Pre-Event Self-Efficacy and Sports Performance: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Moderating Variables
1.2. Aims of the Study
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Eligibility Criteria and Selection Process
2.2. Information Sources, Search Strategy, and Search Protocol
- Examined all of Moritz et al.’s [8] studies.
- Began the EBSCOhost search.
- Selected individual databases (e.g., PsychINFO).
- Selected EBSCOhost advanced search.
- Typed in the following search terms using the Boolean operator AND: self-efficacy AND sport performance AND competitive.
- Limited EBSCOhost to scholarly peer-reviewed journals.
- Selected page options for 50 records per page.
- Limited search time for a specific year (e.g., 1996).
- Repeated until all years of the search were completed.
- Began another search, substituting athlete for competitive with the Boolean operator AND.
- Opened Google Scholar at https://scholar.google.com (last accessed 26 September 2022)
- Typed self-efficacy and sport performance.
- Limited year to one (e.g., 2010).
- Searched the first three pages of the results.
- Repeated all searches covering 2022–2023 as time passed, completing our manuscript.
- Examined Jekauc et al.’s [11] included studies.
- Hand searched SPORTDiscus.
2.3. Data Collection and Items Retrieved
2.4. Study Quality and Risk of Bias Assessments
2.5. Summary Statistics, Planned Analyses, and Certainty Assessment
3. Results
3.1. Study Selection, Characteristics, and Quality
3.2. Individual Study Data, Synthesis of Results, and Risk of Bias across Studies
3.3. Additional Sensitivity Analyses
3.4. Moderator Analyses
3.5. Certainty of Evidence
4. Discussion
4.1. Moderator Effects
4.2. Strengths, Limitations, Future Directions, and Practical Applications
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Review Registration
References
- Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 1977, 84, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feltz, D.L.; Short, S.E.; Sullivan, P.J. Self-Efficacy in Sport. Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Maddux, J.E. Self-efficacy theory: An introduction. In Self-Efficacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment: Theory, Research, and Application; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995; pp. 3–33. [Google Scholar]
- Short, S.; Ross-Stewart, L. A review of self-efficacy based interventions. In Advances in Applied Sport Psychology; Mellalieu, S.D., Manton, S., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 231–290. [Google Scholar]
- Wurtele, S.K. Self-efficacy and athletic performance: A review. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 1986, 4, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McAuley, E.; Szabo, A.; Gothe, N.; Olson, E.A. Self-efficacy: Implications for physical activity, function, and functional limitations in older adults. Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 2011, 5, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samson, A.; Solmon, M. Examining the sources of self-efficacy for physical activity within the sport and exercise domains. Int. Rev. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2011, 4, 70–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moritz, S.E.; Feltz, D.L.; Fahrbach, K.R.; Mack, D.E. The relation of self-efficacy measures to sport performance: A meta-analytic review. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 2000, 71, 280–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stajkovic, A.D.; Luthans, F. Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 1998, 124, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Talsma, K.; Schüz, B.; Schwarzer, R.; Norris, K. I believe, therefore I achieve (and vice versa): A meta-analytic cross-lagged panel analysis of self-efficacy and academic performance. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2018, 61, 136–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jekauc, D.; Fiedler, J.; Wunsch, K.; Mülberger, L.; Burkart, D.; Kilgus, A.; Fritsch, J. The effect of self-confidence on performance in sports: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Int. Rev. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2023, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lochbaum, M.; Stoner, E.; Hefner, T.; Cooper, S.; Lane, A.M.; Terry, P.C. Sport psychology and performance meta-analyses: A systematic review of the literature. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0263408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lochbaum, M.; Sherburn, M.; Sisneros, C.; Cooper, S.; Lane, A.M.; Terry, P.C. Revisiting the self-confidence and sport performance relationship: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 6381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terry, P. The efficacy of mood state profiling with elite performers: A review and synthesis. Sport Psychol. 1995, 9, 309–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slobounov, S.; Yukelson, D.; O’Brien, R. Self-efficacy and movement variability of Olympic-level springboard divers. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 1997, 9, 171–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lowther, J.; Lane, A.; Lane, H. Self-efficacy and psychological skills during the amputee soccer world cup. Athl. Insight 2002, 4, 23–34. [Google Scholar]
- Gernigon, C.; Delloye, J.-B. Self-efficacy, causal attribution, and track athletic performance following unexpected success or failure among elite sprinters. Sport Psychol. 2003, 17, 55–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bueno García, J.; Capdevila Ortís, L.; Fernández-Castro, J. Sufrimiento competitivo y rendimiento en deportes de resistencia. Rev. De Psicol. Del Deporte 2002, 11, 209–226. [Google Scholar]
- Beedie, C.J.; Terry, P.C.; Lane, A.M. The profile of mood states and athletic performance: Two meta-analyses. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 2000, 12, 49–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lochbaum, M.; Zanatta, T.; Kirschling, D.; May, E. The Profile of Moods States and athletic performance: A meta-analysis of published studies. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2021, 11, 50–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int. J. Surg. 2021, 88, 105906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borenstein, M.; Hedges, L.E.; Higgins, J.P.T.; Rothstein, H.R. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software Version 4; Biostat, Inc.: Englewood, NJ, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Borenstein, M. Common Mistakes in Meta-Analysis and How to Avoid Them; Biostat, Inc.: Englewood, NJ, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Aikawa, S.; Takai, H. Relationship between imagery ability, performance, and variables related to performance. Sport Psychol. 2021, 35, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arruza, J.A.; Telletxea, S.; Gil de Montes, L.; Arribas, S.; Balagué, G.; Cecchini, J.A.; Brustad, R.J. Understanding the relationship between perceived development of the competition plan and sport performance: Mediating effects of self-efficacy and state depression. Percept. Mot. Ski. 2009, 109, 304–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Avugos, S.; Bar-Eli, M.; Ritov, I.; Sher, E. The elusive reality of efficacy–performance cycles in basketball shooting: An analysis of players’ performance under invariant conditions. Int. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2013, 11, 184–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baretta, D.; Greco, A.; Steca, P. Understanding performance in risky sport: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and sensation seeking in competitive freediving. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2017, 117, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beauchamp, M.R.; Bray, S.R.; Albinson, J.G. Pre-competition imagery, self-efficacy and performance in collegiate golfers. J. Sports Sci. 2002, 20, 697–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beauchamp, M.R.; Whinton, L.C. Self-efficacy and other-efficacy in dyadic performance: Riding as one in equestrian eventing. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2005, 27, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Besharat, M.A.; Pourbohlool, S. Moderating effects of self-confidence and sport self-efficacy on the relationship between competitive anxiety and sport performance. Psychology 2011, 2, 760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bezjak, J.E.; Langga-Sharifi, E. Validation of the Physical Fitness Opinion Questionnaire against marathon performance. Percept. Mot. Ski. 1991, 73, 993–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blecharz, J.; Horodyska, K.; Zarychta, K.; Adamiec, A.; Luszczynska, A. Intrinsic motivation predicting performance satisfaction in athletes: Further psychometric evaluations of the Sport Motivation Scale-6. Pol. Psychol. Bull. 2015, 46, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blecharz, J.; Luszczynska, A.; Tenenbaum, G.; Scholz, U.; Cieslak, R. Self-efficacy moderates but collective efficacy mediates between motivational climate and athletes’ well-being. Appl. Psychol. Health Well-Being 2014, 6, 280–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blecharz, J.; Luszczynska, A.; Scholz, U.; Schwarzer, R.; Siekanska, M.; Cieslak, R. Predicting performance and performance satisfaction: Mindfulness and beliefs about the ability to deal with social barriers in sport. Anxiety Stress Coping 2014, 27, 270–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brace, A.W.; George, K.; Lovell, G.P. Mental toughness and self-efficacy of elite ultra-marathon runners. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0241284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bray, S.R.; Balaguer, I.; Duda, J.L. The relationship of task self-efficacy and role efficacy beliefs to role performance in Spanish youth soccer. J. Sports Sci. 2004, 22, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bueno, J.; Weinberg, R.S.; Fernández-Castro, J.; Capdevila, L. Emotional and motivational mechanisms mediating the influence of goal setting on endurance athletes’ performance. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2008, 9, 786–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burke, S.T.; Jin, P. Predicting performance from a triathlon event. J. Sport Behav. 1996, 19, 272. [Google Scholar]
- Coudevylle, G.R.; Ginis, K.A.M.; Famose, J.-P. Determinants of self-handicapping strategies in sport and their effects on athletic performance. Soc. Behav. Personal. Int. J. 2008, 36, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donovan, J.J.; Williams, K.J. Missing the mark: Effects of time and causal attributions on goal revision in response to goal-performance discrepancies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Estevan, I.; Álvarez, O.; Castillo, I. Autoeficacia percibida y rendimiento técnico-táctico en taekwondistas universitarios. Cuad. De Psicol. Del Deporte 2016, 16, 51–64. [Google Scholar]
- Feltz, D.L.; Lirgg, C.D. Perceived team and player efficacy in hockey. J. Appl. Psychol. 1998, 83, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- George, T.R. Self-confidence and baseball performance: A causal examination of self-efficacy theory. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 1994, 16, 381–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haney, C.J.; Long, B.C. Coping effectiveness: A path analysis of self-efficacy, control, coping, and performance in sport competitions. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1995, 25, 1726–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hatzigeorgiadis, A.; Zourbanos, N.; Goltsios, C.; Theodorakis, Y. Investigating the functions of self-talk: The effects of motivational self-talk on self-efficacy and performance in young tennis players. Sport Psychol. 2008, 22, 458–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayslip, B., Jr.; Petrie, T.A.; MacIntire, M.M.; Jones, G.M. The influences of skill level, anxiety, and psychological skills use on amateur golfers’ performances. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 2010, 22, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heazlewood, I.; Burke, S. Self-efficacy and its relationship to selected sport psychological constructs in the prediction of performance in ironman triathlon. J. Human Sport Exerc. 2011, 6, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kane, T.D.; Marks, M.A.; Zaccaro, S.J.; Blair, V. Self-efficacy, personal goals, and wrestlers’ self-regulation. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 1996, 18, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koper, M.; Nadolska, A.; Urbański, P.; Wilski, M. Relationship between pre-competition mental state and sport result of disabled boccia athletes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Laguardia, R.; Labbé, E.E. Self-efficacy and anxiety and their relationship to training and race performance. Percept. Mot. Ski. 1993, 77, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, C. The relationship between goal setting, self-efficacy, and female field hockey team performance. Int. J. Sport Psychol. 1989, 20, 147–161. [Google Scholar]
- Martin, J.J.; Gill, D.L. The relationships among competitive orientation, sport-confidence, self-efficacy, anxiety, and performance. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 1991, 13, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, J.J.; Gill, D.L. The relationships of competitive orientations and self-efficacy to goal importance, thoughts, and performance in high school distance runners. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 1995, 7, 50–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, J.J. Training and performance self-efficacy, affect, and performance in wheelchair road racers. Sport Psychol. 2002, 16, 384–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McAuley, E.; Gill, D. Reliability and validity of the physical self-efficacy scale in a competitive sport setting. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 1983, 5, 410–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicholls, A.R.; Polman, R.; Levy, A.R. Coping self-efficacy, pre-competitive anxiety, and subjective performance among athletes. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2010, 10, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okwumabua, T.M. Psychological and physical contributions to marathon performance: An exploratory investigation. J. Sport Behav. 1985, 8, 163. [Google Scholar]
- Treasure, D.C.; Monson, J.; Lox, C.L. Relationship between self-efficacy, wrestling performance, and affect prior to competition. Sport Psychol. 1996, 10, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, M.J.; Jones, M.V.; Sheffield, D.; Slater, M.J.; Barker, J.B.; Bell, J.J. Who thrives under pressure? Predicting the performance of elite academy cricketers using the cardiovascular indicators of challenge and threat states. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2013, 35, 387–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, M.J.; Massie, R.; Slater, M.J.; Braithwaite, E. Do challenge and threat evaluations predict netball performance and selection at trials in youth netball players? Sport Exerc. Perform. Psychol. 2021, 10, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watkins, B.; Garcia, A.W.; Turek, E. The relation between self-efficacy and sport performance: Evidence from a sample of youth baseball players. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 1994, 6, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weiss, M.R.; Wiese, D.M.; Klint, K.A. Head over heels with success: The relationship between self-efficacy and performance in competitive youth gymnastics. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 1989, 11, 444–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z. An empirical analysis of the relationship between self-efficacy, motivation, and team performance of high-level basketball players. Rev. Psicol. Deporte 2020, 29, 221–231. [Google Scholar]
- Lochbaum, M.; Cooper, S.; Limp, S. The Athletic Identity Measurement Scale: A systematic review with meta-analysis from 1993 to 2021. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2022, 12, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoy, D.; Brooks, P.; Woolf, A.; Blyth, F.; March, L.; Bain, C.; Baker, P.; Smith, E.; Buchbinder, R. Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: Modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2012, 65, 934–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duval, S.; Tweedie, R. Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000, 56, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rosenthal, R. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychol. Bull. 1979, 86, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orwin, R.G. A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. J. Educ. Stat. 1983, 8, 157–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Egger, M.; Smith, G.D.; Schneider, M.; Minder, C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997, 315, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cohen, J. Things I have learned (so far). Am. Psychol. Assoc. 1990, 45, 1304–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hagger, M. Meta-analysis. Int. Rev. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2022, 15, 120–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Craft, L.L.; Magyar, T.M.; Becker, B.J.; Feltz, D.L. The relationship between the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 and sport performance: A meta-analysis. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2003, 25, 44–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woodman, T.; Hardy, L. The relative impact of cognitive anxiety and self-confidence upon sport performance: A meta-analysis. J. Sports Sci. 2003, 21, 443–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Andersen, M.B.; Stoove, M.A. The sanctity of p < 0.05 obfuscates good stuff: A comment on Kerr and Goss. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 1998, 10, 168–173. [Google Scholar]
- Kyllo, B.L.; Landers, D.M. Goal setting in sport and exercise: A research synthesis to resolve the controversy. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 1995, 17, 117–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swann, C.; Moran, A.; Piggott, D. Defining elite athletes: Issues in the study of expert performance in sport psychology. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2015, 16, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afremow, J. The Champion’s Mind: How Great Athletes Think, Train, and Thrive; Tantor Audio: Old Saybrook, CN, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Collins, D.; Cruikshank, A. Sport Psychology Essentials; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Karageorghis, C.I.; Terry, P.C. Inside Sport Psychology; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Vernon, A. Mind Games; Bloomsbury Sport: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
Rating Explanations | |||
---|---|---|---|
Bias | Low Risk (3 Points) | Medium Risk (2 Points) | High Risk (1 Point) |
Sample | Elite or advanced | Intermediate or youth | Mix |
Recruitment | Stated random selection occurred from a much larger group (e.g., from all athletes at an event) | Random selection occurred within a group of athletes (e.g., a college team at an event) | No random selection of any kind stated |
Nonresponse | Appears most participants completed the measures | Participants recruited; coaches/parents denied participation in at least 25% | Many did not do it (e.g., a big race, subjects recruited at the race, most likely most did not do it) |
Collection setting | Administered in person | Mix in person and unsupervised | Unsupervised (e.g., survey left in lockers) or mail, online |
Performance measure | Event time, win–loss, placement, event scores | Participant statistics | Subjective |
Setting | Actual event | No medium rating | Contrived |
Collection consistency | All the same | No medium rating | A mix of ways (e.g., individual for some, in large groups for others) |
Anonymity | Yes, stated | Not stated but informed consent presented | Not stated |
Study | Age Means, Ranges, or Descriptions | N | % Male | Ctry. | Sport | Performance Measure |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aikawa and Takai [24] | 19.70 | 52 | 56.76 | JP | Gymnastics | Performance statistics |
Arruza et al. [25] | 23.60 | 11 | 72.73 | US | Mix individual | Self-evaluation |
Avugos et al. [26] | 19.74 | 26 | 100 | IL | Basketball | Shots made percentage |
Baretta et al. [27] | 39.79 | 129 | 66.67 | IT | Freediving | Performance statistics |
Beauchamp et al. [28] | 20.80 | 60 | 100 | CA | Golf | Event score |
Beauchamp and Whinton [29] | 12.48 | 187 | 20.32 | UK | Equestrian | Performance statistics |
Besharat and Pourbohlool [30] | 23.03 | 246 | 60.57 | IR | Mix individual and team | Coach evaluation |
Bezjak and Sharifi [31] | 34.80 | 98 | 56.64 | US | Marathon | Event time |
Blecharz et al. [32] | 21.77 | 197 | 57.36 | US | Mix | Performance satisfaction |
Blecharz et al. [33] | 18.14 | 101 | 100 | PL | Soccer | Shots made percentage |
Blecharz et al. (2 samples) [34] | 22.70, 18.23 | 56, 113 | 36.00, 100 | US | Mix, soccer | Performance satisfaction |
Brace et al. [35] | 38.86 | 56 | 67.85 | Mix | Ultra-endurance | Event time |
Bray et al. [36] | 14.80 | 295 | 100 | ES | Soccer | Self-evaluations |
Bueno et al. [18] | 31.01 | 90 | ? | ES | Triathlon | Event times |
Bueno et al. [37] | 22.00 | 35 | 0 | US | Track and field (endurance) | Performance statistics (meters covered in 5 min) |
Burke and Jin [38] | NR | 40 | 92.5 | AU | Triathlon | Event times |
Coudevylle et al. [39] | 20.22 | 31 | 51.61 | FR | Basketball | Performance statistics scale (shots and passes) |
Donovan and Williams [40] | 17.00 to 21.00 | 100 | 60.5 | US | Track and field | Mercier scoring of performance |
Estevan et al. [41] | 22.03 | 86 | 55.81 | ES | Taekwondo | Winners vs. losers |
Feltz and Lirgg [42] | 19.00 to 22.00 | 159 (6 teams) | NR | US | Ice hockey | Game statistics including winning percentage |
George [43] | 17.30, 20.70 | 28, 25 | 100 | US | Baseball | Hitting statistics |
Gernigon and Delloye [17] | 19.90 | 62 | 67.74 | FR | Running sprints | International Amateur Athletic Federation points earned based on 60 m trial |
Haney and Long [44] | 19.16 | 178 | 0 | US | Mix team | Shots scored scale |
Hatzigeorgiadis et al. [45] | 13.26 | 46 | 46 | GR | Tennis | Forehand drive score |
Hayslip et al. [46] | 44.46 | 220 | 100 | US | Golf | Event score |
Heazlewood and Burke [47] | 32.40, 33.60 | 416 | NR | AU | Triathlon | Event time |
Kane et al. [48] | Adolescents | 216, 204 | 100 | US | Wrestling | Win/loss records |
Koper et al. [49] (4 samples) | 33.90, 28.10, 29.00, 29.90 | 18, 25, 42, 24 | 78.0, 80.0, 74.0, 83.0 | Mix | Boccia | Event results |
LaGuardia and Labbe [50] | Adults | 63 | 68.25 | US | Running | Pace times |
Lee [51] | 21.00 | 257 | 17.9 | US | Mix individual and team | Team winning percentage |
Lowther et al. [16] | 19.00 to 28.00 | 15 | 100 | UK | Soccer | Self-referenced measure |
Martin and Gill [52] | 16.00 | 73 | 100 | US | Track and field | Event time, placement |
Martin and Gill 1995 [53] | 16.00 | 86 | 55.81 | US | Track and field | Event time, placement |
Martin [54] | 35.40 | 51 | 100 | US | Wheelchair road racing | Event time, placement |
McAuley and Gill [55] | 19.00 to 22.00 | 52 | 0 | US | Gymnastics | Event scores |
Nicholls et al. [56] | 21.30 | 307 | 82.08 | UK | Mix individual and team | Performance rating |
Okwumabua [57] | 35.50 | 90 | 91.11 | US | Marathon | Best 10K time |
Slobounov et al. [15] | 18.00 to 21.00 | 6 | 50 | US | Diving | Self-evaluation |
Treasure et al. [58] | 16.03 | 70 | 100 | US | Wrestling | Winning percentage, point statistics |
Turner et al. [59] | 16.45 | 42 | 100 | UK | Cricket | Batting test statistics |
Turner et al. [60] | 13.26 | 92 | 0 | UK | Netball | Coach evaluation |
Watkins et al. [61] | 12.50 | 205 | 100 | US | Baseball | Hitting statistics |
Weiss [62] | 11.50 | 22 | 100 | US | Gymnastics | Event scores |
Yang [63] | NR | 270 | NR | ES | Basketball | Team performance score |
Study | Duration | Skill | Event | Measure | Reference | Concordance | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aikawa and Takai [24] | >10 | C | ACT | SUB | Self | Yes | Sub |
Arruza et al. [25] | <10, >10 | C, O | ACT | SUB | Self | Yes | Elite |
Avugos et al. [26] | <10 | C | CON | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Elite |
Baretta et al. [27] | <10 | C | ACT | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Elite |
Beauchamp et al. [28] | >10 | C | ACT | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Sub |
Beauchamp and Whinton [29] | <10, >10 | C | ACT | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Sub |
Besharat and Pourbohlool [30] | <10, >10 | C, O | ACT | SUB | OTH | Yes | Elite |
Bezjak and Sharifi [31] | >10 | C | ACT | OBJ | OTH | No | Mix |
Blecharz et al. [32] | <10, >10 | C, O | ACT | SUB | Self | No | Elite |
Blecharz et al. [33] | <10 | C | CON | OBJ | OTH | No | Sub |
Blecharz et al. [34] | >10 | O | ACT | SUB | Self | No | Sub |
Brace et al. [35] | >10 | C | ACT | OBJ | OTH | No | Elite |
Bray et al. [36] | >10 | O | ACT | SUB | Self | Yes | Sub |
Bueno et al. [18] | >10 | C | ACT | OBJ | Self | Yes | Sub |
Bueno et al. [37] | <10 | C | CON | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Sub |
Burke and Jin [38] | >10 | C | ACT | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Sub |
Coudevylle et al. [39] | <10 | C | CON | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Sub |
Donovan and Williams [40] | <10 | C | ACT | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Sub |
Estevan et al. [41] | <10 | O | ACT | OBJ | OTH | No | Sub |
Feltz and Lirgg [42] | >10 | O | ACT | OBJ | OTH | No | Sub |
George [43] | >10 | O | ACT | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Sub |
Gernigon and Delloye [17] | <10 | C | CON | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Sub |
Haney and Long [44] | <10 | C | ACT | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Sub |
Hatzigeorgiadis et al. [45] | <10 | C | CON | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Sub |
Hayslip et al. [46] | >10 | C | ACT | OBJ | OTH | No | Sub |
Heazlewood and Burke [47] | >10 | C | ACT | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Sub |
Kane et al. [48] | <10 | O | ACT | SUB | Self | No | Sub |
Koper et al. [49] (4 samples) | <10 | O | ACT | OBJ | OTH | No | Sub |
LaGuardia and Labbe [50] | <10, >10 | C | ACT | OBJ | OTH | Both | Sub |
Lee [51] | <10, >10 | C, O | ACT | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Sub |
Lowther et al. [16] | >10 | O | ACT | SUB | Self | Yes | Elite |
Martin and Gill [52] | <10 | C | ACT | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Sub |
Martin and Gill [53] | >10 | C | ACT | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Sub |
Martin [54] | >10 | C | ACT | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Elite |
McAuley and Gill [55] | <10 | C | ACT | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Sub |
Nicholls et al. [56] | ? | C, O | ACT | SUB | Self | No | Sub |
Okwumabua [57] | >10 | C | ACT | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Sub |
Slobounov et al. [15] | <10 | C | CON | SUB | Self | Yes | Elite |
Treasure et al. [58] | <10 | O | ACT | OBJ | OTH | Both | Sub |
Turner et al. [59] | <10 | C | CON | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Elite |
Turner et al. [60] | >10 | O | ACT | OBJ/SUB | OTH | Yes | Sub |
Watkins et al. [61] | <10 | C | CON | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Sub |
Weiss [62] | <10 | C | ACT | OBJ | OTH | Yes | Sub |
Yang [63] | >10 | O | ACT | SUB | OTH | No | Sub |
Moderator | Group | k | r | 95% CI | 95% PI | Q | p-Value | τ2 | I2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sport duration | <10 | 24 | 0.27 | 0.19, 0.35 | −0.13, 0.60 | 0.04 | 83.07 | ||
>10 | 25 | 0.34 | 0.17, 0.49 | −0.51, 0.85 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.19 | 97.63 | |
Sport skill | Closed | 29 | 0.37 | 0.22, 0.50 | −0.48, 0.86 | 0.19 | 97.62 | ||
Open | 21 | 0.23 | 0.12, 0.33 | −0.23, 0.61 | 2.21 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 85.27 | |
Event | Actual | 45 | 0.32 | 0.21, 0.42 | −0.42, 0.81 | 0.14 | 96.86 | ||
Contrived | 10 | 0.26 | 0.12, 0.40 | −0.22, 0.64 | 0.44 | 0.50 | 0.04 | 93.70 | |
Performance measure | Objective | 42 | 0.29 | 0.16, 0.41 | −0.52, 0.82 | 0.18 | 96.82 | ||
Subjective | 11 | 0.38 | 0.23, 0.52 | −0.22, 0.78 | 0.95 | 0.33 | 0.07 | 93.70 | |
Performance reference | Other | 44 | 0.31 | 0.19, 0.43 | −0.50, 0.83 | 0.18 | 96.89 | ||
Self | 10 | 0.25 | 0.18, 0.33 | 0.02, 0.46 | 0.65 | 0.42 | 0.01 | 67.72 | |
Concordance | Yes | 32 | 0.37 | 0.23, 0.49 | −0.44, 0.85 | 0.17 | 97.44 | ||
No | 21 | 0.22 | 0.11, 0.32 | −0.23, 0.59 | 2.98 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 85.08 | |
Athlete level | Elite | 10 | 0.40 | 0.17, 0.59 | −0.44, 0.87 | 0.13 | 92.19 | ||
Sub-elite | 42 | 0.28 | 0.16, 0.39 | −0.46, 0.79 | 0.93 | 0.33 | 0.15 | 96.92 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lochbaum, M.; Sisneros, C.; Cooper, S.; Terry, P.C. Pre-Event Self-Efficacy and Sports Performance: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Sports 2023, 11, 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports11110222
Lochbaum M, Sisneros C, Cooper S, Terry PC. Pre-Event Self-Efficacy and Sports Performance: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Sports. 2023; 11(11):222. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports11110222
Chicago/Turabian StyleLochbaum, Marc, Cassandra Sisneros, Sydney Cooper, and Peter C. Terry. 2023. "Pre-Event Self-Efficacy and Sports Performance: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis" Sports 11, no. 11: 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports11110222