Next Article in Journal
Clinical Experience with Off-Label Intrathecal Administration of Selected Antibiotics in Adults: An Overview with Pharmacometric Considerations
Next Article in Special Issue
Competition between H4PteGlu and H2PtePAS Confers para-Aminosalicylic Acid Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Previous Article in Journal
β-Lactam Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Prospective, Observational, Cohort Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prevalence of Carbapenemases in Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates from the Kingdom of Bahrain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Neonatal Bloodstream Infection with Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Resistant blaKPC-2-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Carrying blaVEB-25

1
Microbiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
3
Infectious Disease Unit, 3rd Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hippokration Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
4
Basic and Translational Research Unit, Special Unit for Biomedical Research and Education, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
5
1st Department of Neonatology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2023, 12(8), 1290; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12081290
Submission received: 25 June 2023 / Revised: 23 July 2023 / Accepted: 3 August 2023 / Published: 5 August 2023

Abstract

:
Background: Although ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) has become an important option for treating adults and children, no data or recommendations exist for neonates. We report a neonatal sepsis case due to CAZ/AVI-resistant blaKPC-2-harboring Klebsiella pneumoniae carrying blaVEB-25 and the use of a customized active surveillance program in conjunction with enhanced infection control measures. Methods: The index case was an extremely premature neonate hospitalized for 110 days that had been previously treated with multiple antibiotics. Customized molecular surveillance was implemented at hospital level and enhanced infection control measures were taken for early recognition and prevention of outbreak. Detection and identification of blaVEB-25 was performed using next-generation sequencing. Results: This was the first case of a bloodstream infection caused by KPC-producing K. pneumoniae that was resistant to CAZ/AVI without the presence of a metalo-β-lactamase in the multiplex PCR platform in a neonate. All 36 additional patients tested (12 in the same NICU and 24 from other hospital departments) carried wild-type blaVEB-1 but they did not harbor blaVEB-25. Conclusion: The emergence of blaVEB-25 is signal for the horizontal transfer of plasmids at hospital facilities and it is of greatest concern for maintaining a sharp vigilance for the surveillance of novel resistance mechanisms. Molecular diagnostics can guide appropriate antimicrobial therapy and the early implementation of infection control measures against antimicrobial resistance.

1. Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a public health threat facing humanity as it tests the resilience of health systems worldwide [1,2]. Various genetic elements are associated with the development of resistance because they manage via complex pathways to be transmitted between bacteria [3]. In addition, other practices such as delayed and/or incorrect diagnosis and the prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics reinforce the problem of AMR [4]. Advances and innovations in the whole genome sequencing method and the bioinformatics revolution contribute to the immediate detection of the causes of resistance and the taking of timely and effective control measures [5].
A decisive factor in the development of AMR in healthcare facilities and especially in the intensive care units (ICU) of hospitals is the spread of multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria. Enterobacterales are the most important, among which Klebsiella pneumoniae is the main representative. K. pneumoniae is the second most common Gram-negative opportunistic pathogen and one of the most prevalent causes of community- and hospital-acquired infections [6]. It is responsible for health-care-associated pneumonia [7] and bacterial neonatal sepsis in low- and middle-income countries [8]. A serious public health threat is the emergence and dissemination of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) that is associated with high morbidity and mortality, increased medical costs, and prolonged hospital stay [9]. Ιn addition, CRKP infections affect disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) per 100,000 population with a median value in the European Union of 11.5 years, while for these infections treatment options are limited [10,11]. CRKP isolates have a variety of mechanisms, which may confer resistance to virtually all available β-lactam antibacterial drugs, including carbapenems. The main resistance molecular mechanism is the production of a range of carbapenemases, including KPC, NDM, VIM, and OXA-48-like carbapenemases [12,13]. KPC-producing CRKP strains display the most extensive global distribution and represent a significant challenge due to their limited therapeutic options [14].
A novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLIs) combination is effective against strains of non-metallo-β lactamase producing Enterobacterales (Ambler class A, class C, and some class D β-lactamases) [15,16]. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) [17] has become an important first-line option for treating adult and pediatric (>3 months of age) patients with serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms, but not yet for neonates (IDSA) [18]. It is indicated for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections, and infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) or carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, in patients with limited or no other treatment options [19].
Although KPC-producing Enterobacterales strains are generally considered susceptible to CAZ/AVI, isolates resistant to this antimicrobial agent have been documented without the evidence of metallo-β-lactamases [20]. Ιn 2018, a rapid risk assessment conducted by ECDC identified CAZ/AVI resistance in CRE as a public health threat that merits careful monitoring [21]. CAZ/AVI resistance mechanisms include the increased expression of the blaKPC gene product (acquisition of resistance was mostly associated with isolates harboring the substitution D179Y in blaKPC-3 or in blaKPC-2) [22,23], the presence of other genetic determinants of resistance against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (SHV-, CTX-M-, or VEB-type β-lactamases) [24,25], changes in cell permeability (i.e., non-functional porins- OmpK35, OmpK36, and OmpK37) [26], and the expression of efflux pumps [27].
VEB-type β-lactamases (Vietnamese extended-spectrum β-lactamase) are a group of Ambler class A enzymes inhibited by avibactam. blaVEB-25 differs from blaVEB-1 by a missense mutation (substitution of lysine with arginine at position 237 -K234R) [28], which compromises the inhibitory efficiency of avibactam [29].
Herein, we report a successful treatment of bloodstream infection associated with CAZ/AVI-resistant blaKPC-2-producing K. pneumoniae carrying blaVEB-25 in a preterm neonate hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of a tertiary hospital and the use of a customized active surveillance program in conjunction with infection control measures for the early recognition and prevention of an outbreak.

2. Results

2.1. Index Case

The index case was the first neonate of a twin pregnancy born to a 33-year-old healthy primigravida at gestational age of 25w+5d (birth weight = 850 gr, appropriate for a gestational age neonate) due to the premature rapture of membranes and the onset of labor. Postnatally, the patient presented respiratory distress syndrome, patent ductus arteriosus, severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia and need for prolonged mechanical ventilation, posthemorrhagic ventricular dilation, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, retinopathy of prematurity, and episodes of late onset sepsis (LOS). The first LOS occurred on the fourth day of life due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, which was successfully treated. The patient was colonized with carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii and Providencia stuartii between Day 4 and 25, respectively. During that time, the neonate had been exposed to multiple antibiotic regimens for prolonged time periods, including meropenem, aminoglycosides, colistin, tigecycline, and CAZ/AVI due to episodes of suspected LOS and colonization by CR Gram-negative bacteria.
At Day 108, the neonate was on nasal continuous positive airway pressure due to chronic lung disease, and presented with fever and impaired peripheral perfusion. Empiric antibiotic treatment with colistin (300,000 IU/kg/day every 8 h), tigecycline (2 mg/kg/day every 12 h) and daptomycin (10 mg/kg/day once daily) was immediately initiated for suspected sepsis and due to the previous administration of multiple antimicrobial regimens. Blood culture was positive for a Gram-negative rod within 24 h since the onset of symptoms. A multiplex PCR platform (Biofire® FilmArray®, Biomeriuex, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) was used within an hour from positive blood culture. A blaKPC producing K. pneumoniae was detected and CAZ/AVI at a reduced dose of 31 mg/kg/d every 8 h was added to the antimicrobial regimen in attendance of the Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST).
During the first 48 h of this sepsis episode, the neonate deteriorated, requiring mechanical ventilation and possessing high inflammatory indices (max CRP value of 394 mg/L) and thrombocytopenia. At Day 110, the AST displayed a high level of resistance to almost all antimicrobial agents, including piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, imipenem, meropenem (MIC ≥ 16 mg/L), amikacin, gentamicin, ampicillin/sulbactam, aztreonam, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, fosfomycin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. It was also resistant to novel agents, like ceftolozane/tazobactam and CAZ/AVI, while it was only susceptible to tigecycline and colistin. The isolate displayed a positive phenyl boronic acid phenotypic test and the lateral flow immunoassay, and the PCR method confirmed that the isolate carried blaKPC.
A favorable clinical and microbiological response was documented including defervescence and a decrease in CRP within 48–72 h, the first negative blood culture within 4 days, and the discontinuation of invasive mechanical ventilation within 8 days of colistin and tigecycline initiation. The administration of both daptomycin and CAZ/AVI was discontinued, whereas ciprofloxacin was empirically added four days after the first positive blood culture for a total of 13 days. The neonate was successfully treated with colistin and tigecycline for a total of 18 days.

NGS Report

A variety of genes conferring resistance to antimicrobial agents and heavy metals, as well as genes related to virulence, capsule, and efflux, and regulator systems were detected (Table 1). Only one serine-carbapenemase was detected, which was the blaKPC-2 gene and belonged to ST35. Another five β-lactamases (blaSHV-33, blaTEM-1B, blaVEB-25, blaDHA-1, and blaOXA-10) were co-detected, including the blaVEB-25. The co-production of blaKPC-2 and blaVEB-25 in K. pneumoniae has been associated with CAZ/AVI resistance in the absence of metallo-β-lactamase [24].

2.2. Molecular and Phenotypic Surveillance within the NICU and the Hospital

Thirteen K. pneumoniae strains were isolated from stool samples of neonates hospitalized in the NICU within a period of 3 months upon the recognition of the index case. Among these isolates, only the index case was blaVEB-25 positive (Figure 1A), confirming the NGS result. Based on the AST results, 24 additional carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae strains collected from various hospital sites were also analyzed with targeted PCR; even though they contained blaVEB-1, they did not harbor blaVEB-25 (Figure 1B).
Based on the AST results of the 24 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae strains collected from various hospital sites, half were characterized as pan-drug-resistant [PDR, non-susceptibility to all agents in all antimicrobial categories (i.e., bacterial isolates are not susceptible to any clinically available drug)], and the other half as extensively drug resistant [XDR, non-susceptibility to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antimicrobial categories (i.e., bacterial isolates remain susceptible to only one or two antimicrobial categories)]. Therefore, all 24 CRKP isolates displayed high levels of resistance to almost all antimicrobials including imipenem (MIC ≥ 16 mg/L), meropenem (MIC ≥ 16 mg/L), amikacin (MIC ≥ 16 mg/L), gentamicin (MIC ≥ 16 mg/L), ampicillin/sulbactam (MIC ≥ 32 mg/L), piperacillin/tazobactam (MIC ≥ 128 mg/L), aztreonam (MIC ≥ 64 mg/L), cefepime (MIC ≥ 64 mg/L), cefoxitin (MIC ≥ 64 mg/L), ceftazidime (MIC ≥ 64 mg/L), ceftriaxone (MIC ≥ 64 mg/L), ciprofloxacin (MIC ≥ 4 mg/L), levofloxacin (MIC ≥ 8 mg/L), fosfomycin (MIC ≥ 256 mg/L), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (MIC ≥ 320 mg/L). These isolates were also analyzed with targeted PCR; even though they contained blaVEB-1, they did not harbor blaVEB-25.

2.3. Overall Assessment

This index case was the last neonate that was infected with A. baumannii and colonized by P. stuartii within the NICU after the implementation of enhanced infection control measures targeting these two pathogens. Upon the recognition of the first K. pneumoniae producing blaKPC-2 and blaVEB-25 and a combination of intensified and targeted infection control actions in the unit, there were no other cases within the NICU for the next 6 months.

3. Discussion

We report a neonatal case of a bloodstream infection caused by a K. pneumoniae strain co-producing blaKPC-2 and blaVEB-25 β-lactamases and emphasize the use of precise medicine to customize infection control measures. Treatment options for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant bacteria are extremely limited in neonates. The “off label” use of either “last-line” antimicrobial agents (such as polymyxins and tigecycline) or the currently available newer β-lactam/β-lactam inhibitor combinations, such as CAZ/AVI, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam that are not yet licensed for neonates, for the empirical treatment of neonatal sepsis in areas endemic for CRKP is still questionable due to limited pharmacokinetic data and local epidemiology of resistant genes [30].
One of the mechanisms that confers resistance to CAZ/AVI is the new blaKPC variants that are constantly appearing worldwide. Very recently, Shi et al. reported multiple novel variants in a K. pneumoniae strain carrying blaKPC-2 from two separate patients during their exposure to CAZ/AVI. In one patient, the blaKPC-2 mutated to blaKPC-35, blaKPC-78, and blaKPC-33 during the same period, while in the other patient it mutated to blaKPC-79 and blaKPC-76, thus enhancing the level of resistance [31]. ST258 K. pneumoniae is considered the most frequent type in the majority of blaKPC-associated infections resistant to CAZ/AVI [32].
The blaKPC-2-harboring K. pneumoniae isolated in our study belonged to Sequence Type ST35. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of ST35 CRKP bearing both blaKPC-2 and blaVEB-25 that confers resistance to CAZ/AVI. Findlay et al. identified two isolates as belonging to Sequence Types ST147 and ST258, harboring blaVEB-25 on the plasmid, that confer resistance to CAZ/AVI [33].
To date, there are three reports of CAZ/AVI-resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae emergence in Greece, all in adults (six infected and five colonized patients) [24,34,35]. Notably, the first CAZ/AVI-resistant clinical isolate was detected in Greece before the introduction of CAZ/AVI in clinical practice. The resistance was due to the existence of blaKPC-23 (variant differed from blaKPC-3 by one -V240A, and from blaKPC-2 by two amino acid substitutions -V240A and H274Y) [34]. CAZ/AVI resistance due to the harboring of blaVEB-25 has been reported in two additional cases (one isolate from blood and one from the lower respiratory tract) from patients without prior CAZ/AVI exposure [35]. Eight more CAZ/AVI-resistant CRKP isolates were detected in patients not previously exposed to CAZ/AVI (two patients with catheter-related bloodstream infections, one with ventilator-associated pneumonia, and five with colonization); the resistance was conferred by the harboring blaVEB-25 and blaVEB-14 [24]. After intense epidemiological and microbiological surveillance in our NICU, as well as in pediatric and adult departments within our general hospital (especially pediatric and adult intensive care units), we could not find the source of this resistant organism. However, our index patient had been previously exposed to multiple courses of antimicrobial agents, including CAZ/AVI, and also had gut colonization with XDR Gram-negative bacteria, such as A. baumannii and P. stuartii.
This was the first premature neonate presenting with sepsis due to CAZ/AVI-resistant blaKPC-2-harboring K. pneumoniae carrying the blaVEB-25 that was successfully treated with non-conventional “off-label” antimicrobial agents. Currently, available diagnostic platforms detect the presence of the most prevalent carbapenemases, such as KPC, VIM, NDM, and OXA. Neonatologists and infectious disease specialists should be cautious when interpreting the results from these molecular platforms for decision making in empiric and targeted treatment for neonatal sepsis. The mechanism of resistance, especially for the newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors, may differ in times and in different parts of the world and even within the same institution [36]. In addition, various mechanisms of CAZ/AVI resistance emphasize the need for the surveillance of CAZ/AVI-resistant pathogens, as well as for its judicious use.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Risk Assessment and Bundle of Actions Taken after Index Case

This was the first case of a bloodstream infection caused by KPC-producing K. pneumoniae that was resistant to CAZ/AVI without the presence of metalo-β-lactamase in the multiplex PCR platform in a neonate. The bundle of actions implemented is summarized in Figure 2 and included: (1) enhanced infection control measures including strict isolation of the case index; (2) continuation of active surveillance for CRE and tests for CAZ/AVI susceptibility reported for all isolates recovered from surveillance; (3) application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and molecular testing for the index case to identify probable mechanism(s) of CAZ/AVI resistance; (4) targeted PCR analysis in all CRE isolates from all neonates in the ICU, independently to CAZ/AVI susceptibility; and (5) targeted PCR analysis specifically for CAZ/AVI-R isolates from other departments of the hospital to identify potential sources and/or burden of a potential outbreak.

4.1.1. Infection Control Measures

The NICU was already on strict infection control measures, including the cohorting of all neonates colonized/infected with an XDR A. baumannii strain. Upon recognition of this index case, extra measures were taken: isolation of index case, dedicated nurse for all shifts, universal application of contact precautions, written reports of active surveillance, and daily audits by infection control team (with a dedicated infection control nurse and a dedicated pediatric infectious disease specialist).

4.1.2. Active Surveillance

Already in place with twice weekly colonization cultures. Specifically, stool samples were taken from the neonates on the NICU and cultured on MacConkey agar plates supplemented with 1 mg/L meropenem. AST was applied to all isolates as written in Section 4.2, including CAZ/AVI susceptibility. Active surveillance included not only gut and pharyngeal colonization but also environmental cultures.

4.2. Microbiological Methods, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, and Phenotypic Analysis

CRKP was identified with a VITEK 2 automated system (Biomeriuex, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) using the GN ID according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The AST of K. pneumoniae was performed using the AST 376 and XN10 cards; the interpretation of results was according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints of January 2022. Susceptibility testing to CAZ/AVI was performed using MIC test strips (Liofilchem srl, Roseto, Italy), while susceptibility testing to colistin was performed using the broth microdilution method (Liofilchem srl, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy). Tigecycline was evaluated using the susceptibility breakpoints approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (MIC ≤ 2 mg/L for susceptibility and ≥8 mg/L for resistance).
The isolate was phenotypically tested for KPC and metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) production using phenylboronic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Carbapenemase genes blaKPC, blaNDM, blaOXA-48-like, blaIMP, and blaVIM were screened with a multiplex lateral flow immunoassay (NG-Test CARBA 5, NG Biotech, Guipry, France). The detection limits using purified recombinant enzymes for NDM, KPC, IMP, VIM, and OXA-48-like were 150, 600, 200, 300, and 300 pg/mL, respectively.

4.3. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)

DNA was extracted using the DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The Qubit double-strand DNA HS assay kit (Q32851, Life Technologies Corporation, Grand Island, NY, USA) was used for measuring the dsDNA concentration. All procedures regarding shearing, purification, ligation, barcoding, size selection, library amplification and quantitation, emulsion PCR, and enrichment were conducted according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. After template enrichment, sequencing was performed on an Ion PGM™ semiconductor sequencer using a Hi-Q View Sequencing Kit and a 316 Chip V2 BC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The sequence reads were de novo assembled and annotated using Geneious Prime version 2021.2.1. The sequence of the K. pneumoniae NTUH-K2044 strain (Accession number NC-012731) was used as reference.

4.4. MLST and Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes and Plasmids

MLST and antimicrobial resistance genes and plasmids were identified using the online databases at the Center for Genomic Epidemiology (MLST-2.0, Resfinder 4.1 and Plasmid finder) [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44] and the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) Bait Capture Platform 1.0.0 [https://card.mcmaster.ca/ (accessed on 4 August 2023)]. Genes related to virulence, resistance to heavy metals, efflux, regulator systems, and capsules were detected using the Institut Pasteur website on K. pneumoniae [https://bigsdb.pasteur.fr/klebsiella/ (accessed on 4 August 2023)].

4.5. Targeted PCR Analysis

Molecular surveillance at the NICU and hospital level: After the recognition of the existence of blaVEB-25 as the mechanism of CAZ/AVI resistance in KPC K. pneumoniae, targeted PCR protocol was initiated to investigate transmission within the NICU, but also to other carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolated from other pediatric and adult departments in the hospital (particularly, pediatric and adult intensive care units). A total of 37 K. pneumoniae strains were tested for the presence of blaVEB-1. Thirteen of them were isolated from stool samples collected from neonates in the NICU where the blaVEB-25 index case was identified, and twenty-four strains were isolated from different clinical sources (blood, urine, tracheal aspirate, trauma, and central venous catheter) collected from several departments of the hospital to investigate potential sites of outbreak. Plasmid DNA was extracted using the alkaline lysis method, as described previously (H.C.Birnboim and J.Doly NAR 7: 1513-1523, 1979). For PCR amplification, VEB-F (5′-CGA CTT CCA TTT CCC GAT GC-3′) and VEB-B (5′-GGA CTC TGC AAC AAA TAC GC-3′) primers were used as diagnostic primers to amplify a 642 bp internal VEB-1 DNA segment, whereas the external primers VEBcas-F (5′-GTT AGC GGT AAT TTA ACC AGA TAG-3′) and VEBcas-B (5′-CGG TTT GGG CTA TGG GCA G-3′) were used to amplify the entire gene for DNA sequencing. For each PCR reaction, 50–70 ng of K. pneumoniae plasmid DNA was used in a standard PCR reaction using Kapa Hi Fi DNA polymerase (KAPA Biosystems) with the following amplification program: 1 cycle of 95 °C 3 min, 35 cycles of 20 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, 30 s at 72 °C, and a final extension step of 1 min at 72 °C. The PCR products were Sanger sequenced. Nucleotide sequence analysis and pairwise alignments were performed using the National Center of Biotechnology Information website [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov accessed on 4 August 2023)].

5. Conclusions

Applying next-generation sequencing technology is crucial for guiding the prediction of underlying resistance mechanisms facilitating the study of the evolution and molecular epidemiology of multidrug-resistant pathogens, especially in endemic areas. The emergence of blaVEB-25 is a warning for the horizontal transfer of plasmids at hospital facilities, and it is of greatest concern for maintaining a sharp vigilance for the surveillance of novel resistance mechanisms. The use of molecular diagnostics may guide appropriate antimicrobial therapy and the early implementation of strict infection control measures, and therefore could play an important role in the fight against antimicrobial resistance.

Author Contributions

C.Z.: investigation, formal analysis, review and editing, and writing the initial draft. E.I.: investigation, formal analysis, review and editing, and writing the initial draft. M.S.: formal analysis and review and editing. S.P.: investigation and review and editing. A.K.: provision of study materials and review and editing. E.R.: methodology, data curation, provision of study materials, formal analysis, review and editing, and supervision. A.P.: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, formal analysis, visualization, review and editing, supervision, and funding acquisition. C.Z., E.I., E.R. and A.P. contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the European Union′s Horizon 2020 project VEO (grant number 874735).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Aristotle’s University Medical Faculty (no. of approval 5.160/18-12-19). Since this was a mainly microbiological retrospective analysis of the bacteria isolated from the index case and during surveillance from other hospitalized patients according to the policy of the Infection Control and Prevention Committee of Hippokration General Hospital, there was no need for informed consent from the parents or the patients.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent for publication was signed by the father of the index patient and is available in the medical chart of the patient.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during, and/or analyzed during, the current study are not publicly available due to the fact that these are the results of patient examinations carried out in a public hospital, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the personnel of the NICU that helped obtain surveillance samples from the patients, and the laboratory personnel who helped with the laboratory work. The help of Kostantinos Zarras in the experiments is also greatly acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Accession Numbers

The data for this study have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) at EMBL-EBI under Biosample accession number SAMEA112484914.

References

  1. Aljeldah, M.M. Antimicrobial Resistance and Its Spread Is a Global Threat. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dadgostar, P. Antimicrobial Resistance: Implications and Costs. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019, 12, 3903–3910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Reygaert, W.C. An overview of the antimicrobial resistance mechanisms of bacteria. AIMS Microbiol. 2018, 4, 482–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chaw, P.S.; Hopner, J.; Mikolajczyk, R. The knowledge, attitude and practice of health practitioners towards antibiotic prescribing and resistance in developing countries-A systematic review. J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 2018, 43, 606–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Schurch, A.C.; van Schaik, W. Challenges and opportunities for whole-genome sequencing-based surveillance of antibiotic resistance. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2017, 1388, 108–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ssekatawa, K.; Byarugaba, D.K.; Nakavuma, J.L.; Kato, C.D.; Ejobi, F.; Tweyongyere, R.; Eddie, W.M. Prevalence of pathogenic Klebsiella pneumoniae based on PCR capsular typing harbouring carbapenemases encoding genes in Uganda tertiary hospitals. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 2021, 10, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Juan, C.H.; Chuang, C.; Chen, C.H.; Li, L.; Lin, Y.T. Clinical characteristics, antimicrobial resistance and capsular types of community-acquired, healthcare-associated, and nosocomial Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 2019, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Milton, R.; Gillespie, D.; Dyer, C.; Taiyari, K.; Carvalho, M.J.; Thomson, K.; Sands, K.; Portal, E.A.R.; Hood, K.; Ferreira, A.; et al. Neonatal sepsis and mortality in low-income and middle-income countries from a facility-based birth cohort: An international multisite prospective observational study. Lancet Glob. Health 2022, 10, e661–e672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Agyeman, A.A.; Bergen, P.J.; Rao, G.G.; Nation, R.L.; Landersdorfer, C.B. Mortality, clinical and microbiological response following antibiotic therapy among patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections (a meta-analysis dataset). Data Brief 2020, 28, 104907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cassini, A.; Plachouras, D.; Monnet, D.L. Attributable deaths caused by infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria in France–Authors’ reply. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 129–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Alexander, B.T.; Marschall, J.; Tibbetts, R.J.; Neuner, E.A.; Dunne, W.M., Jr.; Ritchie, D.J. Treatment and clinical outcomes of urinary tract infections caused by KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae in a retrospective cohort. Clin. Ther. 2012, 34, 1314–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Ainoda, Y.; Aoki, K.; Ishii, Y.; Okuda, K.; Furukawa, H.; Manabe, R.; Sahara, T.; Nakamura-Uchiyama, F.; Kurosu, H.; Ando, Y.; et al. Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258 isolated from a Japanese patient without a history of foreign travel-a new public health concern in Japan: A case report. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Mathers, A.J.; Vegesana, K.; German-Mesner, I.; Ainsworth, J.; Pannone, A.; Crook, D.W.; Sifri, C.D.; Sheppard, A.; Stoesser, N.; Peto, T.; et al. Risk factors for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) gene acquisition and clinical outcomes across multiple bacterial species. J. Hosp. Infect. 2020, 104, 456–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Jean, S.S.; Harnod, D.; Hsueh, P.R. Global Threat of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 823684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sherry, N.; Howden, B. Emerging Gram negative resistance to last-line antimicrobial agents fosfomycin, colistin and ceftazidime-avibactam-epidemiology, laboratory detection and treatment implications. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2018, 16, 289–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Coskun, Y.; Atici, S. Successful Treatment of Pandrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection With Ceftazidime-avibactam in a Preterm Infant: A Case Report. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2020, 39, 854–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Approves New Antibacterial Drug Avycaz; FDA news release; U.S. FDA: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tamma, P.D.; Aitken, S.L.; Bonomo, R.A.; Mathers, A.J.; van Duin, D.; Clancy, C.J. Infectious Diseases Society of America 2022 Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum beta-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa). Clin. Infect. Dis. 2022, 75, 187–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. van Duin, D.; Bonomo, R.A. Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Ceftolozane/Tazobactam: Second-generation beta-Lactam/beta-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 63, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Di Bella, S.; Giacobbe, D.R.; Maraolo, A.E.; Viaggi, V.; Luzzati, R.; Bassetti, M.; Luzzaro, F.; Principe, L. Resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam in infections and colonisations by KPC-producing Enterobacterales: A systematic review of observational clinical studies. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2021, 25, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. ECDC. Emergence of Resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae-12 June 2018; ECDC: Stockholm, Sweden, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hemarajata, P.; Humphries, R.M. Ceftazidime/avibactam resistance associated with L169P mutation in the omega loop of KPC-2. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 1241–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Haidar, G.; Clancy, C.J.; Shields, R.K.; Hao, B.; Cheng, S.; Nguyen, M.H. Mutations in blaKPC-3 That Confer Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance Encode Novel KPC-3 Variants That Function as Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e02245-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Galani, I.; Karaiskos, I.; Souli, M.; Papoutsaki, V.; Galani, L.; Gkoufa, A.; Antoniadou, A.; Giamarellou, H. Outbreak of KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae endowed with ceftazidime-avibactam resistance mediated through a VEB-1-mutant (VEB-25), Greece, September to October 2019. Euro Surveill. 2020, 25, 2000028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Castanheira, M.; Simner, P.J.; Bradford, P.A. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: An update on their characteristics, epidemiology and detection. JAC-Antimicrob. Resist. 2021, 3, dlab092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Humphries, R.M.; Hemarajata, P. Resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Klebsiella pneumoniae Due to Porin Mutations and the Increased Expression of KPC-3. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, 10–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Nelson, K.; Hemarajata, P.; Sun, D.; Rubio-Aparicio, D.; Tsivkovski, R.; Yang, S.; Sebra, R.; Kasarskis, A.; Nguyen, H.; Hanson, B.M.; et al. Resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam Is Due to Transposition of KPC in a Porin-Deficient Strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae with Increased Efflux Activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e00989-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Protonotariou, E.; Meletis, G.; Pilalas, D.; Mantzana, P.; Tychala, A.; Kotzamanidis, C.; Papadopoulou, D.; Papadopoulos, T.; Polemis, M.; Metallidis, S.; et al. Polyclonal Endemicity of Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in ICUs of a Greek Tertiary Care Hospital. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lahiri, S.D.; Alm, R.A. Identification of Novel VEB beta-Lactamase Enzymes and Their Impact on Avibactam Inhibition. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 3183–3186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Carattoli, A.; Hasman, H. PlasmidFinder and In Silico pMLST: Identification and Typing of Plasmid Replicons in Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS). Methods Mol. Biol. 2020, 2075, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Clausen, P.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Lund, O. Rapid and precise alignment of raw reads against redundant databases with KMA. BMC Bioinform. 2018, 19, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Larsen, M.V.; Cosentino, S.; Rasmussen, S.; Friis, C.; Hasman, H.; Marvig, R.L.; Jelsbak, L.; Sicheritz-Ponten, T.; Ussery, D.W.; Aarestrup, F.M.; et al. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 1355–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Bartual, S.G.; Seifert, H.; Hippler, C.; Luzon, M.A.; Wisplinghoff, H.; Rodriguez-Valera, F. Development of a multilocus sequence typing scheme for characterization of clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 4382–4390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Griffiths, D.; Fawley, W.; Kachrimanidou, M.; Bowden, R.; Crook, D.W.; Fung, R.; Golubchik, T.; Harding, R.M.; Jeffery, K.J.; Jolley, K.A.; et al. Multilocus sequence typing of Clostridium difficile. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 770–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Jaureguy, F.; Landraud, L.; Passet, V.; Diancourt, L.; Frapy, E.; Guigon, G.; Carbonnelle, E.; Lortholary, O.; Clermont, O.; Denamur, E.; et al. Phylogenetic and genomic diversity of human bacteremic Escherichia coli strains. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Wirth, T.; Falush, D.; Lan, R.; Colles, F.; Mensa, P.; Wieler, L.H.; Karch, H.; Reeves, P.R.; Maiden, M.C.; Ochman, H.; et al. Sex and virulence in Escherichia coli: An evolutionary perspective. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 60, 1136–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lemee, L.; Dhalluin, A.; Pestel-Caron, M.; Lemeland, J.F.; Pons, J.L. Multilocus sequence typing analysis of human and animal Clostridium difficile isolates of various toxigenic types. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 2609–2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Zusman, O.; Altunin, S.; Koppel, F.; Dishon Benattar, Y.; Gedik, H.; Paul, M. Polymyxin monotherapy or in combination against carbapenem-resistant bacteria: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Shi, Q.; Han, R.; Guo, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wu, S.; Ding, L.; Zhang, R.; Yin, D.; Hu, F. Multiple Novel Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Resistant Variants of bla(KPC-2)-Positive Klebsiella pneumoniae in Two Patients. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0171421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shields, R.K.; Chen, L.; Cheng, S.; Chavda, K.D.; Press, E.G.; Snyder, A.; Pandey, R.; Doi, Y.; Kreiswirth, B.N.; Nguyen, M.H.; et al. Emergence of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance Due to Plasmid-Borne bla(KPC-3) Mutations during Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Findlay, J.; Poirel, L.; Bouvier, M.; Gaia, V.; Nordmann, P. Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam in a KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae caused by the extended-spectrum beta-lactamase VEB-25. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2023, 42, 639–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Galani, I.; Antoniadou, A.; Karaiskos, I.; Kontopoulou, K.; Giamarellou, H.; Souli, M. Genomic characterization of a KPC-23-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258 clinical isolate resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019, 25, 763.e5–763.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Voulgari, E.; Kotsakis, S.D.; Giannopoulou, P.; Perivolioti, E.; Tzouvelekis, L.S.; Miriagou, V. Detection in two hospitals of transferable ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae due to a novel VEB beta-lactamase variant with a Lys234Arg substitution, Greece, 2019. Euro Surveill. 2020, 25, 1900766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Evans, S.R.; Tran, T.T.T.; Hujer, A.M.; Hill, C.B.; Hujer, K.M.; Mediavilla, J.R.; Manca, C.; Domitrovic, T.N.; Perez, F.; Farmer, M.; et al. Rapid Molecular Diagnostics to Inform Empiric Use of Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: PRIMERS IV. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 68, 1823–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Agarose gel electrophoresis profile of the blaVEB-25 variant. Panel (A) shows the blaVEB-25 positive variant, whereas panel (B) shows the 642 bp amplified products of blaVEB-25-negative carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae strains. The amplified products of 1070 bp and 642 bp were produced using the external VEBcas-F/VEBcas-B (lane 2) and internal VEB-F/VEB-B primer pairs (lane 3). The amplified product containing the entire gene (1070 bp) was used to deduce the nucleotide sequence. The 100 bp DNA ladder with reference bands ranging from 100 bp to 1500 bp is indicated in lane 1.
Figure 1. Agarose gel electrophoresis profile of the blaVEB-25 variant. Panel (A) shows the blaVEB-25 positive variant, whereas panel (B) shows the 642 bp amplified products of blaVEB-25-negative carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae strains. The amplified products of 1070 bp and 642 bp were produced using the external VEBcas-F/VEBcas-B (lane 2) and internal VEB-F/VEB-B primer pairs (lane 3). The amplified product containing the entire gene (1070 bp) was used to deduce the nucleotide sequence. The 100 bp DNA ladder with reference bands ranging from 100 bp to 1500 bp is indicated in lane 1.
Antibiotics 12 01290 g001
Figure 2. Summary of a bundle of actions followed in a premature neonate with a ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection carrying the VEB-25 gene. LOS: late onset sepsis, DOL: day of life, CAZ-AVI: ceftazidime-avibactam.
Figure 2. Summary of a bundle of actions followed in a premature neonate with a ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection carrying the VEB-25 gene. LOS: late onset sepsis, DOL: day of life, CAZ-AVI: ceftazidime-avibactam.
Antibiotics 12 01290 g002
Table 1. Genetic characteristics of the neonatal blood K. pneumoniae isolate of the study via NGS.
Table 1. Genetic characteristics of the neonatal blood K. pneumoniae isolate of the study via NGS.
Strain ID A1746/22
Date of isolation 25 February 2022
Biological sample Blood
MLST 35
Plasmids IncC, IncR, IncFIA(HI1), IncFIB(K), IncFIB(pKPHS1), IncFIB(pQil), IncFII(K)
Antibiotic Resistance β-lactamasesSHV-33, TEM-1B, VEB-25, DHA-1, OXA-10
CarbapenemasesKPC-2
Aminoglycosidesant(2″)-Ia, aph(3″)-Ib, aph(6)-Id, rmtB, aadA1
QuinoloneqnrB4, oqxA, oqxB
FosfomycinfosA
Sulfonamidesul1, sul2
PhenicolcatA1, cmlA1
Tetracyclinetet(A), tet(G)
Resistance to Heavy Metals merC, merP, merT, silR
Virulence kfuA, mrkA, mrkF, mrkH, mrkl, ybtE, ybtQ, ybtT, ybtX
Capsule wzi
Efflux and Regulator Systems acrR, envR, fis, marA, marR, oqxR, rob, sdiA, soxR, soxS, ramA, ramR, rarA
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zarras, C.; Iosifidis, E.; Simitsopoulou, M.; Pappa, S.; Kontou, A.; Roilides, E.; Papa, A. Neonatal Bloodstream Infection with Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Resistant blaKPC-2-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Carrying blaVEB-25. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1290. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12081290

AMA Style

Zarras C, Iosifidis E, Simitsopoulou M, Pappa S, Kontou A, Roilides E, Papa A. Neonatal Bloodstream Infection with Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Resistant blaKPC-2-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Carrying blaVEB-25. Antibiotics. 2023; 12(8):1290. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12081290

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zarras, Charalampos, Elias Iosifidis, Maria Simitsopoulou, Styliani Pappa, Angeliki Kontou, Emmanuel Roilides, and Anna Papa. 2023. "Neonatal Bloodstream Infection with Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Resistant blaKPC-2-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Carrying blaVEB-25" Antibiotics 12, no. 8: 1290. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12081290

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop