Next Article in Journal
The RND Efflux Pump Gene Expression in the Biofilm Formation of Acinetobacter baumannii
Next Article in Special Issue
The Real Practice Prescribing Antibiotics in Outpatients: A Failed Control Case Assessed through the Simulated Patient Method
Previous Article in Journal
Quinolone Resistance Genes and Their Contribution to Resistance in Vibrio cholerae Serogroup O139
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genotypic Diversity, Antibiotic Resistance, and Virulence Phenotypes of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Clinical Isolates from a Thai University Hospital Setting
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/antibiotics12020417
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Bacteriophage Therapy as an Application for Bacterial Infection in China

by
Shuang Liang
1,
Yanling Qi
1,
Huabo Yu
1,
Wuwen Sun
1,2,
Sayed Haidar Abbas Raza
3,
Nada Alkhorayef
4,
Samia S. Alkhalil
5,
Essam Eldin Abdelhady Salama
6 and
Lei Zhang
1,2,*
1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130000, China
2
Borui Technology Co., Ltd., Changchun 130000, China
3
College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
4
Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Al-Quway’iyah, Shaqra University, Riyadh 19257, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Shaqra University, Shaqra 11961, Saudi Arabia
6
Anatomy Department College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11495, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2023, 12(2), 417; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12020417
Submission received: 25 December 2022 / Revised: 31 January 2023 / Accepted: 5 February 2023 / Published: 20 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insights into Antibiotics in Human, Animal, and Agriculture: Resistance, Determinant, and Treatment)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Antibiotic resistance has emerged as a significant issue to be resolved around the world. Bacteriophage (phage), in contrast to antibiotics, can only kill the target bacteria with no adverse effect on the normal bacterial flora. In this review, we described the biological characteristics of phage, and summarized the phage application in China, including in mammals, ovipara, aquatilia, and human clinical treatment. The data showed that phage had a good therapeutic effect on drug-resistant bacteria in veterinary fields, as well as in the clinical treatment of humans. However, we need to take more consideration of the narrow lysis spectrum, the immune response, the issues of storage, and the pharmacokinetics of phages. Due to the particularity of bacteriophage as a bacterial virus, there is no unified standard or regulation for the use of bacteriophage in the world at present, which hinders the application of bacteriophage as a substitute for antibiotic biological products. We aimed to highlight the rapidly advancing field of phage therapy as well as the challenges that China faces in reducing its reliance on antibiotics.

1. Introduction

At present, the main treatment for bacterial infection is antibiotics. Due to the extensive use of antibiotics, there have been numerous problems, such as the emergence of drug-resistant bacteria, immunosuppression, drug residues in animal products, environmental pollution, and so on. According to statistics, 75% of bacteria in the United States are resistant to at least one kind of antibiotic, and nearly 2 million people’s health is at risk each year due to drug-resistant bacteria [1]. In addition, more than half of the clinical Staphylococcus isolated in Japan have multidrug resistances to antibiotics [2]. A report from the British government in 2016 showed that the deaths caused by drug-resistant bacteria could reach about 700,000 each year [3]. It is estimated that by the year 2050, upwards of 10 million people will die each year due to antimicrobial resistance. In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) published a list of global priority pathogens comprising 12 species of bacteria which were categorized into critical, high, and medium priority based on their level of resistance and available therapeutics (Table 1). It is crucial to discover, design, and develop new and alternative antimicrobial therapies. The current rate of resistance development far exceeds the level of antibiotic discovery and development and represents a global public health challenge.
The Chinese government placed a high priority on bacterial drug resistance and included it on the agenda of the G20 Hangzhou Summit. In order to control the development of bacterial resistance, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China issued the National Action Plan for Reducing the Use of Veterinary Antimicrobials (2021–2025) and the List of Banned Drugs and Other Compounds for Food Animals. In addition, the Chinese government encourages large-scale animal husbandry to cut off pathogen infection at the source. Companies have tried to develop new antibiotics, but few are available in terms of their commercial value [4]. Faced with the problem of increasing bacterial resistance year by year, it is urgent to find a new treatment that can replace antibiotics. Antimicrobial peptides and biological enzymes are also popular alternatives to antibiotic therapy. However, the utilization of these medications is constrained due to their lengthy research cycles and limited antibacterial properties [5].
Bacteriophage(phage) is a virus that can infect microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes, and spirochetes. Phages have been used as antibacterial agents since their discovery in the 1920s. However, with the discovery of antibiotics and their widespread use, people gradually ignored the in-depth study of phage therapy. Since the 1980s, due to the continuous emergence of drug-resistant bacteria worldwide, antibiotic therapy has been facing great challenges, and bacteriophage as a traditional antimicrobial therapy has attracted attention again. Phage has the characteristics of strong specificity, little toxicity, good bactericidal effect, good biological safety, and great potential in the prevention and control of bacterial infection. Recently, some scholars from western countries have published special papers on bacteriophage antibacterial technology, sharing positive comments on the basic research and development of bacteriophage. They believed that the natural targeting effect, specificity, and high efficiency of bacteriophages had opened up a new field for the control and prevention of bacterial diseases [6,7,8]. Haddad et al. collated the literature on phage therapy published from 1985 to 2018, and the results showed that phage therapy was effective in reducing bacterial concentration, degrading biofilms, healing wounds, and improving outcomes in most studies (87%, 26/30) [9].
In this review, we summarized the research and application of phage in the prevention and control of bacterial infections in China, and discussed the limitations and challenges of phage therapy, hoping to provide a reference for promoting the clinical application of phage therapy.

2. Overview of Phages

Bacteriophages (phages) are highly abundant in the environment and may be the source of low-cost antimicrobials. Bacteriophages coexist with their bacterial hosts and play an important role in many biological processes such as bacterial evolution and microorganism diversity [10,11,12,13,14,15]. In general, the biological characteristics of a phage include its optimum pH, temperature, one-step growth curve, morphology, etc. Like other viruses, phages are simple in structure, consisting of a protein capsid and core. According to their morphological and structural characteristics, there are three types of phages: Caudovirales (which are divided into Siphoviridae, Podoviridae, and Myoviridae), Ballabactivirus, and Inoviridae [16]. Ling Chen et al. described the biological characteristics of phage ValSw3-3, which belonged to the Siphoviridae [17]. ValSw3-3 had a latent period of about 15 min and a burst size of 95 ± 2 PFU/cell. Its infectivity remained above 80% at pH 6–10. Meanwhile, this phage was able to exist stably at 4–50 °C. Because of their tail fiber proteins, which can specifically recognize receptors on the surface of bacteria, phages can form a strict specificity with the host bacteria. Although the life cycle of phages is well understood, we will discuss it briefly based on the article of Zhang (Figure 1) [18]. According to the life cycle of phages, they can be divided into lytic phages and temperate phages. Lytic phages, also known as virulent phages, have the ability to inject their genomes into the bacteria, hijack the metabolic function of the host, and lyse the host cells to produce new progeny phages [19]. Temperate phages live a different life cycle and infect their hosts by initiating a lysogenic cycle. In the lysogenic cycle, the phage genome remains dormant as a prophage, replicates alongside its host, and occasionally bursts into a lytic cycle in response to a specific trigger [20].

3. Phage Therapy in Animal Models

By 2022, we have found more than 95,400 articles about phage research on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database (URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 27 July 2022), of which more than 4500 were published by Chinese researchers, accounting for 4.72% (Figure 2). Along with the gradual deepening of phage research, scientists have assessed the value of phages in animal models through more rigorous and detailed experiments. We are attempting to explore the possible clinical application of phage therapy based on the animal experiments. We summarized the progress of phage application in mammals, oviparous animals, and aquatic animals by Chinese researchers (Table 2).

3.1. Mammals

Many studies have shown that bacteriophages have a good therapeutic effect in mammals. Mice models are widely used in the treatment of diseases such as pneumonia, sepsis, and intestinal infection with phage therapy. As a result of a study conducted by Cao, after mice were infected with multiple drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteria for 2 h, the survival rate could reach about 80% by nasally inhaling phage 1513 (2 × 109 PFU/mouse) [37]. Moreover, the injury of the lung was effectively improved in the treatment group, while the mice in the untreated control group all died, indicating that phage had a good effect on lung infection caused by drug-resistant bacteria. Wang infected mice with imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa [42]. In this experiment, all the animals died within 24 h after the minimal lethal dose of bacteria (3 × 107 CFU/mL) injected. If phage was injected 15 and 30 min after the bacteria infection (MOI > 0.1), the survival rate could reach 100%. In contrast, the survival rate decreased to 50% and 20% respectively, when phage treatment was administered at 3 h and 6 h. Thus, phages should be used as early as possible to treat bacterial infections. Bacteriophages are also effective in treating Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Yersinia enterocolitica infections [49,50,51]. Yersinia enterocolitica is generally considered an important food-borne pathogen, particularly in the European Union. Xue established a mouse enteritis model caused by a Yersinia enterocolitica infection with serotype O:3, and evaluated the therapeutic effect of the instillation of phage X1 [47]. The result showed that a single oral administration of phage X1 (1.95 × 108 PFU/mouse) at 6 h post infection was sufficient to eliminate Yersinia enterocolitica in 33.3% of mice (15/45). In addition, the number of Yersinia enterocolitica strains in the mice was also dramatically reduced to approximately 103 CFU/g after 18 h, compared to 107 CFU/g in the mice without phage treatment. Phage X1 treatment significantly improved of intestinal tissue, and the level of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α and IL-1β) was significantly reduced (p < 0.05). These results indicated that phage was a promising candidate to control infection by bacteria in mice. In mice models, Prof. Hongping Wei and Prof. Hang Yang from the Laboratory of Diagnostic Microbiology, CAS Key Laboratory of Special Pathogens and Biosafety, Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences also contributed to the application of phage and lysin therapy in the treatment of drug-resistant bacterial infections [52,53].
Phage therapy is also widely used in large mammals such as pigs, cattle, and sheep. For weaned piglets, Escherichia coli is the main pathogen causing diarrhea. In 2019, Zeng YD et al. found that adding phage in diets can improve growth performance and reduce the diarrhea index of weaned piglets [54]. Moreover, the phage supplement can improve the morphological structure and function of intestines, regulate the activity of intestinal digestive enzymes, improve the structure of intestinal microorganisms, and promote the intestinal health of piglets [55]. Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a highly contagious disease in cloven-hoofed animals, which causes severe economic losses. To prevent this disease, Hai demonstrated the potential of T7 bacteriophage, based on nanoparticles displaying a genetically fused G-H loop peptide (T7-GH) as a FMDV vaccine candidate [56]. They found that the T7-GH phage nanoparticles were effective in eliciting antigen-specific immune responses in pigs. Qu YG invented a bacteriophage cocktail (six species of Escherichia coli phages of bovine mastitis; two species of cow mastitis source Streptococcus phages; two dairy cow mastitis, source Staphylococcus aureus bacteriophage; 1 × 109 PFU of each phage) in 2021 for clinical dairy cow mastitis and recessive mastitis, of which the effect was superior to antibiotic treatment and antimicrobial peptide treatment [57,58]. There were many other experiments on the successful treatment of bacterial infection in mammals by phage, but we have not provided any more examples.

3.2. Ovipara

Phage can be used as a prophylactic agent to protect chickens from lethal Escherichia coli infestation. Inoculation of the phage (BP16, 1.5 × 108 PFU) suspension prior to infection with Escherichia coli (O2 serotype, 1.5 × 108 CFU) enabled a 100% protection rate [59]. When the chicken were injected with phage after the bacteria infected them, the survival rate could reach around 80%, compared with 70% in the antibiotic-treated group. The results showed that phage was effective in preventing and treating poultry infection caused by lethal Escherichia coli. Salmonella pullorum is the major pathogen that is harmful to the poultry industry in developing countries, and the treatment of chicken diarrhea caused by drug-resistant Salmonella pullorum has become increasingly difficult. A lytic bacteriophage of YSP2 was used, which was able to specifically infect Salmonella [32]. Experiments in vivo demonstrated that a single oral administration of YSP2 (1 × 1010 PFU/mL, 80 μL/chicken) 2 h after Salmonella pullorum administration at a double median lethal dose was sufficient to protect chickens against diarrhea. Bacteriophages and their phage cocktails are also widely used as disinfectants specifically to eliminate pathogens in poultry [60,61].

3.3. Aquatilia

People often use antibiotics and water disinfectants in aquaculture to treat bacterial infections. However, the entry of residual drugs into the natural environment affects the composition and activity of microorganisms, disrupting the balance of microbiome. Phage therapy is used in aquaculture, which can effectively control pathogenic bacteria including Citrobacter freundii, Aeromonas hydrophila, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio harveyi, etc. Zhang Lei et al. from Jilin Agricultural University, committed to the research of phage therapy, found that bacteriophage had good therapeutic effects in the treatment of aquatic drug-resistant bacteria. They isolated a phage, IME-JL18, which had strong activity against Citrobacter freundii, and applied it to the treatment of carp enteritis models [43]. In this study, a dose of IME-JL18 at 1 × 107 PFU effectively counteracted the lethal dose of Citrobacter freundii (1 × 109 CFU/carp), inhibiting the formation of the host bacterial biofilms. To treat an Aeromonas hydrophila infection, a phage mixture therapy was established based on the analysis of the genomic sequences and biological characteristics of vB_AHAp_PZL-AH8 and vB_AHAp_PZL-AH1 [62]. The results also showed that phage therapy was a good method to inhibit the production of phage-resistant strains. This team recently found a bacteriophage named PZL-Ah152, which had good efficacy in reducing the pathogenic Aeromonas hydrophila strain 152 in vivo and in vitro [63]. Furthermore, a 12-day consecutive injection of PZL-Ah152 (2 × 109 PFU) did not cause significant adverse effects on the main organs of the treated fish, such as liver, spleen, kidney, gut, and gill. They also found that members of the genus Aeromonas can enter and colonize the gut. The phage PZL-Ah152 reduced the number of colonies of the genus Aeromonas. However, no significant changes were observed in α-diversity and β-diversity parameters, which suggested that the consumed phage had little effect on the gut microbiota. Other researchers have also studied the application of bacteriophages in aquatic products. A study found that vB_VpaS_PG07 (7.6 × 109 PFU/mL) significantly reduced the mortality of shrimps challenged with Vibrio parahaemolyticus (2.27 × 106 CFU/shrimp), a bacterium causing acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND). The findings highlighted the potential of PG07 as an effective antibacterial agent for phage prophylaxis and phage therapy in aquaculture [64]. Another study found that phage qdvp001 (1.0 × 107 PFU/mL) could purify Vibrio parahaemolyticus (1.0 × 108 CFU/mL) in both oyster cultured environment and oyster bodies [65]. Simultaneously, this phage could inhibit the expression of pro-inflammatory factors including IL-1β, IL-6, and CD-14, and regulate the immune response caused by the bacteria. In addition, Vibrio harveyi can cause infections and diseases in a variety of marine vertebrates and invertebrates, which is very harmful to the aquaculture industry. Cui et al. isolated two bacteriophages [66], vB_VhaP_Vh-5 and vB_VhaM_VH-8, and discussed the practicability of feeding phages as a route of administration to protect turbot from Vibrio harveyi infection. When the MOI was 10 and 100, the phages could enhance the resistance of turbot to Vibrio harveyi VH5 infection, indicating feeding phage cocktails may be another optimal therapeutic agent against Vibrio harveyi infection in turbot culture.

4. Application of Bacteriophages in Clinics

In the 1940s, with the discovery of Penicillin, rapid and effective sterilization became the most effective treatment for bacterial diseases, heralding the golden age of antibiotics. Scientists have largely abandoned in-depth research on phage therapy ever since [67]. However, scientists in the former Soviet Union and some eastern European countries were not affected by the abandonment of phage therapy by western European countries and the United States, and still carried out in-depth research on the anti-infection effect of phages [68,69]. Currently, phage preparations have been approved for commercial use in many countries, including Georgia, Poland, and Russia. In China, the application of phage therapy to treat clinical diseases also has a long history. The former Dalian Institute of Biological Products was the first to develop phage research and related production (used for the prevention and treatment of dysentery) in China [70]. The Wuhan Institute of Biological Products also carried out a period of trial production around 1958. In 2017, the Shanghai Institute of Phage was established, which was the first institution to obtain the qualification for clinical treatment of bacteriophages in China. The institute launched the first ethically approved clinical trial of phage therapy in 2018 in China. Since then, teams such as the Chinese Academy of Sciences have also been working on the development of engineered phages to treat drug-resistant bacterial infections. In 2020, the Chinese team published a paper on the clinical practice of bacteriophages and proposed a new protocol of “non-sensitive antibiotic-phage combination,” providing a new strategy for the treatment of “super-bacteria” that was resistant to both antibiotics and bacteriophages [71]. The leading enterprises of phage industrialization in China also include Qingdao Nuoan Baxter Biotechnology Co., Ltd. and Phagelux Inc. These companies applied bacteriophage formulations to animals, aquatic products, agriculture, and human health. Here, we summarize some successful cases of phage application in clinical therapy in China (Figure 3), hoping to promote the wider application of phage in clinical practice (Table 3).

4.1. Skin Infection

Gram-negative bacilli, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii, are important pathogens of nosocomial infections. The majority of patients who suffered from chronic wounds/ulcers (86.1%, n = 310) and skin infections (94.9%, n = 734) experienced remission or improvement after phage therapy [78]. In 1958, Professor Yu He successfully cured patients infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa using phage therapy [73]. This was the first successful clinical application of phage in China. In 2021, a patient in Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center was infected with drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa after surgery. Following expert consultation, phage therapy with catheter perfusion and wound wet compress was implemented. After the treatment, the patient was cured.

4.2. Respiratory Tract Infection

Clinically, aerosol inhalation techniques enable accurate delivery of bacteriophages to the site of infection [79]. In the treatment of lung infection caused by drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, clinical symptoms were effectively relieved after two inhalations of phage aerosol preparations [80]. The team led by Ma also used the aerosol method of bacteriophage to treat patients and, after two weeks of treatment, successfully cleared the lung infection caused by Acinetobacter baumannii [72]. This was the first case in Shenzhen (China) using phage to treat drug-resistant bacteria infections. Furthermore, Wu assessed the efficacy and safety of compassionate phage therapy on secondary carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections in patients hospitalized with critical COVID-19. They suggested the potential of phages on rapid responses to secondary CRAB outbreak in COVID-19 patients [81,82]. For the patient who suffered from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii), Tan used a specific lysing pathogen-specific phage (phage Ab_SZ3, 5 × 106 PFU-5 × 1010 PFU) in combination with tigecycline and colistin for a 16-day treatment [83]. The patient’s pathogen clearance rate and lung function were clinically improved.

4.3. Urinary Tract Infection

Urinary tract infection (UTI) with extensively drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (XDRKp) is a challenging infection complication to immunocompromised patients, such as transplant recipients and patients with cancer and diabetes. In the context of increasing antibiotic resistance, phage therapy is effective in treating urinary tract infections. In 2018, Zhu successfully cured the first urinary tract infection caused by multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in China. In 2019, another patient infected with complex pan-drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae recovered by using a 3-strain phage mixture through continuous bladder perfusion and retrograde ureteral intubation in both renal–pelvis [76]. The following year, Bao reported a case of a 63-year-old female patient who developed a recurrent urinary tract infection with extensively drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (ERKp) [71]. The combination of antibiotic (Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, SMZ-TMP, 800mg-100mg) with a phage mixture (Kp152, Kp154, Kp155, Kp164, Kp6377, and HD001, 5 × 108 PFU/mL for each phage) inhibited the appearance of phage-resistant mutants in vitro and successfully cured the patient. There is a possibility that, instead of replacing antibiotics with phages, a combination of these two types of antibacterial agents may be more effective compared with use of either independently [84]. Qin et al. used a cocktail phage therapy to treat a man with multifocal urinary tract infection caused by MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae in 2021 [85]. Finally, the patient recovered. These successful cases provided valuable treatment ideas and solutions for phage treatment of complex infections.

4.4. Others

In addition to the above aspects, Chinese researchers are also attempting to apply phages in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis, dental ulcers, and alcoholic hepatitis. In 2018, Zhang identified bacteriophages (Sa83 and Sa87, 1 × 105 PFU) that could effectively kill multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the nasal passages of patients with chronic sinusitis [86]. Moreover, Li used phage topical application to treat the tuberculous oral ulcer, and the patient soon recovered [74]. Meng found that using Enterobacter faecalis phage can significantly reduce liver cytolytic level and fecal enterococcus quantity [75], which can eliminate ethanol-induced liver injury and steatosis. Phages can target specific bacteria, providing a new treatment for alcoholic hepatitis.

5. Limitation of Phage Therapy

There is no doubt that phage therapy is an attractive solution to combat escalating antibiotic resistance. Numerous studies have highlighted the potential of therapeutic phages in vitro and in vivo, and many clinical trials have been conducted over the past decade [87]. Despite the promise of phage therapy, many issues must be addressed before it can be used as a treatment: ① The immune response. As a foreign substance, phage can stimulate the immune response of the body, and the antibodies produced may inhibit the ability of phage to eliminate bacteria, thereby reducing phage efficacy [88]. Moreover, the reticuloendothelial system can quickly eliminate phages. Optimizing the dose of phage can reduce the production of specific antibodies. In addition to reducing the dose of phage application, phage packaging can also alleviate specific antibodies [89]. Similarly, an encapsulation approach for standard phage therapy can also provide effective and targeted delivery of phages to the site of infection to protect the phages from immune system clearance [90]. ② The host spectrum of phages is relatively narrow; a certain type of phage can only infect and lyse the corresponding species or type of bacteria [91]. Phage cocktail therapy can combine species–specific phages to improve the efficacy of phage therapy and also reduce the production of phage-resistant mutants [92]. ③ Phage therapy has limitations in dose and duration. According to the pharmacokinetics, phages can only proliferate when the bacteria reach a certain density [93]. Therefore, early or inappropriate bacteriophage inoculation may be cleared by the immune system before proliferation. Optimal inoculation time and dose will be the key to phage therapy. ④ When bacteriophages are stored for a long time, there will be a certain inactivation or reduced titers. Bacteriophages as viruses have protein structures, so they are susceptible to known protein denaturation factors. These factors include exposure to organic solvents, high temperatures, pH, ionic strength, and interface effects [94]. Therefore, when choosing a storage method, careful consideration of its physical and chemical properties is required. The current preservation methods are: a. Broth lysate; b. 50% glycerol dilution; c. Saturating filter paper with lysate and then drying; d. Phage lyophilization [95]. ⑤ Safety of phage application. Some toxin genes carried by phages may have adverse effects on the body. Therefore, phages should be sequenced before they are used to ensure that they do not have virulence genes or integrase genes. The important step in the process of isolation and purification of phage is to remove endotoxin. Bacterial endotoxin, as an important part of Gram-negative bacteria, is released when bacteriophage lyses bacteria, which is toxic to the human body and has potential safety hazards. At present, bacteriophage preparation can be purified by affinity chromatography, commercial kits, and other methods to remove endotoxin from bacteriophage particles. ⑥ Criteria for clinical use of phages. It is necessary to ensure the activity of phages and remove contaminants from bacteria as much as possible. Information critical to the success of clinical trials includes: a. The adequate characterization and selection of phages as well as of subjects (humans) and the target bacteria. b. The formulations, dosing, and efficacy of the phage [96]. c. The sterility and purity of the phage preparation [97].

6. Regulation of Phage Application in China and Western Countries

Phage therapy has made great achievements both in animals and clinically. When it comes to the clinical treatment of phages, we definitely mention Hirszfeld Institute in Wroclaw, Poland and the Eliava Institute in Tbilisi, Georgia. The Eliava Institute focuses on the production and therapeutic use of phage cocktails for specific pathogenic bacteria. The Hirszfeld Institute supports the development of a more personalized phage therapeutic approach [98]. Both institutions have demonstrated convincing success rates in the use of phage therapy. Data from clinical trials at the Eliava Institute showed that phage therapy was approximately 70% and 55% effective in the treatment of Staphylococcal infection and Staphylococcal sepsis, respectively [69]. The Hirszfeld Institute pointed out that the good response rate to phage therapy was about 40% [97]. However, only a few phage therapies currently have completed phase I and phase II clinical trials, both of which lacked strict criteria and did not have evidence of properly controlled clinical trials [99]. The reports from Poland, Georgia, and other former Soviet Union countries have provided good experiences, but this form of treatment still lacks modern, properly controlled, double-blind clinical trials, and an appropriate framework is needed to make phage therapy a reality. Although phage-based clinical products have been commercialized in some eastern European countries, in western Europe and the United States, phage products for clinical applications have not yet reached the commercialization stage [7]. Currently, sporadic applications of bacteriophage therapy are carried out in western countries, where it is allowed to be used as a placebo in clinical treatment when antibiotic therapy is ineffective. Its research process and application are supervised by the Ethics Review Board and are generally protected by Article 37 of the New Helsinki Declaration [100]. The Declaration, although not a document with the force of law, became the standard for medical research ethics and serves as the basis for the development of other international guidelines. In fact, an increasing number of patients have been treated on an emergency IND (eIND) basis with the approval of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the European Medicines Agency [101]. Belgium is currently implementing a pragmatic framework for phage therapy that centers on the magistral preparation (compounding pharmacy in the US) of tailor-made phage medicines [102]. This made Belgium the only western country that routinely produced phage drugs under prescription.
D’Herelle successfully treated four patients using phage injection in 1919. The earliest clinical use of phages in China can be traced back to 1958. As phage research develops in China, the cooperation between China and western countries in this field is closer. In 2022, Professor Martha Clokie from the University of Leicester, UK, in collaboration with the Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, published a book named Phage Pharmacology and Experimental Methods [103]. The book focused on pharmacology and had a strong practical application of phages. Since 2018, the Shanghai Institute of Phage and Drug Resistance (China) has conducted clinical trials on phage therapy. As far as we know, the patients receiving phage therapy must meet the following conditions:
(1)
The patients were between 14 and 90 years of age who suffered from multi-drug resistant bacterial infections.
(2)
The pathogenic bacteria that the patient is infected with should meet the following conditions:
  • The patient is infected with pathogenic bacteria that are fully resistant to antibiotics.
  • Pathogenic bacteria are resistant to key antibiotics (WHO has published a list of 12 superbug categories for 2017, as seen in Figure 1).
  • The pathogen is sensitive to the key antibiotic but this antibiotic treatment is ineffective.
(3)
To receive at least one or more phages capable of lysing drug-resistant bacteria.
(4)
Be able to administer the phage by topical application, focal spraying of infection, nebulized inhalation, perfusion, local injection, or infusion tube.

7. The Direction of Phage Application

Due to the emergence of drug-resistant bacteria, researchers reattached importance to the study of bacteriophages as biological antibacterial agents. At present, the research and development directions of phage are as follows: strong lysis ability, good environmental adaptability and stability, no virulence genes on the genome, easy isolation and purification, no negative effect on the human immune system, and establishment of scientific pharmaceutical standards for phage preparations. Phage cocktail preparations are commonly used in clinical settings to respond to infections with different bacteria. Phage cocktails can broaden the host spectrum and reduce the frequency with which bacteria develop resistance to phages [104]. Phage cocktail therapy was approved by the U.S. government and its regulators as the first phage product for agriculture in 2005. The Shanghai Institute of Phage and Drug Resistance in China has also used phage cocktail therapy to cure patients with multi-drug resistant bacterial infections. The genetic modification of phages can broaden the host spectrum of phages, reduce cytotoxicity, and prolong the cycle time of phages in vivo. The genetic modification of phages is full of infinite possibilities to overcome some limitations of natural phage applications and improve the performance and therapeutic efficacy of phages. In addition, appropriate genetic modification strategies were used to extract lytic enzymes. Phage lysozyme is also one of the directions. The advantages of lysin lie in its easy purification, easy directional operation, high specificity, no damage to normal bacteria, and good antibacterial activity. Phages and antibiotics have different bactericidal mechanisms. The combination of the two could also improve antibacterial efficacy and produce synergistic therapeutic effects on bacteria. Genetically modified phages were used to increase or inhibit bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics. The introduction of rpsL and gyrA genes into the genome of drug-resistant E. coli using bacteriophage λ restored the susceptibility of the host bacteria to streptomycin [105]. Particularly, the combination of genetically modified phages and antibiotics can broaden the host lytic spectrum, which is one of the important directions for the development of phage therapy in the future. Phage has been properly investigated for its clinical potential for a long time. The upcoming years could be seen as a major milestone for phage and endolysin in terms of clinical recognition as viable alternatives to antibiotics. In order to bridge the gap and increase the packing of antibacterial drugs, researchers and clinicians must explore improved delivery strategies and creative approaches to designing phage and endolysin, as well as advancements in clinical trials [106].

8. Conclusions

Due to the widespread prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacteria and the slow development of antibiotics, the application of bacteriophages in the prevention, control, and treatment of bacterial infections has attracted people’s attention again. The existing research showed that phage therapy had considerable prospects and effects in clinic trials, veterinary medicine, food, and other fields. An ideal phage for clinical trials should have strong lysis ability, no toxin gene, easy separation and purification, good environmental adaptability and stability, and be harmless to the body. However, phage has some limitations, such as immune response, narrow host spectrum, dosage of administration, and preservation conditions. These problems need to be solved urgently. We can use molecular biology technology to modify the phage genome, expanding the host spectrum, improving the lytic ability and modifying the lysin. Additionally, global criteria for clinical use of phage need to be developed as soon as possible so that phages can be used more widely. It is hoped that on the basis of the existing research, we can break through the current limitations and make bacteriophages safe, green, and effective products for drug-resistant bacteria.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.Z. and S.L.; validation, L.Z.; formal analysis, S.L. and H.Y.; investigation, S.L. and Y.Q.; data curation, S.L.; writing—original draft preparation, S.L.; writing—review and editing, S.L., L.Z., S.H.A.R., N.A., S.S.A. and E.E.A.S.; supervision, L.Z. and W.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was founded by the Jilin Province Science and technology development plan project, grant No. 20210508006R Q.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

Shuang Liang and Yanling Qi contributed equally to this work. The authors thank Jilin Agricultural University and Borui Technology Co for their support for this project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Perry, J.; Waglechner, N.; Wright, G. The Prehistory of Antibiotic Resistance. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2016, 6, a025197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Merril, C.R.; Scholl, D.; Adhya, S.L. The prospect for bacteriophage therapy in Western medicine. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2003, 2, 489–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Górski, A.; Międzybrodzki, R.; Weber-Dąbrowska, B.; Fortuna, W.; Letkiewicz, S.; Rogóż, P.; Jończyk-Matysiak, E.; Dąbrowska, K.; Majewska, J.; Borysowski, J. Phage Therapy: Combating Infections with Potential for Evolving from Merely a Treatment for Complications to Targeting Diseases. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Rex, J.H.; Outterson, K. Antibiotic reimbursement in a model delinked from sales: A benchmark-based worldwide approach. Lancet. Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 500–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Waglechner, N.; Wright, G.D. Antibiotic resistance: It’s bad, but why isn’t it worse? BMC Biol. 2017, 15, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Khalid, A.; Lin, R.C.Y.; Iredell, J.R. A Phage Therapy Guide for Clinicians and Basic Scientists: Background and Highlighting Applications for Developing Countries. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 599906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Royer, S.; Morais, A.P.; da Fonseca Batistão, D.W. Phage therapy as strategy to face post-antibiotic era: A guide to beginners and experts. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 1271–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Caflisch, K.M.; Suh, G.A.; Patel, R. Biological challenges of phage therapy and proposed solutions: A literature review. Expert. Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2019, 17, 1011–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. El Haddad, L.; Harb, C.P.; Gebara, M.A.; Stibich, M.A.; Chemaly, R.F. A Systematic and Critical Review of Bacteriophage Therapy Against Multidrug-resistant ESKAPE Organisms in Humans. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 69, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wendling, C.C.; Goehlich, H.; Roth, O. The structure of temperate phage–bacteria infection networks changes with the phylogenetic distance of the host bacteria. Biol. Lett. 2018, 14, 20180320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Fineran, P.; Petty, N.; Salmond, G. Transduction: Host DNA transfer by bacteriophages. In Encyclopedia of Microbiology; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2009; pp. 666–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Engelhardt, T.; Kallmeyer, J.; Cypionka, H.; Engelen, B. High virus-to-cell ratios indicate ongoing production of viruses in deep subsurface sediments. ISME J. 2014, 8, 1503–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Suttle, C.A. Viruses in the sea. Nature 2005, 437, 356–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Suttle, C.A. Marine viruses--major players in the global ecosystem. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 5, 801–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Williamson, K.E.; Corzo, K.A.; Drissi, C.L.; Buckingham, J.M.; Thompson, C.P.; Helton, R.R. Estimates of viral abundance in soils are strongly influenced by extraction and enumeration methods. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2013, 49, 857–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Letarov, A.V.; Kulikov, E.E. Adsorption of Bacteriophages on Bacterial Cells. Biochemistry 2017, 82, 1632–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, L.; Liu, Q.; Fan, J.; Yan, T.; Zhang, H.; Yang, J.; Deng, D.; Liu, C.; Wei, T.; Ma, Y. Characterization and Genomic Analysis of ValSw3-3, a New Siphoviridae Bacteriophage Infecting Vibrio alginolyticus. J. Virol. 2020, 94, e00066-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zhang, M.; Zhang, T.; Yu, M.; Chen, Y.L.; Jin, M. The Life Cycle Transitions of Temperate Phages: Regulating Factors and Potential Ecological Implications. Viruses 2022, 14, 1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Casjens, S.R.; Hendrix, R.W. Bacteriophage lambda: Early pioneer and still relevant. Virology 2015, 479, 310–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Shen, J.; Zhou, J.; Fu, H.; Mu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Xu, Y.; Xiu, Z. A Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteriophage and its effect on 1, 3-propanediol fermentation. Process Biochem. 2016, 51, 1323–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Niu, Y.D.; Xu, Y.; McAllister, T.A.; Rozema, E.A.; Stephens, T.P.; Bach, S.J.; Johnson, R.P.; Stanford, K. Comparison of fecal versus rectoanal mucosal swab sampling for detecting Escherichia coli O157:H7 in experimentally inoculated cattle used in assessing bacteriophage as a mitigation strategy. J. Food Prot. 2008, 71, 691–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Guo, M.; Gao, Y.; Xue, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, X.; Cheng, Y.; Ma, J.; Wang, H.; Sun, J.; Wang, Z.; et al. Bacteriophage Cocktails Protect Dairy Cows Against Mastitis Caused By Drug Resistant Escherichia coli Infection. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 690377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xu, Z.; Jin, P.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Liu, X.; Shao, S.; Liu, Q. Isolation of a Virulent Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. masoucida Bacteriophage and Its Application in Phage Therapy in Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e0146821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, Z.; Xue, Y.; Gao, Y.; Guo, M.; Liu, Y.; Zou, X.; Cheng, Y.; Ma, J.; Wang, H.; Sun, J.; et al. Phage vB_PaeS-PAJD-1 Rescues Murine Mastitis Infected With Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 689770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sui, B.; Han, L.; Ren, H.; Liu, W.; Zhang, C. A Novel Polyvalent Bacteriophage vB_EcoM_swi3 Infects Pathogenic Escherichia coli and Salmonella enteritidis. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 649673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shi, Y.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, C.; Luo, X.; Chen, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Chen, J.; Gong, Y. Safety and Efficacy of a Phage, kpssk3, in an in vivo Model of Carbapenem-Resistant Hypermucoviscous Klebsiella pneumoniae Bacteremia. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 613356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, J.; Liang, L.; Cui, K.; Li, P.; Hao, G.; Sun, S. Salmonella phage CKT1 significantly relieves the body weight loss of chicks by normalizing the abnormal intestinal microbiome caused by hypervirulent Salmonella Pullorum. Poult. Sci. 2022, 101, 101668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xu, J.; Chen, M.; He, L.; Zhang, S.; Ding, T.; Yao, H.; Lu, C.; Zhang, W. Isolation and characterization of a T4-like phage with a relatively wide host range within Escherichia coli. J. Basic. Microbiol. 2016, 56, 405–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Y.; Mi, Z.; Niu, W.; An, X.; Yuan, X.; Liu, H.; Li, P.; Liu, Y.; Feng, Y.; Huang, Y.; et al. Intranasal treatment with bacteriophage rescues mice from Acinetobacter baumannii-mediated pneumonia. Future. Microbiol. 2016, 11, 631–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Deng, L.Y.; Yang, Z.C.; Gong, Y.L.; Huang, G.T.; Yin, S.P.; Jiang, B.; Peng, Y.Z. Therapeutic effect of phages on extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-induced sepsis in mice. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi 2016, 32, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gu, J.; Li, X.; Yang, M.; Du, C.; Cui, Z.; Gong, P.; Xia, F.; Song, J.; Zhang, L.; Li, J.; et al. Therapeutic effect of Pseudomonas aeruginosa phage YH30 on mink hemorrhagic pneumonia. Vet. Microbiol. 2016, 190, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tie, K.; Yuan, Y.; Yan, S.; Yu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, J.; Sun, C.; Lei, L.; et al. Isolation and identification of Salmonella pullorum bacteriophage YSP2 and its use as a therapy for chicken diarrhea. Virus Genes 2018, 54, 446–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tang, F.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, Q.; Xue, F.; Ren, J.; Sun, J.; Qu, Z.; Zhuge, X.; Li, D.; Wang, J.; et al. Isolation and characterization of a broad-spectrum phage of multiple drug resistant Salmonella and its therapeutic utility in mice. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 126, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ji, Y.; Cheng, M.; Zhai, S.; Xi, H.; Cai, R.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Wang, X.; Xue, Y.; Li, X.; et al. Preventive effect of the phage VB-SavM-JYL01 on rabbit necrotizing pneumonia caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Vet. Microbiol. 2019, 229, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chen, Y.; Sun, E.; Yang, L.; Song, J.; Wu, B. Therapeutic Application of Bacteriophage PHB02 and Its Putative Depolymerase Against Pasteurella multocida Capsular Type A in Mice. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Geng, H.; Zou, W.; Zhang, M.; Xu, L.; Liu, F.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; Xu, Y. Evaluation of phage therapy in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus-induced mastitis in mice. Folia Microbiol. 2020, 65, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cao, F.; Wang, X.; Wang, L.; Li, Z.; Che, J.; Wang, L.; Li, X.; Cao, Z.; Zhang, J.; Jin, L.; et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of a bacteriophage in the treatment of pneumonia induced by multidrug resistance Klebsiella pneumoniae in mice. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 752930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Yu, L.; Wang, S.; Guo, Z.; Liu, H.; Sun, D.; Yan, G.; Hu, D.; Du, C.; Feng, X.; Han, W.; et al. A guard-killer phage cocktail effectively lyses the host and inhibits the development of phage-resistant strains of Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 971–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhao, J.; Liu, Y.; Xiao, C.; He, S.; Yao, H.; Bao, G. Efficacy of Phage Therapy in Controlling Rabbit Colibacillosis and Changes in Cecal Microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Luo, X.; Liao, G.; Liu, C.; Jiang, X.; Lin, M.; Zhao, C.; Tao, J.; Huang, Z. Characterization of bacteriophage HN48 and its protective effects in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus against Streptococcus agalactiae infections. J. Fish Dis. 2018, 41, 1477–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, Y.; Guo, G.; Sun, E.; Song, J.; Yang, L.; Zhu, L.; Liang, W.; Hua, L.; Peng, Z.; Tang, X.; et al. Isolation of a T7-Like Lytic Pasteurella Bacteriophage vB_PmuP_PHB01 and Its Potential Use in Therapy against Pasteurella multocida Infections. Viruses 2019, 11, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Wang, J.; Hu, B.; Xu, M.; Yan, Q.; Liu, S.; Zhu, X.; Sun, Z.; Reed, E.; Ding, L.; Gong, J.; et al. Use of bacteriophage in the treatment of experimental animal bacteremia from imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2006, 17, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Jia, K.; Yang, N.; Zhang, X.; Cai, R.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, J.; Raza, S.H.A.; Kang, Y.; Qian, A.; Li, Y.; et al. Genomic, Morphological and Functional Characterization of Virulent Bacteriophage IME-JL8 Targeting Citrobacter freundii. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 585261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gu, J.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Han, W.; Lei, L.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Gao, Y.; Song, J.; Lu, R.; et al. A method for generation phage cocktail with great therapeutic potential. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Bao, H.; Zhou, Y.; Shahin, K.; Zhang, H.; Cao, F.; Pang, M.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, S.; Olaniran, A.; Schmidt, S.; et al. The complete genome of lytic Salmonella phage vB_SenM-PA13076 and therapeutic potency in the treatment of lethal Salmonella Enteritidis infections in mice. Microbiol. Res. 2020, 237, 126471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, X.; Ji, Y.; Su, J.; Xue, Y.; Xi, H.; Wang, Z.; Bi, L.; Zhao, R.; Zhang, H.; Yang, L.; et al. Therapeutic Efficacy of Phage P(IZ) SAE-01E2 against Abortion Caused by Salmonella enterica Serovar Abortusequi in Mice. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e01366-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Xue, Y.; Zhai, S.; Wang, Z.; Ji, Y.; Wang, G.; Wang, T.; Wang, X.; Xi, H.; Cai, R.; Zhao, R.; et al. The Yersinia Phage X1 Administered Orally Efficiently Protects a Murine Chronic Enteritis Model Against Yersinia enterocolitica Infection. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Cheng, M.; Liang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, L.; Gong, P.; Cai, R.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, H.; Ge, J.; Ji, Y.; et al. The Bacteriophage EF-P29 Efficiently Protects against Lethal Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Alleviates Gut Microbiota Imbalance in a Murine Bacteremia Model. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Salazar, K.C.; Ma, L.; Green, S.I.; Zulk, J.J.; Trautner, B.W.; Ramig, R.F.; Clark, J.R.; Terwilliger, A.L.; Maresso, A.W. Antiviral Resistance and Phage Counter Adaptation to Antibiotic-Resistant Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli. mBio 2021, 12, e00211-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Easwaran, M.; De Zoysa, M.; Shin, H.J. Application of phage therapy: Synergistic effect of phage EcSw (ΦEcSw) and antibiotic combination towards antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020, 67, 2809–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rouse, M.D.; Stanbro, J.; Roman, J.A.; Lipinski, M.A.; Jacobs, A.; Biswas, B.; Regeimbal, J.; Henry, M.; Stockelman, M.G.; Simons, M.P. Impact of Frequent Administration of Bacteriophage on Therapeutic Efficacy in an A. baumannii Mouse Wound Infection Model. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Yang, H.; Zhang, H.; Wang, J.; Yu, J.; Wei, H. A novel chimeric lysin with robust antibacterial activity against planktonic and biofilm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Li, C.; Jiang, M.; Khan, F.M.; Zhao, X.; Wang, G.; Zhou, W.; Li, J.; Yu, J.; Li, Y.; Wei, H.; et al. Intrinsic Antimicrobial Peptide Facilitates a New Broad-Spectrum Lysin LysP53 to Kill Acinetobacter baumannii In Vitro and in a Mouse Burn Infection Model. ACS Infect. Dis. 2021, 7, 3336–3344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zeng, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zou, T.; Zheng, L.; Li, S.; You, J. Effects of Bacteriophage on Growth Performance, Intestinal pH, Volatile Fatty Acid Contents and Disaccharase Activity of Weaned Piglets. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 32, 682–690. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  55. Lin, Y.; Zhou, B.; Zhu, W. Pathogenic Escherichia coli-Specific Bacteriophages and Polyvalent Bacteriophages in Piglet Guts with Increasing Coliphage Numbers after Weaning. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e0096621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Xu, H.; Bao, X.; Lu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Deng, B.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Hou, J. Immunogenicity of T7 bacteriophage nanoparticles displaying G-H loop of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV). Vet. Microbiol. 2017, 205, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Qu, Y.; Liang, Y.; Yang, R.; Chang, J.; Liu, G.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Q. Preparation and application of phage cocktail preparation for dairy cow mastitis. CN113082060A, 9 July 2021. Available online: https://www.patentguru.com/search?q=CN113082060A (accessed on 25 November 2022).
  58. Zeng, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zou, T.; Chen, J.; Li, G.; Zheng, L.; Li, S.; You, J. Bacteriophage as an Alternative to Antibiotics Promotes Growth Performance by Regulating Intestinal Inflammation, Intestinal Barrier Function and Gut Microbiota in Weaned Piglets. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 623899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, M.; Zhao, Z.; Yang, T.; Zhang, H. Prevention and Treatment Effect of Escherichia coli Phage BP16 on Chicken Colibacillosis. China Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2022, 49, 776–782. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yu, X.; Yan, C.; Ren, J.; Zhang, C.; Ren, H. The effect of E. coli bacteriophage Bp7 on the disinfection of the chicken coop environment. Heilongjiang Anim. Sci. Vet. Med. 2016, 56, 107–109. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bao, H.; Zhang, H.; Li, G.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, R. Sterilization of Foodborne Pathogens by Aerosol Spray Treatments with Phages and Their Cocktails. Food Sci. 2013, 34, 10–13. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  62. Yu, H.; Zhang, L.; Feng, C.; Chi, T.; Qi, Y.; Abbas Raza, S.H.; Gao, N.; Jia, K.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, R.; et al. A phage cocktail in controlling phage resistance development in multidrug resistant Aeromonas hydrophila with great therapeutic potential. Microb. Pathog. 2022, 162, 105374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Feng, C.; Jia, K.; Chi, T.; Chen, S.; Yu, H.; Zhang, L.; Haidar Abbas Raza, S.; Alshammari, A.M.; Liang, S.; Zhu, Z.; et al. Lytic Bacteriophage PZL-Ah152 as Biocontrol Measures Against Lethal Aeromonas hydrophila Without Distorting Gut Microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 898961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ding, T.; Sun, H.; Pan, Q.; Zhao, F.; Zhang, Z.; Ren, H. Isolation and characterization of Vibrio parahaemolyticus bacteriophage vB_VpaS_PG07. Virus Res. 2020, 286, 198080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ding, Y. Isolation, Identification and Preliminary Application of Bacteriophage qdvp001 Host Vibrio Para-Haemolyticus in Oyster Purification. Master’s Thesis, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  66. Cui, H.; Cong, C.; Wang, L.; Li, X.; Li, J.; Yang, H.; Li, S.; Xu, Y. Protective effectiveness of feeding phage cocktails in controlling Vibrio harveyi infection of turbot Scophthalmus maximus. Aquaculture 2021, 535, 736390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sulakvelidze, A.; Alavidze, Z.; Morris, J.G., Jr. Bacteriophage therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Lu, T.K.; Koeris, M.S. The next generation of bacteriophage therapy. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2011, 14, 524–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Kutateladze, M.; Adamia, R. Phage therapy experience at the Eliava Institute. Med. Mal. Infect. 2008, 38, 426–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chen, T. Trial phages to stop superbug infection–recall a long-forgotten place in the original ‘Dalian Institute’. Prog. Microbiol. Immunol. 2010, 38, 57–61. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bao, J.; Wu, N.; Zeng, Y.; Chen, L.; Li, L.; Yang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, M.; Li, L.; Li, J.; et al. Non-active antibiotic and bacteriophage synergism to successfully treat recurrent urinary tract infection caused by extensively drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Emerg. Microbes. Infect. 2020, 9, 771–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Chen, P.; Kong, Y.; Wen, S.; Gu, X.; Zhou, Y.; Tan, X.; Ma, Y.; Lu, H. A case report of phage therapy against lung infection caused by Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Electron. J. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7, 71–75. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Qing, N. China’s first doctor of bacteriology–Yu He. Acta Microbiol. Sin. 2007, 949–950. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Li, H.; Wan, X.; Li, W. Bacteriophages in the treatment of tuberculosis uicers. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2009, 19, 151–152. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  75. Meng, F.; Sun, Y.; Yuan, G.; Gao, Y. Progress in the application of phage in the treatment of alcoholic liver disease. Chin. Hepatol. 2021, 26, 956–957. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zeng, Y.; Bao, J.; Tan, D.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, M.; Zhu, Z.; Shao, E.; Zhu, T. Application of phage in patients with pan-drug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection in urinary tract. Chin. J. Urol. 2020, 41, 677–680. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  77. Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Gao, H.; Qing, G. Phage display derived peptides for Alzheimer’s disease therapy and diagnosis. Theranostics 2022, 12, 2041–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Qin, J.; Wu, N.; Bao, J.; Shi, X.; Ou, H.; Ye, S.; Zhao, W.; Wei, Z.; Cai, J.; Li, L.; et al. Heterogeneous Klebsiella pneumoniae Co-infections Complicate Personalized Bacteriophage Therapy. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 608402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Wu, N.; Dai, J.; Guo, M.; Li, J.; Zhou, X.; Li, F.; Gao, Y.; Qu, H.; Lu, H.; Jin, J.; et al. Pre-optimized phage therapy on secondary Acinetobacter baumannii infection in four critical COVID-19 patients. Emerg. Microbes. Infect. 2021, 10, 612–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Li, L.; Li, J.; He, B.; Wu, N.; Zhu, T.; Guo, X.; Chen, Z. Clinical application and effect of phage on the treatment of pulmonary infection by pan-drug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. J. Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ. 2021, 41, 1272–1276. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  81. Tan, X.; Chen, H.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, X.; Huang, W.; Ma, Y. Clinical Experience of Personalized Phage Therapy Against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Lung Infection in a Patient With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 631585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Steele, A.; Stacey, H.J.; de Soir, S.; Jones, J.D. The Safety and Efficacy of Phage Therapy for Superficial Bacterial Infections: A Systematic Review. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Wang, X.; Xie, Z.; Zhao, J.; Zhu, Z.; Yang, C.; Liu, Y. Prospects of Inhaled Phage Therapy for Combatting Pulmonary Infections. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 758392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wu, N.; Chen, L.K.; Zhu, T. Phage therapy for secondary bacterial infections with COVID-19. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2022, 52, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Li, X.; He, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wei, J.; Hu, T.; Si, J.; Tao, G.; Zhang, L.; Xie, L.; Abdalla, A.E.; et al. A combination therapy of Phages and Antibiotics: Two is better than one. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 17, 3573–3582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Zhang, G.; Zhao, Y.; Paramasivan, S.; Richter, K.; Morales, S.; Wormald, P.J.; Vreugde, S. Bacteriophage effectively kills multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates from chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Int. Forum. Allergy Rhinol. 2018, 8, 406–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Furfaro, L.L.; Payne, M.S.; Chang, B.J. Bacteriophage Therapy: Clinical Trials and Regulatory Hurdles. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Gembara, K.; Dąbrowska, K. Phage-specific antibodies. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2021, 68, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Singla, S.; Harjai, K.; Katare, O.P.; Chhibber, S. Encapsulation of Bacteriophage in Liposome Accentuates Its Entry in to Macrophage and Shields It from Neutralizing Antibodies. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Loh, B.; Gondil, V.S.; Manohar, P.; Khan, F.M.; Yang, H.; Leptihn, S. Encapsulation and Delivery of Therapeutic Phages. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 87, e01979-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Hyman, P.; Abedon, S.T. Bacteriophage host range and bacterial resistance. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 70, 217–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Malik, S.; Sidhu, P.K.; Rana, J.S.; Nehra, K. Managing urinary tract infections through phage therapy: A novel approach. Folia. Microbiol. 2020, 65, 217–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Nilsson, A.S. Pharmacological limitations of phage therapy. Upsala J. Med. Sci. 2019, 124, 218–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Malik, D.J.; Sokolov, I.J.; Vinner, G.K.; Mancuso, F.; Cinquerrui, S.; Vladisavljevic, G.T.; Clokie, M.R.J.; Garton, N.J.; Stapley, A.G.F.; Kirpichnikova, A. Formulation, stabilisation and encapsulation of bacteriophage for phage therapy. Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2017, 249, 100–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Clark, W.A. Comparison of several methods for preserving bacteriophages. Appl. Microbiol. 1962, 10, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Loganathan, A.; Manohar, P.; Eniyan, K.; VinodKumar, C.S.; Leptihn, S.; Nachimuthu, R. Phage therapy as a revolutionary medicine against Gram-positive bacterial infections. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2021, 10, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Międzybrodzki, R.; Borysowski, J.; Weber-Dąbrowska, B.; Fortuna, W.; Letkiewicz, S.; Szufnarowski, K.; Pawełczyk, Z.; Rogóż, P.; Kłak, M.; Wojtasik, E.; et al. Clinical aspects of phage therapy. Adv. Virus Res. 2012, 83, 73–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Kakasis, A.; Panitsa, G. Bacteriophage therapy as an alternative treatment for human infections. A comprehensive review. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2019, 53, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Kutter, E.; De Vos, D.; Gvasalia, G.; Alavidze, Z.; Gogokhia, L.; Kuhl, S.; Abedon, S.T. Phage therapy in clinical practice: Treatment of human infections. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2010, 11, 69–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Onsea, J.; Soentjens, P.; Djebara, S.; Merabishvili, M.; Depypere, M.; Spriet, I.; De Munter, P.; Debaveye, Y.; Nijs, S.; Vanderschot, P.; et al. Bacteriophage Application for Difficult-to-treat Musculoskeletal Infections: Development of a Standardized Multidisciplinary Treatment Protocol. Viruses 2019, 11, 891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Luong, T.; Salabarria, A.C.; Edwards, R.A.; Roach, D.R. Standardized bacteriophage purification for personalized phage therapy. Nat. Protoc. 2020, 15, 2867–2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Pirnay, J.P.; Verbeken, G.; Ceyssens, P.J.; Huys, I.; De Vos, D.; Ameloot, C.; Fauconnier, A. The Magistral Phage. Viruses 2018, 10, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Clokie, R.J.M. Phage Pharmacology and Experimental Methods; Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  104. Chan, B.K.; Abedon, S.T.; Loc-Carrillo, C. Phage cocktails and the future of phage therapy. Future. Microbiol. 2013, 8, 769–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Li, G.; Hu, F. History and development of phage therapy. Chin. J. Antibiot. 2017, 42, 807–813. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Gondil, V.S.; Khan, F.M.; Mehra, N.; Kumar, D.; Khullar, A.; Sharma, T.; Sharma, A.; Mehta, R.; Yang, H. Clinical Potential of Bacteriophage and Endolysin Based Therapeutics: A Futuristic Approach. In Microbial Products for Health, Environment and Agriculture; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 39–58. [Google Scholar]
Antibiotics 12 00417 g001 550
Figure 1. Mechanisms of action of lytic phage and lysogenic phage.
Figure 1. Mechanisms of action of lytic phage and lysogenic phage.
Antibiotics 12 00417 g001
Antibiotics 12 00417 g002 550
Figure 2. Percentage of articles published on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database.
Figure 2. Percentage of articles published on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database.
Antibiotics 12 00417 g002
Antibiotics 12 00417 g003 550
Figure 3. Summary of the clinical application of bacteriophage in China. Includes respiratory [72], skin [73], mouth [74], liver [75], urinary tract [76], bones, and phage display [77].
Figure 3. Summary of the clinical application of bacteriophage in China. Includes respiratory [72], skin [73], mouth [74], liver [75], urinary tract [76], bones, and phage display [77].
Antibiotics 12 00417 g003
Table
Table 1. WHO pathogen priority list, 2017.
Table 1. WHO pathogen priority list, 2017.
PriorityPathogen NameResistance
CriticalAcinetobacter baumanniiCarbapenem
Pseudomonas aeruginosaCarbapenem
EnterobacteriaceaeCarbapenem and produces extended-spectrum lactamase (ESBL)
HighEnterococcus faecalisVancomycin
Staphylococcus aureusMethicillin and Vancomycin intermediary
HelicobacterpyloriClarithromycin
CampylobacterFluoroquinolones
SalmonellaFluoroquinolones
Neisseria gonorrhoeaeCephalosporin and Fluoroquinolones
MediumStreptococcus pneumoniaePenicillin
Haemophilus influenzaeAmpicillin
ShigellaFluoroquinolones
Note: Critical priority pathogens are bacteria that cause severe infection and high mortality in hospitalized patients; High priority pathogens are bacteria that cause a large number of infections in healthy people; Medium priority pathogens are three types of bacteria that are developing more resistance to available drugs.
Table
Table 2. Summary of Bacteriophage Therapy for Bacterial Infection in Animal Models in China.
Table 2. Summary of Bacteriophage Therapy for Bacterial Infection in Animal Models in China.
Host OrganismAnimalInfectionDelivery
b-Bacterial
p-Phage
bp-Bacterial and Phage		Phage Log (CFU)Phage Log (CFU)Phage SpeciesPhage Therapy Outcome
A Remarkable Effect
B Medium Effect
C No Effect		Reference
Escherichia coliPseudomonas aeruginosaAerominas saimonicidaKlebsiella pneumoniaeHighly pathogenic SaimonellaAcinetobacter baumaniiSaimonelllaStaphylococcus aureusPasteurellaStreptococcus agaiactiaeCitrobacter freundiiYersiniaEnterococcus faecallsMouseBirdChickenCalveMinkTurbotDuckRabbitTilapia mossambicaCrapColibacillosisMastitisPneumoniaInflammationBacteremiaPullorum diseaseSepsisPlacenta and endometritisSalmonellosisSystemicIntestineNephritisTake OrallyTransnasal EntryIntraperitoneal InjectionIntramuscular InjectionBreast InjectionIntestinal InjectionReduce Bacterial ConcentrationClear InfectionEffect of Delay in TreatmentDose Related StudiesContinuous Injection of Phage
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 10.011.04BB [21]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 1.88.73AA [22]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 4–62.9–6.91AB A [23]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 5.36.31BB [24]
◆ ◆ ◆ b p 8.05–71AB A [25]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 7.36–71AB A [26]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 6.37.01BB [27]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 5.38.51BB A[28]
◆ ◆ bp 8.39.31AAA [29]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 7.78.01AA [30]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 10.05–71AA A [31]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 7.74.9–8.91AA A [32]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 9.310.31BB A[33]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 8.56.5–9.51BB A [34]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 1.98.01BB AA[35]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 4.87.32BA [36]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 8.37.3–9.31BA A [37]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 8.05.02AA [38]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 10.011.01AA [39]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp5.19.81AB [40]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 4.58.01BB [41]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 7.59.81AAA [42]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 9.37.01CB A [43]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 8.43.5–4.53AAAA [44]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 8.79.51BB [45]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 3.35.01AA [46]
◆ ◆ ◆ bp 9.49.31AACA [47]
◆◆ ◆ bp 9.35.61AA A [48]
Note: The site where ◆ appeared is indicated as that Host Organism/Animal/Infection.
Table
Table 3. Summary of the clinical treatment of bacterial infections by bacteriophages in China.
Table 3. Summary of the clinical treatment of bacterial infections by bacteriophages in China.
No.Age–YearHost OrganismType of InfectionDeliveryPhage(s) UsedOutcome
[1] 66MDR Klebsiella pneumoniaeUrinary tract infectionsIrrigated simultaneously via the kidney and bladderA two-phage cocktail (ΦJD902 + ΦJD905) and a three-phage cocktail (ΦJD905 + ΦJD907 + ΦJD908), combined with antibiotic treatmentDischarged and did not recur after two months of follow-up
[2] 65Complex pan-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniaeUrinary tract infectionsBladder infusionA four-phage cocktail (117, 135, 178, and GD168 phage) and a three-phage cocktail (130, 131, and 909 phage)Pan-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae was cleared and bladder infection was significantly improved.
[3]Patient 1: 62
Patient 2: 64
Patient 3: 81
Patient 4: 78		Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB)Pulmonary infectionVia nebulizationA phage cocktail (2Φ)Patient 1 and Patient 2: Discharged
Patient 3: CRAB was
eliminated but an un-subdued Carbapenem-resistant
CRKP infection was followed and died on day 10
Patient 4: Discharged from ICU Day 7, however died of respiratory failure a month.
[4] 54Klebsiella pneumoniaePulmonary infectionVia nebulizationSingle-phage preparation (Φ59)The symptoms of cough and expectoration were improved, and the inflammatory reaction was reduced
[5]82Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) and Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomon asaeruginosa (CRPA)Pulmonary infectionVia nebulizationA two-phage cocktail (ΦPA3 + ΦPA39) and single-phage preparation (ΦAB3), combined with antibiotic treatmentThe pulmonary infection was significantly improved
[6]88Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB)Pulmonary infectionVia nebulizationSingle-phage preparation (Ab_SZ3), combined with antibiotic treatmentCRAB was cleared and the pulmonary infection was significantly improved
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, S.; Qi, Y.; Yu, H.; Sun, W.; Raza, S.H.A.; Alkhorayef, N.; Alkhalil, S.S.; Salama, E.E.A.; Zhang, L. Bacteriophage Therapy as an Application for Bacterial Infection in China. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 417. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12020417

AMA Style

Liang S, Qi Y, Yu H, Sun W, Raza SHA, Alkhorayef N, Alkhalil SS, Salama EEA, Zhang L. Bacteriophage Therapy as an Application for Bacterial Infection in China. Antibiotics. 2023; 12(2):417. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12020417

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Shuang, Yanling Qi, Huabo Yu, Wuwen Sun, Sayed Haidar Abbas Raza, Nada Alkhorayef, Samia S. Alkhalil, Essam Eldin Abdelhady Salama, and Lei Zhang. 2023. "Bacteriophage Therapy as an Application for Bacterial Infection in China" Antibiotics 12, no. 2: 417. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12020417

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop