Next Article in Journal
The Unresolved Methodological Challenge of Detecting Neuroplastic Changes in Astronauts
Next Article in Special Issue
Essential Oil Composition Analysis, Antimicrobial Activities, and Biosystematic Studies on Six Species of Salvia
Previous Article in Journal
Interplay Impact of Exogenous Application of Abscisic Acid (ABA) and Brassinosteroids (BRs) in Rice Growth, Physiology, and Resistance under Sodium Chloride Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of Native Essential Oils from Forestry Resources in South Korea
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biological Activity of Hybrid Molecules Based on Major Constituents of Cinnammomun verum and Thymus vulgaris Essential Oils

by
Juan Valverde Sancho
1,*,
Cristina Carreño Amate
2,
María del Mar Caparrós Pérez
1,
Omar Santana Méridas
3 and
Luis F. Julio
1,*
1
Green Chemistry Area, R&D Department, Kimitec Group, Paraje Cerro de Los Lobos, 04738 Vícar, Spain
2
Phytopathology Area, R&D Department, Kimitec Group, Paraje Cerro de Los Lobos, 04738 Vícar, Spain
3
Phytochemistry Area, R&D Department, Kimitec Group, Paraje Cerro de Los Lobos, 04738 Vícar, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2023, 13(2), 499; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020499
Submission received: 19 January 2023 / Revised: 3 February 2023 / Accepted: 7 February 2023 / Published: 11 February 2023

Abstract

:
Plants have been used by humans since ancient times due their antimicrobial and medicinal properties. Essential oils (EOs) are complex mixtures of secondary plant metabolites, including terpenoids, phenylpropanoids, and other aromatic compounds. Cinnamomun verum and Thyme vulgaris EOs and their organic extracts exert numerous biological activities because of their major compounds, particularly thymol, carvacrol, eugenol, and benzoic and cinnamic acid. The structural motifs presented by these phytochemicals are responsible for their biological activities. Modification or hybridization of these structures could lead to new bio-based compounds with improved efficacy or multiple modes of action. In this work, we aimed to develop reliable methods of obtaining six hybrid molecules from the major constituents of C. verum and T. vulgaris EOs. For the first time, we tested their efficacy in the inhibition of the mycelium growth and spore germination of two of the most important phytopathogenic fungi, Fusarium oxysporum and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, and one opportunistic human pathogen, Aspergillus niger. The cytotoxic activity of the obtained hybrids was assessed using the brine shrimp lethality assay. In addition, we report for the first time a biocatalytic process for the obtention of these bioactive hybrid molecules. The results of this work enable the possibility of using hybrid molecules based on the major constituents of EOs as active ingredients in strategic industries such as agriculture, aquaculture, and pharmaceuticals.

1. Introduction

Plants are one of the richest and most versatile chemical factories on the planet for obtaining natural bioactive compounds. In particular, cinnamon (Cinnamomun verum J. Presl; syn. Cinnamomun zeylanicum Blume) and thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) have been used by humans since ancient times due to their pesticidal, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and medicinal properties [1,2,3,4,5]. Essential oils (EOs) are among the most valuable fractions obtained from these aromatic species, comprising complex mixtures of secondary plant metabolites, including terpenoids and aromatic compounds.
The methoxyphenol eugenol is the major constituent of the C. verum essential oil [6]. The bioactivities exerted by essential oils containing eugenol are generally attributed to this compound [7,8]. Organic extracts of C. verum, of which aromatic compounds and carboxylic acids such as cinnamic and benzoic acid are reported as major compounds, also exhibit numerous bioactivities [9]. On the other hand, the essential oil of T. vulgaris contains phenolic monoterpenes as major constituents—particularly, thymol and its structural isomer carvacrol.
These natural compounds have been extensively studied and may be responsible for the bioactivities of the essential oils containing them [10]. The modes of action of these natural bioactive compounds are under intense investigation, although some of them have been relatively well described. Figure 1 depicts some of the bioactivities exhibited by each compound described above and the modes of action by which they are exerted [11,12,13,14,15,16,17].
The structural motifs presented by these phytochemicals are responsible for their biological activities. The modification or hybridization of these structures could lead to the development of new naturally inspired compounds with potent biological activities, which could be used as a new generation of lead compounds. The design and synthesis of hybrid molecules based on bioactive phytochemicals would allow molecules to be obtained that are capable of interacting with different molecular targets simultaneously. Scientific evidence and cases of enormous commercial success support this notion [18,19]. Therefore, these hybrids could be used as multifunctional leads in novel biopesticide compositions that would minimize the appearance of resistance, or as the active ingredients of polypharmaceuticals, and have thus been proposed as a powerful tool to treat diseases that require complex therapeutic approaches [20,21].
In this work, we propose cost-effective synthesis and purification methods for six hybrid molecules based on the major constituents of C. verum and T. vulgaris EOs. We demonstrate, for the first time, their antifungal activity against two of most scientific/economic important phytopathogenic fungi, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz. [22] and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae [23], as well as one opportunistic human pathogen, Aspergillus niger P.E.L. To determine their antifungal activity, in vitro assays were carried out, covering two different modes of action. In addition, the cytotoxic activity was assessed in vivo by means of the brine shrimp lethality assay (BSLA), a well-established method for the preliminary screening of potential anticancer nature-based drugs. It has been proven that BSLA provides good correlation data with cytotoxic activity in some human solid tumors [24], such as 9KB cells (human nasopharyngeal carcinoma) and the 3PS (P388) cell line (leukemia in vivo) [25,26]. Although most of these hybrids have not yet been described in nature, we demonstrate here, for the first time, the process of obtaining these molecules by means of enzymatic catalysis.
The aim of this research was to provide a reliable method for the obtention of pure EO-based hybrid molecules which exert potent bioactivities, and to examine the possibility of obtaining them by natural means although they have not been reported in nature. These compounds thus have the potential to be used as novel active ingredients in strategic industries such as agriculture, aquaculture, and pharmaceuticals.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Cinnamoyl chloride, benzoyl chloride, cinnamic acid, benzoic acid, eugenol, thymol, carvacrol, potassium hydroxide (KOH), anhydrous sodium sulfate (Na2SO4), ethyl acetate, n-hexane, and DMSO were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (San Luis, MO, USA). The biocatalyst, Novozym® 435, was purchased from STREM Chemicals Inc. (Newburyport, MA, USA).

2.2. Chemical Synthesis of the Hybrid Molecules

Chemical synthesis of the six hybrid molecules was achieved by means of bimolecular nucleophilic substitution. First, 50 mmol of the phenolic compound was stirred in a 10 mL KOH solution (5 mmol/mL) until neutralization. To the prior solution, 100 mmol of acyl chloride were slowly added. The mixture was continually stirred at room temperature (25 °C) for 2 h. The resulting mixture was submitted to liquid-liquid extraction, stirring it overnight with n-hexane and aqueous KOH saturated solution. The organic phase was recovered and the aqueous phase was discarded. The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate and filtered, and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. Chemical characterization of products was carried out by means of GC-MS analysis. The structural features and purity of the obtained hybrid molecules were confirmed via 1H NMR analysis. Figure 2 shows the general reaction scheme for the chemical synthesis of the six hybrid molecules obtained.

2.3. Enzymatic Synthesis of the Hybrid Molecules

Enzymatic synthesis of the six hybrid molecules was carried out using Novozym® 435 as a biocatalyst. Novozym® 435 is Candida antarctica B lipase (CALB) immobilized on acrylic resin. First, 5 mmol of the phenolic compound were mixed with 5 mmol of carboxylic acid in a glass vial. Then, 0.1% (m/m) of Novozym® 435 was added regarding the phenol. The reaction occurred over 72 h at 90 °C in the absence of solvent or agitation. The production of hybrid molecules was confirmed by means of GC-MS. The identification of products was made by comparing the retention time (tR) and mass spectra of the biosynthesized molecules with those obtained chemically.

2.4. GC-MS Analysis

The GC-MS analysis was carried out using an Agilent Model 7890 Series gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), combined with an autosampler and an Agilent 7000 D GC/TQ mass-selective detector. Compounds were diluted in ethyl acetate at 1000 ppm and were separated on an HP-5MS UI 3 30 m long × 250 μm ID × 0.25 μm thick capillary column (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The injection and ion source temperatures were 300 °C and 280 °C, respectively. Mass spectra were obtained at 70 eV in full-scan mode (40–500 m/z). The scan rate was 2.7 cycles/s. Compound identification was carried out via the comparison of the mass spectra obtained with fractionation patterns available in the NIST database (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), and additionally via 1H NMR analysis.
The chromatographic conditions used were as follows: He as carrier gas at a flow rate of 1 mL/min; injector temperature = 300 °C, with a split ratio of 40:1; initial oven temperature = 70 °C (0 min), with a first ramp of 6 °C/min up to 250 °C (30 min), followed by a second ramp of 90 °C/min up to 290 °C, and a third stage where the temperature was maintained for 4 min. The total chromatography time was 34.4 min.

2.5. NMR Analysis

A Bruker Avance III 600 spectrometer, operating at a proton frequency of 600 MHz, equipped with a SampleJet 480-position thermostatised autosampler, and a QCI quadruple cryoprobe with magnetic field gradient, was used. Homonuclear (1H) NMR experiments were recorded. The acquisition and processing of the obtained spectra were performed using TOPSPIN software.

2.6. In Vitro Antifungal Activity Assay

Three phytopathogenic fungi: Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae J.C. Hubb. and Gerik, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Penzig) Penzig and Saccardo (CECT 21107), as well as an opportunistic human pathogen, Aspergillus niger P.E.L. van Tieghem 1867 (ATCC 9029), were used. Fungi were stored in the R&D department of Kimitec Group (Vícar, Almería, Spain) at −80 °C on glycerol (15%). Prior to the experiments, the microorganisms were activated at 28 °C on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium for 7 days. The antifungal activity of the six hybrid molecules listed in Section 2.2 was evaluated for the inhibition of mycelial growth and spore germination.

2.6.1. Mycelial Growth Inhibition

Hybrid molecules were dissolved on dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at 50%, 25%, and 12.5% (w/v). Culture media were prepared mixing prior solutions at 1% (v/v) with PDA medium, achieving final concentrations of 0.5%, 0.25%, and 0.125%. Control treatments consisted of 1% (v/v) of DMSO with PDA medium. Media were autoclaved at 120 °C for 21 min and poured into Petri dishes. The inoculation was performed by placing an agar circle with mycelia from the cultures described in Section 2.6 in the center of each Petri dish. Next, the dishes were sealed with parafilm and incubated at 28 °C for 6 days. The diameter of the mycelium was measured on the sixth day. Five replicates per treatment were performed.
Mycelial growth inhibition was determined by measuring the mycelium diameter (cm) in the treatment samples, taking in consideration the growth observed in the control samples. The percentage of mycelial growth inhibition (MGI) was calculated according to the following formula [27]:
MGI = Dt Ds Dt × 100
where Dt is the diameter of the mycelium in the controls and Ds is the mycelium diameter in the treatment dishes.

2.6.2. Spore Germination Inhibition

The effect of spore germination inhibition exhibited by the hybrid molecules was assessed by means of a previously reported slide assay [28] with some modifications. Briefly, a spore suspension was prepared by flooding 15 mL of potato dextrose broth (PDB) medium and scraping gently with a sterile Drigalski spatula on a 10-day culture of fungi grown in potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium at 28 °C. The spore suspension was filtered with sterile gauze. Then, the spore concentration was adjusted to 5 × 105 spores/mL, using PDB medium and a Neubauer chamber for counting.
Hybrid molecules were dissolved in DMSO at 2.5%, 1.25%, and 0.625% (w/v). Then, 400 µL of the spore suspension and 100 µL of the hybrid molecule solution were homogenized via gentle agitation, reaching final concentrations of 0.5%, 0.25%, and 0.125%. The control group consisted of 400 µL of the spore suspension and 100 µL of DMSO. Then, 10 µL of the prior solution was placed in a glass slide and covered with a coverslip. All slides were incubated in a dark humidity chamber at 28 °C for 24 h. Using a light microscope (NIKON, Model Eclipse Ci-S, Tokyo, Japan) at 200× magnification, a total of 100 spores from each slide were counted, and the number of germinated spores was also determined. Germinated spores were those with a hyphal size at least as large as the spore diameter. The percentage of spore germination inhibition (SGI) was calculated using the following formula [29]:
SGI = Gc Gt Gt × 100  
where Gc is the total number of germinated spores in the control group and Gt is the total number of germinated spores in the treatment group. Control and treatment samples were prepared in triplicate.

2.7. Brine Shrimp Lethality Bioassay

The cytotoxic effect of the six hybrid molecules was assessed by means of the brine shrimp lethality assay (BSLA) described by Meyer et al. [30]. The toxicities of hybrids were tested at 600, 300, 150, 100, 75, 50, 25, 10, and 1 µg/mL in 3 mL sea-water solutions in 1% DMSO (v/v). Sea water and DMSO were used as negative controls.
Briefly, Artemia salina cysts were purchased from IBERCAN-Spain, hatched, and maintained in laboratory for 48 h with continuous aeration at room temperature. In a 24-well plate, ten nauplii were disposed for each test in the presence of the prior solutions at the different concentrations. Three replicates were used for each concentration. After 24 h of exposure, the number of dead nauplii was counted and the percentage of mortality was calculated using the following formula [31]:
%   mortality = number   of   dead   nauplii 10   ( initial   number   of   live   nauplii )   × 100
Median lethal concentration (LC50) was determined for each hybrid molecule, using the regression line equation in the linear part of the graph by plotting the tested concentration against the death percentage. Survivors and dead nauplii were counted macroscopically by two independent counters.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using a one-way ANOVA and the results of biological activities were expressed as means plus standard deviations. Significant results were considered for p-values less than 0.05. In addition, Tukey’s test was carried out for the testing of multiple comparisons. STATGRAPHICS centurion Version 19.4.01 (64 bit) software was used for the statistical analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Synthesis of Hybrid Molecules Based on Major Constituents of Thymus vulgaris and Cinnamomun verum EOs

In total, six hybrid EO-based molecules were obtained via chemical synthesis. Figure 3 shows the structures of the six hybrids corresponding to esters of benzoic acid and cinnamic acid with the main constituents of T. vulgaris EO (thymol and carvacrol) and C. verum EO (eugenol).
The structures of the obtained molecules were established based on MS and 1H NMR analysis. Spectroscopic data were acquired in order to corroborate the structural features of the obtained hybrids. All structures have been previously reported in the literature [32,33,34,35,36,37]. Their yields and their chemical characterizations are presented below.
(1) 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenyl benzoate [32]—Yellow liquid. Yield 70.93%; GC-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%): 254 [M+] (38), 150 (34), 149 (26), 133 (17), 106 (11), 105 (100), 91 (28), 78 (24), 77 (24), 51 (21). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.24 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.72–7.59 (m, 1H), 7.58–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.33–7.19 (m, 1H), 7.08 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 0.9 Hz, 1H), 3.08 (hept, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 2.36 (s, 3H), 1.23 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H).
(2) 5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenyl benzoate [32]—Orange liquid. Yield 75.04%; GC-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%): 254 [M+] (15), 255 (33), 107 (17), 106 (20), 105 (100), 91 (45), 79 (16), 78 (38), 77 (38), 51 (34). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.24 (dd, J = 7.4, 1.3 Hz, 2H), 7.67–7.63 (m, 1H), 7.53 (dd, J = 8.3, 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.23–7.17 (m, 1H), 7.10 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 2.92 (hept, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 2.22 (s, 3H), 1.26 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H).
(3) 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenyl benzoate [33,34]—Colorless crystals. Yield 71.15%; GC-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%): 268 [M+] (9), 269 (2), 107 (1), 106 11), 105 (100), 103 (2), 91 (3), 78 (2), 77 (23), 51 (2). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.23 (d, J = 7.9, 2H), 7.63 (ddt, J = 8.8, 7.4, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.55–7.46 (m, 2H), 7.07 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.87–6.75 (m, 2H), 6.03–6.95 (m, J = 1H), 5.15–5.11 (m, 2H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.42 (dt, J = 6.9, 1.6 Hz, 2H).
(4) 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenyl cinnamate [35]—Yellow crystals. Yield 70.57%; GC-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%): 280 [M+] (4), 149 (20), 135 (4), 132 (24), 131 (100), 104 (4), 103 (36), 102 (5), 91 (5), 77 (14). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.91 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.65–7.60 (m, 2H), 7.52–7.41 (m, 3H), 7.33–7.18 (m, 1H), 7.13–7.06 (m, 1H), 6.97 (dd, J = 1.8, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 6.69 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 2.92 (hept, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 2.20 (s, 3H), 1.27 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H).
(5) 5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenyl cinnamate [35]—Pale brown crystals. Yield 78.12%; GC-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%): 280 [M+] (2), 135 (3), 133 (2), 132 (12), 131 (100), 104 (2), 103 (19), 102 (3), 91 (3), 77 (8). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz, δ, ppm): 7.91 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.63 (m, 2H), 7.45 (m, 3H), 7.25 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 3.06 (hept, J = 5.9 Hz, 1H), 2.35 (s, 3H), 1.24 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 6H).
(6) 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenyl cinnamate [36,37]—Colorless crystals. Yield 75.44%; GC-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%): 294 [M+] (3), 250 (2), 164 (3), 132 (14), 131 (100), 104 (3), 103 (24), 102 (3), 91 (3), 77 (9). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.88 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.66–7.52 (m, 2H), 7.44–7.38 (m, 3H), 7.04 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.88–6.78 (m, 2H), 6.68 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 5.99 (ddt, J = 16.8, 10.0, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 5.20–5.02 (m, 2H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.41 (dt, J = 6.7, 1.5 Hz, 2H).
Except for (3), which was recently tentatively detected (but never isolated or quantified) as a minor compound in the non-polar fraction of the aerial part of Vincetoxicum funebre [38], the other five hybrids have never been reported in nature until now. However, in Section 3.2 we demonstrate the possibility of obtaining these compounds by natural means such as enzymatic catalysis.
Following the described chemical synthesis method, six hybrids of ≥95% purity were obtained with high yields (≥70%) based on the spectroscopic analysis. All secondary products were obtained by following the proposed synthesis and purification method. Figure 4 shows the chromatograms acquired via GC-MS of the obtained compounds and the structures of each hybrid.
These results reveal that the proposed method of chemical synthesis could be reliable for obtaining further hybrid molecules based on the use of EOs in large quantities, specifically, via the esterification of different phenolic compounds with carboxylic acids, achieving good yields of high-purity products in two hours and in the absence of heat or hazardous solvents.

3.2. Enzymatic Synthesis of Hybrid Molecules Based on Major Constituents of Thymus vulgaris and Cinnamomun verum EOs

Although most of these hybrids were previously synthetized chemically, we have reported their obtention by means of enzymatic catalysis for the first time in absence of solvents. Figure 5 shows the chromatograms obtained via GC-MS of the enzymatic reactions when benzoic acid was used as the carboxylic acid and thymol, carvacrol, and eugenol were used as phenol compounds, obtaining hybrids (1), (2), and (3), respectively.
Figure 6 shows the chromatograms obtained for the enzymatic reaction products using cinnamic acid as the carboxylic acid. Thymol, carvacrol, and eugenol were the phenol compounds used to obtain hybrids (4), (5), and (6), respectively.
The peaks which correspond to target compounds have been pointed out with their numbers in the chromatograms. In all cases, the retention times and MS fractionation patterns coincided with those of the chemically obtained hybrids, allowing us to ensure that the chemically and enzymatically obtained compounds were the same.
Enzymatic reactions carried out under the proposed conditions produced qualitatively low product yields. Substrates, either carboxylic acid or phenols, were the major compounds at the end of the reaction, and several non-identified secondary products were obtained.
In view of these results, CALB lipase seems to be less specific to methoxyphenols such as eugenol and to have greater affinity for other phenylpropanoids such as cinnamic acid. The highest conversions of reactants to products were observed in reactions (4) and (5), when thymol, carvacrol, and cinnamic acid were used as substrates.
The possibility for the biotechnological production of these bio-based hybrid molecules was thus demonstrated, despite the fact that most of them have not previously been reported in nature. However, the method used in this study required subsequent purification processes in order to obtain large quantities of pure hybrid compounds based on the constituents of T. vulgaris and C. verum EOs. Temperature, the stoichiometric ratio of the substrate, and enzyme quantities could be also key variables in the optimization of the process.
The methodology and results described here for obtaining EO-based hybrids by means of enzymatic catalysis are in the process of being protected by a patent [39].

3.3. Biological Activity

The biological activity, in terms of antifungal activity against two modes of action, and the cytotoxic effects of the obtained EO-based hybrid molecules were assessed.

3.3.1. Mycelial Growth Inhibition

Mycelial growth inhibition was evaluated by the so-called “poisoned food method” [40]. A mycelial disc of actively growing fungi was placed in the center of a Petri dish with PDA medium and the target hybrid molecule (DMSO in controls) at different concentrations. The radial growth of the mycelium was measured after 6 days of incubation and the percentage of mycelial growth inhibition (MGI) was calculated using the formula presented in Section 2.6.1. The efficacy of each hybrid molecule was expressed in terms of MGI against all fungi tested, as summarized in Table 1.
The mycelial growth inhibition (MGI) effects against three fungi exerted by each hybrid molecule at three different concentrations are shown in Figure 7. In the case of C. gloeosporioides, all candidates showed strong antifungal activity at all concentrations tested. The use of hybrids (4) and (6) at 0.5% completely prevented the growth of fungi.
In comparison with C. gloeosporioides, hybrid molecules exerted lower antifungal efficacy against F. oxyposrum. At the highest concentration assayed, MGI was potent, but this effect nearly disappeared when hybrids were tested at 0.125%. Furthermore, cinnamic esters seemed to be more effective in inhibiting the mycelial growth of F. oxysporum.
In the case of Aspergillus niger, all hybrids exerted medium to low bioactivity. At 0.125%, (4) nearly lost its activity completely, but it became clear which hybrids from cinnamic acid exerted higher antifungal effects. It should be noted that the tested molecules did not exhibit dose-dependent response behavior.
In order to demonstrate the antifungal effects of the EO hybrid molecules, in Figure 7 we provide images of one replicate of each fungus at each concentration tested. Statistically significant differences between treatments were observed amongst the various concentrations assayed.
Although A. niger can also be responsible for plant diseases, is not a strictly phytopathogen. Consequently, these results indicated which of the hybrid phytochemical-based molecules tested, were able to exert potent mycelium inhibitory growth effects on specific plant pathogens but lesser effects on opportunistic human fungi.

3.3.2. Spore Germination Inhibition

To obtain solid understanding of the compounds’ antifungal activity, we determined the spore germination inhibition (SGI) as a secondary mode of action, following the method described in Section 2.6.2. The results of the SGI analysis for each hybrid at three different concentrations against the selected fungi are shown in Table 2.
The SGI results obtained for the EO hybrid molecules can be qualitative extrapolated to describe their MGI bioactivities. All candidates exerted higher efficacy against C. gloeosporioides than against F. oxyposrum, and with regard to A. niger most of them were completely ineffective in inhibiting spore germination.
In general terms, all the concentrations tested exerted medium to low bioactivities. Once again, the obtained phytochemical hybrid molecules were relatively good spore-inhibitory ingredients for controlling phytopathogenic fungi but not for human diseases caused by these microorganisms.
Figure 8 contains a graphical depiction of the SGI results obtained for the hybrids to enable easier interpretation. As shown, for C. gloeosporioides, all hybrids displayed medium efficacy at 0.5% and the benzoic esters performed the best. For F. oxysporum, all hybrids exhibited medium to low activity at higher tested concentrations, with (1), (3), and (4) being the best candidates. In the case of A. niger, the SGI results are not shown in the graph because only (1) and (2) exerted low efficacies, and the other hybrids appeared to be completely ineffective in inhibiting spore germination. Most hybrids did not present dose-dependent response behavior in the SGI assays conducted in this study.

3.3.3. Cytotoxic Activity

BSLA is a robust bioassay that is widely used in pharmacological studies for naturally occurring and natural-related chemicals, which is capable of identifying cytotoxic and bioactive compounds. Table 3 presents the cytotoxic activity in terms of the medium lethal concentrations for brine shrimp nauplii (LC50) of the six hybrid molecules examined in this study. Experiments were conducted for nine different concentrations—600, 300, 150, 100, 75, 50, 25, 10, and 1 µg/mL solutions in DMSO (1%).
According to the Clarkson’s toxicity criterion [41], plant extracts and natural compounds can be considered non-toxic when treatments have LC50 values above 1000 µg/mL, whereas LC50 between 1000–500 µg/mL are lowly toxic and treatments with LC50 100–500 µg/mL and 100–0 µg/mL are moderately and highly toxic, respectively.
In view of these results, a clear relationship exist between the chemical structure and the mortality of A. salina nauplii. The eugenol-derived hybrids, (3) and (6), exerted medium–low toxic activities and exhibited LC50 values ten times higher than thymol and carvacrol derivatives, regardless of whether eugenol was hybridized with benzoic acid or cinnamic acid. Furthermore, hybrids based on benzoic acid appeared to be slightly more active than cinnamic acid derivatives and thymol-based molecules were more active than carvacrol-related hybrids. In view of the above conclusions and supported by the experimental data, (1) was the hybrid molecule with the lowest LC50 and the highest bioactivity against A. salina.
The hybridization of the major compounds of C. verum seemed to result in new molecules which did not exert high cytotoxic effects. Moreover, when hybrids were obtained by means of a combination of phenylpropanoids from C. verum and phenols from T. vulgaris EO, high cytotoxic effects were noted.

4. Discussion

In a changing scenario, in which the traditional active ingredients in agroindustry and pharmaceuticals are gradually being displaced by nature-based ingredients, basic and industrial research on novel lead compounds is necessary in order to comply with new legal and social requirements. Notably, in the European “Green Deal” strategy, 50% of conventional phytosanitary products will be prohibited by 2030 [42]. In the present study, we proposed to develop reliable chemical methods for the industrial scaling-up of six bioactive hybrid molecules based on major constituents of Cinnamomun verum and Thymus vulgaris EOs. Some recent works have demonstrated the possibility of obtaining, by other chemical methods, a few of these hybrid molecules, namely, 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenyl benzoate (1), 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenyl benzoate (3), and 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenyl cinnamate (4), and their potential bioactivity as antileishmanial and insecticidal compounds has been tested [43,44]. For the first time, we have demonstrated further biological activities in the form of antifungal effects against two different modes of action, and their cytotoxicity results allowed us to propose industry-targeted applications for EO-based hybrid molecules. In addition, a distinguishing feature of the present research work is that it is the first demonstration of the obtention of these EO-based hybrid molecules by means of enzymatic catalysis, even though most of them have not been reported in nature.
To assess their antifungal activity, in vitro experiments were conducted using two different modes of action against the two most important phytopathogenic fungi and an opportunistic human pathogen. The inhibitory effects on the mycelial growth of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Fusarium oxysporum for 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenyl benzoate (4) and 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenyl cinnamate (6) were potent, and we determined that 0.5% was the concentration that inhibited 100% of mycelial growth. Regarding the inhibition of spore germination activities, benzoic acid derivatives exhibited the highest efficacies against C. gloeosporioides and F. oxysporum, but all of the compounds exerted medium to low efficacies. The obtained results indicated that these could be lead compounds in novel biopesticide formulations applied in field curative applications. Moreover, the next step to validate the antifungal activity of the selected hybrids could involve well-established in vivo pot or greenhouse assays against phytopathogenic fungi. In the other hand, the efficacy of the two modes of action against Aspergillus niger was quite low. Testing higher concentrations or searching for other phytochemical hybrids could provide ingredients for the treatment of opportunistic fungal human diseases. Even though the antifungal activities of all the starting products were well established [45,46,47,48], the aim of this study was to expand the chemical space, uncovering novel EO-based derivatives and determining their modes of action, as well as proposing new biotechnological means of obtaining them.
To examine the potential bioactivity of these EO-based molecules, the cytotoxicity was assessed by means of the brine shrimp lethality assay, a well-established method to preliminarily test the bioactivity of plant extracts and nature-related pure compounds. This easy, fast, accurate, and cost-effective bioassay is widely used for pre-screening anticancer compounds and extracts from natural sources [3,26,49]. The indicator of cytotoxicity (potential anticancer effects) is an LC50 value less than 1000 µg/mL. The EO-based hybrid molecules developed here exhibited a strong correlation between their toxicity against A. salina and their structural features. In all cases, they demonstrated potential as anticancer drugs, with toxicities varying between medium (LC50 ≈ 500 µg/mL) and high (LC50 ˂ 100 µg/mL). Eugenol-derived molecules were ten-fold less toxic than thymol or carvacrol hybrids, and benzoic derivatives were slightly more active. It is worth noting that the published data indicate that thymol’s activity against A. salina nauplii was LC50 = 514 µg/mL [30], ten times higher than that of 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenyl benzoate (1) and 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenyl cinnamate (4). For validation of the data obtained in the experiments performed here, the most effective hybrids, which correspond to the hybridization of phenolic monoterpenes from T. vulgaris and phenylpropanoids from C. verum, must be tested against target tumoral cell lines. These results could also imply toxicity to aquatic life; therefore, if applied in agriculture, well-established tests [50] to ensure ecotoxicological safety should be carried out. Alternatively, hybrids could be used which have been observed to exert high antifungal activities and low cytotoxicities, such as as 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenyl benzoate (3).
In the present work, we have also amply demonstrated reliable, cost-effective, and industrially scalable chemical synthesis methods for EO-based hybrids. The high purity of the obtained products was demonstrated via H1 NMR, and the lowest yield achieved was higher than 70%. On the other hand, and although in this study we have presented the first demonstration of the enzymatic production of these hybrids, the proposed method demonstrates that they could be obtained by natural means, and thus could have the potential for industrial scalability. Further investigations could be accomplished regarding the enzymatic catalysis process. Variations in substrate ratios, temperatures, and reaction times, as well as the use of different enzymes and cost-effective purification processes, could be investigated in order to achieve higher conversion of the substrates to products or to avoid the obtention of secondary artefacts.
Specifically, the compound 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenyl benzoate (1) was most active as an antifungal compound and as a potential anticancer drug, and was also one of the most reliable hybrids obtained via chemical and enzymatic methods. In conclusion, in the present work, we have proposed industrially-applicable chemical and enzymatic methods for obtaining hybrid molecules based on EO constituents. We have demonstrated which of these hybrids could represent novel active ingredients in agricultural biofungicide products and, potentially, in EO-based anticancer drugs. Furthermore, we revealed and discussed some structure–activity relationships, thus enabling the rational design of new EO-based hybrid molecules which could meet the demands of industry and society.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.F.J. and J.V.S.; methodology, L.F.J. and J.V.S.; formal analysis, C.C.A. and M.d.M.C.P.; investigation, C.C.A., M.d.M.C.P. and J.V.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.V.S.; writing—review and editing, O.S.M., L.F.J. and J.V.S.; supervision, L.F.J. and O.S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Juan Valverde Sancho would like to acknowledge the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation for the industrial doctorate grant he enjoys and made possible the achievement of the present work (DIN2019-010829).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Special acknowledge to the entire Kimitec team, especially the R&D and Regulatory departments for their invaluable support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alizadeh Behbahani, B.; Falah, F.; Lavi Arab, F.; Vasiee, M.; Tabatabaee Yazdi, F. Chemical Composition and Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Antiproliferative Activities of Cinnamomum Zeylanicum Bark Essential Oil. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2020, 2020, 5190603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Galovičová, L.; Borotová, P.; Valková, V.; Vukovic, N.L.; Vukic, M.; Štefániková, J.; Ďúranová, H.; Kowalczewski, P.Ł.; Čmiková, N.; Kačániová, M. Thymus Vulgaris Essential Oil and Its Biological Activity. Plants 2021, 10, 1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kubatka, P.; Uramova, S.; Kello, M.; Kajo, M.; Samec, M.; Jasek, K.; Vybohova, D.; Liskova, A.; Mojzis, J.; Adamkov, M.; et al. Anticancer Activities of Thymus vulgaris L. in Experimental Breast Carcinoma in Vivo and in Vitro. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nuță, D.C.; Limban, C.; Chiriță, C.; Chifiriuc, M.C.; Costea, T.; Ioniță, P.; Nicolau, I.; Zarafu, I. Contribution of Essential Oils to the Fight against Microbial Biofilms—A Review. Processes 2021, 9, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ebadollahi, A.; Ziaee, M.; Palla, F. Essential Oils Extracted from Different Species of the Lamiaceae Plant Family as Prospective Bioagents against Several Detrimental Pests. Molecules 2020, 25, 1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Alagawany, M.; Abdel-Moneim, A.-M.E.; Mohammed, N.G.; Khafaga, A.F.; Bin-Jumah, M.; Othman, S.I.; Allam, A.A.; Elnesr, S.S. Cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) Oil as a Potential Alternative to Antibiotics in Poultry. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Marchese, A.; Barbieri, R.; Coppo, E.; Orhan, I.E.; Daglia, M.; Nabavi, S.F.; Izadi, M.; Abdollahi, M.; Nabavi, S.M.; Ajami, M. Antimicrobial Activity of Eugenol and Essential Oils Containing Eugenol: A Mechanistic Viewpoint. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 43, 668–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Barboza, J.N.; da Silva Maia Bezerra Filho, C.; Silva, R.O.; Medeiros, J.V.R.; de Sousa, D.P. An Overview on the Anti-Inflammatory Potential and Antioxidant Profile of Eugenol. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 2018, 3957262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Błaszczyk, N.; Rosiak, A.; Kałużna-Czaplińska, J. The Potential Role of Cinnamon in Human Health. Forests 2021, 12, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gavaric, N.; Mozina, S.S.; Kladar, N.; Bozin, B. Chemical Profile, Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activity of Thyme and Oregano Essential Oils, Thymol and Carvacrol and Their Possible Synergism. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2015, 18, 1013–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kachur, K.; Suntres, Z. The Antibacterial Properties of Phenolic Isomers, Carvacrol and Thymol. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 3042–3053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kowalczyk, A.; Przychodna, M.; Sopata, S.; Bodalska, A.; Fecka, I. Thymol and Thyme Essential Oil—New Insights into Selected Therapeutic Applications. Molecules 2020, 25, 4125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shang, X.-F.; Dai, L.-X.; Yang, C.-J.; Guo, X.; Liu, Y.-Q.; Miao, X.-L.; Zhang, J.-Y. A Value-Added Application of Eugenol as Acaricidal Agent: The Mechanism of Action and the Safety Evaluation. J. Adv. Res. 2021, 34, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bezerra, D.; Militão, G.; de Morais, M.; de Sousa, D. The Dual Antioxidant/Prooxidant Effect of Eugenol and Its Action in Cancer Development and Treatment. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Guo, S.; Zhen, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Zhou, G.; Zheng, X. Cinnamic Acid Rescues Behavioral Deficits in a Mouse Model of Traumatic Brain Injury by Targeting MiR-455-3p/HDAC2. Life Sci. 2019, 235, 116819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mao, X.; Yang, Q.; Chen, D.; Yu, B.; He, J. Benzoic Acid Used as Food and Feed Additives Can Regulate Gut Functions. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 5721585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guzman, J. Natural Cinnamic Acids, Synthetic Derivatives and Hybrids with Antimicrobial Activity. Molecules 2014, 19, 19292–19349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Galm, U.; Sparks, T.C. Natural Product Derived Insecticides: Discovery and Development of Spinetoram. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 43, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fallahi, P.; Ferrari, S.; Bari, F.; Materazzi, G.; Benvenga, S.; Miccoli, P.; Antonelli, A. Cabozantinib in Thyroid Cancer. Recent Pat. Anti-Cancer Drug Discov. 2015, 10, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kabir, A.; Muth, A. Polypharmacology: The Science of Multi-Targeting Molecules. Pharmacol. Res. 2022, 176, 106055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fierascu, R.C.; Fierascu, I.C.; Dinu-Pirvu, C.E.; Fierascu, I.; Paunescu, A. The Application of Essential Oils as a Next-Generation of Pesticides: Recent Developments and Future Perspectives. Z. Für Nat. C 2020, 75, 183–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dean, R.; Van Kan, J.A.L.; Pretorius, Z.A.; Hammond-Kosack, K.E.; Di Pietro, A.; Spanu, P.D.; Rudd, J.J.; Dickman, M.; Kahmann, R.; Ellis, J.; et al. The Top 10 Fungal Pathogens in Molecular Plant Pathology: Top 10 Fungal Pathogens. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 13, 414–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fujiwara, K.; Iida, Y.; Iwai, T.; Aoyama, C.; Inukai, R.; Ando, A.; Ogawa, J.; Ohnishi, J.; Terami, F.; Takano, M.; et al. The Rhizosphere Microbial Community in a Multiple Parallel Mineralization System Suppresses the Pathogenic Fungus Fusarium oxysporum. MicrobiologyOpen 2013, 2, 997–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Niksic, H. Cytotoxicity Screening of Thymus Vulgaris L. Essential Oil in Brine Shrimp Nauplii and Cancer Cell Lines. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mclaughlin, J.L.; Rogers, L.L.; Anderson, J.E. The Use of Biological Assays to Evaluate Botanicals. Drug Inf. J. 1998, 32, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pérez, O.P.; Lazo, F.J. Ensayo de Artemia: Útil herramienta de trabajo para ecotoxicólogos y químicos de productos naturales. Rev. Protección Veg. 2010, 25, 10. [Google Scholar]
  27. Saghrouchni, H.; Barnossi, A.E.; Chefchaou, H.; Mzabi, A.; Tanghort, M.; Remmal, A.; Fouzia, C. Study the Effect of Carvacrol, Eugenol and Thymol on Fusariums Sp Responsible for Lolium Perenne Fusariosis. Ecol. Environ. Conserv. Pap. 2020, 26, 1059–1067. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chakravarthi, B.V.S.K.; Singh, S.; Kamalraj, S.; Gupta, V.K.; Jayabaskaran, C. Evaluation of Spore Inoculum and Confirmation of Pathway Genetic Blueprint of T13αH and DBAT from a Taxol-Producing Endophytic Fungus. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Choub, V.; Ajuna, H.B.; Won, S.-J.; Moon, J.-H.; Choi, S.-I.; Maung, C.E.H.; Kim, C.-W.; Ahn, Y.S. Antifungal Activity of Bacillus Velezensis CE 100 against Anthracnose Disease (Colletotrichum Gloeosporioides) and Growth Promotion of Walnut (Juglans regia L.) Trees. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Meyer, B.N.; Ferrigni, N.A.; Putnam, J.E.; Jacobsen, L.B.; Nichols, D.E.; McLaughlin, J.L. Brine Shrimp: A Convenient General Bioassay for Active Plant Constituents. Planta Med. 1982, 45, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Waghulde, S.; Kale, M.K.; Patil, V. Brine Shrimp Lethality Assay of the Aqueous and Ethanolic Extracts of the Selected Species of Medicinal Plants. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Electronic Conference on Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Online, 15 November–15 December 2019; p. 47. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mesquita, B.; Nascimento, P.; Souza, L.; Farias, I.; Silva, R.; Lemos, T.; Monte, F.; Oliveira, I.; Trevisan, M.T.; Silva, H.; et al. Synthesis, Larvicidal and Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitory Activities of Carvacrol/Thymol and Derivatives. Quim. Nova 2018, 41, 412–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, M.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, G.; Chen, F.; Cheng, J. Palladium/NHC-Catalyzed Oxidative Esterification of Aldehydes with Phenols. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 2480–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, G.; Lei, P.; Szostak, M. Transition-Metal-Free Esterification of Amides via Selective N–C Cleavage under Mild Conditions. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 5622–5625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gonçalves, R.; de Farias, I.; Silva, M.F.; Pessoa, C.; Zocolo, G.; Zampieri, D.; de Lemos, T.L.; Monte, F.J. Preparation, Spectral Characterization and Anticancer Potential of Cinnamic Esters. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2021, 32, 1931–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Glaser, J.; Schultheis, M.; Hazra, S.; Hazra, B.; Moll, H.; Schurigt, U.; Holzgrabe, U. Antileishmanial Lead Structures from Nature: Analysis of Structure-Activity Relationships of a Compound Library Derived from Caffeic Acid Bornyl Ester. Molecules 2014, 19, 1394–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mali, R.S.; Papalkar, A.S. Useful Synthesis of Aryl Cinnamates: Synthesis of Difengpin. J. Chem. Res. 2003, 10, 603–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Abbas-Mohammadi, M.; Moridi Farimani, M.; Salehi, P.; Ebrahimi, S.N.; Sonboli, A.; Kelso, C.; Skropeta, D. Molecular Networking Based Dereplication of AChE Inhibitory Compounds from the Medicinal Plant Vincetoxicum funebre (Boiss. & Kotschy). J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2022, 40, 1942–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Juan, V.S.; Torres, J.; Fernando, L.; Omar, S.M.; Cristina, C.A.; María del Mar, C.P. Procedimiento de Síntesis Biológica de Moléculas Hibridas. ES Patent P202330030, 18 January 2023. [Google Scholar]
  40. Balouiri, M.; Sadiki, M.; Ibnsouda, S.K. Methods for in Vitro Evaluating Antimicrobial Activity: A Review. J. Pharm. Anal. 2016, 6, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Clarkson, C.; Maharaj, V.J.; Crouch, N.R.; Grace, O.M.; Pillay, P.; Matsabisa, M.G.; Bhagwandin, N.; Smith, P.J.; Folb, P.I. In Vitro Antiplasmodial Activity of Medicinal Plants Native to or Naturalised in South Africa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 92, 177–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Fetting, C. The European Green Deal; ESDN Office: Viena, Austria, 2020; p. 22. [Google Scholar]
  43. de Morais, S.M.; Vila-Nova, N.S.; Bevilaqua, C.M.L.; Rondon, F.C.; Lobo, C.H.; de Alencar Araripe Noronha Moura, A.; Sales, A.D.; Rodrigues, A.P.R.; de Figuereido, J.R.; Campello, C.C.; et al. Thymol and Eugenol Derivatives as Potential Antileishmanial Agents. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 6250–6255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pengsook, A.; Tharamak, S.; Keosaeng, K.; Koul, O.; Bullangpoti, V.; Kumrungsee, N.; Pluempanupat, W. Insecticidal and Growth Inhibitory Effects of Some Thymol Derivatives on the Beet Armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Their Impact on Detoxification Enzymes. Pest Manag. Sci. 2022, 78, 684–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Marchese, A.; Orhan, I.E.; Daglia, M.; Barbieri, R.; Di Lorenzo, A.; Nabavi, S.F.; Gortzi, O.; Izadi, M.; Nabavi, S.M. Antibacterial and Antifungal Activities of Thymol: A Brief Review of the Literature. Food Chem. 2016, 210, 402–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Nehela, Y.; Taha, N.A.; Elzaawely, A.A.; Xuan, T.D.; Amin, M.A.; Ahmed, M.E.; El-Nagar, A. Benzoic Acid and Its Hydroxylated Derivatives Suppress Early Blight of Tomato (Alternaria solani) via the Induction of Salicylic Acid Biosynthesis and Enzymatic and Nonenzymatic Antioxidant Defense Machinery. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Olea, A.; Bravo, A.; Martínez, R.; Thomas, M.; Sedan, C.; Espinoza, L.; Zambrano, E.; Carvajal, D.; Silva-Moreno, E.; Carrasco, H. Antifungal Activity of Eugenol Derivatives against Botrytis Cinerea. Molecules 2019, 24, 1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhou, K.; Chen, D.; Li, B.; Zhang, B.; Miao, F.; Zhou, L. Bioactivity and Structure-Activity Relationship of Cinnamic Acid Esters and Their Derivatives as Potential Antifungal Agents for Plant Protection. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0176189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mawardi, A.L.; Siregar, A.R.S.; Elfrida. Anticancer Pre–Screening of Sansevieria Masoniana C. Using Brine Shrimp Lethality Assay. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Science; Atlantis Press: Langsa, Indonesia, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lillicrap, A.; Belanger, S.; Burden, N.; Pasquier, D.D.; Embry, M.R.; Halder, M.; Lampi, M.A.; Lee, L.; Norberg-King, T.; Rattner, B.A.; et al. Alternative Approaches to Vertebrate Ecotoxicity Tests in the 21st Century: A Review of Developments over the Last 2 Decades and Current Status. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2016, 35, 2637–2646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Main bioactivities and modes of action of the major constituents of the essential oils and organic extracts of C. verum and T. vulgaris.
Figure 1. Main bioactivities and modes of action of the major constituents of the essential oils and organic extracts of C. verum and T. vulgaris.
Life 13 00499 g001
Figure 2. Chemical synthesis of the proposed hybrid molecules.
Figure 2. Chemical synthesis of the proposed hybrid molecules.
Life 13 00499 g002
Figure 3. Chemical structures of hybrid molecules from the main constituents of T. vulgaris and C. verum EOs.
Figure 3. Chemical structures of hybrid molecules from the main constituents of T. vulgaris and C. verum EOs.
Life 13 00499 g003
Figure 4. Chromatograms obtained via GC-MS of the chemical reaction products. (a) Chromatogram of 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenyl benzoate (1); (b) chromatogram of 5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenyl benzoate (2); (c) chromatogram of 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenyl benzoate (3); (d) chromatogram of 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenyl cinnamate (4); (e) chromatogram of 5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenyl cinnamate (5); (f) chromatogram of 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenyl cinnamate (6).
Figure 4. Chromatograms obtained via GC-MS of the chemical reaction products. (a) Chromatogram of 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenyl benzoate (1); (b) chromatogram of 5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenyl benzoate (2); (c) chromatogram of 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenyl benzoate (3); (d) chromatogram of 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenyl cinnamate (4); (e) chromatogram of 5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenyl cinnamate (5); (f) chromatogram of 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenyl cinnamate (6).
Life 13 00499 g004
Figure 5. Chromatograms obtained via GC-MS of the enzymatic reaction products, obtaining (1), (2) and (3).
Figure 5. Chromatograms obtained via GC-MS of the enzymatic reaction products, obtaining (1), (2) and (3).
Life 13 00499 g005
Figure 6. Chromatograms obtained via GC-MS of the enzymatic reaction products, obtaining (4), (5) and (6).
Figure 6. Chromatograms obtained via GC-MS of the enzymatic reaction products, obtaining (4), (5) and (6).
Life 13 00499 g006
Figure 7. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Fusarium oxysporum, and Aspergillus niger mycelial growth inhibition effects exerted by hybrids: (1) 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenyl benzoate, (2) 5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenyl benzoate, (3) 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenyl benzoate, (4) 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenyl cinnamate, (5) 5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenyl cinnamate, (6) 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenyl cinnamate. Only one replicate per treatment and concentration is shown. Obverse and reverse of control treatment are shown.
Figure 7. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Fusarium oxysporum, and Aspergillus niger mycelial growth inhibition effects exerted by hybrids: (1) 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenyl benzoate, (2) 5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenyl benzoate, (3) 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenyl benzoate, (4) 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenyl cinnamate, (5) 5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenyl cinnamate, (6) 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenyl cinnamate. Only one replicate per treatment and concentration is shown. Obverse and reverse of control treatment are shown.
Life 13 00499 g007
Figure 8. Spore germination inhibition effects exerted by hybrids against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Fusarium oxysporum at three different concentrations. Blue: 0.5% (w/v), Orange: 0.25% (w/v), Grey: 0.125% (w/v). (1) 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenyl benzoate, (2) 5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenyl benzoate, (3) 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenyl benzoate, (4) 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenyl cinnamate, (5) 5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenyl cinnamate, (6) 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenyl cinnamate.
Figure 8. Spore germination inhibition effects exerted by hybrids against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Fusarium oxysporum at three different concentrations. Blue: 0.5% (w/v), Orange: 0.25% (w/v), Grey: 0.125% (w/v). (1) 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenyl benzoate, (2) 5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenyl benzoate, (3) 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenyl benzoate, (4) 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenyl cinnamate, (5) 5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenyl cinnamate, (6) 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenyl cinnamate.
Life 13 00499 g008
Table 1. Inhibition values of hybrid molecules at different concentrations in regard to the mycelial growth of C. gloeosporioides, F. oxysporum, and A. niger at 6 days.
Table 1. Inhibition values of hybrid molecules at different concentrations in regard to the mycelial growth of C. gloeosporioides, F. oxysporum, and A. niger at 6 days.
HybridMycelial Growth Inhibition (MGI)
C. gloeosporioidesF. oxysporumA. niger
Concentration (w/v)Concentration (w/v)Concentration (w/v)
0.5%0.25%0.125%0.5%0.25%0.125%0.5%0.25%0.125%
(1) 94.76 ± 0.14 *76.83 ± 0.12 * 65.56 ± 0.13 *75.04 ± 0.14 *63.20 ± 0.11 *48.23 ± 0.07 *65.13 ± 0.02 *62.66 ± 0.05 *57.19 ± 0.08 *
(2) 94.74 ± 0.06 *86.77 ± 0.04 *76.22 ± 0.09 *69.74 ± 0.06 *54.96 ± 0.08 *29.48 ± 0.15 *60.11 ± 0.02 *58.97 ± 0.04 *51.10 ± 0. 07 *
(3) 91.22 ± 0.08 *88.24 ± 0.11 *78.33 ± 0.10 *83.09 ± 0.02 *60.07 ± 0.10 *51.48 ± 0.06 *59.56 ± 0.03 *57.27 ± 0.07 *50.61 ± 0.03 *
(4) 100 ± 0.00 *83.61 ± 0.04 *73.82 ± 0.09 *70.07 ± 0.18 *61.62 ± 0.09 *32.87 ± 0.12 *18.34 ± 0.05 *12.28 ± 0.08 *3.31 ± 0.07 *
(5) 96.41 ± 0.03 *80.67 ± 0.18 *70.07 ± 0.09 *86.82 ± 0.10 *51.63 ± 0.07 *30.81 ± 0.04 *28.37 ± 0.06 *23.10 ± 0.02 *20.34 ± 0.05 *
(6) 100 ± 0.00 *70.51 ± 0.04 *64.23 ± 0.18 *82.77 ± 0.08 *64.23 ± 0.17 *20.56 ± 0.05 *27.92 ± 0.08 *12.95 ± 0.11 *11.19 ± 0.03 *
Values are presented as mean ± SD. * significantly different at p ˂ 0.05, as determined via the one-way ANOVA Tukey test.
Table 2. Inhibition of hybrid molecules at different concentrations on the spore germination of C. gloeosporioides, F. oxysporum, and A. niger at 24 h.
Table 2. Inhibition of hybrid molecules at different concentrations on the spore germination of C. gloeosporioides, F. oxysporum, and A. niger at 24 h.
HybridSpore Germination Inhibition (SGI)
C. gloeosporioidesF. oxysporumA. niger
Concentration (w/v)Concentration (w/v)Concentration (w/v)
0.5%0.25%0.125%0.5%0.25%0.125%0.5%0.25%0.125%
(1) 34.40 ± 2.98 *13.89 ± 1.84 *11.24 ± 2.2916.82 ± 0.25 *11.84 ± 2.570.00 ± 0.0013.68 ± 2.54 *10.24± 1.870.00 ± 0.00
(2) 27.32 ± 1.86 *2.57 ± 0.051.19 ± 0.765.92 ± 1.120.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.0023.62 ± 3.05 *10.91 ± 3.046.49 ± 1.12
(3) 11.94 ± 0.43 *8.09 ± 0.301.64 ± 0.2637.69 ± 6.3 *24.92 ± 3.5 *14.64 ± 0.75 *0.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00
(4) 7.00 ± 1.895.60 ± 1.420.00 ± 0.0016.52 ± 4.75 *12.86 ± 1.23 *0.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00
(5) 4.68 ± 1.494.50 ± 0.930.00 ± 0.000.16 ± 0.110.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00
(6) 10.90 ± 5.32.72 ± 0.712.20 ± 0.870.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00
Values are presented as mean ± SD. * significantly different at p ˂ 0.05 by means of the one-way ANOVA Tukey test.
Table 3. Percentage mortality of Artemia salina nauplii after 24 h treated with different concentrations of EO-based hybrid molecules and LC50 values calculated for each hybrid.
Table 3. Percentage mortality of Artemia salina nauplii after 24 h treated with different concentrations of EO-based hybrid molecules and LC50 values calculated for each hybrid.
HybridConcentrations (µg/mL)% MortalityLC50 (µg/mL)
(1) 600100 ± 0.00 *50.39
300100 ± 0.00 *
15096.67 ± 5.77 *
10076.67 ± 15.27 *
7570.00 ± 10.00 *
5046.67 ± 15.27 *
2543.33 ± 10.00 *
1033.33 ± 5.77 *
113.33 ± 5.77 *
(2) 60096.67 ± 5.77 *68.22
30096.67 ± 5.77 *
15083.33 ± 15.27 *
10063.33 ± 15.27 *
7560.00 ± 10.00 *
5050.22 ± 10.00 *
2530.68 ± 10.00 *
1022.34 ± 0.00 *
110.12 ± 10.00 *
(3)60066.67 ± 5.77 *418.56
30026.67 ± 5.77 *
15016.98 ± 5.77 *
10016.42 ± 5.77 *
7515.38 ± 0.00 *
5012.11 ± 5.77 *
2510.8 ± 0.00 *
108.7 ± 0.00 *
15.6 ± 0.00 *
(4)600100 ± 0.00 *64.41
30093.30 ± 5.77 *
15086.67 ± 5.77 *
10063.33 ± 5.77 *
7560.00 ± 5.77 *
5033.33 ± 5.77 *
2536.67 ± 11.33 *
1033.33 ± 5.77 *
120.00 ± 0.00 *
(5)60080.00 ± 17.32 *71.95
30070.00 ± 10.00 *
15070.00 ± 10.00 *
10063.33 ± 15.27 *
7554.85 ± 5.77 *
5040.00 ± 17.32 *
2533.33 ± 5.77 *
1036.67 ± 5.77 *
123.33 ± 0.00 *
(6)60066.67 ± 15.27 *465.87
30033.33 ± 5.77 *
15030.00 ± 10.00 *
10030.00 ± 0.00 *
7523.33 ± 5.77 *
5021.48± 5.77 *
2516.67 ± 0.00 *
1016.00± 5.77 *
115.00 ± 0.00 *
Values are presented as mean ± SD. * significantly different at p ˂ 0.05 level by one-way ANOVA Tukey test.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Valverde Sancho, J.; Carreño Amate, C.; Caparrós Pérez, M.d.M.; Santana Méridas, O.; Julio, L.F. Biological Activity of Hybrid Molecules Based on Major Constituents of Cinnammomun verum and Thymus vulgaris Essential Oils. Life 2023, 13, 499. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020499

AMA Style

Valverde Sancho J, Carreño Amate C, Caparrós Pérez MdM, Santana Méridas O, Julio LF. Biological Activity of Hybrid Molecules Based on Major Constituents of Cinnammomun verum and Thymus vulgaris Essential Oils. Life. 2023; 13(2):499. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020499

Chicago/Turabian Style

Valverde Sancho, Juan, Cristina Carreño Amate, María del Mar Caparrós Pérez, Omar Santana Méridas, and Luis F. Julio. 2023. "Biological Activity of Hybrid Molecules Based on Major Constituents of Cinnammomun verum and Thymus vulgaris Essential Oils" Life 13, no. 2: 499. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020499

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop