Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Mandibular Condyle Morphologic Relation before and after Orthognathic Surgery in Class II and III Malocclusion Patients Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
Next Article in Special Issue
Correction: Torres et al. Twentieth-Century Paleoproteomics: Lessons from Venta Micena Fossils. Biology 2022, 11, 1184
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Mechanism of Blood Pressure Regulation through the Atrial Natriuretic Peptide
Previous Article in Special Issue
Using Macro- and Microscale Preservation in Vertebrate Fossils as Predictors for Molecular Preservation in Fluvial Environments
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/biology11091352
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dental Paleobiology in a Juvenile Neanderthal (Combe-Grenal, Southwestern France)

by
María Dolores Garralda
1,*,
Steve Weiner
2,
Baruch Arensburg
3,
Bruno Maureille
4 and
Bernard Vandermeersch
4
1
Departamento de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución, Facultad de CC. Biológicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
2
Department of Chemical and Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, 234 Herzl Street, Rehovot 76100, Israel
3
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv 39040, Israel
4
University Bordeaux, CNRS, MC, PACEA UMR5199, F-33600 Pessac, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2022, 11(9), 1352; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11091352
Submission received: 1 August 2022 / Revised: 5 September 2022 / Accepted: 9 September 2022 / Published: 14 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Paleontology in the 21st Century)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Numerous prehistoric sites in Europe and the Near East provided bones and dental remains of the populations of the past. One of them is the Combe-Grenal Cave (SW France), where fossils of children and adults represent the Neanderthals who lived there more than 60 ky ago, during a harsh period of the last glaciation. In this paper, we analyze a sample of the tartar of a juvenile individual. The numerous bacteria forming the plaque are compared to those of one adult from Israel, Kebara 2, revealing the differences between the most common bacteria in a young and an older individual, probably because of their immunological systems, and the different living conditions of the human groups they represented.

Abstract

Combe-Grenal site (Southwest France) was excavated by F. Bordes between 1953 and 1965. He found several human remains in Mousterian levels 60, 39, 35 and especially 25, corresponding to MIS 4 (~75–70/60 ky BP) and with Quina Mousterian lithics. One of the fossils found in level 25 is Combe-Grenal IV, consisting of a fragment of the left corpus of a juvenile mandible. This fragment displays initial juvenile periodontitis, and the two preserved teeth (LLP4 and LLM1) show moderate attrition and dental calculus. The SEM tartar analysis demonstrates the presence of cocci and filamentous types of bacteria, the former being more prevalent. This result is quite different from those obtained for the two adult Neanderthals Kebara 2 and Subalyuk 1, where more filamentous bacteria appear, especially in the Subalyuk 1 sample from Central Europe. These findings agree with the available biomedical data on periodontitis and tartar development in extant individuals, despite the different environmental conditions and diets documented by numerous archeological, taphonomical and geological data available on Neanderthals and present-day populations. New metagenomic analyses are extending this information, and despite the inherent difficulties, they will open important perspectives in studying this ancient human pathology.

1. Introduction

The Combe-Grenal site is located east of the Domme village (Dordogne), on the right side of the valley of a small Dordogne dried river. The site, facing south-west, corresponds to a probably very deep and large rock-shelter, naturally formed within Cogniacian limestone. Only a small part of the rock-shelter remains, preserving only a narrow and very small cave at its northeastern angle. Such geomorphology describes the site name “grotte de Combe-Grenal” since at least 1817. Combe-Grenal rock-shelter was first excavated by D. Peyrony in 1929, who identified three Mousterians layers, but the most important investigations were those led by F. Bordes, between 1953 and 1965 [1,2,3,4]. Since 2014, new scientific fieldwork is in progress under the direction of J.-Ph. Faivre (PACEA, Bordeaux).
Considering human fossil remains, several pieces were found by Bordes in Mousterian levels 60, 39, 35 and 25. Geological and faunal studies conducted by Guadeli and Laville [5] attribute level 60 to MIS 6, level 39 to MIS 5a, while levels 35 to 25 are related to MIS 4. Most of the Combe-Grenal fossils (those from layers 35, and especially 25, should be placed chronologically at the beginning of MIS 4 (~70 to 60 ky) and assigned to its coldest period (~70 to 65 ky). Paleoenvironmental and chronostratigraphic data document climatic changes toward colder conditions, first humid and later increasingly drier, as well as a progression of the open Arctic milieu fauna, confirming the cold and harsh environment in which people then lived [5].
The anthropological fossils found at Combe-Grenal were the objects of detailed morpho-anatomical descriptions and analyses [6,7,8,9]. The whole sample is presently preserved at the Musée National de Préhistoire at Les Eyzies (Southwestern France).
Most of the remains were found in level 25, where several young adult males and females (MNI ~8) of different ages were identified [6]. Bordes’ unpublished data demonstrate the dispersion of the fossils in several excavation grid squares, very close to one another, located at the center of the back part of the rock-shelter [6]. All the human fossils were fragmented and randomly mixed with abundant faunal remains and lithics. There were no traces of deliberate burials, but cut marks were identified on several fragments [6,7,9]. Morphological and anatomical analyses of the Combe-Grenal fossils have led to their assignment to Neanderthals.
The aim of this contribution is the study of a tartar sample obtained from the mandibular fragment Combe-Grenal IV. We will briefly summarize the interest in dental calculus analyses, followed by the main morphological characteristics of the fossil, the oral pathology and the results of the tartar SEM analysis in comparison with the previously published data from other Neanderthals and new methods of analyses.

2. Brief Reminder of Tartar (Dental Calculus) Etiology

Tartar or dental calculus is a form of hardened dental plaque, caused by the precipitation of minerals from saliva and gingival crevicular fluid in the tooth’s plaque. Such a process kills the bacterial cells within the dental plaque, forming a rough and hardened surface ideal for further plaque formation, namely tartar [10].
Two types of dental calculus have been described. Supragingival tartar affects the gums along the gumline, while subgingival tartar forms within the narrow sulcus existing between the teeth and the gingiva [10]. Dental calculus formation is associated with several clinical manifestations, including receding gums and chronically inflamed gingiva.
According to Lang et al. [10], tartar is composed of both inorganic (mineral) and organic (cellular and extracellular matrix) components. The cells within the dental calculus are primarily bacterial, but also include at least one species of Archaea (usually called “cocci”) and several species of yeast. Trace amounts of dietary and environmental micro debris or plant DNA have also been found.
The processes of dental calculus formation are not well understood. Tartar forms in incremental layers, but the timing and triggering of these events are poorly understood and vary widely among individuals, probably related to age, gender, diet, etc. [10]. Supragingival tartar is more abundant on the buccal surfaces of the upper maxillary molars and the lingual surfaces of the mandibular molars, while subgingival tartar forms below the gumline and is typically dark in color due to the presence of black-pigmented bacteria.
Dental calculus has been described in animals (e.g., [11]) and documented in various human groups and individuals from Prehistory to present times. Sometimes, even if exceptional, tartar can be present as a very thick deposit, such as on the T15 individual from the Medieval cemetery from Clarensac (Gard, Southeastern France; [12,13]). Concerning human fossil teeth, unfortunately, in the past, many of them have been excessively cleaned, destroying and removing tartar deposits. However, we do have a few with preserved tartar deposits. This is the case for several Early Upper Pleistocene Neanderthals, whose analyses offer new data on their biology and expand the knowledge of their hunter–gatherer population behaviors.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Combe-Grenal IV is a fragment of the left side mandibular corpus corresponding to the upper part of the left mandibular body (Figure 1), ranging from the distal margin of the left lower second premolar (from here LLP3) alveolus to the mesial septum of the left lower second molar (LLM2; [6]). It preserves two lower teeth, the lower left second premolar (LLP4) and the first molar (LLM1), both with tartar deposits (Figure 1, red arrows) around the crowns and interproximal facets with the LLP3 and the LLM2 (both absent), which indicate that all four teeth had emerged and were functional.
On this mandibular fragment, Combe-Grenal IV, we can also observe the alveolus of the LLM2 (Figure 1C,D). It has highly visible osseous trabeculae, and the alveolar ridge is altered by gingivitis (Figure 1 blue arrows), indicating that the LLM2 had fully erupted and was functional long before the individual’s death, causing the distal interproximal facet on the LLM1. The LLP4 has the mesiodistal axis slightly oblique in comparison to that of the molar. The crown has traces of occlusal attrition (degree 1; [14]) and two interproximal facets, while the mesial one has a deep vertical sulcus [6].
Few age markers can be considered regarding this incomplete fossil, such as the close apex of the two preserved teeth (Figure 1E), their weak attrition (degree 1 from Murphy; [14]) or the small interproximal facet caused on the LLM1 distal side (Figure 1D) by the (absent) LLM2. It is possible to estimate the age at death of this individual by using the charts on dental eruption published for modern children, although they are based on samples with very different biological and environmental conditions. Thus, according to the Ubelaker [15] schemes and the AlQahtani et al. [16] atlas, the age was 15 ± 3 years and 15.5 years, respectively. Consequently, Combe-Grenal IV can be assigned to a juvenile individual.
The alveolar arch (Figure 1 green arrows) displays a slight degree of resorption and is separated from the tooth cement–enamel junction by 2.5/3.02 mm. The loss of osseous mass and the alveolar destruction can also be seen in the radiograph (Figure 1E), showing a pathology that seems to be the result of incipient periodontal disease. This slight exposure of roots, especially if we consider the lack of conjunctive tissue, varies between 1.0 and 1.5 mm in height [17]. Both preserved teeth on Combe-Grenal IV show supragingival tartar deposits (Figure 1 red arrows) forming a wide band around the crowns, separated by 5/7 mm from the alveolar margin. As in degree 2 on the Brothwell [18] scale, and, according to the classification of periodontal diseases [19], they correspond to stage I (early–mild) and nearly stage II (moderate).
Two pulp stones (pulpoliths) of different sizes (that rattle when shaking the fragment) also appear in the pulp chamber of those teeth (Figure 1E, yellow arrows). Such pathology has been documented in other Neanderthals, as in the case with Combe-Grenal X and 29 [6] and Kebara 2 [20,21].

3.2. Methods

A small sample of supragingival dental calculus was detached from the lingual surface of the Combe-Grenal IV LLM1 and processed for a scanning electron microscope study at the Weizmann Institute of Science at Rehovot (Israel).
We measured the bacteria directly from the micrographs, keeping in mind that these are only estimates. This is because we cannot know whether we are viewing the real length or diameter, given that they were partially embedded in the calcified matrix. The average dimensions were photographed in three pictures, with the different magnifications indicated in Table 1 and Table 2. We measured the bacteria appearing more complete (avoiding the empty cavities). Each crown measurement was repeated on three different days by two of the authors (S.W. and B.A.), and the inter- and intra-observer error between measurements was <4%.
On the obtained images, the bacteria identification and measurements were performed by Image Tools 3 “UTHSCA” analysis, and the results are expressed as means ± SE (standard error). The analyses included a breakdown and one-way ANOVA tests. The p-values indicated the post hoc significance levels for the respective pairs of means, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. The calculations were performed using the SPSS statistical package (1990) and the STATISTICA package (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OH, USA, 1995), and their results are given in Table 3.

4. Results

The two preserved teeth on Combe-Grenal IV, left LLP4 and LLM1, show supragingival dental calculus deposits (Figure 1 red arrows) forming a wide band around the crowns, separated 5/7 mm from the alveolar border, as in degree 2 on the Brothwell [18] scale and I/II of the recent classification [19].
On the surface of the Combe-Grenal IV tartar sample, fine crystal dental calculus deposits appear in the macro photographs at different magnifications. They reveal alternate layers running from the first calcified plaque directly covering the enamel surfaces to the outermost and final calcified layer, indicating various stages in the dental calculus formation of this individual. Magnifications of 3500 µm (Figure 2A), 10,000 µm (Figure 2B) and 20,000 µm (Figure 3A) clearly show both empty bacterial cavities and complete bacteria embedded in the calcified matrix. The bacteria present are cocci and filamentous types, although it is not possible to recognize the specific fossilized micro-organisms among the ~325 species that could be present in the oral cavity [22].
We used the SEM images to compare the distribution of these microbiotas in two different Neanderthal fossils: the juvenile Combe-Grenal IV and the adult male Kebara 2 (Israel), for which we have the analysis of a sample also from the calculus of his LLM1 [20].
As can be observed in Figure 3B, the Levantine fossil contains numerous cocci bacterial types [20], and rods are more frequent than in the young Combe-Grenal individual.
There are also some differences in the size of the identified bacteria between both individuals. In Table 1 and Table 2, the parameters corresponding to the length and diameter (in µm) of the bacteria in the compared fossils cited above are given. They were measured on the SEM microphotographs corresponding to the indicated numbers (Combe-Grenal IV: 304, 306, and 308; Kebara 2: 601, 603, and 606).
In Figure 4, the “Box and Whisker Plot” shows the differences obtained for the total dimensions of Combe-Grenal IV and Kebara 2 bacteria, with the former (Figure 4, left) corresponding to the diameter and the latter (Figure 4, right) to the length. On both graphs appear the mean values and the variation range of ± 1 and 1.96 standard errors. The differences between the total values obtained for both fossil individuals (Table 3) are statistically significant, particularly those comparing the diameters (p < 0.001), indicating larger dimensions of the bacterial flora on the adult male Kebara 2 than on the juvenile Combe-Grenal IV.
These results agree with the available information on the older adult Subalyuk 1 (Hungary), which—following Pap et al. [23]—shows the presence of more filamentous type bacteria than on Kebara 2 [20]. As their dimensions were not given, no statistical comparison with the other two Neanderthals can be made.

5. Discussion

Tartar, being a mineralized form of dental plaque adhering to the surface of the tooth, can be preserved, and the study of this durable material using SEM provides information on the microbial flora responsible for the periodontal disease of ancient hominid fossils. It is well known that the presence of periodontitis, in general, is the result of a dense accumulation of micro-organisms on the tooth surface and the host response (innate and acquired immunity) of each individual [24].
The most ancient case among hominids is that described by Ripamonti [25] on a juvenile Australopithecus. Concerning the Neanderthals, the publications on the bacteria found in the dental calculus of Kebara 2 [20,21], Subalyuk 1 [23] and the present paper demonstrate the rich oral flora present in ancient human populations.
The results of the tartar macroanalyses of these three Neanderthals, Combe-Grenal IV, Kebara 2 and Subalyuk 1, also indicate differences in the oral flora causing supragingival dental calculus and periodontitis among them. When interpreting these findings, it is important to consider not only the chronology and environment in which they lived, but also the individual’s age at death (more cocci on the juvenile) and the available data on diets. The latter is difficult to obtain when dealing with sites excavated long ago. Another influencing factor could be immunological differences between individuals, because each one of the three Neanderthals studied could have had different reactions to similar stress, illness or diet. This hypothesis is, however, impossible to verify.
As previously indicated, the three considered Neanderthals have similar antiquity, related to MIS 4 (both European fossils) or the beginning of MIS 3 (Kebara 2), meaning that they lived in a cold and dry environment, undoubtedly colder in Europe than in the Levant. In the case of Combe-Grenal level 25, where the studied fossil was found, sedimentological analyses indicate very cold and dry weather conditions with an open Arctic milieu fauna [5]. Layer 11 from Subalyuk Cave displayed similar conditions, according to Bartucz et al. [26]. In Kebara Cave, the analyses demonstrated that Unit XII (where the burial of the individual Kebara 2 appeared) was formed in a dry and cold environment, but not as extreme as that known for the European sites [27].
None of the three individuals under consideration have been analyzed to obtain the “carbon and nitrogen isotopic signature” used to evaluate aspects of the diet, but some data are available for other Neanderthals found, for example, in Scladina [28], Marillac [29], Vindija [30], Saint-Césaire [31,32], Jonzac [33] or Troisième caverne from Goyet [34]. The results obtained from these fossils indicate that animal tissue must have been a very important source of food, regardless of their different chronologies and environments (e.g., the reindeer so frequent in Marillac, and absent from the Kebara environment). Recently, Ca isotopes were used to assess aspects of the diet of the MIS 5 Neanderthal Regourdou 1 [35]. This study demonstrates the carnivore-like diet of the fossil and, also, the ingestion of a small percentage of bone, probably during the consumption of bone fat and red marrow.
The evaluation of the possible ingestion of vegetables in Paleolithic times is often difficult because of the absence of such remains in many sites, or the imitations imposed by the archeological data sets. Nevertheless, several well-documented excavations, such as those for the Kebara Cave, document not only ephemeral seasonal hunting during late spring–summer, to intensive winter to early spring hunting, but also archeobotanical remains indicating that plant foods appear to have been gathered during the autumn (October–December) and early spring (March–April) and remained more or less constant throughout the analyzed sequence [36,37]. Hardy and colleagues’ [38] research on dental calculus from five El Sidrón Neanderthals has demonstrated the ingestion by these individuals of different kinds of probably cooked plants. Moreover, based on nitrogen isotope analyses for the Spy Neanderthal bone collagen, it was hypothesized that plant consumption accounted for up to 20% of the sources of their diet [39].
The studies on Combe-Grenal IV, Kebara 2 and Subalyuk 1 also allow us to identify the presence of mild periodontitis in Combe-Grenal IV [6], and a more advanced process with thicker dental calculus deposits in the adults Kebara 2 [40] and Subalyuk 1 [23]. The presence of such pathologies on a juvenile specimen is not an exception in Middle Paleolithic times; the Combe-Grenal I (~7 years old) child’s mandible shows a slight periodontosis and a thin tartar line on the two preserved deciduous molars [6]. Genetic factors and living conditions are highly correlated to the development of periodontal disease. Note, also, that the marked interproximal facets described on the juvenile Combe-Grenal IV LLP4 and LLM1 [6] reflect strong masticatory forces, which developed daily, perhaps not only due to diet but also due to paramasticatory activities.

6. Conclusions

The study of the mandibular fragment Combe-Grenal IV (MIS 4, ~ 70 ky) allows the assignment of this fossil to a relatively robust juvenile Neanderthal individual (~15 years old). Two teeth are preserved (LLP4 and LLM1), and show moderate attrition, pulpoliths and initial root hypercementosis. Mild periodontitis affected the alveolar region, and both teeth display almost continuous 1 mm high strip dental calculus on their buccal crown lengths.
The SEM analysis of the LLM1 dental calculus demonstrated the prevalence of cocci-type bacteria, which is usual in juvenile individuals. This group of microbiota is less prevalent in the tartar from the adult male Kebara 2, where “rods” are more frequent, although less so than in the Subalyuk 1 older adult. In agreement with these observations, the measurements made on the SEM pictures from Combe-Grenal IV and Kebara 2 show larger dimensions of the bacteria in the latter individual, with statistically significant differences being found between the means of the lengths and, particularly, between the diameters.
It is interesting to remark that tartar was preserved in the studied fossils, while other individuals, such as the late Neanderthal maxillary CF-1 from Cova Foradà [41], was assigned to an old individual who suffered advanced periodontal disease, but no tartar has been described. In other fossils, such as Krapina-J, the modern manipulations that removed the dental plaque are visible.
Over the last two decades, scientists have relied increasingly on analyses of stable carbon, nitrogen and oxygen isotopes, as well as strontium and other trace elements, in bone, tooth enamel and dentine in order to determine the role of plants, animal tissues and fish in past human diets. Various studies indicate that one can differentiate between the consumption of C3 and C4 plants and trace the exploitation of terrestrial and marine mammals and fish, e.g., [42,43,44]. Even with the use of these techniques, we still cannot determine the ratios of animal tissues versus plant foods when analyzing Neanderthal remains [45,46,47]. However, testing the correlation between ethnographic information and stable isotopes on samples of more recent chronology has demonstrated good agreement [48].
At present, new possibilities are opening with metagenomic analyses which can enable the detailed study of the microbial genomes preserved in the dental calculus. The first results demonstrated, as expected, the regional differences in ecology among the several Neanderthal specimens considered, and consequently differences in diet and paleogenetics [49], and some of them are questionable [50,51]. Similar results have been published by studying the faunal remains found on numerous sites (e.g., [50] in Europe and the Near East, often allowing for the determination of the seasonal periods of hunting, as in the cited case for Kebara [34,35] or Marillac [52]). The macromorphological tartar studies that we present in this contribution for Combe-Grenal IV, or those on the Kebara 2 or Subalyuk 1’s tartar, reflect the development of the microbiota related to the different diets and ages at death of these Neanderthals, evolving through life to include more rods, as is known for extant populations [10].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.D.G. and B.A.; methodology and software, S.W. and B.A.; validation, formal analysis and investigation, all the authors; writing—original draft preparation, all the authors; writing—review and editing, all the authors; supervision, M.D.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

M. D. Garralda received a Professor Research Grant from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Research to study the Combe-Grenal Neanderthal series in collaboration with the Laboratoire d’Anthropologie (Bordeaux University, France). B. Maureille works on Quina Neanderthals benefit of funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No 851793). This research also benefited from the scientific framework of the University of Bordeaux’s IdEx “Investments for the Future” program/GPR “Human Past”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank B. Alonso, Faculty of Odontology of the Universidad Complutense de Madrid, for discussion of the results and bibliographical references, E. Lundin for the revision of the manuscript and P. Billet for the radiographies. Special thanks are due to D. de Sonneville-Bordes for her important help regarding F. Bordes Combe-Grenal excavation documents and to J. J. Cleyet-Merle, Director of the Musée National de Préhistoire des Eyzies, who gave us the permission to study the Combe-Grenal anthropological remains.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bordes, F. La stratigraphie de la grotte de Combe-Grenal (Dordogne). Note préliminaire. Bull. Soc. Préhistorique Française 1955, 52, 426–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bordes, F. A Tale of Two Caves; Harper & Row: New York, NY, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bordes, F.; Prat, F. Observations sur les faunes du Riss et du Würm I en Dordogne. l’Anthropologie 1965, 69, 31–46. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bordes, F.; Laville, H.; Paquerau, M.M. Observations sur le Pléistocéne supérieur du gisement de Combe-Grenal (Dordogne). Actes Soc. Linnéenne Bordx. 1966, 103, 3–19. [Google Scholar]
  5. Guadelli, J.L.; Laville, H. L’environnement climatique de la fin du Moustérien à Combe-Grenal et à Camiac. Confrontation des Données Naturalistes et Implications. In Paléolithique Moyen Récent et Paléolithique Superieur Ancien en Europe; Farizy, C., Ed.; Mém. du Musée de Préhistoire d’Ile de France: Nemours, France, 1990; pp. 43–48. [Google Scholar]
  6. Garralda, M.D.; Vandermeersch, B. Les Néandertaliens de la Grotte de Combe-Grenal (Domme, France). Paléo Rev. D’archéologie Préhistorique 2000, 12, 213–259. [Google Scholar]
  7. Garralda, M.D.; Giacobini, G.; Vandermeersch, B. Neanderthal cutmarks: Combe-Grenal and Marillac (France). A SEM analysis. Anthropologie 2005, 43, 189–197. [Google Scholar]
  8. Maureille, B.; Garralda, M.D.; Madelaine, S.; Turq, A.; Vandermeersch, B. Le plus ancien enfant d’Aquitaine, Combe-Grenal 31 (Domme, France). PALEO. Rev. D’archéologie Préhistorique 2011, 21, 189–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gómez-Olivencia, A.; Garralda, M.D.; Vandermeersch, B.; Madelaine, S.; Arsuaga, J.-L.; Maureille, B. Two newly identified mousterian human rib fragments from Combe-Grenal. PALEO. Rev. D’archéologie Préhistorique 2013, 24, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lang, N.P.; Mombelli, A.; Attström, R. Dental Plaque and Calculus. In Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, 3rd ed.; Lindle, J., Karring, T., Lang, N.P., Eds.; Munsksgaard: Copenhagen, Denmark, 1998; pp. 102–137. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ottoni, C.; Guelli, M.; Ozga, A.T.; Stone, A.C.; Kersten, O.; Bramanti, B.; Porcier, B.; Van Neer, W. Metagenomic analysis of dental calculus in ancient Egyptian baboons. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gleize, Y.; Castex, D.; Duday, H.; Chapoulie, R. Analyse préliminaire et discussion sur la nature d’un dépôt dentaire très particulier. Bull. Mémoires Société d’Anthropologie Paris. BMSAP 2005, 17, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Verger-Pratoucy, J.-C. Commentaires sur l’article: Analyse préliminaire et discussion sur la nature d’un dépôt dentaire très particulier. Bull. Mémoires Société d’Anthropologie Paris. BMSAP 2007, 19, 95–102. [Google Scholar]
  14. Smith, B.H. Patterns of Molar Wear in Hunter-Gatherers and Agriculturalists. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1984, 63, 39–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ubelaker, D. Human Skeletal Remains, 2nd ed.; Taraxacum Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  16. AlQahtani, S.J.; Hector, M.P.; Liversidge, H.M. The London Atlas of Human Tooth Development and Eruption. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2010, 142, 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lavigne, S.E.; Molto, J.E. System of measurement of the severity of periodontal disease in Past Populations. Int. J. Osteoarch. 1995, 5, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Brothwell, D. Digging Up Bones, 3rd ed.; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dietrich, P.; Ower, P.; Tank, M.; West, N.X.; Walter, C.; Needleman, I.; Hughes, F.J.; Wadia, R.; Milward, M.R.; Hodge, P.J.; et al. Periodontal diagnosis in the context of the 2017 classification system of periodontal diseases and conditions—Implementation in clinical practice. Br. Dent. J. 2019, 226, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Vandermeersch, B.; Arensburg, B.; Tillier, A.-M.; Rak, Y.; Weiner, S.; Spiers, M.; Aspillaga, E. Middle Paleolithic dental Bacteria from Kebara, Israel. Comptes Rendus L Acad. Sci. Ser. Ii 1994, 319, 727–731. [Google Scholar]
  21. Littner, M.; Tillier, A.-M.; Arensburg, B.; Kaffe, I. A Middle Paleolithic mandible from Kebara Israel (60.000 BP) in View of Oral Health of Modern Humans. J. Isr. Dent. Assoc. 1996, 13, 1. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lindhe, J.; Karring, T.; Lang, N.P. Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, 3rd ed.; Munksgaard: Copenhagen, Denmark, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  23. Pap, I.; Tillier, A.-M.; Arensburg, B.; Weiner, S.; Chech, M. First scanning electron microscope analysis of dental calculus from European Neanderthals: Subalyuk (Middle Paleolithic, Hungary). Bull. Mémoires Société d'Anthropologie Paris 1995, 7, 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hillson, S. Dental Anthropology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ripamonti, U. Paleopathology in Australopithecus africanus: A suggested case of a 3 million-year-old prepubertal periodontitis. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1988, 76, 197–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bartucz, L.; Dancza, J.; Hollendonner, F.; Kadic, O.; Mottl, M.; Pataki, V.; Palosi, E.; Szabo, J.; Vendl, A. Die Mussolini-Höhle (Subalyuk) bei Cserépfalu; Editio Instituti Regni Hungarici Geologici: Budapest, Hungary, 1939; Volume 14. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bar-Yosef, O. Middle Paleolithic Adaptations in the Mediterranean Levant. In The Evolution and Dispersal of Modern Humans in Asia; Akazawa, T., Aoki, K., Kimura, T., Eds.; Hokusen-Sha: Tokyo, Japan, 1992; pp. 189–216. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bocherens, H.; Billiou, D.; Patou-Mathis, M.; Otte, M.; Bonjean, D.; Toussaint, M.; Mariotti, A. Palaeoenvironmental and palaeoditary implications of isotopic biogeochemistry of late interglacial Neandertal and mammal bones in Scladina Cave (Belgium). J. Archeol. Sci. 1999, 26, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bocherens, H. Isotopic biogeochemistry as a marker of Neandertal diet. Anthrop. Anz. 1997, 55, 101–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Richards, M.P.; Pettitt, P.B.; Trinkaus, E.; Smith, F.H.; Paunovic, M.; Karavanic, I. Neanderthal diet at Vindija and Neanderthal predation: The evidence from stable isotopes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 7663–7666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Balter, V.; Simon, L. Diet and behavior of the Saint-Césaire Neanderthal inferred from biogeochemical data inversion. J. Hum. Evol. 2006, 51, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bocherens, H.; Drucker, D.; Billiou, D.; Pathou-Mathis, M.; Vandermeersch, B. Isotopic evidence for diet and subsistence pattern of the Saint-Césaire 1 Neanderthal review and use of a multi-source mixing model. J. Hum. Evol. 2005, 49, 71–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Richards, M.P.; Taylor, G.; Steele, T.; McPherron, S.; Soressi, M.; Jaubert, J.; Orschiedt, J.; Mallye, J.-B.; Rendu, W.; Hublin, J.-J. Isotopic analysis of a Neanderthal and associated fauna from the site of Jonzac (Charente-Maritime, France). J. Hum. Evol. 2008, 55, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wibing, C.; Rougier, H.; Baumann, C.; Comeyne, A.; Crevecoeur, I.; Drucker, D.; Gaudzinski-Windheuser, S.; Germonpré, M.; Gomez-Olivencia, A.; Krause, J.; et al. Stable isotopes reveal patterns of diet and mobility in the last Neanderthls and first modern humans in Europe. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dodat, P.-J.; Tacail, T.; Albalat, E.; Gómez-Olivencia, A.; Couture-Veschambre, C.; Holliday, T.; Madelaine, S.; Martin, J.E.; Rmoutilova, R.; Maureille, B.; et al. The dietary reconstruction of the Regourdou 1 Neandertal (MIS 5, France) using bone calcium isotopes. J. Hum. Evol. 2021, 10, 21230. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bar-Yosef, O. Eat what is there: Hunting and Gathering in the World of Neanderthals and their Neighbours. Int. J. Osteoarch. 2004, 14, 333–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lev, E.; Kislev, M.E.; Bar-Yosef, O. Mousterian vegetal food in Kebara Cave, Mt. Carmel. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2005, 32, 475–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hardy, K.; Buckley, S.; Collins, M.J.; Estalrrich, A.; Brothwel, D.; Copeland, L.; García-Tabernero, A.; García-Vargas, S.; de la Rasilla, M.; Lalueza-Fox, C.; et al. Neanderthal medics? Evidence for food, cooking, and medicinal plants entrapped in dental calculus. Naturwissenschaften 2012, 99, 617–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Naito, Y.I.; Chikaraishi, Y.; Drucker, D.G.; Ohkouchi, N.; Semal, P.; Wißing, C.; Bocherens, H. Ecological niche of Neanderthals from Spy Cave revealed by nitrogen isotopes of individual amino acids in collagen. J. Hum. Evol. 2016, 93, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Duday, H.; Arensburg, B. La Pathologie. In Le Squelette Moustérien de Kébara 2; Bar-Yosef, O., Vandermeersch, B., Eds.; Cahiers de Paléoanthropologie, CNRS: Paris, France, 1991; pp. 179–193. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lozano, M.; Subirà, M.E.; Aparicio, J.; Lorenzo, C.; Gómez-Merino, G. Toothpicking and periodontal disease in a Neanderthal specimen from Cova Foradà site (Valencia, Spain). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e76852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. van der Merwe, N.J.; Williamson, R.F.; Pfeiffer, S.; Thomas, S.C.; Allegretto, K.O. The Moatfield ossuary: Isotopic dietary analysis of an Iroquoian community, using dental tissue. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 2003, 22, 245–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Schoeninger, M.J.; Reeser, H.; Hallin, K. Paleoenvironment of Australopithecus anamensis at Allia Bay, East Turkana, Kenya: Evidence from mammalian herbivore enamel stable isotopes. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 2003, 22, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lee-Thorp, J.; Sponheimer, M. Three case studies used to reassess the reliability of fossil bone and enamel isotope signals for paleodietary studies. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 2003, 22, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Richards, M.P.; Schmitz, R.W. Isotope evidence for the diet of the Neanderthal type specimen. Antiquity 2008, 82, 553–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bocherens, H. Diet and Ecology: Implications from C and N isotopes. In Neanderthal Lifeways, Subsistence and Technology; Conard, N., Richter, N.H., Eds.; Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Series; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bocherens, H.; Díaz-Zorita, M.; Daujeard, C.; Fernandes, P.; Raynal, J.-P.; Moncel, M.-H. Direct Isotopic evidence for subsistence variability in Middle Pleistocene Neanderthals (Payre, southeastern France). Quat. Sci. Rev. 2016, 154, 226–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Harrison, R.G.; Katzenberg, M.A. Paleodiet studies using stable carbon isotopes from bone apatite and collagen: Examples from Southern Ontario and San Nicolas Island, California. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 2003, 22, 227–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Weyrich, L.S.; Duchene, S.; Soubrier, J.; Arriola, L.; Llamas, B.; Breen, J.; Morris, A.G.; Alt, K.W.; Caramelli, D.; Dresely, V.; et al. Neanderthal behaviour, diet, and disease inferred from ancient DNA in dental calculus. Nature 2017, 554, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Charlier, P.; Gaultier, F.; Héry-Arnaud, G. Interbreeding between Neanderthals and modern humans: Remarks and methodological dangers of a dental calculus microbioma analysis. J. Hum.Evol. 2019, 126, 124–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mann, A.E.; Fellows Yates, J.A.; Fagernäs, Z.; Austin, R.M.; Nelson, E.A.; Hofman, C.A. Do I have something in my teeth? The trouble with genetic analyses of diet from archaeological dental calculus. Quat. Int. 2022; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Costamagno, S.; Meignen, L.; Cédric, B.; Vandermeersch, B.; Maureille, B. Les Pradelles (Marillac-le-Franc, France): A Mousterian reindeer hunting camp? J. Anthrop. Archaeol. 2006, 26, 466–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biology 11 01352 g001 550
Figure 1. Combe-Grenal IV: external (A), internal (B), occlusal (C), distal side of the LLM1and the alveolus of the LLM2 (D), X-ray (E) external side. Scales = 10 mm.
Figure 1. Combe-Grenal IV: external (A), internal (B), occlusal (C), distal side of the LLM1and the alveolus of the LLM2 (D), X-ray (E) external side. Scales = 10 mm.
Biology 11 01352 g001
Biology 11 01352 g002 550
Figure 2. Combe-Grenal IV. (A): (picture 306), tartar bacteria at 3500 SEM magnification. (B): (picture 304): tartar bacteria at 10,000 SEM magnification, white scale = 1 μm.
Figure 2. Combe-Grenal IV. (A): (picture 306), tartar bacteria at 3500 SEM magnification. (B): (picture 304): tartar bacteria at 10,000 SEM magnification, white scale = 1 μm.
Biology 11 01352 g002
Biology 11 01352 g003 550
Figure 3. Combe Grenal IV. (A): (picture 308), tartar bacteria at 20,000 SEM magnification. (B): Kebara 2 (picture 603), tartar bacteria at 5000 SEM magnification.
Figure 3. Combe Grenal IV. (A): (picture 308), tartar bacteria at 20,000 SEM magnification. (B): Kebara 2 (picture 603), tartar bacteria at 5000 SEM magnification.
Biology 11 01352 g003
Biology 11 01352 g004 550
Figure 4. Comparison (Box and Whisker Plot) of the total diameter (left) and length (right) measurements (in μm) of the Combe-Grenal IV and Kebara 2 bacteria. The mean and the ranges of variation of ±1 and 1.96 error standard deviations are indicated.
Figure 4. Comparison (Box and Whisker Plot) of the total diameter (left) and length (right) measurements (in μm) of the Combe-Grenal IV and Kebara 2 bacteria. The mean and the ranges of variation of ±1 and 1.96 error standard deviations are indicated.
Biology 11 01352 g004
Table
Table 1. Measurements in μm (diameter and length) of the Combe-Grenal IV tartar bacteria, taken from the SEM pictures indicated.
Table 1. Measurements in μm (diameter and length) of the Combe-Grenal IV tartar bacteria, taken from the SEM pictures indicated.
MeasurementsNMeanStd. Dev.Std. ErrorMinimumMaximumVariance
C. Grenal 304
(10.000 M)		Diameter160.4930.1090.0270.3600.7000.012
Length70.7910.2620.0990.5901.3400.069
C.-Grenal 306
(3.500 M)		Diameter310.6010.1380.0250.3100.8500.019
Length101.6080.4720.1491.0502.5500.222
C.-Grenal 308
(20.000 M)		Diameter150.4770.1650.0430.3300.8400.027
Length71.4990.3760.1421.1602.2000.141
Total C.-Grenal IVDiameter620.5430.1490.0190.3300.8500.022
Length241.3380.5220.1070.5902.5500.272
Table
Table 2. The measurements in μm (diameter and length) of the Kebara 2 tartar bacteria, taken from the indicated SEM pictures.
Table 2. The measurements in μm (diameter and length) of the Kebara 2 tartar bacteria, taken from the indicated SEM pictures.
PicturesMeasurementsNMeanStd. Dev.Std. ErrorMinimumMaximumVariance
Kebara 601
(10.000 M)		Diameter200.7180.1610.0360.3500.9400.026
Length181.2410.4220.1000.8302.3600.178
Kebara 603
(5.000 M)		Diameter170.8250.1540.0370.5701.1400.024
Length163.1160.7190.1801.9404.3100.517
Kebara 606
(5.000 M)		Diameter220.5550.1420.0300.4000.8100.020
Length0
Total KebaraDiameter590.6870.1870.0240.4001.1400.035
Length342.1231.1090.1900.8304.3101.229
Table
Table 3. Statistical analysis of the total lengths and diameters of the tartar bacteria from Combe-Grenal IV and Kebara 2.
Table 3. Statistical analysis of the total lengths and diameters of the tartar bacteria from Combe-Grenal IV and Kebara 2.
IndividualsTraitsNMeanStd. ErrorP
Total Kebara 2Diameter590.6870.1870.0001
Total Combe-Grenal IV620.5430.149
Total Kebara 2Length342.1231.1090.02
Total Combe-Grenal IV241.3380.522
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Garralda, M.D.; Weiner, S.; Arensburg, B.; Maureille, B.; Vandermeersch, B. Dental Paleobiology in a Juvenile Neanderthal (Combe-Grenal, Southwestern France). Biology 2022, 11, 1352. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11091352

AMA Style

Garralda MD, Weiner S, Arensburg B, Maureille B, Vandermeersch B. Dental Paleobiology in a Juvenile Neanderthal (Combe-Grenal, Southwestern France). Biology. 2022; 11(9):1352. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11091352

Chicago/Turabian Style

Garralda, María Dolores, Steve Weiner, Baruch Arensburg, Bruno Maureille, and Bernard Vandermeersch. 2022. "Dental Paleobiology in a Juvenile Neanderthal (Combe-Grenal, Southwestern France)" Biology 11, no. 9: 1352. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11091352

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop