Next Article in Journal
H2S Donors with Cytoprotective Effects in Models of MI/R Injury and Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity
Previous Article in Journal
AD−1 Small Molecule Improves Learning and Memory Function in Scopolamine-Induced Amnesic Mice Model through Regulation of CREB/BDNF and NF-κB/MAPK Signaling Pathway
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Trace Elements and Ferritin in Pig Saliva: Variations during Fattening, Time of Sampling, Effect of Dirtiness and Stability under Different Storage Conditions

by
Alba Ortín-Bustillo
1,
Damián Escribano
1,2,
Silvia Martínez-Subiela
1,
Asta Tvarijonaviciute
1,
Alberto Muñoz-Prieto
1,
Marina López-Arjona
3,
José J. Cerón
1 and
Fernando Tecles
1,*
1
Interdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Analysis (Interlab-UMU), Regional Campus of International Excellence ‘Campus Mare Nostrum’, University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo s/n, 30100 Murcia, Spain
2
Department of Animal Production, Regional Campus of International Excellence ‘Campus Mare Nostrum’, University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo s/n, 30100 Murcia, Spain
3
Department of Animal and Food Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2023, 12(3), 649; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12030649
Submission received: 20 February 2023 / Revised: 1 March 2023 / Accepted: 3 March 2023 / Published: 5 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Health Outcomes of Antioxidants and Oxidative Stress)

Abstract

:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the possible changes of zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), iron (Fe) and ferritin during the entire productive cycle in fattening pigs and at different diurnal sampling times. Moreover, the possible effects of the presence of pen contaminants and storage stability at different temperature conditions were assessed. The analytes changed along the different phases of the fattening productive cycle, showing, in general, higher values at the initial phases. In addition, statistically significant variations were found in Zn and Cu measurements at different sampling times of the day. In the spectrophotometric assays, the values of all analytes significantly increased after adding high concentrations of feces or feed. However, when low concentrations of feces or feed were added, only Cu showed a significant increase. Overall, the salivary levels of Zn, Cu, Fe and ferritin in pigs can change during different fattening phases and the different hours of the day. These analytes were more stable at −80 °C and, if saliva is contaminated with feces or feed, it can lead to an increase in these analytes.

1. Introduction

The application of the saliva as a non-invasive sample for analysis has grown more popular in recent years [1,2]. Saliva has a wide spectrum of components [3], with potential as biomarkers to assess health status [4]. Collecting saliva samples is a non-invasive and easy way to perform sampling without the need to acquire specialized skills [5,6]. In veterinary science, the use of saliva implies an easier collection in less time and, therefore, more efficient sampling of a higher number of animals [7]. The use of saliva is particularly convenient in porcine species, where blood sampling is stressful for the animal and technically complicated due to its thick layer of fat body, lack of easily accessible superficial vessels and susceptibility to develop a state of stress [8].
Sialochemistry is a term that defines a series of laboratory tests performed on saliva and includes biomarkers that provide diverse information on the health status of the animals [2]. Trace elements such as iron (Fe), zinc (Zn) and copper (Cu) are related to iron deficiency [9,10,11], inflammation and activation of the immune response among other physiological pathways [12,13,14,15]; they can be measured in porcine saliva by automated commercial assays [16]. Ferritin is a biomarker related to Fe that participates in several cellular functions [17] and it has a role in inflammation [18].
In a previous report, an analytical validation was performed for Fe, Zn, Cu and ferritin measurement in porcine saliva. These analytes were measured in saliva of Fe supplemented and non-supplemented piglets, with the supplemented group having higher values of ferritin and Zn in saliva [16]. Although the measurement of these analytes in the saliva of pigs is still not widely used, it could be of interest for the evaluation of different physiological processes in which these analytes are involved, for example, to evaluate the addition of different Cu levels to diet [19], the effect of Zn in the stress and immune response [20] or Fe in intestinal inflammation [21].
The aim of this study was to gain knowledge about the measurements of Zn, Cu, Fe and ferritin in the saliva of pigs. For this purpose, we evaluated whether these analytes could change under different physiological conditions, such as the entire productive cycle in fattening pigs and different sample times during the day. In addition, the effect of pen feces and feed contamination, and also the stability of the storage of these salivary analytes, were assessed in order to evaluate possible variations in the measurements due to these factors.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Biomedical Ethics

Saliva samples from pigs (Sus Scrofa domesticus, Large-White) located at the Veterinary Teaching Farm of the University of Murcia (Guadalupe, Murcia, Spain), which is free of the porcine respiratory virus and reproductive syndrome, were used. Animals were accommodated under general commercial housing and conditions conforming to European Union guidelines (Directive 2010/63/EU1).

2.2. Sampling

Saliva collection tubes (Salivette, Sarstedt, Aktiengesellschaft and Co., Nümbrecht, Germany) and fragments (5 × 2 × 2 cm) of polypropylene sponges (Esponja Marina, La Griega E. Koronis, Madrid, Spain) were used for sampling as previously reported [22]. Animals were allowed to chew a fragment of sponge attached to a thin, flexible metal rod for 1–2 min or until thoroughly moistened. Then, the sponge was introduced in a Salivette tube and transported refrigerated to the laboratory (which took around 2 h) where they were centrifuged (3000× g, 10 min, 4 °C). The obtained volume of saliva was transferred to 1.5 mL tubes (Eppendorf Ibérica, Spain) to be stored at −80 °C until analysis (less than a month in all cases). During sampling, animals that were drinking or eating were avoided. Dirty sponges or oral fluid with color were discarded.

2.3. Analysis of Zn, Cu, Fe and Ferritin

Fe, Zn and Cu were analyzed using colorimetric methods from BioSystems (Iron-Ferrozine, 11,509, BioSystems S.A., Barcelona, Spain) and Randox (Zinc, ZN2341, and Copper, CU2340, Randox Laboratories Ltd., Crumlin, UK). Ferritin was measured using an automated immunoturbidimetric assay (Ferritin latex, 31,935, Biosystems S.A., Barcelona, Spain). Chemistry analyzers (Olympus AU 400 for Zn, Cu and ferritin and Olympus AU 600 for Fe, Olympus Diagnostica GmbH1, Hamburg, Germany) were used for the analysis. The four methods were previously analytically validated for pig saliva samples, showing adequate precision and accuracy in a simple and fast manner, without using deproteinization pre-treatments in case of trace elements [16]. In that report, the intra- and inter-assay imprecision was <12% in average for all the assays, and the variation percentage compared with the values expected in the recovery tests was <9% [16].

2.4. Evaluation of Changes of Zn, Cu, Fe and Ferritin in Fattening Pigs during a Complete Productive Cycle

This was made in surplus samples from Large White pigs (24 males and 21 females) from 5 litters (average litter size of 10.0 ± 0.7) from a previous experiment [23]. Sampling was performed in the sucking phase at 24 days of life (T1); in the nursery phase one week after weaning (T2); at the end of nursery (T3); at the beginning of the growing-finishing phase after one week for acclimatization (T4); and at the end of the phase (T5).

2.5. Evaluation of Changes of Zn, Cu, Fe and Ferritin According to the Time of Sampling (Diurnal Variations Study)

This was made in surplus samples from a previous experiment [24]. A total of 40 Large White pigs (20 males and 20 females) were randomly chosen for the experimental study with an age around 5 months approximately, and they had ad libitum access to water and a commercial suitable diet. Saliva was sampled from the pigs at 0800 h, 1200 h, 1600 h and 2000 h within a same day. Pen temperature oscillated from 19 °C in the morning to 24 °C at midday.

2.6. Influence of Fecal and Feed Contamination of Saliva Samples in the Measurements of Zn, Cu and Fe

The experimental assay was performed based on a previous study made to evaluate the effect of pen feces and feed in salivary biomarker assays [25]. Clean saliva samples collected from apparently healthy finishing pigs (around 110 kg body weight and 5 months of age) were mixed to obtain pools (n = 16) of 12 mL. Pen feces and animals feed were also collected in falcon tubes (Eurotubo®, sterilized conic tubes 15 mL and 50 mL, Deltalab S.L, Barcelona, Spain). Feed was a commercial finisher diet (Cefusa, Murcia, Spain) integrated by corn, wheat, sunflower, barley, rapeseed and soybeans, nutritionally balanced (15.5% of crude protein -CP-; 0.79% standardized ileal digestible lysine, %SID Lys; and 13.5 MJ of metabolizable energy per kg -ME/kg-). It was given ad libitum in pellets with 400 μm particle size.
After that, five aliquots of each saliva pools were prepared and treated as follows: (1) control group (C group, n = 16) with 3.5 mL of saliva without any treatment; (2) effect of high pen feces contamination (HD group, n = 8) by adding 875 mg of pen feces, previously collected in a Falcon tube from the farm of the study, to 3.5 mL of clean pig saliva; (3) effect of low pen feces (LD group, n = 8), by adding 87.5 mg of pen feces to 3.5 mL of clean saliva; (4) effect of high feed contamination (HF group, n = 8) by adding 875 mg of commercial porcine feed, used at the farm of this study, to a 3.5 mL of clean saliva; (5) effect of low feed contamination (LF group, n = 8) by adding 87.5 mg of feed to 3.5 mL of clean pig saliva. For preparing those mixes, the pen feces or feed inside falcon tubes were crushed and mixed with the pools of saliva during 1 min and incubated at 38 °C for 5 min. Then, sponges were introduced in each falcon to absorb the mixture, placed in saliva collection tubes and centrifuged to obtain the pools.
The trace elements concentration of those mixtures was analyzed by the colorimetric methods, and also with ICP-MS (Agilent 7900 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry), to assess the possible effect of the method of measurement in the interferences. ICP-MS is a highly sensitive and accurate technique [26], previously validated for trace elements measurement in saliva [27], which requires a previous treatment of the samples with HNO3 65% (500 µL of acid added to 500 µL of sample). As additional controls, the trace elements concentration of 87.5 mg of feces and of 87.5 mg of feed diluted in 3.5 mL of distilled water was previously measured by ICP. Concentrations were 245.55 ppb of Fe, 304.83 ppb of Cu and 723.82 ppb of Zn for the feces dilution; and 175.17 ppb of Fe, 731.67 ppb of Cu and 743.79 ppb of Zn for feed dilution. Therefore, the concentrations of each element were 10.07 µg of Fe, 15.24 µg of Cu and 29.68 µg of Zn per mg of feces; and 8.76 µg of Fe, 29.99 µg of Cu and 30.50 µg of Zn per mg of feed.

2.7. Storage Stability

The effect of different storage temperature conditions through time was evaluated for Zn, Cu, Fe and ferritin measurement in saliva of pigs. Ten saliva samples were collected from the Teaching Farm of the University of Murcia and were measured after collection (T0) and then, each sample was aliquoted in three subsamples: one was refrigerated at 4 °C, one frozen at −20 °C and one frozen at −80 °C. The samples were measured before storage (T0) and after 1 week (TW) and 6 months (T6). Percentages of loss and recovery of markers after each point of measurements were calculated as percentages from initial analysis (T0 as 100% of each analyte concentration of saliva sample). Measurements were calculated according to the following formula: (T − T0) × 100/T0 [28].

2.8. Statistical Analysis

All data were assessed for normality by the Shapiro–Wilk method. Since most of the data showed non-normal distribution, continuous variables were naturally log transformed prior to analysis by applying the formula ln (x + 1) for further analysis [29].
For the longitudinal and diurnal variation studies, a Mixed Linear Model of repeated measures was used in which time and sex were fixed factors and the individual was a random factor. Univariate analysis and Bonferroni post hoc test were further performed for any of those fixed factors considered as significant.
For assessing the effect of the presence of dirt in the saliva samples, the results obtained after the addition of feces or feed to the sample were analyzed by a General Linear Model (GLM) or repeated measures, followed by a Bonferroni post hoc test for pairwise comparisons.
For stability storage evaluation, the imprecision of the assay, calculated as the intra-assay coefficient of variation (Intra-CV), was used to assess stability. Thus, the biomarkers of this study were considered stable when changes observed in the stored samples did not exceed the significant change limit (SCL) acceptable for the assay, which was defined as SCL = 100% ± 2 × Intra-CV [30]. A two-way ANOVA test of repeated measures, followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, was used to assess whether the percentage of change observed in analytes’ levels over time was statistically significant at different temperatures. Changes out of SCL and with significant differences from T0 were considered to have unacceptable stability for that storage conditions.
The calculations were made using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0.1. IBM Corp, NY, USA) statistical packages, and the significant level was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Longitudinal Study

The results of the salivary analytes obtained at the different phases are shown in Table 1. Time effect was significant for all analytes.
Zn concentrations reached the highest values at the beginning of nursery. Then a progressive decrease was observed until they reached the lower values at the end of the growing phase.
Cu concentrations in saliva were lower at lactation and then significantly increased, reaching its peak at the beginning of nursery. Then Cu decreased in the growing phase. A significant gender effect was observed, with Cu concentrations being significantly higher in females than in males at the end of the nursery and growing phases.
Fe salivary concentrations were higher at lactation and the beginning of nursery, then they decreased by the end of nursery and values remained stable since then. Significantly higher Fe concentrations were detected in females than in males at the end of the nursery and growing periods.
Ferritin concentrations in saliva were higher at lactation, showing a strong decrease at the beginning of nursery. By the end of nursery, the ferritin concentrations achieved stable values until the end of the growing phase. Sex effect was significant since females showed higher values than males at nursery and by the end of growing phase.
In spite of the gender differences observed, the evolution of salivary biomarker concentrations was similar in both sexes since time–gender interaction was not significant in any case.

3.2. Diurnal Variations Study

The results of this section are shown in Figure 1. Time effect was significant for Zn and Cu salivary concentrations. Significantly lower Zn concentrations were observed at 1600 h compared with 1200 h. Cu concentrations were significantly lower at 1600 h and 2000 h compared with 0800 h. No gender effect was observed in Zn and Cu throughout the hours of the day. Fe and ferritin salivary concentrations remained stable along the day, with no significant changes due to time or gender.

3.3. Influence of Fecal and Feed Contamination

The results of this section appear in Figure 2. The addition of high concentrations of feces or feed to the saliva samples significantly increased Zn, Cu and Fe values in both colorimetric and ICP methods (GLM p < 0.001 in all cases). No statistically significant changes were found in the colorimetric assays for Zn and Fe after the addition of low concentrations of feces or feed, whereas Cu was affected when the concentration of dirtiness was low. In the case of ICP assays, the presence of feces or feed at any concentration significantly increased the results in all analytes.

3.4. Storage Stability under Different Temperature Conditions

Data obtained after evaluating stability of Zn, Cu, Fe and ferritin at different temperature storage conditions are shown in Figure 3. No statistically significant differences between the different storage conditions were observed in Zn after six months, but mean concentrations from samples stored at 4 °C were higher and showed higher variability than the frozen ones at this time, and saliva stored at −20 °C showed median levels out of SCL. In case of Cu, values were stable after one week at −20 °C and −80 °C. After six months, samples stored at −80 °C showed median values more similar to controls and within SCL. Fe was stable until six months of storage at −80 °C, with most of the values kept inside the SCL with no statistically significant changes at any time point. Ferritin showed a significant increase after six months of refrigeration with results out of SCL; whereas the values of frozen samples were maintained inside the SCL or nearby, with no statistically significant variation at any time point.

4. Discussion

In this report, the influence of different physiological conditions, such as the phases of fattening and other factors such as time of sample collection, sample contamination or type of storage, on the measurement of Zn, Cu, Fe and ferritin in pig saliva was studied. These data can contribute to the appropriate interpretation of these analytes and their better use in the evaluation of pig health and welfare.
In general, trace elements presented higher levels at the beginning of the fattening cycle, and their concentrations were lower in later phases. In the case of ferritin and Fe, the peak was presented in lactation. Values obtained at lactation in the analytes of this study were similar to those described in a previous paper [16]. The age could be the possible factor that causes these variations, in part, since it can influence the values of analytes in human saliva [31]. The decline of trace elements with age, which occurs in our report, has been described also in human serum [32,33]. In addition, different diet formulations in each production phase may play a role in the variations found in our experimental conditions.
In our study, the four different diurnal sampling times were selected to represent the times of sampling that could be taken in routine farm conditions [24,34]. We found significant changes depending on the time of sampling for Zn and Cu. Based on this, for these analytes, it could be recommended to sample the pig saliva in the morning or establish another reference range if sampling is performed in the afternoon, as has been suggested for other salivary analytes in pigs [24]. To our knowledge, there are no studies in which the analytes of our research have been measured at different times in other species; nevertheless, a similar decrease in Zn to that in our study has been described in human serum at 1500 h [35].
The evaluation of the effects of the presence of pen feces and feed, which can frequently contaminate saliva, indicated that the spectrophotometric assays used in the experimental conditions in our study are less affected by a low degree of contamination than the ICP-MS. The reason why ICP-MS was more affected by a low degree of dirtiness than the colorimetric assays should be further clarified. Among the possible reasons, it could be postulated that the perchloric acid digestion, or the form of complexes that could alter the dissociation constants of the trace elements, could have a possible influence on the results. On the other hand, at high contaminant concentrations, major changes and interferences were observed in all the analytes of our study, with both the spectrophotometric and ICP-MS giving falsely high values in a similar way as occurs with other salivary analytes in pigs [25].
In general, the levels of salivary biomarkers studied were more stable at frozen temperatures than at refrigeration. Moreover, samples stored at −80 °C were more stable during the experiment than at −20 °C. This lowest variability, found at −80 °C, has been reported for other salivary biomarkers in porcine samples [28]. Therefore, for measurements of salivary Zn, Cu, Fe and ferritin, it is highly recommended to store samples at −80 °C. More studies should be undertaken to delve into the reasons for the lower stability of the analytes in refrigeration or at −20 °C, testing if it could be related to the form of the complexes or due to action of the bacteria present in saliva that could be maintained in refrigeration.
As limitations of this report, it could be stated that the study was performed using samples from only one farm. Thus, it would be necessary to take precautions when extrapolating these results. Ideally, the possible retention of the sponge of the analytes in pig saliva should be evaluated. Since it was difficult to obtain saliva by flow in pigs, we tested the effect of the sponge in 10 samples of distilled water in which Fe, Cu and Zn, in the range of the concentrations found in porcine saliva samples, were added from the standards of the kits. The analytes were measured before and after mixing and spiked the with sponge and no significant differences were detected in the values of each analyte before and after the sponge was introduced (data not shown). So, it could be postulated that the sponge does not produce an evident interference in the analytes of our study. Moreover, the possible variations depending on other factors, such as the breed, age, season of the year or different productivity status, should be assessed in future studies, as well as changes due to diseases or stressful states. All these potential sources of variation should be considered in order to establish appropriate reference values for these analytes.

5. Conclusions

Concentrations of Zn, Cu, Fe and ferritin in pig saliva change with fattening, with most of them increasing at the suckling and beginning of nursery periods. In addition, Zn and Cu show variations throughout the hours of the day, having lower values at 1600 h. Moreover, falsely increased results can appear if samples are collected under high-dirt conditions or after being stored at inappropriate temperatures. Therefore, all these issues must be considered in the proper assessment of these measurements in porcine saliva.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.J.C. and A.O.-B.; methodology, A.O.-B., D.E., S.M.-S., A.T., A.M.-P. and M.L.-A.; software, A.O.-B. and F.T.; investigation, A.O.-B. and J.J.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.O.-B., F.T. and J.J.C.; writing—review and editing, A.O.-B., D.E., S.M.-S., A.T., A.M.-P., M.L.-A., F.T. and J.J.C.; supervision, F.T. and J.J.C.; project administration, J.J.C.; funding acquisition, J.J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the project reference PCI2020-120712-2, funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and the European Union “NextGenerationEU”/PRTR (1st ICRAD Joint Cofund Call). A.O.-B. was funded by a pre-doctoral grant from the Seneca Foundation of Murcia Regional Government, Spain (21603/FPI/21); D.E. was granted by the postdoctoral contract “Generational renewal to promote research” of the University of Murcia. A.M-P. has a post-doctoral fellowship “Ramón y Cajal” supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI), Spain, and The European Next Generation Funds (NextgenerationEU) (RYC2021-033660-I). M.L.-A. has a post-doctoral fellowship “Juan de la Cierva Formación” supported by “Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad” (FJC2021-047105-I).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All protocols were previously approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Murcia (Approval number, 235/2016) and by the Murcia Region, Spain (CARM 1984/GERM/15).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Lamy, E.; Mau, M. Saliva Proteomics as an Emerging, Non-Invasive Tool to Study Livestock Physiology, Nutrition and Diseases. J. Proteom. 2012, 75, 4251–4258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cerón, J.J.; Contreras-Aguilar, M.D.; Escribano, D.; Miró, S.M.; Martínez, M.J.L. Basics for the Potential Use of Saliva to Evaluate Stress, Inflammation, Immune System, and Redox Homeostasis in Pigs. BMC Vet. Res. 2022, 18, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lima, D.P.; Diniz, D.G.; Moimaz, S.A.S.; Sumida, D.H.; Okamoto, A.C. Saliva: Reflection of the Body. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 14, 184–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kaczor-Urbanowicz, K.E.; Martin Carreras-Presas, C.; Aro, K.; Tu, M.; Garcia-Godoy, F.; Wong, D.T.W. Saliva Diagnostics—Current Views and Directions. Exp. Biol. Med. 2017, 242, 459–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Kaufman, E.; Lamster, I.B. The Diagnostic Applications of Saliva—A Review. Crit. Rev. oral Biol. Med. 2002, 13, 197–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Yoshizawa, J.M.; Schafer, C.A.; Schafer, J.J.; Farrell, J.J.; Paster, B.J.; Wong, D.T.W. Salivary Biomarkers: Toward Future Clinical and Diagnostic Utilities. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 26, 781–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Pfaffe, T.; Cooper-White, J.; Beyerlein, P.; Kostner, K.; Punyadeera, C. Diagnostic Potential of Saliva: Current State and Future Applications. Clin. Chem. 2011, 57, 675–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Tecles, F.; Contreras-Aguilar, M.D.; Martínez-Miró, S.; Tvarijonaviciute, A.; Martínez-Subiela, S.; Escribano, D.; Cerón, J.J. Total Esterase Measurement in Saliva of Pigs: Validation of an Automated Assay, Characterization and Changes in Stress and Disease Conditions. Res. Vet. Sci. 2017, 114, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Özhan, O.; Erdem, N.; Aydoğdu, İ.; Erkurt, A.; Kuku, İ. Serum Zinc Levels in Iron Deficient Women: A Case-Control Study. Turkish J. Hematol. 2016, 33, 156–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Turgut, S.; Hacioǧlu, S.; Emmungil, G.; Turgut, G.; Keskin, A. Relations between Iron Deficiency Anemia and Serum Levels of Copper, Zinc, Cadmium and Lead. Polish J. Environ. Stud. 2009, 18, 273–277. [Google Scholar]
  11. Perri, A.M.; Friendship, R.M.; Harding, J.C.S.; O’Sullivan, T.L. An Investigation of Iron Deficiency and Anemia in Piglets and the Effect of Iron Status at Weaning on Post-Weaning Performance. J. Swine Health Prod. 2016, 24, 10–20. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ward, R.J.; Crichton, R.R.; Taylor, D.L.; Della Corte, L.; Srai, S.K.; Dexter, D.T. Iron and the Immune System. J. Neural Transm. 2011, 118, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bonaventura, P.; Benedetti, G.; Albarède, F.; Miossec, P. Zinc and Its Role in Immunity and Inflammation. Autoimmun. Rev. 2015, 14, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Solomons, N.W. Mild Human Zinc Deficiency Produces an Imbalance between Cell-Mediated and Humoral Immunity. Nutr. Rev. 1998, 56 Pt 1, 27–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Percival, S.S. Copper and Immunity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998, 67 (Suppl. S5), 1064S–1068S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Ortín-Bustillo, A.; Ramis Vidal, G.; Escribano, D.; López-Arjona, M.; Peres Rubio, C.; Cerón, J.J.; Muñoz-Prieto, A.; Pardo-Marín, L.; López-Martínez, M.J.; Botia, M.; et al. Automated Assays for Trace Elements and Ferritin Measurement in Saliva of Pigs: Analytical Validation and a Pilot Application to Evaluate Different Iron Status. Res. Vet. Sci. 2022, 152, 410–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. López-Castro, J.D.; Delgado, J.J.; Perez-Omil, J.A.; Gálvez, N.; Cuesta, R.; Watt, R.K.; Domínguez-Vera, J.M. A New Approach to the Ferritin Iron Core Growth: Influence of the H/L Ratio on the Core Shape. Dalt. Trans. 2012, 41, 1320–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sharif, K.; Vieira Borba, V.; Zandman-Goddard, G.; Shoenfeld, Y. Eppur Si Muove: Ferritin Is Essential in Modulating Inflammation. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2018, 191, 149–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Zhang, F.; Yao, W.; Ji, X.; Liu, X.; Jin, E. Ionomics-Metabolome Association Analysis as a New Approach to the Impact of Dietary Copper Levels in Suckling Piglets Model. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Medida, R.L.; Sharma, A.K.; Guo, Y.; Johnston, L.; Urriola, P.E.; Gomez, A.; Saqui-Salces, M. Dietary Zinc Restriction Affects the Expression of Genes Related to Immunity and Stress Response in the Small Intestine of Pigs. J. Nutr. Sci. 2022, 11, e104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Li, Y.; Hansen, S.L.; Borst, L.B.; Spears, J.W.; Moeser, A.J. Dietary Iron Deficiency and Oversupplementation Increase Intestinal Permeability, Ion Transport, and Inflammation in Pigs. J. Nutr. 2016, 146, 1499–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Contreras-Aguilar, M.D.; Hevia, M.L.; Escribano, D.; Lamy, E.; Tecles, F.; Cerón, J.J. Effect of Food Contamination and Collection Material in the Measurement of Biomarkers in Saliva of Horses. Res. Vet. Sci. 2020, 129, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ortín-Bustillo, A.; Escribano, D.; López-Arjona, M.; Botia, M.; Fuentes, P.; Martínez-Miró, S.; Rubio Peres, C.; García-Manzanilla, E.; Franco-Martínez, L.; Pardo-Marín, L.; et al. Changes in a Comprehensive Profile of Saliva Analytes in Fattening Pigs during a Complete Productive Cycle: A Longitudinal Study. Animals 2022, 12, 1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ortín-Bustillo, A.; Contreras-Aguilar, M.D.; Rubio Peres, C.; Botia, M.; Cerón, J.J.; López-Arjona, M.; Martínez-Subiela, S.; Escribano, D.; Tecles, F. Evaluation of the Effect of Sampling Time on Biomarkers of Stress, Immune System, Redox Status and Other Biochemistry Analytes in Saliva of Finishing Pigs. Animals 2022, 12, 2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Franco-Martínez, L.; Ortín-Bustillo, A.; Rubio, C.P.; Escribano, D.; López-Arjona, M.; García-Manzanilla, E.; Cerón, J.J.; Martínez-Subiela, S.; Tvarijonaviciute, A.; Tecles, F. Effects of Pen Faeces and Feed Contamination in Biomarkers Determination in Oral Fluid of Pigs. Res. Vet. Sci. 2022, 152, 403–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Montaño, M.D.; Olesik, J.W.; Barber, A.G.; Challis, K.; Ranville, J.F. Single Particle ICP-MS: Advances toward Routine Analysis of Nanomaterials. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 408, 5053–5074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Romano, F.; Castiblanco, A.; Spadotto, F.; Di Scipio, F.; Malandrino, M.; Berta, G.N.; Aimetti, M. ICP-Mass-Spectrometry Ionic Profile of Whole Saliva in Patients with Untreated and Treated Periodontitis. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Escribano, D.; Contreras-Aguilar, M.D.; Tvarijonaviciute, A.; Martínez-Miró, S.; Martínez-Subiela, S.; Cerón, J.J.; Lamy, E.; Tecles, F. Stability of Selected Enzymes in Saliva of Pigs under Different Storage Conditions: A Pilot Study. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2018, 80, 1657–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Contreras-Aguilar, M.D.; Lamy, E.; Escribano, D.; Cerón, J.J.; Tecles, F.; Quiles, A.J.; Hevia, M.L. Changes in Salivary Analytes of Horses Due to Circadian Rhythm and Season: A Pilot Study. Animals 2020, 10, 1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gröschl, M.; Wagner, R.; Rauh, M.; Dörr, H.G. Stability of Salivary Steroids: The Influences of Storage, Food and Dental Care. Steroids 2001, 66, 737–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nassar, M.; Hiraishi, N.; Islam, M.S.; Otsuki, M.; Tagami, J. Age-Related Changes in Salivary Biomarkers. J. Dent. Sci. 2014, 9, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Jezerniczky, J.; Nagy, Z.; Dvoracsek, E.; Nagy, B.; Ilyés, I.; Csorba, S. Trace Elements in the Serum of Mothers and Their Children. Acta Paediatr. Acad. Sci. Hung. 1976, 17, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Özden, T.A.; Gökçay, G.; Cantez, M.S.; Durmaz, Ö.; Issever, H.; Ömer, B.; Saner, G. Copper, Zinc and Iron Levels in Infants and Their Mothers during the First Year of Life: A Prospective Study. BMC Pediatr. 2015, 15, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Gallagher, N.L.; Giles, L.R.; Wynn, P.C. The Development of a Circadian Pattern of Salivary Cortisol Secretion in the Neonatal Piglet. Biol. Neonate 2002, 81, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fimmel, S.; Borchelt, M.; Kage, A.; Köttgen, E. Trace Elements and Carrier Proteins in the Aged. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 1994, 19, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Results for the zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), iron (Fe) and ferritin concentrations obtained in saliva from 40 healthy fattening pigs (20 females, 20 males) at different hours of the day. pB: p value of the Bonferroni post hoc analysis.
Figure 1. Results for the zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), iron (Fe) and ferritin concentrations obtained in saliva from 40 healthy fattening pigs (20 females, 20 males) at different hours of the day. pB: p value of the Bonferroni post hoc analysis.
Antioxidants 12 00649 g001
Figure 2. Results for the zinc (Zn), copper (Cu) and iron (Fe) after adding different quantities of pen feces (a) or feed (b) in pig saliva. Concentrations obtained in saliva pools without any treatment (UN—untreated)), after adding low quantity of pen feces or feed (FcL) and high quantity of pen feces or feed (FcH) by automated colorimetric assays and by ICP-MS method. pB: p value of the Bonferroni post hoc analysis. Asterisks indicate significant differences from the C group (***: p < 0.001).
Figure 2. Results for the zinc (Zn), copper (Cu) and iron (Fe) after adding different quantities of pen feces (a) or feed (b) in pig saliva. Concentrations obtained in saliva pools without any treatment (UN—untreated)), after adding low quantity of pen feces or feed (FcL) and high quantity of pen feces or feed (FcH) by automated colorimetric assays and by ICP-MS method. pB: p value of the Bonferroni post hoc analysis. Asterisks indicate significant differences from the C group (***: p < 0.001).
Antioxidants 12 00649 g002
Figure 3. Stability plots of the zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), iron (Fe) and ferritin in ten porcine saliva samples kept at different temperatures. Results are expressed in percentages of the baseline concentration (fresh sample = 100% concentration). Each aliquot was stored at different temperatures and measured in fresh conditions (T0) and after 1 week (TW) and 6 months (T6). Dotted lines indicate the significant change limit (SCL) acceptable for the assay, which was defined as SCL = 100% ± 2 × Intra-CV. The plot shows median (line within box), 25th and 75th percentiles (box), 5th and 95th percentiles (whisker). Asterisks indicate significant differences from T0 (*: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001).
Figure 3. Stability plots of the zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), iron (Fe) and ferritin in ten porcine saliva samples kept at different temperatures. Results are expressed in percentages of the baseline concentration (fresh sample = 100% concentration). Each aliquot was stored at different temperatures and measured in fresh conditions (T0) and after 1 week (TW) and 6 months (T6). Dotted lines indicate the significant change limit (SCL) acceptable for the assay, which was defined as SCL = 100% ± 2 × Intra-CV. The plot shows median (line within box), 25th and 75th percentiles (box), 5th and 95th percentiles (whisker). Asterisks indicate significant differences from T0 (*: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001).
Antioxidants 12 00649 g003
Table 1. Results obtained of salivary zinc, copper, iron and ferritin in 45 Large White pigs (21 females, 24 males) at suckling phase (T1); beginning (T2) and end (T3) of nursery phase; beginning (T4) and end (T5) of growing phase. Median (interquartile range) are expressed.
Table 1. Results obtained of salivary zinc, copper, iron and ferritin in 45 Large White pigs (21 females, 24 males) at suckling phase (T1); beginning (T2) and end (T3) of nursery phase; beginning (T4) and end (T5) of growing phase. Median (interquartile range) are expressed.
Sampling Time
BiomarkersT1T2T3T4T5Fixed Factorsp Value
Zn (µg/dL)452.6 a (453.7)2154.6 b (3104.3)186.0 c (212.1)170.3 c (258.1)59.9 d (65.4)Time<0.001
Female517.4 a (681.2)2340.3 b (2040.7)261.0 c (251.9)172.5 c (208.2)79.3 d (82.3)Sex0.102
Male444.2 a (382.4)1841.7 b (3328.4)166.5 c (160.0)170.0 c (288.4)46.1 d* (64.4)Time * sex0.189
Cu (µg/dL)23.2 a (26.6)194.8 b (185.8)57.2 c (39.3)73.6 c (94.5)71.3 c (85.4)Time<0.001
Female27.3 a (28.4)182.2 b (248.5)67.2 c (64.6)81.9 c (95.6)112.2 c (90.2)Sex0.038
Male18.0 a (27.7)195.7 b (151.9)47.7 c* (27.4)64.1 c (99.6)65.8 c* (29.5)Time * sex0.203
Fe (µg/dL)183.2 a (112.6)133.2 ab (127.9)46.7 d (30.7)59.5 bc (128.0)57.8 cd (50.5)Time<0.001
Female160.8 a (130.2)144.8 ab (139.8)57.6 c (38.0)58.5 bc (139.3)74.2 bc (91.3)Sex0.046
Male186.2 a (104.0)98.2 ab (115.0)46.4 c* (31.6)63.7 b (114.9)49.6 c* (38.9)Time * sex0.079
Ferritin (µg/L)79.1 a (144.1)8.3 b (15.6)4.2 c (5.3)3.0 c (5.0)3.4 c (4.0)Time<0.001
Female97.8 a (219.1)16.1 b (25.7)5.6 c (4.7)2.9 c (5.4)4.2 c (5.6)Sex<0.001
Male60.0 a (101.4)6.5 b*** (8.8)2.9 c** (2.8)3.1 bc (5.1)1.6 c* (3.1)Time * sex0.200
Zn: zinc; Cu: copper; Fe: iron; ferritin; BW: birth weight. Statistical analysis: a different letter indicates significant differences between sampling times; asterisks indicate significant differences between sexes (*: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ortín-Bustillo, A.; Escribano, D.; Martínez-Subiela, S.; Tvarijonaviciute, A.; Muñoz-Prieto, A.; López-Arjona, M.; Cerón, J.J.; Tecles, F. Trace Elements and Ferritin in Pig Saliva: Variations during Fattening, Time of Sampling, Effect of Dirtiness and Stability under Different Storage Conditions. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 649. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12030649

AMA Style

Ortín-Bustillo A, Escribano D, Martínez-Subiela S, Tvarijonaviciute A, Muñoz-Prieto A, López-Arjona M, Cerón JJ, Tecles F. Trace Elements and Ferritin in Pig Saliva: Variations during Fattening, Time of Sampling, Effect of Dirtiness and Stability under Different Storage Conditions. Antioxidants. 2023; 12(3):649. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12030649

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ortín-Bustillo, Alba, Damián Escribano, Silvia Martínez-Subiela, Asta Tvarijonaviciute, Alberto Muñoz-Prieto, Marina López-Arjona, José J. Cerón, and Fernando Tecles. 2023. "Trace Elements and Ferritin in Pig Saliva: Variations during Fattening, Time of Sampling, Effect of Dirtiness and Stability under Different Storage Conditions" Antioxidants 12, no. 3: 649. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12030649

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop