Next Article in Journal
Investigations and Applications in Advanced Materials Processing
Previous Article in Journal
Direct Liquid Reactor-Injector of Nanoparticles: A Safer-by-Design Aerosol Injection for Nanocomposite Thin-Film Deposition Adapted to Various Plasma-Assisted Processes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence Mechanism of (NH4)2SO4 on the Composition and Structure of Fe-Co Alloys

School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2023, 13(3), 629; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13030629
Submission received: 6 December 2022 / Revised: 16 February 2023 / Accepted: 12 March 2023 / Published: 16 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Thin Films)

Abstract

:
Fe-Co alloys have the advantages of high saturation magnetization and high magnetic elongation. They are used in electromagnet pole heads, earphone vibration films, magnetostriction transducers, and so on. At present, few papers have been published on the co-deposition process of Fe-Co alloys. In the present work, smooth dense Fe-Co films of 10 μm were successfully prepared in an economical, green, sulfate solution system via electrodeposition. The cathodic polarization curves were measured separately under different conditions, and the electrochemical analyses showed that the increase in the main salt concentration is beneficial for obtaining higher deposition rates. An increase in temperature can increase the current density of electrochemical reduction of Fe2+, and 50 °C is a suitable temperature at which to prepare the Fe-deposited layer with a flat surface. The increase in Co2+ concentration can favor the co-electrodeposition process of Fe-Co alloys. Secondly, the EDS results showed that the mass fraction of Co in the films increased linearly with the increase in Co2+ concentration in the solution. The mass fraction of Co in the films gradually increased with the increase in current density. The mass fraction of Co in the films gradually decreased with the increase in (NH4)2SO4 concentration. In addition, the XRD showed that the grain size of the Fe-Co alloy films was closely related to the concentration of (NH4)2SO4 in the electrolyte, and the smallest crystallite size of the Fe-Co alloy film was 17 nm. SEM showed that (NH4)2SO4 can significantly affect the surface morphology of the films, in which the cracks are obviously removed.

1. Introduction

Magnetostrictive materials are functional for energy and information conversion. It has important applications in robots, sensors, displacement controllers, and other micro devices. Particularly, magnetostrictive materials can be found in microwave-absorbing films, smart electromagnetic films, magnetic recording films, magnetic core films for magnetic heads, etc. [1,2,3,4]. Magnetostrictive materials are divided into three main categories: materials containing rare earths, metals and alloys, and ferrite magnetostrictive materials [5,6]. Fe-Co alloys are known for their excellent magnetic flux density and low cost [7,8,9]. Nowadays, the production methods of Fe-Co alloys include both chemical and physical methods. Among them, chemical methods include electrodeposition, chemical deposition, etc., and physical methods include the vacuum vapor deposition method, the special rolling method, the vapor phase deposition technique, etc. [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Electrodeposition is an easy-to-operate, green, and economical technique for thin film fabrication. The advantages of electrodeposition are mild conditions; low time consumption; and the ability to control the size, thickness, and shape of the film by simply tuning the electrodeposition parameters.
Many efforts have been made by researchers to further improve the magnetic properties of Fe-Co alloys. The Fe-Co magnetic films prepared by E. A. Denisova et al. have excellent magnetic properties. Here, the saturation magnetic induction strength is about 2.47 T and the coercivity is greater than 1600 A/m [21]. R. S. Iskhakov et al. prepared Fe-Co alloys by electrodeposition in the chloride–sulfuric acid solution system using C3H3NaO3S as an additive. The results of the study show that the coercivity of Fe-Co alloys is 400.02 A/m and the saturation magnetic induction intensity reaches 1.91 T for a C3H3NaO3S concentration of 0.6 g/L [22]. Dong Zhou et al. investigated the effect of pulsed current electrodeposition on the magnetic properties of Fe-Co alloy films, and the results showed that the grain size of the samples prepared by pulsed electrodeposition was smaller than that of the samples prepared by the constant pressure method, which was conducive to the reduction of their coercivity [23]. In addition, magnetic nanowire arrays are valued for their potential advantages. These nanowires are widely used in perpendicular magnetic media due to their special characteristics, such as high magnetization strength and excellent perpendicular coercivity [24,25,26,27,28].
As often reported, it is not easy to control the growth and morphology of Fe-Co films. The obtention of magnetic films with high magnetic flux density and low coercive force is a key challenge, as these properties are usually difficult to combine because the requirements for film composition and crystal structure are different. Therefore, the process of exploring the influencing factors of the Fe-Co co-deposition process, understanding the mechanism of additives, and improving the formulation of the deposited Fe-Co film seems to be a promising method for adjusting the film’s properties [29,30]. In addition, S.V. Trukhanov et al. have shown that a good control of the stoichiometry of the alloy is important to the high quality of the alloys. Deviation from stoichiometry and the appearance of oxygen anions cause changes in the cation’s charge state, which in turn can dramatically alter the electronic, seriously affecting the practical application of the obtained materials [31,32].
In this study, smooth and dense Fe-Co films of 10 μm were prepared directly by electrodeposition through careful control of the electrodeposition parameters and electrolyte composition. The results showed that ammonium (NH4)2SO4 as an additive significantly affected the co-deposition process of Fe-Co alloys and affected the composition, microstructure, and surface morphology of the alloys, and further affected the magnetic properties of the materials. Microscopic understanding of the co-electrodeposition process of Fe-Co alloys is still unsatisfactory. Therefore, the influence mechanism of (NH4)2SO4 on the Fe-Co co-deposition process was thoroughly analyzed, including the concentration of Fe2+ and Co2+, the contents of (NH4)2SO4, the ratios of Co2+/(Fe2+ + Co2+), the current density, and the grain size. A strategy of physical dispersion (magnetic stirring) and chemical dispersion (adding surfactant) was used to promote the co-electrodeposition of Fe2+ and Co2+. The results are beneficial for guiding the Fe-Co co-deposition process, and helping us to reduce the internal stress so that a high-performance Fe-Co magnetic film can be produced. The study of these theoretical mechanisms can help us to prepare Fe-Co films with better magnetostrictive properties in our next work.

2. Experiment

2.1. Preparation of Fe-Co Alloys

In this study, A titanium plate with dimensions of 10 cm × 8 cm × 0.1 cm was used as the cathode substrate, the working area dimensions were 6 cm × 4 cm, and the non-electrodeposited area of the titanium sheet was sealed with epoxy resin. The titanium sheet was soaked in an acid solution for 10 s for activation before electroplating, and then rinsed in distilled water. The electrodeposition system consisted of an electrolytic cell (beaker with a volume of 2 L), an anode (titanium mesh), a cathode (titanium sheet), and a DC power supply. Schematic diagram of the Fe-Co electrodeposition process can be found in Figure 1. The iron-cobalt alloy was electrodeposited in an electrolyte containing 0.12 M FeSO4·7H2O, 0.06 M CoSO4·7H2O and a 0.18 M (NH4)2SO4 group. The pH of the solutions was adjusted with dilute sulfuric acid and ammonium hydroxide, respectively. The Fe-Co films were electrodeposited at a current density of 50 mA/cm2 for 13 min. The solution was stirred at 400 rpm during the electrodeposition process.

2.2. Electrochemical Characterization

Electrochemical tests were performed using an electrochemical workstation (CHI 660B). A platinum grid with an area of 12 cm2 was used as the auxiliary electrode, a saturated glycury electrode (SCE) was used as the reference electrode, and a titanium sheet with an area of 1 cm2 was used as the working electrode. A saturated calomel electrode was used relative to the given potentials and the scan rate of cathodic polarizing curves was 0.5 mV/s. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were tested to determine the alloy structure and particle size. Finally, the morphology of the films was measured by SEM, and the composition and content of the film were analyzed by Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS). The thickness was measured by the thickness meter with high precision (0.1 μm).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Electrodeposition Process of Fe-Co films

3.1.1. Analyses by Cathodic Polarization of Fe2+

The cathodic polarization curves of different Fe2+ concentrations at 50 °C were measured and shown in Figure 2a. From the figure, it can be seen that the current density gradually increases with the negative shift of the potential. According to Figure 2a, the relations between the current density and the concentration of Fe2+ when the potential is −1.2 V are shown in Figure 2b. It can be observed that the current density increases linearly with the increase in Fe2+ concentration. Additionally, the ratio of Fe2+ concentration to the cathodic current density |Ic| is 0.002, and the ratio is 0.001 as the Fe2+ concentration increases. The results indicate that the increase in Fe2+ concentration favors a higher deposition rate.
The cathodic polarization curves of 0.06 M Fe2+ at different temperatures are displayed in Figure 3a. From the figure, it can be observed that the current density gradually increases with the negative shift of the potential. The relations between the current density and the temperatures when the potential is −1.2 V in Figure 3a are shown in Figure 3b. The current density increases at an accelerated rate with the increase in the temperature. Additionally, the ratio of temperature to the cathodic current density |Ic| is 3.3, and the ratio is 1.1 as the temperature increases. The results show that the temperature affects the depositing rate of Fe2+ remarkably.
The cathodic polarization curves measured in solutions of 0.12 M Fe2+ and different concentrations of (NH4)2SO4 are shown in Figure 4a. It can be observed that the current density decreases for 0.05 M (NH4)2SO4 at the same potential compared to the solution without (NH4)2SO4, and after 0.05 M, the current density increases as the (NH4)2SO4 concentration increases. The relationship between the (NH4)2SO4 concentration and the current density at a potential of −1.2 V in Figure 4a is shown in Figure 4b. It can be observed that the addition of (NH4)2SO4 in a low concentration, such as 0.05 M, reduces the current density. As the concentration of (NH4)2SO4 is higher than 0.1 M, the current density increases with the increase in (NH4)2SO4 concentration. The results exhibit that the high concentration of (NH4)2SO4 accelerates the deposition while the addition of (NH4)2SO4 in very small amounts inhibits the deposition. We believe that a small amount of (NH4)2SO4 adsorbs at the electrode-solution interface and hinders the hydrogen evolution reaction in the initial stage, so the current density decreases. However, a large amount of (NH4)2SO4 benefits the deposition of metal ions, so the current density increases [33].

3.1.2. Analyses by Cathodic Polarization of Co2+

The cathodic polarization curves measured in solutions with different Co2+ concentrations are shown in Figure 5a. It can be observed that the current density gradually increases as the potential moves negatively. According to Figure 5a, the relation between the current density and the concentration of Co2+ when the potential is −1.2 V is shown in Figure 5b. From the figure, it can be observed that the current density increases linearly with the increase in Co2+ concentration. Additionally, the ratio of Co2+ concentration to the cathodic current density |Ic| is 0.001, and the ratio is 0.003 as the Co2+ concentration increases. The results indicate that the increase in Co2+ concentration favors a higher deposition rate.
The cathodic polarization curves tested with different (NH4)2SO4 concentrations in the solution with 0.06 M Co2+ are shown in Figure 6a. The corresponding current density at a potential of −1.2 V is shown in Figure 6b. It can be observed from the figure that the current density decreases and then increases with the increase in the (NH4)2SO4 concentration and reaches its minimum at the (NH4)2SO4 concentration of 0.05 M. The current density of (NH4)2SO4 increases with the increase in (NH4)2SO4 concentration. The results indicate that the electrolyte addition of an appropriate amount of (NH4)2SO4 is beneficial for obtaining a higher Co2+ deposition rate.

3.1.3. Analyses by Cathodic Polarization of Fe2+ and Co2+

The cathodic polarization curves of different Co2+ concentrations are shown in Figure 7a. As can be seen from the figure, the current density gradually increases with the negative shift of the potential. From Figure 7b, it can be observed that the relationship between the proportion of Co2+ in the solution and the current density at a potential of −1.2 V. The results show that the current density gradually increases with the increase in the ratio of Co2+/(Fe2+ + Co2+). The growth rate of current density is greater when the ratio of Co2+/(Fe2+ + Co2+) is greater than 0.5 than that when the ratio of Co2+/(Fe2+ + Co2+) is less than 0.5. The above results indicate that increasing the proportion of Co2+ in the electrolyte can accelerate the electrochemical reaction rate of Fe2+ and Co2+, which is beneficial to the co-electrodeposition process. According to the Nernst Equation (1) [34], we calculated EFe = −0.471 V, ECo = −0.319 V. It can be observed that the reduction potential difference of Fe2+ and Co2+ is small, and it is easy to co-deposit at this concentration. Therefore, suitably increasing the concentration of Co2+ in the electrolyte is conducive to the co-deposition process of Fe-Co.
E = E 0 R T n F l n a
where E is the electrode potential at a certain concentration, E0 is the standard electrode potential, R is the gas constant (8.314 J·k−1 mol−1), T is the temperature (K), n is the net number of electrons gained and lost in the electrode reaction, F is Faraday’s constant (96,485 C mol−1).
Figure 8a shows the effect of (NH4)2SO4 on the co-electrodeposition process of the Fe-Co alloy. The cathodic polarization curves in solutions with different (NH4)2SO4 concentrations undergo a similar process of change. The current density gradually increases with the negative shift of the potential, and decreases when 0.05 M (NH4)2SO4 is added to the electrolyte compared with the electrolyte without (NH4)2SO4. Beyond this concentration, the current density increases monotonically with the (NH4)2SO4 concentration [33]. The influence of the (NH4)2SO4 concentration on Fe2+, Co2+, and the co-electrodeposition process are shown in Figure 4b, Figure 6b, and Figure 8b, respectively. From Figure 8b, it can be seen that the current density of Fe-Co alloy co-deposition is greater than that of Fe2+ and Co2+ electrodeposition alone. As the concentration of (NH4)2SO4 in the electrolyte increases, the electrochemical reaction rates of the Fe-Co alloy, Fe2+, and Co2+ all decrease and then increase. When the concentration of (NH4)2SO4 in the electrolyte was less than 0.13 M, the electrochemical reaction rate of Fe2+ was larger than that of Co2+, and the electrochemical reaction growth rate of Co2+ was faster than that of Fe2+, indicating that (NH4)2SO4 could be more favorable for promoting the electrodeposition process of Co2+.
To further investigate the effect of (NH4)2SO4 on Fe-Co alloys, Figure 9 shows the effect of (NH4)2SO4 on the current rate of the Fe-Co alloy. According to Equation (2) [35], the current efficiency η of the Fe-Co alloy was calculated. The study showed that the current efficiency of the Fe-Co alloy gradually increases with the increase in the (NH4)2SO4 concentration in the electrolyte. When the (NH4)2SO4 concentration is in the range of 0.05 M–0.2 M, the current efficiency of Fe-Co alloy grows at a greater rate. Additionally, when the (NH4)2SO4 concentration exceeds 0.2 M, the current efficiency of the Fe-Co alloy grows slowly. Too much (NH4)2SO4 is detrimental to the hydrogen precipitation reaction and internal stress; therefore, the study concluded that the suitable (NH4)2SO4 concentration for the preparation of Fe-Co alloy is 0.18 mol/L.
η = η Fe + η Co = W Fe · Δ G I · t · C Fe + W Co · Δ G I · t · C Co
ηFe and ηCo are the current efficiency of electrodeposited Fe and Co, respectively. CFe and CCo are the electrochemical equivalents of Fe and Co, respectively. ΔG is the mass of the alloy coating, WFe and WCo are the mass percentages of Fe and Co in the alloy, respectively, I is the cathode deposition current, and t is the deposition time.

3.2. Analyses of the Composition

The relation between iCo2+/(Co2++Fe2+) and the mass fraction of Co in the film without (NH4)2SO4 is shown in Figure 10a. The study shows that when the potential shifts negatively, the current density in the Fe2+ solution increases more than that in the Co2+ solution, so iCo2+/(Co2++Fe2+) decreases gradually. The ion ratio used in iCo2+/(Fe2++Co2+) is 33.3%. It can be seen that iCo2+/(Co2++Fe2+) is significantly lower than the Co wt.% in the film (more than 35 wt.%). The results show that Fe2+ promotes the deposition of Co2+ in the solution without (NH4)2SO4. The relation between iCo2+/(Co2++Fe2+) and the mass fraction of Co in the film with (NH4)2SO4 is shown in Figure 10b. The study shows that when the potential shifts negatively, the current density in the Co2+ solution is greater than that in the Fe2+ solution, and iCo2+/(Co2++Fe2+) is significantly greater than the Co wt.% in the film. The results show that (NH4)2SO4 inhibits the deposition of Co2+.
The effect of the ratio of Co2+/(Fe2+ + Co2+) in the solution on the Co mass fraction in the films is shown in Figure 11a. It can be found the Co wt.% of the film increases linearly with the increase in the ratio of Co2+/(Fe2+ + Co2+) of the solution. Additionally, the ratio of Co2+ concentration to the Co wt.% in the film is 0.99. The result indicates that anomalous deposition behavior is not observed here, in contrast to that observed in Fe-Ni alloy film deposition. The effect of the current density on the Co mass fraction in the film is shown in Figure 11b. It can be observed that the mass fraction of Co in the film linearly increases with the increasing current density below 40 mA/cm2, and the Co content in the film is significantly slower beyond 40 mA/cm2. Additionally, the ratio of current density to the mass fraction of Co in the film is 8.3, and the ratio is 15 as the current density increases. According to this standard, the desired composition for the purpose of achieving better properties can be controlled by the current density. The effect of (NH4)2SO4 on the content of Co in the film is shown in Figure 11c. It can be observed that as the concentration of (NH4)2SO4 increases, the content of Co in the film decreases gradually, and the content of Co in the film reaches its maximum at 0.5 M (NH4)2SO4. Additionally, the ratio of the (NH4)2SO4 concentration to the mass fraction of Co in the film is 1.67, and the ratio is −1.19 as the (NH4)2SO4 concentration increases. The results illustrate that the concentration of (NH4)2SO4 affects the composition of the film obviously, and may therefore affect the internal stress of Fe-Co films.

3.3. Structure Analysis

Figure 12 shows the XRD patterns with and without the (NH4)2SO4 in Fe2+ solution, the Co2+ solution, the Fe2+ and Co2+ solutions, which proves that the films prepared in this study are Fe-Co alloys. Electrodeposition is an epitaxial growth mode and ammonium sulphate directly affect the electrocrystallisation process following the electrochemical reduction of the metal ions, thus affecting the grain orientation and strength. As seen in Figure 12, (NH4)2SO4 changes the orientation of the Co deposition, but does not change the orientation or strength of the Fe and FeCo alloys. Additionally, according to the half-peak width of the XRD patterns, the crystallite size was calculated by the Scherrer Formula (3), and the crystallite size with different (NH4)2SO4 concentrations is shown in Figure 13. The study shows that as the concentration of (NH4)2SO4 increases, the crystallite size of Fe increases, but the crystallite size of Co decreases. As for the film of Fe-Co alloy, the crystallite size decreases firstly and then increases, and the smallest crystallite size of Fe-Co alloy film is 17 nm when C(NH4)2SO4/C(Fe2++Co2+) is 1.5. The results indicate that the crystallite size of Fe-Co alloy film can be controlled by the concentration of (NH4)2SO4.
D = ()/Bcosθ
where K is a constant, 0.943, for the cubic structure, γ is the X-ray wavelength, 0.15406 nm; B is the half-peak width of the diffraction peak, which is obtained by Jade; θ is the diffraction angle.
Finally, Figure 14 shows the morphology of the films with 10 μm thickness as measured by SEM. Additionally, the Co content in the film is 34 wt.%, and the oxygen content across the film thickness is about 2.45 wt.%. It is shown that a certain concentration of (NH4)2SO4 can significantly affect the surface morphology of the film and eliminate cracks to obtain a dense and smooth film.

4. Conclusions

It can be concluded that smooth dense Fe-Co films with 10 μm thickness were successfully prepared by the electrodeposition technique in a non-toxic sulfate solution system. Firstly, the cathodic polarization curves were measured with respect to different conditions at 50 °C, and pH 2.5. The results indicated that the increase in main salt concentration is beneficial to obtaining a higher depositing rate. Increasing the temperature can speed up the electrochemical reaction of Fe2+; combining the effects of other aspects, it was determined that a temperature of 50 °C is suitable for the preparation of flat films. The increase in the proportion of Co2+ in the electrolyte favors the Fe-Co co-electrodeposition process. When the concentration of (NH4)2SO4 in the electrolyte exceeded 0.13 M, the electrochemical reaction rate of Co2+ was greater than that of Fe2+, and (NH4)2SO4 was more favorable to the electrochemical reaction process of Co2+. Secondly, the results of EDS showed that the Co content in the film increased linearly with the increase in the proportion of Co2+ in the solution. The Co content in the film gradually increased with the rise of the current density. As the concentration of (NH4)2SO4 increased, the content of Co in the film decreased gradually. The XRD showed that the crystallite size of Fe-Co alloy films can be controlled by the concentration of (NH4)2SO4, and the smallest crystallite size of Fe-Co alloy film was 17 nm. SEM showed that a certain concentration of (NH4)2SO4 can eliminate the cracks on the surface of the films and result in smooth and dense flat films. These results provide evidence for the potential improvement of the Fe-Co co-deposition process and preparation of Fe-Co magnetic films with excellent performance in further research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.W. and Y.W.; methodology, W.W.; software, Y.W.; validation, W.W., Y.W. and X.Q.; formal analysis, Y.W.; investigation, X.Q.; resources, W.W.; data curation, Y.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.W.; writing—review and editing, Y.W.; visualization, Y.W.; supervision, W.W.; project administration, W.W.; funding acquisition, W.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Metal Fuel Cell Key Laboratory of Sichuan province.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Osaka, T. Electrodeposition of highly functional thin films for magnetic recording devices of the next century. Electrochimica Acta 2000, 45, 3311–3321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alper, M.; Kockar, H.; Sahin, T.; Karaagac, O. Properties of Co–Fe Films: Dependence of Cathode Potentials. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2010, 46, 390–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Han, M.; Lu, H.; Deng, L. Control of gigahertz permeability and permittivity dispersion by means of nano crystallization in Fe-Co based nanocrystalline alloy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 192507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cheng, Y.; Ji, G.; Li, Z.; Lv, H.; Liu, W.; Zhao, Y.; Cao, J.; Du, Y. Facile synthesis of FeCo alloys with excellent microwave absorption in the whole Ku-band: Effect of Fe/Co atomic ratio. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 704, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rubel, M.H.; Hossain, M.K. Crystal Structures and Properties of Nanomagnetic Materials. Fundam. Low Dimens. Magn. 2017, 5, 32. [Google Scholar]
  6. Khan, S.; Hossain, M.K. Classification and properties of nanoparticles. In Nanoparticle-Based Polymer Composites; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2022; pp. 15–54. [Google Scholar]
  7. Amsarajan, S.; Jagirdar, B.R. Air-stable magnetic cobalt-iron (Co7Fe3) bimetallic alloy nanostructures via co-digestive ripening of cobalt and iron colloids. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 816, 152632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yanai, T.; Shiraishi, K.; Watanabe, Y.; Ohgai, T.; Nakano, M.; Suzuki, K.; Fukunaga, H. Magnetic Fe-Co films electroplated in a deep-eutectic-solvent-based plating bath. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 117, 17A925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Zong, B.; Wu, Y.; Ho, P.; Phuoc, N.N.; Yang, Y.; Guo, Z.; Ang, S.Z.; Yang, Z.; Li, Z. Growth Method to Improve the Resonant Frequency and Magnetic Permeability of FeCo Thin Films. IEEE Magn. Lett. 2015, 6, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kadyrzhanov, K.K.; Shlimas, D.I.; Kozlovskiy, A.L.; Zdorovets, M.V. Research of the shielding effect and radiation resistance of composite CuBi2O4 films as well as their practical applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020, 31, 11729–11740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sharko, S.A.; Serokurova, A.I.; Novitskii, N.N.; Ketsko, V.A.; Smirnova, M.N.; Almuqrin, A.H.; Sayyed, M.I.; Trukhanov, S.V.; Trukhanov, A.V. A New Approach to the Formation of Nanosized Gold and Beryllium Films by Ion-Beam Sputtering Deposition. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bautin, V.A.; Kholodkov, N.S.; Seferyan, A.G.; Usov, N.A. Chemically Synthesized FeCo Powder for Advanced Applications. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2018, 31, 3371–3378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rizal, C.; Kolthammer, J.; Pokharel, R.K.; Choi, B.C. Magnetic properties of nanostructured Fe-Co alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 113905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sun, K.; Wang, K.; Yu, T.; Liu, X.; Wang, G.; Jiang, L.; Bu, Y.; Xie, G. High-performance Fe Co P alloy catalysts by electroless deposition for overall water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 1328–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, X.; Morisako, A. Magnetic properties of Fe-Co films prepared by co-sputtering and hydrogenous gas reactive sputtering. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2008, 44, 3910–3912. [Google Scholar]
  16. Reichel, L.; Giannopoulos, G.; Kauffmann-Weiss, S.; Hoffmann, M.; Pohl, D.; Edström, A.; Oswald, S.; Niarchos, D.; Rusz, J.; Schultz, L. Increased magneto crystalline anisotropy in epitaxial Fe-Co-C thin films with spontaneous strain. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 116, 213901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Wu, Y.; Liu, T.; Ji, B.; Wang, W. Mossbauer study of disordering in thin sputtered Fe-Co-SiO2 and Fe-Co films. J. Alloys Compd. 2012, 536, 33–37. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mehrizi, S.; Sohi, M.H. Electrical resistivity and magnetic properties of electrodeposited nanocrystalline CoFe thin films. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2015, 26, 7381–7389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kozlovskiy, A.L.; Zdorovets, M.V. Synthesis, structural, strength and corrosion properties of thin films of the type CuX (X = Bi, Mg, Ni). J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 11819–11832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zubar, T.I.; Usovich, T.I.; Tishkevich, D.I.; Kanafyev, O.D.; Fedkin, V.A.; Kotelnikova, A.N.; Panasyuk, M.I.; Kurochka, A.S.; Nuriev, A.V.; Idris, A.M.; et al. Features of Galvanostatic Electrodeposition of NiFe Films with Composition Gradient: Influence of Substrate Characteristics. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Denisova, E.A.; Chekanova, L.A.; Komogortsev, S.V.; Nemtsev, I.V.; Iskhakov, R.S.; Dolgopolova, M.V. Iron-Cobalt Coatings Produced Using an Eco-friendly Route. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2021, 34, 2681–2688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, Z.; Yang, X.; Fu, Y. Influence of sodium propargyl sulfonate on electrodeposition of Fe–Co alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 826, 154167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhou, D.; Zhou, M.; Zhu, M.; Yang, X.; Yue, M. Electrodeposition and magnetic properties of FeCo alloy films. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 111, 07A319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Su, H.L.; Wang, R.L.; Chen, Y.Q. AC electrodeposition frequency dependence of composition and magnetic properties of Fe-Co nanowire arrays. J. Univ. Sci. Technol. China 2009, 39, 699–705. [Google Scholar]
  25. Pourkhayyat, S.; Manafi, S.; Yahyaei, B. Synthesis of nanocrystalline Fe-Co and Fe-Co-TiO2 ferro magnetic films obtained by pulse electrodeposition. J. Mater. Rese. 2021, 36, 397–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bento, F.R.; Mascaro, L.H. Analysis of the initial stages of electro crystallization of Fe, Co, and Fe-Co alloys in chloride solutions. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2002, 13, 502–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lin, X.H.; Ji, G.B.; Du, Y.W. Ultrafine Fe-Co nanowires: Fabrication and heat treatment structure and magnetic properties. Soli. Stat. Comm. 2011, 151, 1708–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, X.; Gong, L.Q.; Li, F.S. Magnetic properties of Fe-Co films with tunable in-plane uniaxial anisotropy prepared by electrodeposition. Mater. Sci. Eng. Appl. 2011, 160, 951–956. [Google Scholar]
  29. Takata, F.; Sumodjo, P. Electrodeposition of magnetic CoPd thin films: Influence of plating condition. Electrochim. Acta 2007, 52, 6089–6096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Herzer, G. Grain size dependence of coercivity and permeability in nanocrystalline ferromagnets. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1990, 26, 1397–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Trukhanov, S.V.; Vasiliev, A.; Balagurov, A.M.; Szymczak, H. Magnetic state of the structural separated anion-deficient La0.70Sr0.30MnO2.85 manganite. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 2011, 113, 819–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kozlovskiy, A.; Egizbek, K.; Zdorovets, M.V.; Ibragimova, M.; Shumskaya, A.; Rogachev, A.A.; Ignatovich, Z.V.; Kadyrzhanov, K. Evaluation of the Efficiency of Detection and Capture of Manganese in Aqueous Solutions of FeCeOx Nanocomposites Doped with Nb2O5. Sensors 2020, 20, 4851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, Y.; Liu, T.; Ji, B.; Wang, W. Effect of (NH4)2SO4 on the co-electrodeposition of Fe-Co alloys. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 612, 155567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chang, C.N.; Cheng, H.B.; Chao, A.C. Applying the Nernst Equation ToSimulate Redox Potential Variationsfor Biological Ni-trification and Denitrification Processes. Nviron. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 1807–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Eliaz, N.; Venkatakrishna, K.; Hegde, A.C. Electroplating and characterization of Zn–Ni, Zn–Co and Zn–Ni–Co alloys. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2010, 205, 1969–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the Fe-Co electrodeposition process.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the Fe-Co electrodeposition process.
Coatings 13 00629 g001
Figure 2. (a) Cathodic polarization curves measured in solutions with different Fe2+ concentrations; (b) the corresponding cathodic current density |Ic| at a potential of −1.2 V.
Figure 2. (a) Cathodic polarization curves measured in solutions with different Fe2+ concentrations; (b) the corresponding cathodic current density |Ic| at a potential of −1.2 V.
Coatings 13 00629 g002
Figure 3. (a) Cathodic polarization curves of 0.06 M Fe2+ at different temperatures and pH 2.5; (b) The relationship between the temperatures and the cathodic current density |Ic| when the potential is −1.2 V in Figure 3a.
Figure 3. (a) Cathodic polarization curves of 0.06 M Fe2+ at different temperatures and pH 2.5; (b) The relationship between the temperatures and the cathodic current density |Ic| when the potential is −1.2 V in Figure 3a.
Coatings 13 00629 g003
Figure 4. (a) Cathodic polarization curves measured in solutions with different (NH4)2SO4 concentrations with 0.12 M Fe2+; (b) the corresponding cathodic current density |Ic| at a potential of −1.2 V.
Figure 4. (a) Cathodic polarization curves measured in solutions with different (NH4)2SO4 concentrations with 0.12 M Fe2+; (b) the corresponding cathodic current density |Ic| at a potential of −1.2 V.
Coatings 13 00629 g004
Figure 5. (a) Cathodic polarization curves measured in solutions with different Co2+ concentrations; (b) the corresponding cathodic current density |Ic| at a potential of −1.2 V.
Figure 5. (a) Cathodic polarization curves measured in solutions with different Co2+ concentrations; (b) the corresponding cathodic current density |Ic| at a potential of −1.2 V.
Coatings 13 00629 g005
Figure 6. (a) Cathodic polarization curves measured in solutions with different (NH4)2SO4 concentrations with 0.06 M Co2+; (b) the corresponding cathodic current density |Ic| at a potential of −1.2 V.
Figure 6. (a) Cathodic polarization curves measured in solutions with different (NH4)2SO4 concentrations with 0.06 M Co2+; (b) the corresponding cathodic current density |Ic| at a potential of −1.2 V.
Coatings 13 00629 g006
Figure 7. (a) Cathodic polarization curves measured in solutions with different Co2+ concentrations; (b) the corresponding cathodic current density |Ic| at a potential of −1.2 V.
Figure 7. (a) Cathodic polarization curves measured in solutions with different Co2+ concentrations; (b) the corresponding cathodic current density |Ic| at a potential of −1.2 V.
Coatings 13 00629 g007
Figure 8. (a) Cathodic polarization curves measured in solutions with different (NH4)2SO4 concentrations; (b) the corresponding cathodic current density |Ic| at a potential of −1.2 V.
Figure 8. (a) Cathodic polarization curves measured in solutions with different (NH4)2SO4 concentrations; (b) the corresponding cathodic current density |Ic| at a potential of −1.2 V.
Coatings 13 00629 g008
Figure 9. Effect of different concentrations of (NH4)2SO4 on the current efficiency of Fe-Co alloy.
Figure 9. Effect of different concentrations of (NH4)2SO4 on the current efficiency of Fe-Co alloy.
Coatings 13 00629 g009
Figure 10. (a) Relations between iCo2+/(Co2++Fe2+) and the mass fraction of Co in the film without (NH4)2SO4; (b) Relation between iCo2+/(Co2++Fe2+) and the mass fraction of Co in the film with (NH4)2SO4.
Figure 10. (a) Relations between iCo2+/(Co2++Fe2+) and the mass fraction of Co in the film without (NH4)2SO4; (b) Relation between iCo2+/(Co2++Fe2+) and the mass fraction of Co in the film with (NH4)2SO4.
Coatings 13 00629 g010
Figure 11. Variation curves of factors influencing the content of elemental Co in the films (a) Co2+ concentration in the solution; (b) Current density; (c) (NH4)2SO4 concentration.
Figure 11. Variation curves of factors influencing the content of elemental Co in the films (a) Co2+ concentration in the solution; (b) Current density; (c) (NH4)2SO4 concentration.
Coatings 13 00629 g011
Figure 12. XRD patterns with and without (NH4)2SO4. (a) Fe2+ solution; (b) Co2+ solution; (c) Fe2+ and Co2+ solution.
Figure 12. XRD patterns with and without (NH4)2SO4. (a) Fe2+ solution; (b) Co2+ solution; (c) Fe2+ and Co2+ solution.
Coatings 13 00629 g012
Figure 13. Crystallite size with different (NH4)2SO4 concentrations.
Figure 13. Crystallite size with different (NH4)2SO4 concentrations.
Coatings 13 00629 g013
Figure 14. SEM photos of surface and section of Fe-Co films electrodeposited by (NH4)2SO4. (a) Surface morphology without (NH4)2SO4. (b) Surface morphology with (NH4)2SO4. (c) Section morphology with (NH4)2SO4.
Figure 14. SEM photos of surface and section of Fe-Co films electrodeposited by (NH4)2SO4. (a) Surface morphology without (NH4)2SO4. (b) Surface morphology with (NH4)2SO4. (c) Section morphology with (NH4)2SO4.
Coatings 13 00629 g014
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, Y.; Qiao, X.; Wang, W. Influence Mechanism of (NH4)2SO4 on the Composition and Structure of Fe-Co Alloys. Coatings 2023, 13, 629. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13030629

AMA Style

Wu Y, Qiao X, Wang W. Influence Mechanism of (NH4)2SO4 on the Composition and Structure of Fe-Co Alloys. Coatings. 2023; 13(3):629. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13030629

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Yan, Xue Qiao, and Wei Wang. 2023. "Influence Mechanism of (NH4)2SO4 on the Composition and Structure of Fe-Co Alloys" Coatings 13, no. 3: 629. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13030629

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop