Next Article in Journal
The Epidemiology and Control of Bovine Viral Diarrhoea Virus in Tropical Indonesian Cattle
Next Article in Special Issue
Management of Pyrenophora teres f. teres, the Causal Agent of Net Form Net Blotch of Barley, in A Two-Year Field Experiment in Central Italy
Previous Article in Journal
Zoonotic Episodes of Scabies: A Global Overview
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Coxsackievirus and Adenovirus Receptor Has a Short Half-Life in Epithelial Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seasonal Patterns of Enteric Pathogens in Colombian Indigenous People—A More Pronounced Effect on Bacteria Than on Parasites

1
Medical Mission Institute, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
2
Institute for Biometry, Epidemiology and Information Processing, Veterinary Medical University Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany
3
Department A-Veterinary Medicine, Central Institute of the Bundeswehr Medical Service Kiel, 24119 Kronshagen, Germany
4
Department for Infectious Disease Diagnostics, Bernhard-Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, 20359 Hamburg, Germany
5
Tropical Health Foundation, Santa Marta 470003, Colombia
6
Organization Wiwa Yugumaiun Bunkauanarrua Tayrona (OWYBT), Department Health Advocacy, Valledupar 200001, Colombia
7
Department of Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Bundeswehr Hospital Hamburg, 20359 Hamburg, Germany
8
Institute for Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2022, 11(2), 214; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020214
Submission received: 21 December 2021 / Revised: 4 February 2022 / Accepted: 4 February 2022 / Published: 6 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 10th Anniversary of Pathogens—Feature Papers)

Abstract

:
Enteric pathogens, which are frequently food- and waterborne transmitted, are highly abundant in Indigenous people living in remote rural areas of Colombia. As the frequency of gastroenteritis in the tropics shows seasonal differences, we analyzed variations of pathogen patterns in the stool samples of a Colombian Indigenous tribe called Wiwa during the dry (n = 105) and the rainy (n = 227) season, applying real-time PCR from stool samples and statistical analysis based on a multi-variable model. Focusing on bacterial pathogens, increased detection rates could be confirmed for enteropathogenic, enterotoxigenic and enteroaggregative Escherichia coli with a tendency for an increase in Campylobacter jejuni detections during the rainy season, while there was no seasonal effect on the carriage of Tropheryma whipplei. Salmonellae were recorded during the rainy season only. A differentiated pattern was seen for the assessed parasites. Entamoeba histolytica, Necator americanus and Trichuris trichiura were increasingly detected during the rainy season, but not Ascaris lumbricoides, Giardia duodenalis, Hymenolepis nana, Strongyloides stercoralis, and Taenia solium, respectively. Increased detection rates during the dry season were not recorded. Negative associations were found for Campylobacter jejuni and Giardia duodenalis with age and for Tropheryma whipplei with the body mass index, respectively. Positive associations of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and Taenia solium detections were observed with age. In conclusion, facilitating effects of the tropical rainy season were more pronounced on bacterial enteric pathogens compared to enteropathogenic parasites.

1. Introduction

Seasonal effects on the epidemiology of infectious diseases in general and gastroenteric infections in particular are well-known phenomena. However, available information is still scarce and partly inhomogeneous. In an assessment with deployed European soldiers in the tropical South of Mali, particularly high gastroenteritis rates were observed in the moist, hot climate of the rainy season [1]. Decades before, U.S. American armed forces had a similar experience with seasonality of tropical gastroenteritis at a military base on the Philippines [2,3]. In the Colombian Indigenous Wiwa population, an increased rate of Cyclospora cayetanensis infections was observed in the rainy season as well [4], confirming an inconsistently reported seasonality of cyclosporiasis [5,6,7]. For other coccidian parasites like Cryptosporidium spp., similar associations with the rainy season have been reported from the tropics [8]. Increased rates of bacterial gastroenteritis due to pathogens like shigellae, enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae have been recorded in tropical Bangladesh in the hot and moist summer months [9]. In Sri Lanka, risk of Campylobacter spp.-associated diarrhea increased with increasing temperature and increasing humidity up to 80%, while further increases of humidity above 80% were associated with a reduction in this risk [10]. There are exemptions. Clostridioides difficile shows peaks of infection in spring in temperate climate zones [11], while the pathogen is comparably rarely detected in the tropics in human stool samples [12].
Interestingly, moisture-associated effects have also been described in the other direction. In tropical Northern Nigeria, Bangladesh and Costa Rica, increased rates of rotavirus-associated diarrhea have been predominantly recorded in the dry season [9,13,14,15], while the cool season in regions with temperate climate is predominantly associated with increased incidence rates irrespective of humidity or rainfall [14,16,17,18]. In subtropical Hong Kong, the colder winter season was also associated with increased rates of gastroenteritis due to human parechovirus [19], and in Taiwan, higher concentrations of adenovirus were recorded in river water in the winter months [20]. In addition, social reasons can contribute to seasonal disease peaks, as shown for the winter peak of Campylobacter spp.-associated diarrhea in Switzerland associated with meat fondues consumed during this festive season [21]. As confirmed by a study with diseased children in Singapore [22], the abovementioned observations suggest differentiated, species-dependent effects of climate conditions, resulting in no obvious effects of seasonality on all-cause gastroenteritis.
Next to infectious gastroenteritis, respiratory and febrile infections were also shown to be affected by seasonality in the tropics [23]. In children in tropical Singapore, both upper and lower respiratory tract infections were negatively associated with humidity [22]. Certain pathogens even obligatorily need special climate conditions like Vibrio parahaemolyticus, which requires warm, no-salinity water for transmission during the summer months [24], next to high inorganic phosphate concentration and copepod abundance [25].
In the Wiwa population in North-Eastern Colombia, high rates of infections or colonization with various gastrointestinal pathogens have been observed in the rainy season [26]. With a delay of about three years due to organizational and funding issues, the assessment was repeated in the dry season. In detail, the assessed population is at high risk for various gastrointestinal infections as their water sources are unprotected wells or cisterns as well as water directly taken from local rivers. In addition, there are no sanitary installations, and excrements are used as top dressing due to lack of awareness of the associated infection risks. The Wiwas live together with their livestock in limited space. Houses consist of clay and the roofs are made of palm tree leaves, which also contributes to many other health disorders such as Chagas disease, because the houses are optimal breeding places for various insects. Access to health care is sparse. Health points are rare and most of the time are not occupied, and if they are, then only with a community nurse. Infrastructure like roads is not in place; hospitals or better equipped health points are located on average 6 h walking distance away. Due to the Wiwas’ habitation of very remote areas, they are often not included in surveillance or health programs. According to weather information as provided by the company eglitis-media (Oldenburg, Germany), the averaged day temperature and night temperature are quite stable throughout the year with about 35 °C at daytime and about 25 °C at nighttime in the assessment region. In contrast, a doubling of the number of rainy days and an increase in the amount of rain by a factor of 3 to 4 can be expected when comparing the dry season assessment period January–April with the rainy season assessment period July–November. The aim of this study was the comparative assessment of pathogen patterns as observed in stool samples of the local population in tropical Colombia in the dry and rainy season in order to confirm hints for pathogen-specific seasonality.

2. Results

During the rainy season of 2014 (assessment period July–November 2014), 105 stool samples from the assessed Indigenous study population were included in the multi-variable model-based assessment, while 227 samples could be included from the dry season in 2018 (assessment period January–April 2018). A differentiated pattern with marked differences for bacteria and parasites could be shown.
Focusing on recorded detections of bacteria, all assessed diarrheagenic Escherichia coli, i.e., enteropathogenic, enterotoxigenic and enteroaggregative E. coli, were more frequently recorded in the rainy season than in the dry season. For Campylobacter jejuni, at least a non-significant tendency for more detections during the rainy season could be shown, while there was no effect on Tropheryma whipplei. Salmonella spp. (six records in the rainy season only), Shigella spp./enteroinvasive E. coli (two records in the rainy season, four records in the dry season), Yersinia spp. (no records at all) were too rarely detected to be included in the statistical assessment.
Focusing on the included parasites, increased frequency during the rainy season could be shown for the protozoon Entamoeba histolytica and the helminths Necator americanus and Trichuris trichiura. Thereby, the effect seen for Entamoeba histolytica was just based on very low numbers of seven detections in the rainy season and two detections in the dry season. In contrast, no seasonal effect could be shown for the protozoon Giardia duodenalis and the helminths Ascaris lumbricoides, Hymenolepis nana, Strongyloides stercoralis, and Taenia solium, respectively. The low detection rates for the protozoon Cryptosporidium parvum (one record in the rainy and dry season each) and the helminths Ancylostoma spp. (no records at all), Enterobius vermicularis (two records in the rainy season, four records in the dry season), Schistosoma spp. (one record in the dry season only), and Taenia saginata (no records at all), respectively, were insufficient for statistical assessments.
Details are provided in Table 1 and Table 2.
As indicated in the multi-variable model, a small number of recorded patient-specific features showed associations with pathogen detections. Thereby, the effects of additionally assessed parameters were strongly pathogen-depending. Of note, Campylobacter jejuni (Odds ratio (OR) 0.957, p = 0.0004) and Giardia duodenalis (OR 0.982, p = 0.0234) infections were negatively associated with patient age, enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (OR 1.031, p = 0.0005) and Taenia solium (OR 1.039, p = 0.0195) detections were positively associated with patient age, and body mass index (BMI) was negatively associated with Tropheryma whipplei (OR 0.795, p = 0.0091) detection, respectively. No other associations could be identified as statistically significant in the multi-variable model. In particular, there was no sex-specific association with pathogen detection and no association with gastrointestinal symptoms.

3. Discussion

The study aimed to address seasonality of different gastroenteric pathogens in the Indigenous tribe called Wiwa in North-Eastern Colombia. Seasonality of infectious gastroenteritis is not just an academic topic but an issue of practical relevance as demonstrated by considerable health care-associated costs in temperate climate zones, e.g., due to viral diarrhea outbreaks during the winter seasons [27]. In Japan, modellings of potential cost savings due to reduced numbers of inpatient gastroenteritis cases as likely beneficial consequences of global warming have been conducted [28], underlining the medical-economic relevance of the topic. In Indigenous Wiwa communities in North-Eastern Colombia, a differentiated pattern with a proportion of seasonality-associated effects deserving further discussion could be recorded in the present study, confirming previous findings with focus on C. cayetanensis [4].
Either more pathogen detections during the rainy season as compared to the dry season or no differences at all were recorded. A situation of higher proportions of gastrointestinal pathogen detections in the dry season was, in contrast, never observed. This is well in line with previous reports indicating increased disease activity of infectious gastroenteritis during the rainy season in tropical settings [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] and thus confirms those previous findings.
A highly pronounced seasonal effect on diarrheagenic coliform bacteria transmitted via the food- and water-borne route could be shown. In detail, this could be demonstrated for enteropathogenic, enterotoxigenic, and enteroaggregative E. coli, which are particularly associated with poor hygiene conditions, partly due to a lack of knowledge regarding appropriate hygiene procedures [29], partly due to lacking options of adequate hygiene procedures due to scarce resources. For Salmonella spp., low numbers of pathogen detections did not allow a sound statistical assessment. However, of note, Salmonella spp. detections were recorded in the rainy season only. For fecal-orally transmitted Campylobacter jejuni [30], only a tendency below the significance threshold could be recorded, but the trend was towards a higher infection rate in the rainy season in line with previous findings [10], potentially associated with higher humidity and reduced ultraviolet (UV) light exposure. For Tropheryma whipplei, no seasonal effect at all could be demonstrated. Direct nosocomial person-to-person-transmission, which is assumed to be a relevant mode of T. whipplei-transmission [31], shows little dependence on weather conditions, which is a likely explanation for the lacking seasonal effect.
A seasonal effect was much less pronounced and more species-dependent on enteric parasites compared to the observed effect on bacteria. So, the seasonal effect which was recently described for C. cayetanensis among the Wiwa population [4] could not be generalized. While no such effect could be demonstrated for the most assessed parasites, comprising locally frequently detected species like Ascaris lumbricoides, Giardia duodenalis and Hymenolepis nana [26], which are mainly transmitted by the consumption of contaminated food including raw meat in spite of hygiene training measures or close proximity to infected animals, there was a number of exemptions. So, increased frequency of detection during the rainy season could be shown for the soil-transmitted helminths Necator americanus and Trichuris trichiura, as well as for the water-borne protozoon Entamoeba histolytica. For the latter pathogen, however, the effect was calculated based on very few detections only, making an associated bias likely.
Apart from seasonal effects, a number of other associations with pathogen detections was shown to be statistically significant by the applied multi-variable model. Age-specific effects on G. duodenalis and Campylobacter jejuni, being more frequently observed in the stools of young children in the tropics with declining detection rates with increasing age, have previously been reported from tropical Africa as well [32,33]. Further, the pathogenic potential of enteropathogenic E. coli is believed to be restricted to young age [34], while the bacterium might become part of the gut flora with increasing age, potentially explaining the observed positive association with age.
Altogether, the calculations suggested just a minor influence of age. A stronger inverse association was recorded between the detection of Tropheryma whipplei and the calculated body mass index (BMI). This finding is interesting, because detections of T. whipplei in stool samples from the tropics have usually been considered as more or less harmless colonization due to inconsistent data on associations between T. whipplei in stool specimens and gastrointestinal symptoms in the tropics [35,36,37,38]. The here-observed association between low BMI and T. whipplei in the Wiwas’ stool samples, however, may speak in favor of potential health-related effects. Since the study was not designed to answer this question, future assessments should address the potential medical relevance of T. whipplei detections in the Wiwa population.
As recently indicated [4], the study has a number of limitations. First, the explorative design of the study in a population without certain information on prevalence rates and expected effect sizes did not allow a sample size calculation prior to the assessment based on reliable assumptions. Second, the time period of more than three years between the first and the second assessment, which was due to funding restrictions, makes influences other than seasonality possible. However, as the living conditions of the Wiwa population did not relevantly change in the meantime, only a minor influence of additional factors was assumed. Further, no specific events like protracted durations of the dry season or relevantly increased amounts of rain were reported for the years between the assessments. Third, the low and non-identical number of study participations makes the interpretation of the results challenging and any stratification for specific living conditions unfeasible. Fourth, the fact that no associations with reported gastrointestinal symptoms were found needs to be interpreted with care. As discussed before [4,26], complaints on gastroenteric disorders are socially discouraged in Wiwa populations, making an underreporting bias likely. Further, multiple pathogen detections in the same sample make conclusions on associations of symptoms with individual pathogens challenging.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Type

The study was conducted as a comparison of two cross sectional exploratory studies, of which the first was performed in the rainy season (July–November 2014) and the second in the dry season (January–April 2018) as an epidemiological follow-up assessment in Indigenous Wiwa populations living in a remote region of tropical Colombia, where high baseline colonization or infection rates with gastroenteric pathogens in the rainy season are known [26].

4.2. Study Population, Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

As described before [4], the compositions of the two study populations were as shown in Table 2. Next to the laboratory assessments as listed below, recorded participant data comprised age, sex, height, weight, and self-reported gastroenteric symptoms (comprising abdominal pain or diarrhea) at the time of each sample collection. Sampling and pre-analytic conditions have been detailed elsewhere [4,26]. In short, diagnostic stool assessments with the option of subsequent therapy in case of pathogen detections were offered as a voluntary option for all Wiwas in the study area. Associated with the sample collection, the abovementioned participant data were recorded. Freshly collected stool samples were locally stored in cooling boxes and subsequently at −20 °C. After shipment to Germany, all samples were stored at −80 °C until further processing.
Data sets were included in the analysis if full information was available. Study participants without questionnaire-based information were excluded completely, whereas individually missing PCR results resulting from insufficient sample volumes were accepted, causing different sample sizes for different parameters. In compliance with these inclusion and exclusion criteria, the composition of the study populations was as shown in Table 3.

4.3. Diagnostic Procedures

To ensure comparability, the diagnostic assessments were identical for both study populations and performed as described recently [26,39,40,41,42,43,44]. In short, they comprised real-time PCR assessment of the stool samples targeting Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia intestinalis, Cryptosporidium parvum, Necator americanus, Strongyloides stercoralis, Ascaris lumbricoides, Ancylostoma spp., Trichuris trichiura, Schistosoma spp., Enterobius vermicularis, Taenia saginata, Taenia solium, Hymenolepis nana, Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella spp., Shigella ssp./enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), Yersinia spp., enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enterotoxin-producing E. coli (ETEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), and Tropheryma whipplei. Nucleic acid extraction was performed with the QiaAMP DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, eluates were stored at −80 °C prior to the PCR assessments. All real-time PCR protocols, including positive, negative and extraction controls, were run exactly as published [39,40,41,42,43,44] and diagnostically provided by our laboratory applying the HotStar master mix (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as reaction chemistry on RotorGene Q cyclers (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The detailed PCR protocols have been described elsewhere [40,41,42,44], a summary of the oligonucleotide sequences and target genes is provided as Table A1.

4.4. Statistics

All data were analysed using the software SAS, version 9.4 TS Level 1M5. For data description and unifactorial comparison purposes, univariable logistic regression including Wald’s test was used for both categorical and continuous data to compare negative with positive test-outcomes. To test for homogeneity between the studies in 2014 and 2018, Wald’s test for categories and non-adjusted Wilcoxon-testing only for the category “PCR-positive” were applied. To ensure a multi-factorial perspective on the data and to control for potential confounding effects, a multivariable logistic regression was utilized for those factors which appeared statistically significant on the univariable level. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

4.5. Ethics

Ethical clearance for the assessment of the population in 2014 was provided by the Ethics Committee of Valledupar, Cesar, Colombia (Acta no 0022013, February 2013), for the assessment of the population in 2018 by the Ethics Committee for Research in Santa Marta (Acta no 102016, October 2016). From each participant or from the parent or legal guardian of children, written informed consent was obtained prior to study participation. Agreement with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki was assured for the study.

5. Conclusions

In spite of the above-mentioned limitations, the study indicated that the tropical rainy season is associated with increasing detection rates of enteric pathogens in the Wiwa population. Increased moisture associated with temperatures of about 35 °C provides optimized growth conditions for microorganisms and livestock lives even more closely associated with the Wiwas in the rainy season. Higher detection rates in the dry season were not observed. Increased detection rates were more pronounced for water-borne bacterial pathogens with particular emphasis on diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. For enteric parasites, in contrast, a differentiated pattern of increased and unchanged detection rates was observed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K., M.H., H.F., L.K.; methodology, M.H., H.F., L.K.; software, M.H., J.A., J.H., U.S., L.K.; validation, M.H., J.A., U.S., H.F., L.K.; formal analysis, M.H., L.K.; investigation, M.H., J.A., J.H., J.C.D., A.A., G.C.; resources, S.K., U.S., H.F., L.K.; data curation, S.K., M.H.,, J.A., J.H., U.S., L.K.; writing—original draft preparation, H.F.; writing—review and editing, S.K., M.H., J.A., J.H., J.C.D., A.A., G.C., U.S., H.F., L.K.; visualization, M.H., L.K., H.F.; supervision, S.K., U.S., H.F., L.K.; project administration, S.K.; funding acquisition, S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Foundation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical clearance for the assessment of population 1 in 2014 was provided by the Ethics Committee of Valledupar, Cesar, Colombia (Acta no 0022013, February 2013), for the assessment of population 2 in 2018 by the Ethics Committee for Research in Santa Marta (Acta no 102016, October 2016). Agreement with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki was assured for the study.

Informed Consent Statement

From each participant or from the parent or legal guardian of children, written informed consent was obtained prior to study participation.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are provided in the manuscript or the Appendix tables. Raw data can be made available on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Alba Luz-Luque Lommel for her support regarding the correspondence with the Colombian health authorities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

Table A1. Target genes as well as sequences of the oligonucleotides used for the real-time PCR assessments (in alphabetic order) and references including the detailed protocols.
Table A1. Target genes as well as sequences of the oligonucleotides used for the real-time PCR assessments (in alphabetic order) and references including the detailed protocols.
Target PathogenTarget GeneForward Primer SequenceReverse Primer SequenceProbe SequenceReference, where the Detailed Protocol Can Be Found
Ancylostoma spp.ITS2GAATGACAGCAAACTCGTTGTTGATACTAGCCACTGCCGAAACGTATCGTTTACCGACTTTAG[40]
Ascaris lumbricoidesITS1GTAATAGCAGTCGGCGGTTTCTTGCCCAACATGCCACCTATTCTTGGCGGACAATTGCATGCGAT[40]
Campylobacter jejunigyrACTATAACAACTGCACCTACTAATAAGTGTAAGCACACAAGGTACTTAATAGCCGTCACCCCAC[44]
Cryptosporidium parvum138-bp fragment inside the C. parvum-specific 452-bp fragmentCGCTTCTCTAGCCTTTCATGACTTCACGTGTGTTTGCCAATCCAATCACAGAATCATCAGAATCGACTGGTATC[40]
Entamoeba histolyticaSSU rRNA geneATTGTCGTGGCATCCTAACTCAGCGGACGGCTCATTATAACATCATTGAATGAATTGGCCATTT[40]
Enterobius vermicularisITS1CGGTGTAATTTTGTTGGTGTCTATGTGGCAGCATTGCAAACTAATGTGTGCCAGTCAACGCCTAAACCGTC[40]
Escherichia coli, enteroaggregative (EAEC)aatACAATGTATAGAAATCCGCTGTTCTGTCAGATAAAATCTCGAGAGAACATGTTCCTGAGAGTGCAATCCCAG[42]
Escherichia coli, enteropathogenic (EPEC)eaeCATTGATCAGGATTTTTCTGGTGATACTCATGCGGAAATAGCCGTTAATAGTCTCGCCAGTATTCGCCACCAATACC[42]
Escherichia coli, enterotoxigenic (ETEC)eltBGCGTTACTATCCTCTCTATGTGATATTCCGAACATAGTTCTGTATAGACTGGGGAGCTCCGTGTGC[42]
estBTCCCTCAGGATGCTAAACCAACAAAGCAACAGGTACATACGTATAGCACCCGGTACAAGCAGG[42]
Giardia intestinalisSSU rRNA geneGACGGCTCAGGACAACGGTTTTGCCAGCGGTGTCCGCCCGCGGCGGTCCCTGCTAG[40]
Hymenolepis nanaITS1CATTGTGTACCAAATTGATGATGAGTACAACTGACAGCATGTTTCGATATGCGTGTGCGCCTCTGGCTTACCG[40]
Necator americanusITS2CTGTTTGTCGAACGGTACTTGCATAACAGCGTGCACATGTTGCCTGTACTACGCATTGTATAC[40]
Salmonella spp.ttrCATTGTTGATTCAGGTACAAACAATTAGCCATGTTGTAATCTCCAAGTTCAACGCGCAATTTA[44]
Schistosoma spp.ITS2GGTCTAGATGACTTGATYGAGATGCTTCCCGAGCGYGTATAATGTCATTATGGGTTGTGCTCGAGTCGTGGC[40]
Shigella spp./Escherichia coli, enteroinvasive (EIEC)ipaHCAGAAGAGCAGAAGTATGAGCAGTACCTCGTCAGTCAGACAGGTGATGCGTGAGACTG[44]
Strongyloides stercoralis18S rRNA geneGAATTCCAAGTAAACGTAAGTCATTAGCTGCCTCTGGATATTGCTCAGTTCACACACCGGCCGTCGCTGC[40]
Taenia saginataITS1GCGTCGTCTTTGCGTTACACTGACACAACCGCGCTCTGCCACAGCACCAGCGACAGCAGCAA[40]
Taenia soliumITS1ATGGATCAATCTGGGTGGAGTTATCGCAGGGTAAGAAAAGAAGGTTGGTACTGCTGTGGCGGCGG[40]
Trichuris trichiura18S rRNA geneTTGAAACGACTTGCTCATCAACTTCTGATTCTCCGTTAACCGTTGTCCGATGGTACGCTACGTGCTTACCATGG[40]
Tropheryma whippleiDig 15TGTTTTGTACTGCTTGTAACAGGATCTGATGATAGGAGGGATAGA-GCAGGAAGAGATACATTTGTGTTAGTTGTTACA[41]
Dig 15TGAGTGATGGTAGTCTGAGAGATATGTTCCATAACAAAGACAACAACCAATCAGAAGAAGATGTTACGGGTTG[41]
Yersinia spp.ailGCATTAACGAATATGTTAGCATCGAGTTTGGAGTATTCATCCGCTTCCAAATTTTGTCAT[44]
bp = base pairs, ITS = internal transcribed spacer, rRNA = ribosomal ribonucleic acid, SSU = small subunit.

References

  1. Frickmann, H.; Hagen, R.M.; Geiselbrechtinger, F.; Hoysal, N. Infectious diseases during the European Union training mission Mali (EUTM MLI)—A four-year experience. Mil. Med. Res. 2018, 5, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jones, T.C.; Dean, A.G.; Parker, G.W. Seasonal gastroenteritis and malabsorption at an American military base in the Philippines. II. Malabsorption following the acute illness. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1972, 95, 128–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dean, A.G.; Couch, R.B.; Jones, T.C.; Douglas, R.G., Jr. Seasonal gastroenteritis and malabsorption at an American military base in the Philippines. 3. Microbiologic investigations and volunteer experiments. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1972, 95, 451–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Frickmann, H.; Alker, J.; Hansen, J.; Dib, J.C.; Aristizabal, A.; Concha, G.; Schotte, U.; Kann, S. Seasonal Differences in Cyclospora cayetanensis Prevalence in Colombian Indigenous People. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Almeria, S.; Cinar, H.N.; Dubey, J.P. Cyclospora cayetanensis and Cyclosporiasis: An Update. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Shields, J.M.; Olson, B.H. Cyclospora cayetanensis: A review of an emerging parasitic coccidian. Int. J. Parasitol. 2003, 33, 371–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, J.; Wang, R.; Chen, Y.; Xiao, L.; Zhang, L. Cyclospora cayetanensis infection in humans: Biological characteristics, clinical features, epidemiology, detection method and treatment. Parasitology 2020, 147, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Moodley, D.; Jackson, T.F.; Gathiram, V.; van den Ende, J. Cryptosporidium infections in children in Durban. Seasonal variation, age distribution and disease status. S. Afr. Med. J. 1991, 79, 295–297. [Google Scholar]
  9. Das, S.K.; Begum, D.; Ahmed, S.; Ferdous, F.; Farzana, F.D.; Chisti, M.J.; Latham, J.R.; Talukder, K.A.; Rahman, M.M.; Begum, Y.A.; et al. Geographical diversity in seasonality of major diarrhoeal pathogens in Bangladesh observed between 2010 and 2012. Epidemiol. Infect. 2014, 142, 2530–2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kalupahana, R.S.; Mughini-Gras, L.; Kottawatta, S.A.; Somarathne, S.; Gamage, C.; Wagenaar, J.A. Weather correlates of Campylobacter prevalence in broilers at slaughter under tropical conditions in Sri Lanka. Epidemiol. Infect. 2018, 146, 972–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Furuya-Kanamori, L.; McKenzie, S.J.; Yakob, L.; Clark, J.; Paterson, D.L.; Riley, T.V.; Clements, A.C. Clostridium difficile infection seasonality: Patterns across hemispheres and continents—A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, 0120730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Loderstädt, U.; Hagen, R.M.; Hahn, A.; Frickmann, H. New Developments in PCR-Based Diagnostics for Bacterial Pathogens Causing Gastrointestinal Infections—A Narrative Mini-Review on Challenges in the Tropics. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2021, 6, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gomwalk, N.E.; Umoh, U.J.; Gosham, L.T.; Ahmad, A.A. Influence of climatic factors on rotavirus infection among children with acute gastroenteritis in Zaria, northern Nigeria. J. Trop. Pediatr. 1993, 39, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hieber, J.P.; Shelton, S.; Nelson, J.D.; Leon, J.; Mohs, E. Comparison of human rotavirus disease in tropical and temperate settings. Am. J. Dis. Child. 1978, 132, 853–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ureña-Castro, K.; Ávila, S.; Gutierrez, M.; Naumova, E.N.; Ulloa-Gutierrez, R.; Mora-Guevara, A. Seasonality of Rotavirus Hospitalizations at Costa Rica’s National Children’s Hospital in 2010–2015. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Atchison, C.J.; Tam, C.C.; Hajat, S.; van Pelt, W.; Cowden, J.M.; Lopman, B.A. Temperature-dependent transmission of rotavirus in Great Britain and The Netherlands. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2010, 277, 933–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ansari, S.A.; Springthorpe, V.S.; Sattar, S.A. Survival and vehicular spread of human rotaviruses: Possible relation to seasonality of outbreaks. Rev. Infect. Dis. 1991, 13, 448–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cook, S.M.; Glass, R.I.; LeBaron, C.W.; Ho, M.S. Global seasonality of rotavirus infections. Bull. World Health Organ. 1990, 68, 171–177. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chiang, G.P.K.; Chen, Z.; Chan, M.C.W.; Lee, S.H.M.; Kwok, A.K.; Yeung, A.C.M.; Nelson, E.A.S.; Hon, K.L.; Leung, T.F.; Chan, P.K.S. Clinical features and seasonality of parechovirus infection in an Asian subtropical city, Hong Kong. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tao, C.W.; Hsu, B.M.; Kao, P.M.; Huang, W.C.; Hsu, T.K.; Ho, Y.N.; Lu, Y.J.; Fan, C.W. Seasonal difference of human adenoviruses in a subtropical river basin based on 1-year monthly survey. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2016, 23, 2928–2936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bless, P.J.; Schmutz, C.; Suter, K.; Jost, M.; Hattendorf, J.; Mäusezahl-Feuz, M.; Mäusezahl, D. A tradition and an epidemic: Determinants of the campylobacteriosis winter peak in Switzerland. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2014, 29, 527–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Loh, T.P.; Lai, F.Y.; Tan, E.S.; Thoon, K.C.; Tee, N.W.; Cutter, J.; Tang, J.W. Correlations between clinical illness, respiratory virus infections and climate factors in a tropical paediatric population. Epidemiol. Infect. 2011, 139, 1884–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tay, J.S.; Yip, W.C.; Yap, H.K. Seasonal variations in admissions to a tropical paediatric unit. Trop. Geogr. Med. 1983, 35, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Kelly, M.T.; Stroh, E.M. Temporal relationship of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in patients and the environment. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1988, 26, 1754–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Rehnstam-Holm, A.S.; Atnur, V.; Godhe, A. Defining the niche of Vibrio parahaemolyticus during pre- and post-monsoon seasons in the coastal Arabian Sea. Microb. Ecol. 2014, 67, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kann, S.; Bruennert, D.; Hansen, J.; Mendoza, G.A.C.; Gonzalez, J.J.C.; Quintero, C.L.A.; Hanke, M.; Hagen, R.M.; Backhaus, J.; Frickmann, H. High Prevalence of Intestinal Pathogens in Indigenous in Colombia. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sandmann, F.G.; Jit, M.; Robotham, J.V.; Deeny, S.R. Burden, duration and costs of hospital bed closures due to acute gastroenteritis in England per winter, 2010/11–2015/16. J. Hosp. Infect. 2017, 97, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Onozuka, D.; Gasparrini, A.; Sera, F.; Hashizume, M.; Honda, Y. Modeling Future Projections of Temperature-Related Excess Morbidity due to Infectious Gastroenteritis under Climate Change Conditions in Japan. Environ. Health Perspect. 2019, 127, 77006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. O’Ryan, M.; Prado, V.; Pickering, L.K. A millennium update on pediatric diarrheal illness in the developing world. Semin. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 2005, 16, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Altekruse, S.F.; Swerdlow, D.L.; Stern, N.J. Microbial food borne pathogens. Campylobacter jejuni. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 1998, 14, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Keita, A.K.; Brouqui, P.; Badiaga, S.; Benkouiten, S.; Ratmanov, P.; Raoult, D.; Fenollar, F. Tropheryma whipplei prevalence strongly suggests human transmission in homeless shelters. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 17, e67–e68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Krumkamp, R.; Sarpong, N.; Schwarz, N.G.; Adlkofer, J.; Loag, W.; Eibach, D.; Hagen, R.M.; Adu-Sarkodie, Y.; Tannich, E.; May, J. Gastrointestinal infections and diarrheal disease in Ghanaian infants and children: An outpatient case-control study. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0003568. [Google Scholar]
  33. Frickmann, H.; Schwarz, N.G.; Rakotozandrindrainy, R.; May, J.; Hagen, R.M. PCR for enteric pathogens in high-prevalence settings. What does a positive signal tell us? Infect. Dis. 2015, 47, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hu, J.; Torres, A.G. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli: Foe or innocent bystander? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2015, 21, 729–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Keita, A.K.; Bassene, H.; Tall, A.; Sokhna, C.; Ratmanov, P.; Trape, J.F.; Raoult, D.; Fenollar, F. Tropheryma whipplei: A common bacterium in rural Senegal. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2011, 5, e1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Keita, A.K.; Dubot-Pérès, A.; Phommasone, K.; Sibounheuang, B.; Vongsouvath, M.; Mayxay, M.; Raoult, D.; Newton, P.N.; Fenollar, F. High prevalence of Tropheryma whipplei in Lao kindergarten children. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0003538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ramharter, M.; Harrison, N.; Bühler, T.; Herold, B.; Lagler, H.; Lötsch, F.; Mombo-Ngoma, G.; Müller, C.; Adegnika, A.A.; Kremsner, P.G.; et al. Prevalence and risk factor assessment of Tropheryma whipplei in a rural community in Gabon: A community-based cross-sectional study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2014, 20, 1189–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Vinnemeier, C.D.; Klupp, E.M.; Krumkamp, R.; Rolling, T.; Fischer, N.; Owusu-Dabo, E.; Addo, M.M.; Adu-Sarkodie, Y.; Käsmaier, J.; Aepfelbacher, M.; et al. Tropheryma whipplei in children with diarrhoea in rural Ghana. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2016, 22, 65.e1–65.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Frickmann, H.; Hoffmann, T.; Köller, T.; Hahn, A.; Podbielski, A.; Landt, O.; Loderstädt, U.; Tannich, E. Comparison of five commercial real-time PCRs for in-vitro diagnosis of Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia duodenalis, Cryptosporidium spp., Cyclospora cayetanensis, and Dientamoeba fragilis in human stool samples. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2021, 41, 102042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Köller, T.; Hahn, A.; Altangerel, E.; Verweij, J.J.; Landt, O.; Kann, S.; Dekker, D.; May, J.; Loderstädt, U.; Podbielski, A.; et al. Comparison of commercial and in-house real-time PCR platforms for 15 parasites and microsporidia in human stool samples without a gold standard. Acta Trop. 2020, 207, 105516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Frickmann, H.; Hanke, M.; Hahn, A.; Schwarz, N.G.; Landt, O.; Moter, A.; Kikhney, J.; Hinz, R.; Rojak, S.; Dekker, D.; et al. Detection of Tropheryma whipplei in stool samples by one commercial and two in-house real-time PCR assays. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2019, 24, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Hahn, A.; Luetgehetmann, M.; Landt, O.; Schwarz, N.G.; Frickmann, H. Comparison of one commercial and two in-house TaqMan multiplex real-time PCR assays for detection of enteropathogenic, enterotoxigenic and enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2017, 22, 1371–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Tanida, K.; Hahn, A.; Frickmann, H. Comparison of two commercial and one in-house real-time PCR assays for the diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2020, 10, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wiemer, D.; Loderstaedt, U.; von Wulffen, H.; Priesnitz, S.; Fischer, M.; Tannich, E.; Hagen, R.M. Real-time multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection of Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella, Shigella and Yersinia species in fecal samples. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2011, 301, 577–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Seasonal distribution of pathogens as included in the assessment ordered by group and quantitative relevance.
Table 1. Seasonal distribution of pathogens as included in the assessment ordered by group and quantitative relevance.
Screening in the Rainy Season * of 2014 (n = 105)Screening in the Dry Season * of 2018 (n = 227)
Assessed MicroorganismPositive, n (%)Negative, n (%)Positive, n (%)Negative, n (%)
Bacteria (in the order of total numbers of detections within the study)
Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC)45 (42.9%)60 (57.1%)65 (28.6%)162 (71.4%)
Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC)69 (65.7%)36 (34.3%)40 (17.6%)187 (32.4%)
Campylobacter jejuni31 (29.5%)74 (70.5%)48 (22.2%)168 (77.8%)
Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC)44 (41.9%)61 (58.1%)25 (11.0%)202 (89.0%)
Tropheryma whipplei7 (6.7%)98 (93.3%)12 (5.3%)215 (94.7%)
Salmonella spp.0 (0.0%)105 (100.0%)6 (2.6%)221 (97.4%)
Shigella spp./enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC)2 (1.9%)103 (98.1%)4 (1.8%)225 (98.2%)
Yersinia spp.0 (0.0%)105 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)227 (100.0%)
Protozoa (in the order of total numbers of detections within in the study)
Giardia intestinalis50 (57.6%)55 (52.4%)117 (54.2%)99 (45.8%)
Entamoeba histolytica7 (6.7%)98 (93.3%)2 (0.9%)214 (99.1%)
Cryptosporidium parvum1 (0.9%)104 (99.1%)1 (0.4%)226 (99.6%)
Helminths (in the order of total numbers of detections within in the study)
Hymenolepis nana21 (20.0%)84 (80.0%)43 (18.9%)184 (81.1%)
Necator americanus20 (19.0%)85 (81.0%)22 (10.2%)194 (89.8%)
Trichuris trichiura23 (21.9%)82 (78.1%)12 (5.3%)215 (94.7%)
Ascaris lumbricoides11 (10.5%)94 (89.5%)21 (9.7%)195 (90.3%)
Taenia solium6 (5.7%)99 (94.3%)4 (1.8%)223 (98.2%)
Strongyloides stercoralis3 (2.9%)102 (97.1%)6 (2.8%)210 (97.2%)
Enterobius vermicularis2 (1.9%)103 (98.1%)4 (1.8%)225 (98.2%)
Schistosoma spp.0 (0.0%)105 (100.0%)1 (0.4%)226 (99.6%)
Ancylostoma spp.0 (0.0%)105 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)227 (100.0%)
Taenia saginata0 (0.0%)105 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)227 (100.0%)
* Rainy season: assessment period July–November 2014. Dry season: assessment period January–April 2018.
Table 2. Odds ratios and significance levels for the different pathogen detections. Only pathogen detections were included for which sufficient numbers for a sound calculation were recorded in both seasons.
Table 2. Odds ratios and significance levels for the different pathogen detections. Only pathogen detections were included for which sufficient numbers for a sound calculation were recorded in both seasons.
PathogensMore Detections in the Rainy Season Than in the Dry SeasonMale Versus Female (Reference)Gastrointestinal SymptomsAge Per 1 YearBody Mass Index per 1 kg/m2
Ordered by Bacteria, Protozoa and HelminthsOdds Ratio in the Multimodal ModelSignificance (Threshold 0.05)Odds Ratio in the Multimodal ModelSignificance (Threshold 0.05)Odds Ratio in the Multimodal ModelSignificance (Threshold 0.05)Odds Ratio in the Multimodal ModelSignificance (Threshold 0.05)Odds Ratio in the Multimodal ModelSignificance (Threshold 0.05)
Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC)1.9430.01040.8550.52711.4810.24331.0310.00050.9350.0582
Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC)9.513<0.00010.6480.11821.2330.58621.0090.33791.0090.7910
Campylobacter jejuni1.7350.06011.1810.54590.7000.43360.9570.00041.0170.6635
Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC)6.130<0.00010.9280.80050.9470.89890.9980.84850.9900.7890
Tropheryma whipplei1.9750.21362.5880.07950.9180.90291.0070.65740.7950.0091
Giardia intestinalis0.8100.39181.2740.29680.9490.87890.9820.02340.9890.7109
Entamoeba histolytica10.8620.00570.2470.09520.8360.88280.9960.89090.8670.2418
Hymenolepis nana1.0630.84261.2550.42630.8490.70020.9880.24711.0120.7513
Necator americanus2.1180.02790.6240.17590.7860.65111.0090.38630.9860.7592
Trichuris trichiura5.411<0.00011.2590.55210.7630.65000.9920.54090.9480.3428
Ascaris lumbricoides1.1770.68550.5930.17950.9110.87211.0040.73100.9500.3514
Taenia solium2.8890.11690.8380.79501.5020.61151.0390.01950.9490.5449
Strongyloides stercoralis0.9410.93341.3720.64751.6040.57921.0120.52831.0280.7175
Table 3. Composition of both study populations.
Table 3. Composition of both study populations.
Study Population 1
(Rainy Season, July–November 2014)
Study Population 2
(Dry Season, January–April 2018)
Village (Number (n) of individuals assessed with coverage in %)ncoverage of the entire population in %ncoverage of the entire population in %
Tezhumake, Department Cesar627.68433.6
Siminke, Department La Guajira320.02516.1
Valledapur, Department Cesar50.017663.3
Ashintukwa, Department La Guajiran.a.n.a.4216.8
All105227
Sex (n, %)n%n%
Female5451.411450.2
Male5148.611349.8
Gastrointestinal symptoms (n, %)n%n%
No8984.819485.5
Yes1615.23314.5
Age in yearsnmeanmedianSTDnmeanmedianSTD
10524.520.018.022719.610.618.0
Body Size in cmnmeanmedianSTDnmeanmedianSTD
104136.0144.024.4225124.8125.025.9
Weight in kgnmeanmedianSTDnmeanmedianSTD
10341.745.016.222633.926.719.0
Body mass index (BMI) in kg/m2nmeanmedianSTDnmeanmedianSTD
10321.520.83.922519.918.25.0
STD = standard deviation. n.a. = not applicable.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kann, S.; Hartmann, M.; Alker, J.; Hansen, J.; Dib, J.C.; Aristizabal, A.; Concha, G.; Schotte, U.; Kreienbrock, L.; Frickmann, H. Seasonal Patterns of Enteric Pathogens in Colombian Indigenous People—A More Pronounced Effect on Bacteria Than on Parasites. Pathogens 2022, 11, 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020214

AMA Style

Kann S, Hartmann M, Alker J, Hansen J, Dib JC, Aristizabal A, Concha G, Schotte U, Kreienbrock L, Frickmann H. Seasonal Patterns of Enteric Pathogens in Colombian Indigenous People—A More Pronounced Effect on Bacteria Than on Parasites. Pathogens. 2022; 11(2):214. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020214

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kann, Simone, Maria Hartmann, Juliane Alker, Jessica Hansen, Juan Carlos Dib, Andrés Aristizabal, Gustavo Concha, Ulrich Schotte, Lothar Kreienbrock, and Hagen Frickmann. 2022. "Seasonal Patterns of Enteric Pathogens in Colombian Indigenous People—A More Pronounced Effect on Bacteria Than on Parasites" Pathogens 11, no. 2: 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020214

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop