Next Article in Journal
The Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, and Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis E Virus Infection—A Condition Affecting Immunocompromised Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
Isolation, Identification and Evaluation of the Effects of Native Entomopathogenic Fungi from Côte d’Ivoire on Galleria mellonella
Previous Article in Journal
Natural Antimicrobials for Listeria monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat Meats: Current Challenges and Future Prospects
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization of the Bacterial Microbiome in Natural Populations of Barley Stem Gall Midge, Mayetiola hordei, in Morocco
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Anti-Insect Properties of Penicillium Secondary Metabolites

by
Rosario Nicoletti
1,2,
Anna Andolfi
3,4,
Andrea Becchimanzi
2,4,* and
Maria Michela Salvatore
3,5
1
Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Center for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, 81100 Caserta, Italy
2
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy
3
Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy
4
BAT Center-Interuniversity Center for Studies on Bioinspired Agro-Environmental Technology, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy
5
Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council, 80055 Portici, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(5), 1302; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051302
Submission received: 30 March 2023 / Revised: 13 May 2023 / Accepted: 14 May 2023 / Published: 16 May 2023

Abstract

:
In connection with their widespread occurrence in diverse environments and ecosystems, fungi in the genus Penicillium are commonly found in association with insects. In addition to some cases possibly implying a mutualistic relationship, this symbiotic interaction has mainly been investigated to verify the entomopathogenic potential in light of its possible exploitation in ecofriendly strategies for pest control. This perspective relies on the assumption that entomopathogenicity is often mediated by fungal products and that Penicillium species are renowned producers of bioactive secondary metabolites. Indeed, a remarkable number of new compounds have been identified and characterized from these fungi in past decades, the properties and possible applications of which in insect pest management are reviewed in this paper.

1. Introduction

Insects have a tremendous impact on human welfare in terms of both directly affecting our health and damaging crops and foodstuffs. Until recently, the never-ending struggle against these deleterious animals has mainly relied on the use of insecticides; however, many synthetic chemicals proved to have harmful side effects, calling for the introduction of alternative control tools and strategies. Hence, the exploitation of natural sources that could minimize the undesirable outcomes caused by chemicals to health and the environment has become undeniable. In this respect, all sorts of antagonistic organisms have been considered that could exert a natural pressure on pest populations, including entomopathogenic fungi [1]. This category has been defined to comprise fungi able to cause diseases in insects and to spread at epidemic levels in insect populations. These aptitudes characterize a good number of species, such as Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae, and Lecanicillium-Akanthomyces spp., which today are routinely employed in the biological control of several insects [2,3,4]. However, the effects of fungi on insect pests can go beyond the classical pathogenic interactions, involving fine physiological effects that are modulated by secondary metabolites released in the plant tissues [5,6].
Fungi in the genus Penicillium have also been reported for their entomopathogenic behavior, and some species have been proposed as effective biocontrol agents, such as P. corylophilum and P. janthinellum, against mosquitoes [7]. They are among the most prolific producers of compounds displaying bioactive properties with possible applications in human and veterinary medicine, agriculture, and other fields as antibiotics, antitumor drugs, modulators of the immune system, enzyme inhibitors, etc. [8,9,10,11]. This paper presents an overview of the secondary metabolites of these fungi which have displayed various sorts of anti-insect effects and may be considered for possible exploitation in pest management.

2. Penicillium Species as Insect Associates

Penicillium species (Eurotiomycetes, Aspergillaceae) are widespread in every environment on earth, from desert sands to Antarctica to ocean trenches [8,12,13,14]. Their occurrence in ecosystems is even more pervasive as a result of the ability to establish symbiotic relationships with various organisms [11,15,16]. These features of adaptability and eclecticism reflect a notable taxonomic diversity such that the current number of more than 400 species requires being continuously integrated with new findings and descriptions [13].
Until recently, Penicillium was used to designate the anamorphic stages of species classified in the genera Eupenicillium and Talaromyces. After the adoption of the ‘one fungus, one name’ concept in fungal taxonomy, this genus name has come into general use for all species except for those in the subgenus Biverticillium; in fact, following accurate phylogenetic studies, the latter have been officially separated and are now classified as Talaromyces in the family Trichocomaceae [17]. As a result, biverticillate species, such as P. funiculosum, P. pinophilum, P. purpurogenum and P. rugulosum, which are frequently reported as insect associates [18], have not been considered in this review; moreover, species formerly classified in the genus Eupenicillium are mentioned according to the revised Penicillium nomenclature [17]. While making the recent identifications more reliable, these taxonomic reassessments and the widespread use of DNA sequencing for strain classification have introduced some uncertainty into identifications done in past decades, based exclusively on morphology. Hence, some data collected more than 10 years ago could prove to be incorrect or require revision.
In addition to a series of isolates provisionally identified as Penicillium sp., the examination of the available literature indicates that at least 62 Penicillium species have been identified in association with insects so far (Table 1).
Most of the findings listed in Table 1 refer to isolations from whole insect bodies, which does not allow for advancing reliable hypotheses about a defined symbiotic role. Rather, in most cases, the occurrence of Penicillia can be regarded as deriving from occasional contamination or ingestion. However, some clues about specialization could concern species that were first or exclusively reported as insect associates; this is the case of P. brocae [30], P. mallochii and P. guanacastense [51], P. costaricense and the three species P. camponotum, P. infrabuccatum, and P. fundyense, which so far have only found been in the buccal cavities of carpenter ants (Camponotus spp.: Hymenoptera, Formicidae) [31]. A mutualistic association has been conjectured in the case of two unidentified species isolated from both leaf rolls and the mycangia of females of the leaf-rolling weevil Euops lespedezae (Coleoptera, Attelabidae). In fact, one or the other of these species was isolated from 80% of females, and they proved to be the most dominant fungi in leaf rolls, especially at the egg stage [62]. Later, P. herquei was determined to be the dominant species associated with the congeneric Euops chinensis [15]. Mutualism has been also considered to possibly characterize the systematic occurrence of several Penicillium species in the digestive tracts of kissing bugs (Triatoma spp.: Hemiptera, Reduviidae) [25,50]. On the opposite edge of symbiotic relationships, entomopathogenic aptitude has been documented for some common species, such as P. brevicompactum [29], P. citrinum [39,40], P. corylophilum, P. fellutanum, P. janthinellum, P. viridicatum, and P. waksmanii [7].
The notable taxonomic diversity of insect-associated Penicillia further increases when considering isolations from insect microenvironments or products. For instance, the new species P. apimei, P. fernandesiae, P. meliponae, and P. mellis were identified in Brazil from honey, bee pollen or from inside the nests of the stingless bee Melipona scutellaris (Hymenoptera, Apidae), along with a series of known and more or less infrequent species, namely P. brocae, P. chermesinum, P. citreosulfuratum, P. citrinum, P. echinulonalgiovense, P. fellutanum, P. mallochii, P. paxilli, P. rubens, P. sansahense, P. sclerotiorum, P. shearii, P. singorense, P. steckii, P. sumatrense, and P. wotroi [72]. In addition to bees, the nests of ants, termites, and other social insects have frequently been reported as sources of isolation of Penicillium spp. [73]; however, in these cases, a symbiotic connection is not obvious, considering that these fungi are ubiquitous in soil.

3. Effects on Insect Viability and Development

The above-considered entomopathogenic aptitude disclosed by some Penicillium spp. is thought to be basically related to the capacity by the infectious strains to synthesize bioactive compounds that can help to overcome the defensive barriers provided by the host’s immune system or influence its behavior and fitness [74]. This reasonable hypothesis has stimulated enormous research activity aiming to identify the candidate products that can be credited for these anti-insect properties and can be further investigated for possible application in various fields.

3.1. Crude Culture Extracts

Some reports have been limited to preliminary evidence of insecticidal activity by culture extracts, which has not been followed by the characterization of the bioactive compounds. This is the case with dichloromethane extracts from liquid cultures of P. decumbens and P. oxalicum, displaying insecticidal effects against the large milkweed bug (Oncopeltus fasciatus: Hemiptera, Lygaeidae) in assays in which the insects were maintained in Petri dishes containing a deposit of 500 μg cm−2 of extract; particularly, extracts from cultures in Wickerham broth of P. oxalicum induced 100% mortality [75]. Moreover, as tested for its larvicidal activity on the tobacco cutworm (Spodoptera litura: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) and the southern house mosquito (Culex quinquefasciatus: Diptera, Culicidae), ethyl acetate extract from cultures of a Penicillium strain related to P. chrysogenum induced significant mortality, resulting after dipping of larvae in the extract for 10 s. In greater detail, LC50 of 72.205 mg mL−1 and 94.701 mg mL−1, and LC90 of 282.783 mg mL−1, and 475.049 mg mL−1 were calculated against the two insect species, respectively [76].
Culture filtrates of an unidentified Penicillium strain that is endophytic in the leaves of the scrambling shrub Derris cuneifolia (=D. hancei) caused 100% mortality of second-instar larvae of S. litura in a leaf disc feeding assay and 75.10% mortality of the turnip aphid (Lipaphis erysimi: Hemiptera, Aphididae) in a soaking assay [77]. Three chromatographic fractions from the chloroform extract of the mycelium of another Penicillium strain endophytic in the roots of Derris elliptica showed insecticidal effects against L. erysimi after 48 h of exposure to a concentration of 1 mg mL−1; the induced mortality rates were 57.68%, 63.28%, and 69.74%, respectively [78]. Finally, ethyl acetate extract from the mycelium of an unidentified Penicillium strain displayed insecticidal effects against first to fourth-instar larvae of C. quinquefasciatus and the yellow fever mosquito (Aedes aegypti: Diptera, Culicidae) as assayed at four concentrations (100, 200, 300, and 500 μg mL−1); for the two mosquito species, the mortality data were respectively calculated as LC50 in the ranges of 7–25.2 μg mL−1 and 5.5–6.9 μg mL−1, while LC90 was in the ranges 12.5–41.7 μg mL−1 and 10.4–13.9 μg mL−1 [79].

3.2. Purified Compounds

3.2.1. Mycotoxins

Mycotoxins have been the subject of enormous investigational activity in light of assessing their effects on a variety of organisms. Insects not only provide a model for toxicological studies but also can pose a threat to human and animal health by acting as a vehicle for contamination of foodstuffs with mycotoxin-producing fungi. On the other hand, direct exposure to mycotoxins is considered a factor possibly affecting the spread of insect harriers in foodstuffs. Some storage fungi attract insects as food sources and promote population increases; others produce metabolites with a repellent effect [80]. Indeed, the mycotoxins-insects interaction is quite variable in its effects and calls into question the basic role played by cytochrome P-450 in mycotoxin detoxification [81]. Of course, Penicillium spp. are particularly involved in this biological struggle, with reference to their renowned implications in the contamination of food and feed with mycotoxins, such as citrinin, ochratoxin A, patulin, and more [16].
Mycotoxins (Figure 1) may impact insect physiology in multiple ways. In one of the first studies published on this topic, citrinin was found to be repellent toward the confused flour beetle (Tribolium confusum: Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae) when offered in whole wheat flour; nevertheless, development of the insect was generally promoted by the presence of mycotoxin-producing Penicillia in the flour [82]. In additional studies performed by the same research group, ochratoxin A, citrinin, rubratoxin B, patulin, penicillic acid, and oxalic acid were fed at various concentrations to T. confusum, the cigarette beetle (Lasioderma serricorne: Coleoptera, Ptinidae), and the black carpet beetle (Attagenus megatoma: Coleoptera, Dermestidae) in whole wheat flour. Penicillic and oxalic acids were not toxic to these insects at any concentrations; ochratoxin A and citrinin inhibited larval growth of A. megatoma at 10 and 1000 ppm, respectively, while rubratoxin B had no effect; citrinin and rubratoxin B inhibited larval growth of T. confusum and L. serricorne at 1000 ppm only; and patulin inhibited growth of T. confusum at 1000 ppm, either with or without yeast supplementation in the diet. Moreover, growth of L. serricorne larvae was slower when patulin was added to the diet at any concentration, without yeast. Finally, reproduction of T. confusum was impaired by citrinin, patulin, and ochratoxin A at the highest concentration tested, while only citrinin affected the reproduction of L. serricorne [83]. Further assays were performed by adding the same mycotoxins in 10-fold concentrations to wheat flour administered to the Mediterranean flour moth, Anagasta (=Ephestia) kuhniella (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae), with and without yeast supplementation. Larval growth was inhibited by citrinin, ochratoxin A, patulin, and rubratoxin B; and ochratoxin A (10 ppm), citrinin, and rubratoxin B (100 ppm) caused significant mortality, with no larvae surviving at 1000 ppm citrinin and 100 ppm ochratoxin A; moreover, rubratoxin B decreased fecundity and fertility, especially in diets without yeast, while penicillic acid and oxalic acid had no effects [84].
Dowd [85] evaluated the oral toxicity of several Penicillium mycotoxins, alone and in combination, at naturally occurring levels in the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) and the corn earworm (Helicoverpa zea) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). As considered alone, ochratoxin A and citrinin were the most toxic products to both species, causing abnormalities in the Malpighian tubules. Their synergistic combination was more toxic to S. frugiperda, whereas the combination of ochratoxin A and penicillic acid resulted in greater toxicity to H. zea. In another study by the same author based on a series of tremorgenic mycotoxins, penitrem A caused significant mortality to H. zea at 25 ppm, while treatment with 2.5 ppm of penitrem A and verruculogen reduced the weights of larvae of both H. zea and S. frugiperda after 7 days; larvae of H. zea were also sensitive at 0.25 ppm of penitrem A. Moreover, paxilline was found to affect larval weight and viability, while paspaline did not cause mortality [86].
The new indole-diterpenoid compound penitrem G was isolated from the mycelium of a strain of P. crustosum from corn, along with the already known paspaline and penitrems A–D and F. The latter compounds showed convulsive and insecticidal activities against O. fasciatus and the Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata: Diptera, Tephritidae); in addition, reductions in the fecundity and fertility were observed in C. capitata females treated with a dose of 10 μg. Two functional groups in the penitrem molecule are thought to be implicated in the observed mortality: the chlorine atom seems to be important for the acute mortality, while the epoxy function likely affects the delayed toxicity. In fact, the chlorinated penitrems A, C and F were responsible for the highest acute toxicities, significantly differing from the other non-chlorinated analogues; moreover, penitrems A and F, both possessing an epoxy group, exhibited the highest delayed mortality, while inactivity of penitrem G could depend on the hydroxyl substituent at R3 (Figure 1). Paspaline was also inactive [87].
Another series of indole alkaloids were isolated from extracts obtained using various organic solvents from the sclerotioid ascostromata of an isolate of P. shearii recovered from savannah soil in the Ivory Coast. Along with the novel compounds shearinines A–C, this series included paxilline and a few of its analogues, namely 21-isopentylpaxilline, 7-hydroxy-13-dehydroxypaxilline, 13-dehydroxypaxilline, 2,18-dioxo-2,18-secopaxilline, and paspalinine. All compounds were responsible for reductions in growth and feeding rates as evaluated in dietary assays against H. zea and the dried-fruit beetle (Carpophilus hemipterus: Coleoptera, Nitidulidae), with shearinines A–B being the most potent. Shearinine A also exhibited activity in a topical assay against H. zea, while shearinine B and paxilline caused significant mortality in a leaf disk assay against S. frugiperda [88].
More biosynthetically related indole-diterpenes [89], namely the known janthitrems B–C and the new compounds janthitrems A and D (described as 11,12-epoxyjanthitrems B–C, respectively), were isolated from strains of P. janthinellum recovered from pastures in New Zealand. Similar to paxilline used as a positive control, both the new products reduced the weight gain and food consumption of larvae of the porina moth (Wiseana cervinata: Lepidoptera, Hepialidae) when added to the diet at the doses of 20 and 50 µg g−1, with greater potency shown by janthitrem A [90].
Crude extracts of seven isolates belonging to the species P. brevicompactum, P. citrinum, and P. expansum were assayed for weight reduction and mortality against larvae of the African cotton leafworm (Spodoptera littoralis: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). Five extracts caused significant reductions in weight, and four of them caused significant increases in mortality. A total of 15 secondary metabolites were identified in the extracts, namely brevianamide A, citrinin, cyclopenol, 3,5-dimethyl-6-hydroxyphthalide, 3,5-dimethyl-6-methoxyphthalide, lapidosin, mycophenolic acid, ochratoxin A, patulin, penicillic acid, purpurogenone, rubratoxin B, terrein, viomellein, and xanthocillin. Seven of them were then assayed at 10 ppm against the vinegar fly (Drosophila melanogaster: Diptera, Drosophilidae) for feeding inhibition and against S. littoralis for feeding inhibition and mortality. Significant effects were observed in all three assays for ochratoxin A, brevianamide A, citrinin, and penicillic acid. Moreover, viomellein significantly reduced feeding in D. melanogaster and survival in S. littoralis, and cyclopenol significantly inhibited feeding in both insects but not survival of S. littoralis, while patulin did not cause significant effects. Finally, high levels of feeding inhibition were obtained for brevianamide A and penicillic acid against S. littoralis [91]. Afterward, the same research group reported anti-insect effects against S. frugiperda and the tobacco budworm (Heliothis virescens: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) induced by ochratoxin A from P. verrucosum and brevianamide A and its photolysis product brevianamide D from P. viridicatum. Ochratoxin A and brevianamide A were potent antifeedants against larvae of both species at 1000 ppm, with the latter retaining activity at 100 ppm. Moreover, ochratoxin A caused 100% mortality at 10 ppm against S. frugiperda, while brevianamide D was more effective than brevianamide A at reducing pupal weight [92].

3.2.2. Other Products

Assays on S. frugiperda were also performed to characterize the insecticidal properties of penifulvin A, a sesquiterpene featuring a [5.5.5.6]dioxafenestrane ring that was purified from an isolate of P. griseofulvum from dead wood and was found to cause 74% reduction in the growth rate of larvae when tested at a dietary level of 160 ppm [93]. Moreover, ethyl acetate extracts from fermented rice cultures of two strains colonizing wood-decaying fungi, classified as P. decaturense and P. thiersii, exhibited potent toxicity against S. frugiperda in a dietary assay. Among several novel metabolites possessing anti-insect activity, 15-deoxyoxalicine B and decaturins A–B are characterized by a rare polycyclic structure; the first two compounds were obtained from P. decaturense, while decaturin B was produced by P. thiersii. Treatment with 15-deoxyoxalicine B at 140 ppm resulted in 23% reduction in growth rate, while decaturin A caused 31% reduction at 100 ppm. Despite the structural similarity (Figure 2), decaturin B showed significantly more potent activity, causing 89% growth reduction at 100 ppm [94]. The known analogues oxalicines A and B were also isolated from these strains, along with three new compounds, namely 15-deoxyoxalicine A and decaturins C–D. Potent anti-insect activity was shown against S. frugiperda by oxalicine B, decaturin B, and decaturin D, respectively, causing 62%, 89%, and 77% reductions in growth rate at 100 ppm. Oxalicine A showed comparable activity at this dose and caused 98% growth reduction when tested at a higher level (360 ppm), while decaturin C was less active, causing 28% growth reduction at 80 ppm [95]. Oxalicine B was again purified from butanolic extract of a solid culture of a Penicillium strain from soil, provisionally identified as belonging to the subgenus Furcatum. It was found to induce 82% mortality against the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae: Hemiptera, Aphididae) at 100 ppm, while 32% mortality and weak antifeedant activity resulted at 500 ppm against larvae of the western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis: Thysanoptera, Thripidae) [96].
Five alkaloids from cultures of a soil strain of P. expansum, communesins A–E, displayed insecticidal activity against third-instar larvae of silkworm (Bombyx mori: Lepidoptera, Bombycidae) through oral administration. Communesins B and E respectively exhibited LD50 values of 5 and 80 μg g−1 in the diet, while communesins A, C, and D were less active [97].
Four new xanthene derivatives, penicixanthenes A–D, were isolated from liquid cultures of a Penicillium strain endophytic in the mangrove Ceriops tagal. Penicixanthenes B–C inhibited growth of newly hatched larvae of the cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) with IC50 values of 100 and 200 μg mL−1, respectively; moreover, penicixanthenes A, C and D showed insecticidal activity against freshly hatched larvae of C. quinquefasciatus with LC50 values of 38.5, 11.6 and 20.5 μg mL−1, respectively [98]. The same research group extracted and characterized two new meroterpenoids, penicianstinoids A and B, and eight new isocoumarins, peniciisocoumarins A–H, together with ten known analogues as secondary metabolites of a Penicillium isolate from the mangrove Bruguiera sexangula var. rhynchopetala. Among these compounds, penicianstinoids A–B, peniciisocoumarins A, B, E, F and H, austin, austinol and 1,2-dihydro-7-hydroxydehydroaustin showed growth inhibition activity against newly hatched larvae of H. armigera with IC50 values ranging from 50 to 200 μg mL−1 [99]. Moreover, a new compound obtained from the same strain, penicilactone B, showed insecticidal activity against freshly hatched larvae of C. quinquefasciatus with LC50 of 78.5 μg mL−1 [100]. Two more austin derivatives produced by a soil strain of P. brasilianum (MG-11), namely dehydroaustin and acetoxydehydroaustin, displayed insecticidal activity against A. aegypti; in particular, the first compound was the most active, with LC50 of 2.9 ppm [101].
Significant growth inhibitory properties against newly hatched larvae of H. armigera, with IC50 values in the range of 50–200 µg mL−1, have also been recently reported for secondary metabolites of an isolate of P. oxalicum from roots of the mangrove Lumnitzera littorea, including four new products, namely the cyclopiane diterpenes conidiogenones J–K, the steroid andrastin H, and the alkaloid (Z)-4-(5-acetoxy-N-hydroxy-3-methylpent-2-enamido)butanoate, along with the known compounds demethylincisterol A3, ergosterol, ∆7-sitosterol, (−)-β-sitosterol, 7-deacetoxyyanuthone A, and (1S,5R,6S)-5-hydroxy-4-methyl-1-[(2E,6E)-3,7,11-trimethyl-2,6,10-dodecatrien-1-yl]-7-oxabicyclo [4.1.0]hept-3-en-2-one [102].
A few products of a strain of P. brevicompactum were characterized for insecticidal activity against O. fasciatus, namely 2-(hept-5-enyl)-3-methyl-4-oxo-6,7,8,8a-tetrahydro-4H-pyrrolo [2,1-b]-1,3-oxazine [103], along with some compounds of the paraherquamide family and five known diketopiperazines from the culture broth of a strain of P. cluniae. Paraherquamide E, with LD50 of 0.089 μg, was the most potent product, followed by paraherquamide A; structures of these compounds only differ by the presence of a hydroxyl function in the latter (Figure 2), which was 3.5-fold less active. More in general, comparative structure-activity data indicated that oxidative substitutions in the proline unit of the paraherquamide analogues hinder the insecticidal activity, which conversely is supported by the alkyl substitution [104].
The chloroform and hexane extracts from sclerotioid ascostromata of an isolate of P. gladioli (=Eupenicillium crustaceum) were found to possess significant anti-insect activity in dietary assays on H. zea. The major metabolite responsible for this activity was 10,23-dihydro-24,25-dehydroaflavinine, which was extracted from ascostromata in the amount of 2.8 mg g−1. In assays at 3000 ppm, 42% reduction in feeding rate and 79% reduction in weight increment were observed in larvae of C. hemipterus and H. zea, respectively. New macrophorin-type compounds accounted for the anti-insect activity of ascostromata from another strain of the same species producing no aflavinines, while a strain of P. egyptiacum (=Eupenicillium molle) was found to synthesize both aflavinines and macrophorins. Moreover, a strain of P. (Eupenicillium) reticulisporum produced the aflavinine analogue 10,23-dihydro-24,25-dehydroaflavinine, along with pyripyropene A [105].
Quinolactacide isolated from solid cultures of a soil strain of P. citrinum induced 88% mortality against M. persicae at 250 ppm. This compound is characterized by a peculiar structure, in which a quinolone skeleton is conjugated to a bicyclic moiety consisting of a γ-lactam ring and a pyrrole ring. The nitrogen atom of the piperidone ring is not methylated, unlike those at the corresponding position of the related quinolactacins (cf. Section 4.1), indicating that demethylation of the nitrogen atom affects the insecticidal activity [106].
Finally, insecticidal activity against the melon and cotton aphid (Aphis gossypii: Hemiptera, Aphididae) at the concentration of 1000 ppm has been reported for penicinoline, a novel pyrrolyl 4-quinolinone alkaloid produced by a mangrove endophytic Penicillium strain. In addition to retaining strong activity on this sucking pest, a semi-synthetic lactam obtained through intramolecular dehydration, named penicinotam, also effected total control of the chewing larvae of the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella: Lepidoptera, Plutellidae) at 500 ppm, in addition to displaying some activity on H. virescens at 1000 ppm [107].
The implications of secondary metabolites produced by insect-associated Penicillia may go beyond a direct anti-insect effect. In fact, it has been observed that patulin produced by P. urticae (currently a synonym of P. griseofulvum) inhibits conidia germination and growth of B. bassiana, possibly resulting in an indirect protective effect for insects when strains producing this metabolite occur in the host microbiome [108]. Indeed, many of the aforementioned compounds and more Penicillium secondary metabolites have displayed fungitoxic, antibiotic, and antiviral properties, and they may play protective roles to some extent against entomopathogens [9,11,109,110].

4. Effects on the Nervous System

The anti-insect activity of Penicillium secondary metabolites derives from their impact on different aspects of insect physiology. The nervous system transmits electric signals, providing a rapid means for sensing the environment and coordinating cellular events and movement [111]. These fundamental functions are targeted by most of the chemicals used for insect pest control [112]. In particular, neurotoxic insecticides act at the neuron–neuron and neuromuscular synaptic contacts, where the propagation of the nervous signals relies on neurotransmitters and their receptors. Ion channels in the postsynaptic membrane are opened after binding of the neurotransmitter to the receptor, and a postsynaptic membrane potential develops. A particular synapse is stimulatory or inhibitory depending on the neurotransmitter released. There is evidence that, in the central nervous system, acetylcholine (ACh) is a synaptic transmitter at stimulatory synapses, while γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is an inhibitory transmitter. The chemical transmitters at neuromuscular synapses in insects are l-glutamic acid and possibly l-aspartic acid [113]. Chemical signaling at synapses can be disrupted in many ways by agonists or antagonists of receptors, as well as by inhibitors of the enzymes involved in the turnover of neurotransmitters.

4.1. Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors

Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is an enzyme involved in the termination of neurotransmission at cholinergic synapses by rapid hydrolysis of acetylcholine and other choline esters, which act as neurotransmitters [114]. Inhibition of AChE is the main mechanism of action of several classes of insecticides of both natural [115] and synthetic origin [116,117]. A variety of assays have been developed to measure AChE activity and the inhibitory effects by fungal extracts and purified compounds [118], including Ellman’s method [119], thin layer chromatography bioautography [120], and a combined liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry modified Ellman’s method [121]. Moreover, some laboratories use the QuantiChrom® assay kit, which is based on an improved Ellman’s method in a 96-well plate reader [122]. Otherwise, assessments can be based on the reduction in Vmax values of the enzyme, as in the case of citreoviridin, which is produced by P. citreoviride [123]. Indeed, this kind of bioactivity is commonly investigated in natural product research, considering its multiple applications in agriculture and human medicine [124,125].
In addition to preliminary evidence resulting in studies based on crude culture extracts and their fractions [36,126,127,128,129], more than 60 secondary metabolites purified from Penicillium strains from various sources have been characterized for AChE-inhibitory properties (Figure 3). This long list of compounds displaying a notable chemodiversity is to be integrated with huperzine A, the most valuable AChE-inhibitor of natural origin used as a drug for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease [130]. In fact, this sesquiterpene alkaloid has been reported in several endophytic Penicillium strains associated with the firmoss Huperzia serrata, from which the product was originally described; in particular, a strain phylogenetically related to P. citrinum from Vietnam [131] and strains of P. polonicum [132] and P. griseofulvum from China [126].
As assessed in terms of IC50, the bioactivity of these products ranged from 1 nM for arisugacin A to 280 µM for quinolactacin A1 (Table 2). However, the bioactivity values determined in different laboratories do not always collimate for some compounds (e.g., arisugacins B and D, territrems B and C), implying that results of these assays must be considered provisional until further verification.
First characterized from a strain of Aspergillus fumigatus [133], the meroterpenoid pyripyropene A (PPA) has been also reported to be a secondary metabolite of P. coprobium [134] and a previously mentioned strain of P. reticulisporum [105]. This product represents a fundamental reference for compounds displaying AChE-inhibitory properties, and it has been used as a model for the synthesis of new insecticides [135,136]. More Penicillium secondary metabolites present a structural affinity with PPA, such as the arisugacins and the territrems. The previously mentioned oxalicines and decaturins are also biogenetically related to PPA; however, their scaffold, including a pyridinyl-α-pyrone substructure, likely arises from nicotinic acid, acetate, and terpenoid precursors, into which a diterpenoid unit is incorporated instead of the sesquiterpenoid component found in PPA [95].
Other compounds in Figure 2 belong to different classes, also representing models for insights into the structural properties of AChE-inhibitors. This is the case for anthraquinones, such as aloe-emodin and citrorosein [137], xanthones (e.g., pinseline) [138], and chromones (e.g., maritimin and analogues) [139].
In some cases, the experimental findings have provided indications concerning structure–activity relationships, which are valuable in light of their applicative extension. In the case of arisugacins, the enone moiety, the hydroxy group as a substituent of R5, and the phenyl group substituents (Figure 3) have been considered to play important roles in AChE inhibition [140]. Likewise, the methyl group on the cycloesadienone of penicitrinone H is essential for inhibitory activity when compared with its B analogue [141], while palitantin was reported to be significantly more potent than its analogue 13-hydroxypalitantin [142]. Some quantitative differences have also been found among stereoisomers, such as (+)- and (-)-penicilliumine [143], quinolactacins A1–A2 [144], and penaloidines A–B, which are unprecedented pyridine alkaloids possessing a tetrahydrofuro[3,2-c][2,7]naphthyridinyl scaffold [145].
In the case of territrem B, an in silico molecular docking study was performed, providing a better understanding of the mechanisms of its inhibitory activity. The compound was determined to tightly bind inside the active pocket of AChE in the same way known for the model compound tacrine. In greater detail, the benzene ring with three methoxy groups is considered to stretch into the catalytic pocket consisting of three amino acid residues (His-440, Phe-330 and Ser-200); four hydrogen bonds are established with two of these residues (His-440 and Ser-200) and Gly-118, while the pyrone ring interacts with Phe-330 [146].
Table 2. Secondary metabolites of Penicillium spp. reported for AChE-inhibitory properties.
Table 2. Secondary metabolites of Penicillium spp. reported for AChE-inhibitory properties.
Secondary MetaboliteMethodActivityReferences
Aloe-emodinEllman42.5 µg/mL (IC50)[147]
Arisugacin AEllman0.001 µM (IC50)[133,148,149]
Arisugacin BEllman
Ellman
0.0258 µM (IC50)
3.03 µM (IC50)
[148,149]
[150]
Arisugacin CEllman
Ellman *
2.5 µM (IC50)
1.4 µM (IC50)
[149]
[122]
Arisugacin DEllman
Ellman
3.5 µM (IC50)
53.39 µM (IC50)
[149]
[150]
Arisugacin FEllman 0.37 µM (IC50)[151]
Arisugacin IEllman 0.64 µM (IC50)[151]
Arisugacin LEllman *0.191 µM (IC50)[122]
Arisugacin NEllman *3.9 µM (IC50)[122]
Arisugacin OEllman *4.6 µM (IC50)[122]
Arisugacin PEllman *66 µM (IC50)[122]
5-BromosclerotiorinEllman 200 µg/mL (23.87%)[152]
CitreoroseinEllman40.5 µg/mL (IC50)[147]
Cyclo-(l-Pro–l-Val)Marston 10.0 µg (MIR)[153]
CyclopeninEllman 2.04 µM (IC50)[148]
Dechloroisochromophilone IIMarston 10 ng (MIR)[154]
3′′-Deoxy-6′-O-desmethylcandidusin BEllman 7.8 µM (IC50)[155]
6′-O-Desmethylcandidusin BEllman 5.2 µM (IC50)[155]
Dicitrinin AEllman modified42.0 µM (MIC)[156]
(3R,4R)-3,4-Dihydro-4,6-dihydroxy-3-methyl-1-oxo-1H-isochromene-5-carboxylic acidMarston 3.0 µg (MIR)[157]
(3R,4R)-4,7-DihydroxymelleinMarston 10.0 µg (MIR)[157]
4-(5,7-Dimethoxy-4-oxo-4H-chromen-2-yl)butanoic acidEllman 93.2 µM (IC50)[158]
3-(5,7-Dimethoxy-4-oxo-4H-chromen-2-yl)propanoic acidEllman 50.8 µM (IC50)[158]
3-Epiarisugacin EEllman 38.23 µM (IC50)[150]
4-HydroxymelleinMarston30.0 µg (MIR)[153]
(R)-7-HydroxymelleinMarston 10.0 µg (MIR)[157]
13-HydroxypalitantinEllman 12 µM (IC50)[142]
Isochromophilone IIMarston 50 ng (MIR)[154]
Isochromophilone III Marston10 ng (MIR)[154]
Isochromophilone IVMarston 100 ng (MIR)[154]
Isochromophilone VIIIMarston 50 ng (MIR)[154]
Isocyclocitrinol BEllman modified166.0 µM (MIC)[156]
MaritiminEllman 75.3 µM (IC50)[158]
OchrephiloneMarston 50 ng (MIR)[154]
Orcinol Marston 60.0 µg (MIR)[153]
(+)-PalitantinEllman 0.079 µM (IC50)[142]
Penaloidine AEllman 14.85 µM (IC50)[145]
Penaloidine BEllman 41.27 uM (IC50)[145]
Penicillar BEllman 50 µg/mL (19.5%)[159]
Penicillar CEllman 50 µg/mL (21.3%)[159]
Penicillic acidMarston Not determined [160]
(+)-PenicilliumineEllman50 µM (32.4%)[143]
(−)-PenicilliumineEllman50 µM (18.7%)[143]
PenicinolineEllman 87.3 µM (IC50)[161]
Penicinoline EEllman 68.5 µM (IC50)[161]
Penicitrinol AEllman modified23.0 µM (MIC)[156]
Penicitrinone BEllman38.96 µM (IC50)[141]
Penicitrinone HEllman23.62 µM (IC50)[141]
Penicnthene Ellman28.03 µM (IC50)[141]
Peniopyranone Ellman 0.0152 µM (IC50)[162]
Pileotin BEllman 13.9 µM (IC50)[163]
PinselinEllman45.9 µg/mL[147]
Quinolactacin A1Ellman 280 µM (IC50)[144]
Quinolactacin A2Ellman 19.8 µM (IC50)[144]
SclerotioramineEllman 38.7 µM (IC50)[158]
Sorbiterrin Anot reported25 µg/mL (IC50)[164]
Terreulactone CEllman 0.028 µM (IC50)[150]
Territrem AEllman 0.11 µM (IC50)[165]
Territrem BEllman
Ellman
Ellman
Ellman
0.0076 µM (IC50)
0.00703 µM (IC50)
0.047 µM (IC50)
0.00036 µM (IC50)
[133,148]
[142]
[165]
[146]
Territrem CEllman
Ellman
Ellman
0.0068 µM (IC50)
0.23 µM (IC50)
0.045 µM (IC50)
[133,148]
[150]
[165]
TetrahydrobisvertinoloneEllman 50 µg/mL (51.1%) [166]
Tetrahydrotrichodimer etherEllman 50 µg/mL (55.1%) [166]
MIR: minimum amount required for inhibitory activity; MIC: minimum concentration required for inhibitory activity. * The commercial QuantiChrom® assay kit was employed.
It has been observed that the AChE-inhibitory activity of fungal extracts can be increased by inducing biotic stress following co-inoculation with other fungi [167] or by supplementation of some stimulatory compounds to the growth substrate. For instance, a 100% increase was achieved for an extract from a strain of P. janthinellum when it was grown with procainamide [168]. Moreover, cultivation of an endophytic Penicillium strain with suberanilohydroxamic acid, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, led to the isolation of two pairs of diterpenic meroterpenoids combining features of PPA and decaturins/oxalicines, namely pyrandecaturins A–B and pileotins A–B, among which the latter pair showed AChE-inhibitory activity [163].

4.2. Antagonists of Acetylcholine and γ-Aminobutyric Acid Receptors

In insects, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are the most abundant excitatory post-synaptic receptors and represent selective targets for synthetic neurotoxic insecticides, such as neonicotinoids [169]. In addition to direct neurotoxic effects, the latter may affect brain and midgut functions [170], lifespan [171], development [172], reproduction [173], and immunity [174], even at sublethal doses. These findings suggest that the functions of nAChRs and the impact of neurotoxic products targeting these receptors are not limited to the nervous system, as also pointed out by recent studies [175]. In past decades, many compounds that display potent nAChR agonist and antagonist activity have been identified in extracts obtained from fungi [176], some of which are inherent Penicillium species/strains (Figure 4).
The neurotoxic meroterpenoid austin and its analogues dehydroaustin and acetoxydehydroaustin, found as products of a previously mentioned strain of P. brasilianum (MG-11), induced paralysis in male adult American cockroaches (Periplaneta americana: Blattodea, Blattidae) within 1 h after injection. In laboratory assays performed by means of whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology, austins proved not to behave as agonists of ACh, GABA, or l-glutamate receptors in neurons. When the products were applied before the corresponding ligand, no effect was detected on GABA and l-glutamate; conversely, the reduction in ACh- and epibatidine-induced currents indicated an effect as selective antagonists of nAChRs. In particular, dehydroaustin showed the highest blocking potency for nAChRs, differentially attenuating the peak and slowly desensitizing the current amplitude of ACh-induced responses, in an action mode not competitive with ACh [177]. Previous studies on silkworms had shown that, although none of these compounds affected the motility of the caterpillars when tested alone, they enhanced convulsions induced by verruculogen, another tremorgenic product of the same strain [178].
The binding of GABA to insect receptors elicits a rapid, transient opening of anion-selective ion channels, which is generally inhibitory [179]. These receptors are also the targets of several synthetic insecticides, such as fipronil and endosulfan. Alantrypinone, a spiroquinazoline alkaloid isolated from P. thymicola, was found to act as a selective antagonist for GABA receptors in houseflies (Musca domestica: Diptera, Muscidae). Assays based on a series of synthetic derivatives showed that the amide NHs are important for activity, while removal of indolin-2-one is detrimental [180].
When cultured on okara, which is an insoluble residue of whole soybeans, two soil strains of P. simplicissimum produced a series of novel indole alkaloids with a molecular scaffold based on a seven-ring system, named okaramine A–G and J–R, along with some penitrems. Okaramine A–D, G, and Q showed insecticidal activity when added to the diet of third-instar silkworms at the doses of 8, 0.2, 8, 20, 40, and 8 µg g−1, respectively. Comparative examination of bioactivities indicated an essential role of the azetidine and azocine moieties (Figure 4); the methoxy group as an R3 substituent in okaramine B is also presumed to enhance bioactivity, while the hydroxyl substituent at R2 in okaramine D and the N-dimethylallyl group in okaramine G reduced effectiveness [181,182,183,184,185,186]. Studies performed by patch-clamp electrophysiology showed that okaramine B induces inward currents that reverse close to the chloride equilibrium potential and are blocked by fipronil. As tested on the GABA-gated chloride channel (GABACl) and the l-glutamate-gated chloride channel (GluCl) in silkworms, okaramine B only activated GluCl [187]. Since GluCl is only found in the nervous systems and muscle cells of invertebrates, okaramines could be regarded as a new lead for the development of safe insect-control products [188].
Two more novel compounds isolated by activity-guided fractionation from okara fermented with a soil isolate (JV-379) of P. brasilianum, brasiliamides A–B, were found to induce convulsive effects when added to the diet of silkworms, with ED50 values of 300 and 50 μg g−1, respectively [189].

5. Anti-Juvenile Hormone Activity

Insect metamorphosis is finely regulated by hormones, which are secreted by glands and transported by the circulatory system to other parts of the body, where they evoke physiological responses in target tissues [111]. Juvenile hormone (JH) is a sesquiterpenoid that prevents metamorphosis of insects into the adult stage and is necessary for egg maturation [190]. Any factors inhibiting its synthesis or activity induce precocious interruption of the larval development, determining the formation of abnormal pupae or adults that fail to reproduce [191]. Hence, the discovery of JH inhibitors represents a remarkable target in the search for anti-insect products [192]. So far, several products of Penicillium spp. have been reported for their anti-juvenile hormone activity (Figure 4).
Compactin, also known as mevastatin, is best known for its anticholesterolemic properties, characterizing it as the progenitor of a group of blockbuster pharmaceuticals [193]. This compound was reported to be a secondary metabolite of a few Penicillium species, such as P. brevicompactum and P. citrinum [194], and it represents the first product of these fungi to have disclosed potential as an inhibitor of insect growth and development based on its antijuvenile properties. In fact, it was found to competitively inhibit the activity of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase in homogenates from the corpora allata of the tobacco hornworm (Manduca sexta: Lepidoptera, Sphingidae); more specifically, a KI of 0.9 nM was determined for reductase after treatment with the sodium salt of compactin. In intact corpora allata, JH biosynthesis was inhibited by approximately 50% at 10 nM. As an indication of JH deficiency, darkening of the cuticle was observed following injection of compactin into larvae after ecdysis from the third to the fourth instar [195]. In assays performed on the cabbage armyworm (Mamestra brassicae: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae), the formation of larval–pupal intermediates was observed after injecting 50 μg of compactin in two or three doses, respectively at 9- or 6-h intervals, beginning 18 h before head capsule slippage in the penultimate instar. Later application 6 h after head capsule slippage only inhibited ommochrome synthesis, an effect that could be prevented by simultaneous application of JH-I. The activity of compactin is reversible, considering that JH biosynthesis inhibition only occurs temporarily due to rapid metabolization [196].
Direct incorporation of compactin into the corpora allata of adult females of P. americana inhibited JH-III synthesis. Topical treatment with 100 μg of compactin 12 hr before extirpation of corpora allata resulted in about 50% inhibition of JH-III synthesis when the glands were subsequently cultured in vitro. However, no inhibition of JH synthesis was observed when cockroaches were directly injected [197]. Afterward, similar effects were reported when the product was administered, either free or encapsulated into liposomes, to virgin females of the German cockroach (Blattella germanica: Blattodea, Blattellidae). An ID50 of 10−7 M was estimated for JH synthesis when corpora allata from 6-day-old females were incubated with compactin for 2 h in vitro, an inhibitory effect that persisted for 2 h after treatment. In the case of liposomes containing compactin, significant values of JH inhibition were only induced after prolonged incubation; however, persistence of inhibition was greater in comparison with the non-encapsulated product. Additional experiments showed that compactin moderately inhibited oocyte growth. In fact, administration of the compound in fractionated doses, 3 or 5 × 5 μg, from the third day on the first gonotrophic cycle led to 43% or 28% inhibition, respectively, on day 6. Similar results were obtained for encapsulated compactin, although in this case, a single dose of 5 μg administered on day 3 elicited 26% inhibitory activity. However, neither compactin nor liposomes could inhibit development of the first ootheca in the long term, even if the encapsulated compound caused a significant delay in the gonotrophic cycle when administered at fractionated doses [198].
Two fractions obtained through chromatography of dichloromethane extract from cultures of an isolate of P. brevicompactum showed anti-JH activity. One was active when assayed against third-instar nymphs of O. fasciatus, whereas the other strongly inhibited JH-III biosynthesis in corpora allata from the migratory locust (Locusta migratoria: Orthoptera, Acrididae). Brevioxime was determined as the main component responsible for bioactivity, targeting the final steps of JH-III biosynthesis [199]. Moreover, a new biogenetically related product isolated from the same strain, N-(2-methyl-3-oxodecanoyl)-2-pyrroline, also displayed anti-JH activity on O. fasciatus, inducing precocious metamorphosis in 70% of nymphs treated with a dose of 10 μg [200]. Subsequently, the same research group reported strong anti-JH activity by the analogue N-(2-methyl-3-oxodec-8-enoyl)-2-pyrroline, with ED50 at 0.7 μg as determined in assays on newly molted fourth-instar nymphs [109].
In addition to hormone action, insect development and metamorphosis are greatly influenced by the biochemical processes involved in chitin biosynthesis. Therefore, compounds able to interfere at any step in chitin assemblage represent an obvious target for the development of new insecticides. A series of quinazoline-based diketopiperazines were isolated from a marine strain of P. polonicum and found to be active against chitinases of the Asian corn borer (Ostrinia furnacalis: Lepidoptera, Crambidae), namely the three new polonimides A–C and the known aurantiomides A–C and anacine. Particularly, these compounds displayed strong activity against GH18 chitinase, along with weak inhibitory effects toward GH20 β-N-acetyl-d-hexosaminidase at a concentration of 10.0 μM, with inhibition rates ranging between 79.1–95.4% and 0.7–10.3%, respectively. The authors of this study also provided insights into the binding mode of these compounds based on molecular docking, obtaining some clues about the structure–activity relationships. In greater detail, the methoxy group in polonimide A could weaken the inhibitory activity compared to aurantiomide C; moreover, the double bond in the Z configuration improved the activity of aurantiomide C compared to polonimide B, indicating a direct influence of the geometry of the double bond [201].

6. Effects on Immune Response

Insect immune responses represent an emerging target for developing new control strategies based on reducing immunocompentence to enhance the action of entomopathogens used as bioinsecticides, such as Bacillus thuringiensis and B. bassiana [202]. When an entomopathogen overcomes the physical barriers of the insect host, the cellular immune response is rapidly activated through the processes of phagocytosis, nodulation, and encapsulation by hemocytes. These reactions are usually accompanied by the release of coagulating and melanizing agents, which promote wound closure and antibiosis against the invading organisms [113]. The coevolutionary arms race between fungal entomopathogens and their hosts has led to the diversification of sophisticated strategies to counter insect immune defenses [203]. Secondary metabolites are part of such strategies, with their effects on cellular and humoral responses by the host during infection [204,205].
Being involved in melanization and wound healing, phenoloxidase (PO) plays a fundamental role in the defense reactions of insects against pathogens and parasites [206]. In fact, this enzyme generates quinone compounds and other reactive intermediates, which are effective in immobilizing and killing the invaders [207]. One of the best-known examples of a PO inhibitor is represented by kojic acid (Figure 4), which has been reported as a secondary metabolite in many fungal genera, including Penicillium [208]. This compound induced 50% inhibition of activity of hemolymph serum PO from larvae of S. littoralis at a concentration of 135 μM [209]. Moreover, at 10−1 M, kojic acid inhibited PO activity in the cuticle and hemolymph of S. frugiperda by 80%, and significant inhibition (35–40%) was still detectable at 10−4 M. Inhibition of PO activity by kojic acid was also observed in H. zea, L. serricorne, and the Freeman sap beetle (Carpophilus freemani: Coleoptera, Nitidulidae), while it was much less effective against greenhouse whiteflies (Trialeurodes vaporariorum: Heteroptera, Aleyrodidae) [210].
Kojic acid also proved to disrupt the development of the pumpkin fruit fly (Zeugodacus tau: Diptera, Tephritidae) by acting as an effective competitive inhibitor of PO. When larvae were fed a diet with 1.66% kojic acid added, the levels of ZtPPO1 transcripts, which are highly expressed during larval–prepupal transition and in the hemolymph, significantly increased by 2.79 and 3.39 fold in the whole larvae and cuticle, respectively, while the corresponding PO activity was significantly reduced; in addition, the larval and pupal instar durations were significantly prolonged, the pupal weights were lower, and abnormal phenotypes originated [211].
More Penicillium secondary metabolites would deserve circumstantial investigations concerning their inhibitory properties against PO and other enzymes involved in the immune response, as well as the plasma hemolymph components. Recently, citrinin from P. aurantiogriseum has been reported to induce effects on PO activity, hemocytes, and total hemolymph protein in fifth-instar nymphs of the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria: Orthoptera, Acrididae) up to 9 days post-application. The treated nymphs revealed fluctuations in the mean plasmatocyte, lymphocyte, granulocyte, and total hemocyte counts, along with alteration of PO titers at all intervals after infection [23]. Other products could have more general effects on the immune system. This is the case with phoenicin, a dimer deriving from two 2-hydroxy-6-methyl-benzoquinones, which is produced by several Penicillium species in the sections Charlesia, Citrina and Exilicaulis [212,213]; in fact, it is structurally related to oosporein, a bibenzoquinone product typical of Beauveria spp., which is known to possess immunosuppressive properties toward insects [204,214].

7. Behavioral Effects

Many smart approaches to pest control address the manipulation of insect behavior through the use of semiochemicals. These signaling molecules, which are emitted from host plants or other potential partners, and received by olfactory organs, may lure insects to a bait (‘pull’), or repel them from potential host plants or animals (‘push’). Within this framework, many natural compounds, such as pheromones, plant volatiles, essential oils, and proteins, can be used as insect attractants or repellents [215].
The azadirachtins, tetranortriterpene limonoids typical of the neem tree (Azadirachta indica) and related species among the Meliaceae, are a well-known example of a natural insecticide, which basically acts as an antifeedant and growth disruptor. Interestingly, a neem endophytic strain of P. parvum was reported to produce azadirachtins A–B [216]. Likewise, the pyranone compounds phomopsolides A–B, known as feeding deterrents for elm bark beetles (Scolytus spp.: Coleoptera, Scolytinae), have been extracted from liquid cultures of an unidentified Penicillium strain endophytic in the Pacific yew (Taxus brevifolia) [217] and a strain of P. clavigerum associated with the green alga Chlorella vulgaris [218].
Xanthomegnin and the already mentioned viomellein are bis-naphthoquinones known as products of several Penicillium species [219]. The deterrent effects of these mycotoxins were tested in a food choice experiment by adding them to bakery yeast offered to the springtail Folsomia candida (Collembola, Isotomidae). At the level of 10 mg g−1, the springtails avoided yeast containing either viomellein or xanthomegnin, and no insects were feeding after 20 min of exposure; at a lower level (2 mg g−1), the deterrent effects were less noticeable, even if still significant [220].
Known to play a role in inter- and intraspecific communication in many organisms, including insects, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) already have practical application as attractants/deterrents with the aim of disrupting this remote signaling. Products in this category have also been reported from Penicillium species associated with plants and insects [44]. This is the case of an isolate of P. expansum from the frass and feces of the pine weevil (Hylobius abietis: Coleoptera, Curculionidae). VOCs produced by this strain in cultures on sterilized pine frass medium were collected by solid phase micro-extraction; styrene and 3-methylanisole were found to be the major products through GC-MS analysis. In particular, large quantities of styrene were produced when the fungus was cultured on grated pine bark with yeast extract. In a multi-choice arena test, styrene significantly reduced the attraction of male and female weevils to pieces of pine twigs, whereas 3-methylanisole only reduced the attraction of males [48].
VOCs emitted by strains of several Penicillium species, namely P. expansum, P. solitum, P. crustosum, P. polonicum and P. maximae, caused repellent and toxic effects on Drosophila larvae and adults [221]. Low concentrations of the vapor form of several eight carbon compounds, including oxylipins and 1-octen-3-ol, were found to be toxic to D. melanogaster in previous studies [222,223,224]. In particular, 1-octen-3-ol selectively induced behavioral alterations upon affection of dopaminergic neurons and inflammatory responses in hemocytes [225,226]. Moreover, geosmin, known as a volatile product of several Penicillium spp. [219], was determined to be an ecological stimulus that alerts Drosophila flies to the presence of harmful microbes. In fact, this compound activates a single class of sensory neurons expressing the olfactory receptor Or56a. These neurons connect to projection neurons that respond exclusively to geosmin, with an aversive effect that overcomes inputs from other olfactory pathways and inhibits positive chemotaxis, feeding, and oviposition. Hence, the geosmin detection system enables flies to identify unsuitable feeding and breeding sites [227]. Conversely, rather than being aversive, geosmin was found to mediate egg-laying site selection in A. aegypti; female mosquitoes likely associate geosmin with the availability of microbes representing the food sources of larvae, supporting possible use of this compound as attractant in baits [228].
Gravid females of the oriental fruit fly (Bactrocera dorsalis: Diptera, Tephritidae) were found to be attracted by VOCs emitted by a strain of P. citrinum. After finding the fungus in the intestinal tracts throughout all larval stages, a mutualistic association between the two organisms based on nutritional supplementation was postulated, which could be considered a possible target in control programs [229]. Likewise, three Penicillium species, namely P. citrinum, P. sumatrense, and P. digitatum, were found to influence the oviposition selection and behavior of the yellow peach moth (Conogethes punctiferalis: Lepidoptera, Crambidae). When comparing infected with non-infected, mechanically damaged apples and strains of the three Penicillium species cultured on potato dextrose agar, both the oviposition selection and four-arm olfactometer experiments showed that mated moth females preferred apples infected by the fungi. Further GC-MS analyses of VOCs showed that the absolute contents of ethyl hexanoate and (Z,E)-α-farnesene in the presence of these fungal isolates were higher than those in non-infected apples; a total of 16 novel VOCs were detected in apples infected by fungi, demonstrating a change in the components and proportions of apple VOCs. This finding paves the way for the development of new field trapping strategies to be adopted in the management of C. punctiferalis [230]. In another study by the same research group, a repellent effect on mated females of this moth, which is also a pest of maize, was observed by VOCs produced by P. oxalicum. Since the latter is known as a pathogen causing maize ear rot, possible effects on the phytosanitary conditions of this crop may be derived as a consequence of the natural interaction between these two organisms [231].

8. Conclusions

The examination of the pertinent literature points out a widespread occurrence of Penicillium species/strains in association with insects from most orders, as well as various ecological contexts and geographical areas. Although this finding is in line with the known ubiquity of these micromycetes, the aptitude of these fungi as producers of secondary metabolites disclosing anti-insect properties stimulates a more accurate consideration of their ecological role and the real effects of these symbiotic interactions. In particular, the diffuse endophytic association of Penicillia with plants has increasingly emerged in past decades [11,232]; it is indicative of a possible direct impact on herbivorous insects, which deserves to be thoroughly investigated.
More than 150 compounds belonging to several chemical classes have been reported from Penicillium spp. and considered in our overview, confirming chemodiversity as a notable feature of these fungi. However, in most instances, the assessment of their effects has been undertaken following a general intent to detect any bioactivity or the propensity of single laboratories for investigations concerning a specific mode of action. Indeed, most of the available data are partial or fragmentary and do not offer an exhaustive appreciation of the real potential of the compounds and the producing strains in insect pest management. In this respect, the establishment of definite protocols to be followed in the aim of providing a more circumstantial account of the anti-insect properties for both new and old products could result in substantial progress in view of applicative perspectives. Following the example of pyripyropene A, the expectation is great that multiple products could be selected as new leads for the development of ecofriendly insecticides.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.N.; resources, R.N. and M.M.S.; data curation, A.B. and M.M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, R.N. and A.B.; writing—review and editing, R.N., A.B. and M.M.S.; supervision, A.A.; funding acquisition, A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was performed within the Agritech National Research Center and received funding from the European Union Next-Generation EU (PIANO NAZIONALE DI RIPRESA E RESILIENZA (PNRR)—MISSIONE 4 COMPONENTE 2, INVESTIMENTO 1.4—D.D. 1032 17/06/2022, CN00000022). This manuscript reflects only the authors’ views and opinions; neither the European Union nor the European Commission can be considered responsible for them.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Berestetskiy, A.; Hu, Q. The chemical ecology approach to reveal fungal metabolites for arthropod pest management. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. McKinnon, A.C.; Saari, S.; Moran-Diez, M.E.; Meyling, N.V.; Raad, M.; Glare, T.R. Beauveria bassiana as an endophyte: A critical review on associated methodology and biocontrol potential. BioControl 2017, 62, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Peng, Z.-Y.; Huang, S.-T.; Chen, J.-T.; Li, N.; Wei, Y.; Nawaz, A.; Deng, S.-Q. An update of a green pesticide: Metarhizium anisopliae. All Life 2022, 15, 1141–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nicoletti, R.; Becchimanzi, A. Endophytism of Lecanicillium and Akanthomyces. Agriculture 2020, 10, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shikano, I. Evolutionary ecology of multitrophic interactions between plants, insect herbivores and entomopathogens. J. Chem. Ecol. 2017, 43, 586–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Francis, F.; Fingu-Mabola, J.C.; Ben Fekih, I. Direct and endophytic effects of fungal entomopathogens for sustainable aphid control: A review. Agriculture 2022, 12, 2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. da Costa, G.L.; Lage de Moraes, A.M.; de Oliveira, P.C. Pathogenic action of Penicillium species on mosquito vectors of human tropical diseases. J. Basic Microbiol. 1998, 38, 337–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ashtekar, N.; Anand, G.; Thulasiram, H.V.; Rajeshkumar, K.C. Genus Penicillium: Advances and application in the modern era. In New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 201–213. [Google Scholar]
  9. Nicoletti, R.; Buommino, E.; De Filippis, A.; Lopez-Gresa, M.P.; Manzo, E.; Carella, A.; Petrazzuolo, M.; Tufano, M.A. Bioprospecting for antagonistic Penicillium strains as a resource of new antitumor compounds. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 24, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nicoletti, R. Antitumor and Immunomodulatory Compounds from Fungi. In Encyclopedia of Mycology, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 683–709. [Google Scholar]
  11. Toghueo, R.M.K.; Boyom, F.F. Endophytic Penicillium species and their agricultural, biotechnological, and pharmaceutical applications. 3 Biotech 2020, 10, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vinale, F.; Salvatore, M.M.; Nicoletti, R.; Staropoli, A.; Manganiello, G.; Venneri, T.; Borrelli, F.; DellaGreca, M.; Salvatore, F.; Andolfi, A. Identification of the main metabolites of a marine-derived strain of Penicillium brevicompactum using LC and GC MS techniques. Metabolites 2020, 10, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Houbraken, J.; Kocsubé, S.; Visagie, C.M.; Yilmaz, N.; Wang, X.-C.; Meijer, M.; Kraak, B.; Hubka, V.; Bensch, K.; Samson, R.A.; et al. Classification of Aspergillus, Penicillium, Talaromyces and related genera (Eurotiales): An overview of families, genera, subgenera, sections, series and species. Stud. Mycol. 2020, 95, 5–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Visagie, C.M.; Houbraken, J.; Frisvad, J.C.; Hong, S.-B.; Klaassen, C.H.W.; Perrone, G.; Seifert, K.A.; Varga, J.; Yaguchi, T.; Samson, R.A. Identification and nomenclature of the genus Penicillium. Stud. Mycol. 2014, 78, 343–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, X.; Guo, W.; Wen, Y.; Solanki, M.K.; Ding, J. Transmission of symbiotic fungus with a nonsocial leaf-rolling weevil. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2016, 19, 619–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Salvatore, M.M.; Carraturo, F.; Salbitani, G.; Rosati, L.; De Risi, A.; Andolfi, A.; Salvatore, F.; Guida, M.; Carfagna, S. Biological and metabolic effects of the association between the microalga Galdieria sulphuraria and the fungus Penicillium citrinum. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yilmaz, N.; Visagie, C.M.; Houbraken, J.; Frisvad, J.C.; Samson, R.A. Polyphasic taxonomy of the genus Talaromyces. Stud. Mycol. 2014, 78, 175–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nicoletti, R.; Becchimanzi, A. Talaromyces–Insect relationships. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Poitevin, C.G.; Porsani, M.V.; Poltronieri, A.S.; Zawadneak, M.A.C.; Pimentel, I.C. Fungi isolated from insects in strawberry crops act as potential biological control agents of Duponchelia fovealis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2018, 53, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Teixeira, M.F.N.P.; Souza, C.R.; Morais, P.B. Diversity and enzymatic capabilities of fungi associated with the digestive tract of larval stages of a shredder insect in cerrado and Amazon forest, Brazil. Braz. J. Biol. 2022, 82, e260039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Gambino, P.; Thomas, G.M. Fungi associated with two Vespula (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) species. Pan-Pac. Entomol. 1988, 64, 107–113. [Google Scholar]
  22. Brooks, D.L. Entomogenous Fungi of Corn Insects in Iowa; Iowa State University: Ames, Iowa, 1962. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rashad, E.M.; Rashed, S.S.; Helal, G.A.; Hashem, F.M. Influence of Penicillium aurantiogriseum and its mycotoxin citrinin on haemolymph of Schistocerca gregaria (Forskål). Middle East J. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 673–682. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ismail, M.A.; Abdel-Sater, M.A. Fungi associated with the Egyptian cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis Boisdoval. Mycopathologia 1993, 124, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Moraes, A.M.L.; Junqueira, A.C.V.; Costa, G.L.; Celano, V.; Oliveira, P.C.; Coura, J.R. Fungal flora of the digestive tract of 5 species of triatomines vectors of Trypanosoma cruzi, Chagas 1909. Mycopathologia 2001, 151, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Heo, I.; Hong, K.; Yang, H.; Lee, H.B.; Choi, Y.-J.; Hong, S.-B. Diversity of Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Talaromyces species isolated from freshwater environments in Korea. Mycobiology 2019, 47, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Turesson, G. The toxicity of moulds to the honeybee and the cause of bee paralysis. Svensk. Bot. Tidskr. 1917, 11, 33–38. [Google Scholar]
  28. Park, J.M.; You, Y.-H.; Back, C.-G.; Kim, H.-H.; Ghim, S.-Y.; Park, J.-H. Fungal load in Bradysia agrestis, a phytopathogen-transmitting insect vector. Symbiosis 2018, 74, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Müller-Kögler, E.; Huger, A. Wundinfektionen Bei Raupen von Malacosoma neustria (L.) Durch Penicillium brevi-compactum Dierckx. Zeit. Angew. Entomol. 1960, 45, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Peterson, S.W.; Pérez, J.; Vega, F.E.; Infante, F. Penicillium brocae, a new species associated with the coffee berry borer in Chiapas, Mexico. Mycologia 2003, 95, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Visagie, C.M.; Renaud, J.B.; Burgess, K.M.N.; Malloch, D.W.; Clark, D.; Ketch, L.; Urb, M.; Louis-Seize, G.; Assabgui, R.; Sumarah, M.W.; et al. Fifteen new species of Penicillium. Persoonia 2016, 36, 247–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. da Costa, G.L.; de Oliveira, P.C. Penicillium species in mosquitoes from two Brazilian regions. J. Basic Microbiol. 1998, 38, 343–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Burnside, C.E. Saprophytic fungi associated with the honey bee. Bee World 1929, 10, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gilliam, M.; Prest, D.B. Fungi isolated from the intestinal contents of foraging worker honey bees, Apis mellifera. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 1972, 20, 101–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gilliam, M.; Prest, D.B.; Morton, H.L. Fungi isolated from honey bees, Apis mellifera, fed 2, 4-D and antibiotics. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 1974, 24, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rodrigues, K.F.; Costa, G.L.; Carvalho, M.P.; Epifanio, R. de A. Evaluation of extracts produced by some tropical fungi as potential cholinesterase inhibitors. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 21, 1617–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yamoah, E.; Jones, E.E.; Weld, R.J.; Suckling, D.M.; Waipara, N.; Bourdôt, G.W.; Hee, A.K.W.; Stewart, A. Microbial population and diversity on the exoskeletons of four insect species associated with gorse (Ulex europaeus L.). Australian J. Entomol. 2008, 47, 370–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Russell, B.M.; Kay, B.H.; Shipton, W. Survival of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) eggs in surface and subterranean breeding sites during the Northern Queensland dry season. J. Med. Entomol. 2001, 38, 441–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sen, S.K.; Jolly, M.S.; Jammy, T.R. A mycosis in the Indian tasar silkworm, Antheraea mylitta Drury, caused by Penicillium citrinum Thom. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 1970, 15, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Maketon, M.; Amnuaykanjanasin, A.; Kaysorngup, A. A rapid knockdown effect of Penicillium citrinum for control of the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus in Thailand. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 30, 727–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Betts, A.D. The Fungi of the Bee-Hive; Cornell University Library: London, UK, 1912. [Google Scholar]
  42. Moraes, A.M.L.; de Figueiredo, A.R.; Junqueira, A.C.V.; da Costa, G.L.; Aguiar, R.K.; de Oliveira, P.C. Fungal flora of the digestive tract of Panstrongylus megistus (Reduviidae) used for experimental xenodiagnosis of Trypanosoma (Schizotripanum) cruzi Chagas, 1909. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2001, 18, 79–82. [Google Scholar]
  43. Foo, K.; Sathiya Seelan, J.S.; Dawood, M.M. Microfungi associated with Pteroptyx bearni (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) eggs and larvae from Kawang river, Sabah (Northern Borneo). Insects 2017, 8, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Azeem, M.; Terenius, O.; Rajarao, G.K.; Nagahama, K.; Nordenhem, H.; Nordlander, G.; Borg-Karlson, A.-K. Chemodiversity and biodiversity of fungi associated with the pine weevil Hylobius abietis. Fungal Biol. 2015, 119, 738–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Vecchi, M.A. La microflora dell’ape mellifica. Microbiol. Enzimol. 1959, 9, 73–86. [Google Scholar]
  46. Batra, L.R.; Batra, S.W.T.; Bohart, G.E. The mycoflora of domesticated and wild bees (Apoidea). Mycopathol. Mycol. Appl. 1973, 49, 13–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Taniwaki, M.H.; Pitt, J.I.; Iamanaka, B.T.; Massi, F.P.; Fungaro, M.H.P.; Frisvad, J.C. Penicillium excelsum sp. nov from the Brazil nut tree ecosystem in the Amazon basin’. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Azeem, M.; Rajarao, G.K.; Nordenhem, H.; Nordlander, G.; Borg-Karlson, A.K. Penicillium expansum volatiles reduce pine weevil attraction to host plants. J. Chem. Ecol. 2013, 39, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jaber, S.; Mercier, A.; Knio, K.; Brun, S.; Kambris, Z. Isolation of fungi from dead Arthropods and identification of a new mosquito natural pathogen. Parasit. Vectors 2016, 9, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Marti, G.A.; García, J.J.; Cazau, M.C.; López Lastra, C.C. Fungal flora of the digestive tract of Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) from Argentina. Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 2007, 42, 175–179. [Google Scholar]
  51. Rivera, K.G.; Díaz, J.; Chavarría-Díaz, F.; Garcia, M.; Urb, M.; Thorn, R.G.; Louis-Seize, G.; Janzen, D.H.; Seifert, K.A. Penicillium mallochii and P. guanacastens, two new species isolated from Costa Rican caterpillars. Mycotaxon 2012, 119, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xu, B.; Zou, K.; Cheng, F. Alkaloids from Penicillium oxalicum, a fungus residing in Acrida cinerea. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 881–883, 442–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kataria, S.K.; Singh, P.; Pandove, G.; Kalia, A.; Chandi, R.S. Penicillum oxalicum Spg1: A novel entomopathogenic fungus isolated from mummified Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) of cotton. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2018, 10, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lamsal, K.; Kim, S.W.; Naeimi, S.; Adhikari, M.; Yadav, D.R.; Kim, C.; Lee, H.B.; Lee, Y.S. Three new records of Penicillium species isolated from insect specimens in Korea. Mycobiology 2013, 41, 116–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Siedlecki, I.; Gorczak, M.; Okrasińska, A.; Wrzosek, M. Chance or necessity—The fungi co-occurring with Formica polyctena ants. Insects 2021, 12, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Dângelo, R.A.C.; de Souza, D.J.; Mendes, T.D.; da Cruz Couceiro, J.; Della Lucia, T.M.C. Actinomycetes inhibit filamentous fungi from the cuticle of Acromyrmex leafcutter ants. J. Basic Microbiol. 2016, 56, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Calderón, R.A.; Rivera, G.; Sánchez, L.A.; Zamora, L.G. Chalkbrood (Ascosphaera apis) and some other fungi associated with africanized honey bees (Apis mellifera) in Costa Rica. J. Apic. Res. 2004, 43, 187–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Fernández-Marín, H.; Zimmerman, J.K.; Nash, D.R.; Boomsma, J.J.; Wcislo, W.T. Reduced biological control and enhanced chemical pest management in the evolution of fungus farming in ants. Proc. Royal Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 276, 2263–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Skou, J.-P.; Nørgaard Holm, S.; Haas, H. Preliminary investigations on diseases in bumble-bees (Bombus Latr.). In Yearbook 1963; Royal Veterinary and Agricultural College: Copenhagen, Denmark, 1963; pp. 27–41. [Google Scholar]
  60. Lamboni, Y.; Hell, K. Propagation of mycotoxigenic fungi in maize stores by post-harvest insects. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2009, 29, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kakinuma, N.; Iwai, H.; Takahashi, S.; Hamano, K.; Yanagisawa, T.; Nagai, K.; Tanaka, K.; Suzuki, K.; Kirikae, F.; Kirikae, T.; et al. Quinolactacins A, B and C: Novel quinolone compounds from Penicillium sp. EPF-6 I. Taxonomy, production, isolation and biological properties. J. Antibiot. 2000, 53, 1247–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kobayashi, C.; Fukasawa, Y.; Hirose, D.; Kato, M. Contribution of symbiotic mycangial fungi to larval nutrition of a leaf-rolling weevil. Evol. Ecol. 2008, 22, 711–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Batra, S.W.T. Social Behavior and nests of some nomiine bees in India (Hymenoptera, Halictidæ). Ins. Soc 1966, 13, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zarrin, M.; Vazirianzadeh, B.; Solary, S.; Mahmoudabadi, A.Z.; Rahdar, M. Isolation of fungi from housefly (Musca domestica) in Ahwaz, Iran. Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2007, 23, 917–919. [Google Scholar]
  65. Rosa, E.; Ekowati, C.N.; Handayani, T.T.; Ikhsanudin, A.; Apriliani, F.; Arifiyanto, A. Characterization of entomopathogenic fungi as a natural biological control of American cockroaches (Periplaneta americana). Biodiversitas 2020, 21, 5276–5282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Henriques, J.; Inácio, L.; Sousa, E. Fungi associated to Platypus cylindrus Fab. (Coleoptera: Platypodidae) in cork oak. Rev. Ciências Agr. 2009, 32, 56–66. [Google Scholar]
  67. Zoberi, M.H.; Grace, J.K. Fungi associated with the subterranean termite Reticulitermes flavipes in Ontario. Mycologia 1990, 82, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Luz, C.; Tai, M.H.H.; Santos, A.H.; Rocha, L.F.N.; Albernaz, D.A.S.; Silva, H.H.G. Ovicidal activity of entomopathogenic hyphomycetes on Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) under laboratory conditions. J. Med. Entomol. 2007, 44, 799–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kumari, P.; Sivadasan, R.; Jose, A. Microflora associated with the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J. Agr. Technol. 2011, 7, 1625–1631. [Google Scholar]
  70. Balogun, S.A.; Fagade, O.E. Entomopathogenic fungi in population of Zonocerus variegatus (l) in Ibadan, South West, Nigeria. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2004, 3, 382–386. [Google Scholar]
  71. Cruz, J.S.; da Costa, G.L.; Villar, J.D.F. Biological activities of crude extracts from Penicillium waksmanii isolated from mosquitoes vectors of tropical diseases. World J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 5, 90–102. [Google Scholar]
  72. Barbosa, R.N.; Bezerra, J.D.P.; Souza-Motta, C.M.; Frisvad, J.C.; Samson, R.A.; Oliveira, N.T.; Houbraken, J. New Penicillium and Talaromyces species from honey, pollen and nests of stingless bees. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2018, 111, 1883–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Guswenrivo, I.; Nagao, H.; Lee, C.Y. The diversity of soil fungus in and around termite mounds of Globitermes sulphureus (Haviland) (Blattodea: Termitidae) and response of subterranean termite to fungi. In Sustainable Future for Human Security; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 37–52. [Google Scholar]
  74. Holighaus, G.; Rohlfs, M. Fungal Allelochemicals in insect pest management. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 5681–5689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Santamarina, M.P.; Roselló, J.; Llacer, R.; Sanchis, V. Antagonistic activity of Penicillium oxalicum Corrie and Thom, Penicillium decumbens Thom and Trichoderma harzianum Rifai isolates against fungi, bacteria and insects. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2002, 19, 99–103. [Google Scholar]
  76. Arunthirumeni, M.; Vinitha, G.; Shivakumar, M.S. Antifeedant and larvicidal activity of bioactive compounds isolated from entomopathogenic fungi Penicillium sp. for the control of agricultural and medically important insect pest (Spodoptera litura and Culex quinquefasciatus). Parasit. Int. 2023, 92, 102688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Huang, X.; Luo, J.; Hu, M.; Liang, Y.; Ye, X.; Zhong, G. Isolation and bioactivity of endophytic fungi in Derris hancei. J. South China Agr. Univ. 2009, 30, 44–47. [Google Scholar]
  78. Hu, M.Y.; Zhong, G.H.; Sun, Z.T.; Sh, G.; Liu, H.M.; Liu, X.Q. Insecticidal activities of secondary metabolites of endophytic Pencillium sp. in Derris elliptica Benth. J. Appl. Entomol. 2005, 129, 413–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ragavendran, C.; Manigandan, V.; Kamaraj, C.; Balasubramani, G.; Prakash, J.S.; Perumal, P.; Natarajan, D. Larvicidal, histopathological, antibacterial activity of indigenous fungus Penicillium sp. against Aedes aegypti L and Culex quinquefasciatus (Say) (Diptera: Culicidae) and its acetylcholinesterase inhibition and toxicity assessment of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 427. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  80. Magan, N.; Hope, R.; Cairns, V.; Aldred, D. Post-harvest fungal ecology: Impact of fungal growth and mycotoxin accumulation in stored grain. In Epidemiology of Mycotoxin Producing Fungi; Xu, X., Bailey, J.A., Cooke, B.M., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 723–730. [Google Scholar]
  81. Berenbaum, M.R.; Bush, D.S.; Liao, L.-H. Cytochrome P450-mediated mycotoxin metabolism by plant-feeding insects. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2021, 43, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Wright, V.F.; Harein, P.K.; Collins, N.A. Preference of the confused flour beetle for certain Penicillium isolates 1. Environ. Entomol. 1980, 9, 213–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wright, V.F.; De Las Casas, E.; Harein, P.K. Evaluation of Penicillium mycotoxins for activity in stored-product Coleoptera 1. Environ. Entomol. 1980, 9, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wright, V.F.; Harein, P.K. Effects of some mycotoxins on the Mediterranean flour moth. Environ. Entomol. 1982, 11, 1043–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Dowd, P.F. Toxicity of naturally occurring levels of the Penicillium mycotoxins citrinin, ochratoxin a, and penicillic acid to the corn earworm, Heliothis zea, and the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ. Entomol. 1989, 18, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Dowd, P.F.; Cole, R.J.; Vesonder, R.F. Toxicity of selected tremorgenic mycotoxins and related compounds to Spodoptera frugiperda and Heliothis zea. J. Antib. 1988, 41, 1868–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. González, M.C.; Lull, C.; Moya, P.; Ayala, I.; Primo, J.; Primo Yufera, E. Insecticidal activity of penitrems, including penitrem G, a new member of the family isolated from Penicillium crustosum. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 2156–2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Belofsky, G.N.; Gloer, J.B.; Wicklow, D.T.; Dowd, P.F. Antiinsectan alkaloids: Shearinines A-C and a new paxilline derivative from the ascostromata of Eupenicillium shearii. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 3959–3968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Nicholson, M.J.; Eaton, C.J.; Stärkel, C.; Tapper, B.A.; Cox, M.P.; Scott, B. Molecular cloning and functional analysis of gene clusters for the biosynthesis of indole-diterpenes in Penicillium crustosum and P. janthinellum. Toxins 2015, 7, 2701–2722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Babu, J.V.; Popay, A.J.; Miles, C.O.; Wilkins, A.L.; di Menna, M.E.; Finch, S.C. Identification and structure elucidation of janthitrems A and D from Penicillium janthinellum and determination of the tremorgenic and anti-insect activity of janthitrems A and B. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 13116–13125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Paterson, R.R.M.; Simmonds, M.S.J.; Blaney, W.M. Mycopesticidal effects of characterized extracts of Penicillium isolates and purified secondary metabolites (including mycotoxins) on Drosophila melanogaster and Spodoptora littoralis. J. Invert. Pathol. 1987, 50, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Paterson, R.R.M.; Simmonds, M.J.S.; Kemmelmeier, C.; Blaney, W.M. Effects of brevianamide A, its photolysis product brevianamide D, and ochratoxin A from two Penicillium strains on the insect pests Spodoptera frugiperda and Heliothis virescens. Mycol. Res. 1990, 94, 538–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Shim, S.H.; Swenson, D.C.; Gloer, J.B.; Dowd, P.F.; Wicklow, D.T. Penifulvin A:  A sesquiterpenoid-derived metabolite containing a novel dioxa[5,5,5,6]fenestrane ring system from a fungicolous isolate of Penicillium griseofulvum. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1225–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhang, Y.; Li, C.; Swenson, D.C.; Gloer, J.B.; Wicklow, D.T.; Dowd, P.F. Novel antiinsectan oxalicine alkaloids from two undescribed fungicolous Penicillium spp. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 773–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Li, C.; Gloer, J.B.; Wicklow, D.T.; Dowd, P.F. Antiinsectan decaturin and oxalicine analogues from Penicillium thiersii. J. Nat. Prod. 2005, 68, 319–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Abe, M.; Imai, T.; Ishii, N.; Usui, M.; Okuda, T.; Oki, T. Isolation of an insecticidal compound oxalicine B from Penicillium sp. TAMA 71 and confirmation of its chemical structure by X-ray crystallographic analysis. J. Pest. Sci. 2007, 32, 124–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hayashi, H.; Matsumoto, H.; Akiyama, K. New insecticidal compounds, communesins C, D and E, from Penicillium expansum Link MK-57. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2004, 68, 753–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bai, M.; Zheng, C.-J.; Nong, X.-H.; Zhou, X.-M.; Luo, Y.-P.; Chen, G.-Y. Four new insecticidal xanthene derivatives from the mangrove-derived fungus Penicillium sp. JY246. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Bai, M.; Zheng, C.-J.; Huang, G.-L.; Mei, R.-Q.; Wang, B.; Luo, Y.-P.; Zheng, C.; Niu, Z.-G.; Chen, G.-Y. Bioactive meroterpenoids and isocoumarins from the mangrove-derived fungus Penicillium sp. TGM112. J. Nat. Prod. 2019, 82, 1155–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Bai, M.; Huang, G.-L.; Mei, R.-Q.; Wang, B.; Luo, Y.-P.; Nong, X.-H.; Chen, G.-Y.; Zheng, C.-J. Bioactive lactones from the mangrove-derived fungus Penicillium sp. TGM112. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Geris, R.; Rodrigues-Fo, E.; Garcia da Silva, H.H.; Garcia da Silva, I. Larvicidal effects of fungal meroterpenoids in the control of Aedes aegypti L., the main vector of dengue and yellow fever. Chem. Biodivers. 2008, 5, 341–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wang, Y.; Chen, W.; Xu, Z.; Bai, Q.; Zhou, X.; Zheng, C.; Bai, M.; Chen, G. Biological secondary metabolites from the Lumnitzera littorea-derived fungus Penicillium oxalicum HLLG-13. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Cantín, Á.; Moya, P.; Castillo, M.-A.; Primo, J.; Miranda, M.A.; Primo-Yúfera, E. Isolation and synthesis of N-(2-methyl-3-oxodec-8-enoyl)-2-pyrroline and 2-(hept-5-enyl)-3-methyl-4-oxo-6,7,8,8a-tetrahydro-4h-pyrrolo[2,1-b]1,3-oxazine—Two new fungal metabolites with in vivo anti-juvenile-hormone and insecticidal activity. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Lopez-Gresa, M.P.; Gonzalez, M.C.; Ciavatta, L.; Ayala, I.; Moya, P.; Primo, J. Insecticidal activity of paraherquamides, including paraherquamide H and paraherquamide I, two new alkaloids isolated from Penicillium cluniae. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 2921–2925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wang, H.J.; Gloer, J.B.; Wicklow, D.T.; Dowd, P.F. Aflavinines and other antiinsectan metabolites from the ascostromata of Eupenicillium crustaceum and related species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 4429–4435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Abe, M.; Imai, T.; Ishii, N.; Usui, M.; Okuda, T.; Oki, T. Quinolactacide, a new quinolone insecticide from Penicillium citrinum Thom F 1539. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2005, 69, 1202–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Shao, C.-L.; Wang, C.-Y.; Gu, Y.-C.; Wei, M.-Y.; Pan, J.-H.; Deng, D.-S.; She, Z.-G.; Lin, Y.-C. Penicinoline, a new pyrrolyl 4-quinolinone alkaloid with an unprecedented ring system from an endophytic fungus Penicillium sp. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 3284–3286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Shields, M.S.; Lingg, A.J.; Heimsch, R.C. Identification of a Penicillium urticae metabolite which inhibits Beauveria bassiana. J. Invert. Pathol. 1981, 38, 374–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Castillo, M.A.; Moya, P.; Cantín, A.; Miranda, M.A.; Primo, J.; Hernández, E.; Primo-Yúfera, E. Insecticidal, anti-juvenile hormone, and fungicidal activities of organic extracts from different Penicillium species and their isolated active components. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 2120–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Khokhar, I.; Mukhtar, I.; Mushtaq, S. Antifungal effect of Penicillium metabolites against some fungi. Archiv. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2011, 44, 1347–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Klowden, M.J.; Pallai, S.R. Physiological Systems in Insects, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2022; 682p. [Google Scholar]
  112. Jeschke, P. Status and outlook for acaricide and insecticide discovery. Pest Manag. Sci. 2021, 77, 64–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Nation, J.L.N. Insect Physiology and Biochemistry; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015; 586p. [Google Scholar]
  114. Silman, I.; Sussman, J.L. Acetylcholinesterase: How is structure related to function? Chemico-Biol. Interact. 2008, 175, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Peter, R.; Josende, M.E.; da Silva Barreto, J.; da Costa Silva, D.G.; da Rosa, C.E.; Maciel, F.E. Effect of Illicium verum (Hook) essential oil on cholinesterase and locomotor activity of Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer). Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 2022, 181, 105027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Nillos, M.G.; Rodriguez-Fuentes, G.; Gan, J.; Schlenk, D. Enantioselective acetylcholinesterase inhibition of the organophosphorous insecticides profenofos, fonofos, and crotoxyphos. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2007, 26, 1949–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Thapa, S.; Lv, M.; Xu, H. Acetylcholinesterase: A primary target for drugs and insecticides. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2017, 17, 1665–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Su, J.; Liu, H.; Guo, K.; Chen, L.; Yang, M.; Chen, Q. Research advances and detection methodologies for microbe-derived acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: A systemic review. Molecules 2017, 22, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ellman, G.L.; Courtney, K.D.; Andres Jr, V.; Featherstone, R.M. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1961, 7, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Marston, A.; Kissling, J.; Hostettmann, K. A Rapid TLC Bioautographic method for the detection of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors in plants. Phytochem. Anal. 2002, 13, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Ingkaninan, K.; De Best, C.M.; Van Der Heijden, R.; Hofte, A.J.P.; Karabatak, B.; Irth, H.; Tjaden, U.R.; Van der Greef, J.; Verpoorte, R. High-performance liquid chromatography with on-line coupled UV, mass spectrometric and biochemical detection for identification of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors from natural products. J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 872, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Dai, W.; Sandoval, I.T.; Cai, S.; Smith, K.A.; Delacruz, R.G.C.; Boyd, K.A.; Mills, J.J.; Jones, D.A.; Cichewicz, R.H. Cholinesterase inhibitory arisugacins L–Q from a Penicillium sp. isolate obtained through a citizen science initiative and their activities in a phenotype-based zebrafish assay. J. Nat. Prod. 2019, 82, 2627–2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Datta, S.C.; Ghosh, J.J. Effect of citreoviridin, a mycotoxin from Penicillium citreoviride, on kinetic constants of acetylcholinesterase and ATPase in synaptosomes and microsomes from rat brain. Toxicon 1981, 19, 555–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Houghton, P.J.; Ren, Y.; Howes, M.-J. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors from plants and fungi. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2006, 23, 181–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Marucci, G.; Buccioni, M.; Dal Ben, D.; Lambertucci, C.; Volpini, R.; Amenta, F. Efficacy of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropharmacology 2021, 190, 108352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Wang, Y.; Zeng, Q.G.; Zhang, Z.B.; Yan, R.M.; Wang, L.Y.; Zhu, D. Isolation and characterization of endophytic huperzine A-producing fungi from Huperzia serrata. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 38, 1267–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Wang, L.; Zhu, J.-Y.; Qian, C.; Fang, Q.; Ye, G.-Y. Venom of the parasitoid wasp Pteromalus puparum contains an odorant binding protein. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2015, 88, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Wang, C.-H.; Zhang, C.; Xing, X.-H. Xanthine dehydrogenase: An old enzyme with new knowledge and prospects. Bioengineered 2016, 7, 395–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Nie, Y.; Yang, W.; Liu, Y.; Yang, J.; Lei, X.; Gerwick, W.H.; Zhang, Y. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and antioxidants mining from marine fungi: Bioassays, bioactivity coupled LC–MS/MS analyses and molecular networking. Mar. Life Sci. Technol. 2020, 2, 386–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Friedli, M.J.; Inestrosa, N.C. Huperzine A and its neuroprotective molecular signaling in Alzheimer’s disease. Molecules 2021, 26, 6531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Thi Minh Le, T.; Thi Hong Hoang, A.; Thi Bich Le, T.; Thi Bich Vo, T.; Van Quyen, D.; Hoang Chu, H. Isolation of endophytic fungi and screening of huperzine A–producing fungus from Huperzia serrata in Vietnam. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 16152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Kang, X.; Liu, C.; Liu, D.; Zeng, L.; Shi, Q.; Qian, K.; Xie, B. The complete mitochondrial genome of huperzine A-producing endophytic fungus Penicillium polonicum. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2016, 1, 202–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Omura, S.; Kuno, F.; Otoguro, K.; Sunazuka, T.; Shiomi, K.; Masuma, R.; Iwai, Y. Arisugacin, a novel and selective inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase from Penicillium sp. FO-4259. J. Antibiot. 1995, 48, 745–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Hu, J.; Okawa, H.; Yamamoto, K.; Oyama, K.; Mitomi, M.; Anzai, H. Characterization of two cytochrome P450 monooxygenase genes of the pyripyropene biosynthetic gene cluster from Penicillium coprobium. J. Antibiot. 2011, 64, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Kandasamy, R.; London, D.; Stam, L.; von Deyn, W.; Zhao, X.; Salgado, V.L.; Nesterov, A. Afidopyropen: New and potent modulator of insect transient receptor potential channels. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 84, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Horikoshi, R.; Goto, K.; Mitomi, M.; Oyama, K.; Hirose, T.; Sunazuka, T.; Ōmura, S. Afidopyropen, a novel insecticide originating from microbial secondary extracts. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Campora, M.; Francesconi, V.; Schenone, S.; Tasso, B.; Tonelli, M. Journey on naphthoquinone and anthraquinone derivatives: New insights in Alzheimer’s disease. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Vanessa, V.V.; Mah, S.H. Xanthone: Potential acetylcholinesterase inhibitor for Alzheimer’s disease treatment. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2021, 21, 2507–2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Sharma, K. Chromone scaffolds in the treatment of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease: An overview. ChemistrySelect 2022, 7, e202200540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Sunazuka, T.; Handa, M.; Nagai, K.; Shirahata, T.; Harigaya, Y.; Otoguro, K.; Kuwajima, I.; Ōmura, S. Absolute Stereochemistries and total synthesis of (+)-arisugacins A and B, potent, orally bioactive and selective inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 7845–7859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Li, H.-T.; Sun, Y.; Xie, F.; Wang, M.; Chen, J.-Y.; Zhou, H.; Ding, Z.-T. Xanthene and citrinin derivatives from the endophytic fungus Penicillium sp. T2-11. Tetrahedron Lett. 2022, 90, 153626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Huang, X.-S.; Yang, B.; Sun, X.-F.; Xia, G.-P.; Liu, Y.-Y.; Ma, L.; She, Z.-G. A new polyketide from the mangrove endophytic fungus Penicillium sp. Sk14JW2P. Helv. Chim. Acta 2014, 97, 664–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. He, J.-B.; Ji, Y.-N.; Hu, D.-B.; Zhang, S.; Yan, H.; Liu, X.-C.; Luo, H.-R.; Zhu, H.-J. Structure and absolute configuration of penicilliumine, a new alkaloid from Penicillium commune 366606. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014, 55, 2684–2686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Kim, W.-G.; Song, N.-K.; Yoo, I.-D. Quinolactacins Al and A2, new acetylcholinesterase inhibitors from Penicillium citrinum. J. Antibiot. 2001, 54, 831–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Gan, D.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, X.-R.; Li, C.-Z.; Wang, C.-Y.; Cai, L.; Ding, Z.-T. Penaloidines A and B: Two unprecedented pyridine alkaloids from Penicillium sp. KYJ-6. Org. Chem. Front. 2022, 9, 2405–2411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Hu, Y.-W.; Chen, W.-H.; Song, M.-M.; Pang, X.-Y.; Tian, X.-P.; Wang, F.-Z.; Liu, Y.-H.; Wang, J.-F. Indole diketopiperazine alkaloids and aromatic polyketides from the Antarctic fungus Penicillium sp. SCSIO 05705. Nat. Prod. Res. 2023, 37, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Xu, F.; Chen, W.; Ye, Y.; Qi, X.; Zhao, K.; Long, J.; Pang, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J. A new quinolone and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors from a sponge-associated fungus Penicillium sp. SCSIO41033. Nat. Prod. Res. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Kuno, F.; Otoguro, K.; Shiomi, K.; Iwai, Y.; Omura, S. Arisugacins A and B, novel and selective acetylcholinesterase inhibitors from Penicillium sp. FO-4259 I. Screening, taxonomy, fermentation, isolation and biological activity. J. Antibiot. 1996, 49, 742–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Otoguro, K.; Shiomi, K.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Arai, N.; Sunazuka, T.; Masuma, R.; Iwai, Y.; Omura, S. Arisugacins C and D, novel acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and their related novel metabolites produced by Penicillium sp. FO-4259-11. J. Antibiot. 2000, 53, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Ding, B.; Wang, Z.; Huang, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, W.; She, Z. Bioactive α-pyrone meroterpenoids from mangrove endophytic fungus Penicillium sp. Nat. Prod. Res. 2016, 30, 2805–2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Huang, X.; Sun, X.; Ding, B.; Lin, M.; Liu, L.; Huang, H.; She, Z. A new anti-acetylcholinesterase α-pyrone meroterpene, arigsugacin I, from mangrove endophytic fungus Penicillium sp. Sk5GW1L of Kandelia candel. Planta Med. 2013, 79, 1572–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Wang, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Zhao, W.; Dai, H.; Chang, W.; Lv, F. Structures and biological activities of brominated azaphilones produced by Penicillium sclerotiorum E23Y–1A. Phytochem. Lett. 2022, 52, 138–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Oliveira, C.M.; Silva, G.H.; Regasini, L.O.; Zanardi, L.M.; Evangelista, A.H.; Young, M.C.M.; Bolzani, V.S.; Araujo, A.R. Bioactive metabolites produced by Penicillium sp.1 and sp.2, two endophytes associated with Alibertia macrophylla (Rubiaceae). Zeit. Naturforsch. C 2009, 64, 824–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Hemtasin, C.; Kanokmedhakul, S.; Moosophon, P.; Soytong, K.; Kanokmedhakul, K. Bioactive azaphilones from the fungus Penicillium multicolor CM01. Phytochem. Lett. 2016, 16, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Huang, H.; Feng, X.; Xiao, Z.; Liu, L.; Li, H.; Ma, L.; Lu, Y.; Ju, J.; She, Z.; Lin, Y. Azaphilones and p-terphenyls from the mangrove endophytic fungus Penicillium chermesinum (ZH4-E2) isolated from the South China Sea. J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 997–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Liu, Y.-F.; Zhong, R.; Cao, F.; Wang, C.; Wang, C.-Y. Citrinin derivatives and unusual C25 steroids from a sponge-derived Penicillium sp. fungus. Chem. Nat. Compds. 2016, 52, 548–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Oliveira, C.M.; Regasini, L.O.; Silva, G.H.; Pfenning, L.H.; Young, M.C.M.; Berlinck, R.G.S.; Bolzani, V.S.; Araujo, A.R. Dihydroisocoumarins produced by Xylaria sp. and Penicillium sp., endophytic fungi associated with Piper aduncum and Alibertia macrophylla. Phytochem. Lett. 2011, 4, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Yuan, W.-H.; Wei, Z.-W.; Dai, P.; Wu, H.; Zhao, Y.-X.; Zhang, M.-M.; Jiang, N.; Zheng, W.-F. Halogenated metabolites isolated from Penicillium citreonigrum. Chem. Biodivers. 2014, 11, 1078–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Kong, F.D.; Zhou, L.M.; Ma, Q.Y.; Huang, S.Z.; Wang, P.; Dai, H.-F.; Zhao, Y.-X. Penicillars A–E from the marine animal endogenic fungus Penicillium sp. SCS-KFD08. Phytochem. Lett. 2016, 17, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Schürmann, B.T.M.; Sallum, W.S.T.; Takahashi, J.A. Austin, dehydroaustin and other metabolites from Penicillium brasilianum. Quím. Nova 2010, 33, 1044–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Chen, C.-M.; Chen, W.-H.; Pang, X.-Y.; Liao, S.-R.; Wang, J.-F.; Lin, X.-P.; Yang, B.; Zhou, X.-F.; Luo, X.-W.; Liu, Y.-H. Pyrrolyl 4-quinolone alkaloids from the mangrove endophytic fungus Penicillium steckii SCSIO 41025: Chiral resolution, configurational assignment, and enzyme inhibitory activities. Phytochemistry 2021, 186, 112730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Li, X.-S.; Tan, M.-H.; Lv, M.-M.; Liu, C.-X.; Guo, Z.-Y.; Zhang, L.; Zou, K.; Chen, H.-Y.; Proksch, P. New γ-pyranone and nucleoside derivatives from Penicillium sp. Phytochem. Lett. 2017, 20, 285–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Li, C.; Shao, Y.; Li, W.; Yin, T.; Li, H.; Yan, H.; Guo, X.; Liu, B.; He, B. Hybrid diterpenic meroterpenoids from an endophytic Penicillium sp. induced by chemical epigenetic manipulation. J. Nat. Prod. 2022, 85, 1486–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Chen, L.; Zhu, T.; Ding, Y.; Khan, I.A.; Gu, Q.; Li, D. Sorbiterrin A, a novel sorbicillin derivative with cholinesterase inhibition activity from the marine-derived fungus Penicillium terrestre. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 325–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Dowd, P.F.; Peng, F.-C.; Chen, J.W.; Ling, K.H. Toxicity and anticholinesterase activity of the fungal metabolites territrems to the corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1992, 65, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Pang, X.; Zhou, X.; Lin, X.; Yang, B.; Tian, X.; Wang, J.; Xu, S.; Liu, Y. Structurally various sorbicillinoids from the deep-sea sediment derived fungus Penicillium sp. SCSIO06871. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 107, 104600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. de Oliveira, G.P.; Barreto, D.L.C.; Ramalho Silva, M.; Augusti, R.; Evódio Marriel, I.; Gomes de Paula Lana, U.; Takahashi, J.A. Biotic stress caused by in vitro co-inoculation enhances the expression of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors by fungi. Nat. Prod. Res. 2022, 36, 4266–4270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Lima, M.T.N.S.; dos Santos, L.B.; Bastos, R.W.; Nicoli, J.R.; Takahashi, J.A. Antimicrobial activity and acetylcholinesterase inhibition by extracts from chromatin modulated fungi. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2018, 49, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Matsuda, K.; Buckingham, S.D.; Kleier, D.; Rauh, J.J.; Grauso, M.; Sattelle, D.B. Neonicotinoids: Insecticides acting on insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2001, 22, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Oliveira, R.A.; Roat, T.C.; Carvalho, S.M.; Malaspina, O. Side-effects of thiamethoxam on the brain and midgut of the africanized honeybee Apis mellifera (Hymenopptera: Apidae). Environ. Toxicol. 2014, 29, 1122–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Shi, J.; Liao, C.; Wang, Z.; Zeng, Z.; Wu, X. Effects of sublethal acetamiprid doses on the lifespan and memory-related characteristics of honey bee (Apis mellifera) workers. Apidologie 2019, 50, 553–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Hatjina, F.; Papaefthimiou, C.; Charistos, L.; Dogaroglu, T.; Bouga, M.; Emmanouil, C.; Arnold, G. Sublethal doses of imidacloprid decreased size of hypopharyngeal glands and respiratory rhythm of honeybees in vivo. Apidologie 2013, 44, 467–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Blacquière, T.; Smagghe, G.; van Gestel, C.A.M.; Mommaerts, V. Neonicotinoids in bees: A review on concentrations, side-effects and risk assessment. Ecotoxicology 2012, 21, 973–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Di Prisco, G.; Cavaliere, V.; Annoscia, D.; Varricchio, P.; Caprio, E.; Nazzi, F.; Gargiulo, G.; Pennacchio, F. Neonicotinoid clothianidin adversely affects insect immunity and promotes replication of a viral pathogen in honey bees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 18466–18471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Giordani, G.; Cattabriga, G.; Becchimanzi, A.; Di Lelio, I.; De Leva, G.; Gigliotti, S.; Pennacchio, F.; Gargiulo, G.; Cavaliere, V. Role of neuronal and non-neuronal acetylcholine signaling in Drosophila humoral immunity. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2023, 153, 103899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Hirata, K.; Kataoka, S.; Furutani, S.; Hayashi, H.; Matsuda, K. A fungal metabolite asperparaline a strongly and selectively blocks insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: The first report on the mode of action. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e18354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Kataoka, S.; Furutani, S.; Hirata, K.; Hayashi, H.; Matsuda, K. Three austin family compounds from Penicillium brasilianum exhibit selective blocking action on cockroach nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. NeuroToxicology 2011, 32, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Hayashi, H.; Mukaihara, M.; Murao, S.; Arai, M.; Clardy, J. Acetoxydehydroaustin, a new bioactive compound, and related compound neoaustin from Penicillium sp. MG-11. Biosci., Biotechnol. Biochem. 1994, 58, 334–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Hosie, A.; Sattelle, D.; Aronstein, K.; ffrench-Constant, R. Molecular biology of insect neuronal GABA receptors. Trends Neurosci. 1997, 20, 578–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Watanabe, T.; Arisawa, M.; Narusuye, K.; Alam, M.S.; Yamamoto, K.; Mitomi, M.; Ozoe, Y.; Nishida, A. Alantrypinone and its derivatives: Synthesis and antagonist activity toward insect GABA receptors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 94–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Hayashi, H.; Sakaguchi, A. Okaramine G, a new okaramine congener from Penicillium simplicissimum ATCC 90288. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1998, 62, 804–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Hayashi, H.; Fujiwara, T.; Murao, S.; Arai, M. Okaramine C, a new insecticidal indole alkaloid from Penicillium simplicissimum. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1991, 55, 3143–3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Hayashi, H.; Asabu, Y.; Murao, S.; Arai, M. New okaramine congeners, okaramines D, E, and F, from Penicillium simplicissimum ATCC 90288. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1995, 59, 246–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Shiono, Y.; Akiyama, K.; Hayashi, H. New okaramine congeners, okamines J, K, L, M and related ccmpounds, from Penicillium simplicissimum ATCC 90288. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1999, 63, 1910–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Shiono, Y.; Akiyama, K.; Hayashi, H. Okaramines N, O, P, Q and R, new okaramine congeners, from Penicillium simplicissimum ATCC 90288. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2000, 64, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Shiono, Y.; Akiyama, K.; Hayashi, H. Effect of the azetidine and azocine rings of okaramine B on insecticidal activity. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2000, 64, 1519–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Furutani, S.; Nakatani, Y.; Miura, Y.; Ihara, M.; Kai, K.; Hayashi, H.; Matsuda, K. GluCl a target of indole alkaloid okaramines: A 25 year enigma solved. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Matsuda, K. Okaramines and other plant fungal products as new insecticide leads. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2018, 30, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Fujita, T.; Makishima, D.; Akiyama, K.; Hayashi, H. New convulsive compounds, brasiliamides A and B, from Penicillium brasilianum Batista JV-379. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2002, 66, 1697–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Riddiford, L.M. Juvenile hormone action: A 2007 perspective. J. Insect Physiol. 2008, 54, 895–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Konopova, B.; Jindra, M. Juvenile hormone resistance gene methoprene-tolerant controls entry into metamorphosis in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 10488–10493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Cusson, M.; Sen, S.E.; Shinoda, T. Juvenile hormone biosynthetic enzymes as targets for insecticide discovery. In Advanced Technologies for Managing Insect Pests; Ishaaya, I., Palli, S.R., Horowitz, A.R., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 31–55. [Google Scholar]
  193. Nagaoka, S.; Hara, Y. Compactin. In Drug Discovery in Japan: Investigating the Sources of Innovation; Nagaoka, S., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 15–34. [Google Scholar]
  194. Nicoletti, R.; Buommino, E.; Antonietta Tufano, M. Patenting Penicillium strains. Recent Pat. Biotechnol. 2012, 6, 81–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Monger, D.J.; Lim, W.A.; Kézdy, F.J.; Law, J.H. Compactin inhibits insect HMG-CoA reductase and juvenile hormone biosynthesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1982, 105, 1374–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Hiruma, K.; Yagi, S.; Endo, A. ML-236B (Compactin) as an inhibitor of juvenile hormone biosynthesis. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1983, 18, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Edwards, J.P.; Price, N.R. Inhibition of juvenile hormone III biosynthesis in Periplaneta americana with the fungal metabolite compactin (ML-236B). Insect Biochem. 1983, 13, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Bellés, X.; Camps, F.; Casas, J.; Lloria, J.; Messeguer, A.; Piulachs, M.D.; Sánchez, F.J. In vivo and in vitro effects of compactin in liposome carriers on juvenile hormone biosynthesis in adult females of Blattella germanica. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 1988, 32, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Castillo, M.; Moya, P.; Couillaud, F.; Garcerá, M.D.; Martínez-Pardo, R. A heterocyclic oxime from a fungus with anti-juvenile hormone activity. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 1998, 37, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Moya, P.; Cantín, Á.; Castillo, M.-A.; Primo, J.; Miranda, M.A.; Primo-Yúfera, E. Isolation, structural assignment, and synthesis of N-(2-methyl-3-oxodecanoyl)-2-pyrroline, a new natural product from Penicillium brevicompactum with in vivo anti-juvenile hormone activity. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 8530–8535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Guo, X.-C.; Zhang, Y.-H.; Gao, W.-B.; Pan, L.; Zhu, H.-J.; Cao, F. Absolute configurations and chitinase inhibitions of quinazoline-containing diketopiperazines from the marine-derived fungus Penicillium polonicum. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Caccia, S.; Astarita, F.; Barra, E.; Di Lelio, I.; Varricchio, P.; Pennacchio, F. Enhancement of Bacillus thuringiensis toxicity by feeding Spodoptera littoralis larvae with bacteria expressing immune suppressive DsRNA. J. Pest. Sci 2020, 93, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Nicoletti, R.; Becchimanzi, A. Ecological and molecular interactions between insects and fungi. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Feng, P.; Shang, Y.; Cen, K.; Wang, C. Fungal biosynthesis of the bibenzoquinone oosporein to evade insect immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 11365–11370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Wei, G.; Lai, Y.; Wang, G.; Chen, H.; Li, F.; Wang, S. Insect pathogenic fungus interacts with the gut microbiota to accelerate mosquito mortality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 5994–5999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Marmaras, V.J.; Charalambidis, N.D.; Zervas, C.G. Immune response in insects: The role of phenoloxidase in defense reactions in relation to melanization and sclerotization. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 1996, 31, 119–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Lu, Z.; Jiang, H. Regulation of phenoloxidase activity by high-and low-molecular-weight inhibitors from the larval hemolymph of Manduca sexta. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007, 37, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. DellaGreca, M.; De Tommaso, G.; Salvatore, M.M.; Nicoletti, R.; Becchimanzi, A.; Iuliano, M.; Andolfi, A. The issue of misidentification of kojic acid with flufuran in Aspergillus flavus. Molecules 2019, 24, 1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Lee, M.J.; Anstee, J.H. Phenoloxidase and its zymogen from the haemolymph of larvae of the Lepidopteran Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1995, 110, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Dowd, P.F. Relative inhibition of insect phenoloxidase by cyclic fungal metabolites from insect and plant pathogens. Nat. Toxins 1999, 7, 337–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Zhang, H.-H.; Luo, M.-J.; Zhang, Q.-W.; Cai, P.-M.; Idrees, A.; Ji, Q.-E.; Yang, J.-Q.; Chen, J.-H. Molecular characterization of prophenoloxidase-1 (PPO1) and the inhibitory effect of kojic acid on phenoloxidase (PO) activity and on the development of Zeugodacus tau (Walker) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 2019, 109, 236–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Christensen, M.; Frisvad, J.C.; Tuthill, D. Taxonomy of the Penicillium miczynskii group based on morphology and secondary metabolites. Mycol. Res. 1999, 103, 527–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Houbraken, J.; Frisvad, J.C.; Samson, R.A. Taxonomy of Penicillium section Citrina. Stud. Mycol. 2011, 70, 53–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Mc Namara, L.; Dolan, S.K.; Walsh, J.M.D.; Stephens, J.C.; Glare, T.R.; Kavanagh, K.; Griffin, C.T. Oosporein, an abundant metabolite in Beauveria caledonica, with a feedback induction mechanism and a role in insect virulence. Fungal Biol. 2019, 123, 601–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. El-Ghany, N.M.A. Semiochemicals for controlling insect pests. J. Plant Prot. Res. 2019, 59, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Kusari, S.; Verma, V.C.; Lamshoeft, M.; Spiteller, M. An endophytic fungus from Azadirachta indica A. Juss. that produces azadirachtin. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 28, 1287–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Stierle, D.B.; Stierle, A.A.; Ganser, B. New phomopsolides from a Penicillium sp. J. Nat. Prod. 1997, 60, 1207–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Stierle, A.A.; Stierle, D.B.; Mitman, G.G.; Snyder, S.; Antczak, C.; Djaballah, H. Phomopsolides and related compounds from the alga-associated fungus, Penicillium clavigerum. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2014, 9, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Frisvad, J.C.; Smedsgaard, J.; Larsen, T.O.; Samson, R.A. Mycotoxins, drugs and other extrolites produced by species in Penicillium subgenus Penicillium. Stud. Mycol. 2004, 49, 201–241. [Google Scholar]
  220. Xu, Y.; Vinas, M.; Alsarrag, A.; Su, L.; Pfohl, K.; Rohlfs, M.; Schäfer, W.; Chen, W.; Karlovsky, P. Bis-naphthopyrone pigments protect filamentous Ascomycetes from a wide range of predators. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Yin, G.; Zhao, H.; Pennerman, K.K.; Jurick, W.M.; Fu, M.; Bu, L.; Guo, A.; Bennett, J.W. Genomic analyses of Penicillium species have revealed patulin and citrinin gene clusters and novel loci involved in oxylipin production. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Yin, G.; Padhi, S.; Lee, S.; Hung, R.; Zhao, G.; Bennett, J.W. Effects of three volatile oxylipins on colony development in two species of fungi and on Drosophila larval metamorphosis. Curr. Microbiol. 2015, 71, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Macedo, G.E.; de Brum Vieira, P.; Rodrigues, N.R.; Gomes, K.K.; Martins, I.K.; Franco, J.L.; Posser, T. Fungal compound 1-octen-3-ol induces mitochondrial morphological alterations and respiration dysfunctions in Drosophila melanogaster. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 2020, 206, 111232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Almaliki, H.S.; Angela, A.; Goraya, N.J.; Yin, G.; Bennett, J.W. Volatile organic compounds produced by human pathogenic fungi are toxic to Drosophila melanogaster. Front. Fungal Biol. 2021, 1, 629510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Inamdar, A.A.; Hossain, M.M.; Bernstein, A.I.; Miller, G.W.; Richardson, J.R.; Bennett, J.W. Fungal-derived semiochemical 1-octen-3-ol disrupts dopamine packaging and causes neurodegeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 19561–19566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Inamdar, A.A.; Bennett, J.W. A common fungal volatile organic compound induces a nitric oxide mediated inflammatory response in Drosophila melanogaster. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 3833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Stensmyr, M.C.; Dweck, H.K.M.; Farhan, A.; Ibba, I.; Strutz, A.; Mukunda, L.; Linz, J.; Grabe, V.; Steck, K.; Lavista-Llanos, S.; et al. A conserved dedicated olfactory circuit for detecting harmful microbes in Drosophila. Cell 2012, 151, 1345–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Melo, N.; Wolff, G.H.; Costa-da-Silva, A.L.; Arribas, R.; Triana, M.F.; Gugger, M.; Riffell, J.A.; DeGennaro, M.; Stensmyr, M.C. Geosmin attracts Aedes aegypti mosquitoes to oviposition sites. Curr. Biol. 2020, 30, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Gu, F.; Ai, S.; Chen, Y.; Jin, S.; Xie, X.; Zhang, T.; Zhong, G.; Yi, X. Mutualism promotes insect fitness by fungal nutrient compensation and facilitates fungus propagation by mediating insect oviposition preference. ISME J. 2022, 16, 1831–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Guo, H.-G.; Han, C.-Y.; Zhang, A.-H.; Yang, A.-Z.; Qin, X.-C.; Zhang, M.-Z.; Du, Y.-L. Penicillium fungi mediate behavioral responses of the yellow peach moth, Conogethes punctiferalis (Guenée) to apple fruits via altering the emissions of host plant VOCs. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2022, 110, e21895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Chen, Y.; Han, J.; Yang, H.; Qin, X.; Guo, H.; Du, Y. Different maize ear rot fungi deter the oviposition of yellow peach moth (Conogethes punctiferalis (Guenée)) by maize volatile organic compounds. Agronomy 2023, 13, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Nicoletti, R.; Fiorentino, A.; Scognamiglio, M. Endophytism of Penicillium species in woody plants. Open Mycol. J. 2014, 8, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structures of mycotoxins from Penicillium spp. with effects on insect viability and development.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of mycotoxins from Penicillium spp. with effects on insect viability and development.
Microorganisms 11 01302 g001
Figure 2. Structural diversity of secondary metabolites from Penicillium spp. displaying anti-insect activities.
Figure 2. Structural diversity of secondary metabolites from Penicillium spp. displaying anti-insect activities.
Microorganisms 11 01302 g002
Figure 3. Chemical structures of compounds from Penicillium spp. with AChE-inhibitory properties.
Figure 3. Chemical structures of compounds from Penicillium spp. with AChE-inhibitory properties.
Microorganisms 11 01302 g003
Figure 4. Chemical structures of compounds of Penicillium spp. displaying effects as antagonists of ACh receptors regarding juvenile hormone activity and insects’ immune responses and behaviors.
Figure 4. Chemical structures of compounds of Penicillium spp. displaying effects as antagonists of ACh receptors regarding juvenile hormone activity and insects’ immune responses and behaviors.
Microorganisms 11 01302 g004
Table 1. Penicillium species reported in association with insects.
Table 1. Penicillium species reported in association with insects.
SpeciesHostCountrySourceReferences
P. adametzioidesunspecified insectBrazildead or live insect[19]
P. atrofulvumTriplectides sp.Brazilgut[20]
P. aurantiocandidumVespula vulgarisCalifornia (USA)gut of larva[21]
P. aurantiogriseumOstrinia nubilalisIowa (USA)dead adult and larva[22]
Schistocerca gregariaEgyptdead adult[23]
Spodoptera littoralisEgypteggs[24]
Triatoma brasiliensisBrazildigestive tract[25]
P. brasilianumunidentified insectSouth Korea dead insect[26]
P. brevicompactumApis melliferaSwedenmidgut[27]
Bradysia agrestisSouth Korea gut[28]
Malacosoma neustriaGermanydiseased larvae[29]
P. brocaeHypothenemus hempeiMexicocuticle and frass of females[30]
P. cairnsenseTriplectides sp.Brazilgut[20]
P. camponotumCamponotus herculeanusGermanybuccal cavities[31]
Camponotus pennsylvanicusCanada
P. canescensAedes sp.Braziladult[32]
P. caseifulvumTriplectides sp.Brazilgut[20]
P. chermesinumVespula pennsylvanicaCalifornia (USA)gut of larva[21]
P. chrysogenumA. melliferaMichigan (USA)dead adult[33]
Arizona (USA)gut[34,35]
Culex nigripalpusBrazildiseased adult[36]
Culex sp.Braziladult[32]
Cydia ulicetanaNew Zealandexoskeleton of live adult[37]
S. littoralisEgyptpupae and adults[24]
unspecified insectBrazildead or live insect[19]
P. cinnamopurpureumTriatoma pseudomaculataBrazildigestive tract[25]
P. citreonigrumSericothrips staphylinusNew Zealandexoskeleton of live adult[37]
T. brasiliensisBrazildigestive tract[25]
P. citrinumAedes aegyptiAustraliaeggs[38]
Antheraea mylittaIndiadiseased larvae[39]
A. melliferaArizona (USA)gut[35]
B. agrestisSouth Korea gut[28]
Culex quinquefasciatusThailanddead adult [40]
Culex sp.Braziladult[32]
H. hempeiMexicocuticle and gut of females[30]
Nomia melanderiwestern USAdiseased larva[41]
Parastrongylus megistusBrazildigestive tract[42]
Pteroptyx bearniSabah (Malaysia)eggs[43]
T. brasiliensis, T. infestansBrazildigestive tract[25]
Triplectides sp.Brazilgut[20]
unspecified insectBrazilinternal mycobiota[19]
V. vulgarisCalifornia (USA)larva[21]
P. coffeaeB. agrestisSouth Korea gut[28]
P. communeA. melliferaMichigan (USA)dead adults[33]
Hylobius abietisSwedenfrass[44]
P. corylophilumAnopheles darlingi, Culex declarator, C. nigripalpus, C. saltanensis, Mansonia titilansBrazillarvae, adults[7,32,36]
A. melliferaMichigan (USA)dead adults[33]
Arizona (USA)gut[35]
Musca domesticaBrazildiseased adult/larva[36]
P. megistusBrazildigestive tract[42]
T. infestans, T. sordida, T. vitticeps, T. brasiliensis, T. pseudomaculataBrazildigestive tract[25,36]
V. pennsylvanicaCalifornia (USA)adult[21]
P. costaricenseRothschildia lebeauCosta Ricagut[31]
P. crustosumH. hempeiMexicocuticle, frass, gut of female[30]
P. cyclopiumA. melliferaMichigan (USA)dead adults[33]
Arizona (USA)gut[35]
Ostrinia nubilalisIowa (USA)dead adult and larva[22]
P. decumbensAedes sp., Anopheles sp., Culex sp., Mansonia sp.Braziladult[32]
Helicoverpa zeaIowa (USA)dead larva and pupa[22]
Ostrinia nubilalisIowa (USA)dead larva[22]
P. megistusBrazildigestive tract[42]
T. brasiliensisBrazildigestive tract[25]
V. pennsylvanicaCalifornia (USA)gut of larva[21]
P. euglaucumA. melliferaItalydead/live adults/larvae[45]
N. melanderinorthwestern USAdiseased larvae[46]
P. excelsumbees, antsBraziladults[47]
P. expansumA. melliferaMichigan (USA)dead adults[33]
Anopheles sp., Culex sp.Braziladult[32]
H. abietisSwedenfrass[44,48]
T. brasiliensisBrazildigestive tract[25]
P. exsudansTriplectides sp.Brazilgut[20]
P. fellutanumAedes scapularisBrazildiseased adult[36]
C. quinquefasciatusBrazillarvae, adults[7,32]
P. megistusBrazildigestive tract[42]
T. brasiliensis, T. infestansBrazildigestive tract[25]
P. freiiunidentified PyralidaeLebanondead moth[49]
P. fundyenseC. pennsylvanicusCanadabuccal cavities[31]
P. glabrumA. melliferaArizona (USA)gut[34,35]
T. brasiliensisBrazildigestive tract[25]
P. gladioliB. agrestisSouth Korea gut[28]
P. griseofulvumA. melliferaArizona (USA)gut[34]
T. infestansBrazildigestive tract[25]
Argentinadigestive tract[50]
P. guanacastenseEutelia sp.Costa Ricagut[51]
P. herqueiEuops chinensisChinamycangia[15]
P. infrabuccatumC. pennsylvanicusCanadabuccal cavities[31]
P. janthinellumAedes fluvialitis, A. darlingi, C. quinquefasciatusBrazillarvae, adults[7,32]
Anopheles sp., C. nigripalpusBrazildiseased adult[36]
P. megistusBrazildigestive tract[42]
T. infestans, T. brasiliensisBrazildigestive tract[25]
P. lanosumV. pennsylvanicaCalifornia (USA)gut of larva[21]
P. lividumH. abietisSwedenfrass[44]
P. mallochiiCitheronia lobesis, R. lebeauCosta Ricagut[51]
Triplectides sp.Brazilgut[20]
unspecified insectBrazildead or live insect[19]
P. maximaeTriplectides sp.Brazilgut[20]
P. miczynskiiT. infestansBrazildigestive tract[25]
P. ochrochloronA. melliferaArizona (USA)gut[34]
P. olsoniiH. hempeiMexicocuticle and gut of females[30]
P. oxalicumAcrida bicolorChinagut[52]
Bemisia tabaciIndiamummified adult[53]
Mansonia sp.Braziladult[32]
P. palitansA. melliferaMichigan (USA)live adults[33]
P. paxilliTriplectides sp.Brazilgut[20]
P. phoeniceumV. pennsylvanicaCalifornia (USA)gut of larva[21]
P. polonicumCulex sp.Lebanondead adult[49]
Muljarus japonicusSouth Korea dead adult[54]
P. restrictumA. aegyptiAustraliaeggs[38]
V. pennsylvanicaCalifornia (USA)gut of larva[21]
P. rolfsiiTriplectides sp.Brazilgut[20]
P. roseopurpureumA. aegyptiAustraliaeggs[38]
P. rubensTriplectides sp.Brazilgut[20]
P. rubidurumB. agrestisSouth Korea gut[28]
P. simplicissimumA. aegyptiAustraliaeggs[38]
P. solitumH. abietisSwedenfrass[44]
P. soppiiFormica polyctenaPolandworker[55]
Penicillium sp.Acromyrmex balzani, A. niger, A. rugosus, A. subterraneusBrazilworkers[56]
A. aegyptiAustraliaeggs[38]
A. darlingiBrazildiseased adult[36]
A. melliferaCosta Ricadiseased larvae[57]
Atta colombicaPanamaqueen cuticle[58]
Bombus sp.Denmarkdead adult[59]
Carpophilus dimidiatus, Catarthus quadricollis, Cryptolestes ferrugineus, Gnathocerus cornutus, Palorus subdepressus, Prostephanus truncatus, Sitophilus zeamais, Tribolium castaneumBeninadults[60]
C. quinquefasciatusThailanddead adult[40]
Diaphania (Margaronia) pyloalisJapanlarva[61]
Euops lespedezaeJapanmycangia[62]
F. polyctenaPolandworkers[55]
Halictus rubicundusIndiafrass[63]
Lasioglossum zephyrumIndiadead larvae[63]
Lixus impressiventrisSouth Korea dead insect[54]
M. domesticaIranadults[64]
M. domesticaBrazildiseased adult/larva[36]
Periplaneta americanaSumatra (Indonesia)adult[65]
Platypus cylindrusPortugalexoskeleton, gut, mycangia[66]
Reticulitermes flavipesOntario (Canada)live termites[67]
Scaptocoris carvalhoiBraziladult or nymph[68]
T. brasiliensis, T. pseudomaculata, T. vitticepsBrazildigestive tract[25]
T. infestansArgentinadigestive tract[50]
Tribolium castaneumIndiaadults[69]
Zonocerus variegatusNigeriadead adult[70]
P. spinulosumH. abietisSwedenfeces and frass[44]
T. brasiliensis, T. pseudomaculataBrazildigestive tract[25]
P. steckiiMeloe proscarabaeusSouth Korea dead adult[54]
P. megistusBrazildigestive tract[42]
T. sordidaBrazildigestive tract[25]
V. vulgarisCalifornia (USA)larva[21]
P. vancouverenseTriplectides sp.Brazilgut[20]
P. viridicatumA. darlingiBrazillarvae, adults[7,32]
T. brasiliensisBrazildigestive tract[25]
P. waksmaniiAedes sp., Anopheles sp., C. quinquefasciatus, M. titilansBrazillarvae, adults[7,32,71]
P. megistusBrazildigestive tract[42]
T. brasiliensis, T. pseudomaculata, T. vitticepsBrazildigestive tract[25]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nicoletti, R.; Andolfi, A.; Becchimanzi, A.; Salvatore, M.M. Anti-Insect Properties of Penicillium Secondary Metabolites. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1302. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051302

AMA Style

Nicoletti R, Andolfi A, Becchimanzi A, Salvatore MM. Anti-Insect Properties of Penicillium Secondary Metabolites. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(5):1302. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051302

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nicoletti, Rosario, Anna Andolfi, Andrea Becchimanzi, and Maria Michela Salvatore. 2023. "Anti-Insect Properties of Penicillium Secondary Metabolites" Microorganisms 11, no. 5: 1302. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051302

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop