Next Article in Journal
Bacterial Lux Biosensors in Genotoxicological Studies
Next Article in Special Issue
An Anthracene Carboxamide-Based Fluorescent Probe for Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Mitochondrial Hypochlorite in Living Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Levo-Lansoprazole Chiral Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Sensor Based on the Polylysine–Phenylalanine Complex Framework Conformational Separation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biosensors
Volume 13
Issue 5
10.3390/bios13050510
biosensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Novel and Sensitive Fluorescent Probe for Glyphosate Detection Based on Cu2+ Modulated Polydihydroxyphenylalanine Nanoparticles

by
Xiqiong Mu
1,2,
Jian Xu
1,* and
Fankui Zeng
1,*
1
Research & Development Center for Eco-Material and Eco-Chemistry, Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
2
College of Pharmacy, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730101, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2023, 13(5), 510; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13050510
Submission received: 3 April 2023 / Revised: 25 April 2023 / Accepted: 25 April 2023 / Published: 28 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fluorescent Probe for Biosensing and Cell Imaging)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A novel and sensitive fluorescent probe based on Cu2+-modulated polydihydroxyphenylalanine nanoparticles (PDOAs) has been developed for the detection of glyphosate pesticides. Compared to conventional instrumental analysis techniques, fluorometric methods have obtained good results in the field of agricultural residue detection. However, most of the fluorescent chemosensors reported still have some limitations, such as long response times, the high limit of detection, and complex synthetic procedures. In this paper, a novel and sensitive fluorescent probe based on Cu2+ modulated polydihydroxyphenylalanine nanoparticles (PDOAs) has been developed for the detection of glyphosate pesticides. The fluorescence of PDOAs can be effectively quenched by Cu2+ through the dynamic quenching process, which was confirmed by the time-resolved fluorescence lifetime analysis. In the presence of glyphosate, the fluorescence of the PDOAs-Cu2+ system can be effectively recovered due to the higher affinity of glyphosate for Cu2+, and thus released the individual PDOAs. Due to the admirable properties such as high selectivity to glyphosate pesticide, “turn on” fluorescence response, and ultralow detection limit of 1.8 nM, the proposed method has been successfully applied for the determination of glyphosate in environmental water samples.

1. Introduction

Recently, pesticide residue and food safety issues have always been a topic of concern and present a significant challenge all over the world [1,2,3]. Although the extensive use of pesticides and herbicides can effectively improve the yield of agricultural crops, unreasonable application of pesticides is still a major threat to human health and public safety. Glyphosate (N-[phosphine methyl] glycine), as a kind of broad-spectrum and non-selective herbicide, has been widely used worldwide for its excellent performance and effectiveness in weed control [4,5]. However, the abuse of glyphosate often results in high residues in environmental samples because of its high water solubility, long half-life, and high retention in soil, which may pose a risk to human health [6,7,8]. For example, glyphosate can irreversibly inactivate acetylcholinesterase (AChE), resulting in respiratory, myocardial, and neuromuscular dysfunction and even death [9,10,11]. In addition, recent studies have shown that glyphosate has potential carcinogenic effects in humans and inhibits the production of male steroid hormones, which may lead to reduced fertility [12]. As a result, the World Health Organization (WHO) has set a maximum contaminant level of glyphosate residue in drinking water at 5.325 μM (900 μg/L) [13].
In the past decade, many efforts have been devoted to the development of detection techniques for pesticides, including liquid/gas chromatography [14,15], mass spectrometry [16], immunoassay [17], surface-enhanced Raman scattering [18] and electrochemistry [19]. Although these conventional methods displayed high selectivity and adequate sensitivity for pesticide detection, they still involve some limitations for the need for tedious sample pretreatment, qualified analytical technicians, and expensive equipment, which greatly limits their application in actual sample analysis and detection. Compared to these instrumental analysis systems, colorimetric or fluorometric methods have attracted more research interest for their rapid analysis speed, simple operation procedures, high detection sensitivity, and simple instruments [20,21,22]. However, due to the lack of molecular recognition sites in the molecular structure of glyphosate, it is still a challenge to design and develop ideal chromophores and fluorescent detection systems for glyphosate. To date, only a few excellent optical sensors have been developed for pesticide residue sensing. For example, Jiang and co-workers reported a dual-readout assay based on gold nanoparticles for the detection of organophosphorus and carbamate pesticides [23]. Mang and co-workers constructed a simple fluorescent sensor for methyl parathion detection based on an L-tyrosine functionalized carbon dots (Tyr-CDs) system [24]. Despite the fine effects of pesticide detection, these reported chemosensors still have some limitations, such as long response times, the high limit of detection, and complex synthetic procedures. Therefore, there is an increasing demand for establishing a reliable method for the rapid, simple, and sensitive determination of glyphosate in environmental samples.
Recently, it is reported that polydopamine (PDA) organic nanoparticles can be effectively synthesized through the self-polymerize of Dopamine (DA) under alkaline conditions [25]. PDA nanoparticles have been applied in various fields including catalysis, metal deposition, surface modification, cancer diagnosis, drug delivery, and biochemical sensing [26,27,28]. Bayindir and co-workers developed a facile assay for the synthesis of polydopamine nanoparticles with intensive green fluorescence emission [25]. Wu and co-workers prepared highly emissive and biocompatible dopamine-derived oligomers for Fe3+ ion sensing and targeted bioimaging [29]. Zhang and co-workers reported an effective fluorescent Cu2+ detection method using PDA nanoparticles [30]. However, to the best of our knowledge, the reported PDA-based fluorescent sensors for pesticide or glyphosate detection are still rare.
In this work, a novel fluorescent probe based on Cu2+ modulated polydihydroxyphenylalanine nanoparticles (PDOAs) has been developed for the detection of glyphosate pesticide residues for the first time. Dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOA) is the precursor of dopamine in biological processes [31], which has a similar structure to dopamine (DA). PDOAs were prepared by a simple synthetic process under alkaline conditions. As shown in Scheme 1, the PDOAs displayed obvious green fluorescence. Interestingly, the fluorescence of PDOAs can be selectively quenched by Cu2+ and the sensing mechanism is ascribed to the multi-coordination interaction between Cu2+ with N atoms, O atoms, amino, carboxyl, and catechol groups in the molecule structure of PDOAs. According to previous reports, glyphosate can strongly chelate with Cu2+ and the binding affinity is higher than other metal ions [32,33,34]. Inspired by these findings, we speculate that the PDOAs-Cu2+ complex system can be utilized for glyphosate detection. As expected, the addition of glyphosate could quickly restore the fluorescence of the PDOAs-Cu2+ system because of the competitive displacement of glyphosate for PDOAs, which is originated from the strong coordination of carboxyl (-COOH), phosphonyl (-PO(OH)2), and imine (-NH-) of glyphosate with Cu2+. Subsequently, the free PDOAs were released, which finally resulted in the recovery of green emission and color change from colorless to pale yellow. Based on this strategy, the well-designed fluorescent probe based on the PDOAs-Cu2+ complex was applied to the sensitive and selective detection of glyphosate with a low detection limit of 0.799 nM. In addition, the mechanism investigation indicated that the fluorescence quenching of PDOAs by Cu2+ was ascribed to the static quenching process, and the corresponding fluorescence lifetimes of the sensing system were measured. In view of the favorable property, the novel method has been successfully applied for the detection of glyphosate in environmental water samples.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Starting Materials and Instruments

Sodium hydroxide, CuSO4, 3,4-Dihydroxy-phenylalanine, and other metal ions were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich reagent company (Shanghai, China). N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N-ethane-sulphonic acid (HEPES) was purchased from Aladdin chemistry company (Shanghai, China). All reagents were of analytical grade and used without further purification. Water was purified by a Milli-Q system. UV–vis absorbance spectrum measurements were performed on a PerkinElmer Lambda 750S UV–visible Spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Fluorescent spectrum and lifetime were measured on a HORIBA Spectro fluorophotometer (Horiba, Kyoto, Japan). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was conducted on a Thermo Fisher Scientific Escalab 250Xi photoelectron spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The scanning electron microscope images were captured on a SU8020 ultra-high resolution field emission scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).

2.2. Preparation of PDOA Nanoparticles

The preparation of PDOA nanoparticles were accorded to the reported method with minor change [25]. In short, 19.9 mL dihydroxyphenylalanine solution (1 mmol/L) was mixed with 0.1 mL NaOH solution (1 mol/L). The above solution was stirred for 3 h at room temperature (25 °C). Then, an HCl solution (1 mol/L) was applied to terminate the polymerization reaction. The pH of the final solution was adjusted to about 7.0. Subsequently, the solution was dialyzed for 24 h to obtain the purified PDOA nanoparticles. After dialysis, the as-prepared PDOAs solution (20 mL) was concentrated and freeze-dried to afford the desired PDOAs as a solid powder (0.068 g). Thus, the concentration of the PDOAs matrix solution was determined to be 3.4 mg/mL (Supporting Information). In the following experiments, the PDOAs solution was diluted 10 times to 0.34 mg/mL for all the spectrometric analysis and glyphosate detection.

2.3. Fluorescence Detection of Cu2+ and Glyphosate

The spectroscopic experiments were carried out in HEPES buffer solution (pH 7.5) as follows. In a series of colorimetric tubes, the PDOAs stock solution (400 μL, 3.4 mg/mL) was mixed with Cu2+ standard solution. The Cu2+ concentrations were 0, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2.0, 2.4, 2.8, 3.2, 3.6, 4.0, 4.4, 4.8, and 5.2 μM, respectively. Then, the mixed solution was diluted to 4 mL with HEPES buffer solution. The final concentration of PDOAs was 0.34 mg/mL. After incubation for 15 min at room temperature, the fluorescence spectra of the measuring solutions were recorded under an excitation wavelength of 420 nm. The linear relationship between the fluorescence intensity of PDOAs and Cu2+ concentration was obtained. The procedure for glyphosate determination was shown as follows. A total of 400 μL of PDOAs stock solution (3.4 mg/mL) was firstly incubated with 3.6 μM Cu2+ at room temperature for 15 min. After that, the formed PDOAs-Cu2+ system was incubated with HEPES buffer solution (pH 7.5) containing different concentrations of glyphosate (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.7, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 μM). The resulting mixture solution was diluted to 4 mL with HEPES buffer solution and then incubated for 30 min. The fluorescence spectra of the measuring solutions were recorded from 460 nm to 650 nm with the excitation at 420 nm. The linear relationship between the fluorescence intensity of the PDOAs-Cu2+ system and the glyphosate concentration was obtained.

2.4. Detection of Glyphosate in Real Environmental Water Samples

In order to investigate the practical application of the detection method, real water samples were studied. The various water samples were collected from tap water and the Yellow River (Lanzhou, China). Before the fluorescent detection, the water-insoluble organics and particle impurities were filtered through 0.22 μm microporous membranes. Then the glyphosate standard solution was added to actual water samples. The final concentrations of glyphosate in the actual samples were 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, and 1.25 µM, respectively. Finally, the fluorescence intensity was measured under the optimum conditions. The concentrations of glyphosate in these water samples were calculated according to the working curve and each sample was tested three times.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of PDOAs

Under alkaline conditions, dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOA) will be oxidized to the quinone derivative and then autopolymerized to form PDOA nanoparticles (PDOAs). Through the high-resolution scanning electron microscope (HR-SEM) analysis, the morphology of the obtained PDOA nanoparticles can be investigated in depth. As displayed in Figure 1A, PDOAs were irregular in shape and showed a wide particle size distribution. The size of PDOAs was mainly distributed in the range of 80–110 nm, with an average size of 101.5 nm (Figure 1B).
To confirm the functional groups on the surface of PDOAs, the Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR) analysis was performed. As shown in Figure 1C, the intense peak at 3436.9 cm−1 was ascribed to the vibration of the -OH group. The peaks centered at 1602.4 cm−1 and 1462.6 cm−1 were attributed to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of the COO- group, respectively. The band at 1378.7 cm−1 was due to the C-N stretching vibrations. The above results indicated the presence of hydroxy, carboxyl, and imine groups. These functional groups not only improve the hydrophilicity of the PDOAs for sensing applications, but may also act as Cu2+ binding sites.
Next, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was carried out. Four typical peaks of C1s, O1s, N1s, and Na1s were shown in the XPS survey spectrum (Figure 1D). Through semi-quantitative analysis of XPS, the atomic percentages of C, O, N, and Na of the sample were measured to be 78.38%, 15.58%, 4.24%, and 1.79%, respectively. The detailed results of C1s, O1s, and N1s spectra are displayed in Figures S1–S3. The C1s spectrum shows the existence of C–C, C–N, C–O and C=O groups, which are in accordance with the FTIR data (Figure S1). The high-resolution O1s spectrum consisted of two peaks with the binding energy of 531.8 eV and 533.5 eV, which were assigned to the C–O and O=C–O groups (Figure S2). The N1s spectrum (Figure S3) displayed three nitrogen states including pyridine nitrogen (N–C, 399.2 eV), pyrrolic nitrogen (N–C=C, 401.6 eV), and graphitic nitrogen (N–H, 401.6 eV).

3.2. Spectroscopic Property of PDOAs

Initially, spectroscopic evaluation of PDOAs was carried out in HEPES buffer solution (pH 7.5). Individual PDOAs exhibit a maximum absorbance of 270 nm. Upon addition of Cu2+ to the PDOAs solution, the absorption peak at 270 nm decreased and gradually disappeared (Figure 2A), which was reasonably ascribed to the coordination interaction between PDOAs and Cu2+. Correspondingly, the color of the solution changed prominently from faint yellow to colorless. When adding glyphosate to PDOAs-Cu2+ complex system, the color of the solution is recovered and changed from colorless to faint yellow.
In the fluorescent channel, PDOAs showed a characteristic fluorescence emission peaks at 520 nm, when excited at 420 nm. After adding Cu2+ to the PDOAs solution, the fluorescence emission peak at 520nm was significantly decreased. Accordingly, the bright green-colored fluorescence obviously disappeared (Figure 2B). Upon adding glyphosate, the fluorescence “off” state of the PNDPs-Cu2+ system is resumed due to the strong chelate action of glyphosate to Cu2+. Subsequently, the free PDOA nanoparticles were released, which finally resulted in the recovery of green emission (fluorescence “on” state) and color change from colorless to pale yellow.

3.3. Cu2+ Detection Based on “Turn Off” Fluorescence of PDOAs

We then moved forward to the emission titration experiments. (Figure 3A). With the addition of various concentrations of Cu2+, the fluorescence intensity of the PDOAs solution was gradually decreased. The ratio of fluorescent intensity at 520 nm (F0-F/F0) displayed a good linear response with the concentration of Cu2+ in the range of 0–3.6 μM (Figure 3B). In addition, the LOD value was measured to be 1.69 nM (3 б/k, in which б is the standard deviation of blank measurements, and k is the slope of the linear equation). It is noted that about 71.14% reduction in the fluorescence intensity is obtained upon the addition of 3.6 μM of Cu2+, which makes the PDOAs-Cu2+ complex system a good platform for the next step detection of glyphosate.
To further optimize the detection conditions, the time response of PDOAs to Cu2+ was further investigated. As shown in Figure 3C, after adding Cu2+ to the sensing system, a prompt fluorescent decrease at 520 nm was observed and the reaction equilibrium was almost approached at about 15 min.
Furthermore, the selectivity of the sensing system was evaluated by treatment of various potential interfering species, such as usually used cations (Ca2+, Fe2+, Fe3+, K+, Mg2+, Mn2+, Na+, Al3+, Zn2+, Hg2+ and Pb2+). From Figure 3D, we can see that the fluorescence of the PDOAs solution was only significantly quenched by Cu2+ ion. In contrast, neglectable fluorescent intensity changes were found after the addition of other interfering cations under the same conditions.
The pH effect was further investigated for Cu2+ sensing (Figure S4). After adding Cu2+ to the PDOAs solution, the ratio of fluorescent intensity at 520 nm (F0-F/F0) slightly decreased when the pH value was below 7.0, which may be ascribed to the protonated carboxyl group (or hydroxyl, amine group) and thus inhibited the coordination of PDOAs with Cu2+. Therefore, the neutral and weakly alkaline conditions are favorable for the detection of Cu2+.

3.4. Glyphosate Detection Based on “Turn On” Fluorescence of PDOAs-Cu2+ System

In previous works, the strong chelate interaction of glyphosate with Cu2+ has been reported [32,33,34]. Therefore, we speculated that the PDOAs-Cu2+ system can be an effective candidate for glyphosate detection. To verify the expected principle for glyphosate detection, the interaction of glyphosate with the PDOAs-Cu2+ system was carefully investigated. As shown in Figure 4A, the fluorescent intensity of the PDOAs-Cu2+ system was gradually enhanced with increasing glyphosate concentrations in the range of 0–3.0 µM. In addition, the fluorescence intensity ratio (F-F0/F0) at 520 nm showed a good linear response with the concentration of glyphosate in the range of 0–1.5 μM (R2 = 0.9973), where F and F0 represent the fluorescence intensity of PDOAs-Cu2+ system in the presence and absence of glyphosate (Figure 4B). The detection limit was measured to be 1.8 nM (3 б/k, in which б is the standard deviation of blank measurements, and k is the slope of the linear equation). As shown in Table S1, the LOD of the proposed method for detecting glyphosate was almost better than the previously reported methods [35,36,37,38].
To understand the kinetic reaction mechanism, the time-dependent fluorescence responses of the PDOAs-Cu2+ system to glyphosate were investigated (Figure 4C). The addition of 1.5 μM glyphosate led to a dramatic increase in the fluorescence intensity of the PDOAs-Cu2+ system and reached equilibrium at about 25 min. In order to obtain the maximum fluorescent recovery and stable signal, 30 min was selected as the optimum incubation time for the detection of glyphosate.
For a reliable fluorescence probe, high selectivity is another significant requirement for analyte detection. In order to demonstrate the selectivity of the proposed method for target detection, the fluorescence responses of the PDOAs-Cu2+ system to some pesticides such as malathion, chlorpyrifos, methamidophos, dimethoate, parathion, glufosinate and dichlorvos were performed. As shown in Figure 4D, upon excitation at 420 nm, only glyphosate induced a large fluorescence enhancement at 520 nm, whereas other interfering species triggered a small or negligible fluorescence variation. The results demonstrated that the PDOAs-Cu2+ system displayed high selectivity for glyphosate detection.

3.5. Investigation of Sensing Mechanism

In order to further investigate the mechanism of fluorescence quenching of PDOAs upon the addition of Cu2+, the Stern-Volmer equations were used for analyzing the respective emission data (Equation (1)).
F 0 F = 1 + K S V [ Q ] = 1 + K q τ 0 [ Q ] K q = K S V τ 0
In the equations, F0 and F represent the emission intensity of PDOAs in the absence and presence of a quencher, respectively. KSV is the Stern–Volmer quenching constant, [Q] is the concentration of quencher and τ0 represents the average lifetime of the PDOAs in the absence of Cu2+. Figure 5A showed the Stern-Volmer plots of PDOAs in the presence of various concentrations of Cu2+. The Kq value was calculated to be 5.15 × 107 L mol−1 s−1, which indicated that the probable quenching mechanism of PDOAs by Cu2+ ions was ascribed to the dynamic quenching rather than static quenching [39,40].
Furthermore, time-resolved fluorescence lifetime measurement was carried out to distinguish the static and dynamic quenching mechanism of PDOAs with Cu2+. The fluorescence lifetime measurement of PDOAs in the absence and presence of Cu2+ was illustrated in Figure 5B,C. The average fluorescence lifetime value of individual PDOAs is measured to be 10.6 ns. Upon the addition of 3.6 μM Cu2+ to the PDOAs solution, the fluorescence lifetime changed to 7.4 ns. The significant change in the average fluorescence lifetime clearly indicated that the fluorescence quenching belongs to dynamic quenching, reflecting the strong interaction between Cu2+ and PDOAs.
In addition, when glyphosate was added to the PDOAs-Cu2+ complex solution, the fluorescence lifetime of the system was increased to 9.0 ns (Figure 5D), which is close to the value of individual PDOAs. The results further demonstrated the fluorescence recovery originated from the strong coordination interaction between glyphosate and Cu2+, which resulted in the release of free PDOAs.

3.6. Detection of Glyphosate in Real Samples

To evaluate the practicability of the proposed method, a practical sample analysis was carried out to the detection of glyphosate in the environmental water samples. Laboratory tap water and Yellow River water were chosen for the spiked experiment (Table 1). The recoveries of glyphosate were investigated by adding a certain amount of glyphosate standard solution into the water samples with concentrations from 0.5 and 1.25 μM. For the spiked water samples, the recovery values were calculated to be 90.4–104.5 %, and the RSDs were no more than 5.0 %. The results indicate that the proposed method displays satisfied practicability and reliability for glyphosate detection in real water samples.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a novel and sensitive fluorescent probe based on Cu2+-modulated polydihydroxyphenylalanine nanoparticles (PDOAs) has been developed for the detection of glyphosate. Particularly, the fluorescence of PDOAs can be effectively quenched by Cu2+ through the static quenching process, which was confirmed by the time-resolved fluorescence lifetime analysis. When glyphosate was added to the PDOAs-Cu2+ system, the fluorescent signal was effectively recovered, which was ascribed to the higher affinity of glyphosate for Cu2+ and thus released the individual PDOAs. Based on the fluorescence quenching and recovery phenomenon, a new type of PDOAs-based fluorescence probe has been developed for the detection of Cu2+ with “on-off” mode and glyphosate detection with “off-on” mode. In addition, the PDOAs-based fluorescence probe has been successfully applied for the detection of glyphosate in environmental water samples with satisfactory results, indicating that this novel method is hopeful to serve as a practical tool for pesticides-related applied research and inspire the production of new lab-on-chip sensor devices.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/bios13050510/s1 [41,42], Figure S1: The high-resolution C1s spectrum of PDOAs; Figure S2: The high-resolution O1s spectrum of PDOAs; Figure S3: The high-resolution N1s spectrum of PDOAs; Figure S4: The fluorescence intensity ratio histogram of 0.34 mg/mL PDOAs in the presence of 3.6 μM Cu2+ with different pH values; Figure S5: The fluorescence intensity ratio histogram of PDOAs-Cu2+ system in the presence of 1.5 μM glyphosate with different pH values; Table S1: Comparison of various glyphosate probes [9,23,32,33,34,43,44,45,46]; Table S2: Fitting parameters for time-resolved fluorescence decay assay.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.X. and F.Z.; investigation, X.M., J.X. and F.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, X.M.; writing—review and editing, J.X.; visualization, X.M.; supervision, J.X.; project administration, J.X.; funding acquisition, F.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Special Fund Project for High-Tech Industrialization of Science and Technology Cooperation Between Jilin Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. 2021SYHZ0005), China Agriculture Research System (Grant No. CARS-9), Key Research and Development Plan of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (Grant No. 2020BBF03018).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Experimental data associated with this research are available from the authors.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Yinquan Wang (College of Pharmacy, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine) for his visualization and kind assistance in the data analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Singh, S.K.; Tripathi, P.K.; Yadav, R.P.; Singh, D.; Singh, A. Toxicity of malathion and carbaryl pesticides: Effects on some biochemical profiles of the freshwater fish Colisa fasciatus. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2004, 72, 592–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jokanovic, M.; Kosanovic, M. Neurotoxic effects in patients poisoned with organophosphorus pesticides. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmarcol. 2010, 29, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Winter, C.K. Pesticide residues in imported, organic, and “suspect” fruits and vegetables. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 4425–4429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cao, Y.; Wang, L.N.; Shen, C.; Wang, C.Y.; Hu, X.Y.; Wang, G.X. An electrochemical sensor on the hierarchically porous Cu-BTC MOF platform for glyphosate determination. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2019, 283, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Coutinho, C.F.; Coutinho, L.F.; Mazo, L.H.; Nixdorf, S.L.; Camara, C.A. Rapid and direct determination of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in water using anion-exchange chromatography with coulometric detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1208, 246–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Qian, K.; Tang, T.; Shi, T.; Wang, F.; Li, J.; Cao, Y. Residue determination of glyphosate in environmental water samples with high-performance liquid chromatography and UV detection after derivatization with 4-chloro-3,5-dinitrobenzotrifluoride. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 635, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Borggaard, O.K.; Gimsing, A.L. Fate of glyphosate in soil and the possibility of leaching to ground and surface waters: A review. Pest Manag. Sci. 2008, 64, 441–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Clair, E.; Mesnage, R.; Travert, C.; Seralini, G.E. A glyphosate-based herbicide induces necrosis and apoptosis in mature rat testicular cells in vitro, and testosterone decrease at lower levels. Toxicol. Vitr. 2012, 26, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, X.; Sakinati, M.; Yang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Yang, M.; Luo, H.; Hou, C.; Huo, D. The construction of a CND/Cu2+ fluorescence sensing system for the ultrasensitive detection of glyphosate. Anal. Methods 2020, 12, 520–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chang, Y.C.; Lin, Y.S.; Xiao, G.T.; Chiu, T.C.; Hu, C.C. A highly selective and sensitive nanosensor for the detection of glyphosate. Talanta 2016, 161, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, H.; Chen, P.; Liu, Z.; Liu, J.; Yi, J.; Xia, F.; Zhou, C. Electrochemical luminescence sensor based on double suppression for highly sensitive detection of glyphosate. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2020, 304, 127364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zheng, J.; Zhang, H.; Qu, J.; Zhu, Q.; Chen, X. Visual detection of glyphosate in environmental water samples using cysteamine-stabilized gold nanoparticles as colorimetric probe. Anal. Methods 2013, 5, 917–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Almeida LK, S.; Chigome, S.; Torto, N.; Frost, C.L.; Pletschke, B.I. A novel colorimetric sensor strip for the detection of glyphosate in water. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2015, 206, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, W.; Feng, Y.; La, L.I.; An, J.; Zhang, H.; Lian, K. A method for determining glyphosate and its metabolite aminomethyl phosphonic acid by gas chromatography-flame photometric detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2019, 1589, 116–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sun, Y.; Wang, C.; Wen, Q.; Wang, G.; Wang, H.; Qu, Q.; Hu, X. Determination of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in water by LC using a new labeling reagent, 4-methoxybenzenesulfonyl fluoride. Chromatographia 2010, 72, 679–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Saito, T.; Aoki, H.; Namera, A.; Oikawa, H.; Liyazaki, S.; Nakamoto, A.; Inokuchi, S. Lix-mode TiO-C18 monolith spin column extraction and GC/LS for the simultaneous assay of organophosphorus compounds and glufosinate, and glyphosate in human serum and urine. Anal. Sci. 2011, 27, 999–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Viirlaid, E.; Ilisson, L.; Kopanchuk, S.; Laeorg, U.; Rinken, A.; Rinken, T. Immunoassay for rapid on-site detection of glyphosate herbicide. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2019, 8, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, J.; Wei, C. The aptamer DNA-templated fluorescence silver nanoclusters: ATP detection and preliminary mechanism investigation. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 87, 422–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aguirre, L.D.; Urreta, S.E.; Gomez, C.G. A Cu2+/glassy carbon system for glyphosate determination. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2019, 284, 675–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chang, Y.Q.; Zhang, Z.; Hao, J.H.; Yang, W.S.; Tang, J.L. A simple label free colorimetric method for glyphosate detection based on the inhibition of peroxidase-like activity of Cu (II). Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2016, 228, 410–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, H.; Gao, X.; Shao, S. Mitochondria-targeted fluorescent probe for imaging hydrogen peroxide in living cells. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 1455–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, J.; Yu, H.; Hu, Y.; Chen, M.; Shao, S. A gold nanoparticle-based fluorescence sensor for high sensitive and selective detection of thiols in living cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 75, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liu, D.; Chen, W.; Wei, J.; Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, X. A highly sensitive, dual-readout assay based on gold nanoparticles for organophosphorus and carbamate pesticides. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 4185–4191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hou, J.; Dong, J.; Zhu, H.; Teng, X.; Ai, S.; Mang, M. A simple and sensitive fluorescent sensor for methyl parathion based on L-tyrosine methyl ester functionalized carbon dots. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 15, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yildirim, A.; Bayindir, M. Turn-on fluorescent dopamine sensing based on in situ formation of visible light emitting polydopamine nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 5508–5512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, Y.; Ai, K.; Lu, L. Polydopamine and its derivative materials: Synthesis and promising applications in energy, environmental, and biomedical fields. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 5057–5115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ma, Y.; Niu, H.; Zhang, X.; Cai, Y. Colorimetric detection of copper ions in tap water during the synthesis of silver-dopamine nanoparticles. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 12643–12645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, X.; Wang, S.; Xu, L.; Feng, L.; Ji, Y.; Tao, L.; Li, S.; Wei, Y. Biocompatible polydopamine fluorescent organic nanoparticles: Facile preparation and cell imaging. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 5581–5584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xiong, B.; Chen, Y.; Shu, Y.; Shen, B.; Chan, H.N.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, J.; Wu, H. Highly emissive and biocompatible dopamine-derived oligomers as fluorescent probes for chemical detection and targeted bioimaging. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 13578–13580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Su, Y.; Shi, B.; Liao, S.; Qin, Y.; Zhang, L.; Huang, M.; Zhao, S. Facile preparation of fluorescent polydihydroxyphenylalanine nanoparticles for label-free detection of copper ions. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2016, 225, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ischia, M.; Napolitano, A.; Pezzella, A.; Meredith, P.; Sarna, T. Chemical and structural diversity in eumelanins: Unexplored bio-optoelectronic materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 3914–3921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yang, Y.; Ghalandari, B.; Lin, L.; Sang, X.; Su, W.; Divsalar, A.; Ding, X. A turn-on fluorescence sensor based on Cu2+ modulated DNA-templated silver nanoclusters for glyphosate detection and mechanism investigation. Food Chem. 2022, 367, 130617–130623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Guan, J.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Deng, H.; Xu, J.; Wang, J.; Yuan, M.S. Employing a fluorescent and colorimetric picolyl-functionalized rhodamine for the detection of glyphosate pesticide. Talanta 2021, 224, 121834–121839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, L.; Bi, Y.; Gao, J.; Li, Y.; Ding, H.; Ding, L. Carbon dots based turn-on fluorescent probes for the sensitive determination of glyphosate in environmental water samples. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 85820–85828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Guo, Z.X.; Cai, Q.T.; Yang, Z.G. Determination of glyphosate and phosphate in water by ion chromatography-Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1100, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ibanez, M.; Pozo, O.J.; Sancho, J.V.; Lopez, F.J.; Hernandez, F. Residue determination of glyphosate, glufosinate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in water and soil samples by liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1081, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jan, M.R.; Shah, J.; Muhammad, M.; Ara, B. Glyphosate herbicide residue determination in samples of environmental importance using spectrophotometric method. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 169, 742–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lee, H.U.; Jung, D.U.; Lee, J.H.; Song, Y.S.; Park, C.; Kim, S.W. Detection of glyphosate by quantitative analysis of fluorescence and single DNA using DNA labeled fluorescent magnetic core-shell nanoparticles. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2013, 177, 879–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shanmugaraj, K.; Ilanchelian, L. A “turn-off” fluorescent sensor for the selective and sensitive detection of copper (II) ions using lysozyme stabilized gold nanoclusters. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 54518–54524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lin, L.; Song, X.; Chen, Y.; Rong, L.; Zhao, T.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X. One-pot synthesis of highly greenish-yellow fluorescent nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots for pyrophosphate sensing via competitive coordination with Eu3+ Ions. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 15427–15433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Qu, Z.; Na, W.; Nie, Y.; Su, X. A novel fluorimetric sensing strategy for highly sensitive detection of phytic acid and hydrogen peroxide. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 1039, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhang, L.; Zhang, X.; Hu, B.; Shen, L.; Chen, X.; Wang, J. Fenton’s reagent-tuned DNA-templated fluorescent silver nanoclusters as a versatile fluorescence probe and logic device. Analyst 2012, 137, 4974–4980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhou, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Kang, J.; Dong, C.; Chen, N.; Li, X.; Guo, Z.; Wu, A. Detection of herbicide glyphosates based on an anti-aggregation mechanism by using unmodified gold nanoparticles in the presence of Pb2+. Anal. Methods 2017, 9, 2890–2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tu, Q.; Yang, T.; Qu, Y.; Gao, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; He, L. In situ colorimetric detection of glyphosate on plant tissues using cysteamine-modified gold nanoparticles. Analyst 2019, 144, 2017–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, D.; Lin, B.; Cao, Y.; Guo, M.; Yu, Y. A highly selective and sensitive fluorescence detection method of glyphosate based on an immune reaction strategy of carbon dot labeled antibody and antigen magnetic beads. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2016, 64, 6042–6050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Qu, F.; Wang, H.; You, J. Dual lanthanide-probe based on coordination polymer networks for ratiometric detection of glyphosate in food samples. Food Chem 2020, 323, 126815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biosensors 13 00510 sch001 550
Scheme 1. The mechanism of glyphosate detection by PDOAs-Cu2+ complex.
Scheme 1. The mechanism of glyphosate detection by PDOAs-Cu2+ complex.
Biosensors 13 00510 sch001
Biosensors 13 00510 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) The morphologic analysis of the PDOA nanoparticles by HR-SEM. (B) Size distribution of the PDOA nanoparticles. (C) FTIR spectrum of the PDOA nanoparticles. (D) XPS spectrum analysis of the PDOA nanoparticles.
Figure 1. (A) The morphologic analysis of the PDOA nanoparticles by HR-SEM. (B) Size distribution of the PDOA nanoparticles. (C) FTIR spectrum of the PDOA nanoparticles. (D) XPS spectrum analysis of the PDOA nanoparticles.
Biosensors 13 00510 g001
Biosensors 13 00510 g002 550
Figure 2. Absorption (A) and fluorescence (B) spectra: (a) 0.34 mg/mL PDOAs; (b) 0.34 mg/mL PDOAs in the presence of 3.6 μM Cu2+; (c) the reaction mixture of (b) with 1.5 μM glyphosate in HEPES buffer solution (pH 7.5). The inset displays the color picture of (A) and the fluorescent picture of (B).
Figure 2. Absorption (A) and fluorescence (B) spectra: (a) 0.34 mg/mL PDOAs; (b) 0.34 mg/mL PDOAs in the presence of 3.6 μM Cu2+; (c) the reaction mixture of (b) with 1.5 μM glyphosate in HEPES buffer solution (pH 7.5). The inset displays the color picture of (A) and the fluorescent picture of (B).
Biosensors 13 00510 g002
Biosensors 13 00510 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) Fluorescence response of PDOAs (0.34 mg/mL) to different concentrations of Cu2+ (0, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2.0, 2.4, 2.8, 3.2, 3.6, 4.0, 4.4, 4.8 and 5.2 μM). (B) The corresponding linear range of PDOAs after adding various concentrations of Cu2+. (C) Time response of 0.34 mg/mL PDOAs to 3.6 μM Cu2+. (D) Fluorescent responses of 0.34 mg/mL PDOAs toward 10 μM various metal cations. Every data point was the mean of three measurements. The error bars are the standard deviation.
Figure 3. (A) Fluorescence response of PDOAs (0.34 mg/mL) to different concentrations of Cu2+ (0, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2.0, 2.4, 2.8, 3.2, 3.6, 4.0, 4.4, 4.8 and 5.2 μM). (B) The corresponding linear range of PDOAs after adding various concentrations of Cu2+. (C) Time response of 0.34 mg/mL PDOAs to 3.6 μM Cu2+. (D) Fluorescent responses of 0.34 mg/mL PDOAs toward 10 μM various metal cations. Every data point was the mean of three measurements. The error bars are the standard deviation.
Biosensors 13 00510 g003
Biosensors 13 00510 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) Fluorescence spectra of the PDOAs-Cu2+ system in the presence of different concentrations of glyphosate (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.7, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 μM). (B) The corresponding linear range of PDOAs-Cu2+ upon addition of different concentrations of glyphosate. (C) Time response of the PDOAs-Cu2+ system toward 1.5 μM glyphosate. (D) Fluorescence responses of PDOAs-Cu2+ to 10 μM various organophosphorus pesticides.
Figure 4. (A) Fluorescence spectra of the PDOAs-Cu2+ system in the presence of different concentrations of glyphosate (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.7, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 μM). (B) The corresponding linear range of PDOAs-Cu2+ upon addition of different concentrations of glyphosate. (C) Time response of the PDOAs-Cu2+ system toward 1.5 μM glyphosate. (D) Fluorescence responses of PDOAs-Cu2+ to 10 μM various organophosphorus pesticides.
Biosensors 13 00510 g004
Biosensors 13 00510 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) The Stern-Volmer plots of PDOAs upon addition of Cu2+ with different concentrations. (B) Fluorescence decay curves of PDOAs and corresponding fluorescence lifetime. (C) Fluorescence decay curves and fluorescence lifetime of PDOAs in the presence of Cu2+. (D) Fluorescence decay curves and fluorescence lifetime of PDOAs-Cu2+ system in the presence of glyphosate.
Figure 5. (A) The Stern-Volmer plots of PDOAs upon addition of Cu2+ with different concentrations. (B) Fluorescence decay curves of PDOAs and corresponding fluorescence lifetime. (C) Fluorescence decay curves and fluorescence lifetime of PDOAs in the presence of Cu2+. (D) Fluorescence decay curves and fluorescence lifetime of PDOAs-Cu2+ system in the presence of glyphosate.
Biosensors 13 00510 g005
Table
Table 1. Recovery experiments of glyphosate detection in real water samples.
Table 1. Recovery experiments of glyphosate detection in real water samples.
SampleAdded
(uM)		Found
(uM)		Recovery
(%)		RSD
(%)
Laboratory tap water0.50.4692.71.32
0.750.6890.40.71
10.9292.21.54
1.251.1391.60.87
Yellow River0.50.52104.51.67
0.750.7498.51.19
11.02102.21.13
1.251.28102.60.43
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mu, X.; Xu, J.; Zeng, F. A Novel and Sensitive Fluorescent Probe for Glyphosate Detection Based on Cu2+ Modulated Polydihydroxyphenylalanine Nanoparticles. Biosensors 2023, 13, 510. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13050510

AMA Style

Mu X, Xu J, Zeng F. A Novel and Sensitive Fluorescent Probe for Glyphosate Detection Based on Cu2+ Modulated Polydihydroxyphenylalanine Nanoparticles. Biosensors. 2023; 13(5):510. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13050510

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mu, Xiqiong, Jian Xu, and Fankui Zeng. 2023. "A Novel and Sensitive Fluorescent Probe for Glyphosate Detection Based on Cu2+ Modulated Polydihydroxyphenylalanine Nanoparticles" Biosensors 13, no. 5: 510. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13050510

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop