Next Article in Journal
Analysis of the Fruit Drop Rate Caused by Typhoons Using Meteorological Data
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Potential Use of Sentinel-1 and 2 Satellite Imagery for Monitoring Winter Wheat Growth under Agricultural Drought Conditions in North-Western Poland
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Uncovering the Hidden Risks: A Bibliometric Investigation of Farmers’ Vulnerability to Climate Change

Agriculture 2023, 13(9), 1799; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13091799
by Rui Zhang 1, Yanfeng Wang 1, Jie Lyu 1,* and Zhanxiang Sun 2,*
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Agriculture 2023, 13(9), 1799; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13091799
Submission received: 17 August 2023 / Revised: 6 September 2023 / Accepted: 7 September 2023 / Published: 12 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effects of Climate Change on Dry Farming Systems)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear editor,

The manuscript "Uncovering the Hidden Risks: An Exploration of Farmers' Vulnerability to Climate Change: A Bibliometric Study" was submitted to Agriculture. It's a nice review research about climate change in agriculture lands, but I have some concerns and my decision is minor revision. Finally I recommend to authors that improve the quality of this nice paper as following:

1.      The results should be stated more accurately in the abstract. This will be of great help to the readers in the future and has an effective role in attracting the readers.

2.      Please talk more about the results and conclusions in the abstract to improve the quality.

3.      There are several words in the abstract that are written with dashes. The reason?

4.      A number of keywords are similar to the title. Please change them.

5.      In the introduction, try to write more related to the necessity and background of the research.  It’s very important. Especially about the impacts of climate change in Statistics of agricultural products.

6.      I can’t find discussion!!!!

7.      One of the significant concerns is that the authors should carefully develop a discussion section to talk about the significance, shortages or advantages of the methods you proposed, the reliability and meaning of your results (compared to other related studies) etc.

8.      Please be sure that all the references cited in the manuscript are also included in the reference list and vice versa with matching spellings and dates.

9.      Finally, I checked plagiarism detection of this research and the similarity is 26%, please checked attached file. I’m so concern about the similarity.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Dear editor,

The manuscript "Uncovering the Hidden Risks: An Exploration of Farmers' Vulnerability to Climate Change: A Bibliometric Study" was submitted to Agriculture. It's a nice review research about climate change in agriculture lands, but I have some concerns and my decision is minor revision. Finally I recommend to authors that improve the quality of this nice paper as following:

1.      The results should be stated more accurately in the abstract. This will be of great help to the readers in the future and has an effective role in attracting the readers.

2.      Please talk more about the results and conclusions in the abstract to improve the quality.

3.      There are several words in the abstract that are written with dashes. The reason?

4.      A number of keywords are similar to the title. Please change them.

5.      In the introduction, try to write more related to the necessity and background of the research.  It’s very important. Especially about the impacts of climate change in Statistics of agricultural products.

6.      I can’t find discussion!!!!

7.      One of the significant concerns is that the authors should carefully develop a discussion section to talk about the significance, shortages or advantages of the methods you proposed, the reliability and meaning of your results (compared to other related studies) etc.

8.      Please be sure that all the references cited in the manuscript are also included in the reference list and vice versa with matching spellings and dates.

9.      Finally, I checked plagiarism detection of this research and the similarity is 26%, please checked attached file. I’m so concern about the similarity.

Author Response

Please see the attachment. Thank you very much!

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

please refer to the MS for full comments.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment. Thank you very much!

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop