Next Article in Journal
Fused Deposition Modelling as a Potential Tool for Antimicrobial Dialysis Catheters Manufacturing: New Trends vs. Conventional Approaches
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Growth Temperature of the Nucleation Layer on the Growth of InP on Si (001)
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Electron Beam Treatment of Co–Cr Alloy on the Growing Mechanism, Surface Topography, and Mechanical Properties of Deposited TiN/TiO2 Coatings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Growth of GaN Thin Film on Amorphous Glass Substrate by Direct-Current Pulse Sputtering Deposition Technique
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Low Impact Ionization Rate Poly-Si TFT with a Current and Electric Field Split Design

1
Department of Electronic Engineering, Feng Chia University, Taichung 407, Taiwan
2
Department of Digital Multimedia Technology, Vanung University, Zhongli 320, Taiwan
3
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Central University, Zhongli 320, Taiwan
4
Department of Electronic Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2019, 9(8), 514; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9080514
Submission received: 29 June 2019 / Revised: 29 July 2019 / Accepted: 9 August 2019 / Published: 13 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Semiconductor Thin Films)

Abstract

:
In this study, a novel low impact ionization rate (low-IIR) poly-Si thin film transistor featuring a current and electric field split (CES) structure with bottom field plate (BFP) and partial thicker channel raised source/drain (RSD) designs is proposed and demonstrated. The bottom field plate design can allure the electron and alter the electron current path to evade the high electric field area and therefore reduce the device IIR and suppress the kink effect. A two-dimensional device simulator was applied to describe and compare the current path, electric field magnitude distributions, and IIR of the proposed structure and conventional devices. In addition, the advantages of a partial thicker channel RSD design are present, and the leakage current of CES-thin-film transistor (TFT) can be reduced and the ON/OFF current ratio be improved, owing to a smaller drain electric field.

1. Introduction

Over the past decade, low temperature polycrystalline silicon thin film transistors (poly-Si TFTs) fabricated on glass substrates have attracted a great deal of attention in active-matrix organic light emitting (AMOLED) display and active-matrix liquid crystal (AMLCD) display applications, as well as peripheral driving circuits, because of their high electron mobility and large driving current [1,2]. The main problem for poly-Si TFT is that it experiences a very high drain electric field near the channel/drain area, resulting in a very serious leakage current and a profound kink effect in its I-V characteristics, which limits the device’s performance in circuit applications [3,4,5]. The main approach to lower the leakage current and suppress the kink effect is to reduce the device drain side electric field. Several designs have been proposed and studied to reduce the drain electric field and improve device performance, including offset gate [6,7], lightly-doped drain (LDD) [8,9], and field-induced drain (FID) [10,11] TFTs. However, offset gate TFT sacrifices the On-state current, due to an increased parasitic resistance, and FID design often needs an extra mask and one more field bias, which complicates the device biasing scheme. In the same vein, the LDD structure has higher On-state current than the offset one and the LDD design often needs additional implantation process and suffers ion implantation damage and difficulty in controlling the doping in grain boundary [7,8,12]. A raised source/drain (RSD) structure is an alternative approach to lower device leakage current and drain side electric field effectively, without degrading On-state current seriously [4,12]. However, conventional RSD TFTs, which have thicker source/drain regions with a thin channel, are usually not a self-aligned structure and need an extra mask [13]. Although a self-aligned RSD device can be produced by a damascene process method, it involves more complex fabrication steps, including more chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) processes [12].
Our previous studies have proposed a drain-extended field plate structure (DFPTFT) to provide a different option to suppress the kink effect [14]. This drain field plate design constructs a low impact ionization rate (IIR) device featuring a high current density and high electric field apart structure to dampen the kink effect. However, the device shown in [14] has a bottom gate frame with an additional mask, making it difficult to be compatible with the present top gate structure, which is adopted in most popular poly-Si TFTs fabrications applied in industrial production. Furthermore, as a result of the almost unreduced electric field in the previous structure [14], the leakage current is hardly reduced.
This study puts forth new current and electric field split TFT (CES-TFT) with partial thicker channel RSD [15] and bottom field plate (BFP) designs which do not require an extra mask and CMP process. The BFP connected to the drain can allure the electron and change the electron current path away from the high electric field area in the gate/drain region, thereby alleviating the impact ionization phenomenon. In addition, the partial thicker channel RSD structure in use is also conducive to reducing the drain electric field that contributes to the lowering of leakage current and suppression of the kink effect [15]. Figure 1 shows the design information and half cross section of the proposed structure. When the drain voltage (Vds) is lower than the gate voltage (Vgs), the current path will flow along the gate side channel. The current path will be changed once Vds is higher than Vgs owing to a smaller channel resistance near the top area of the field plate.

2. Device Fabrication

To fabricate the device, a heavy doped poly-Si layer with 800 Å was first deposited to be the BFP on an oxidized silicon wafer. Then, an oxide (500 Å) and a 2000 Å undoped amorphous silicon (α-Si) were grown, in turn, forming a raised source/drain structure. Figure 2 illustrates the key fabrication processes of this CES device. After the FP region was defined, an oxide spacer was made before depositing a 1000 Å undoped α-Si channel layer. This α-Si layer and RSD structures were then transferred into the poly-Si together via solid-phase crystallization with 24 h 600 °C treatment. Then, an oxide (500 Å), an in situ doped poly-Si (2000 Å), an oxide (500 Å), and a poly-Si layer (1500 Å) were deposited, functioning as gate oxide, gate electrode, contact open layer (COL) 2, and (COL) 1, respectively. The thickness of (COL) 2 is designed to be the same as for the oxide above the field plate. The contact open layers in use here can make the gate electrode and drain one, respectively, metal-connect to their corresponding layer in the subsequent process. First, the gate area was defined and all layers were etched until the RSD layer was removed to 1500 Å. Then, source/drain areas were formed via phosphorous implantation. A 300-nm-thick oxide was then fabricated to serve as a passivation layer, and contact holes were opened and etched from the top layer to the gate and FP layers simultaneously. Finally, an Al-Si-Cu layer was grown and defined as metal pads. There were four CES-TFT masks, fewer than in the DFPTFT [14] proposed previously. A traditional top gate device was implemented at the same time for comparison purposes. Figure 3 shows the scanning electron microscope picture of the proposed CES-TFT.

3. Structure Simulation, Device Measurement, and Discussion

Before evaluating the device’s performance, ISE-TCAD was employed to gauge the difference between the conventional device and CES-TFT in the current path, drain electric field, and IIR [13,14,15,16]. The device IIR can be derived by a Chynoweth model and expressed [14] as
I I R = J n q A n e B n E
where Jn is the electron current density of an n-type device and the parameters An and Bn are the electron ionization coefficients; these values can be found in our previous publication [14] and are used widely to model impact ionization rate [16,17,18]. If device current can be designed to be far away from the highest electrical field region at a higher drain bias, a low IIR device, and a highly reliable TFT is achievable. Figure 4 demonstrates the electron current path of both structures at Vds = 10 V and Vgs = 5 V. In Figure 4, it can be observed that in BFP design, the electron current path is altered. Figure 5a,b depict the simulated drain side electric field and IIR distributions of both structures as Vds = 10 V and Vgs = 5 V. A more clear comparison can be shown by redrawing the magnitudes of the simulated electric field near the gate/drain areas in a 3D plot. Figure 5c shows the simulated 3D electric field for both structures. The maximum electric field (IIR) is 2.17 × 105 V/cm (4.54 × 1025 cm−3/s) for CES-TFT and 3.45 × 105 V/cm (2.06 × 1028 cm−3/s) for the conventional structure. It is clear that in the CES structure with a partial thicker channel RSD design, both the electric field and IIR can be reduced because the structure can lower the drain side electric field and the BFP design can change the current path, thereby improving the IIR significantly. From Figure 4 and Figure 5 it is obvious that the current path of CES-TFT can detour the highest drain electric field area and therefore reduce the IIR (over two orders of improvement). A lower IIR will be conducive to alleviate the kink effect.
Unlike the conventional CES structure mentioned in [14], where the electric field is almost the same as the conventional device, the proposed CES-TFT with an RSD design can effectively lower the device electric field. Figure 6 shows the simulated drain side electric field distributions for both structures at Vds = 5 V and Vgs = −5 V. The leakage characteristics for both structures can be predicted by a negative gate bias simulation. The lower negative gate bias electric field helps this structure lower the leakage current [13,15].
Figure 7a,b depict the measured transfer curves and device output characteristics for both structures. The leakage currents measured at Vgs = −6 V and Vds = 5 V for CES-TFT and conventional TFT are found to be 4.13 × 10−11 A and 1.01 × 10−8 A, respectively. The threshold voltages (extracted at Vds = 0.1 V) for both devices are 5.4 V (CES-TFT) and 5.2 V (conventional TFT), those values being defined as the Vgs at Ids = 10 nA × (channel width (W)/channel length (L)) [13]. It can be observed that the kink effect of the CES device is significantly mitigated because its electron current route circumvents the highest drain electric field region [14]. The ON/OFF current ratio (defined by maximum current over minimum current) of the CES structure is 2.61 × 106, compared with the corresponding value of 1.03 × 106 for the conventional device. The improved ON/OFF current ratio stems from the reduced device electric field, which facilitates a lower leakage current.
The hot-carrier stress was also carried out at Vgs = 15 V and Vds = 20 V with a 3000 s test to gauge the electrical reliability for both fabricated devices. Figure 8a shows the threshold voltage (Vth) shift of both structures after bias testing. It can be observed that the Vth shift of the CES structure remains almost unchanged after stress. However, there is a significant change in the Vth shift of the conventional device. Figure 8b shows the drop in the maximum ON-current (Imax ) and increase in minimum drain current (Imax) after hot-carrier stress. Both Imax and Imin for the conventional device exhibit much higher variations than those of the CES structure after reliability stress. The Imax and Imin are 2.1% and 34.12%, respectively, for the proposed CES structure compared with the corresponding values of 39.9% and 68% for the conventional device. The experimental results show that the CES-TFT has better hot-carrier stress endurance than the conventional device thanks to the partial thicker channel RSD and CES design.

4. Conclusions

In this study, a current and electric field split top gate TFT with partial thicker channel RSD and BFP designs has been demonstrated, tested, and investigated. It has been proven that the proposed CES with partial thicker channel RSD and BFP designs is much more capable of lowering device leakage current and mitigating its kink effect than conventional TFT. The ON/OFF current ratio of the CES device is also significantly improved. It is clear that the CES-TFT is an appealing structure for use in fully integrated AMLCDs for system-on-panel high-performance analogue or digital circuits.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.-T.C.; formal analysis, F.-T.C., K.-P.H., and H.-C.C.; methodology, F.-T.C., K.-P.H., and K.-T.L.; resources, Y.-T.T. and H.-C.C.; software, Z.-J.H. and Y.-T.T.; writing—original draft, F.-T.C.; writing—review and editing, F.-T.C., Z.-J.H., Y.-T.T., and H.-C.C.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan, Grant MOST. no. 108-2221-E-035-039.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, T.C.; Kuo, J.B.; Zhang, S. Floating-body kink-effect-related parasitic bipolar transistor behavior in poly-si tft. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2012, 33, 842–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ho, C.-H.; Lu, C.; Roy, K. An enhanced voltage programming pixel circuit for compensating gb-induced variations in poly-si tfts for amoled displays. J. Disp. Technol. 2014, 10, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Olasupo, K.; Hatalis, M. Leakage current mechanism in sub-micron polysilicon thin-film transistors. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 1996, 43, 1218–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. KP, A.K.; Sin, J.K.; Nguyen, C.T.; Ko, P.K. Kink-free polycrystalline silicon double-gate elevated-channel thin-film transistors. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 1998, 45, 2514–2520. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mariucci, L.; Fortunato, G.; Bonfiglietti, A.; Cuscuna, M.; Pecora, A.; Valletta, A. Polysilicon tft structures for kink-effect suppression. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2004, 51, 1135–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, X.; Geng, D.; Mativenga, M.; Jang, J. High-speed dual-gate a-igzo tft-based circuits with top-gate offset structure. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2014, 35, 461–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lee, U.G.; Mativenga, M.; Kang, D.H.; Jang, J. A three-mask-processed coplanar a-igzo tft with source and drain offsets. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2012, 33, 812–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhan, S.; Han, R.; Chan, M.J. A novel self-aligned bottom gate poly-si tft with in-situ ldd. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2001, 22, 393–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kimura, M. Behavior analysis of an ldd poly-si tft using 2-d device simulation. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2012, 59, 705–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Park, J.-h.; Kim, O. A novel self-aligned poly-si tft with field-induced drain formed by the damascene process. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2005, 26, 249–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ahn, J.-A.; Kim, O. Influence of field-induced drain on the characteristics of poly-si thin-film transistor using a self-aligned double spacer process. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 43, 897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chang, K.M.; Lin, G.M.; Yang, G.L. A novel low-temperature polysilicon thin-film transistors with a self-aligned gate and raised source/drain formed by the damascene process. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2007, 28, 806–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chien, F.-T.; Chen, C.-W.; Lee, T.-C.; Wang, C.-L.; Cheng, C.-H.; Kang, T.-K.; Chiu, H.-C. A novel self-aligned double-channel polysilicon thin-film transistor. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2012, 60, 799–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chien, F.-T.; Chen, Y.-J. A kink-effect-free poly-si thin-film transistor with current and electric field split structure design. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2010, 57, 2547–2555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chien, F.-T.; Yu, C.-H.; Chen, C.-W.; Cheng, C.-H.; Kang, T.-K.; Chiu, H.-C. A high-current kink effect free z-gate poly–si thin-film transistor. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2016, 37, 886–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. ISE-TCAD Manuals, release 10.0; Integrated Systems Engineering: Zurich, Switzerland, 2004.
  17. Valdinoci, M.; Colalongo, L.; Baccarani, G.; Pecora, A.; Policicchio, I.; Fortunato, G.; Plais, F.; Legagneux, P.; Reita, C.; Pribat, D. Analysis of electrical characteristics of polycrystalline silicon thin-film transistors under static and dynamic conditions. Solid-State Electron. 1997, 41, 1363–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Armstrong, G.; Brotherton, S.; Ayres, J. A comparison of the kink effect in polysilicon thin film transistors and silicon on insulator transistors. Solid-State Electron. 1996, 39, 1337–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Design information and half cross section of the current and electric field split thin-film transistor, where the field plate design can allure the electron at a higher drain bias and alter the electron current path to evade the high electric field area.
Figure 1. Design information and half cross section of the current and electric field split thin-film transistor, where the field plate design can allure the electron at a higher drain bias and alter the electron current path to evade the high electric field area.
Coatings 09 00514 g001
Figure 2. Main fabrication processes for the CES device: (a) defining the field plate (FP) area; (b) forming the oxide spacer between the FP and the channel; (c) depositing the channel, gate oxide, gate electrode, contact open layer (COL) 2, and (COL) 1; (d) defining the gate area and forming the source/drain areas; (e) opening contact holes and forming metal pads.
Figure 2. Main fabrication processes for the CES device: (a) defining the field plate (FP) area; (b) forming the oxide spacer between the FP and the channel; (c) depositing the channel, gate oxide, gate electrode, contact open layer (COL) 2, and (COL) 1; (d) defining the gate area and forming the source/drain areas; (e) opening contact holes and forming metal pads.
Coatings 09 00514 g002
Figure 3. SEM image of the CES-TFT with bottom FP and partial thicker channel RSD area.
Figure 3. SEM image of the CES-TFT with bottom FP and partial thicker channel RSD area.
Coatings 09 00514 g003
Figure 4. Simulated electron current path of conventional-TFT and CES-TFT at a high drain bias.
Figure 4. Simulated electron current path of conventional-TFT and CES-TFT at a high drain bias.
Coatings 09 00514 g004
Figure 5. Simulated devices’ electronic field and IIR: (a) electric field distributions; (b) impact ionization rate distributions; (c) 3D electric field magnitudes for conventional-TFT and CES-TFT at Vds = 10 V and Vgs = 5 V.
Figure 5. Simulated devices’ electronic field and IIR: (a) electric field distributions; (b) impact ionization rate distributions; (c) 3D electric field magnitudes for conventional-TFT and CES-TFT at Vds = 10 V and Vgs = 5 V.
Coatings 09 00514 g005aCoatings 09 00514 g005b
Figure 6. Simulated device electric field distributions with a negative gate bias (Vgs = −5 V) for conventional-TFT and CES-TFT.
Figure 6. Simulated device electric field distributions with a negative gate bias (Vgs = −5 V) for conventional-TFT and CES-TFT.
Coatings 09 00514 g006
Figure 7. Measured transfer curves (a) and output characteristics (b) for both fabricated devices.
Figure 7. Measured transfer curves (a) and output characteristics (b) for both fabricated devices.
Coatings 09 00514 g007
Figure 8. Threshold voltage shift (a) and current degradation characteristics (b) for both fabricated devices after reliability testing.
Figure 8. Threshold voltage shift (a) and current degradation characteristics (b) for both fabricated devices after reliability testing.
Coatings 09 00514 g008

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chien, F.-T.; Hsueh, K.-P.; Hong, Z.-J.; Lin, K.-T.; Tsai, Y.-T.; Chiu, H.-C. A Low Impact Ionization Rate Poly-Si TFT with a Current and Electric Field Split Design. Coatings 2019, 9, 514. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9080514

AMA Style

Chien F-T, Hsueh K-P, Hong Z-J, Lin K-T, Tsai Y-T, Chiu H-C. A Low Impact Ionization Rate Poly-Si TFT with a Current and Electric Field Split Design. Coatings. 2019; 9(8):514. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9080514

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chien, Feng-Tso, Kuang-Po Hsueh, Zhen-Jie Hong, Kuan-Ting Lin, Yao-Tsung Tsai, and Hsien-Chin Chiu. 2019. "A Low Impact Ionization Rate Poly-Si TFT with a Current and Electric Field Split Design" Coatings 9, no. 8: 514. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9080514

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop