Next Article in Journal
Toxicity of Ethyl Formate to Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) Exhibiting Different Levels of Phosphine Resistance and Its Influence on Metabolite Profiles
Next Article in Special Issue
Development and Optimization of an Offset Spiral Tooth Fertilizer Discharge Device
Previous Article in Journal
Regional Perspective of Using Cyber Insurance as a Tool for Protection of Agriculture 4.0
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation of Collision Damage Mechanisms and Reduction Methods for Pod Pepper
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on the Impact of Cutting Platform Vibration on Stalk Cutting Quality in Industrial Hemp

1
Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China
2
Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Equipment and Technology, Zhenjiang 212013, China
3
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Hohai University, Changzhou 213022, China
4
School of Mechanical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
5
School of Automotive Engineering, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 224007, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2024, 14(2), 321; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14020321
Submission received: 15 January 2024 / Revised: 9 February 2024 / Accepted: 15 February 2024 / Published: 18 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Agricultural Machinery Design and Agricultural Engineering)

Abstract

:
In response to the unclear impact of header vibration on cutting performance (stalk cutting quality and cutting energy consumption) during field operations of industrial hemp harvesters, this study utilized a vibration recorder to collect information on header vibration during the operation of industrial hemp harvesters. Through data processing, the dominant range for the resonant frequency and amplitude of the cutting platform is primarily concentrated between 5–45 Hz and 0–35 mm, respectively. Using numerical simulation techniques, a quadratic orthogonal rotation combination experiment was conducted with vibration frequency and amplitude as experimental factors and stalk cutting quality and cutting energy consumption as indicators. Regression equations were established to reveal the relationships between indicators and factors, elucidating the influence of each factor and its interactions on the indicators. Specifically, for the crack length indicator, the amplitude has a highly significant influence on the model, and there is a significant interaction effect between vibration frequency and amplitude on the model. As for the cutting energy consumption indicator, frequency and the interaction between frequency and amplitude significantly affect the model, while amplitude has an extremely significant impact on the model. Through comprehensive fuzzy evaluation, the optimal vibration parameter combination satisfying comprehensive cutting performance indicators was determined as a vibration frequency of 37.86 Hz and an amplitude of 5.34 mm. Furthermore, the reliability of the model has been further validated. This research can provide a reference for improving the field performance of industrial hemp harvesters.

1. Introduction

Industrial hemp refers to an annual herbaceous plant of the cannabis genus with a tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content of less than 0.3%, making it devoid of significant psychoactive properties [1,2,3]. Due to its low THC content, industrial hemp lacks drug utility but possesses excellent fiber characteristics, leading to widespread legal cultivation in various regions worldwide. It serves as a crucial raw material in industries such as textiles, papermaking, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, and military equipment [4,5,6,7,8].
Due to the thick stalks of industrial hemp, the toughness and strength of hemp fibers are high, leading to significant cutting resistance for blades and low cutting stubble quality. This characteristic poses a challenge for the mechanical harvesting of industrial hemp. Therefore, achieving high-quality and low-resistance harvesting is a critical issue that urgently needs to be addressed in the development process of industrial hemp harvesting machines.
In response to the challenges in cutting industrial hemp and similar fiber crops, researchers globally have focused on enhancing blade cutting performance. Dauda S. M. conducted experiments using a serrated disc cutting test bed, exploring the impact of cutting speed on torque and cutting power consumption for jute stalks at different moisture levels. They established regression equations predicting the relationship between cutting torque, cutting power, stalk diameter, and cutting speed [9]. Liu Z. P., based on the physical-mechanical properties of ramie stalks, developed a finite element numerical simulation model for ramie stalk cutting. The study analyzed the influence of various factors (such as the sliding cutting angle, blade tilt angle, blade rotation speed, and forward speed) on the maximum cutting force under different conditions [10]. Shen C. et al. conducted cutting experiments on ramie stalks using a self-developed cutting test bed, studying the impact of different blade geometric parameters (blade length, blade type), cutting speed, and stalk feeding speed on cutting performance (cutting power consumption, cutting quality, and overall rating). They determined the optimal parameter combination, providing a theoretical basis for the selection of cutting blade structure and motion parameters for ramie harvesters [11].
Tian K. P. et al. used the longicorn, a common pest with excellent biting and cutting performance, as a biomimetic model. They designed biomimetic blades for industrial hemp harvesters based on the structural characteristics of the woodworm’s mandibles. Comparative experiments were conducted between biomimetic blades and conventional rice and wheat harvester blades for single stalk cutting performance. The results showed that compared to conventional blades, biomimetic blades reduced average maximum cutting force and cutting power consumption by 7.4% and 8.0%, respectively, and produced a more even stubble cut. The study demonstrated the superior cutting performance of biomimetic blades [12].
Addressing the unclear dynamic cutting performance and optimization potential of the previously developed biomimetic industrial hemp blades in practical conditions, Tian K. P. et al. utilized numerical simulation techniques to investigate the impact of biomimetic blade parameters, such as tooth spacing, tooth inclination angle, and speed ratio coefficient, on cutting energy consumption. The study determined the optimal structural and motion parameter combination for biomimetic blades and further validated the model’s reliability [4].
Similar research has been conducted in the context of stalk cutting for sugarcane [13,14,15,16,17], cotton stalks [18,19], tomatoes [20], mulberry branches [21], and wild chrysanthemums [22].
During field operations of industrial hemp harvesters, in addition to the lateral reciprocating cutting motion and the random forward movement of the cutting device, the vibration induced by the ground roughness of the hemp field and the motion of machine working components were an other important forms of motion for the blades (The overall structure of the industrial hemp harvester and the detailed structure of the cutting unit, as well as the power transmission diagram, are shown in Figures 1 and 2 of Ref. [4], respectively). Existing relevant research primarily focuses on the impact of factors, such as the type of cutting blades, blade structural parameters, cutting speed, and forward speed on cutting performance. However, the influence of harvester header vibration on cutting performance remains unclear, and research in this area is currently lacking.
To address the aforementioned issues, this study built upon previous research and conducted data collection and processing of header vibration during field operations of industrial hemp harvesters. The vibration spectrum data were obtained. Subsequently, utilizing the typical frequencies and amplitudes of the header vibration as experimental factors, numerical simulation cutting experiments under vibration conditions were carried out. This aimed to quantitatively investigate the impact of blade vibration parameters (frequency and amplitude) on stalk cutting quality, cutting energy consumption, and overall cutting performance. The goal was to provide insights into achieving low energy consumption and high-quality cutting in industrial hemp harvesters.

2. Vibration Information Collection and Analysis

2.1. Vibration Information Collection

The vibration data were acquired using the Huashengchang CEM DT-178A vibration recorder, as illustrated in Figure 1. This vibration recorder is characterized by its compact size, user-friendly operation, and high measurement accuracy. The performance parameters of the vibration recorder are outlined in Table 1. During operation, the vibration recorder, with its built-in powerful magnet at the bottom, was started and configured with the desired sampling frequency. It was then placed in proximity to the cutting device one side of the cutting platform, where the magnet securely attached it to the platform. The experimental setup for the placement of the vibration recorder is depicted in Figure 2.
When collecting vibration data, the machine was set to a forward speed of 0.93 m/s and a cutting speed of 1.5 m/s. These parameters represented the typical operational settings for the harvester during normal working conditions. As the industrial hemp harvester drove forward, the vibration recorder documented the variations in cutting platform vibration acceleration. After completing the information collection, the recorder was removed, the power was turned off, and it was brought back to the laboratory for data analysis and processing. The vibration information for this experiment was collected from an industrial hemp plantation in Liuan, Anhui, with the collection date being 27 June 2023.

2.2. Vibration Information Processing

The vibration recorder was connected to a computer through the USB port, equipped with the “Vibration Datalogger” software for vibration information processing. Using the Data Download command, vibration data would be transferred to the computer. A specific stable working period (40 s in this study) was randomly selected for data analysis. The vibration information captured for this study is illustrated in Figure 3.
Due to the complexity of the excitation information received by the header and to facilitate the quantitative study of the impact of vibration excitation on cutting quality, it is necessary to simplify the vibration information received by the header and apply in-phase harmonic excitation with different frequencies and amplitudes to the header. To obtain the spectral information of the harvester platform vibration, this study employed MATLAB to process the extracted time acceleration data by eliminating trend components, applying smoothing techniques, performing noise reduction, and implementing high-pass filtering operations. These processes ultimately resulted in the transformation of the data into frequency displacement amplitude information.
The frequency displacement spectrum after conversion is shown in Figure 4. From this, it can be observed that during the operation of the industrial hemp harvester, the vibration frequency range of the header is mainly concentrated between 5 and 45 Hz, with a displacement amplitude range of 0–35 mm.

3. Numerical Simulation Model Construction for Stalk Cutting

The numerical simulation model construction process for blade cutting of hemp stalks is as follows: Based on the measured dimensions of industrial hemp stalks (measured by randomly selecting 30 industrial hemp stalks and measuring the diameter of the stalks at a cutting section, specifically 10 cm above the root, obtaining an average diameter of 18 mm for the hemp stalks), a model of industrial hemp stalks was created in PTC Creo. Different structural parameter models of biomimetic blades were designed and constructed, and the biomimetic blades were assembled with the stalk model according to the actual cutting relationship. Once the cutting relationship was determined, the blade-stalk three-dimensional model was imported into the finite element analysis software Abaqus through an intermediate format. Following the experimental requirements, the model was defined with material properties, component assembly, creation of analysis steps, definition of loads and boundary conditions, mesh partitioning, computation submission, and other operations for the blade cutting numerical simulation experiment analysis. In defining the material properties of the model, the blade was set as a rigid body, and the stem was set as a flexible body. Since the material properties of industrial hemp stalks follow a transversely isotropic constitutive relationship, their engineering constants can be obtained from the literature [23]. In addition, due to the high similarity between the material characteristics of industrial hemp stalks and wood, values for the transverse failure strength of industrial hemp stalks can be obtained by referring to the transverse strength relationship of wood [24]. The specific parameters are shown in Table 2.
Ref. [4] conducted experiments and parameter optimization research on the dynamic cutting performance of industrial hemp harvester’s beetle-inspired blades but did not consider the impact of cutting platform vibration on cutting performance. In this study, based on the stalk cutting numerical simulation model constructed in that reference, an additional vertical ground-direction vibration excitation was applied to study the effect of vibration on cutting performance. The model used in this study employed biomimetic blades with a pitch of 6.6 mm and a pitch angle of 30°. The cutting speed was set at 1.5 m/s, and the forward speed was set at 0.93 m/s based on the optimal blade structure and motion parameters obtained in preliminary research. The biomimetic blade structure is illustrated in Figure 5.

4. Quadratic Orthogonal Rotational Combination Experiment and Analysis

4.1. Evaluation Indicators

This study primarily investigated the impact of vibration on the cutting performance of blades. The cutting performance of the blades was mainly reflected in the quality of stubble after cutting and the dynamic performance of the blades. Therefore, the evaluation indicators were the stubble quality of industrial hemp and the energy consumption of cutting a single stalk.
The stubble quality of the stalk is characterized by the total length of all cracks on the cut hemp stalks, with a smaller sum indicating a better cutting quality. The numerical simulation results for stalk stubble and cracks are shown in Figure 6.
The cutting energy consumption is characterized by the energy consumed by the blade in cutting a single stalk under vibration conditions. The method for measuring cutting energy consumption using Abaqus numerical simulation is as follows: Reference points for driving constraints for the left and right blades are separately established as sets set-1 and set-2. In the output of the time history during the analysis steps, forces acting on these two sets are specified for output. After submitting the job and completing the computation, the force time curves and data at the two driving reference points can be obtained in the post-processing ODB file.
The formulas for calculating stubble quality (total crack length) and cutting energy consumption are as follows:
Y 1 = p n C p       p = 1 , 2 , 3 n
Y 2 = q n F U q + F L q v s Δ t       q = 1 , 2 , 3 n
where:
Y1 is the total crack length (stubble quality) in mm.
CP is the length of the p-th crack in mm.
Y2 is the cutting energy consumption in mJ.
FUq and FLq are the cutting forces corresponding to the upper and lower blades at the q-th sampling point in N.
vs is the cutting speed of the blade in mm/s.
Δt is the time interval between sampling frequencies in seconds.

4.2. Determination of Experimental Factor Levels and Coding Table

During the harvester’s field operation, vibration frequency and amplitude occur simultaneously. To investigate the effects of vibration frequency, amplitude, and their interaction on stubble quality and cutting energy consumption, this study employed the method of quadratic orthogonal rotational combination experiments [25,26].
According to the principles of quadratic orthogonal rotational combination experiment design, the number of experiments n satisfies the following formula:
n = m c + 2 p + m 0
here, mc is the number of two-level experiments in the orthogonal experiment. If it is fully implemented, then mc = 2m; if only a part of the two-level experiments is conducted (1/2 or 1/4 implementation) based on the orthogonal table, then mc = 2m−1 or mc = 2m−2. In this experiment, full implementation was adopted, so mc = 4.
p is the number of experimental factors, and in this study, p = 2; 2p is the number of experimental points distributed on a sphere of diameter γ, where γ is the star-arm value. When the experiment is fully implemented, γ = 2 p 4  = 1.414.
mo is the number of zero-level experiments. The choice of mo in the quadratic rotation combination design is free. Even if the experiment near the center point is not conducted, it will not affect the rotational properties, but the region near the center point is often the area of interest. As numerical simulation results have uniqueness under the same parameters, mo = 1 was chosen in this experiment.
In summary, n experimental points are distributed on three spheres with unequal radii. Among them, mc points are distributed on a sphere with a radius of p; 2p points are distributed on a sphere with a radius of γ; mo points are concentrated on a sphere with a radius of zero. Thus, it satisfies both rotational and non-degeneracy properties.
When conducting the quadratic orthogonal rotational combination design, the following rules can be used for coding:
Assume that the range of the factors is:
x 1 j x j x 2 j
Now, let the coding values of x1j and x2j be −γ and γ, respectively. Then, the zero level is:
x 0 j = x 1 j + x 2 j 2       j = 1 , 2 , , p
The change radius is:
Δ j = x 2 j x 1 j 2 γ       j = 1 , 2 , , p
So, the coded values −1 and 1 correspond to: x 0 j Δ j and x 0 j + Δ j .
Thus, natural variables with units are transformed into dimensionless normalized variables xj. As mentioned in Section 2.2, the excitation frequency of the hemp field is mainly concentrated in the range of 5–45 Hz, and the displacement amplitude range is 0–35 mm. Based on the above range of factor values, the coding values of factor levels for the quadratic orthogonal rotational combination experimental design can be compiled (see Table 3).

4.3. Experiment and Results Analysis

4.3.1. Experiment and Results

In the cutting process, while considering vibration conditions, the upper and lower blades, in addition to making horizontal reciprocating cutting motions, also underwent vertical reciprocating motions due to vibration excitation. The cutting process is illustrated in Figure 7. The curve depicting the variation of cutting reaction forces on the upper and lower blades during the cutting of stems by blade is shown in Figure 8.
The stalk cutting process depicted in Figure 7 revealed that, while the upper and lower blades were horizontally cutting the stalk, they also underwent simultaneous vertical reciprocating motion under the influence of vibration excitation. As shown in Figure 7a,b, during the horizontal cutting of the stalk, the blades moved downward, exerting compressive forces on the bottom of the stalk, causing stubble splitting. In the return phase of the horizontal reciprocating cutting and vibration motion, the cutting position of the stalk was located below the previous cutting position. At that point, the upper and lower blades moved upward while cutting, applying upward tensile forces to the bottom of the stalk, as illustrated in Figure 7c,d.
The variation curve of cutting reaction forces for the upper and lower blades, as shown in Figure 8, reveals two peaks in the cutting reaction forces of the upper and lower blades. This is attributed to the influence of vibration factors, leading to a secondary cut of the stems by the blades. The cutting energy consumption of the stems can be determined by obtaining the cutting reaction force data and applying Formula (2).
Experimental design and analysis were conducted using Design-Expert Software, and the experimental plan and results are presented in Table 4.

4.3.2. Regression Model and Analysis of Variance

The response analysis of the experimental results yields regression model equations for crack length (Y1) and cutting energy consumption (Y2):
Y 1 = 37.403 + 7.318 A 2.718 B + 0.339 A B 0.233 A 2 + 0.054 B 2
Y 2 = 37068.278 1824.706 A 2988.607 B + 115.019 A B + 18.599 A 2 + 50.570 B 2
Further variance analysis and fit statistics for the regression models are presented in Table 5 and Table 6.
The results in Table 5 show that the regression models for crack length and cutting energy consumption have significance levels (p-values) less than 0.05, indicating the models’ significance. Additionally, from Table 6, the adjusted R2 values for the models are 0.94 and 0.91, signifying high fitting accuracy. The signal-to-noise ratios (Adeq Precision) for the indicators are 13.52 and 11.27, greater than the critical value of 4, suggesting sufficient model signals. In summary, these regression models are significant, well-fitted, and reliable for predicting variations in crack length and cutting energy consumption.
The analysis of significance for various factors based on the analysis of variance indicates that for crack length (Y1), amplitude (B) has a highly significant effect (p < 0.01), and the interaction effect (AB) has a significant impact (p < 0.05). For cutting energy consumption (Y2), the frequency (A), the interaction effect (AB), and amplitude (B) all have significant impacts (p < 0.05), with amplitude (B) having a highly significant effect (p < 0.01).
At a significance level of α = 0.01, insignificant terms were eliminated, and the simplified regression model equations are:
Y 1 = 16.360 + 8.645 A 0.830 B + 0.339 A B 0.259 A 2
Y 2 = 20155.419 894.762 A 1218.663 B + 115.019 A B

4.3.3. Analysis of Factor Interaction Effects on Indicators

From the above analysis of variance, it is evident that the interaction effect between frequency (A) and amplitude (B) significantly impacts the model. Therefore, the interaction between factors A and B cannot be ignored. Utilizing Design Expert, response surface plots illustrating the interaction effects of these two factors were created (as shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10). The shapes of these surface plots were analyzed to understand their impact patterns.
From Figure 9, it can be observed that when the amplitude is at a relatively low level, with the increase of vibration frequency, the overall trend of crack length initially increases and then decreases. However, when the amplitude reaches its maximum level, with the increase of vibration frequency, the crack length continuously increases and reaches its maximum value. This indicates that the influence of frequency on crack length varies when the amplitude takes different values, suggesting an interaction between the two factors. When the frequency is constant, crack length increases continuously with the amplitude, and the rate of increase gradually accelerates. This indirectly validates that amplitude is the primary factor influencing crack length. The analysis suggests that an increase in amplitude leads to significant vertical compressive displacement of the cut hemp stalks, causing stubble breakage.
Figure 10 reveals that when vibration frequency and amplitude are in the low range, cutting energy consumption increases slowly with the increasing vibration frequency and amplitude. However, when vibration frequency and amplitude are in the high range, cutting energy consumption sharply increases with increasing vibration frequency and amplitude. This observation indicates a significant influence of vibration frequency, amplitude, and their interaction on cutting energy consumption. The analysis suggests that during the cutting process, an increase in vibration frequency and amplitude subjects the stalks to multiple pulls in the upward and downward directions, leading to a larger cutting area and severe re-cutting phenomena, resulting in an increase in cutting energy consumption.

4.3.4. Optimization of Comprehensive Performance Parameters and Experimental Verification

To achieve ideal cutting performance, the cutter needs to simultaneously ensure the best possible cutting quality and minimize cutting energy consumption. As cutting quality and cutting energy consumption have different dimensional units, they cannot be uniformly evaluated. Meanwhile, the comprehensive fuzzy evaluation method can establish membership degree models for multiple indicators of different types, obtaining membership values with the same order of magnitude and dimensionless. In this study, a comprehensive fuzzy evaluation method is adopted for a comprehensive scoring evaluation of the experimental results [27,28]. The specific method is to normalize the two indicators first and then perform weighted comprehensive scoring. The higher the score, the better the cutting performance.
When harvesting industrial hemp, it is essential to prioritize higher cutting quality to avoid hemp bark tearing, which leads to entanglement. Cutting quality has a higher priority than cutting energy consumption. In this experiment, the weight vector W is set to [0.6 0.4]. Therefore, the comprehensive evaluation index Q can be expressed as:
Q = 0.6 ( Y 1 j ) max     Y 1 j ( Y 1 j ) max     ( Y 1 j ) min + 0.4 ( Y 2 j ) max     Y 2 j ( Y 2 j ) max     ( Y 2 j ) min ( j = 1 , 2 , 3 9 )
We used the Design Expert optimization module, with the objective and constraint conditions set as:
min   Q s . t . 10.9   Hz A 39.1   Hz 5.1   mm B 29.9   mm
The optimal combination of vibration parameters for achieving the best comprehensive performance index was found to be a blade vibration frequency of 37.86 Hz and an amplitude of 5.34 mm. At this point, the comprehensive performance score is 0.994.
To validate the optimization results, the stalk cutting numerical simulation model was retested with a vibration frequency of 37.86 Hz and an amplitude of 5.34 mm. The resulting comprehensive performance score under these parameters was 0.897, with an error of only 9.76% compared to the optimized result. The experiment demonstrates that the optimization results are highly reliable, further confirming the model’s validity.

5. Conclusions and Discussion

(1) Vibration data of the hemp harvester cutting platform during operation were collected using a vibration recorder. The raw information was processed by eliminating trend components, applying smoothing techniques, performing noise reduction, and implementing high-pass filtering operations. The time acceleration information was consequently transformed into frequency displacement amplitude data. The obtained frequency range of the cutting platform vibration was predominantly concentrated between 5 and 45 Hz, with a displacement amplitude range of 0–35 mm.
(2) To investigate the influence of vibration on cutting performance, a two-factor quadratic rotation combination design experiment was conducted using vibration frequency and amplitude as experimental factors. Crop stubble quality (characterized by crack length) and cutting energy consumption were chosen as performance indicators. The experimental results revealed that, for the crack length indicator, the amplitude significantly affected the model, and the interaction had a significant impact. Regarding the cutting energy consumption indicator and the frequency and the interaction between frequency and amplitude significantly affected the model, and the amplitude had an extremely significant effect. Analysis indicates that under vibration cutting conditions, the crop stalks undergo repeated pulling forces from the blades in the vertical direction, resulting in an increased cutting area and severe re-cutting, leading to increased stubble splitting and cutting energy consumption.
(3) Using the comprehensive fuzzy evaluation method and through analysis and solution, the optimal parameter combination satisfying the comprehensive cutting performance indicators was determined to be a vibration frequency of 37.86 Hz and an amplitude of 5.34 mm. The performance score under these parameters was 0.994, and further verification confirmed the reliability of the model. This indicates that the high-frequency, low-amplitude vibration of the blades will be beneficial for improving the overall cutting performance of the stalks.
(4) This study employs numerical simulation techniques combined with comprehensive fuzzy evaluation methods to investigate the impact of vibration on cutting quality. Due to the fact that the vibration of the header is induced by both the road profile excitation and the vibration of the harvester itself, and the road profile is stochastic in nature, it is not possible to precisely determine the optimal parameters during operation. However, by considering agronomy practices, such as ensuring the ground of the hemp field is as level as possible to reduce the amplitude and avoid resonance, the cutting quality can be improved when harvesting industrial hemp. The findings of this research can serve as a reference for achieving high-quality cutting in industrial hemp and other fiber crops.
(5) Since the vibration cutting test bench is still in the trial stage, this study utilized numerical simulation technology to conduct virtual cutting experiments. Although numerical simulation experiments can replicate the cutting process of stalks under vibration conditions, facilitating the analysis of the influence of vibration on cutting performance trends, there are inevitably some differences between numerical simulation and actual cutting. Subsequent efforts will involve using the vibration test bench to conduct physical experiments under vibration conditions to refine and validate the accuracy of the model.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.T., B.Z. and A.J.; methodology, K.T., J.H. and Z.X.; software, K.T. and J.H.; validation, Z.X.; investigation, J.H.; writing—original draft preparation, K.T.; writing—review and editing, B.Z. and A.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52005274), the Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Equipment and Technology (Jiangsu University) (Grant No. MAET202103), the Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research Systems (Grant No. CARS-16-E20), and the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (31-NIAM-05).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data and materials are available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, X.; Sun, Y.; Cao, K.; Jiang, Y.; Hang, C.; Zhao, Y.; Han, X.; Wang, X. Status and prospect of industrial hemp breeding in Heilongjiang province. Crops 2019, 35, 15–19. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zuk-Golaszewska, K.; Golaszewski, J. Cannabis sativa L.–cultivation and quality of raw material. J. Elem. 2018, 23, 971–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guo, L.; Wang, M.; Wang, D.; Li, Z.; Che, Y.; Zhang, H. Research progress and prospect of comprehensive utilization of industrial hemp. Heilongjiang Agric. Sci. 2014, 8, 132–134. [Google Scholar]
  4. Tian, K.; Zhang, B.; Shen, C.; Liu, H.; Huang, J.; Ji, A. Dynamic cutting performance test and parameter optimization of longicorn bionic blade for industrial hemp harvester. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cao, K.; Wang, X.; Sun, Y.; Han, C.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Han, X.; Guo, Y. The research progress on the breeding of industrial hemp varieties in China. Plant Fiber Sci. China 2019, 41, 187–192. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sepe, R.; Bollino, F.; Boccarusso, L.; Caputo, F. Influence of chemical treatments on mechanical properties of hemp fiber reinforced composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 133, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lü, J.; Long, C.; Ma, L.; Liu, J.; He, H. Design and experiment on decorticator of hemp fresh stem. Trans. CSAE 2014, 30, 298–307. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kymäläinen, H.; Sjöberg, A. Flax and hemp fibres as raw materials for thermal insulations. Build. Environ. 2008, 43, 1261–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Musa, D.; Ahmad, D.; Abdan, K.; Othman, J. Effect of cutting speed on cutting torque and cutting power of varying kenaf-stem diameters at different moisture contents. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 2015, 38, 549–561. [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu, Z. Design and Study on Disc Cutter of Ramie. Ph.D. Thesis, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China, June 2011. [Google Scholar]
  11. Shen, C.; Li, X.; Zhang, B.; Tian, K.; Huang, J.; Chen, Q. Bench experiment and analysis on ramie stalk cutting. Trans. CSAE 2016, 32, 68–76. [Google Scholar]
  12. Tian, K.; Li, X.; Shen, C.; Zhang, B.; Huang, J.; Wang, J.; Zhou, Y. Design and test of cutting blade of cannabis harvester based on longicorn bionic principle. Trans. CSAE 2017, 33, 56–61. [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang, H.; Wang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Zhao, F.; Kong, X. Finite element simulation of sugarcane cutting. Trans. CSAE 2011, 27, 161–166. [Google Scholar]
  14. Qiu, M.; Meng, Y.; Li, Y.; Shen, X. Sugarcane stem cut quality investigated by finite element simulation and experiment. Biosyst. Eng. 2021, 206, 135–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, W.; Zhao, W.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yang, J. Simulation of forces acting on the cutter blade surfaces and root system of sugarcane using FEM and SPH coupled method. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 180, 105893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mathanker, S.; Grift, T.; Hansen, A. Effect of blade oblique angle and cutting speed on cutting energy for energy cane stems. Biosyst. Eng. 2015, 133, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Momin, M.; Wempe, P.; Grift, T.; Hansen, A. Effects of four base cutter blade designs on sugarcane stem cut quality. Trans. ASABE 2017, 60, 1551–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Song, Z.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, S.; Li, Y.; Li, F. Design and experiment on crank-connecting rod cotton stalk cutting test bench. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2011, 42 (Suppl. S1), 162–167. [Google Scholar]
  19. Song, Z.; Song, H.; Geng, A.; Li, Y.; Yan, Y.; Li, F. Experiment on cutting characteristics of cotton stalk with double supports. Trans. CSAE 2015, 31, 37–45. [Google Scholar]
  20. Guo, Q.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Y.; Li, P.; Chen, C. Mechanism and simulation analysis of efficient cutting for tomato straw. J. Agric. Mech. Res 2017, 39, 11–24. [Google Scholar]
  21. Meng, Y.; Wei, J.; Wei, J.; Chen, H.; Cui, Y. An ANSYS/LS-Dyna simulation and experimental study of circular saw blade cutting system of mulberry cutting machine. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 157, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, T.; Liu, Z.; Yan, X.; Mi, G.; Liu, S.; Chen, K.; Zhang, S.; Wang, X.; Zhang, S.; Wu, X. Finite element model construction and cutting parameter calibration of wild chrysanthemum stem. Agriculture 2022, 12, 894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhou, Y.; Li, X.; Shen, C.; Tian, K.; Zhang, B.; Huang, J. Experimental analysis on mechanical model of industrial hemp stalk. Trans. CSAE 2016, 32, 22–29. [Google Scholar]
  24. Available online: http://dec3.jlu.edu.cn/webcourse/T000185/T000199/files/bjjx/z8_2.html (accessed on 7 February 2023).
  25. Li, Y.; Hu, C. Experimental Design and Data Processing; Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2017; pp. 127–128. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ge, Y. Design Method and Application of Design-Expert Software; Harbin Institute of Technology Press: Harbin, China, 2015; pp. 155–160. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yu, Z.; Hu, Z.; Yang, K.; Peng, B.; Wu, F.; Xie, H. Design and experiment of root cutting device in garlic combine harvesting. Trans. CSAE 2016, 32, 77–85. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gao, S.; Yang, Y.; Yin, J. The study of quality assessment method of raw milk based on the fuzzy mathematics. J. Chin. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 10, 233–238. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. CEM DT-178A vibration recorder.
Figure 1. CEM DT-178A vibration recorder.
Agriculture 14 00321 g001
Figure 2. Vibrational information collection.
Figure 2. Vibrational information collection.
Agriculture 14 00321 g002
Figure 3. Original vibration information of the cutting platform.
Figure 3. Original vibration information of the cutting platform.
Agriculture 14 00321 g003
Figure 4. The frequency displacement spectrum chart.
Figure 4. The frequency displacement spectrum chart.
Agriculture 14 00321 g004
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of bionic blade structure. Notes: a represents blade width; b represents spacing between fixed holes; c represents blade length; d represents blade edge length; e represents spacing between fixed holes and the lower end of the blade; f represents blade tooth inclination angle; g represents blade tooth width; h represents fixed hole diameter; t represents blade thickness; s represents bionic tooth curve.
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of bionic blade structure. Notes: a represents blade width; b represents spacing between fixed holes; c represents blade length; d represents blade edge length; e represents spacing between fixed holes and the lower end of the blade; f represents blade tooth inclination angle; g represents blade tooth width; h represents fixed hole diameter; t represents blade thickness; s represents bionic tooth curve.
Agriculture 14 00321 g005
Figure 6. The numerical simulation results for stalk stubble and cracks.
Figure 6. The numerical simulation results for stalk stubble and cracks.
Agriculture 14 00321 g006
Figure 7. Stalk cutting process. Notes: vUH represents horizontal motion of the upper blade; vLH represents horizontal motion of the lower blade; vUV represents vertical motion of the upper blade; vLV represents vertical motion of the lower blade.
Figure 7. Stalk cutting process. Notes: vUH represents horizontal motion of the upper blade; vLH represents horizontal motion of the lower blade; vUV represents vertical motion of the upper blade; vLV represents vertical motion of the lower blade.
Agriculture 14 00321 g007
Figure 8. Graph of the variation in cutting reaction forces for upper and lower blades.
Figure 8. Graph of the variation in cutting reaction forces for upper and lower blades.
Agriculture 14 00321 g008
Figure 9. The influence of interaction effects on crack length.
Figure 9. The influence of interaction effects on crack length.
Agriculture 14 00321 g009
Figure 10. The influence of interaction effects on cutting energy.
Figure 10. The influence of interaction effects on cutting energy.
Agriculture 14 00321 g010
Table 1. Product parameters of CEM DT-178A vibration recorder.
Table 1. Product parameters of CEM DT-178A vibration recorder.
ParameterValue
AccelerometerMEMS Semiconductor
Accelerometer Sampling Rate256 Hz
Acceleration Range±18 g
Acceleration Resolution0.00625 g
Error±0.5 g
Non-linearity±1%
Bandwidth0–60 Hz
Note: The symbol “g” refers to the unit of gravitational acceleration, with a value of approximately 9.8 m per square second.
Table 2. Mechanical property parameter table of stalk material of industrial hemp [4].
Table 2. Mechanical property parameter table of stalk material of industrial hemp [4].
Mechanical
Parameter
EX
/MPa
EY
/MPa
EZ
/MPa
GXY
/MPa
GXZ
/MPa
GYZ
/MPa
UXYUXZUYZ
Value88881743.5033.8531.9931.990.30.020.02
Mechanical
parameter
XT
/MPa
XC
/MPa
YT
/MPa
YC
/MPa
ZT
/MPa
ZC
/MPa
SXY
/MPa
SYZ
/MPa
SXZ
/MPa
Value25101212522
Notes: EX represents Young’s modulus in X-direction; EY represents Young’s modulus in Y-direction; EZ represents Young’s modulus in Z-direction; GXY represents shear modulus of plane XY; GXZ represents shear modulus of plane XZ; GYZ represents shear modulus of plane YZ; UXY represents Poisson’s ratio in plane XY; UXZ represents Poisson’s ratio in plane XZ; UYZ represents Poisson’s ratio in plane YZ; XT represents ultimate tensile stress in X-direction; XC represents ultimate compressive stress in X-direction; YT represents ultimate tensile stress in Y-direction; YC represents ultimate compressive stress in Y-direction; ZT represents ultimate tensile stress in Z-direction; ZC represents ultimate compressive stress in Z-direction; SXY represents ultimate shear stress in plane XY; SYZ represents ultimate shear stress in plane YZ; SXZ represents ultimate shear stress in plane XZ.
Table 3. Coding values for factor levels in quadratic orthogonal rotational combination design.
Table 3. Coding values for factor levels in quadratic orthogonal rotational combination design.
Factor EncodeFrequency A/HzAmplitude B/mm
γ5.00
−110.95.1
025.017.5
+139.129.9
+γ45.035.0
Δj14.112.4
Table 4. Quadratic orthogonal regression rotational combination experimental design plan and results.
Table 4. Quadratic orthogonal regression rotational combination experimental design plan and results.
Test
NO.
Frequency A/HzAmplitude B/mmCrack Length
Y1/mm
Cutting Energy
Y2/mJ
1−1−184.755280.68
21−190.406982.32
3−1162.089728.41
41138.9191,870.05
5−1.41421033.118621.01
61.41421038.9538,514.64
70−1.41421102.245199.71
801.4142175.8258,247.83
90032.0316,582.32
Table 5. Analysis table of regression model equations for crack length and cutting.
Table 5. Analysis table of regression model equations for crack length and cutting.
IndexSourcesSum of SquaresdfMean SquareF-Valuep-Value
Crack lengthModel1.033 × 10552.066 × 10424.610.0122 *
A4.160 × 10314.160 × 1034.960.1124
B7.189 × 10417.189 × 10485.660.0027 **
AB1.405 × 10411.405 × 10416.750.0264 *
A26.225 × 10316.225 × 1037.420.0723
B22.000 × 10212.000 × 1020.240.6589
Residual2.518 ×10338.393 × 102
Cor Total1.058 ×1058
Cutting energyModel7.166 ×10951.433 × 10917.700.0196 *
A1.988 ×10911.988 × 10924.550.0158 *
B3.377 × 10913.377 × 10941.700.0075 **
AB1.618 × 10911.618 × 10919.980.0209 *
A23.977 × 10713.977 × 1070.490.5339
B21.759 × 10811.759 × 1082.170.2370
Residual2.429 × 10838.098 × 107
Cor Total7.409 × 1098
Notes: * represents a significant value (p < 0.05), ** represents a highly significant value (p < 0.01).
Table 6. Table of fit statistics.
Table 6. Table of fit statistics.
Indicator CategoryIndicatorValueIndicatorValue
Crack lengthStd. Dev.28.65R20.98
Mean156.71Adjusted R20.94
C.V. %18.28Adeq Precision13.52
Cutting energyStd. Dev.8998.80R20.97
Mean26780.77Adjusted R20.91
C.V. %33.60Adeq Precision11.27
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tian, K.; Huang, J.; Zhang, B.; Ji, A.; Xu, Z. Study on the Impact of Cutting Platform Vibration on Stalk Cutting Quality in Industrial Hemp. Agriculture 2024, 14, 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14020321

AMA Style

Tian K, Huang J, Zhang B, Ji A, Xu Z. Study on the Impact of Cutting Platform Vibration on Stalk Cutting Quality in Industrial Hemp. Agriculture. 2024; 14(2):321. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14020321

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tian, Kunpeng, Jicheng Huang, Bin Zhang, Aimin Ji, and Zhonghua Xu. 2024. "Study on the Impact of Cutting Platform Vibration on Stalk Cutting Quality in Industrial Hemp" Agriculture 14, no. 2: 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14020321

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop