Next Article in Journal
Nitrous Oxide Emission from Full-Scale Anammox-Driven Wastewater Treatment Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Lithium Biological Action Mechanisms after Ischemic Stroke
Previous Article in Journal
Methionine Promotes the Growth and Yield of Wheat under Water Deficit Conditions by Regulating the Antioxidant Enzymes, Reactive Oxygen Species, and Ions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation-Based Physical Therapy on the Improvement of Balance and Gait in Patients with Chronic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Dabigatran in Cerebral Sinus Vein Thrombosis and Thrombophilia

by Lukas Kellermair 1,2, Matthias W. G. Zeller 1,2, Caterina Kulyk 1,2, Josef Tomasits 2,3, Tim J. von Oertzen 1,2 and Milan R. Vosko 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 7 June 2022 / Revised: 22 June 2022 / Accepted: 27 June 2022 / Published: 28 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ischemic Stroke: From Pathophysiology to Novel Therapeutic Approaches)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

 

The authors discuss dabigatran peak concentration is stable with heterozygote FVL and heterozygote PTM, but not in homozygote PTM compared to controls. The effectiveness of drugs has been illustrated from a novel perspective. But there are still some flaws.

1.   Inclusion and exclusion criteria need to be further clarified.

 2.     How Patients with CSVT who also suffer from prothrombin-mutation (PTM) or Factor V Leiden (FVL) are diagnosed. This requires further clarification in the Methods section.

 3.     Author mentioned all patients reported regular intake of 150 mg dabigatran etexilate twice a day. What is the basis for drug dosage?

4.     It is not appropriate to start a sentence with a numeric. For example, 2 out of the 10 patients with acute CSVT and genetic thrombophilia had multiple insufficient dabigatran peak concentration (26 and 20 ng/ml). 2 should be two.

 5.     What is the basis for diagnosis of acute CSVT, please specify.

 6.     What is the reason why APTT and TT are selected among the commonly used coagulation parameters, while other parameters are not selected, such as PT, platelet and something like that.

 7.     Additional English correction is not required.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors,

Congratulations for this useful paper! I would like to give some comments on your work:

Line 101- please explain the acronym, EHRA, in your text

Line 105- which database did you use concretely?

Line 114- why is the reason to check the peak plasma concentration after 48 h?

Line 158: dot after fibrillation).

Line 256: 2 dots after dabigatran etexilate!

Line 286: Please correct the font for Bristol - Myers Squibb

I suggest for discussion to refer also to this  3 important paper:

 

Bose G, Graveline J, Yogendrakumar V, et al-Direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis: a systematic review BMJ Open 2021;11:e040212. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040212

Khider, L.; Gendron, N.; Mauge, L. Inherited Thrombophilia in the Era of Direct Oral Anticoagulants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1821. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijms23031821

 

Nepal G, Kharel S, Bhagat R, Ka Shing Y, Ariel Coghlan M, Poudyal P, Ojha R, Sunder Shrestha G. Safety and efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in cerebral venous thrombosis: A meta-analysis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2022 Jan;145(1):10-23. doi: 10.1111/ane.13506. Epub 2021 Jul 21. PMID: 34287841.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop