Next Article in Journal
How to Combat Gram-Negative Bacteria Using Antimicrobial Peptides: A Challenge or an Unattainable Goal?
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Multidrug-Resistant P. aeruginosa in Healthcare Facility Water Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization of blaKPC-2-Carrying Plasmid pR31-KPC from a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strain Isolated in China
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/antibiotics10121501
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Nisin-Biogel at Subinhibitory Concentrations on Virulence Expression in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Diabetic Foot Infections

by
Carolina Jesus
,
Rui Soares
,
Eva Cunha
,
Miguel Grilo
,
Luís Tavares
and
Manuela Oliveira
*
CIISA—Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Sanidade Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2021, 10(12), 1501; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10121501
Submission received: 7 November 2021 / Revised: 2 December 2021 / Accepted: 3 December 2021 / Published: 7 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence - 2nd Volume)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A new approach to diabetic foot infections (DFIs) has been investigated, using a nisin-biogel combining the antimicrobial peptide (AMP) nisin with the natural polysaccharide guar-gum. Since in in vivo conditions bacteria may be exposed to decreased antimicrobial concentrations, known as subinhibitory concentrations (sub-MICs), effects of nisin-biogel sub-MIC values corresponding to 1/2, 1/4 and 1/8 of nisin’s minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) on virulence expression by six Staphylococcus aureus DFI isolates was evaluated by determining bacteria growth rate; expression of genes encoding for staphylococcal protein A (spA), coagulase (coa), clumping factor A (clfA), autolysin (atl), intracellular adhesin A (icaA), intracellular adhesin D (icaD), and the accessory gene regulator I (agrI); biofilm formation; Coa production; and SpA release. Nisin-biogel sub-MICs decreased bacterial growth in a strain- and dose-dependent manner, decreased agrI, atl and clfA expression, and increased spA, coa, icaA and icaD expression. Biofilm formation increased in the presence of nisin-biogel at 1/4 and 1/8 MIC, whereas 1/2 MIC had no effect. Finally, nisin-biogel at sub-MICs did not affect coagulase production, but decreased SpA production in a dose-dependent manner. Results highlight the importance of optimizing nisin-biogel doses before proceeding to in vivo trials, to reduce the risk of virulence factor’s up-regulation due to the presence of inappropriate antimicrobial concentrations.

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a lifelong metabolic disorder that affects approximately 537 million people worldwide [1]. The development of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is a serious complication associated with the DM triad of neuropathy, vasculopathy and immunopathy [2]. The severe loss of skin protective barriers creates a chance for tissue colonization by opportunistic microorganisms, including Staphylococcus aureus. Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) usually become chronic and result in increased patient morbidity and mortality, the most common DM complication requiring hospitalization and often resulting in lower-extremity amputations [3].
S. aureus is a Gram-positive bacterium that expresses several regulatory and virulence factors, which contributes to its success as a human opportunistic pathogen [4]. In the first step of a staphylococcal infection, the adhesion phase, the production of several cell surface-associated factors occurs, including clumping factor A (ClfA), staphylococcal protein A (SpA), and coagulase (Coa) that facilitate tissue attachment and evasion of the host immune system [4,5]. Staphylococcal major autolysin (Atl) is also relevant for staphylococcal attachment to surfaces, also participating in bacterial cell wall degradation, lysis mediated biofilm development and secretion of cytoplasmic proteins [6,7,8].
The ability to form biofilms is considered a major staphylococcal pathogenic feature [9]. Biofilms are characterized by the growth of adherent bacterial populations inside a self-produced matrix of extracellular polymeric substances, conferring this sessile mode of life survival advantages, including enhanced antimicrobial resistance. The intercellular adhesion (ica) locus, icaADBC, is associated with cell-to-cell adhesion, being responsible for the biosynthesis of the biofilm exopolysaccharide intercellular adhesion (PIA) [10,11,12,13]. The coordination between S. aureus adhesion and detachment is regulated by Quorum Sensing (QS). The accessory gene regulator (agr) of S. aureus is a QS global transcriptional regulator, controlling virulence factors and biofilm expression in a time and population density-dependent manner [10,14,15].
Another key factor for the success of S. aureus as a human pathogen is the ability to rapidly develop or acquire multiple antibiotic resistance determinants. Nowadays, the development and spread of pathogenic bacteria that are resistant to conventional antibiotics is a major public health concern, which makes it urgent to discover, develop, and implement new effective therapeutic strategies [16,17,18,19,20]. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have been proposed as promising therapeutic candidates to inhibit bacterial growth which can be used synergistically with antibiotics [17]. One of the most studied AMPs is nisin, a lantibiotic produced by Lactococcus lactis which interacts with the bacterial cell wall precursor lipid II, inhibiting cell wall synthesis, and uses lipid II as a docking molecule for subsequent pore formation [21]. Nisin was first commercialized as a food preservative, being recognized as safe by the Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization (FAO/WHO) [17,22,23]. In recent years, it started to be investigated in veterinary and pharmaceutical fields, including for the management of bacterial infections, as this polypeptide presents antimicrobial activity against a broad spectrum of Gram-positive bacteria [17]. Staphylococcus species have a remarkable susceptibility to nisin, which represent an advantage for nisin application towards skin infections, including DFIs, and the treatment of multiple drug resistant systemic infections [17,22].
As AMPs can be inactivated or degraded before achieving their target, different methods for AMPs delivery have been widely investigated, aiming at increasing their clinically efficacy. Natural polysaccharides have been considered promising drug delivery systems mainly due to their non-toxicity, sustainability, biodegradability, biocompatibility, abundance, availability, and cost-effectiveness [24]. Guar gum is a natural, uncharged, and water-soluble polysaccharide that has been largely used for targeted drug delivery, promoting a controlled drug release and availability [25,26]. Considering all the promising features of nisin and guar gum, a guar gum gel-based delivery system for nisin, nisin-biogel, has been developed by our research team as an alternative or complementary strategy to conventional antibiotics used in DFIs treatment [27]. Previous studies have shown that the nisin-biogel had inhibitory capacity towards S. aureus DFI isolates either in their planktonic and biofilm forms [27], could be applied in combination with conventional antibiotics and antiseptics to improve their efficacy [28,29], maintained its activity when stored at temperatures below 22 °C for 24 months [30], exhibited no significant levels of cytotoxicity on human keratinocyte cells [30] and was able to diffuse and keep its antimicrobial activity in a DFU collagen three-dimensional (3D) model established to mimic the DFU environment [29]. However, before proceeding to in vivo trials, the effect of drug therapeutic doses on virulence determinants expression by S. aureus must be addressed, as it may affect infection pathogenesis. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is defined as the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibits the growth of most of the target bacterial population, under controlled in vitro conditions [31]. However, in DFIs patients there is a poor diffusion of the antimicrobials that results from DM patient’s compromised blood circulation and low perfusion due to angiopathy [31,32]. As such, in in vivo infections, bacteria may be exposed to a reduced effective concentration of antimicrobials, referred to as subinhibitory concentrations (sub-MICs), which can lead to a wide variety of physiological and morphological effects on bacteria and, consequently, affect infection pathogenesis [31,33]. Besides promoting bacterial resistance, sub-MICs of antimicrobials can modulate the virulence of S. aureus, by influencing gene expression, biofilm production and the QS system, which may impact the outcome of staphylococcal infections [31,33,34,35,36]. As such, the present study evaluated the effects of nisin-biogel sub-MICs on S. aureus DFI isolates growth rate, virulence-related genes expression, namely of agrI, spA, clfA, coa, atl, icaA and icaD, ability to form biofilm, Coa production and SpA release, aiming at confirming its suitability for in vivo administration.

2. Results

2.1. Effect of Nisin-Biogel Sub-MICs on S. aureus DFI Isolates Growth Rate

The effect of nisin-biogel sub-MICs on S. aureus DFI isolates A 5.2, A 6.3, B 1.1, B 14.2, Z 1.1, and Z 5.2 growth rate is represented in Figure 1. Both in the presence or absence of nisin-biogel at sub-MICs, all S. aureus clinical isolates growth curves presented the typical sigmoidal pattern with the three phases of bacterial growth curves—the lag phase, the exponential phase, and the stationary phase. Nevertheless, different clinical isolates showed different growth rates, with isolate A 6.3 having the highest growth rate, and isolate A 5.2 having the lowest one. Nisin-biogel at sub-MICs slowed bacterial growth, delaying the beginning of the exponential growth phase. Nisin-biogel concentration equivalent to 1/8 MIC was the one that promoted the lower change in bacterial growth, while the 1/2 MIC was the concentration that promoted a higher change on the bacterial growth. For some S. aureus clinical isolates, including isolates Z 5.2, A 6.3, B 1.1 and Z 1.1, there was an increase in bacterial growth in the stationary phase in the presence of nisin-biogel at sub-MICs.

2.2. S. aureus DFI Isolates Gene Expression Kinetics

S. aureus clinical isolates virulence genes expression kinetics was accessed using RT-qPCR assays. Figure 2a,b show that for agrI and atl, the highest expression levels were reached at 6 hours’ incubation, while for spA and clfA it was at 4 h. For coa, maximum expression levels were reached at 3 h. Although the optical expression of the different genes occurred at different periods of bacterial growth, all revealed a considerable expression at 4 h’ incubation, which allowed to select this time point as the more adequate for further evaluation of the effects of nisin-biogel sub-MICs on agrI, spA, clfA, atl and coa expression. Genes icaA and icaD reach their maximum expression levels at 48 h (Figure 3), which allowed to select this time point to icaA and icaD expression assays.

2.3. Effect of Nisin-Biogel at Sub-MICs on Gene Expression by S. aureus DFI Isolates

The effect of nisin-biogel and clindamycin at sub-MICs on virulence genes expression by S. aureus DFI isolates was investigated using RT-qPCR assays. As shown in Figure 4 and Table S1 (available as Supplementary Data), the effects depended on the virulence factor, on the S. aureus clinical isolate, and on the subinhibitory concentration under study. Overall, nisin-biogel and clindamycin at sub-MICs values significantly decreased the expression of agrI, with nisin-biogel at 1/2 MIC being the one that reduced the expression of agrI the most, and 1/8 MIC the one that least reduce agrI expression (Figure 4a). Nisin-biogel at sub-MICs increased the expression of spA, while clindamycin at 1/2 MIC significantly decreased the expression of this gene (Figure 4b). For atl, nisin-biogel at sub-MICs significantly decreased its expression, with 1/2 MIC being the one that least decreased atl expression. Unlike nisin-biogel at sub-MICs, clindamycin at 1/2 MIC increased the expression of this gene (Figure 4c). Nisin-biogel at sub-MICs significantly decreased clfA expression, with 1/2 MIC being responsible for the highest increase in the expression of this gene. On the other hand, clindamycin at 1/2 MIC significantly increased clfA expression (Figure 4d). For coa, both nisin-biogel and clindamycin at sub-MICs increased gene expression and, regarding nisin-biogel, 1/2 MIC was the one that increased coa expression the most (Figure 4e). For icaA, nisin-biogel at 1/4 and 1/8 MIC slightly increased the expression of this gene, while at 1/2 MIC slightly decreased icaA expression. Clindamycin at 1/2 MIC decreased icaA expression (Figure 4f). Finally, for icaD, nisin-biogel sub-MICs slightly increased gene expression, while clindamycin at 1/2 MIC decreased its expression (Figure 4g).

2.4. Effect of Nisin-Biogel Sub-MICs on the Ability of S. aureus DFI Isolates to Form Biofilm

Biofilm formation by S. aureus DFI isolates in the presence of nisin-biogel and clindamycin at sub-MICs was determined using a microtiter assay. Results shown in Table S2 (available as Supplementary Data) demonstrate that different S. aureus clinical isolates have different responses to nisin-biogel and clindamycin at sub-MICs. In Figure 5 it is possible to observe that, overall, nisin-biogel at 1/4 and clindamycin at 1/2 MIC exhibit a trend to increase the ability of S. aureus isolates to form biofilm, and, in the presence of nisin-biogel at 1/8 MIC, biofilm formation significantly increases. Oppositely, nisin-biogel at 1/2 MIC had no effect in the ability of S. aureus clinical isolates to form biofilm.

2.5. Effect of Nisin-Biogel Sub-MICs on Coa Production by S. aureus DFI Isolates

Coagulase test was used to monitor coagulase production by S. aureus clinical isolates in presence and absence of nisin-biogel and clindamycin at sub-MICs. Results were considered valid if the control plasma showed no signs of clotting in all assays.
Different clinical isolates showed different coagulase production ability over 4 h and after 24 h of incubation in the presence or absence of nisin-biogel and clindamycin at sub-MICs, as shown in Tables S3 and S4 (available as Supplementary Data). Besides depending on the S. aureus clinical isolate, the effects of antimicrobials sub-MICs on coagulation varied according to the bacterial growth period. During the first 4 h, in which results were monitored on an hourly basis, clotting in the absence of nisin-biogel was higher than or equal to the one obtained in the presence of nisin-biogel at sub-MICs. After 24 h incubation, most clinical isolates showed the same degree of clotting in the presence or absence of nisin-biogel. Regarding the effect of clindamycin at 1/2 MIC, for isolates A 5.2, A 6.3, and Z 5.2 there was no signs of coagulation in the presence of the antibiotic, whereas for isolates B 1.1, B 14.2 and Z 1.1, clotting degree was equal or higher than the one obtained in the absence of clindamycin at 1/2 MIC.

2.6. Effect of Nisin-Biogel Sub-MICs on SpA Release by S. aureus DFI Isolates

The effect of nisin-biogel and clindamycin at sub-MICs on SpA release by S. aureus DFI isolates was investigated using Protein A ELISA Kit. Results shown in Table S5 (available as Supplementary Data) demonstrate that different S. aureus clinical isolates have different responses regarding SpA release in the presence of antimicrobials sub-MICs. Figure 6 shows the overall effects of nisin-biogel and clindamycin at sub-MICs on the release of SpA by S. aureus DFI isolates. Nisin-biogel at 1/2 significantly decreased the release of SpA, and the other conditions under study exhibited a trend to decrease SpA release by S. aureus clinical isolates.

3. Discussion

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most disseminated chronic diseases worldwide. The last International Diabetes Federation (IDF) Atlas states that, in 2021, 537 million adults aged over 20 years were living with diabetes worldwide. In Portugal, there were over 990 million cases of diabetes registered this year, with the cost associated to each diabetic patient being estimated to be approximately 2.990 euros (https://diabetesatlas.org/data/en/country/159/pt.html, accessed on 27 November 2021), proving that diabetes represents a significant health burden in our country [37].
A frequent and most devastating consequence of diabetes is the development of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), which in about 50% of the cases become infected, developing to diabetic foot infections (DFI) [38]. Besides the conventional therapeutic protocols available for DFI treatment (e.g., debridement, wound healing agents, surgery and antibiotic therapy), several advanced therapeutics are also available, including bacteriophage therapy, negative-pressure wound therapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, stem cell therapy and off-loading [38]. Antimicrobial peptides are also a promising approach for DFI treatment; however, as observed for conventional antibiotics, angiopathy and low perfusion associated with DFU pathogenesis may prevent antimicrobials to reach the infected DFUs at effective concentration, leading to the presence of sub-MICs at the site of infection, which may impair treatment success [31,32].
The presence of antimicrobials sub-MICs can have several effects on bacteria, including the inhibition of bacterial growth [39,40] and therefore on infection progression [35,39]. As such, the effects of nisin-biogel at sub-MICs on bacterial growth were assessed. Previously, Field et al. [17] showed that nisin at sublethal concentrations slightly increased the lag period of S. aureus growth curve, which supports the results from this study, as the nisin-biogel sub-MICs values tested caused a reduction on S. aureus DFI isolates growth by increasing the lag phase. This reduction occurred in a dose-dependent manner, with the nisin-biogel at 1/2 MIC being the concentration that decreased bacterial growth the most, whereas 1/8 MIC was the one that least affected bacterial growth. In the stationary growth phase, the S. aureus clinical isolates Z 5.2, A 6.3, B 1.1 and Z 1.1 seem capable of adapting to the presence of nisin-biogel at sub-MICs, presenting an increase in growth rate.
S. aureus expresses a multitude of virulence factors in a coordinated manner, and many of them are under the control of the agr quorum sensing system. The agr gene positively controls the expression of many exotoxins, mainly produced after the end of the exponential growth phase, allowing bacteria to spread from the colonization sites to deeper tissues, and negatively controls the transcription of some cell wall-associated proteins, mainly synthesized during exponential growth [41]. According to our results, agrI expression levels by the S. aureus isolates tested only started to be relevant after 4 h, a period during which bacterial adherence to the host tissues already occurred in vivo. At this time point, the cell-surface proteins start to be down-regulated, whereas the virulence genes associated with bacterial dissemination and biofilm formation start to be up-regulated [4,42,43]. Peng et al. [44] showed that agr activity is required for post-exponential phase expression of various secreted proteins, which supports the fact that in the present study agr mRNA expression has its peak at 6 h.
SpA is a microbial surface protein that plays an important role in interfering with host defenses, inhibiting antibody-mediated phagocytosis. Staphylococcal extracellular protein, Coa, also contributes for the persistence of S. aureus in the host cell, by stimulating clotting formation in plasma, inhibiting host clearance mechanisms [45,46]. Both proteins are mainly expressed in the early stage of S. aureus growth, i.e., before 3–4 h. A study by Vandenesch et al. [47] suggested that spA mRNA is synthetized for a brief period in the beginning of the exponential phase and then is switched off. Moreover, according to Lebeau et al. [48], coa mRNA is mainly expressed at the early stages of S. aureus growth. Results from this study also showied that coa and spA mRNA are mostly expressed at the early exponential growth phase.
ClfA is also a staphylococcal surface protein that binds to Fg, allowing bacteria to colonize traumatized tissue and, later, form biofilms [49]. clfA is mainly expressed after 4 h of bacterial growth, i.e., at the late exponential growth phase. Results by Josefsson et al. [50] show that clfA expression is higher at 6 h and remains high until 24 h of S. aureus growth, which is not entirely in line with what we obtained in the present study, suggesting that different S. aureus strains may have different clfA mRNA expression kinetics. Atl protein has a multitude of functions, including attachment, bacterial cell wall degradation, biofilm development and bacteriolytic activity [51]. In the present study, atl expression increased with S. aureus growth period, within a time frame of 6 h, probably due to the increased growth rate over this time period. These results are in accordance with those by Oshida et al. [52] that also reported an increase in atl expression during the exponential growth phase.
One of the most relevant staphylococcal virulence factors is biofilm production, conferring bacteria a wide range of adaptive advantages that contribute to bacteria survival and persistence in the host [32]. Thus, icaA and icaD, involved in icaADBC-dependent biofilm formation, are mainly expressed latter during S. aureus growth. According to Atshan et al., 2013, icaA and icaD are up-regulated at 24 h of S. aureus growth and not at 48 h as observed in the present study, which suggests that ica mRNA expression kinetics may differ between S. aureus strains [53]. Furthermore, Patel et al. [54] evaluated gene expression during Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation and, in accordance with the present study, the expression levels of icaA and icaD at 48 h were the highest ones. Although this study focused on S. aureus, S. epidermidis also produces biofilm in an icaADBC-dependent manner, allowing to suggest that the time frame required for the expression of icaA and icaD may be identical in both species.
Several studies have shown that the use of antimicrobials at sub-MICs modulates virulence gene expression and, consequently, influences bacterial pathogenicity [21,39]. Determining the effects of antimicrobials sub-MICs on virulence genes expression may provide important information for the rational use of antimicrobials in clinical practice [39]. One of the antibiotics currently applied as a DFIs alternative treatment is clindamycin, used in this study as a control to compare the effects of nisin-biogel at sub-MICs on S. aureus gene expression [21,55].
Subinhibitory levels of nisin-biogel decreased the expression of the regulatory gene agrI in a dose-dependent manner, which could lead to changes in the virulence modulation and positively affect infection treatment [10,14,15]. Regarding spA and coa, nisin-biogel at sub-MICs exhibited a trend to increase the expression of these genes, which can negatively affect infection treatment, as both SpA and Coa contribute for bacterial evasion from the host immune system [4,5]. Nisin-biogel at sub-MICs significantly decrease the expression of atl and clfA, possibly reducing S. aureus pathogenic potential. These results are in accordance with those by Zhao et al. [56], which stated that the exposure of S. aureus for 1 h to a nisin concentration equivalent to 1/2 MIC lead to a down-regulation of atl and clfA.
Concerning icaA and icaD, involved in biofilm formation, the nisin-biogel at subinhibitory concentrations slightly increased their expression, which can contribute for an increase in biofilm formation, hindering infection treatment. Moreover, the lower the concentration of nisin-biogel, a higher increase of icaA and icaD mRNA levels was observed, which reinforces the importance of defining the optimum dosage of antimicrobials to be applied to the treatment of bacterial infections.
The effects of subinhibitory concentrations on bacterial biofilm formation were also investigated. Biofilms play a major role in the pathogenesis of S. aureus, and are present in 60 to 100% of chronic wounds, including DFUs [57]. Several studies have shown that sub-MICs of some antimicrobials can affect bacterial biofilm formation in vitro, which may have clinical importance [58,59]. Angelopoulou et al. [60] observed that nisin at 1/2, 1/4 and 1/8 MIC significantly increased biofilm formation by S. aureus, with the concentration of 1/8 MIC also being the one that most influenced biofilm formation, as observed in this study. When exposed to nisin-biogel at 1/4 and 1/8 MIC values, the ability of S. aureus clinical isolates to form biofilm increased in a dose-dependent manner, while 1/2 MIC had no effect on biofilm formation. Moreover, the lower the concentration of nisin-biogel, the higher the increase in biofilm formation, which is mostly consistent with the effect on the expression of icaA and icaD. Moreover, as stated by other authors, the increase of biofilm formation may be due to the fact that sublethal concentrations of antimicrobials are cell stressors, which can enhance the production of biofilm matrix polymers [59,61]. However, Andre et al. [58] reported that subinhibitory concentrations of nisin promoted a reduction in biofilm formation, which suggests that different strains may present different responses regarding biofilm formation in the presence of sub-MICs of this antimicrobial peptide.
Alterations in the virulence determinants mRNA levels in the presence of subinhibitory levels of antimicrobials do not always result in changes in protein synthesis or functional activity [62,63]. According to our results, the increase in quantification of spA and coa mRNA in the presence of nisin-biogel at sub-MICs are not directly associated with an increase in SpA production or Coa activity, respectively. In fact, there was an unexpected significant increase of coa expression in the presence of subinhibitory levels of nisin-biogel. When accessing coagulase production, results were different, as most of the clinical isolates showed a similar coagulase activity in the presence of nisin-biogel at sub-MICs. Thus, our findings suggest that coa expression increase that occurs in the presence of nisin-biogel at sub-MICs may be associated with an increase in mRNA stabilization, as previously suggested by Blickwede et al. [64] regarding clindamycin influence on coa stability. On another end, SpA protein levels exhibited a trend to decrease in the presence of nisin-biogel at sub-MICs, which is partly not consistent with what happened to SpA mRNA levels. Actually, in the presence of nisin-biogel at sub-MICs levels, S. aureus DFI isolates increased SpA mRNA levels, which seems to suggest that the inhibition of virulence expression by nisin-biogel is primarily due to the blockage of protein translation at the ribosome, rather than the inhibition of virulence genes transcription.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Strains

S. aureus isolates used in the present study were previously obtained from patients with clinically infected DFUs using biopsies (isolates with a B in their identification code), swabs (isolates with a Z in their identification code) or aspirates (isolates with an A in their identification code), according to the current clinical guidelines [65]. The isolates were virulence and antimicrobial resistance profiles were previsouly analyzed by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), including their biofilm-forming ability, and their clonal profile was previously determined by Pulse Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) and Multilocus Sequence Type (MLST) [66]. S. aureus isolates A 5.2, A 6.3, B 1.1, B 14.2, Z 1.1 and Z 5.2 were selected for this study due to their virulence traits, which includes the presence of genes encoding for staphylococcal protein A (spA), autolysin (atl), clumping factor A (clfA), coagulase (coa), intracellular adhesin A (icaA), intracellular adhesin D (icaD) and the accessory regulator gene I (agrI), and to their capacity to produce biofilms. Moreover, isolates B 14.2, B 1.1 and Z 1.1 are methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), whereas isolates A 5.2, A 6.3 and Z 5.2 are methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) [38,66]. The MICs of nisin-biogel and clindamycin for the S. aureus clinical isolates were previously determined, being, in average, of 22.5 µg/mL and 0.033 µg/mL, respectively [27,67].

4.2. Antimicrobial Solutions

A stock solution of nisin (1000 µg/mL) was obtained by dissolving 1 g of nisin powder (2.5% purity, 1000 IU/mg, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 25 mL of HCl (0.02 M) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). This solution was sterilized by filtration through a 0.22 µm cellulose acetate membrane filter (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) and stored at 4 °C [27].
Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) or Trypticase Soy Broth (TSB) with guar-gum gel at 0.75% (w/v) were prepared by dissolving 3.75 g of guar-gum (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 18.5 g of BHI powder (VWR Chemicals, Leuven, Belgium) or 15 g of TSB powder (VWR Chemicals, Leuven, Belgium), respectively, in 500 mL of sterile distilled water, and heat sterilized by autoclave [27].
Clindamycin is an alternative antibiotic currently used in clinical practice associated with mild DFIs and was used in the present study at 1/2 MIC as a control for comparing the effects of nisin-biogel at sub-MICs on S. aureus DFI isolates virulence factors expression [28]. A stock solution of clindamycin was obtained by dissolving 6.6 mg of clindamycin powder (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 10 mL of sterile water and filtered using a 0.22 μm cellulose acetate membrane filter. This stock solution was kept frozen at −80 °C and diluted with sterile water to the final concentration of 0.0165 µg/mL when required.

4.3. Effects of Nisin-Biogel Sub-MICs on S. aureus DFI Isolates Growth Rate

S. aureus DFI isolates were inoculated in a non-selective BHI agar medium (VWR Chemicals, Leuven, Belgium) at 37 °C for 24 h. After incubation, bacterial suspensions of 108 CFU/mL were prepared directly from plate cultures using a 0.5 McFarland standard in NaCl (Merck, Damstrants, Germany), and the bacterial suspensions were diluted in fresh BHI broth or in fresh BHI broth containing guar gum at 0.75% (w/v) to a final concentration of 107 CFU/mL. Afterwards, nisin was added to the fresh BHI broth with guar gum to obtain bacterial cultures with nisin-biogel at 1/2, 1/4 and 1/8 MIC values. Then, the wells of a 96-well flat-bottomed polystyrene microtiter plates (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were inoculated with 200 µL of the negative controls (fresh BHI broth and fresh BHI broth with guar gum at 7.5 mg/mL) and with 200 µL of the different bacterial suspensions previously prepared, namely in fresh BHI broth, BHI broth with guar gum plus 1/2 MIC of the nisin-biogel ((nisin) = 11.25 µg/mL; (guar gum) = 7.5 mg/mL), BHI broth with guar gum plus 1/4 MIC of the nisin-biogel ((nisin) = 5.625 µg/mL; (guar gum) = 7.5 mg/mL) and BHI broth with guar gum plus 1/8 MIC of the nisin-biogel ((nisin) = 2.8175 µg/mL; (guar gum) = 7.5 mg/mL).
Each different growth condition was evaluated in triplicate wells on three independent assays. During the 24 h of incubation at 37 °C with shaking (150 rpm), optical density at 600 nm (OD600) for each well were obtained automatically every hour, using the FLUOstar OPTIMA (BMG LABTECH, Ortenberg, Germany) microplate reader. For each isolate, OD600 was calculated by subtracting the average OD600 of the three blank wells (fresh BHI broth or fresh BHI broth with guar gum at 7.5 mg/mL) from the average of OD600 of the three replicates of the sample under evaluation. Final result corresponds to the average results of each independent assay replicates.

4.4. S. aureus DFI Isolates Gene Expression Kinetics

Isolates A 5.2 and Z 5.2 were inoculated in a non-selective BHI agar medium at 37 °C for 24 h. After incubation, bacterial suspensions of 108 CFU/mL were prepared as described. Bacterial suspensions were diluted in fresh BHI broth to a final concentration of 107 CFU/mL and grown at 37 °C with gyratory shaking (180 rpm). For quantification of agrI, spA, coa, clfA and atl expression, aliquots were collected after 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 h of incubation for subsequent stabilization of total RNA with RNAprotect® Bacteria Reagent (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), enzymatic lysis of bacteria with Buffer TE containing lysostaphin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), RNA extraction using the Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and cDNA synthesis with random primers using a Promega Go ScriptTM Reverse Transcription System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), according to manufacturer’s instructions. Gene expression was analyzed by RT-qPCR [68], using the specific primers shown in Table S6 (available as Supplementary Data). RT-qPCR was performed in a 7300 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) using the following conditions: an initial uracil-N-glycosylase gene (UNG) activation at 50 °C for 2 min, followed by an initial DNA polymerase activation at 95 °C for 10 min, and 35 cycles consisting in melting at 95 °C for 15 s and annealing/extending at 60 °C for 1 min. A set of dissociation steps was also performed, using the following conditions: 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min, 95 °C for 15 s, and 60 °C for 15 s. For icaA and icaD genes, aliquots were collected after 8, 24, 32, 48 and 56 h of incubation for subsequent stabilization of total RNA, enzymatic lysis of bacteria, RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and analyses by RT-qPCR. The relative standard curve method was used to quantify gene transcription, using gyrase B (gyrB) gene for normalization. An average ± standard deviation of the fold change obtained for the isolates A 5.2 and Z 5.2 was considered for the determination of gene expression kinetics and, consequently, the best growth time for further investigate the effects of nisin-biogel at sub-MICs on virulence-related genes expression.

4.5. Effects of Nisin-Biogel Sub-MICs on Gene Expression by S. aureus DFI Isolates

Isolates A 5.2, A 6.3, B 1.1, B 14.2, Z 1.1 and Z 5.2 were inoculated in a non-selective BHI agar medium at 37 °C for 24 h. After incubation, bacterial suspensions of 108 CFU/mL were prepared as described. For each isolate, 5 different bacterial suspensions were prepared: in BHI broth, BHI broth plus clindamycin at 1/2 MIC ((clindamycin) = 0.0165 µg/mL), BHI broth with guar-gum at 7.5 mg/mL plus 1/2 MIC of the nisin-biogel ((nisin) = 11.25 µg/mL), BHI broth with guar-gum at 7.5 mg/mL plus 1/4 MIC of the nisin-biogel ((nisin) = 5.625 µg/mL) and in BHI broth with guar-gum at 7.5 mg/mL plus 1/8 MIC of the nisin-biogel ((nisin) = 2.8175 µg/mL). All these suspensions were incubated at 37 °C for 4 h to agrI, spa, atl, coa and clfa genes expression studies, and for 48 h to icaA and icaD genes expression studies, with gyratory shaking (180 rpm).
After incubation, stabilization of total RNA, enzymatic lysis of bacteria, RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis were performed, and the resulting cDNA was used as a template for RT-qPCR using the specific primers shown in Table S1 (available as Supplementary Data), and the relative standard curve method was used to quantify transcription. Therefore, to determine the effects of nisin-biogel and clindamycin sub-MICs on virulence-related genes expression, the expression levels of the genes under investigation were expressed as fold change of the spa/gyrB, agrI/gyrB, coa/gyrB, clfa/gyrB, icaA/gyrB, icaD/gyrB and atl/gyrB ratios in the presence of antimicrobials (nisin-biogel or clindamycin) relative to the spa/gyrB, agrI/gyrB, coa/gyrB, clfa/gyrB, icaA/gyrB, icaD/gyrB and atl/gyrB ratios, respectively, of the growth control (no antimicrobial present). For each isolate and each incubation condition, two different and independent assays were performed.

4.6. Effect of Nisin-Biogel Sub-MICs on the Ability of S. aureus DFI Isolates to Form Biofilm

To test the influence of nisin-biogel sub-MICs on biofilm formation, a modified version of the protocol described by Santos et al. [27] was performed. Isolates A 5.2, A 6.3, B 1.1, B 14.2, Z 1.1 and Z 5.2 were inoculated in a non-selective BHI agar medium at 37 °C for 24 h. Then, three to five colonies were collected using a sterile loop, resuspended in 5 mL of TSB and incubated for 18 h at 37 °C. After incubation, the turbidity of bacterial suspension was adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard (108 CFU/mL), and 1:100 dilutions were made in TSB with 0.25% glucose, TSB with 0.25% glucose plus 1/2 MIC of clindamycin ((clindamycin) = 0.0165 µg/mL), TSB with guar-gum at 7.5 mg/mL and 0.25% glucose plus 1/2 MIC of nisin-biogel ((nisin) = 11.25 µg/mL), TSB with guar-gum at 7.5 mg/mL and 0.25% glucose plus 1/4 MIC of nisin-biogel ((nisin) = 5.625 µg/mL) and TSB with guar-gum at 7.5 mg/mL and 0.25% glucose plus 1/8 MIC of nisin-biogel ((nisin) = 2.8175 µg/mL).
Bacterial suspensions were transferred to a sterile 96-well polystyrene plate (200 µL/well) and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. After incubation, the content of each well was removed, and the wells were carefully washed three times with 180 µL of PBS, pH 7.0. Then, wells were filled with 200 µL of PBS, pH 7.0, and the microtiter plate was incubated in an ultrasound bath (Grant MXB14), at 50 Hz for 15 min, in order to disperse the biofilm-based bacteria from the microtiter plate surface. Finally, the OD of the suspension from each well was measured at 570 nm using the FLUOstar OPTIMA microplate reader. Results were calculated by subtracting the average OD570 of the three replicas of the negative controls (TSB broth or TSB broth with guar gum at 7.5 mg/mL) from the average of OD570 of the three wells of each sample. Final result corresponds to the average of the three independent assays.

4.7. Effect of Nisin-Biogel Sub-MICs on Coa Production by S. aureus DFI Isolates

Isolates A 5.2, A 6.3, B 1.1, B 14.2, Z 1.1 and Z 5.2 were inoculated in a non-selective BHI agar medium at 37 °C for 24 h. After, isolates were incubated in BHI broth, BHI broth plus clindamycin at 1/2 MIC ((clindamycin) = 0.0165 µg/mL), BHI broth with guar-gum at 7.5 mg/mL plus nisin-biogel at 1/2 MIC ((nisin) = 11.25 µg/mL), BHI broth with guar-gum at 7.5 mg/mL plus nisin-biogel at 1/4 MIC ((nisin) = 5.625 µg/mL) and BHI broth with guar-gum at 7.5 mg/mL plus nisin-biogel at 1/8 MIC ((nisin) = 2.8175 µg/mL) for 24 h or for 4 h at 37 °C. Coagulase test was performed by adding 0.1 mL of each culture to 0.3 mL of rabbit plasma previously rehydrated with sterile water. After gentle mixing, suspensions were incubated at 37 °C and examined every hour for 4 h, and after 24 h. Results were interpreted according to the scale proposed by Sperber & Tatini, 1975, where negative means no evidence of fibrin formation, positive 1+ means small unorganized clots, positive 2+ means small organized clot, positive 3+ means large organized clot, and positive 4+ means that the entire content of tube coagulates and is not displaced when tube is inverted [69]. As negative controls, 0.1 mL of BHI broth or 0.1 mL of BHI broth with guar-gum at 7.5 mg/mL were added to 0.3 mL of rabbit plasma and incubated without bacteria in the same conditions.

4.8. Effect of Nisin-Biogel Sub-MICs on SpA Release by S. aureus DFI Isolates

Isolates A 5.2, A 6.3, B 1.1, B 14.2, Z 1.1 and Z 5.2 were inoculated in a non-selective BHI agar medium at 37 °C for 24 h. After, isolates were incubated in BHI broth for 4 h, i.e., isolates were grown to the exponential phase at 37 °C. Then, the cultures were incubated in the presence of nisin-biogel at 1/2 MIC ((nisin) = 11.25 µg/mL), 1/4 MIC ((nisin) = 5.625 µg/mL) and 1/8 MIC ((nisin) = 2.8175 µg/mL), and clindamycin at 1/2 MIC ((clindamycin) = 0.0165 µg/mL) for 18 h at 37 °C with shaking. After incubation, bacterial suspensions were centrifuged at 1500× g rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, and supernatant were used to determine SpA level using the SpA ELISA Kit (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), as recommended by the manufacturer. Samples and standards were added to the 96-well plate, the assay was performed and absorvance values at 450 nm determined, as these values are directly proportional to the level of protein A in the sample. The results correspond to the ratios of the amount of SpA (pg/mL) in the bacterial supernatants incubated with clindamycin or nisin-biogel and the mean amount of SpA (pg/mL) in the bacterial supernatants incubated without antimicrobials and are expressed as percentages.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using Microsoft Excel 2016®. Quantitative variables are expressed as mean values ± standard deviation. Comparisons between treatments and control were performed using two-tailed Student’s t-tests. A confidence interval of 95% was considered, and p-values < 0.05 indicate statistical significance.

5. Conclusions

S. aureus produces a wide variety of virulence factors, such as adherence and colonization molecules, exotoxins, and enzymes, and forms biofilms, which contribute to its ability to colonize host tissues and cause disease, making it difficult to control staphylococcal infections. The effect of antimicrobial agents on these virulence factors’ expression has become a major focal point in the study of new antimicrobial alternatives. The present results demonstrated that nisin-biogel at subinhibitory levels affects the growth of S. aureus in a strain-dependent and dose-dependent manner, as well as the production of several virulence factors, including coagulase, protein A, and biofilm. The expression of some virulence-related genes, such as agrI, atl and clfA, were found to be repressed by nisin-biogel at sub-MICs, whereas the transcription levels of spA, coa, icaA and icaD were increased. Results highlight the importance of accessing the effects of nisin-biogel sub-MICs at different levels, providing an in vitro basis to understand what happens in vivo throughout the treatment of a DFI, and emphasizes how critical it is to establish the correct dosage of antimicrobials to be applied in clinical practice.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics10121501/s1, Table S1: Primers used in RT-qPCR protocols using 7300 Real Time PCR System for accessing virulence gene expression; Table S2: Effects of nisin-biogel at 1/2 MIC, 1/4 MIC and 1/8 MIC and clindamycin at 1/2 MIC on agrI, spA, atl, clfA, coa, icaA and icaD mRNA expression for the isolates A 5.2, A 6.3, B 1.1, B 14.2, Z 1.1 and Z 5.2. Results are expressed as n-fold differences in ‘gene under study/gyrB’ ratio in the presence of the different conditions described above relative to ‘gene under study/gyrB’ ration in the growth control (no antimicrobial). Values are present as mean values ± SD (two repeated different experiments), except for the clfa/gyrB fold change for the isolate Z 5.2, since only one assay was performed. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between treatments and between treatments and control for each clinical isolate (* = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.001, compared with the results of the corresponding control); Table S3: Effects of nisin-biogel at 1/2 MIC, 1/4 MIC and 1/8 MIC and clindamycin at 1/2 MIC on biofilm formation by the isolates A 5.2, A 6.3, B 1.1, B 14.2, Z 1.1 and Z 5.2. Values are present as mean values ± SD (three repeated different experiments). * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.001, compared with the results of the corresponding control; Table S4: Effects of nisin-biogel at 1/2 MIC, 1/4 MIC and 1/8 MIC and clindamycin at 1/2 MIC on coagulase production by the isolates A 5.2, A 6.3, B 1.1, B 14.2, Z 1.1 and Z 5.2 after 24 h of growth under the different conditions tested. Coagulation ability was measured every hour for 4 h of incubation, and after 24 h of incubation. -: no evidence of fibrin formation; 1+: small unorganized clots; 2+: small organized clots; 3+: large organized clots; 4+: entire content of tube coagulates and is not displaced when tube is inverted; Table S5: Effects of nisin-biogel at 1/2 MIC, 1/4 MIC and 1/8 MIC and clindamycin at 1/2 MIC on coagulase production by the isolates A 5.2, A 6.3, B 1.1, B 14.2, Z 1.1 and Z 5.2 after 4 h of growth under the different conditions tested. Coagulation ability was measured every hour for 4 h of incubation, and after 24 h of incubation. -: no evidence of fibrin formation; 1+: small unorganized clots; 2+: small organized clots; 3+: large organized clots; 4+: entire content of tube coagulates and is not displaced when tube is inverted; Table S6: Effects of nisin-biogel at 1/2 MIC, 1/4 MIC and 1/8 MIC and clindamycin at 1/2 MIC on protein A release by S. aureus DFI isolates A 5.2, A 6.3, B 1.1, B 14.2, Z 1.1 and Z 5.2 after 18 h of growth under the different conditions tested. The results are the racios of the amount of SpA (pg/mL) in the bacterial supernatants incubated with nisin-biogel or clindamycin to the amount of SpA (pg/mL) in the bacterial supernatants incubated without antimicrobials and are expressed as percentages.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.J., R.S. and M.O.; Methodology, C.J., R.S. and M.O.; Validation, E.C., M.G., L.T. and M.O.; Investigation, C.J.; Data curation, C.J.; Writing—original draft preparation, C.J.; Writing—review and editing, R.S., E.C., M.G., L.T. and M.O.; Supervision, M.O.; Project administration, L.T. and M.O.; Funding acquisition, L.T. and M.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Foundation for Science and Technology, project PTDC/SAU-INF/28466/2017—Polyphasic validation of antimicrobial peptides as alternative treatment for diabetic foot infections). The authors would also like to recognize the Foundation of Science and Technology for the PhD fellowship SFRH/BD/131384/2017 (Eva Cunha) and to the University of Lisbon for the PhD fellowship C10571K (Miguel L. Grilo).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article or Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. IDF Diabetes Atlas—9th Edition. Available online: https://diabetesatlas.org/ (accessed on 27 November 2021).
  2. Armstrong, D.G.; Boulton, A.J.M.; Bus, S.A. Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 2367–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Noor, S.; Khan, R.U.; Ahmad, J. Understanding Diabetic Foot Infection and Its Management. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev. 2017, 11, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, B.; Muir, T.W. Regulation of Virulence in Staphylococcus aureus: Molecular Mechanisms and Remaining Puzzles. Cell Chem. Biol. 2016, 23, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Periasamy, S.; Joo, H.S.; Duong, A.C.; Bach, T.H.L.; Tan, V.Y.; Chatterjee, S.S.; Cheung, G.Y.C.; Otto, M. How Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms Develop Their Characteristic Structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 1281–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Biswas, R.; Voggu, L.; Simon, U.K.; Hentschel, P.; Thumm, G.; Götz, F. Activity of the Major Staphylococcal Autolysin Atl. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2006, 259, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Porayath, C.; Suresh, M.K.; Biswas, R.; Nair, B.G.; Mishra, N.; Pal, S. Autolysin Mediated Adherence of Staphylococcus aureus with Fibronectin, Gelatin and Heparin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 110, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Singh, V.K. High Level Expression and Purification of Atl, the Major Autolytic Protein of Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Microbiol. 2014, 2014, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  9. Reffuveille, F.; Josse, J.; Vallé, Q.; Mongaret, C.; Gangloff, S.C. Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms and Their Impact on the Medical Field; InTech: London, UK, 2017; Volume 11, p. 187. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dickschat, J.S. Quorum Sensing and Bacterial Biofilms. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2010, 27, 343–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Maira-Litrán, T.; Kropec, A.; Abeygunawardana, C.; Joyce, J.; Mark, G.; Goldmann, D.A.; Pier, G.B. Immunochemical Properties of the Staphylococcal Poly-N-Acetylglucosamine Surface Polysaccharide. Infect. Immun. 2002, 70, 4433–4440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Otto, M. Staphylococcal Biofilms. In Gram-Positive Pathogens; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2019; pp. 699–711. [Google Scholar]
  13. O’Gara, J.P. Ica and beyond: Biofilm Mechanisms and Regulation in Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2007, 270, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Huntzinger, E.; Boisset, S.; Saveanu, C.; Benito, Y.; Geissmann, T.; Namane, A.; Lina, G.; Etienne, J.; Ehresmann, B.; Ehresmann, C.; et al. Staphylococcus aureus RNAIII and the Endoribonuclease III Coordinately Regulate Spa Gene Expression. EMBO J. 2005, 24, 824–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kong, K.F.; Vuong, C.; Otto, M. Staphylococcus Quorum Sensing in Biofilm Formation and Infection. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chastain, C.A.; Klopfenstein, N.; Serezani, C.H.; Aronoff, D.M. A Clinical Review of Diabetic Foot Infections. Clin. Podiatr. Med. Surg. 2019, 36, 381–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Field, D.; O’Connor, R.; Cotter, P.D.; Ross, R.P.; Hill, C. In Vitro Activities of Nisin and Nisin Derivatives Alone and In Combination with Antibiotics against Staphylococcus Biofilms. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Grigoropoulou, P.; Eleftheriadou, I.; Jude, E.B.; Tentolouris, N. Diabetic Foot Infections: An Update in Diagnosis and Management. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2017, 17, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Han, D.; Sherman, S.; Filocamo, S.; Steckl, A.J. Long-Term Antimicrobial Effect of Nisin Released from Electrospun Triaxial Fiber Membranes. Acta Biomater. 2017, 53, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Peterson, E.; Kaur, P. Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms in Bacteria: Relationships between Resistance Determinants of Antibiotic Producers, Environmental Bacteria, and Clinical Pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Perez, R.; Perez, M.T.; Elegado, F. Bacteriocins from Lactic Acid Bacteria: A Review of Biosynthesis, Mode of Action, Fermentative Production, Uses, and Prospects. Int. J. Philipp. Sci. Technol. 2015, 8, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Delves-Broughton, J.; Blackburn, P.; Evans, R.J.; Hugenholtz, J. Applications of the Bacteriocin, Nisin. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1996, 69, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Punyauppa-Path, S.; Phumkhachorn, P. Nisin: Production and Mechanism of Antimicrobial Action. Int. J. Curr. Res. Rev. 2015, 7, 47–53. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mirhosseini, H.; Amid, B.T. A Review Study on Chemical Composition and Molecular Structure of Newly Plant Gum Exudates and Seed Gums. Food Res. Int. 2012, 46, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Narsaiah, K.; Jha, S.N.; Wilson, R.A.; Mandge, H.M.; Manikantan, M.R. Optimizing Microencapsulation of Nisin with Sodium Alginate and Guar Gum. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 4054–4059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Prabaharan, M. Prospective of Guar Gum and Its Derivatives as Controlled Drug Delivery Systems. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2011, 49, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Santos, R.; Gomes, D.; Macedo, H.; Barros, D.; Tibério, C.; Veiga, A.S.; Tavares, L.; Castanho, M.; Oliveira, M. Guar Gum as a New Antimicrobial Peptide Delivery System against Diabetic Foot Ulcers Staphylococcus aureus Isolates. J. Med. Microbiol. 2016, 65, 1092–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Santos, R.; Ruza, D.; Cunha, E.; Tavares, L.; Oliveira, M. Diabetic Foot Infections: Application of a Nisin-Biogel to Complement the Activity of Conventional Antibiotics and Antiseptics against Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Gomes, D.; Santos, R.; Soares, R.S.; Reis, S.; Carvalho, S.; Rego, P.; Peleteiro, M.C.; Tavares, L.; Oliveira, M. Pexiganan in Combination with Nisin to Control Polymicrobial Diabetic Foot Infections. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Soares, R.S.; Santos, R.; Cunha, E.; Tavares, L.; Trindade, A.; Oliveira, M. Influence of Storage on the Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Activities of a Nisin-biogel with Potential to be Applied to Diabetic Foot Infections Treatment. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Andersson, D.I.; Hughes, D. Microbiological Effects of Sublethal Levels of Antibiotics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 12, 465–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, J.; Xie, S.; Ahmed, S.; Wang, F.; Gu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Chai, X.; Wu, Y.; Cai, J.; Cheng, G. Antimicrobial Activity and Resistance: Influencing Factors. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Otto, M.P.; Martin, E.; Badiou, C.; Lebrun, S.; Bes, M.; Vandenesch, F.; Etienne, J.; Lina, G.; Dumitrescu, O. Effects of Subinhibitory Concentrations of Antibiotics Factor Expression by Community-Acquired Methicillin-Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2013, 68, 1524–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Davies, J.; Spiegelman, G.B.; Yim, G. The World of Subinhibitory Antibiotic Concentrations. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2006, 9, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Herbert, S.; Barry, P.; Novick, R.P. Subinhibitory Clindamycin Differentially Inhibits Transcription of Exoprotein Genes in Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 2001, 69, 2996–3003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Schilcher, K.; Andreoni, F.; Dengler Haunreiter, V.; Seidl, K.; Hasse, B.; Zinkernagel, A.S. Modulation of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Matrix by Subinhibitory Concentrations of Clindamycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 5957–5967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. IDF Europe Members—Portugal. Available online: https://idf.org/our-network/regions-members/europe/members/153-portugal.html (accessed on 27 November 2021).
  38. Heravi, F.S.; Zakrzewski, M.; Vickery, K.; Armstrong, D.G.; Hu, H. Bacterial Diversity of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Current Status and Future Prospectives. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Reeks, B.Y.; Champlin, F.R.; Paulsen, D.B.; Scruggs, D.W.; Lawrence, M.L. Effects of Sub-Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Antibiotic Levels and Temperature on Growth Kinetics and Outer Membrane Protein Expression in Mannheimia haemolytica and Heamophilus somnus. Can. J. Vet. Res. 2005, 69, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhanel, G.G.; Hoban, D.J.; Harding, G.K. Subinhibitory Antimicrobial Concentrations: A Review of In Vitro and In Vivo Data. Can. J. Infect. Dis. 1992, 3, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Pratten, J.; Foster, S.J.; Chan, P.F.; Wilson, M.; Nair, S.P. Staphylococcus aureus Accessory Regulators: Expression within Biofilms and Effect on Adhesion. Microbes Infect. 2001, 3, 633–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, D.; Li, Z.; Wang, G.; Li, T.; Zhang, L.; Tang, P. Virulence Analysis of Staphylococcus aureus in a Rabbit Model of Infected Full-Thickness Wound under Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. Int. J. Gen. Mol. Microbiol. 2018, 111, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Mottola, C.; Mendes, J.J.; Cristino, J.M.; Cavaco-Silva, P.; Tavares, L.; Oliveira, M. Polymicrobial Biofilms by Diabetic Foot Clinical Isolates. Folia Microbiol. 2016, 61, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Peng, H.L.; Novick, R.P.; Kreiswirth, B.; Kornblum, J.; Schlievert, P. Cloning, Characterization, and Sequencing of an Accessory Gene Regulator (agr) in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 1988, 170, 4365–4372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Gómez, M.I.; O’Seaghdha, M.; Magargee, M.; Foster, T.J.; Prince, A.S. Staphylococcus aureus Protein A Activates TNFR1 Signaling through Conserved IgG Binding Domains. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 20190–20196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Yanagihara, K.; Tashiro, M.; Fukuda, Y.; Ohno, H.; Higashiyama, Y.; Miyazaki, Y.; Hirakata, Y.; Tomono, K.; Mizuta, Y.; Tsukamoto, K.; et al. Effects of Short Interfering RNA against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Coagulase In Vitro and In Vivo. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006, 57, 122–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vandenesch, F.; Kornblum, J.; Novick, R.P. A Temporal Signal, Independent of Agr, Is Required for Hla but Not Spa Transcription in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 6313–6320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Lebeau, C.; Vandenesch, F.; Greenland, T.; Novick, R.P.; Etienne, J. Coagulase Expression in Staphylococcus aureus Is Positively and Negatively Modulated by an agr-Dependent Mechanism. J. Bacteriol. 1994, 176, 5534–5536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Farnsworth, C.W.; Schott, E.M.; Jensen, S.E.; Zukoski, J.; Benvie, A.M.; Refaai, M.A.; Kates, S.L.; Schwarz, E.M.; Zuscik, M.J.; Gill, S.R.; et al. Adaptive Upregulation of Clumping Factor A (clfA) by Staphylococcus aureus in the Obese, Type 2 Diabetic Host Mediates Increased Virulence. Infect. Immun. 2017, 85, e01005-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Josefsson, E.; Kubica, M.; Mydel, P.; Potempa, J.; Tarkowski, A. In Vivo Sortase A and Clumping Factor A MRNA Expression during Staphylococcus aureus Infection. Microb. Pathog. 2008, 44, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Pasztor, L.; Ziebandt, A.K.; Nega, M.; Schlag, M.; Haase, S.; Franz-Wachtel, M.; Madlung, J.; Nordheim, A.; Heinrichs, D.E.; Götz, F. Staphylococcal Major Autolysin (Atl) Is Involved in Excretion of Cytoplasmic Proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 36794–36803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Oshida, T.; Takano, M.; Sugai, M.; Suginaka, H.; Matsushita, T. Expression Analysis of the Autolysin Gene (atl) of Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiol. Immunol. 1998, 42, 655–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Atshan, S.S.; Shamsudin, M.N.; Karunanidhi, A.; van Belkum, A.; Lung, L.T.T.; Sekawi, Z.; Nathan, J.J.; Ling, K.H.; Seng, J.S.C.; Ali, A.M.; et al. Quantitative PCR Analysis of Genes Expressed during Biofilm Development of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Infect. Genet. Evol. 2013, 18, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Patel, J.D.; Colton, E.; Ebert, M.; Anderson, J.M. Gene Expression during S. epidermidis Biofilm Formation on Biomaterials. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2012, 100, 2863–2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Smieja, M. Current Indications for the Use of Clindamycin: A Critical Review. Can. J. Infect. Dis. 1998, 9, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Zhao, X.; Meng, R.; Shi, C.; Liu, Z.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Guo, N.; Yu, L. Analysis of the Gene Expression Profile of Staphylococcus aureus Treated with Nisin. Food Control 2016, 59, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Malone, M.; Bjarnsholt, T.; McBain, A.J.; James, G.A.; Stoodley, P.; Leaper, D.; Tachi, M.; Schultz, G.; Swanson, T.; Wolcott, R.D. The Prevalence of Biofilms in Chronic Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Published Data. J. Wound Care 2017, 26, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Andre, C.; de Jesus Pimentel-Filho, N.; de Almeida Costa, P.M.; Vanetti, M.C.D. Changes in the Composition and Architecture of Staphylococcal Biofilm by Nisin. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2019, 50, 1083–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kaplan, J.B. Antibiotic-Induced Biofilm Formation. Int. J. Artif. Organs 2011, 34, 737–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Angelopoulou, A.; Field, D.; Pérez-Ibarreche, M.; Warda, A.K.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P. Vancomycin and Nisin A Are Effective against Biofilms of Multi-Drug Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Human Milk. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0233284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Majidpour, A.; Fathizadeh, S.; Afshar, M.; Rahbar, M.; Boustanshenas, M.; Heidarzadeh, M.; Arbabi, L.; Soleymanzadeh Moghadam, S. Dose-Dependent Effects of Common Antibiotics Used to Treat Staphylococcus aureus on Biofilm Formation. Iran. J. Pathol. 2017, 12, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hodille, E.; Rose, W.; Diep, B.A.; Goutelle, S.; Lina, G.; Dumitrescu, O. The Role of Antibiotics in Modulating Virulence in Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 30, 887–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. McAdow, M.; Missiakas, D.M.; Schneewind, O. Staphylococcus aureus Secretes Coagulase and von Willebrand Factor Binding Protein to Modify the Coagulation Casca de and Establish Host Infections. J. Innate Immun. 2012, 4, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Blickwede, M.; Wolz, C.; Valentin-Weigand, P.; Schwarz, S. Influence of Clindamycin on the Stability of Coa and FnbB Transcripts and Adherence Properties of Staphylococcus aureus Newman. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2005, 252, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Mendes, J.J.; Marques-Costa, A.; Vilela, C.; Neves, J.; Candeias, N.; Cavaco-Silva, P.; Melo-Cristino, J. Clinical and Bacteriological Survey of Diabetic Foot Infections in Lisbon. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2012, 95, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Mottola, C.; Semedo-Lemsaddek, T.; Mendes, J.J.; Melo-Cristino, J.; Tavares, L.; Cavaco-Silva, P.; Oliveira, M. Molecular Typing, Virulence Traits and Antimicrobial Resistance of Diabetic Foot Staphylococci. J. Biomed. Sci. 2016, 23, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Mottola, C.; Matias, C.S.; Mendes, J.J.; Melo-Cristino, J.; Tavares, L.; Cavaco-Silva, P.; Oliveira, M. Susceptibility Patterns of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms in Diabetic Foot Infections. BMC Microbiol. 2016, 16, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Kearns, A.M.; Seiders, R.R.; Wheeler, J.; Freeman, R.; Steward, M. Rapid Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci by Multiplex PCR. J. Hosp. Infect. 1999, 43, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Sperber, W.H.; Tatini, S.R. Interpretation of the Tube Coagulase Test for Identification of Staphylococcus aureus. Appl. Microbiol. 1975, 29, 502–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Antibiotics 10 01501 g001a 550Antibiotics 10 01501 g001b 550
Figure 1. Growth curves obtained for S. aureus clinical isolates during 24 h at 37 °C with shaking (150 rpm) in the absence or in the presence of different sub-MICs of nisin-biogel. Results are presented as mean values of three independent assays, reflecting bacterial growth for each S. aureus clinical isolate under the different conditions tested. (a): Strain ID A 5.2, isolated from a DFI aspirate (agrI +; spA +; atl +; clfA +; coa +; icaA +; icaD +; Biofilm production +; MSSA). (b): Strain ID A 6.3, isolated from a DFI aspirate (agrI +; spA +; atl +; clfA +; coa +; icaA +; icaD +; Biofilm production +; MSSA). (c): Strain ID B 1.1, isolated from a DFI biopsy (agrI +; spA +; atl +; clfA +; coa +; icaA +; icaD +; Biofilm production +; MRSA). (d): Strain ID B 14.2, isolated from a DFI biopsy (agrI +; spA +; atl +; clfA +; coa +; icaA +; icaD +; Biofilm production +; MRSA). (e): Strain ID Z 1.1, isolated from a DFI swab (agrI +; spA +; atl +; clfA +; coa +; icaA +; icaD +; Biofilm production +; MRSA). (f): Strain ID Z 5.2, isolated from a DFI swab (agrI +; spA +; atl +; clfA +; coa +; icaA +; icaD +; Biofilm production +; MSSA). MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration. NB: nisin-biogel. OD600: optical density at 600 nm.
Figure 1. Growth curves obtained for S. aureus clinical isolates during 24 h at 37 °C with shaking (150 rpm) in the absence or in the presence of different sub-MICs of nisin-biogel. Results are presented as mean values of three independent assays, reflecting bacterial growth for each S. aureus clinical isolate under the different conditions tested. (a): Strain ID A 5.2, isolated from a DFI aspirate (agrI +; spA +; atl +; clfA +; coa +; icaA +; icaD +; Biofilm production +; MSSA). (b): Strain ID A 6.3, isolated from a DFI aspirate (agrI +; spA +; atl +; clfA +; coa +; icaA +; icaD +; Biofilm production +; MSSA). (c): Strain ID B 1.1, isolated from a DFI biopsy (agrI +; spA +; atl +; clfA +; coa +; icaA +; icaD +; Biofilm production +; MRSA). (d): Strain ID B 14.2, isolated from a DFI biopsy (agrI +; spA +; atl +; clfA +; coa +; icaA +; icaD +; Biofilm production +; MRSA). (e): Strain ID Z 1.1, isolated from a DFI swab (agrI +; spA +; atl +; clfA +; coa +; icaA +; icaD +; Biofilm production +; MRSA). (f): Strain ID Z 5.2, isolated from a DFI swab (agrI +; spA +; atl +; clfA +; coa +; icaA +; icaD +; Biofilm production +; MSSA). MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration. NB: nisin-biogel. OD600: optical density at 600 nm.
Antibiotics 10 01501 g001aAntibiotics 10 01501 g001b
Antibiotics 10 01501 g002 550
Figure 2. agrI, spA, clfA, atl and coa expression kinetics by S. aureus during a five hour growth period. Results are expressed as ‘gene under study/gyrB’ fold changes at 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 h. Values are presented as means values ± SD (isolates A 5.2 and Z 5.2). (b) corresponds to an amplification of part of (a), so the y axis has different scales in the two figures. agrI: accessory gene regulator I; spA: gene encoding staphylococcal protein A; atl: gene encoding autolysin; clfA: gene encoding clumping factor A; coa: gene encoding coagulase; gyrB: gene encoding gyrase B.
Figure 2. agrI, spA, clfA, atl and coa expression kinetics by S. aureus during a five hour growth period. Results are expressed as ‘gene under study/gyrB’ fold changes at 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 h. Values are presented as means values ± SD (isolates A 5.2 and Z 5.2). (b) corresponds to an amplification of part of (a), so the y axis has different scales in the two figures. agrI: accessory gene regulator I; spA: gene encoding staphylococcal protein A; atl: gene encoding autolysin; clfA: gene encoding clumping factor A; coa: gene encoding coagulase; gyrB: gene encoding gyrase B.
Antibiotics 10 01501 g002
Antibiotics 10 01501 g003 550
Figure 3. icaA and icaD expression kinetics for 48 h. Results are expressed as ‘gene under study/gyrB’ fold changes at 8, 24, 32, 48, and 56 h. Values are presented as means values ± SD (isolates A 5.2 and Z 5.2). icaA: gene encoding intracellular adhesin A; icaD: gene encoding intracellular adhesin D; gyrB: gene encoding gyrase B.
Figure 3. icaA and icaD expression kinetics for 48 h. Results are expressed as ‘gene under study/gyrB’ fold changes at 8, 24, 32, 48, and 56 h. Values are presented as means values ± SD (isolates A 5.2 and Z 5.2). icaA: gene encoding intracellular adhesin A; icaD: gene encoding intracellular adhesin D; gyrB: gene encoding gyrase B.
Antibiotics 10 01501 g003
Antibiotics 10 01501 g004 550
Figure 4. (a–g): Effects of nisin-biogel at 1/2 MIC, 1/4 MIC and 1/8 MIC and clindamycin at 1/2 MIC on agrI, spA, atl, clfA, coa, icaA and icaD mRNA expression, respectively. Results are expressed as n-fold differences in the ‘gene under study/gyrB’ ratio in the presence of the different conditions described above relative to ‘gene under study/gyrB’ ration in the growth control (no antimicrobial). Values are means ± SD (two repeated different experiments). Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between treatments and control (* = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.001). NB: nisin-biogel; CLI: clindamycin; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration. agrI: accessory gene regulator I; spA: gene encoding staphylococcal protein A; atl: gene encoding autolysin; clfA: gene encoding clumping factor A; coa: gene encoding coagulase; icaA: gene encoding intracellular adhesin A; icaD: gene encoding intracellular adhesin D; gyrB: gene encoding gyrase B.
Figure 4. (a–g): Effects of nisin-biogel at 1/2 MIC, 1/4 MIC and 1/8 MIC and clindamycin at 1/2 MIC on agrI, spA, atl, clfA, coa, icaA and icaD mRNA expression, respectively. Results are expressed as n-fold differences in the ‘gene under study/gyrB’ ratio in the presence of the different conditions described above relative to ‘gene under study/gyrB’ ration in the growth control (no antimicrobial). Values are means ± SD (two repeated different experiments). Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between treatments and control (* = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.001). NB: nisin-biogel; CLI: clindamycin; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration. agrI: accessory gene regulator I; spA: gene encoding staphylococcal protein A; atl: gene encoding autolysin; clfA: gene encoding clumping factor A; coa: gene encoding coagulase; icaA: gene encoding intracellular adhesin A; icaD: gene encoding intracellular adhesin D; gyrB: gene encoding gyrase B.
Antibiotics 10 01501 g004
Antibiotics 10 01501 g005 550
Figure 5. Effects of nisin-biogel at 1/2 MIC, 1/4 MIC and 1/8 MIC and clindamycin at 1/2 MIC on the ability of S. aureus DFI isolates to form biofilm. Values are presented as means ± SD (three repeated different experiments). Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between treatments and control. NB: nisin-biogel; CLI: clindamycin; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration. OD570: optical density at 570 nm.
Figure 5. Effects of nisin-biogel at 1/2 MIC, 1/4 MIC and 1/8 MIC and clindamycin at 1/2 MIC on the ability of S. aureus DFI isolates to form biofilm. Values are presented as means ± SD (three repeated different experiments). Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between treatments and control. NB: nisin-biogel; CLI: clindamycin; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration. OD570: optical density at 570 nm.
Antibiotics 10 01501 g005
Antibiotics 10 01501 g006 550
Figure 6. Effects of nisin-biogel at 1/2 MIC, 1/4 MIC and 1/8 MIC and clindamycin at 1/2 MIC on SpA production by S. aureus DFI isolates. Results are the ratios of the amount of SpA (pg/mL) in the bacterial supernatants incubated with nisin-biogel and clindamycin to the mean amount of SpA (pg/mL) incubated without antimicrobials and are expressed as supernatants. Values are presented as mean values ± SD. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between treatments and control (* = p < 0.05). NB: nisin-biogel; CLI: clindamycin; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration. SpA: staphylococcal protein A.
Figure 6. Effects of nisin-biogel at 1/2 MIC, 1/4 MIC and 1/8 MIC and clindamycin at 1/2 MIC on SpA production by S. aureus DFI isolates. Results are the ratios of the amount of SpA (pg/mL) in the bacterial supernatants incubated with nisin-biogel and clindamycin to the mean amount of SpA (pg/mL) incubated without antimicrobials and are expressed as supernatants. Values are presented as mean values ± SD. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between treatments and control (* = p < 0.05). NB: nisin-biogel; CLI: clindamycin; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration. SpA: staphylococcal protein A.
Antibiotics 10 01501 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jesus, C.; Soares, R.; Cunha, E.; Grilo, M.; Tavares, L.; Oliveira, M. Influence of Nisin-Biogel at Subinhibitory Concentrations on Virulence Expression in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Diabetic Foot Infections. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10121501

AMA Style

Jesus C, Soares R, Cunha E, Grilo M, Tavares L, Oliveira M. Influence of Nisin-Biogel at Subinhibitory Concentrations on Virulence Expression in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Diabetic Foot Infections. Antibiotics. 2021; 10(12):1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10121501

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jesus, Carolina, Rui Soares, Eva Cunha, Miguel Grilo, Luís Tavares, and Manuela Oliveira. 2021. "Influence of Nisin-Biogel at Subinhibitory Concentrations on Virulence Expression in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Diabetic Foot Infections" Antibiotics 10, no. 12: 1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10121501

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop