Next Article in Journal
Acute Macular Neuroretinopathy and Paracentral Acute Middle Maculopathy during SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Vaccination
Next Article in Special Issue
Social Media Sentiment about COVID-19 Vaccination Predicts Vaccine Acceptance among Peruvian Social Media Users the Next Day
Previous Article in Journal
Cohort-Specific Peptide Reagents Broaden Depth and Breadth Estimates of the CD8 T Cell Response to HIV-1 Gag Potential T Cell Epitopes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Immunotherapy for Urological Tumors on YouTubeTM: An Information-Quality Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Social Media Content on Immunology: Is an Assessment by the Scientific Community Required?

by
Simone Morra
1,2,*,
Francesco Di Bello
2,
Claudia Collà Ruvolo
2 and
Gianluigi Califano
2
1
Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
2
Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2023, 11(2), 473; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020473
Submission received: 12 February 2023 / Accepted: 15 February 2023 / Published: 17 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social Media in Immunology and Immunotherapy)
In recent years, vaccines and immunotherapy have become two of the most promising and effective tools in the fight against a wide range of diseases, from the common cold to cancer. Both have the potential to save countless lives, but their impact is dependent on widespread access and adoption. Unfortunately, despite the proven safety and efficacy of these treatments, there are still many people who are skeptical or even opposed to them. In an era of information overload, where social media (SoMe) platforms are a primary source of news and information, it is critical that we take a closer look at how these platforms shape the public’s understanding of vaccines and immunotherapy.
Today, over 50 million Americans search for medical information and advice on the Internet [1]. This phenomenon is even more accentuated after the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak [2]. Specifically, we are witnessing a growing use of SoMe platforms worldwide: data from Pew Research Center report that the percentage of Americans who use SoMe rose from 5% in 2005 to 72% in 2021 [3]. Similarly, in 2021, the percentage of Europeans aged 16–74 that used SoMe was around 57%, with the highest rate reported in Denmark (85%) and the lowest in Italy (48%) [4]. Among the various platforms currently available to Internet users, the most used is YouTube. It is noteworthy that this SoMe platform represents the one with the highest rates in terms of use for both genders (which stands at around 80%), for different race/ethnicity groups (ranging from 79% for White people to 85% for Hispanic people) and, even more important, for all income groups (ranging from 75% to 90% for the population with a median annual income lower than USD 30K and higher than USD 75K, respectively) and ages (ranging from 49 to 95% for +65 to 18–29 years old, respectively) [3]. The users who mostly carry out online searches on medical topics are represented by patients suffering from chronic or oncological diseases, and their caregivers [5].
Among the chronic diseases with the highest prevalence, rheumatological diseases are to be counted. Specifically, arthritis is diagnosed in 23% of adult Americans and psoriasis affect 1–4% of the population worldwide [6,7]. Additionally, a recent report by the World Health Organization (WHO), has revealed that infectious diseases, specifically lower respiratory infections, represent the first cause of communicable death worldwide, for both males and females [8]. Moreover, among the top 10 causes of death in low-income countries, along with lower respiratory tract infections, are other infectious diseases, such as diarrheal diseases, malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS [9]. Furthermore, the relevance of infectious diseases is not negligible considering that some infectious agents have been classified as causal agents of some neoplasms [10]. Specifically, the human papillomavirus is one of the most potent viruses that causes sexually transmitted diseases in a large-scale population worldwide, and it is the major causative agent for carcinoma of the uterine cervix, squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and oropharyngeal carcinomas [11]. Additionally, chronic hepatitis B infections are responsible for more than 820,000 deaths annually due to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma [12]. For both of the aforementioned viruses, effective vaccines have received Food and Drug Administration approval since 2006 and 1981, respectively [13,14]. The correct implementation of a vaccination campaign would drastically reduce the spread of the diseases and the relative deaths connected to them.
Moreover, the recent phenomenon of the COVID-19 pandemic has brought to light the large impact that infectious diseases can have even in high-income countries, placing a strain on healthcare systems [15]. The important role of immunology in the fight against COVID-19 is incontestable. Given the imperative for speed, the ability to rapidly develop a vaccine was instrumental to coping with the pandemic [16].
Of no less importance for collective health, oncological pathologies must be considered. Specifically, GLOBOCAN 2020 estimates of cancer incidence and mortality produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer estimated 19.3 million new cancer cases and almost 10.0 million cancer deaths in 2020 [17]. Although surgery and chemotherapy still represent the cornerstones of the treatment of this type of disease, immunotherapy is changing the way we think about and treat cancer. In fact, to date, there are notable applications, in various types of cancer, of drugs designed to stimulate the body’s immune response against neoplastic cells [18,19,20].
It is undeniable that SoMe platforms have often been the location of debates on medical topics, and this phenomenon has further increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, the medical contents uploaded to SoMe are not subjected to any proofreading operation, meaning that the quality of the information is not guaranteed. Therefore, in the last year, as well as for other specialties [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34], many works that analyzed the quality of immunological information on social media have been produced [35,36,37,38]. The result of the analysis of YouTube content on immunological topics is that the content is of a low-quality, and especially greatly confused in the description of the chosen topic. Moreover, it is increasingly evident that the most popular videos are not necessarily those of the highest quality. Therefore, a revision of these contents is necessary by the scientific community.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.C. and S.M.; methodology, S.M.; software, S.M.; validation, G.C.; formal analysis, C.C.R.; investigation, F.D.B.; resources, S.M.; data curation, C.C.R.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M.; writing—review and editing, S.M.; visualization, F.D.B.; supervision, G.C.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Steinberg, P.L.; Wason, S.; Stern, J.M.; Deters, L.; Kowal, B.; Seigne, J. YouTube as Source of Prostate Cancer Information. Urology 2010, 75, 619–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Creta, M.; Sagnelli, C.; Celentano, G.; Napolitano, L.; La Rocca, R.; Capece, M.; Califano, G.; Calogero, A.; Sica, A.; Mangiapia, F.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Infection Affects the Lower Urinary Tract and Male Genital System: A Systematic Review. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 3133–3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. NW, 1615 L. St; Washington, S. 800; Inquiries, D. 20036 U.-419-4300|M.-857-8562|F.-419-4372|M. Social Media Fact Sheet. Pew Res. Cent. Internet Sci. Tech. Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/ (accessed on 9 January 2023).
  4. Do You Participate in Social Networks? Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/edn-20210630-1 (accessed on 9 January 2023).
  5. Marar, S.D.; Al-Madaney, M.M.; Almousawi, F.H. Health Information on Social Media: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Practices of Patients and Their Companions. Saudi Med. J. 2019, 40, 1294–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Barbour, K.E.; Helmick, C.G.; Boring, M.; Brady, T.J. Vital Signs: Prevalence of Doctor-Diagnosed Arthritis and Arthritis-Attributable Activity Limitation—United States, 2013–2015. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2017, 66, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Gisondi, P.; Geat, D.; Maurelli, M.; Degli Esposti, L.; Bellinato, F.; Girolomoni, G. Cost per Responder Analysis of Secukinumab versus Adalimumab in the Treatment of Psoriatic Disease. Vaccines 2022, 10, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Global Health Estimates: Life Expectancy and Leading Causes of Death and Disability. Available online: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates (accessed on 8 February 2023).
  9. The Top 10 Causes of Death. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death (accessed on 8 February 2023).
  10. Cancer. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer (accessed on 9 February 2023).
  11. Malik, S.; Sah, R.; Muhammad, K.; Waheed, Y. Tracking HPV Infection, Associated Cancer Development, and Recent Treatment Efforts—A Comprehensive Review. Vaccines 2023, 11, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Flores, J.E.; Thompson, A.J.; Ryan, M.; Howell, J. The Global Impact of Hepatitis B Vaccination on Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Vaccines 2022, 10, 793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. HPV Vaccination: What Everyone Should Know|CDC. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/hpv/public/index.html (accessed on 12 February 2023).
  14. Pinkbook: Hepatitis B|CDC. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/hepb.html (accessed on 12 February 2023).
  15. Griffin, G.; Krizo, J.; Mangira, C.; Simon, E.L. The Impact of COVID-19 on Emergency Department Boarding and in-Hospital Mortality. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2023, 67, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Thanh Le, T.; Andreadakis, Z.; Kumar, A.; Gómez Román, R.; Tollefsen, S.; Saville, M.; Mayhew, S. The COVID-19 Vaccine Development Landscape. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2020, 19, 305–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA. Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Morse, W.; Nawaz, H.; Choudhry, A.A. Combination of Chemotherapeutic Agents and Biological Response Modifiers (Immunotherapy) in Triple-Negative/Her2( +) Breast Cancer, Multiple Myeloma, and Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J. Egypt. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2023, 34, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Califano, G.; Ouzaid, I.; Verze, P.; Hermieu, J.-F.; Mirone, V.; Xylinas, E. Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. World J. Urol. 2021, 39, 1357–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Califano, G.; Ouzaid, I.; Laine-Caroff, P.; Peyrottes, A.; Collà Ruvolo, C.; Pradère, B.; Elalouf, V.; Misrai, V.; Hermieu, J.-F.; Shariat, S.F.; et al. Current Advances in Immune Checkpoint Inhibition and Clinical Genomics in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: State of the Art. Curr. Oncol. Tor. Ont 2022, 29, 687–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Morra, S.; Collà Ruvolo, C.; Napolitano, L.; La Rocca, R.; Celentano, G.; Califano, G.; Creta, M.; Capece, M.; Turco, C.; Cilio, S.; et al. YouTubeTM as a Source of Information on Bladder Pain Syndrome: A Contemporary Analysis. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2021, 41, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Azer, S.A.; AlKhawajah, N.M.; Alshamlan, Y.A. Critical Evaluation of YouTube Videos on Colostomy and Ileostomy: Can These Videos Be Used as Learning Resources? Patient Educ. Couns. 2022, 105, 383–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cilio, S.; Collà Ruvolo, C.; Turco, C.; Creta, M.; Capece, M.; La Rocca, R.; Celentano, G.; Califano, G.; Morra, S.; Melchionna, A.; et al. Analysis of Quality Information Provided by “Dr. YouTubeTM” on Phimosis. Int. J. Impot. Res. 2022, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Etzel, C.M.; Bokshan, S.L.; Forster, T.A.; Owens, B.D. A Quality Assessment of YouTube Content on Shoulder Instability. Phys. Sportsmed. 2022, 50, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Turco, C.; Collà Ruvolo, C.; Cilio, S.; Celentano, G.; Califano, G.; Creta, M.; Capece, M.; La Rocca, R.; Napolitano, L.; Mangiapia, F.; et al. Looking for Cystoscopy on YouTube: Are Videos a Reliable Information Tool for Internet Users? Arch. Ital. Urol. Androl. Organo Uff. Soc. Ital. Ecogr. Urol. Nefrol. 2022, 94, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yavan, M.A.; Gökçe, G. YouTube as a Source of Information on Adult Orthodontics: A Video Analysis Study. J. World Fed. Orthod. 2022, 11, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Melchionna, A.; Collà Ruvolo, C.; Capece, M.; La Rocca, R.; Celentano, G.; Califano, G.; Creta, M.; Napolitano, L.; Morra, S.; Cilio, S.; et al. Testicular Pain and YoutubeTM: Are Uploaded Videos a Reliable Source to Get Information? Int. J. Impot. Res. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yeter, H.H.; Akcay, O.F. YouTube as a Platform for Knowledge and Awareness of Peritoneal Dialysis: A Content Analysis. Perit. Dial. Int. J. Int. Soc. Perit. Dial. 2022, 42, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Di Bello, F.; Collà Ruvolo, C.; Cilio, S.; La Rocca, R.; Capece, M.; Creta, M.; Celentano, G.; Califano, G.; Morra, S.; Iacovazzo, C.; et al. Testicular Cancer and YouTube: What Do You Expect from a Social Media Platform? Int. J. Urol. Off. J. Jpn. Urol. Assoc. 2022, 29, 685–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jones, P.; Rajasegaran, A.; Brassale, S.; Chen, Y.; Haslam, R.; Austin, C.; Seideman, C.A. Assessment of the Educational Value of Distal Hypospadias Repair Videos on YouTube. Urology 2022, 159, 28–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Collà Ruvolo, C.; Califano, G.; Tuccillo, A.; Tolentino, S.; Cancelliere, E.; Di Bello, F.; Celentano, G.; Creta, M.; Longo, N.; Morra, S.; et al. YouTubeTM as a Source of Information on Placenta Accreta: A Quality Analysis. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2022, 272, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gerundo, G.; Collà Ruvolo, C.; Puzone, B.; Califano, G.; La Rocca, R.; Parisi, V.; Capece, M.; Celentano, G.; Creta, M.; Rengo, G.; et al. Personal Protective Equipment in COVID-19: Evidence-Based Quality and Analysis of YouTube Videos after One Year of Pandemic. Am. J. Infect. Control 2022, 50, 300–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Osman, W.; Mohamed, F.; Elhassan, M.; Shoufan, A. Is YouTube a Reliable Source of Health-Related Information? A Systematic Review. BMC Med. Educ. 2022, 22, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Morra, S.; Napolitano, L.; Collà Ruvolo, C.; Celentano, G.; La Rocca, R.; Capece, M.; Creta, M.; Passaro, F.; Di Bello, F.; Cirillo, L.; et al. Could YouTubeTM Encourage Men on Prostate Checks? A Contemporary Analysis. Arch. Ital. Urol. E Androl. 2022, 94, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kocyigit, B.F.; Akaltun, M.S. Does YouTube Provide High Quality Information? Assessment of Secukinumab Videos. Rheumatol. Int. 2019, 39, 1263–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, H.O.-Y.; Pastukhova, E.; Brandts-Longtin, O.; Tan, M.G.; Kirchhof, M.G. YouTube as a Source of Misinformation on COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Analysis. BMJ Glob. Health 2022, 7, e008334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Memioglu, T.; Ozyasar, M. Analysis of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information for Myocarditis during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Clin. Res. Cardiol. Off. J. Ger. Card. Soc. 2022, 111, 1113–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Atigan, A. Analysis of YouTube Videos on Pregnant COVID-19 Patients During the Pandemic Period. Cureus 2022, 14, e29934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Morra, S.; Di Bello, F.; Collà Ruvolo, C.; Califano, G. Social Media Content on Immunology: Is an Assessment by the Scientific Community Required? Vaccines 2023, 11, 473. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020473

AMA Style

Morra S, Di Bello F, Collà Ruvolo C, Califano G. Social Media Content on Immunology: Is an Assessment by the Scientific Community Required? Vaccines. 2023; 11(2):473. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020473

Chicago/Turabian Style

Morra, Simone, Francesco Di Bello, Claudia Collà Ruvolo, and Gianluigi Califano. 2023. "Social Media Content on Immunology: Is an Assessment by the Scientific Community Required?" Vaccines 11, no. 2: 473. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020473

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop