Next Article in Journal
Traditional and Emerging Approaches for Disease Management of Plasmopara viticola, Causal Agent of Downy Mildew of Grape
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Polymer Adjuvant Type and Concentration on Atomization Characteristics of Nozzle
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Most Relevant Socio-Economic Aspects of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants through a Literature Review

by
Maria Pergola
1,*,
Enrica De Falco
1,
Angelo Belliggiano
2 and
Corrado Ievoli
2
1
Degree Course of Agriculture, Dipartimento di Farmacia, Università degli Studi di Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
2
Dipartimento Agricoltura, Ambiente, Alimenti, Università del Molise, Via de Sanctis III Polifunzionale, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2024, 14(3), 405; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030405
Submission received: 10 January 2024 / Revised: 28 February 2024 / Accepted: 29 February 2024 / Published: 2 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Economics, Policies and Rural Management)

Abstract

:
Around the world, medicinal and aromatic plants (MAPs) play a fundamental role in the economic, social, cultural, and ecological ambits of local communities. Today, the most important uses of MAPs are their applications in the pharmaceutical, perfume, cosmetics, toothpaste, soap, beverage, and food industries. At the same time, the expression MAPs is often used with a plurality of meanings that are not always clear and well-defined. Thus, the paper aims to answer two research questions: (1) to understand how the expression MAPs has been meant over time by scholars, and (2) to realize the weight that socio-economic research regarding MAPs has assumed in this context. To these ends, a literature review was conducted using the scientific database Scopus. The results highlight that researchers started talking explicitly about MAPs in the 1950s, and the geographical focus of the literature on this theme is in India, followed by China. Researchers have published studies concerning the agronomic aspects, cultivation, characterization, and germination techniques of MAPs, but the most cited articles concern the health and beneficial properties of their essential oils. At the same time, nobody has ever wondered what MAPs are, and since 1977, the World Health Organization definition has been taken for granted, and any species with medicinal or aromatic functions is considered to be a MAP. Regarding the socio-economic weight of the research conducted on MAPs, they represent only 1% of the total academic publications, but from them, it has emerged that, especially in rural areas, MAPs depict important sources of income for several local communities. At the same time, there is a need to increase the estimation of the ecosystem services that MAPs offer, the analyses of consumer preferences in the search for new business opportunities, and the environmental impact assessment of the entire supply chain.

1. Introduction

Worldwide plants have always represented fundamental sources of food and medicines, especially for local populations [1]. The oldest available medicinal records date back to 5000–3000 B.C., written by the Sumerians, and show that humans understood disease and that the use of medicinal plants could help to maintain and restore good health [2]. So, herbal medicine is one of the oldest forms of healthcare known to mankind, and many medicines commonly used today are of herbal origin. Azaizeh et al. [3] classified herbal medicines into four typologies: traditional Chinese herbalism, which is part of traditional oriental medicine; Ayurvedic herbalism, which is derived from Ayurveda, the traditional Hindu system of medicine; Western herbalism; and Traditional Arabic and Islamic Medicine.
In addition to their medicinal function, in many countries, there is a strong link between plants and food uses. Stefanaki and van Andel [4] documented the variety of culinary aromatic herb species used in the Mediterranean region, affirming that the most-used aromatic herbs in Mediterranean cookery are parsley, mint, laurel, oregano, thyme, rosemary, coriander, dill, basil, tarragon, chives, sage, marjoram, fennel, and chervil. Moreover, there are different countries in which there is a clear linkage between plant resources and religion, culture, tradition, scriptures, and lifestyle [5,6]. In some contexts, geographic, climatic, and topographic characteristics make up territories rich in diverse flora and endemic plants, including a large variety of those with important aromatic and medicinal properties [7]. Thus, in one form or another, there are several ways people benefit from plants, including medicine, nutrition, personal hygiene, body care, incense, and ritual healing [8]. In particular, the popularity of using these plants [9] and the growing demand in the markets of high-income countries [10], in which the functions of particular plants are historically linked to body care, hygiene, and aromas for perfumes, but also food or beverage uses, have been rediscovered and are causing their production to increase even more, also through their cultivation. So, today, the most important uses of medicinal and aromatic plants seem to be applications in other non-traditional sectors such as the perfume, cosmetics, toothpaste, soap, beverage, and food industries [11]. Alongside the latter, also in agriculture, researchers are looking for active ingredients of natural origin for weed and disease control [12] or for use as natural colorants [13]. These trends have been accentuated—even in European countries where their use is less widespread—by the ecological transition, one of the objectives of the Green Deal.
Starting from the different functions that certain plants perform and the valuable and important roles that they play in the economic, social, cultural, and ecological ambits of local communities around the world [8], the “category” of medicinal and aromatic plants (MAPs) was born. In particular, the FAO’s Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Working Group defines MAPs as “botanicals that provide people with medicines to prevent disease, maintain health or cure ailments” [8]. Indeed, MAPs play an essential role in global health systems, since more than 80% of the population use natural products in their primary healthcare. At the same time, different plants are used both in animal healthcare and in their production and reproduction, since they act as feed additives, growth promoters, immune boosters, reproduction enhancers, and also help in the reduction in methane and ammonia emissions [14,15,16]. In addition, over time, the antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antiseptic, draining, anti-neuralgic, digestive, and calming properties of essential oils have been extensively studied [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24], and aromatherapy has taken on an important role in research [25,26,27,28,29,30]. Consequently, the global use of herbal medicines has exponentially increased, as well as many MAP products being introduced into the market, with many cultivation practices being applied to produce high-quality and standardized plant materials [31].
McKenna et al. [32], unlike FAO, distinguished medicinal from aromatic plants, making an interpretation of the multiple definitions of MAPs offered in academic research, industry associations, and regulatory bodies. In particular, the authors identified as “medicinal” those plants with botanical components proven or believed to be beneficial to health, often called botanicals or herbal drugs, while “aromatic” plants (primarily used in cosmetics, as spices, as flavoring, and in aromatherapy) were those which produce or exude volatile compounds known as essential oils. At the same time, McKenna et al. [32] stated that, in sectoral analyses and trade studies, the terms medicinal and aromatic are often used as synonymous. Thus, in our opinion, the expression MAPs is often used with a plurality of meanings that are not always clear and well defined.
Over time, there have been several reviews that have studied MAPs, most of which focused on single species and their ethnobotanical uses, phytochemical content, pharmacological activities, cultivation, and propagation [10,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. Contrary to that, the present review wants to give a comprehensive overview of the academic studies on MAPs to discover how the expression MAPs has been understood by scholars over time and, more specifically, to realize the weight that socio-economic research regarding MAPs has assumed in this context.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. The Review Process

According to the aim of the paper, a systematic and bibliometric review of the literature on the expression Medicinal and Aromatic Plants was conducted to outline the geographical focus of the literature; how the academic world approaches the study of MAPs; and what the current and future research lines are. As stated by Denyer and Tranfield [43] and Merli et al. [44], this type of analysis allows for providing a transparent and reproducible process of selecting, analyzing, and reporting on the previously conducted research on a specific topic. As in other studies [43,44,45,46], the review process followed some steps: research questions definition; documents collection; quali–quantitative analysis; documents selection; qualitative analysis and grouping; and documents evaluation (Figure 1).
The scientific database Scopus was used for the documents collection. This database was chosen because it is one of the most comprehensive scientific databases [47,48] and facilitates the implementation of reliable bibliometric studies [49]. To collect all MAPs studies across the scientific community, in the first step, the generic expression “Medicinal and Aromatic Plants” was used and the research criterion “Title, Author, Keywords, Abstract” was employed. All types of documents were used as units of analysis (article, review, book chapter, conference paper, book, short survey, editorial, note, letter, erratum, data paper, retracted, and conference review) and in all languages. No chronological restriction was employed and the query on the database was performed on 5 April 2023. From 1947, Scopus returned a total of 5318 documents. Thus, on one hand, a quantitative analysis of the distribution and evolution of manuscripts on MAPs over time, sources, number of citations, and thematic areas was performed; on the other, a qualitative analysis was made of the abstracts to understand when and in what terms the scholars talked about MAPs.
Then, to identify a representative sample of relevant papers from an economic point of view, the subject area “Social Science” and the strings “Medicinal and aromatic plants” + “economy”, “Medicinal and aromatic plants” + “market”, “Medicinal and aromatic plants” + “business”, and “Medicinal and aromatic plants” + “trade” were used with the research criterion “Title, Author, Keywords, Abstract”, as performed previously. In this case, Scopus returned a total of 621 results, of which, after removing duplicates, 442 documents were considered. The latter, through a qualitative analysis, were analyzed in detail and grouped into research areas.
Finally, we further skimmed the results of this research by considering only the papers which actually make significant contributions to the study of the socio-economic aspects of MAPs, eliminating those containing the search terms economy, market, business, and trade in a vague way. Thus, a sample of 73 documents was thoroughly reviewed, as reported in Figure 1.

2.2. The Science Mapping

Science mapping is one of the two categories of techniques for a bibliometric analysis that examines the relationships between research constituents [50], and, according to the aims of the present review, the co-word analysis was used to explore the relationships among topics by focusing on the written content of the publications. VOSviewer software (version 1.6.20) was used to extract and analyze the semantic contents of the titles, abstracts, and keywords of the publications, relating them to the citation count data and generating network maps to visualize the results [51]. As in Muley and Medithi [52], default parameters were used for the analyses and creation of the network maps. The font size of the words in the network map indicates their frequency of occurrence. If two words co-occurred in the evaluated publications more frequently, they are nearer to each other. Only words that had a minimum number of occurrences of 10 (for the 5318 documents), 5 (for the 442 economic papers), and 2 (for the selected 73 economic papers) were analyzed and visualized. Two unit of analysis (“all keywords” and “author keywords”) were used to create the maps and the full counting method was used, meaning that each co-occurrence link carried the same weight. The default “association strength method” was used for the normalization of the co-occurrence matrix with default values of attraction and repulsion.
As specified in Donthu et al. [50], in the network visualization maps created using the VOSviewer software, each node in a network represents a keyword, wherein: (1) the size of the node indicates the occurrence of the keyword (i.e., the number of times that the keyword occurs), (2) the link between the nodes represents the co-occurrence between keywords (i.e., keywords that co-occur or occur together), (3) the thickness of the link signals the occurrence of co-occurrences between keywords (i.e., the number of times that the keywords co-occur or occur together), (4) the bigger the node, the greater the occurrence of the keyword, and (5) the thicker the link between nodes, the greater the occurrence of the co-occurrences between keywords. Each color represents a thematic cluster.

3. Results

3.1. The Quali–Quantitative Analysis of the Literature on MAPs

The first article on MAPs dates back to 1947 and it was a study on perfume and medicinal materials from overseas France [53], in which the terms “aromatic” and “medicinal” were found among the keywords as adjectives of the term substances. On the contrary, the first papers explicitly referring to the expression “medicinal and aromatic plants” date back to the 1950s (Table 1). Furthermore, the definition of “medicinal plant”, given by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1977, is reported only in 2014 by Chauhan et al. [54].
The number of publications referring to MAPs started to grow from 1998 (n = 34). A steady increase in research articles has been observed since then, with peaks occurring in 2002 (n = 72), 2011 (n = 214), 2016 (n = 309), and 2022 (n = 520) (Figure 2), according to the remarkable increase in the global demand for spices, herbs, and MAPs and the growing interest of the healthcare sector in the therapeutic properties of the phytochemicals associated with indigenous medicinal plants [60]. In addition, the highest number of publications was recorded in the two-year period of 2020–2022 (n = 1463), representing 28% of the total publications found on Scopus.
The distribution of all publications by countries shows that 17% of them were from India (1129), 6% were from China (394) and 15% were from the United States (351), Brazil (315), and Iran (313), as reported in Figure 3.
Most of the published manuscripts were original articles (3988; 75%), followed by review papers (608; 11%), book chapters (322; 6%), and conference papers (283; 5%). About 90% of the manuscripts (4683) were published in journals and the top ten source types are listed in Table 2. The latter shows that the main research areas can be assigned to three main groups: one addressing agronomic and cultivation aspects and techniques; one characterized by chemical, pharmacological, and pharmaceutical items; and another one of a more environmental nature.
Figure 4 shows that, considering the five sources with the highest share of publications, Acta Horticulturae (the book series with the highest number of publications in absolute) maintained leadership until 2012, while Industrial Crops and Products has incremented its contribution to the MAPs topic since 2013. The Journal of Ethnopharmacology published its first article back in 1982, but has contributed significantly to the research topic in the last years. Molecules, present since 2011, contributed significantly only starting in 2020, confirming the growing interest in MAPs also from other sectors (chemistry). On the contrary, the scientific contribution of the Journal of Essential Oil-Bearing Plants was concentrated from 2014 to 2021.
Contrary to the above, the top ten cited articles dealt with essential oils’ properties, MAPs’ radical scavenging activity, and the antitumor activities of flavonoids, curcumin, and clove (Table 3). Therefore, on the one hand, researchers published studies concerning the agronomic aspects, cultivation, analysis, and germination techniques of MAPs, and on the other hand, the most cited articles concerned the health and beneficial properties of essential oils.
Referring to the subject areas, those most represented were Agricultural and Biological Sciences (2497); Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmaceutics (1571); Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology (1513); Medicine (1035); and Chemistry (1003), representing together 78% of the total (Figure 5).
From the co-word analysis of all the keywords of the 5318 collected documents, the “complexity” of the concept of MAPs emerged. Indeed, the descriptive analysis carried out through the co-occurrence networks showed that the semantic cores of this complexity were the biochemical and analytical aspects, although the agronomic and genetic aspects, as well as the ethnobotanical ones, were present with a certain importance. Furthermore, the top five most recurring words were: article (occurrences: 1576), nonhuman (occurrences: 1492), medicinal plant (occurrences: 1376), unclassified drug (occurrences: 11,111), and essential oil (occurrences: 1091) (Figure 6).
At the same time, to unravel the complexity of the MAPs concept, the unit of analysis “author keywords” was used and the corresponding network visualization map (Figure 7) showed that the most recurring keywords were essential oil/essential oils (534 and 249 occurrences, respectively); medicinal plants (312 occurrences); medicinal and aromatic plants (199 occurrences); and antioxidant activity/antioxidant (158 and 149 occurrences, respectively).
The 237 keywords that had a minimum of 10 occurrences in the “author keywords” of the 5318 analyzed documents were divided into 10 clusters, easily visually distinguishable because they were marked with different colors, but difficult to interpret because they contained words that were very semantically different from each other, confirming, once again, the complexity of this concept. Moreover, the color of a keyword circle is deliberated by the cluster to which it belongs.
From the manual analysis of the extrapolated Scopus database, the expression “medicinal and aromatic plants” occurred in the titles of 692 documents, especially in those published in the last decade (representing 64% of the total), and in the keywords of 1258 manuscripts. At the same time, a focus on this expression with VOSviewer software (Figure 8) allowed us to understand the co-occurrences with the expression “medicinal and aromatic plants” and the research areas to which it was most closely linked. Thus, Figure 8 shows that the expression MAPs was strongly linked, above all, to the extraction/production of essential oils, then to secondary metabolites, their properties (above all, antioxidant and antifungal activity), and their compounds (as polyphenols). Not marginal areas of research included traditional medicine and ethnobotany, conservation, cultivation, breeding, sustainability, climate change, and markets.

3.2. The Analysis of the Socio-Economic Literature on MAPs

To understand the economic importance of MAPs over time among scientists, a focus was conducted on manuscripts belonging to the subject area “Social Science” and on those documents with a certain correlation with the terms economy, trade, markets, and business to avoid omitting any assigned to some other subject area, as specified in the materials and methods. This screening revealed that socio-economic aspects have a limited weight in the current meaning of MAPs. In fact, only 442 articles (just over 8% of the total) mentioned these aspects, but in any case, these were references of little relevance compared to the topics addressed and the contents produced.
The analysis of the various source types shows that these 442 documents have been published in as many as 288 different sources and that the top five with the highest number of manuscripts are Acta Horticulturae (n = 31); Foods (n = 13); Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (n = 10); Industrial Crops and Products (n = 9); and Sustainability (Switzerland) (n = 9).
The co-occurrences analysis of the “author keywords” of the 442 selected documents showed six different clusters and that the economic themes which most frequently recurred combined with medicinal and aromatic plants were: marketing and rural development (falling into the red cluster); market and trade (falling into the green cluster); circular economy (falling into the blue cluster); and markets (falling into the light-blue cluster) (Figure 9).
As before, also in this case, the descriptive analysis did not produce satisfactory results in order to identify the papers that actually made significant contributions to the socio-economic aspects. Thus, a qualitative analysis of the abstracts was performed and the 442 useful documents were assembled into 24 research areas, as reported in Table 4. The latter showed that 13% of socio-economic research had an ethnobotanical nature; 12% was related to essential oils; and 10% was related to cultivation and other agricultural aspects. Thus, also from a socio-economic point of view, the major aspects concerned, on the one hand, the use and perception of plant species within certain human communities, on the other, the importance of essential oils relating to their chemical composition and properties, and yet another, the cultivation of MAPs.
With reference to the ethnobotanical area, the research ambit that contained the highest number of documents of a socio-economic nature, more than half of the papers were published in the last five years and the top ten source types were Ethnobotany Research and Applications (n = 6), Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (n = 5), Acta Horticulturae (3), Journal of Ethnopharmacology (3), and Journal of Mountain Science (3).

3.3. The Focus on the Economic Documents

The last step of this review concerned further screening of the results related to the socio-economic literature to analyze, in detail, the documents that effectively addressed the MAPs topic from an economic point of view. As said above, they were 73 and the co-occurrences analysis of “all keywords” showed that the most recurring economic terms, together with the various expressions of MAPs, were: marketing, profitability, economic analysis, cost–benefit analysis, rural economy, market, and trade (Figure 10).
The first economic paper dates back to 1957 (Figure 11) and concerned the investigation of the economic importance of the MAPs of the sands of the Danube in Yugoslavia [71]. Then, there was a lack of papers of this type until 1992, when Verlet [72] published an overview of the French situation at the beginning of the twentieth century, where he reported that there was widespread harvesting of herbs in many regions of France, and this period also represented the apogee of the French perfume industry.
In the 1990s, only eight papers were published, including Nepal’s politics, laws, and trade [73,74] and data on the turnover of MAPs and essential oils in the most important markets places of Santo Domingo [75]. In this period, the first works began to take into account the increase in interest in MAPs by making considerations about supply, safety, and sustainability in the USA marketplace as result of the general increase in the interest and use of MAPs as natural products for food and pharmaceutical applications [76], and the biological and economical aspects of the utilization and exploitation of wild growing medicinal plants in middle and south European regions [77], while Hüsnü Can Başer [78] focused on the steady upsurge of interest in the industrial utilization of medicinal plant products, as reflected by the growing market worldwide.
In the first ten years of 2000, thirteen papers on MAPs of economic interest were published, and between 2010 and 2020, this scientific production tripled, above all in India, where MAPs are a source of economy, sustainable livelihood, and employment for many rural communities [79]. In the most recent years (2021–2023), 18 economic papers were published, 12 of which only in 2021 (Figure 6).
To deepen the theme further, four structural dimensions were detected, and, for each of them, some analytical categories were used to systematize the socio-economic documents. The results are reported in Table 5. Referring to the structural dimension “Research methodology/type of research”, the economic documents on MAPs were divided into five approaches to research: precisely modeling, case studies, statistical data analysis, review, and survey/interviews. The most employed were survey/interviews (34%) and statistical data analysis (23%).
Economic papers on MAPs were categorized into three levels of analysis: the micro level, which focused on single or a few farms; the meso level, which encompassed research carried out in a nation, a region, or a province; and the macro level, which included studies developed in a general way describing the situation on a global or European level. Table 5 shows that more than half of the papers studied MAPs from an economic point of view with a meso level of analysis (56%), above all, at a national [73,80,81] or regional level [82,83,84]. By referring to the geographic focus of the study, in almost 90% of cases, the economic papers related to a specific geographical area and were concentrated in India (Figure 12), according to the data of the distribution of total publications shown previously in Figure 3.
Finally, 80% of the considered economic studies dealt with the MAPs theme by referring to the whole category of medicinal and aromatic plants, while only in 14 cases were specific species studied (Table 5). The medicinal and aromatic species studied over time from an economic point of view are reported in Table 6.

4. Discussions

The study highlights that researchers started explicitly talking about MAPs in the 1950s and the geographical focus of the literature on this theme is in India, followed by China. It can be said that the research interest reflected the worldwide distribution of MAPs. Indeed, according to what was said by Pandey et al. [98], in India, more than 7500 species are used in ethnomedicines, which is half of the country’s Indian native plant species, while China has around 6000 species in use that have medicinal properties.
At the same time, although the academic world began talking about MAPs in 1950, it was only in the 1990s that the interest in this topic began to be recognized, which has increased from the 2000s to today. Indeed, since the 2000s, there has been an increase in academic publications about MAPs, and the year with the highest number of results was 2021. As stated by Muley and Medithi [52], this could have been due to the COVID-19 pandemic, when the interest of researchers focused on improving immunity using medicinal and aromatic plants, an interest which was then maintained—at least in Europe—thanks to the Green Deal and the role that MAPs can now have in the search for new natural products that can be used in all sectors to make the European Union more ecological, sustainable, and competitive.
Acta Horticulturae was the source with the highest number of publications in absolute and maintained this leadership until 2012, the year in which Industrial Crops and Products incremented its contribution. Consequently, 2012/2013 can be designated as the year that marks the transition from an entirely agronomic view of MAPs to a more pharmaceutical, chemical, and cosmetic one, even if ethnobotanical aspects always maintain a certain importance over time.
Regarding the socio-economic aspects of the research conducted on MAPs, these represented only 1% of the total academic publications. According to the general trends, they have increased since 2000, 2021 was the year with the highest number of results, and they were concentrated in India. These documents were surveys at a meso level (conducted in a region or country), and were, therefore, carried out in a specific geographical area, which, in most cases, concerned the expression MAPs in general.
The co-occurrences analysis of the keywords performed with VOSviewer software showed the “complexity” of the MAPs concept and indeterminate results, which made it necessary to carry out a deeper, qualitative analysis of the socio-economic literature on MAPs. The latter (reported in Table 4) showed that the highest percentages were recorded for ethnobotany, essential oils, and agricultural aspects (which, together, represented around 35% of socio-economic papers). At the same time, if we observe the most recent data among the various research areas identified, the categories “Sustainable use, conservation, and valorization”, and “Rural economy” seem to be of particular interest, since the papers falling into these areas identified guidelines for the protection and valorization of local resources and rural territories and for the diversification of agriculture. Thus, the most recent issue was the prevention of the extinction of MAPs and their sustainable utilization. To this end, Raina and Gautam [99] claimed the need for collaborative efforts by both government and researchers to restrict their harvest, reintroduce species into their natural habitat, develop in situ and ex situ conservation strategies, and formulate techniques for the scientific harvesting of these species. Karki [100] proposed a series of actions, including raising awareness through formal and informal education means; the development of skill in sustainable harvesting; the integration of agricultural and pastoral livelihoods with off-farm activities through the value chain development of major niche products that have high-value capturing potential; improvements in degraded pasture and farmlands; conservation through sustainable-use-oriented policy and legal reforms to implement integrated strategies linking the conservation of wild fauna and flora with sustainable pastoral production systems; and the expansion of ecologically sensitive low-input high-return tourism, using pastoralists to provide services, particularly through their indigenous knowledge and improved local production practices.
Some authors [101] have pointed out a new path through certifications, such as Non-Wood Forest Products (NWFP), as a tool to support sustainable value chains and influence customer behavior towards MAPs’ consumption and sustainable harvesting, in addition to harvesting limits, legal constrains, and other command-and-control systems usually implemented by governments in different countries to preserve species against overharvesting. In particular, NWFPs have a strong link with sustainable tourism through so-called “territorial marketing”, a distinctive feature of a territory used as a brand to create an image to attract tourists to the region [102].
According to the most recent research, the interest in territorial marketing in rural areas is growing, also in reference to MAPs, and involving the local population in the implementation process seems to be essential, as well as stakeholders’ participation, in creating an identity and linking the products to the image of the place. Sher and Barkworth [103], in addition to demonstrating the feasibility and financial benefits of cultivating MAPs as a cash crop, identified certain steps that would increase the benefits of MAPs’ cultivation in rural areas: specialized education, market infrastructure development, and a small loans program.
With specific reference to the aim of this paper and so to realize how the expression MAPs has been understood by scholars over time, nobody has ever wondered what MAPs are, and the 1977 WHO definition has been taken for granted, with any species with medicinal or aromatic functions being considered to be an MAP. Only recently, Brinckmann et al. [104] developed and applied a method to create a list of MAP species. With all the limitations of the study, the authors [104] found evidence of the commercial cultivation of 3227 taxa, belonging to 235 different plant families. Thus, to date, no researcher has ever made a complete list of species to consider as MAPs, distinguishing them from non-MAPs, but this is, perhaps, almost impossible given the great variety of existing plant species with medicinal and aromatic properties. Over time, the properties of MAPs, their uses, cultivation techniques, geographical distribution, and economic value in the various national and international markets have been extensively studied, but nobody has ever wondered what a MAP is and if a species should be considered as such.
The interest of researchers has always been high, especially in recent years, and touches on different areas, ranging from more traditional to more modern uses, to the beneficial properties of essential oils, to cultivation techniques to improve productivity, and to strategies to diversify production and ensure a fair standard of living for local communities, especially in rural areas. In many countries, MAPs can represent important sources of income, and their economic value is widely recognized worldwide, but the present literature analysis shows that few researchers have approached this topic from an exclusively economic point of view. Thus, in light of the growing interest in MAPs, their nutraceutical value, and their different uses, also taking into account the ecological transition, it is necessary to strengthen the role of socio-economic research in this sector, also looking at sustainability through environmental impact assessment studies.

5. Conclusions

The results of the present systematic and bibliometric literature review highlight the importance of medicinal and aromatic plants over time, although socio-economic studies regarding MAPs were few compared to the total academic publications.
The properties of MAPs, their uses, cultivation techniques, geographical distribution, and economic value in the various national and international markets have been extensively studied over time, but, at the same time, there is a lack of estimation of the ecosystem services that MAPs offer, analyses of consumer preferences in the search for new business opportunities, and environmental impact assessments of the entire supply chain. This is especially true in the Western academic world, where, among other things, researchers should analyze the regenerative potential of MAPs within mountain and rural areas to diversify agriculture, protect these often marginal and fragile territories, and create new job opportunities to allow farmers in these areas to continue their important function of protecting the territory.

Limitations of the Study

The results of the research are influenced by the use of Scopus as the extraction database, which includes only documents with CiteScore and not the many other forms of reports (such as national and international projects) in which the socio-economic aspects of MAPs may have been discussed. Furthermore, the absence of an in-depth analysis typical of reviews, which, in the future, we intend to fill with empirical analyses on case studies, represents another limitation of the study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: C.I.; data curation: M.P.; formal analysis: M.P.; investigation: M.P.; methodology: C.I., A.B. and M.P.; supervision: C.I.; validation: C.I., A.B. and E.D.F.; visualization: C.I., A.B. and E.D.F.; writing—original draft preparation: M.P.; and writing—review and editing: C.I., A.B., E.D.F. and M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Carrubba, A.; Marceddua, R.; Sarno, M. Bringing spontaneous plants to cultivation: Issues and constraints for medicinal and aromatic plants. Acta Hortic. 2023, 1358, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Inoue, M.; Hayashi, S.; Craker, L.E. Role of medicinal and aromatic plants: Past, present, and future. In Pharmacognosy-Medicinal Plants; Perveen, S., Al-Taweel, A., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019; pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  3. Azaizeh, H.; Saad, B.; Cooper, E.; Said, O. Traditional Arabic and Islamic Medicine, a Re-emerging Health Aid. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2010, 7, 419–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Stefanaki, A.; van Andel, T. Chapter 3—Mediterranean aromatic herbs and their culinary use. In Aromatic Herbs in Food—Bioactive Compounds, Processing, and Applications; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 93–121. [Google Scholar]
  5. Guleria, C.; Vaidya, M.K.; Sharma, R.; Dogra, D. Economics of Production and Marketing of important Medicinal and Aromatic Plants in Mid Hills of Himachal Pradesh. Econ. Aff. 2014, 59, 363–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kipkosgei, D.K. Factors Influencing Sustainability of Medicinal Plants: A Case of Laikipia East District, Kenya. A Research Project Report Submitted in Partial Fulfillment for the Requirements of the Degree of Master of Arts in Project Planning and Management of the University of Nairobi. 2014. Available online: http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11295/74125/Kipkosgei,Daniel?sequence=3 (accessed on 12 December 2023).
  7. Güney, O.I. Consumption attributes and preferences on medicinal and aromatic plants: A consumer segmentation analysis. Ciência Rural. 2019, 49, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marshall, E. Health and Wealth from Medicinal Aromatic Plants; FAO Diversification booklet number 17; Rural Infrastructure and Agro-Industries Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2012; Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/i2473e/i2473e.pdf (accessed on 10 September 2023).
  9. Artukoğlu, M.; Usman, A.; Olgun, A. An evaluation of medicinal and aromatic plant trade in the world, in the EU and in Turkey. Agro Food Ind. Hi-Tech 2002, 13, 19–22. [Google Scholar]
  10. Varghese, R.; Ray, J.G. Sustainable agriculture of tropical spices: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as an ecotechnological tool—A critical review. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2023, 36, 100507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ozdal, T.; Tomas, M.; Toydemir, G.; Kamiloglu, S.; Capanoglu, E. Chapter 1—Introduction to nutraceuticals, medicinal foods, and herbs. In Aromatic Herbs in Food—Bioactive Compounds, Processing, and Applications; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. De Falco, E.; Rigano, D.; Fico, V.; Vitti, A.; Barile, G.; Pergola, M. Spontaneous Officinal Plants in the Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni National Park: Tradition, Protection, Enhancement, and Recovery. Plants 2023, 12, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yadav, S.; Tiwari, K.S.; Gupta, C.; Tiwari, M.K.; Khan, A.; Sonkar, S.P. A brief review on natural dyes, pigments: Recent advances and future perspectives. Results Chem. 2023, 5, 100733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kuralkar, P.; Kuralkar, S.V. Role of herbal products in animal production—An updated review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 278, 114246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mayer, M.; Vogl, C.R.; Amorena, M.; Hamburger, M.; Walkenhorst, M. Treatment of organic livestock with medicinal plants: A systematic review of European ethnoveterinary research. Forsch. Komplementärmedizin 2014, 21, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jayakumar, S.; Baskaran, N.; Arumugam, R.; Sathiskumar, S.; Pugazhenthi, M. Herbal medicine as a live practice for treating livestock ailments by indigenous people: A case study from the Konar community of Tamil Nadu. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2018, 118, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Akhila, A.; Tyagi, B.R.; Naqvi, A. Variation of essential oil constituents in C. martinii Wats var. motia at different stages of plant growth. Indian Perfum. 1987, 28, 126–128. [Google Scholar]
  18. Amri, I.; Hanana, M.; Jamoussi, B.; Hamrouni, L. Essential oils of Pinus nigra J.F. Arnold subsp. laricio Maire: Chemical composition and study of their herbicidal potential. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10, S3877–S3882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, Y.; Zhang, L.L.; Wang, W.; Wang, G. Recent updates on bioactive properties of α-terpineol. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2023, 35, 274–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hogg, C.L.; Svoboda, K.P.; Hampson, J.B.; Brocklehurst, S. Investigation into the composition and bioactivity of essential oil from lovage (Levisticum officinale W.D.J. Koch). Int. J. Aromather. 2001, 11, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Manion, C.R.; Widder, R.M. Essentials of essential oils. Am. J. Health-Syst. Pharm. 2017, 74, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Reyes-Jurado, F.; Franco-Vega, A.; Ramírez-Corona, N.; Palou, E.; López-Malo, A. Essential Oils: Antimicrobial Activities, Extraction Methods, and Their Modeling. Food Eng. Rev. 2015, 7, 275–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rodrigues, N.; Malheiro, R.; Casal, S.; Asensio-S-Manzanera, M.C.; Bento, A.; Pereira, J.A. Influence of spike lavender (Lavandula latifolia Med.) essential oil in the quality, stability, and composition of soybean oil during microwave heating. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012, 50, 2894–2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Schilcher, H. Effects and Side-Effects of Essential Oils. In Essential Oils and Aromatic Plants; Svendsen, A.B., Scheffer, J.J.C., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. De Falco, E.; Roscigno, G.; Iodice, C.; Senatore, F. Phytomorphological and Essential Oil Characterization “In Situ” and “Ex Situ” of Wild Biotypes of Oregano Collected in the Campania Region (Southern Italy). Chem. Biodivers. J. 2013, 19, 2078–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gonçalves, S.; Romano, A. In vitro culture of lavenders (Lavandula spp.) and the production of secondary metabolites. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Prusinowska, R.; Smigielski, K. Composition, biological properties, and therapeutic effects of lavender (Lavandula angustifolia L.). A review. Herba Pol. 2014, 60, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sabogal-Guáqueta, A.M.; Osorio, E.; Cardona-Gómez, G.P. Linalool reverses neuropathological and behavioral impairments in old triple transgenic Alzheimer’s mice. Neuropharmacology 2016, 102, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Caputo, L.; Souza, L.F.; Alloisio, S.; Cornara, L.; De Feo, V. Coriandrum sativum and Lavandula angustifolia Essential Oils: Chemical Composition and Activity on Central Nervous System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Nasiri, L.Z.; Hajimonfarednejad, M.; Riasaziano, M.; Abolhassanzadeh, Z.; Iraji, A.; Vojoud, M.; Heydari, M.; Shams, M.J. Efficacy of inhaled Lavandula angustifolia Mill. Essential oil on sleep quality, quality of life and metabolic control in patients with diabetes mellitus type II and insomnia. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 251, 112560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Tomou, E.M.; Lytra, K.; Chrysargyris, A.; Tzortzakis, N.; Skaltsa, H. NMR fingerprint comparison of cultivated Sideritis spp. from cyprus. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. McKenna, M.; Miesner, U.; van Hal, J.; Ferro, G.; Onugha, I.; Varela, G.; Krishna, R.; Manghnani, R.; Rijal, S. Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Strategic Segmentation Analysis: Nepal; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2018; Available online: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/496421556737648658/pdf/Medicinal-and-Aromatic-Plants.pdf (accessed on 10 September 2023).
  33. Bicchi, C.; Joulain, D. Review headspace-gas chromatographic analysis of medicinal and aromatic plants and flowers. Flavour Fragr. J. 1990, 5, 131–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. De Vincenzi, M.; Stammati, A.; De Vincenzi, A.; Silano, M. Constituents of aromatic plants: Carvacrol. Fitoterapia 2004, 75, 801–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ertas, A.; Yigitkan, S.; Orhan, I.E. A Focused Review on Cognitive Improvement by the Genus salvia L. (Sage)—From Ethnopharmacology to Clinical Evidence. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Joshi, B.R.; Hakim, M.M.; Patel, I.C. The biological active compounds and biological activities of Desmodium species from Indian region: A review. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2023, 12, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kdimy, A.; El Yadini, M.; Guaadaoui, A.; Bourais, I.; El Hajjaji, S.; Le, H.V. Phytochemistry, Biological Activities, Therapeutic Potential, and Socio-Economic Value of the Caper Bush (Capparis spinosa L.). Chem. Biodivers. 2022, 19, 202200300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lahlou, R.A.; Samba, N.; Soeiro, P.; Alves, G.; Gonçalves, A.C.; Silva, L.R.; Silvestre, S.; Rodilla, J.; Ismael, M.I. Thymus hirtus Willd. ssp. algeriensis Boiss. and Reut: A Comprehensive Review on Phytochemistry, Bioactivities, and Health-Enhancing Effects. Foods 2022, 11, 3195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Luanda, A.; Ripanda, A.; Sahini, M.G.; Makangara, J.J. Ethnomedicinal uses, phytochemistry and pharmacological study of Ocimum americanum L.: A review. Phytomed 2023, 3, 100433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Saqib, S.; Ullah, F.; Naeem, M.; Younas, M.; Ayaz, A.; Ali, S.; Zaman, W. Mentha: Nutritional and Health Attributes to Treat Various Ailments Including Cardiovascular Diseases. Molecules 2022, 27, 6728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Teixeira Da Silva, J.A.; Yonekura, L.; Kaganda, J.; Mookdasanit, J.; Nhut, D.T.; Afach, G. Important secondary metabolites and essential oils of species within the Anthemideae (Asteraceae). J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants 2004, 11, 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wilbert, W. The pneumatic theory of female Warao herbalists. Soc. Sci. Med. 1987, 25, 1139–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Denyer, D.; Tranfield, D. Producing a systematic review. In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods; Buchanan, D.A., Bryman, A., Eds.; Sage Publications Ltd.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2009; pp. 671–689. [Google Scholar]
  44. Merli, R.; Preziosi, M.; Acampora, A. How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 178, 703–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mayring, P. Introduction to Qualitative Social Research (Einführung in Die Qualitative Sozialforschung); Henriette Swiatek: Berlin, Germany, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  46. Tranfield, D.C.; Denyer, D.C.; Smart, P. Towards a methodology for evidence-based management. Br. J. Manag. 2003, 14, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Aghaei Chadegani, A.; Salehi, H.; Md Yunus, M.M.; Farhadi, H.; Fooladi, M.; Farhadi, M.; Ale Ebrahim, N. A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of science and Scopus databases. Asian Soc. Sci. 2013, 9, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Guz, A.N.; Rushchitsky, J.J. Scopus: A system for the evaluation of scientific journals. Int. Appl. Mech. 2009, 45, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sánchez, A.D.; de la Cruz Del Río Rama, M.; García, J.Á. Bibliometric analysis of publications on wine tourism in the databases Scopus and WoS. Eur. Res. Manag. Bus. Econ. 2017, 23, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Donthu, N.; Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, D.; Pandey, N.; Lim, W.M. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 133, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Manual for VOSviewer Version 1.6.20. 2023. Available online: https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.20.pdf (accessed on 23 February 2024).
  52. Muley, A.; Medithi, S. A Quantitative Literature Analysis of the Research on Holy Basil (Tulsi). J. Scientometr. Res. 2022, 11, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mascre, M. Matières odorantes et matières médicinales de la France d’Outre-Mer. Prod. Pharm. 1947, 2, 392–403. [Google Scholar]
  54. Chauhan, A.; Verma, R.S.; Padalia, R.C. Influence of biotic and abiotic factors on yield and quality of medicinal and aromatic plants. In Climate Change Effect on Crop Productivity; CRC Press, Taylor Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014; pp. 251–278. [Google Scholar]
  55. Planting of aromatic and medicinal plants in 1950. Cas. Českého Lékárnictva 1950, 63, 203.
  56. Cultivation of medicinal and of aromatic plants in 1950, in Czechoslovakia. Zdr. Rev. Věstník Minist. Zdr. 1950, 25, 273.
  57. Pritzel, K. Medicinal and aromatic plants from the pharmaceutic and industrial viewpoint. Die Pharm. 1951, 6, 261. [Google Scholar]
  58. Heeger, E.F. History of medicinal and aromatic plant culture with particular consideration of development in Germany. Die Pharm. 1951, 6, 262–273. [Google Scholar]
  59. Toxopeus, H.J. Value of variety selection in cultivation of medicinal and aromatic plants. Pharm. Weekbl. 1952, 87, 631–636. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Riaz, U.; Iqbal, S.; Sohail, M.I.; Samreen, T.; Ashraf, M.; Akmal, F.; Siddiqui, A.; Ahmad, I.; Naveed, M.; Naveed Iqbal, K.; et al. A Comprehensive Review on Emerging Importance and Economical Potential of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants (MAPs) in Current Scenario. Pak. J. Agric. Res. 2021, 34, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bakkali, F.; Averbeck, S.; Averbeck, D.; Idaomar, M. Biological effects of essential oils—A review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 446–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Miliauskas, G.; Venskutonis, P.R.; van Beek, T.A. Screening of radical scavenging activity of some medicinal and aromatic plant extracts. Food Chem. 2004, 85, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kandaswami, C.; Lee, L.T.; Lee, P.P.; Hwang, J.J.; Ke, F.C.; Huang, Y.T.; Lee, M.T. The antitumor activities of flavonoids. In Vivo 2005, 19, 895–909. [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhou, H.; Beevers, C.S.; Huang, S. The targets of curcumin. Curr. Drug Targets 2011, 12, 332–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sandur, S.K.; Pandey, M.K.; Sung, B.; Ahn, K.S.; Murakami, A.; Sethi, G.; Limtrakul, P.; Badmaev, V.; Aggarwal, B.B. Curcumin, demethoxycurcumin, bisdemethoxycurcumin, tetrahydrocurcumin and turmerones differentially regulate anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative responses through a ROS-independent mechanism. Carcinogenesis 2007, 28, 1765–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lucchesi, M.E.; Chemat, F.; Smadja, J. Solvent-free microwave extraction of essential oil from aromatic herbs: Comparison with conventional hydro-distillation. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1043, 323–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Swamy, M.K.; Akhtar, M.S.; Sinniah, U.R. Antimicrobial Properties of Plant Essential Oils against Human Pathogens and Their Mode of Action: An Updated Review. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 2016, 3012462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Cimanga, K.; Kambu, K.; Tona, L.; Apers, S.; De Bruyne, T.; Hermans, N.; Totté, J.; Pieters, L.; Vlietinck, A.J. Correlation between chemical composition and antibacterial activity of essential oils of some aromatic medicinal plants growing in the Democratic Republic of Congo. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2002, 79, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Sartoratto, A.; Machado, A.L.M.; Delarmelina, C.; Figueira, G.M.; Duarte, M.C.T.; Rehder, V.L.G. Composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oils from aromatic plants used in Brazil. Environmental and Soil Microbiology. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2004, 35, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cortés-Rojas, D.F.; de Souza, C.R.; Oliveira, W.P. Clove (Syzygium aromaticum): A precious spice. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2014, 4, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Tucakov, J. Medicinal and aromatic plants of the sands of the Danube in Yugoslavia; economic importance and possibility of culturing them. Ann. Pharm. Fr. 1957, 15, 720–731. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  72. Verlet, N. Trends of the medicinal and aromatic plant sector in France. Acta Hortic. 1992, 306, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Olsen, C.S.; Helles, F. Making the poorest poorer: Policies, laws and trade in medicinal plants in Nepal. J. World For. Resour. Manag. 1997, 8, 137–158. [Google Scholar]
  74. Olsen, C.S. The trade in medicinal and aromatic plants from central Nepal to Northern India. Econ. Bot. 1998, 52, 279–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Roersch, C. The marketing of medicinal, aromatic plants and essential oils in the Dominican Republic. Acta Hortic. 1999, 503, 197–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Craker, L.E. Trends in medicinal and aromatic plant production in the United States. Acta Hortic. 1999, 502, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bernáth, J. Biological and economical aspects of utilization and exploitation of wild growing medicinal plants in middle-and south Europe. Acta Hortic. 1999, 500, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hüsnü Can Başer, K. Industrial utilization of medicinal and aromatic plants. Acta Hortic. 1999, 503, 177–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chandra, P.; Sharma, V.; Kant, S. From Commodity to Brand: The Country of Origin Branding Perspective for Indian Medicinal and Aromatic plants. Bus. Strategy Dev. 2019, 2, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Fuentes Baluzzi, V.; Balsamo, M.; Galli, M.C.; Guariniello, J.; Jaldo Alvaro, M.; Risso, O.A.; Nagahama, N.; Mazzoni, A.O. Characterization of consumers of aromatic and medicinal plants in Argentina. Hortic. Argent. 2022, 41, 175–188. [Google Scholar]
  81. Ibishi, L.; Musliu, A. Impact of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants on improving the socio-economic situation of rural families in Kosovo. J. Agric. Environ. Int. Dev. 2021, 115, 39–50. [Google Scholar]
  82. Alaoui, H.I.; El Asri, B.; Ghazi, S.; Brhadda, N.; Ziri, R. Ethnobotanical and socio-economic evaluation of the medicinal and aromatic plants in the Oued beht watershed, Morocco. For. Ideas 2022, 28, 163–177. [Google Scholar]
  83. Goswami, K.; Thapa, D.B.; Sandilya, J.; Deka, N. An assessment of economic profitability of black rice (Oryza sativa L. indica) production in Assam, India. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2023, 34, 100488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Pyakurel, D.; Subedee, B.R.; Subedi, C.K.; Gurung, J.; Chaudhary, R.P. Trade potentiality of oils extracted from Prunus davidiana (wild apricot), Sapindus mukorossi (soapnut) and Zanthoxylum armatum (Nepalese pepper) in Kailash Sacred Landscape, Nepal. Environ. Chall. 2022, 7, 100490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Corrêa, J.R.C.; Scheffer, M.C. Experience in the integration of industry and growers in the production and marketing of medicinal plants. Acta Hortic. 1999, 503, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Markovic, T.; Ivanovic, S.; Pajic, M. Costs and profit in chamomile production using weather put option. Custos Agronegocio 2014, 10, 285–295. [Google Scholar]
  87. Falk, C.L.; van Voorthuizen, H.; Wall, M.M.; Guldan, S.J.; Martin, C.A.; Kleitz, K.M. An Economic Analysis of Transplanting versus Direct Seeding of Selected Medicinal Herbs in New Mexico. J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants 2000, 7, 15–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Muyima, N.Y.O.; Zulu, G.; Bhengu, T.; Popplewell, D. The potential application of some novel essential oils as natural cosmetic preservatives in a aqueous cream formulation. Flavour Fragr. J. 2002, 17, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Maroufi, K.; Farahani, H.A.; Darvishi, H.H. Importance of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) between the medicinal and aromatic plants. Adv. Environ. Biol. 2010, 4, 433–436. [Google Scholar]
  90. Choudhary, D.; Kala, S.P.; Todaria, N.P.; Rawat, R.B.S.; Kunwar, M.S.; Kollmair, M. Upgrading Mountain people in medicinal and aromatic plants value chains: Lessons for sustainable management and income generation from Uttarakhand, India. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2013, 20, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mehta, N.; Saini, R. Callistemon viminalis: A plant with industrial potential. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2016, 32, 127–133. [Google Scholar]
  92. Saraswatia, S.S.; Mastiholi, A.B.; Vandana, A.K.; Sakhubai, H.T. Economics of medicinal coleus (Plectranthus forskohlii Willd.). Acta Hortic. 2019, 1241, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Bozdemir, Ç. Economic importance and usage fields of oregano species growing in Turkey. J. Agric. Sci. 2019, 29, 583–594. [Google Scholar]
  94. Kumar, D.; Kumar, R.R.; Singh, A.K.; Verma, K.; Singh, K.P.; Nilofer, S.; Kumar, A.; Singh, V.; Kaur, P.; Singh, A.; et al. A novel and economically viable agro-technique for enhancing productivity and resource use efficiency in menthol mint (Mentha arvensis L.). Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 162, 113233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Rymbai, H.; Das, A.; Mohapatra, K.P.; Talang, H.; Nongbri, B.; Law, I. Ginger (Zingiber officinale) based intercropping systems for enhancing productivity and income—A farmers’ participatory approach. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2021, 91, 956–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Singh, A.; Verma, K.; Kumar, D.; Nilofer, S.; Lothe, N.B.; Kumar, A.; Chaudhary, A.; Kaur, P.; Singh, K.P.; Singh, A.K.; et al. Optimized irrigation regime and planting technique improve yields and economics in aloe vera [Aloe barbadensis (Miller)]. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 167, 113539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Almansour, B.M.; Ali, G.A. Economic Analysis of Thyme (Origanum syriacum) Production for Smallholder Farmers. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 923, 012001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Pandey, A.K.; Kumar, P.; Saxena, M.J.; Maurya, P. Chapter 6—Distribution of aromatic plants in the world and their properties. In Feed Additives, Aromatic Plants and Herbs in Animal Nutrition and Health; Elsevier: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 89–114. [Google Scholar]
  99. Raina, R.; Gautam, K. Conservation and Utilization of High-Altitude Threatened Medicinal Plants. In Conservation and Utilization of Threatened Medicinal Plants; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 369–387. [Google Scholar]
  100. Karki, M.B. Harnessing the Potential of Medicinal, Aromatic and Non-timber Forest Products for Improving the Livelihoods of Pastoralists and Farmers in Himalayan Mountains. In Conservation and Utilization of Threatened Medicinal Plants; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 93–106. [Google Scholar]
  101. Corradini, G.; Vidale, E.; Pettenella, D. Certification standards applicable to Non-Wood Forest Products. In Forest Management Auditing: Certification of Forest Products and Services; Routledge: London, UK, 2018; pp. 147–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Rovira, M.; Garay, L.; Górriz-Mifsud, E.; Bonet, J.A. Territorial Marketing Based on Non-Wood Forest Products (NWFPs) to Enhance Sustainable Tourism in Rural Areas: A Literature Review. Forests 2022, 13, 1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Sher, H.; Barkworth, M.E. Economic development through medicinal and aromatic plants (MAPs) cultivation in Hindu Kush Himalaya mountains of District Swat, Pakistan. J. Mt. Sci. 2015, 12, 1292–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Brinckmann, J.A.; Kathe, W.; Berkhoudt, K.; Harter, D.E.V.; Schippmann, U. A New Global Estimation of Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Species in Commercial Cultivation and Their Conservation Status. Econ. Bot. 2022, 76, 319–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematization of the review process.
Figure 1. Schematization of the review process.
Agriculture 14 00405 g001
Figure 2. Trends of publications on MAPs.
Figure 2. Trends of publications on MAPs.
Agriculture 14 00405 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of the total publications (n = 5318) by countries.
Figure 3. Distribution of the total publications (n = 5318) by countries.
Agriculture 14 00405 g003
Figure 4. Time trend of the five sources with the highest share of publications.
Figure 4. Time trend of the five sources with the highest share of publications.
Agriculture 14 00405 g004
Figure 5. Distribution of documents by subject area.
Figure 5. Distribution of documents by subject area.
Agriculture 14 00405 g005
Figure 6. Density map visualizing words from titles, abstracts, and keywords of the 5318 documents.
Figure 6. Density map visualizing words from titles, abstracts, and keywords of the 5318 documents.
Agriculture 14 00405 g006
Figure 7. Co-word (keywords co-occurrence) network visualization map.
Figure 7. Co-word (keywords co-occurrence) network visualization map.
Agriculture 14 00405 g007
Figure 8. Co-word (author keywords co-occurrence) network visualization map: focus on the keyword “medicinal and aromatic plants”.
Figure 8. Co-word (author keywords co-occurrence) network visualization map: focus on the keyword “medicinal and aromatic plants”.
Agriculture 14 00405 g008
Figure 9. Network visualization map of “author keywords” co-occurrence of the 442 selected economic documents.
Figure 9. Network visualization map of “author keywords” co-occurrence of the 442 selected economic documents.
Agriculture 14 00405 g009
Figure 10. Network visualization map of “all keywords” co-occurrence of the 73 economic documents.
Figure 10. Network visualization map of “all keywords” co-occurrence of the 73 economic documents.
Agriculture 14 00405 g010
Figure 11. Time trend of the economic results.
Figure 11. Time trend of the economic results.
Agriculture 14 00405 g011
Figure 12. Distribution of the economic publications (n = 73) by countries.
Figure 12. Distribution of the economic publications (n = 73) by countries.
Agriculture 14 00405 g012
Table 1. First papers explicitly referring to the expression MAPs.
Table 1. First papers explicitly referring to the expression MAPs.
Document TitleYearReference
(1) Planting of aromatic and medicinal plants in 19501950[55]
(2) Cultivation of medicinal and aromatic plants in 1950, in Czechoslovakia1950[56]
(3) Medicinal and aromatic plants from the pharmaceutic and industrial viewpoint1951[57]
(4) History of medicinal and aromatic plant culture with particular consideration of development in Germany1951[58]
(5) Value of variety selection in cultivation of medicinal and aromatic plants1952[59]
Table 2. The top ten contributor sources.
Table 2. The top ten contributor sources.
Source TitleN of Publications% of Publications
Acta Horticulturae 2014%
Industrial Crops and Products1493%
Journal Of Ethnopharmacology952%
Molecules751%
Journal Of Essential Oil-Bearing Plants631%
Journal Of Natural Products581%
Plants481%
Zeitschrift Fur Arznei Und Gewurzpflanzen481%
Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants451%
Natural Product Communications451%
Total of the top ten contributor sources8274%
N of manuscripts published in journals468388%
N of documents related to MAPs5318100%
Table 3. The top ten cited articles.
Table 3. The top ten cited articles.
Manuscripts TitleN of Citations
Biological effects of essential oils—A review [61]5198
Screening of radical scavenging activity of some medicinal and aromatic plant extracts [62]1515
The antitumor activities of flavonoids [63]590
The targets of curcumin [64]586
Curcumin, demethoxycurcumin, bisdemethoxycurcumin, tetrahydrocurcumin and turmerones differentially regulate anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative responses through a ROS-independent mechanism [65]536
Solvent-free microwave extraction of essential oil from aromatic herbs: Comparison with conventional hydro-distillation [66]517
Antimicrobial properties of plant essential oils against human pathogens and their mode of action: An updated review [67]490
Correlation between chemical composition and antibacterial activity of essential oils of some aromatic medicinal plants growing in the Democratic Republic of Congo [68]468
Composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oils from aromatic plants used in Brazil [69]419
Clove (Syzygium aromaticum): A precious spice [70]399
Table 4. The research areas of the socio-economic sample (our elaboration).
Table 4. The research areas of the socio-economic sample (our elaboration).
Research Area—MAPs in…N of ManuscriptsPercentage
Ethnobotany5612.7%
Essential oil5111.5%
Agricultural aspects4610.4%
Production, markets, trade, and value chain409.0%
Sustainable use, conservation, and valorization409.0%
Properties388.6%
Characterization, NMR fingerprints, pharmacognostic evaluation327.2%
Micropropagation and breeding255.7%
Rural economy214.8%
Biotechnology, DNA barcoding153.4%
Biofertilizers, biopesticides, and bioremediation92.0%
Product quality improvement92.0%
Industrial utilization81.8%
Technology aspects81.8%
Laws and certification81.8%
Drying71.6%
Bibliometric analysis61.4%
Food culture and functional food51.1%
Botanical characteristics40.9%
Impact assessment40.9%
Archaeobotanical investigation30.7%
Consumers’ attitudes30.7%
Use as substrate30.7%
Ecosystem services10.2%
Total442100%
Table 5. Structural dimensions and analytical categories.
Table 5. Structural dimensions and analytical categories.
Structural DimensionsAnalytical CategoriesN of Documents
Research methodologies/type of researchModeling10
Case studies12
Statistical data analysis17
Review9
Survey/interviews25
Level of analysis Micro17
Meso41
Macro15
Geographical focusSpecific geographical area64
Not specific9
Research objectMAPs in general59
Specific MAPs14
Table 6. MAPs’ species studied from an economic point of view.
Table 6. MAPs’ species studied from an economic point of view.
Common NameScientific NameReferences
Black riceOryza sativa L. indica[83]
Wild apricot, soapnut, Nepalese pepperPrunus davidiana, Sapindus mukorossi, Zanthoxylum armatum[84]
ChamomileMatricaria chamomilla[85,86]
Catnip, stinging nettle, calendula, melissa, gray globemallowNepeta cataria L., Urtica dioica L., Calendula officinalis L., Melissa officinalis L., and Sphaeralcea incana Tort.[87]
Artemisia, Asbos, lavender, rosemaryArtemisia afra, Pteronia incana, Lavandula officinalis, Rosmarinus officinalis[88]
CorianderCoriandrum sativum[89]
TejpatCinnamomum tamala Nees & Eberm[90]
CallistemonCallistemon viminalis[91]
Indian mintPlectranthus forskohlii Willd[92]
OreganoOriganum vulgare[93]
Menthol mintMentha arvensis L.[94]
GingerZingiber officinale Rose[95]
Aloe veraAloe barbadensis Miller[96]
ThymeOriganum Syriacum[97]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pergola, M.; De Falco, E.; Belliggiano, A.; Ievoli, C. The Most Relevant Socio-Economic Aspects of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants through a Literature Review. Agriculture 2024, 14, 405. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030405

AMA Style

Pergola M, De Falco E, Belliggiano A, Ievoli C. The Most Relevant Socio-Economic Aspects of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants through a Literature Review. Agriculture. 2024; 14(3):405. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030405

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pergola, Maria, Enrica De Falco, Angelo Belliggiano, and Corrado Ievoli. 2024. "The Most Relevant Socio-Economic Aspects of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants through a Literature Review" Agriculture 14, no. 3: 405. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030405

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop