Next Article in Journal
Potential Environmental and Health Implications from the Scaled-Up Production and Disposal of Nanomaterials Used in Biosensors
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Fluorescent Turn-On Probes for CAG-RNA Repeats
Previous Article in Special Issue
Generalized Analytical Model for Enzymatic BioFET Transistors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Current Status of Field-Effect Transistors for Biosensing Applications

by
Cristian Ravariu
1,2
1
BioNEC Group, Department of Electronic Devices Circuits and Architectures, Polytechnic University of Bucharest, Splaiul Independentei 313, 060042 Bucharest, Romania
2
EduSciArt SRL, SME of Education Science and Art, Iovita 2, 050686 Bucharest, Romania
Biosensors 2022, 12(12), 1081; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12121081
Submission received: 19 November 2022 / Accepted: 24 November 2022 / Published: 25 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Field-Effect Transistors for Biosensing Applications)
The latest novelties in electronic biosensors indicate an increased interest in the compatibilization between Field Effect Transistors (FETs) and bioreceptors, either enzymes, antibodies or cells, for the purpose of detecting the multiple analytes [1,2,3]. Despite existing products based on substrate detection using Enzyme-FETs [4] or antigen detection using Immuno-FETs [5], the spatial coupling of various biodetection materials and nano-scale FETs is a serious challenge. Sometimes, enzymatic receptors need further functionalization, combinations of nano-particles and organic compounds [6,7,8], and other times, they need nano-porous materials anchored in the gate space of an FET transistor [9]. On the other hand, the FET class has been expanded in a huge palette of nano-devices in the last few years [10,11,12]. In biosensing, different transistors have been successfully used, Organic FETs, Carbon Nanotube FETs, Graphene FETs and Silicon-On-Insulator FETs, being the common transistors.
Some nano-transistors have an advantage: they are able to establish an extremely low limit of detection (LOD). This includes Silicon Nanowire FETs [13] or Single Electron Transistors, thanks to their extremely low operation currents [14].
In this Special Issues, recent results of Biosensors based on Field Effect Transistors were reported. The actual topic concerns bio-compatibility issues in enzyme–silicon wafers, biodetection performance, technological aspects, FET biosensors applied in medicine, living matter studies, the food industry, toxicology and environmental analyses, as a few examples.
In this Special Issue, Almeida et al. [15] reported a graphene-based biosensor sensitive to recombinant cyanovirin-N (rCV-N), which is a protein with an antiviral property. The application of this biosensor in medicine is based on its effective microbicide effect to inhibit the replication of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The fabrication technology of this graphene-based biosensor is based on a modified graphene monolayer with 1-pyrenebutanoic acid succinimidyl ester that is able to interact with both graphene and the primary and secondary amines of antibodies. The working principle of this biosensor concerns the modification of the electrical resistance of the modified graphene layer. Extremely low detection limits for rCV-N protein in solutions were achieved by this method. Working in the 0.02–10 ng/mL range, the authors found a detection limit of 0.45 pg/mL [15], which is smaller than that obtained with well-known techniques [16]. This result propels the graphene-based biosensors above Silicon Nanowire FETs in terms of performance [17]. From another point of view, a graphene biosensor was studied by Purwidyantri et al. [18] in this Special Issue. In a previous work, the same group of authors reported a graphene-based biosensor that was achieved by CVD grown from a single layer of graphene. It detected DNA molecules up to attomolar concentrations, which represent a signal sensitivity for a single strand of the DNA sequence, using a field effect transistor [19]. A liquid-gated Graphene Field-Effect Transistor (GFET) has been developed in this Special Issue. This set-up can be used with high accuracy for ultrasensitive bio-detection platforms. The characteristics of the GFETs were measured in different conditions, such as different ionic strengths, different pH and electrolyte types, and different buffers, i.e., phosphate buffer (PB) or phosphate buffer saline (PBS). The study shows that a longer Debye length is not the decisive parameter for increasing the sensitivity of the GFET or decreasing its limit of detection. For DNA detection, a prevailing role is fulfilled by the additional salts present in PBS as compared to PB. In this way, the studies have demonstrated a strong increase in the electron mobility in the graphene-based devices [18]. Another topic of this Special Issue concerns the fabrication and modeling of the Enzyme FETs.
A development direction is the down-scaling of the transducer for these kinds of biosensors [20,21], which results in more advantages: co-integration with the Si technology, low limits of detection, reduced costs, integration facilities, low power consumption and increased sensitivity [22]. Some researchers reported the fabrication of Ion-Sensitive Field Effect Transistors (ISFET) able to consume only some pico-watts of energy [23]. The solution for the next ten years seems to be the co-integration of the enzyme receptor with Metal Oxide Semiconductor (MOS) transistors [9] or Organic Thin Film Transistors (OTFT) [24] or any standard Field Effect Transistors (FET) as transducers to produce Enzyme-Field Effect Transistors (ENFET) [25].
In this Special Issue, Ravariu’s group reported a glucose biosensor [26] that was optimized in the second iteration, starting from a previous experience [9]. A standard MOS-FET transistor was co-integrated with an enzymatic membrane made by glucose oxidase enzyme entrapped in nafion. To optimize the enzyme immobilization, a titanium film was deposited over the gate metal, and then it was converted by anodization into TiO2nanotubes. The paper described multiple details of the co-integration technology between MOS devices and enzymatic receptors. Finally, the ENFET was tested at VDS = 2 V and VGS = 4 V. The optimal saturation regime for a good linearity of the biosensor seems to be in the glucose concentration range of 0.001 mM–100 mM, which is larger than the linear range of other glucose biosensors [27].
Models of the enzymatic kinetic within an ENFET were developed in a second paper [28]. Software tools able to simulate the functionality of ENFETs are missing. For instance, the Silvaco platform has resources to simulate optical sensors, magneto-transistors and very recent electrochemical sensors [29], but it does not have facilities to simulate biosensors.
The international community has been reporting the lack of models for Bio-FETs for many years, promoting any advancement [30]. The last paper from this issue generalizes previous concepts, extending the reaction rate from first-order to second-order and to n-order, where n > 1. The developed model envisaged three stages: (1) the dependence of the ion product’s concentration on the initial glucose concentration, as a consequence of the enzymatic reaction; (2) the shift in the threshold voltage versus the accumulated ions in the gate space; and (3) the drain current deviation under the control of the gate voltage.
This Special Issue included important contributions on transistors for biosensing applications, including graphene-based biosensors, liquid-gated graphene field-effect transistors and technological solutions for MOS-FET co-integration and Enzyme FET modeling. The results are promising. They prove a detection limit up to attomolar concentrations, while enzyme immobilization techniques appeal to both cross-linked and nano-structured materials.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful for the opportunity to serve as one of the guest editors of the Special Issue “Field-Effect Transistors for Biosensing Applications”, as well as the contribution of all the authors to this Special Issue. The dedicated work of Special Issue Editor of Biosensors and the editorial and publishing staff of Biosensors is greatly appreciated.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Song, J.; Dailey, J.; Li, H.; Jang, H.-J.; Russell, L.; Zhang, P.; Searson, P.C.; Wang, J.T.-H.; Everett, A.D.; Katz, H.E. Influence of Bioreceptor Layer Structure on Myelin Basic Protein Detection using Organic Field Effect Transistor-Based Biosensors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1802605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dai, X.; Vo, R.; Hsu, H.-H.; Deng, P.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, X. Modularized Field-Effect Transistor Biosensors. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 6658–6664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Forsyth, R.; Devadoss, A.; Guy, O.J. Graphene Field Effect Transistors for Biomedical Applications: Current Status and Future Prospects. Diagnostics 2017, 7, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Luo, X.-L.; Xu, J.-J.; Zhao, W.; Chen, H.-Y. A novel glucose ENFET based on the special reactivity of MnO2 nanoparticles. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2004, 19, 1295–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Halima, H.B.; Bellagambi, F.G.; Brunon, F.; Alcacer, A.; Pfeiffer, N.; Heuberger, A.; Hangouët, M.; Zine, N.; Bausells, J.; Errachid, A. Immuno field-effect transistor (ImmunoFET) for detection of salivary cortisol using potentiometric and impedance spectroscopy for monitoring heart failure. Talanta 2022, 253, 123802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bertana, V.; Scordo, G.; Parmeggiani, M.; Scaltrito, L.; Ferrero, S.; Gomez, M.G.; Cocuzza, M.; Vurro, D.; D’Angelo, P.; Iannotta, S.; et al. Rapid prototyping of 3D Organic Electrochemical Transistors by composite photocurable resin. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ravariu, C.; Ravariu, F. A test biodevice with lipophylic and hidrophylic bioliquids. J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 2007, 8, 2589–2592. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ravariu, C.; Mihaiescu, D.; Morosan, A.; Vasile, B.S.; Purcareanu, B. Sulpho-Salicylic Acid Grafted to Ferrite Nanoparticles for n-Type Organic Semiconductors. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ravariu, C.; Manea, E.; Babarada, F. Masks and metallic electrodes compounds for silicon biosensor integration. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 697, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ravariu, C.; Pârvulescu, C.; Manea, E.; Dinescu, A.; Gavrila, R.; Purica, M.; Arora, V. Manufacturing of a Nothing On Insulator Nano-Structure with two Cr/Au Nanowires Separated by 18 nm Air Gap. Nanotechnology 2020, 31, 275203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ravariu, C.; Rusu, A.; Ravariu, F. Interface electric charge modelling and characterization with delta-distribution generator strings in thin SOI films. Microelectronics 2006, 9, 943–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gong, L.; Zhao, Z.; Lv, Y.-F.; Huan, S.-Y.; Fu, T.; Zhang, X.-B.; Shen, G.-L.; Yu, R.-Q. DNAzyme-based Biosensors and Nanodevices. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 979–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tran, D.P.; Pham, T.T.T.; Wolfrum, B.; Offenhäusser, A.; Thierry, B. CMOS-Compatible Silicon Nanowire Field-Effect Transistor Biosensor: Technology Development toward Commercialization. Materials 2018, 11, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Nakajima, A. Application of Single-Electron Transistor to Biomolecule and Ion Sensors. Appl. Sci. 2016, 6, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. de Almeida, P.R., III; Murad, A.M.; Silva, L.P.; Rech, E.L.; Alves, E.S. Development of a Graphene-Based Biosensor for Detecting Recombinant Cyanovirin-N. Biosensors 2020, 10, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hill, E.W.; Vijayaragahvan, A.; Novoselov, K. Graphene Sensors. IEEE Sens. J. 2011, 11, 3161–3170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mishra, A.K.; Jarwal, D.K.; Mukherjee, B.; Kumar, A.; Ratan, S.; Jit, S. CuO Nanowire-Based Extended-Gate Field-Effect-Transistor (FET) for pH Sensing and Enzyme-Free/Receptor-Free Glucose Sensing Applications. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 20, 5039–5047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Purwidyantri, A.; Domingues, T.; Borme, J.; Guerreiro, J.R.; Ipatov, A.; Abreu, C.M.; Martins, M.; Alpuim, P.; Prado, M. Influence of the Electrolyte Salt Concentration on DNA Detection with Graphene Transistors. Biosensors 2021, 11, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Campos, R.; Borme, J.; Guerreiro, J.R.; Machado, G.; Cerqueira, M.F.G.; Petrovykh, D.Y.; Alpuim, P. Attomolar label-free detection of DNAa hybridization with electrolyte-gated graphene field-effect transistors. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, L.; He, X.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Z. A fully integrated CMOS nanoscale biosensor microarray. In Proceedings of the IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC), San Jose, CA, USA, 19–21 September 2011; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, H.; He, S.; Xiao, K.; Jiang, Y.-L.; Wan, J. Impact of Evaporated AuNP Thickness on Pseudo-MOS and its Application in Direct MicroRNA-375 Detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE 14th International Conference on ASIC (ASICON), Kunming, China, 26–29 October 2021; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Georgiev, Y.M.; Petkov, N.; Yu, R.; Nightingale, A.M.; Buitrago, E.; Lotty, O.; Demello, J.C.; Ionescu, A.M.; Holmes, J.D. Detection of ultra-low protein concentrations with the simplest possible field effect transistor. Nanotechnology 2019, 30, 324001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, J.; Rupakula, M.; Bellando, F.; Cordero, E.G.; Longo, J.; Wildhaber, F.; Herment, G.; Guérin, H.; Ionescu, A.M. Sweat Biomarker Sensor Incorporating Picowatt Three-Dimensional Extended Metal Gate Ion Sensitive Field Effect Transistors. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 2039–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sun, C.; Wang, X.; Auwalu, M.A.; Cheng, S.; Hu, W. Organic thin film transistors-based biosensors. EcoMat 2021, 3, e12094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Huang, W.; Wan, G.; Xia, M.; Chen, D.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Guo, F.; Tan, J.; et al. Integrated Urinalysis Devices Based on Interface-Engineered Field-Effect Transistor Biosensors Incorporated With Electronic Circuits. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2203224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ravariu, C.; Parvulescu, C.C.; Manea, E.; Tucureanu, V. Optimized Technologies for Cointegration of MOS Transistor and Glucose Oxidase Enzyme on a Si-Wafer. Biosensors 2021, 11, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Artigues, M.; Abellà, J.; Colominas, S. Analytical Parameters of an Amperometric Glucose Biosensor for Fast Analysis in Food Samples. Sensors 2017, 17, 2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ravariu, C.; Srinivasulu, A.; Mihaiescu, D.E.; Musala, S. Generalized Analytical Model for Enzymatic BioFET Transistors. Biosensors 2022, 12, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Silvaco Manual and Examples. 2021. Available online: https://silvaco.com/examples/tcad/index.html (accessed on 11 November 2022).
  30. Ravariu, C.; Arora, V. Modeling of Enzyme-FET Biosensor Based on Experimental Glucose-Oxidase Receptor. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Virtual, 1–5 November 2021; pp. 4339–4342. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ravariu, C. Current Status of Field-Effect Transistors for Biosensing Applications. Biosensors 2022, 12, 1081. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12121081

AMA Style

Ravariu C. Current Status of Field-Effect Transistors for Biosensing Applications. Biosensors. 2022; 12(12):1081. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12121081

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ravariu, Cristian. 2022. "Current Status of Field-Effect Transistors for Biosensing Applications" Biosensors 12, no. 12: 1081. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12121081

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop