Next Article in Journal
Plant Virus and Virus-like Disease Threats to Australia’s North Targeted by the Northern Australia Quarantine Strategy
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolic Perturbation and Synthetic Biology Strategies for Plant Terpenoid Production—An Updated Overview
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 10
Issue 10
10.3390/plants10102181
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Overexpression of Rice OsS1Fa1 Gene Confers Drought Tolerance in Arabidopsis

by
Sung-Il Kim
1,†,
Kyu Ho Lee
1,†,
Jun Soo Kwak
1,†,
Dae Hwan Kwon
1,
Jong Tae Song
2 and
Hak Soo Seo
1,*
1
Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Bioresources, Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
2
Department of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Sung-Il Kim, Kyu Ho Lee and Jun Soo Kwak contributed equally to this work as first authors.
Plants 2021, 10(10), 2181; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102181
Submission received: 3 September 2021 / Revised: 6 October 2021 / Accepted: 11 October 2021 / Published: 14 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Molecular Biology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Small peptides and proteins play critical regulatory roles in plant development and environmental stress responses; however, only a few of these molecules have been identified and characterized to date because of their poor annotation and other experimental challenges. Here, we present that rice (Oryza sativa L.) OsS1Fa1, a small 76-amino acid protein, confers drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. OsS1Fa1 was highly expressed in leaf, culm, and root tissues of rice seedlings during vegetative growth and was significantly induced under drought stress. OsS1Fa1 overexpression in Arabidopsis induced the expression of selected drought-responsive genes and enhanced the survival rate of transgenic lines under drought. The proteasome inhibitor MG132 protected the OsS1Fa1 protein from degradation. Together, our data indicate that the small protein OsS1Fa1 is induced by drought and is post-translationally regulated, and the ectopic expression of OsS1Fa1 protects plants from drought stress.

1. Introduction

Abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, cold, and heat induce biochemical and molecular changes that affect plant growth and crop yields [1,2]. To survive under these stress conditions, plants activate various cell signaling pathways such as the production of antioxidants, the induction of stress-related proteins, and the accumulation of compatible solutes [1,3].
Drought refers to low water availability for an extended period of time. At the molecular level, plant drought resistance is a complex process involving many genes and signaling pathways that modify several physiological, morphological, and molecular responses. The perception of external drought stress stimuli by sensors located at the plant cell membrane induces the expression of a large number of genes with diverse functions, resulting in drought adaptation [4,5].
Drought-responsive proteins can be categorized into three groups: transcription and signaling cascade-related proteins such as transcription factors and protein kinases; protein- and membrane-protecting proteins such as the late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) protein and antioxidants; and water and ion uptake and transport-related proteins such as aquaporins and sugar transporters [4,6,7,8]. Thousands of drought-responsive genes have been identified using next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches such as RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), and the functions of many of these genes have been characterized to date [9,10].
S1Fa is a spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) nuclear protein that binds to the cis-element of the Site 1 binding site, one of three binding sites (Site 1, 2, and 3) located within the promoter of the nuclear gene rps1, which encodes the plastid ribosomal protein cS [11]. S1Fa is a small protein, with only 76 amino acids (aa), and is different from the Site 1 Factor (S1F) protein, which has been characterized in spinach leaf extracts as a 28–30 kDa protein [12]. The predicted amino acid sequence of S1Fa contains a nuclear localization signal (NLS) peptide and a DNA recognition motif [13], supporting its function as a transcription factor. The spinach S1Fa gene is expressed at higher levels in roots and etiolated seedlings than in green leaves, indicating that S1Fa binds to the rps1 promoter to repress its expression specifically in roots and etiolated plants [13].
S1Fa is highly conserved among dicots and monocots. Although there are no more than five S1Fa-like protein families in several plant species, including rice (Oryza sativa L.), soybean (Glycine max L.), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), and Arabidopsis, 126 S1Fa-like protein families have been identified in Arachis duranensis, and genes encoding the S1Fa proteins belonging to these 126 families are more highly expressed in roots and etiolated seedlings than in green leaves, similar to spinach S1Fa [14]. These findings suggest that S1Fa plays important roles in plant growth and development, including in responses to environmental stress. Nevertheless, the biochemical, molecular, and physiological functions of S1Fa have not yet been elucidated.
According to previous studies, small proteins and peptides are involved in plant growth, development, reproduction, and environmental stress responses [15,16,17,18]. Nevertheless, compared with larger proteins, the roles of small proteins in plant processes remain poorly understood. In this study, we provide evidence showing that the rice small protein OsS1Fa1, a homolog of spinach S1Fa, participates in plant survival under drought, and its stability is regulated by the ubiquitination pathway.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Growth Conditions and Stress Treatments

Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Nipponbare) seeds were germinated in soil in a growth chamber at 28 °C under a 14 h light/10 h dark cycle, and seedlings were grown under the same conditions for 3 weeks. In the drought stress treatment, watering of seedlings was withheld for 10 d, whereas in the mock treatment, seedlings were watered every day for 10 d. After 10 d, samples were harvested, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −70 °C until needed for further analysis. Plants of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia (Col-0; wild type [WT]) and OsS1Fa1 overexpression lines were grown in a growth chamber at 22 °C under a 16 h light/8 h dark cycle on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 0.5 g/L MES, 10 g/L sucrose, and 0.75% agar. To test the drought stress tolerance of WT and transgenic Arabidopsis plants, seeds of these genotypes were cold-stratified on wet soil at 4 °C in the dark for 3 d, and seedlings were grown at 22 °C under a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod, without watering, for 28 d. After the drought stress treatment, plants were rewatered for 5 d and then photographed.

2.2. Production of Recombinant Proteins

To produce His6-OsS1Fa1, full-length OsS1Fa1 cDNA was cloned into the pET28a vector (Novagen, Madison, WI, USA). The resultant construct was transformed into Escherichia coli BL21/DE3 (pLysS) cells. Then, isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactoside (IPTG) was added to the transformed E. coli cell culture to induce the expression of the fusion protein. To extract the His6-OsS1Fa1 recombinant protein, bacteria were lysed in a buffer containing 50 mM NaH2PO4 (pH 8.0), 300 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM imidazole, 5 mM DTT, 2 mM PMSF, and a proteinase inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The extracted recombinant protein was then purified using Ni2+-nitrilotriacetate (Ni2+-NTA) resin (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Primers used for plasmid construction are listed in Table S1.

2.3. RT-qPCR Analysis

To evaluate the effect of drought stress on OsS1Fa1 expression, the mock- and drought-treated rice leaf samples were ground thoroughly to obtain a fine powder. Total RNA was isolated from the ground tissue using the FavorPrepTM Plant Total RNA Mini Kit (Favorgen, Ping-Tung, Taiwan) and then reverse transcribed to produce cDNA using ReverTra Ace® qPCR RT Master Mix, with gDNA Remover (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan). Then, the cDNA template was amplified by RT-qPCR on LightCycler®480 using the KAPA SYBR® FAST qPCR Master Mix (2X) Kit (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, NC, USA) and OsS1Fa1-specific primers. The Ubiquitin 5 (UBQ5) gene was used as an internal reference.
To examine the level of OsS1Fa1 expression in rice seedlings during vegetative growth, total RNA was isolated from the shoot, leaf, culm, and root tissues of rice seedlings harvested at five different vegetative growth stages and amplified by RT-qPCR.
To examine the transcript levels of drought-responsive genes in Arabidopsis, total RNA was isolated from the leaves of 14-d-old WT and OsS1Fa1-overexpressing plants, and RT-qPCR was carried out using gene-specific primers. Primers for Actin (internal control) were added to the RT-qPCR reaction together with other gene-specific primers.
All experiments were repeated three times, with three replicates per sample. Primers used for all RT-qPCR assays are listed in Table S2.

2.4. Antibody Production and Western Blotting

The recombinant His6-OsS1Fa1 protein was purified using the Ni2+-NTA affinity column, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen), and the concentration of the purified protein was measured with the Bradford assay [19]. The anti-OsS1Fa1 antibody was produced by subcutaneous injection of the recombinant protein into rabbits. To examine the level of OsS1Fa1 in rice and Arabidopsis, total proteins were extracted from the required samples and separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) on 12% acrylamide gel. The OsS1Fa1 protein was then detected by Western blotting with anti-OsS1Fa1 antibody.

2.5. Production and Characterization of Transgenic Arabidopsis Lines

To generate transgenic Arabidopsis lines overexpressing OsS1Fa1, the full-length cDNA of OsS1Fa1 was cloned into the pBA002 vector under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter. The resulting 35S-OsS1Fa1 construct was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404, which was further used to transform Arabidopsis via the floral dipping method [20]. The expression level of OsS1Fa1 was examined in transgenic plants by RT-qPCR (as described above), and the protein level of OsS1Fa1 was examined in the leaves of 14-d-old WT and transgenic plants by Western blotting with anti-OsS1Fa1 antibody.

2.6. Prediction of Conserved Motifs in the OsS1Fa1 Protein

Conserved motifs in the OsS1Fa1 protein were predicted based on its amino acid sequences using the QUARK computer algorithm [21] (https://zhanglab.Ccmb.med.umich.edu/QUARK/, accessed on 2 October 2018).

2.7. Effect of MG132 on OsS1Fa1 Protein Level and Stability

To perform a cell-free degradation assay, leaves of 10-d-old soil-grown rice seedlings were ground in liquid nitrogen and resuspended in a buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 4 mM PMSF, 5 mM DTT, and 10 mM ATP. Cell debris was pelleted by centrifugation, and equal volumes of the supernatant were aliquoted into individual tubes. Then, purified His6-OsS1Fa1 and 50 µM MG132 (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA) were added to the protein extract in each tube, and samples were incubated at room temperature for 4 h. The reaction was stopped by adding an equal volume of 2× SDS sample buffer. Finally, the level of OsS1Fa1 was analyzed by Western blotting with anti-OsS1Fa1 antibody. To estimate the effect of MG132 on OsS1Fa1 in vivo, 2-week-old transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings or 7-d-old rice seedlings grown on MS medium were treated with 50 µM MG132 for 15 h. Leaf samples were ground in liquid nitrogen, and equal amounts of total protein were analyzed by Western blotting with anti-OsS1Fa1 antibody.

3. Results

3.1. Expression of OsS1Fa1 Is Upregulated by Drought Stress

To identify the small protein involved in the drought stress response in rice, we chose S1Fa (LOC_Os04g33420), as it has not yet been functionally characterized in rice and is highly conserved among monocots and dicots [14]. To perform the drought stress treatment, wild-type (WT) seedlings were grown in a pot for 20 d under well-watered conditions. On day 20, irrigation was withheld for the next 19 d. To determine the role of OsS1Fa1 in drought stress response, we first investigated the expression pattern of the OsS1Fa1 gene by quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR). The expression of OsS1Fa1 was significantly induced in rice leaves following the dehydration treatment (Figure 1A). Interestingly, the deduced amino acid sequence of OsS1Fa1 contained four possible functional domains: transmembrane domain, NLS, DNA recognition α-helix, and sumoylation motif (Figure 1B). Thus, despite its small size (76 aa), OsS1Fa1 could perform multiple functions in different subcellular organs.

3.2. OsS1F1a Transcript and the Encoded Protein Exhibit Organ-Specific Expression

Next, we evaluated the expression level of OsS1Fa1 in the leaf, culm, and root tissues of 14-d-old rice seedlings (Figure 1A). The OsS1Fa1 expression was higher in leaves than in culms and roots (Figure 2B). To investigate the OsS1F1a protein levels, we produced an anti-OsS1Fa1 antibody using the recombinant His6-OsS1Fa1 protein, which was produced in E. coli and purified by nickel affinity chromatography. The results of Western blotting showed that the OsS1Fa1 protein level was very low in leaves (unlike its transcript level) but was detectable in the culm and root (consistent with its transcript level) (Figure 2C). The molecular weight (MW) of OsS1Fa1, based on its amino acid sequence, was estimated at approximately 8.36 kDa; however, on the Western blot, the OsS1Fa1protein was detected at approximately 14.0 kDa (Figure 2C).
We also examined the affinity of anti-OsS1Fa1 antibody to bind to OsS1Fa1 in the crude extracts of E. coli expressing His6-OsS1Fa1. The results showed that the anti-OsS1Fa1 antibody specifically recognized OsS1Fa1 (Figure 2D). The size of the His6-OsS1Fa1 protein was approximately 15.5 kDa on the Western blot, which was greater than that predicted based on its amino acid sequence (9.02 kDa) (Figure 2D).
Because the OsS1Fa1 protein level in the leaf tissue was quite low, despite the high OsS1Fa1 transcript level, we evaluated the expression level of OsS1Fa1 in the shoot, leaf, culm, and root of rice seedlings at five different growth stages (1–5) (Figure 3A). The OsS1Fa1 transcript level in the shoot at stage 1 was approximately 1.25-fold higher than that in leaf tissues at stages 2–5 (Figure 3B), and in the culm and root tissues, the OsS1Fa1 transcript levels decreased slightly during growth. We also evaluated the OsS1Fa1 protein level in different tissues of rice seedlings at different growth stages. The level of OsS1Fa1 in leaves was lower at stage 2 than at stage 1, and the protein was undetectable in leaves at stages 3 to 5. However, in the culm and root tissues, the OsS1Fa1 protein level was somehow proportional to its gene transcript level at all growth stages (Figure 3C).

3.3. OsS1Fa1 Overexpression in Arabidopsis Enhances Drought Stress Tolerance

Because drought treatment increased the expression level of OsS1Fa1 in rice (Figure 1A), we hypothesized that OsS1Fa1 acts as a positive regulator of drought stress tolerance. To test this hypothesis, we constructed and introduced the 35S-OsS1Fa1 plasmid in Arabidopsis and analyzed the OsS1Fa1 transcript and OsS1Fa1 protein levels in transgenic Arabidopsis lines by RT-qPCR and Western blotting, respectively. The OsS1Fa1 gene was expressed to high levels in three different transgenic lines, and the results of Western blotting were consistent with those of RT-qPCR, although a slight difference was observed between OsS1Fa1 transcript and OsS1Fa1 protein levels (Figure 4A,B). Next, we determined the transcript levels of drought-responsive genes, including Late Embryogenesis Abundant (LEA), Growth Regulating Factor 7 (GRF7), YODA, a mitogen-activated kinase kinase kinase (MAPKKK) gene, Response-to-Dehydration 29A (RD29A), and Calcium-dependent protein kinase 6 (CPK6), in transgenic OsS1Fa1 overexpression lines. Expression levels of all drought-responsive genes were higher in transgenic lines than in WT plants (Figure 4C). Next, we examined the drought stress tolerance of transgenic OsS1Fa1 overexpression lines. Seeds of the WT and transgenic lines were cold-stratified on wet soil for 3 d, and the emerged seedlings were grown at 22 °C without watering for 28 d. After the drought stress treatment, plants were rewatered for 5 d and then photographed. The results showed that the OsS1Fa1-overexpressing plants showed higher rate of plant survival than the WT plants (Figure 4D). Thus, these data suggest that OsS1Fa1 enhances plant survival under drought.

3.4. OsS1Fa1 Degradation Is Influenced by Proteasome Inhibition

The high transcript and low protein levels of OsS1Fa1 during leaf development (Figure 2B,C and Figure 3B,C) suggest that the stability of OsS1Fa1 is regulated at the post-translational level. To test this possibility, we examined the cell-free degradation of OsS1Fa1 using the total protein extract from rice leaves and purified His6-OsS1Fa1 in the presence or absence of a 26S proteasome inhibitor, MG132. OsS1Fa1 degradation was substantially delayed with the proteasome inhibitor (Figure 5A). The effect of MG132 on OsS1Fa1 levels in rice seedlings and OsS1Fa1-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants was also assessed. The OsS1Fa1 levels increased in both rice seedlings and transgenic Arabidopsis plants after direct treatment with MG132, as shown by Western blotting with anti-OsS1Fa1 antibody (Figure 5B,C). These results indicate that OsS1Fa1 can be degraded by the 26S proteasome complex.

4. Discussion

In this study, we demonstrate that the rice small protein OsS1Fa1 enhances drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Recent studies have improved our understanding of the molecular genetic mechanisms underlying drought resistance in plants, thus facilitating the development of drought tolerant crops. However, most of these studies investigated large transcripts and proteins. Recently, several research groups reported the role of small proteins and peptides in plant development, nutrient assimilation, and environmental stress response [22,23,24,25,26]. This has led to a large-scale investigation of small proteins and peptides via bioinformatic analysis of genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data [27,28].
Rice is a semi-aquatic plant species that requires standing water for proper growth and development. Thus, drought is one of the major abiotic stresses that directly influences plant growth and productivity in rice. Here, we explored the role of OsS1Fa1 in the drought stress response. A previous study showed that spinach S1Fa is expressed to higher levels in etiolated seedlings and roots than in green leaves [13]. In the current study, OsS1Fa1 was highly expressed in green leaves and culms; however, its expression was relatively low in roots (Figure 2B, Figure 3B). These data suggest that the expression pattern of S1Fa genes in monocots, including rice, is different from that in dicots such as spinach.
Protein mobility shift during SDS-PAGE fractionation can occur for several reasons. First, it is caused by chemical modifications of proteins such as phosphorylation [29], glycosylation [30], hydroxylation [31], methylation [32], and ubiquitination [33,34]. The acidity and hydrophobicity of proteins are other factors that could influence protein mobility [35,36]. In our data, the MW of native OsS1Fa1 and recombinant His6-OsS1Fa1 proteins in SDS-PAGE is approximately 5.64 and 6.30 kDa larger than its predicted MW, respectively (Figure 2C,D). OsS1Fa1 contains a transmembrane domain (Figure 1B), thus suggesting that its migration might be affected by a hydrophobic surface. Further examination of the transmembrane domain of mutant OsS1Fa1 proteins is required to find out the cause of the mobility shift. It is also possible that OsS1Fa1 is modified by chemicals. Mass spectrometry analysis by using gel electrophoresis liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry can also be applied to find a clue.
A number of small proteins and peptides, such as CLAVATA3/EMBRYO-SURROUNDING REGION-RELATED 25 (CLE25), INFLORESCENCE DEFICIENT IN ABSCISSION (IDA), and IDA-LIKE 1, are involved in the response to abiotic stresses such as drought and salt [18,37,38,39,40]. Our results showed that OsS1Fa1 expression was induced under drought stress (Figure 1A). Consistent with this result, overexpression of OsS1Fa1 in Arabidopsis increased the survival rate of transgenic plants under drought (Figure 4D). Additionally, OsS1Fa1 overexpression in Arabidopsis upregulated the expression of drought-responsive genes (Figure 4E). These data indicate that OsS1Fa1 protects plants against drought stress. Despite the high transcript levels of OsS1Fa1 in leaves during development, the level of the OsS1Fa1 protein in leaf tissues was very low (Figure 2B,C, Figure 3B,C), suggesting that the stability of OsS1Fa1 is regulated at the post-translational level. We, therefore, determined the concentration of OsS1Fa1 in transgenic Arabidopsis plants carrying the 35S-OsS1Fa1 construct as well as in rice seedlings. Treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 increased the concentration of OsS1Fa1 and delayed its degradation (Figure 5A–C). In addition, the computer program QUARK predicted several ubiquitination sites in OsS1Fa1 (Table S3). Taken together, these results indicate that the stability of OsS1Fa1 in vivo is regulated by the proteasome complex after polyubiquitination.
The binding of spinach S1Fa to the rpsl gene promoter in the nucleus [11] suggests that S1Fa functions as a transcription factor. In this study, we found a putative sumoylation motif in the DNA recognition α-helix domain of OsS1Fa1 (Figure 1B). Increasing evidence shows that sumoylation changes the conformation of the target protein, thereby affecting its subcellular localization, stability, and activity as well as interactions with other proteins [41,42,43,44]. This suggests that the transcriptional activation function and stability of OsS1Fa1 can be controlled by sumoylation. In addition, the presence of a transmembrane domain in OsS1Fa1 strongly suggests that OsS1Fa1 functions in the membrane and potentially participates in cellular processes as an interaction partner of other membrane proteins. Further subcellular localization analysis of the OsS1Fa1 protein and the identification of nuclear and cytoplasmic membrane-localized OsS1Fa1-interacting proteins will help to further understand the function of OsS1Fa1 in the cell.
MicroProteins are small proteins that interact with and modulate the activity of large proteins [45]. Recently, an improved algorithm capable of processing poorly annotated genomes and advanced translatomics was employed to predict small proteins and their interacting partners [46,47]. This strategy can be used to identify the function of the small protein itself or the effects of small proteins on their interacting partners. MicroProteins also act as a regulatory tool. For example, in Arabidopsis, two B-box-containing microProteins, microProtein1a (miP1a) and miP1b, regulate CONSTANS (CO) to control flowering time [48]. In addition, the overexpression of the synthetic Hd1 B-box domain in rice interferes with the endogenous function of the CO homolog, Hd1 [49]. Small proteins are also known to regulate fundamental plant processes such as growth and stress response [47] and therefore can be used for crop bioengineering. Together, these studies suggest that OsS1Fa1 interacts with target proteins via its NLS and transmembrane domain and can be used to develop drought tolerance crops.
In summary, OsS1Fa1 expression is induced by drought, and overexpression of OsS1Fa1 in Arabidopsis not only enhances drought stress tolerance but also increases the expression of drought tolerance-related genes. In addition, the stability of the OsS1Fa1 protein is post-translationally modulated. Further studies are needed to investigate the potential roles of the conserved motifs of OsS1Fa1 in its subcellular localization. Elucidation of the ubiquitination and sumoylation of OsS1Fa1 in vivo and the effects of OsS1Fa1 overexpression on drought stress tolerance are also required for understanding the role of OsS1Fa1. In addition to these, identification of OsS1Fa1-interacting proteins would bring another insight into the understanding of the function of OsS1Fa1 in drought stress response. Together, these studies will elucidate the role of OsS1Fa1 in plant development and stress responses.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants10102181/s1, Table S1: Putative ubiquitination sites of OsS1Fa1 identified using the computational Prediction of protein Ubiquitination sites with a Bayesian Discrimination Method (BDM-PUB), Table S2: Primers used for plasmid construction, Table S3: Primers used to perform quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR).

Author Contributions

S.-I.K., K.H.L. and H.S.S. designed the experiments, and S.-I.K., K.H.L., J.S.K. and D.H.K. performed the experiments. J.T.S. and H.S.S. wrote the manuscript. H.S.S. supervised the project. All authors discussed the results and commented on the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. PJ01567701)”, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Acknowledgments

We thank the editors and reviewers of this manuscript for providing helpful comments and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huang, G.T.; Ma, S.L.; Bai, L.P.; Zhang, L.; Ma, H.; Jia, P.; Liu, J.; Zhong, M.; Guo, Z.F. Signal transduction during cold, salt, and drought stresses in plants. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 969–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sharma, R.; De Vleesschauwer, D.; Sharma, M.K.; Ronald, P.C. Recent advances in dissecting stress-regulatory crosstalk in rice. Mol. Plants 2013, 6, 250–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Wang, W.; Vinocur, B.; Altman, A. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: Towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 2003, 218, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhu, J.K. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2002, 53, 247–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Bartels, D.; Sunkar, R. Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2005, 4, 23–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Seki, M. Regulatory network of gene expression in the drought and cold stress responses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6, 410–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hirayama, T.; Shinozaki, K. Research on plant abiotic stress responses in the post-genome era: Past, present and future. Plant J. 2010, 61, 1041–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Martignago, D.; Rico-Medina, A.; Blasco-Escámez, D.; Fontanet-Manzaneque, J.B.; Caño-Delgado, A.I. Drought resistance by engineering plant tissue-specific responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 10, 1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Manna, M.; Thakur, T.; Chirom, O.; Mandlik, R.; Deshmukh, R.; Salvi, P. Transcription factors as key molecular target to strengthen the drought stress tolerance in plants. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 172, 847–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Franzetti, B.; Zhou, D.X.; Mache, R. Structure and expression of the nuclear gene coding for the spinach plastid CS1 ribosomal protein from spinach. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20, 4153–4157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhou, D.X.; Li, Y.F.; Rocipon, M.; Mache, R. Sequence-specific interaction between S1F, a spinach nuclear factor, and a negative c/s-element conserved in plastid-related genes. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 23515–23519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhou, D.X.; Bisanz-Seyer, C.; Mache, R. Molecular cloning of a small DNA binding protein with specificity for a tissue-specific negative element within the rps1 promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23, 1165–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Chen, X.; Li, H.; Pandey, M.K.; Yang, Q.; Wang, X.; Garg, V.; Li, H.; Chi, X.; Doddamani, D.; Hong, Y.; et al. Draft genome of the peanut A-genome progenitor (Arachis duranensis) provides insights into geocarpy, oil biosynthesis, and allergens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 6785–6790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Tavormina, P.; De Coninck, B.; Nikonorova, N.; De Smet, I.; Cammue, B.P. The plant peptidome: An expanding repertoire of structural features and biological functions. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 2095–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. De Coninck, B.; De Smet, I. Plant peptides-taking them to the next level. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 4791–4795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Campos, M.L.; Lião, L.M.; Alves, E.S.F.; Migliolo, L.; Dias, S.C.; Franco, O.L. A structural perspective of plant antimicrobial peptides. Biochem. J. 2018, 475, 3359–3375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Takahashi, F.; Hanada, K.; Kondo, T.; Shinozaki, K. Hormone-like peptides and small coding genes in plant stress signaling and development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2019, 51, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Xu, D.; Zhang, Y. Ab initio protein structure assembly using continuous structure fragments and optimized knowledge-based force field. Proteins 2012, 80, 1715–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Albert, M. Peptides as triggers of plant defence. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 5269–5279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Fan, S.K.; Fang, X.Z.; Guan, M.Y.; Ye, Y.Q.; Lin, X.Y.; Du, S.T.; Jin, C.W. Exogenous abscisic acid application decreases cadmium accumulation in Arabidopsis plants, which is associated with the inhibition of IRT1-mediated cadmium uptake. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Grillet, L.; Lan, P.; Li, W.; Mokkapati, G.; Schmidt, W. IRON MAN is a ubiquitous family of peptides that control iron transport in plants. Nat. Plants 2018, 4, 953–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Matsubayashi, Y. Posttranslationally modified small-peptide signals in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2014, 65, 385–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Okamoto, S.; Tabata, R.; Matsubayashi, Y. Long-distance peptide signaling essential for nutrient homeostasis in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2016, 34, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sawa, S.; Kinoshita, A.; Betsuyaku, S.; Fukuda, H. A large family of genes that share homology with CLE domain in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Signal. Behav. 2008, 3, 337–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Wang, P.; Yao, S.; Kosami, K.I.; Guo, T.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Fukao, Y.; Kaneko-Kawano, T.; Zhang, H.; She, Y.M.; et al. Identification of endogenous small peptides involved in rice immunity through transcriptomics- and proteomics-based screening. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 18, 415–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Wegener, A.D.; Jones, L.R. Phosphorylation-induced mobility shift in phospholamban in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels. Evidence for a protein structure consisting of multiple identical phosphorylatable subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 1984, 259, 1834–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wilson, B.S.; Palade, G.E.; Farquhar, M.G. Endoplasmic reticulum-through-Golgi transport assay based on O-glycosylation of native glycophorin in permeabilized erythroleukemia cells: Role for Gi3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 1681–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Phelps, D.S.; Floros, J. Proline hydroxylation alters the electrophoretic mobility of pulmonary surfactant-asso.ciated protein A. Electrophoresis 1988, 9, 231–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Boyd, A.; Simon, M.I. Multiple electrophoretic forms of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins generated by stimulus-elicited methylation in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1980, 143, 809–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Elsasser, S.; Shi, Y.; Finley, D. Binding of ubiquitin conjugates to proteasomes as visualized with native gels. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 832, 403–422. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Kim, Y.S.; Nagy, K.; Keyser, S.; Schneekloth, J.S., Jr. An electrophoretic mobility shift assay identifies a mechanistically unique inhibitor of protein sumoylation. Chem. Biol. 2013, 20, 604–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Rath, A.; Glibowicka, M.; Nadeau, V.G.; Chen, G.; Deber, C.M. Detergent binding explains anomalous SDS-PAGE migration of membrane proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 1760–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Guan, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Huang, D.; Zhao, S.; Lo, L.J.; Peng, J. An equation to estimate the difference between theoretically predicted and SDS PAGE-displayed molecular weights for an acidic peptide. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Vie, A.K.; Najafi, J.; Liu, B.; Winge, P.; Butenko, M.A.; Hornslien, K.S.; Kumpf, R.; Aalen, R.B.; Bones, A.M.; Brembu, T. The IDA/IDA-LIKE and PIP/PIP-LIKE gene families in Arabidopsis: Phylogenetic relationship, expression patterns, and transcriptional effect of the PIPL3 peptide. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 5351–5365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Christmann, A.; Grill, E. Peptide signal alerts plants to drought. Nature 2018, 556, 178–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Takahashi, F.; Suzuki, T.; Osakabe, Y.; Betsuyaku, S.; Kondo, Y.; Dohmae, N.; Fukuda, H.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. A small peptide modulates stomatal control via abscisic acid in long-distance signalling. Nature 2018, 556, 235–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Takahashi, F.; Kuromori, T.; Urano, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. Drought stress responses and resistance in plants: From cellular responses to long-distance intercellular communication. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 556972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Johnson, E.S. Protein modification by SUMO. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2004, 73, 355–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Mazzucotelli, E.; Mastrangelo, A.M.; Crosatti, C.; Guerra, D.; Michele Stanca, A.; Cattivelli, L. Abiotic stress response in plants: When post-transcriptional and post-translational regulations control transcription. Plant Sci. 2008, 174, 420–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Miura, K.; Hasegawa, P.M. Sumoylation and other ubiquitin-like post-translational modifications in plants. Trends Cell Biol. 2010, 20, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kwak, J.S.; Son, G.H.; Song, J.T.; Seo, H.S. Post-translational modifications of FLOWERING LOCUS C modulate its activity. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 383–3389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Eguen, T.; Straub, D.; Graeff, M.; Wenkel, S. Micro-Proteins: Small size-big impact. Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 477–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, Y.; Li, D.; Fan, W.; Zheng, X.; Zhou, Y.; Ye, H.; Liang, X.; Du, W.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, K. PsORF: A database of small ORFs in plants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 2158–2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bhati, K.K.; Kruusvee, V.; Straub, D.; Chandran, A.K.N.; Jung, K.H.; Wenkel, S. Global Analysis of cereal microProteins suggests diverse roles in crop development and environmental adaptation. G3 (Bethesda) 2020, 10, 3709–3717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Graeff, M.; Straub, D.; Eguen, T.; Dolde, U.; Rodrigues, V.; Brandt., R.; Wenkel, S. MicroProtein-mediated recruitment of CONSTANS into a TOPLESS trimeric complex represses flowering in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1005959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Eguen, T.; Ariza, J.J.; Brambilla, V.; Sun, B.; Bhati, K.K.; Fornara, F.; Wenkel, S. Control of flowering in rice through synthetic microProteins. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 730–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 10 02181 g001 550
Figure 1. Analysis of OsS1Fa1 transcript levels and the OsS1Fa1 amino acid sequence. (A) RT-qPCR analysis of OsS1Fa1 expression in rice seedlings under drought stress. Wild-type (WT) seedlings were grown for 20 d under well-watered conditions by maintaining equal-sized seedlings in pots. Irrigation was withheld on day 20 for the next 19 d. Transcript levels of OsS1Fa1 were examined by RT-qPCR using gene-specific primers. Data represent mean ± standard deviation (SD; n = 3). (B) The deduced amino acid sequence of OsS1Fa1. Conserved motifs are indicated in bold.
Figure 1. Analysis of OsS1Fa1 transcript levels and the OsS1Fa1 amino acid sequence. (A) RT-qPCR analysis of OsS1Fa1 expression in rice seedlings under drought stress. Wild-type (WT) seedlings were grown for 20 d under well-watered conditions by maintaining equal-sized seedlings in pots. Irrigation was withheld on day 20 for the next 19 d. Transcript levels of OsS1Fa1 were examined by RT-qPCR using gene-specific primers. Data represent mean ± standard deviation (SD; n = 3). (B) The deduced amino acid sequence of OsS1Fa1. Conserved motifs are indicated in bold.
Plants 10 02181 g001
Plants 10 02181 g002 550
Figure 2. Analysis of OsS1Fa1 expression in rice tissues and detection of the His-tagged recombinant proteins in E. coli. (A) Photograph of a 3-week-old rice seedling showing the leaf, culm, and root tissues used for total RNA isolation. (B) Expression analysis of OsS1Fa1 in rice tissues by RT-qPCR. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3). (C) Western blot analysis of OsS1Fa1 in rice tissues using anti-OsS1Fa1 antibody. Total proteins were extracted from the same samples as those used in (B). The corresponding protein gel is shown below. (D) Detection of the His6-OsS1Fa1 recombinant protein in E. coli extracts using anti-OsS1Fa1 antibody. The recombinant protein was detected in E. coli before and after the addition of IPTG.
Figure 2. Analysis of OsS1Fa1 expression in rice tissues and detection of the His-tagged recombinant proteins in E. coli. (A) Photograph of a 3-week-old rice seedling showing the leaf, culm, and root tissues used for total RNA isolation. (B) Expression analysis of OsS1Fa1 in rice tissues by RT-qPCR. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3). (C) Western blot analysis of OsS1Fa1 in rice tissues using anti-OsS1Fa1 antibody. Total proteins were extracted from the same samples as those used in (B). The corresponding protein gel is shown below. (D) Detection of the His6-OsS1Fa1 recombinant protein in E. coli extracts using anti-OsS1Fa1 antibody. The recombinant protein was detected in E. coli before and after the addition of IPTG.
Plants 10 02181 g002
Plants 10 02181 g003 550
Figure 3. Analysis of OsS1Fa1 transcript level and the corresponding protein level in different tissues of rice seedlings at different development stages. (A) Photographs showing rice seedlings at five different developmental stages. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of OsS1Fa1 expression in the leaf, culm, and root tissues of rice seedlings at different developmental stages. Stage 1, one leaf (7-d-old seedlings); stage 2, two leaves (10-d-old seedlings); stage 3, three leaves (13-d-old seedlings); stage 4, four leaves (19-d-old seedlings); stage 5, five leaves (21-d-old seedlings). Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3). (C) Western blot analysis of the OsS1Fa1 protein using anti-OsS1Fa1 antibody. Total proteins were extracted from the same samples used in (B). Corresponding protein gels are shown below.
Figure 3. Analysis of OsS1Fa1 transcript level and the corresponding protein level in different tissues of rice seedlings at different development stages. (A) Photographs showing rice seedlings at five different developmental stages. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of OsS1Fa1 expression in the leaf, culm, and root tissues of rice seedlings at different developmental stages. Stage 1, one leaf (7-d-old seedlings); stage 2, two leaves (10-d-old seedlings); stage 3, three leaves (13-d-old seedlings); stage 4, four leaves (19-d-old seedlings); stage 5, five leaves (21-d-old seedlings). Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3). (C) Western blot analysis of the OsS1Fa1 protein using anti-OsS1Fa1 antibody. Total proteins were extracted from the same samples used in (B). Corresponding protein gels are shown below.
Plants 10 02181 g003
Plants 10 02181 g004 550
Figure 4. Generation and characterization of transgenic Arabidopsis lines overexpressing OsS1Fa1. (A) RT-qPCR analysis of OsS1Fa1 expression in WT and transgenic Arabidopsis plants using gene-specific primers. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3). (B) Western blot analysis of the OsS1Fa1 protein in WT and transgenic plants using anti-OsS1Fa1 antibody. Total proteins were isolated from the same samples as those used in (B). Rubisco was used as the loading control. (C) Expression analysis of LEA, GRF7, YODA, RD29A, and CPK6 in WT and transgenic plants by RT-qPCR using gene-specific primers. Total RNA samples used in this experiment were the same as those used in (A). Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3). (D) Drought tolerance assay.
Figure 4. Generation and characterization of transgenic Arabidopsis lines overexpressing OsS1Fa1. (A) RT-qPCR analysis of OsS1Fa1 expression in WT and transgenic Arabidopsis plants using gene-specific primers. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3). (B) Western blot analysis of the OsS1Fa1 protein in WT and transgenic plants using anti-OsS1Fa1 antibody. Total proteins were isolated from the same samples as those used in (B). Rubisco was used as the loading control. (C) Expression analysis of LEA, GRF7, YODA, RD29A, and CPK6 in WT and transgenic plants by RT-qPCR using gene-specific primers. Total RNA samples used in this experiment were the same as those used in (A). Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3). (D) Drought tolerance assay.
Plants 10 02181 g004
Plants 10 02181 g005 550
Figure 5. Effect of a proteasome inhibitor on the OsS1Fa1 protein level. (A) Cell-free degradation assay of OsS1Fa1. Rice leaf extracts were mixed with purified His6-OsS1Fa1 and treated with 50 µM MG132 (26S proteasome inhibitor) or 2% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; solvent for the inhibitor; control) for the indicated time periods. OsS1Fa1 levels were determined by Western blotting using anti-OsS1Fa1 antibody, with known concentrations of actin serving as loading controls. (B,C) Proteasome pathway-mediated OsS1Fa1 degradation in vivo. Rice seedlings (B) and OsS1Fa1-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants (C) were treated with 50 µM MG132. After overnight incubation, the OsS1Fa1 protein concentration was assessed by Western blotting using anti-OsS1Fa1 antibody, with known concentrations of actin or binding protein (BIP) serving as loading controls. Values below each lane indicate relative intensities. All experiments were repeated three times, with similar results.
Figure 5. Effect of a proteasome inhibitor on the OsS1Fa1 protein level. (A) Cell-free degradation assay of OsS1Fa1. Rice leaf extracts were mixed with purified His6-OsS1Fa1 and treated with 50 µM MG132 (26S proteasome inhibitor) or 2% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; solvent for the inhibitor; control) for the indicated time periods. OsS1Fa1 levels were determined by Western blotting using anti-OsS1Fa1 antibody, with known concentrations of actin serving as loading controls. (B,C) Proteasome pathway-mediated OsS1Fa1 degradation in vivo. Rice seedlings (B) and OsS1Fa1-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants (C) were treated with 50 µM MG132. After overnight incubation, the OsS1Fa1 protein concentration was assessed by Western blotting using anti-OsS1Fa1 antibody, with known concentrations of actin or binding protein (BIP) serving as loading controls. Values below each lane indicate relative intensities. All experiments were repeated three times, with similar results.
Plants 10 02181 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, S.-I.; Lee, K.H.; Kwak, J.S.; Kwon, D.H.; Song, J.T.; Seo, H.S. Overexpression of Rice OsS1Fa1 Gene Confers Drought Tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plants 2021, 10, 2181. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102181

AMA Style

Kim S-I, Lee KH, Kwak JS, Kwon DH, Song JT, Seo HS. Overexpression of Rice OsS1Fa1 Gene Confers Drought Tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plants. 2021; 10(10):2181. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102181

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Sung-Il, Kyu Ho Lee, Jun Soo Kwak, Dae Hwan Kwon, Jong Tae Song, and Hak Soo Seo. 2021. "Overexpression of Rice OsS1Fa1 Gene Confers Drought Tolerance in Arabidopsis" Plants 10, no. 10: 2181. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102181

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop