with ion beams tended to decrease as the absorbed dose increased (Figure 2). The LD50 was 21.7 Gy for C irradiation, 8.5 Gy for Ar irradiation, and 4.4 Gy for Fe irradiation (Figure 2). These findings suggest that ion beams with higher LETs have a greater effect on the survival rate at lower absorbed doses. The irradiation conditions that resulted in the highest growth change rate and trait/morphological mutation rates were 10 Gy for C irradiation, 5 Gy for Ar irradiation, and 5 Gy for F irradiation (Figure 3 and Figure 5). These results suggest that a range of absorbed dose of around LD50 to about 10 Gy lower is one of the criteria for efficiently obtaining growth-changed and trait/morphology mutants.
The negative growth change rate observed following C and Ar irradiation increased with the absorbed dose and tended to decrease above a certain absorbed dose (Figure 3). It is common for growth to be negatively regulated by radiation damage in irradiated plants [8,31]. In the present study, the negative growth rate was higher than the positive growth rate in most of the irradiated areas, suggesting that radiation damage was a factor. In addition, ion beam irradiation of Arabidopsis thaliana induced stunted growth morphology due to large-scale genomic deletions [7,30]. Genomic deletions could be a factor in the negative growth changes were seen in the present study.
In contrast, the positive growth change rate was higher than negative growth change rate following Ar irradiation at 1, 2, and 25 Gy, and tended to decrease with increasing absorbed dose (Figure 3). C and Fe irradiation also resulted in positive growth changes, although to a lesser extent. It is already known that low doses of radiation has the stimulating effect on plants and animals (radiation hormesis) [32,33]. And a recent study reported that irradiation of Arabidopsis dry seeds with C-ion beams suppressed the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) under low temperature conditions and promoted plant growth [34]. The positive growth changes obtained in present study may also have been induced by these phenomena and should be investigated in detail in the future. In addition, mutation of cell division-related genes, such as DA1, promotes growth in Arabidopsis and Brassica napus [35,36], suggesting that DNA mutation may be a factor for positive growth changes. At this stage, direct radiation effects and mutational effects are both expected to appear. Since it is not possible to evaluate which is the cause at this point, it is necessary to evaluate this in the next generation.
Single mutations of trait/morphological mutants include petal color change (Figure 4B–D), petal type change (Figure 4E–G), semidouble flowering (Figure 4H), and male sterility (Figure 4I,J), and it was confirmed stably even in late flower buds.
Flower color mutations were the most frequently observed single mutations due to ion beam irradiation (Table 1). Flower color change from white to yellow by C and He irradiation was obtained in chrysanthemum due to loss of function of the carotenoid-degrading gene, CmCCD4 [37]. There was also a flower color change from purple to white in chrysanthemum following C irradiation [24], suggesting a mutation in the anthocyanin biosynthesis gene or transcriptional factor regulation [38]. However, the flower color mutation was obtained in the present study resulted in a change from the white/pink color of the wild type to a dark pink color, and there were no cases of flower color change. Expression of genes involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis may be increased as an expected molecular mechanism, and a detailed analysis to identify the causative gene is required.
Flower shape mutations, such as petal slender shape, petal sword shape, petal receiving shape, and semidouble mutants, were also achieved (Figure 4E–H). These flower shaped mutations have not been reported in chrysanthemum, and are considered gerbera-specific mutations (Figure 4E–H).
Furthermore, male sterile mutants of gerbera were obtained as flower trait mutations (Figure 4I,J). A male sterile mutant was previously obtained by N irradiation in verbena [11,12], which did not form pollen, thus improving the longevity of the cut flowers and making it easier to use as a seed parent when crossbreeding. The same advantage was considered for male sterile mutants of gerbera (Figure 4I,J).
C, Ar, and Fe irradiation resulted in 7, 23, and 14 trait/morphology mutants, respectively. The total trait/morphology mutation rate was 1.9% (44 out of 2363 plants of the total number of irradiated plants), and the highest trait/morphological mutation rate was 14.1% with Ar irradiation at 5 Gy (Figure 5). Previous reports have shown that the mutation rate of flower color due to C irradiation (LET: 86 keV μm−1) on chrysanthemum petal is 4.5~11.9% [21], and was 0.4~6.4% [27] and 14.7% [25] when C irradiation (LET: 23 keV μm−1) was applied to the ears of chrysanthemum. Moreover, the mutation rate of flower color was 1.7~3.5% when leaves and flowers of chrysanthemum were irradiated with Ar ion beams (LET: 93 ke µm−1) [22]. Furthermore, as a result of C irradiation (LET: 23 keV μm−1) with the ears of 30 varieties of chrysanthemum, differences between varieties were observed, and a flower color mutation rate was 0% to 57.1% [24]. Based on the above previous study, the trait/morphology mutation rates in the present study were similar or slightly lower, suggesting that ion beam irradiation is an effective technique for mutation breeding in gerbera.
Although there are cases of gerbera mutants produced by γ-rays, it is highly chimeric, and it is reported that 97% of the mutants obtained even after two micropropagations after irradiation were chimeric plants [39]. In this study, the frequency of obtaining chimeric mutants is low, and chimericity was not a problem even in the same family of chrysanthemums [20,22,24]. In addition, γ-rays have a low LET and induce small deletions or point mutations in many regions of the whole genome, so it is known that mutant traits are not stable due to many mutations other than the target trait. On the other hand, it has been reported in Arabidopsis that ion beams can induce in/del of more than 100 bp and chromosomal rearrangement in less abundant regions of whole DNA due to their higher LET than γ-rays, and it is thought that it is easier to obtain mutants in which only the target trait is mutated [7,30]. Based on the above, ion beam irradiation for gerbera mutation will be useful as basic knowledge for the future production of gerbera mutants.
In addition, genotype analysis of male sterile mutants using the GRAS-Di method identified 1 marker for flower color mutant, 6 markers for petal slender mutant, and 31 markers for male sterile mutant that showed different amplification patterns were compared with the wild type (Table 2). Since GRAS-Di method does not amplify the whole genome, it is possible that more genomic mutations are induced, but it was demonstrated that genomic mutations were induced in the mutant. Although genome analysis of gerbera is difficult due to the lack of a genome reference sequence, the GRAS-Di method has proven to be an efficient method for genome sequence comparison. Future studies using molecular breeding and functional analysis using mutant-specific DNA markers are expected. Recently, whole-genome analysis using the next-generation genome sequencer is a useful technology that has come to be widely used in plants [40,41,42,43]. In this study as well, whole-genome analysis of trait/morphological mutants obtained by ion beam irradiation may clarify the specific types of genomic mutations, such as frequency of SNPs and In-Del per kb, and provide academically useful findings. However, gerbera is highly heterogeneous and has no genomic reference sequence information. Therefore, it is necessary to create a high-resolution map of the gerbera genome in order to analyze the genome of the obtained mutant. This is an issue for the future.
Furthermore, in recent years, genome editing technology has become widespread as a very useful technology for plant mutation [44,45,46,47,48,49]. However, due to the lack of genome reference information and knowledge of genes related to the target phenotype for Gerbera, it is currently difficult to mutate only specific genes, which create the expected phenotype. In addition, genome editing requires more than one year for transformation, and furthermore, backcrossing is currently required to remove selection marker genes and vector genes, which takes several years or longer. Although random mutagenesis by ion beam cannot induce targeted mutations, it can induce various mutations such as flower shape, male sterility as well as flower color even in the absence of genomic information. Furthermore, present study can produce mutants in less than one year. It is hoped that this research will reveal genes related to flower color and morphology, which will pave the way for the application of genome editing to introduce mutations.
In summary, we demonstrated for the first time that gerbera mutants can be efficiently produced by ion beam irradiation of in vitro shoots. In addition, the highest growth change and trait/morphological mutation rates were obtained using Ar irradiation at 5 Gy and were considered one of the criteria for ion beam irradiation of gerbera in vitro shoots. Furthermore, the genotype of the obtained mutants can be analyzed, and DNA marker selective breeding and molecular biological analysis of mutant genome is expected to be possible. Based on the present study, the establishment of more efficient techniques for the production and analysis of gerbera mutants, such as the expansion of irradiated cultivars based on the present study, is expected.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material

Gerbera “Opal” in vitro shoots (Greentech Co., Ltd., Shizuoka, Japan) in glass bottles (ca. 9 × 9 × 12 cm) were used in the present study. Ion beam irradiation was performed using a Heavy Ion Medial Accelerator in Chiba (HIMAC) at the National Institutes of Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (Chiba, Japan). Irradiation was performed using a plateau region with a 10-cm diameter uniform-field of three ion beams (Carbon, Argon, and Iron) with different LETs (Table 3).

4.2. Procedure

A schematic of the procedure used in the present study is shown in Figure 1 and the number of plants irradiated with ion beams is shown in Table 4. From May to September 2019, in vitro shoots were irradiated after 4 months of cultivation using ion beams and then cultured for 2 months at 23 °C with a 12-h daylength and potted up and grown in an unheated greenhouse. Cultivation management was entrusted to Greentech Co. Although the exact details cannot be disclosed, the cultivation management was performed as previously described by Kako [50].

4.3. Survival Rate

Among the in vitro shoots irradiated with ion beams, those that were able to be potted without dying after about 2 months of incubation at 23 °C and 12 h light condition were defined as “survival plants”, and the ratio of the number of survival plants to irradiated plants was calculated as the survival rate. Since the timing of irradiation differed among the ion, the relative value of the survival rate of each irradiated ion to that of the nonirradiated area was calculated as the relative survival rate. The absorbed dose at which the relative survival rate became <50% was defined as the 50% lethal dose (LD50). To evaluate the dose response, curve fitting and LD50 calculation were performed by using GraphPad Prism 9.

4.4. Growth Change Rate

After potting, the number of leaves and maximum leaf length were measured in all plants. We visually selected the largest leaf among the plants and defined its length as the maximum leaf length. We also defined plants with leaf number and maximum leaf length less than the minimum values as negative growth change plants and plants with leaf number and maximum leaf length greater than the maximum values as positive growth change plants relative to the wild type without irradiation. The ratio of positive growth change plants to the number of irradiated plants was calculated as the positive growth change rate and the ratio of negative growth change to the number of to irradiated plants was calculated as the negative growth change rate. These values were measured 153 days after irradiation using a C ion beam, 145 days after irradiation using an Ar ion beam, and 115 days after irradiation with an Fe ion beam, which is the time of the number of leaves spread in the non-irradiation about 6.

4.5. Trait/Morphological Mutation Rate

The traits and morphology of the flowers were visually investigated during flowering, and plants with traits and morphologies that differed from those in the nonirradiated wild type group were defined as trait/morphology mutant plants. The ratio of the number of trait/morphology mutant plants to irradiated plants was calculated as the trait/morphology mutation rate.

4.6. Genotype Analysis of Gerbera Mutants Obtained by Ion Beam Irradiation

Genotype analysis using next-generation genome sequencers was performed using confirm whether mutations were induced in the genomes of the mutants. Leaves were sampled from mutants and stored at −20 °C. The sampled leaves were frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground, DNA was extracted using NucleoSpin Plant II (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan), and the yield was confirmed to be >600 ng using a biospectrometer (Eppendorf Inc., Tokyo, Japan). We confirmed that there was no degradation of DNA by electrophoresis using 2% agarose. The obtained DNA was used as a template and the entire genome was amplified and sequenced using Genotyping by Random Amplicon Sequencing-Direct (GRAS-Di) technology using a next-generation genome sequencer (Illumina, Eurofins Genomics Inc., Tokyo, Japan). In contrast to conventional genotyping by sequencing, GRAS-Di technology has fewer biased analysis regions, genome-uniform genotyping, and genomic mutation detection and marketization, even in species without reference sequences such as gerbera [51,52]. The sequences obtained from the wild type and mutant were compared and sequences that differing and determined to be highly accurate were selected to determine DNA markers specific to the mutant.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.H., M.Y. and A.T.; methodology, T.S.; investigation, T.H., Y.U., H.K. and A.T.; writing—original draft preparation, T.H.; writing—review and editing, M.Y. and A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Shinichi Fukuoka of Green Tech Co., Ltd. for his cooperation in carrying out the research. We would also like to express our sincere gratitude for using the equipment of the Model Plant Research Support Office, Model Biology Research Center, National Institute for Basic Biology. This work was supported in part by the Research Project Heavy Ions at NIRS–HIMAC (project No. 18J501).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cardoso, J.C.; da Silva, J.A.T. Gerbera micropropagation. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 1344–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. MAFF. The 94th Statistical Yearbook of Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 2020. Available online: https://www.maff.go.jp/e/data/stat/94th/index.html (accessed on 18 May 2021).
  3. Gerbera.org. Available online: http://www.gerbera.org (accessed on 14 May 2021).
  4. Bhatia, R.; Singh, K.P.; Sharma, T.R.; Jhang, T. Evaluation of the genetic fidelity of in vitro propagated gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii Bolus) using DNA-based markers. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2011, 104, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chakabrarty, D.; Datta, S.K. Micropropagation of gerbera: Lipid peroxidation and antioxidante enzyme activities during acclimatization process. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2008, 30, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dowrick, G.J.; El-Bayoumi, A. The induction of mutations in chrysanthemum using X- and gamma radiation. Euphytica 1966, 15, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kazama, Y.; Ishii, K.; Hirano, T.; Wakana, T.; Yamada, M.; Ohbu, S.; Abe, T. Different mutational function of low- and high-linear energy transfer heavy-ion irradiation demonstrated by whole-genome resequencing of Arabidopsis mutants. Plant J. 2017, 92, 1020–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Yamaguchi, H. Mutation breeding of ornamental plants using ion beams. Breed. Sci. 2018, 68, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Miyazaki, K.; Suzuki, K.; Iwaki, K.; Kusumi, T.; Abe, T.; Yoshida, S.; Fukui, H. Flower pigment mutations induced by heavy ion beam irradiation in an interspecific hybrid of Torenia. Plant Biotechnol. 2006, 23, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Sasaki, K.; Aida, R.; Niki, T.; Yamaguchi, H.; Narumi, T.; Nishijima, T.; Hayashi, Y.; Ryuto, H.; Fukunishi, N.; Abe, T.; et al. High efficiency improvement of transgenic torenia flowers by ion beam irradiation. Plant Biotechnol. 2008, 25, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kanaya, T.; Saito, H.; Hayashi, Y.; Fukunishi, N.; Ryuto, H.; Miyazaki, K.; Kusumi, T.; Abe, T.; Suzuki, K. Heavy-ion beam-induced sterile mutants of verbena (Verbena × hybrida) with an improved flowering habit. Plant Biotechnol. 2008, 25, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Suzuki, K.; Yomo, Y.; Abe, T.; Katsumoto, Y.; Miyazaki, K.; Yoshida, S.; Kusumi, T. Isolation of Sterile Mutants of Verbena hybrida Using Heavy-Ion Beam Irradiation. RIKEN Accel. Prog. Rep. 2002, 35, 129. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sasaki, N.; Watanabe, A.; Asakawa, T.; Sasaki, M.; Hoshi, N.; Naito, Z.; Furusawa, Y.; Shimokawa, T.; Nishihara, M. Biological effects of ion beam irradiation on perennial gentian and apple. Plant Biotechnol. 2018, 35, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Sugiyama, M.; Saito, H.; Ichida, H.; Hayashi, Y.; Ryuto, H.; Fukunishi, N.; Terakawa, T.; Abe, T. Biological effects of heavy-ion beam irradiation on cyclamen. Plant Biotechnol. 2008, 25, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Hase, Y.; Okamura, M.; Takeshita, D.; Narumi, I.; Tanaka, A. Efficient induction of flower-color mutants by ion beam irradiation in petunia seedlings treated with high sucrose concentration. Plant Biotechnol. 2010, 27, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Nakano, M.; Amano, J.; Watanabe, Y.; Nomizu, T.; Suzuki, M.; Mizunashi, K.; Mori, S.; Kuwayama, S.; Han, D.S.; Saito, H.; et al. Morphological variation in Tricyrtis hirta plants regenerated from heavy ion beam-irradiated embryogenic calluses. Plant Biotechnol. 2010, 27, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Okamura, M.; Umemoto, N.; Onishi, N. Breeding glittering carnations by an efficient mutagenesis system. Plant Biotechnol. 2012, 29, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Okamura, M.; Nakayama, M.; Umemoto, N.; Cano, E.A.; Hase, Y.; Nishizaki, Y.; Sasaki, N.; Ozeki, Y. Crossbreeding of a metallic color carnation and diversification of the peculiar coloration by ion-beam irradiation. Euphytica 2013, 191, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Matsuyama, T.; Watanabe, M.; Murota, Y.; Nakata, N.; Kitamura, H.; Shimokawa, T.; Ebisuzaki, T.; Wada, S.; Sato, S.; Tabata, S. Efficient mutation induction using heavy-ion beam irradiation and simple T genomic screening with random primers in taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott). Sci. Hortic. 2020, 272, 109568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Matsumura, A.; Nomizu, T.; Furutani, N.; Hayashi, K.; Minamiyama, Y.; Hase, Y. Ray florets color and shape mutants induced by 12C5+ ion beam irradiation in chrysanthemum. Sci. Hortic. 2010, 123, 558–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Okamura, M.; Yasuno, N.; Takano, M.; Tanaka, A.; Shikazono, N.; Hase, Y. Mutation generation in chrysanthemum plants regenerated from floral organ cultures irradiated with ion beams. TIARA Ann. Rep. 2002, 2001, 42–43. [Google Scholar]
  22. Okamura, M.; Hase, Y.; Furusawa, Y.; Tanaka, A. Tissue dependent somaclonal mutation frequencies and spectra enhanced by ion beam irradiation in chrysanthemum. Euphytica 2015, 202, 333–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shirao, T.; Ueno, K.; Abe, T.; Matsuyama, T. Development of DNA markers for identifying chrysanthemum cultivars generated by ion-beam irradiation. Mol. Breed. 2013, 31, 729–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tamaki, K.; Yamanaka, M.; Hayashi, Y.; Abe, T.; Koyama, Y. Effect of the cultivar characteristics on the appearance of flower color mutants by C-ion irradiation in Chrysanthemum. Hortic. Res. (Jpn.) 2017, 16, 117–123, (Abstract in English). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tanokashira, Y.; Nagayoshi, S.; Hirano, T.; Abe, T. Effects of heavy-ion-beam irradiation on flower-color mutation in chrysanthemum. RIKEN Accel. Prog. Rep. 2015, 47, 297. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ueno, K.; Nagayoshi, S.; Imakiire, S.; Koriyama, K.; Minami, T.; Tanaka, A.; Hase, Y.; Matsumoto, T. Breeding of new chrysanthemum cultivar ‘Aladdin 2′ through stepwise improvements of cv. ‘Jimba’ using ion beam re-irradiation. Hortic. Res. (Jpn.) 2013, 12, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wakita, N.; Kazama, Y.; Hayashi, Y.; Ryuto, H.; Fukunishi, N.; Yamamoto, K.; Ijichi, S.; Abe, T. Induction of floral color mutation by C-ion irradiation in spray-type chrysanthemum. RIKEN Accel. Prog. Rep. 2009, 41, 230. [Google Scholar]
  28. Yamaguchi, H.; Shimizu, A.; Hase, Y.; Degi, K.; Tanaka, A.; Morishita, T. Mutation induction with ion beam irradiation of lateral buds of chrysanthemum and analysis of chimeric structure of induced mutants. Euphytica 2009, 165, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yamaguchi, H.; Shimizu, A.; Hase, Y.; Tanaka, A.; Shikazono, N.; Degi, K.; Morishita, T. Effects of ion beam irradiation on mutation induction and nuclear DNA content in chrysanthemum. Breed. Sci. 2010, 60, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hirano, T.; Kazama, Y.; Ishii, K.; Ohbu, S.; Shirakawa, Y.; Abe, T. Comprehensive identification of mutations induced by heavy-ion beam irradiation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2015, 82, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yamaguchi, H.; Watanabe, Y. Mutation Breeding; YokendoTokyo: Tokyo, Japan, 1983. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  32. Beyaz, R.; Kahramanogullari, C.T.; Yildiz, C.; Darcin, E.S.; Yildiz, M. The effect of gamma radiation on seed germination and seedling growth of Lathyrus chrysanthus Boiss. under in vitro conditions. J. Environ. Radioact. 2016, 162–163, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Charbaji, T.; Nabulsi, I. Effect of low doses of gamma irradiation on in vitro growth of grapevine. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1999, 57, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, L.; Ma, R.; Yin, Y.; Jiao, Z. Role of carbon ion beams irradiation in mitigating cold stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 162, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, Y.; Zheng, L.; Corke, F.; Smith, C.; Bevan, M.W. Control of final seed and organ size by the DA1 gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene Dev. 2008, 22, 1331–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Wang, J.; Tang, M.; Chen, S.; Zheng, X.; Mo, H.; Li, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, K.; Ding, L.; Liu, S.; et al. Down-regulation of BnDA1, whose gene locus is associated with the seeds weight, improves the seeds weight and organ size in Brassica napus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 1024–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Ohmiya, A.; Kishimoto, S.; Aida, R.; Yoshioka, S.; Sumitomo, K. Carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase (CmCCD4a) contributes to white color formation in chrysanthemum petals. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 1193–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Naing, A.H.; Lee, J.H.; Park, K.I.; Kim, K.-O.; Chung, M.Y.; Kim, C.K. Transcriptional control of anthocyanin biosynthesis genes and transcription factors associated with flower coloration patterns in Gerbera hybrida. 3 Biotech 2018, 8, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Laneri, U.; Franconi, R.; Altavista, P. Somatic mutagenesis of Gerbera jamesonii hybr.: Irradiation and in vitro culture. Acta Hortic. 1990, 280, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Edger, P.P.; Poorten, T.J.; VanBuren, R.; Hardigan, M.A.; Colle, M.; McKain, M.R.; Smith, R.D.; Teresi, S.J.; Nelson, A.D.L.; Wai, C.M.; et al. Origin and evolution of the octoploid strawberry genome. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 541–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Sato, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Kaneko, T.; Asamizu, E.; Kato, T.; Nakao, M.; Sasamoto, S.; Watanabe, A.; Ono, A.; Kawashima, K.; et al. Genome structure of the legume, Lotus japonicus. DNA Res. 2008, 15, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Schmutz, J.; Cannon, S.B.; Schlueter, J.; Ma, J.; Mitros, T.; Nelson, W.; Hyten, D.L.; Song, Q.; Thelen, J.J.; Cheng, J.; et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 2010, 463, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. The Tomato Genome Consortium. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 2012, 485, 635–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Anders, C.; Niewoehner, O.; Duerst, A.; Jinek, M. Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nature 2014, 513, 569–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Li, J.F.; Norville, J.E.; Aach, J.; McCormack, M.; Zhang, D.; Bush, J.; Church, G.M.; Sheen, J. Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 688–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Malnoy, M.; Viola, R.; Jung, M.H.; Koo, O.J.; Kim, S.; Kim, J.S.; Velasco, R.; Nagamangala, K.C. DNA-free genetically edited grapevine and apple protoplast using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Svitashev, S.; Schwartz, C.; Lenderts, B.; Young, J.K.; Cigan, M.A. Genome editing in maize directed by CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, H.; Zhang, J.; Wei, P.; Zhang, B.; Gou, F.; Feng, Z.; Mao, Y.; Yang, L.; Zhang, H.; Xu, N.; et al. The CRISPR/Cas9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2014, 12, 797–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhang, R.; Liu, J.; Chai, Z.; Chen, S.; Bai, Y.; Zong, Y.; Chen, K.; Li, J.; Jiang, L.; Gao, C. Generation of herbicide tolerance traits and a new selectable marker in wheat using base editing. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 480–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kako, S. Culture of Horticultural Plant Organs and Tissues; Seibundoshinkosya Tokyo: Tokyo, Japan, 1985; pp. 176–193. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  51. Hosoya, S.; Hirase, S.; Kikuchi, K.; Nanjo, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Kohno, H.; Sano, M. Random PCR-based genotyping by sequencing technology GRAS-Di (genotyping by random amplicon sequencing, direct) reveals genetic structure of mangrove fishes. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2019, 19, 1153–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yoshikawa, S.; Hamasaki, M.; Kadomura, K.; Yamada, T.; Chuda, H.; Kikuchi, K.; Hosoya, S. Genetic dissection of a precocious phenotype in male Tiger Pufferfish (Takifugu rubripes) using Genotyping by Random Amplicon Sequencing, Direct (GRAS-Di). Mar. Biotechnol. 2021, 23, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Outline of cultivation and investigation in the present study.
Figure 1. Outline of cultivation and investigation in the present study.
Plants 10 01480 g001
Figure 2. Correlation between the relative survival rate z and absorbed dose. A sigmoid curve was created using GraphPad Prism 9 and LD50 values were calculated. Numbers in the squares indicate the LD50 value. z Relative value when the survival rate of the nonirradiated plants is set to 1.
Figure 2. Correlation between the relative survival rate z and absorbed dose. A sigmoid curve was created using GraphPad Prism 9 and LD50 values were calculated. Numbers in the squares indicate the LD50 value. z Relative value when the survival rate of the nonirradiated plants is set to 1.
Plants 10 01480 g002
Figure 3. Growth change rate of gerbera obtained by ion beam irradiation.
Figure 3. Growth change rate of gerbera obtained by ion beam irradiation.
Plants 10 01480 g003
Figure 4. Characteristics of trait/morphological mutations obtained by ion beam irradiation. (A) Wild type, (BD) flower color, (E) petal slender, (F) petal sword, (G) receive shape, (H) semidouble, (I,J) male sterile, (K) flower color/petal slender, (L) flower color/receive shape, (M) flower color/semidouble, (N) petal slender/male sterile, and (O,P) chimeric mutation. Scale bar represents 1 cm. All the numbers represent in the figure indicate line number in the irradiated plants.
Figure 4. Characteristics of trait/morphological mutations obtained by ion beam irradiation. (A) Wild type, (BD) flower color, (E) petal slender, (F) petal sword, (G) receive shape, (H) semidouble, (I,J) male sterile, (K) flower color/petal slender, (L) flower color/receive shape, (M) flower color/semidouble, (N) petal slender/male sterile, and (O,P) chimeric mutation. Scale bar represents 1 cm. All the numbers represent in the figure indicate line number in the irradiated plants.
Plants 10 01480 g004
Figure 5. Trait/morphological mutation rate obtained by ion beam irradiation.
Figure 5. Trait/morphological mutation rate obtained by ion beam irradiation.
Plants 10 01480 g005
Table 1. Number of mutants with trait/morphological mutations obtained by ion beam irradiation with 2363 plants.
Table 1. Number of mutants with trait/morphological mutations obtained by ion beam irradiation with 2363 plants.
Classification of Mutant PhenotypesIrradiation treatment
C Ar FeTotal
25102512510251251025
Single mutationFlower color0120145112220021
Petal slender 000000200000002
Petal sword000000100000001
Receptive shape020000000011004
Semidouble000001000000001
Male sterile000000220001005
Complex mutationFlower color/Petal slender001000000010002
Flower color/Receptive shape001000000000001
Flower color/Semidouble000001000001002
Flower color/Male sterile000000010000001
Petal slender/Male sterile000000000001001
Chimeric mutation000000100101003
Total03401611413470044
Table 2. Summary of GRAS-Di analysis results for the mutants obtained by ion beam irradiation.
Table 2. Summary of GRAS-Di analysis results for the mutants obtained by ion beam irradiation.
TraitLine NameNo. of ReadNo. of Seqenced Bases (Mbp)%Q30 zNo. of Mutant-Specific Markers y
Wild typeNormal 0 Gy5,289,24853488.6-
MutantFlower colorFe 2 Gy- 875,355,90454189.51
Petal slenderAr 5 Gy- 295,364,69054289.26
Male sterileFe 5 Gy- 345,045,04851088.931
z Percentage of bases estimated to have base reliability of 99.9% or higher. y Amplification products with different sequences in the wild type and mutant.
Table 3. Outline of ion beam irradiation.
Table 3. Outline of ion beam irradiation.
ElementsIon NotationEnergyLET
(MeV·µ−1)(keV·µm−1)
Carbon12C6+29014
Argon 40Ar18+50089
Iron 56Fe26+500185
Table 4. Number of gerbera in vitro shoots irradiated with ion beams.
Table 4. Number of gerbera in vitro shoots irradiated with ion beams.
IonAbsorbed Dose
(Gy)
Number of Irradiated PlantsNumber of Surviving Plants
C0201201
2187184
5210205
10185174
2512314
Ar06363
19692
210198
57871
106523
25867
Fe0154122
1181171
2160146
515153
1016619
251564
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hosoguchi, T.; Uchiyama, Y.; Komazawa, H.; Yahata, M.; Shimokawa, T.; Tominaga, A. Effect of Three Types of Ion Beam Irradiation on Gerbera (Gerbera hybrida) In Vitro Shoots with Mutagenesis Efficiency. Plants 2021, 10, 1480. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071480

AMA Style

Hosoguchi T, Uchiyama Y, Komazawa H, Yahata M, Shimokawa T, Tominaga A. Effect of Three Types of Ion Beam Irradiation on Gerbera (Gerbera hybrida) In Vitro Shoots with Mutagenesis Efficiency. Plants. 2021; 10(7):1480. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071480

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hosoguchi, Tomoya, Yuna Uchiyama, Hinata Komazawa, Masaki Yahata, Takashi Shimokawa, and Akiyoshi Tominaga. 2021. "Effect of Three Types of Ion Beam Irradiation on Gerbera (Gerbera hybrida) In Vitro Shoots with Mutagenesis Efficiency" Plants 10, no. 7: 1480. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071480

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop