Next Article in Journal
Green Synthesis of Gold Nanoflowers Using Rosmarinus officinalis and Helichrysum italicum Extracts: Comparative Studies of Their Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activities
Next Article in Special Issue
Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) Analysis of Virulence and AMR Genes in Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-Producing Escherichia coli from Animal and Environmental Samples in Four Italian Swine Farms
Previous Article in Journal
Long-Term Lactulose Administration Improves Dysbiosis Induced by Antibiotic and C. difficile in the PathoGutTM SHIME Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Detection of Acquired Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Domestic Pig (Sus scrofa) and Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio) Intestinal Samples by Metagenomics Analyses in Hungary
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clonal Complexes 23, 10, 131 and 38 as Genetic Markers of the Environmental Spread of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-Producing E. coli

by
Lara Pérez-Etayo
1,2,*,
David González
1,2 and
Ana Isabel Vitas
1,2
1
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
2
Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(11), 1465; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111465
Submission received: 30 September 2022 / Revised: 17 October 2022 / Accepted: 21 October 2022 / Published: 24 October 2022

Abstract

:
In accordance with the global action plan on antimicrobial resistance adopted by the World Health Assembly in 2015, there is a need to develop surveillance programs for antimicrobial resistant bacteria. In this context, we have analyzed the clonal diversity of Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli (E. coli) isolated from aquatic environments and human and food samples in Spain, with the aim of determining possible clonal complexes (CCs) that act as markers of the potential risk of transmission of these resistant bacteria. The phylogenetic groups, sequence types (STs) and CCs were determined by different Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) techniques. Phylogroup A was prevalent and was mainly present in food and water strains, while human strains were mostly associated with phylogroup B2. According to the observed prevalence in the different niches, CC23 and CC10 are proposed as markers of phylogroups A and C, related with the spread of blaCTX-M1 and blaCTX-M15 genes. Similarly, CC131 and CC38 could be associated to the dissemination of pathogenic strains (phylogroups B2 and D) carrying mainly blaCTX-M14 and blaCTX-M15 genes. Some strains isolated from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) showed identical profiles to those isolated from other environments, highlighting the importance that water acquires in the dissemination of bacterial resistance. In conclusion, the detection of these genetic markers in different environments could be considered as an alert in the spread of ESBL.

1. Introduction

Bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as one of the main public health threats of the 21st century [1]. The list of global priority pathogens resistant to antibiotics includes enterobacteria resistant to 3rd generation of cephalosporins among the 12 families of bacteria most dangerous to human health [2], being Escherichia coli (E. coli) one of the major extended-spectrum β-lactamase enzymes (ESBL)-producer. The World Health Organization (WHO) points out the need to address the problem of antimicrobial resistance from a global approach (in accordance with the One Health initiative) and promotes a series of strategies to contain the spread of the resistances [3], including the surveillance of resistant bacteria in different environments [4].
E. coli is a very ubiquitous Gram-negative micro-organism [5] that, in addition to being part of the intestinal microbiota of most animal species [6], is one of the main etiological agents of different urinary or gastrointestinal infections [7]. The great diversity of E. coli strains has given rise to various classifications over the years [8]. According to their pathogenic capacity, commensal intestinal and extraintestinal strains can be differentiated, and it has been seen that they harbor numerous virulence factors and antibiotic resistance genes [9]. Herzer et al. [10] conceived a classification system in four phylogroups (A, B1, B2 and D) with independence of the pathogenic capacity. However, a relationship was later found between the different phylogroups and the virulence of the strains [11]. Thus, phylogroups A and B1 harbor commensal strains with low virulent power, while phylogroups B2 and D include mainly extraintestinal pathogenic strains that express virulence factors responsible for promoting the stages of colonization, adherence, invasion, etc. [12,13].
Afterward, Clermont et al. [14] developed a molecular technique for the detection of these phylogenetic groups, which was improved years later by modifying the primers and the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) conditions [15]. Thus, the new phylogenetic classification contains seven phylogroups (A, B1, B2, C, D, E and F) that belong to the species E. coli sensu stricto and one xmore that belongs to the Escherichia clade [16]. This clade is divided into five groups (Clades I-V), phenotypically and biochemically very similar to E. coli but genetically distant [17]. Given the interest in phylogenetic studies of these strains, Wirth et al. [18] developed a database for the study of E. coli using Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST). Thus, each strain of E. coli is associated with a sequence type (ST) and clonal complexes (CC) and various studies have shown the great diversity of existing STs among the different ESBL-producing E. coli isolates. In addition, multiple associations have been found between different STs and phylogroups, as ST131 and phylogroup B2 [19,20].
Thus, the main objective of this work was to determine possible CCs that could act as markers of the potential risk of transmission of β-lactam antibiotic resistances. The study was carried out in ESBL-producing E. coli strains isolated by our research group from diverse sources in the north of Spain (Navarra) in previous studies [21,22,23,24]. The sources were selected according to the observed high prevalence of these resistant strains and/or the presence of clinically relevant resistant bacteria. This way, the phylogenetic relationship among ESBL-producing E. coli isolated from foods (chicken and turkey meat), human (healthy people) and aquatic environments (rivers, collectors and wastewater treatment plants [WWTP]) was determined.

2. Results

2.1. Classification of E. coli ESBL Strains According to Phylogenetic Groups

The 61 E. coli strains were classified into the different phylogenetic groups mentioned above: phylogroup A being the largest (29.5%), followed by B1 (19.7%) and B2 (14.8). On the contrary, phylogenetic groups C, E and Clade I or II were the least prevalent (4.9%, 1.6% and 1.6%, respectively). On the other hand, in 8.2% of the strains (n = 5) no determining results of phylogenetic classification were obtained, so it was necessary to perform the MLST technique.
A heterogenous distribution of phylogroups was observed according to the origin of strains (Figure 1). Thus, strains isolated from food and water, mainly belong to phylogroup A, while human strains (healthy carriers) are mostly associated with phylogroup B2. In this sense, significant differences (p < 0.005) were found in the frequency of phylogroup B2 between food and water samples (p = 0.0372) and between food and healthy carriers (p = 0.0068).
In this way, phylogroups B2 and D, which mainly include extraintestinal pathogenic strains, were identified only among strains isolated from water and from healthy carriers, with a higher prevalence of group B2 within the human strains. On the contrary, phylogroups A, B1 and C (mainly harboring commensal strains with low virulent power) were detected in the three environments studied, with no significant differences in the observed prevalence (p > 0.05) (in the case of phylogroup B1 probably due to the small sample size of healthy carriers). On the other hand, it should be mentioned that the detection of the new phylogroup E in a single strain isolated from water and the fact that phylogroups F and Clade I or II were only present in food strains (no significant differences).
At the same time, the relationship of the main bla genes present in the 57 strains, with the phylogenetic groups was also studied (Figure 2), not finding significant differences between any of these percentages (p > 0.05). Despite no substantial association of bla genes with a certain phylogenetic group being found, E. coli strains producing blaCTX-M15 belonged mostly to phylogroup B2 (42%) and blaCTX-M1 to phylogroup A (50%). Phylogroups A, B1, F, and D were found to be associated with all ESBL types (except CTX-M15 in the case of phylogroups F and D; and SHV-12 in phylogroup D). On the other hand, phylogenetic group B2 was associated with genes blaCTX-M14, blaCTX-M15 and blaTEM-171, while group C was only found in association with bla genes of the CTX-M type (except blaCTX-M14). Finally, it should be noted that Clade I or II was only detected in strains carrying blaSHV-12 and phylogroup E was only associated with a strain carrying two types of β-lactamases (CTX-M14 and CTX-M15).

2.2. Analysis of CCs and STs by MLST

The analysis of the data obtained by MLST allowed us to establish the taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships between the strains by creating different phylogenetic trees, as shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4.
Regarding the strains isolated from turkey and chicken meat, the analysis showed a great diversity of STs. A total of 15 different STs was detected among 21 strains (Figure 3A), being the prevalent ST117 (14.3%), followed by ST23 (9.5%) and ST354 (9.5%). In terms of CCs, 5 different were detected. Because to date ST117 is not associated with any known complex, the predominant were CC23, CC354 and CC168 (9.5%), followed by CC10 and CC101. In addition, despite the distances found in the phylogenetic tree, the three strains belonging to ST117, the strain ST2085 and the two strains ST354, belong to the new phylogroup F. The strains grouped in the CC168 and CC10 were associated with phylogroup A, while the two belonging to CC23 were from different phylogroups (C and Clade I or II).
In relation to the strains isolated from aquatic environments (Figure 3B), the results showed the presence of 20 different STs in 27 strains, ST131, ST1434, ST1486 and ST38 (7.4%) being the most frequent, while 3 of the strains were not associated with any known ST. Eight different CCs were detected, with an identical prevalence of CC10, CC131 and CC38 (7.4%). It should be noted that all of them have been detected in water from WWTP or slaughterhouse collector, with the exception of CC23 that has been detected in a river (Table S1). As described in the literature [19,20], the two strains associated with the CC131 were included within the pathogenic phylogroup B2, while the strains of the CC38 were associated with the phylogroup D. On the other hand, the strain carrying the mcr-1 colistin resistance gene was assigned to phylogroup B2, despite the determined ST155 being phylogenetically closer to the ST1434 (phylogroup B1). In general, phylogroups A and B1 were associated with a higher diversity of STs, which were spread throughout the phylogenetic tree. CC10 (related to phylogroup A) was one of the previous strains isolated from chicken samples. The same happened with the CC23, which was detected in only one strain and in this case belongs to phylogroup C. Finally, the new phylogroup E detected in a single strain seems to be related to the CC31 (ST130).
Finally, the clonal composition of the 13 ESBL-producing E. coli strains isolated from healthy carriers is shown in Figure 3C. Only five ST were determined, being ST131 the most prevalent (30.8%), while the remaining five strains were not related to any known ST. At the same time, two different CCs were established and, as can be seen in the Minimum Spanning Tree (MST), both complexes are close and related with the more pathogenic phylogroups. The four strains corresponding to ST131 and ST3483 (all of them belonging to phylogroup B2) were defined as CC131, while the CC38 included only strain ST38, associated with phylogroup D.

ST and CC Relationship of Strains Isolated from Different Environments

In total, 36 STs and 11 CCs have been identified in this study and none of them has been present in the 3 environments (Figure 4A). However, it can be seen that despite not finding a common CC, there were strains phylogenetically closer (huge circle) that were isolated in the three environments. Most of these strains were ESBL producers and in addition, three of them were resistant to colistin (Table S1). Likewise, the CC131, CC38, CC10, CC23 and the corresponding ST (indicated with arrows in the Figure 4A) appear in two different environments. In this sense, the CC131 (associated with phylogroup B2) was present in four strains from healthy carriers and two strains from aquatic environments. The same occurred with the CC38 (associated with phylogroup D), disseminated in the aforementioned environments. On the contrary, the CC10 and CC23 were present in strains from food and aquatic environments. It should be noted that there has been no coincidence between strains isolated from food and healthy carriers, probably because bacterial inactivation occurs during cooking of chicken and turkey meat.
At the same time, a study of the different STs and CCs was also carried out in relation to the type of β-lactamase produced by each strain (Figure 4B). Phylogenetic relationships have been established taking into account the CTX-M group as the main bla gene when the strains expressed more than one different type of β-lactamase. In the case of presenting only another type of gene (blaSHV or blaTEM), these are shown in the phylogenetic tree as “other ESBLs” as indicated in the legend. The 6 strains belonging to the CC131 (isolated from healthy carriers and water) are producers of CTX-M14 and CTX-M15 (or even both β-lactamases together), while the CC38 detected in these same environments is related with strains carrying blaCTX-M14 and blaCTX-M1. In the case of strains isolated from water and food belonging to CC10, these are producers of CTX-M1 and CTX-M15, the same as strains belonging to CC23, which also includes a producer of SHV-12. On the other hand, the strains grouped in the CC168 are carriers of blaCTX-M1, unlike those associated with CC354 are producers of other types of β-lactamases, such as SHV-12 or TEM-171. In the same way, the strains corresponding to the CC101, as well as other STs (ST117, ST1524, ST937, etc.) are also producers of these types of β-lactamases. Finally, the corresponding strains with the ST971, ST746, ST2404 and ST6094, as well as other unknown ones, are producers of CTX-M14.

3. Discussion

The data obtained in this study show the phylogenetic relationships between ESBL-producing E. coli strains isolated from different out-of-hospital environments (animal source foods, aquatic environments and healthy people) in Navarra, northern Spain.
The prevalent phylogenetic groups in the studied foods have been A (33%), F (29%) and B1 (19%), very similar to that observed in strains isolated from water with the exception of phylogroup F, which has not been detected (29% and 26%, groups A and B1, respectively). By contrast, the prevalent phylogroup in healthy carriers was B2 (39%), followed by groups A (23%) and D (15%). A relationship between virulence and phylogeny in E. coli strains has been established based in most cases on the study of the 4 main phylogenetic groups (A, B1, B2 and D) [25,26]. In this way, the strains that cause extraintestinal infections have been associated with phylogroup B2 and to a lesser extent with D, while the commensal strains are associated with groups A and B1 [27]. However, according to the latest updated scheme by Clermont et al. [15], the groups are restructured as follows: phylogenetic group A is reclassified into A and C; the phylogenetic group B2 would include B2 and E, while D can be divided into D and F. Although this new classification was published in 2013, there are still few studies based on it, so there is not much information about the characteristics and distribution of the new phylogroups, C, E, and F, and the cryptic clades of Escherichia among the different ecosystems. In this line, our results coincide with those published by Coura et al. [28] who reported the prevalence of groups related to commensal strains (A, B1 and C) among 149 poultry isolates. Similarly, Tansawai et al. [29] determined that the majority of ESBL-producing E. coli isolated from poultry meat (chicken, duck and poultry) belonged to phylogenetic group A (51%) and B1 (27.5%), reinforcing the idea of the association of phylogroups A, B1 and C with commensal strains. In our study we have detected these three phylogroups in all the environments studied, with phylogroups A and B1 being the most frequently detected in samples from foods of animal origin, as described by Carlos et al. [26]. On the other hand, the presence of the new phylogroup F in strains isolated from processed chicken products should be mentioned, since this phylogroup has recently awaked interest due to its association with extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) strains in humans [30,31] and domestic animals [32,33]. However, its lacks the virulence characteristics typically associated with phylogroup B2 causing extraintestinal infections [31]. On the contrary, the most pathogenic groups B2 and D have been detected both in aquatic environments and in healthy carriers, with a high prevalence of phylogroup B2 in the latter (39%). Both phylogroups have been associated with urinary tract infections and bacteremia in immunosuppressed patients [34]. These data are consistent with other studies [20,35], which also associate these phylogenetic groups with strains carrying blaCTX-M15, coinciding with our results (Figure 4). In addition, phylogroup D was also detected in strains from wastewater and rivers in previous studies carried out by our research group [36]. On the other hand, E. coli strains belonging to the phylogenetic group E have been reported to be more prevalent in the gastrointestinal tract of wild mammals than in humans [15,27,37], which is consistent with our results, since this phylogroup has only been detected in aquatic environments, with which wild mammals have been able to have close contact. At the same time, 5% of food isolates were classified as cryptic clades of Escherichia, that is, biochemically and phenotypically identical strains of E. coli but genetically distant. The cryptic clades of Escherichia were defined in 2009 by Walk et al. [38] and although there are very few studies in this regard, they seem to correspond to strains better adapted to the natural environment (especially Clades II-IV), such as water, soils or sediments [16]. Thus, animals could act as occasional reservoir of this phylogroup due to their close contact with the natural environment. Most cryptic Escherichia strains are characterized by lower levels of resistance and virulence (except Clade I), but there are few studies indicating the differences in resistance patterns between the clades [17,39]. In our case, the data obtained in the study of resistance patterns (MicroScan), reveal resistance to penicillins, cephalosporins, monobactams, tetracyclines and some type of quinolones, in addition to being a carrier of the blaSHV-12 gene (Table S1, strain 10). Due to the distinction between the clades is based on biochemical markers, further studies would be necessary to characterize whether this strain corresponds to Clade I or II.
MLST studies revealed the presence of multiple STs and 11 well-defined CCs among the strains tested. No CCs were found that brings together strains from the 3 environments, however, 4 CCs associated strains from 2 niches, so they could act as genetic markers for the surveillance of β-lactam antibiotics resistance. Specifically, CC23 and CC10 were detected in samples of water and food, while CC131 and CC38 were present in aquatic environments and healthy carriers. In this sense, the presence of the CC10 (associated with phylogroup A) in chicken and water stands out, coinciding with the results published by other authors who determined the spread of this CC in food and environmental settings [40,41,42]. Although this CC is commonly associated with strains of low virulent power, it has been related to human infections and ESBL-producing strains with variants belonging to the blaCTX-M1, blaCTX-M2 and blaCTX-M9 groups in different ecosystems [43]. In our study, these three E. coli CC10 strains are carriers of blaSHV-12, blaTEM-171, blaCTX-M1 and blaCTX-M15, and in addition to being resistant to β-lactam antibiotics, they are also resistant to other families of antibiotics (Table S1). On the other hand, CC23, which has been well characterized and is disseminated throughout various environments, as shown by other researchers [44,45], has been detected in strains isolated from food and water: two belonging to the phylogroup C-blaCTX-M and another to Clade I or II-blaSHV-12. One of the most prevalent CC has been CC131 (11.5% n = 6), associated with more virulent strains related to phylogroup B2 [19,46] and which has become one of the most important pandemic clones in the rapid global spread of the blaCTX-M15 genes and to a lesser extent blaCTX-M14 [5,47]. As can be seen in Figure 4, all strains associated with this complex have been isolated from healthy carriers and aquatic environments and are producers of CTX-M14 y CTX-M15 enzymes. Finally, another CC detected in these same environments has been CC38 (5%), which comprises important lineages related to the dissemination of ESBL/AmpC genes between the human, livestock and environmental environments [48]. In this same line, the strains associated with this complex were related to phylogroup D, belonging to virulent strains and were carriers of blaTEM-171, blaCTX-M14 and blaCTX-M1 genes.
Regarding others ST detected in rivers, ST1434 was associated with phylogroup B1 and with the spread of blaCTX-M14 genes. Similarly, the association of this ST with resistance to β-lactams and carbapenems was previously described by Piedra-Carrasco et al. [49] in other rivers in northern Spain. In the case of ST1486, in this work it has been related to the commensal phylogroup A and blaCTX-M1 genes, meanwhile Zhang et al. [50] had observed the presence of this ST in retail pork isolates, that were also carriers of NDM-5 carbapenemases. On the other hand, the colistin-resistant strain number 48 (positive for the mcr-1 gene and isolated from the collector of a rabbit slaughterhouse, Table S1), has been found to belong to the CC155 and phylogroup B2. These results are in agreement with those presented by Jamborova et al. [51], who determined that the strains associated with this complex have been frequently related to infections in livestock in Europe. In relation with food isolates, ST117 was the most prevalent. Although to date this ST is not associated with any known CC, it is well characterized as the cause of avian colibacillosis (APEC “avian pathogenic E. coli”) [52]. This is consistent with our results, since all the ST117 strains associated with the phylogroup F and carrying the blaCTX-M1, blaCTX-M14 and blaSHV-12 genes have been isolated from chicken samples, in a similar way to that described by Ben Said et al. [44]. ST117 is a potential zoonotic that poses a risk of extra-intestinal infections in humans [53], therefore surveillance of these strains raises concerns [54]. However, there is a lack of understanding of virulence traits, antimicrobial resistance patterns, and genomic evolution [55]. Likewise, the CC168 (associated with phylogroup A) has been detected in two strain carriers of blaCTX-M1 and blaSHV-12 isolated from food, consistent with previous studies in the same region [36]. The CC354 has been observed in two food strains associated with phylogroup F and, as in the work of Guo et al. [33], both are resistant to quinolones. This fact is relevant since this resistance is closely related to the use of quinolones in poultry [56], especially in chickens, the source of most of the analyzed food samples.
In summary, the large number of phylogroups, STs and CCs shows the great genetic diversity that exists between E. coli populations. However, strains isolated from WWTPs have shown identical profiles to those of strains isolated from other environments, highlighting the importance that water acquires in the dissemination of bacterial resistance. According to the obtained results, CCs 10 and 23 are proposed as markers of phylogroups A and C, respectively. Their detection in samples from animal and food environment could be considered as a possible warning of the spread of β-lactam resistance, due to the relationship with blaCTX-M1 and blaCTX-M15 genes. On the other hand, clones CC131 and CC38 could be used as markers with great clinical relevance, based on their relationship with pathogenic strains belonging to phylogroups B2 and D, respectively, as well as their association with blaCTX-M14 and blaCTX-M15 genes. In the framework of the One Health initiative, surveillance programs should include the monitoring of different sources, with especial emphasis in aquatic environments to detect ESBLs dissemination between environment, animals and people.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Selection of E. coli Strains

A total of 59 E. coli strains isolated from processed turkey and chicken foods (n = 21), water (n = 25) and healthy carriers (n = 13), were selected from a collection of strain isolated in previous studies. Previous phenotypic characterization confirmed that they were ESBL producers, although β-lactamase genes were not detected in two of them [22,23,24]. In addition, 2 colistin-resistant strains isolated from water were included in the study (given the relevance of resistance to this antibiotic used in the treatment of infections caused by multiresistant bacteria), with the presence of the mcr-1 gene in one of them [23]. The main characteristics of the 61 strains in relation to the source, resistance genes and the resistance profile to different antibiotics are shown in the supplementary material (Table S1). It should be noted that 96.7% of the strains had a multi-drug resistance (MDR) profile and 73.8% extended MDR (resistance to at least three or five families of antibiotics, respectively).

4.2. Bacterial DNA Extraction

From fresh cultures of each strains in Triptic Soy Agar (TSA, Scharlab, Barcelona, Spain), 5 mL of Brain Heart Infusion broth (BHI, Scharlab, Barcelona, Spain) were inoculated and incubated at 37 °C for 18–24 h. From this, 2 mL were centrifugated at 5000× g. for 10 min (Fisher MicroCentrifuge Model 235A) and the total DNA was extracted using the DNeasy® Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen, Barcelona, Spain), with a modified pre-treatment protocol for Gram-negative bacteria, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Finally, the quantity and quality of the DNA was analyzed using the ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). The extracts were stored at −20 °C until use.

4.3. Determination of Phylogenetic Groups

The determination of the phylogenetic groups was carried out using the PCRs described by Clermont et al. [15], which consists of a quadruplex PCR and two simple PCRs. This reaction is based on the amplification of three genes (chuA, yjaA and arpA) and a DNA fragment (TspE4.C2) that allows each of the strains to be classified in one of the eight phylogenetic groups of E. coli (A, B1, B2, C, D, E, F and Escherichia clade I).
The different PCR reactions were carried out in a final volume of 25 μL. Firstly, the quadruplex PCR was performed using the following quantities: 2 μL of DNA, 2.5 μL of 10X buffer (Bioline, London, UK), 2.5 μL of dNTPs (Bioline, London, UK), 1 μL of 50 mM MgCl2 (Bioline, London, UK), 2 μL of primers chuA.1b, chuA.2, yjaA.1b, yjaA.2b, TspE4.C2.1b, TspE4.C2.2b, AceK.f and ArpA1.R (Sigma Aldrich, Madrid, Spain), 1.5 U Immolase ™ DNA polymerase (Bioline, London, UK) and type II water (Millipore, Massachusetts, United States) to complete the final volume). The conditions of the reaction were the following: 4 min at 95 °C, followed by 30 cycles of 35 s at 95 °C, 45 s at 59 °C, 2 min at 72 °C and a final cycle of 5 min at 72°C. From the quadruple genotype obtained, either each strain was directly assigned to a phylogroup or two additional simple PCRs were performed by adding the specific primers E and C and their corresponding annealing temperatures (57 °C and 59 °C, respectively). The amplification reaction conditions were as follows: 4 min at 95°C, followed by 30 cycles of 35 s at 95 °C, 45 s at 59 °C, 2 min at 72 °C, and a final cycle of 5 min at 72 °C and using the same concentrations of reagents as in the previous case. After amplification, PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel in 1xTBE buffer, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized by UV transillumination. The molecular weight marker 1 kb plus DNA Ladder was used (Invitrogen, Barcelona, Spain).

4.4. Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST)

To determinate the clonal dissemination of ESBL-producing E. coli, an ST analysis was performed following the scheme described by Wirth et al. [18]. Seven housekeeping genes selected from the MLST database of the University of Warwick were amplified and sequenced for each isolate. These genes code for the following proteins: adenylate cyclase (adk), fumarate hydratase (fumC), DNA gyrase (gyrB), isocitrate/isopropylmalate dehydrogenase (icd), malate dehydrogenase (mdh), adenylosuccinate (purA) and ATP/GTP binding motif (recA). The PCR reaction was performed according to the procedure described by Tartof et al. [57] in a total volume of 50 μL:3 μL of the previously extracted DNA, 5 μL of 10X buffer (Bioline, London, UK), 5 μL of dNTPs (Bioline, London, UK), 1.5 μL of 50 mM MgCl2 (Bioline, London, UK), 2 μL of each primer (Sigma Aldrich, Madrid, Spain), 1.5 U of Inmolase™ (Bioline, London, UK) and type II water (Millipore, Massachusetts, United States) to final volumen. The amplification reaction conditions were as follows: 3 min at 94 °C, followed by 30 cycles of 1 min at 59 °C, 1 min at the binding temperature of each primer, 2 min at 72 °C, and a final cycle of 5 min at 72 °C.
Subsequently, the amplicons were sequenced at the EZ-Seq service of Macrogen Spain and sequence data were imported into the E. coli MLST database website (http://mlst.warwick.ac.uk/mlst/dbs/Ecoli, URL accessed on 15 September 2022) to determine MLST type. Finally, the data for each allele, ST and CC were analyzed into the BioNumerics version 7.6 software (Applied Maths NV/bioMérieux, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium) and Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) were created based on the number of common alleles of each strain. This mathematical algorithm allows us to reconstruct from the MLST data the existing phylogenetic relationships between the different isolated strains and the different clonal groups. These relationships are represented in Figure 3 and Figure 4 by the connecting lines between the nodes (bold, solid, dashed or dotted lines according to the presence of 1, 2, 3 and 4 discordant alleles, respectively).

4.5. Statistical Analysis

The results were subjected to statistical processing with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 15.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), applying the Chi-square test (X2) with a significance level of p < 0.05.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics11111465/s1, Table S1: Main characteristics of the strains selected for this study.

Author Contributions

L.P.-E. performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. D.G. and A.I.V. conceived and designed the experiments, supervised data analysis, and reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a grant of the “Asociación de Amigos de la Universidad de Navarra”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Murray, C.J.; Ikuta, K.S.; Sharara, F.; Swetschinski, L.; Robles Aguilar, G.; Gray, A.; Han, C.; Bisignano, C.; Rao, P.; Wool, E.; et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 629–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. WHO. Global Priority List of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria to Guide Research, Discovery, and Development of New Antibiotics; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  3. WHO. Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  4. WHO Antimicrobial resistance. Global report on surveillance. World Heal. Organ. 2014, 61, 383–394. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nicolas-Chanoine, M.H.; Bertrand, X.; Madec, J.Y. Escherichia coli ST131, an intriguing clonal group. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 27, 543–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Allocati, N.; Masulli, M.; Alexeyev, M.F.; Di Ilio, C. Escherichia coli in Europe: An overview. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10, 6235–6254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Croxen, M.A.; Finlay, B.B. Molecular mechanisms of Escherichia coli pathogenicity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 26–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Johnson, J.R.; Russo, T.A. Extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli: “The other bad E. coli”. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 2002, 139, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Branger, C.; Zamfir, O.; Geoffroy, S.; Laurans, G.; Arlet, G.; Vu Thien, H.; Gouriou, S.; Picard, B.; Denamur, E. Genetic background of Escherichia coli and extended-spectrum β-lactamase type. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005, 11, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Herzer, P.J.; Inouye, S.; Inouye, M.; Whittam, T.S. Phylogenetic distribution of branched RNA-linked multicopy single-stranded DNA among natural isolates of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 6175–6181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Johnson, J.R.; Delavari, P.; Kuskowski, M.; Stell, A.L. Phylogenetic Distribution of Extraintestinal Virulence-Associated Traits in Escherichia coli. J. Infect. Dis. 2001, 183, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Gonçalves, A.; Torres, C.; Silva, N.; Carneiro, C.; Radhouani, H.; Coelho, C.; Araújo, C.; Rodrigues, J.; Vinué, L.; Somalo, S.; et al. Genetic characterization of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in Escherichia coli isolates of pigs from a portuguese intensive swine farm. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2010, 7, 1569–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Millán, Y.; Hernández, E.; Millán, B.; Araque, M. Distribución de grupos filogenéticos y factores de virulencia en cepas de Escherichia coli uropatógena productora de β-lactamasa CTX-M-15 aisladas de pacientes de la comunidad en mérida, Venezuela. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 2014, 46, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Clermont, O.; Bonacorsi, S.; Bingen, E. Rapid and simple determination of the Escherichia coli phylogenetic group. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 4555–4558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Clermont, O.; Christenson, J.K.; Denamur, E.; Gordon, D.M. The Clermont Escherichia coli phylo-typing method revisited: Improvement of specificity and detection of new phylo-groups. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2013, 5, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Luo, C.; Walk, S.T.; Gordon, D.M.; Feldgarden, M.; Tiedje, J.M.; Konstantinidis, K.T. Genome sequencing of environmental Escherichia coli expands understanding of the ecology and speciation of the model bacterial species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 7200–7205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Clermont, O.; Gordon, D.M.; Brisse, S.; Walk, S.T.; Denamur, E. Characterization of the cryptic Escherichia lineages: Rapid identification and prevalence. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 13, 2468–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Wirth, T.; Falush, D.; Lan, R.; Colles, F.; Mensa, P.; Wieler, L.H.; Karch, H.; Reeves, P.R.; Maiden, M.C.J.; Ochman, H.; et al. Sex and virulence in Escherichia coli: An evolutionary perspective. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 60, 1136–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Mathers, A.J.; Peirano, G.; Pitout, J.D.D. Escherichia coli ST131: The Quintessential Example of an International Multiresistant High-Risk Clone. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 90, 109–154. [Google Scholar]
  20. Merino, I.; Shaw, E.; Horcajada, J.P.; Cercenado, E.; Mirelis, B.; Pallarés, M.A.; Gómez, J.; Xercavins, M.; Martínez-Martínez, L.; De Cueto, M.; et al. CTX-M-15-H30Rx-ST131 subclone is one of the main causes of healthcare-associated ESBL-producing Escherichia coli bacteraemia of urinary origin in Spain. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 2125–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ojer-Usoz, E.; González, D.; Vitas, A.I.; Leiva, J.; García-Jalón, I.; Febles-Casquero, A.; de la Soledad Escolano, M. Prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in meat products sold in Navarra, Spain. Meat Sci. 2013, 93, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vitas, A.I.; Naik, D.; Pérez-Etayo, L.; González, D. Increased exposure to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae through the consumption of chicken and sushi products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 269, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pérez-Etayo, L.; González, D.; Leiva, J.; Vitas, A.I. Multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from different aquatic environments in the North of Spain and South of France. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. González, D.; Gallagher, E.; Zúñiga, T.; Leiva, J.; Vitas, A.I. Prevalence and characterization of β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in healthy human carriers. Int. Microbiol. 2019, 23, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Escobar-Páramo, P.; Sabbagh, A.; Darlu, P.; Pradillon, O.; Vaury, C.; Denamur, E.; Lecointre, G. Decreasing the effects of horizontal gene transfer on bacterial phylogeny: The Escherichia coli case study. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2004, 30, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Carlos, C.; Pires, M.M.; Stoppe, N.C.; Hachich, E.M.; Sato, M.I.Z.; Gomes, T.A.T.; Amaral, L.A.; Ottoboni, L.M.M. Escherichia coli phylogenetic group determination and its application in the identification of the major animal source of fecal contamination. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 161, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Massot, M.; Daubié, A.S.; Clermont, O.; Jauréguy, F.; Couffignal, C.; Dahbi, G.; Mora, A.; Blanco, J.; Branger, C.; Mentré, F.; et al. Phylogenetic, virulence and antibiotic resistance characteristics of commensal strain populations of Escherichia coli from community subjects in the paris area in 2010 and evolution over 30 years. Microbiology 2016, 162, 642–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Coura, F.M.; Diniz, S.D.A.; Silva, M.X.; Mussi, J.M.S.; Barbosa, S.M.; Lage, A.P.; Heinemann, M.B. Phylogenetic Group Determination of Escherichia coli Isolated from Animals Samples. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 4. [Google Scholar]
  29. Tansawai, U.; Sanguansermsri, D.; Na-udom, A.; Walsh, T.R.; Niumsup, P.R. Occurrence of extended spectrum β-lactamase and AmpC genes among multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli and emergence of ST131 from poultry meat in Thailand. Food Control 2018, 84, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vangchhia, B.; Abraham, S.; Bell, J.M.; Collignon, P.; Gibson, J.S.; Ingram, P.R.; Johnson, J.R.; Kennedy, K.; Trott, D.J.; Turnidge, J.D.; et al. Phylogenetic diversity, antimicrobial susceptibility and virulence characteristics of phylogroup F Escherichia coli in Australia. Microbiology 2016, 162, 1904–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Johnson, J.R.; Johnston, B.D.; Gordon, M. Rapid and Specific Detection of the Escherichia coli Sequence Type 648 Complex within Phylogroup F. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 1116–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Ewers, C.; Bethe, A.; Stamm, I.; Grobbel, M.; Kopp, P.A.; Guerra, B.; Stubbe, M.; Doi, Y.; Zong, Z.; Kola, A.; et al. CTX-M-15-D-ST648 Escherichia coli from companion animals and horses: Another pandemic clone combining multiresistance and extraintestinal virulence? J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014, 69, 1224–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Guo, S.Y.; Wakeham, D.; Brouwers, H.J.M.; Cobbold, R.N.; Abraham, S.; Mollinger, J.L.; Johnson, J.R.; Chapman, T.A.; Gordon, D.M.; Barrs, V.R.; et al. Human-associated fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli clonal lineages, including ST354, isolated from canine feces and extraintestinal infections in Australia. Microbes Infect. 2015, 17, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Coque, T.M.; Novais, A.; Carattoli, A.; Poirel, L.; Pitout, J.; Peixe, L.; Baquero, F.; Canton, R.; Nordmann, P. Dissemination of clonally related E. coli strains expressing ESBL CTX-M-15. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2008, 14, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Fernández-Reyes, M.; Vicente, D.; Gomariz, M.; Esnal, O.; Landa, J.; Oñate, E.; Pérez-Trallero, E. High rate of fecal carriage of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in healthy children in Gipuzkoa, northern Spain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 1822–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ojer-usoz, E.; Gonzalez, D.; Vitas, A.I. Caracterización de Enterobacterias Productoras de β-Lactamasas de Espectro Extendido Aisladas en Muestras Alimentarias, Ambientales y Clínicas. Doctoral Thesis, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mercat, M.; Clermont, O.; Massot, M.; Ruppe, E.; De Garine-Wichatitsky, M.; Miguel, E.; Fox, H.V.; Cornelis, D.; Andremont, A.; Denamur, E.; et al. Escherichia coli population structure and antibiotic resistance at a buffalo/cattle interface in southern Africa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 1459–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Walk, S.T.; Alm, E.W.; Gordon, D.M.; Ram, J.L.; Toranzos, G.A.; Tiedje, J.M.; Whittam, T.S. Cryptic lineages of the genus Escherichia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 6534–6544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Kondratyeva, K.; Salmon-Divon, M.; Navon-Venezia, S. Meta-analysis of Pandemic Escherichia coli ST131 Plasmidome Proves Restricted Plasmid-clade Associations. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Oteo, J.; Diestra, K.; Juan, C.; Bautista, V.; Novais, Â.; Pérez-Vázquez, M.; Moyá, B.; Miró, E.; Coque, T.M.; Oliver, A.; et al. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in Spain belong to a large variety of multilocus sequence typing types, including ST10 complex/A, ST23 complex/A and ST131/B2. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2009, 34, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Belmar Campos, C.; Fenner, I.; Wiese, N.; Lensing, C.; Christner, M.; Rohde, H.; Aepfelbacher, M.; Fenner, T.; Hentschke, M. Prevalence and genotypes of extended spectrum beta-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae isolated from human stool and chicken meat in Hamburg, Germany. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2014, 304, 678–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ojer-Usoz, E.; González, D.; Vitas, A.I. Clonal diversity of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolated from environmental, human and food samples. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Griffin, P.M.; Manges, A.R.; Johnson, J.R. Food-borne origins of Escherichia coli causing extraintestinal infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 55, 712–719. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ben Said, L.; Jouini, A.; Klibi, N.; Dziri, R.; Alonso, C.A.; Boudabous, A.; Ben Slama, K.; Torres, C. Detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae in vegetables, soil and water of the farm environment in Tunisia. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 203, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Manges, A.R.; Geum, H.M.; Guo, A.; Edens, T.J.; Fibke, C.D.; Pitout, J.D.D. Global extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (Expec) lineages. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 32, e00135-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bajaj, P.; Singh, N.S.; Kanaujia, P.K.; Virdi, J.S. Distribution and molecular characterization of genes encoding CTX-M and AmpC β-lactamases in Escherichia coli isolated from an Indian urban aquatic environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 505, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Rogers, B.A.; Sidjabat, H.E.; Paterson, D.L. Escherichia coli O25b-ST131: A pandemic, multiresistant, community-associated strain. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dorado-García, A.; Smid, J.H.; van Pelt, W.; Bonten, M.J.M.; Fluit, A.C.; van den Bunt, G.; Wagenaar, J.A.; Hordijk, J.; Dierikx, C.M.; Veldman, K.T.; et al. Molecular relatedness of ESBL/AmpC-producing Escherichia coli from humans, animals, food and the environment: A pooled analysis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Piedra-Carrasco, N.; Fàbrega, A.; Calero-Cáceres, W.; Cornejo-Sánchez, T.; Brown-Jaque, M.; Mir-Cros, A.; Muniesa, M.; González-López, J.J. Carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriaceae recovered from a Spanish river ecosystem. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0175246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Zhang, Q.; Lv, L.; Huang, X.; Huang, Y.; Zhuang, Z.; Lu, J.; Liu, E.; Wan, M.; Xun, H.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Rapid increase in carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in retail meat driven by the spread of the blaNDM-5-carrying IncX3 plasmid in China from 2016 to 2018. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e00573-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Jamborova, I.; Dolejska, M.; Vojtech, J.; Guenther, S.; Uricariu, R.; Drozdowska, J.; Papousek, I.; Pasekova, K.; Meissner, W.; Hordowski, J.; et al. Plasmid-mediated resistance to cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones in various Escherichia coli sequence types isolated from rooks wintering in Europe. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 648–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Mora, A.; López, C.; Herrera, A.; Viso, S.; Mamani, R.; Dhabi, G.; Alonso, M.P.; Blanco, M.; Blanco, J.E.; Blanco, J. Emerging avian pathogenic Escherichia coli strains belonging to clonal groups O111: H4-D-ST2085 and O111: H4-D-ST117 with high virulence-gene content and zoonotic potential. Vet. Microbiol. 2012, 156, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ronco, T.; Stegger, M.; Olsen, R.H.; Sekse, C.; Nordstoga, A.B.; Pohjanvirta, T.; Lilje, B.; Lyhs, U.; Andersen, P.S.; Pedersen, K. Spread of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli ST117 O78: H4 in Nordic broiler production. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Ćwiek, K.; Woźniak-Biel, A.; Karwańska, M.; Siedlecka, M.; Lammens, C.; Rebelo, A.R.; Hendriksen, R.S.; Kuczkowski, M.; Chmielewska-Władyka, M.; Wieliczko, A. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of mcr-1-positive multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli ST93, ST117, ST156, ST10, and ST744 isolated from poultry in Poland. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2021, 52, 1597–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Xia, F.; Jiang, M.; Wen, Z.; Wang, Z.; Wang, M.; Xu, Y.; Zhuge, X.; Dai, J. Complete genomic analysis of ST117 lineage extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) to reveal multiple genetic determinants to drive its global transmission: ST117 E. coli as an emerging multidrug-resistant foodborne ExPEC with zoonotic potential. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2022, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  56. Savin, M.; Bierbaum, G.; Hammerl, J.A.; Heinemann, C.; Parcina, M.; Sib, E.; Voigt, A.; Kreyenschmidt, J. Isolation and characterization of ESKAPE-bacteria and ESBL-producing E. coli from waste- and process water of German poultry slaughterhouses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Tartof, S.Y.; Solberg, O.D.; Manges, A.R.; Riley, L.W. Analysis of a Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Clonal Group by Multilocus Sequence Typing. Society 2005, 43, 5860–5864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Distribution of E. coli strains in phylogenetic groups according to their origin.
Figure 1. Distribution of E. coli strains in phylogenetic groups according to their origin.
Antibiotics 11 01465 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of E. coli strains producing different types of ESBLs within the phylogenetic groups.
Figure 2. Distribution of E. coli strains producing different types of ESBLs within the phylogenetic groups.
Antibiotics 11 01465 g002
Figure 3. Clonal composition by MST of E. coli strains isolated from (A) food, (B) water and (C) healthy carriers. Each circle corresponds to an ST, its size being proportional to the number of isolates. The color of the circles indicates the phylogroup to which each isolate belongs, as indicated in the legend. The shaded areas indicate the detected CCs that group different STs. The union lines between the different nodes (bold, continuous, dashed or dotted lines) show the number of discordant alleles between the profiles of the strains (1, 2, 3 and 4 alleles, respectively).
Figure 3. Clonal composition by MST of E. coli strains isolated from (A) food, (B) water and (C) healthy carriers. Each circle corresponds to an ST, its size being proportional to the number of isolates. The color of the circles indicates the phylogroup to which each isolate belongs, as indicated in the legend. The shaded areas indicate the detected CCs that group different STs. The union lines between the different nodes (bold, continuous, dashed or dotted lines) show the number of discordant alleles between the profiles of the strains (1, 2, 3 and 4 alleles, respectively).
Antibiotics 11 01465 g003
Figure 4. Clonal composition by MST of the 61 E. coli strains analyzed according to the source of isolation (A) and in relation to the type of β-lactamase produced (B). Each circle corresponds to an ST; its size being proportional to the number of isolates. The shaded areas indicate the detected CCs that group different STs. The union lines between the different nodes (bold, continuous, dashed or dotted lines) show the number of discordant alleles between the profiles of the strains (1, 2, 3 and 4 alleles, respectively) and the arrows indicate the same ST that appear in different niches.
Figure 4. Clonal composition by MST of the 61 E. coli strains analyzed according to the source of isolation (A) and in relation to the type of β-lactamase produced (B). Each circle corresponds to an ST; its size being proportional to the number of isolates. The shaded areas indicate the detected CCs that group different STs. The union lines between the different nodes (bold, continuous, dashed or dotted lines) show the number of discordant alleles between the profiles of the strains (1, 2, 3 and 4 alleles, respectively) and the arrows indicate the same ST that appear in different niches.
Antibiotics 11 01465 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pérez-Etayo, L.; González, D.; Vitas, A.I. Clonal Complexes 23, 10, 131 and 38 as Genetic Markers of the Environmental Spread of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-Producing E. coli. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1465. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111465

AMA Style

Pérez-Etayo L, González D, Vitas AI. Clonal Complexes 23, 10, 131 and 38 as Genetic Markers of the Environmental Spread of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-Producing E. coli. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(11):1465. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111465

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pérez-Etayo, Lara, David González, and Ana Isabel Vitas. 2022. "Clonal Complexes 23, 10, 131 and 38 as Genetic Markers of the Environmental Spread of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-Producing E. coli" Antibiotics 11, no. 11: 1465. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111465

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop