Next Article in Journal
A Botnets Circumspection: The Current Threat Landscape, and What We Know So Far
Next Article in Special Issue
Design of IoT-based Cyber–Physical Systems: A Driverless Bulldozer Prototype
Previous Article in Journal
Studying Transaction Fees in the Bitcoin Blockchain with Probabilistic Logic Programming
Previous Article in Special Issue
Internet of Things Infrastructure for Security and Safety in Public Places
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Resource Allocation Combining Heuristic Matching and Particle Swarm Optimization Approaches: The Case of Downlink Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access

Information 2019, 10(11), 336; https://doi.org/10.3390/info10110336
by Dimitrios Pliatsios and Panagiotis Sarigiannidis *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Information 2019, 10(11), 336; https://doi.org/10.3390/info10110336
Submission received: 1 October 2019 / Revised: 28 October 2019 / Accepted: 28 October 2019 / Published: 30 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue IoT Applications and Industry 4.0)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Some suggestions to improve the paper:

-A better title for subsection 1.3 can be 'Novelty of this work and structure of the paper'

-Line 106-110, the numbering of the sections are not consistent with rest of the paper. should be secion2, section 3 etc.  

-Please consider re-writing line 202-204, since it contains grammatical error.

-From the power budget of 46 dBm it looks like you are considering a macro BS. What is the justification of using 500m of cell?

-I can see that you have mentioned that users are deployed randomly. but how are you modeling the user arrival and death rate?  

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper investigates the case of downlink Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access in resource allocation combining heuristic matching and particle swarm optimization approaches. Even though this topic is interesting and timely, I have the following minor concerns.

There are three drawbacks for the paper:

In the system description and problem formulation of section 2, NOMA scheme described by SIC is not detailed enough, the authors are suggested to have a more detailed derivation process. In the part of simulation results of the paper, the authors can try to do more comparison, and the performance parameters should be clear. In the channel matching and power allocation scheme in section 3, it is very important that the authors should clearly indicate the initial requirements when discussing the algorithm. Before giving the simulation, it’s better to make a simple introduction to the system scene.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop