Figure 1.
Diagram of the extraction, separation, and purification of Allium cepa. Note: ACE, the ethanol extract of Allium cepa; ACW, the water fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC30%, the 30% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC50%, the 50% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resincolumn chromatography; AC70%, the 70% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC95%, the 95% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography. Compound 1, gallic acid; Compound 2, quercetin-3,4’-diglucoside; Compound 3, Isoquercetin; Compound 4, quercetin; Compound 5, Isorhamnetin.
Figure 1.
Diagram of the extraction, separation, and purification of Allium cepa. Note: ACE, the ethanol extract of Allium cepa; ACW, the water fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC30%, the 30% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC50%, the 50% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resincolumn chromatography; AC70%, the 70% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC95%, the 95% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography. Compound 1, gallic acid; Compound 2, quercetin-3,4’-diglucoside; Compound 3, Isoquercetin; Compound 4, quercetin; Compound 5, Isorhamnetin.
Figure 2.
DPPH● scavenging rate of the fractions from Allium cepa. Note: ACE, the ethanol extract of Allium cepa; ACW, the water fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC30%, the 30% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC50%, the 50% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC70%, the 70% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC95%, the 95% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography.
Figure 2.
DPPH● scavenging rate of the fractions from Allium cepa. Note: ACE, the ethanol extract of Allium cepa; ACW, the water fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC30%, the 30% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC50%, the 50% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC70%, the 70% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC95%, the 95% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography.
Figure 3.
ABTS scavenging rate of the fractions from Allium cepa. Note: ACE, the ethanol extract of Allium cepa; ACW, the water fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC30%, the 30% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC50%, the 50% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC70%, the 70% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC95%, the 95% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography.
Figure 3.
ABTS scavenging rate of the fractions from Allium cepa. Note: ACE, the ethanol extract of Allium cepa; ACW, the water fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC30%, the 30% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC50%, the 50% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC70%, the 70% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC95%, the 95% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography.
Figure 4.
Results of cell survival test of the fractions from Allium cepa. Note: NC, the negative group; FFA, the model group; PC, the positive group; ACE, the ethanol extract of Allium cepa; ACW, the water fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC30%, the 30% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC50%, the 50% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC70%, the 70% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC95%, the 95% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography.
Figure 4.
Results of cell survival test of the fractions from Allium cepa. Note: NC, the negative group; FFA, the model group; PC, the positive group; ACE, the ethanol extract of Allium cepa; ACW, the water fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC30%, the 30% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC50%, the 50% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC70%, the 70% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC95%, the 95% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography.
Figure 5.
Representative pictures of oil red O staining of the extract and fractions from Allium cepa L. and related controls. Note: (A), the negative group; (B), the model group; (C), the positive group; (D), high-dose group of A. cepa ethanol extract; (E), high-dose group of the water fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; (F), high-dose group of the 30% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; (G), high-dose group of the 50% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; (H), high-dose group of the 70% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; (I), high-dose group of the 95% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resincolumn chromatography.
Figure 5.
Representative pictures of oil red O staining of the extract and fractions from Allium cepa L. and related controls. Note: (A), the negative group; (B), the model group; (C), the positive group; (D), high-dose group of A. cepa ethanol extract; (E), high-dose group of the water fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; (F), high-dose group of the 30% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; (G), high-dose group of the 50% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; (H), high-dose group of the 70% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; (I), high-dose group of the 95% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resincolumn chromatography.
Figure 6.
TG levels in HepG2 cells treated for 24 h with the extract and fractions from Allium cepa. Note: NC, the negative group; FFA, the model group; PC, the positive group; ACE, the ethanol extract of Allium cepa; ACW, the water fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC30%, the 30% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC50%, the 50% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resincolumn chromatography; AC70%, the 70% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC95%, the 95% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography. H, M, and L, respectively, indicate high, medium, and low concentrations of the experimental groups; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 as compared to the model group of FFA-induced cells; ### p < 0.001 as compared to the negative controls.
Figure 6.
TG levels in HepG2 cells treated for 24 h with the extract and fractions from Allium cepa. Note: NC, the negative group; FFA, the model group; PC, the positive group; ACE, the ethanol extract of Allium cepa; ACW, the water fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC30%, the 30% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC50%, the 50% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resincolumn chromatography; AC70%, the 70% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC95%, the 95% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography. H, M, and L, respectively, indicate high, medium, and low concentrations of the experimental groups; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 as compared to the model group of FFA-induced cells; ### p < 0.001 as compared to the negative controls.
Figure 7.
TC levels in HepG2 cells treated for 24 h with the extract and fractions from Allium cepa. Note: NC, the negative group; FFA, the model group; PC, the positive group; ACE, the ethanol extract of Allium cepa; ACW, the water fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC30%, the 30% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC50%, the 50% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC70%, the 70% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC95%, the 95% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography. H, M, and L, respectively, indicate high, medium, and low concentrations of the experimental groups; * p < 0.05 as compared to the model group of FFA-induced cells; ## p < 0.01 as compared to the negative controls.
Figure 7.
TC levels in HepG2 cells treated for 24 h with the extract and fractions from Allium cepa. Note: NC, the negative group; FFA, the model group; PC, the positive group; ACE, the ethanol extract of Allium cepa; ACW, the water fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC30%, the 30% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC50%, the 50% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC70%, the 70% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography; AC95%, the 95% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin column chromatography. H, M, and L, respectively, indicate high, medium, and low concentrations of the experimental groups; * p < 0.05 as compared to the model group of FFA-induced cells; ## p < 0.01 as compared to the negative controls.
Figure 8.
Relative mRNA expression of 10 genes after 30% ethanol treatment. Note: NC, the negative group; FFA, the model group; PC, the positive group; AC30%, the 30% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 as compared to the model group of FFA-induced cells; # p < 0.05 as compared to the negative controls.
Figure 8.
Relative mRNA expression of 10 genes after 30% ethanol treatment. Note: NC, the negative group; FFA, the model group; PC, the positive group; AC30%, the 30% ethanol fraction of ACE through D101 macroporous adsorption resin; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 as compared to the model group of FFA-induced cells; # p < 0.05 as compared to the negative controls.
Figure 9.
AC30% liquid chromatogram.
Figure 9.
AC30% liquid chromatogram.
Figure 10.
AC30% total ion current chromatogram.
Figure 10.
AC30% total ion current chromatogram.
Figure 11.
Compounds A-H from AC30%.
Figure 11.
Compounds A-H from AC30%.
Figure 12.
Liquid chromatogram of AC50%.
Figure 12.
Liquid chromatogram of AC50%.
Figure 13.
Total ion current chromatogram of AC50%.
Figure 13.
Total ion current chromatogram of AC50%.
Figure 14.
Compounds I-X from AC50%.
Figure 14.
Compounds I-X from AC50%.
Figure 15.
Compounds 1–5 from Allium cepa.
Figure 15.
Compounds 1–5 from Allium cepa.
Figure 16.
DPPH● scavenging rate of the components from A. cepa. Note: Compound 1, gallic acid; Compound 2, quercetin-3,4-diglucoside; Compound 3, Isoquercetin; Compound 4, quercetin; Compound 5, Isorhamnetin.
Figure 16.
DPPH● scavenging rate of the components from A. cepa. Note: Compound 1, gallic acid; Compound 2, quercetin-3,4-diglucoside; Compound 3, Isoquercetin; Compound 4, quercetin; Compound 5, Isorhamnetin.
Figure 17.
ABTS+● scavenging rate of the components from A. cepa. Note: Compound 1, gallic acid; Compound 2, quercetin-3,4-diglucoside; Compound 3, Isoquercetin; Compound 4, quercetin; Compound 5, Isorhamnetin.
Figure 17.
ABTS+● scavenging rate of the components from A. cepa. Note: Compound 1, gallic acid; Compound 2, quercetin-3,4-diglucoside; Compound 3, Isoquercetin; Compound 4, quercetin; Compound 5, Isorhamnetin.
Figure 18.
Results of cell survival test of the compounds from Allium cepa. Note: NC, the negative group; FFA, the model group; PC, thepositive group; Compound 1, gallic acid; Compound 2, quercetin-3,4’-diglucoside; Compound 3, Isoquercetin; Compound 4, quercetin; Compound 5, Isorhamnetin.
Figure 18.
Results of cell survival test of the compounds from Allium cepa. Note: NC, the negative group; FFA, the model group; PC, thepositive group; Compound 1, gallic acid; Compound 2, quercetin-3,4’-diglucoside; Compound 3, Isoquercetin; Compound 4, quercetin; Compound 5, Isorhamnetin.
Figure 19.
TG levels of the monomers against HepG2 cells after 24 h. Note: NC, the negative group; FFA, the model group; PC, the positive group; Compound 1, gallic acid; Compound 2, quercetin-3,4-diglucoside; Compound 3, Isoquercetin; Compound 4, quercetin; Compound 5, Isorhamnetin, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 as compared to the model group of FFA-induced cells; #### p < 0.0001 as compared to the negative controls.
Figure 19.
TG levels of the monomers against HepG2 cells after 24 h. Note: NC, the negative group; FFA, the model group; PC, the positive group; Compound 1, gallic acid; Compound 2, quercetin-3,4-diglucoside; Compound 3, Isoquercetin; Compound 4, quercetin; Compound 5, Isorhamnetin, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 as compared to the model group of FFA-induced cells; #### p < 0.0001 as compared to the negative controls.
Figure 20.
TC levels of the monomers against HepG2 cells after 24 h. Note: NC, the negative group; FFA, the model group; PC, the positive group; Compound 1, gallic acid; Compound 2, quercetin-3,4-diglucoside; Compound 3, Isoquercetin; Compound 4, quercetin; Compound 5, Isorhamnetin, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001 as compared to the model group of FFA-induced cells; #### p < 0.0001 as compared to the negative controls.
Figure 20.
TC levels of the monomers against HepG2 cells after 24 h. Note: NC, the negative group; FFA, the model group; PC, the positive group; Compound 1, gallic acid; Compound 2, quercetin-3,4-diglucoside; Compound 3, Isoquercetin; Compound 4, quercetin; Compound 5, Isorhamnetin, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001 as compared to the model group of FFA-induced cells; #### p < 0.0001 as compared to the negative controls.
Figure 21.
Relative mRNA expression of 10 genes after quercetin treatment. Note: NC, the negative group; FFA, the model group; PC, the positive group; H, quercetin, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 and as compared to the model group of FFA-induced cells; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, and ### p < 0.001 as compared to the negative controls.
Figure 21.
Relative mRNA expression of 10 genes after quercetin treatment. Note: NC, the negative group; FFA, the model group; PC, the positive group; H, quercetin, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 and as compared to the model group of FFA-induced cells; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, and ### p < 0.001 as compared to the negative controls.
Table 1.
Primer sequence table.
Table 1.
Primer sequence table.
Genes | Gene Accession Number | Primer Sequence |
---|
h-β-actin | NM_001101 | Forward: 5′-CCTAGAAGCATTTGCGGTGG-3′ |
| | Reverse: 5′-GAGCTACGAGCTGCCTGACG-3′ |
h-SREBP-1 | XM_054316990 | Forward: 5′-CACCGTTTCTTCGTGGATGG-3′ |
| | Reverse: 5′-CACACAGTTCAGTGCTCGCTCTA-3′ |
h-SREBP-2 | XM_054325874 | Forward: 5′-GCAGTCTGGTGGACAATGAGG-3′ |
| | Reverse: 5′-TCATCCAATAGAGGGCTTCC-3′ |
h-FAS | XM_054315477 | Forward: 5′-ACAGGGACAACCTGGAGTTCT-3′ |
| | Reverse: 5′-CTGTGGTCCCACTTGATGAGT-3′ |
h-HMGCR | XM_054352485 | Forward: 5′-AGGACCCCTTTGCTTAGATGA-3′ |
| | Reverse: 5′-GCACCTCCACCAAGACCTATT-3′ |
h-ACC1 | XM_054315912 | Forward: 5′-ATTTCTTCCATCTCCCCCTCT-3′ |
| | Reverse: 5′-ATGCCAATCTCATTTCCTCCT-3′ |
h-SCD1 | NM_005063 | Forward: 5′-TGGTTTCACTTGGAGCTGTG-3′ |
| | Reverse: 5′-GGCCTTGGAGACTTTCTTCC-3′ |
h-CYP7A1 | NM_000780 | Forward: 5′-GTCTTTCCAGCCCTGGTAGC-3′ |
| | Reverse: 5′-GAGGACCACGAGGTGTGTCT-3′ |
h-CPT1 | XM_054367696 | Forward: 5′-CGTCTTTTGGGATCCACGATT-3′ |
| | Reverse: 5′-TGTGCTGGATGGTGTCTGTCTC-3′ |
h-LXRα | XM_054367384 | Forward: 5′-AGCGCTTTGCCCACTTCA-3′ |
| | Reverse: 5′-AGCCGGGTAGCTGTTTAGCA-3′ |
h-PPARα | XM_054325750 | Forward: 5′-GACGTGCTTCCTGCTTCATAG-3′ |
| | Reverse: 5′-CCACCATCGCGACCAGAT-3′ |
Table 2.
Gradient elution conditions.
Table 2.
Gradient elution conditions.
Time(min) | Phase A (%) | Phase B (%) |
---|
0 | 100 | 0 |
30 | 85 | 15 |
50 | 50 | 50 |
80 | 0 | 100 |
100 | 0 | 100 |
101 | 100 | 0 |
110 | 100 | 0 |
Table 3.
Contents of total polyphenols and flavonoids in different fractions of onion.
Table 3.
Contents of total polyphenols and flavonoids in different fractions of onion.
Source | Fractions | TPC (mg GAE/g DW) | TFC (mg RE/g DW) |
---|
UAE | ACE | 18.02 | 30.89 |
D101 resin | ACA | 10.74 | 15.92 |
AC30% | 4.43 | 16.62 |
AC50% | 1.60 | 3.82 |
AC70% | 0.12 | 0.36 |
AC95% | 0.10 | 0.66 |
Table 4.
IC50.values of the fractions from A. cepa against ABTS+● and DPPH● free radicals.
Table 4.
IC50.values of the fractions from A. cepa against ABTS+● and DPPH● free radicals.
Sample | DPPH●(μg/mL) | ABTS+●(μg/mL) |
---|
AC30% | - | 24.15 |
AC50% | 82.20 | 17.45 |
AC70% | 90.03 | 18.52 |
Rutin | 13.10 | 8.748 |
Table 5.
Analysis results of AC30% using UPLC-ESI-MS/MS.
Table 5.
Analysis results of AC30% using UPLC-ESI-MS/MS.
No. | tR (min) | Identification | Composition | [M-H]− (m/z) | MS/MS (m/z) | Error (ppm) | References |
---|
A | 3.01 | Alliin | C6H11NO3S | 176.0404 | 145,120 | 5.727 | Massbank Database, [28] |
B | 6.93 | N-Fructosyl pyroglutamate | C11H17NO8 | 290.0884 | 128 | 4.764 | [36] |
C | 20.02 | Protocatechuic acid | C7H6O4 | 153.0209 | 109 | 7.097 | [34] |
D | 40.16 | Quercetin-3,7,4′-O-triglucoside | C33H40O22 | 787.1946 | 625,463,301 | 2.390 | [35] |
E | 43.13 | Quercetin-3,7-O-diglucoside | C27H30O17 | 625.1420 | 463,301 | 3.334 | [35] |
F | 46.06 | Quercetin-7,4′-O-diglucoside | C27H30O17 | 625.1420 | 463,301 | 3.334 | [35] |
G | 48.58 | Quercetin-3,4′-O-diglucoside | C27H30O17 | 625.1420 | 463,301 | 3.334 | [35] |
H | 49.40 | Isorhamnetin-3,4′-O-diglucoside | C28H32O17 | 639.1579 | 477, 315 | 3.679 | [35] |
Table 6.
Analysis results of AC50% using UPLC-ESI-MS/MS.
Table 6.
Analysis results of AC50% using UPLC-ESI-MS/MS.
No. | tR (min) | Identification | Composition | [M-H]− (m/z) | MS/MS (m/z) | Error (ppm) | References |
---|
Ⅰ | 45.09 | Taxifolin-3-glucoside | C21H22O12 | 465.1045 | 285, 151 | 0.990 | [9], PubChem |
Ⅱ | 46.08 | Quercetin-7,4′-diglucoside | C27H30O17 | 625.1422 | 463, 301 | 3.595 | [35] |
Ⅲ | 47.68 | Taxifolin | C15H12O7 | 303.0519 | 151, 125 | 0.980 | [9], PubChem |
Ⅳ | 48.57 | Quercetin-3,4′-diglucoside | C27H30O17 | 625.1422 | 463, 301 | 3.595 | [35] |
Ⅴ | 49.38 | Isorhamnetin-3,4′-diglucoside | C28H32O17 | 639.1581 | 477, 315 | 4.012 | [35] |
Ⅵ | 49.79 | Quercetin-7-O-glucoside | C21H20O12 | 463.0892 | 301 | 4.474 | [35] |
Ⅶ | 52.38 | Quercetin-3-O-glucoside | C21H20O12 | 463.0892 | 300 | 4.474 | [35] |
Ⅷ | 53.92 | Quercetin-4′-O-glucoside | C21H20O12 | 463.0892 | 301 | 4.474 | [35] |
Ⅸ | 55.42 | Isorhamnetin-4′-glucoside | C22H22O12 | 477.1045 | 315 | 3.723 | [35] |
Ⅹ | 58.04 | Quercetin | C15H10O7 | 301.037 | 151,107 | 1.000 | [35] |
Table 7.
IC50 of the components from A. cepa against ABTS+● and DPPH● free radicals.
Table 7.
IC50 of the components from A. cepa against ABTS+● and DPPH● free radicals.
Sample | DPPH●(μg/mL) | ABTS+●(μg/mL) |
---|
Rutin | 13.10 | 8.748 |
1 | 12.76 | 2.865 |
2 | - | 17.87 |
3 | 31.36 | 5.484 |
4 | 7.12 | 2.121 |
5 | - | 96.83 |