Next Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: A Comprehensive Review of Currently Used Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Morphing Natural Product Platensimycin via Heck, Sonogashira, and One-Pot Sonogashira/Cycloaddition Reactions to Produce Antibiotics with In Vivo Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Oral Vancomycin Prophylaxis for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients Treated with Systemic Antibiotic Therapy: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial for the Special Issue: “Current and Novel Antimicrobial Strategies for Bacterial and Fungal Infections by Resistant Organisms”

by
Alberto Enrico Maraolo
First Division of Infectious Diseases, Cotugno Hospital, AORN Ospedali dei Colli, 80131 Naples, Italy
Antibiotics 2022, 11(4), 426; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11040426
Submission received: 7 March 2022 / Accepted: 18 March 2022 / Published: 23 March 2022
The pandemic driven by the SARS-CoV-2 infection has compelled health services globally to direct all available human and economic resources toward fighting the novel coronavirus. Nevertheless, another pandemic looms over both high-income and low-income countries—the one represented by antimicrobial resistance (AMR).
A 2019 systematic analysis investigated the impact of AMR in 204 countries and territories, just before the global breakout of SARS-CoV-2. It estimated that nearly 5 million deaths were associated with bacterial AMR in 2019, of which a quarter (1.27 million) were directly attributable to bacterial AMR [1]. The highest death rate across all ages attributable to AMR itself was predicted to have occurred in Western sub-Saharan Africa [1].
Therefore, it is imperative to stay vigilant to resistant organisms, to prevent another severe crisis from affecting healthcare systems, which are already under strain due to the 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Besides rigorous infection control policies at national and local levels, strategies to optimize antimicrobial weapons are necessary. For instance, there is a need for stewardship initiatives aimed at containing the misuse of carbapenems by correctly using alternative drugs when feasible [2], especially considering that carbapenem-resistant bacteria are among the major drivers of AMR-related deaths [1]. Other strategies may include the streamlined use of old and repurposed agents such as colistin and other drugs [3].
This Special Issue includes full research articles, reviews and brief reports addressing the issue of AMR from several perspectives; these include risk factors and molecular aspects, with a focus on therapeutics, and particularly on new drugs or novel approaches.
Regarding the first type of contribution, concerning the risk factors of AMR, Baraka and colleagues presented an interesting cross-sectional survey aimed at physicians, nurses and pharmacists from six tertiary hospitals in the Eastern province of Saudi Arabia [4]. Respondents acknowledged that improper antimicrobial use based on indication, duration and type were, unfortunately, common practice, and were identified as key factors contributing to AMR. According to the authors, the relevant knowledge gap must be filled in that area of Saudi Arabia to improve the appropriateness of antimicrobial use.
Silago and coworkers reported on the existence of multiple extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) genes (blaCTX-M, blaTEM, and blaSHV) among Enterobacterales spp., isolated from multiple samples in a nosocomial setting in Tanzania [5]. Isolates harboring all three ESBL genes showed complex resistant patterns to antibiotics belonging to non-beta-lactam classes. Furthermore, the study found isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae harboring blaCTX-M and blaTEM from the contaminated hands of healthcare workers, highlighting the potential role of personnel in the transmission of ESBL-producing pathogens.
Regarding therapeutic aspects, this Special Issues included papers specifically describing current and novel antimicrobial strategies.
Although not considered a resistant organism, Clostridioides difficile is regarded as a major and urgent antibiotic-resistant threat, along with carbapenem-resistant pathogens. Indeed, C. difficile is caused by the same factors that drive antibiotic resistance, namely antibiotic use responsible of dysbiosis and the spread of germs. Oral vancomycin is a long-standing option for the first-line treatment of C. difficile infection, as well as for severe and recurrent forms. Recently, oral vancomycin prophylaxis (OVP) has emerged as a preventative strategy against either primary or secondary (recurrent) C. difficile infection in subjects undergoing concurrent systemic antibiotic therapy (SAT). Maraolo and colleagues performed a comprehensive systematic review with meta-analysis to pool available evidence on the topic; they showed that OVP is a very promising approach [6]. Of course, there are many potential strategies to minimize the risk of primary C. difficile infection or recurrence, but oral vancomycin appears to be safe and inexpensive. At any rate, more data from randomized clinical trials are needed. In the meantime, OVP should be offered to selected persons, such as immunosuppressed patients undergoing SAT based on drugs associated with a high risk of C. difficile infection.
When it comes to novel therapeutic options for resistant bacteria, latest generation cephalosporins are among the main characters on the stage.
Giacobbe and collaborators illustrated the real-life use of ceftaroline in a tertiary hospital located in northern Italy [7]. Ceftaroline is a fifth-generation cephalosporin whose spectrum of activity includes methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). This makes the agent a very appealing option against a vast array of infections, beyond the on-label indications represented by complicated infections of the skin and soft-tissue, as well as community-acquired pneumonia. The cohort consisted of 200 patients, from July 2019 to December 2020. Ceftaroline was used as empirical therapy in most cases (179/200), generally for suspected bacterial co-infection or superinfection in COVID-19 patients; only in 7% of patients was there an off-label use, usually for treating a bloodstream infection arising from MRSA.
Bavaro and colleagues focused instead on difficult-to-treat Gram-negative bacteria, specifically describing the effectiveness of cefiderocol-based combination regimens in 13 patients [8]. Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore cephalosporin that could be a game changer in the fight against carbapenem-resistant superbugs. Indeed, it was conceived to overcome the challenges linked to paramount carbapenem-resistance mechanisms exhibited by fermenters such as Enterobacterales, and by nonfermenters such as Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Cefiderocol is stable against hydrolysis by all carbapenemases, and its entry into bacterial cells is independent of porin channels and efflux pumps. Its place in therapy has not been established yet, nor has the best use for it as monotherapy or in combination with other agents. According to Bavaro and colleagues, cefiderocol was always associated with several companion drugs, and microbiological eradication was achieved in all 13 cases. Three patients died (outcome assessed at 30 days), but their deaths were attributed to causes other than the infections for which cefiderocol was utilized.
Strategies to properly counter severe infections may not rely only on antimicrobials. Recchia and coworkers illustrated a case report on a young male subject affected by Lemierre’s syndrome, whose aetiologic agent was Fusobacterium necrophorum—an anaerobic, non-spore-forming, non-motile, Gram-negative bacterium [9]. Physicians took an aggressive stance to counter the neuroendocrine dysregulation accompanying septic shock by exploiting the synergistic effect of norepinephrine, vasopressin and steroids. Of course, the patient was treated with proper antimicrobial treatment as well as a surgical source control, in accordance with two tenets of Lemierre’s syndrome therapy. This case report serves as reminder that serious infections, even when not caused by resistant organisms (although the rate of AMR among anaerobic bacteria is reportedly increasing worldwide), may need innovative therapeutic approaches to achieve good clinical outcomes. Ultimately, the aim of this Special Issue was to attract papers illustrating avant-garde approaches for fungal infections. To this end, Hefzy and colleagues reported on the antifungal inhibitory activity of bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances (BLISs); these were derived from clinical isolates of potentially probiotic lactobacilli and streptococci on Candida spp. (albicans and non-albicans) in women with vulvovaginitis [10]. The experiments were conducted in vitro and in vivo (using the Galleria mellonella larvae model), and yielded encouraging results that may be the basis for further research aimed at establishing BLISs as an alternative or adjunctive antifungal therapy for vulvovaginal candidiasis. Novel antimycotic options are required, since many pathogenic Candida species have developed resistance to the currently available antifungal agents.
In conclusion, this Special Issue collects multidisciplinary research articles that hopefully represent a fruitful contribution for stakeholders working in the field of AMR, either in bacterial or fungal-lactamases, or in related fields.

Funding

This paper received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 629–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Corcione, S.; Lupia, T.; Maraolo, A.E.; Mornese Pinna, S.; Gentile, I.; De Rosa, F.G. Carbapenem-sparing strategy: Carbapenemase, treatment, and stewardship. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 32, 663–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Giacobbe, D.R.; Saffioti, C.; Losito, A.R.; Rinaldi, M.; Aurilio, C.; Bolla, C.; Boni, S.; Borgia, G.; Carannante, N.; Cassola, G.; et al. Use of colistin in adult patients: A cross-sectional study. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 20, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Baraka, M.A.; Alboghdadly, A.; Alshawwa, S.; Elnour, A.A.; Alsultan, H.; Alsalman, T.; Alaithan, H.; Islam, M.A.; El-Fass, K.A.; Mohamed, Y.; et al. Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals Regarding Factors Associated with Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) and Their Consequences: A Cross Sectional Study in Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Silago, V.; Kovacs, D.; Samson, H.; Seni, J.; Matthews, L.; Oravcová, K.; Lupindu, A.M.; Hoza, A.S.; Mshana, S.E. Existence of Multiple ESBL Genes among Phenotypically Confirmed ESBL Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli Concurrently Isolated from Clinical, Colonization and Contamination Samples from Neonatal Units at Bugando Medical Center, Mwanza, Tanzania. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Maraolo, A.E.; Mazzitelli, M.; Zappulo, E.; Scotto, R.; Granata, G.; Andini, R.; Durante-Mangoni, E.; Petrosillo, N.; Gentile, I. Oral Vancomycin Prophylaxis for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients Treated with Systemic Antibiotic Therapy: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Giacobbe, D.R.; Russo, C.; Martini, V.; Dettori, S.; Briano, F.; Mirabella, M.; Portunato, F.; Dentone, C.; Mora, S.; Giacomini, M.; et al. Use of Ceftaroline in Hospitalized Patients with and without COVID-19: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bavaro, D.F.; Belati, A.; Diella, L.; Stufano, M.; Romanelli, F.; Scalone, L.; Stolfa, S.; Ronga, L.; Maurmo, L.; Dell’Aera, M.; et al. Cefiderocol-Based Combination Therapy for “Difficult-to-Treat” Gram-Negative Severe Infections: Real-Life Case Series and Future Perspectives. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Recchia, A.; Cascella, M.; Altamura, S.; Borrelli, F.; De Nittis, N.; Dibenedetto, E.; Labonia, M.; Pavone, G.; Del Gaudio, A. Early Diagnosis and Antibiotic Treatment Combined with Multicomponent Hemodynamic Support for Addressing a Severe Case of Lemierre’s Syndrome. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hefzy, E.M.; Khalil, M.A.F.; Amin, A.A.I.; Ashour, H.M.; Abdelaliem, Y.F. Bacteriocin-like Inhibitory Substances from Probiotics as Therapeutic Agents for Candida Vulvovaginitis. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maraolo, A.E. Editorial for the Special Issue: “Current and Novel Antimicrobial Strategies for Bacterial and Fungal Infections by Resistant Organisms”. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11040426

AMA Style

Maraolo AE. Editorial for the Special Issue: “Current and Novel Antimicrobial Strategies for Bacterial and Fungal Infections by Resistant Organisms”. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(4):426. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11040426

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maraolo, Alberto Enrico. 2022. "Editorial for the Special Issue: “Current and Novel Antimicrobial Strategies for Bacterial and Fungal Infections by Resistant Organisms”" Antibiotics 11, no. 4: 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11040426

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop