Next Article in Journal
A Multi-Fidelity Successive Response Surface Method for Crashworthiness Optimization Problems
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effects of Toluene Mineralization under Denitrification Conditions on Carbonate Dissolution and Precipitation in Water: Mechanism and Model
Previous Article in Journal
Long-Term Dynamics of Persistent Organic Pollutants in Water Bodies of the Aral Sea–Syrdarya Basin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development and Application of an Integrated Site Remediation Technology Mix Method Based on Site Contaminant Distribution Characteristics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Mobilization, Speciation, and Transformation of Organic and Inorganic Contaminants in Soil–Groundwater Ecosystems

1
Center for Geomicrobiology and Biogeochemistry Research, State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
2
Tianjin Center (North China Center for Geoscience Innovation), China Geological Survey, Tianjin 300170, China
3
Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(20), 11454; https://doi.org/10.3390/app132011454
Submission received: 8 October 2023 / Accepted: 17 October 2023 / Published: 19 October 2023
The delicate balance of our ecosystems is under threat from the unrelenting release of contaminants into the environment. Among the most concerning are organic and inorganic pollutants that infiltrate the soil and permeate into the groundwater, posing significant risks to both environmental health and the wellbeing of humans who use groundwater as drinking water. To address this pressing issue, we present our Special Issue on the topic of “The Mobilization, Speciation, and Transformation of Organic and Inorganic Contaminants in Soil–Groundwater Ecosystems”. This collection of research articles and studies seeks to shed light on these critical processes and foster innovative solutions for safeguarding our soil–groundwater ecosystems.
The common types of inorganic pollutants in soil and groundwater environments include inorganic salts, toxic metals, radioactive substances, etc. [1,2,3,4]. The common types of organic pollutants in soil and groundwater environments include polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), chlorinated solvents, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), pesticides, and other emerging contaminants [5,6,7,8]. Biological contaminants have also raised significant concerns [9]. Both organic and inorganic pollutants are propagated through soil–groundwater systems and eventually enter the food chain, posing health risks to humans. Long-term rock–water interactions, different groundwater recharge patterns, and intensive human activities have resulted in a complicated enrichment of those pollutants [10,11]. The mobilization, speciation, and transformation of these pollutants in the soil and groundwater ecosystem vary greatly depending on the specific hydro-biogeochemical processes and environments.
Understanding the factors influencing the mobilization of contaminants is crucial to implementing effective strategies to prevent their spread and mitigate their impacts. Unforeseen climatic events, human activities, and land-use changes all contribute to the release of harmful substances into subsurface environments. Climate change poses a threat to groundwater by affecting various aspects of the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of soil and surface water bodies and aquifer recharge patterns. For instance, when heavy precipitation causes flooding, soil erosion occurs, and pollutants such as heavy metals, organic compounds, nutrients, and pathogens are transported from the soil into surface water bodies [12]. In regions where geomorphic units facilitate frequent interactions between surface water and groundwater, pollutants are carried into the groundwater aquifers as surface water infiltrates in large quantities, subsequently deteriorating the groundwater environment [13].
The hydraulic connections and frequent exchanges between surface water and groundwater (SW–GW) constitute a widespread phenomenon [14]. The variations in the water quality and quantity in these bodies of water are significantly influenced by their mutual interactions on both the time and space scales [15,16,17]. Once one of them becomes polluted, the other is inevitably under serious threat. During the process of pollutants infiltrating and recharging groundwater from surface water, the migration process and flux of pollutants are notably influenced by the local hydrodynamic characteristics and biogeochemical processes within the hyporheic zone [18,19]. Differences in flow pathways, velocities, residence times, and the exchange between surface water and groundwater control the reactive transport of, and affect the flux in, pollutants.
In the process of pollutants from the vadose soil environment entering the groundwater system, their adsorption, migration, and transformation within the geological media are complex and take forms such as surface runoff, leaching, erosion, desorption, and dissolution [19,20,21]. This complexity encompasses factors including the soil lithology, porosity, moisture content, pollutant type and concentration, oxidation–reduction potential (ORP), pH, organic matter, cation exchange capacity, microbial communities, etc. [22,23]. It is worth noting that certain elements (e.g., phosphorus, iron, fluoride, arsenic, iodine, uranium, and molybdenum,) are naturally abundant in the form of minerals/rocks in soils and groundwater sediments [3,24,25,26].
Although elevated levels of these inorganic constituents are often attributed to geogenic processes such as weathering, leaching, and water–rock interactions, anthropogenic activities can be expected to introduce and further intensify the contaminations [27,28,29]. These contaminants are primarily derived from domestic, agricultural, and industrial sources, including the application of fertilizers and pesticides in agricultural production, irrigation with sewage (or reclaimed water), leakage from domestic sewage networks and landfill site wastewater, waste residues generated during mining, or oil and gas field exploitation. [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,18,19,20]. For instance, fluctuations in groundwater levels caused by either natural or anthropogenic processes accelerate the leaching of organic matter, nitrogen, and heavy metals from the soil into shallow groundwater [30] and affect the aquifer redox cycling and microbial activity [31]. Intensive groundwater pumping can draw recently recharged contaminated modern groundwater into deeper aquifer systems [32]. Petroleum and natural gas exploitation causes petroleum hydrocarbon and salinity contamination in the vadose zone [33] and shallow groundwater [34]. Furthermore, the role of metals (e.g., Hg, Zn, Cu, and Cd) in co-selecting antibiotic resistance might be important in the spread of antibiotic resistance genes [20].
The speciation of contaminants adds another layer of complexity to the soil–groundwater environment. As pollutants interact with the soil matrix and microbial communities, they undergo chemical transformations, altering their properties and toxicity. Contaminants can undergo different chemical transformations, resulting in various species with different properties and toxicities. Metals can exist in different oxidation states, and organic contaminants can undergo degradation or transformation into metabolites and greenhouse gases. The speciation of contaminants affects their mobility, bioavailability, and toxicity, and an understanding of these forms is crucial to accurately assessing their environmental impact and risk.
For instance, arsenic (As) primarily exists as As(V) and can transform into more mobile As(III) under reducing conditions, affecting the groundwater quality [35]. Chromium (Cr) exists as both the Cr(VI) and Cr(III) forms, with Cr(VI) becoming soluble and migrating into groundwater under oxidizing conditions [36]. Uranium (U) in soil and sediments is typically found as less mobile U(IV) compounds, while, in groundwater, it exists as more mobile uranyl U(VI) and UO22+ complexes, which are strongly influenced by various groundwater physicochemical factors [37]. Redox conditions and natural organic matter play key roles in these transformations [24,29,38,39].
Fluoride often exists in nature in the form of F and forms soluble salts with monovalent alkali metals in groundwater, such as fluoride salt (NaF) and fluoride potassium salt (KF) [3]. Meanwhile, fluorite (CaF2), sellaite (MgF2), and fluoride-bearing silicate minerals such as mica, amphibole, tourmaline, and fluorapatite are commonly found in soils or rocks. Therefore, the weathering of fluoride minerals could be a natural source of fluoride in water [3]. In the groundwater systems, I commonly exists in the form of iodide (I), iodate (IO3), and organic iodine (OI), and I is the dominant species in groundwater, whereas IO3 and OI are the common species in the soil/sediments [29].
Organic contaminants include a range of conventional pollutants such as petroleum hydrocarbon, phenolic compounds, and pesticides, while concerns have also extended to persistent organic pollutants, such as perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs), antibiotics, and microplastics [2,5,8]). Perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) including PFAS are persistent organic pollutants that can linger in soil and impact groundwater long after their use [40]. They are highly toxic and include chemicals such as PFOA and PFOS. The antibiotic pollution in soils and groundwater is diverse, with substances such as ciprofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole found in high concentrations [8,20]. Microplastics include small plastic particles including polyethylene and polyvinyl chloride, etc., resulting from the breakdown of larger plastic waste [41,42].
Pollutants in soil and groundwater pose significant risks to both ecosystems and human health [39,43]. These pollutants enter the human body through pathways including bioaccumulation, the food chain, and drinking water, leading to different types of toxicity, including chemical toxicity, radiation toxicity, and carcinogenicity. Common pollutants, such as nitrogen, when present in excess, can cause various cancers and other health issues [21]. Heavy metals, such as arsenic, chromium, and lead, can lead to cancer, organ damage, and nervous system disorders [29,36]. Radioactive isotopes in groundwater can be highly toxic, affecting various bodily systems. Additionally, non-degradable organic pollutants, such as antibiotics and microplastics, pose emerging health risks due to their persistence and limited microbial degradation [20,42].
The transformation of contaminants within soil–groundwater ecosystems can lead to either an exacerbation or attenuation of their effects. The processes of degradation, redox reactions, and other chemical transformations can significantly impact the persistence and fate of pollutants. An in-depth exploration of these mechanisms together is vital to developing sustainable solutions for remediating contaminated sites. The range of strategies for alleviating the impact of contaminants in soil–groundwater systems includes the monitoring and assessment of pollutant levels, the implementation of containment measures, the promotion of natural attenuation through bioremediation, the incorporation of remediation materials, and the employment of engineered solutions such as permeable reactive barriers or pump-and-treat systems to capture and treat contaminated groundwater, as well as phytoremediation to treat contaminants before they seep into aquifers ([44,45,46,47,48,49]). Before these techniques are used, their cost and resulting environmental impacts should be considered.
Bioremediation emerges as a particularly promising, sustainable, environmentally friendly, and cost-effective strategy. To start with, understanding the assembly of microbial communities, their driving forces (e.g., their pH, salinity, nutrients, and metals) and their role in transforming pollutants in the vadose-zone–groundwater ecosystem is instrumental to unlocking the full potential of bioremediation [22,50,51,52]. While advanced techniques have been developed for characterizing microbes, significant gaps remain in our understanding of dynamic subsurface microbial communities and the biogeochemical processes in the environments they inhabit [53], which hinder the effective use of biostimulation or bioaugmentation as an in situ remediation strategy. For example, the complex coupled carbon and iron cycling at multiple redox interfaces across subsurface environments can be expected to positively and negatively affect both microbial and extracellular enzyme activity [54]. Dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonia is enriched in the downgradient along the groundwater flow path [55]. Sulfate reduction accelerates groundwater arsenic contamination in aquifers with replete iron oxides [56]. The intrusion of produced water enhances the salinity and petroleum hydrocarbon levels in shallow groundwater, causing a transformation in the composition and functionality of bacterial and archaeal communities [34]. Moreover, hydrodynamic disturbance is another possible driving force for microbial community assembly and biogeochemical processes in sedimentary environments [57].
The mobilization, speciation, and transformation of contaminants in soil–groundwater ecosystems represent an urgent call for action in the face of environmental degradation. The task of preserving the integrity of our soil–groundwater ecosystems is a complex one that requires a multidisciplinary approach. There is still a gap in our understanding of the mechanisms that connect mobilization, speciation, health impacts, and microbial processes related to groundwater contaminants. To effectively address soil pollution sources and manage the risks of groundwater pollution, it is essential to comprehend how complex geological and hydrogeological factors in soil–groundwater systems interplay with climate change and human activities. This understanding can significantly inform the development of remediation strategies.
As we present this Special Issue on “The Mobilization, Speciation, and Transformation of Organic and Inorganic Contaminants in Soil–Groundwater Ecosystems”, we call upon researchers to come together, share knowledge, and work toward a shared vision of a cleaner and greener future. Through the insightful research and innovative solutions showcased in this Special Issue, we are reminded of our collective responsibility to safeguard the delicate balance of nature.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (42302299).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the authors who contributed and will contribute to this Special Issue. We would like to also thank all the reviewers for providing their valuable comments, which have greatly improved the quality of the published papers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abascal, E.; Gómez-Coma, L.; Ortiz, I.; Ortiz, A. Global diagnosis of nitrate pollution in groundwater and review of removal technologies. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 810, 152233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kurwadkar, S.; Kanel, S.R.; Nakarmi, A. Groundwater pollution, occurrence, detection, and remediation of organic and inorganic pollutants. Water Environ. Res. 2020, 92, 1659–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jiang, W.J.; Sheng, Y.Z.; Liu, H.W.; Ma, Z.; Song, Y.X.; Liu, F.T.; Chen, S.M. Groundwater quality assessment and hydrogeochemical processes in typical watersheds in Zhangjiakou region, northern China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 3521–3539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Martinez-Morata, I.; Bostick, B.C.; Conroy-Ben, O.; Duncan, D.T.; Jones, M.R.; Spaur, M.; Patterson, K.P.; Prins, S.J.; Navas-Acien, A.; Nigra, A.E. Nationwide geospatial analysis of county racial and ethnic composition and public drinking water arsenic and uranium. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 7461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. MacLeod, M.; Arp, H.P.H.; Tekman, M.B.; Jahnke, A. The global threat from plastic pollution. Science 2021, 373, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sheng, Y.; Tian, X.; Wang, G.; Hao, C.; Liu, F. Bacterial diversity and biogeochemical processes of oil-contaminated groundwater, Baoding, North China. Geomicrobiol. J. 2016, 33, 537–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fernández-Fernández, V.; Ramil, M.; Cela, R.; Rodríguez, I. Occurrence and risk assessment of pesticides and pharmaceuticals in viticulture impacted watersheds from Northwest Spain. Chemosphere 2023, 341, 140098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zainab, S.M.; Junaid, M.; Xu, N.; Malik, R.N. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs) in groundwater, A global review on dissemination, sources, interactions, environmental and human health risks. Water Res. 2020, 187, 116455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dong, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Hu, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Tong, L.; Yu, Y.; Cheng, J.; He, Y.; Shi, J.; Wang, Y. Pathogen contamination of groundwater systems and health risks. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, W.J.; Wang, G.C.; Sheng, Y.Z.; Shi, Z.M.; Zhang, H. Isotopes in groundwater (2H, 18O, 14C) revealed the climate and groundwater recharge in the Northern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 666, 298–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jiang, W.J.; Sheng, Y.Z.; Wang, G.C.; Shi, Z.M.; Liu, F.T.; Zhang, J.; Chen, D.L. Cl, Br, B, Li, and noble gases isotopes to study the origin and evolution of deep groundwater in sedimentary basins, a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2022, 20, 1497–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Griebler, C.; Avramov, M. Groundwater ecosystem services: A review. Freshw. Sci. 2015, 34, 355–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hartmann, A.; Jasechko, S.; Gleeson, T.; Wada, Y.; Andreo, B.; Barberá, J.A.; Brielmann, H.; Bouchaou, L.; Charlier, J.B.; Darling, W.G.; et al. Risk of groundwater contamination widely underestimated because of fast flow into aquifers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2024492118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sophocleous, M. Interactions between groundwater and surface water: The state of the science. Hydrogeol. J. 2022, 10, 52–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhou, P.P.; Wang, G.C.; Mao, H.R.; Liao, F.; Shi, Z.M.; Huang, H.X. Numerical modeling for the temporal variations of the water interchange between groundwater and surface water in a regional great lake (Poyang Lake, China). J. Hydrol. 2022, 610, 127827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Adyasari, D.; Dimova, N.T.; Dulai, H.; Gilfedder, B.S.; Cartwright, I.; McKenzie, T.; Fuleky, P. Radon-222 as a groundwater discharge tracer to surface waters. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2023, 238, 104321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liao, F.; Cardenas, M.B.; Ferencz, S.B.; Chen, X.B.; Wang, G.C. Tracing Bank Storage and Hyporheic Exchange Dynamics Using 222Rn, Virtual and Field Tests and Comparison with Other Tracers. Water Resour. Res. 2021, 57, e2020WR028960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Y.; Wang, P.; Gojenko, B.; Yu, J.J.; Wei, L.Z.; Luo, D.G.; Xiao, T.F. A review of water pollution arising from agriculture and mining activities in Central Asia, Facts, causes and effects. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 291, 118209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gandhi, T.P.; Sampath, P.V.; Maliyekkal, S.M. A critical review of uranium contamination in groundwater, treatment and sludge disposal. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 825, 153947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Amarasiri, M.; Sano, D.; Suzuki, S. Understanding human health risks caused by antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARG) in water environments, Current knowledge and questions to be answered. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 50, 2016–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Picetti, R.; Deeney, M.; Pastorino, S.; Miller, M.R.; Shah, A.; Leon, D.A.; Dangour, A.D.; Green, R. Nitrate and nitrite contamination in drinking water and cancer risk, A systematic review with meta-analysis. Environ. Res. 2022, 210, 112988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sheng, Y.; Li, G.; Dong, H.; Liu, Y.; Ma, L.; Yang, M.; Liu, Y.; Liu, J.; Deng, S.; Zhang, D. Distinct assembly processes shape bacterial communities along unsaturated, groundwater fluctuated, and saturated zones. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 761, 143303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gnesda, W.R.; Draxler, E.F.; Tinjum, J.; Zahasky, C. Adsorption of PFAAs in the vadose zone and implications for long-term groundwater contamination. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 16748–16758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dong, H.L.; Huang, L.Q.; Zhao, L.D.; Zeng, Q.; Liu, X.L.; Sheng, Y.Z.; Shi, L.; Wu, G.; Jiang, H.C.; Li, F.R.; et al. A critical review of mineral-microbe interaction and coevolution, mechanisms and applications. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2022, 9, nwac128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jia, Y.; Xi, B.; Jiang, Y.; Guo, H.; Yang, Y.; Lian, X.; Han, S. Distribution, formation and human-induced evolution of geogenic contaminated groundwater in China: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 643, 967–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sheng, Y.; Baars, O.; Guo, D.; Whitham, J.; Srivastava, S.; Dong, H. Mineral-bound trace metals as cofactors for anaerobic biological nitrogen fixation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 7206–7216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Podgorski, J.; Berg, M. Global analysis and prediction of fluoride in groundwater. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Podgorski, J.; Berg, M. Global Threat of Arsenic in Groundwater. Science 2020, 368, 845–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Y.X.; Li, J.X.; Ma, T.; Xie, X.J.; Deng, Y.M.; Gan, Y.Q. Genesis of geogenic contaminated groundwater, As, F and I. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 51, 2895–2933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vázquez-Suñé, E.; Sánchez-Vila, X.; Carrera, J. Introductory review of specific factors influencing urban groundwater, an emerging branch of hydrogeology, with reference to Barcelona, Spain. Hydrogeol. J. 2005, 13, 522–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sheng, Y.; Dong, H.; Coffin, E.; Myrold, D.; Kleber, M. Inhibition of Extracellular Enzyme Activity by Reactive Oxygen Species upon Oxygenation of Reduced Iron-Bearing Minerals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 3425–3433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Thaw, M.; GebreEgziabher, M.; Villafañe-Pagán, J.Y.; Jasechko, S. Modern groundwater reaches deeper depths in heavily pumped aquifer systems. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sheng, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yang, J.; Dong, H.; Liu, B.; Zhang, H.; Li, A.; Wei, Y.; Li, G.; Zhang, D. History of petroleum disturbance triggering the depth-resolved assembly process of microbial communities in the vadose zone. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 402, 124060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chen, X.L.; Sheng, Y.Z.; Wang, G.; Guo, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, F.; Yang, T.; Huang, D.D.; Han, X.; Zhou, L. Microbial compositional and functional traits of BTEX and salinity co-contaminated shallow groundwater by produced water. Water Res. 2022, 15, 118277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Guo, H.; Wen, D.; Liu, Z.; Jia, Y.; Guo, Q. A review of high arsenic groundwater in Mainland and Taiwan, China, distribution, characteristics and geochemical processes. Appl. Geochem. 2014, 41, 196–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Perraki, M.; Vasileiou, E.; Bartzas, G. Tracing the origin of chromium in groundwater: Current and new perspectives. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 2021, 22, 100267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vengosh, A.; Coyte, R.M.; Podgorski, J.; Johnson, T.M. A critical review on the occurrence and distribution of the uranium- and thorium-decay nuclides and their effect on the quality of groundwater. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 808, 151914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, Z.; Guo, H.M.; Han, S.B.; Gao, Z.P.; Niu, X. Controls of Geochemical and Hydrogeochemical Factors on Arsenic Mobility in the Hetao Basin, China. Groundwater 2022, 61, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xie, X.; Shi, J.; Pi, K.; Deng, Y.; Yan, B.; Tong, L.; Yao, L.; Dong, Y.; Li, J.; Ma, L.; et al. Groundwater Quality and Public Health. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2023, 48, 12.1–12.24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xiang, L.; Qiu, J.; Chen, Q.Q.; Yu, P.F.; Liu, B.L.; Zhao, H.M.; Li, Y.W.; Feng, N.X.; Cai, Q.Y.; Mo, C.H.; et al. Development, Evaluation, and Application of Machine Learning Models for Accurate Prediction of Root Uptake of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Law, K.L.; Rochman, C.M. Large-scale collaborations uncover global extent of plastic pollution. Nature 2023, 619, 254–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Rochman, C.M.; Hoellein, T. The global odyssey of plastic pollution. Science 2020, 368, 1184–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, P.; Karunanidhi, D.; Subramani, T.; Srinivasamoorthy, K. Sources and consequences of groundwater contamination. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2021, 80, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hou, D.; Al-Tabbaa, A.; O’Connor, D.; Hu, Q.; Zhu, Y.G.; Wang, L.; Kirkwood, N.; Ok, Y.S.; Tsang, D.C.; Bolan, N.S.; et al. Sustainable remediation and redevelopment of brownfield sites. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2023, 4, 271–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hashim, M.A. Soumyadeep Mukhopadhyay, Jaya Narayan Sahu, and Bhaskar Sengupta. Remediation technologies for heavy metal contaminated groundwater. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92, 2355–2388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sheng, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhai, X.; Zhang, F.; Li, G.; Zhang, D. A mobile, modular and rapidly-acting treatment system for optimizing and improving the removal of non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPLs) in groundwater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 360, 639–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ossai, I.C.; Ahmed, A.; Hassan, A.; Hamid, F.S. Remediation of soil and water contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbon: A review. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 17, 100526. [Google Scholar]
  48. Vangronsveld, J.; Herzig, R.; Weyens, N.; Boulet, J.; Adriaensen, K.; Ruttens, A.; Mench, M. Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater, lessons from the field. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2009, 16, 765–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dong, H.; Coffin, E.S.; Sheng, Y.; Duley, M.L.; Khalifa, Y.M. Microbial reduction of Fe (III) in nontronite: Role of biochar as a redox mediator. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2023, 345, 102–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sheng, Y.; Bibby, K.; Grettenberger, C.; Kaley, B.; Macalady, J.L.; Wang, G.; Burgos, W.D. Geochemical and temporal influences on the enrichment of acidophilic iron-oxidizing bacterial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 3611–3621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sheng, Y.; Wang, G.; Zhao, D.; Hao, C.; Liu, C.; Cui, L. Groundwater microbial communities along a generalized flowpath in confined aquifers in the Qaidam Basin, China. Groundwater 2018, 56, 719–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ruff, S.E.; Humez, P.; de Angelis, I.H.; Diao, M.; Nightingale, M.; Cho, S.; Connors, L.; Kuloyo, O.O.; Seltzer, A.; Bowman, S.; et al. Hydrogen and dark oxygen drive microbial productivity in diverse groundwater ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kaur, G.; Kaur, G.; Krol, M.; Brar, S.K. Unraveling the mystery of subsurface microorganisms in bioremediation. Curr. Res. Biotechnol. 2022, 4, 302–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dong, H.; Zeng, Q.; Sheng, Y.; Chen, C.; Yu, G.; Kappler, A. Coupled Iron Redox Cycling and Organic Matter Transformation Across Multiple Interfaces. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2023, 4, 659–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Guo, L.; Xie, Q.; Sheng, Y.Z.; Wang, G.C.; Jiang, W.J.; Tong, X.X.; Xu, Q.Y.; Hao, C.B. Co-variation of hydrochemistry, inorganic nitrogen, and microbial community composition along groundwater flowpath. Appl. Geochem. 2022, 140, 105296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nghiem, A.A.; Prommer, H.; Mozumder, M.R.H.; Siade, A.; Jamieson, J.; Ahmed, K.M.; van Geen, A.; Bostick, B.C. Sulfate reduction accelerates groundwater arsenic contamination even in aquifers with abundant iron oxides. Nat. Water 2023, 1, 151–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Chen, Y.J.; Leung, P.M.; Cook, P.L.; Wong, W.W.; Hutchinson, T.; Eate, V.; Kessler, A.J.; Greening, C. Hydrodynamic disturbance controls microbial community assembly and biogeochemical processes in coastal sediments. ISME J. 2022, 16, 750–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sheng, Y.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, M. Mobilization, Speciation, and Transformation of Organic and Inorganic Contaminants in Soil–Groundwater Ecosystems. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 11454. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132011454

AMA Style

Sheng Y, Jiang W, Zhang M. Mobilization, Speciation, and Transformation of Organic and Inorganic Contaminants in Soil–Groundwater Ecosystems. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(20):11454. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132011454

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sheng, Yizhi, Wanjun Jiang, and Min Zhang. 2023. "Mobilization, Speciation, and Transformation of Organic and Inorganic Contaminants in Soil–Groundwater Ecosystems" Applied Sciences 13, no. 20: 11454. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132011454

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop