Next Article in Journal
Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients with Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Stenosis: In-Hospital Clinical Outcomes at a Single Neurovascular Center
Next Article in Special Issue
A Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Nasotracheal Intubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Fibrin Strands Will Grow from Soluble Fibrin and Hang Up in an In Vitro Microcirculatory Viscoelastic Model: Is This a Major Cause of COVID-19 Associated Coagulopathy?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Perioperative Supplemental Oxygen and Plasma Catecholamine Concentrations after Major Abdominal Surgery—Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/jcm11082085
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Perioperative Supplemental Oxygen and Postoperative Copeptin Concentrations in Cardiac-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery—A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

by
Alexander Taschner
1,
Barbara Kabon
1,2,
Alexandra Graf
3,
Nikolas Adamowitsch
1,
Markus Falkner von Sonnenburg
1,
Melanie Fraunschiel
4,
Katharina Horvath
1,
Edith Fleischmann
1,2 and
Christian Reiterer
1,2,*
1
Department of Anaesthesia, General Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2
Outcome Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
3
Centre for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria
4
IT Systems and Communications, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(8), 2085; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082085
Submission received: 11 March 2022 / Revised: 5 April 2022 / Accepted: 6 April 2022 / Published: 7 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anesthetic Management in Perioperative Period)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Noncardiac surgery is associated with hemodynamic perturbations, fluid shifts and hypoxic events, causing stress responses. Copeptin is used to assess endogenous stress and predict myocardial injury. Myocardial injury is common after noncardiac surgery, and is often caused by myocardial oxygen demand-and-supply mismatch. In this secondary analysis, we included 173 patients at risk for cardiovascular complications undergoing moderate- to high-risk major abdominal surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 80% or 30% oxygen throughout surgery and the first two postoperative hours. We evaluated the effect of supplemental oxygen on postoperative Copeptin concentrations. Copeptin concentrations were measured preoperatively, within two hours after surgery, on the first and third postoperative days. In total, 85 patients received 0.8 FiO2, and 88 patients received 0.3 FiO2. There was no significant difference in postoperative Copeptin concentrations between both study groups (p = 0.446). Copeptin increased significantly within two hours after surgery, compared with baseline in the overall study population (estimated effect: −241.7 pmol·L−1; 95% CI −264.4, −219.1; p < 0.001). Supplemental oxygen did not significantly attenuate postoperative Copeptin release. Copeptin concentrations showed a more immediate postoperative increase compared with previously established biomarkers. Nevertheless, Copeptin concentrations did not surpass Troponin T in early determination of patients at risk for developing myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery.

1. Introduction

During recent years, the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery has significantly increased [1]. As a consequence, the incidence of postoperative major cardiovascular complications has risen to approximately 8% among this patient population [2,3].
Surgery and anesthesia are associated with trauma, hemodynamic perturbations, fluid shifts, stress and hypoxic events [4,5]. These are trigger factors for endogenous stress, reflected by increased catecholamine and cortisol release, and myocardial injury [6]. Elevated stress levels are associated with increased sympathetic nerve activity leading to tachycardia and hypertension [7]. This might lead to an imbalance in myocardial oxygen supply and demand, and finally result in myocardial injury [7,8,9]. It is very well known that perioperative hypoxic events caused by hypovolemia, hypotension, tachycardia and hypoxemia significantly increase the risk for myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) [9,10]. A previous study has shown that preoperative Copeptin concentrations might be able to predict myocardial injury in the immediate perioperative period [11].
Copeptin is a relatively novel biomarker and reflects plasma concentrations of arginine-vasopressin (AVP) [12]. AVP is an antidiuretic hormone released from the hypothalamus in response to changes in plasma osmolality and blood pressure, and its main function is homeostasis of fluid balance, vascular tonus and regulation of the endocrine stress response [13]. In detail, an increase in blood osmolality and hypovolemia leads to increased plasma AVP and Copeptin concentrations [14]. In contrast to AVP, plasma concentrations of Copeptin are very stable and simple to measure, and are therefore used to indirectly assess plasma AVP concentration [13]. Copeptin concentrations significantly correlate with physiologic as well as pathophysiologic endogenous stress, such as that caused by surgery [13,15]. In detail, Copeptin concentrations are significantly increased in patients who have suffered from myocardial infarction, heart failure, shock, stroke and traumatic brain injury [16,17,18,19]. Elevated concentrations are explained by exacerbated endogenous stress associated with cardiovascular complications [11]. Furthermore, preoperative elevated Copeptin values are strong predictors for MINS [11]. Copeptin concentrations accurately reflect myocardial strain and injury as well as endogenous stress, and could therefore be of high value in properly reflecting perioperative stress.
In our main trial, we investigated the effect of 80% versus 30% perioperative oxygen administration on postoperative maximum NT-proBNP concentrations and MINS [20]. We observed no significant difference between both study groups [21]. Because there is limited data in regard to perioperative Copeptin concentrations, specifically on the subject of supplemental oxygen, we evaluated in this secondary analysis if supplemental oxygen influences perioperative Copeptin concentrations. Thus, we evaluated the hypothesis if perioperative administration of 80% oxygen leads to a significant decrease in postoperative Copeptin concentrations as compared to perioperative administration of 30% oxygen in patients at risk for cardiovascular complications undergoing moderate- to high-risk major abdominal surgery. Furthermore, we evaluated the effect of surgery per se as well as MINS on perioperative Copeptin concentrations in the overall study population. In a post-hoc analysis, we evaluated the predictive values of Copeptin concentrations in the perioperative time course for the development of MINS.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This is a pre-planned secondary analysis of a prospective, randomised, double-blinded, single-centre clinical trial conducted at the Medical University of Vienna, which primarily investigated the effect of 80% versus 30% inspired oxygen concentration on postoperative maximum NT-proBNP concentrations [21]. This study was approved by the University’s Ethics Committee (Ethikkomission Medizinische Universität Wien; Borschkegasse 8b/6, 1090, Vienna, Austria; EK-Number 1744/2017; Chairperson Prof. Martin Brunner) on 13 November 2017. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients participating in the study. The trial was registered prior to patient enrolment at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03366857, Principal Investigator: Edith Fleischmann, Date of registration: 2 December 2017) and the European Trial Database (EudraCT 2017-003714-68), and was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. This manuscript adheres to the applicable CONSORT guidelines. The study protocol was published previously [20]. The additional measurement of Copeptin concentrations for this secondary analysis was amended on 19 July 2018 after 87 patients had already been included. Patients of at least 45 years of age and undergoing major abdominal surgery for ≥2 h were eligible for the trial. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria were published previously [20].

2.2. Randomisation

For patient randomisation of the main study, a web-based randomisation programme (Randomizer, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria, https://www.meduniwien.ac.at/randomizer/web) (last accessed on 5 November 2019) was used. Randomisation sequence was generated by the study statistician using permutated blocks with a size of six numbers. We did not use stratification of randomisation.
Patients were randomised to receive either 80% or 30% inspired oxygen concentration throughout surgery, and for the first two postoperative hours. We randomised patients shortly before induction of anesthesia. The trial was conducted in accordance with the original protocol [20]. Protocol for induction and maintenance of anesthesia was published previously [20]. Intraoperative fluid management in all patients was performed in an esophageal-Doppler-guided manner according to a previously published algorithm [22,23]. As per study protocol, all patients received a 2 mL·kg−1·BW−1 baseline infusion of balanced crystalloids. A bolus of 250 mL balanced crystalloids was administered when stroke volume decreased by ≥20% from baseline. In case of acute bleeding or systemic inflammatory response during surgery, volume was administered according to fluid requirements to maintain hemodynamic stability. Blood and blood products were administered as per clinical judgement [20]. Copeptin concentrations were measured preoperatively, within two hours after surgery, and on the first and third postoperative day. All data were recorded and stored in the data management system ‘Clincase’, v2.7.0.12 hosted by IT Systems & Communications, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

We performed an intention-to-treat analysis according to allocated randomisation. Continuous variables were summarised using mean, standard deviation (SD), median, quartiles [25th percentile; 75th percentile] as well as minimum and maximum values. Descriptive statistics are given for randomised groups separately. Categorical variables were summarised using absolute and percent values. Continuous intraoperative values were compared between groups using Mann–Whitney U tests. To investigate a difference in the time course of Copeptin concentrations between the two study groups, first a linear regression model for Copeptin accounting for time, study group and the interaction between time and group as fixed factors as well as accounting for subject ID as random factor was performed. Univariable linear regression models (with random factor subject) were performed for the possible influence factors of time (without interaction term time), type of surgery (open or laparoscopic), age, BMI, sex, ASA physical status, history of coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, stroke, heart failure, diabetes, and hypertension. All factors significant (with a p < 0.05) in the simple models were then included in a multivariable regression model (with random factor patient). All analyses were performed using R version 3.3.3 and SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

2.4. Post-Hoc Analysis

We compared the perioperative time-course of Copeptin concentrations between patients who developed MINS and patients who did not develop MINS. We measured Troponin T concentrations in all patients preoperatively, within 2 h after surgery, on the first and third postoperative days. MINS was defined as a postoperative Troponin T concentration of 20–65 ng·L−1 with an absolute change of at least 5 ng·L−1 or a postoperative Troponin T concentration > 65 ng·L−1. Patients in whom Troponin T concentration was adjudicated for nonischemic etiology (e.g., sepsis, pulmonary embolism) were not considered as having MINS [24]. We performed a Mann–Whitney U test to compare Copeptin values at each time point. We further performed a receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve to evaluate the predictive value of Copeptin and Troponin T concentrations at baseline and within two hours after surgery on the occurrence of postoperative MINS. Furthermore, we performed a ROC curve to investigate the predictive value of Copeptin concentrations in the perioperative period on the occurrence of a composite of postoperative cardiovascular complications, including cardiac failure, myocardial infarction, new onset of cardiac arrhythmias and death.

2.5. Sample Size Considerations

Out of the 260 patients planned for the primary aim of the main study, we included 173 patients in our secondary analysis.
We re-estimated the sample size for this secondary analysis based on previous data on Copeptin to get an evaluation of the available sample size. Previous data showed that postoperative Copeptin concentrations in patients undergoing vascular surgery and developing myocardial injury increased up to 100 ± 80 pmol·L−1 compared with Copeptin concentrations of 65 ± 80 pmol·L−1 in patients without myocardial injury [25]. Therefore, we assumed a difference of 35% in postoperative Copeptin concentrations as clinically meaningful. Using a two-sided t-test, we calculated that at least 82 patients per group are needed to detect a significant difference between both study groups at a significance level of 0.05 with 80% power. Thus, the given sample size of 173 (85 vs. 88) may be adequate to detect the assumed clinically relevant effect.

3. Results

A total of 173 consecutive patients, who were enrolled in the main trial from August 2018 to May 2019, were included in this secondary analysis. Eighty-five patients received 80% inspired oxygen and eighty-eight patients received 30% inspired oxygen throughout surgery and for the first two postoperative hours (Figure 1).
Baseline characteristics, including age, weight, ASA physical status, cardiovascular comorbidities, long-term medications and baseline laboratory parameters, were balanced between the two study groups (Table 1). The duration of anesthesia and surgery, anaesthetics, fluid, and vasopressors administered, hemodynamic parameters, and arterial blood gas analyses were balanced between both study groups (Table 2).

3.1. Primary Outcome

We did not observe a significant difference in Copeptin concentrations in the overall perioperative time course (p = 0.446) between both study groups (Figure 2). Furthermore, at none of the time points was a significant difference in Copeptin concentrations between the 80% oxygen and 30% oxygen group found (2 h postoperative: p = 0.090; postoperative day 1: p = 0.936; postoperative day 3: p = 0.935) (Table 3).
Copeptin concentrations increased significantly within two hours after surgery, compared with baseline values in the overall study population (estimated effect pre vs. post: −241.7 pmol·L−1; 95% CI −264.4 to −219.1; p < 0.001) as well as in each study group (each p < 0.001). Similarly, Copeptin concentrations on the first postoperative day were elevated significantly from baseline values in the overall study population (estimated effect pre vs. post: −35.2 pmol·L−1; 95% CI −58.2 to −12.2; p = 0.003) as well as in each study group (80% oxygen group: p = 0.032; 30% oxygen group: p = 0.037). There was no significant difference found in Copeptin concentrations on the third postoperative day compared with baseline values in the overall study population (p = 0.505), or the 80% oxygen group (p = 0.610) or the 30% oxygen group (p = 0.666) separately.
Baseline patient characteristics, including age, sex, BMI, ASA physical status, history of coronary artery disease, history of peripheral artery disease, history of stroke, heart failure, diabetes or hypertension, did not significantly affect perioperative Copeptin concentrations in the univariable regression model (all p > 0.05). On an average over all time points, significantly larger Copeptin concentrations were found for open as compared to laparoscopic surgery (p = 0.014). A larger increase in Copeptin concentrations from baseline to two hours after surgery was found for open surgeries as compared to laparoscopic surgeries (p = 0.001).
In the multivariable regression model, Copeptin values within two hours after surgery were significantly higher in patients receiving open as compared to laparoscopic surgery (p < 0.001).
No significant difference was observed in postoperative Copeptin concentrations from baseline to the first or third postoperative day between open or laparoscopic surgeries (Appendix A, Table A1).

3.2. Post-Hoc Analysis

We observed significantly higher Copeptin concentrations in patients with MINS as compared to patients without MINS before surgery (14.1 [IQR 8.1 to 22.4] versus 7.7 [IQR 4.5 to 14.2]; p = 0.002), on the first postoperative day (49.0 [IQR 29.7 to 116.0] versus 26.7 [IQR 11.9; 53.6]; p = 0.002) and on the third postoperative day (24.3 [IQR 16.1 to 46.3] versus 12.5 [IQR 7.2 to 21.5]; p = 0.002). Copeptin concentrations within two hours after surgery were similar between patients with MINS (190.3 [IQR 118.2 to 376.9]) and patients without MINS (196.8 [IQR 109.0 to 362.9]) (p = 0.840) (Appendix A, Figure A1). Figure A2 in Appendix A shows ROC curves for preoperative Copeptin concentrations and MINS (Area under the curve (AUC) = 0.686; 95% CI 0.586 to 0.926) as well as for preoperative Troponin T concentrations and MINS (AUC = 0.908; 95% CI 0.849 to 0.967) (Appendix A). The area under the ROC curve for Copeptin concentrations within two hours after surgery and MINS was 0.514 (95% CI 0.400 to 0.628) and for Troponin T within two hours after surgery and MINS was 0.480 (95% CI 0.368 to 0.592) (Appendix A, Figure A2).
Overall, 10 patients in this secondary analysis developed a postoperative cardiovascular complication within 30 days after surgery. Copeptin concentrations at baseline (AUC = 0.666; 95% CI 0.445 to 0.886) or within 2 h after surgery (AUC = 0.611; 95% CI 0.432 to 0.789) did not show a predictive value for the occurrence of cardiovascular complications within 30 days after surgery. The area under the ROC curve for Copeptin concentrations on the first postoperative day and cardiovascular complications was 0.819 (95% CI 0.688 to 0.950) and for Copeptin concentrations on the third postoperative day and cardiovascular complications was 0.866 (95% CI 0.743 to 0.988) (Appendix A, Figure A3).

4. Discussion

The administration of perioperative supplemental oxygen did not significantly attenuate the release of postoperative Copeptin concentrations in patients at risk for cardiovascular complications undergoing moderate- to high-risk major abdominal surgery. However, we observed a significant increase in postoperative Copeptin concentrations compared with preoperative baseline values in both study groups as well as in the overall study population.
In contrast to the non-surgical setting, we did not observe significant stress reduction in patients who received perioperative supplemental oxygen [27]. One explanation could be that in the study performed in the non-surgical setting, supplemental oxygen was administered for four weeks during the night [27]. Furthermore, only patients with stable heart failure and documented Cheyne–Stokes respiration, who have a high risk for nocturnal desaturation, were included [27]. In this context, the authors suggested that the administration of supplemental oxygen leads to a reduction in episodes of desaturation, which finally leads to reduction in stress [27]. Thus, it might be possible that the duration of oxygen administration in our study was too short to show the same effects. Furthermore, patients undergoing surgery are closely monitored, which makes episodes of desaturation very unlikely. Therefore, our patients might have not been exposed to stress caused by hypoxic events.
An in vitro study has shown that hyperoxia leads to a significant increase in cytotoxicity in adult cardiac myocytes [28]. A retrospective analysis of the PROXI trial has shown that supplemental oxygen increases the risk of myocardial complications after noncardiac surgery [29]. However, a further retrospective sub-analysis of a more recent prospective trial, which investigated the effect of 80% versus 30% oxygen on wound-related complications, did not observe a negative effect of intraoperative supplemental oxygen on cardiovascular complications [30]. More importantly, the most recent trial also showed no negative effects of supplemental oxygen on the incidence of MINS in patients with cardiovascular risk factors undergoing major noncardiac surgery [31]. These findings are consistent with the results of our main trial [21]. Similar to postoperative Troponin T concentrations, the administration of supplemental oxygen also did not result in a significant difference in postoperative Copeptin concentrations.
It has been shown recently that preoperative Copeptin values > 14 ng/L have a high predictive value for the development of myocardial injury after surgery [11]. However, the trend of Copeptin concentrations in the postoperative period was only investigated in a relatively small study on 30 patients undergoing major vascular surgery [25]. In our post-hoc analysis, we observed significantly increased Copeptin concentrations in patients with MINS as compared to patients with no MINS on the first and third postoperative days. Copeptin concentrations within 2 h after surgery did not differ significantly between those groups. Interestingly, we found that Copeptin concentrations before surgery and two hours after surgery were not superior to Troponin T at these time points for predicting MINS. Therefore, it seems likely that Copeptin concentrations in the preoperative and immediate postoperative period do not surpass Troponin T concentrations in the early stratification of patients at risk of developing MINS.
Several studies have shown that noncardiac surgery is associated with a significant postoperative increase in cardiac and stress markers [21,32]. The time after surgery remains a very decisive period associated with cardiovascular complication [2,33]. Troponin T and NT-proBNP concentrations in the first postoperative days are strong predictors for myocardial injury and myocardial strain [2,34]. In contrast to NT-proBNP and Troponin T, which increase approximately 48 h after major abdominal surgery [21,35], we observed that Copeptin concentrations peak within two hours after surgery. Nevertheless, only Copeptin concentrations on the first and third postoperative days were predictive for the development of MINS. Copeptin concentrations have been shown to be significantly elevated in patients experiencing cardiovascular morbidities, including myocardial infarction, stroke and heart failure. Postoperative atherosclerotic complications are the leading cause of postoperative deaths in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery [24]. Nevertheless, while several risk factors for the development of cardiovascular complications have been established, a clear pathophysiologic explanation has not been determined yet [36]. In our secondary analysis we found a significant increase in postoperative Copeptin concentrations, which highlights the fact that noncardiac surgery is associated with a significant postoperative stress response. Furthermore, we observed a predictive value of preoperative Copeptin concentrations for the development of MINS as well as a predictive value of Copeptin concentrations on the first and third postoperative days for the development of cardiovascular complications. Based on our results, further studies should investigate the impact of perioperative stress on the occurrence of postoperative cardiovascular complications in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery.
We observed significantly higher postoperative Copeptin concentrations in the overall study population compared with baseline values. Surgery is associated with significantly higher cortisol concentrations, inflammatory response and oxidative stress [37,38,39]. Similar postoperative responses in oxidative stress were also observed in another secondary analysis of our main trial [40]. In detail, we have shown that oxidative stress, assessed via oxidation–reduction potential, which is a reliable marker for oxidative stress [41], significantly increased in the overall study population [40]. Furthermore, there was a simultaneous decrease in the oxidation–reduction capacity [40].
Our study has some limitations. This is a secondary analysis of our main trial [21]. The primary study was powered to detect the effect of supplemental oxygen on postoperative maximum NT-proBNP concentrations [21]. Nevertheless, the given sample size may be adequate to detect clinically relevant effects of supplemental oxygen on Copeptin concentrations. We did not measure further biomarkers to assess perioperative stress such as catecholamines or cortisol concentrations in our study population. The additional assessment of other biomarkers might have provided more substantial information on the effect of supplemental oxygen on perioperative stress response.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we showed that the administration of supplemental oxygen has no significant effect on postoperative Copeptin concentrations, which has been used as a surrogate parameter for surgical stress response and myocardial injury. However, we found that Copeptin increased earlier as compared to other biomarkers. Based on our results and previous literature, it is becoming more evident that surgical trauma is a very stressful event, which was reflected by a significant increase in postoperative Copeptin concentrations. In this context, supplemental oxygen might play a negligible role in the postoperative stress response, which could be predominantly caused by surgery.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.R., B.K. and E.F.; methodology, C.R., B.K. and E.F.; software, M.F.; validation, B.K. and A.G.; formal analysis, A.G., B.K. and E.F.; investigation, A.T., N.A., M.F.v.S., K.H. and C.R.; resources, C.R.; data curation, A.T., N.A., M.F.v.S. and C.R.; writing—original draft preparation, A.T.; writing—review and editing, A.T., B.K., E.F. and C.R.; visualization, C.R.; supervision, C.R.; project administration, C.R.; funding acquisition, C.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research for the study was supported by the Medical-Scientific Fund of the Mayor of Vienna (Nr. 18058), Medical University of Vienna.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Ethikkommission Medizinische Universität Wien (protocol code 1744/2017; Date of approval 13 November 2017).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this secondary analysis are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table
Table A1. Multivariable regression model Copeptin.
Table A1. Multivariable regression model Copeptin.
VariableComparisonEffectLower CIUpper CIp-Value
Time × OP TypeOverall Interaction Test <0.001
Laparoscopic vs. Open: 2 h post—pre−100.940−147.280−54.589<0.001
Laparoscopic vs. Open: POD 1—pre−12.263−59.37034.8450.609
Laparoscopic vs. Open: POD 3—pre−10.150−58.72538.4250.682
Laparoscopic vs. Open: pre−1.973−37.62333.6760.914
Laparoscopic vs. Open: 2 h post−102.910−138.100−67.715<0.001
Laparoscopic vs. Open: POD 1−14.236−50.42121.9490.440
Laparoscopic vs. Open: POD 3−12.123−50.20425.9570.532
Laparoscopic: pre vs. 2 h post−176.100−213.39−138.810<0.001
Laparoscopic: pre vs. POD 1−27.172−65.20310.8590.161
Laparoscopic: pre vs. POD 3−1.508−41.30338.2870.941
Open: pre vs. 2 h post−277.030−304.550−249.520<0.001
Open: pre vs. POD 1−39.435−67.232−11.6370.006
Open: pre vs. POD 3−11.658−39.51216.1970.411
The estimated effect sizes, confidence intervals (CI) and p-values were calculated using multivariable regression models (with random factor patient); POD, postoperative day.
Jcm 11 02085 g0a1 550
Figure A1. Boxplots showing the perioperative trend of Copeptin concentrations between patients with MINS and patients without MINS. Boxplots demonstrate medians and interquartile ranges; circles represent outliers; stars represent extreme outliers; MINS, myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery; POD, postoperative day.
Figure A1. Boxplots showing the perioperative trend of Copeptin concentrations between patients with MINS and patients without MINS. Boxplots demonstrate medians and interquartile ranges; circles represent outliers; stars represent extreme outliers; MINS, myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery; POD, postoperative day.
Jcm 11 02085 g0a1
Jcm 11 02085 g0a2 550
Figure A2. Receiver–operator characteristic curves for MINS and Copeptin concentrations at baseline (blue) and within two hours after surgery (green) and Troponin T concentrations at baseline (red) and within two hours after surgery (orange). 2 h post OP, within two hours after surgery; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.
Figure A2. Receiver–operator characteristic curves for MINS and Copeptin concentrations at baseline (blue) and within two hours after surgery (green) and Troponin T concentrations at baseline (red) and within two hours after surgery (orange). 2 h post OP, within two hours after surgery; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.
Jcm 11 02085 g0a2
Jcm 11 02085 g0a3 550
Figure A3. Receiver–operator characteristic curves for cardiovascular complications within 30 days after surgery and Copeptin concentrations at baseline (blue), within two hours after surgery (green), on the first postoperative day (red) and on the third postoperative day (orange). 2 h post OP, within two hours after surgery; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.
Figure A3. Receiver–operator characteristic curves for cardiovascular complications within 30 days after surgery and Copeptin concentrations at baseline (blue), within two hours after surgery (green), on the first postoperative day (red) and on the third postoperative day (orange). 2 h post OP, within two hours after surgery; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.
Jcm 11 02085 g0a3

References

  1. Weiser, T.G.; Haynes, A.B.; Molina, G.; Lipsitz, S.R.; Esquivel, M.M.; Uribe-Leitz, T.; Fu, R.; Azad, T.; Chao, T.E.; Berry, W.R.; et al. Estimate of the global volume of surgery in 2012: An assessment supporting improved health outcomes. Lancet 2015, 385, S11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Devereaux, P.J.; Duceppe, E.; Guyatt, G.; Tandon, V.; Rodseth, R.; Biccard, B.M.; Xavier, D.; Szczeklik, W.; Meyhoff, C.S.; Vincent, J.; et al. Association of postoperative high-sensitivity troponin levels with myocardial injury and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. JAMA-J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2017, 317, 1642–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Smilowitz, N.R.; Gupta, N.; Ramakrishna, H.; Guo, Y.; Berger, J.S.; Bangalore, S. Perioperative major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events associated with noncardiac surgery. JAMA Cardiol. 2017, 2, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Turan, A.; Chang, C.; Cohen, B.; Saasouh, W.; Essber, H.; Yang, D.; Ma, C.; Hovsepyan, K.; Khanna, A.K.; Vitale, J.; et al. Incidence, Severity, and Detection of Blood Pressure Perturbations after Abdominal Surgery—A prospective blinded observational study. Anesthesiology 2019, 130, 550–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shoemaker, W.C.; Appel, P.L.; Kram, H.B. Tissue oxygen debt as a determinant of lethal and nonlethal postoperative organ failure. Crit. Care Med. 1988, 16, 1117–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chernow, B.; Alexander, H.R.; Smallridge, R.C.; Thompson, W.R.; Cook, D.; Beardsley, D.; Fink, M.P.; Lake, C.R.; Fletcher, J.R. Hormonal Responses to Graded Surgical Stress. Arch. Intern. Med. 1987, 147, 1273–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Parker, S.D.; Breslow, M.J.; Frank, S.M.; Rosenfeld, B.A.; Norris, E.J.; Christopherson, R.; Rock, P.; Gottlieb, S.O.; Raff, H.; Perler, B.A.; et al. Catecholamine and cortisol responses to lower extremity revascularization: Correlation with outcome variables. Perioperative Ischemia Randomized Anesthesia Trial Study Group. Crit. Care Med. 1995, 23, 1954–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Devereaux, P.J.; Yang, H.; Yusuf, S.W.; Guyatt, G.H.; Leslie, K.; Villar, J.C.; Xavier, D.; Chrolavicius, S.; Greenspan, L.; Pogue, J.; et al. Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2008, 371, 1839–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Devereaux, P.J.; Szczeklik, W. Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery: Diagnosis and management. Eur. Heart J. 2019, 41, 3083–3091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gill, N.P.; Wright, B.; Reilly, C.S. Relationship between hypoxaemic and cardiac ischaemic events in the perioperative period. Br. J. Anaesth. 1992, 68, 471–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mauermann, E.; Bolliger, D.; Seeberger, E.; Puelacher, C.; Corbiere, S.; Filipovic, M.; Seeberger, M.; Mueller, C.; Buse, G.L. Incremental value of preoperative copeptin for predicting myocardial injury. Anesth. Analg. 2016, 123, 1363–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lipinski, M.J.; Escárcega, R.O.; D’Ascenzo, F.; Magalhães, M.A.; Baker, N.C.; Torguson, R.; Chen, F.; Epstein, S.E.; Miró, O.; Llorens, P.; et al. A systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis to determine the incremental value of copeptin for rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 2014, 113, 1581–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Christ-Crain, M. Vasopressin and Copeptin in health and disease. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2019, 20, 283–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Balanescu, S.; Kopp, P.; Gaskill, M.B.; Morgenthaler, N.G.; Schindler, C.; Rutishauser, J. Correlation of plasma copeptin and vasopressin concentrations in hypo-, iso-, and hyper-osmolar states. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, 1046–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Bolignano, D.; Cabassi, A.; Fiaccadori, E.; Ghigo, E.; Pasquali, R.; Peracino, A.; Peri, A.; Plebani, M.; Santoro, A.; Settanni, F.; et al. Copeptin (CTproAVP), a new tool for understanding the role of vasopressin in pathophysiology. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2014, 52, 1447–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nickel, C.H.; Bingisser, R.; Morgenthaler, N.G. The role of copeptin as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for risk stratification in the emergency department. BMC Med. 2012, 10, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Khan, S.Q.; Dhillon, O.S.; O’Brien, R.J.; Struck, J.; Quinn, P.A.; Morgenthaler, N.G.; Squire, I.B.; Davies, J.E.; Bergmann, A.; Ng, L. C-terminal provasopressin (copeptin) as a novel and prognostic marker in acute myocardial infarction: Leicester acute myocardial infarction peptide (LAMP) study. Circulation 2007, 115, 2103–2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Alehagen, U.; Dahlström, U.; Rehfeld, J.F.; Goetze, J.P. Association of copeptin and N-terminal proBNP concentrations with risk of cardiovascular death in older patients with symptoms of heart failure. JAMA-J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2011, 305, 2088–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Morgenthaler, N.G.; Müller, B.; Struck, J.; Bergmann, A.; Redl, H.; Christ-Crain, M. Copeptin, a stable peptide of the arginine vasopressin precursor, is elevated in hemorrhagic and septic shock. Shock 2007, 28, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Reiterer, C.; Kabon, B.; Von Sonnenburg, M.F.; Starlinger, P.; Taschner, A.; Zotti, O.; Goshin, J.; Drlicek, G.; Fleischmann, E. The effect of supplemental oxygen on perioperative brain natriuretic peptide concentration in cardiac risk patients—A protocol for a prosprective randomized clinical trial. Trials 2020, 21, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Reiterer, C.; Kabon, B.; Taschner, A.; von Sonnenburg, M.F.; Graf, A.; Adamowitsch, N.; Starlinger, P.; Goshin, J.; Fraunschiel, M.; Fleischmann, E. Perioperative supplemental oxygen and NT-proBNP concentrations after major abdominal surgery—A prospective randomized clinical trial. J. Clin. Anesth. 2021, 73, 110379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gan, T.J.; Sooitt, A.; Maroof, M.; El-Moalem, H.; Robertson, K.M.; Moretti, E.; Dwane, P.; Glass, P.S.A. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology 2002, 97, 820–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Feldheiser, A.; Conroy, P.; Bonomo, T.; Cox, B.; Garces, T.R.; Spies, C.; Anaesthesia Working Group of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS®) Society. Development and feasibility study of an algorithm for intraoperative goaldirected haemodynamic management in noncardiac surgery. J. Int. Med. Res. 2012, 40, 1227–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Spence, J.; LeManach, Y.; Chan, M.T.; Wang, C.Y.; Sigamani, A.; Xavier, D.; Pearse, R.; Alonso-Coello, P.; Garutti, I.; Srinathan, S.K.; et al. Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: A large, international, prospective cohort study establishing diagnostic criteria, characteristics, predictors, and 30-day outcomes. Anesthesiology 2014, 120, 564–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kamber, F.; Mauermann, E.; Seeberger, E.; Guerke, L.; Mueller, C.; Bolliger, D.; Buse, G.A.L. Peri-operative copeptin concentrations and their association with myocardial injury after vascular surgery: A prospective observational cohort study. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2018, 35, 682–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Schulz, K.F.; Altman, D.G.; Moher, D. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int. J. Surg. 2011, 9, 672–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Staniforth, A.D.; Kinnear, W.J.M.; Starling, R.; Hetmanski, D.J.; Cowley, A.J. Effect of oxygen on sleep quality, cognitive function and sympathetic activity in patients with chronic heart failure and Cheyn-Stokes respiration. Eur. Heart J. 1998, 19, 922–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Hafner, C.; Wu, J.; Tiboldi, A.; Hess, M.; Mitulović, G.; Kaun, C.; Krychtiuk, K.; Wojta, J.; Ullrich, R.; Tretter, E.V.; et al. Hyperoxia induces inflammation and cytotoxicity in human adult cardiac myocytes. Shock 2017, 47, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Fonnes, S.; Gögenur, I.; Søndergaard, E.S.; Siersma, V.D.; Jorgensen, L.N.; Wetterslev, J.; Meyhoff, C.S.; Søndergaard, E. Perioperative hyperoxia—Long-term impact on cardiovascular complications after abdominal surgery, a post hoc analysis of the PROXI trial. Int. J. Cardiol. 2016, 215, 238–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ruetzler, K.; Cohen, B.; Leung, S.; Mascha, E.J.; Knotzer, J.; Kurz, A.; Sessler, D.I.; Turan, A. Supplemental intraoperative oxygen does not promote acute kidney injury or cardiovascular complications after noncardiac surgery: Subanalysis of an alternating intervention trial. Anesth. Analg. 2019, 130, 933–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Holse, C.; Aasvang, E.K.; Vester-Andersen, M.; Rasmussen, L.S.; Wetterslev, J.; Christensen, R.; Jorgensen, L.N.; Pedersen, S.S.; Loft, F.C.; Troensegaard, H.; et al. Hyperoxia and Antioxidants for Myocardial Injury in Noncardiac Surgery: A 2 × 2 Factorial, Blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesthesiology 2022, 136, 408–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sametz, W.; Metzler, H.; Gries, M.; Porta, S.; Sadjak, A.; Supanz, S.; Juan, H. Perioperative catecholamine changes in cardiac risk patients. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 1999, 29, 582–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Devereaux, P.J.; Duceppe, E.; Guyatt, G.; Tandon, V.; Rodseth, R.; Biccard, B.M.; Xavier, D.; Szczeklik, W.; Meyhoff, C.; Vincent, J.; et al. Dabigatran in patients with myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MANAGE): An international, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2018, 391, 2325–2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rodseth, R.N.; Biccard, B.M.; Chu, R.; Buse, G.A.L.; Thabane, L.; Bakhai, A.; Bolliger, D.; Cagini, L.; Cahill, T.J.; Cardinale, D.; et al. Postoperative B-type natriuretic peptide for prediction of major cardiac events in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: Systematic review and individual patient meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 2013, 119, 271–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Reiterer, C.; Kabon, B.; Taschner, A.; Zotti, O.; Kurz, A.; Fleischmann, E. A comparison of intraoperative goal-directed intravenous administration of crystalloid versus colloid solutions on the postoperative maximum N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide in patients undergoing moderate- To high-risk noncardiac surgery. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020, 20, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Devereaux, P.J.; Sessler, D.I. Cardiac complications in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 2258–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Solomon, M.J.; Young, C.J.; Eyers, A.A.; Roberts, R.A. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br. J. Surg. 2002, 89, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Arsalani-Zadeh, R.; Ullah, S.; Khan, S.; MacFie, J. Oxidative stress in laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgery: A systematic review. J. Surg. Res. 2011, 169, e59–e68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Obradovic, M.; Kurz, A.; Kabon, B.; Roth, G.; Kimberger, O.; Zotti, O.; Bayoumi, A.; Reiterer, C.; Stift, A.; Fleischmann, E. The effect of intraoperative goal-directed crystalloid versus colloid administration on perioperative inflammatory markers- Asubstudy of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020, 20, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Reiterer, C.; Fleischmann, E.; Taschner, A.; Adamowitsch, N.; von Sonnenburg, M.F.; Graf, A.; Fraunschiel, M.; Starlinger, P.; Goschin, J.; Kabon, B. Perioperative supplemental oxygen and oxidative stress in patients undergoing moderate- to high-risk major abdominal surgery—A subanalysis of randomized clinical trial. J. Clin. Anesth. 2022, 77, 110614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Stagos, D.; Goutzourelas, N.; Ntontou, A.M.; Kafantaris, I.; Deli, C.K.; Poulios, A.; Jamurtas, A.Z.; Bar-Or, D.; Kouretas, D. Assessment of eccentric exercise-induced oxidative stress using oxidation-reduction potential markers. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2015, 2015, 204615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jcm 11 02085 g001 550
Figure 1. Patient Flow Diagram; Design and Form in Accordance with the 2010 CONSORT Guidelines [26].
Figure 1. Patient Flow Diagram; Design and Form in Accordance with the 2010 CONSORT Guidelines [26].
Jcm 11 02085 g001
Jcm 11 02085 g002 550
Figure 2. Plot showing the perioperative trend of Copeptin concentrations between patients who received 0.8 FiO2 (red) and patients who received 0.3 FiO2 (black). Dots represent mean values, vertical lines represent standard deviations of each group. The blank dots give the values of the observed individuals separately for the two groups.
Figure 2. Plot showing the perioperative trend of Copeptin concentrations between patients who received 0.8 FiO2 (red) and patients who received 0.3 FiO2 (black). Dots represent mean values, vertical lines represent standard deviations of each group. The blank dots give the values of the observed individuals separately for the two groups.
Jcm 11 02085 g002
Table
Table 1. Patient Characteristics.
Table 1. Patient Characteristics.
80% Oxygen
(n = 85)		30% Oxygen
(n = 88)
Age, years73 (70; 78)74 (70; 79)
Height, cm172 (165; 176)172 (167; 178)
Weight, kg80 (67; 93)75 (67; 90)
BMI, kg·m−226.6 (23.8; 30.7)24.9 (23.2; 27.7)
Sex, n (%)
 Women31 (36.5)28 (31.8)
 Men54 (63.5)60 (68.2)
ASA physical status, n (%)
 II16 (18.8)30 (34.1)
 III67 (78.8)58 (65.9)
 IV2 (2.4)0 (0)
Comorbidities, n (%)
 Hypertension79 (92.9)82 (93.2)
 Coronary artery disease24 (28.2)23 (26.1)
 Peripheral artery disease13 (15.3)15 (17.0)
 Stroke7 (8.2)5 (5.7)
 Congestive heart failure5 (5.9)6 (6.8)
 Transient ischemic attack2 (2.4)2 (2.3)
 Diabetes26 (30.6)19 (21.6)
 Insulin use7 (8.2)2 (2.3)
Long-term medication, n (%)
 Beta blockers44 (51.8)47 (53.4)
 ACI/ARB45 (52.9)50 (56.8)
 Diuretics31 (36.5)26 (29.5)
 Statins33 (38.8)38 (43.2)
 Acetylsalicylic acid24 (28.2)30 (34.1)
 Oral anticoagulant31 (36.5)21 (23.9)
 Alpha 2 agonist3 (3.5)3 (3.4)
Type of Surgery, (%)
 Hepatobiliary6 (7.1)6 (6.8)
 Colorectal18 (21.2)18 (20.5)
 Pancreatic11 (12.9)14 (15.9)
 Urological37 (42.1)34 (40.0)
 Gynaecological6 (7.1)3 (3.4)
 Other10 (11.8)10 (11.6)
Open vs. Laparoscopic Surgery, (%)
 Open51 (60.0)53 (60.2)
 Laparoscopic30 (35.3)30 (34.1)
 Both 14 (4.7)5 (5.7)
Laboratory parameters
 CRP, mg·dL−10.33 (0.10; 0.82)0.27 (0.10; 0.91)
 Creatinine, mg·dL−10.9 (0.7; 1.1)0.9 (0.8; 1.1)
 Hemoglobin, g·dL−112.2 (10.7; 13.2)12.6 (10.8; 13.9)
 Leukocytes, G·L−15.96 (5.03; 7.72)5.73 (4.85; 7.76)
 NT-proBNP, pg·ml−1205 (88; 486)218 (102; 796)
 Troponin T, ng·L−113 (8; 19)13 (9; 21)
Summary characteristics are presented as counts, percentages of patients, and median [25th quartile; 75th quartile]. BMI, body mass index; ASA, American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status; ACI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; CRP, C-reactive protein; NT-proBNP, N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide. 1 Defined as conversion from laparoscopic to open procedure.
Table
Table 2. Perioperative variables.
Table 2. Perioperative variables.
80% Oxygen
(n = 85)		30% Oxygen
(n = 88)		p-Value
Intraoperative
 Duration of anesthesia, min272 (186; 355)259 (205; 352)0.622
 Duration of surgery, min221 (141; 307)200 (142; 292)0.711
Fluid management
 Crystalloid, mL2160 (1508; 3386)2578 (1683; 3339)0.304
 Blood loss, mL300 (0; 600)275 (0; 725)0.610
 Urine output, mL300 (150; 475)300 (200; 500)0.417
Anesthesia management
 Fentanyl, mcg1013 (800; 1463)1100 (838; 1513)0.459
 Propofol, mg120 (93; 150)125 (50; 200)0.536
 Phenylephrine, mg0.28 (0.09; 0.46)0.21 (0.08; 0.42)0.717
 Noradrenaline, mg0.25 (0.00; 0.60)0.20 (0.00; 0.08)0.491
 etSevo, %1.3 (1.0; 1.3)1.2 (1.0; 1.3)0.556
 FiO2, %80 (80; 80)31 (30; 32)
 etCO2, mmHg34 (32; 36)34 (31; 35)0.531
 Core temp, °C36.5 (36.1; 36.8)36.5 (36.2; 36.9)0.210
Hemodynamic Parameters
 HR, beats·min−170 (58; 86)65 (56; 73)0.845
 MAP, mmHg80 (76; 84)81 (76; 88)0.549
 SV, mL71 (63; 84)66 (57; 83)0.821
 CO, L·min−14.1 (3.7; 5.6)4.6 (3.7; 5.3)0.615
 CVP, mmHg12 (10; 15)10 (9; 12)0.086
Arterial Blood Gas Analysis
 pO2, mmHg314 (270; 361)131 (109; 158)<0.001
 pCO2, mmHg42 (40; 44)41 (39; 43)0.015
 pH7.38 (7.35; 7.41)7.39 (7.35; 7.42)0.169
 BE−0.6 (−1.9; 0.9)−0.3 (−1.9; 0.9)0.765
 Hemoglobin, g·dL−111.7 (9.9; 12.8)11.7 (10.2; 12.9)0.745
 Lactate, mmol·L−10.9 (0.7; 1.2)0.9 (0.7; 1.1)0.745
 Glucose, mmol·L−17.3 (6.4; 8.9)7.0 (6.2; 8.1)0.071
2 h postoperative
Hemodynamic Parameters
 HR, beats·min−175 (61; 91)69 (63; 77)0.450
 MAP, mmHg82 (76; 100)81 (77; 100)0.431
72 h postoperative
 Fluid, mL a9852 (6845; 11,989)9506 (7200; 12,137)0.900
 Piritramide, mg b8.0 (3.0; 20.3)10.0 (3.0; 21.0)0.903
Summary characteristics of perioperative variables are presented as medians [25th quartile; 75th quartile]. All p-values are for two-tailed Mann–Whitney U tests. etSevo, end-tidal Sevoflurane concentration; FiO2, Fraction of inspired oxygen; etCO2, end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration; HR, heart rate; MAP, mean arterial pressure; SV, stroke volume; CO, cardiac output; CVP, central venous pressure; pO2, oxygen partial pressure; pCO2, carbon dioxide partial pressure; BE, base excess. a Overall amount of fluid administered during the first 72 h after surgery. b Overall amount of piritramide administered during the first 72 h after surgery.
Table
Table 3. Univariable regression model Copeptin.
Table 3. Univariable regression model Copeptin.
VariableComparisonEffectLower CIUpper CIp-Value
Timepre vs. 2 h post−241.740−264.440−219.050<0.001
pre vs. POD 1−35.206−58.245−12.1680.003
pre vs. POD 3−7.976−31.47015.5190.505
Time × GroupGroup 30% vs. 80% pre−0.087−35.11934.9440.996
Group 30% vs. 80% 2 h post29.838−4.61464.2910.090
Group 30% vs. 80% POD 1−1.453−36.79433.8880.936
Group 30% vs. 80% POD 3−1.514−38.05335.0250.935
Group 30% pre vs. 2 h post−256.380−288.210−224.550<0.001
Group 30% pre vs. POD 1−34.513−66.983−2.0420.037
Group 30% pre vs. POD 3−7.259−40.29525.7780.666
Group 80% pre vs. 2 h post−226.450−258.820−194.080<0.001
Group 80% pre vs. POD 1−35.878−68.582−3.1750.032
Group 80% pre vs. POD 3−8.685−42.11524.7440.610
Type of surgeryLaparoscopic vs. Open−31.164−55.866−6.4630.014
Time × Type of surgeryOverall Interaction <0.001
Age 0.559−0.9372.0550.464
BMI 0.194−2.1362.5230.871
SexFemale vs. Male15.426−9.30940.1610.221
ASAIII, IV vs. I, II−3.227−29.83623.3830.812
Coronary Artery DiseaseYes vs. No5.535−20.69731.7670.679
Peripheral Artery DiseaseYes vs. No19.548−12.76351.8590.235
StrokeYes vs. No1.759−44.60148.1180.941
Heart FailureYes vs. No22.391−24.92569.7070.353
DiabetesYes vs. No−1.582−28.14324.9800.907
HypertensionYes vs. No−4.915−51.27341.4430.835
The estimated effect sizes, confidence intervals (CI) and p-values were calculated using univariable regression models. pre, preoperative; 2 h post, within two hours after surgery; POD, postoperative day; BMI, body mass index; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Taschner, A.; Kabon, B.; Graf, A.; Adamowitsch, N.; Falkner von Sonnenburg, M.; Fraunschiel, M.; Horvath, K.; Fleischmann, E.; Reiterer, C. Perioperative Supplemental Oxygen and Postoperative Copeptin Concentrations in Cardiac-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery—A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2085. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082085

AMA Style

Taschner A, Kabon B, Graf A, Adamowitsch N, Falkner von Sonnenburg M, Fraunschiel M, Horvath K, Fleischmann E, Reiterer C. Perioperative Supplemental Oxygen and Postoperative Copeptin Concentrations in Cardiac-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery—A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(8):2085. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082085

Chicago/Turabian Style

Taschner, Alexander, Barbara Kabon, Alexandra Graf, Nikolas Adamowitsch, Markus Falkner von Sonnenburg, Melanie Fraunschiel, Katharina Horvath, Edith Fleischmann, and Christian Reiterer. 2022. "Perioperative Supplemental Oxygen and Postoperative Copeptin Concentrations in Cardiac-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery—A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 8: 2085. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082085

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop