Next Article in Journal
Editorial for Special Issue “Antimicrobial Therapy in Intensive Care Unit”
Next Article in Special Issue
The Efficacy and Safety of Vonoprazan and Amoxicillin Dual Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Diclofenac and Meloxicam Exhibited Anti-Virulence Activities Targeting Staphyloxanthin Production in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recombinant Helicobacter pylori Vaccine Delivery Vehicle: A Promising Tool to Treat Infections and Combat Antimicrobial Resistance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mutations Related to Antibiotics Resistance in Helicobacter pylori Clinical Isolates from Bangladesh

by
Kartika Afrida Fauzia
1,2,3,
Hafeza Aftab
4,
Evariste Tshibangu-Kabamba
5,
Ricky Indra Alfaray
1,3,
Batsaikhan Saruuljavkhlan
1,
Alain Cimuanga-Mukanya
1,6,
Takashi Matsumoto
1,
Phawinee Subsomwong
7,
Junko Akada
1,
Muhammad Miftahussurur
3,8 and
Yoshio Yamaoka
1,8,9,10,11,*
1
Department of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu 879-5593, Japan
2
Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia
3
Helicobacter pylori and Microbiota Study Group, Institute of Tropical Disease, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia
4
Department of Gastroenterology, Dhaka Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
5
Research Center for Infectious Sciences, Department of Parasitology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka 545-8585, Japan
6
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Public Health, University of Mbujimayi, Mbujimayi 225-80, Democratic Republic of the Congo
7
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki 036-8562, Japan
8
Division of Gastroentero-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine-Dr. Soetomo Teaching Hospital, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60131, Indonesia
9
Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
10
Research Center for Global and Local Infectious Diseases, Oita University, Yufu 879-5593, Japan
11
Borneo Medical and Health Research Centre, University Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah 88400, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2023, 12(2), 279; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12020279
Submission received: 4 January 2023 / Revised: 24 January 2023 / Accepted: 25 January 2023 / Published: 31 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotic Resistance and Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection)

Abstract

:
Current management of gastric inflammation involves the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. However, the effectiveness of commonly used antibiotics against H. pylori infection has decreased due to antibiotic resistance. Phenotypic-based diagnostics are laborious and finding the cause of resistance can be difficult. Therefore, early detection and understanding of the underlying mechanism of this resistance are necessary. This study evaluated the mutations in the genes related to the Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) of the clinical isolates from Bangladeshi subjects. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on 56 isolates and the genes (such as pbp1a, rdxA, ribF, fur, gyrA, gyrB, 23S rRNA, and infB) were extracted. The reads were assembled, and the SNPs were extracted by the latest pipeline for antibiotic mutation analysis, ARIBA. The mutations and the association with the antibiotic phenotypes were evaluated using Fisher’s exact test. In this study, the clarithromycin resistance rate was high, 39.3% (22/56), with the median MIC 24 mg/L ranging from 2 to 128 mg/L. The mutation of A2147G was significantly associated with resistance (p = 0.000018) but not in locus A2146G (p = 0.056). Levofloxacin also posed a high resistance. We observed that the mutation of D91N (but not D91Y) (p = 0.002) and N87K (p = 0.002) of gyrA was associated with levofloxacin resistance. Mutations in locus A343V (p = 0.041) of gyrB also showed a significant association. Meanwhile, in the pbp1a gene, several mutations might explain the resistance; they were G594fs (p = 0.036), K306R (p = 0.036), N562Y (p = 0.0006), and V45I (p = 0.018). The prevalence of metronidazole was exceptionally high (96.4%), and numerous mutations occurred in rdxA genes, including the truncation of genes. These results imply that the mutation in genes encoding the target protein of antibiotics remains the critical resistance mechanism in H. pylori.

1. Introduction

Due to widespread antimicrobial resistance, the first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection has a decreasing cure rate [1,2]. In contrast, a chronic H. pylori infection can lead to the development of gastroduodenal diseases such as stomach cancer and peptic ulcer disease [3]. A recent agreement on H. pylori treatment strongly advocated modifying the treatment based on the findings of antimicrobial susceptibility testing to address the issue [4]. It hoped to improve eradication rates and lower antibiotic resistance levels globally, but some studies still found eradication failures [5]. These findings imply a knowledge gap in the mechanisms underlying antibiotic resistance. Understanding the factors that lead to antibiotic resistance can help to eradicate and manage H. pylori infections effectively.
Clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and proton pump inhibitors have been the initial regimens for eradicating H. pylori. The macrolide clarithromycin inhibits the function of 23S rRNA in protein synthesis [6]. Various global investigations have implicated point mutations in the 23S rRNA gene as the source of the development of resistance, with mutation types varying at loci 2146, 2147, and 2182 [6,7,8,9]. Other genes, including infB, have also been linked to the emergence of resistance [10]. Meanwhile, it has been discovered that mutations within the penicillin-binding protein gene family are a significant factor in amoxicillin resistance [11].
Significant prospects for alternate regimens include metronidazole and levofloxacin. However, resistance to levofloxacin and metronidazole increasingly continues to be an issue [2]. As well as mutations in the gyrB gene involved in levofloxacin resistance, mutations in the gyrA gene primarily occur at loci N87 and D91 [12]. As for metronidazole resistance, numerous potential genes, including rdxA and frxA, have been discovered. Now, investigations indicate that additional genes, including ribF, mdaB, and omp11, also play a role [7].
Compared to other bacterial species, the H. pylori genome is highly diverse [13,14]. Genome diversities also affect genetic material associated with antibiotic resistance, as some regions have unique properties at the gene or single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) level. According to multiple investigations, there are still resistant bacteria for which no mutations are observed [6]. Therefore, a population must comprehensively examine the SNP level’s resistance mechanism.
This study attempted to examine known-variant and novel-variant genes involved in antibiotic resistance from Next Generation Sequencing data. Clinical H. pylori isolates from Bangladesh have been checked for susceptibility to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, and metronidazole [15]. Whole genome analysis was then performed to understand further the mechanism of H. pylori’s antibiotic resistance.

2. Results

2.1. Genome Relatedness and Antibiotic Resistance

Incorporating genome alignment of Bangladeshi isolates and reference isolates whose populations had been previously identified, the maximum likelihood tree was constructed. In accordance with a previous report [16], Bangladesh isolates clustered with hpAsia2 and hpEurope, which can be distinguished from the tree (Figure 1). Levofloxacin and metronidazole resistance are distributed comparably among hpAsia2 (levofloxacin 16/23, metronidazole 22/23) and hpEurope (levofloxacin 21/33, metronidazole 32/33) Multidrug resistance was observed in 78.6% (44/56) isolates, while metronidazole resistance was observed in only 12.6% (12/56) isolates. In addition, we found that 19 of 22 clarithromycin-resistant bacteria and all amoxicillin-resistant bacteria shared resistance to levofloxacin.

2.2. Mutations Related to Resistance to Levofloxacin

gyrA and gyrB are the genes encoding the protein target of levofloxacin. Among the 56 genomes we evaluated, the total SNPs were 618 for gyrA and 853 for gyrB (Figure 2). The total number of mutations in the resistance isolates is higher than sensitive.
We observed that only mutations in the loci 87 and 91 of gyrA showed significant association with levofloxacin resistance, and none of these mutants were found in the susceptible isolates (Table 1). Only one strain had a mutation in both loci, and the MIC was 64 mg/L. About 87.5% of mutations in gyrB are complemented with the mutation in gyrA, while only one resistant strain possessed mutation A343V on gyrB but not on gyrA. Based on the mutations of these loci, the concordance between the genotype and phenotype was 89.2% (33/37).
A tendency of mutation N87K of the resistant isolates in the hpEurope cluster was observed (8/13) (Supplementary Table S1). The mutation of D91N was also more frequent in hpEurope; implying the possible influence of population type in the resistance.

2.3. Mutations Related to Resistance to Amoxicillin

To find the genetic variant that appeared in amoxicillin resistance, we evaluated four genes: pbp1a. pbp2, pbp3, and pbp4 (Table 2). The substitution from Asparagine to Tyrosine in locus 562 of pbp1a was found in both resistant isolates but not in the susceptible isolates. The other mutation was found in only one strain each. Based on the identification through locus 562 in pbp1a, the agreement between the genotypic and phenotypic approaches was 100%.

2.4. Mutations Related to Resistance to Metronidazole

Several genes reportedly contribute to metronidazole resistance. In this study, six genes were evaluated and the association analysis was performed (Table 3). Isolates possessing frameshift mutations in various loci were reported the resistance phenotype (Supplementary Table S2). The eight loci of a frameshift mutation in the rdxA gene were found in 47 isolates (83.3%).
In the ribF gene, the total number of variants possessed by all isolates is higher than the genes in both resistant and susceptible isolates. An average of 11.6 SNPs were present in each resistant strain, while 12.8 SNPs were present in susceptible isolates. Significant associations between the metronidazole susceptibility and the SNPs in the ribF gene were also observed as a substitution of aspartic acid to glutamic acid in locus 253 (D253E) and a substitution of Isoleucine to Leucine (S151L). Isolates possessing a substitution in locus D253E showed an MIC value of 128 mg/L, significantly higher compared to isolates without the mutation (Figure 3a).
The protein physical and chemical parameters analysis of proteins Fur and RibF from the wild-type strain compared to the mutant showed a difference in the instability index (Supplementary Table S3). In the case of the Fur protein, the wild-type had a lower instability index, meaning this protein was more stable than the mutant (see the mutation position in Supplementary Figure S1A). As for the RibF protein, the wild-type and the mutant D253E showed similar values for all parameters. The wild-type had a lower aliphatic index, meaning this protein had slightly lower thermal stability than mutant RibF S151L (see the mutation position in Supplementary Figure S1B,C).

2.5. Mutations Related to Resistance to Clarithromycin

For the clarithromycin resistance, we evaluated 23S rRNA and infB. The resistance to clarithromycin is more prevalent in the HpEurope (48.5%) than in hpAsia2 (26.5%). A mutation in A2147G was also more frequent in the hpEurope isolates than the others. Among resistant isolates with A2147G mutation, 90% belonged to hpEurope.
Among 22 isolates resistant to clarithromycin, 14 possessed a mutation in loci 2146 and 2147. Interestingly, none of them had a mutation in both loci (Table 4). This indicated that, based on the mutation of 2146 and 2147 only, the agreement between genotype and phenotype was 63.6%.
A mutation in locus 718 in the infB gene also been reported to be associated with resistant isolates; although, they were also found in the susceptible isolates. Isolates possessing mutation in A412G also showed high MIC (Figure 4). Only alteration in locus 184 showed extremely high MIC (64–128 mg/L). All of these mutations were found together with mutations on 23S rRNA. Therefore, it did not improve the agreement between phenotype and genotype.

3. Discussion

H. pylori antimicrobial resistance remains a severe problem in H. pylori eradication. Mutations in the target genes have been proposed to be the most common mechanism in resistance of H. pylori. Therefore, we examined known mutations and SNPs in antibiotic protein targets using this dataset. In South Asia, both a high prevalence of infection and a high prevalence of antibiotic resistance have been recorded. A high prevalence of levofloxacin and metronidazole-resistant isolates was also reported in the other parts of India, 65.6% and 81.2%, respectively [16].
The genomic diversity of H. pylori varied according to geographic location [14]. These genetic variations also occurred, gyrA and gyrB [8]. This observation is consistent with this dataset, which contained a high prevalence of levofloxacin resistance. The gyrA mutations D91N and N87K were more frequent in the cluster that shared a branch with hpEurope than the ones with hpAsia2. N87K and D91N mutations were located in the Quinolone Resistance Determining Region (QRDR) of the gyrA H. pylori [17]. The mutations in this region were found in the resistant isolates in many previous studies [18,19,20]. Interestingly, one strain containing a mutation in both loci (87 and 91) showed high-level resistance. As described in a previous study, isolates from patients who failed eradication by sitafloxacin also showed high MIC and double-mutation mutations that occurred in more than one locus [21]. Complementation of both mutations that worsen the stability of the protein could be a plausible explanation.
Amoxicillin resistance is included in the first-line regiments of H. pylori eradication [4]. Amoxicillin resistance is the result of a mutation in the penicillin-binding motif of Penicillin Binding Protein (Pbp). SNPs in the pbp1a, pbp2, pbp3, and pbp4 genes were investigated. We discovered the well-known N562Y mutation in the pbp1a gene and the most prevalent mutations seen in H. pylori amoxicillin-resistant isolates. The natural transformation also demonstrated the crucial role of mutations to increase the minimum inhibitory concentration levels [11]. It concerns the motif SNN559-561, one of the three pbp1A motifs defining the active site of the enzymes [22]. These motifs are located at the SAIK368-371 motif and have already been reported before in association with amoxicillin resistance. The others (K306R, T30S, and V45I) turn out to be new candidates except for V45I, which has been already reported in previous studies [9,23]. Therefore, further investigation in vitro is needed to establish their association with the resistance. Nevertheless, these loci do not fall among the binding sites and V45I is present in 11.1% of susceptible isolates. Mutations in pbp2, pbp3, and pbp4 were also found among the significant mutations. However, they were rarely found in both isolates. Perhaps, the statistical significance might be due to this unbalanced sampling. In addition, the effect of mutation accumulation is hard to determine since both isolates had MIC values of 0.25 mg/L. Further explorations would shed more light on these mutations.
Various alterations have been described up to this point, but they are inconclusive due to the global spread of metronidazole resistance [24,25]. In fact, just three isolates in this dataset were sensitive to metronidazole. High-resistance NADPH reductase encoded by the rdxA gene is the target of metronidazole. In this study, isolates possessing frameshift mutations in rdxA were resistant. Frameshift mutations were also prevalent in the frxA genes among resistant isolates; although, they were also present in the susceptible isolates. The analysis also expanded to the ferric uptake regulator (fur), a modulator of drug activity B (mdaB), riboflavin biosynthesis protein (ribF), and omp11 [7]. A previous study reported mutations in loci 222 and 227 of ribF, but none of them was found in ours [26]. Instead, significant associations with the very high metronidazole MIC were found in loci D253E and S151L of ribF. The afore-mentioned study also found a mutation in locus 114, whereas the current one showed significance in locus N118Q fur. The stability index analysis showed that the mutation affects the stability index; although, further docking analysis with metronidazole and experimental analysis is necessary. These results also indicate that multiple mechanisms might be involved in metronidazole resistance.
Clarithromycin suppresses protein synthesis by binding to the peptidyl-transferase of the 23S ribosomal RNA (rRNA). In the clarithromycin resistance isolates, the mutations decreased. The A2142G mutation was more prevalent than the A2143G mutation [27,28]. Resistance to metronidazole and clarithromycin was observed in 41.6% of isolates. Mutations at locus 2146 and 2147 of 23S rRNA (formerly known as locus 2142 and 2143) account for most of the clarithromycin resistance. The mutations in these two loci were only found in the resistant isolates. According to prior research in South Asia, the substitution of adenine for guanine at locus 2147 is more prevalent than the substitution of adenine for cytosine [8]. The mutations in 2147 are also more prevalent than those in locus 2146, which is coherent with the previous study [27]. Unlike previously reported studies in Bangladesh [29], the mutation related to clarithromycin resistance could be influenced by the genome population, as has been shown in most cases (90%), the A2147G mutation belonged to hpEurope. Further study using the worldwide dataset is necessary to confirm the results.
However, the mutations in loci 2146 and 2147 were only present in 50% of isolates. Previous studies reported the mutation in another locus of 23S rRNA, such as 2182 [30]. However, there were no significantly associated SNPs found in our dataset. Therefore, we searched the SNPs in the genes previously reported by our group to induce clarithromycin resistance: infB. The infB gene encodes the translation initiation factor IF-2, which stimulates the binding of formyl methionyl-transfer RNA to 30S ribosomal subunits during the initiation of protein synthesis and is implicated in the hydrolysis of GTP during the development of the 70S ribosomal complex. Although we could not find the mutation in a similar location (locus 160), we discovered that the alteration of cytosine to thymine in locus 718 was significantly associated with resistance, as well as in locus 184 and 412, which could be the new candidates for further investigation. These mutations were first reported in this study, and they were located in four separate locations. Further evaluation on finding the binding motifs is necessary.
Conducting an AMR test prior to the treatment also increases the eradication efficacy [31]. Genotypically guided treatment, especially for clarithromycin and levofloxacin, was also reported to be effective [32]. The findings in this study with the well-known mutations in gyrA and 23SrRNA support the utilization of genotypic-guided therapy. Genotypic-based results are faster to obtain compared to phenotypic. Previous studies detected resistant H. pylori in clinical specimens with excellent specificity and sensitivity using more straightforward techniques such as restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), 3′-mismatch PCR, DNA sequencing, the PCR line probe assay (PCR-LiPA), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) [33]. Nonetheless, in order to acquire a greater resolution and investigate mutations not previously identified, whole genome sequencing analysis is required. The mutations found in the current study utilized the ARIBA pipeline to identify the mutations found in the current study and showed similar results to our previous findings, indicating that this method could be an alternative to use directly from the FASTQ file without going through genome assembly [24]. This study’s limitations include the number of datasets used. In addition, the possibility of recombination and linkage between loci in the genomes of bacteria was not considered. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct additional research with a larger dataset that has been meticulously curated to determine the genetic population.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patient Sampling and H. pylori Isolates

The H. pylori isolates used as the primary dataset in this study were obtained from gastric biopsies of 133 patients during a survey conducted in 2014 in Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh. Each subject was given the information for consent and submitted the informed consent. To obtain a single colony of H. pylori isolates, biopsy specimens from the antrum were homogenized in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), inoculated in H. pylori selective plates (Nissui Pharmaceuticals Co., Tokyo, Japan), and incubated for five days in microaerophilic environment (5% O2 and 10% CO2). Before harvesting for genomic DNA extraction, each colony was subcultured on Brucella agar (BD BBL, Becton Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) supplemented with 7% horse blood. H. pylori were isolated from 56 patients suffering from chronic gastritis (53/56) and peptic ulcers (3/56). This study’s protocol was approved by the Oita University Faculty of Medicine in Japan and the Ethics Committee of the Bangladesh Medical Research Council (BMRC) in Dhaka, Bangladesh.

4.2. Antibiotics Susceptibility Test

All isolates were tested for susceptibility to five antibiotics by Etest (Biomerieux, Nice, France) [15]. The bacteria were subcultured three times from the −80 °C bacterial stock on Brucella agar plates with 7% horse blood and no antibiotics in microaerophilic conditions. Day 2 culture of H. pylori was suspended in PBS and modified its bacterial density to 0.5 Mc Farland standard. H. pylori were inoculated onto Mueller–Hinton agar ((BD BBL, Becton Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) with 10% horse serum, and an Etest strip was inserted in the middle according to manufacturer’s instructions. Clarithromycin, amoxicillin, tetracycline, and metronidazole ranged from 0.016 mg/L to 256 mg/L, whereas levofloxacin ranged from 0.002 to 32 mg/L. After 72 h of microaerophilic incubation, the results were evaluated. We also calculated the MIC50 as the median to show the antibiotic’s ability to inhibit 50% of isolates. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) clinical breakpoints for antibiotic susceptibility tests were amoxicillin 0.125 mg/L, clarithromycin 0.5 mg/L, levofloxacin 1 mg/L, metronidazole 8 mg/L, and tetracycline 1 mg/L (EUCAST, 2022; available at https://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints (accessed on 10 May 2022).

4.3. Genome Sequencing

H. pylori were harvested in PBS and DNA was extracted using the Qiagen DNEeasy Kit, per the manufacturer’s instructions (Hilden, Germany). The Quantifluor dsDNA System (Madison, WI, USA) and Quantus Fluorometer measured DNA concentration (Sunnyvale, CA, USA). After standardizing the concentration, MiSeq Illumina whole-genome sequencing produced 300 bp paired-end reads. We constructed a full genome alignment of all Bangladesh sequences and a prior study that defined population to analyze genetic relatedness and population genetics [34]. Snippy-core version 4.6.2 (available at https://github.com/tseemann/snippy (accessed on 18 April 2022)) aligned was used to align the genome, FastTree 2.0 with GTR–nt mode was utilized to create a maximum probability tree from the alignment [35], and Microreact was used to visualize the tree [36].

4.4. Analysis of the SNP and Protein Modelling

ARIBA pipeline analyzed the SNPs. A reference database was created by collecting antibiotic-related genes of strain 26,695. Coding sequences and novel variants contained ARIBA metadata and CD-HIT clusters’ references. The 56 isolates’ fastq readings were mapped to the cluster’s reference sequence and assembled individually. Bowtie mapped reads to cluster references, then SAMtools called variations. Strain results included assembled genes and variations compared to strain 26,695. Text files summarized the reports. If coverage and identity exceeded 50% and 90%, the genes were present. SNPs with amino acid variations were summarized, and those that occurred in fewer than 10% of isolates were eliminated. Antibiotic resistance phenotype was correlated with SNP occurrence and absence. Fisher’s exact test p < 0.05 was significant. Spearman’s rank correlation analyzed the other non-parametric correlation. R was used for statistical analysis and graphing (version 3.5.1).
To assess the role of mutation in RibF and the Fur gene, a protein model was constructed from the genes of 26,695 using Phyre2 [37]. The physicochemical characteristics were evaluated using Expasy [38] and compared between the wild-type isolates and mutant isolates.

5. Conclusions

Significant correlations exist between genetic H. pylori variables discovered by WGS and phenotypic resistance. This enables the prediction of phenotypic clarithromycin, amoxicillin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin resistance in a clinically relevant timeframe based on genotypic information in the 23S rRNA infB, pbp1a, gyrA, gyrB, and rdxA, genes with a substantial concordant. This result may facilitate the rapid determination of drug susceptibility in personalizing treatments to increase the efficacy of H. pylori eradication.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics12020279/s1, Table S1. The distribution of mutations in the gyrA gene between the H. pylori population; Table S2. Frameshift mutations occurred in the rdxA, mdaB, ribF, and frxA; Table S3. Physical and chemical parameters of the Fur and RibF, Figure S1. The protein structure prediction of RibF and Fur.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.A.F. and Y.Y.; methodology, K.A.F., J.A. and T.M.; software, B.S.; formal analysis, K.A.F. and M.M.; investigation, K.A.F., R.I.A., B.S. and P.S.; resources, H.A. and Y.Y.; data curation, A.C.-M. and E.T.-K.; writing—original draft preparation, K.A.F. and R.I.A.; writing—review and editing, K.A.F. and Y.Y.; visualization, B.S., K.A.F. and R.I.A.; supervision, Y.Y.; project administration, Y.Y.; funding acquisition, Y.Y., T.M., J.A. and M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (DK62813) (Y.Y) and Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan (221S0002, 18KK0266, and 19H03473) (YY), 21K08010 (T.M), and 21K07898 (J.A). The Japan Society also supported this work for the Promotion of Science Institutional Program for Young Researcher Overseas Visits and the Strategic Funds for the Promotion of Science and Technology Agency (JST) for Y.Y., B.S. and R.I.A. were PhD students supported by the Japanese Government (MEXT) scholarship program for 2019. In addition, this study was also supported by the Indonesian Research Collaboration No. 1073/UN3.15/PT/2022 (MM). This work was also supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) (e-ASIA JRP) (M.M., Y.Y).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Oita University Faculty of Medicine Japan and the Ethics Committee of the Bangladesh Medical Research Council (BMRC), Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patients to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

All genome data were stored in Genbank with BioProject accession PRJDB11821.

Acknowledgments

We thankful for David Y. Graham for the discussion and suggestion for this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yeo, Y.H.; Shiu, S.-I.; Ho, H.J.; Zou, B.; Lin, J.-T.; Wu, M.-S.; Liou, J.-M.; Wu, C.-Y. First-line Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies in countries with high and low clarithromycin resistance: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Gut 2018, 67, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Kuo, Y.-T.; Liou, J.-M.; El-Omar, E.M.; Wu, J.-Y.; Leow, A.H.R.; Goh, K.L.; Das, R.; Lu, H.; Lin, J.-T.; Tu, Y.-K.; et al. Primary antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori in the Asia-Pacific region: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 2, 707–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Correa, P.; Houghton, J. Carcinogenesis of Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology 2007, 133, 659–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Malfertheiner, P.; Megraud, F.; O’Morain, C.A.; Gisbert, J.P.; Kuipers, E.J.; Axon, A.T.; Bazzoli, F.; Gasbarrini, A.; Atherton, J.; Graham, D.Y.; et al. Management ofHelicobacter pyloriinfection—The Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report. Gut 2017, 66, 6–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Gingold-Belfer, R.; Niv, Y.; Schmilovitz-Weiss, H.; Levi, Z.; Boltin, D. Susceptibility-guided versus empirical treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 36, 2649–2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mannion, A.; Dzink-Fox, J.; Shen, Z.; Piazuelo, M.B.; Wilson, K.T.; Correa, P.; Peek, R.M.; Camargo, M.C.; Fox, J.G. Helicobacter pylori Antimicrobial Resistance and Gene Variants in High- and Low-Gastric-Cancer-Risk Populations. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2021, 59, e03203-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tshibangu-Kabamba, E.; Yamaoka, Y. Helicobacter pylori infection and antibiotic resistance—From biology to clinical implications. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 18, 613–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mahant, S.; Sharma, A.K.; Gehlot, V.; Mukhopadhyay, A.K.; Chhawchharia, A.; Dutta, S.; Agarwal, A.; Som, A.; Das, K.; Das, R. Geographically Distinct North-East Indian Helicobacter pylori Strains are Highly Sensitive to Clarithromycin but are Levofloxacin Resistant. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2019, 37, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Subsomwong, P.; Doohan, D.; Fauzia, K.A.; Akada, J.; Matsumoto, T.; Yee, T.T.; Htet, K.; Waskito, L.A.; Tuan, V.P.; Uchida, T.; et al. Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Study of Helicobacter pylori Isolates from Myanmar and Their Susceptibility to Antibiotics. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Binh, T.T.; Shiota, S.; Suzuki, R.; Matsuda, M.; Trang, T.T.H.; Kwon, D.H.; Iwatani, S.; Yamaoka, Y. Discovery of novel mutations for clarithromycin resistance in Helicobacter pylori by using next-generation sequencing. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014, 69, 1796–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rimbara, E.; Noguchi, N.; Kawai, T.; Sasatsu, M. Mutations in penicillin-binding proteins 1, 2 and 3 are responsible for amoxicillin resistance in Helicobacter pylori. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2008, 61, 995–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Rimbara, E.; Noguchi, N.; Kawai, T.; Sasatsu, M. Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Helicobacter pylori: Role of Mutations at Position 87 and 91 of GyrA on the Level of Resistance and Identification of a Resistance Conferring Mutation in GyrB. Helicobacter 2012, 17, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Suerbaum, S.; Smith, J.M.; Bapumia, K.; Morelli, G.; Smith, N.H.; Kunstmann, E.; Dyrek, I.; Achtman, M. Free recombination within Helicobacter pylori. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 12619–12624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Suerbaum, S.; Achtman, M. Population Genetics. In Helicobacter pylori: Physiology and Genetics; Mobley, H.L.T., Mendz, G.L., Hazell, S.L., Eds.; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  15. Aftab, H.; Miftahussurur, M.; Subsomwong, P.; Ahmed, F.; Khan, A.A.; Yamaoka, Y. Helicobacter pylori antibiotic susceptibility patterns in Bangladesh: Emerging levofloxacin resistance. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2016, 10, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Hallur, V.; Panigrahi, M.; Sable, M.; Ghosh, M.; Mohanty, S.; Purkait, S.; Praharaj, A. Low clarithromycin resistance in virulent Helicobacter pylori from dyspeptic patients at a tertiary care centre in Odisha. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2022, 40, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Salehi, N.; Attaran, B.; Eskini, N.; Esmaeili, M.; Sharifirad, A.; Sadeghi, M.; Mohammadi, M. New insights into resistance ofHelicobacter pyloriagainst third- and fourth-generation fluoroquinolones: A molecular docking study of prevalent GyrA mutations. Helicobacter 2019, 24, e12628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ziver-Sarp, T.; Yuksel-Mayda, P.; Saribas, S.; Demiryas, S.; Gareayaghi, N.; Ergin, S.; Tasci, I.; Ozbey, D.; Bal, K.; Erzin, Y.; et al. Point Mutations at gyrA and gyrB Genes of Levofloxacin Resistant Helicobacter pylori Strains and Dual Resistance with Clarithromycin. Clin. Lab. 2021, 67, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Hanafiah, A.; Binmaeil, H.; Ali, R.A.R.; Rose, I.M.; Lopes, B.S. Molecular characterization and prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori isolates in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019, 12, 3051–3061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Vianna, J.S.; Ramis, I.B.; Ramos, D.F.; Gastal, O.L.; Da Silva, R.A.; Gonçalves, C.V.; Da Silva, P.E.A. The interplay between mutations in cagA, 23S rRNA, gyrA and drug resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. São Paulo 2018, 60, e25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Mori, H.; Suzuki, H.; Matsuzaki, J.; Masaoka, T.; Kanai, T. Acquisition of double mutation in gyrA caused high resistance to sitafloxacin in Helicobacter pylori after unsuccessful eradication with sitafloxacin-containing regimens. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2018, 6, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zapun, A.; Contreras-Martel, C.; Vernet, T. Penicillin-binding proteins and β-lactam resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2008, 32, 361–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Eng, N.F.; Ybazeta, G.; Chapman, K.; Fraleigh, N.L.; Letto, R.; Altman, E.; Diaz-Mitoma, F. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Canadian isolates of Helicobacter pylori in Northeastern Ontario. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2015, 26, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sukri, A.; Hanafiah, A.; Yusoff, H.; Nizam, N.A.S.; Nameyrra, Z.; Wong, Z.; Ali, R.A.R. Multidrug-Resistant Helicobacter pylori Strains: A Five-Year Surveillance Study and Its Genome Characteristics. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Metwally, M.; Ragab, R.; Hamid, H.S.A.; Emara, N.; Elkholy, H. Helicobacter pylori Antibiotic Resistance in Egypt: A Single-Center Study. Infect. Drug Resist. 2022, 15, 5905–5913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Albert, T.J.; Dailidiene, D.; Dailide, G.; Norton, J.E.; Kalia, A.; Richmond, T.A.; Molla, M.; Singh, J.; Green, R.D.; Berg, D.E. Mutation discovery in bacterial genomes: Metronidazole resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Nat. Methods 2005, 2, 951–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wani, F.A.; Bashir, G.; Khan, M.A.; Zargar, S.A.; Rasool, Z.; Qadri, Q. Antibiotic Resistance in Helicobacter pylori: A Mutational Analysis from a Tertiary Care Hospital in Kashmir, India. Indian J. Med Microbiol. 2018, 36, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Gehlot, V.; Mahant, S.; Mukhopadhyay, A.K.; Das, K.; Alam, J.; Ghosh, P.; Das, R. Low prevalence of clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori isolates with A2143G point mutation in the 23S rRNA gene in North India. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2016, 6, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Qumar, S.; Nguyen, T.H.; Nahar, S.; Sarker, N.; Baker, S.; Bulach, D.; Ahmed, N.; Rahman, M. A comparative whole genome analysis of Helicobacter pylori from a human dense South Asian setting. Helicobacter 2021, 26, e12766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khan, R.; Nahar, S.; Sultana, J.; Ahmad, M.M.; Rahman, M. T2182C Mutation in 23S rRNA Is Associated with Clarithromycin Resistance in Helicobacter pylori Isolates Obtained in Bangladesh. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 3567–3569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Hoshiya, S.; Watanabe, K.; Tokunaga, K.; Tanaka, A.; Ninomiya, H.; Shingaki, M.; Itoh, T.; Saito, S.; Ishida, H.; Takahashi, S. Relationship between eradication therapy and clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori in Japan. J. Gastroenterol. 2000, 35, 10–14. [Google Scholar]
  32. Liou, J.-M.; Chang, C.-Y.; Sheng, W.-H.; Wang, Y.-C.; Chen, M.-J.; Lee, Y.-C.; Hung, H.-W.; Chian, H.; Chang, S.-C.; Wu, M.-S.; et al. Genotypic Resistance in Helicobacter pylori Strains Correlates with Susceptibility Test and Treatment Outcomes after Levofloxacin- and Clarithromycin-Based Therapies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 1123–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xuan, S.-H.; Wu, L.-P.; Zhou, Y.-G.; Xiao, M.-B. Detection of clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori in clinical specimens by molecular methods: A review. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2016, 4, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yahara, K.; Furuta, Y.; Oshima, K.; Yoshida, M.; Azuma, T.; Hattori, M.; Uchiyama, I.; Kobayashi, I. Chromosome painting in silico in a bacterial species reveals fine population structure. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 1454–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Price, M.N.; Dehal, P.S.; Arkin, A.P. FastTree 2–approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Argimón, S.; Abudahab, K.; Goater, R.J.; Fedosejev, A.; Bhai, J.; Glasner, C.; Feil, E.J.; Holden, M.T.; Yeats, C.A.; Grundmann, H. Microreact: Visualizing and sharing data for genomic epidemiology and phylogeography. Microb. Genom. 2016, 2, e000093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Kelley, L.A.; Mezulis, S.; Yates, C.M.; Wass, M.N.; Sternberg, M.J.E. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2015, 10, 845–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gasteiger, E.; Hoogland, C.; Gattiker, A.; Duvaud, S.; Wilkins, M.R.; Appel, R.D.; Bairoch, A. Protein Identification and Analysis Tools on the ExPASy Server. In The Proteomics Protocols Handbook; Walker, J.M., Ed.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005; pp. 571–607. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of clinical H. pylori isolated from Bangladesh. Phylogenetic tree of Bangladesh clinical isolates was constructed based on the maximum likelihood method. The resistance phenotypes of antibiotics were also shown in filled color, as mentioned in the legend.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of clinical H. pylori isolated from Bangladesh. Phylogenetic tree of Bangladesh clinical isolates was constructed based on the maximum likelihood method. The resistance phenotypes of antibiotics were also shown in filled color, as mentioned in the legend.
Antibiotics 12 00279 g001
Figure 2. The SNPs obtained after the alignment to the gyrA and gyrB genes of H. pylori strain 26695.
Figure 2. The SNPs obtained after the alignment to the gyrA and gyrB genes of H. pylori strain 26695.
Antibiotics 12 00279 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of metronidazole MIC in the presence and absence of mutations: All isolates possessing D253E mutation showed a high level of resistance (MIC 128 mg/L) (a). Meanwhile, the majority of high-level resistance possessed the S151L mutations (b).
Figure 3. Comparison of metronidazole MIC in the presence and absence of mutations: All isolates possessing D253E mutation showed a high level of resistance (MIC 128 mg/L) (a). Meanwhile, the majority of high-level resistance possessed the S151L mutations (b).
Antibiotics 12 00279 g003
Figure 4. Distributions of MIC in the presence and absence of mutations. The MIC is plotted as y-axis and mutation were represented by dots. Mutations in infB and 23S rRNA genes associated with higher clarithromycin MIC. (a) MIC comparisons mutations in the infB genes. (b) MIC comparisons mutations in the 23S rRNA genes.
Figure 4. Distributions of MIC in the presence and absence of mutations. The MIC is plotted as y-axis and mutation were represented by dots. Mutations in infB and 23S rRNA genes associated with higher clarithromycin MIC. (a) MIC comparisons mutations in the infB genes. (b) MIC comparisons mutations in the 23S rRNA genes.
Antibiotics 12 00279 g004aAntibiotics 12 00279 g004b
Table 1. Mutations associated with levofloxacin resistance in H. pylori.
Table 1. Mutations associated with levofloxacin resistance in H. pylori.
SNPResistant (n = 37)Sensitive (n = 19)Totalp-Value
AbsentPresentAbsentPresent
gyrA
D91G325190560.15
D91N2413190560.002
D91Y361190561
N87K2413190560.002
N87Y361190561
gyrB
A343V298190560.041
p-Values < 0.05 were determined as significant association.
Table 2. Significant mutations found in Amoxicillin resistance in H. pylori.
Table 2. Significant mutations found in Amoxicillin resistance in H. pylori.
GenesAMX Resistant (n = 2)AMX Susceptible (n = 54)p-Value
PresentAbsentPresentAbsent
pbp1a
   T30S110540.0357
   V45I206480.0182
   K306R110540.0357
   V374L110540.0357
   N562Y200540.0006
   G594fs110540.0357
pbp2
   S79A110540.0357
   F99S110540.0357
   E312G110540.0357
   G529V110540.0357
   P582T110540.0357
pbp3
   I14V204500.0097
   I191V208460.0292
   V223M207470.0234
pbp4
   Q226R110540.0357
   T272A110540.0357
p-Values < 0.05 were determined as significant association.
Table 3. Genetic variations associated with metronidazole resistance in H. pylori.
Table 3. Genetic variations associated with metronidazole resistance in H. pylori.
GenesFrameshiftTruncatedSNPResistantSusceptible
n TotalAveragen TotalAverage
ribF206761511.63812.7
frxA145812314.4144.7
rdxA85953536.7144.7
mdaB101402895.5113.7
omp111017521.000.0
fur0014420.820.7
Table 4. The point mutation occurred in the clarithromycin resistance.
Table 4. The point mutation occurred in the clarithromycin resistance.
Row LabelsResistant (n = 22)Susceptible (n = 34)p-Value
YesPercentageYesPercentage
23S rRNA
   A2146C14.5%00.0%0.39
   A2146G313.6%00.0%0.05
   A2147G1045.5%00.0%1.8 × 10−5
infB
   C718T836.4%38.8%0.024239
   A1899G1045.5%2676.5%0.016799
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fauzia, K.A.; Aftab, H.; Tshibangu-Kabamba, E.; Alfaray, R.I.; Saruuljavkhlan, B.; Cimuanga-Mukanya, A.; Matsumoto, T.; Subsomwong, P.; Akada, J.; Miftahussurur, M.; et al. Mutations Related to Antibiotics Resistance in Helicobacter pylori Clinical Isolates from Bangladesh. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 279. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12020279

AMA Style

Fauzia KA, Aftab H, Tshibangu-Kabamba E, Alfaray RI, Saruuljavkhlan B, Cimuanga-Mukanya A, Matsumoto T, Subsomwong P, Akada J, Miftahussurur M, et al. Mutations Related to Antibiotics Resistance in Helicobacter pylori Clinical Isolates from Bangladesh. Antibiotics. 2023; 12(2):279. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12020279

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fauzia, Kartika Afrida, Hafeza Aftab, Evariste Tshibangu-Kabamba, Ricky Indra Alfaray, Batsaikhan Saruuljavkhlan, Alain Cimuanga-Mukanya, Takashi Matsumoto, Phawinee Subsomwong, Junko Akada, Muhammad Miftahussurur, and et al. 2023. "Mutations Related to Antibiotics Resistance in Helicobacter pylori Clinical Isolates from Bangladesh" Antibiotics 12, no. 2: 279. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12020279

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop