Next Article in Journal
The Inhibitory Effect of Quercetin on Biofilm Formation of Listeria monocytogenes Mixed Culture and Repression of Virulence
Next Article in Special Issue
The Catechins Profile of Green Tea Extracts Affects the Antioxidant Activity and Degradation of Catechins in DHA-Rich Oil
Previous Article in Journal
Recombinant Expression of Archaeal Superoxide Dismutases in Plant Cell Cultures: A Sustainable Solution with Potential Application in the Food Industry
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Toxic Heavy Metal Salts on Oxidative Quality Deterioration in Ground Pork Model during Aerobic Display Storage
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/antiox11091732
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Thermally-Oxidized Frying Oils (Corn Oil and Lard) on Gut Microbiota in Hamsters

by
Erika Kwek
1,
Chi Yan
1,
Huafang Ding
1,
Wangjun Hao
1,
Zouyan He
2,
Ka Ying Ma
1,
Jianhui Liu
1,3,*,
Hanyue Zhu
1,4,* and
Zhen-Yu Chen
1,*
1
School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong 999077, China
2
School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China
3
College of Food Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Finance & Economics, Nanjing 210023, China
4
School of Food Science and Engineering, South China Food Safety Research Center, Foshan University, Foshan 528200, Guangdong, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2022, 11(9), 1732; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11091732
Submission received: 14 July 2022 / Revised: 15 August 2022 / Accepted: 26 August 2022 / Published: 31 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lipid Oxidation in Food and Antioxidant Strategies)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Repeated reuse of frying oil raises health concerns due to the accumulation of oxidative products after each frying cycle. Gut microbiota is integral in lipid metabolism and immune regulation. The present study was designed to investigate the effects of thermally-oxidized corn oil and lard on gut microbiota in relation to atherosclerosis, inflammatory cytokines, and plasma lipids. Male Golden Syrian hamsters were randomly divided into four groups and fed one of four diets containing fresh corn oil (CF), oxidized corn oil (CO), fresh lard (LF), and oxidized lard (LO), for six weeks. CO and LO were prepared by deep-frying potatoes in corn oil or lard for seven days. Results indicated that oxidized oil and lard caused the loss of species diversity and richness of gut microbiota. Feeding CO and LO also reduced the body and adipose tissue weights, associated with genus Acetatifactor and Allobaculum. Plasma triacylglycerols significantly increased by 51% in the CO and 35% in the LO group compared with that in their CF and LF counterparts, respectively. CO could also affect the abundance of specific bacteria genera: Bacteroides, Barnesiella, Acetatifactor, Allobaculum, Clostridium_IV, Clostridium_XIVa, Coprococcus, Lactococcus, Paraprevotella, Parasutterella, and Oscillibacter. In addition, CO and LO could adversely remodel gut composition and affect intestinal production of short-chain fatty acids, pro-inflammatory biomarkers (LPS and IL-6), anti-inflammatory biomarker IL-10, and atherosclerotic progression. It was concluded that frying oil could adversely modulate the gut microbiota and exacerbate the atherosclerosis at least in a hypercholesterolemia hamster model.

1. Introduction

The trend of fast-food consumption is reportedly increasing world-wide. One of the most popular fast-foods are French fries, prepared by deep-frying potato (Solanum tuberosum) [1]. Deep-frying is a process where food is submerged in hot oil and undergoes complex chemical reactions [2]. Loss of water from food can trigger the hydrolysis and breakage of triacylglycerol (TG) ester linkages, and releases the free fatty acids (FFA), glycerol, and mono-/di-acylglycerols [3]. Other chemical changes include the oxidation and polymerization of oil. Nonvolatile polar compounds, such as dimers and oligomers, are products of oil degradation [4]. FFA, volatile, and nonvolatile compounds alter the stability and quality of frying oils [5]. Deep-fat frying leads to a loss of unsaturated fatty acids and the physical increase in viscosity, color pigmentation, and foaming of oil [3,6]. Frying oils can be categorized based on their origin: vegetable oils or animal fats.
Corn is the most abundantly produced crop around the world with approximately 1000 million tons of annual yield, accounting for more than 30% total cereal production [7]. Corn oil is a vegetable oil that can be extracted from the corn germ either mechanically through expeller pressing, chemically using solvents like hexane, or a combination of these methods [8]. The typical fatty acid composition of corn oil is characterized by possessing a high amount of unsaturated fatty acid—particularly linoleic and oleic acid [8,9]. Corn oil is often used for cooking and deep-frying [10]. As one of the most common edible animal fats, lard is also used in the production of margarines, shortenings, sausages, and in deep-frying [11,12,13,14]. Compared with corn oil, lard contains more palmitic and stearic acids and less linoleic acid [12].
The repeated reuse of frying oil is a common practice in many fast-food restaurants. This has caused health concerns due to the accumulation of oxidative products after each frying cycle. To date, there has been no study to directly investigate the association of the intake of thermally-abused frying oils with diseases such as cardiovascular disease (CVD) [13,14]. It is known that diets can significantly modulate the gut microbiota. However, it remains unclear how frying oils affect the gut microbiota. Hence, the present study aims to investigate and compare the effects of thermally-abused corn oil (as a representative of vegetable oils) and lard (as a representative of animal fats) on gut microbiota in hamsters.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Oil Preparation

Corn oil (Mazola), lard (Camelia-Holland), and potatoes were purchased from the local market (New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China). After the removal of skin, the potatoes were rinsed in cold water and cut into traditional 1.5-inch-thick French fries. Corn oil or lard (~2.5 L or 2200 g) was poured into the inner bowl of a Philips Cucina fryer (HD6155). Approximately 500 g of French fries were fried at 160 °C for 4 min, during the first frying cycle. Then, the potatoes were taken out and cooled at room temperature. The same batch of potatoes were submerged in 180 °C for 8 min during the second frying cycle. This two-step frying was repeated for 12 consecutive hours daily, using a fresh batch of potatoes each time. At the end of the 12 h of frying, the corn oil or lard was stored at room temperature overnight. The entire procedure was continued for 7 days for both corn oil and lard to produce oxidized corn oil and oxidized lard, respectively.

2.2. Diet Preparation

Four diets were formulated based on the American Institute of Nutrition (AIN)-93 animal diet, with minor adjustments [15,16] (Table 1). The basal diets were made with (g/kg diet): corn starch (508), casein (242), sucrose (19), mineral mix (40), vitamin mix (20), gelatin (20), DL-methionine (1), and cholesterol (0.4). Each diet consisted of 30% kcal fat by adding 155g/kg of either fresh corn oil (CF), oxidized corn oil (CO), fresh lard (LF), or oxidized lard (LO). All four diets were molded, air-dried, and stored at −20 °C.

2.3. Peroxide Value of Oil and Fats

The peroxide values of corn oil (fresh and oxidized), and lard (fresh and oxidized) were determined according to the AOAC Official Method 965.33. In brief, approximately 5 g of oils or fats was weighed into a conical flask. A mixture of 30 mL glacial acetic acid–chloroform (3:2) was added. Addition of 0.5 mL saturated potassium iodide was followed by 30 mL of ddH2O. After mixing, 0.5 mL of 1% starch solution was added. Titration was slowly conducted using 0.01 M sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3) until reversed color change was observed. The final and initial volume of Na2S2O3 were recorded. Peroxide values (mEq peroxide/kg sample) were calculated according to the formula:
P e r o x i d e   v a l u e = V o l u m e   o f   N a 2 S 2 O 3   u s e d   ×   M o l a r i t y   of   N a 2 S 2 O 3   ×   1000 S a m p l e   w e i g h t   ( g )

2.4. Fatty Acid Analyses

The fatty acid compositions of all the corn oil and lard were analyzed using a gas liquid chromatography method as described previously [17]. Boron trifluoride (14% in methanol) was added to corn oils and lards for methylation and the preparation of fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs). A Shimadzu Gas Chromatograph 2010 (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) with an HP Innowax column (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to separately detect individual FAMEs according to retention time compared to standards (Nu-Chek Prep Inc., Elysian, MN, USA). Quantification was conducted relative to the internal standard of heptadecanoic acid.

2.5. Animals

Male, eight-week-old Golden Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) were selected as an animal model. The entire experimental protocol was approved by the Animal Experimental Ethical Committee of the Chinese University of Hong Kong (Reference Number: 21-169-MIS). Hamsters with 100–120 g body weight were randomly divided into four groups (n = 8, each). The animal housing room was equipped with controlled environmental settings (12 h–12 h light–dark cycle, 23 °C room temperature and free access to tap water). After one week of acclimatization, the hamsters were fed one of four diets (CF, CO, LF, LO) for six weeks (Table 1). Body weight, food intake, and fecal outputs were recorded weekly. Hamsters were sacrificed using carbon dioxide anesthesia after six weeks’ feeding. Blood, organ, and tissue collections were conducted similarly to the procedures described above [17].

2.6. Plasma Lipid Profile Analysis

Plasma lipoprotein and lipids were quantified including total cholesterol (TC), triacylglycerols (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (n-HDL-C). The plasma samples of the hamsters were tested at Week 0 and week 6 using analytic kits (Stanbio Laboratories, Boerne, TX, USA). The value of n-HDL-C was calculated by subtracting HDL-C from TC.

2.7. Atherosclerotic Plaque Quantification

Atherosclerosis was measured by staining the thoracic aorta with Oil Red O. The staining preparation involved prior cleaning and removal of tissues around the aorta. Individual aorta were cut vertically, and dried by isopropanol. After staining, the aorta was scanned by desktop scanner and quantified through ImageJ software (NIH, LOCI, USA), to measure the plaque area percentage.

2.8. Analysis of Plasma LPS, IL-10, and IL-6

Plasma lipopolysaccharide (LPS), interleukin 10 (IL-10), and IL-6 were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (Cusabio Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China). Briefly, the standards provided were diluted serially to create a standard curve. Plasma samples from Week 6 were added to pre-coated antibody wells. After the addition of reagents, absorbances were measured using the spectrophotometer.

2.9. Analysis of Fecal Short-Chain Fatty Acids (SCFA)

Total SCFA includes acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, and valeric acid. Fecal total SCFA was quantified through methods previously described [18,19]. The feces collected at Week 6 were extracted using 50% ethanol. Internal standard 2-ethylbutyric acid was also added. After repeated sonication and centrifugation, the supernatant was injected into a gas chromatograph (Shimadzu GC-2010, Tokyo, Japan) with CP-FFAP CB capillary column (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA), and quantified according to the amount of internal standard added.

2.10. 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Fresh feces collected at Week 6 were used for 16S rRNA gene sequencing of gut microbiota (BGI Genomics, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China). Bacterial DNA templates were amplified with 16S fusion primers targeting V3-V4 regions. After PCR, purification, and library construction, sequencing was conducted using Illumina HiSeq2500. Clustering into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) was conducted using USEARCH (version 7.0.1090), where tags have a 97% similarity threshold. Annotation of taxonomy based on OTUs was conducted through Greengene database by RDP classifier (version 2.2), and analyses were conducted using R software (version 3.1.1).

2.11. Statistical Analysis

Data were presented as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA and LSD post-hoc test was used to detect the statistical differences among the four diet groups when p < 0.05 (SPSS Inc., version 15.0, IBM, Bloomington, IL, USA). Gut microbiota comparisons between four different groups were conducted using the Kruskal–Wallis test. The relationship between bacterial abundance and environmental parameters was evaluated using Spearman’s correlation.

3. Results

3.1. Fatty Acid Profile and Peroxide Value of Oil and Fats

Fresh corn oil was composed of 53% polyunsaturated fatty acids (primarily 18:2n-6) and 30% oleic acid (18:1n-9). Comparatively, fresh lard mainly consisted of 45% saturated fatty acids and 37% oleic acid. The deep-frying preparation process of oxidized corn oil and oxidized lard caused a 36% and 89% loss of polyunsaturated fatty acids, respectively (Table 2). Peroxide value is a widely accepted measure of hydroperoxide oxidation products to indicate oil or fat rancidity. Oxidized lard and corn oil had markedly elevated peroxide values after repeated deep-frying, compared to fresh lard and corn oil, respectively (Table 2).

3.2. Food Intake and Weights of Body, Organ, and Fecal Output

Hamsters across the five diet groups had similar daily food intakes. At the start of week 0, body weights among the groups were comparable. However, after 6 weeks of feeding, the CO and LO groups had 15% and 7% lower body weights (p < 0.05) compared with the CF and LF groups, respectively. Perirenal and epididymal adipose tissues are the major internal fat reserves of hamsters. The weights of both perirenal and epididymal fats were significantly decreased (p < 0.05) after intake of oxidized oil and lard. It was also observed that the total weights of feces excreted in week 6 by oxidized groups CO and LO were significantly elevated, by 93–111% (p < 0.05), compared with their CF and LF counterparts (Table 3).

3.3. Plasma Lipid Profiles

At week 0, the plasma lipid profiles of all the hamsters were statistically similar (p > 0.05). After six weeks’ feeding with oxidized lard, the LO group had a 13% (p < 0.05) lower plasma TC compared to LF. TC levels between the CF and CO groups remained comparable (p > 0.05). The plasma TG level in hamsters fed CO was 51% higher than the CF group; the LO group also had 35% more TG in plasma than the LF group (p < 0.05) (Table 4).

3.4. Atherosclerotic Plaque Area

Feeding a CO diet increased the atherosclerotic plaque in the aorta by 62% compared with feeding CF (p < 0.05). Plaque accumulation of the LF and LO groups was statistically similar (p > 0.05) (Figure 1).

3.5. Plasma LPS, IL-10, and IL-6

Plasma concentrations of inflammatory biomarker LPS and IL-6 and anti-inflammatory IL-10 between the two lard groups (LF and LO) were relatively similar (p > 0.05). In contrast, compared to CF, the intake of CO dramatically increased plasma LPS by 72%, elevated IL-6 by 960%, and reduced IL-10 by 53% (p < 0.05) (Figure 2).

3.6. Fecal SCFA

Total SCFA is the sum of acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, and valeric acid. Consumption of CO led to a significant decrease in total fecal SCFA by 30% compared to CF. This is mainly characterized by the reduction of fecal propionic acid by 52%, butyric acid by 46%, and valeric acid by 53% (p < 0.05). Total fecal SCFA of LO and LF were statistically similar (p > 0.05) (Figure 3).

3.7. Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs)

Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) are clusters of bacteria that exhibit ≥97% similarity in 16S rRNA sequences. Venn diagrams represent the comparison of the OTUs of CF, CO, LF, and LO. It was observed that there were 187 shared OTUs between all four groups. Between same fat types: CF and CO shared 212 OTUs, while LF and LO shared 235 OTUs. In general, the fresh groups CF and LF had a higher number of unique OTUs compared to the oxidized groups CO and LO, respectively (Figure 4). An OTU rank curve is constructed by calculating the relative abundance of individual OTUs in each sample and ranking them in a decreasing order. A flatter curve shape indicates greater species evenness in a group. Among all four diet groups, species evenness and richness ranked in a decreasing order was: CF > LF > LO > CO. (Figure 5A).

3.8. Alpha Diversity

The alpha diversity index aims to measure sample community diversity. The Sobs (observed species) index reflects species richness, while the Shannon index represents species diversity. The shape of the alpha diversity rank curves (Sobs and Shannon) plateaued smoothly, indicating that sufficient samplings were conducted. In a decreasing order, the Sobs index of species richness between the groups was: CF > LF > LO > CO. The Shannon index of species diversity was: LF > CF > LO > CO. Alpha diversity analyses indicated that oxidized oils and fats decreased the richness and diversity of bacterial communities (p < 0.05) (Figure 5B).

3.9. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

To visualize similarity or dissimilarity among groups, the dimensional reduction of PCA was conducted. On the OTU level, the composition clusters of oxidized groups and fresh groups were separated distinctively. It was observed that the CO and LO group clusters migrated along the PC1 axis, away from their respective CF and LF groups. PCA analysis indicated that oxidized fats and oils had a dissimilar bacteria composition compared with their corresponding non-oxidized counterparts (Figure 6).

3.10. Phyla Abundance

Four main phyla were characterized—Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria. There was no statistical difference between two lard groups LF and LO across phyla (p > 0.05). However, feeding a CO diet significantly reduced Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes, whereas it increased Actinobacteria, compared with feeding CF (p < 0.05). The ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes was significantly higher in the CO group compared with CF (p < 0.05) (Figure 7).

3.11. Family Abundance

Both oxidized groups, CO and LO, had significantly lower abundance of Erysipelotrichaceae, and higher Eubacteriaceae at the family level compared with CF and LF, respectively (p < 0.05). Lard groups LF and LO had comparable abundance of Porphyromonadaceae, Bifidobacteriaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Sutterellaceae, Coriobacteriaceae, Bacteroidaceae, and Prevotellaceae (p > 0.05). In the two corn oil groups, however, feeding a CO diet led to a major reduction in Porphyromonadaceae, Coriobacteriaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Prevotellaceae, Bacteroidaceae, and Sutterellaceae (p < 0.05). Feeding CO had elevated Bifidobacteriaceae compared with feeding CF (p < 0.05). The abundance of Ruminococcaeae remained unaffected by the intake of oxidized LO and CO, relative to LF and CF, respectively (p > 0.05) (Figure 8).

3.12. Genus Abundance

Differences in genus abundance among the four diet groups were also observed. The taxonomic relationship between genera and phyla is represented by the phylogenetic tree (Figure 9A). Compared with the fresh groups CF and LF, both oxidized groups CO and LO had significantly reduced the abundance of Allobaculum (p < 0.05). Both oxidized and fresh groups had similar levels of Ruminococcus (p > 0.05). Between the two lard groups, LF and LO did not have significant alterations in the abundances of Bifidobacterium, Barnesiella, Parasutterella, Olsenella, Lactococcus, Paraprevotella, Clostridium_XIVa, and Bacteroides (p > 0.05). However, in the corn oil groups, oxidized CO intake led to a higher abundance of Bifidobacterium, and a drastic reduction in Barnesiella, Parasutterella, Olsenella, Lactococcus, Paraprevotella, Clostridium_XIVa, and Bacteroides (p < 0.05) (Figure 10). Analysis of genus abundance found that a significant number of Unclassified_Genus was elevated in oxidized CO and LO, which were categorized as “Other” (p < 0.05) (Figure 9B) (Figure 10B).

3.13. Correlation of Genus Abundance with Metabolic Parameters

Spearman’s correlation analyses were performed to correlate the abundance of specific bacterial genus with other parameters, including weight of perirenal and epididymal adipose tissues, plasma TG, atherosclerotic plaque area, total and individual SCFAs (acetic acid, butyric acid, propionic acid, valeric acid), as well as plasma LPS, IL-10, and IL-6. The weight of perirenal and epididymal adipose tissue was found to have a direct correlation with Acetatifactor, Allobaculum, Bacteroides, Clostridium_IV, Clostridium_XIVa, Corynebacterium, Lactococcus, Ruminococcus, and Oscillibacter, while it indirectly correlated with Bifidobacterium (p < 0.05). Plasma TG had an inverse relationship with Barnesiella, Coprococcus, and Paraprevotella, and a direct association with Hespellia (p < 0.05). Levels of Barnesiella, Bacteroides, and Paraprevotella were inversely correlated with atherosclerotic plaque accumulation (p < 0.05). Total SCFA was indirectly linked with Corynebacterium and Ruminococcus, while it was directly connected to the abundance of Paraprevotella (p < 0.05). Plasma inflammatory IL-10 was indirectly correlated to Bifidobacterium, and had a direct association to Acetatifactor, Allobaculum, Bacteroides, Clostridium_IV, Clostridium_XIVa, Coprococcus, Corynebacterium, Lactococcus, and Oscillibacter (p < 0.05) (Figure 11).

4. Discussion

The expansion of the global fast-food industry has led to an increase in the consumption of deep-fried food products. Complex chemical reactions during deep-frying produce oxidative products, which are largely absorbed into the food [3]. It remains unclear how different vegetable oils and animal fats can affect the gut microbiota when they are used repeatedly in deep-frying. The present study aimed to investigate and compare the effect of thermally-oxidized corn oil (vegetable oil) and lard (animal fat) on gut microbiota. By mimicking common restaurant practices, the oxidized oil and lard were prepared according to traditional French fry recipes for seven consecutive days. Golden Syrian hamsters were fed diets containing oxidized and fresh corn oil and lard for six weeks. It was observed that the intake of thermally-oxidized corn oil (CO) and oxidized lard (LO) caused some significant changes in the overall structure and composition of gut bacteria. The results of alpha diversity index analysis clearly demonstrated that CO and LO caused a marked loss of species diversity and richness. The compositional changes across bacteria phylum, family, and genus levels were also shown to be associated with atherosclerotic plaque development, gut-derived SCFA, and inflammatory biomarkers LPS, IL-6, and IL-10.
As valid indicators of gastrointestinal health and functioning, alpha diversity indices (Sobs and Shannon) are used to effectively compare gut bacterial communities under various physiological condition [20]. The structure and diversity of gut microbiota can be measured in terms of the number of unique species (richness), evenness within a sample, and a combination of the two [21]. Compared with the fresh CF and LF groups, the oxidized CO and LO groups had significantly lower species richness and diversity (Figure 5). Sufficient sampling was conducted and indicated by the rarefaction curves of both the Sobs and Shannon index (Figure 5). Differences between community structure could also be seen through PCA analysis of OTUs, which showed a clear separation of CO from CF, and LO from LF, along the PC1 axis (Figure 6). Additionally, the number of unique OTUs was also lower in the oxidized CO and LO groups, compared with their non-oxidized counterparts CF and LF, as represented by Venn diagrams (Figure 4). The loss of alpha diversity has been linked to metabolic complications such as obesity, irritable bowel syndrome (IBD), diabetes, and metabolic syndrome [22,23,24,25].
A decrease in bacterial diversity and richness was found to significantly affect healthy body weight. Previous studies had observed that a key difference between abnormal weight (both over- and under-weight), adiposity, dyslipidemia, and elevated inflammation, is characterized by the loss of bacterial richness [26,27]. Similarly, the present study also observed that the body weights of CO were 15% lower than CF, while LO was 7% lower than LF, despite of similar food intakes among four groups (Table 3). This was accompanied by a 15–35% reduction of epididymal and perirenal adipose tissues in the oxidized groups CO and LO, compared with the fresh CF and LF groups (Table 3). Spearman’s correlation found that the genus abundance of Acetatifactor and Allobaculum was positively correlated with epididymal and perirenal fat weights (Figure 11). Feeding CO and LO diets caused a reduction in the abundance of both genera, consistent with the reduction in adipose tissue weights compared with CF and LF, respectively. In addition, CO also had a lower abundance of other genera which were positively correlated with epididymal and perirenal fat, including: Bacteroides, Clostridium_XIVa, Lactococcus, Oscillibacter, Barnesiella, and Clostridium_IV (Figure 10). Additionally, CO had elevated Bifidobacterium, which is negatively associated with both adipose tissue weights. It has been shown that Bifidobacterium is associated with the lean phenotype in other studies [28]. Decreased body weight and body fat content after the consumption of reused frying oils and lipid oxidation products have also been observed in porcine and canine models [29,30]. It has also been found that the oxidation products may decrease overall digestibility, due to the difficulty in polymer breakdown and absorption [31,32]. This could explain the elevated weight of weekly fecal output observed in the oxidized groups in our study, where the fecal weights of CO and LO were 93–111% higher than those of the CF and LF groups (Table 3). Interestingly, while the body weights of oxidized groups were reduced, the plasma TG levels of CO and LO were 35–50% higher than CF and LF (Table 4). It was observed that Barnesiella, which is associated with epididymal weight, was inversely correlated with plasma TG (Figure 11). It is speculated that the decrease of Barnesiella, Coprococcus, and Paraprevotella in the CO group, and the increase of Hespellia in the LO group could contribute to the increased TG levels, compared with CF and LF (Figure 10). Other studies have also found that gut microbiota could affect TG deposition into adipocytes via fasting-induced adipocyte factor [33], which may explain the differences in plasma TG, adipose tissues, and body weights between oxidized and non-oxidized groups of corn oil and lard. The present results suggested that the loss of bacterial richness and diversity in CO and LO was, at least in part, responsible for the reduction in body weight and adipose tissue. It is also worth noting that other oxidation products produced during frying process such as trans fatty acids, had been found to increase plasma TG levels similarly to our observation, although previous studies in this regard have been highly inconsistent [34,35,36,37].
Inflammation is regulated by the action of cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10. Increased IL-6 levels promote chronic inflammation, which is characteristic in patients with inflammatory diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune diseases, as well as in COVID-19 [38,39]. Contrastingly, the anti-inflammatory mediator IL-10 assists in regulating host immune response. Dysregulated IL-10 levels are associated with inflammatory complication and infections [40,41]. The measurement of plasma cytokines found that the oxidized CO group had significantly elevated IL-6 concentration and decreased levels of plasma IL-10, compared with the CF group, whereas no differences were observed between plasma cytokines of the lard LO and LF groups (Figure 2). Previous studies using probiotics have found that gut bacteria can influence plasma cytokines [42,43]. Correlation analysis found that plasma IL-6 was negatively correlated with Bacteroides genus and positively correlated with Bifidobacterium in our study (Figure 11). Reduced abundance of Bacteroides and elevated Bifidobacterium in CO may partly contribute to the elevated plasma IL-6 compared with CF (Figure 10). The release of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 can be induced by endotoxin LPS, which enters circulation through leaky gut barriers [44]. The relationship between LPS and IL-6 is supported in our study, as the data of plasma LPS compliments IL-6. The CO group had higher LPS concentration compared to CF, and no significant differences between two lard groups were observed (Figure 2). Compared to CF, CO had significantly lower Clostridium_IV abundance, which is a bacteria cluster negatively correlated with plasma LPS (Figure 11). Anti-inflammatory plasma IL-10 also had a direct correlation with several gut bacteria, specifically: Acetatifactor, Allobaculum, Bacteroides, Clostridium_IV, Clostridium_XIVa, Coprococcus, Lactococcus, and Oscillibacter (Figure 11). Compared with the CF group, the abundance of these genera in the CO group was significantly reduced, which could explain the reduction in the plasma IL-10 level of the CO group (Figure 2).
Atherosclerosis and the build-up of fatty streak and plaques are accelerated by aberrant levels of IL-6 and IL-10 [45,46]. The present study observed that the atherosclerosis plaque area of CO was higher than CF, with no difference being observed between LO and LF (Figure 1). This trend was complementary to plasma IL-6 and IL-10 levels, supporting the relationship between cytokines and atherosclerosis progression (Figure 2). Additionally, the percentage of plaque accumulation in the aorta was negatively linked to bacteria abundance of Bacteroides, Barnesiella, and Paraprevotella through Spearman’s correlation analysis (Figure 11). This suggests the role of gut bacteria in the promotion of aortic plaque development and atherosclerosis.
SCFAs are metabolites produced by gut bacteria that can regulate host metabolism. Studies have found the beneficial effects of SCFAs on immune regulation by suppressing production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, while increasing IL-10 secretion [47,48,49]. Total fecal SCFAs levels in CO were significantly reduced compared with CF, in a similar trend to plasma IL-6 and IL-10 data (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Similarly, an inverse relationship between fecal SCFAs and plasma LPS in the CO group was also observed (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Previous studies have found that SCFAs can promote a healthy gut barrier and prevent inflammation caused by the entrance of LPS into bloodstream [50]. As a gut-derived metabolite, SCFAs production can be attributed to multiple bacterial genera. Paraprevotella of the Bacteroidetes phylum was directly associated with the production of acetate, butyrate, propionate, valerate, and total fecal SCFAs. Feeding CO caused a significant decrease in Paraprevotella and Bacteroidetes phyla, compared with the CF group (Figure 10). Additionally, Parasutterella and Barnesiella (both directly linked to butyrate), were also decreased in the CO group. On a phylum level, Bacteroidetes phyla was significantly reduced by the intake of oxidized CO compared with CF, leading to a higher Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes (F:B) ratio. The F:B ratio is a debated indicator of metabolic health, body weight maintenance, and immune regulation [51,52,53]. An increased F:B ratio in the CO group could potentially explain the elevated inflammation and body weight differences relative to those in the CF group.
Fresh and oxidized lard and corn oil had different effects on gut microbiota. This may be attributable to differences in their fatty acid compositions (Table 2). Fresh lard (in LF) largely consisted of 45% SFA and 37% MUFA. Fresh corn oil (in CF), on the other hand, has 53% PUFA and 30% MUFA. With a higher level of unsaturation, corn oil is less stable than lard, and is more susceptible to oxidation and rancidity [54]. Repeated deep-frying led to a significant loss of PUFA in corn oil (CF), making MUFA and SFA proportionally the major fatty acids in CO (Table 2). On the other hand, while thermal-oxidation did increase the saturation degree of lard, both LO and LF remained mainly composed of SFA and MUFA. As a result, differences between the lard LO and LF groups in gut microbiota may not be as radical as the differences observed between the corn oil CO and CF groups.
There are several limitations in the study of thermally-oxidized deep-frying oil and health. Deep-frying is an intricate process and specific oxidation products produced have not been fully identified [55]. Furthermore, differences in experimental conditions (e.g., choice of oil and their fatty acid profiles, choice of food for frying, temperature of oil, and frequency of frying) can affect the degree of changes to oil quality, leading to different findings between studies. Similarly, much remains to be investigated about how reused deep-frying oils can affect specific bacteria in the gut, as our study also observed that oxidized CO and LO had significant elevation in Unclassified_Genus abundance, which are yet to be identified.

5. Conclusions

In summary, the current study aimed to investigate how the intake of repeatedly reused deep-frying corn oil and lard could affect gut microbiota, compared to the consumption of fresh oil and lard. It was observed that oxidized oil and fat could decrease the richness and diversity of gut composition in hamsters. Corn oil, in particular, was more susceptible to changes as a result of repeated deep-frying and could alter gut microbiota at multiple taxonomic levels. The loss of bacterial richness and diversity, and the alteration of specific bacterial abundances, could exacerbate the atherosclerotic plaque development, and dysregulate the production of gut-derived metabolite SCFAs, pro-inflammatory biomarkers LPS and IL-6, and anti-inflammatory biomarker IL-10.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.K., H.Z. and Z.-Y.C.; Methodology, E.K.; Software, E.K.; Validation, E.K., C.Y., H.D., W.H., Z.H., K.Y.M. and J.L.; Formal Analysis, E.K.; Investigation, E.K., C.Y., H.D., W.H., Z.H., K.Y.M. and J.L.; Resources, Z.-Y.C.; Data Curation, E.K.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, E.K.; Writing—Review and Editing, Z.-Y.C.; Visualization, E.K.; Supervision, Z.-Y.C.; Project Administration, Z.-Y.C.; Funding Acquisition, Z.-Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Hong Kong Research Grants Council General Research Fund (Project Number CUHK 14102321 and 14105820).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Animal Experimental Ethical Committee of the Chinese University of Hong Kong (Reference Number: 21-169-MIS).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data produced in this study were presented in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Skog, K.; Viklund, G. Processing Contaminants: Acrylamide. In Encyclopedia of Food Safety; Motarjemi, Y., Ed.; Academic Press: Waltham, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 363–370. ISBN 978-0-12-378613-5. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ozkoc, S.O.; Sumnu, G.; Sahin, S. Chapter 20—Recent Developments in Microwave Heating. In Emerging Technologies for Food Processing, 2nd ed.; Sun, D.-W., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2014; pp. 361–383. ISBN 978-0-12-411479-1. [Google Scholar]
  3. Choe, E.; Min, D.B. Chemistry of Deep-Fat Frying Oils. J. Food Sci. 2007, 72, R77–R86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sébédio, J.-L.; Juaneda, P. 5-Isomeric and Cyclic Fatty Acids as a Result of Frying. In Deep Frying, 2nd ed.; Erickson, M.D., Ed.; AOCS Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2007; pp. 57–86. ISBN 978-1-893997-92-9. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dana, D.; Blumenthal, M.M.; Saguy, I.S. The Protective Role of Water Injection on Oil Quality in Deep Fat Frying Conditions. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2003, 217, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Cheng, Y.; Liu, Y. Effect of Frying Oils’ Fatty Acid Profile on Quality, Free Radical and Volatiles over Deep-Frying Process: A Comparative Study Using Chemometrics. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 101, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Scott, M.P.; Emery, M. Maize: Overview. In Reference Module in Food Science; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; ISBN 978-0-08-100596-5. [Google Scholar]
  8. Barrera-Arellano, D.; Badan-Ribeiro, A.P.; Serna-Saldivar, S.O. Chapter 21—Corn Oil: Composition, Processing, and Utilization. In Corn, 3rd ed.; Serna-Saldivar, S.O., Ed.; AACC International Press: Oxford, UK, 2019; pp. 593–613. ISBN 978-0-12-811971-6. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mushtaq, Z.; Imran, M.; Ahmad, N.; Khan, M.K.; Asghar, N. Chapter 16—Cold Pressed Corn (Zea Mays) Oil. In Cold Pressed Oils; Ramadan, M.F., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 191–195. ISBN 978-0-12-818188-1. [Google Scholar]
  10. List, G.R. 2—Oilseed Composition and Modification for Health and Nutrition. In Functional Dietary Lipids; Sanders, T.A.B., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2016; pp. 23–46. ISBN 978-1-78242-247-1. [Google Scholar]
  11. Suresh, K.S.; Suresh, P.V.; Kudre, T.G. 4—Prospective Ecofuel Feedstocks for Sustainable Production. In Advances in Eco-Fuels for a Sustainable Environment; Azad, K., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2019; pp. 89–117. ISBN 978-0-08-102728-8. [Google Scholar]
  12. Carvalho, A.P.; Moreira, M.M.; Delerue-Matos, C.; Gomes, A.M.; Freitas, A.C.; Grosso, C. Chapter 4—Valorization of Lipid by-Products. In Lipids and Edible Oils; Galanakis, C.M., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 133–174. ISBN 978-0-12-817105-9. [Google Scholar]
  13. Guallar-Castillón, P.; Rodríguez-Artalejo, F.; Lopez-Garcia, E.; León-Muñoz, L.M.; Amiano, P.; Ardanaz, E.; Arriola, L.; Barricarte, A.; Buckland, G.; Chirlaque, M.-D.; et al. Consumption of Fried Foods and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease: Spanish Cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Study. BMJ 2012, 344, e363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sayon-Orea, C.; Martinez-Gonzalez, M.A.; Gea, A.; Flores-Gomez, E.; Basterra-Gortari, F.J.; Bes-Rastrollo, M. Consumption of Fried Foods and Risk of Metabolic Syndrome: The SUN Cohort Study. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 33, 545–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Reeves, P.G. Components of the AIN-93 Diets as Improvements in the AIN-76A Diet. J. Nutr. 1997, 127, 838S–841S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hao, W.; Zhu, H.; Chen, J.; Kwek, E.; He, Z.; Liu, J.; Ma, N.; Ma, K.Y.; Chen, Z.-Y. Wild Melon Seed Oil Reduces Plasma Cholesterol and Modulates Gut Microbiota in Hypercholesterolemic Hamsters. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 2071–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kwek, E.; Zhu, H.; Ding, H.; He, Z.; Hao, W.; Liu, J.; Ma, K.Y.; Chen, Z.-Y. Peony Seed Oil Decreases Plasma Cholesterol and Favorably Modulates Gut Microbiota in Hypercholesterolemic Hamsters. Eur. J. Nutr. 2022, 61, 2341–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, J.; Hao, W.; He, Z.; Kwek, E.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, H.; Liang, N.; Ma, K.Y.; Lei, L.; He, W.-S.; et al. Beneficial Effects of Tea Water Extracts on the Body Weight and Gut Microbiota in C57BL/6J Mice Fed with a High-Fat Diet. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 2847–2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kwek, E.; Yan, C.; Ding, H.; Hao, W.; He, Z.; Liu, J.; Ma, K.Y.; Zhu, H.; Chen, Z.-Y. Effects of Hawthorn Seed Oil on Plasma Cholesterol and Gut Microbiota. Nutr. Metab. 2022, 19, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Willis, A.D. Rarefaction, Alpha Diversity, and Statistics. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Scrosati, R.A.; Knox, A.S.; Valdivia, N.; Molis, M. Species Richness and Diversity across Rocky Intertidal Elevation Gradients in Helgoland: Testing Predictions from an Environmental Stress Model. Helgol. Mar. Res. 2011, 65, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Plassais, J.; Gbikpi-Benissan, G.; Figarol, M.; Scheperjans, F.; Gorochov, G.; Derkinderen, P.; Cervino, A.C.L. Gut Microbiome Alpha-Diversity Is Not a Marker of Parkinson’s Disease and Multiple Sclerosis. Brain Commun. 2021, 3, fcab113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Opstelten, J.L.; Plassais, J.; van Mil, S.W.C.; Achouri, E.; Pichaud, M.; Siersema, P.D.; Oldenburg, B.; Cervino, A.C.L. Gut Microbial Diversity Is Reduced in Smokers with Crohn’s Disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2016, 22, 2070–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tuddenham, S.A.; Koay, W.L.A.; Zhao, N.; White, J.R.; Ghanem, K.G.; Sears, C.L.; HIV Microbiome Re-analysis Consortium. The Impact of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection on Gut Microbiota α-Diversity: An Individual-Level Meta-Analysis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 70, 615–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zouiouich, S.; Loftfield, E.; Huybrechts, I.; Viallon, V.; Louca, P.; Vogtmann, E.; Wells, P.M.; Steves, C.J.; Herzig, K.-H.; Menni, C.; et al. Markers of Metabolic Health and Gut Microbiome Diversity: Findings from Two Population-Based Cohort Studies. Diabetologia 2021, 64, 1749–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Le Chatelier, E.; Nielsen, T.; Qin, J.; Prifti, E.; Hildebrand, F.; Falony, G.; Almeida, M.; Arumugam, M.; Batto, J.-M.; Kennedy, S.; et al. Richness of Human Gut Microbiome Correlates with Metabolic Markers. Nature 2013, 500, 541–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gupta, V.K.; Kim, M.; Bakshi, U.; Cunningham, K.Y.; Davis, J.M.; Lazaridis, K.N.; Nelson, H.; Chia, N.; Sung, J. A Predictive Index for Health Status Using Species-Level Gut Microbiome Profiling. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ignacio, A.; Fernandes, M.R.; Rodrigues, V.A.A.; Groppo, F.C.; Cardoso, A.L.; Avila-Campos, M.J.; Nakano, V. Correlation between Body Mass Index and Faecal Microbiota from Children. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2016, 22, 258.e1–258.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Arowolo, F.K.; Willis, K.A.; Karabayir, I.; Akbiligic, O.; Blaser, M.; Booth, J.; Pierre, J.F.; Shanmuganayagam, D. Dietary Lipid Oxidization Products Alter Growth, Adiposity and Gut Microbial Ecology in Prepubertal Porcine Model. bioRxiv 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Turek, J.J.; Watkins, B.A.; Schoenlein, I.A.; Allen, K.G.D.; Hayek, M.G.; Aldrich, C.G. Oxidized Lipid Depresses Canine Growth, Immune Function, and Bone Formation. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2003, 14, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. David, R.O.; Sánchez-Muniz, F.J.; Bastida, S.; Benedi, J.; González-Muñoz, M.J. Gastric Emptying and Short-Term Digestibility of Thermally Oxidized Sunflower Oil Used for Frying in Fasted and Nonfasted Rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 9242–9248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Márquez-Ruiz, G.; Pérez-Camino, M.C.; Dobarganes, M.C. Evaluation of Hydrolysis and Absorption of Thermally Oxidized Olive Oil in Non-Absorbed Lipids in the Rat. ANM 1993, 37, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bäckhed, F.; Ding, H.; Wang, T.; Hooper, L.V.; Koh, G.Y.; Nagy, A.; Semenkovich, C.F.; Gordon, J.I. The Gut Microbiota as an Environmental Factor That Regulates Fat Storage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 15718–15723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lichtenstein, A.H. Trans Fatty Acids, Plasma Lipid Levels, and Risk of Developing Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation 1997, 95, 2588–2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Katan, M.B.; Zock, P.L.; Mensink, R.P. Trans Fatty Acids and Their Effects on Lipoproteins in Humans. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1995, 15, 473–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tsuzuki, W.; Matsuoka, A.; Ushida, K. Formation of Trans Fatty Acids in Edible Oils during the Frying and Heating Process. Food Chem. 2010, 123, 976–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cassagno, N.; Palos-Pinto, A.; Costet, P.; Breilh, D.; Darmon, M.; Bérard, A.M. Low Amounts of Trans 18:1 Fatty Acids Elevate Plasma Triacylglycerols but Not Cholesterol and Alter the Cellular Defence to Oxidative Stress in Mice. Br. J. Nutr. 2005, 94, 346–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Gabay, C. Interleukin-6 and Chronic Inflammation. Arthritis Res. 2006, 8, S3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hirano, T. IL-6 in Inflammation, Autoimmunity and Cancer. Int. Immunol. 2021, 33, 127–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Iyer, S.S.; Cheng, G. Role of Interleukin 10 Transcriptional Regulation in Inflammation and Autoimmune Disease. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 32, 23–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Saraiva, M.; O’Garra, A. The Regulation of IL-10 Production by Immune Cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 10, 170–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, I.-K.; Wu, Y.-Y.; Yang, Y.-F.; Ting, I.-W.; Lin, C.-C.; Yen, T.-H.; Chen, J.-H.; Wang, C.-H.; Huang, C.-C.; Lin, H.-C. The Effect of Probiotics on Serum Levels of Cytokine and Endotoxin in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Benef. Microbes 2015, 6, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Guo, Y.; Wang, B.; Wang, T.; Gao, L.; Yang, Z.; Wang, F.; Shang, H.; Hua, R.; Xu, J. Biological Characteristics of IL-6 and Related Intestinal Diseases. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 17, 204–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mohammad, S.; Thiemermann, C. Role of Metabolic Endotoxemia in Systemic Inflammation and Potential Interventions. Front. Immunol. 2021, 11, 594150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fatkhullina, A.R.; Peshkova, I.O.; Koltsova, E.K. The Role of Cytokines in the Development of Atherosclerosis. Biochemistry 2016, 81, 1358–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yoo, J.Y.; Sniffen, S.; Percy, K.M.; Chidipi, B.B.; Pallaval, V.B. The Gut Dysbiosis and Immune System in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ACVD). Microorganisms 2021, 10, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Sun, M.; Wu, W.; Chen, L.; Yang, W.; Huang, X.; Ma, C.; Chen, F.; Xiao, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Ma, C.; et al. Microbiota-Derived Short-Chain Fatty Acids Promote Th1 Cell IL-10 Production to Maintain Intestinal Homeostasis. Nat Commun 2018, 9, 3555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kim, C.H.; Park, J.; Kim, M. Gut Microbiota-Derived Short-Chain Fatty Acids, T Cells, and Inflammation. Immune Netw. 2014, 14, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, J.-J.; Zhang, Q.-M.; Ni, W.-W.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Li, A.-L.; Du, P.; Li, C.; Yu, S.-S. Modulatory Effect of Lactobacillus Acidophilus KLDS 1.0738 on Intestinal Short-Chain Fatty Acids Metabolism and GPR41/43 Expression in β-Lactoglobulin-Sensitized Mice. Microbiol. Immunol. 2019, 63, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tedelind, S.; Westberg, F.; Kjerrulf, M.; Vidal, A. Anti-Inflammatory Properties of the Short-Chain Fatty Acids Acetate and Propionate: A Study with Relevance to Inflammatory Bowel Disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2007, 13, 2826–2832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Magne, F.; Gotteland, M.; Gauthier, L.; Zazueta, A.; Pesoa, S.; Navarrete, P.; Balamurugan, R. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes Ratio: A Relevant Marker of Gut Dysbiosis in Obese Patients? Nutrients 2020, 12, 1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Turnbaugh, P.J.; Ridaura, V.K.; Faith, J.J.; Rey, F.E.; Knight, R.; Gordon, J.I. The Effect of Diet on the Human Gut Microbiome: A Metagenomic Analysis in Humanized Gnotobiotic Mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2009, 1, 6ra14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zeng, M.Y.; Inohara, N.; Nuñez, G. Mechanisms of Inflammation-Driven Bacterial Dysbiosis in the Gut. Mucosal. Immunol. 2017, 10, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Marcus, J.B. Chapter 6—Lipids Basics: Fats and Oils in Foods and Health: Healthy Lipid Choices, Roles and Applications in Nutrition, Food Science and the Culinary Arts. In Culinary Nutrition; Marcus, J.B., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2013; pp. 231–277. ISBN 978-0-12-391882-6. [Google Scholar]
  55. Dobarganes, C.; Márquez-Ruiz, G. Possible Adverse Effects of Frying with Vegetable Oils. Br. J. Nutr. 2015, 113, S49–S57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Antioxidants 11 01732 g001 550
Figure 1. Atherosclerosis plaque areas in hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D., where different letters indicate statistical difference, p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Atherosclerosis plaque areas in hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D., where different letters indicate statistical difference, p < 0.05.
Antioxidants 11 01732 g001
Antioxidants 11 01732 g002 550
Figure 2. Concentration of (A) LPS; (B) IL-10; and (C) IL-6, in plasma of hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D., where different letters indicate statistical difference, p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Concentration of (A) LPS; (B) IL-10; and (C) IL-6, in plasma of hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D., where different letters indicate statistical difference, p < 0.05.
Antioxidants 11 01732 g002
Antioxidants 11 01732 g003 550
Figure 3. Changes in propionic acid, acetic acid, butyric acid, valeric acid, and total short chain fatty acids (SCFA) in hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D., where different letters indicate statistical difference, p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Changes in propionic acid, acetic acid, butyric acid, valeric acid, and total short chain fatty acids (SCFA) in hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D., where different letters indicate statistical difference, p < 0.05.
Antioxidants 11 01732 g003
Antioxidants 11 01732 g004 550
Figure 4. Venn diagrams representing unique and shared operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard.
Figure 4. Venn diagrams representing unique and shared operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard.
Antioxidants 11 01732 g004
Antioxidants 11 01732 g005a 550Antioxidants 11 01732 g005b 550
Figure 5. (A) Species diversity depicted by an Operational taxonomic units (OTU) rank curve; (B) Rarefaction curves and alpha diversity indices, comparing community richness (sobs) and diversity (Shannon) between hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard.
Figure 5. (A) Species diversity depicted by an Operational taxonomic units (OTU) rank curve; (B) Rarefaction curves and alpha diversity indices, comparing community richness (sobs) and diversity (Shannon) between hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard.
Antioxidants 11 01732 g005aAntioxidants 11 01732 g005b
Antioxidants 11 01732 g006 550
Figure 6. Principal components analysis (PCA) on operational taxonomic units (OTU) level, representing overall composition similarity and dissimilarity among groups of hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard.
Figure 6. Principal components analysis (PCA) on operational taxonomic units (OTU) level, representing overall composition similarity and dissimilarity among groups of hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard.
Antioxidants 11 01732 g006
Antioxidants 11 01732 g007 550
Figure 7. Phylum level changes in bacterial composition (>0.01%) of hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard. (A) Bar plot of relative abundance (%). Comparison in abundances of: (B) Actinobacteria, (C) Proteobacteria, (D) Firmicutes, and (E) Bacteroidetes. (F) Ratio between Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D., where different letters indicate statistical difference, p < 0.05.
Figure 7. Phylum level changes in bacterial composition (>0.01%) of hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard. (A) Bar plot of relative abundance (%). Comparison in abundances of: (B) Actinobacteria, (C) Proteobacteria, (D) Firmicutes, and (E) Bacteroidetes. (F) Ratio between Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D., where different letters indicate statistical difference, p < 0.05.
Antioxidants 11 01732 g007
Antioxidants 11 01732 g008 550
Figure 8. Family-level changes in bacterial composition of hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard. (A) Bar plot of relative abundance (%). Comparison in abundances of: (B) Erysipelotrichaceae, (C) Eubacteriaceae, (D) Porphyromonadaceae, (E) Ruminococcaceae, (F) Bifidobacteriaceae, (G) Lachnospiraceae, (H) Bacteroidaceae, (I) Prevotellaceae, (J) Coriobacteriaceae, and (K) Sutterellaceae. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D., where different letters indicate statistical difference, p < 0.05.
Figure 8. Family-level changes in bacterial composition of hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard. (A) Bar plot of relative abundance (%). Comparison in abundances of: (B) Erysipelotrichaceae, (C) Eubacteriaceae, (D) Porphyromonadaceae, (E) Ruminococcaceae, (F) Bifidobacteriaceae, (G) Lachnospiraceae, (H) Bacteroidaceae, (I) Prevotellaceae, (J) Coriobacteriaceae, and (K) Sutterellaceae. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D., where different letters indicate statistical difference, p < 0.05.
Antioxidants 11 01732 g008
Antioxidants 11 01732 g009 550
Figure 9. (A) Phylogenetic tree depicting the evolutionary relationship between the genera and phyla of bacteria found in this study. (B) Bar plot of genus relative abundance (%) between hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard.
Figure 9. (A) Phylogenetic tree depicting the evolutionary relationship between the genera and phyla of bacteria found in this study. (B) Bar plot of genus relative abundance (%) between hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard.
Antioxidants 11 01732 g009
Antioxidants 11 01732 g010 550
Figure 10. Genus level changes in bacterial composition of hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard. Comparison of relative abundances of: (A) Allobaculum, (B) Unclassified_Genus (C) Ruminococcus, (D) Bifidobacterium, (E) Barnesiella, (F) Parasutterella, (G) Olsenella, (H) Clostridium XIVa, (I) Bacteroides, (J) Paraprevotella, and (K) Lactococcus. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D., where different letters indicate statistical difference, p < 0.05.
Figure 10. Genus level changes in bacterial composition of hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard. Comparison of relative abundances of: (A) Allobaculum, (B) Unclassified_Genus (C) Ruminococcus, (D) Bifidobacterium, (E) Barnesiella, (F) Parasutterella, (G) Olsenella, (H) Clostridium XIVa, (I) Bacteroides, (J) Paraprevotella, and (K) Lactococcus. Data are expressed as mean ± S.D., where different letters indicate statistical difference, p < 0.05.
Antioxidants 11 01732 g010
Antioxidants 11 01732 g011 550
Figure 11. Spearman’s correlation heatmap of major genera with key indices. Hamsters were fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard. Correlation significance is indicated by asterisks (“*” reflects p < 0.05, “**” p < 0.01). Filled box (▪) represents a corn oil or lard group that has a significantly greater abundance of bacteria relative to its counterpart (p < 0.05). Unfilled box (▫) represents a corn oil or lard group that has a significantly lower abundance of bacteria relative to its counterpart (p < 0.05). Taxonomic information (phylum, family) is provided on the right.
Figure 11. Spearman’s correlation heatmap of major genera with key indices. Hamsters were fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard. Correlation significance is indicated by asterisks (“*” reflects p < 0.05, “**” p < 0.01). Filled box (▪) represents a corn oil or lard group that has a significantly greater abundance of bacteria relative to its counterpart (p < 0.05). Unfilled box (▫) represents a corn oil or lard group that has a significantly lower abundance of bacteria relative to its counterpart (p < 0.05). Taxonomic information (phylum, family) is provided on the right.
Antioxidants 11 01732 g011
Table
Table 1. Composition of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard.
Table 1. Composition of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard.
Ingredients (g/kg)CFCOLFLO
Corn Starch508.0508.0508.0508.0
Casein242.0242.0242.0242.0
Sucrose119.0119.0119.0119.0
Corn Oil—Fresh155.0---
Corn Oil—Oxidized-155.0--
Lard—Fresh--155.0-
Lard—Oxidized---155.0
Mineral Mix40.040.040.040.0
Vitamin Mix20.020.020.020.0
Gelatin20.020.020.020.0
DL-Methionine1.01.01.01.0
Cholesterol (0.04%)0.40.40.40.4
Table
Table 2. Fatty acid composition and peroxide values of fresh corn oil (CF), oxidized corn oil (CO), fresh lard (LF), and oxidized lard (CO).
Table 2. Fatty acid composition and peroxide values of fresh corn oil (CF), oxidized corn oil (CO), fresh lard (LF), and oxidized lard (CO).
CFCOLFLO
(a) Fatty Acids (%)
14:01.683.061.753.20
16:011.4817.0225.8635.97
18:01.652.5616.9018.87
Total SFA14.8222.6544.5258.05
18:1n-929.9838.1137.4627.31
Total MUFA29.9838.1137.4627.31
18:2n-651.7633.369.980.71
18:3n-30.830.230.750.42
Total PUFA52.6033.5910.741.14
(b) Peroxide value (mEq peroxide/kg sample)5.34 ± 0.22 c33.15 ± 1.91 a2.65 ± 0.08 c12.51 ± 0.55 b
SFA, saturated fatty acids; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids. Different letters in superscript indicate statistical difference, p < 0.05.
Table
Table 3. Food intake, body weight, organ weight, and fecal output of hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard. *
Table 3. Food intake, body weight, organ weight, and fecal output of hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard. *
CFCOLFLOp-Value
Daily Food Intake (g)7.83 ± 0.597.30 ± 0.367.25 ± 0.487.79 ± 0.210.137
Body Weight (g)
Initial107.88 ± 6.38109.00 ± 6.57108.88 ± 7.20106.75 ± 9.510.926
Final137.00 ± 8.04 a115.88 ± 8.13 c135.57 ± 7.04 a125.71 ± 7.50 b<0.001
Organ Weights (g/100 g Body Weight)
Heart0.80 ± 0.03 b0.90 ± 0.05 a0.81 ± 0.05 b0.84 ± 0.04 b<0.001
Testis3.61 ± 0.25 b4.06 ± 0.30 a3.76 ± 0.41 ab3.67 ± 0.19 b0.025
Kidney1.30 ± 0.06 ab1.51 ± 0.08 c1.28 ± 0.05 a1.43 ± 0.06 b<0.001
Liver5.33 ± 0.22 c6.06 ± 0.34 a5.18 ± 0.24 c5.66 ± 0.26 b<0.001
Perirenal Adipose Tissue1.70 ± 0.31ab1.31 ± 0.11c1.81 ± 0.12 a1.55 ± 0.08 bc<0.001
Epididymal Adipose Tissue2.25 ± 0.38 c1.88 ± 0.18 a2.45 ± 0.27 c2.02 ± 0.28 b0.002
Weekly Fecal Output (g)3.58 ± 0.61 b7.57 ± 0.97 a3.68 ± 0.64 b7.10 ± 0.63 a<0.001
* Data are expressed as mean ± S.D., where different letters in superscript indicate statistical difference, p < 0.05.
Table
Table 4. Plasma lipid profile at Week 0 and Week 6 of hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard *.
Table 4. Plasma lipid profile at Week 0 and Week 6 of hamsters fed one of the four diets: CF, fresh corn oil; CO, oxidized corn oil; LF, fresh lard; LO, oxidized lard *.
CFCOLFLOp-Value
Week 0
TC (mg/dL)144.96 ± 15.06147.53 ± 13.48144.66 ± 18.86144.88 ± 23.960.988
HDL-C (mg/dL)114.15 ± 5.84115.40 ± 12.78117.01 ± 5.94115.25 ± 7.350.925
nHDL-C (mg/dL)30.81 ± 17.7332.13 ± 16.8227.65 ± 19.9529.63 ± 17.290.965
nHDL-C/HDL-C0.27 ± 0.170.29 ± 0.180.24 ± 0.170.25 ± 0.140.919
HDL-C/TC0.80 ± 0.100.79 ± 0.110.82 ± 0.120.81 ± 0.110.922
TG (mg/dL)91.25 ± 21.3096.50 ± 43.56102.42 ± 23.6898.25 ± 21.520.894
Week 6
TC (mg/dL)150.06 ± 15.32 bc137.56 ± 15.08 c189.18 ± 10.40 a164.43 ± 16.97 b<0.001
HDL-C (mg/dL)133.88 ± 15.68 b134.18 ± 10.21 b156.16 ± 16.38 a145.10 ± 11.63 ab0.009
nHDL-C (mg/dL)16.18 ± 12.99 a3.38 ± 7.54 c33.01 ± 14.81 b19.33 ± 11.69 a0.001
nHDL-C/HDL-C0.13 ± 0.12 a0.02 ± 0.06 b0.22 ± 0.10 a0.13 ± 0.08 a0.003
HDL-C/TC0.89 ± 0.08 b0.98 ± 0.06 a0.83 ± 0.08 b0.89 ± 0.06 b0.002
TG (mg/dL)75.50 ± 25.45 c114.25 ± 30.82 b111.94 ± 21.13 b150.69 ± 30.84 a<0.001
* Data are expressed as mean ± S.D., where different letters in superscript indicate statistical difference, p < 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kwek, E.; Yan, C.; Ding, H.; Hao, W.; He, Z.; Ma, K.Y.; Liu, J.; Zhu, H.; Chen, Z.-Y. Effects of Thermally-Oxidized Frying Oils (Corn Oil and Lard) on Gut Microbiota in Hamsters. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1732. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11091732

AMA Style

Kwek E, Yan C, Ding H, Hao W, He Z, Ma KY, Liu J, Zhu H, Chen Z-Y. Effects of Thermally-Oxidized Frying Oils (Corn Oil and Lard) on Gut Microbiota in Hamsters. Antioxidants. 2022; 11(9):1732. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11091732

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kwek, Erika, Chi Yan, Huafang Ding, Wangjun Hao, Zouyan He, Ka Ying Ma, Jianhui Liu, Hanyue Zhu, and Zhen-Yu Chen. 2022. "Effects of Thermally-Oxidized Frying Oils (Corn Oil and Lard) on Gut Microbiota in Hamsters" Antioxidants 11, no. 9: 1732. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11091732

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop