Next Article in Journal
Fermentation Quality and Microbial Community of Corn Stover or Rice Straw Silage Mixed with Soybean Curd Residue
Next Article in Special Issue
Sex Differences in Mate Choice Preference Characteristics of Aequidens rivulatus
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Postbiotics and Paraprobiotics as Replacements for Antibiotics on Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, Small Intestine Histomorphology, Immune Status and Hepatic Growth Gene Expression in Broiler Chickens
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Volitional Swimming Behavior of Schizothorax prenanti Using an Open-Channel Flume with Spatially Heterogeneous Turbulent Flow
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 7
10.3390/ani12070918
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preference for Shelters at Different Developmental Stages of Chinese Mitten Crab (Eriocheir sinensis)

by
Chunbo Li
1,2,†,
Chenchen Shen
1,2,†,
Guangpeng Feng
1,2,*,
Xiaorong Huang
1 and
Xincang Li
1
1
East China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Shanghai 200090, China
2
College of Fisheries and Life Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 200090, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2022, 12(7), 918; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12070918
Submission received: 12 March 2022 / Revised: 31 March 2022 / Accepted: 1 April 2022 / Published: 3 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Behavioral Ecology of Aquatic Animals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Shelter is closely correlated with growth and development of aquatic crustaceans. Aquatic crustaceans often prefer to live in shelters to forage and avoid predators. In this study, Chinese Mitten Crabs (Eriocheir sinensis) at different developmental stages were selected to analyze preference for shelters. These results indicated that juvenile crabs had a significant preference for grass; button-sized crabs preferred to hide in mud; and the favorite shelters for parent crabs were rocks. Moreover, light, size, feeding habit, predation and molting were critical factors that affect the preference for shelters of E. sinensis.

Abstract

A shelter is a good habitat for aquatic organisms, which could aid in avoiding cannibalism and facilitate predation. Chinese Mitten Crab (Eriocheir sinensis) is an important aquaculture species with troglodytism and nocturnal habit. To clarify the preference for shelters at different developmental stages of E. sinensis, different shelters (mud, sand, grass and rocks) were selected for comparison. These results indicated that juvenile crabs had a significant preference for grass; button-sized crabs preferred to hide in mud; and the favorite shelters for parent crabs were rocks, followed by mud. E. sinensis in three stages all showed concealing behavior. The concealing behavior of juvenile crabs was the most significant, followed by button-sized and parent crabs. Additionally, E. sinensis held a low hiding rate at night but a high hiding rate during the daytime due to nocturnal habits. These findings will help to better understand the habits of E. sinensis and provide a reference for resource restoration, habitat construction and the restoration of E. sinensis.

1. Introduction

Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis (Crustacea, Decapoda, Varunidae), is an important aquaculture species with high production and economic values, which is also a representative crab species in China [1]. Meanwhile, E. sinensis is also an invasive species in Europe and America, which is notorious due to the destructive nature towards native biodiversity and the banks of rivers [2,3]. E. sinensis belongs to a migratory crustacean group that prefers to live in caves along rivers and lakes [4]. E. sinensis has several developmental stages, including zygote, zoea, megalopa, juvenile crab, young crab (button-sized) and adult crab [1]. E. sinensis needs to molt several times from zoea to adult, and molting occurs about five times in juvenile, button-sized and adult crabs, respectively, but most crabs are vulnerable to other individuals during the molting period [5,6]. In addition to the aggressive instinct of crabs, the lack of suitable shelters for molting in the environment is a reason for being attacked [7]. Studies have shown that crabs might molt less, even stop molting, and lose weight when the living conditions were unsuitable [8,9]. Therefore, a suitable shelter with high safety and abundant food is very important for the growth and development of crabs.
A shelter is a good habitat for aquatic organisms, which could help in avoiding cannibalism and facilitate predation [10]. Shelters could reduce the individual density in the water environment, and the low individual density promoting the growth of crustaceans has already been observed in Fenneropenaeus chinensis, Paralithodes camtschaticus and Macrobrachium rosenbergii [11,12,13]. Many field observations have found that appropriate shelters could reduce the probability of intraspecific aggression, provide food source and improve the survival rate of aquatic animals. For example, biological concealment, such as Vallisneria natans and Myriophyllum spicatum, can not only contribute to reducing direct contact between species and avoiding natural enemies but also be a food source for M. rosenbergii, which was consistent with the function of aquatic plants for juvenile crabs [14]. Similarly, submerged plants in ponds might benefit E. sinensis in the survival, growth and development, and the survival rate of juvenile Callinectes sapidus in vegetated habitat was significantly higher than that in unvegetated habitats [15,16]. The three-dimensional artificial floating wetlands could provide new habitats, which form a stable environment for nekton and increase the habitat available to juvenile fish [17]. Meanwhile, abiological substances, such as rocks, mud, plastic box and waste tire, are also often used as shelters by aquatic animals. Rocks are often utilized as shelters for holothurian to complete the aestivation and hibernation [18]. Scylla paramamosain could improve the survival and growth rates by using perforated brick, sand grains and clam shell as shelters [19]. Moreover, polyvinylchloride tubes could also be used as shelters for Salvelinus alpines to improve yields [20]. The shelter made by half of a plastic frame could effectively shorten the molting period and improve the weight growth rate of Portunus trituberculatus after molting [21]. Blue crabs were protected from predators in natural waters by seaweed, shells and filamentous algae [22]. Shelters also helped megalopa and juvenile crabs to maintain spatial position and avoid being driven away from favorable habitats by swift currents [23].
In the recent years, with the implementation of some water-related projects and the changes of water environment in the main stream of the Yangtze River, the habitat of E. sinensis has been severely damaged [24,25]. The loss of vegetation, sediment reduction and lack of rocks in the water environment had a great negative impact on the normal life of E. sinensis. As a consequence, in order to provide a reference for resource restoration, habitat construction and restoration of E. sinensis, mud, sand, grass and rocks were selected as shelters for comparison according to the habits of E. sinensis. The concealing behavior and preference for shelters of E. sinensis at different development stages were focused to select the most suitable shelter in this study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal Collection and Source of Shelters

A total of 300 stage-3 juvenile crabs with the average body weight of (0.31 ± 0.15) g, 300 button-sized crabs with the average body weight of (12.23 ± 3.68) g, and 300 parent crabs with the average body weight of (111.03 ± 17.66) g, which had been mature, were selected from Gaoyou Lake, Jiangsu Province. During the acclimation period, crabs were fed with live razor clams at 2–3% of body weight of crabs every night. After a week, healthy and non-mutilated juvenile, button-sized and parent E. sinensis were selected for the experiment.
Mud, sand, grass and rocks were selected as shelters. Unlike the substrate, mud and sand were made into burrows for crabs to inhabit; rocks were piled up to form caves, and grass was normally planted in small amounts of soil. The mud was taken from the Yangtze estuary, which was dried and then ground to powder, and water was added to make mud stick together to simulate caves installed in the experimental device. The sand was washed to remove debris and then dried to simulate caves installed in the experimental device. Rocks with a surface area that was larger than the experimental crabs were used and piled up to form caves as shelters in the experimental device, and the rock’s surfaces were cleaned. Grass originating from aquaculture farms was washed and planted in small amounts of soil to hold the experimental device. Four kinds of shelters were, respectively, placed in each black part of the experimental devices (Figure 1).

2.2. Experimental Design and Procedure

Due to the different development stages of E. sinensis, three different experimental devices were designed. The experiments of juvenile crabs and adult mitten crabs were carried out in different experimental devices, respectively, without mutual interference. The experimental device of parent crabs was an annular tank with the length of 5 m, width of 2 m and height of 0.5 m. Both ends are semicircular with a radius of 1 m, and the middle is rectangular and measured 3 m long and 0.5 m wide (Figure 1a). The experimental devices of juvenile and button-sized crabs were cylindrical culture tanks (made of fiberglass) with a diameter of 0.6 m and 1 m, respectively, and the bottom was evenly divided into four parts (Figure 1b). The area in each black part where a kind of shelter was placed was the same as the blank area. Two infrared cameras were installed above the migration trough to ensure that the entire migration trough could be monitored. In order to avoid interference, the entire test area was surrounded by a curtain and isolated from the surrounding area. Observation and recording were carried out by an infrared camera.
Concealing behavior experiments: Before experiments, crabs were removed from tanks and dried with a dry towel. A white reflective film was affixed to carapaces for observation. Crabs were released in the center of the experimental device and acclimated for 10 min. The concealing behavior experiments were carried out during the daytime and at night. The infrared cameras were used to observe whether crabs were hidden in the shelters. The hiding ratio referred to the proportion of crabs in the shelters, and the hiding ratio was used to judge whether crabs showed concealing behavior.
Selection of shelters experiments: The previous treatment was the same as the concealing behavior experiments. The experiments were conducted during the daytime and at night. The parent crab group took individuals as an experimental unit. In the experiment, every parent crab was released in the center of the experimental device for 10 min, and then the infrared cameras were used to record the distribution of parent crabs for 5 min (residence time in each shelter). Parent crabs were divided into four groups with eight crabs in each group, and each experiment was repeated three times. Before the beginning of each experiment, the positions of four shelters were randomly changed to prevent the preference of E. sinensis for a certain location in the tank from affecting experimental results. The experiment method of button-sized crabs was the same as parent crabs. However, due to the strong movement ability of the button-sized crab, the adaptation time was extended to 20 min. The button-sized crabs were divided into four groups, with four crabs in each group, and each experiment was repeated three times. Given that the individual juvenile crabs were too small to be observed with cameras, the population experiment was carried out for juvenile crabs. Juvenile crabs were divided into four groups with thirty crabs in each group, and each experiment was repeated three times. The number of experimental crabs in each shelter was recorded. All crabs were alive after experiments, and the survival rate was 100%.

2.3. Data Acquisition and Statistical Analysis

One-way ANOVA was used to determine the significant differences in preference for shelters of E. sinensis (p < 0.05). Duncan’s multiple range test was performed to analyze the differences between shelters. The significant differences between groups were tested by the independent samples t-test. All data were analyzed using SPSS 24.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), and these results were presented as Mean ± SD (standard deviation of the mean).

3. Results

3.1. Concealing Behavior of E. sinensis in Different Developmental Stages

The hiding rate was 100% for juvenile crabs, and the hiding rate was (92.71 ± 4.77)% for button-sized crabs, showing a significant difference between juvenile and button-sized crabs (Figure 2). For parent crabs, the hiding rate (68.23 ± 2.39)% indicated a significant difference between hiding and not hiding (Figure 2). Therefore, the concealing behavior of juvenile crabs was the most significant, followed by button-sized and parent crabs.

3.2. Differences in Concealing Behavior of E. sinensis between Daytime and Night

For juvenile crabs, the hiding rate (100%) showed no significant difference between night and daytime (Figure 3). In daytime, the hiding rate of button-sized crabs was (97.92 ± 3.61)%, which was significantly higher than that at night (p < 0.05). Parent crabs yielded analogous results in our study. The hiding rate was (79.17 ± 4.77)% in daytime, which was also significantly higher than that at night (57.29 ± 4.77)%.

3.3. Preference for Shelters in the Juvenile Crabs

In daytime, the percentages of time that juvenile crabs hid in mud, sand, grass and rocks were (11.67 ± 0.84)%, (5.83 ± 2.20)%, (51.67 ± 1.67)% and (30.83 ± 3.33)%, respectively (Figure 4). Juvenile crabs spent the longest time hiding in grass in daytime, followed by rocks, mud and sand, showing significant differences in four shelters (p < 0.05). At night, the percentages of time that juvenile crabs hid in mud, sand, grass and rocks were (12.5 ± 0.83)%, (4.72 ± 0.96)%, (70.83 ± 3.82)% and (11.94 ± 3.47)%, respectively (Figure 4). Juvenile crabs spent the longest time hiding in grass at night, followed by mud, rocks and sand, showing significant differences among four different kinds of shelters (p < 0.05). Moreover, juvenile crabs spent more time staying in rocks during daytime than night, and juvenile crabs spent more time staying in grass during night than daytime, indicating significant differences between night and daytime (p < 0.05). However, mud and sand had no significant difference between night and daytime (p > 0.05).

3.4. Preference for Shelters in the Button-Sized Crabs

In daytime, the percentages of time that button-sized crabs hid in mud, sand, grass and rocks were (39.74 ± 18.28)%, (15.92 ± 8.16)%, (10.78 ± 5.93)% and (33.55 ± 10.13)%, respectively (Figure 5). Parent crabs spent significantly more time hiding in mud than in sand and grass at night (p < 0.05), but no significant difference was observed in mud and rocks (p > 0.05). At night, the percentages of time that the button-sized crabs hid in mud, sand, grass and rocks were (36.39 ± 17.34)%, (16.14 ± 7.22)%, (17.47 ± 7.01)% and (30.01 ± 10.61)%, respectively (Figure 5). The hidden time of parent crabs showed no significant difference among four kinds of shelters (p > 0.05). Additionally, the hidden time of parent crabs had insignificant differences between night and daytime.

3.5. Preference for Shelters in the Parent Crabs

In daytime, the percentages of time that parent crabs hid in mud, sand, grass and rocks were (22.18 ± 15.12)%, (6.00 ± 6.89)%, (17.87 ± 12.19)% and (53.94 ± 9.87)%, respectively (Figure 4). The hiding time of parent crabs was significantly more in rocks than other shelters in daytime (p < 0.05). At night, the percentages of time that parent crabs hid in mud, sand, grass and rocks were (40.33 ± 7.03)%, (14.64 ± 1.11)%, (12.66 ± 4.11)% and (32.36 ± 2.39)%, respectively (Figure 6). The hidden time of parent crabs in mud and rocks was significantly higher than that in sand and grass at night (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between mud and rocks (p > 0.05).

4. Discussion

The transition stage is the weakest phase for aquatic crustaceans as they are seriously vulnerable to predation and invasion from other aquatic animals [26]. Thus, selecting suitable shelters is necessary for crustaceans. Moreover, previous studies have reported that stereo artificial floating wetlands could enhance the habitat of juvenile fish in the degraded habitats along the estuary, and they were conducive to creating spawning grounds for phytophilous fish in urban rivers, suggesting that suitable shelters contribute to the growth and reproduction of aquatic animals [27,28]. At present, most research studies on shelters had focused on the effects on growth indicators, reproduction and spatial distribution [29,30]. Nevertheless, research on preference for shelters of aquatic crustaceans, especially at different developmental stages, remains limited. In the natural environment, juvenile crabs living in lakes often use aquatic plant or big rocks as hiding objects to hide themselves from harm, and mud is often washed by the current and becomes moist, which is easy to dig holes for crabs [31]. Hence, mud, sand, grass and rocks were selected as shelters to study the concealing behavior and preference for shelters of E. sinensis at different development stages in this study.
The juvenile, button-sized and parent E. sinensis all exhibited concealing behavior. Compared to button-sized and parent crabs, juvenile E. sinensis preferred to hide. This phenomenon might be caused by resistance to the light of juvenile E. sinensis. After metazoa developed into juvenile crabs, E. sinensis changed to benthic life, and juvenile crabs preferred habitats with weak light [32]. Then, shelters could provide dark environments for crabs to survive. As they were growing, juvenile crabs grew into button-sized crabs and eventually into parent crabs. Compared with parent crabs, juvenile and button-sized crabs are vulnerable to predation from aquatic animals. Previous studies have shown that shelters could induce significant improvements in the survival rate of juvenile Scylla serrara, and both survival and growth rates of mud fish increased in the shelters (grass and composite boards) [33,34]. Thus, shelters could provide a natural protective barrier for young crabs to reduce casualties. Finally, concealing behaviors could greatly reduce the movement to save more energy for body growth or molting [35,36]. Thereby, juvenile E. sinensis preferred to hide in the shelters for better growth and higher survival rates.
Juvenile crabs had a significant preference for shelter (grass) in this study, which might be related to predation and anti-predation. The main food source of juvenile crabs is aquatic plants in nature, and grass could provide energy for juvenile crabs [37]. Then, crabs lacked activity and self-protection ability, and the survival rate was often low in the early stage of life [38,39]. Aquatic plants could provide suitable living environments for juvenile crabs to attach and avoid predators. As they were growing, juvenile crabs grew into button-sized crabs. Due to stage specificity, button-sized crabs showed no obvious preference for four shelters. The button-sized crabs need to molt several times before growing into adult crabs, and molting is a complex process that needs more energy to generate fresh shell or maintain metabolism [40]. Therefore, button-sized crabs have to move around to find more food to replenish energy before molting. Despite insignificant differences, button-sized crabs preferred to hide in the mud compared to other shelters in this study. As they were growing, button-sized crabs grew into parent crabs. For parent crabs, the favorite shelters were rocks, followed by mud, which agreed with the report by Yonezawa [41]. The parent crabs mainly appear in coastal estuaries and islands, and the lifestyle of E. sinensis is troglodytism in riparian beach land [42]. Both rocks and mud could provide parent crabs with caves. Parent crabs are larger than juvenile and button-sized crabs, so rocks and mud are more conducive for hiding for parent crabs. Furthermore, adult crabs tend to be carnivorous, so shelters (rocks and mud) could assist parent crabs to hunt other aquatic animals, and caves could protect parent crabs from predators such as herons, gulls and cranes [43,44]. Taken together, the preferences for shelters of E. sinensis were diverse at different developmental stages due to size restriction, feeding habit, predation and molting. These results could provide a reference for resource restoration, habitat construction and the restoration of E. sinensis in China. Moreover, rocks or grass-covered habitats were vulnerable to invasion by crabs as shelters, which could lead to population expansion. Hence, removing these shelters might contribute to catching and removing crabs in Europe and America.
Previous reports have confirmed that shrimps and crabs have the habit of hiding during daytime and foraging at night [45]. E. sinensis has an obvious feeding rhythm, and the best feeding time is at night [46]. In current study, button-sized and parent crabs were better at hiding during daytime than night. Our study showed that E. sinensis held a low hiding rate at night but a high hiding rate in daytime, which was consistent with the nocturnal habit of crabs [47]. Moreover, the concealing behavior of E. sinensis between daytime and night was similar to some aquatic animals. The hiding rate of Penaeus japonicus in daytime was higher than night, resulting in a 36% average decrease in cannibalism (p < 0.05) [48]. Panulirus stimpsoni was more active at night, and P. japonicus showed a nocturnal feeding pattern [49,50]. The climbing density and climbing proportion of Chiromantes neglectum in reed at night were significantly higher than those in daytime [51]. The preferences for crevices in Glyptosternum maculatum larvae and juveniles were significantly higher in daytime than night [52]. The preference for concealing behavior in daytime of E. sinensis could provide more references for the study of feeding times.

5. Conclusions

In summary, the preferences for shelters of E. sinensis were diverse at different developmental stages: juvenile crabs had an obvious preference for grass; button-sized crabs preferred to hide in the mud; and the favorite shelters of parent crabs were rocks. In our study, juvenile, button-sized and parent E. sinensis all exhibited concealing behavior, which occurred mainly during daytime. Moreover, light, size restriction, feeding habit, predation and molting were main factors that affect the preference for shelters at different developmental stages of E. sinensis. In order to effectively increase the resources of E. sinensis in China, E. sinensis at different developmental stages should be raised in areas with different shelters (i.e., grass, rocks and mud) according to the preference for shelters to improve the survival rate. Moreover, America and Europe could regularly clean rocks and grass on the banks of rivers to reduce crab infestation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.L. and G.F.; methodology, C.L. and X.L.; validation, C.L., X.H. and G.F.; investigation, C.L.; resources, G.F.; writing—original draft preparation, C.L. and C.S.; writing—review and editing, C.S., G.F. and X.L. visualization, C.L. and C.S.; supervision, G.F.; project administration, G.F.; funding acquisition, G.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2020YFD0900805); National Natural Science Foundation of China (General Project 31972795); Shanghai Chinese Mitten Crab Modern Agricultural Industrial Technology System Project (2017-4); and Species Resources Protection Project of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (17200308).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Eriocheir sinensis in the experiments belongs to cultured crab, which is not a rare protected species and does not involve animal welfare. The experiments were normal behavioral experiments without any other treatment. During the experiments, the crabs were placed in observation devices and immediately returned to the tank for breeding after experiments. No treatment was performed on the experimental crabs, and no crab was harmed during this experiment. Nevertheless, the applicable institutional and governmental ethical regulations concerning the use of experimental animals were also followed. This study has also obtained the approval of Division of Scientific Research Management, East China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article. Further information is available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our great appreciation to the editor and the reviewers for their constructive comments on the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Feng, G.; Zhuang, P. Stock enhancement and genetic preservation of Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) in the Yangtze River estuary. In Aquaculture in China, Success Stories and Modern Trends; Gui, J., Tang, Q., Li, Z., Liu, J., De Silva, S., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 514–526. [Google Scholar]
  2. Herborg, L.M.; Rushton, S.; Clare, A.; Bentley, M. The invasion of the Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) in the United Kingdom and its comparison to continental Europe. Biol. Invasions 2005, 7, 959–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gilbey, V.; Attrill, M.; Coleman, R. Juvenile Chinese mitten crabs (Eriocheir sinensis) in the Thames estuary: Distribution, movement and possible interactions with the native crab Carcinus Maenas. Biol. Invasions 2008, 10, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, K.; Duan, J.R.; Xu, D.P.; Zhang, M.Y.; Shi, W.G. Studies on current resource and causes of catch fluctuation of brooders of mitten crab in estuary of the Changjiang River. J. Lake Sci. 2006, 2, 212–217, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  5. Du, N.S. Migration of Eriocheir sinensis. Fish. Sci. Technol. Inf. 2004, 31, 56–57+94. [Google Scholar]
  6. Huang, B.; Du, N.S. Effects of temperature and Ca2+ on the larval development of the decapoda crustacean: Eriocheir sinensis. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2001, 19, 228–232. [Google Scholar]
  7. He, J.; Gao, Y.; Wang, W.; Xie, J.; Shi, H.; Wang, G.; Xu, W. Limb autotomy patterns in the juvenile swimming crab (Portunus trituberculatus) in earth ponds. Aquaculture 2016, 463, 189–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sterner, A.W.; Ottmar, M.L.; Copeman, L.A. Temperature effects on the molting, growth, and lipid composition of newly-settled red king crab. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2010, 393, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lu, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhao, Z.; Dong, S.; Ma, S. Effects of salinity on growth, molt and energy utilization of juvenile swimming crab Portunus trituberculatus. J. Fish. Sci. China 2012, 13, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, Y.K. Effect of Sand Sediment and Shelters on Behavior, Growth and Survivorship of Portunus Trituberculatus. Master’s Thesis, Ocean University of China, Shandong, China, June 2009. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, T.; Kong, J.; Liu, P.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Q. Effect of diet and stocking density on growth and survivorship of juvenile shrimp Fenneropenaeus chinensis. Mar Fish Res. 2008, 29, 41–47, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  12. Daleo, P.; Luppi, T.; Casariego, A.M.; Escapa, M.; Riberiro, P.; Silva, P.; Lribarne, O. The effect of size and cheliped autotomy on sexual competition between males of the mud crab Cyrtograpsus angulatus Dana. Mar Biol. 2009, 156, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dai, X.L.; Zhou, M.Y.; Ju, B.; Guo, Z.Q.; Jiang, F.; Su, J.; Ding, F.J. Effects of stocking density on growth, sexual differentiation and gonad development of Macrobrachium rosenbergii. J. Fish. China 2016, 40, 1874–1882, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  14. Jiang, Z.H.; Cong, N.; Qian, G.Y. Selection and setting of concealed objects in Macrobrachium rosenbergii breeding pond. Inland Fish. 1997, 6, 25–26. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang, Q.; Wang, Z.B.; Yang, X.B.; Zhu, S.G. Effects of the coverage of waterweed in pond on the growth of Eriocheir sinensis. Anim. Husb. Feed Sci. 2014, 35, 66–67. [Google Scholar]
  16. Pile, A.J.; Lipcius, R.N.; Montfrans, J.; Orth, R.J. Density-dependent settler-recruit-juvenile relationships in blue crabs. Ecol. Monogr. 1996, 66, 277–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, X.; Zhao, F.; Song, C.; Gao, Y.; Geng, Z.; Zhuang, P. Effects of stereoscopic artificial floating wetlands on nekton abundance and biomass in the Yangtze Estuary. Chemosphere 2017, 183, 510–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, Y.M.; Zhang, S.H.; Zhang, X.L.; Qu, J.M. Application of movable and portable shelter in farming of sea cucumber. Shandong Fish. 2004, 21, 9–10. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Ut, V.N.; Le, V.L.; Nghia, T.T.; Hong, T.T.T. Development of nursery culture techniques for the mud crab Scylla paramamosain (Estampador). Aquac. Res. 2007, 38, 1563–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Benhaïm, D.; Leblanc, C.A.; Lucas, G. Impact of a new artificial shelter on Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus, L.) behaviour and culture performance during the endogenous feeding period. Aquaculture 2009, 295, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. He, J.; Gao, Y.; Xu, W.; Yu, F.; Su, Z.; Xuan, F. Effects of different shelters on the molting, growth and culture performance of Portunus trituberculatus. Aquaculture 2017, 481, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Eileen, P.V.; Wolcot, T.G.; Wolcott, D.L. Nursery role of seagrass beds: Enhanced growth of juvenile blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus Rathbun). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1996, 198, 155–173. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen, X.L.; Zhang, X.L.; Li, S.J.; Wang, G.Z.; Lin, Q.W. Shelter preference of megalopae and first juvenile of mud crab, Scylla paramamosain (Estampador, 1949). J. Xiamen Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2009, 48, 594–599. [Google Scholar]
  24. Geng, Z.; Feng, G.; Zhao, F.; Zhang, T.; Yang, G.; Zhang, T.; Zhao, Y. Distribution of larval crabs (Eriocheir sinensis) and relationship with oceanographic features in the Yangtze Estuary. Ecoscience 2018, 25, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, R.Q. Preliminary report on physico-chemical properties of main channel and tributaries in upper and middle reaches of the Changjiang river, before and after damming of the three gorges project. Acta Hydrobiol. Sin. 2000, 24, 446–450. [Google Scholar]
  26. Polis, G.A. The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1981, 12, 225–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, X.; Zhao, F.; Song, C.; Gao, Y.; Chai, Y.; Zhong, L.; Zhuang, P. Hatchery technology restores the spawning ground of phytophilic fish in the urban river of Yangtze Estuary, China. Urban Ecosyst. 2020, 23, 1087–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Huang, X.; Zhao, F.; Song, C.; Chai, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhuang, P. Larva fish assemblage structure in three-dimensional floating wetlands and non-floating wetlands in the Changjiang River estuary. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2021, 39, 721–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Song, T.; Ding, F.; Chen, J.; Wu, S.; Wang, X. Effects of broodstock sizes, shelter, illumination and stocking density on breeding in red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii. Fish. Sci. 2012, 31, 549–553, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  30. Karnofsky, E.B.; Atema, J.; Elgin, R.H. Field observations of social behavior, shelter use, and foraging in the lobster, Homarus americanus. Biol. Bull. 2013, 176, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Min, Y.Y. A Preliminary Study on the Comparison of the Efficiency of Crayfish and Crab Culture in Jianghan Area. Master’s Thesis, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China, April 2017. [Google Scholar]
  32. Huang, X.; Xu, Q.; Feng, G.; Huang, X.; Geng, Z.; Zhao, F.; Zhuang, P. Circadian rhythm oscillation affects the structural morphology of eyes in juvenile Eriocheir sinensis H. Milne-Edwards, 1853 (Decapoda: Varunidae) exposed to alternating dark/light conditions. Zoomorphol. Res. Artic. 2020, 72, 245–253. [Google Scholar]
  33. David, L.M.; Tom, A.; Beverley, K.; Trent, L.; Brian, P. Stocking density and artificial habitat influence stock structure and yield from intensive nursery systems for mud crabs Scylla serrara. Aquac. Res. 2007, 38, 1580–1587. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zeng, G.C.; Jin, F.L. Model test of artificial shelter in loach breeding pond. Inland Fish. 1992, 93, 14–16. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  35. Maximino, C.; Brito, T.; Moraes, F.; Oliveira, F.; Taccolini, I. A comparative analysis of the preference for dark environments in five teleosts. Int. J. Comp. Psychol. 2007, 20, 351–367. [Google Scholar]
  36. Maximino, C.; Brito, T.M.D.; Colmanetti, R.; Pontes, A.A.; Castro, H.M.D.; Lacerda, R.I.T.D.; Jr, A.G. Parametric analyses of anxiety in zebra fish scototaxis. Behav. Brain Res. 2010, 210, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rudnick, D.; Resh, V. Stable isotopes, mesocosms and gut content analysis demonstrate trophic differences in two invasive decapod crustacea. Freshw. Biol. 2010, 50, 1323–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Menge, B.A.; Sutherland, J.P. Community regulation: Variation in disturbance, competition, and predation in relation to environmental stress and recruitment. Am. Nat. 1987, 130, 730–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Smith, K.N.; Herrnkind, W.F. Predation on early juvenile spiny lobsters Panulirus argus (Latreille): Influence of size and shelter. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1992, 157, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Huang, S.; Wang, J.; Yue, W.; Chen, J.; Gaughan, S.; Lu, W.; Lu, G.; Wang, C. Transcriptomic variation of hepatopancreas reveals the energy metabolism and biological processes associated with molting in Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Yonezawa, T.; Saito, M.; Yamashiro, T.; Hamano, T.; Nakata, K. Shelter preference for the Japanese mitten crab Eriocheir japonica: A field experiment in a river, southern central Japan. Ecol. Civil Eng. 2016, 19, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, W.; Cheng, Y.X.; Li, Y.S. Crab breeding and crab culture-the biology of Eriocheir sinensis. Fish. Sci. Technol. Inf. 2007, 34, 25–28, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  43. Cowan, J.; Brown, G. Foraging trade-offs and predator inspection in an ostariophysan fish: Switching from chemical to visual cues. Behaviour 2000, 137, 181–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Figueiredo, B.R.S.; Mormul, R.P.; Thomaz, S.M. Swimming and hiding regardless of the habitat: Prey fish do not choose between a native and a non-native macrophyte species as a refuge. Hydrobiologia 2015, 746, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jia, E.T.; Yan, M.J.; Lai, Q.C.; Luo, W.T.; Jiang, G.Z. Feeding rhythm of the Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis). J. Fish. Sci. China. 2018, 25, 546–554. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, K.X. Shrimp and Crab Breeding; China Agricultural Press: Beijing, China, 1997; pp. 32–36. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  47. Dai, A.Y.; Yang, S.L.; Song, Y.Z.; Chen, G.X. Marine Crab of China; Marine Press: Beijing, China, 1986. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  48. Chen, X.L.; Lin, Q.W.; Li, S.J.; Wang, G.Z.; Ai, Q.X.; Li, B.L.; Lin, T. Observations and studies on the cannibalism among post larvae of Kuruma prawn, Penaeus japonicus. J. Xiamen Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2003, 42, 358–361. [Google Scholar]
  49. Chen, Z.Q.; Chen, C.S.; Wu, Z.Q.; Lin, C.C.; Jia, X.W. The roosting habit of the spiny lobster Panulirus stimpsoni. Mar. Sci. 2001, 25, 11–15. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  50. Reymond, H.; Lagardère, J.P. Feeding rhythms and food of Penaeus japonicus Bate (Crustacea, Penaeidae) in salt marsh ponds; role of halophilic entomofauna. Aquaculture 1990, 84, 125–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhao, X.; Xiong, L.H. Plant-climbing behavior of a mudflat crab, Chiromantes neglectum in 24 hour duration at Phragmites-dominated tidal marshin Changjiang River Estuary. Chin. J. Zool. 2016, 51, 423–433. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  52. Xi, J.; Zheng, Z.L.; Mou, Z.B.; Liu, F.; Liu, X.Y.; Shen, J.; Liu, H.P.; Zhou, Y. Study on the hiding behavior of the Glyptosternum maculatum larvae and juveniles. Acta Hydrobiol. Sin. 2021, 45, 1129–1137. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
Animals 12 00918 g001 550
Figure 1. Different experimental devices for different development stages of Eriocheir sinensis ((a): the experimental device of parent crabs; (b): the experimental devices of juvenile and button-sized crabs). The numbers 1–4 represented four experimental areas including black areas and blank areas. Four black areas represented the location of four kinds of shelters respectively.
Figure 1. Different experimental devices for different development stages of Eriocheir sinensis ((a): the experimental device of parent crabs; (b): the experimental devices of juvenile and button-sized crabs). The numbers 1–4 represented four experimental areas including black areas and blank areas. Four black areas represented the location of four kinds of shelters respectively.
Animals 12 00918 g001
Animals 12 00918 g002 550
Figure 2. The hiding rate of Eriocheir sinensis in different developmental stages. Bars with same letters on the top indicate they have insignificant differences (p > 0.05), and bars with different letters on the top indicate they have significant differences (p < 0.05). Capital letters indicate the significance of hiding rates in different developmental stages, and lowercase letters indicate the significance of hiding and not hiding in the same stage.
Figure 2. The hiding rate of Eriocheir sinensis in different developmental stages. Bars with same letters on the top indicate they have insignificant differences (p > 0.05), and bars with different letters on the top indicate they have significant differences (p < 0.05). Capital letters indicate the significance of hiding rates in different developmental stages, and lowercase letters indicate the significance of hiding and not hiding in the same stage.
Animals 12 00918 g002
Animals 12 00918 g003 550
Figure 3. The hiding rate of Eriocheir sinensis in different developmental stages between daytime and night. Bars with same letters on the top indicate they have insignificant differences (p > 0.05), and bars with different letters on the top indicate they have significant differences (p < 0.05). Capital letters indicate the significance of hiding rates in different developmental stages, and lowercase letters indicate the significance of hiding and not hiding in the same stage.
Figure 3. The hiding rate of Eriocheir sinensis in different developmental stages between daytime and night. Bars with same letters on the top indicate they have insignificant differences (p > 0.05), and bars with different letters on the top indicate they have significant differences (p < 0.05). Capital letters indicate the significance of hiding rates in different developmental stages, and lowercase letters indicate the significance of hiding and not hiding in the same stage.
Animals 12 00918 g003
Animals 12 00918 g004 550
Figure 4. The hiding rate of juvenile Eriocheir sinensis in different shelters between daytime and night. Bars with same letters on the top indicate they have insignificant differences (p > 0.05), and bars with different letters on the top indicate they have significant differences (p < 0.05). Capital letters indicate the significance of hiding rates in different developmental stages, and lowercase letters indicate the significance of hiding and not hiding in the same stage.
Figure 4. The hiding rate of juvenile Eriocheir sinensis in different shelters between daytime and night. Bars with same letters on the top indicate they have insignificant differences (p > 0.05), and bars with different letters on the top indicate they have significant differences (p < 0.05). Capital letters indicate the significance of hiding rates in different developmental stages, and lowercase letters indicate the significance of hiding and not hiding in the same stage.
Animals 12 00918 g004
Animals 12 00918 g005 550
Figure 5. The hiding rate of button-sized Eriocheir sinensis in different shelters between daytime and night. Bars with same letters on the top indicate they have insignificant differences (p > 0.05), and bars with different letters on the top indicate they have significant differences (p < 0.05). Capital letters indicate the significance of hiding rates in different developmental stages, and lowercase letters indicate the significance of hiding and not hiding in the same stage.
Figure 5. The hiding rate of button-sized Eriocheir sinensis in different shelters between daytime and night. Bars with same letters on the top indicate they have insignificant differences (p > 0.05), and bars with different letters on the top indicate they have significant differences (p < 0.05). Capital letters indicate the significance of hiding rates in different developmental stages, and lowercase letters indicate the significance of hiding and not hiding in the same stage.
Animals 12 00918 g005
Animals 12 00918 g006 550
Figure 6. The hiding rate of parent Eriocheir sinensis in different shelters between daytime and night. Bars with same letters on the top indicate they have insignificant differences (p > 0.05), and bars with different letters on the top indicate they have significant differences (p < 0.05). Capital letters indicate the significance of hiding rates in different developmental stages, and lowercase letters indicate the significance of hiding and not hiding in the same stage.
Figure 6. The hiding rate of parent Eriocheir sinensis in different shelters between daytime and night. Bars with same letters on the top indicate they have insignificant differences (p > 0.05), and bars with different letters on the top indicate they have significant differences (p < 0.05). Capital letters indicate the significance of hiding rates in different developmental stages, and lowercase letters indicate the significance of hiding and not hiding in the same stage.
Animals 12 00918 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, C.; Shen, C.; Feng, G.; Huang, X.; Li, X. Preference for Shelters at Different Developmental Stages of Chinese Mitten Crab (Eriocheir sinensis). Animals 2022, 12, 918. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12070918

AMA Style

Li C, Shen C, Feng G, Huang X, Li X. Preference for Shelters at Different Developmental Stages of Chinese Mitten Crab (Eriocheir sinensis). Animals. 2022; 12(7):918. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12070918

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Chunbo, Chenchen Shen, Guangpeng Feng, Xiaorong Huang, and Xincang Li. 2022. "Preference for Shelters at Different Developmental Stages of Chinese Mitten Crab (Eriocheir sinensis)" Animals 12, no. 7: 918. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12070918

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop