Next Article in Journal
Genome Improvement and Core Gene Set Refinement of Fugacium kawagutii
Next Article in Special Issue
Genomic and Metabolic Insights into Denitrification, Sulfur Oxidation, and Multidrug Efflux Pump Mechanisms in the Bacterium Rhodoferax sediminis sp. nov.
Previous Article in Journal
Simulating Extracellular Glucose Signals Enhances Xylose Metabolism in Recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Previous Article in Special Issue
Paenibacillus lutrae sp. nov., A Chitinolytic Species Isolated from A River Otter in Castril Natural Park, Granada, Spain
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 8
Issue 1
10.3390/microorganisms8010101
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Isolation and Identification of Microvirga thermotolerans HR1, a Novel Thermo-Tolerant Bacterium, and Comparative Genomics among Microvirga Species

by
Jiang Li
1,2,
Ruyu Gao
2,
Yun Chen
2,
Dong Xue
2,
Jiahui Han
2,
Jin Wang
1,2,
Qilin Dai
1,
Min Lin
2,
Xiubin Ke
2,* and
Wei Zhang
2,*
1
School of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, Sichuan, China
2
Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(1), 101; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8010101
Submission received: 27 November 2019 / Revised: 30 December 2019 / Accepted: 9 January 2020 / Published: 10 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbial Isolation and Characterization)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Members of the Microvirga genus are metabolically versatile and widely distributed in Nature. However, knowledge of the bacteria that belong to this genus is currently limited to biochemical characteristics. Herein, a novel thermo-tolerant bacterium named Microvirga thermotolerans HR1 was isolated and identified. Based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, the strain HR1 belonged to the genus Microvirga and was highly similar to Microvirga sp. 17 mud 1-3. The strain could grow at temperatures ranging from 15 to 50 °C with a growth optimum at 40 °C. It exhibited tolerance to pH range of 6.0–8.0 and salt concentrations up to 0.5% (w/v). It contained ubiquinone 10 as the predominant quinone and added group 8 as the main fatty acids. Analysis of 11 whole genomes of Microvirga species revealed that Microvirga segregated into two main distinct clades (soil and root nodule) as affected by the isolation source. Members of the soil clade had a high ratio of heat- or radiation-resistant genes, whereas members of the root nodule clade were characterized by a significantly higher abundance of genes involved in symbiotic nitrogen fixation or nodule formation. The taxonomic clustering of Microvirga strains indicated strong functional differentiation and niche-specific adaption.

1. Introduction

Microvirga subterranea is a typical species, so Kanso and Patel initially established the genus Microvirga (family Methylobacteriaceae, order Rhizobiales, class Alphaproteobacteria) [1,2]. After that, the description of the genus Microvirga was amended three times. Zhang and Song expanded the optimum temperature range and temperature range for growth on the basis of Kanso and Patel [1,2], Hang-Yeon and Soon-Wo added the G+C content of the DNA, the predominant isoprenoid quinone, and the major fatty acid information into the description of the genus Microvirga [3], and the latest revision was made by Zhang and Zhang, stating that the nitrate reduction was variable, C18: 1ω7c and/or C19: 0 cyclo ω8c was contained in the major fatty acids, and the genome size and DNA G+C content were 3.53–9.63 Mb and 61.1–65.1%, respectively [4]. Generally the members of Microvirga showed common features in the appearance of cells and the composition of their cell wall. Sixteen strains have been isolated from various environmental niches and have been included in the genus Microvirga, including Microvirga aerilata 5420S-16T and Microvirga aerophila 5420S-12T, which were isolated from air [3], Microvirga arabica SV2184PT, Microvirga makkahensis SV1470T, Microvirga guangxiensis CGMCC 1.7666T, Microvirga indica S-MI1bT, Microvirga pakistanensis NCCP-1258T, Microvirga soli R491T, Microvirga rosea MAH-2T, and Microvirga flavescens c27j1T, which were isolated from different soil types [1,4,5,6,7,8], Microvirga flocculans TFBT, which was isolated from a hot spring [3,9], Microvirga lotononidis WSM3557T, Microvirga lupine Lut6T, and Microvirga zambiensis WSM3693T, which were isolated from nitrogen-fixing nodules of the legumes [10], Microvirga ossetica V5/3MT and Microvirga vignae BR3299T, which were isolated from root nodules [11,12], Microvirga massiliensis JC119T, which was isolated from a stool sample [13], and Microvirga brassicacearum CDVBN77T, which was isolated from rapeseed [14].
Previous studies have mainly focused on comparisons among the Microvirga species according to their physical characteristics and biological functions. For example, M. aerilata, M. aerophila, M. guangxiensis, M. pakistanensis, M. soli, M. rosea, M. lupine, and M. massiliensis have flagellum, but the others species do not. Moreover, M. lupine, M. zambiensis, and M. vignae could form unique colorful colonies that are distinct from other species [10]. In addition, M. indica S-MI1b could oxidize arsenite in a broad pH range from 4.0 to 9.0 [6]. Furthermore, M. subterranean FaiI4, an only moderate thermophile bacterium, could grow over a wide temperature range from 25 to 45 °C and grow optimally at 41 °C [2]. To date, there are 16 valid species in the genus Microvirga listed in the LPSN database (http://www.bacterio.net/), and the complete genome of Microvirga sp. 17 mud 1–3 has been published [15]. According to the analysis of this complete genome, for instance, Microvirga sp. 17 mud 1–3 is considered a radiation-resistant bacterium [15], M. zambiensis, M. lupini, M. lotononidis, M. guangxiensis, and M. vignae BR 3299T are considered symbiotic nitrogen-fixing alphaproteobacteria [16], and M. brassicacearum CDVBN77 is considered a rapeseed endophyte with biotechnological potential [14].
In nature, Microvirga species have been found in a wide range of ecological niches. Studies of culturable bacteria belonging to the Microvirga genus typically focus on isolation, identification, and phenotypical characterization, while little attention has been paid to the genetic make-up of the Microvirga genus and to comparing their phenotypes. The present study describes the novel thermo-tolerant bacterium Microvirga thermotolerans HR1 isolated from a rice paddy located in the main rice-producing area, Wuchang, in the northeast of China. Furthermore, the whole genome sequencing of the Microvirga thermotolerans HR1 strain and comparative genomic analysis of 11 strains of Microvirga are provided to explain the specific niche adaptation of various Microvirga strains.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection, Strain Isolation, and Cultivation

The rhizospheric soil sample was collected from Wuchang, the main rice-producing area in the northeast of China (N 45° 3′7″, E 127° 3′24″). To isolate the bacteria, 2 g of soil sample was added to 20 mL of R2A, LB, TGY liquid medium and incubated at 16, 30, 37, and 48 °C for 3 days. Then, 200 μL of enrichment solution was transferred into 20 mL of fresh R2A liquid medium correspondence with last step and incubated at 16, 30, 37, and 48 °C for 3 days. This routine was repeated three times to obtain an enrichment solution. Afterward, 100 μL of enrichment solution was diluted for 10−3, 10−4, and 10−5, respectively, with PBS buffer (KH2PO4 0.2 g, Na2HPO4·12H2O 2.9 g, NaCl 8 g, KCl 0.2 g, pH = 7.0). The dilutions were plated on correspondence agar plates and incubated at 16, 30, 37, and 48 °C. After 3 days, the colony was selected for 16S rRNA sequencing. The strain HR1 was isolated from R2A agar plates incubated at 48 °C.

2.2. 16S rRNA and Housekeeping Gene Amplification and Analysis

Genomic DNA of strain HR1 was extracted and purified by a commercial bacterial genomic DNA isolation kit (Magen, Guangzhou, China). The 16S rRNA gene was amplified with the universal bacterial primers F27 and R1492 [17], and housekeeping genes (gyrB, recA, and rpoB) were amplified with the universal primers described by Radl and Simoes-Araujo [12]. The amplified fragments were cloned into a cloning-vector pJET1.2/Blunt Vector (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and sequenced by BGI ARK Biotechnology (Beijing, China). A preliminary 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis was performed using the Ezbiocloud server (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/identify) [18], and further phylogenetic analyses were performed through the software MEGA 7.0 [19] with the neighbor-joining method [20]. Bootstrap values were calculated based on 1000 replicates. The housekeeping gene (gyrB, recA, and rpoB) phylogenetic analyses were also used to confirm the phylogenetic relationship of strain HR1 with the neighbor-joining [20]. Bootstrap values were calculated based on 1000 replicates. According to the 16S rRNA sequence analysis, the closely related type strains were bought from GDMCC and were used for chemotaxonomic analysis with HR1. The GenBank accession number of 16S rRNA sequence was MN524586.

2.3. Physiological Characteristics of Microvirga thermotolerans HR1

To investigate the optimum condition for HR1 growth, strain HR1 was cultivated on a series of different growth conditions. The growth test was performed on R2A agar (and liquid), LB agar (and liquid), TGY agar (and liquid), and Rouf’s liquid medium (1 g of yeast extract, 5 g of peptone, 0.2 g of MgSO4·7H2O, 0.05 g of CaCl2, 0.15 g of ferric ammonium citrate, 0.05 g of MnSO4·4H2O, 0.01 g of FeCl3·4H2O, 17 g of agar, 10 mL of vitamin solution, and 1 mL of trace-element solution) [2] at 4, 15, 20, 25, 30, 37, 40, 45, 50, and 55 °C for 3 days, respectively. A method for gram-stain reaction determination was modified from Buck’s method [21]. The HR1 strain was grown on R2A agar for 3 days at 40 °C for cell morphology and size observation using a transmission electron microscope (H-7650, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The optimal temperatures for growth were investigated by growth on R2A agar at different temperatures (4–55 °C, interval as description above) for 7 days. Tolerance to different NaCl concentrations (0–0.5%, at intervals of 0.1%, w/v, NaCl) and pH range (pH 4.0–11.0, at intervals of 1 unit) were performed at 40 °C for 7 days. Anaerobic growth was tested in an MGCAnaeroPouch-Anaero (Mitsubishi, Tokyo, Japan) for 7 days at 40 °C on R2A agar. Catalase and oxidase activities were investigated in 3% (v/v) H2O2 and using commercial strips (Huankai, Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s instruction, respectively. Enzymatic and carbon source utilization assays were tested using the API 20NE, API ZYM (bioMerieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, French) and Biolog plates kits (Hayward, CA, USA) according to the manufacturers’ instruction after 7-day growth on R2A agar at 40 °C.

2.4. Chemotaxonomic Analysis of Microvirga thermotolerans HR1

To investigate the chemotaxonomic features of strain HR1, a series of experiments were carried out to determine the content of the respiratory quinones, polar lipids, and fatty acids of closely related or type strains (M. flavescens c27j1, M. indica S-MI1b and M. subterranean FaiI4) and HR1. Respiratory quinones of the studied strain were extracted and analyzed via the HPLC system. Polar lipids of strain HR1 were extracted and examined by two-dimensional TLC. The fatty acids were extracted, quantified, and analyzed using the microbial identification system with strain HR1 and related type strains grown on R2A agar for 3 days at optimal growth condition.

2.5. Complete Genome Sequencing and Analysis

After the cells were cultivated in Rouf’s medium at 40 °C overnight, a commercial bacterial genomic DNA isolation kit (Magen) was used to extract and purify the genome DNA of strain HR1. Concentration and quality of DNA was detected by Nanodrop2500 (OD260/ OD 280 = 1.8–2.0, ≥10 μg).
The complete genome was sequenced using the Illumina Hiseq and PacBio platform. The assembly software Canu and SPAdes was used to assembly the complete genome of strain HR1. Glimmer (http://ccb.jhu.edu/software/glimmer/index.shtml) GeneMarkS and Prodigal software were used to predicted the coding sequence (CDS) in the genome of strain HR1. Gene functional annotation was mainly based on protein sequence alignment, and the corresponding functional annotation information was obtained by comparing the gene sequence with each database. Databases used include NR, swiss-prot, Pfam, EggNOG, GO, and KEGG. The ANI calculator (www.ezbiocloud.net/tools/ani) and the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC 2.1) [22] (http://ggdc.dsmz.de/home.php) were used for calculated the average nucleotide identity [23] (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values, respectively. The GenBank accession number of the complete genome was CP045423.

2.6. Comparative Genomics of Microvirga Species

The present study compared the genomes of 11 bacteria belonging to the genus Microvirga. The 11 bacteria and genome accession numbers were as follows: M. massiliensis JC119, LN811386; M. vignae BR3299, LCYG01000000; M. subterranea DSM 14364, QQBB01000000; M. aerophila NBRC 106136, BJYU00000000; M. guangxiensis CGMCC 1.7666, FMVJ01000000; M. lotononidis WSM3557, AJUA01000000; M. brassicacearum CDVBN77, VCMV01000000; M. ossetica V5/3M, CP016616; Microvirga sp. 17 mud 1–3, CP029481; Microvirga sp. KLBC 81, QDAH01000000; M. thermotolerans HR1, CP045423. The Bacterial Pan Genome Analysis (BPGA) pipeline [24] was used for the pan genome analyses. The clustering tool USEARCH was used to cluster protein families. A 50% sequence identity was considered as the cut-off value for orthologous clustering to obtain the pan and core genome. After obtaining the core genome of the Microvirga genus, the OrthoFinder [25,26] was used to perform an all-versus-all BLAST search and identify clusters of orthologous genes (OGs), and those OGs were then aligned and concatenated by MUSCLE [27]. A phylogenetic tree based on orthologous proteins of the Microvirga genus was constructed by FastTree [28] according to the maximum-likelihood method.

2.7. Effect of Temperature on the Growth of Microvirga thermotolerans HR1

M. thermotolerans HR1 and M. subterranean FaiI4 (as a control strain) were incubated to mid-exponential phase (OD600 = 0.2–0.4) in Rouf’s liquid medium [2]. Afterward, culture medium was added to 20 mL of fresh medium at a final OD600 value of 0.1, and incubated under different temperature conditions (15, 20, 25, 30, 37, 40, 45, and 50 °C at a pH set-point of 7.0). After 15 h incubation, bacterial growth was determined by using Spec.

3. Results

3.1. Isolation and Characterization of Microvirga thermotolerans HR1

The HR1 strain was isolated from paddy soil collected from the main rice-producing area in Wuchang, in the northeast of China. This isolate was routinely cultivated on R2A agar and in Rouf’s liquid medium at 40 °C for overnight. A milk white, semi-transparent, smooth, and drop-shaped substance appeared on the agar after 3 days of incubation. Staining experiments revealed that the isolate was Gram-negative. Microscopic examination confirmed that the cells were rod-shaped, and 0.7–0.9 µm wide and 1.2–2.8 µm long with flagellum (Figure 1a–c). Physiological analyses revealed that the isolate was able to grow at 15–50 °C and pH 6.0–8.0 and in the presence of 0–0.5% (w/v) NaCl, and optimal growth was achieved at 40 °C, pH 7.0, without NaCl. The rise of culture temperatures from 45 to 50 °C resulted in a dramatically decrease of the strain HR1. Similarly, a more extreme stress on M. subterranean FaiI4, which was previously described as thermophilic bacterium, was observed when the temperature reached up to 45–50 °C (Figure 2).
A positive reaction was observed for catalase but not for oxidase. Other phenotypic characteristics were detailed in the species description found in Table 1.
The tests for nitrate reduction, hydrolysis of gelatin were negative; assimilation for arabinose, citric acid and phenylacetic acid were negative; the catalase was positive for alkaline phosphatase, esterase (C4), weakly positive for esterase lipase (C8), acid phosphatase, negative for lipid enzyme (C14). Carbon source utilization for tetrazolium violet was positive, minocycline was weakly positive, α-d-glucose, D-fucose, fusidic acid, myo-inositol, α-keto-glutaric acid, and tween 40 were negative. The differential characteristics of strain HR1 with respect to the most closely related species, M. flavescens c27j1, M.indica S-MI1b and the type strain of genus M. subterranean FaiI4 were also shown in Table 1.
The major respiratory quinone of strain HR1 was Q-10, which was the same as that of other species of the Microvirga genus. The polar lipids of strain HR1 included diphosphatidylglycerol (DPG), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), phosphatidylcholine (PC), phospholipids (PL), and aminolipid (AL) (Figure S1). The constituents of quinone and polar lipids were consistent with the characteristics of the genus Microvirga. The major fatty acids (>10% of the total) of strain HR1 were C18: 1 ω7c and/or C18: 1 ω6c (56.76%) and C19: 0 cyclo ω8c (16.8%), compared with its closely related type strains. The comments of major fatty acids in strain HR1 was consistent with the type species (M. subterranean FaiI4), but different from other closely related type strains (Table 2).

3.2. Phylogenic Analysis of 16S rRNA and Housekeeping Genes

The analysis of 16S rRNA and housekeeping genes (rpoB, recA, and gyrB) was employed to elucidate the taxonomic position of strain HR1. The 16S rRNA gene (accession no: MN524586) and partly housekeeping gene (gyrB, recA and rpoB) sequence of strain HR1 comprised 1467, 882, 1016, and 965 bp, respectively. The 16S rRNA gene of strain HR1 shared the highest similarity to Microvirga sp. 17 mud 1–3 (97.87%), M. flavescens c27j1 (97.37%), and M. aerilata 5420S–16 (97.16%). The rpoB, recA and gyrB genes of strain HR1 shared the highest similarity (92.43, 92.59 and 89.88%, respectively) to Microvirga sp. 17 mud 1–3. Phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene constructed by the neighbor-joining method showed that strain HR1 was a member of genus Microvirga (Figure 3). Housekeeping genes phylogenetic analysis revealed that strain HR1 was clearly differentiated from other species of the genus Microvirga (Figures S2–S4).

3.3. Genomic Features of Microvirga thermotolerans HR1 Strain

The complete genome sequence of strain HR1 was 3,823,049 bp, and DNA G+C content was 67.71%, containing 3818 putative protein-coding sequences (CDSs), 51 tRNA genes, and 6 rRNAs genes (Figure S5a). This was similar to other Microvirga species (the genome size ranged from 3.53 to 9.63 Mbp, Table 3), such as Microvirga sp. 17 mud 1–3, M. flavescens c27j1, M. aerilata 5420S-16, and M. indica S-MI1b. However, the strain showed high genome G+C content compared with the other Microvirga species (reference ranged from 61.1 to 65.1%) sequenced so far (Table 3). The digital DNA–DNA hybridization values of strain HR1 and Microvirga sp. 17 mud 1–3 and of that and M. flavescens c27j1 based on the whole genome sequence were 38.2 and 19.9%, while the ANI values were 84.21 and 77.67%, respectively. Therefore, complete genome analysis combined with 16S rRNA phylogenic, physiological, and biochemical properties all supported the identification of the strain HR1 as a novel species of the genus Microvirga.

3.4. Niche Adaption of Microvirga Species

A summary of 11 whole-genome comparisons between M. thermotolerans HR1 and the publicly available genome sequences of members of the genus Microvirga (downloaded from NCBI database, Table 3) were used for the comparative genomic analysis using the Bacterial Pan Genome Analysis (BPGA) pipeline. The size and G+C content of the genomes used in this study ranged from 3.8 to 9.1 MB and 61.1 to 67.71%, respectively. Generally, a local database containing 11 genomes and 57,302 putative protein-coding genes was created.
Based on this database, 1558 (2.71%) shared orthologous coding sequences were clustered into the core genome of Microvirga, 27,150 (47.38%) were represented in the accessory genome, and 12,549 (21.8%) were identified as strain-unique genes (Figure 4a). Therefore, a highly reliable mathematical extrapolation of the pan and core genome was constructed (Figure S6a). The total genes increase in the pan genome of Microvirga with the rise in the analyzed genome number, suggesting that the pan genome was open. Meanwhile, the genes’ number of core genomes was highly conserved, relatively reaching a constant after five species were added to the analysis, indicating that the core genome of genus Microvirga was conserved.
Analysis of the distribution pattern of Microvirga strains based on 1558 core orthologous proteins generated two main distinct clusters: a mostly soil clade consisting of soil isolates and a predominantly root nodule clade consisting of nodule-formation bacteria or rhizobia (Figure 4b). In brief, three strains, i.e., M. thermotolerans HR1, Microvirga sp. 17 mud 1–3, and M. subterranea Fail4, formed a separate cluster, named a soil clade, and shared common features, e.g., a higher G+C content, a smaller genome size, thermo-tolerance, and radiation resistance. Notably, a markedly lower genome size and lower numbers of genes and proteins were observed for the soil-associated (soil cluster) strains. In contrast, a higher G+C content was found in the bacteria belonging to the soil cluster, as compared to other clusters (Table 3, Figure S5b). For the soil clade, eight heat-shock-related genes (four ipbA genes—HR0375, HR1773, HR2572, and HR2592—and two Hsp20-encoding genes—HR2563 and HR2573) and 14 DNA-repair-related genes were found in the genome of M. thermotolerans HR1, and similar genes were detected in the genome of M. subterranea Fail4, indicating their thermo-tolerance potential. Additionally, a UV damage repair endonuclease (UvdE) and DNA mismatch repair proteins (MutS, MutS2, and Mutl) were found in the genome of Microvirga sp. 17 mud 1–3. Meanwhile, DNA recombination repair pathways were also discovered in M. thermotolerans HR1. Furthermore, five strains, i.e., M. lotononidis WSM3557, M. ossetica V5/3M, M. vignae BR3299, Microvirga sp. KLBC81, and M. guangxiensis, formed a cluster named the root nodule clade, which had nitrogen-fixing and/or -forming nodules in common. The exception to this division was the soil-isolated strain M. guangxiensis, which functionally clustered with root nodule isolates (Figure 4b). Generally, nif genes and a nitrogen fixation regulator all existed in the genome of these strains. Moreover, the genes involved in nodulation formation (e.g., the nod genes) were also found in their genomes (Table S1). Interestingly, the nod genes required for nodulation was absent in M. ossetica V5/3M and M. guangxiensis CGMCC1.766. In addition, three independent clusters were separated according to isolation source (air, human stool, or rapeseed endophyte, respectively) (Figure 4b). A series of genes coding for phosphorus and potassium-solubilization protein were found in M. brassicacearum, indicating its role in plant growth promotion. In the genome of Microvirga massiliensis JC119, which was isolated from human stool, key genes involved in heme synthesis, transport, and secretion during infection implied the potential for Microvirga massiliensis JC119 to result in disease [29,30].
Moreover, the linear comparison based on the three complete genomes of Microvirga indicated that M. thermotolerans HR1 was more linear with the Microvirga sp. 17 mud 1–3 derived from soil than the root nodule isolate M. ossetica V5/3M (Figure S6b).

3.5. Description of Microvirga thermotolerans sp. nov.

Microvirga thermotolerans (ther.mo.to′le.rans. Gr. fem. n. therme heat; N.L. pres. part. tolerans tolerating; N.L. part. adj. thermotolerans heat-tolerating) cells are Gram-stain-negative, aerobic, single polar flagellum, and rod-shaped (1.2–0.7 × 2.8–0.9 µm). Growth occurs on R2A agar, but not on LB and TGY. Colonies on R2A agar are milk white, semi-transparent, smooth, drop-shaped, and smaller than 0.5 mm in diameter after 3 days at 40 °C. The strain HR1 produces milk-white colonies, and growth occurs within a range of 15–50 °C, pH 6.0–8.0, and 0–0.5% (w/v) NaCl. The catalase is positive, and the oxidase is negative. The catalase is positive for alkaline phosphatase, esterase (C4), and weakly positive for esterase lipase (C8), negative for lipase (C14). The major respiratory quinone is Q-10, and the major fatty acids are summed feature 8 (C18:1ω7c and/or C18:1ω6c (56.76%) and C19:0 cyclo ω8c (16.8%)). The polar lipids contain diphosphatidylglycerol (DPG), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), phosphatidylcholine (PC), phospholipids (PL), and aminolipid (AL). The genomic DNA G+C content of the type strain is 67.71%. The GenBank accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequence and whole genome sequence of the type strain HR1 are MN524586 and CP045423, respectively. The type strain, HR1T (=GDMCC 1.1658T = KACC 21422T), was isolated from rice rhizospheric soil from Wuchang, a traditional rice-planting area in the northeast of China.

4. Discussion

Microvirga spp. are Gram-negative α-proteobacteria that are found in various environments. Members of the Microvirga genus show a diverse spectrum of metabolic activities, which is indicative of their adaptation to various niches such as soil, air, and human hosts [31,32]. Microvirga spp. have also been found to be nitrogen-fixing rhizobia and plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria [10,12,14]. In this study, a novel thermo-tolerant strain named M. thermotolerans HR1 was isolated from rice paddy. The 16S rRNA sequence analysis revealed maximum identity with Microvirga sp. 17 mud 1–3 (97.87%). Additionally, the strain HR1 contained highly similar components of quinone and main fatty acids with respect to other members of the Microvirga genus [4]. According to the principles defined by Jongsik and Aharon [33], bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequence with a similarity under 98.7% with respect to its closest related species represented a novel species. M. thermotolerans HR1 differed from the closest species in many features. For example, nitrate reduction was negative for M. thermotolerans HR1 but positive for its relatives, Microvirga flavescens c27j1. In addition, M. thermotolerans HR1 presented milk white colonies on an R2A agar medium, while two close species M. flavescens and M. aerilata 5420S-16 presented light yellow and pink colonies, respectively [3,4]. Moreover, the predominant polar lipids in M. thermotolerans HR1 also showed differences from other relatives. The digital DNA–DNA hybridization values of strain HR1 and Microvirga sp. 17 mud 1–3 and of that and M. flavescens c27j1 were 38.2 and 19.9%, respectively. According to the definition of a novel bacterial species (ANI was lower than 96–98%, and dDDH was lower than 70%) and the principles described by Varghese [34] and Stackebrandt and Goebel [35], combined with the phenotypic and biochemistry data, strain HR1 should be classified as representative of a novel species of the Microvirga genus. Among all members of the Microvirga genus, the highest thermo-resistance was only found in strains M. thermotolerans HR1 and M. subterranean FaiI4 [2], which survived temperatures of 40 °C. When the temperature reached 45–50 °C, M. thermotolerans HR1 showed a higher tolerance than M. subterranean FaiI4. Considering the fact that this strain was isolated at 48 °C and that it expressed biological traits at temperatures ranging from 15 to 50 °C, it is more appropriate to call it a thermo-tolerant bacterium rather than thermophilic (heat-loving) [36]. Indeed, key genes of strain HR1, which were responsible for heat shock response and DNA recombination repair, were annotated during genome analysis. Compared with M. subterranea FaiI4, both of their genomes contained the Hsp family genes. In addition, strain HR1 contained more stress-resistance-related genes than the strain M. subterranea FaiI4. It is well known that Hsps can be induced by heat shock, and Hsp20 is known to be a small heat shock protein in the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans [37]. In addition, DNA recombination repair pathways were discovered in M. thermotolerans HR1. The MutL-MutS pathway, for example, which contains DNA mismatch repair proteins, performs a central role in bacteria such as Microvirga sp. 17 mud 1–3 [15], Deinococcus radiodurans [15], E. coli [38], and Salmonella serotypes [39]. Another example of a DNA repair system is the RecF pathway. For E. coli, eight proteins in the RecF pathway, namely RecA, RecN, RecF, RecO, RecR, RecQ, RecJ, and SSB [40], which are responsible for the recombinational repair of DNA damage, are also included in the genome of M. thermotolerans HR1. Thus, it was speculated that the thermo-tolerance capacity of M. thermotolerans HR1 was mainly attributed to the existence of heat shock response and DNA-repair-function-related genes.
Genome phylogenetic analysis based on 11 strains of the Microvirga genus generated five clades depending on isolation source, including human stool, soil, air, root nodule, and rapeseed endophytes, respectively. M. thermotolerans HR1 fell into the soil cluster which shares niche-specific functions (e.g., thermo-tolerance and radiation resistance) with M. subterranea FaiI4 and Microvirga sp. 17 mud 1–3. This is consistent with the phenotypic observation above. Similarly, the largest clade, the root nodule, was formed of five species with the abilities of nitrogen fixation and/or nodulation formation. Although Microvirga is not a close relative of the Rhizobium genus [10], it is interesting that a small fraction (four out of the 11) of the Microvirga spp. was shown to be symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria. This suggests that such gene content in five species of Microvirga might be obtained from rhizobia. Previous work has indicated that rhizobia may sense rhizosphere environments and transfer gene content to other genera [41]. Moreover, M. brassicacearum CDVBN77 has been described as a plant endosymbiont capable of promoting plant growth by providing nutrients to hosts [14]. Given that members of this clade contain nodulation-forming and nitrogen-fixing genes, Microvirga species may play an important role in plant–microbe interaction. It is noted that, a trend toward a higher G+C content has been observed in the soil clade, possibly as a result of a more varied environment which means higher chance for horizontal gene transfer. Indeed, based on genetic analysis, the core genome of the Microvirga genus was conserved, and the pan genome was open, leading to a high possibility that foreign genes integrated into the genome by horizontal gene transfer over years of evolution. Therefore, the distribution pattern of the Microvirga genus reflects a high correlation between functional properties and their respective environments.
In this study, we report a novel species of the Microvirga genus, and comparative genomic analysis revealed the niche adaptation of Microvirga species. Genome phylogenetic analysis generated five clades that suggested a niche-specific adaption in the Microvirga genus. The results have the potential to provide information that facilitates future studies relating to the cloning and functional analysis of genes in Microvirga species.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/1/101/s1. Figure S1: Two-dimensional TLC of polar lipids of strain HR1. Figures S2–S4: Phylogenetic tree based on rpoB, gyrB, recA sequence. Figure S5: Circular genome map of HR1 genome and scatter plot illustrating whole-genome feature in the genus Microvirga; Figure S6: Mathematical modeling and linear comparison of Microvirga. Table S1: The genes coding protein relative to nitrogen fix and nodules form in Microvirga genomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L., J.W., M.L., X.K. and W.Z.; Data Curation, J.L., R.G. and X.K.; Formal Analysis, J.L., R.G., Y.C., D.X., J.W., Q.D., J.H. and X.K.; Funding Acquisition, J.W., Q.D., M.L., X.K. and W.Z.; Methodology, J.L., R.G., Y.C., D.X., J.W., M.L., J.H., X.K. and W.Z.; Project Administration, M.L., X.K. and W.Z.; Resources, J.L.; Supervision, M.L., X.K. and W.Z.; Visualization, R.G.; Writing—Original Draft, J.L.; Writing—Review & Editing, X.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFA0901000, 2018YFA0901003), and the National Transgenic Major Project of China (No. 2019ZX08010-004, 2016ZX08009-003), the Ministry of Agriculture Transgenic Program (No. 2016ZX08009003-002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31800061, 31570080, and 31500063). We also appreciate the support of the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of CAAS.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks go to Min Lin, Wei Zhang, and Xiubin Ke for their constructive suggestions on the revision of the article and other authors for their excellent technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, J.; Song, F.; Xin, Y.H.; Zhang, J.; Fang, C. Microvirga guangxiensis sp. nov., a novel alphaproteobacterium from soil, and emended description of the genus Microvirga. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 1997–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Kanso, S.; Patel, B.K. Microvirga subterranea gen. nov., sp. nov., a moderate thermophile from a deep subsurface Australian thermal aquifer. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2003, 53, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Weon, H.Y.; Kwon, S.W.; Son, J.A.; Jo, E.H.; Kim, S.J.; Kim, Y.S.; Kim, B.Y.; Ka, J.O. Description of Microvirga aerophila sp. nov. and Microvirga aerilata sp. nov., isolated from air, reclassification of Balneimonas flocculans Takeda et al. 2004 as Microvirga flocculans comb. nov. and emended description of the genus Microvirga. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 2596–2600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, X.J.; Zhang, J.; Yao, Q.; Feng, G.D.; Zhu, H.H. Microvirga flavescens sp. nov., a novel bacterium isolated from forest soil and emended description of the genus Microvirga. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 667–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huq, M.A. Microvirga rosea sp. nov.: A nanoparticle producing bacterium isolated from soil of rose garden. Arch. Microbiol. 2018, 200, 1439–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tapase, S.R.; Mawlankar, R.B.; Sundharam, S.S.; Krishnamurthi, S.; Dastager, S.G.; Kodam, K.M. Microvirga indica sp. nov., an arsenite-oxidizing Alphaproteobacterium, isolated from metal industry waste soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 3525–3531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dahal, R.H.; Kim, J. Microvirga soli sp. nov., an alphaproteobacterium isolated from soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Amin, A.; Ahmed, I.; Habib, N.; Abbas, S.; Hasan, F.; Xiao, M.; Hozzein, W.N.; Li, W.J. Microvirga pakistanensis sp. nov., a novel bacterium isolated from desert soil of Cholistan, Pakistan. Arch. Microbiol. 2016, 198, 933–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Takeda, M.; Suzuki, I.; Koizumi, J. Balneomonas flocculans gen. nov., sp. nov., a new cellulose-producing member of the alpha-2 subclass of Proteobacteria. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 27, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ardley, J.K.; Parker, M.A.; De Meyer, S.E.; Trengove, R.D.; O’Hara, G.W.; Reeve, W.G.; Yates, R.J.; Dilworth, M.J.; Willems, A.; Howieson, J.G. Microvirga lupini sp. nov., Microvirga lotononidis sp. nov. and Microvirga zambiensis sp. nov. are alphaproteobacterial root-nodule bacteria that specifically nodulate and fix nitrogen with geographically and taxonomically separate legume hosts. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2012, 62, 2579–2588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Safronova, V.I.; Kuznetsova, I.G.; Sazanova, A.L.; Belimov, A.A.; Andronov, E.E.; Chirak, E.R.; Osledkin, Y.S.; Onishchuk, O.P.; Kurchak, O.N.; Shaposhnikov, A.I.; et al. Microvirga ossetica sp. nov., a species of rhizobia isolated from root nodules of the legume species Vicia alpestris Steven. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Radl, V.; Simoes-Araujo, J.L.; Leite, J.; Passos, S.R.; Martins, L.M.; Xavier, G.R.; Rumjanek, N.G.; Baldani, J.I.; Zilli, J.E. Microvirga vignae sp. nov., a root nodule symbiotic bacterium isolated from cowpea grown in semi-arid Brazil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 725–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Caputo, A.; Lagier, J.C.; Azza, S.; Robert, C.; Mouelhi, D.; Fournier, P.E.; Raoult, D. Microvirga massiliensis sp. nov., the human commensal with the largest genome. Microbiologyopen 2016, 5, 307–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Jimenez-Gomez, A.; Saati-Santamaria, Z.; Igual, J.M.; Rivas, R.; Mateos, P.F.; Garcia-Fraile, P. Genome Insights into the Novel Species Microvirga brassicacearum, a Rapeseed Endophyte with Biotechnological Potential. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Sathiyaraj, G.; Kim, M.K.; Kim, J.-Y.; Kim, S.-J.; Jang, J.H.; Maeng, S.; Kang, M.-S.; Srinivasan, S. Complete genome sequence of Microvirga sp. 17 mud 1–3, a radiation-resistant bacterium. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 2018, 14, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zilli, J.E.; Passos, S.R.; Leite, J.; Xavier, G.R.; Rumjaneck, N.G.; Simoes-Araujo, J.L. Draft Genome Sequence of Microvirga vignae Strain BR 3299T, a Novel Symbiotic Nitrogen-Fixing Alphaproteobacterium Isolated from a Brazilian Semiarid Region. Genome Announc. 2015, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Weisburg, W.G.; Barns, S.M.; Pelletier, D.A.; Lane, D.J. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Yoon, S.H.; Ha, S.M.; Kwon, S.; Lim, J.; Kim, Y.; Seo, H.; Chun, J. Introducing EzBio-Cloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 1613–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Saitou, N.; Nei, M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4, 406–425. [Google Scholar]
  21. Buck, J.D. Nonstaining (KOH) method for determination of gram reactions of marine bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1982, 44, 992–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Auch, A.F.; Klenk, H.-P.; Göker, M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinform. 2013, 14, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Yoon, S.H.; Ha, S.M.; Lim, J.M.; Kwon, S.J.; Chun, J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017, 110, 1281–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chaudhari, N.M.; Gupta, V.K.; Dutta, C. BPGA—An ultra-fast pan-genome analysis pipeline. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Emms, D.M.; Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: Solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves orthogroup inference accuracy. Genome Biol. 2015, 16, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Emms, D.M.; Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: Phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: A multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinform. 2004, 5, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Price, M.N.; Dehal, P.S.; Arkin, A.P. FastTree 2—Approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Salaemae, W.; Booker, G.W.; Polyak, S.W. The Role of Biotin in Bacterial Physiology and Virulence: a Novel Antibiotic Target for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Choby, J.E.; Skaar, E.P. Heme Synthesis and Acquisition in Bacterial Pathogens. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 428, 3408–3428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Bobay, L.M.; Ochman, H. The Evolution of Bacterial Genome Architecture. Front. Genet. 2017, 8, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zhong, Z.; Kwok, L.Y.; Hou, Q.; Sun, Y.; Li, W.; Zhang, H.; Sun, Z. Comparative genomic analysis revealed great plasticity and environmental adaptation of the genomes of Enterococcus faecium. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chun, J.; Oren, A.; Ventosa, A.; Christensen, H.; Arahal, D.R.; da Costa, M.S.; Rooney, A.P.; Yi, H.; Xu, X.W.; De Meyer, S.; et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Varghese, N.J.; Mukherjee, S.; Ivanova, N.; Konstantinidis, K.; Mavrommatis, K.; Kyrpides, N.C.; Pati, A. Microbial species delineation using whole genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 6761–6771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Stackebrandt, E.; Goebel, B.M. Taxonomic Note: A place for dna-dna reassociation and 16s rrna sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1994, 44, 846–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Noll, K.M. Thermophilic Bacteria. In Encyclopedia of Genetics; Sydney, B., Jefferey, H.M., Eds.; Molecular Sciences Institute Inc.: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2001; pp. 1961–1963. [Google Scholar]
  37. Schmid, A.K.; Howell, H.A.; Battista, J.R.; Peterson, S.N.; Lidstrom, M.E. Global transcriptional and proteomic analysis of the Sig1 heat shock regulon of Deinococcus radiodurans. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 3339–3351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Pitsikas, P.; Polosina, Y.Y.; Cupples, C.G. Interaction between the mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair pathways in the prevention of 5-azacytidine-induced CG-to-GC mutations in Escherichia coli. DNA Repair 2009, 8, 354–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, B.; Zheng, J.; Brown, E.W.; Zhao, S.; Meng, J. Characterisation of antimicrobial resistance-associated integrons and mismatch repair gene mutations in Salmonella serotypes. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2009, 33, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Handa, N.; Morimatsu, K.; Lovett, S.T.; Kowalczykowski, S.C. Reconstitution of initial steps of dsDNA break repair by the RecF pathway of E. coli. Genes Dev. 2009, 23, 1234–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ling, J.; Wang, H.; Wu, P.; Li, T.; Tang, Y.; Naseer, N.; Zheng, H.; Masson-Boivin, C.; Zhong, Z.; Zhu, J. Plant nodulation inducers enhance horizontal gene transfer of Azorhizobium caulinodans symbiosis island. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 13875–13880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Microorganisms 08 00101 g001 550
Figure 1. Transmission electron micrograph showing the morphology of strain HR1 and Gram-stain of HR1. Bar: 500 nm for (a), 1.0 μm for (b), 5 μm for (c).
Figure 1. Transmission electron micrograph showing the morphology of strain HR1 and Gram-stain of HR1. Bar: 500 nm for (a), 1.0 μm for (b), 5 μm for (c).
Microorganisms 08 00101 g001
Microorganisms 08 00101 g002 550
Figure 2. M. subterranean FaiI4 and M. thermotolerans HR1 strains culture for 15 h under different temperatures at a pH fixed at 7.0 ± 0.2. The values are means ± standard deviations (n = 4).
Figure 2. M. subterranean FaiI4 and M. thermotolerans HR1 strains culture for 15 h under different temperatures at a pH fixed at 7.0 ± 0.2. The values are means ± standard deviations (n = 4).
Microorganisms 08 00101 g002
Microorganisms 08 00101 g003 550
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences reconstructed by the neighbor-joining method. This tree shows the phylogenetic relationship between strain HR1 and closely related species. Bootstrap percentages are based on 1000 replications. The GenBank accession numbers for 16S rRNA gene sequences are shown in parentheses. Bar: 0.005 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences reconstructed by the neighbor-joining method. This tree shows the phylogenetic relationship between strain HR1 and closely related species. Bootstrap percentages are based on 1000 replications. The GenBank accession numbers for 16S rRNA gene sequences are shown in parentheses. Bar: 0.005 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Microorganisms 08 00101 g003
Microorganisms 08 00101 g004 550
Figure 4. The Pangenome analysis and the genome phylogenetic tree of strains belonging to the Microvirga genus. (a) Petal diagram of the pangenome. Each strain is represented by a colored oval. The center is the number of orthologous coding sequences shared by all strains (i.e., the core genome). Numbers in nonoverlapping portions of each oval show the numbers of CDSs unique to each strain. The total numbers of protein-coding genes within each genome are listed in Table 3. (b) Groups divided into five groups based on the phylogenetic tree, which is based on 1558 core orthologous proteins of the Microvirga genus. Bootstrap values are expressed as percentages of 1000 replications. Bar: 0.01 substitutions per amino acid.
Figure 4. The Pangenome analysis and the genome phylogenetic tree of strains belonging to the Microvirga genus. (a) Petal diagram of the pangenome. Each strain is represented by a colored oval. The center is the number of orthologous coding sequences shared by all strains (i.e., the core genome). Numbers in nonoverlapping portions of each oval show the numbers of CDSs unique to each strain. The total numbers of protein-coding genes within each genome are listed in Table 3. (b) Groups divided into five groups based on the phylogenetic tree, which is based on 1558 core orthologous proteins of the Microvirga genus. Bootstrap values are expressed as percentages of 1000 replications. Bar: 0.01 substitutions per amino acid.
Microorganisms 08 00101 g004
Table
Table 1. Differential physiological characteristics between strain HR1 and closely related type strains and type species of the genus Microvirga (Strains: 1. M. thermotolerans HR1 (data from this study); 2. M. flavescens c27j1 (data from this study); 3. M. indica S-MI1b (data from this study); 4. M. subterranean FaiI4 (data from this study); +: positive; w: weakly positive; −: negative; Nitrate reduction, hydrolysis and assimilation test by using API 20NE, Enzyme activity test by using API ZYM, carbon source utilization test by using Biolog.
Table 1. Differential physiological characteristics between strain HR1 and closely related type strains and type species of the genus Microvirga (Strains: 1. M. thermotolerans HR1 (data from this study); 2. M. flavescens c27j1 (data from this study); 3. M. indica S-MI1b (data from this study); 4. M. subterranean FaiI4 (data from this study); +: positive; w: weakly positive; −: negative; Nitrate reduction, hydrolysis and assimilation test by using API 20NE, Enzyme activity test by using API ZYM, carbon source utilization test by using Biolog.
Characteristic1234
Isolation sourceRice paddy Forest soilSoilThermal aquifer
Cell dimensions (µm)0.5–0.9 × 1.2–2.80.4–0.7 × 1.8–4.20.6–0.65 × 0.9–1.21.06 × 1.5–4.0
Motility++++
Conditions for growth:
Temperature range (°C)15–5015–3725–4525–45
Optimum temperature (°C)40304041
NaCl tolerance (%, w/v)0–0.50–10–7<1.0
pH range6–86–106–126–9
Nitrate reduction−−++
Hydrolysis of gelatin−−−+
Assimilation:
Arabinose−−w+
Citric acid−−+−
Phenylacetic acid−+−−
Enzyme activity:
Alkaline phosphatase++++
Acid phosphatasew+++
Esterase(C4)++++
Esterase lipase (C8)w+++
Lipid enzyme (C14)−−−−
Carbon source utilization:
α-d-Glucose−ww−
D-Fucose−ww−
Fusidic Acid−www
Myo-Inositol−ww−
Minocyclinew−−−
Tetrazolium Violet+www
α-Ketoglutaric Acid−www
Tween 40−w+w
DNA G+C content (%)67.762.267.265.1
Table
Table 2. Fatty acid composition of strain HR1 and closely related species and type species of the genus Microvirga. (Strains: 1. M. thermotolerans HR1 (data from this study); 2. M. flavescens c27j1 (data from this study); 3. M. indica S-MI1b (data from this study); 4. M. subterranean FaiI4 (data from this study); * Summed features are groups of two or three fatty acids, which cannot be separated using the MIDI system. Summed feature 2 contains C12:0 aldehyde and/or unknown ECL 10.9525; summed feature 3 contains C16:1 ω7c/C16:1 ω6c and/or C16:1 ω6c/C16:1 ω7c; summed feature 7 contains C19:1 ω7c/C19:1 ω6c and/or C19:1 ω6c/ω7c/19cy; summed feature 8 contains C18:1 ω7c and/or C18 1 ω6c.
Table 2. Fatty acid composition of strain HR1 and closely related species and type species of the genus Microvirga. (Strains: 1. M. thermotolerans HR1 (data from this study); 2. M. flavescens c27j1 (data from this study); 3. M. indica S-MI1b (data from this study); 4. M. subterranean FaiI4 (data from this study); * Summed features are groups of two or three fatty acids, which cannot be separated using the MIDI system. Summed feature 2 contains C12:0 aldehyde and/or unknown ECL 10.9525; summed feature 3 contains C16:1 ω7c/C16:1 ω6c and/or C16:1 ω6c/C16:1 ω7c; summed feature 7 contains C19:1 ω7c/C19:1 ω6c and/or C19:1 ω6c/ω7c/19cy; summed feature 8 contains C18:1 ω7c and/or C18 1 ω6c.
Fatty Acid1245
C16:08.176.1213.877.09
C17:02.78-0.4612.14
C18:04.572.814.523.67
C17:0 cyclo-2.65-3.46
C19:0 cyclo ω8c16.843.124.5220.46
C20:2 ω6,9c 0.742.12-0.8
11-Methyl C18:1ω7c0.852.65-1.44
C14:0 2-OH 2.03---
C18:0 3-OH 1.482.251.771.26
* Summed feature 22.165.572.962.2
* Summed feature 3 1.362.473.680.84
* Summed feature 72.280.55--
* Summed feature 856.7628.768.4943.72
Table
Table 3. General features of bacterial genomes used in this study.
Table 3. General features of bacterial genomes used in this study.
Strain NameAccession No.LevelContigsN50L50Size (Mb)GC%No. of GenesNo. of ProteinsIsolation
Microvirga massiliensis JC119LN811386Scaffold36556347499.162.785758045Human stool
Microvirga vignae BR3299LCYG01000000Scaffold16599306196.4761.163045674Nodule
Microvirga subterranea DSM 14364QQBB01000000Scaffold3651975345.1565.149754902Thermal aquifer
Microvirga aerophila NBRC 106136BJYU00000000Contig62843211427.3661.672207162Air
Microvirga guangxiensis CGMCC 1.7666FMVJ01000000Scaffold3440738454.7261.445724499Paddy soil
Microvirga lotononidis WSM3557AJUA01000000Scaffold104261220107.0863.169156524Nodule
Microvirga brassicacearum CDVBN77VCMV01000000Scaffold78150733105.2262.349534755Rapeseed
Microvirga ossetica V5/3MCP016616Complete---5.8463.555435265Nodule
Microvirga sp. 17 mud 1-3CP029481Complete---4.46441434001Soil
Microvirga sp. KLBC 81QDAH01000000Scaffold35770985266.8661.365886085Nodule
Microvirga thermotolerans HR1CP045423Complete---3.867.7138753818Soil

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J.; Gao, R.; Chen, Y.; Xue, D.; Han, J.; Wang, J.; Dai, Q.; Lin, M.; Ke, X.; Zhang, W. Isolation and Identification of Microvirga thermotolerans HR1, a Novel Thermo-Tolerant Bacterium, and Comparative Genomics among Microvirga Species. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8010101

AMA Style

Li J, Gao R, Chen Y, Xue D, Han J, Wang J, Dai Q, Lin M, Ke X, Zhang W. Isolation and Identification of Microvirga thermotolerans HR1, a Novel Thermo-Tolerant Bacterium, and Comparative Genomics among Microvirga Species. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(1):101. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8010101

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Jiang, Ruyu Gao, Yun Chen, Dong Xue, Jiahui Han, Jin Wang, Qilin Dai, Min Lin, Xiubin Ke, and Wei Zhang. 2020. "Isolation and Identification of Microvirga thermotolerans HR1, a Novel Thermo-Tolerant Bacterium, and Comparative Genomics among Microvirga Species" Microorganisms 8, no. 1: 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8010101

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop