Next Article in Journal
Structure Evolution of Nanocrystalline–Amorphous TiAl Biphase Films during Helium Ion Implantation
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental and Numerical Study on Regulation of Cutting Temperature during the Circular Sawing of 45 Steel
Previous Article in Journal
Influence Mechanism of (NH4)2SO4 on the Composition and Structure of Fe-Co Alloys
Previous Article in Special Issue
Model Development of Stress Intensity Factor on 7057T6 Aluminum Alloy Using Extended Finite Element Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Investigations and Applications in Advanced Materials Processing

Faculty of Engineering, Huanghe Science & Technology University, Zhengzhou 450003, China
Coatings 2023, 13(3), 631; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13030631
Submission received: 13 March 2023 / Accepted: 15 March 2023 / Published: 17 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Investigations and Applications in Advanced Materials Processing)
Advanced structural materials have been widely used in modern industries, such as mining, building, aerospace, chip manufacturing and surface engineering. High-precision materials handling results in prolonged tool life, damage free-surfaces, artificial implants, etc. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of material mechanisms and behaviors is a necessity, facilitating the extraordinary performance of such materials in industrial applications.
Material processing problems are encountered in a myriad of experimental analyses and testing situations. For instance, when polishing the silicon wafer, damage-free surfaces and high polishing efficiency are essential in the post-processing stage. Specifically, an extremely planarized surface is the solid ground of applying lithography to fabricate the wafers [1,2]. The most commonly used handling method is chemical mechanical polishing (CMP), which is a wear-based, surface flattening process involving the addition of chemicals and mechanical actions [3]. CMP has been widely exploited when polishing various kinds of advanced materials, such as aluminum [4], crystal [5], ceramics [6], and silicon [7]. During the planarization process, the friction force generated by the abrasive particles removes the chemical reacted surface. Then, processing parameters such as the chemical content, the size of the particles, the speed of rotation, etc., contribute to the efficient material removal rate (MRR) in the planarization process [8,9]. Xie et al. [10] developed a novel slurry by employing the potassium ions to facilitate the MRR of silicon wafers, with excellent stability and dispersity for colloidal silica. Kim et al. [11] pointed out that the increase in rotation speed, down force, and back pressure potentially improve the MRR. They also demonstrated that the pad conditioning parameters further consolidated the MRR during polishing. Zhang et al. [12] found that the increasing frictional force between the sapphire substrate and the pad majorly improved the MRR. Another study conducted by Zhang et al. [13] confirmed that the oxidation behavior of chemical slurry determines the MRR efficiency. Both chemical and mechanical parameters determine the efficiency and planarization during polishing. Therefore, such parametric analyses of the processing mechanism provide practical identification guidance, helping engineers and researchers optimize the machining process.
Besides the polishing of semi-conductive materials, the toughening of advance structural ceramics, such as alumina and zirconia, is of key significance for industrial applications due to its high hardness, high strength, super temperature and erosion resistance, etc. However, the high brittleness induced by the ceramic polycrystalline structures leads to the lack of slip system, resulting in the appearance of micro-cracks around the surface [14]. When the surface is subjected to the impact load, catastrophic failure occurs. Therefore, investigations on toughening the ceramics have been conducted, such as weak interface ceramic system setup [15], composite and laminated ceramics fabrication [16,17], and nano ceramic and additive ceramic manufacturing [18,19]. Thus, accurate measurement of ceramic toughness is critical for determining the toughening results. Miyazaki et al. [20] conducted a single-edge V-notch plate experiments to successfully evaluate the fracture toughness of Al2O3, AlN, and Si3N4. The lengths of both the pre-notch and the crack are key factors to confirm the fracture toughness. Roy [21] exploited the crack opening displacement method via indentation cracks to evaluate the fracture toughness of sintered ZnO ceramics. The crack length during indentation is involved in calculating the toughness. D’Andrea [22] also acquired the elastic properties and fracture toughness of silicate bioactive glass-ceramics through nano-indentation and pointed out the tensile strength is affected by the flaw size by using fracture mechanics. Hence, all such toughness measurement methods rely on the critical parameters, such as crack length and flaw size, to efficiently describe the ceramic fracture-resistant behaviors.
Moreover, in mining practices, the tool life extension is one of the most imperative topics. The life of a tool is significantly affected by the cutter material. Polycrystalline diamond composites (PDC) refer to the tungsten carbide (WC) base coated by polycrystalline diamond, with high temperature and wear resistance [23]. Compared with the traditional WC cutters, the PDC coated mining cutters show a dramatically increased wear resistance. Myriad investigations have been conducted, focusing on how the PDC pick behaviors during cutting and affects the wear process. In drilling practices, the PDC drag cutter formed two processes: cutting and frictional contact, and the frictional force is the main source of the tool wear [24]. Rostamsowlat et al. [25] conducted a comprehensive series of experiments to demonstrate that the normal frictional force is closely related to the depth of the cut. Witt-Doerring et al. [26] experimentally demonstrated that the high wear rate is mainly caused by the high cutter temperature during drilling. More specifically, Glowka et al. [27] indicated that 350 °C is the threshold temperature leading to the cutter wear. Besides the temperature effects, Sinor et al. [28] found that the increment in the rotation speed in RPM (revolutions per minute) results in the acceleration of cutter wear. A prominent experimental report conducted by Yahiaoui et al. [29] found that the increased content of cobalt element in the cutter materials brings about the wear seriousness. The extensive investigations of affectation factors on PDC cutters in mining practices provide an efficient guidance for tool wear conditions, setting up a quantitative understanding of such rock drilling mechanisms.
In summary, parameter investigations in advanced material processing, could be exploited to explore the nature of such material mechanisms. Mathematical methods, such as gradient-based optimization, machine learning, deep learning, multiscale analysis, image processing, etc., can also be exerted in the corresponding investigations. Hence, the Special Issue focuses on a collection of review and original research articles relating to recent materials processing problems in all aspects of engineering practices, including ingenious and initiative applications.

Funding

The authors acknowledge financial support from the 9th Group Project of Key Disciplines in Henan Province—Mechanical design, Manufacturing and Mechatronics.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zantye, P.B.; Kumar, A.; Sikder, A. Chemical mechanical planarization for microelectronics applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2004, 45, 89–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, Y.; Zhang, K.; Wang, F.; Di, W. Investigation on the final polishing slurry and technique of silicon substrate in ULSI. Microelectron. Eng. 2003, 66, 438–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Oliaei, S.N.B.; Mukhtarkhanov, M.; Perveen, A. Technological Advances and Challenges in Chemical Mechanical Polishing. In Advances in Abrasive Based Machining and Finishing Processes; Das, S., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 235–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kuo, H.-S.; Tsai, W.-T. Effects of alumina and hydrogen peroxide on the chemical-mechanical polishing of aluminum in phosphoric acid base slurry. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2001, 69, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, Z.; Jin, Z.; Guo, J.; Han, X.; Mu, Q.; Zhu, X. A novel chemical mechanical polishing slurry for yttrium aluminum garnet crystal. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 496, 143601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dai, S.; Lei, H.; Fu, J. Self-assembly preparation of popcorn-like colloidal silica and its application on chemical mechanical polishing of zirconia ceramic. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 24225–24230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wen, J.; Ma, T.; Zhang, W.; van Duin, A.C.; Lu, X. Atomistic mechanisms of Si chemical mechanical polishing in aqueous H2O2: ReaxFF reactive molecular dynamics simulations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2017, 131, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Manivannan, R.; Ramanathan, S. The effect of hydrogen peroxide on polishing removal rate in CMP with various abrasives. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 3764–3768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gitis, N.; Mudhivarthi, R. Tribometrology of CMP Process. In Microelectronic Applications of Chemical Mechanical Planarization; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007; pp. 81–121. [Google Scholar]
  10. Xie, W.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, L.; Cui, X.; Yu, S.; Su, H.; Wang, S. Chemical mechanical polishing of silicon wafers using developed uniformly dispersed colloidal silica in slurry. J. Manuf. Process. 2023, 90, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, N.-H.; Choi, M.-H.; Kim, S.-Y.; Chang, E.-G. Design of experiment (DOE) method considering interaction effect of process parameters for optimization of copper chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) process. Microelectron. Eng. 2006, 83, 506–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, Z.; Yan, W.; Zhang, L.; Liu, W.; Song, Z. Effect of mechanical process parameters on friction behavior and material removal during sapphire chemical mechanical polishing. Microelectron. Eng. 2011, 88, 3020–3023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, Q.; Pan, J.; Zhang, X.; Lu, J.; Yan, Q. Tribological behavior of 6H–SiC wafers in different chemical mechanical polishing slurries. Wear 2021, 472, 203649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Denoual, C.; Hild, F. A damage model for the dynamic fragmentation of brittle solids. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2000, 183, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Chen, F.; Yan, K.; Zhou, J.; Zhu, Y.; Hong, J. High toughness Si3N4 ceramic composites synergistically toughened by multilayer graphene/β-Si3N4 whisker: Preparation and toughening mechanism investigation. J. Alloy. Compd. 2022, 921, 166183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Q.; Pan, Z.; Liang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Li, J.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, X. Ceramic composites toughened by vat photopolymerization 3D printing technology. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2023, 146, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, J.; Chen, J.; Ye, F.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, Y. High-temperature atomically laminated materials: The toughening components of ceramic matrix composites. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 32628–32648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sharma, N.; Biswas, K.; Jha, S.K. Dry sliding wear behaviour of metal toughened nanoceramics: A case study of aluminium-alumina nanocermets. Wear 2022, 502, 204389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sarker, S.; Mumu, H.T.; Amin, A.; Alam, Z.; Gafur, M. Impacts of inclusion of additives on physical, microstructural, and mechanical properties of Alumina and Zirconia toughened alumina (ZTA) ceramic composite: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 62, 2892–2918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Miyazaki, H.; Yoshizawa, Y.-I.; Hirao, K.; Ohji, T.; Hyuga, H. Measurements of fracture toughness of ceramic thin plates through single-edge V-notch plate method. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2016, 36, 4327–4331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Roy, T.K. Estimation of fracture toughness in ZnO ceramics from indentation crack opening displacement measurements. Measurement 2019, 137, 588–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. D’Andrea, L.; De Cet, A.; Gastaldi, D.; Baino, F.; Verné, E.; Vena, P. Estimation of elastic modulus, fracture toughness and strength of 47.5B-derived bioactive glass-ceramics for bone scaffold applications: A nanoindentation study. Mater. Lett. 2023, 335, 133783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bellin, F.; Dourfaye, A.; King, W.; Thigpen, M. The current state of PDC bit technology. World Oil 2010, 231, 67–71. [Google Scholar]
  24. Detournay, E.; Defourny, P. A phenomenological model for the drilling action of drag bits. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 1992, 29, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rostamsowlat, I.; Akbari, B.; Evans, B. Analysis of rock cutting process with a blunt PDC cutter under different wear flat inclination angles. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2018, 171, 771–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Witt-Doerring, Y.; Pastusek, P.P.; Ashok, P.; van Oort, E. Quantifying PDC Bit Wear in Real-Time and Establishing an Effective Bit Pull Criterion Using Surface Sensors. In Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 21–23 September 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Glowka, D.A.; Stone, C.M. Effects of Thermal and Mechanical Loading on PDC Bit Life. SPE Drill. Eng. 1986, 1, 201–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sinor, L.A.; Powers, J.R.; Warren, T.M. The effect of PDC cutter density, back rake, size, and speed on performance. In Proceedings of the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, Dallas, TE, USA, 3–6 March 1998; p. SPE-39306-MS. [Google Scholar]
  29. Yahiaoui, M.; Gerbaud, L.; Paris, J.-Y.; Denape, J.; Dourfaye, A. A study on PDC drill bits quality. Wear 2013, 298, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yao, Q. Investigations and Applications in Advanced Materials Processing. Coatings 2023, 13, 631. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13030631

AMA Style

Yao Q. Investigations and Applications in Advanced Materials Processing. Coatings. 2023; 13(3):631. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13030631

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yao, Qingyu. 2023. "Investigations and Applications in Advanced Materials Processing" Coatings 13, no. 3: 631. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13030631

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop