Next Article in Journal
Corrosion of Laser Cladding High-Entropy Alloy Coatings: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Improving the Protection Performance of Waterborne Coatings with a Corrosion Inhibitor Encapsulated in Polyaniline-Modified Halloysite Nanotubes
Previous Article in Journal
ZIF-67 Derived Co-Ni/C Composites for High-Efficiency Broadband Microwave Absorption
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Self-Healing Organic-Inorganic Coatings

1
Institute of Chemistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara 14800-060, SP, Brazil
2
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Materials Performance, Kemistintie 3, FI-02044 Espoo, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2022, 12(11), 1668; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12111668
Submission received: 25 October 2022 / Accepted: 31 October 2022 / Published: 3 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Self-Healing Organic-Inorganic Coatings)
Nowadays, steel and light alloys, such as aluminum, magnesium, and titanium, represent most of the primary components of metallic structures in many applications. Steel is known for its availability, high strength, and cost-efficiency [1]. Aluminum stands out for its excellent strength-to-weight ratio, easy casting, high thermal conductivity, and reasonable corrosion resistance [2,3]. Magnesium is somewhat similar to aluminum but is lighter and less corrosion-resistant [3]. Finally, titanium alloys are a good option when either biocompatibility, a high tensile strength, or elevated temperatures (working temperatures around 540 °C) are required [4]. However, the corrosion of these alloys remains an important challenge in terms of durability and safety, since, in addition to their susceptibility to environmental conditions, they can form local microgalvanic couples at intermetallic sites [3,5,6]. To address these issues, polymer coatings are one of the simplest and most efficient protection strategies, limiting the exposure of the metal to corrosive environments. Hence, the development of high-performance smart/self-healing coatings that significantly improve the metal’s lifetime is of the utmost importance and its methods of obtention and action must be thoroughly investigated.
The challenge of developing multifunctional anti-corrosion coatings has urged research to meet the demanding requirements of modern technologies. New metal alloys and extreme environments such as temperature and pH variation, presence of salts, microorganisms, and UV radiation, just to name a few, put the use of conventional polymer coatings into question. In this scenario, the increased demand for durable solutions is driving manufacturers to produce new materials that need to be environmentally friendly and provide optimum protection for the metal under harsh conditions. In addition, the trend towards circular economy has also implemented a more demanding model of production and its implications include the development of self-repairable barrier coatings.
Important advances in the protective coatings field were achieved when the nanophases of ceramic materials were incorporated into standard polymer coatings, resulting in the so-called “hybrid coatings” [7]. The synergy seen when combining the hydrophobic barrier of polymers with the high thermal and mechanical features of inorganic phases results in a unique material with improved properties. For instance, improvements in the adhesion of acrylic coatings to metal substrates from 6.7 to 26.3 MPa have been reported when proper amounts of silica nanoparticles were added to the organic phase [8]. Additionally, thermal [9,10] and mechanical [11,12] properties can be significantly improved by adding an inorganic nanophase in optimized amounts and under optimal conditions.
The concept of self-healing coatings meets the circular economy premises and has attracted a lot of attention from industry and academia. Achieving actual self-healing, however, is not an easy task. Conventional paints have been designed and in use since the early 1900s, primarily to promote a physical barrier between the metal and the environment. Additionally, for decorative purposes, pigments were also incorporated [13]. Over time, a subsequent increase in the complexity and functionality of coatings led to the incorporation of corrosion inhibitors such as phosphates, benzoates, chromates, cerium and molybdates salts, amines and amides, and sulfur compounds, among several others, into polymer coatings [14,15,16]. Nonetheless, the concept of self-healing or self-repair in biological systems was pioneered by White et al. in 2001 after incorporating microcapsules containing a monomer and catalyst that regenerated cracks in epoxy resins [17].
Recent studies have demonstrated that the addition of micro- or nanocapsules containing organic or inorganic healing agents, reversible covalent bonds (of polymers), shape memory polymers, vascular networks, and organic or inorganic corrosion inhibitors are efficient approaches to promote coating repair after damage. It has been found that the reparative action can be either triggered autonomously or through external intervention (pH, temperature, UV light, mechanical action, chemical reactions, etc.) [18,19,20]. Regardless of the action type, the passive layer’s integrity should not be compromised when additives are incorporated into coatings. Therefore, the smart system’s size, complexity, and costs should be considered when designing new self-healing coatings [6,20,21,22,23].
In recent decades, the advances in polymeric coating systems resulted in technologies capable of solving issues such as a faster curing time, improved adhesion to the metal substrate, higher performance, and environmental safety [24,25]. Despite all these advances, self-triggered smart coatings that can reversibly regenerate coatings after failure, extending their safety, lifetime, and functionality, need to be implemented in the market.
The use of inorganic inhibitors, such as inorganic salts [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36], organic molecules [37,38], or carbon dots [39,40], has shown an excellent cost–benefit ratio and low complexity, making this approach very promising for applications in a wide range of industries. When loaded in a concentration range of 500 to 2000 ppm, these additives do not significantly affect the structural integrity and adhesion of the coatings [26,27].
The nano- and microcapsule systems containing inorganic or organic healing agents [17,20,41,42,43,44,45,46] have shown good activity against corrosion and mechanical damage, liberating active agents by crack-induced rupture. Similarly, ion exchange systems, such as lamellar double hydroxides (natural or synthetic clays), can release considerable amounts of inhibitor compounds or ions that interact with corrosion products, thus forming a passive layer [47,48]. Sulfur-containing compounds exhibit the ability to form reversible covalent disulfide bonds in the damaged zones [49,50], thanks to the dynamic nature of the S-S cross bonds of tetrasulfide groups [51].
Finally, the integration of microvascular networks, capillaries, or sensors inspired by biological circulatory systems has been explored as an alternative in the release of self-healing agents for the detection and repair of multiple damages in coatings. The incorporated three-dimensional nanostructures act as reservoirs for the storage of healing substances such as 8-hydroxyquinoline, Ce(III), Li2CO3, among others [6,52,53,54], which are released in the vessels through capillary action to the damaged region. For these systems, a maximum efficiency of regeneration over some cycles can be observed, resulting in an increase in the coatings’ lifetime, although the costs and complexity for its scalability need to be considered [6,20,21,22,23].
Considering all these approaches, some of the most challenging factors in producing smart anticorrosive coatings include: (i) the selection of effective, stable, and environmentally friendly systems that provide fast restoration after failure; (ii) the incorporation of agents that largely preserve the integrity of the physical barrier property; (iii) functional compatibility between additives and the coating; (iv) the employment of cost-effective, green, and simple methodologies; and (v) development of reversible healable coatings with reproducible performance over several cycles. Even though significant advances have been made toward more sustainable high-performance and self-healing films, the latter criterion remains the most challenging. New studies are necessary to further develop smart coating systems that provide efficient, reproducible, scalable, economical, and green solutions for the industrial sector.

Author Contributions

All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors voice their thanks for the financial support from the following funding agencies: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (424133/2016-4, 142305/2020-0), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) (88887.341571/2019-00, 88887.495487/2020-00, Finance Code 001), and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) (grants 2015/11907-2, 2015/09342-7, 2019/13871-6).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alcántara, J.; de la Fuente, D.; Chico, B.; Simancas, J.; Díaz, I.; Morcillo, M. Marine Atmospheric Corrosion of Carbon Steel: A Review. Materials 2017, 10, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Davis, J.R. Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys. In Alloying: Understanding the Basics; ASM International: Novelty, OH, USA, 2001; pp. 351–416. [Google Scholar]
  3. Thomer, K.W. Materials and Concepts in Body Construction. In Automotive Paints and Coatings; Streitberger, H.-J., Dössel, K.-F., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 13–60. [Google Scholar]
  4. Niinomi, M.; Nakai, M.; Hieda, J. Development of New Metallic Alloys for Biomedical Applications. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 3888–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Smith, B.; Spulber, A.; Modi, S.; Fiorelli, T. Technology Roadmaps: Intelligent Mobility Technology, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, and Light Duty Vehicle Propulsion. Cent. Automot. Res. 2017, 22, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dieleman, C.D.; Denissen, P.J.; Garcia, S.J. Long-Term Active Corrosion Protection of Damaged Coated-AA2024-T3 by Embedded Electrospun Inhibiting Nanonetworks. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 5, 1800176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sanchez, C.; Belleville, P.; Popall, M.; Nicole, L. Applications of Advanced Hybrid Organic–Inorganic Nanomaterials: From Laboratory to Market. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 696–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Trentin, A.; de Gasparini, A.L.; Faria, F.A.; Harb, S.V.; dos Santos, F.C.; Pulcinelli, S.H.; Santilli, C.V.; Hammer, P. Barrier Properties of High Performance PMMA-Silica Anticorrosion Coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2020, 138, 105398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dos Santos, F.C.; Pulcinelli, S.H.; Santilli, C.V.; Hammer, P. Protective PMMA-Silica Coatings for Aluminum Alloys: Nanostructural Control of Elevated Thermal Stability and Anticorrosive Performance. Prog. Org. Coat. 2021, 152, 106129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Torrico, R.F.A.O.; Harb, S.V.; Trentin, A.; Uvida, M.C.; Pulcinelli, S.H.; Santilli, C.V.; Hammer, P. Structure and Properties of Epoxy-Siloxane-Silica Nanocomposite Coatings for Corrosion Protection. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 513, 617–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Harb, S.V.; Pulcinelli, S.H.; Santilli, C.V.; Knowles, K.M.; Hammer, P. A Comparative Study on Graphene Oxide and Carbon Nanotube Reinforcement of PMMA-Siloxane-Silica Anticorrosive Coatings. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 16339–16350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Harb, S.V.; Cerrutti, B.M.; Pulcinelli, S.H.; Santilli, C.V.; Hammer, P. Siloxane–PMMA Hybrid Anti-Corrosion Coatings Reinforced by Lignin. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2015, 275, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Trentin, A.; Pakseresht, A.; Duran, A.; Castro, Y.; Galusek, D. Electrochemical Characterization of Polymeric Coatings for Corrosion Protection: A Review of Advances and Perspectives. Polymers 2022, 14, 2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Magnussen, O.M. Corrosion Protection by Inhibition. In Encyclopedia of Electrochemistry; Bard, A.J., Ed.; Wiley VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2007; pp. 435–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Aldykewicz, A.J.; Isaacs, H.S.; Davenport, A.J. The Investigation of Cerium as a Cathodic Inhibitor for Aluminum-Copper Alloys. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1995, 142, 3342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Andreatta, F.; Fedrizzi, L. Corrosion Inhibitors. In Active Protective Coatings: New-Generation Coatings for Metals; Hughes, A.E., Mol, J.M.C., Zheludkevich, M.L., Buchheit, R.G., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 59–84. [Google Scholar]
  17. White, S.R.; Sottos, N.R.; Geubelle, P.H.; Moore, J.S.; Kessler, M.R.; Sriram, S.R.; Brown, E.N.; Viswanathan, S. Autonomic Healing of Polymer Composites. Nature 2001, 409, 794–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Baghdachi, J. Smart Coatings. In Smart Coatings II; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2009; Volume 1002, pp. 3–24. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fischer, H.R.; García, S.J. Active Protective Coatings: Sense and Heal Concepts for Organic Coatings. In Active Protective Coatings: New-Generation Coatings for Metals; Hughes, A.E., Mol, J.M.C., Zheludkevich, M.L., Buchheit, R.G., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 139–156. [Google Scholar]
  20. Blaiszik, B.J.; Kramer, S.L.B.; Olugebefola, S.C.; Moore, J.S.; Sottos, N.R.; White, S.R. Self-Healing Polymers and Composites. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2010, 40, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hansen, C.J.; Wu, W.; Toohey, K.S.; Sottos, N.R.; White, S.R.; Lewis, J.A. Self-Healing Materials with Microvascular Networks. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 581–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gergely, R.C.R.; Santa Cruz, W.A.; Krull, B.P.; Pruitt, E.L.; Wang, J.; Sottos, N.R.; White, S.R. Restoration of Impact Damage in Polymers via a Hybrid Microcapsule–Microvascular Self-Healing System. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1704197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, Y.; Yu, M.; Chen, C.; Li, S.; Liu, J. Self-Healing Coatings Based on Stimuli-Responsive Release of Corrosion Inhibitors: A Review. Front. Mater. 2022, 8, 795397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Akafuah, N.; Poozesh, S.; Salaimeh, A.; Patrick, G.; Lawler, K.; Saito, K. Evolution of the Automotive Body Coating Process—A Review. Coatings 2016, 6, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Doerre, M.; Hibbitts, L.; Patrick, G.; Akafuah, N.K. Advances in Automotive Conversion Coatings during Pretreatment of the Body Structure: A Review. Coatings 2018, 8, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Trentin, A.; Harb, S.V.; Uvida, M.C.; Pulcinelli, S.H.; Santilli, C.V.; Marcoen, K.; Pletincx, S.; Terryn, H.; Hauffman, T.; Hammer, P. Dual Role of Lithium on the Structure and Self-Healing Ability of PMMA-Silica Coatings on AA7075 Alloy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 40629–40641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Harb, S.V.; dos Santos, F.C.; Caetano, B.L.; Pulcinelli, S.H.; Santilli, C.V.; Hammer, P. Structural Properties of Cerium Doped Siloxane-PMMA Hybrid Coatings with High Anticorrosive Performance. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 15414–15424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Visser, P.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, X.; Hashimoto, T.; Thompson, G.E.; Lyon, S.B.; van der Ven, L.G.J.; Mol, A.J.M.C.; Terryn, H.A. The Corrosion Protection of AA2024-T3 Aluminium Alloy by Leaching of Lithium-Containing Salts from Organic Coatings. Faraday Discuss. 2015, 180, 511–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Mosa, J.; Rosero-Navarro, N.C.; Aparicio, M. Active Corrosion Inhibition of Mild Steel by Environmentally-Friendly Ce-Doped Organic–Inorganic Sol–Gel Coatings. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 39577–39586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Harb, S.V.; Trentin, A.; de Souza, T.A.C.; Magnani, M.; Pulcinelli, S.H.; Santilli, C.V.; Hammer, P. Effective Corrosion Protection by Eco-Friendly Self-Healing PMMA-Cerium Oxide Coatings. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 383, 123219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, T.; Shi, H.; Fan, S.; Liu, F.; Han, E.-H. Cerium Tartrate as a Pigment in Epoxy Coatings for Corrosion Protection of AA 2024-T3. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 105, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Calado, L.M.; Taryba, M.G.; Morozov, Y.; Carmezim, M.J.; Montemor, M.F. Novel Smart and Self-Healing Cerium Phosphate-Based Corrosion Inhibitor for AZ31 Magnesium Alloy. Corros. Sci. 2020, 170, 108648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Morozov, Y.; Calado, L.M.; Shakoor, R.A.; Raj, R.; Kahraman, R.; Taryba, M.G.; Montemor, M.F. Epoxy Coatings Modified with a New Cerium Phosphate Inhibitor for Smart Corrosion Protection of Steel. Corros. Sci. 2019, 159, 108128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Castro, Y.; Özmen, E.; Durán, A. Integrated Self-Healing Coating System for Outstanding Corrosion Protection of AA2024. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020, 387, 125521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Trentin, A.; Harb, S.V.; Uvida, M.C.; Marcoen, K.; Pulcinelli, S.H.; Santilli, C.V.; Terryn, H.; Hauffman, T.; Hammer, P. Effect of Ce(III) and Ce(IV) Ions on the Structure and Active Protection of PMMA-Silica Coatings on AA7075 Alloy. Corros. Sci. 2021, 189, 109581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, X.; Tang, J.; Wei, H.; Zhang, H.; Tang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Zuo, Y. Effect of Cerium Tartrate on the Corrosion Resistance of Epoxy Coating on Aluminum Alloy and Its Mechanism. Coatings 2022, 12, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Habib, S.; Fayyed, E.; Shakoor, R.A.; Kahraman, R.; Abdullah, A. Improved Self-Healing Performance of Polymeric Nanocomposites Reinforced with Talc Nanoparticles (TNPs) and Urea-Formaldehyde Microcapsules (UFMCs). Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 102926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yabuki, A. Self-Healing Coatings for Corrosion Inhibition of Metals. Mod. Appl. Sci. 2015, 9, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhu, C.; Fu, Y.; Liu, C.; Liu, Y.; Hu, L.; Liu, J.; Bello, I.; Li, H.; Liu, N.; Guo, S.; et al. Carbon Dots as Fillers Inducing Healing/Self-Healing and Anticorrosion Properties in Polymers. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1701399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yang, D.; Ye, Y.; Su, Y.; Liu, S.; Gong, D.; Zhao, H. Functionalization of Citric Acid-Based Carbon Dots by Imidazole toward Novel Green Corrosion Inhibitor for Carbon Steel. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 229, 180–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Snihirova, D.; Lamaka, S.V.; Montemor, M.F. “SMART” Protective Ability of Water Based Epoxy Coatings Loaded with CaCO3 Microbeads Impregnated with Corrosion Inhibitors Applied on AA2024 Substrates. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 83, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Recloux, I.; Mouanga, M.; Druart, M.E.; Paint, Y.; Olivier, M.G. Silica Mesoporous Thin Films as Containers for Benzotriazole for Corrosion Protection of 2024 Aluminium Alloys. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 346, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, J.; Feng, Q.; Cui, J.; Yuan, Q.; Qiu, H.; Gao, S.; Yang, J. Self-Assembled Graphene Oxide Microcapsules in Pickering Emulsions for Self-Healing Waterborne Polyurethane Coatings. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 151, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nguyen Thuy, D.; To Thi Xuan, H.; Nicolay, A.; Paint, Y.; Olivier, M.G. Corrosion Protection of Carbon Steel by Solvent Free Epoxy Coating Containing Hydrotalcites Intercalated with Different Organic Corrosion Inhibitors. Prog. Org. Coat. 2016, 101, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Attaei, M.; Taryba, M.G.; Shakoor, R.A.; Kahraman, R.; Marques, A.C.; Montemor, M.F. Highly Protective Polyolefin Coating Modified with Ceria Nano Particles Treated with N,N,N’,N’-Tetrakis(2-Hydroxyethyl)Ethylenediamine for Corrosion Protection of Carbon Steel. Corros. Sci. 2022, 198, 110162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yan, D.; Liu, X.; Chen, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, T.; Wang, J. A Double-Layered Self-Healing Coating System Based on the Synergistic Strategy of Cysteine and Iron Polyacrylate for Corrosion Protection. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 451, 138995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Montemor, M.F.; Snihirova, D.V.; Taryba, M.G.; Lamaka, S.V.; Kartsonakis, I.A.; Balaskas, A.C.; Kordas, G.C.; Tedim, J.; Kuznetsova, A.; Zheludkevich, M.L.; et al. Evaluation of Self-Healing Ability in Protective Coatings Modified with Combinations of Layered Double Hydroxides and Cerium Molibdate Nanocontainers Filled with Corrosion Inhibitors. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 60, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Danaee, I.; Darmiani, E.; Rashed, G.R.; Zaarei, D. Self-Healing and Anticorrosive Properties of Ce(III)/Ce(IV) in Nanoclay-Epoxy Coatings. Iran. Polym. J. 2014, 23, 891–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rekondo, A.; Martin, R.; Ruiz de Luzuriaga, A.; Cabañero, G.; Grande, H.J.; Odriozola, I. Catalyst-Free Room-Temperature Self-Healing Elastomers Based on Aromatic Disulfide Metathesis. Mater. Horiz 2014, 1, 237–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Abdolah Zadeh, M.; van der Zwaag, S.; Garcia, S.J. Adhesion and Long-Term Barrier Restoration of Intrinsic Self-Healing Hybrid Sol–Gel Coatings. ACS Appl Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 4126–4136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Goyal, M.; Kumar, S.; Bahadur, I.; Verma, C.; Ebenso, E.E. Organic Corrosion Inhibitors for Industrial Cleaning of Ferrous and Non-Ferrous Metals in Acidic Solutions: A Review. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 256, 565–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Frankel, G.S. Corrosion-Sensing Behavior of an Acrylic-Based Coating System. Corrosion 1999, 55, 957–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. McAdam, G.; Newman, P.J.; McKenzie, I.; Davis, C.; Hinton, B.R.W. Fiber Optic Sensors for Detection of Corrosion within Aircraft. Struct. Health Monit. 2005, 4, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kendig, M.; Hon, M.; Warren, L. ‘Smart’ Corrosion Inhibiting Coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2003, 47, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hammer, P.; Uvida, M.C.; Trentin, A. Self-Healing Organic-Inorganic Coatings. Coatings 2022, 12, 1668. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12111668

AMA Style

Hammer P, Uvida MC, Trentin A. Self-Healing Organic-Inorganic Coatings. Coatings. 2022; 12(11):1668. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12111668

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hammer, Peter, Mayara Carla Uvida, and Andressa Trentin. 2022. "Self-Healing Organic-Inorganic Coatings" Coatings 12, no. 11: 1668. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12111668

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop