Next Article in Journal
Urinary Proteome Changes during Pregnancy in Rats
Next Article in Special Issue
Ultramicronized N-Palmitoylethanolamine Regulates Mast Cell-Astrocyte Crosstalk: A New Potential Mechanism Underlying the Inhibition of Morphine Tolerance
Previous Article in Journal
The Photobiomodulation of MAO-A Affects the Contractile Activity of Smooth Muscle Gastric Tissues
Previous Article in Special Issue
Palmitoylethanolamide Mitigates Paclitaxel Toxicity in Primary Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 13
Issue 1
10.3390/biom13010033
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

First Evidence of the Protective Effects of 2-Pentadecyl-2-Oxazoline (PEA-OXA) in In Vitro Models of Acute Lung Injury

by
Aniello Schiano Moriello
1,2,
Fiorentina Roviezzo
3,
Fabio Arturo Iannotti
1,
Giuseppina Rea
4,
Marco Allarà
1,2,
Rosa Camerlingo
5,
Roberta Verde
1,
Vincenzo Di Marzo
1,6,* and
Stefania Petrosino
1,2,*
1
Endocannabinoid Research Group, Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, National Research Council, 80078 Pozzuoli, Italy
2
Epitech Group SpA, Saccolongo, 35100 Padova, Italy
3
Department of Pharmacy, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy
4
Microenvironment Molecular Targets, National Cancer Institute G. Pascale Foundation, IRCCS, 80131 Naples, Italy
5
Cellular Biology and Biotherapy-Research Department, National Cancer Institute G. Pascale Foundation, IRCCS, 80131 Naples, Italy
6
Canada Excellence Research Chair on the Microbiome-Endocannabinoidome Axis in Metabolic Health, CRIUCPQ and INAF, Faculties of Medicine and Agriculture and Food Sciences, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 4G5, Canada
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2023, 13(1), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13010033
Submission received: 1 December 2022 / Revised: 20 December 2022 / Accepted: 21 December 2022 / Published: 24 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue To Go Where Nature Leads: Focus on Palmitoylethanolamide and Related ALIAmides As Innovative Approach to Neuroinflammatory and Pain-Related Disease States in Honor of Doctor Francesco Della Valle)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a serious inflammatory lung disorder and a complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection, the transition to ARDS is principally due to the occurrence of a cytokine storm and an exacerbated inflammatory response. The effectiveness of ultra-micronized palmitoylethanolamide (PEA-um) during the earliest stage of COVID-19 has already been suggested. In this study, we evaluated its protective effects as well as the effectiveness of its congener, 2-pentadecyl-2-oxazoline (PEA-OXA), using in vitro models of acute lung injury. In detail, human lung epithelial cells (A549) activated by polyinosinic–polycytidylic acid (poly-(I:C)) or Transforming Growth Factor-beta (TGF-β) were treated with PEA-OXA or PEA. The release of IL-6 and the appearance of Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) were measured by ELISA and immunofluorescence assays, respectively. A possible mechanism of action for PEA-OXA and PEA was also investigated. Our results showed that both PEA-OXA and PEA were able to counteract poly-(I:C)-induced IL-6 release, as well as to revert TGF-β-induced EMT. In addition, PEA was able to produce an “entourage” effect on the levels of the two endocannabinoids AEA and 2-AG, while PEA-OXA only increased PEA endogenous levels, in poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells. These results evidence for the first time the superiority of PEA-OXA over PEA in exerting protective effects and point to PEA-OXA as a new promising candidate in the management of acute lung injury.

1. Introduction

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the most devastating condition of acute lung injury, characterized by pulmonary edema, severe hypoxemia and impaired ability to eliminate CO2, and represents one among the most challenging clinical disorders of critical care medicine with high mortality [1,2,3]. A wide spectrum of risk factors associated with ARDS, such as pneumonia, bacterial or viral infection, transfusion of blood components, trauma, acute pancreatitis and drug reaction, can cause direct or indirect acute lung injury [2]. Among viral infections the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has arisen as a new risk factor in as much as it can affect the lower respiratory tract by causing ARDS [4]. In particular, in the early stage of COVID-19, the first cells infected by SARS-CoV-2 are the nasal ciliated cells [5]. Successively, if innate or adaptive responses are not able to clear the virus, the latter can spread from the nasal cavity to the lung via inhalation and thus infect alveolar cells [6,7], causing a diffuse alveolar damage that might progress to ARDS. Patients with severe COVID-19 exhibit systemic hyper-inflammation characterized by a cytokine storm, including an excessive release of pro-inflammatory mediators, such as interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) [8], which in turn is responsible for ARDS. In addition, in the lungs of patients with severe COVID-19 the expansion of fibroblasts, which determines a degree of fibrosis that increases over the course of the disease [8], was found, causing or worsening lung injury and failure.
Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), originally identified in egg yolk and subsequently in a wide variety of food sources, is highly recognized as an endogenous bioactive lipid, given its presence in most cells and tissues, from both animals and humans [9]. PEA is synthesized “on demand” in conditions of current or potential damage and is endowed with anti-inflammatory, analgesic and neuroprotective properties [10], which are mediated by several molecular and cellular mechanisms. One of these is the Autacoid Local Inflammation Antagonism (ALIA), through which PEA downregulates the degranulation of mast cells [11]. PEA is known to directly activate the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- (PPAR-α) [12] and the orphan G-protein-coupled receptor 55 (GPR55) [13] or to indirectly activate the cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 [14,15] and the transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) [16,17,18]. The indirect interaction of PEA with cannabinoid and vanilloid receptors is known as the “entourage effect”, since it is due to PEA increasing the levels of the endocannabinoids and endovanilloids, i.e., anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoyl-glycerol (2-AG). The effect depends upon the inhibition or down-regulation of the AEA-hydrolyzing enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) [14] or the stimulation of the activity of the biosynthesizing enzyme diacylglycerol lipase (DAGL) [15]. PEA tissue concentrations are altered during different neuro-inflammatory disorders, suggesting that (i) increased levels might represent a compensatory mechanism to restore homeostasis, while (ii) decreased levels might contribute to the etiology of the disease [9,10,19]. For these reasons, the exogenous application of PEA could be required to potentiate the endogenous protective mechanisms, when the endogenous production of PEA is insufficient o lacking [20,21].
Recently, a natural congener of PEA, 2-pentadecyl-2-oxazoline (PEA-OXA), identified in both green and roasted coffee beans [22], has been reported to have anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive properties in an experimental model of acute inflammatory pain [23], to reduce neuroinflammation in an experimental model of Parkinson’s disease [24] and to exert neuroprotective effects in different neuroinflammatory conditions associated with spinal and brain trauma in mice [25]. It has been hypothesized that PEA-OXA could exert its protective role by inhibiting the enzyme responsible for PEA catabolism, N-acyl-ethanolamine-hydrolyzing acid amidase (NAAA), resulting in an increase in the endogenous levels of PEA [23].
Therefore, given the ability of PEA and its congener PEA-OXA to exert important anti-inflammatory and protective effects, the present work aimed to investigate their potential effectiveness in in vitro models of acute lung injury, reproducing the clinical conditions of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In particular, this study was based on two currently well-established facts, i.e., i) IL-6 is a key contributor of the cytokine storm observed in SARS-CoV-2 infection-associated hyperinflammation and multiorgan failure [8,26], suggesting that this cytokine is a promising marker and an efficacious therapeutic target for the treatment of COVID-19 [26,27]; and ii) ultramicronized PEA (PEA-um) is a promising adjuvant to be assumed in the earliest stage of COVID-19, since a reduction in the inflammatory state has been demonstrated both in cultured murine alveolar macrophages activated by the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein [28] and in a randomized clinical trial [29] carried out with this formulation of PEA.
To achieve our objectives, here we used the human lung epithelial cell line A549 to reproduce: (i) a viral infection resulting in IL-6 cytokine release and (ii) Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) mechanisms resulting in lung fibrosis.

2. Materials and Methods

All reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milano, Italy) unless otherwise stated. Pentadecyl-2-oxazoline (PEA-OXA) and palmitoylethanolamide in an ultra-micronized formulation (referred to as PEA hereafter) were obtained from Epitech Group SpA (Saccolongo, Padova, Italy). Polyinosinic–polycytidylic acid (poly-(I:C)) was purchased from InvivoGen (Aurogene, Roma, Italy). 5′-Iodoresiniferatoxin (IRTX) and GW6471 were purchased from Tocris Bioscience (Space Import-Export, Milano, Italy). The deuterated standards—[2H]8-AEA, [2H]5-2-AG and [2H]4-PEA—were purchased from Cayman Chemical (Cabru, Arcore, Italy). The human lung epithelial cell line (A549) was purchased from LGC Standards (Milano, Italy). The human IL-6 ELISA Kit and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) were purchased from Abcam (Prodotti Gianni, Milano, Italy). Total mRNA was isolated from A549 cells using Trizol Reagent (Thermo Fisher, Milano, Italy) following the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA preparation from RNA was performed using iScript Reverse Transcription enzyme (Biorad, Milano, Italy). Specific primer sequences were designed using Primer3 Software (https://primer3.ut.ee/, accessed on 28 November 2022) and synthetized by Eurofin (Milano, Italy).

2.1. Cell Culture

A549 cells were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) complemented with penicillin (400 U mL−1), streptomycin (50 mg mL−1) and 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), in the presence of a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C, plated on 100 mm diameter Petri dishes.

2.2. Poly-(I:C)-Induced Inflammatory Response in A549 Cells

A549 cells were plated into 24-well culture dishes at a cell density of 2 × 105 cells per well for 1 day at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. After 1 day, A549 cells were stimulated with poly-(I:C) (100 μg mL−1) or vehicle (water) and incubated for 6 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells were treated with PEA-OXA (0.1, 1 and 10 µM), PEA (0.1, 1 and 10 μM) or vehicle (dimethyl sulfoxide or methanol, respectively) and incubated for the indicated time. Poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells were also treated with a TRPV1 antagonist, IRTX (0.1 μM), or PPAR-α antagonist, GW6471 (1 µM), in the presence or absence of PEA-OXA (10 µM) or PEA (10 μM) and incubated for the indicated time. After 6 h, the supernatants were collected, and the amounts of produced IL-6 were measured by using a human IL-6 ELISA kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Abcam) and by using a reader Glomax® Explorer (Promega, Milano, Italy). Data are expressed as picograms per milliliter of IL-6.

2.3. RNA Extraction and Quantitative PCR (qPCR)

Total RNA was isolated from A549 cells using TRIzol Reagent (cat# 15596018, Life Technologies, Milano, Italy) and reacted with DNase-I (cat# AMPD1, Merk, Milano, Italy) for 15 min at room temperature, followed by spectrophotometric quantification. Subsequently, the RNA integrity number (RIN) for each RNA sample was analyzed on an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Roma, Italy). Purified RNA was reverse-transcribed by the use of the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (cat# 1708841, Bio-Rad, Milano, Italy). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was carried out in a real-time PCR system CFX384 (Bio-Rad, Milano, Italy) using the SYBR Green PCR Kit (Cat# 1725274, Bio-Rad for mRNAs) detection technique and specific primer sequences (Table 1).
Quantitative PCR was performed on independent biological samples (n = 3). Each sample was amplified simultaneously in quadruplicate in a one-assay run with a nontemplate control blank for each primer pair to control for contamination or primer–dimer formation, and the cycle threshold (Ct) value for each experimental group was determined. The housekeeping gene ribosomal protein S16 was used to normalize the Ct values, using the 2−ΔCt formula.

2.4. Quantification by Liquid Chromatography–Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization–Mass Spectrometry (LC-APCI-MS) of the Endogenous AEA, 2-AG and PEA Levels in A549 Cells

A549 cells, plated in 6-well culture dishes at a cell density of 9 × 105 cells per well, were stimulated with poly-(I:C) (100 μg mL−1) or vehicle (water) and treated in the presence or absence of PEA-OXA (10 µM), PEA (10 µM) or vehicle (dimethyl sulfoxide and methanol, respectively) and incubated for 6 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. After 6 h, cells and supernatants were collected and homogenized in a solution of chloroform/methanol/Tris-HCl 50 mM, pH 7.4 (2:1:1 by vol.) containing 10 pmol of [2H]8-AEA and 50 pmol of [2H]5-2-AG and [2H]4-PEA as internal standards. The lipid-containing organic phase was dried, weighed and pre-purified by open-bed chromatography on silica gel. Fractions derived by eluting the column with a solution of chloroform/methanol (90:10 by vol) were analyzed by LC-APCI-MS by using a Shimadzu (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) apparatus (LC-10ADVP) coupled with a Shimadzu (LCMS-2020) quadrupole MS via a Shimadzu APCI interface. LC-APCI-MS analyses of AEA, 2-AG and PEA were performed in the selected ion-monitoring (SIM) mode [30,31], using m/z values of 356 and 348 (molecular ion + 1 for deuterated and undeuterated AEA), 384.35 and 379.35 (molecular ion + 1 for deuterated and undeuterated 2-AG), and 304 and 300 (molecular ion + 1 for deuterated and undeuterated PEA). The AEA, 2-AG and PEA levels were determined on the basis of their area ratio with the internal standard signal areas to provide the amounts in pmol mg–1 of the lipid extract.

2.5. TGF-β-Induced Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition in A549 Cells

A549 cells, harvested at 80% confluence and plated into 24-well culture dishes, were stimulated with TGF-β1 (2 ng mL−1) or vehicle (PBS) and incubated for 72 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. TGF-β-stimulated A549 cells were treated with PEA-OXA (10 µM), PEA (10 µM) or vehicle (dimethyl sulfoxide and methanol, respectively) and incubated for the indicated time. After 72 h, A549 cells were fixed with 70% ethanol/0.1% Triton for 30 min at 4 °C, treated with 5% BSA for 60 min at room temperature and then stained with primary antibodies, rabbit anti-human cytokeratin (clone ab9377, Abcam) and mouse anti-human vimentin V9 (clone ab8069, Abcam), overnight at 4 °C. The secondary antibodies, goat anti-rabbit Alexa fluor488 (Cell Signaling Technology Danvers, MA, USA) and goat anti-mouse Alexa fluor594 (Cell Signaling Technology Danvers, MA, USA), were incubated for 60 min at 4 °C, and DAPI (Sigma, Milano, Italy), used to stain the nucleus, was incubated for 7 min at room temperature. Appropriate isotype controls were used. The images were acquired with a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Milano, Italy) and AxionCam MRc5 (Zeiss, Milano, Italy).

2.6. Data Analysis

Each experiment was performed in at least 3–4 independent biological samples for each group. Data were expressed as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software version 9.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test was used for the analysis. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Figures were generated in GraphPad Prism software version 9.0.

3. Results

3.1. PEA-OXA and PEA Reduce Poly-(I:C)-Induced Release of Il-6 in Lung Epithelial Cells

A549 cells stimulated with poly-(I:C) (100 μg mL−1 for 6 h) and treated with the vehicle of PEA-OXA or PEA significantly released IL-6, as compared to vehicle-stimulated A549 cells (Figure 1). PEA-OXA and PEA, at the highest concentration tested (10 μM), reduced the release of IL-6 from poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells, as compared to poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells treated with the vehicle of PEA-OXA or PEA (Figure 1). PEA-OXA (10 μM) was more effective (1.6-fold) than PEA (10 μM) in reducing the release of IL-6 from poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells (53% and 33% of inhibition, respectively) (Figure 1). No effect on IL-6 release was observed when A549 cells were treated with PEA-OXA or PEA alone (0.1, 1 and 10 μM), i.e., in the absence of poly-(I:C), as compared to vehicle-treated A549 cells (Figure 1).

3.2. The Anti-Inflammatory Effect of PEA-OXA and PEA Is Not Reverted by Antagonism at the TRPV1 or PPAR-α Receptors in Lung Epithelial Cells

In untreated A549 cells, we a found robust mRNA expression of PPARα and a low relative mRNA expression of TRPV1 (Figure 2). Instead, no mRNA expression of CB2 was found in untreated A549 cells (Figure 2). Importantly, the highest mRNA expression levels in this cell line were found for NAAA (Figure 2).
When A549 cells were stimulated with poly-(I:C) (100 μg mL−1 for 6 h) and treated with a selective TRPV1 (IRTX, 0.1 µM) or PPAR-α (GW6471, 1 µM) receptor antagonist, IL-6 release was comparable to that observed in poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells treated with the vehicle (Figure 3a). When poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells were co-treated with PEA-OXA (10 μM) and IRTX (0.1 μM) or GW6271 (1 µM), IL-6 release was comparable to that observed in poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells treated with PEA-OXA (10 μM) (Figure 3a). Likewise, when poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells were co-treated with PEA (10 μM) and IRTX (0.1 μM) or GW6271 (1 µM), IL-6 release was comparable to that observed in poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells treated PEA (10 μM) (Figure 3b). No effect was observed on IL-6 release when A549 cells were treated with the antagonists alone, i.e., in the absence of poly-(I:C), as compared to vehicle-treated A549 cells (Figure 3a).

3.3. Effect of PEA and PEA-OXA Treatment on AEA, 2-AG and PEA Endogenous Levels, in Poly-(I:C)-Stimulated A549 Cells

When A549 cells were stimulated with poly-(I:C) under the same conditions shown above (100 μg mL−1 for 6 h), the endogenous levels of AEA, 2-AG and PEA did not change, as compared to those in A549 cells stimulated with vehicle (Figure 4). By contrast, when poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells were treated with PEA (10 μM), the endogenous levels of AEA and 2-AG were significantly increased by 4-fold and 1.5-fold, respectively, compared to those in poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells treated with the PEA vehicle (Figure 4b,c). In addition, the levels of PEA were significantly increased by 96-fold when poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells were treated with PEA (10 µM), as compared to those in poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells treated with the vehicle of PEA (Figure 4a). The endogenous levels of PEA were significantly increased by 18-fold when poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells were treated with PEA-OXA (10 µM), as compared to those in poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells treated with the vehicle of PEA-OXA (Figure 4a). No statistically significant variation in the endogenous levels of AEA and 2-AG was observed when poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells were treated with PEA-OXA (10 µM) (Figure 4a), compared to poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells treated with the PEA-OXA vehicle, although a trend towards the enhancement of the AEA levels was observed (Figure 4a).

3.4. PEA-OXA and PEA Block TGF-β-Induced Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition in Lung Epithelial Cells

We previously reported that A549 cells cultured in the absence of TGF-β1 maintain a classic epithelial morphology appearing short, spindle-shaped and triangle-shaped, whereas following incubation with TGF-β1 (2 ng mL−1) for 72 h, these cells assume an elongated shape, with many cells losing contact with their neighboring cells and displaying a long spindle shape typical of a fibroblast-like morphology, an effect known as Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) [32]. Consistent with these morphological observations, alterations in the expression and distribution of cytokeratin and vimentin were evidenced here by immunofluorescence assays. Indeed, these observations showed that, under the same experimental conditions, TGF-β1 induced the down-regulation of cytokeratin (Figure 5a, panels B and T; Figure 5b) and the up-regulation of vimentin (Figure 5a, panels H and T; Figure 5c), when compared to vehicle-incubated A549 cells (Figure 5a, panels A, G and S; Figure 5b,c). Treatment of TGF-β1-incubated A549 cells with PEA-OXA (10 µM) or PEA (10 µM) reverted the down-regulation of cytokeratin (Figure 5a, panels C, U, D and V; Figure 5b) and the up-regulation of vimentin (Figure 5a, panels I, U, J and V; Figure 5c). No cell alteration in the expression and distribution of cytokeratin and vimentin was evidenced by immunofluorescence assay when A549 cells were treated with PEA-OXA (10 µM) alone (Figure 5a, panels E, K and W; Figure 5b,c), i.e., in the absence of TGF-β1, as compared to vehicle-treated A549 cells (Figure 5a, panels A, G and S; Figure 5b,c). Likewise, no cell alteration in the expression and distribution of vimentin was evidenced by immunofluorescence assay when A549 cells were treated with PEA (10 µM) alone (Figure 5a, panels L and X; Figure 5c), as compared to vehicle-treated A549 cells (Figure 5a, panels G and S; Figure 5c). Instead, PEA (10 µM) alone showed a per se effect on the expression and distribution of cytokeratin (Figure 5a, panels F and X; Figure 5b), as compared to vehicle-treated A549 cells (Figure 5a, panels A and S; Figure 5b).

4. Discussion

Since the effectiveness of ultra-micronized PEA i) in attenuating acute lung inflammation, reducing immune cell infiltration and cytokine release in an acute lung injury model induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [33] and ii) in inhibiting the pro-inflammatory response activated by SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in cultured murine alveolar macrophages has been already demonstrated [28], in this study we investigated for the first time if PEA-OXA, a congener of PEA endowed with anti-inflammatory activity [23], could be as effective as PEA in counteracting the IL-6 production and lung cell failure typical of COVID-19. For this purpose, we used two different in vitro models of acute lung injury. In the first in vitro model, we used a human lung epithelial cell line (A549) activated by a stable synthetic double-stranded RNA (poly-(I:C)) that can bind to toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) with high affinity [34] to stimulate the pathophysiological viral disease state and reproduce the cell signaling pathways typical of the cytokine storm in terms of IL-6 overproduction. Our results demonstrated that both PEA-OXA and PEA were able to counteract IL-6 release induced by poly-(I:C) in A549 cells. Interestingly, PEA-OXA resulted to be more efficacious than PEA (at the same concentration tested and in terms of percent of the effect of poly-(I:C) alone) at counteracting poly-(I:C)-induced IL-6 cytokine release. It is possible that PEA-OXA exerts a stronger protective effect against IL-6 than PEA because it might act through a dual mechanism of action, both PEA-mediated and PEA-independent. In fact, we also investigated the mechanism of action through which PEA-OXA and PEA could exert their anti-inflammatory effects in A549 cells. Our results indicated that the inhibitory effect of PEA-OXA and PEA on poly-(I:C)-induced IL-6 cytokine release was not reverted by an antagonism at TRPV1 and PPAR-α receptors, although these receptors, and particularly the latter one, were strongly expressed in A549 cells. This suggests a non- TRPV1- and non-PPAR-α-mediated mechanism for the actions of the two molecules. Therefore, we investigated the ability of PEA-OXA and PEA to modulate the endogenous levels of endocannabinoids (AEA and 2-AG), as well as, in the case of PEA-OXA, the endogenous levels of PEA, in poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells. Our results confirmed the existence of an “entourage” effect of PEA on the endogenous levels of 2-AG [15] and demonstrated for the first time the ability of PEA to also increase the endogenous levels of AEA in an inflammatory condition. In addition, we confirmed the ability of PEA-OXA to increase the endogenous levels of PEA in inflammatory conditions, an effect that might be exerted by inhibiting the enzyme responsible for PEA degradation (i.e. NAAA) [23]. In line with this hypothesis, we found a strong mRNA expression of NAAA in untreated A549 cells. This finding was not surprising, since NAAA is known to be abundantly expressed in lung cells and tissues [35]. Intriguingly, despite the fact that PEA-OXA significantly (18-fold) elevated the endogenous levels of PEA, this was not sufficient for this compound to also trigger the elevation of the endocannabinoid levels, suggesting that the elevation of PEA cellular levels beyond a certain threshold is necessary to induce an “entourage” effect. Indeed, and not surprisingly, exogenous PEA administration to the cells caused a much higher elevation of the cellular PEA levels (96-fold) than PEA-OXA at the same concentration. These results, taken together, suggest that the anti-inflammatory effects of PEA-OXA and PEA may be partially mediated by bioactive endogenous lipids (i.e., endocannabinoids in the case of PEA, and PEA in the case of PEA-OXA). Further studies will be needed to further clarify the mechanism(s) of the anti-inflammatory actions described for PEA and PEA-OXA in lung cells.
In the second in vitro model, we used A549 cells activated by TGF-β in order to reproduce the lung fibrosis that is a critical feature of chronic lung diseases and a serious complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In particular, TGF-β modulates lung tissue morphogenesis and differentiation by inducing the development of EMT, an important cellular process in chronic respiratory diseases. Our results suggest that following exposure to TGF-β, A549 cells acquire a fibroblast-like morphology characterized by a decrease of the epithelial marker expression and an increase of the mesenchymal marker expression. The immunofluorescence analysis showed the presence of EMT, characterized by a reduction in cytokeratin-positive staining and an increase in vimentin-positive staining, which was inhibited by the treatment with both PEA-OXA and PEA. These results are in agreement with previous data, in which ultra-micronized PEA inhibited the inflammation response and lung fibrosis in mice subjected to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [36].

5. Conclusions

In summary, in this study we reported for the first time the protective effects of PEA-OXA and PEA in counteracting the inflammatory response induced by poly-(I:C), as well as in reverting the fibrosis induced by TGF-β. Our results also evidence a greater effectiveness of PEA-OXA over PEA and point to PEA-OXA as a new and promising candidate in the management of acute lung injury caused by conditions induced by a cytokine storm.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S.M., V.D. and S.P.; methodology, G.R., M.A., R.C. and R.V.; formal analysis, F.A.I., A.S.M. and S.P.; investigation, A.S.M., F.R., F.A.I. and S.P.; data curation, S.P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.M., F.R. and S.P.; writing—review and editing, V.D. and S.P.; supervision, V.D. and S.P.; project administration, S.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable for studies not involving humans or animals.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable here.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Francesco Della Valle for his foresight, excellent and invaluable contribution to scientific research, opening new perspectives from pharmacological research to the pharmaceutical industry. S.P. also dedicates this work to the memory of her beloved mother who died of COVID-19.

Conflicts of Interest

A.S.M., M.A. and S.P. are employees of the Epitech Group SpA. S.P. and V.D. are co-inventors on patents on Adelmidrol and/or PEA, respectively, which are unrelated to the present study. The other authors declare no other conflict of interest.

References

  1. Su, C.-F.; Kao, S.J.; Chen, H.I. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Lung Injury: Pathogenetic Mechanism and Therapeutic Implication. World J. Crit. Care Med. 2012, 1, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rezoagli, E.; Fumagalli, R.; Bellani, G. Definition and Epidemiology of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Ann. Transl. Med. 2017, 5, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Gragossian, A.; Siuba, M.T. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Emerg. Med. Clin. North Am. 2022, 40, 459–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Khodadadi, H.; Salles, É.L.; Jarrahi, A.; Chibane, F.; Costigliola, V.; Yu, J.C.; Vaibhav, K.; Hess, D.C.; Dhandapani, K.M.; Baban, B. Cannabidiol Modulates Cytokine Storm in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Induced by Simulated Viral Infection Using Synthetic RNA. Cannabi. annabinoid. Res. 2020, 5, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ahn, J.H.; Kim, J.; Hong, S.P.; Choi, S.Y.; Yang, M.J.; Ju, Y.S.; Kim, Y.T.; Kim, H.M.; Rahman, M.D.T.; Chung, M.K.; et al. Nasal Ciliated Cells Are Primary Targets for SARS-CoV-2 Replication in the Early Stage of COVID-19. J. Clin. Invest. 2021, 131, 148517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hou, Y.J.; Okuda, K.; Edwards, C.E.; Martinez, D.R.; Asakura, T.; Dinnon, K.H.; Kato, T.; Lee, R.E.; Yount, B.L.; Mascenik, T.M.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Reverse Genetics Reveals a Variable Infection Gradient in the Respiratory Tract. Cell 2020, 182, 429–446.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Justet, A.; Zhao, A.Y.; Kaminski, N. From COVID to Fibrosis: Lessons from Single-Cell Analyses of the Human Lung. Hum. Genomics 2022, 16, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lamers, M.M.; Haagmans, B.L. SARS-CoV-2 Pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022, 20, 270–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Petrosino, S.; Schiano Moriello, A. Palmitoylethanolamide: A Nutritional Approach to Keep Neuroinflammation within Physiological Boundaries-A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Petrosino, S.; Di Marzo, V. The Pharmacology of Palmitoylethanolamide and First Data on the Therapeutic Efficacy of Some of Its New Formulations. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 174, 1349–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aloe, L.; Leon, A.; Levi-Montalcini, R. A Proposed Autacoid Mechanism Controlling Mastocyte Behaviour. Agents Actions 1993, 39 Spec. No., C145–C147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lo Verme, J.; Fu, J.; Astarita, G.; La Rana, G.; Russo, R.; Calignano, A.; Piomelli, D. The Nuclear Receptor Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Alpha Mediates the Anti-Inflammatory Actions of Palmitoylethanolamide. Mol. Pharmacol. 2005, 67, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ryberg, E.; Larsson, N.; Sjögren, S.; Hjorth, S.; Hermansson, N.-O.; Leonova, J.; Elebring, T.; Nilsson, K.; Drmota, T.; Greasley, P.J. The Orphan Receptor GPR55 Is a Novel Cannabinoid Receptor. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 152, 1092–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Di Marzo, V.; Melck, D.; Orlando, P.; Bisogno, T.; Zagoory, O.; Bifulco, M.; Vogel, Z.; De Petrocellis, L. Palmitoylethanolamide Inhibits the Expression of Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase and Enhances the Anti-Proliferative Effect of Anandamide in Human Breast Cancer Cells. Biochem. J. 2001, 358, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Petrosino, S.; Schiano Moriello, A.; Verde, R.; Allarà, M.; Imperatore, R.; Ligresti, A.; Mahmoud, A.M.; Peritore, A.F.; Iannotti, F.A.; Di Marzo, V. Palmitoylethanolamide Counteracts Substance P-Induced Mast Cell Activation in Vitro by Stimulating Diacylglycerol Lipase Activity. J. Neuroinflamm. 2019, 16, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Ho, W.-S.V.; Barrett, D.A.; Randall, M.D. “Entourage” Effects of N-Palmitoylethanolamide and N-Oleoylethanolamide on Vasorelaxation to Anandamide Occur through TRPV1 Receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 155, 837–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. De Petrocellis, L.; Davis, J.B.; Di Marzo, V. Palmitoylethanolamide Enhances Anandamide Stimulation of Human Vanilloid VR1 Receptors. FEBS Lett. 2001, 506, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Petrosino, S.; Schiano Moriello, A.; Cerrato, S.; Fusco, M.; Puigdemont, A.; De Petrocellis, L.; Di Marzo, V. The Anti-Inflammatory Mediator Palmitoylethanolamide Enhances the Levels of 2-Arachidonoyl-Glycerol and Potentiates Its Actions at TRPV1 Cation Channels. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 173, 1154–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Iannotti, F.A.; Di Marzo, V.; Petrosino, S. Endocannabinoids and Endocannabinoid-Related Mediators: Targets, Metabolism and Role in Neurological Disorders. Prog. Lipid Res. 2016, 62, 107–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Skaper, S.D.; Di Marzo, V. Endocannabinoids in Nervous System Health and Disease: The Big Picture in a Nutshell. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 2012, 367, 3193–3200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Skaper, S.D.; Facci, L. Mast Cell-Glia Axis in Neuroinflammation and Therapeutic Potential of the Anandamide Congener Palmitoylethanolamide. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2012, 367, 3312–3325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Impellizzeri, D.; Cordaro, M.; Bruschetta, G.; Crupi, R.; Pascali, J.; Alfonsi, D.; Marcolongo, G.; Cuzzocrea, S. 2-Pentadecyl-2-Oxazoline: Identification in Coffee, Synthesis and Activity in a Rat Model of Carrageenan-Induced Hindpaw Inflammation. Pharmacol. Res. 2016, 108, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Petrosino, S.; Campolo, M.; Impellizzeri, D.; Paterniti, I.; Allarà, M.; Gugliandolo, E.; D’Amico, R.; Siracusa, R.; Cordaro, M.; Esposito, E.; et al. 2-Pentadecyl-2-Oxazoline, the Oxazoline of Pea, Modulates Carrageenan-Induced Acute Inflammation. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Cordaro, M.; Siracusa, R.; Crupi, R.; Impellizzeri, D.; Peritore, A.F.; D’Amico, R.; Gugliandolo, E.; Di Paola, R.; Cuzzocrea, S. 2-Pentadecyl-2-Oxazoline Reduces Neuroinflammatory Environment in the MPTP Model of Parkinson Disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018, 55, 9251–9266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Impellizzeri, D.; Cordaro, M.; Bruschetta, G.; Siracusa, R.; Crupi, R.; Esposito, E.; Cuzzocrea, S. N-Palmitoylethanolamine-Oxazoline as a New Therapeutic Strategy to Control Neuroinflammation: Neuroprotective Effects in Experimental Models of Spinal Cord and Brain Injury. J. Neurotrauma 2017, 34, 2609–2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Aliyu, M.; Zohora, F.T.; Anka, A.U.; Ali, K.; Maleknia, S.; Saffarioun, M.; Azizi, G. Interleukin-6 Cytokine: An Overview of the Immune Regulation, Immune Dysregulation, and Therapeutic Approach. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2022, 111, 109130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rezaei Tolzali, M.M.; Noori, M.; Shokri, P.; Rahmani, S.; Khanzadeh, S.; Nejadghaderi, S.A.; Fazlollahi, A.; Sullman, M.J.M.; Singh, K.; Kolahi, A.-A.; et al. Efficacy of Tocilizumab in the Treatment of COVID-19: An Umbrella Review. Rev. Med. Virol. 2022, e2388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Del Re, A.; Corpetti, C.; Pesce, M.; Seguella, L.; Steardo, L.; Palenca, I.; Rurgo, S.; De Conno, B.; Sarnelli, G.; Esposito, G. Ultramicronized Palmitoylethanolamide Inhibits NLRP3 Inflammasome Expression and Pro-Inflammatory Response Activated by SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein in Cultured Murine Alveolar Macrophages. Metabolites 2021, 11, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Albanese, M.; Marrone, G.; Paolino, A.; Di Lauro, M.; Di Daniele, F.; Chiaramonte, C.; D’Agostini, C.; Romani, A.; Cavaliere, A.; Guerriero, C.; et al. Effects of Ultramicronized Palmitoylethanolamide (Um-PEA) in COVID-19 Early Stages: A Case-Control Study. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Di Marzo, V.; Goparaju, S.K.; Wang, L.; Liu, J.; Bátkai, S.; Járai, Z.; Fezza, F.; Miura, G.I.; Palmiter, R.D.; Sugiura, T.; et al. Leptin-Regulated Endocannabinoids Are Involved in Maintaining Food Intake. Nature 2001, 410, 822–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Marsicano, G.; Wotjak, C.T.; Azad, S.C.; Bisogno, T.; Rammes, G.; Cascio, M.G.; Hermann, H.; Tang, J.; Hofmann, C.; Zieglgänsberger, W.; et al. The Endogenous Cannabinoid System Controls Extinction of Aversive Memories. Nature 2002, 418, 530–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Riemma, M.A.; Cerqua, I.; Romano, B.; Irollo, E.; Bertolino, A.; Camerlingo, R.; Granato, E.; Rea, G.; Scala, S.; Terlizzi, M.; et al. Sphingosine-1-Phosphate/TGF-β Axis Drives Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition in Asthma-like Disease. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2022, 179, 1753–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Peritore, A.F.; D’Amico, R.; Siracusa, R.; Cordaro, M.; Fusco, R.; Gugliandolo, E.; Genovese, T.; Crupi, R.; Di Paola, R.; Cuzzocrea, S.; et al. Management of Acute Lung Injury: Palmitoylethanolamide as a New Approach. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Stowell, N.C.; Seideman, J.; Raymond, H.A.; Smalley, K.A.; Lamb, R.J.; Egenolf, D.D.; Bugelski, P.J.; Murray, L.A.; Marsters, P.A.; Bunting, R.A.; et al. Long-Term Activation of TLR3 by Poly(I:C) Induces Inflammation and Impairs Lung Function in Mice. Respir. Res. 2009, 10, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tsuboi, K.; Takezaki, N.; Ueda, N. The N-Acylethanolamine-Hydrolyzing Acid Amidase (NAAA). Chem. Biodivers. 2007, 4, 1914–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Di Paola, R.; Impellizzeri, D.; Fusco, R.; Cordaro, M.; Siracusa, R.; Crupi, R.; Esposito, E.; Cuzzocrea, S. Ultramicronized Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA-Um(®)) in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Pharmacol. Res. 2016, 111, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomolecules 13 00033 g001 550
Figure 1. PEA-OXA and PEA reduce IL-6 release from poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells. (a) IL-6 release was measured after stimulation of A549 cells with poly-(I:C) (100 μg mL−1) in the presence or absence of PEA-OXA (0.1, 1 and 10 μM) for 6 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere; (b) IL-6 release was measured after stimulation of A549 cells with poly-(I:C) (100 μg mL−1) in the presence or absence of PEA (0.1, 1 and 10 μM) for 6 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Each bar shows the mean ± SEM of independent experiments (n = 4). p-values were determined by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. **** p < 0.0001 and * p < 0.05.
Figure 1. PEA-OXA and PEA reduce IL-6 release from poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells. (a) IL-6 release was measured after stimulation of A549 cells with poly-(I:C) (100 μg mL−1) in the presence or absence of PEA-OXA (0.1, 1 and 10 μM) for 6 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere; (b) IL-6 release was measured after stimulation of A549 cells with poly-(I:C) (100 μg mL−1) in the presence or absence of PEA (0.1, 1 and 10 μM) for 6 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Each bar shows the mean ± SEM of independent experiments (n = 4). p-values were determined by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. **** p < 0.0001 and * p < 0.05.
Biomolecules 13 00033 g001
Biomolecules 13 00033 g002 550
Figure 2. mRNA expression levels of PEA targets (PPARα, TRPV1, CB2) and PEA-catabolizing enzyme (NAAA) in A549 cells. Bar chart with individual points showing the mRNA expression levels of the indicated proteins (PPARα, TRPV1, CB2 and NAAA) measured in A549 cells. Each bar shows the mean ± SEM of 3 independent biological samples. Data are expressed using the 2−Δct formula.
Figure 2. mRNA expression levels of PEA targets (PPARα, TRPV1, CB2) and PEA-catabolizing enzyme (NAAA) in A549 cells. Bar chart with individual points showing the mRNA expression levels of the indicated proteins (PPARα, TRPV1, CB2 and NAAA) measured in A549 cells. Each bar shows the mean ± SEM of 3 independent biological samples. Data are expressed using the 2−Δct formula.
Biomolecules 13 00033 g002
Biomolecules 13 00033 g003 550
Figure 3. TRPV1 and PPAR-α antagonists do not revert the anti-inflammatory effect of PEA-OXA and PEA in poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells. (a) IL-6 release was measured after that A549 cells were stimulated with poly-(I:C) (100 μg mL−1) and treated with IRTX (0.1 μM) or GW6471 (1 µM) in the presence or absence of PEA-OXA (10 μM), for 6 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere; (b) IL-6 release was measured after A549 cells were stimulated with poly-(I:C) (100 μg mL−1) and treated with IRTX (0.1 μM) or GW6471 (1 µM) in the presence or absence of PEA (10 μM), for 6 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Each bar shows the mean ± SEM of independent experiments (n = 4). The p-values were determined by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. **** p < 0.0001 and * p < 0.05.
Figure 3. TRPV1 and PPAR-α antagonists do not revert the anti-inflammatory effect of PEA-OXA and PEA in poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells. (a) IL-6 release was measured after that A549 cells were stimulated with poly-(I:C) (100 μg mL−1) and treated with IRTX (0.1 μM) or GW6471 (1 µM) in the presence or absence of PEA-OXA (10 μM), for 6 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere; (b) IL-6 release was measured after A549 cells were stimulated with poly-(I:C) (100 μg mL−1) and treated with IRTX (0.1 μM) or GW6471 (1 µM) in the presence or absence of PEA (10 μM), for 6 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Each bar shows the mean ± SEM of independent experiments (n = 4). The p-values were determined by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. **** p < 0.0001 and * p < 0.05.
Biomolecules 13 00033 g003
Biomolecules 13 00033 g004 550
Figure 4. Variation of the levels of PEA, AEA and 2-AG in poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells treated with PEA and PEA-OXA. PEA (a), AEA (b) and 2-AG (c) levels were quantified by LC–MS; after that, A549 cells were stimulated with poly-(I:C) (100 μg mL−1) in the presence or absence of PEA (10 μM) and PEA-OXA (10 μM) for 6 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Each bar shows the mean ± SEM of independent experiments (n = 3). The p-values were determined by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. **** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001 and * p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Variation of the levels of PEA, AEA and 2-AG in poly-(I:C)-stimulated A549 cells treated with PEA and PEA-OXA. PEA (a), AEA (b) and 2-AG (c) levels were quantified by LC–MS; after that, A549 cells were stimulated with poly-(I:C) (100 μg mL−1) in the presence or absence of PEA (10 μM) and PEA-OXA (10 μM) for 6 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Each bar shows the mean ± SEM of independent experiments (n = 3). The p-values were determined by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. **** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001 and * p < 0.05.
Biomolecules 13 00033 g004
Biomolecules 13 00033 g005 550
Figure 5. TGF-β1-induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition in A549 cells as evidenced by immunofluorescence approaches is avoided by the treatment with PEA-OXA or PEA. (a) Immunofluorescence staining was examined for the following markers: cytokeratin, an epithelial marker (green fluorescence, panels A–F), and vimentin, a mesenchymal marker (red fluorescence, panels G–L). DAPI staining was included to visualize the cell nucleus (blue fluorescence, panels M–R). In the merged images the co-expression and co-distribution of the markers are visualized (panels S–X). Quantifications of cytokeratin (b) and vimentin (c). The cells were captured with a 40 × microscope objective (Bar = 20 µm). Each bar shows the mean ± SEM of independent experiments (n = 3). The p-values were determined by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. **** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05.
Figure 5. TGF-β1-induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition in A549 cells as evidenced by immunofluorescence approaches is avoided by the treatment with PEA-OXA or PEA. (a) Immunofluorescence staining was examined for the following markers: cytokeratin, an epithelial marker (green fluorescence, panels A–F), and vimentin, a mesenchymal marker (red fluorescence, panels G–L). DAPI staining was included to visualize the cell nucleus (blue fluorescence, panels M–R). In the merged images the co-expression and co-distribution of the markers are visualized (panels S–X). Quantifications of cytokeratin (b) and vimentin (c). The cells were captured with a 40 × microscope objective (Bar = 20 µm). Each bar shows the mean ± SEM of independent experiments (n = 3). The p-values were determined by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. **** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05.
Biomolecules 13 00033 g005
Table
Table 1. List of primer sequences used in the qPCR analysis.
Table 1. List of primer sequences used in the qPCR analysis.
geneForward (5′–3′)Reverse (5′–3′)
CNR2TAGTGCTGAGAGGACCCACGCTATCCACCTTCCTACAA
TRPV1CTGCCCGACCATCACAGTCCTGCGATCATAGAGCCTGAGG
PPARαTTCGCAATCCATCGGCGAGCCACAGGATAAGTCACCGAGG
NAAATGACAGTGGATGTGCAATTCTTGCCTTTATCTCGTTCATCACCAG
S16TCGGACGCAAGAAGACAGCGAAGCGTGCGCGGCTCAATCAT
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schiano Moriello, A.; Roviezzo, F.; Iannotti, F.A.; Rea, G.; Allarà, M.; Camerlingo, R.; Verde, R.; Di Marzo, V.; Petrosino, S. First Evidence of the Protective Effects of 2-Pentadecyl-2-Oxazoline (PEA-OXA) in In Vitro Models of Acute Lung Injury. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13010033

AMA Style

Schiano Moriello A, Roviezzo F, Iannotti FA, Rea G, Allarà M, Camerlingo R, Verde R, Di Marzo V, Petrosino S. First Evidence of the Protective Effects of 2-Pentadecyl-2-Oxazoline (PEA-OXA) in In Vitro Models of Acute Lung Injury. Biomolecules. 2023; 13(1):33. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13010033

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schiano Moriello, Aniello, Fiorentina Roviezzo, Fabio Arturo Iannotti, Giuseppina Rea, Marco Allarà, Rosa Camerlingo, Roberta Verde, Vincenzo Di Marzo, and Stefania Petrosino. 2023. "First Evidence of the Protective Effects of 2-Pentadecyl-2-Oxazoline (PEA-OXA) in In Vitro Models of Acute Lung Injury" Biomolecules 13, no. 1: 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13010033

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop