Next Article in Journal
A Novel Lightweight Grape Detection Method
Next Article in Special Issue
Construction and Verification of Spherical Thin Shell Model for Revealing Walnut Shell Crack Initiation and Expansion Mechanism
Previous Article in Journal
Classification of Cassava Leaf Disease Based on a Non-Balanced Dataset Using Transformer-Embedded ResNet
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application of Mathematical Models and Thermodynamic Properties in the Drying of Jambu Leaves
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biomechanical Characterization of Bionic Mechanical Harvesting of Tea Buds

1
School of Engineering, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2022, 12(9), 1361; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12091361
Submission received: 8 August 2022 / Revised: 25 August 2022 / Accepted: 31 August 2022 / Published: 1 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Agricultural Products Processing and Postharvest Storage)

Abstract

:
To date, mechanized picking of famous tea (bud, one bud one leaf) causes a lot of damage. Manual picking results in high-quality tea but the process is inefficient. Therefore, in order to improve the quality of mechanically harvested tea buds, the study of bionic picking is beneficial to reduce the damage rate of mechanical picking. In this paper, the manual flexible picking process is studied, and a bionic bladeless mechanical picking mechanics model is developed. The relationship between the mechanical properties and structural deformation of tea stalks is obtained by microstructural observation and mechanical experimental analysis and determination of the bud bionic picking mechanics flow by combined loading tests is carried out. The results show that the key factor for low damage in tea picking is the precise flexible force applied to different parts of the shoot tip during pinching, upward, and picking. The biological force of tea stalks is closely related to the stalk diameter and maturity of stalk tissue development. The larger the xylem of the tea stalk, the stronger its resistance to bending, stretching, and deformation. The stalks at the tender end of the tea are more resilient than the lower stalks and will not break under the action of large angle bending. Additionally, the stalks at the shoot tip have significantly lower pull-off force than the stalks at other places. By simulating the manual picking process, the mechanical picking mechanical parameters were determined to be a clamping pressure of 340 kPa, bending force of 0.134 N, and pull-off force of 5.1 N. These findings help the design of low-damage pickers for famous tea and provide a reference for low-damage bionic picking of tea.

1. Introduction

Tea is one of the main cash crops in China [1]. The global tea cultivation area is 4.89 million hectares [2]. Most premium teas are not harvested by dedicated mechanical equipment but by manual picking. The low efficiency of manual harvesting has hindered the development of the tea industry [3]. When machinery is used to harvest fine tea, the non-selective picking method can cause considerable damage and breakage of tea buds. Most mechanical tea-bud pickers are discontinuous and rigid shear pickers that can damage and alter tea quality [4].
Manually harvested tea is high-quality tea. However, studies have not investigated the harvesting mechanism in depth by taking into consideration the finger flexibility forces, stalk structure, and interactions between multiple forces during manual picking. There is flexible contact between the fingers and shoots during manual picking. Additionally, no adverse chemical changes occur at the bud breakage point upon contact with fingers. Here, we studied a low-damage mechanical harvesting technique for tea buds, based on the imitation ability of artificial flexibility forces and mechanisms for low-damage tea picking. Bionic picking can reduce the damage from mechanical tea picking and thereby considerably improve the picking efficiency.
Tea buds are easily damaged by external forces, and the mechanical properties of different parts of tea stalks vary considerably. Moreover, the bending resistance and shear strength of tea stalks significantly correlate with the structures of the xylem and pith [5,6]. Further, Du et al. [7] combined grey relations with multiple linear regression to identify the correlations between the cellulose content, flexural strength, shear strength, stem diameter, and moment of inertia of tea stalks. In turn, Jia et al. [8] observed a normal distribution of the tea stalk pull-off force. Meanwhile, Hao [9] determined the pull-off and pinch-off forces of tea shoots, and, using hyperspectral techniques, Du et al. [10] observed that the neutral and acid detergent fiber contents of tea stalks directly affected the magnitude of the shear strength. Furthermore, the average modulus of elasticity, compression, and shear of the fourth node stalk of new tea tree tips were calculated as 31.81, 10.12, and 9.19 MPa, respectively [11]. As for the control of flexible forces during picking, Miao and Zheng [12] established a flexible-force control algorithm that can provide low-damage picking for different fruit types. In turn, Zou et al. [13] established a rheological constitutive equation for leafy greens, analyzed the force–displacement relationship, and obtained a low-damage flexible clamping model for leafy greens. Finally, Hou et al. [14] established a link between the soft contact mechanical index of the finger and the mechanical structure of the finger tissue to obtain a bionic flexible-finger mechanical model.
Therefore, here, we studied the mechanics of manual harvesting of premium tea buds to identify the reasons for the high quality that characterizes hand-picked buds. The principles of bionic low-damage picking mechanics were determined by analyzing the finger flexibility forces, tea stalk mechanical properties (flexible clamping force, compression force, pull-off force, bending force), and tea-bud picking paths. Multiple mechanical modes for individual loading modes were designed for the experiments using tea stalks. On this basis, the finger flexibility forces, tender tip-bending forces, clamping forces, and breakage forces were analyzed. Mechanical low-damage picking mechanisms were obtained by analyzing the manual picking path of tea buds under a coupled loading mode.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bionic Picking Analysis

Bionic picking of tea buds simulates the respective hand-picking movements. As shown in Figure 1a, tea buds are manually picked using the index finger and the thumb to grip the tea stalk. The flexible subcutaneous tissue allows the picking point to be tightly wrapped. The solid red box in the diagram shows the distribution area of the picking points, which is generally within 10–15 mm. The area of contact between the index finger and the thumb is the intermeshing region. After clamping the picking point in the intermeshing region, the wrist rotates to drive the finger to rotate, and the finger rotates at a certain angle to pick the shoots off.
As Figure 1b shows, in manual tea picking, the thumb and forefinger are used to pinch the stalk from the lower part of the bud. The diameter of the tea stalk gradually increases from the top to the bottom of the tea stalk. The engaged fingers remain in a flexible state as they gradually move upwards from the lower section. As the fingers pass through the stalk nodes, they relax under increased stress, thereby ensuring the passage of older leaves. When the fingers pass over a node, they fit around the stalk again. The tea stalks are then pinched once the intermeshing region reaches the picking point. The wrist drives the thumb and forefinger, and the tea bud is bent and broken.

2.2. Preparation of Experimental Material

Tea buds are newly sprouted tissues borne of stalks that have not become lignified. The water content in the shoots and stalks is high, and tea shoots are susceptible to damage upon harvesting [15]. The mechanical properties of tea stalks reportedly improve with increasing lignification [16] depending on the forces applied to tea during the picking process. This study focused on the mechanical properties of the stalks between the buds and leaves (BIS), one and two leaf interstitial stalks (OTS), and stalks between the second and third leaves (STS). The structure and morphology of the tea tissues (BIS, OTS, and STS) analyzed in this study are shown in Figure 2. The mechanical properties of tea stalks vary according to their position on the plant. Therefore, the mechanical mechanisms during manual picking of tea stalks should be analyzed for different stem positions.
The tea samples selected for this study were obtained from the Agricultural Park of Anhui Agricultural University in Hefei, Anhui Province, China. The tea variety used was ‘Shu Cha Zao’, and the samples were predominantly grown during April. The average bud length of the samples was 25 ± 2 mm, and the average total length of the tea stalks was 70 ± 2 mm. Because the water content of tea leaves considerably affects the mechanical properties of stalks, the experiment was completed within 5 min from the picking of the samples. In this paper, 500 test samples were prepared for analysis of the stems. It is crucial to understand the deformation and mechanical parameters of the plant tissues at the point where the thumb and the forefinger engage to properly determine the characteristics required by bionic picking. To identify the mechanical properties of the fingers at the point of engagement with the tea, the thumb and the forefinger were placed on separate fixation blocks. The respective force changes were measured according to the displacement of the different fingers. The ballast structure was designed according to the shape of the tea stalk.

2.3. Measurements of Tea Mechanics

Tea is picked off at BIS because of the mechanical properties of the tea stalks [7] and the amount and type of force applied by the flexible fingers at different positions. A mechanical measurement platform with different loading modes was used to measure the mechanical properties of the tea stalks. As shown in Figure 3, the computer software (LabVIEW) recorded the force and time data in real time, and the loaded parts moved at a speed of 0.4 mm s−1. One sensor (ZNLBS-G-10KG) measured force within a range of 100 N with a sensitivity of 2.0 mv v−1 while the other sensor (JLBS-M2-500G) measured force within a range of 0–5 N with a sensitivity of 2.0 mv v−1 (Bengbu Zhongnuo Sensor Co., Ltd., Bengbu, China).
To determine the mechanical properties of the tea stalk, four loading modes were used at different locations, as shown in Figure 4 [17]. The mechanical properties of the finger engagement area from the time of contact to the wrapping of the tea stalk were determined using mode a. The extrusion properties at different positions in the vertical direction of the tea stalk were determined using mode b. The tensile properties of the tea stalks at different positions and under different bending angles were analyzed using mode c. Finally, the bending properties of the tea stalks at different positions were calculated using mode d. All experiments were loaded at a speed of 0.4 mm s−1.

2.4. Stalk Microstructure Analysis

The correlation between the stalk structure and mechanical properties was analyzed. An optical microscope (MSD100-9, Meisidi Dongguan Technology Co., Ltd., Dongguan, China) was used to examine the transverse and longitudinal sections of the stalks at different positions. The maximum magnification of the microscope used was ×10,000. A five-megapixel high-definition (HD) electronic eyepiece enabled the display of the pictures on the computer. The working diagram of the microscope is shown in Figure 5. Stems at BIS, OTS, and STS were used as test samples. The stalk at BIS was selected for observation under a ×10 eyepiece and a ×10 objective lens. The stalks at OTS and STS were selected for observation under a ×10 eyepiece and a ×4 objective lens.

3. Results and Discussion

During the picking process, the fingers exert compressive, frictional, bending, and pulling forces on the tea stalks. However, the breaking and bending forces required vary according to the location of the tea plantation. Therefore, the forces acting on the shoot tips, either individually or in combination, should be analyzed to explore the mechanisms underlying the breakage of tea buds upon hand-picking.

3.1. Microstructural Damage to Stalk Fracture

The wounds produced by blade-shear picking and hand-picking of tea stalks are shown in Figure 6. Under blade-shear picking, the blades squeezed the stalks, which resulted in an oval-shaped wound. The fracture interface was uneven and showed numerous burrs. The stalk tissue was torn at the point of fracture, and the interior of the fracture was also damaged through the crushing action, such that cavities were observed in the wood pith. After shear picking, the fractured sections and internally damaged tissues were extensively oxidized. Oxidation produces substances that darken the tea [18]. Blade-shear picking disrupts the tissues within the tea stalks, and such rupturing produces an excess tissue fluid that further increases the oxidation rate. In contrast, hand picking involves lifting off the buds by squeezing the stalks with the fingers, whereby the resulting fracture section is flat and burr-free. After equal oxidation periods, the oxidized area in a wound produced by hand picking was considerably smaller than that in a wound caused by blade-shear picking. The bud tissues showed a brownish-red color after the wound was oxidized by ambient air, particularly in the xylem and wood pith.

3.2. Analysis of Flexible Clamping Force

The structure of human fingers predominantly comprises skin, subcutaneous tissue, and phalanges [14]. When fingers engage the tea, the skin and subcutaneous tissue form indentations under the pressure exerted by the tea stalks. The depressed space formed by the thumb and forefinger then wraps around the tea stalk. The finger bones are considerably denser than the subcutaneous tissue. Therefore, when the fingers pinch the tea stalks, the flexible subcutaneous tissue creates a cushion, which prevents damage to the tea. Further, when fingers are wrapped around the tea stalk, the finger bones prevent the subcutaneous tissue from sinking. The grip of the fingers on the tea stalk then suddenly increases. The forces on the thumb and forefinger engagement area when in contact with the tea stalk are shown in Figure 7. The forces on the two intermeshing regions vary non-linearly with time. The contact force from the index finger slowly increased from 0 to 2.8 s, followed by a rapid increase in the contact force in the 2.8–5.6 s band. Meanwhile, the compression force from the thumb slowly increased from 0 to 6 s, with a rapid increase in the compression force in the 6–8.5 s band. These findings are consistent with those of Dzidek et al. [19]. However, Dzidek’s study was conducted on the ventral region of the finger, where the pressure was 1.2 N when the ventral deformation was 1.46 mm. The previous work did not specify the force parameters of the thumb tip and the joint between the first and second joints of the index finger.
When the index finger intermeshing region was deformed by approximately 1.6 mm, the contact force was approximately 1.5 N. At this point, the contact force from the thumb was approximately 0.8 N, which was lower because the subcutaneous tissue in the intermeshing region from the thumb is thicker than that of the index finger. Specifically, when the rod is loaded and the thumb intermeshing region is squeezed, the buffer zone of the thumb is larger than that of the index finger. Based on the mechanical variation trend, the intermeshing of the thumb and the index finger can be simplified as two separate linear elastic variations of flexible materials. As shown in Figure 7, the fitted curves for the anterior and posterior segments of the thumb were named thumb1 and thumb2, respectively. The thumb deformation was within 0–2.4 mm, and its elasticity coefficient was 783 N m−1 for thumb1 and the deformation interval was within 2.4–3.4 mm, with an elasticity coefficient of 6632 N m−1 for thumb2. The fitted curves for the anterior and posterior segments of the index finger were named index1 and index2, respectively. The index finger had an elasticity coefficient of 658 N m−1 in the deformation interval 0–1.1 mm. The deformation interval was within 1.1–2.2 mm when the elasticity coefficient was 3729 N m−1. The area of the engagement zone was 143 mm2.

3.3. Extrusion Properties at Different Positions of the Stalk Level

During tea picking, the clamping force is always applied to the tea stalk. The intensity of the clamping force directly affects the extent of the possible damage to the tea [20]. In mode b, the tea stalks were placed on the side of the fixing block. The probe was loaded to squeeze the stalk from the other side at an even speed. The data from 20 experiments were considered for each group, and the average value was used to represent the experimental results. Seven experimental points on the tea stalks were selected for these measurements, starting at the middle of the BIS, with other points 5 mm apart along the stem and down the stalk. The loading forces required to produce plastic deformation at different positions in the horizontal length of the tea stalk are shown in Figure 8. The width and length of the loading block was 1 and 10 mm, respectively, and the indentation area formed on the stalk was 1 ± 0.2 mm2.
As Figure 8 shows, the diameter of the tea stalk gradually increased from the tip of the bud downwards. As the diameter increased, the forces producing deformation in the stalk gradually increased and the loading force tended to be linearly distributed. The average maximum stalk deformation force was 4.38 N for BIS, 6.2 N for OTS, and 8.3 N for STS. Owing to the different diameters for the same parts of tea stalks during growth, the deformation forces per unit diameter at different positions along the stalk were investigated. As the diameter increased, the maximum deformation force per unit diameter tended to slowly increase, then level off, and then rapidly increase. Further, the tea stalk diameter underwent substantial mutation from BIS to OTS but not from OTS to STS.
The increase in the stalk deformation force with increasing diameter was attributed to the changes in the structure of the stalk tissue. This was in line with the findings of Cao et al. [21]. Previously, Cao’s study showed a linear correlation between the stalk cross-sectional area and shear force. The shear force was 0.6 N when the cross-sectional area of the tea stalk was 1.8 mm2. The results of this study showed a linear correlation between the stalk cross-sectional area and squeezing pressure. The squeezing pressure was 4.4 N for a tea stalk cross-sectional area of 1.8 mm2. However, the previous research studied the shear force of the stalk and did not analyze the squeezing force between the fingers and the stalk. As shown in Figure 9, the stalk cross-section comprises the stalk bark, bast, xylem, and wood pith. The cross-sectional organization of the stalks was relatively similar at the stalk lengths of 0, 5, 10, and 15 mm. In contrast, the bast and medullary fibers of the stalk became more transparent, and the xylem diameter increased considerably at 20, 25, and 30 mm. The xylem in the tea stalks increased with increasing diameter. The cells of the stalk bast and wood pith showed progressive fibrillation from position 0 to 30 on the stalk. The xylem is the main structure responsible for maintaining the stalk in an upright position. As the stalk diameter increased, the bast of the stalk became progressively fibrous. This change was consistent with the trend of the deformation forces generated by the stalk. Therefore, the intensity of the deformation force generated by the stalk is directly related to the degree of fibrillation of the bast.

3.4. Pull-off Force at Different Positions on the Stalk

When picking tea buds by hand, the fingers first bend the shoots at a certain angle and then the fingers lift off the buds. It is crucial to identify the difference in the pull-off forces between the bud break point and the rest of the stalk under bending to develop efficient bionic harvesting. The tea stalk diameter varies in size, whereby the pull-off force cannot be directly compared. Therefore, the pull-off force per unit diameter was adopted as a measurement. The pull-off force per unit diameter was evaluated separately for the BIS, OTS, and STS of the stalk, and the results are shown in Figure 10. For stalk bending angles between 0° and 90° in the BIS range, the stalk pull-off force per unit diameter ranged within 2.2–2.4 N. In turn, the pull-off force per unit diameter of the stalk at OTS ranged from 2.2 to 3.1 N, and that at STS ranged from 1.6 to 4.1 N. In all three cases, the stalk pull-off force per unit diameter increased and then decreased under the action of different bending angles. Specifically, as the bending angle increased from 0° to 30°, the partial force required to pull off the stalk increased, resulting in a larger combined force. On the other hand, the hardness of the stalk decreased when the bending angle exceeded 30°. The stalk xylem vessels became brittle and broke under the bending action and, consequently, the pull-off force was reduced.
When the stalk was subjected to axial tension, the breaking point occurred at the end of clamping. The cross-section of the point of fracture at BIS was smooth and burr-free, whereas that at OTS showed few filamentous fibers, and that at STS showed abundant filamentous fibers. The breakage of all tea stalks was a brittle break. This was attributed to the high water content of the stalks and the fact that they were not yet fully lignified. The axial cross-sectional organization of tea stalks is shown in Figure 11. The fibrous tissue in the stalk gradually increased with increasing diameter. The small variation range in the pull-off force at different stalk angles at BIS was attributed to the similarity of the organization of the various regions of the stalk in that section. The bending angle showed a lower effect on the pull-off force of the stalk at BIS. Furthermore, owing to its smaller xylem and diameter, BIS presented a lower pull-off force. The stalk bark, bast, xylem, and wood pith were clearly distinguished in the axial cross-sectional view of the stalk at OTS. However, the cellular tissue at this point was not yet mature compared with the STS stem tissue. Therefore, the mechanical trend of OTS was in line with that of STS. These findings were consistent with those of Huang et al. [22]. Previous studies by Hang showed that the average values of shear force at BIS and OTS were 0.97 and 1.2 N, respectively. The results of this study showed that the mean values of the pull-off forces at BIS and OTS were 2.2 and 2.6 N, respectively, at 0 deg. In this paper, the bending force, pull-off forces, and stalk structure were analyzed simultaneously. At OTS and STS, the stalks showed a gradual reduction in the stalk pull-off force at 30–90°. Because of the increase in diameter and xylem tissue, the stalk was more likely to break under bending action, thereby reducing the pull-off force.

3.5. Forces Required for Bending at Different Stalk Positions

At the final stage during tea-bud picking, stalks should be bent at an angle that allows tea buds to be quickly picked [23]. Stalks should be bent at the BIS during picking, while remaining upright at other positions. There are diameter differences for the same stalk position, whereby the bending forces cannot be directly compared. Therefore, we selected tea samples with the largest diameter at BIS and the smallest diameter at OTS and STS for the experiments. To analyze the forces required to bend the different parts of the tea stalk, the experiments were conducted at different positions along the tea stalks, as shown in Figure 12.
Consistent with findings reported by Wu et al. [24], the bending force required by the tea stalk gradually increased as the bending angle increased, in the experiments described herein. Previously, Wu’s study showed decreasing values of the stem stiffness from the bottom to the top. In this paper, the bending force of the stalk was measured at different positions. The test results show that the stiffness of the stalk decreases slowly from the bottom to the top and then decreases rapidly. Further, the bending resistance of the stalks was most pronounced at STS, and, because STS showed the largest xylem vessels, its potential for the stalk was the greatest and increased with an increasing angle. Conversely, the stalk showed the least bending resistance at BIS, which indicated a greater toughness. The tissue structure of the stalk at BIS can remain intact even under the effects of large angular bending. Indeed, bending forces of 0.022, 0.246, and 0.354 N were required at 90° for BIS, OTS, and STS, respectively. Furthermore, the bending force of BIS was considerably lower than those of OTS or STS owing to the small diameter of BIS and greater hardness of the stalk tissue in this case.

3.6. Picking Mechanics Program

The pinching, upward pulling, and picking of bionic harvesting was determined based on the characteristics of manual picking. Multiple forces act on tea stalks during tea bud harvesting, and the main ones are clamping force, tension, and bending force. A flow diagram of the load applied to the stalk during the three stages of manual picking is shown in Figure 13. The engagement gap is the distance between the contact surfaces of the index finger and the thumb. Contact without extrusion is represented by a positive value, whereas deformation extrusion is represented a negative value. The fingers guide the stalk into the engagement zone at the pinching stage, during which a clamping force is primarily used. The range of pressure action at STS was obtained from the finger engagement zone pressures, which have been previously measured as 0 < p < 417.5 kPa. When engaged, old leaves fill the engagement gap and fluctuate at 1–5 mm in the engagement gap.
The fingers move upwards while bending to guide the stalk behind them into the bend. The range of pressure on the stalk at this point was 0 < p < 393.8 kPa, and the stalks were bent at an angle of 30 ± 5°. The finger tension was less than the breaking tension of the stalk; thus, it was <5.1 N. During the picking stage, the fingers pinch the stalk, and at BIS, the stalk can act on a range of pressures of 340 ± 0.5 kPa. A higher bending angle of the stalk improved the picking. However, the bending angle of the wrist is limited; therefore, the bending angle at BIS was 90 ± 5°. At this point, the tension acting on the stalk is greater than the breaking tension of the stalk (i.e., tension is greater than 4.38 N). At this point, the fingers must squeeze the stalk to create a greater frictional force to pull it off. The engagement gap was measured as −5.1 ± 0.5 mm.
During manual picking, the fingers can be used to sense the gripping force and the shape of the stalks in real time. The strength and direction are adjusted in real time depending on the stalk position. As bionic picking simulates manual picking, a flow chart of tea bud bionic harvesting mechanics (Figure 14) based on the manual harvesting process was drawn. Bionic picking starts by clamping the tea plant on the lower part of the stalk and then moving upwards through the STS, OTS, and then BIS. To ensure that the stalks are not damaged by clamping, the maximum pressure that tea stalks can withstand was determined based on the maximum pressure at the most vulnerable point. This maximum clamping pressure was determined as 340 kPa throughout the picking process.
Tea buds should be picked at BIS, and OTS and STS should remain intact. Greater bending angles of BIS led to better picking, which is consistent with the principle of manual picking. The OTS and STS bending angles showed the highest pull-off force at 30°; therefore, a BIS-bend angle of 90° and OTS- and STS-bend angles of 30° were considered the most suitable for tea picking. Based on the bending force experiment (Figure 12), a bending force of 0.134 N was determined.
During the picking process, greater pulling forces loaded on the tea buds can lead to more efficient bud harvest. However, excessive tension can cause the tea stalks to break at STS or OTS. Therefore, it is important to ensure that the buds are pulled off without breaking other points of the stalk. The critical value of the tensile force should be less than that required to break the stalk at OTS. Based on the tensile tests, a pull-off force of 5.1 N was determined.

4. Conclusions

This study analyzed the process of manual picking of tea buds and investigated the mechanical functioning and mechanic paths for bionic tea-bud picking. The bionic picking mechanics paths obtained herein can be used to determine the structural design of a low-damage, fast-picking mechanism to use for tea shoots. The main findings of this study are as follows:
(1)
Tea stalk breakage is brittle fracture. Finger engagement with the tea stalk is soft contact. Bionic picking of tea consists of three processes, namely: pinching, pulling upward, and picking. Finger engagement is simplified by the combination of the two moduli of elasticity materials that can change the clamping force as the position of the stalk changes. Pinching and upward lifting ensure that the stalks are bent at a specified angle in the specified position. Flexible clamping and picking effectively protect the stalk interior and wound structure.
(2)
Tea stalks gradually lignify in a basipetal progression, and BIS shows low lignification and greater toughness. Fracture at BIS occurs mainly through bending forces and normal tension at the bending point. The OTS and STS stalks break easily under large-angle bending action, and later break easily under tension.
(3)
A precise application of bending forces at different positions on the stalk during harvesting is crucial for appropriate bionic harvesting. The maximum clamping pressure of 340 kpa, bending force of 0.134 N, and pulling force of 5.1 N were determined for the bionic picking of tea leaves.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.L., Z.W., C.C. and X.Z.; methodology, K.L., Z.W., C.C. and K.Q.; software, K.L. and M.A.; validation, K.L., X.Z. and Z.W.; formal analysis, K.L.; investigation, K.L.; data curation, K.L.; writing—original draft preparation, K.L.; writing—review and editing, K.L., Z.W., C.C. and K.Q.; supervision, K.L. and M.A.; funding acquisition, Z.W. and K.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China [grant number 2021YFD1601102] and by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 52105239].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Zhengmin Wu from State Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization for providing equipment and technical support during the experiments. We also thank other colleagues in the laboratory such as Kuan Qin, Xuenchen Zheng, and Minhui An for their help in the experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhu, Y.P.; Wu, C.Y.; Tong, J.H.; Chen, J.N.; He, L.Y.; Wang, R.Y.; Jia, J.M. Deviation tolerance performance evaluation and experiment of picking end effector for famous tea. Agriculture 2021, 11, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wu, X.L. Analysis of the World Tea Production and Trade Pattern and its Inspiration. Tea Fujian 2019, 41, 41–42. [Google Scholar]
  3. Han, Y.; Xiao, R.H.; Song, Y.Z.; Ding, Q.W. Design and Evaluation of Tea-Plucking Machine for Improving Quality of Tea. Appl. Eng. Agric. 2019, 35, 979–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, X.; Lin, Y.; Zhao, S.; Zhao, X.; Geng, Z.; Yuan, Z. Transcriptome changes and its effect on physiological and metabolic processes in tea plant during mechanical damage. For. Pathol. 2018, 48, e12432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lin, Y.P.; Jin, X.Y.; Hao, Z.L.; Ye, N.X.; Huang, Y.B.; Tang, H.Y.; Chen, X.H.; Zhou, X.Y. Experiment on mechanical properties and crude fiber of tea leaf. J. Tea Sci. 2013, 33, 364–369. [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu, Q.T.; Ou, Y.G.; Qing, S.L.; Wang, W.Z. Study progress on mechanics properties of crop stalks. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2007, 38, 172–176. [Google Scholar]
  7. Du, Z.; Hu, Y.G.; Buttar, N.A. Analysis of mechanical properties for tea stem using grey relational analysis coupled with multiple linear regression. Sci. Hort. 2020, 260, 108886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jia, J.M.; Ye, Y.Z.; Cheng, P.L.; Zhu, Y.P.; Fu, X.P.; Chen, J.N. Design and experimental optimization of hand-held manipulator for picking famous tea shoot. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2022, 53, 86–92. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hao, M. Researches on the Identification of Tender Leaves and Bionic Plucking Fingers for High-Quality Green Tea. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  10. Du, Z.; Hu, Y.G.; Mahmood, A.; Wang, S. Determination of shearing force by measuring NDF and ADF in tea stems with hyperspectral imaging technique. IFAC PapersOnLine 2018, 51, 849–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, S. Research Design and Experimental Study on Portable Electric Tea Plucking Machine. Master’s Thesis, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  12. Miao, Y.B.; Zheng, J.F. Optimization design of compliant constant-force mechanism for apple picking actuator. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 170, 105232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zou, L.L.; Yuan, J.; Liu, X.M.; Li, J.G.; Zhang, P.; Niu, Z.R. Burgers viscoelastic model-based variable stiffness design of compliant clamping mechanism for leafy greens harvesting. Biosyst. Eng. 2021, 208, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hou, Z.L.; Li, Z.G.; Fadiji, T.; Fu, J. Soft grasping mechanism of human fingers for tomato-picking bionic robots. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 182, 106010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, N.; Liu, W.; Lai, J. An attempt to model the influence of gradual transition between cell wall layers on cell wall hygroelastic properties. J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49, 1984–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Du, Z.; Hu, Y.G.; Wu, W.Y.; Lu, Y.Z.; Buttar, N.A. Structural analysis on cutting notch of tea stalk by X-ray micro-computed tomography. Inf. Process. Agric. 2020, 7, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lu, W.; Li, X.C.; Zhang, G.C.; Tang, J.H.; Ni, S.; Zhang, H.B.; Zhang, Q.; Zhai, Y.L.; Mu, G. Research on Biomechanical Properties of Laver (Porphyra yezoensis Ueda) for Mechanical Harvesting and Postharvest Transportation. AgriEngineering 2022, 4, 48–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, K. Research on the Enzymological Characteristics of Polyphenol Oxidase from Tea and the Effect of Infrared on Its Activity and Conformation. Master’s Thesis, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dzidek, B.M.; Adams, M.J.; Andrews, J.W.; Zhang, Z.; Johnson, S.A. Contact mechanics of the human finger pad under compressive loads. J. R. Soc. Interface 2017, 14, 20160935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhu, H.; Zhao, H.; Bai, L.; Ma, S.; Zhang, X.; Li, H. Mechanical Characteristics of Rice Root–Soil Complex in Rice–Wheat Rotation Area. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cao, W.C.; Xue, Y.F.; Zhou, J.G. Study on shearing properties of tea shoot. J. Zhejiang Agric. Univ. 1995, 21, 11–16. [Google Scholar]
  22. Huang, Y.; Wei, K.; Wang, L.Y.; Cheng, H.; He, W.; Zhou, J. Study of developmental pattern of tea shoot tenderness on the base of texture analyser. J. Tea Sci. 2012, 32, 173–178. [Google Scholar]
  23. Xue, Y.F.; Cao, W.C. Mechanical properties of tea young shoot under bending. J. Zhejiang Agric. Univ. 1994, 20, 43–48. [Google Scholar]
  24. Wu, W.C.; Hu, Y.G.; Jiang, Z.H. Investigation on the bending behavior of tea stalks based on non-prismatic beam with virtual internodes. Agriculture 2022, 12, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Analysis of tea-bud manual picking. (a) Hand-picked objects. (b) Manual picking process. Fp—Clamping force, Fu—Tensile force, Fy—y-axis component force, Fx—x-axis component force, ω—Tensile force, O—Tensile force.
Figure 1. Analysis of tea-bud manual picking. (a) Hand-picked objects. (b) Manual picking process. Fp—Clamping force, Fu—Tensile force, Fy—y-axis component force, Fx—x-axis component force, ω—Tensile force, O—Tensile force.
Agriculture 12 01361 g001
Figure 2. Structure of analyzed tea samples. BIS: stalks between buds and leaves; OTS: one and two leaves interstitial stalks; STS: stalks between the second and third leaves.
Figure 2. Structure of analyzed tea samples. BIS: stalks between buds and leaves; OTS: one and two leaves interstitial stalks; STS: stalks between the second and third leaves.
Agriculture 12 01361 g002
Figure 3. Setup of the mechanical test.
Figure 3. Setup of the mechanical test.
Agriculture 12 01361 g003
Figure 4. Loading modes used for the analysis of mechanical properties. (a) Flexible clamping force. (b) Damage forces in different locations. (c) Pull-off force. (d) Bending force. α is the stalk bending angle.
Figure 4. Loading modes used for the analysis of mechanical properties. (a) Flexible clamping force. (b) Damage forces in different locations. (c) Pull-off force. (d) Bending force. α is the stalk bending angle.
Agriculture 12 01361 g004
Figure 5. Microscopic view of the stalk cross-section.
Figure 5. Microscopic view of the stalk cross-section.
Agriculture 12 01361 g005
Figure 6. Appearance of the wound areas caused by hand and shear-blade picking of tea buds.
Figure 6. Appearance of the wound areas caused by hand and shear-blade picking of tea buds.
Agriculture 12 01361 g006
Figure 7. Forces on the engagement area.
Figure 7. Forces on the engagement area.
Agriculture 12 01361 g007
Figure 8. Maximum force on different points on the measured tea stalks.
Figure 8. Maximum force on different points on the measured tea stalks.
Agriculture 12 01361 g008
Figure 9. Microscopic cross-sectional view of different parts of tea stalks. Here, 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 are distances (mm) along the stalks and indicate the positions on the stalk at which measurements were carried out.
Figure 9. Microscopic cross-sectional view of different parts of tea stalks. Here, 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 are distances (mm) along the stalks and indicate the positions on the stalk at which measurements were carried out.
Agriculture 12 01361 g009
Figure 10. Tensile force on tea stalks under different bending actions. BIS: stalks between buds and leaves; OTS: one and two leaves interstitial stalks; STS: stalks between the second and third leaves.
Figure 10. Tensile force on tea stalks under different bending actions. BIS: stalks between buds and leaves; OTS: one and two leaves interstitial stalks; STS: stalks between the second and third leaves.
Agriculture 12 01361 g010
Figure 11. Longitudinal micro-sectional view of different parts of tea stalks. BIS: stalks between buds and leaves; OTS: one and two leaves interstitial stalks; STS: stalks between second and third leaves.
Figure 11. Longitudinal micro-sectional view of different parts of tea stalks. BIS: stalks between buds and leaves; OTS: one and two leaves interstitial stalks; STS: stalks between second and third leaves.
Agriculture 12 01361 g011
Figure 12. Stalk bending force. BIS: stalks between buds and leaves; OTS: one and two leaves interstitial stalks; STS: stalks between the second and third leaves.
Figure 12. Stalk bending force. BIS: stalks between buds and leaves; OTS: one and two leaves interstitial stalks; STS: stalks between the second and third leaves.
Agriculture 12 01361 g012
Figure 13. Force path of artificial shoot picking. BIS: stalks between buds and leaves; OTS: one and two leaves interstitial stalks; STS: stalks between the second and third leaves.
Figure 13. Force path of artificial shoot picking. BIS: stalks between buds and leaves; OTS: one and two leaves interstitial stalks; STS: stalks between the second and third leaves.
Agriculture 12 01361 g013
Figure 14. The path of the bionic shoot-picking force. BIS: stalks between buds and leaves; OTS: one and two leaves interstitial stalks; STS: stalks between the second and third leaves.
Figure 14. The path of the bionic shoot-picking force. BIS: stalks between buds and leaves; OTS: one and two leaves interstitial stalks; STS: stalks between the second and third leaves.
Agriculture 12 01361 g014
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luo, K.; Wu, Z.; Cao, C.; Qin, K.; Zhang, X.; An, M. Biomechanical Characterization of Bionic Mechanical Harvesting of Tea Buds. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1361. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12091361

AMA Style

Luo K, Wu Z, Cao C, Qin K, Zhang X, An M. Biomechanical Characterization of Bionic Mechanical Harvesting of Tea Buds. Agriculture. 2022; 12(9):1361. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12091361

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luo, Kun, Zhengmin Wu, Chengmao Cao, Kuan Qin, Xuechen Zhang, and Minhui An. 2022. "Biomechanical Characterization of Bionic Mechanical Harvesting of Tea Buds" Agriculture 12, no. 9: 1361. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12091361

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop