Next Article in Journal
Seawater Corrosion of Copper and Its Alloy Coated with Hydrothermal Carbon
Next Article in Special Issue
Degradation and Stabilization of Resin-Dentine Interfaces in Polymeric Dental Adhesives: An Updated Review
Previous Article in Journal
Microstructure and Nanoindentation Evolution of (Ni,Pt)Al Coating on IC21 Substrate at 1100 °C
Previous Article in Special Issue
Coralline Hydroxyapatite Coated with a Layer Biomimetic Calcium Phosphate Containing BMP-2 Induces Dose-Related Ectopic Bone Formation in Wistar Rats
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advanced Biomaterials, Coatings, and Techniques: Applications in Medicine and Dentistry

by
Lavinia Cosmina Ardelean
1,* and
Laura-Cristina Rusu
2
1
Department of Technology of Materials and Devices in Dental Medicine, Multidisciplinary Center for Research, Evaluation, Diagnosis and Therapies in Oral Medicine, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 2 Eftimie Murgu Sq., 300041 Timisoara, Romania
2
Department of Oral Pathology, Multidisciplinary Center for Research, Evaluation, Diagnosis and Therapies in Oral Medicine, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 2 Eftimie Murgu Sq., 300041 Timisoara, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2022, 12(6), 797; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12060797
Submission received: 6 June 2022 / Accepted: 7 June 2022 / Published: 8 June 2022
The field of biomaterials is very extensive, encompassing both the materials themselves and the manufacturing methods, which are constantly developing. Biomaterials, natural or synthetic, alive or lifeless, due to their biological interactions, are frequently used in medical or oral applications to augment or replace a natural function [1].
A biomaterial for medical or oral applications has been defined as a natural or synthetic material that can be inserted into live tissues without developing an immune reaction [2]. As a consequence of the close proximity with human tissues, their use implies specific issues related to properties such as biocompatibility, bio-integration, antimicrobial action, corrosion resistance, and long-term performance. Based on biocompatibility, they are classified as bioactive, biotolerant, biodegradable, or bioinert [3].
The wide range of biomaterial applications in medicine and dentistry include both hard and soft tissue regeneration [4,5]. The basic characteristics of biomaterials for tissue engineering have constantly improved due to the advancements in the field, being characterized by corrosion resistance, non-toxicity and non-carcinogenic properties, bioactivity, and proper mechanical strength, depending on the surrounding tissue type [2,6].
Starting with medical devices or grafts, regenerative medicine has improved the field of tissue engineering, with the aid of biomaterials. Natural or synthetic biomaterial scaffolds have been developed to induce replacement of the missing tissue by means of generating specific regenerative cell responses, through bioactive molecules. Once placed into a specific tissue, the biomaterial surface initiates the interaction with the surrounding cells, inducing the charging of its surface energy and resulting in an adequate matrix for biomolecule adhesion [2,7,8,9].
Scaffolds promote cell growth and differentiation, resulting in tissue healing. Based on their type, scaffold biomaterials can be categorized in natural-based and synthetic-based polymers, ceramics, hydrogels, and bioactive glasses [9,10].
The latest generation of scaffolds can induce specific cellular responses: adhesion, differentiation, and proliferation. In order to improve tissue response and intensify the regenerative capability scaffolds were combined with growth factors and bioactive molecules. They are used to provide an extracellular matrix, an attachment site, or 3D support for regenerative cells, as well as a template for tissue regeneration [1,2,11].
Smart scaffolds, which incorporate bioactive molecules and nanoparticles, with tailored physical and chemical properties, aim to improve the interactions with cells by enhancing the osteogenic differentiation and generate a better response to the surrounding environment. Providing a proper microenvironment that ensures cell adhesion and differentiation is the ultimate goal [12,13,14].
Platelet-rich fibrin is a biomaterial scaffold with trapped platelets and leukocytes aimed to accelerate musculoskeletal tissue recovery by providing a binding site for platelets and growth factors [15,16]. It promotes tissue regeneration and reduces healing time by increasing the local concentration of growth factors, and has been frequently used in combination with bone graft materials in maxillofacial and orthopaedic surgery and sports-related injuries [17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. It has excellent handling characteristics, and can be firmly sutured in an anatomically desired location during open surgery [24,25,26].
The additive manufacturing (3D printing) of biomaterials launched a new perspective for the field of biomedical engineering, considering its patient-specific clinical applications. Scaffolds are now being fabricated using 3D bioprinting methods and progress has been made in 3D printing of biocompatible materials, seed cells, and supporting components into functional living tissue [1,2,27].
Based on layer-by-layer precise positioning of biological constituents, biochemicals and living cells, this novel technology facilitates the printing of cells, tissues, and organs for regenerative medicine purposes, enabling the manufacturing of tissue-engineered constructs with tailored structures and properties [1,28,29,30,31,32].
Coatings play an important role in achieving the most crucial properties of biomaterials by surface modification, making them suitable for medical and oral applications. The application of coatings onto medical devices is quite vast, ranging from implantable to non-implantable medical devices, from orthopedic prostheses to dental implants, including hydroxyapatite (which enhances cell attachment onto orthopaedic implants), antimicrobial silver coatings on catheters, drug-eluting coatings on stents, and blood-compatible coatings (such as heparin). The protective medical coating of prosthetic device surfaces results in healing stimulation; meanwhile, porous bioactive coatings make implants far better suited to bone tissue interaction. The coating of scaffolds with stem or differentiated cells is a complex and novel method used in the field of regenerative medicine [2,33].
Among the different methods used to deposit coatings, plasma spraying, dipping, and spin coating are quite usual. Meanwhile, recently developed techniques such as laser, low-temperature atmospheric plasmas, and microblasting have been used for the deposition of bioactive coatings [34,35,36].
This Special Issue aims to provide a forum for researchers to share current research findings to promote further research and provide an updated outlook on the applications of biomaterials and coatings in medicine and dentistry, as well as presenting innovative manufacturing technologies.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Matichescu, A.; Ardelean, L.C.; Rusu, L.-C.; Craciun, D.; Bratu, E.A.; Babucea, M.; Leretter, M. Advanced Biomaterials and Techniques for Oral Tissue Engineering and Regeneration—A Review. Materials 2020, 13, 5303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Roi, A.; Ardelean, L.C.; Roi, C.I.; Boia, E.-R.; Boia, S.; Rusu, L.-C. Oral Bone Tissue Engineering: Advanced Biomaterials for Cell Adhesion, Proliferation and Differentiation. Materials 2019, 12, 2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Marin, E.; Boschetto, F.; Pezzotti, G. Biomaterials and biocompatibility: An historical overview. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2020, 108, 1617–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Huang, G.T. Pulp and dentin tissue engineering and regeneration: Current progress. Regen. Med. 2009, 4, 697–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ohara, T.; Itaya, T.; Usami, K.; Ando, Y.; Sakurai, H.; Honda, M.J.; Ueda, M.; Kagami, H. Evaluation of scaffold materials for tooth tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2010, 94, 800–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Anderson, J.M. The future of biomedical materials. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2006, 17, 1025–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bhat, S.; Kumar, A. Biomaterials and bioengineering tomorrow’s healthcare. Biomatter 2013, 3, e24717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gilbert Triplett, R.; Budinskaya, O. New Frontiers in Biomaterials. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. 2017, 29, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jafari, M.; Paknejad, Z.; Rezai Rad, M.; Motamedian, S.R.; Eghbal, M.J.; Nadjmi, N.; Khojasteh, A. Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering: A literature review. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B 2017, 105, 431–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rusu, L.-C.; Ardelean, L.; Negrutiu, M.-L.; Dragomirescu, A.-O.; Albu, M.G.; Ghica, M.V.; Topala, F.I.; Podoleanu, A.; Sinescu, C. SEM for the General Structural Features Assesing of the Synthetic Polymer Scaffolds. Rev. Chim. 2011, 62, 841–845. [Google Scholar]
  11. Baranova, J.; Büchner, D.; Götz, W.; Schulze, M.; Tobiasch, E. Tooth Formation: Are the Hardest Tissues of Human Body Hard to Regenerate? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, K.; Wang, S.; Zhou, C.; Cheng, L.; Gao, X.; Xie, X.; Sun, J.; Wang, H.; Weir, M.D.; Reynolds, M.A.; et al. Advanced smart biomaterials and constructs for hard tissue engineering and regeneration. Bone Res. 2018, 6, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Motamedian, S.R.; Hosseinpour, S.; Ahsaie, M.G.; Khojasteh, A. Smart scaffolds in bone tissue engineering: A systematic review of literature. World J. Stem Cells 2015, 7, 657–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Khan, F.; Tanaka, M. Designing smart biomaterials for tissue engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Grecu, A.F.; Reclaru, L.; Ardelean, L.C.; Nica, O.; Ciucă, E.M.; Ciurea, M.E. Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Its Emerging Therapeutic Benefits for Musculoskeletal Injury Treatment. Medicina 2019, 55, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Sánchez, A.R.; Sheridan, P.J.; Kupp, L.I. Is platelet-rich plasma the perfect enhancement factor? A current review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2003, 18, 93–103. [Google Scholar]
  17. Alsousou, J.; Thompson, M.; Hulley, P.; Noble, A.; Willett, K. The biology of platelet-rich plasma and its application in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A review of the literature. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2009, 91, 987–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zumstein, M.A.; Berger, S.; Schober, M.; Boileau, P.; Nyffeler, R.W.; Horn, M.; Dahinden, C.A. Leukocyteand platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) for long-term delivery of growth factor in rotator cuff repair: Review, preliminary results and future directions. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2012, 13, 1196–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Naik, B.; Karunakar, P.; Jayadev, M.; Marshal, V.R. Role of Platelet rich fibrin in wound healing: A critical review. J. Conserv. Dent. 2013, 16, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ali, S.; Bakry, S.A.; Abd-Elhakam, H. Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Systematic Review. J. Oral. Implantol. 2015, 41, 746–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Borie, E.; Oliví, D.G.; Orsi, I.A.; Garlet, K.; Weber, B.; Beltrán, V.; Fuentes, R. Platelet-rich fibrin application in dentistry: A literature review. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015, 8, 7922–7929. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Asutay, F.; Yolcu, Ü.; Geçör, O.; Acar, A.H.; Öztürk, S.A.; Malkoç, S. An evaluation of effects of platelet rich-fibrin on postoperative morbidities after lower third molar surgery. Niger. J. Clin. Pract. 2017, 20, 1531–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Ozgul, O.; Senses, F.; Er, N.; Tekin, U.; Tuz, H.H.; Alkan, A.; Kocyigit, I.D.; Atil, F. Efficacy of platelet rich fibrin in the reduction of the pain and swelling after impacted third molar surgery: Randomized multicenter split-mouth clinical trial. Head Face Med. 2015, 11, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Guinot, A.; Arnaud, A.; Azzis, O.; Habonimana, E.; Jasienski, S.; Frémond, B. Preliminary experience with the use of an autologous platelet-rich fibrin membrane for urethroplasty coverage in distal hypospadias surgery. J. Pediatr. Urol. 2014, 10, 300–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Garin, P.; Peerbaccus, Y.; Mullier, F.; Gheldof, D.; Dogne, J.M.; Putz, L.; Van Damme, J.P. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): An autologous packing material for middle ear microsurgery. B-ENT 2014, 10, 27–34. [Google Scholar]
  26. Niedzielska, I.; Ciapiński, D.; Bąk, M.; Niedzielski, D. The Assessment of the Usefulness of Platelet-Rich Fibrin in the Healing Process Bone Resorption. Coatings 2022, 12, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ma, Y.; Xie, L.; Yang, B.; Tian, W. Three-dimensional printing biotechnology for the regeneration of the tooth and tooth-supporting tissues. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2019, 116, 452–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zadpoor, A.A.; Malda, J. Additive manufacturing of biomaterials, tissues, and organs. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2017, 45, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Murphy, S.V.; Atala, A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 773–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, X.; Ao, Q.; Tian, X.; Fan, J.; Wei, Y.; Hou, W.; Tong, H.; Bai, S. 3D bioprinting technologies for hard tissue and organ engineering. Materials 2016, 9, 802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ji, X.; Zhu, H.; Zhao, L.; Xiao, J. Recent advances in 3D bioprinting for the regeneration of functional cartilage. Regen. Med. 2018, 13, 73–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nakamura, M.; Kobayashi, A.; Takagi, F.; Watanabe, A.; Hiruma, Y.; Ohuchi, K.; Iwasaki, Y.; Horie, M.; Morita, I.; Takatani, S. Biocompatible inkjet printing technique for designed seeding of individual living cells. Tissue Eng. 2005, 11, 1658–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Taranu, B.-O.; Ianasi, P.; Rus, S.F.; Bucur, A.I. Simultaneous Precipitation and Electrodeposition of Hydroxyapatite Coatings at Different Temperatures on Various Metal Substrates. Coatings 2022, 12, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, X.; Liu, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; Tang, N. Layer-by-Layer Deposition of Hyaluronan and Quercetin-Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles onto Titanium for Improving Blood Compatibility. Coatings 2020, 10, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Rau, J.V.; De Bonis, A.; Curcio, M.; Schuhladen, K.; Barbaro, K.; De Bellis, G.; Teghil, R.; Boccaccini, A.R. Borate and Silicate Bioactive Glass Coatings Prepared by Nanosecond Pulsed Laser Deposition. Coatings 2020, 10, 1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bartmański, M.; Pawłowski, Ł.; Zieliński, A.; Mielewczyk-Gryń, A.; Strugała, G.; Cieślik, B. Electrophoretic Deposition and Characteristics of Chitosan–Nanosilver Composite Coatings on a Nanotubular TiO2 Layer. Coatings 2020, 10, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ardelean, L.C.; Rusu, L.-C. Advanced Biomaterials, Coatings, and Techniques: Applications in Medicine and Dentistry. Coatings 2022, 12, 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12060797

AMA Style

Ardelean LC, Rusu L-C. Advanced Biomaterials, Coatings, and Techniques: Applications in Medicine and Dentistry. Coatings. 2022; 12(6):797. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12060797

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ardelean, Lavinia Cosmina, and Laura-Cristina Rusu. 2022. "Advanced Biomaterials, Coatings, and Techniques: Applications in Medicine and Dentistry" Coatings 12, no. 6: 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12060797

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop