Next Article in Journal
Uptake of Silver by Jarosite and Natrojarosite Family Compounds at 22 °C, 97 °C and 140 °C
Next Article in Special Issue
Inclusion Metallurgy
Previous Article in Journal
Distinguishing Features of Quenched Nanoprecipitates in Allotriomorphic Ferrite and Reverted γ during Aging for Dual-Phase PHSS
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modification of Rare Earth Ce on Inclusions in W350 Non-Oriented Silicon Steel
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Rare Earth La–Ce Alloying Treatment on Modification of Inclusions and Magnetic Properties of W350 Non-Oriented Silicon Steel

1
Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Metallurgical Engineering & Resources Recycling, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan 243002, China
2
National Engineering Research Center of Continuous Casting Technology, China Iron & Steel Research Institute Group, Beijing 100081, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Metallurgy, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
4
Xinyu Iron and Steel Co., Ltd., Xinyu 338001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2023, 13(3), 626; https://doi.org/10.3390/met13030626
Submission received: 30 January 2023 / Revised: 17 March 2023 / Accepted: 17 March 2023 / Published: 21 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inclusion Metallurgy)

Abstract

:
In order to study the effects of rare earth La–Ce alloying treatment on the characteristics of inclusions in non-oriented silicon steels, industrial experiments were conducted studying the composition, morphology, size and quantity of inclusions in W350 non-oriented silicon steel during the RH (Ruhrstahl-Hereaeus) refining process and tundish process, after rare earth treatment. The products were analyzed by means of ICP-MS (inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry), SEM/EDS (scanning electron microscope-energy dispersive spectrometry), and ASPEX (automated SEM/EDS inclusion analysis). The research results showed that the types of inclusions in experimental steel changed significantly after rare earth treatment. The types of inclusions after RE (rare earth) treatment are typically rare earth composite inclusions that are mainly composed of (La, Ce)Al2O3, and conventional inclusions. The addition of rare earth promotes the agglomeration of inclusions; the morphologies of the inclusions are mostly blocky, and some are distributed in long strips. After rare earth treatment during the RH refining process, the number of inclusions with sizes of 1.0~3.5 μm in the experimental steel is increased, and the average size of the inclusions is 2.66 μm. In addition, the number of inclusions larger than 4 μm in the specimens increases due to the collision and growth of inclusions caused by the RH circulation. After rare earth treatment during the tundish process, the number of micro inclusions with sizes of 1.0~2.5 μm in the specimen steels decreases, while the number of inclusions larger than 5 μm increases. The size distribution of micro inclusions in hot-rolled sheets after rare earth treatment was studied using TEM (transmission electron microscopy). In the specimens without rare earth, the content of micro inclusions (≤1 μm) is 51,458.2/mm2 and the average size is 0.388 μm. In the specimens with rare earth added, the content of micro inclusions (≤1 μm) is 24,230.2/mm2 and the average size is 0.427 μm. Compared to sheet produced by the original process, the iron loss of the 0.35 mm finished experimental sheet is reduced by 0.068 W/kg, and the magnetic induction is increased by 0.007 T. The iron loss of the 0.50 mm finished experimental sheet is reduced by 0.008 W/kg, and the magnetic induction is increased by 0.004 T. After rare earth treatment, the average size of micro inclusions increases and the magnetic properties are obviously improved.

1. Introduction

High-grade non-oriented silicon steel, as the functional material for high-end power equipment [1,2], is widely used in the cores of large generators and high-efficiency energy-saving motors, in high-efficiency energy-saving appliances, and in electric vehicle manufacturing, due to its magnetic characteristics of low iron loss and high magnetic induction [3,4,5]. With the implementation and promotion of frequency conversion technologies in the home appliance industry, the rise of the new energy automobile industry and the development of energy-saving and high-efficiency motors, there is an increased demand for the low iron loss and high magnetic induction properties of high-grade non-oriented silicon steel [6]. Inclusions in steel are one of the many factors affecting its magnetic properties, in particular, the size of the inclusions. Since coercivity is inversely proportional to the size of inclusions, when the size of the inclusions is close to the thickness of the domain wall, the ability of inclusions to pin magnetic domains is usually at its strongest, and the deterioration of magnetic properties is typically at its most serious [7,8]. Relevant production enterprises and research institutes have carried out research on the modification and purification of inclusions in silicon steels, with the mechanisms and production applications of rare earth modified inclusions attracting a large number of researchers. Rare earth elements have unique metallurgical and physical properties, and can change the inherent types and morphologies of inclusions, reduce the harm of inclusions in the steel, and improve the related properties of steel products [9,10,11,12,13,14]. Takashima et al. [15,16] proposed the addition of composite rare earth and Al to non-oriented silicon steel. Their results showed that after adding rare earth alloys and Al, the inclusion sizes increased, the grain growth rate was significantly improved, the residual stress after annealing was reduced, and the product performance was significantly improved. Li [17], Kong [18], Qiao [19], and Wan [20,21,22] have studied the applications of rare earth elements in silicon steels. With the addition of rare earth elements, the magnetic properties of silicon steel products are obviously improved. The modification mechanism of rare earth elements on inclusions is relatively clear. However, there is a lack of relevant research on how the type and size distributions of inclusions formed in each process change after the addition of rare earth, especially the type transformations and size changes of micro inclusions in liquid steel.
In this work, industrial trials were carried out using La and Ce rare earth alloys during the production of silicon steels. The effects of rare earth La and Ce alloys on the evolution characteristics and metamorphism of inclusions, and the magnetic properties of products from different processes were investigated, which was conducive to realizing the stable application of rare earth elements in industrial production.

2. Materials and Methods

Slag was completely removed before the hot metal entered the desulfurization station, and slag was removed twice after the deep desulfurization treatment, to achieve [S] ≤ 0.0010% and minimize the amounts of high-sulfur slag entering the converter. The scrap steel was self-produced high-quality scrap steel, of which about 50% was silicon steel scrap. During the tapping of the converter, the slide plate and the slag stopper were used to control the slag, and the thickness of the top slag in the ladle was required to be less than 60 mm. Lime was added to the top slag during the tapping process, and the argon flow rate was controlled to prevent the top slag of the ladle from agglomerating. During the RH refining process, it was forbidden to add aluminum to the liquid steel to melt it after the liquid steel had arrived at the RH refining station. After decarburization, the oxygen content of the liquid steel was less than 300 ppm, before alloying. After adding the desulfurizer and bauxite, rare earth alloys were added to liquid steel. The vacuum was broken after 8 min of net circulation and the sedation time was not less than 15 min.
The chemical composition of La and Ce alloys used in the experiment is listed in Table 1. Spectrography and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, Thermo Fisher Scientific (China) Co., Ltd., China) were used to determine the steel composition. The chemical composition of the experimental steel is shown in Table 2.
During the experiment, steel samples were taken during the RH refining process and from the tundish. The specific sampling plan is shown in Table 3. Metallographic specimens (20 mm × 15 mm × 15 mm) were taken from the edges of the steel samples after removing the oxide scales on their surfaces, as shown in Figure 1. After grinding and polishing, the morphology, quantity, size and composition of inclusions with sizes >1 μm in the steel were analyzed by automated SEM/EDS inclusion analysis (ASPEX, FEI, USA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-6490LV, JEOL Ltd., Japan), and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS, Oxford Instruments, High Wycombe, UK). The contents of total oxygen (T.O.) and nitrogen in the steel were detected by inert gas fusion pulse-infrared absorption spectroscopy.
The magnetic flux density, B50, was determined at a magnetic field strength of H = 5000 A/m, and the core losses, P15/50, at an induction of 1.5 T and 50 Hz. Magnetic measurements were carried out for final-annealed sheets of 30 mm in width and 100 mm in length, in both rolling and transverse directions. The measured values were averaged to align with the Epstein method, using MPG100D equipment (Dr. Brockhaus Messtechnik GmbH & Co. KG, Lüdenscheid, Germany).

3. Results

The morphologies and compositions of inclusions in the steel were analyzed by SEM and EDS. Figure 2 and Figure 3 show the typical morphologies, compositions and surface scanning results for inclusions in the steel during the RH refining process, with rare earth treatment. The main types of inclusions in the steel are (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaO-Al2O3-MgO, (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaS-(CaO-Al2O3), and CaO-Al2O3-MgO. Inclusions with (La, Ce)Al2O3 as the core are surrounded by a CaO-Al2O3-MgO or CaO-Al2O3-MgO composite phase, and their morphologies are spherical or ellipsoidal. Among the inclusions, the (La, Ce)Al2O3 inclusions are distributed in light, white blocks, and CaO-Al2O3-MgO inclusions are spherical or approximately spherical.
Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the typical morphologies, compositions and surface scanning results for inclusions in the steel at the end of the RH refining process. It was found that the types of inclusions are still (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaO-Al2O3-MgO, (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaS+oxides, and CaO-Al2O3-MgO. (La, Ce)Al2O3 inclusions are distributed in long strips at the edge of the composite phase. In addition, some inclusions contain a small amount of SiO2.
The main types of inclusions in the tundish impact zone are (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaO-Al2O3-MgO, (La,Ce)Al2O3+CaS+oxides and CaO-Al2O3-MgO-(CaS); the typical morphologies and compositions are shown in Figure 6. Compared to the inclusions found after the RH refining process, the morphologies of inclusions in the tundish impact zone are mainly spherical. Figure 7 shows surface scanning results for typical inclusions. The (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaO-Al2O3-MgO inclusions are composed of two composite phases with (La, Ce)Al2O3 as the core, surrounded by CaO-Al2O3-MgO.
Figure 8 and Figure 9 show the typical morphologies, compositions and surface scanning results for inclusions in the tundish pouring zone. The types of inclusions in the tundish pouring zone are mainly (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaO-Al2O3-MgO, (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaS+oxides, and MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-CaS. The (La, Ce)Al2O3 inclusions are distributed in light, white blocks.

4. Discussion

4.1. Changes to Inclusion Types after Rare Earth Treatment

Figure 10 shows the morphologies and compositions of typical inclusions after alloying in the RH refining process, with and without rare earth treatment. It can be seen that without rare earth treatment, the types of inclusions in the steel after RH alloying are mainly Al2O3-SiO2-(MnO) and Al2O3-(MgO), and some inclusions contain a small amount of CaS and MnS. The Al2O3-(MgO) inclusions are mostly spherical, while those including CaS and MnS have square or angular shapes. In addition, some Al2O3 inclusions aggregate in clusters. After adding rare earth La–Ce alloys during the RH refining process, the main types of inclusions are (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaO-Al2O3-MgO, (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaS-(CaO-Al2O3), and CaO-Al2O3-MgO, a finding which is similar to that of Ren et al. [23,24]. Inclusions with (La, Ce)Al2O3 as the core are surrounded by a CaO-Al2O3-MgO or CaO-Al2O3-MgO composite phase, and the morphologies are spherical or ellipsoidal.
Figure 11 shows the morphologies and compositions of typical inclusions in the steel before and after rare earth treatment, after the RH refining station. The majority of inclusions at the RH station are composed of Al2O3-CaO, with some inclusions containing a small amount of MnS and CaS. The content of Al2O3 in the inclusions is high, and their morphologies are spherical or irregular. After rare earth treatment, the main types of inclusions in the steel after the RH refining station are (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaO-Al2O3-MgO, (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaS+oxides, and CaO-Al2O3-MgO. The (La, Ce)Al2O3 inclusions are distributed at the edge of the composite phase. In addition, some of the inclusions contain a small amount of SiO2.
Figure 12 shows the typical morphologies and compositions of inclusions in the tundish pouring zone, before and after rare earth treatment. The results show that without rare earth treatment, the inclusions in the tundish pouring zone are composed of Al2O3-CaO-MgO-(SiO2), and their morphologies are spherical or oval. After adding rare earth, the main types of inclusions in the steel are (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaO-Al2O3-MgO, (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaS+oxides, and MgO-Al2O3-CaS.
Through the analysis of the experimental results before and after rare earth treatment in different processes, it can be seen that rare earth treatment transforms the typical CaO-Al2O3-MgO inclusions with rectangular, acicular, or irregular shapes, into spherical or ellipsoidal rare earth inclusions. According to the investigations of Li et al. [17], rare earth elements added to liquid steel at a certain temperature will first react with the non-metallic elements O, S, etc., to form inclusions. The general formula of the chemical reaction is as follows:
RE + y x M = 1 x R E x M y s
where [RE] represents various rare earth elements dissolved in liquid steel, [M] represents various impurity elements dissolved in liquid steel, and (s) refers to the solid phase, with an activity of 1. According to the change of Gibbs free energy, the different types of inclusions can be determined. In addition to the formation sequence of inclusions in liquid steel, rare earth inclusions can also be converted to each other, which is closely related to the amounts of rare earth elements added. In the previous study, the author introduced the modification of inclusions in W350 non-oriented silicon steel by rare earth Ce [25].
Furthermore, it is generally accepted that rare earth inclusions have high melting points, that is, higher than 1690 °C. The temperature of liquid steel during the RH refining process and the continuous casting process is lower than the melting point of rare earth inclusions. Therefore, the physical properties of rare earth inclusions essentially determine that they can be used as the basic conditions for heterogeneous nucleation in liquid steel [26]. Whether during the RH refining process or the tundish process, the types of inclusions in the steel changed significantly before and after rare earth treatment. With the ability of rare earth oxides (sulfides) to form heterogeneous nuclei, the types of inclusions with rare earth treatment are mainly rare earth composite inclusions, and most of them are (La, Ce)Al2O3+conventional inclusions [27]. In addition, the inclusions detected after rare earth treatment are usually composed of more than two composite phases, indicating that the addition of rare earth elements promotes the agglomeration of inclusions.

4.2. Size Distribution of Inclusions before and after Rare Earth Treatment

Figure 13 shows the size distributions of inclusions, the proportions of inclusions with different sizes, and the changes in average size during the production processes of RH refining→after RH station→tundish. The morphologies, quantities and sizes of inclusions with a size of >1 μm in the steel were analyzed by an automatic scanning electron microscope (ASPEX). It can be seen that the number of inclusions with a size of 1.0~3.5 μm in the steel during the RH refining process, after rare earth treatment, is increased and their proportion is 11.11~24.07%. The average size of inclusions in the steel is 2.66 μm. The number of inclusions in the steel increases after the RH station, and the number of inclusions larger than 5 μm in the steel increases due to the collision of inclusions during the RH refining process. As the pouring casting proceeds, the number of micro inclusions with sizes of 1.0~2.5 μm in the steel decreases, while the number of inclusions with sizes of >5 μm increases, especially in the tundish impact zone. The number density of inclusions in the tundish pouring zone is 8.50/mm2 and their proportion is 28.57%. The size distribution of inclusions is relatively stable.
Inclusions of less than 1 μm were difficult to observe due to their small size. Therefore, high-magnification TEM (backscattered, JEM-2100, JEOL Ltd., Japan) observation was used to assist in the identification of typical inclusions, through energy spectrum observation statistics.
The carbon extraction replica test samples for TEM were prepared as samples with sizes of 8 mm (TD) × 10 mm (RD) by wire cutting, and then roughly and finely ground. The samples were prepared by electro-polishing at 90 mA in 10% AA (acid alcohol) electrolyte for 120 s. The electrolyzed samples were coated with a layer of carbon film with a thickness of approximately 30 nm, using a vacuum carbon spray instrument. After dividing the carbon film into sizes of approximately 2 mm × 2 mm, they were placed in a 10% perchloric acid alcohol solution for electrolytic release, and then molybdenum nets with a 3 mm diameter were used to extract the carbon film. The samples were also prepared for TEM, and then electropolishing and observations, with 30 fields in each sample, were performed at different magnifications under TEM. The sizes and numbers of precipitates were analyzed using Image-Pro Plus.
The inclusions in hot-rolled sheet were observed and counted, and 30 fields of view were randomly selected, as shown in Figure 14.
As illustrated in Figure 15, the content of micro inclusions (≤1 μm) in hot-rolled sheets is 51,458.2/mm2 and their average size is 0.388 μm, before rare earth treatment. After rare earth treatment, the content of micro inclusions (≤1 μm) in hot-rolled sheets is 24,230.2/mm2 and their average size is 0.427 μm. According to previous investigations, when the size of micro inclusions in non-oriented silicon steel is 0.1~0.5 μm, the magnetic properties of non-oriented silicon steel seriously deteriorate because the sizes of the micro inclusions are close to the thickness of the magnetic domain wall. In the current study, the number of micro inclusions in hot-rolled sheets after rare earth treatment is greatly reduced, and the average size of the micro inclusions is also increased. The magnetic properties of the steel with rare earth treatment are improved, which is consistent with previous investigations [28,29,30]. Compared to sheet produced through the original process, the iron loss of the 0.35 mm finished experimental sheet is reduced by 0.068 W/kg, and the magnetic induction is increased by 0.007 T, as shown in Table 4. The iron loss of the 0.50 mm finished experimental sheet is reduced by 0.008 W/kg, and the magnetic induction is increased by 0.004 T.

5. Conclusions

(1) The types of inclusions in the steel significantly change after rare earth treatment. They are mainly composed of (La, Ce)Al2O3 and conventional inclusions. The morphologies are mostly blocky and partially chain-shaped.
(2) Adding rare earth La–Ce alloys during the RH refining process results in inclusions that are mainly (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaO-Al2O3-MgO, (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaS+oxides, and CaO-Al2O3-MgO. At the end of RH refining, the inclusions are mainly (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaO-Al2O3-MgO, (La,Ce)Al2O3+CaS+oxides, and CaO-Al2O3-MgO. The inclusions in the tundish impact zone are mainly (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaO-Al2O3-MgO, (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaS+oxides, and CaO-Al2O3-MgO-(CaS). The inclusions in the tundish pouring zone are mainly (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaO-Al2O3-MgO, (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaS+oxides, MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-CaS, and Al2O3-SiO2-CaO. After rare earth treatment during the RH refining process, the number of inclusions in the steel with sizes of 1.0~3.5 μm is increased and their average size is 2.66 μm. Due to collisions and growth, the number of inclusions with sizes greater than 4 μm in the steel increases after the RH refining station. The number of micro inclusions with sizes of 1.0~2.5 μm in the tundish decreases, while the number of inclusions with sizes larger than 5 μm increases.
(3) Before rare earth treatment, the content of micro inclusions (≤1 μm) in hot-rolled sheets is 51,458.2/mm2 and their average size is 0.388 μm. The content of micro inclusions (≤1 μm) in hot-rolled sheets with rare earth treatment is 24,230.2/mm2 and their average size is 0.427 μm. Compared to sheets produced by the original process, the magnetic properties of the experimental sheets show that the iron loss of the 0.35 mm finished product is decreased by 0.068 W/kg, and the magnetic induction is increased by 0.007 T. The iron loss of the 0.5 mm finished product is decreased by 0.008 W/kg, and the magnetic induction is increased by 0.004 T.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.W. and H.L.; methodology, H.W.; software, H.W.; validation, H.W., Y.Z. and W.Z.; formal analysis, H.W.; investigation, H.W.; resources, H.W.; data curation, H.W., J.Q. and Y.N.; writing—original draft preparation, H.W.; writing—review and editing, H.W. and S.Q.; visualization, H.W. and H.L.; supervision, S.Q.; project administration, H.W. and S.Q.; funding acquisition, H.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 52274312 and 51804003), the Fund of Education Department of Anhui Province (Nos. 2022AH050291, 2022AH050293), the Open Project Program of Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Metallurgical Engineering & Resources Recycling (Anhui University of Technology) (Nos. SKF21-04 and SKF21-05), the University Natural Science Research Project of Education Department of Anhui Province (No. KJ2021A0396), and the Jiangxi Province Major Scientific and Technological Research and Development Special Funding Project (20213AAE01009).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available in a publicly accessible repository.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kubota, T. Recent progress on non-oriented silicon steel. Steel Res. Int. 2005, 76, 464–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Oda, Y.; Kohno, M.; Honda, A. Recent development of non-oriented electrical steel sheet for automobile electrical devices. J. Mag. Mag. Mater. 2008, 320, 2430–2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Paolinelli, S.C.; Da Cunha, M.A. Development of a new generation of high permeability non-oriented silicon steels. J. Mag. Mag. Mater. 2006, 304, e596–e598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kubota, T. Development of non-oriented electrical steel used for high efficiency cores. Curr. Adv. Mater. Process. 2003, 16, 626. [Google Scholar]
  5. Qin, J.; Yang, P.; Mao, W.M.; Ye, F. Effect of texture and grain size on the magnetic flux density and core loss of cold-rolled high silicon steel sheets. J. Mag. Mag. Mater. 2015, 393, 537–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Oda, Y.; Okubo, T.; Takata, M. Recent development of non-oriented electrical steel in JFE steel. JFE Tech. Rep. 2016, 21, 7–13. [Google Scholar]
  7. Manoh, P.A.; Ferry, M.; Chandra, T. Five decades of the Zener equation. ISIJ Int. 1998, 38, 913–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wang, J.Y.; Ren, Q.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, L.F. Effect of non-metallic precipitates and grain size on core loss of non-oriented electrical silicon steels. J. Mag. Mag. Mater. 2018, 451, 454–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hou, C.K.; Liao, C.C. Effect of cerium content on the magnetic properties of non-oriented electrical steels. ISIJ Int. 2008, 48, 531–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Ren, Q.; Hu, Z.Y.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, L.F. Effect of rare earth elements on magnetic properties of non-oriented electrical steels. J. Mag. Mag. Mater. 2022, 560, 169624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fan, L.F.; Zhu, R.; He, J.Z.; Lu, B. Effect of rare earth element La on texture and inclusion of non-oriented electrical steel produced by thin slab casting and rolling process. ISIJ Int. 2018, 58, 2348–2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Zhang, F.; Ma, C.S.; Wang, B.; Zhang, P.L.; Ma, Z.G.; Zhang, Y. Control of nonmetallic inclusions of non-oriented silicon steel sheets by the rare earth treatment. Baosteel Tech. Res. 2011, 5, 41–45. [Google Scholar]
  13. He, Z.H.; Sha, Y.H.; Gao, Y.K.; Chang, S.T.; Zhang, F.; Zuo, L. Recrystallization texture development in rare-earth (RE)-doped non-oriented silicon steel. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2020, 27, 1339–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shi, C.J.; Jin, Z.L.; Ren, H.P.; You, J.L. Effect of lanthanum on recrystallization behavior of non-oriented silicon steel. J. Rare Earths 2017, 35, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Takashima, M.; Ono, T.; Nishimura, K. Low iron loss non-oriented electrical steel for high efficiency motors “RMA Series”. Kawasaki Steel Tech. Rep. 1998, 39, 48–49. [Google Scholar]
  16. Takashima, M.; Morito, N.; Honda, A.; Maeda, C. Non-oriented electrical steel sheet with low iron loss for high-efficiency motor cores. IEEE Trans. Mag. 1999, 35, 557–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, N.; Lu, Q.Y.; Wang, Y.Q.; Zhu, Z.H.; Xiang, L.X.; Qiu, S.T. Effect of Ce on inclusions modification in 2.9% Si-0.8% A1 non-oriented electrical steel. J. Iron Steel Res. 2017, 29, 570–576. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kong, W.; Chen, Y.; Cang, D. A statistical study of inclusions in medium-grade non-oriented silicon steel. Metall. Res. Technol. 2019, 116, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Qiao, J.L.; Guo, F.H.; Hu, J.W.; Xiang, L.; Qiu, S.T.; Wang, H.J. Precipitates in compact strip production (CSP) process non-oriented electrical steel. Metals 2020, 10, 1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wan, Y.; Chen, W.Q.; Wu, S.J. Effect of lanthanum content on microstructure and magnetic properties of non-oriented electrical steels. J. Rare Earths 2013, 3, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wan, Y.; Wu, S.J.; Li, J. Effects of complex trace elements on the microstructure and magnetic properties of non-oriented electrical steels. Metall. Res. Technol. 2016, 113, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wan, Y.; Chen, W.Q.; Wu, S.J. Effects of lanthanum and boron on the microstructure and magnetic properties of non-oriented electrical steels. High Temp. Mater. Process. 2014, 33, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ren, Q.; Zhang, L.F. Effect of cerium content on inclusions in an ultra-low-carbon aluminum-killed steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2020, 51, 589–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ren, Q.; Zhang, L.F.; Hu, Z.Y.; Cheng, L. Transient influence of cerium on inclusions in an Al-killed non-oriented electrical steel. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2020, 48, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, H.J.; Niu, Y.H.; Ling, H.T.; Qiao, J.L.; Zhang, Y.L.; Zhong, W.; Qiu, S.T. Modification of rare earth Ce on inclusions in W350 non-oriented silicon steel. Metals 2023, 13, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ji, Y.P.; Li, Y.M.; Zhang, M.X.; Qu, W.; Zhao, T.X.; Ren, H.P. Grain refinement mechanism of the δ-ferrite in steels through cerium addition. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2020, 51, 1707–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, B.; Zhu, H.Y.; Zhao, J.X.; Song, M.M.; Li, J.L.; Xue, Z.L. Effect of rare-earth La on inclusion evolution in high-Al steel. Steel Res. Int. 2022, 93, 2100347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bóc, I.; Cziráki, Á.; Gróf, T.; Csébi, J. Analysis of inclusions in cold-rolled n.o. Si-Fe strips. J. Mag. Mag. Mater. 1990, 83, 381–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, F.; Li, G.Q.; Miao, L.D.; Zhu, C.Y. Effects of chemical composition systems on non-metallic inclusions in non-oriented silicon steel sheets. J. Iron Steel Res. 2012, 24, 40–44. [Google Scholar]
  30. Chen, L.F.; Zhao, Z.Y. Effect of cooling rate on precipitating behavior of inclusions in non-oriented silicon steel. Spec. Steel 2015, 36, 55–58. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Diagram depicting sampling of the experimental steel.
Figure 1. Diagram depicting sampling of the experimental steel.
Metals 13 00626 g001
Figure 2. Typical morphologies and compositions of inclusions, with rare earth treatment. (a) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-CaO-CaS; (b) Inner layer: (La,Ce)AlO3, Outer layer:Al2O3-CaO-MgO; (c) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-CaO-MgO; (d) Al2O3-CaO-MgO; (e) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-MgO-CaS; (f) (La,Ce)AlO3.
Figure 2. Typical morphologies and compositions of inclusions, with rare earth treatment. (a) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-CaO-CaS; (b) Inner layer: (La,Ce)AlO3, Outer layer:Al2O3-CaO-MgO; (c) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-CaO-MgO; (d) Al2O3-CaO-MgO; (e) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-MgO-CaS; (f) (La,Ce)AlO3.
Metals 13 00626 g002
Figure 3. Surface scanning results for inclusions, with rare earth treatment. (a) (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaS-CaO-Al2O3, (b) (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaO-Al2O3-MgO.
Figure 3. Surface scanning results for inclusions, with rare earth treatment. (a) (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaS-CaO-Al2O3, (b) (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaO-Al2O3-MgO.
Metals 13 00626 g003aMetals 13 00626 g003b
Figure 4. Typical morphologies and compositions of inclusions in the steel at the end of the RH refining process. (a) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3+MgO-CaS-SiO2; (b) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3+Al2O3-CaO-MgO; (c) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3+Al2O3-MgO-CaS-SiO2; (d) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-CaO-MgO-CaS; (e) Al2O3-SiO2; (f) Al2O3-CaO-MgO.
Figure 4. Typical morphologies and compositions of inclusions in the steel at the end of the RH refining process. (a) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3+MgO-CaS-SiO2; (b) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3+Al2O3-CaO-MgO; (c) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3+Al2O3-MgO-CaS-SiO2; (d) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-CaO-MgO-CaS; (e) Al2O3-SiO2; (f) Al2O3-CaO-MgO.
Metals 13 00626 g004
Figure 5. Surface scanning results for inclusions in the steel at the end of the RH refining process. (a) (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaS-MgO-Al2O3, (b) (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaS-MgO-Al2O3-CaO.
Figure 5. Surface scanning results for inclusions in the steel at the end of the RH refining process. (a) (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaS-MgO-Al2O3, (b) (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaS-MgO-Al2O3-CaO.
Metals 13 00626 g005aMetals 13 00626 g005b
Figure 6. Typical morphologies and compositions of inclusions in the tundish impact zone. (a) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-MgO-CaO; (b) (La,Ce)AlO3-Al2O3+Al2O3-CaO-MgO-CaS; (c) Al2O3-MgO-CaS-CaO; (d) Al2O3-MgO-CaS.
Figure 6. Typical morphologies and compositions of inclusions in the tundish impact zone. (a) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-MgO-CaO; (b) (La,Ce)AlO3-Al2O3+Al2O3-CaO-MgO-CaS; (c) Al2O3-MgO-CaS-CaO; (d) Al2O3-MgO-CaS.
Metals 13 00626 g006
Figure 7. Surface scanning results for (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaO-Al2O3-MgO in the tundish impact zone.
Figure 7. Surface scanning results for (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaO-Al2O3-MgO in the tundish impact zone.
Metals 13 00626 g007
Figure 8. Typical morphologies and compositions of inclusions in the tundish pouring zone. (a) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-MgO-CaO; (b) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-CaO-CaS; (c) (La,Ce)AlO3-Al2O3-MgO-CaO+Al2O3-MgO; (d) (La,Ce)AlO3-Al2O3+Al2O3-MgO-CaS; (e) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-CaO-SiO2; (f) Al2O3-CaS-MgO-SiO2-MnS.
Figure 8. Typical morphologies and compositions of inclusions in the tundish pouring zone. (a) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-MgO-CaO; (b) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-CaO-CaS; (c) (La,Ce)AlO3-Al2O3-MgO-CaO+Al2O3-MgO; (d) (La,Ce)AlO3-Al2O3+Al2O3-MgO-CaS; (e) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-CaO-SiO2; (f) Al2O3-CaS-MgO-SiO2-MnS.
Metals 13 00626 g008
Figure 9. Surface scanning results for inclusions in the tundish pouring zone. (a) (La, Ce)Al2O3+MgO-Al2O3-CaO, (b) (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaS-Al2O3-CaO.
Figure 9. Surface scanning results for inclusions in the tundish pouring zone. (a) (La, Ce)Al2O3+MgO-Al2O3-CaO, (b) (La, Ce)Al2O3+CaS-Al2O3-CaO.
Metals 13 00626 g009
Figure 10. Morphologies and compositions of inclusions, before and after rare earth treatment, after RH alloying. (a) Al2O3-MgO; (b)MgO-Al2O3-MnO; (c) Al2O3-MgO; (d) Al2O3-MgO-MnS; (e) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-CaO-CaS; (f) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-MgO-CaO; (g) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-MgO-CaO; (h) Al2O3-MgO-CaO.
Figure 10. Morphologies and compositions of inclusions, before and after rare earth treatment, after RH alloying. (a) Al2O3-MgO; (b)MgO-Al2O3-MnO; (c) Al2O3-MgO; (d) Al2O3-MgO-MnS; (e) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-CaO-CaS; (f) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-MgO-CaO; (g) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-MgO-CaO; (h) Al2O3-MgO-CaO.
Metals 13 00626 g010
Figure 11. Morphologies and compositions of typical inclusions in the steel, before and after rare earth treatment, after the RH refining station. (a) Al2O3-CaO; (b) Al2O3-SiO2-MnS-CaS; (c) Al2O3-CaO-CaS; (d) Al2O3-CaO; (e) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-MgO-CaS-SiO2; (f) (La,Ce)AlO3-Al2O3+Al2O3-MgO-CaO; (g) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-MgO-CaS-SiO2; (h) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-MgO-CaS-CaO.
Figure 11. Morphologies and compositions of typical inclusions in the steel, before and after rare earth treatment, after the RH refining station. (a) Al2O3-CaO; (b) Al2O3-SiO2-MnS-CaS; (c) Al2O3-CaO-CaS; (d) Al2O3-CaO; (e) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-MgO-CaS-SiO2; (f) (La,Ce)AlO3-Al2O3+Al2O3-MgO-CaO; (g) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-MgO-CaS-SiO2; (h) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-MgO-CaS-CaO.
Metals 13 00626 g011
Figure 12. Morphologies and compositions of typical inclusions in the steel, before and after rare earth treatment, in the tundish pouring zone. (a) Al2O3-CaO-MgO-SiO2; (b) Al2O3-CaO-MgO; (c) Al2O3-CaO-MgO; (d) Al2O3-CaO-MgO; (e) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-MgO-CaO; (f) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-CaS-CaO; (g) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-MgO; (h) (La,Ce)AlO3-Al2O3+Al2O3-MgO-CaS.
Figure 12. Morphologies and compositions of typical inclusions in the steel, before and after rare earth treatment, in the tundish pouring zone. (a) Al2O3-CaO-MgO-SiO2; (b) Al2O3-CaO-MgO; (c) Al2O3-CaO-MgO; (d) Al2O3-CaO-MgO; (e) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-MgO-CaO; (f) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-CaS-CaO; (g) (La,Ce)AlO3+Al2O3-MgO; (h) (La,Ce)AlO3-Al2O3+Al2O3-MgO-CaS.
Metals 13 00626 g012
Figure 13. Size distributions and changes to inclusions in the steel. (a) The size distribution of inclusions, (b) The proportion of inclusions with different sizes, (c) Average size change of inclusions.
Figure 13. Size distributions and changes to inclusions in the steel. (a) The size distribution of inclusions, (b) The proportion of inclusions with different sizes, (c) Average size change of inclusions.
Metals 13 00626 g013aMetals 13 00626 g013b
Figure 14. TEM morphology of micro inclusions in hot-rolled sheet, after rare earth treatment.
Figure 14. TEM morphology of micro inclusions in hot-rolled sheet, after rare earth treatment.
Metals 13 00626 g014aMetals 13 00626 g014b
Figure 15. Size distribution of inclusions before and after rare earth treatment. (a) RE-free (b) RE-added.
Figure 15. Size distribution of inclusions before and after rare earth treatment. (a) RE-free (b) RE-added.
Metals 13 00626 g015
Table 1. Chemical composition of rare earth La–Ce alloys (wt%).
Table 1. Chemical composition of rare earth La–Ce alloys (wt%).
ElementCMgSiCaLaCe
Content0.0020.0010.20.00137.3261.67
Table 2. Chemical composition of experiment steel (wt%).
Table 2. Chemical composition of experiment steel (wt%).
ElementCMnSPSiAlsNTiCuLaCe
RE-free (Rare earth-free)0.00240.320.00220.0162.690.530.0010.00180.038//
RE-added (Rare earth-added)0.00260.360.00280.0152.620.540.0010.00190.0400.00120.0013
Table 3. Sampling plan.
Table 3. Sampling plan.
No.ProcessSampling LocationSampling Method
1RH refiningRare earth alloyingCylindrical sample (Φ70 mm × 100 mm)
2Carrying out stationCylindrical sample (Φ70 mm × 100 mm)
3TundishImpact zoneCylindrical sample (Φ70 mm × 100 mm)
4Pouring zoneCylindrical sample (Φ70 mm × 100 mm)
Φ represents the diameter of cylindrical sample.
Table 4. Electromagnetic properties of the steel.
Table 4. Electromagnetic properties of the steel.
GradeProjectP1.5/50, W/kgΔ Value (P1.5/50, W/kg)B50, TΔ Value, (B50, T)
0.35 mmExperiment roll after rare earth treatment2.370−0.0681.679+0.007
Original process sheet2.438 1.672
0.50 mmExperiment roll after rare earth treatment2.730−0.0081.695+0.004
Original process sheet2.738 1.691
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, H.; Niu, Y.; Ling, H.; Qiao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhong, W.; Qiu, S. Effects of Rare Earth La–Ce Alloying Treatment on Modification of Inclusions and Magnetic Properties of W350 Non-Oriented Silicon Steel. Metals 2023, 13, 626. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13030626

AMA Style

Wang H, Niu Y, Ling H, Qiao J, Zhang Y, Zhong W, Qiu S. Effects of Rare Earth La–Ce Alloying Treatment on Modification of Inclusions and Magnetic Properties of W350 Non-Oriented Silicon Steel. Metals. 2023; 13(3):626. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13030626

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Haijun, Yuhao Niu, Haitao Ling, Jialong Qiao, Yanling Zhang, Wei Zhong, and Shengtao Qiu. 2023. "Effects of Rare Earth La–Ce Alloying Treatment on Modification of Inclusions and Magnetic Properties of W350 Non-Oriented Silicon Steel" Metals 13, no. 3: 626. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13030626

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop