Next Article in Journal
Targeting Redox Regulation as a Therapeutic Opportunity against Acute Leukemia: Pro-Oxidant Strategy or Antioxidant Approach?
Next Article in Special Issue
Valorization of Agro-Industrial Wastes by Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction as a Source of Proteins, Antioxidants and Cutin: A Cascade Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Formyl-Peptide Receptor 2 Signaling Redirects Glucose and Glutamine into Anabolic Pathways in Metabolic Reprogramming of Lung Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Natural Antioxidants from Fruit Leaves on the Oxidative Stability of Soybean Oil during Accelerated Storage
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/antiox11091693
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Solid State Fermentation of Olive Leaves as a Promising Technology to Obtain Hydroxytyrosol and Elenolic Acid Derivatives Enriched Extracts

by
Anna Starzyńska-Janiszewska
1,
Carmen Fernández-Fernández
2,
Beatriz Martín-García
3,
Vito Verardo
3,4,* and
Ana María Gómez-Caravaca
2,4
1
Department of Biotechnology and General Technology of Food, Faculty of Food Technology, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Balicka 122, 30-149 Krakow, Poland
2
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, Av. de Fuentenueva s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain
3
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Granada, Campus of Cartuja, 18071 Granada, Spain
4
Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology ‘José Mataix’, Biomedical Research Centre, University of Granada, Avda del Conocimiento s/n, 18100 Armilla, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2022, 11(9), 1693; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11091693
Submission received: 27 July 2022 / Revised: 17 August 2022 / Accepted: 23 August 2022 / Published: 29 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Extraction of Antioxidants from Food Waste II)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Extraction of valuable bioactive compounds from olive leaves is a hot topic and the use of sustainable and green technologies is mandatory in terms of circular economy. In this way, the use of fermentation technologies showed very interesting results in terms of phenolic compound recovery. Because of that in this work the use of solid state fermentations, as valuable tool to improve the phenolic extraction has been checked. Aspergillus oryzae (in mycelium and spore form), Aspergillus awamori and Aspergillus niger were used as fermentation microrganisms. Phenolic compounds were determined by HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS and, to our knowledge, new compounds have been tentatively identified in olive leaves. Fermentation using mycelium of Aspergillus awamori, Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus oryzae were effective to increase both hydroxytyrosol and elenolic acid derivatives whereas the use of spores of Aspergillus oryzae caused a loss of hydroxytyrosoyl derivatives, contrary the content of elenolic derivatives are comparable with the other fermentation treatments and higher than control. The proposed fermentation processes using the mycelium of Aspergillus awamori, Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus oryzae lead to an increase the hydroxytyrosyl and elenolic acid derivatives and could be used at industrial scale to obtain enriched extracts.

1. Introduction

Olive (Olea europaea L.) is an evergreen tree found throughout the world, especially in the Mediterranean region, and cultivated for the production of oil and table olives [1,2]. Despite the important role played by olive industry within economy and society, its rapid growth and extensive activity generate large amounts of residues and by-products that can have a negative impact on environment, when burnt or grinded and scattered on the field, due to their high organic content and phytotoxicity [3,4]. Thus, valorization of by-products as a source of value-added products seems a potential alternative to increase the profitability of the olive sector.
One of the most important by-products from both olive tree cultivation and olive processing industry are olive leaves, generated in large quantities every year (10–30 kg per tree) after being separated from olives before processing (5% of weight of olives) and during the pruning of olive trees (25% of weight of olives) [5,6]. These by-products have always been used as animal feed and in folk medicine. However, they have the potential to be used as a valuable raw material in different fields, especially in the pharmaceutical and food industries [7,8]. In fact, olive leaves are rich in a wide variety of phenolic compounds, supporting their use in medicine, pharmaceutics, cosmetics, food shelf-life improvement and functional foods development [9,10,11,12]. Therefore, olive leaves not only are a by-product produced in large amounts, but also an excellent source of bioactive compounds, highlighting the potential valorization of this unexploited resource. Various studies have evaluated olive leaf extracts properties in relation to their phenolic content, describing better results in terms of antioxidant capacity when mixed than when compounds are tested separately due to the synergic effect between phenols [13,14]. In this sense, utilization of olive leaf extracts rather than an isolated compound would contribute to a better by-product valorization.
Phenolic compounds are generally extracted from natural sources through solid-liquid extractions using organic solvents; but there are other existing techniques proposed to obtain them, including supercritical fluids, high pressure processes, microwave-assisted extraction, and ultrasound-assisted extraction [15]. Recently, fermentation has also gained attention since it is able to provide high quality and high activity extracts which are easily recovered, enhancing the profitability of this process [16]. Nowadays, there are two main strategies to carry out fermentation process, depending on the type of substrate: submerged fermentation (SmF) and solid-state fermentations (SSF). In the first one, a liquid substrate (or water added to solid substrate) is used for microorganisms cultivation, while in SSF fermenting microorganisms grow on a solid substrate under controlled conditions, in the absence of free water (or with minimal amount of it) [17]. SSF shows several advantages over SmF, such as similarity to the natural habitat of microorganisms, a high yield, obtaining a final product with high activity, low water and energy consumptions, greater resistance to contamination, and being more environmentally friendly and cheaper as it can use agro-industrial by-products as substrates for fermentation, reducing the waste generated [17,18,19]. Consequently, there is an increasing interest towards the application of SSF for the recovery of valuable bioactive compounds from agro-industrial by-products, as this process proves to be more efficient than SmF [20].
Although SSF can be performed with different microorganisms, filamentous fungi are the most commonly used microorganisms in this type of fermentation, because of their ability to grow under low moisture content conditions and their potential to produce bioactive compounds by SSF as a result of enzymatic activity [19,21]. Indeed, filamentous fungi of genera Aspergillus have being widely used for studying the influence of fermentation on phenolic profiles from different agro-industrial by-products and enhancing their antioxidant potential [22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. There is limited information regarding the use of olive leaves as substrate for SSF; just about the effects of A. niger on nutrient and mineral composition, phenolic compounds, and condensed tannin of olive leaves, in relation to animal feed [29,30]. Therefore, the potential of this by-product together with SSF remains unknown.
In this context, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of SSF on phenolic content and thereby on antioxidant activity of olive leaves samples, concerning the potential of this fermented by-product as an excellent source of bioactive compounds for pharmaceutical and food applications. For that purpose, fermentation process was carried out with three different strains of Aspergillus (A. awamori, A. niger and A. oryzae) at different fermentation periods comparing the phenolic profiles obtained.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample and Microorganism Strains

Olive leaves from ‘Picual’ cultivar were obtained from “IFAPA, Centro Alameda del Obispo” in Córdoba, Spain (37°51′36.5″ N, 4°47′53.7″ W). Olive leaves were air dried at room temperature. Then, leaves were ground with an IKA A 10 Basic Mill (Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany) and the obtained powder was stored at −20°C until the extraction.
Fungal strains tested in the study were: Rhizpus oligosporus ATCC 64063, Neurospora intermedia CBS 131.92, Aspergillus oryzae CBS 673.92, Aspergillus awamori KKP 40 (IBPRS-Collection of Industrial Microbial Cultures (KKP), Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology, Warsaw, Poland) and Aspergillus niger 377-4 (Fruit and Vegetable Industry Factory Pektowin, Jasło, Poland). The strains were grown on potato extract agar (PDA) slants for 12 days at 24 °C.

2.2. Fermentation Process

Dry milled olive leaves were hydrated to 65% moisture content with distilled water, supplemented with yeast extract (1 g/L), NaHPO4 (1 g/L), MgSO4 (0.5 g/L) and KCl (0.5 g/L) to encourage fungal growth. Then, the material was autoclaved (121 °C, 20 min). Cooled material was inoculated with spore suspension (106 spores per 25 g of raw substrate) or mycelium fragments (3 loops per 25 g of raw substrate) of R. oligosporus, N. intermedia or A. oryzae strain. Inoculated substrate was transferred into Petri dishes (3 cm diameter, 3 replicates for each variant) and incubated at 30 °C and 60% air humidity. Among the strains tested, only A. oryzae was capable of growing on olive leaves. It was previously reported that olive leaf extract showed inhibitory effect on some fungal strains, concerning spore germination and/or mycelium growth [31]. The substrate was fully overgrown by mycelium after 5 days (AO5-m) (Figure 1A) and 8 (AO8-s) days (Figure 1B), respectively, when mycelium and spores were used as inoculating material.
As mycelium proved to be more effective than spores, the former procedure was also applied for A. awamori (Aaw) and A. niger (Anig) strains, and the inoculated material was incubated for 5 days. The fermentation was stopped by steaming (10 min), and then material was lyophilized.

2.3. Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Fermented Olive Leaves

The extraction was performed according to the methodology described by Martín-García et al. [32] Briefly, 0.25 g of fermented material were extracted by sonication via sonotrode with 100 mL of an ethanol/water solution (55:45, v/v) for 8 min. The supernatant was evaporated and reconstituted with 3 mL of MeOH/H2O (50/50 v/v). The final extracts were filtered through 0.22 μm nylon syringe filters and stored at −18 °C until the analyses.

2.4. Determination of Phenolic Compounds in Fermented Olive Leaves by HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS Analysis

The determination of the phenolic composition of fermented olive leaves was conducted slightly modifying the method previously described by Talhaoui et al. [33]. The equipment consists of a UPLC system ACQUITY (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) coupled to a time-of-flight analyzer (TOF) (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). Phenolic compounds were separated with a Poroshell 120 EC-C18 analytical column (4.6 × 100 mm, 2.7 mm) from Agilent Technologies, maintaining the column temperature at 25 °C, a flow rate set at 0.8 mL min−1 and an injection volume of 2.5 µL. The mobile phases were water with 1% acetic acid (phase A) and acetonitrile (phase B), changing the solvent gradient as follows: 0 min, 5% B; 4 min, 9% B; 7 min, 12% B; 8 min, 15% B; 9 min, 16% B; 14 min, 20% B; 15 min, 22% B; 18 min, 28% B; 19 min, 30% B; 20 min, 31% B; 24 min, 40% B; 28 min, 100% B; 31 min, 100% B; 33 min, 5% B. Mass spectrometer was equipped with an interface with electrospray ionization (ESI) source operating in negative mode. The operational conditions were: capillary voltage, 2300 kV; source temperature, 100 °C; cone gas flow, 40 L/h; desolvatation temperature, 500 °C; desolvatation gas flow, 11,000 L/h; and scan range, m/z 50–1500. The software MassLynx 4.1 (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) was used to process the data acquired.
The quantification of phenolic compounds in the fermented extracts was performed by using five standards (hydroxytyrosol, apigenin-7-glucoside, rutin, luteolin and oleuropein). Their calibration curves were prepared at eight concentration levels from the limit of quantification (LOQ) to 250 ppm (Table S1).

2.5. Antioxidant Capacity Assays

Antioxidant capacity has been evaluated using three different assays called DPPH, ABTS and FRAP according to our previous study [32]. All the spectrophotometric assays performed using on aUV-1601spectrophotometer from Shimadzu (Duisburg, Germany). Results were expressed in Trolox equivalents using its calibration curve.
To evaluate the DPPH radical scavenging, 100 µL of each extract was added to 2.9 mL of 0.1 M DPPH solution in 80/20 methanol/water (v/v). A decrease in absorbance was evaluated at 517 nm in the 0–30 min range (at 25 °C).
The radical-scavenging capability of phenolic was tested using the ABTS•+ radical cation assay (2,2′-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline)-6-sulfonic acid, diammonium salt; a stock solution of ABTS 7 mM was prepared and diluted with phosphate buffer 5 mM at pH = 7.4 obtaining an absorbance of 0.7 ± 0.02. The extracts were added to the solution and the absorbance was monitored for 10 min at 734 nm.
The ability of phenolic compounds to reduce the ferric ions by a single electron-transfer mechanism was evaluated by the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay; freshly prepared FRAP reagent (containing TPTZ, FeCl3 and acetate buffer) was warmed at 37 °C and added of the phenolic extracts. The absorbance values were measured at 595 nm after 30 min.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The results reported in this work are the averages of three repetitions (n = 3). Fisher test was used to establish significant differences (one-way ANOVA) (at the p < 0.05 level) that were calculated using Statistica 6.0 software (2001, StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA). PLS-DA, VIP and Hierarchical Clustering results presented as heatmaps have been obtained with MetaboAnalyst 4.0 software.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Identification of Phenolic Compounds by HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS

A total of 96 compounds have been identified and 74 phenolic compounds have been quantified in the samples analyzed by HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS. They were identified according to their m/z, molecular formula, in source fragments, error and Fit Conf % and by comparing them with literature, the co-elution with commercial standards (when possible) and with several databases (Pubchem, KEGG COMPOUND Database).
Among them, 5 compounds belonged to simple phenols, 6 to elenolic acid derivatives, 18 to flavonoids, 40 to secoiridoids, 1 to iridoids and 4 to other phenolic compounds (Table S2).
Main of them was previously described in olive leaves and olive leaf extracts. However, to our knowledge few compounds were tentatively described for the first time in olive leaves. The compound 10 with molecular formula C10H16O5 and m/z 215 was tentatively assigned to elenolic acid derivative according to Abbattista et al. [34] that identified them in olive pomaces. Compounds 15 and 16 showed an m/z 639 and a molecular formula C29H36O16; Cardinali and co-workers [35] identified this compound in olive mill wastewaters assigning it to β-Hydroxyverbascoside. Compounds 18 and 20, which were tentatively identified only in fermented samples, showed a molecular ion at 243 m/z and molecular formula C11H16O6; several authors [36] described them in plasma and olive pomaces assigning it to hydrogenated-elenolic acid. Compound 31 with molecular ion at m/z 551 and molecular formula C26H32O13 was tentatively identified as 6-(3-Hydroxy-3-methylbutyl) taxifolin 7-O-β-D-glucoside and it was found only in some fermented samples. Compound 39 reported a molecular formula of C17H22O7 and a molecular ion at 337 m/z, according to Ventura et al. [37] it was tentatively assigned to monohydrated oleacein and it was identified only in fermented samples. Compound 40 with m/z 323 was tentatively identified as hydroxytyrosol derivative according to Garcia-Aloy [38]. Compound 52 with 321 m/z and molecular formula C17H22O6 was tentatively identified as lactone ester with hydroxytyrosol according to the data reported by Garcia-Aloy and co-workers [38]. Compounds 40 and 52 were identified in all fermented samples but not in the control.
Finally, compounds 81 with m/z 601 and molecular formula C27H38O15 was tentatively identified as frameroside or 2″-epi-frameroside; Sidda and co-workers [39] identified them in ash leaves from Oleaceae family.

3.2. Concentration of Phenolic Compounds by HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS

The control sample showed a total phenolic content of 14.64 mg/g d.w. (Table S3), a lower content than the presented in other studies about ‘Picual’ olive leaves (32–34), maybe due to the high temperatures reached during autoclaving and also because of differences in agronomic and environmental conditions. Total phenolic content showed a significant increase after the inoculation with mycelium of AO5-m (11%) and Aaw (9.6%). An increment of total phenolics was also observed after the inoculation during 8 days with spores of AO8-s; however, the increase was lower (6.4%).
Regarding the families of phenolic compounds, simple phenols significantly increased about 38.8% after the inoculation with mycelium of AO5-m. A lower increase was observed after the inoculation with mycelium of Aaw (14.5%) and Anig (17.8%). The inoculation with spores of Aspergillus oryzae (AO5-s and AO8-s) did not improve the recovery of simple phenols. The increment was related to the increase of hydroxytyrosol, hydroxytyrosol derivative and hydroxytyrosol ester with lactone, that could be associated to the breakdown of oleuropein (formed by the ester of hydroxytyrosol with elenolic acid) during fermentation. In fact, according to other authors [40,41], Aspergillus niger produce β-glycosidase and esterase that are able to hydrolyze the oleuropein. This could be a promising finding because hydroxytyrosol and its derivatives have been considered by EFSA as compounds that contribute to the protection of blood lipids from oxidative stress [42]. Thus, fermentation could be a useful tool to increment the recovery of hydroxytyrosol and its derivatives from olive leaves.
Elenolic acid derivatives showed a significant increase after all types of fermentation. Inoculation with mycelium and 5-days spores of AO5-s were the fermentations that mostly augment the concentration of elenolic acid derivatives (65.3% and 65.7%, respectively), followed by inoculation with mycelium of Anig and Aaw and inoculation with 8-days spores AO8-s (59.5%, 59.9% and 60.15%, respectively). As exception of elenolic acid glucoside isomer c, the rest of elenolic acid derivatives increased after all types of fermentation. This fact probably indicates that secoiridoids such as oleuropein and ligstroside derivatives suffer a breakdown during fermentation, as stated before during the evaluation of hydroxytyrosol derivatives behavior. This aspect is also important; in fact Salamanca et al. [43] have recently noticed the antiviral activity of this compound. These authors showed as elenolic acid is able to reduce the neuraminidase activity and to prevent the metabolic inactivation of the host cells during the infection experiments, promoting it as anti-influenza compound.
Secoiridoids presented a significant increase after the olive leaves treatment with mycelium of Aaw and AO8-s (5.4% and 8.4%, respectively); whereas the inoculation with mycelium of Aspergillus oryzae AO5-m did not show significant differences compared to control sample and mycelium of Anig and AO5-m showed a significant decrease of secoiridoids extraction (−6.1% and −15.2%, respectively). This is partially justifiable by the enzymatic activity of the Aspergillus niger that is a good producer of β-glucosidase [44]; therefore it is plausible to hypothesize that the fermentation with this microorganism promotes the conversion of oleuropein in hydroxytyrosol, thus the content of secoridoids is lower. The compounds that contribute to observe this increment trend are: oleoside, secologanoside, oleuropein isomer a, hydrooleuropein, oleuropein isomer b, oleuropein isomer c, oleuropein isomer d, oleuropein isomer e, oleuropein isomer f, oleuropein isomer g, oleuropein aglycone isomer a. Most of them are isomers of oleuropein and this fact coincides with the reduction of oleuropein glucoside isomers, which maybe can be explain because of the breakdown of the glycosidic bond during fermentation. About minor secoridoids, monohydrated oleacein was detected only in fermented samples and the highest content has been noticed in AO5-m sample. This secoridoid is a hydrolytic derivative of oleuropein and, more precisely, it represents its dialdehydic isomeric form with anticancer properties [45]. Recently, Marx and co-workers [46] noticed as fungi isolated from olive leaves are able to improve the content of oleacein in Arbequina olives. This trend was tentatively justified by these authors by a possible higher production of pectinases and cellulases, which may promote the hydrolysis of the cellular membrane and consequently of the phenolic compounds.
Flavonoids content significantly improved after the inoculation with AO5-s and Aaw (11.5% and 16.8%, respectively). The other strains did not show significant differences with the control sample. Luteolin rutinoside isomer a, luteolin and resinoside isomer b contribute to the high flavonoid levels in both kind of fermentations. However, gallocatechin, apigenin glucoside, chrysoeriol-7-glucoside, quercetin, and resinoside isomer a showed the highest increment after the inoculation with Aaw and luteolin rutinoside isomers b and d presented the highest concentration after the inoculation with AO5-s. The increase of quercetin-glucoside in Aaw sample is consistent with the data reported by Leonard et al. [47]; these authors noticed that the Aspergillus awamori is able to release quercetin from rutin thanks to the α-rhamnosidase responsible to the convertion of rutin in quercetin-glucoside, and to the β-glucosidase that catalyze the conversion of quercetin-3-glucoside to quercetin.
Iridoids, represented by allobetonicoside, were only present in the autoclaved sample before fermentation and the other phenolic compounds significantly diminish after fermentation compared to autoclaved sample. This decrease was in the range between 25.4% with Aaw and 39.8% with AO5-m.
To better understand the phenolic distribution in the samples, a color-coded two-dimensional heatmap was produced and it is shown in Figure 2. It is composed by two clusters (one sample oriented and the other one is variable-oriented) and was calculated using the Euclidean distance according to the Ward method.
Sample oriented cluster showed a first cluster discriminating control from fermented samples; the second cluster discriminated between Aaw fermented sample and the other ones. Red zones in the map correspond to high amounts of the selected compound.
Analyzing the results of control samples, it is very clear that the red colored boxes corresponding to oleuropein-derivatives (particularly oleuropein aglycone and glucoside), rutin, luteolin-glucosides depicts the high amounts of these phenolics as compared to other samples. Aaw fermented samples reported a cluster related to the high amounts of apigenin glucoside, quercetin and β-hydroxyverbascoside isomers. Generally, fermented samples showed sub-clusters indicating the higher amounts of elenolic acid derivatives, hydroxytyrosol-derivatives, some oleuropein isomers, and oleoside.
PLS-DA was used to classify the different olive leaf samples using the phenolic composition as predictors. The PLS-DA score plot for the final model is shown in Supplementary Figure S1; it shows as the samples were well clustered according to control and fermented samples as well as a tendency for the different fermentations clustering with a classification according to the microorganism and the form that it was inoculated (spore or mycelium).
It is important to underline that, as previously reported, the increase or decrease of the phenolic compounds is related to the production of specific enzymes by the selected fungi that are able to transform the phenolic structure; however, the increase of the content of phenolic compounds is also due to the action of the lignocellulolytic enzymes produced by the genus Aspergillus [44] that are capable to degrade the cell wall polysaccharides improving the extractability of the phenolic compounds.
Figure 3A reports the results of PLS-DA analysis; the most important phenolic compounds are plotted according to the PLS-DA variable importance in projection (VIP) scores. In this way, the importance of variables to the model was presented and according to other authors [48] threshold was set to VIP > 1. Figure 3a–g reports the concentration (µg/g d.w.) of the selected phenolic compounds with VIP score ranging between 5.06 to 1.20 corresponding to hydroxytyrosol-lactone (a), hydroxytyrosol (b), dihydroxyoleuropein isomer I (c), hydroxyoleuropein isomer I and II (d and e), oleuropein aglicone isomer b (f), and apigenin-glucoside (g).
On the other hand, the most abundant compound in the olive leaf samples is the hydroxytyrosol lactone ester, this compound has been found in all the fermented samples (Figure 3a) and we suppose that is a metabolite formed during the fermentation; leaves fermented with Aaw and AO5-m showed the highest content. As showed in Figure 3b, hydroxytyrosol was detected in control and fermented samples; however, its content increased after fermentation with Aaw and Anig. Dihydroxyoleuropein isomer I was the third compound in terms of VIP score and its content was higher in samples fermented with spores of A. oryzae, lower amounts were also described in the samples fermented with the mycelium of A. niger and A. oryzae; contrary, this compound was not detected in the sample fermented with A. awamori.
About the compounds hydroxyoleuropein isomer I and II, and apigenin glucoside only the fermentation with A. awamori was able to improve their content compared to the control. Finally, oleuropein aglycone isomer b is higher in the control and its content decreased during the fermentation confirming the rupture of this molecule to form hydroxytyrosol derivatives [40,41].

3.3. Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity in Control and Fermented Extracts

Figure 4 reported the values of the antioxidant activity of the extracts evaluated by three different assays. As previously reported [32], these assays have different mechanism of action; in fact, ABTS and DPPH mechanism is based on the electron transfer or by radical quenching, besides FRAP mechanism is based on the ability of phenolic compounds to donate an electron.
Antioxidant activity evaluated by ABTS assay ranged between 17 and 47.1 mg Trolox equivalent/g leaf d.w. and the control sample showed the highest value. According to the obtained data, all the samples fermented with the A. oryzae reported the highest values of antioxidant activity with DPPH radical assay; contrary, control was the lowest one. Briefly, sample fermented by A. niger showed the lowest value of antioxidant activity evaluated by FRAP, the samples fermented with the spores of A. oryzae showed the highest one. These data confirmed as the different phenolic compounds present different mechanisms of action. Figure 5 reports the Pearson’s correlations between the antioxidant activity and the phenolic composition.
A moderate high correlation was noticed between the luteolin-glucoside and comselogoside, and the ABTS assay. In other words, high correlation was noticed between DPPH and elenolic acid glucoside, dihydroxyoleuropein, hydrogenated elenolic acid, luteoin rutinoside, hydroxyoleuropein, ligstroside and 6′-O-[(2E)-2,6-dimethyl-8-hydroxy-2-octenoyloxy] secologanoside.
Finally, ligstroside and 6′-O-[(2E)-2,6-dimethyl-8-hydroxy-2-octenoyloxy] secologanoside, hydroxyoleuropein and dihydroxyoleuropein was moderately correlated with FRAP assay.
High correlation was found among the antioxidant assays.

4. Conclusions

This study proposed the solid state fermentation as a treatment of olive leaves aiming the increase of hydroxytyrosol and elenolic acid derivatives concentration.
The use of HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS allowed the tentatively identification of new compounds that, to our knowledge, were not previously described in olive leaves. Most of them were detected only in fermented samples confirming that they are metabolites that have been formed during the fermentation.
Fermentation using mycelium of Aspergillus awamori, Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus oryzae were effective to increase both hydroxytyrosol and elenolic acid derivatives whereas the use of spores of Aspergillus oryzae caused a loss of hydroxytyrosoyl derivatives, contrary the content of elenolic derivatives are comparable with the other fermentation treatments and higher than control.
Briefly, the proposed fermentation processes using the mycelium of Aspergillus awamori, Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus oryzae lead to an increase the hydroxytyrosyl and elenolic acid derivatives and could be used at industrial scale to obtain enriched extracts. Further works will be focused on the use of mix of microorganism to evaluate possible synergisms in terms of secoridoid hydrolysis to produce enriched extracts of hydroxytyrosol and elenolic acid derivatives. Moreover, additional researches are needed to better understand the kinetic of formation of fermentation metabolites (i.e., lactone ester with hydroxytyrosol among others) during the process.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antiox11091693/s1, Figure S1: PLS-DA analysis; Table S1: Analytical parameters of the method proposed. LOD: Limit of detection, LOQ: Limit of quantification. Table S2: Phenolic compounds tentatively identified in olive leaf extracts by HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS; Table S3: Content of phenolic compounds in olive leaf extracts (mg/g d.w. leaf).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.G.-C., A.S.-J. and V.V.; methodology, formal analysis, A.S.-J., B.M.-G. and C.F.-F.; resources, A.M.G.-C.; data curation, A.S.-J., V.V. and C.F.-F.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.G.-C. and V.V.; writing—review and editing, A.S.-J.; supervision, A.M.G.-C. and V.V.; project administration, A.M.G.-C. and V.V.; funding acquisition, A.M.G.-C., A.S.-J. and V.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by project. “This research was funded by Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, grant number RTI2018-099835-A-I00 financed by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/FEDER “Una manera de hacer Europa”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Lorenzo Leon and Raúl de la Rosa from the “IFAPA, Centro Alameda del Obispo (Cordoba, Spain)” for providing the olive leaf sample.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Giacometti, J.; Žauhar, G.; Žuvić, M. Optimization of Ultrasonic-Assisted Extraction of Major Phenolic Compounds from Olive Leaves (Olea europaea L.) Using Response Surface Methodology. Foods 2018, 7, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Klisović, D.; Novoselić, A.; Jambrak, A.R.; Bubola, K.B. The utilisation solutions of olive mill by-products in the terms of sustainable olive oil production: A review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 56, 4851–4860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nunes, M.A.; Pimentel, F.B.; Costa, A.S.; Alves, R.C.; Oliveira, M.B.P. Olive by-products for functional and food applications: Challenging opportunities to face environmental constraints. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2016, 35, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Guinda, A.; Castellano, J.M.; Santos-Lozano, J.M.; Delgado-Hervás, T.; Gutiérrez-Adánez, P.; Rada, M. Determination of major bioactive compounds from olive leaf. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 64, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Abaza, L.; Taamalli, A.; Nsir, H.; Zarrouk, M. Olive Tree (Olea europeae L.) Leaves: Importance and Advances in the Analysis of Phenolic Compounds. Antioxidants 2015, 4, 682–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cavaca, L.A.; López-Coca, I.M.; Silvero, G.; Afonso, C.A. The Olive-Tree Leaves as a Source of High-Added Value Molecules: Oleuropein. In Studies in Natural Products Chemistry; Atta-Ur-Rahman, Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; Volume 64, pp. 131–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Espeso, J.; Isaza, A.; Lee, J.Y.; Sörensen, P.M.; Jurado, P.; Avena-Bustillos, R.D.J.; Olaizola, M.; Arboleya, J.C. Olive Leaf Waste Management. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 660582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Irakli, M.; Chatzopoulou, P.; Ekateriniadou, L. Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of phenolic compounds: Oleuropein, phenolic acids, phenolic alcohols and flavonoids from olive leaves and evaluation of its antioxidant activities. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 124, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lama-Muñoz, A.; Contreras, M.D.M.; Espínola, F.; Moya, M.; Romero, I.; Castro, E. Content of phenolic compounds and mannitol in olive leaves extracts from six Spanish cultivars: Extraction with the Soxhlet method and pressurized liquids. Food Chem. 2020, 320, 126626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gullón, P.; Gullón, B.; Astray, G.; Carpena, M.; Fraga-Corral, M.; Prieto, M.A.; Simal-Gandara, J. Valorization of by-products from olive oil industry and added-value applications for innovative functional foods. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Martín-García, B.; Pimentel-Moral, S.; Gómez-Caravaca, A.M.; Arráez-Román, D.; Segura-Carretero, A. Box-Behnken experimental design for a green extraction method of phenolic compounds from olive leaves. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2020, 154, 112741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Oliveira, A.L.; Gondim, S.; Gómez-García, R.; Ribeiro, T.; Pintado, M. Olive leaf phenolic extract from two Portuguese cultivars –bioactivities for potential food and cosmetic application. J. Environ. 2021, 9, 106175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ayadi, A.; Yahia, Y.; Othman, K.; Hannachi, H. Oxidative stability of olive oil enriched with oleaster leaves under accelerated storage conditions. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2020, 93, 168–176. [Google Scholar]
  14. Talhaoui, N.; Trabelsi, N.; Taamalli, A.; Verardo, V.; Gómez-Caravaca, A.M.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, A.; Arraez-Roman, D. Olea europaea as Potential Source of Bioactive Compounds for Diseases Prevention. In Studies in Natural Products Chemistry; Atta-ur-Rahman, Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 57, pp. 389–411. ISBN 9780444640574. [Google Scholar]
  15. Martins, S.; Mussatto, S.I.; Martinez-Avila, G.; Montañez-Saenz, J.; Aguilar, C.N.; Teixeira, J.A. Bioactive phenolic compounds: Production and extraction by solid-state fermentation. A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Amaya-Chantaca, D.; Flores-Gallegos, A.C.; Iliná, A.; Aguilar, C.N.; Sepúlveda-Torre, L.; Ascacio-Vadlés, J.A.; Chávez-González, M.L. Comparative extraction study of grape pomace bioactive compounds by submerged and solid-state fermentation. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2021, 97, 1494–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Martí-Quijal, F.J.; Khubber, S.; Remize, F.; Tomasevic, I.; Roselló-Soto, E.; Barba, F.J. Obtaining Antioxidants and Natural Preservatives from Food By-Products through Fermentation: A Review. Fermentation 2021, 7, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Postigo, L.O.C.Y.; Jacobo-Velázquez, D.A.; Guajardo-Flores, D.; Amezquita, L.E.G.; García-Cayuela, T. Solid-state fermentation for enhancing the nutraceutical content of agrifood by-products: Recent advances and its industrial feasibility. Food Biosci. 2021, 41, 100926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Šelo, G.; Planinić, M.; Tišma, M.; Tomas, S.; Komlenić, D.K.; Bucić-Kojić, A. A Comprehensive Review on Valorization of Agro-Food Industrial Residues by Solid-State Fermentation. Foods 2021, 10, 927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chilakamarry, C.R.; Sakinah, A.M.; Zularisam, A.; Sirohi, R.; Khilji, I.A.; Ahmad, N.; Pandey, A. Advances in solid-state fermentation for bioconversion of agricultural wastes to value-added products: Opportunities and challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 343, 126065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Leite, P.; Belo, I.; Salgado, J.M. Co-management of agro-industrial wastes by solid-state fermentation for the production of bioactive compounds. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2021, 172, 113990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Larios-Cruz, R.; Buenrostro-Figueroa, J.; Prado-Barragán, A.; Rodríguez-Jasso, R.M.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R.; Montañez, J.C.; Aguilar, C.N. Valorization of Grapefruit By-Products as Solid Support for Solid-State Fermentation to Produce Antioxidant Bioactive Extracts. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 2019, 10, 763–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yepes-Betancur, D.P.; Márquez-Cardozo, C.J.; Cadena-Chamorro, E.M.; Martinez-Saldarriaga, J.; Torres-León, C.; Ascacio-Valdes, A.; Aguilar, C.N. Solid-state fermentation—Assisted extraction of bioactive compounds from hass avocado seeds. Food Bioprod. Process. 2021, 126, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dulf, F.V.; Vodnar, D.C.; Socaciu, C. Effects of solid-state fermentation with two filamentous fungi on the total phenolic contents, flavonoids, antioxidant activities and lipid fractions of plum fruit (Prunus domestica L.) by-products. Food Chem. 2016, 209, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dulf, F.V.; Vodnar, D.C.; Dulf, E.-H.; Diaconeasa, Z.; Socaciu, C. Liberation and recovery of phenolic antioxidants and lipids in chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa) pomace by solid-state bioprocessing using Aspergillus niger and Rhizopus oligosporus strains. LWT 2018, 87, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sadh, P.K.; Chawla, P.; Duhan, J.S. Fermentation approach on phenolic, antioxidants and functional properties of peanut press cake. Food Biosci. 2018, 22, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bangar, S.P.; Sandhu, K.S.; Purewal, S.S.; Kaur, M.; Kaur, P.; Siroha, A.K.; Kumari, K.; Singh, M.; Kumar, M. Fermented barley bran: An improvement in phenolic compounds and antioxidant properties. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Maia, I.D.C.; D’Almeida, C.T.D.S.; Freire, D.M.G.; Cavalcanti, E.D.C.; Cameron, L.C.; Dias, J.F.; Ferreira, M.S.L. Effect of solid-state fermentation over the release of phenolic compounds from brewer’s spent grain revealed by UPLC-MSE. LWT 2020, 133, 110136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Altop, A.; Coskun, I.; Filik, G.; Kucukgul, A.; Bekiroglu, Y.G.; Çayan, H.; Gungor, E.; Sahin, A.; Erener, G.; Kırsehir Ahi Evran University; et al. Amino acid, mineral, condensed tannin, and other chemical contents of olive leaves (Olea europaea L.) processed via solid-state fermentation using selected Aspergillus niger strains. Cien. Inv. Agr. 2018, 45, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Altop, A. Effect of Solid-State Fermentation on Main Nutritional Components, Some Minerals, Condensed Tannin and Phenolic Compounds of Olive Leaves. Turk. J. Agric. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 7, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Korukluoglu, M.; Sahan, Y.; Yigit, A. Antifungal Properties of Olive Leaf Extracts and Their Phenolic Compounds. J. Food Saf. 2008, 28, 76–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Martín-García, B.; De Montijo-Prieto, S.; Jiménez-Valera, M.; Carrasco-Pancorbo, A.; Ruiz-Bravo, A.; Verardo, V.; Gómez-Caravaca, A.M. Comparative Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Olive Leaves Using a Sonotrode and an Ultrasonic Bath and the Evaluation of Both Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Talhaoui, N.; Gómez-Caravaca, A.M.; León, L.; De la Rosa, R.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, A. Determination of phenolic compounds of ‘Sikitita’ olive leaves by HPLC-DAD-TOF-MS. Comparison with its parents ‘Arbequina’ and ‘Picual’ olive leaves. LWT 2014, 58, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Abbattista, R.; Ventura, G.; Calvano, C.; Cataldi, T.; Losito, I. Bioactive Compounds in Waste By-Products from Olive Oil Production: Applications and Structural Characterization by Mass Spectrometry Techniques. Foods 2021, 10, 1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cardinali, A.; Pati, S.; Minervini, F.; D’Antuono, I.; Linsalata, V.; Lattanzio, V. Verbascoside, Isoverbascoside, and Their Derivatives Recovered from Olive Mill Wastewater as Possible Food Antioxidants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 1822–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Silva, S.; Garcia-Aloy, M.; Eduardo Figueira, M.; Combet, E.; Mullen, W.; Bronze, M.B. From High Resolution Mass Spectrometric Analysis of secoiridoids and metabolites as biomarkers of acute olive oil intake. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2018, 62, 1700065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ventura, G.; Calvano, C.D.; Abbattista, R.; Bianco, M.; De Ceglie, C.; Losito, I.; Palmisano, F.; Cataldi, T.R. From Characterization of bioactive and nutraceutical compounds occurring in olive oil processing wastes. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2019, 33, 1670–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Garcia-Aloy, M.; Groff, N.; Masuero, D.; Nisi, M.; Franco, A.; Battelini, F.; Vrhovsek, U.; Mattivi, F. Exploratory Analysis of Commercial Olive-Based Dietary Supplements Using Untargeted and Targeted Metabolomics. Metabolites 2020, 10, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sidda, J.D.; Song, L.; Parker, J.L.; Studholme, D.J.; Sambles, C.; Grant, M. Diversity of secoiridoid glycosides in leaves of UK and Danish ash provide new insight for ash dieback management. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 19566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Khoufi, S.; Hamza, M.; Sayadi, S. Enzymatic hydrolysis of olive wastewater for hydroxytyrosol enrichment. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 9050–9058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hamza, M.; Sayadi, S. High production of Aspergillus niger β-glucosidase at pilot-scale and application for hydroxytyrosol release from olive by-product. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 50, 1882–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Commission Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 of 16 May 2012. Available online: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/article13.htm (accessed on 25 July 2022).
  43. Salamanca, A.; Almodóvar, P.; Jarama, I.; González-Hedström, D.; Prodanov, M.; Inarejos-García, A.M. Anti-influenza virus activity of the elenolic acid rich olive leaf (Olea europaea L.) extract Isenolic. Antivir. Chem. Chemother. 2021, 29, 20402066211063391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Leite, P.; Silva, C.; Salgado, J.M.; Belo, I. Simultaneous production of lignocellulolytic enzymes and extraction of antioxidant compounds by solid-state fermentation of agro-industrial wastes. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2019, 137, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gentile, L.; Uccella, N.A.; Sivakumar, G. Soft-MS and Computational Mapping of Oleuropein. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Marx, Í.M.G.; Baptista, P.; Casal, S.; Rodrigues, N.; Cruz, R.; Velos, A.C.A.; Pereira, J.A.; Peres, A.M. Inoculation of cv. Arbequina olives with fungi isolated from leaves and its effect on the extracted oils’ stability and health-related composition. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Leonard, W.; Zhang, P.; Ying, D.; Adhikari, B.; Fang, Z. Fermentation transforms the phenolic profiles and bioactivities of plant-based foods. Biotechnol. Adv. 2021, 49, 107763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Cai, Z.; Wang, C.; Zou, L.; Liu, X.; Chen, J.; Tan, M.; Mei, Y.; Wei, L. Comparison of Multiple Bioactive Constituents in the Flower and the Caulis of Lonicera japonica Based on UFLC-QTRAP-MS/MS Combined with Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Molecules 2019, 24, 1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Antioxidants 11 01693 g001 550
Figure 1. A. oryzae 5 days inoculated with mycelium (A) and A. oryzae 8 days inoculated with spores (B).
Figure 1. A. oryzae 5 days inoculated with mycelium (A) and A. oryzae 8 days inoculated with spores (B).
Antioxidants 11 01693 g001
Antioxidants 11 01693 g002 550
Figure 2. Hierarchical clustering analysis of phenolic compounds across the samples showing the distribution of target phenolic compounds and their concentration.
Figure 2. Hierarchical clustering analysis of phenolic compounds across the samples showing the distribution of target phenolic compounds and their concentration.
Antioxidants 11 01693 g002
Antioxidants 11 01693 g003 550
Figure 3. VIP score of PLS-DA analysis (A) and box plots (a–g) reporting the amounts of targeted compounds with VIP score > 1 in the different samples. HYTY, hydroxytyrosol; DHO, dihydroxyoleuropein; HO, hydroxyoleuropein.
Figure 3. VIP score of PLS-DA analysis (A) and box plots (a–g) reporting the amounts of targeted compounds with VIP score > 1 in the different samples. HYTY, hydroxytyrosol; DHO, dihydroxyoleuropein; HO, hydroxyoleuropein.
Antioxidants 11 01693 g003
Antioxidants 11 01693 g004 550
Figure 4. Antioxidant activity (mg Trolox equivalent/g leaf d.w.) of analysed samples. Different letters in the same raw indicate statistical differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Antioxidant activity (mg Trolox equivalent/g leaf d.w.) of analysed samples. Different letters in the same raw indicate statistical differences (p < 0.05).
Antioxidants 11 01693 g004
Antioxidants 11 01693 g005 550
Figure 5. Heatmap visualization of the correlations between phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity evaluated by ABTS, DPPH and FRAP.
Figure 5. Heatmap visualization of the correlations between phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity evaluated by ABTS, DPPH and FRAP.
Antioxidants 11 01693 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Starzyńska-Janiszewska, A.; Fernández-Fernández, C.; Martín-García, B.; Verardo, V.; Gómez-Caravaca, A.M. Solid State Fermentation of Olive Leaves as a Promising Technology to Obtain Hydroxytyrosol and Elenolic Acid Derivatives Enriched Extracts. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1693. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11091693

AMA Style

Starzyńska-Janiszewska A, Fernández-Fernández C, Martín-García B, Verardo V, Gómez-Caravaca AM. Solid State Fermentation of Olive Leaves as a Promising Technology to Obtain Hydroxytyrosol and Elenolic Acid Derivatives Enriched Extracts. Antioxidants. 2022; 11(9):1693. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11091693

Chicago/Turabian Style

Starzyńska-Janiszewska, Anna, Carmen Fernández-Fernández, Beatriz Martín-García, Vito Verardo, and Ana María Gómez-Caravaca. 2022. "Solid State Fermentation of Olive Leaves as a Promising Technology to Obtain Hydroxytyrosol and Elenolic Acid Derivatives Enriched Extracts" Antioxidants 11, no. 9: 1693. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11091693

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop