Assessment of Ecological and Toxicological State of Soils and Waters in the Neighborhood of Mining Industry Enterprises in the Armenian Highlands
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Awaji, T.; Teranishi, S. Mining and Its Environmental Damage. In The State of the Environment in Asia; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2003; pp. 25–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bennagen, M.E. Estimation of Environmental Damages from Mining Pollution: The Marinduque Island Mining Accident; EEPSEA Research Report Series; Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA): Singapore, 1998; Available online: https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/bitstream/handle/10625/21613/116325.pdf?sequence=23&isAllowed=y (accessed on 2 October 2022).
- Gibadulina, I.I.; Larionov, M.V.; Maslennikova, N.N. Anatomical and morphological features of the leaves of Tilia cordata Mill. as an indicator of the adaptive capabilities of the species to the conditions of the urban environment. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022, 988, 032082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gromova, T.S.; Siraeva, I.S.; Ermolenko, A.S.; Larionov, N.V.; Larionov, M.V. Vitality of woody plants as the aggregate basis of the ecological condition of urban and suburban ecosystems of the Khopyor River Region. Mod. Sci. Actual Probl. Theory Pract. Ser. “Nat. Tech. Sci.” 2020, 7, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiménez, T.; Pollán, M.; Domínguez-Castillo, A.; Lucas, P.; Sierra, M.; de Larrea-Baz, N.F.; González-Sánchez, M.; Salas-Trejo, D.; Llobet, R.; Martínez, I.; et al. Residential proximity to industrial pollution and mammographic density. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 829, 154578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Siraeva, I.S.; Larionov, M.V.; Larionov, N.V.; Soldatova, V.V.; Gromova, T.S.; Ermolenko, A.S.; Kulagina, E.Y. Environmental assessment of health indicators of woody plants in natural and man-made conditions. Samara J. Sci. 2020, 9, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim, M. The Use of ‘Prince System’ in Minimizing the Environmental Damages in Mining Activities. J. Teknol. 1992, 20, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pleshakova, E.; Ngun, C.; Reshetnikov, M.; Larionov, M.V. Evaluation of the Ecological Potential of Microorganisms for Purifying Water with High Iron Content. Water 2021, 13, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Provornaya, I.V.; Yurkevich, N.V.; Dzuba, Y.A. Mine Tailings: Environmental Damage and Resource Potential. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 459, 022084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaw, W.D.; Eiswerth, M.E.; Huszar, E.H. Environmental Damages from Gold Mining: Application to the Humboldt River Watershed and Implications for Europe. Rev. Econ. Catalunya 2001, 70–78. [Google Scholar]
- Galstyan, M.H.; Hayrapetyan, E.M.; Harutyunyan, S.S.; Tamoyan, S.J. The eco-economic efficacy of using natural mineral ameliorants together with organic fertilizers for eggplant production. Biol. J. Armen. 2009, 60, 82–87. (In Armenian) [Google Scholar]
- Hayrapetyan, E.M.; Shirinyan, A.V. Agriecology, Textbook for the NAS students, Yerevan. Int. Sci. J. 2003, 408. (In Armenian) [Google Scholar]
- Harutyunyan, V.S.; Sargsyan, K.S. Ecological safety, Yerevan. Int. Sci. J. 2018, 476. (In Armenian) [Google Scholar]
- Hayrapetyan, E.M.; Galstyan, M.H.; Harutyunyan, S.S.; Tamoyan, S.J. The influence of the combined use of natural ameliorants and organic fertilizers on the yield of agricultural crops and the accumulation of heavy metals in the plants of technogenically contaminated soils “Ecological problems of agriculture”. Mater. Int. Sci. Conf. 2008, 145–151. (In Armenian) [Google Scholar]
- Budnikov, G.A. Heavy metals in environmental monitoring of water systems. Soros Educ. J. 1998; 23–28. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Saet, Y.E.; Revich, B.A.; Yanin, E.P.; Smirnova, R.S.; Basharkevich, I.L.; Onishchenko, T.L.; Pavlova, L.N.; Trefilova, N.Y.; Achkasov, A.I.; Sargsyan, S.S. Geochemistry of the Environment; Nedra: Moscow, Russia, 1990; 335p, Available online: https://www.geokniga.org/bookfiles/geokniga-292484.pdf (accessed on 2 October 2022). (In Russian)
- Sokolov, O.A.; Chernikov, V.A.; Lukin, S.V. Atlas of The Distribution Of Heavy Metals. Constanta: Belgorod, Russia, 2008; 188p, Available online: https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000199_000009_004370214/ (accessed on 2 October 2022). (In Russian)
- Ashikhmina, T.Y.; Kantor, G.Y.; Vasilyeva, A.N.; Timonyuk, V.M.; Kondakova, L.V.; Sityakov, A.S. Environmental Monitoring; Akademicheskij Proekt: Moscow, Russia, 2006; 416p, Available online: https://rongaschool.ucoz.ru/ehkologicheskie_metodiki.pdf (accessed on 2 October 2022). (In Russian)
- Mitra, S.; Chakraborty, A.J.; Tareq, A.M.; Emran, T.B.; Nainu, F.; Khusro, A.; Idris, A.M.; Khandaker, M.U.; Osman, H.; Alhumaydhi, F.; et al. Impact of heavy metals on the environment and human health: Novel therapeutic insights to counter the toxicity. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2022, 34, 101865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Influence of Atmospheric Pollution on Soil Properties; Grishina, L.A. (Ed.) Publishing house of Moscow State University: Moscow, Russia, 1990; 203p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Garmash, G.A. The content of lead and cadmium in various parts of potatoes and vegetables grown on soils contaminated with these metals. In Chemical Elements in the Soil-Plant System; Nauka: Novosibirsk, Russia, 1982; pp. 105–110. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Garmash, G.A. Distribution of Heavy Metals in the Organs of Cultivated Plants. Agrochemistry 1987, 40–46. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Saghatelyan, A.K. Peculiarities of Distribution of Heavy Metals in the Territory of Armenia; Monogr. H. CENS NAS RA: Yerevan, Armenia, 2004; 157p. (In Armenian) [Google Scholar]
- Shahinyan, H.O. On the Hydrochemical. Characteristics of Some Drinking Water Supply. H. CENS NAS RA, Yerevan, Armenia. Earth Sci. 2005, 58, 41–45. (In Armenian) [Google Scholar]
- Clesceri, L.S.; Greenberg, E.A.; Eaton, A.D. Standard Methods for The Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1998; p. 1220. [Google Scholar]
- Davydova, S. Heavy metals as toxicants in big cities. Microchem. J. 2005, 79, 133–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghalachyan, L.; Asatryan, A. Distribution of heavy metals in water-soil-plant system zones of the Armenian NPP. Monogr. Yerevan 2012, 4, 28–31. (In Armenian) [Google Scholar]
- Rokni, M.A.; Galstyan, M.A.; Shokrzadeh, M. Lead, Cadmium and Chromium Concentrations in Irrigation Supply of/and Taron Rice in Central Cities of Mazandaran Province. Iran J. Maz. Univ. Med. Sci. 2013, 22, 234–242. Available online: http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-27-27&slc_lang=en&sid=1 (accessed on 2 October 2022).
- Fomin, G.S. Water: Control of Chemical, Bacterial and Radiation Safety According to International Standards; Protektor: Moscow, Russia, 2000; 848p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Kipriyanov, N.A. Environmentally Friendly Plant Raw Materials and Finished Food Products; Agar: Moscow, Russia, 1997; 175p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Mineev, V.G. Biological Farming and Mineral Fertilizers; Kolos: Moscow, Russia, 1993; 413p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Potemkin, L.A. Protection of Subsoil and the Environment; Nedra: Moscow, Russia, 1977. Available online: https://www.geokniga.org/bookfiles/geokniga-ohrana-nedr-i-okruzhayushchey-prirody.pdf (accessed on 4 October 2022). (In Russian).
- Protasov, V.F.; Molchanov, A.V. Ecology, Health, and Environmental Management in Russia; Finansy i Statistika: Moscow, Russia, 1995; 524p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Lorenc, W.; Markiewicz, B.; Kruszka, D.; Kachlicki, P.; Barałkiewicz, D. Total Versus Inorganic and Organic Species of As, Cr, and Sb in Flavored and Functional Drinking Waters: Analysis and Risk Assessment. Molecules 2020, 25, 1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fellenberg, G. Pollution of the natural environment. In Introduction to Ecological Chemistry; Mir: Moscow, Russia, 1997; 232p, Available online: https://www.geokniga.org/bookfiles/geokniga-fellenbergzagryaznprirodnoysredy1997.pdf (accessed on 2 October 2022). (In Russian)
- ISO 17294-1:2004; Water Quality—Application of Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS)—Part 1: General Guidelines. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/32957.html (accessed on 2 October 2022).
- Galstyan, M.A. Ecological and Economic Efficiency of the Use of Zeolite in Potato Crops Against the Background of Mineral Fertilizers and Manure in Technogen Polluted Soils of Armenia; Materials of the I Transcaucasian Forum (Grozny, Russia, 15–16 October 2013); KCHSU Publ.: Grozny, Russia; pp. 170–174. (In Russian)
- Yagodin, B.A.; Smirnov, P.M.; Peterburgskij, A.V.; Asarov, K.K.; Demin, V.A.; Reshetnikova, N.V. Agrochemistry Workshop; Agropromizdat: Moscow, Russia, 1987; 512p, Available online: https://studizba.com/files/show/pdf/115282-1-yagodin_b.html (accessed on 2 October 2022). (In Russian)
- Guideline on the Chemical Analysis of Terrestrial Surface Waters; Gidromet: Moscow, Russia, 1977; 542p. (In Russian)
- Glazovskaya, M.A. Methodological Bases for Assessing the Ecological and Geochemical Resistance of Soils to Technogenic Impacts; University of Moscow Publ.: Moscow, Russia, 1997; 102p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Golubev, A.V. Fertilize without Destroying; Privolzhskoe Knizhnoe Izdatel'stvo: Saratov, Russia, 1990; 125p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Urazaev, N.A.; Bakulin, A.A.; Nikitin, A.V.; Urazaev, D.N.; Chukhlebova, N.S. Agricultural Ecology; Kolos: Moscow, Russia, 2000; 304p, Available online: https://www.rulit.me/books/selskohozyajstvennaya-ekologiya-pod-red-n-a-urazaeva-read-454493-1.html (accessed on 2 October 2022). (In Russian)
- Girusov, E.V.; Bobylev, S.N.; Novoselov, A.L.; Chepurnykh, N.V. Ecology and Economics of Environmental Management; YUNITI-DANA, Edinstvo: Moscow, Russia, 2003; 519p, Available online: https://knigogid.ru/books/1222417-ekologiya-i-ekonomika-prirodopolzovaniya/toread (accessed on 2 October 2022). (In Russian)
- Ecology, Nature Conservation and Environmental Safety; Danilov-Danilyan, V.I. (Ed.) MNEPU Publ.: Moscow, Russia, 1997; 744p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Agrogeochemistry and Environmental Monitoring; Yagodin, B.A. (Ed.) Agropromizdat: Moscow, Russia, 1990; pp. 113–118. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Dospekhov, B.A. Field Experience Methodology: With the Basics of Statistical Processing of Research Results; Al’yans: Moscow, Russia, 2011; 352p, Available online: https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000706_000023_NBRBU-RU_%D0%93%D0%9F%D0%9D%D0%A2%D0%91+%D0%A0o%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B8_KNIG1_%D0%9F1_%D0%94+705-219171/ (accessed on 7 October 2022).
- Hansen, E.; University of Wisconsin, Department of Economics. Econometrics. 2019. Available online: https://ssc.wisc.edu/~%7B%7Dbhansen/econometrics/Econometrics.pdf (accessed on 7 October 2022).
No | Sampling Depth, cm | % | pH | Content of Available Nutrients, mg in 100 g Soil | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hygro-Scopic Moisture Content | Humus | CaCO3 | N | P2O5 | K2O | |||
1 | 0–20/tailings sludge/ | 6.90 | - | 12.10 | 7.45 | - | - | - |
2 | 20–45/experimental plots under the tailings/ | 5.12 | 1.27 | 10.79 | 7.35 | 0.85 | 0.67 | 13.02 |
No | Sampling Depth, cm | Mo | Cu | Zn | Co | Ni | Pb |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0–20 (tailings layer) | 59.6 | 30.0 | 68.2 | 290 | 318.0 | 136.5 |
3.8 | 18.0 | 16.0 | 18.0 | 46.0 | 32.0 | ||
2 | 20–45 (experimental plots layer) | 6.20 | 15.0 | 24.20 | 5.00 | 15.4 | 1.040 |
1.20 | 3.60 | 2.30 | 0.250 | 0.58 | 0.240 |
No | Variants | Name of Heavy Metals | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pb | Ni | Cu | Zn | Co | As | ||
1 | Control (Without fertilization) | 0.133 | 0.444 | 3.30 | 1.898 | 0.133 | traces |
2 | Manure 40 t/ha-background | 0.166 | 0.509 | 3.70 | 2.000 | 0.166 | |
3 | Background + Zeolite 3 tons/ha | 0.196 | 0.585 | 3.30 | 2.962 | 0.196 | |
4 | Background + Zeolite 6 tons/ha | 0.106 | 0.561 | 2.90 | 1.610 | 0.106 | |
5 | Background + Zeolite 9 tons/ha | 0.290 | 0.749 | 4.00 | 2.880 | 0.290 | |
6 | Background + Bentonite 3 tons/ha | 0.153 | 0.522 | 3.30 | 1.793 | 0.153 | |
7 | Background + Bentonite 6 tons/ha | 0.182 | 0.512 | 3.30 | 1.932 | 0.182 | |
8 | Background + Bentonite 9 tons/ha | 0.198 | 0.449 | 1.29 | 2.134 | 0.198 |
No | Variants | Potato | Bean (Green) | Eggplant | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Per Replications | Average Yield | Yield Surplus | Per Replications | Average Yield | Yield Surplus | Average Yield | Yield Surplus | |||||||||
I | II | III | c/ha | % | I | II | III | c/ha | % | c/ha | % | |||||
1 | Control (without fertilization) | 98.0 | 102.0 | 101.8 | 100.6 | - | - | 63.0 | 71.0 | 67.0 | 67.0 | - | - | 87.0 | - | - |
2 | Manure 40 t/ha-background | 195.0 | 194.0 | 199.0 | 196.0 | 95.4 | 94.8 | 94.0 | 92.0 | 96.0 | 94.0 | 27.0 | 40.3 | 175.0 | 88.0 | 101.1 |
3 | Background + Zeolite 3 t/ha | 210.0 | 202.0 | 212.0 | 208.0 | 107.4 | 106.8 | 93.6 | 97.0 | 100.4 | 97.0 | 30.0 | 44.8 | 184.0 | 97.0 | 111.5 |
4 | Background + Zeolite 6 t/ha | 213.0 | 224.0 | 223.0 | 220.0 | 119.4 | 118.7 | 104.0 | 101.6 | 106.4 | 104.0 | 37.0 | 55.2 | 200.0 | 113.0 | 129.9 |
5 | Background + Zeolite 9 t/ha | 227.0 | 224.0 | 221.0 | 224.0 | 123.4 | 122.7 | 99.5 | 102.0 | 104.5 | 102.0 | 35.0 | 52.2 | 203.0 | 116.0 | 133.3 |
6 | Background + Bentonite 3 t/ha | 243.0 | 249.0 | 246.0 | 246.0 | 145.4 | 144.5 | 115.0 | 112.0 | 118.0 | 115.0 | 48.0 | 71.6 | 213.0 | 126.0 | 144.8 |
7 | Background + Bentonite 6 t/ha | 269.0 | 266.0 | 272.0 | 269.0 | 168.4 | 167.4 | 126.0 | 128.0 | 130.0 | 128.0 | 61.0 | 91.0 | 229.0 | 142.0 | 163.2 |
8 | Background + Bentonite 9 t/ha | 279.0 | 275 | 271.0 | 275.0 | 174.4 | 173.4 | 132.0 | 129.0 | 135.0 | 132.0 | 65.0 | 97.0 | 228.0 | 143.0 | 164.4 |
Sx, % | 4.2 | 2.4 | 3.1 | |||||||||||||
LSD0.95, c | 6.8 | 4.9 | 4.6 |
No | Variants | Average Potato Yield | Starch Content, % | Nitrates Content, mg/kg | Starch Yield, c/ha | Average Eggplant Yield, c/ha | Nitrates Content, mg/kg | Green Bean Yield, c/ha | Nitrates Content, mg/kg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Control (without fertilization) | 100.6 | 17.5 | 85.0 | 17.6 | 87.0 | 170.0 | 67.0 | 120 |
2 | Manure 40 t/ha-background | 196.0 | 16.0 | 175.0 | 31.4 | 175.0 | 235.0 | 94.0 | 190 |
3 | Background + Zeolite 3 t/ha | 208.0 | 16.2 | 165.0 | 33.7 | 184.0 | 240.0 | 97.0 | 180 |
4 | Background + Zeolite 6 t/ha | 220.0 | 15.9 | 170.0 | 35.0 | 200.0 | 225.0 | 104.0 | 185 |
5 | Background + Zeolite 9 t/ha | 224.0 | 15.7 | 168.0 | 35.2 | 203.0 | 230.0 | 102.0 | 175 |
6 | Background + Bentonite 3 t/ha | 246.0 | 16.2 | 185.0 | 39.9 | 213.0 | 245.0 | 115.0 | 200 |
7 | Background + Bentonite 6 t/ha | 269.0 | 17.0 | 180.0 | 45.7 | 229.0 | 240.0 | 128.0 | 205 |
8 | Background + Bentonite 9 t/ha | 275.0 | 16.6 | 185.0 | 45.7 | 238.0 | 235.0 | 132.0 | 215 |
No | Variants | Potato | Bean | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pb | Ni | Cu | Zn | Co | As | Pb | Ni | Cu | Zn | Co | As | ||
1 | Control (Without fertilization) | <0.01 | 0.320 | 2.50 | 1.862 | 0.066 | traces | <0.01 | 0.29 | 1.20 | 1.775 | 0.031 | traces |
2 | Manure 40 t/ha-background | <0.01 | 0.317 | 2.43 | 1.859 | 0.076 | <0.01 | 0.30 | 1.16 | 1.876 | 0.029 | ||
3 | Background + Zeolite 3 t/ha | <0.01 | 0.270 | 2.00 | 1.657 | 0.035 | <0.01 | 0.51 | 0.95 | 1.880 | 0.018 | ||
4 | Background + Zeolite 6 t/ha | <0.01 | 0.200 | 2.00 | 1.670 | 0.039 | <0.01 | 0.52 | 0.93 | 1.800 | 0.020 | ||
5 | Background + Zeolite 9 t/ha | <0.01 | 0.200 | 1.80 | 1.540 | 0.035 | <0.01 | 0.41 | 0.95 | 2.750 | <0.01 | ||
6 | Background + Bentonite 3 t/ha | <0.01 | 0.250 | 1.20 | 1.500 | 0.031 | <0.01 | 0.36 | 0.68 | 1.650 | <0.01 | ||
7 | Background + Bentonite 6 t/ha | <0.01 | 0.250 | 0.95 | 1.450 | 0.030 | <0.01 | 0.38 | 0.67 | 1.600 | <0.01 | ||
8 | Background + Bentonite 9 t/ha | <0.01 | 0.270 | 0.95 | 1.450 | 0.025 | <0.01 | 0.48 | 0.65 | 1.620 | <0.01 |
No | Indicators | Measuring Unit | October–November, 2010 | October–November, 2015 | November, 2019 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Indices of Cellar Pit, October–November | 1.0 km above the Sotk Community | Opposite the Sotk Community | River Mouth (Frith) | The Indices of Cellar Pit, October-November | 1.0 km above the Sotk Community | Opposite the Sotk Community | River Mouth (Frith) | The Indices of Cellar Pit, October–November | 1.0 km above the Sotk Community | Opposite the Sotk Community | River Mouth (Frith) | |||
1 | Hydrogenic index | 8.30 | 8.20 | 8.40 | 8.74 | 8.40 | 8.36 | 8.44 | 8.40 | 8.43 | 8.37 | 8.35 | 8.78 | |
2 | Dissolved oxygen | mg/L | 10.20 | 9.20 | 6.40 | 10.30 | 9.8 | 6.40 | 7.60 | 6.60 | 7.20 | 6.80 | 9.30 | 5.40 |
3 | BOD5 | mgO2/L | 1.80 | 2.00 | 1.30 | 2.20 | 2.0 | 2.15 | 2.18 | 2.10 | 1.79 | 1.00 | 2.70 | 1.91 |
4 | BOD | mgO/L | - | - | 18.0 | - | 15.40 | 28.0 | 15.0 | 27.0 | 15.0 | 35.00 | 17.00 | 30.0 |
5 | Total phosphorus | mg/L | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.04 |
6 | Ammonium ion | mgN/L | 0.30 | 0.25 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.41 | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.23 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.19 |
7 | Nitrite ion | mgN/L | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.04 |
8 | Nitrate ion | mgN/L | 0.00 | - | 1.31 | - | 0.01 | 2.23 | 0.26 | 2.18 | 0.37 | 0.45 | 3.46 | 2.44 |
9 | Phosphate ion | mg/L | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.17 | 0.07 |
10 | Chloride ion | mg/L | 2.65 | 2.34 | 2.31 | 8.30 | 2.45 | 5.26 | 1.62 | 5.13 | 2.43 | 3.27 | 7.96 | 7.58 |
11 | Sulphate ion | mg/L | 20.40 | 21.64 | 28.45 | 65.11 | 19.62 | 30.30 | 8.46 | 29.30 | 6.80 | 15.75 | 41.53 | 43.37 |
12 | Total dissolved salts | mg/L | 239.0 | 246.4 | 306.0 | 299.6 | 261.4 | 330.0 | 202.0 | 309.0 | 210.0 | 230.8 | 285.0 | 253.5 |
13 | Electroconductivity | mSm/cm | 829.0 | 379.0 | 470.0 | 461.0 | 972.4 | 507.0 | 311.0 | 502.0 | 323.0 | 355.0 | 439.0 | 390.0 |
14 | Suspended particles | mg/L | 6.90 | 2.70 | 15.40 | 1.60 | 7.80 | 64.40 | 5.90 | 62.40 | 3.50 | 11.50 | 47.50 | 14.1 |
15 | Permeability | cm | 29 | 29 | 30 | 30 | 27 | 29 | 29 | 29 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 28 |
16 | Color (visual) | degree | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
17 | Flavor | point | Light flavor 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
No | Indicators | Measuring Unit | October–November, 2010 | October–November, 2015 | November, 2019 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 km above the Community of V. Shorzha | 1.5 km below the Community of V. Shorzha | River Mouth | 1.5 km above the Community of V. Shorzha | 1.5 km below the Community of V. Shorzha | River Mouth | The Mouth (frith) of the Karchaghbyur River | 1.5 km above the Community of V. Shorzha | 1.5 km below the Community of V. Shorzha | River Mouth | 0.5 km below the River Mouth after Interflowing | |||
1 | Hydrogenic index | 9.20 | 9.00 | 8.49 | 8.50 | 8.41 | 8.14 | 7.3 | 7.88 | 8.38 | 8.24 | 7.55 | |
2 | Dissolved oxygen | mg/L | 11.40 | 11.2 | 10.00 | 8.90 | 7.00 | 7.30 | 7.9 | 7.70 | 4.10 | 6.70 | 6.90 |
3 | BOD5 | mgO2/L | 2.80 | 2.4 | 2.80 | 1.62 | 1.00 | 1.33 | 1.2 | 1.50 | 1.05 | 2.60 | 2.15 |
4 | BOD | mgO/L | - | 8 | 5.00 | 8.00 | 11.4 | 18.0 | 10.4 | 10.0 | 30.00 | 15.00 | 20.0 |
5 | Total phosphorus | mg/L | 0.01 | 0.0061 | 0.1274 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.27 |
6 | Ammonium ion | mgN/L | 0.10 | 0.1012 | 0.1944 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.21 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.14 |
7 | Nitrite ion | mgN/L | 0.08 | 0.092 | 0.0276 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.11 |
8 | Nitrate ion | mgN/L | - | 0.5534 | 0.4944 | 0.33 | 0.56 | 0.93 | 0.03 | 0.26 | 0.76 | 1.43 | 2.76 |
9 | Phosphate ion | mg/L | 0.01 | 0.0142 | 0.3390 | 0.40 | 0.39 | 0.37 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.28 | 0.23 |
10 | Chloride ion | mg/L | 4.35 | 4.4061 | 4.6562 | 3.06 | 2.62 | 2.41 | 1.10 | 1.19 | 2.15 | 3.09 | 4.92 |
11 | Sulphate ion | mg/L | 11.61 | 11.69 | 16.54 | 5.16 | 5.81 | 6.96 | 10.4 | 4.06 | 6.96 | 15.01 | 20.97 |
12 | Total dissolved salts | mg/L | 152.1 | 152.60 | 156.6 | 154.0 | 162.6 | 176.00 | 114.2 | 69.0 | 146.90 | 141.00 | 171.00 |
13 | Electroconductivity | mSm/cm | 234.0 | 230.60 | 241.0 | 236.0 | 247.4 | 271.00 | 118.2 | 106.0 | 226.00 | 218.00 | 267.00 |
14 | Suspended particles | mg/L | 1.80 | 1.87 | 15.80 | 60.20 | 23.60 | 18.50 | 2.14 | 5.50 | 19.90 | 28.70 | 19.90 |
15 | Permeability | cm | 31 | 31 | 30 | 30 | 32 | 31 | 31 | 32 | 31 | 32 | 32 |
16 | Color (visual) | degree | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
17 | Flavor | point | Light flavor 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | With flavor 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
No | Name of the Chemical Elements | Measuring Unit | October–November, 2010 | October–November, 2015 | November, 2019 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Above the Sotk Community | Opposite the Sotk Community | River Mouth | Above the Sotk Community | Opposite the Sotk Community | River Mouth | Above the Sotk Community | Opposite the Sotk Community | River Mouth | After Interflowing of the Sotk and Masrik Rivers | |||
1 | Ca | mg/L | 35.09 | 40.07 | 50.97 | 37.91 | 21.87 | 28.15 | 20.35 | 23.02 | 46.04 | 34.32 |
2 | Mg | mg/L | 33.63 | 39.91 | 29.26 | 42.14 | 31.12 | 30.72 | 32.56 | 41.09 | 19.70 | 30.39 |
3 | K | mg/L | 1.18 | 1.68 | 5.49 | 2.77 | 0.52 | 5.47 | 0.48 | 0.93 | 2.07 | 2.45 |
4 | Na | mg/L | 3.06 | 6.07 | 11.38 | 3.83 | 2.68 | 10.86 | 2.72 | 6.35 | 7.58 | 11.70 |
5 | Al | mg/L | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.56 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.12 | 0.14 |
6 | Se | mg/L | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | <0.00 | 0.00 |
7 | S/Sulphur | mg/L | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
No | Name of the Chemical Elements | Measuring Unit | October–November, 2010 | October–November, 2015 | November, 2019 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 km above the Community of V. Shorzha | 1.5 km below the Community of V. Shorzha | River Mouth | 1.5 km above the Community of V. Shorzha | 1.5 km below the Community of V. Shorzha | River Mouth | 1.5 km above the Community of V. Shorzha | 1.5 km below the Community of V. Shorzha | River Mouth | After Interflowing of the Sotk and Masrik Rivers | |||
1 | Ca | mg/L | 32.43 | 28.4 | 26.42 | 31.96 | 30.89 | 30.89 | 16.45 | 30.03 | 28.75 | 29.36 |
2 | Mg | mg/L | 6.61 | 8.40 | 9.16 | 5.82 | 8.86 | 8.86 | 2.31 | 6.78 | 7.55 | 11.22 |
3 | K | mg/L | 2.29 | 3.00 | 3.30 | 4.42 | 4.46 | 4.46 | 0.64 | 2.60 | 2.95 | 4.48 |
4 | Na | mg/L | 9.04 | 9.11 | 9.11 | 7.86 | 9.89 | 9.89 | 3.33 | 10.46 | 5.36 | 11.92 |
5 | Al | mg/L | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.79 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.23 |
6 | Se | mg/L | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
7 | S (Sulphur) | mg/L | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Name of the Element | Name of the River and Basin | Phytotoxic Concentrations of Heavy Metals in Soil, mg/kg [10] | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sotk | Masrik | Karchaghbyur | |||||
in Waters, g/L | in Arable Land mg/kg | in Waters, g/L | in Arable Land mg/kg | in Waters, g/L | in Arable Land mg/kg | ||
Ag | <10−5 | 0.2 | <10−5 | 0.8 | - | - | 2 |
As | 0.080 | 14.3 | 0.045 | 17.0 | - | 0.012 | 15–50 |
Cd | <10−3 | 0.7 | <10−2 | 0.9 | - | - | 3–8 |
Co | <10−4 | 10.0 | <10−5 | 13.4 | - | - | 25–50 |
Cr | 0.0080 | 4.6 | 0.0065 | 20.0 | - | - | 75–100 |
Cu | 0.035 | 10.5 | 0.027 | 19.2 | 0.001 | 1.0 | 60–125 |
Hg | 0.003 | 0.2 | 0.0015 | 0.3 | - | - | 0.3–5 |
Mn | 61.3 | 980.0 | 59.4 | 640.0 | - | traces | 1500–3000 |
Ni | 0.003 | 48.0 | 0.009 | 45.0 | - | - | 100 |
Pb | 0.007 | 21.0 | 0.009 | 27.0 | 0.00004 | 0.7 | 100–120 |
Zn | 0.020 | 90.0 | 0.87 | 78.0 | 0.0003 | 1.2 | 70–200 |
Sb | <10−4 | 2.0 | <10−3 | 6.4 | - | - | 5–10 |
Se | <10−5 | - | <10−4 | 0.7 | - | - | 5–10 |
V | 0.035 | 1.4 | 0.026 | 3.0 | - | - | 5–100 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Galstyan, M.H.; Larionov, M.V.; Sayadyan, H.Y.; Sargsyan, K.S. Assessment of Ecological and Toxicological State of Soils and Waters in the Neighborhood of Mining Industry Enterprises in the Armenian Highlands. Life 2023, 13, 394. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020394
Galstyan MH, Larionov MV, Sayadyan HY, Sargsyan KS. Assessment of Ecological and Toxicological State of Soils and Waters in the Neighborhood of Mining Industry Enterprises in the Armenian Highlands. Life. 2023; 13(2):394. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020394
Chicago/Turabian StyleGalstyan, Meruzhan Haykaram, Maxim Viktorovich Larionov, Hovik Yakhsibek Sayadyan, and Karine Shahen Sargsyan. 2023. "Assessment of Ecological and Toxicological State of Soils and Waters in the Neighborhood of Mining Industry Enterprises in the Armenian Highlands" Life 13, no. 2: 394. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020394