Next Article in Journal
Laboratory Investigation of the Water Damage Resistance of Tuff Asphalt Mixture Modified with Additives
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of MoO3 Content on Ni3Al-Ag-MoO3 Composite Coating Microstructure and Tribological Properties
Previous Article in Journal
A Review on Superhydrophobic Surface with Anti-Icing Properties in Overhead Transmission Lines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Surface Characteristic and Friction Behavior of Plasma Sprayed FeCoNiCrMo0.2 High Entropy Alloy Coatings on BS960 High-Strength Steel with Subsequent Shot Peening Treatment

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200240, China
2
Hot Rolling Mill, Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., 885 Fujin Road, Shanghai 201900, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2023, 13(2), 303; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13020303
Submission received: 12 December 2022 / Revised: 24 January 2023 / Accepted: 26 January 2023 / Published: 29 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Friction, Wear, Lubrication and Mechanics of Surfaces and Interfaces)

Abstract

:
The FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coatings were deposited on BS960 high strength steel by plasma spraying method with four different current intensities (250 A, 350 A, 450 A, 550 A). These coatings were then subjected to a subsequent micro-shot peening treatment. Surface characteristics including surface morphology, microhardness and phase composition were characterized, and the wear resistance of the coatings was assessed by reciprocal friction and wear tests. The results showed that the high entropy alloy coatings had FCC structure. XRD results showed that no new phase was formed during the spraying process. At the same time, shot peening treatment could effectively improve the hardness of the coating surface. Under the four processes, the coating surface prepared with the current intensity of 350 A had the highest microhardness and uniformity before and after shot peening, and the hardness values were 473 ± 10.21 and 504 ± 8.62 HV0.2, respectively. The friction and wear test results showed that the friction coefficients of the four coatings were close to each other at 10 N load, which was about 0.4. When the test load reached 25 N, the friction coefficient of the coating with current intensity of 350 A was lower, and it showed better friction performance. After shot peening, the friction coefficient of the four coatings further decreased to about 0.3 under 10 N loading due to the existence of hardened surface layer. When the test load reached 25 N, the hardened layer would be worn through and the friction coefficient would suddenly rise. Under the 25 N test load, the hardened layer of the high-entropy alloy coating with current intensity of 350 A illustrated better friction resistance.

1. Introduction

Wear resistance, as an important property for workpiece selection in the engineering field, largely determined the service life of the workpiece [1,2]. Coating was an important measure for steel protection. The existence of traditional alloy coatings due to their large thickness and low hardness had led to great restrictions on their application [3,4]. With the progress of science and technology, the high-entropy alloy coating formed by the interaction of various alloying elements not only had good comprehensive performance, but also could obtain one or more excellent performances according to the ratio of different alloying elements [5,6], and the requirements for the application environment were sufficiently reduced. High entropy alloy coating would become the main direction of research in the engineering field.
In recent years, high entropy alloy coatings with high wear resistance had been extensively studied. Among them, Fe, Co, Ni and Cr are common alloying elements, which helped to form a face-centered cubic structure consistent with the crystal structure of the alloy. In addition to the inherent metal elements of high entropy alloy coating, the addition of certain metal elements would also enhance its performance [7,8]. Geng et al. [9] proved that FeCoNiCr high entropy alloy had excellent wear resistance. Mo element could form MoO3 oxide film on the surface of metal-based coating, which had a good effect on the wear resistance. Therefore, adding a small amount of Mo to the high entropy alloy might promote wear resistance [10].
The thermal spraying process was the main method for the preparation of high entropy alloy coating [11,12]. It was to obtain the coating with a special function by heating the high entropy alloy powder to the melting or semi-melting state and spraying deposition on the surface of the substrate. Among them, plasma spraying had been widely concerned because of its advantages such as ultra-high temperature, fast firing rate and inert working gas. Fridrici et al. [13] prepared CuNiIn coating on the surface of Ti-6Al-4V alloy by using high-speed oxygen fuel and plasma spraying (PS). The study showed that PS-CuNiIn had good layered microstructure and showed better fretting fatigue resistance. Meghwal et al. [5] used atmospheric plasma spraying process to prepare high-entropy alloy AlCoCr0.5Ni coating with higher wear and corrosion resistance. Wang et al. [14] prepared (CoCrFeNi)95Nb5 high entropy alloy coating on the surface of Q234 steel matrix by plasma spraying process, and found that the coating has good bonding properties with the substrate, and the prepared coating could significantly improve the corrosion resistance and mechanical properties of Q235 steel matrix. Tian et al. [15] prepared AlCoCrFeNiTi high-entropy alloy coating by atmospheric plasma spraying process, whose average microhardness reached 642 HV. Meanwhile, the coating had the best wear resistance at 700 °C, and multiple oxide phases were detected on the surface after the wear test. The volume wear rate was about 0.23 ± 0.02 × 10−4 mm3 N−1 m−1.
In the plasma spraying process, the change in current intensity would directly affect the performance of the coating. Cheng et al. [16] studied the coating prepared by plasma spraying AlCoCrFeNi powders which were pure BCC phase, and the proportion of FCC phase in the coating increased with the increase in spraying current and argon flow rate. Sun et al. [17] studied the influence of process parameters of air plasma spraying on deposition of aluminum and ceramic (Al2O3) coatings on polymer. It was found that when the current intensity was 150 A and the spraying distance was 190 mm, the maximum shear adhesion strength between coating and substrate was 5.21 MPa. Hesam et al. [18] selected different current intensities to evaluate the influence of plasma spraying on Ni-Ti-Al coating, and found that the coating prepared by APS current (600 A) in the middle had the highest density and lowest porosity. At the same time, Sahab et al. [19] studied the performance of plasma spraying on Al2O3-3%TiO2 coating. When the current reached 650 A and the powder speed increased to 26 g/min, the coating obtained the best wear resistance.
The internal porosity of the coating prepared by plasma spraying was relatively high. Therefore, in order to reduce the porosity of the coating and further improve the wear resistance of the coating, surface strengthening process can be added to improve the coating, among which shot peening process has a good choice [20,21]. Zheng et al. [22] strengthened the traditional alloy coating prepared by plasma spraying with subsequent micro-particle shot peening, which not only reduced porosity, but also enhanced the surface microstructure, as a result, the corrosion resistance of the coating was improved. Shot peening also has an obvious effect on the performance of high entropy alloy coating [23]. Wang et al. [24] conducted shot peening treatment on FeCoCrMn HEA coating prepared by plasma cladding technology, and found that after shot peening, the friction coefficient of the high-entropy alloy coating decreased from 0.53 to 0.38, and the wear mechanism changed from abrasive wear to adhesive wear. Tong et al. [25] used laser additive manufacturing and laser impact shot peening (LSP) to prepare CrMnFeCoNi coating. The experimental study showed that the samples treated with LSP had the lowest degree of wear damage, and achieved lower corrosion current density and higher corrosion potential. Therefore, increasing the surface strengthening process may play an important role in improving the properties of high entropy alloys.
In this work, the FeCoNiCrMo0.2 coatings were prepared by plasma spraying method with different current intensities, then these coatings were subsequently treated by micro-shot peening. The surface characteristic and friction behavior of the coatings were investigated. It was expected that this work could offer some useful information for preparing high entropy alloys coatings.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Material Preparation

Alloy powder with purity of 99.9% (provided by China Jiangxi Yongtai Powder Metallurgy Co., Ltd., Nanchang, China) was selected. FeCoCrNiMo0.2 powder was prepared by gas atomization process. The proportion of metal in the powder was about: Fe = 24.05 wt%, Co = 23.47 wt%, Ni = 23.56 wt%, Cr = 23.51 wt% and Mo = 5.01 wt%. The spraying process in our work was atmospheric plasma spraying. UniCoatPro™ System designed by Oerlikon Metco (Langenthal, Switzerland) was selected for spraying. Spraying parameters were shown as follows: Powder feed rate was 26 g/min, spraying distance was 100 mm, spraying rate was 500 mm/s, spraying current intensity were 250 A, 350 A, 450 A and 550 A, and argon gas was used as the protection atmosphere. The substrate material was BS960 high strength steel with 4 layers of spraying. Before spraying, ZrO2 particles were used to clean and roughen the metallic surfaces and anhydrous ethanol was used to clean it.
Ceramic balls with diameter of 0.06 mm were used in the micro-shot peening process, which was processed by pneumatic shot peening equipment (Kunshan Katxing Machinery Company, Suzhou, China). The parameters selected in shot peening were as follows: air pressure: 0.40 MPa; diameter of shot peening nozzle: 15 mm; distance: 100 mm; coverage rate: 100%.

2.2. Material Characterization

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, QUANTA FEG 450, Hillsboro, OR, USA) was used to characterize the morphology of the high entropy alloy powder formed by gas atomization, the surface morphology, cross-section morphology of the coating and morphology of wear scar. X-ray diffractometer (XRD, D8 Advance Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS, EDAX genesis, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) were used to detect phase and element distribution of high entropy alloy powder and coating, the range of XRD test angles was between 20° and 100°. Vickers hardness tester (DHV-1000, photoelectric instrument, Beijing, China) was used to measure the micro-hardness of the coating surface. The test load was 500 g and the saturation time was 15 s. The study of wear performance was explored by reciprocating dry friction wear test (HSR-2M, Lanzhou Zhongkekaimei Development Co., LTD., Lanzhou, China) with an oscillating stroke of 3 mm, a frequency of 3.3 Hz, the test experiment was 10 min and the test loads were 10 N and 25 N.

3. Results and Discussion

The original high entropy alloy powder was characterized, as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1a showed the shape of FeCoCrNiMo0.2 alloy powder. In Figure 1b with high magnification, it could be seen that the shape of alloy particles presented a completely spherical shape, and the average particle diameter is 30 ± 10 μm. The element analysis of the high entropy alloy powder was also characterized, as shown in Figure 1c. It could be seen that all alloy elements were evenly distributed, and the XRD results of the powder showed a FCC structure, as shown in Figure 1d, this is consistent with the results of Zhang et al. [26].
The surface states of the high-entropy alloy coatings before and after shot peening were significantly different. Figure 2 showed the surface morphologies of the coatings before and after shot peening with four different processes. It could be observed in Figure 2a–d that there were many defects on the surface, which was related to the plasma spraying process. Due to the rapid impact of droplets in the spraying process, the splash on the surface of the coating would occur, so there was accumulation phenomenon on the surface. In Figure 2a, it could be found that there were still some unmelted powders in the coating prepared when the current intensity was 250 A, indicating that at this current intensity, the high entropy alloy powder did not melt fully and some remained in powder state, and there were obvious holes on the surface of the coating. With the increase in current intensity, no obvious spherical high-entropy alloy particles could be observed under scanning electron microscopy when the current intensity reached 350 A and above, and the coating surface density was improved. The coating morphology after shot peening was shown in Figure 2e–h. The surface smoothness of the high-entropy alloy coating under the four processes was enhanced, and there were no obvious defects on the surface, the surface showed a typical shot-peened surface state.
Figure 3 showed the XRD diffraction patterns at different current intensities. It could be observed that the diffraction peaks of the coatings detected under different preparation conditions did not change significantly. The diffraction peaks of 43.4°, 50.5°, 74.4°, 90.1° and 95.3° corresponded to crystal plane indices of (111), (200), (220), (311) and (222), respectively. The (111) was the dominated crystallographic plane, and the high entropy alloy FeCoNiCrMo0.2 showed a single FCC structure.
Through the energy spectrum characterization of the prepared high entropy alloy coating, the test results were shown in Figure 4. According to the data analysis in Figure 4b, Fe, Co and Ni contents in the prepared coating were uniform, which were 27.08 wt%, 24.57 wt% and 23.65 wt%, respectively, and there were small deviations in the contents of Cr and Mo elements. There was also a small amount of O element in the prepared coating, indicating that a small amount of oxide was generated during the spraying and cooling process.
Figure 5 showed the SEM image of cross-section of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating. In Figure 5a–d the thickness of the high entropy alloy coatings of four different processes was observed to be about 200 μm. In the process of spraying, the oxidation phenomenon was inevitable. Because the cooling rate of oxidation products was different from that of high entropy alloy; defects such as pores generally appeared in the position of oxides. In Figure 5e,f it could be seen that the cross-section morphologies of the high-entropy alloy coatings prepared at 350 A and 550 A were observed. In the image, the black area was generally the oxidation product, while the gray area was the high-entropy alloy coating. When the current intensity was 350 A, the content of defects and oxidation products in the coating was low, showing a relatively ideal coating structure. With the increase in current intensity, the oxidation density inside the coating increased significantly when the current intensity reached 550 A, indicating that the increase in current intensity would accelerate the oxidation rate of the particle surface. The increase in oxide content would also lead to the increase in pore density, which was caused by the presence of oxides leading to different degrees of volume shrinkage at the interface of high entropy alloy and oxide during the solidification and cooling process. Combined with Figure 2 it could be found that the melting degree of alloy powder can be effectively increased by increasing the current intensity. At the same time, excessive intensity would cause the density of oxides and holes to increase.
Figure 6 showed the surface microhardness of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 coating before and after shot peening. As could be seen from Figure 6a, when the current intensity increased from 250 A to 550 A, the microhardness of the coating presented a change trend of first increasing and then decreasing and the hardness values under different current intensity were 442 ± 24.26, 473 ± 10.21, 457 ± 15.31 and 449 ± 18.59 HV0.2, respectively. The hardness of the coating prepared with current intensity of 350 A was the highest, and the lower the standard deviation was, the better the hardness uniformity of the coating surface was. After shot peening treatment, the surface hardness of the coating was further improved, with the average microhardness reaching 492 ± 18.56, 504 ± 8.62, 479 ± 11.36 and 471 ± 13.54 HV0.2. Meanwhile, the standard deviation of hardness was reduced again, mainly because the shot peening treatment could effectively improve the surface state of the coating, as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 7 showed the friction coefficient of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating prepared by different current intensities under 10 N and 25 N loads. When the load was 10 N, as shown in Figure 5a, the friction coefficient of the high-entropy alloy coating under the four processes increased slowly and tended to be stable, showing two stages of running-in and stability [27]. The main reason for this phenomenon was that the high entropy alloy coating has a high hardness. Under 10 N loading force, the friction phenomenon occurred on the surface of the coating, the depth of the wear mark was shallow, the friction coefficient was mainly related to the surface topography and the four coatings showed similar wear resistance. When the load force reached 25 N, as shown in Figure 5b, the friction coefficient also presented a trend of slow increase. The friction coefficient of HEAs (250 A) was the highest, and the friction coefficient fluctuated greatly after 4 min, showing poor friction resistance, which was mainly related to the internal structure of the coating. Figure 2a showed that there were many unmelted particles in HEAs (250 A), so the friction surface may be damaged during the friction process, resulting in large friction coefficient fluctuation. The other three groups of coatings had similar friction coefficients, but overall, the mean friction coefficient of the high entropy alloy coating was the lowest when the current intensity was 450 A.
In order to have a clearer understanding of the friction mechanism of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating, SEM was used to observe the wear morphology of the coating under different loads. Figure 8 showed the wear morphologies of four kinds of high entropy alloy coatings under 10 N test load. As shown in Figure 8a–d, the wear widths of the high-entropy alloy coatings of the four processes are 887.39 μm, 734.45 μm, 669.16 μm and 749.58 μm, respectively. The wear widths of the coatings at the current intensity of 250 A were larger, which might be due to the existence of small high-entropy alloy particles on the surface. In the process of wear, serious plastic deformation occurred at the edge of wear cracks. As could be seen from Figure 8e, there were large pieces of debris and more particles on the surface of the wear cracks, and there were deep furrows on the surface, mainly because the high entropy alloy powder in the coating would cause damage to the surface of the wear cracks during the friction process. As the current intensity increased, the morphology of the wear cracks was improved. As shown in Figure 8f,g, when the current intensities reached 450 A and 550 A, the surface of the wear track was relatively smooth, there were a few cracks and debris and the furrow depth was shallow, showing good wear resistance. When the current intensity reached 650 A, the wear surface of the high entropy alloy coating appeared obviously peeling off and delamination phenomenon, indicating that the high current intensity would also lead to the decline of wear resistance, which might be due to the insufficient cooling of the coating tissue.
In order to understand the wear resistance of the core of the high entropy alloy coating, the wear morphology of the coating under 25 N load was analyzed and observed, as shown in Figure 9. The most intuitive manifestation of the increase in the test load was the increase in the wear track width. When the load was 25 N, the wear track width of the four coatings were measured, respectively. Through further observation of the morphology, the increase in the load also caused the increase in the defect density of the wear tracks. As shown in Figure 9e, obvious long cracks and deep furrows were distributed in the wear tracks of the coating with the current intensity of 250 A, accompanied by the peeling-off phenomenon, indicating that the friction resistance of the coating was significantly reduced under higher load. Poor morphology of wear tracks would lead to increased friction coefficient and greater volatility, which was corresponding to the friction coefficient in Figure 7b. A small amount of peeling off and debris also appeared in the wear morphology of the coating at 350 A, as shown in Figure 9f. When the current intensity continued to increase, under 25 N load, the debris on the friction surface increased significantly and when the current reached 550 A, the surface appeared a large area of peeling off phenomenon.
For thermal sprayed coating, shot peening was helpful to reduce the porosity of the coating, improve the density of the coating surface, and form a hardened surface layer to achieve the purpose of improving wear resistance. Friction and wear tests were carried out on the high entropy alloy coating after shot peening under different test loads, and the friction coefficient was shown in Figure 10. Under 10 N load, the friction coefficients of the four coatings are similar, as shown in Figure 11a. Compared with the coatings before shot peening, the friction coefficient of the coatings was lower and the friction coefficient fluctuation was smaller, indicating that the coatings maintained relatively stable wear resistance under the experimental conditions. The variation trend of friction coefficient under different loads was due to the hardening layer formed on the surface by shot peening. When the test load was low, the friction mainly occurred on the surface and the hardened layer could play a good protective role. Meanwhile, the increase in the density and hardness of the coating surface would also reduce the friction coefficient. When the test load increased, the hardened surface was easy to be worn through, so the friction coefficient would increase sharply, as shown in Figure 10b. When the load reached 25 N, the four coatings showed the same variation trend, but the time of sudden increase in friction coefficient was different. The coatings with current intensity of 350 A maintained a longer low friction coefficient, indicating that the high entropy alloy coating had better performance under this process.
Through the analysis of the wear morphology, the surface morphology of the high entropy alloy coating after shot peening was shown in Figure 11 under the test load of 10 N. By measuring, the wear widths of the four coatings after shot peening were 387.26 μm, 396.18 μm, 411.46 μm and 447.13 μm, respectively, as shown in Figure 11a–d. By comparison with Figure 8a–d, under 10 N load, the wear width of the high entropy alloy coating after shot peening was reduced by about 300 μm, indicating that the surface performance of the high entropy alloy coating after shot peening was enhanced. For the high-entropy alloy coating with current intensity of 250 A, shot peening helped to impact the unmelted particles in the surface layer to the sub-surface layer. When the friction occurred in the surface layer, the unmelted high-entropy alloy particles could play the role of solid solution strengthening and inhibit the plastic deformation behavior of the coating during the friction process, so the wear width was the lowest. By comparing the high entropy alloy coating, the surface smoothness of the high entropy alloy coating after shot peening was obviously improved. However, the presence of hard high-entropy alloy particles would also have a great impact on the morphology and appearance of the wear track. As shown in Figure 11e, the surface of the wear track was rough, with obvious peeling off phenomenon and debris in some areas of the surface. When the current intensity continued to increase, the high entropy alloy powder melted completely, the solid solution strengthening effect weakened, the width of the wear track increased, but the morphology of the wear track was improved and the surface damage decreased, as shown in Figure 11f–h.
The wear morphology of the high entropy alloy coating treated with shot peening under 25 N test load was shown in Figure 12. When the test load was increased to 25 N, the wear widths of the four kinds of high entropy alloy coatings were 722.22 μm, 716.67 μm, 775.24 μm and 835.19 μm, respectively, which were lower than that before shot peening. At the same time, after shot peening, the wear tracks of the coating showed relatively smooth and even wear morphology under high load. Among them, the local spalling phenomenon existed on the surface of the wear tracks of the coating prepared at the current intensity of 250 A, and there were more debris on the wear scars, as shown in Figure 12a. In contrast, the high entropy alloy coatings prepared at the current intensity of 350 A showed the best wear morphology, which might be related to the hardness.
Shot peening is a cold surface hardening method, which is widely used to improve the fatigue or stress corrosion resistance of metal component. The positive effect is derived from the compressive residual stress and enhanced surface hardness. In this work, the shot peening was reported to enhance the surface hardness and reduce the surface defect of deposited high entropy alloy coatings, it is found that the wear resistance was improved. This work offers some useful information for improving the properties of plasma sprayed high entropy alloy coating.

4. Conclusions

The surface characteristics and the friction behavior of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating prepared by plasma spraying and shot peening were studied, the following conclusions are obtained:
1. The FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating with FCC structure were successfully deposited on BS960 steel surface with different current intensity, the surface defect such as porosity was decreased by subsequent micro-shot peening.
2. Among FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating under four different current, the average microhardness of the high entropy alloy coating with current intensity of 350 A was 473 ± 10.21 HV0.2, showing the highest hardness value and better uniformity. After shot peening, the hardness and uniformity of all coatings were further enhanced. The optimal coating current parameter was still 350 A, and the average microhardness was 504 ± 8.62 HV0.2.
3. In the friction and wear test, the high entropy alloy coating maintained a similar friction coefficient under 10 N load. When the test load increased to 25 N, the high entropy alloy coatings at 350 A current intensity had a lower friction coefficient, smooth appearance of wear marks and fewer defects, showing excellent friction resistance.
4. After shot peening, the friction coefficient of the high entropy alloy coating was further reduced at 10 N load, and the coefficient fluctuated gently. The friction property was further enhanced, which was attributed to the fact that shot peening could help to form a hardened layer on the surface of the coating. When the load increased, the hardened layer would be worn through and the high entropy alloy coating with current intensity of 350 A showed stable resistance to high load friction performance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.J.; methodology, Z.Y.; Investigation, Z.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.Y.; writing—review and editing, C.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wu, Y.; Yang, H.; Guo, R.; Wang, X.; Shi, X.; Liaw, P.; Qiao, J. Tribological behavior of boronized Al0.1CoCrFeNi high-entropy alloys under dry and lubricated conditions. Wear 2020, 460–461, 203452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kumar, D.; Jaishri, B.; Meena, D.K.; Huang, E.-W.; Chang, Y.-J.; Yeh, A.-C.; Jain, J.; Neelakantan, S.; Gosvami, N.N. Reversal of favorable microstructure under plastic ploughing vs. interfacial shear induced wear in aged Co1.5CrFeNi1.5Ti0.5 high-entropy alloy. Wear 2020, 468–469, 203595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mathabatha, M.; Popoola, A.; Oladijo, O. Residual stresses and corrosion performance of plasma sprayed zinc-based alloy coating on mild steel substrate. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 318, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Grandhi, S.; Raja, V.; Parida, S. Effect of manganese addition on the appearance, morphology, and corrosion resistance of hot-dip galvanized zinc coating. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 421, 127377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Meghwal, A.; Anupam, A.; Schulz, C.; Hall, C.; Murty, B.; Kottada, R.S.; Vijay, R.; Munroe, P.; Berndt, C.C.; Ang, A.S.M. Tribological and corrosion performance of an atmospheric plasma sprayed AlCoCr0.5Ni high-entropy alloy coating. Wear 2022, 506–507, 204443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, M.; Setiawan, R.C.; Li, D. Benefits of passive element Ti to the resistance of AlCrFeCoNi high-entropy alloy to corrosion and corrosive wear. Wear 2022, 492–493, 204231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xiao, J.-K.; Wu, Y.-Q.; Chen, J.; Zhang, C. Microstructure and tribological properties of plasma sprayed FeCoNiCrSiAlx high entropy alloy coatings. Wear 2020, 448–449, 203209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Joseph, J.; Haghdadi, N.; Shamlaye, K.; Hodgson, P.; Barnett, M.; Fabijanic, D. The sliding wear behaviour of CoCrFeMnNi and AlxCoCrFeNi high entropy alloys at elevated temperatures. Wear 2019, 428–429, 32–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Geng, Y.; Chen, J.; Tan, H.; Cheng, J.; Yang, J.; Liu, W. Vacuum tribological behaviors of CoCrFeNi high entropy alloy at elevated temperatures. Wear 2020, 456–457, 203368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gu, Z.; Peng, W.; Guo, W.; Zhang, Y.; Hou, J.; He, Q.; Zhao, K.; Xi, S. Design and characterization on microstructure evolution and properties of laser-cladding Ni1.5CrFeTi2B0.5Mox high-entropy alloy coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 408, 126793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, J.; Zhang, H.; Yu, X.; Wang, L.; Huang, W.; Lu, Z. Insight into the structure and tribological and corrosion performance of high entropy (CrNbSiTiZr)C films: First-principles and experimental study. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 421, 127468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, B.; Zhu, S.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Lu, B. Microstructural characteristics and enhanced wear resistance of nanoscale Al2O3/13 wt%TiO2-reinforced CoCrFeMnNi high entropy coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 412, 127019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fridrici, V.; Fouvry, S.; Kapsa, P. Fretting wear behavior of a Cu–Ni–In plasma coating. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2003, 163–164, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, W.; Qi, W.; Xie, L.; Yang, X.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y. Microstructure and Corrosion Behavior of (CoCrFeNi)95Nb5 High-Entropy Alloy Coating Fabricated by Plasma Spraying. Materials 2019, 12, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Tian, L.-H.; Xiong, W.; Liu, C.; Lu, S.; Fu, M. Microstructure and Wear Behavior of Atmospheric Plasma-Sprayed AlCoCrFeNiTi High-Entropy Alloy Coating. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2016, 25, 5513–5521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cheng, K.-C.; Chen, J.-H.; Stadler, S.; Chen, S.-H. Properties of atomized AlCoCrFeNi high-entropy alloy powders and their phase-adjustable coatings prepared via plasma spray process. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 478, 478–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guanhong, S.; Xiaodong, H.; Jiuxing, J.; Yue, S. Parametric study of Al and Al2O3 ceramic coatings deposited by air plasma spray onto polymer substrate. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 7864–7870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sichani, H.R.; Salehi, M.; Edris, H.; Farani, M.T. The effect of APS parameter on the microstructural, mechanical and corrosion properties of plasma sprayed Ni-Ti-Al intermetallic coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 309, 959–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sahab, A.R.M.; Saad, N.H.; Kasolang, S.; Saedon, J. Impact of plasma spray variables parameters on mechanical and wear behaviour of plasma sprayed Al2O3 3%wt TiO2 coating in abrasion and erosion application. Procedia Eng. 2012, 41, 1689–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Yang, Z.; Zheng, J.; Zhan, K.; Jiang, C.; Ji, V. Surface characteristic and wear resistance of S960 high-strength steel after shot peening combing with ultrasonic sprayed graphene oxide coating. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 18, 978–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bao, L.; Li, K.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhan, K.; Yang, Z.; Zhao, B.; Ji, V. Surface characteristics and stress corrosion behavior of AA 7075-T6 aluminum alloys after different shot peening processes. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2022, 440, 128481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zheng, J.; Li, K.; Zhang, Y.; Zhan, K.; Yang, Z.; Zhao, B.; Wang, Z.; Ji, V. Surface characteristic and corrosion resistance of different plasma-sprayed coatings (Zn, Al6061and Zn/23Al) on S960 high strength steel with subsequent micro-shot peening. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2022, 451, 129046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tian, J.-J.; Wei, Y.-K.; Li, C.-X.; Yang, G.-J.; Li, C.-J. Effect of Post-spray Shot Peening Treatment on the Corrosion Behavior of NiCr-Mo Coating by Plasma Spraying of the Shell–Core–Structured Powders. J. Therm. Spray Technol. 2017, 27, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, P.; Xing, B.; Zhang, X.; Jin, B.; Zhang, N. Plasma Cladding Current Optimization of FeCoCrMn HEA Coating and the Effect of Shot Peening. J. Therm. Spray Technol. 2022, 31, 1076–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tong, Z.; Pan, X.; Zhou, W.; Yang, Y.; Ye, Y.; Qian, D.; Ren, X. Achieving excellent wear and corrosion properties in laser additive manufactured CrMnFeCoNi high-entropy alloy by laser shock peening. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 422, 127504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. DeCamp, M.F.; DiChiara, A.D.; Unruh, K.M. Dynamic strain evolution in an optically excited Pt thin film. AIP Adv. 2021, 11, 115111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhan, K.; Zhang, Y.; Bao, L.; Yang, Z.; Zhao, B.; Ji, V. Surface characteristic and wear resistance of QT-700-2 nodular cast iron after laser quenching combing with shot peening treatment. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 423, 127589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a,b) SEM images of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy powder, (c) Element distribution of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy powder, (d) XRD patterns of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy powder.
Figure 1. (a,b) SEM images of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy powder, (c) Element distribution of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy powder, (d) XRD patterns of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy powder.
Coatings 13 00303 g001
Figure 2. Surface morphology of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating on BS960 high strength uh. steel (a) 250 A, (b) 350 A, (c) 450 A, (d) 550 A, (e) 250 A + shot peening, (f) 350 A + shot peening, (g) 450 A + shot peening, (h) 550 A + shot peening.
Figure 2. Surface morphology of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating on BS960 high strength uh. steel (a) 250 A, (b) 350 A, (c) 450 A, (d) 550 A, (e) 250 A + shot peening, (f) 350 A + shot peening, (g) 450 A + shot peening, (h) 550 A + shot peening.
Coatings 13 00303 g002
Figure 3. XRD patterns of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating by plasma spraying at different currents.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating by plasma spraying at different currents.
Coatings 13 00303 g003
Figure 4. Elemental analysis results of plasma sprayed FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating on BS960 high strength steel surface. (a) is surface morphology, (b) is element content. Red square is tested area.
Figure 4. Elemental analysis results of plasma sprayed FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating on BS960 high strength steel surface. (a) is surface morphology, (b) is element content. Red square is tested area.
Coatings 13 00303 g004
Figure 5. (ad) Cross-section morphology of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating on BS960 high strength steel, micro-structure of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating on BS960 high strength steel (e) 350 A, (f) 550 A.
Figure 5. (ad) Cross-section morphology of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating on BS960 high strength steel, micro-structure of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating on BS960 high strength steel (e) 350 A, (f) 550 A.
Coatings 13 00303 g005
Figure 6. Micro-hardness values of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating sprayed by plasma at different currents (a) before shot peening, (b) after shot peening.
Figure 6. Micro-hardness values of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating sprayed by plasma at different currents (a) before shot peening, (b) after shot peening.
Coatings 13 00303 g006
Figure 7. Friction coefficients of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating sprayed by plasma with different currents (a) 10 N, (b) 25 N.
Figure 7. Friction coefficients of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating sprayed by plasma with different currents (a) 10 N, (b) 25 N.
Coatings 13 00303 g007
Figure 8. Wear marks of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating sprayed by plasma at different currents under 10 N load (a,e) 250 A, (b,f) 350 A, (c,g) 450 A, (d,h) 550 A.
Figure 8. Wear marks of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating sprayed by plasma at different currents under 10 N load (a,e) 250 A, (b,f) 350 A, (c,g) 450 A, (d,h) 550 A.
Coatings 13 00303 g008
Figure 9. Wear scars of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating sprayed by plasma at different currents under 25 N load (a,e) 250 A, (b,f) 350 A, (c,g) 450 A, (d,h) 550 A. (red dot line area is typical wear scar).
Figure 9. Wear scars of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating sprayed by plasma at different currents under 25 N load (a,e) 250 A, (b,f) 350 A, (c,g) 450 A, (d,h) 550 A. (red dot line area is typical wear scar).
Coatings 13 00303 g009
Figure 10. Friction coefficients of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating sprayed by plasma with different currents after shot peening treatment (a) 10 N, (b) 25 N.
Figure 10. Friction coefficients of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating sprayed by plasma with different currents after shot peening treatment (a) 10 N, (b) 25 N.
Coatings 13 00303 g010
Figure 11. Wear scars of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating sprayed by plasma at different currents under 10 N load after shot peening treatment (a,e) 250 A, (b,f) 350 A, (c,g) 450 A, (d,h) 550 A.
Figure 11. Wear scars of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating sprayed by plasma at different currents under 10 N load after shot peening treatment (a,e) 250 A, (b,f) 350 A, (c,g) 450 A, (d,h) 550 A.
Coatings 13 00303 g011
Figure 12. Wear scars of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating sprayed by plasma at different currents under 25 N load after shot peening treatment (a,e) 250 A, (b,f) 350 A, (c,g) 450 A, (d,h) 550 A.
Figure 12. Wear scars of FeCoNiCrMo0.2 high entropy alloy coating sprayed by plasma at different currents under 25 N load after shot peening treatment (a,e) 250 A, (b,f) 350 A, (c,g) 450 A, (d,h) 550 A.
Coatings 13 00303 g012
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, Z.; Jiang, C. Surface Characteristic and Friction Behavior of Plasma Sprayed FeCoNiCrMo0.2 High Entropy Alloy Coatings on BS960 High-Strength Steel with Subsequent Shot Peening Treatment. Coatings 2023, 13, 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13020303

AMA Style

Yang Z, Jiang C. Surface Characteristic and Friction Behavior of Plasma Sprayed FeCoNiCrMo0.2 High Entropy Alloy Coatings on BS960 High-Strength Steel with Subsequent Shot Peening Treatment. Coatings. 2023; 13(2):303. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13020303

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Zheng, and Chuanhai Jiang. 2023. "Surface Characteristic and Friction Behavior of Plasma Sprayed FeCoNiCrMo0.2 High Entropy Alloy Coatings on BS960 High-Strength Steel with Subsequent Shot Peening Treatment" Coatings 13, no. 2: 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13020303

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop