Next Article in Journal
Potentially Suitable Geographical Area for Monochamus alternatus under Current and Future Climatic Scenarios Based on Optimized MaxEnt Model
Previous Article in Journal
The Pattern of Social Parasitism in Maculinea teleius Butterfly Is Driven by the Size and Spatial Distribution of the Host Ant Nests
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Population Density and Host Preference of the Japanese Pine Sawyer (Monochamus alternatus) in the Qinling–Daba Mountains of China

1
Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management of the Ministry of Education, College of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
2
Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration for Control of Forest Biological Disasters in Western China, College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
3
Shaanxi Academy of Forestry, Xi’an 710082, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2023, 14(2), 181; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14020181
Submission received: 8 January 2023 / Revised: 5 February 2023 / Accepted: 9 February 2023 / Published: 13 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Physiology, Reproduction and Development)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Monochamus alternatus is not only a serious trunk-boring pest but also the most important and effective vector of the pine wood nematode. The effective control of M. alternatus can effectively limit the spread of pine wilt disease in the Qinling–Daba Mountains. However, little is known about the damage level and host preference of M. alternatus on different host plants. Here, we investigated the population density of M. alternatus overwintering larvae and revealed the host preference and oviposition selection of M. alternatus adults on Pinus tabuliformis, P. armandii, and P. massoniana. The results improve our understanding of the host preference of M. alternatus for feeding and oviposition.

Abstract

Monochamus alternatus is a serious trunk-boring pest and is the most important and effective vector of the pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, which causes pine wilt disease. The pine wilt disease poses a serious threat to forest vegetation and ecological security in the Qinling–Daba Mountains and their surrounding areas. In order to clarify whether the population density of M. alternatus larvae is related to the host preference of M. alternatus adults, we investigated the population density of M. alternatus overwintering larvae and explored the host preference of M. alternatus adults on Pinus tabuliformis, P. armandii, and P. massoniana. The results show that the population density of M. alternatus larvae was significantly higher on P. armandii than those on P. massoniana and P. tabuliformis. The development of M. alternatus larvae was continuous according to the measurements of the head capsule width and the pronotum width. Adults of M. alternatus preferred to oviposit on P. armandii rather than on P. massoniana and P. tabuliformis. Our results indicate that the difference in the population density of M. alternatus larvae between different host plants was due to the oviposition preference of M. alternatus adults. In addition, the instars of M. alternatus larvae could not be accurately determined, because Dyar’s law is not suitable for continuously developing individuals. This study could provide theoretical basis for the comprehensive prevention and control of the pine wilt disease in this region and adjacent areas.

1. Introduction

The Japanese pine sawyer, Monochamus alternatus Hope (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), is mainly distributed in China, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, and several Southeast Asian countries [1,2]. It is a serious trunk-boring pest and is the most important and effective vector of the pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner & Buhrer) Nickle [3]. The pine wilt disease caused by the pine wood nematode is a devastating forest disease that seriously endangers forestry safety across the world [4]. It can quickly kill thousands of pine trees in its invasive range, not only causing serious economic and ecological damage but also having a negative impact on all living things within the forest ecosystem [5]. The pine wood nematode is a major alien invasive species in China and has been listed among the quarantine objects of forest plants in China and many other countries [6,7]. The pine wood nematode is native to North America, and it has also spread to many other countries such as Japan, South Korea, Portugal, and Spain [7]. In China, the first case of Pinus thunbergii showing the pine wilt disease was found in the forests of Zijin Mountain of Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, in 1982 [8]. As of March 2022, the pine wilt disease had spread to 731 county-level administrative regions of 19 provinces, cities, or autonomous regions (Announcement No. 6, 2022, National Forestry and Grassland Administration).
The Qinling–Daba Mountains are an important geographical and ecological boundary in Central China [9], and they are also the watershed between the Yangtze River and the Yellow River. This area is an important hub of China’s geographical pattern, a large-scale east–west ecological corridor, and the area with the highest level of ecological security, which breeds rich natural animal and plant resources with a complex, diverse, and unique natural environment [10,11]. In the Qinling Mountains, the main susceptible pine species are P. tabuliformis, P. armandii, and P. massoniana. In the Daba Mountains, the main susceptible pine species is P. massoniana. In addition, P. tabuliformis, P. armandii and P. massoniana are widely distributed and have large stand areas in the Qinling–Daba Mountains, where the pine wilt disease was first discovered in Zhashui County of Shaanxi Province in 2009. As of March 2022, the pine wilt disease had spread to 171 township-level administrative regions of 24 county-level administrative regions in Shaanxi Province, and it currently covers an area of 321.4 km2, resulting in the death of more than 4 million pine trees (Announcement No. 5, 2022, Shaanxi Forestry Administration). The pine wilt disease poses a serious threat to forest vegetation and ecological security in the Qinling–Daba Mountains and surrounding areas.
It is necessary to better understand the influences of different hosts on the dispersal behavior of M. alternatus [12], which may provide information to effectively limit the spread of the pine wilt disease inrelated arreas. Many studies showed that the damage level of M. alternatus is not consistent due to different host plants. Tu et al. (2019) studied the effects of three host plants, P. massoniana, P. elliottii and Cedarus cedarosa, on the longevity and reproduction of M. alternatus adults, and found that the mass indoor breeding of M. alternatus adults on P. massoniana was beneficial to the reproduction of offspring compared to other two host plants [13]. Bonifácio et al. (2015) found that the selection of host plants by M. alternatus can be divided into two stages: one involves the newly emerged adults feeding on healthy trees, and the other involves the female adults preparing to lay eggs on injured or dead trees [14]. In either case, the selection of the host by M. alternatus is derived from the volatile chemical stimulation of the host pine trees [15]. Recently, Nan et al. (2021) found that the spatial distribution of M. alternatus larvae on different host plants differed in the Qinling–Daba Mountains [16]. However, studies of M. alternatus in the Qinling–Daba Mountains are extremely limited, which seriously hinders the prevention and control of the pine wilt disease in this region.
Here, the population density and the developmental stages of M. alternatus larvae were compared on different host plants (P. tabuliformis, P. armandii, and P. massoniana) killed by the pine wood nematode in the Qinling–Daba Mountains. In addition, the feeding preference and oviposition selection of M. alternatus adults on different host plants were investigated, which may provide useful information for the comprehensive prevention and control of the pine wilt disease in Qinling–Daba Mountains and their adjacent areas.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Field

According to the distribution of the pine wilt disease in the Qinling–Daba Mountains, Fenghuang Town, Yingpan Town and Xialiang Town of Zhashui County, Daheba Town of Foping County, and Chengguan Town of Ningshan County, located on the southern slope of the Qinling Mountains, and Chengguan Town and Zuolong Town of Langao County, as well as Yankou Town of Xixiang County, located on the northern slope of the Daba Mountains, were selected as the study areas (Table 1). In the experimental field, the main susceptible tree species are P. tabuliformis, P. armandii and P. massoniana, and the distance between the individually sampled trees on the same experimental site was relatively close (0–50 m).

2.2. Population Density and Development Stages of M. alternatus on Different Host Plants

After the specimens were collected, M. alternatus larvae and imago were observed under a stereomicroscope (OLYMPUS SZX16) and identified according to the morphology outlined by of Jiang (1989) [17] and Yang and Lin (2017) [18], respectively. In addition, genomic DNA was extracted from some young larvae which were difficult to distinguish morphologically from related species, and the mitochondrial COI gene was amplified and sequenced for molecular identification to ensure the identity was correct.
According to the distribution of dead pine trees caused by the pine wilt disease in the study area, a total of 38 dead pine trees of P. tabuliformis (10), P. armandii (14) and P. massoniana (14) (trees infested with the pine wood nematode, with a diameter at breast height of 16.82 ± 0.76 cm) were sampled at each study site in December of 2020. The dead trees killed by the pine wilt disease were felled from the ground level with a chainsaw and cut into 30–40 cm-long logs from the base of the trunk to the top of the tree (usually above 12 m), and they were numbered in sequence (Figure 1A). Then, we stripped the bark from the logs and split the logs into small splints with a diameter of no more than 2 cm, aiming to collect all the longicorn larvae. The longicorn larvae collected from all sections of the logs, including the bark (under which the young larvae lived), were recorded.
All M. alternatus larvae were brought back to the laboratory and identified through morphological and molecular identification. Two morphological traits, the head capsule width and the pronotum width, were used to estimate the developmental stage of M. alternatus larvae on the three host plants (Figure 1B) [19,20,21].
In addition, five other dead trees of each study site were felled from the ground level with a chainsaw and cut into 1 m-long logs from the base of the trunk to the top of the tree and placed into cages in the field (1.3 m × 0.9 m × 0.6 m), respectively. In the next year, the newly emerged M. alternatus adults were collected from these logs and recorded every week from the beginning to the end of the study.

2.3. Feeding and Oviposition Selection of M. alternatus Adults

In order to verify whether the population density and developmental stages of M. alternatus overwintering larvae on the three host pine species are related to their feeding preference and oviposition, we studied the larvae in Chengguan Town, Ningshan County, from July to September of 2021. In early July, three pairs of newly emerged males and females representing M. alternatus adults were placed into a cage (1.5 m × 1.0 m × 1.0 m), in which we placed fresh pine branches (length: 92.2 ± 1.6 cm) that consisted of young branches (one year old) and old branches (2–3 years old) inserted into bottles filled with water, as well as logs (length: 71.3 ± 0.7 cm, diameter: 26.3 ± 3.1 cm), of the three pine species (Figure 1C). The feeding behavior and oviposition of M. alternatus adults were regularly observed from July to September. The fresh pine branches and logs and M. alternatus adults were replaced every 3 days for a total number of 23 repetitions during the peak of the emergence of M. alternatus adults. The feeding part, the feeding area and the number of oviposition points on the logs of the three pine species were measured and recorded [22,23,24].
Feeding area (mm2) = length of feeding wound (mm) × width of feeding wound (mm);
Total feeding area (mm2) = total feeding area of young branches (one year old) (mm2) + total feeding area of old branches (2–3 years old) (mm2) + total feeding area of bark of logs (mm2);
Feeding ratio of feeding part (%) = total feeding area of one feeding part (mm2)/total feeding area of one host pine tree (mm2) × 100%;
Feeding ratio of host pine tree (%) = total feeding area of one host pine tree (mm2)/total feeding area (mm2) × 100%;
The number of oviposition = the number of oviposition scars.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All datasets were tested for normality and subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using IBM SPSS statistics 22.0 software. Regression analysis was used to compare the correlations between data.

3. Results

3.1. Population Density and Developmental Stages of M. alternatus Overwintering Larvae on Different Host Plants

In total, 5304 overwintering larvae of M. alternatus were collected from 38 dead pine trees of P. tabuliformis (10), P. armandii (14), and P. massoniana (14) in December of 2020. There were averages of 235.50 ± 36.06 larvae on one P. armandii, 91.21 ± 18.80 larvae on one P. massoniana, and 73.00 ± 21.81 larvae on one P. tabuliformis, respectively (Table 2).
In addition, the size of the M. alternatus overwintering larvae on the three pine tree species also showed obvious differences. The head capsule width and pronotum width were measured to determine the developmental stages of the overwintering larvae, compared between different pine trees. The regression analyses indicated that there was a significant correlation between the head capsule width and pronotum width of larvae on the three host plants (p < 0.01), which showed a certain linear regression relationship. The regression equation for the head capsule width and pronotum width of the larvae was obtained as follows: y = 1.5929 x + 0.1020, R2 = 0.9209 (Figure 2B). However, the development of M. alternatus larvae was continuous based on their morphology and the measurements of the head capsule width and the pronotum width (Figure 2), indicating that M. alternatus larvae instars could not be accurately determined by the head capsule width and the pronotum width, because Dyar’s law is not suitable for continuously developing individuals. However, the developmental stages of M. alternatus larvae could be artificially divided into the five groups according to the head capsule width and the pronotum width (Tables S1 and S2). The ranges of the five groups are as follows: Head capsule width: Group 1: 0.51–1.40 mm, Group 2: 1.41–2.30 mm, Group 3: 2.31–3.20 mm, Group 4: 3.21–4.10 mm, Group 5: 4.11–5.00 mm; Pronotum width: Group 1: 1.11–2.50 mm; Group 2: 2.51–3.90 mm; Group 3: 3.91–5.30 mm; Group 4: 5.31–6.70 mm; and Group 5: 6.71–8.10 mm (Tables S1 and S2). The developmental stages of M. alternatus larvae showed obvious differences across the three pine species. Individuals of groups 4–5 were dominant on P. armandii (Figure 3E,F), individuals of groups 3–4 were dominant on P. massoniana (Figure 3C,D), and individuals of groups 2–3 were dominant on P. tabuliformis (Figure 3A,B). The size of M. alternatus larvae was observed to be the largest on P. armandii, followed by P. massoniana and P. tabuliformis (Figure 3).

3.2. The Emergence of M. alternatus Adults on Different Pine Trees

In the field observation of the logs, which began in the early May of 2021, the emergence of M. alternatus adults was first observed on P. armandii on 25 May (Figure 4), while the emergence time of the adults on P. massoniana and P. tabuliformis was one week later. In addition, the emergence number of M. alternatus adults on P. armandii (102) was far more than those of adults on P. massoniana (42) and P. tabuliformis (11) during the whole observation (Figure 4). The emergence time and the number of M. alternatus adults should be closely related to the population density and developmental stages of overwintering larvae on the pine trees.

3.3. Feeding Preference of M. alternatus Adults

The feeding experiments showed that M. alternatus adults can feed on young branches (one year old) (Figure 1D), old branches (2–3 years old) (Figure 1E), and bark of the logs (Figure 1F) of the three pine trees for their complementary nutrition. The feeding areas were the largest on the old branches (60.77%), followed by the log bark (22.86%) and the young branches (16.36%) (Table S3). The total feeding area was the largest on P. massoniana (42.43%), followed by those on P. tabuliformis (36.94%) and P. armandii (20.63%) (Figure 5A, Table S3). Within a given pine species, the feeding areas on young branches, old branches and logs were also significantly different (Figure 5A). As for P. tabuliformis, the feeding area was larger on the old branch bark, accounting for 69.15%, than on the young branch bark (22.44%) and the log bark (8.41%). On P. massoniana, the feeding area was larger on the old branch bark (44.07%) than those on the log bark (39.53%) and the young branch bark (16.40%). On P. armandii, the feeding area was larger on the old branch bark (80.12%) than those on the log bark (14.49%) and the young branch bark (5.39%) (Table S3).

3.4. Oviposition Selection of M. alternatus Adults

The oviposition experiments showed that the shape of the oviposition scars differed significantly among the host pine species, with different diameters at breast height. They were round on the host pine trees, with a smaller diameter at breast height (Figure 1G), while they were oval on the host pine trees, with a larger diameter at breast height (Figure 1H). A single egg was laid under each oviposition scar, generally 1 cm below the oviposition scar (Figure 1I). The oviposition scars on P. armandii accounted for 42.91%, followed by those on P. tabuliformis (33.74%) and P. massoniana (23.36%) (Figure 5B, Table S3).

4. Discussion

In the present study, we found that the population density of M. alternatus was significantly higher on P. armandii than on P. massoniana and P. tabuliformis, and the developmental stages of M. alternatus larvae were the largest on P. armandii, followed by those on P. massoniana and P. tabuliformis. It was revealed that many individuals of M. saltuarius that hatched in June and July became fourth-instar larvae in November, while the populations that hatched in August developed into third-instar larvae (60–70%) or fourth-instar larvae (30–40%) in November, and the populations that hatched in September developed into first- to third-instar larvae in November [24]. M. saltuarius larvae showed different growth and development on the conifers of P. koraiensis, P. densiflora, Abies holophylla, Larix leptolepsis, P. bungeana, and P. rigida, respectively [24]. In addition, the size of M. saltuarius larvae was the largest on P. bungeana, mid-sized on P. koraiensis, P. densiflora and A. holophylla, and the smallest on L. leptolepsis and P. rigida [25]. It has been suggested that pre–diapause larvae of M. alternatus undergo intense diapause in the early summer, while the remaining individuals undergo weak diapause in the early autumn [26]. The voltinism and the ovariole number of females of M. alternatus were not affected by the pine tree species [27]. It was revealed that M. saltuarius preferred to oviposit on P. densiflora, followed by P. koraiensis, P. rigida, and Larix leptolepis [28]. This could be due to the bark thickness of different host pine species. The mass indoor breeding of M. alternatus adults on P. massoniana was beneficial to the reproduction of offspring when compared with those feeding on P. elliottii and Cedarus cedarosa [13]. In the present study, we revealed that M. alternatus preferred to oviposit on P. armandii, followed by P. tabuliformis and P. massoniana, which corresponds to the fact that the development time of M. alternatus larvae was significantly earlier on P. armandii than on P. massoniana and P. tabuliformis. Our findings, combined with prior studies, indicate that the oviposition preference of M. alternatus for different host pines may affect the population density and developmental stage of M. alternatus larvae. The host preference of M. alternatus should have corresponding succession with the pine species succession in different geographical environments, which may have a certain order due to the great diversity of host pine species in the north and south of China.
Controversially, it has been reported that M. alternatus has four instars or five instars [29,30,31,32,33]. Dyar’s law could help us to infer the actual molting times of a given insect from discontinuous or incomplete molting material [34,35]. However, we revealed that the instars of M. alternatus larvae cannot be accurately determined, because the head capsule width and the pronotum width of M. alternatus larvae increase continuously during their ontogenetic development. This is consistent with the results of a previous study [33].
Our results show that among the three pine tree species, P. massoniana was the most popular food source and P. armandii the most unpopular food source of M. alternatus adults for the purpose of complementary nutrition. However, we revealed that M. alternatus preferred to oviposit on P. armandii. We also found that the shape of the oviposition scars was round on host pine trees with a smaller diameter at breast height but oval on hosts with a larger diameter at breast height. This could also be related to the bark thickness and the growth conditions of the host trees. M. alternatus adults prefer to feed on healthy pine trees, but they prefer to oviposit on weak wood [36]. The emissions of pine trees include various terpenes, and the compounds are likely to be a particularly important factor in determining the preference of M. alternatus [37,38]. In addition, the emission of volatile compounds varies between weak pine trees infested with the pine wood nematode and healthy pine trees [39]. Trees infected by the pine wood nematode emit more terpenes, particularly α-pinene, which is the most attractive compound for M. alternatus females [40]. M. alternatus adults can be attracted to volatile mixtures of monoterpenes and oxygenated monoterpenes, and the oviposition can be affected by semiochemicals such as volatile plant compounds and insect pheromones [40,41]. Further investigations are required to determine the chemical constituents of weak trees infested with the pine wood nematode and healthy trees.

5. Conclusions

The population density of M. alternatus was significantly higher on P. armandii than P. massoniana and P. tabuliformis due to the oviposition preference of M. alternatus adults. The development of M. alternatus larvae was continuous, and the instar of M. alternatus could not be accurately determined, because Dyar’s law is not suitable for continuously developing individuals. Our results provide useful information for the comprehensive prevention and control of the pine wilt disease in the Qinling–Daba Mountains and their adjacent areas.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects14020181/s1, Figure S1: Frequency distribution of head capsule width and pronotum width of Monochamus alternatus larvae. A: Frequency distribution of head capsule width of M. alternatus larvae on P. tabuliformis, P. armandii, and P. massoniana; B: Frequency distribution of pronotum width of M. alternatus larvae on P. tabuliformis, P. armandii, and P. massoniana; Table S1: Different groups were divided according to the head capsule width of Monochamus alternatus larvae; Table S2: Different groups were divided according to the pronotum width of Monochamus alternatus larvae; Table S3: Feeding and oviposition preference of Monochamus alternatus on three pine trees.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.N., C.L., H.H. and C.W.; methodology, J.N. and Y.Y.; software, J.N.; formal analysis, J.N., H.H. and C.W.; investigation, J.N., Y.Y., J.Q. and M.Z.; data curation, J.N., H.H. and C.W.; writing—original draft preparation, J.N., H.H. and C.W.; writing—review and editing, J.N., J.Q., H.H. and C.W.; visualization, J.N., H.H. and C.W.; project administration, H.H. and C.W.; funding acquisition, H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Forestry Science and Technology Innovation Project of Shaanxi Province (SXLK2021-0101) and the Special Fund of Shaanxi Provincial Forest Pest Control and Quarantine Station (20191217000008, 20191217000009).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank the relevant staff of Zhashui County Forestry Administration, Ningshan County Forestry Administration, Foping County Forestry Administration, Xixiang County Forestry Administration, Langao County Forestry Administration, and Longcaoping Forestry Administration of Shaanxi Province for their support and help in the field investigation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Linit, M.J. Nematode–vector relationships in the pine wilt disease system. J. Nematol. 1988, 20, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Akbulut, S.; Stamps, W.T. Insect vectors of the pinewood nematode: A review of the biology and ecology of Monochamus species. For. Pathol. 2012, 42, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, H.; Shen, P.; Fu, P.; Lin, M.; Moens, M. Characteristics of the emergence of Monochamus alternatus, the vector of Bursapelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae), from Pinus thunbergii logs in Nanjing, China, and of the transmission of the nematodes through feeding wounds. Nematology 2007, 9, 807–816. [Google Scholar]
  4. Futai, K. Pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2013, 51, 61–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Filipiak, A.; Malewski, T.; Matczyńska, E.; Tomalak, M. Molecular variation among virulent and avirulent strains of the quarantine nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2021, 296, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhao, L.; Mota, M.; Vieira, P.; Butcher, R.A.; Sun, J. Interspecific communication between pinewood nematode, its insect vector, and associated microbes. Trends Parasitol. 2014, 30, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, Y.; Chen, F.; Wang, L.; Min, L. Investigation of beetle species that carry the pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner and Buhrer) Nickle, in China. J. For. Res. 2021, 23, 981–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sun, Y. First report of pine wilt disease from Pinus thunbergii Parl in Sun Yat-sen Mausoleum. J. Jiangsu Univ. Sci. Technol. 1982, 2, 27. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ren, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L. The value of vegetation ecosystem services: A case of Qinling–Daba Mountains. J. Geogr. Sci. 2003, 2, 195–200. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang, B.; Jiang, J.P.; Xie, F.; Li, C. Postglacial colonization of the Qinling Mountains: Phylogeography of the swelled vent frog (Feirana quadranus). PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, F.; Liu, J.; Zhu, W.; Zhang, B.; Zhu, L. Spatial variation of altitudinal belts as dividing index between warm temperate and subtropical zones in the Qinling–Daba Mountains. J. Geogr. Sci. 2020, 30, 642–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lian, J.; Zhang, X. Forest pest ecological control. Sci. Silvae Sin. 2005, 41, 168–176. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tu, Y.G.; Yu, A.L.; Que, S.Q.; Yu, N.F.; Liu, X.H. Effects of different host plants on longevity and reproduction of Monochamus alternatus Hope adults. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci. 2019, 32, 1801–1804. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bonifácio, L.; Naves, P.; Sousa, E. Vector-plant. In Pine Wilt Disease in Europe: Biological Interactions and Integrated Management; Sousa, E., Vale, F., Abrantes, I., Eds.; FNAPF-Federação Nacional das Associações de Proprietários Florestais: Lisboa, Portugal, 2015; pp. 125–157. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gonalves, E.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Barroso, J.G.; Henriques, J.; Sousa, E.; Bonifácio, L. Effect of Monochamus galloprovincialis feeding on Pinus pinaster and Pinus pinea, oleoresin and insect volatiles. Phytochemistry 2019, 169, 112159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nan, J.K.; Yang, Y.X.; Zhang, L.H.; Li, P.F.; Guo, L.J.; He, H.; Wei, C. The damage of Monochamus alternatus on different host pine species in Qinling–Daba Mountains. J. Environ. Entomol. 2021, 43, 1376–1388. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jiang, S.N. Cerambycid Larvae of China; Chongqing Publishing House: Chongqing, China, 1989; pp. 43–44. [Google Scholar]
  18. Yang, X.K.; Lin, M.Y. Insect Fauna of the Qinling Mountains. 6. Coleoptera. 2. Longicorn; World Book Publishing Xi’an Co., Ltd.: Xi’an, China, 2017; p. 329. [Google Scholar]
  19. Caltagirone, L.E.; Getz, W.; Meals, D.W. Head capsule width as an index of age in larvae of navel orangeworm, Amyelois stansitella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Environ. Entomol. 1983, 12, 219–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Beaver, R.J.; Sanderson, J.P. Classifying instars of the Navel orangeworm (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) based on observed head capsule widths. J. Econ. Entomol. 1989, 82, 716–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. McClellan, Q.C.; Logan, J.A. Instar determination for the Gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) based on the frequency distribution of head capsule widths. Environ. Entomol. 1994, 23, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhou, Z.J.; Togashi, K. Oviposition and larval performance of Monochamus alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) on the Japanese cedar Cryptomeria japonica. J. For. Res. 2006, 11, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, M.; Dai, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Sun, S.; Chen, F. New insights into the life history of Monochamus saltuarius (Cerambycidae: Coleoptera) can enhance surveillance strategies for pine wilt disease. J. For. Res. 2021, 32, 2699–2707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Togashi, K. Development of Monochamus alternatus Hope (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in relation to oviposition time. Jpn. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1989, 33, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hwang, I.C.; Kim, J.H.; Park, J.B.; Shin, S.C.; Park, Y.C. Growth, development, and reproduction of Monochamus saltuarius (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) on conifers fed to larvae. J. Appl. Entomol. 2008, 47, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Togashi, K. Influence of oviposition timing on offspring diapause and growth in Monochamus alternatus endai (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). J. For. Res. 2019, 24, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Togashi, K. Effects of three host pine species on diapause induction and life–history traits of Monochamus alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). J. For. Res. 2021, 26, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Han, J.H.; Kim, H.K.; Kang, W.J.; Kim, G.H. Feeding and oviposition preference of the Sakhalin pine sawyer Monochamus saltuarius (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) for different hosts. Entomol. Res. 2016, 46, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Go, M.S.; Kwon, S.H.; Kim, S.B.; Kim, D.S. The developmental characteristics for the head capsule width of Monochamus alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) larvae and determination of the number of instars. J. Insect Sci. 2019, 19, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kozima, K.; Katagiri, K. On the larval instar and changes of its composition of Monochamus alternalus Hope. J. Jpn. For. Soc. 2008, 46, 307–310. [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu, J.D.; Li, B.W.; Wang, J.Y.; Zhao, B.A.; Shu, J.P. Primary study on method to determine instars of Monochamus alternatus larvae. J. Zhejiang For. Sci. Technol. 2008, 28, 84–86. [Google Scholar]
  32. Guo, Y.Q.; Xin, Y.C.; Tao, X.; Yu, H.; Liu, Z.D. Body size difference of male and female adults as well as the relationship between the sizes of pupae and adults and the body weight of overwintering larvae in the Japanese pine sawyer, Monochamus alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Acta Entomol. Sin. 2015, 58, 989–996. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kim, S.B.; Kim, D.S. A new direction to understand the life cycle of the Japanese pine sawyer considering the selection strategy of instar pathways. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dyar, H.G. The number of molts of lepidopterous larvae. Psyche A J. Èntomol. 1890, 5, 420–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hou, Z.; Li, Q.; Yang, M.; Liu, Y.; Wei, C. Ecology of Meimuna mongolica (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) nymphs: Instars, morphological variation, vertical distribution and population density, host-plant selection, and emergence phenology. J. Insect Sci. 2015, 15, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kang, S.H.; Kim, M.K.; Yang, J.O.; Yoon, C.; Goh, S.H.; Shin, S.C.; Kim, C.S.; Kim, G.H. Attraction effects to various conditions of Pinus koraiensis against pine sawyer, Monochamus saltuarius (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). J. Korean Soc. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2009, 52, 456–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ginzel, M.D.; Hanks, L.M. Role of host plant volatiles in mate location for three species of longhorned beetles. J. Chem. Ecol. 2005, 31, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, S.Q.; Fang, Y.L.; Zhang, Z.N. Effects of volatiles of non–host plants and other chemicals on oviposition of Monochamus alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). J. Pest Sci. 2007, 80, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fan, J.; Sun, J.; Shi, J. Attraction of the Japanese pine sawyer, Monochamus alternatus, to volatiles from stressed host in China. Ann. For. Sci. 2007, 64, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vicente, C.S.L.; Soares, M.; Faria, J.M.S.; Ramos, A.P.; Inácio, M.L. Insights into the role of fungi in pine wilt disease. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hao, D.J.; Zhang, Y.H.; Dai, H.G.; Wang, Y. Oviposition preference of Monochamus alternatus Hope (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) to host plants. Acta Entomol. Sin. 2005, 48, 460–464. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Collection and investigation of Monochamus alternatus on different host plants. (A): Logs of P. armandii damaged by the pine wood nematode and M. alternatus. (B): Measurement of M. alternatus larvae (HCW: head capsule width; PW: pronotum width). (C): Net cages containing branches and logs of P. tabuliformis, P. armandii, and P. massoniana. (D): Feeding wound (FW) on the young branches (one year old) caused by M. alternatus. (E): Feeding wound on the old branches (2–3 years old) caused by M. alternatus. (F): Feeding wound on the log bark caused by M. alternatus. (G): Round oviposition scars (OS) caused by M. alternatus adults. (H): Oval oviposition scars caused by M. alternatus adults. (I): Distance between eggs and oviposition scars of M. alternatus.
Figure 1. Collection and investigation of Monochamus alternatus on different host plants. (A): Logs of P. armandii damaged by the pine wood nematode and M. alternatus. (B): Measurement of M. alternatus larvae (HCW: head capsule width; PW: pronotum width). (C): Net cages containing branches and logs of P. tabuliformis, P. armandii, and P. massoniana. (D): Feeding wound (FW) on the young branches (one year old) caused by M. alternatus. (E): Feeding wound on the old branches (2–3 years old) caused by M. alternatus. (F): Feeding wound on the log bark caused by M. alternatus. (G): Round oviposition scars (OS) caused by M. alternatus adults. (H): Oval oviposition scars caused by M. alternatus adults. (I): Distance between eggs and oviposition scars of M. alternatus.
Insects 14 00181 g001
Figure 2. Continuous development of Monochamus alternatus larvae. (A): A continuous increase in the body size of M. alternatus larvae. (B): A continuous increase in the head capsule width and the pronotum width of M. alternatus larvae.
Figure 2. Continuous development of Monochamus alternatus larvae. (A): A continuous increase in the body size of M. alternatus larvae. (B): A continuous increase in the head capsule width and the pronotum width of M. alternatus larvae.
Insects 14 00181 g002
Figure 3. Population density of Monochamus alternatus larvae of different development stages on three pine trees. (A,B): Pinus tabuliformis. (C,D): Pinus massoniana. (E,F): Pinus armandii.
Figure 3. Population density of Monochamus alternatus larvae of different development stages on three pine trees. (A,B): Pinus tabuliformis. (C,D): Pinus massoniana. (E,F): Pinus armandii.
Insects 14 00181 g003
Figure 4. The number of Monochamus alternatus adults in net cages on different observation dates.
Figure 4. The number of Monochamus alternatus adults in net cages on different observation dates.
Insects 14 00181 g004
Figure 5. Feeding and oviposition preference of Monochamus alternatus adults on three pine trees. (A): The feeding area of M. alternatus on different parts of three kinds of pine trees. (B): The number of oviposition scars of M. alternatus adults on three pine trees.
Figure 5. Feeding and oviposition preference of Monochamus alternatus adults on three pine trees. (A): The feeding area of M. alternatus on different parts of three kinds of pine trees. (B): The number of oviposition scars of M. alternatus adults on three pine trees.
Insects 14 00181 g005
Table 1. Surveying sites of Monochamus alternatus in the Qinling–Daba Mountains of China.
Table 1. Surveying sites of Monochamus alternatus in the Qinling–Daba Mountains of China.
Surveying SitesTree SpeciesLongitude (E)Latitude (N)Altitude (m)
Qinling MountainsZhashui CountyFenghuang TownP. tabuliformis, P. armandii109°21′34″33°43′59″659.00
Yingpan TownP. armandii109°06′03″33°74′21″931.33
Xialiang TownP. tabuliformis109°08′54″33°37′42″736.06
Foping CountyDaheba TownP. tabuliformis, P. massoniana108°61′34″33°29′43″769.05
Ningshan CountyChengguan TownP. tabuliformis, P. armandii108°19′48″33°18′00″807.02
Daba MountainsXixiang CountyYankou TownP. massoniana107°50′42″32°59′46″509.88
Langao CountyChengguan TownP. massoniana108°54′35″32°18′30″758.63
Zuolong TownP. massoniana108°53′08″32°30′19″457.31
Table 2. Population density of Monochamus alternatus larvae.
Table 2. Population density of Monochamus alternatus larvae.
Tree SpeciesNNumber of Monochamus alternatus Larvae ± SEVariance Analysis
Pinus tabuliformis1073.00 ± 21.81 bF = 10.480, p = 0.000
Pinus massoniana1491.21 ± 18.80 b
Pinus armandii14235.50 ± 36.06 a
Notes: The different letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.01).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nan, J.; Qi, J.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, M.; Liang, C.; He, H.; Wei, C. Population Density and Host Preference of the Japanese Pine Sawyer (Monochamus alternatus) in the Qinling–Daba Mountains of China. Insects 2023, 14, 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14020181

AMA Style

Nan J, Qi J, Yang Y, Zhao M, Liang C, He H, Wei C. Population Density and Host Preference of the Japanese Pine Sawyer (Monochamus alternatus) in the Qinling–Daba Mountains of China. Insects. 2023; 14(2):181. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14020181

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nan, Junke, Jingyu Qi, Yuexiang Yang, Mengqin Zhao, Chaoqiong Liang, Hong He, and Cong Wei. 2023. "Population Density and Host Preference of the Japanese Pine Sawyer (Monochamus alternatus) in the Qinling–Daba Mountains of China" Insects 14, no. 2: 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14020181

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop