Next Article in Journal
RNN and BiLSTM Fusion for Accurate Automatic Epileptic Seizure Diagnosis Using EEG Signals
Next Article in Special Issue
Neuroprotective Potential of Biflavone Ginkgetin: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
A Rising Star of the Multimarker Panel: Growth Differentiation Factor-15 Levels Are an Independent Predictor of Mortality in Acute Heart Failure Patients Admitted to an Emergency Clinical Hospital from Eastern Europe
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chemical Composition, Antioxidant, Anti-Diabetic, Anti-Acetylcholinesterase, Anti-Inflammatory, and Antimicrobial Properties of Arbutus unedo L. and Laurus nobilis L. Essential Oils
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Wound Healing and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of a Newly Developed Ointment Containing Jujube Leaves Extract

by
Marilena-Viorica Hovaneț
1,†,
Emma Adriana Ozon
2,*,
Elena Moroșan
3,*,
Oana Cristina Șeremet
4,†,
Eliza Oprea
5,
Elisabeta-Irina Geană
6,
Adriana Iuliana Anghel
1,
Carmellina Bădiceanu
7,
Ligia Elena Duțu
8,
Cristina Silvia Stoicescu
9,
Eugenia Nagoda
10 and
Robert Ancuceanu
1
1
Department of Pharmaceutical Botany and Cell Biology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 6 Traian Vuia Street, 020945 Bucharest, Romania
2
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 6 Traian Vuia Street, 020945 Bucharest, Romania
3
Department of Clinical Laboratory and Food Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 6 Traian Vuia Street, 020945 Bucharest, Romania
4
Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 6 Traian Vuia Street, 020945 Bucharest, Romania
5
Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, 1-3 Aleea Portocalelor, 060101 Bucharest, Romania
6
National R&D Institute for Cryogenics and Isotopic Technologies—ICIT, 4th Uzinei Street, 240050 Râmnicu Vâlcea, Romania
7
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 6 Traian Vuia Street, 020945 Bucharest, Romania
8
Department of Pharmacognosy, Phytochemistry and Phytotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 6 Traian Vuia Street, 020945 Bucharest, Romania
9
Ilie Murgulescu Institute of Physical Chemistry, Spl. Independentei 202, P.O. Box 12-194, 060021 Bucharest, Romania
10
Botanical Garden “D. Brandza”, University of Bucharest, Şos. Cotroceni 32, 060114 Bucharest, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Life 2022, 12(12), 1947; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12121947
Submission received: 2 November 2022 / Revised: 15 November 2022 / Accepted: 19 November 2022 / Published: 22 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inflammation and Natural Products)

Abstract

:
Ziziphus jujuba Mill. (jujube) is a well-known medicinal plant with pronounced wound healing properties. The present study aimed to establish the chemical composition of the lyophilized ethanolic extract from Romanian Ziziphus jujuba leaves and to evaluate the healing and anti-inflammatory properties of a newly developed lipophilic ointment containing 10% dried jujube leaves extract. The ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry method was used, and 47 compounds were detected, among them the novel epicatechin and caffeic acid. The extract contains significant amounts of rutin (29.836 mg/g), quercetin (15.180 mg/g) and chlorogenic acid (350.96 µg/g). The lipophilic ointment has a slightly tolerable pH, between 5.41–5.42, and proved to be non-toxic in acute dermal irritation tests on New Zealand albino rabbits and after repeated administration on Wistar rats. The ointment also has a healing activity comparable to Cicatrizin (a pharmaceutical marketed product) on Wistar rats and a moderate anti-inflammatory action compared to the control group, but statistically insignificant compared to indomethacin in the rat-induced inflammation test by intraplantar administration of kaolin. The healing and anti-inflammatory properties of the tested ointment are due to phenolic acids and flavonoids content, less because of minor components as apocynin, scopoletin, and isofraxidin.

1. Introduction

Research concerning healing wound therapy focuses on finding new herbal remedies that are assumed to have fewer side effects, lower cost and similar efficacy compared to conventional synthetic drugs [1,2]. Wound healing involves mainly an inflammation process with vasoconstriction and mediators release, the proliferation of fibroblasts and keratinocytes, formation of granulation tissue, and maturation with collagen fibers remodeling [3,4,5,6,7]. There are different classes of compounds which promote wound healing, such as phenolic derivatives, flavonoids, non-flavonoid polyphenols (phenolic acids as caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid), tannins, lignans, and essential oils such as lavender, chamomile, tea tree, thyme, ocimum oil, isoquinoline alkaloids from the Papaveraceae and Berberidaceae families, terpenes, saponins, and phloroglucinol derivatives (arzanol) [8,9,10,11,12]. These bioactive substances manifest antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial or antifungal properties, positively influencing wound healing by preventing the development of pathogens, enhancing cell proliferation, increasing collagen production, improving wound contraction, and promoting epithelialization, vascularization and a normal regeneration avoiding fibrosis [13,14,15,16,17].
Among the notable species used throughout the world for their wound healing action are Plantago major L., Plantago lanceolata L. [18], Calendula officinalis L. [19], Aloe vera (L.) Burm.f. [20], Hypericum perforatum L. [21,22], Achillea millefolium L. [23], Matricaria chamomilla L. [24,25], Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. [26], Symphytum officinale L. [27], and Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don [28,29]. Another plant with considerable wound healing and anti-inflammatory potential is Ziziphus jujuba Mill. (jujube), from the Rhamnaceae family. It is a native species of China, found today in temperate and subtropical climates. It is known for its nutritional (from its fruits) and medicinal value, several of its organs (leaves, fruits, seeds, and bark) being used in various ailments [30,31]. Its leaves are traditionally used to treat bleeding, boils, and diarrhea [32], for weight loss purposes [33], and to heal wounds and aphthous ulcers [34]. It contains phenolic derivates, especially phenolic acids, flavonoids, tannins, damarane-type saponins, triterpene acids, and cyclopeptide alkaloids [35,36].
The healing effects and the anti-inflammatory properties of the species’ leaves harvested from Romania have been attributed to phenolic acids and flavonoids, which are predominant, and the most active principles have been previously evaluated in two preclinical studies [37,38]. The principles examined include its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-allergic property and its pain reducing and boosting of collagen synthesis property [39,40].
This study aimed to characterize chromatographically the phenolic and flavonoid content and other minor compounds of ethanolic dried extract obtained from Ziziphus jujuba Mill. leaves harvested from Romania. The study also aimed to evaluate in vivo the healing and anti-inflammatory properties of the dried ethanolic extract leaves after inclusion into a hydrophobic ointment base. For the selection of the ointment base, the aims were to choose safe, biocompatible, emollient, and inexpensive ingredients. Cholesterol is an important component of the extracellular lipophilic matrix of stratum corneum, one that ensures the skin barrier function [41]. It has been proven that it has a beneficial effect on damaged skin [42]. It has a higher melting point than the other components but will dissolve in their mixture. Cetyl alcohol has good moisturizing qualities, and skin-protective characteristics useful for skin irritations caused by stings, bites, and rashes [43]. Vaseline has, also, an emollient role, being recommended by the American Academy of Dermatology for the moisturization of skin injuries [44]. Different compendial tests were used to analyze the semi-solid pharmaceutical dosage form to establish its pharmaco-technical properties. Dermatological irritation testing was also performed. All investigations were carried out in comparison to the base alone, and for in vivo activity assessment, two pharmaceutical products were used as references.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The dried ethanolic extract of Ziziphus jujuba Mill. leaves of indigenous plant harvested from Research Institute for Fruit Growing Pitesti, Romania was obtained according to the method indicated in a previously published paper [37]. Briefly, the dry leaves were powdered, then refluxed three times with 70% ethyl alcohol (m/V, the ratio between the herbal product and solvent being 1:10). The solutions thus obtained were mixed and concentrated at 60 °C in an Ingos RVO 004 rotary evaporator. The concentrated solution was subjected to a lyophilization process using a Scanvac CoolSafe Freeze Dryer.
Cetyl alcohol, cholesterol, refined coconut oil and petrolatum were provided by Fagron, Greece. Butylhydroxyanisole was purchased from Merck KGaA, Germany. Kaolin was purchased from Health Chemicals Co., Ltd., Zhangjiagang City, China and urethane from Sigma-Aldrich, Hamburg, Germany. Cicatrizin, produced by Pharmaceutical TIS, Bucharest, Romania, is an ointment that contains extracts of Hypericum perforatum (St. John’s wort), Calendula officinalis (marigold), Symphytum officinale (sorrel), Plantago lanceolata (plantain) and Chamomilla recutita (chamomile) containing as active principles phenolic acids, flavonoids and essential oil.
Indomethacin 40 mg/g ointment, used as a reference product in the anti-inflammatory assessment, is produced by Hyperion, Iași, Romania.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Ointment Production and Pharmacotechnical Assessment

Formulation

For the formulation of the lipophilic semi-solid pharmaceutical dosage form containing 10% (w/w), Ziziphus jujuba Mill. leaves extract, cetyl alcohol, cholesterol and Vaseline were selected to form a single-phase basis suitable for active ingredient suspension. The coconut oil was chosen to adjust the ointment consistency and also for its antioxidant and natural fragrance properties [45,46,47]. To ensure the stability of the product, butylhydroxyanisole, as an antioxidant and preservative agent, was added [48,49]. The formulation is presented in Table 1.

Production

All ingredients were weighed according to the amounts mentioned in the formulation, using a Mettler Toledo AT261 (0.01 mg sensitivity) balance. The hydrophobic components (cetyl alcohol, cholesterol and Vaseline) were melted together on a water bath heated at about 50 °C, and then the basis was cooled to 35 °C when butylhydroxyanisole was added and dissolved. Ziziphus jujuba Mill. leaves extract was first mixed with the coconut oil, and then the lipophilic base was added, continuing the stirring at 700 rpm, at room temperature.
The ointment base to be used alone as a control for the assessment tests, was prepared similarly but without extract inclusion.

Quality Control

Organoleptic Properties and Homogeneity
The organoleptic characterization included appearance, consistency, and homogeneity, together with absence of phase separation, and instabilities of color [50,51]. Grit and consistency were assessed by touch. The homogeneity was determined according to Romanian Pharmacopoeia requirements by spreading 0.5 g of the ointment in a thin layer on a glass slide and examining it with a hand magnifier (4.5×) [52]. The appearance, absence of phase separation and instabilities of color were assessed by visual observation.

pH

The pH measurements were determined as the European Pharmacopoeia recommendations by the potentiometric method [53]. An inoLab level 1 pH meter, produced by WTW GmbH & Co. KG, Weilheim, Germany, was used. It was previously calibrated with a 7.00 pH buffer solution. 0.5 g of ointment was mixed with 10 mL of water by cold stirring, then filtered and the pH of the filtrate was recorded at 19.2 °C. The pH was measured six times for each sample (ointment and base) and the average value and standard deviation were reported.

Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Target phenolic acids and flavonoids analysis was performed with an UltiMate 3000 UHPLC System, coupled with a Q Exactive Focus Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer equipped with Heated Electrospray Ionisation (HESI) probe, all from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany. Separations were performed on Kinetex (C18, 100 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) column (reverse-phase UHPLC column) and a gradient elution of a binary solvent system consisting of solvent A (water with 0.1% formic acid) and solvent B (methanol with 0.1% formic acid). Mass spectra were recorded in the negative ionization mode in the 100–1200 m/z range, at 70,000 resolution. Nitrogen was used as collision, sheath, and auxiliary gas at 11–48 arbitrary unit flow rates. The spray voltage was 2.5 kV, and the capillary temperature 320 °C. The energy of the collision-induced dissociation cell was varied in the 30–60 eV range. Calibrations were carried out in the 50–2000 μg/L concentration range, by serial dilution of the 10 mg/L methanolic standard mix. The lyophilized jujube leaves extract was dissolved in methanolic solution and filtered through a 0.45 μm polytetrafluoroethylene membrane before injection into the UHPLC-MS system. Quantitative data were evaluated by the Quan/Qual Browser Xcalibur 2.3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The mass tolerance window was set to 5 ppm for the two analysis modes. Individual phenolic acids and flavonoid contents were reported as μg/g lyophilized jujube leaves extract. Also, data processing, analysis, and interpretation using Compound Discoverer v. 2.1 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) software was performed using an untargeted metabolomics working template.

Spreadability

For materials in the semi-solid form, spreadability is an essential characteristic that reunites the rheological and structural properties. It is an important test in the assessment of topical semi-solid products, as it can accurately predict the behavior during dose disposal and application. The ointments’ spreadability mostly depends on the consistency and flowability of the base, but in the case of incorporating high amounts of active ingredients, they can influence the final performance.
The spreadability was determined by using the extensiometric method, analyzing the deformation ability of the product when different weights were applied. The procedure was performed on both the base alone and on the pharmaceutical ointment, in triplicate. The device consists of two square plates of glass with 11 cm sides. The bottom plate is positioned over a millimetric graph paper on which five concentric circles are drawn. On the lower plate in the center of the first circle, 1 g of the sample was brought, then the second glass plate was placed. The diameter of the circle occupied by the ointment, after pressing with the glass plate weighing 145 g, was registered. At intervals of one minute, on the top plate of the extensiometer, weights of 50, 100, 200, and 500 g were gradually applied. The diameters of the circles formed by sample spreading were recorded each time [54,55,56].
The spreadability is calculated by the equation:
S = πr2
where S is the spreading area in mm2 and r is the radius in mm.

2.2.2. In Vivo Evaluation

The experiments were performed on animals purchased from the Cantacuzino Institute Biobase (Bucharest). The animals were acclimatized to laboratory conditions for five days before the start of the experiments. The room temperature during the treatment was 23 ± 1 °C, and the relative humidity was 50 ± 2%. The lighting was artificial, with a succession of 12 h of light and 12 h of darkness. The animals had unlimited access to conventional laboratory water and food (grains for mice and rats, Cantacuzino Institute, Bucharest).
All the experiments complied with Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes and the implementing Law no. 43/2014 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes and were approved by the Bioethics Commission of the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest (997/7 October 2016).

Local Tolerability

Two tests were performed to determine the local tolerability of the newly formulated ointment, in accordance with the relevant OECD guidelines: acute irritation/corrosion and dermal irritation after repeated administration for 21 days. The OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals is a set of testing methods developed by experts from the OECD and used by various governments, companies, and independent laboratories to identify and characterize potential hazards of chemicals [57] and are often used in the assessment of herbal extracts [58].

Determination of Acute Dermal Irritation/Corrosion (OECD 404)

To determine acute dermal irritation [59], the sample is applied in a single dose to the skin of the experimental animal. Untreated areas of the animal’s skin serve as a control. The degree of irritation/corrosion is determined at specified intervals, and is described in detail to provide a full assessment of the effects. The study’s duration should be sufficient to assess the reversibility and irreversibility of the irritant/corrosive action.
A male New Zealand albino rabbit (4.55 ± 0.07 kg) was used. About 24 h before the test, the fur on the back was removed very carefully, so as not to damage the skin, using scissors and an electric razor.
The studied ointment (ZIZ-L) (0.5 g) and lipophilic base (B-L) (0.5 g) were applied on a self-adhesive patch on a soft non-woven pad Cosmopore Advance 7.2 × 5 cm (Hartmann, Germany) and then affixed to the back of the rabbit, at a 5 cm distance from each other.
After 4 h of application, the patch was detached, and the ointment was removed by gently wiping it with a cloth soaked in water.
Following patch removal, the rabbit was evaluated for signs of erythema and/or edema immediately, and at 1, 24, 48 and 72 h. The observed dermal reactions were classified according to Table 2.

Determination of Dermal Irritation after Repeated Administration (OECD 410)

A determination of subchronic dermal toxicity [60] can be performed after obtaining initial information by testing for acute dermal toxicity. The determination of subchronic dermal toxicity provides information on the potential health risks that may result from repeated dermal exposure over a limited period of 21 or 28 days. For the present study, 21 days were used.
If a dose of at least 1000 mg/kg bw of a sample does not produce detectable toxic effects, it is not necessary to use three levels of concentration. Previous research has shown that the dried ethanolic extract obtained from Ziziphus jujuba Mill. leaves is virtually nontoxic after single dose administration [38], and therefore, a full study is not required.
The sample is applied daily to the skin of the experimental animals (rats), in graduated doses, using several groups of laboratory animals, one dose for each group, for 21 days. During the application period, the animals are observed daily for signs of toxicity. Rats dying during the test are necropsied, and at the end of the test, surviving and uncropped animals are sacrificed.
A community of 16 rats of 9 week old, Wistar strain, 8 females (214 ± 10 g) and 8 males (259 ± 13 g), were subjected to the tests. The animals were distributed into 4 groups, as follows:
  • Group 1F: ZIZ-L-F: consisting of 4 females, who received the lipophilic ointment ZIZ-L;
  • Group 1M: ZIZ-L-M: consisting of 4 males, who received the lipophilic ointment ZIZ-L;
  • Group 2F: B-L-F: consisting of 4 females, who received the lipophilic base B-L;
  • Group 2M: B-L-M: consisting of 4 males, who received the lipophilic base B-L.
The fur was removed from the dorsal area of the torso 24 h before the test. This operation was repeated at intervals of about a week.
Ointment and ointment base (an amount of ointment corresponding to the dose of 1000 mg/kg bw plant extract for the test batches and the appropriate amount of ointment base for the control batches, respectively) were applied on a self-adhesive patch on a soft non-woven pad Cosmopore Advance 7.2 × 5 cm (Hartmann, Germany) and then affixed to the animal’s back to prevent it from gaining access to them. The animals were followed, the patch remaining set for at least 6 h after application. As OECD Guide 410 allows, ointments were applied 5 days/week for 21 days.
Animals were monitored, in particular, for changes in the skin, fur, and mucous membranes, as well as in somatic-motor activity and for behavioral changes. The animals were weighed weekly.

Wound Healing Activity

Male Wistar rats weighing 200 ± 10 g were used for the study. The rats were depilated in the dorsal area. After ethyl ether anesthesia, the animals suffered burn wounds using a metal device consisting of a disc with a 1 cm diameter which was heated in water with 5% NaCl at 105 °C. The heated disc was applied to the depilated dorsal area and held for 10 s [16,61,62,63].
The rats were distributed by the randomization method in groups of 10 animals and were treated as follows:
Group 1—control group, untreated;
Group 2—group treated with lipophilic ointment ZIZ-L;
Group 3—group treated with lipophilic base L-B;
Group 4—group treated with Cicatrizin ointment, taken as a reference product (it contains extracts of St. John’s wort, papaya, chamomile, and marigold, herbs recognized for their beneficial effect in wound healing).
The treatment was given daily in a single application for 12 days. The evolution of the wounds was followed every two days by measuring the areas in the treated animals (in mm2) and comparing them with those of the untreated controls, respectively, with those of the treatment with Cicatrizin, the reference product.
The clinical condition of the rats was also monitored during the study.

Anti-Inflammatory Activity

The anti-inflammatory action of a substance can be quantified by studying the effect of reducing rat paw edema induced by intraplantar administration of kaolin [64].
The animals (30 male rats, Wistar strain, 270 ± 32 g) were divided into three groups of 10 animals each, which were named according to the treatment received, as follows:
  • Group ZIZ-L: ZIZ-L: lipophilic ointment;
  • Group B-L: B-L lipophilic base;
  • Group IND: Indomethacin HYPERION, ointment, 40 mg/g.
The rats were anesthetized with a 13% urethane solution, administered intraperitoneally, in a dose of 130 mg/kg body weight. After the installation of general anesthesia, the initial volume of the right paw was determined.
A quantity of 0.2 g of each ointment was applied to the surface of the right paw and massaged 50 times. Inflammation was generated by intraplantar administration of 0.2 mL kaolin 10% suspension, and the evolution of the induced edema was followed at 1, 2, 3 and 4 h.
The evolution of paw edema was calculated using the following formula (Vx is the paw volume measured x hours after the induction of inflammation, and V0 is the initial paw volume):
% = (V_x − V_0)/V_0 × 100

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism v. 5.0. (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and the computing and programming environment, R v. 4.2.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
Distribution normality was estimated using the D’Agostino & Pearson global test [65]. The t Student test was applied to compare two groups. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD were used to compare multiple groups. The statistical significance threshold was set at 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Ointment Quality Control

3.1.1. Organoleptic Properties and Homogeneity

A greasy, unctuous, dark green ointment with a characteristic coconut and plant odor was obtained. It contains Ziziphus jujuba Mill. leaves extract homogeneously suspended in the base, presented as fine particles, without the tendency to agglomerate or phase-separation. All these characteristics remained unchanged during the six months of preservation at room temperature.

3.1.2. pH

The pH of the lipophilic ointment was in the 5.41–5.42 range, while for the base the registered values were between 5.67 and 5.70. According to European Pharmacopoeia specifications, both semi-solid products have an easily tolerated pH, not being irritating when applied to the skin. After maintaining the products for six months at room temperature, a slight decrease in the pH values was remarked for both samples (5.36 for ointment and 5.62 for base).

3.1.3. Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry

The analytical approach based on a target UHPLC-ESI/MS analysis allows the quantification of some bioactive compounds responsible for the bioactive potential of jujube leaves extract. The recorded chromatogram is presented in Figure 1.
Quantitative analysis indicates that chlorogenic, 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic, and syringic acids were the primarily phenolic acids identified, while quercetin and rutin were the main flavonoids in the Ziziphus jujube Mill. leaves, similar to results being obtained by Xue (2021) [66]. However, epicatechin and caffeic acid were not identified in the previous study.
The lyophilized jujube leaf extract contains relevant amounts of rutin (29.836 mg/g) and quercetin (15.180 mg/g), and also chlorogenic acid (350.96 µg/g). The compounds which could be responsible for the anti-inflammatory activity of the ointment obtained with Ziziphus jujuba Mill. leaves extract are quercetin [67,68], rutin [69], chlorogenic acid [70], catechin [71], pinostrobin [72], and ferulic acid [73].
The analytical approach based on non-target UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap HRMS analysis allows the identification of other bioactive compounds and specialized metabolites that occur in jujube leaf extract, which are also responsible for the anti-inflammatory activity. Phytochemical compounds such as flavonoids, organic acids, fatty acids, and other specific compounds such as apocynin, scopoletin, and isofraxidin show excellent anti-inflammatory activity [74,75,76,77].
The compound’s name, retention time, exact mass, and accurate mass of m/z adduct ions in negative ESI mode for the identified compounds are shown in Table 3.

3.1.4. Spreadability

Figure 2 displays the variation of the surface occupied by 1 g of each sample depending on the applied weight, and the registered standard deviations.
It is noted that the prepared ointment has proper plasticity, allowing it to easily spread on the skin [78]. When repeating the test after six months of storage, the registered values were similar to the initial ones, confirming the pharmaco-technical stability of the semi-solid product.

3.2. Local Tolerability

3.2.1. Determination of Acute Dermal Irritation/Corrosion (OECD 404)

Areas exposed to the newly formulated ointment, as well as those exposed to the ointment base, were examined 4 h after application on rabbit, immediately after removal of the self-adhesive patches.
In none of the cases was erythema or edema observed. The examination was repeated at 1, 24, 48, and 72 h after patch removal, and no signs of erythema or edema were detected (Table 4).
After testing for acute dermal irritability according to OECD Guideline 404, it can be stated that the ointment obtained from Ziziphus jujuba Mill. leaves is not irritating or corrosive following a single cutaneous application.

3.2.2. Determination of Dermal Irritation after Repeated Administration (OECD 410)

For dermal irritation after repeated administration tests, the experimental results regarding the evolution of body weight during the 21 days can be found in Table 5 and Figure 3 and Figure 4.
The experimental results indicated no changes in the external appearance (fur, skin, mucus) or the motor performances of the rats in the two groups tested. Also, there were no alterations in somatic-motor activity or behavior.
For all tested batches, the body weight increased (statistically significant) throughout the treatment, which indicates the lack of toxicity of both the base and the ointment containing the Ziziphus jujuba Mill. dried leaves extract.

3.3. Wound Healing Activity

The results registered for the wound healing effect are shown in Table 6.
The experimental results on the wound healing are summarized in Figure 5 and Figure 6 and Table 6.
The control rats showed an initial burn area of 99 mm2; after 12 days, it was sized 23 mm2, and showed a cure of 76.76% compared to the primary stage. Total healing occurred after 26 days.
The ointment used in the study as a reference product (Cicatrizin) resulted in 85.09% healing after 12 days of treatment and a burn area of 13.8 mm2. Complete recovery occurred after 18 days.
The lipophilic Ziziphus jujuba Mill. ointment generated wound healing of 79.07% healing compared to the first day of treatment and a burn area of 20 mm2. Complete recovery occurred after 18 days.
In the case of the animals treated with lipophilic base, 70.62% of healing was registered after 12 days and the burn area reached 28.2 mm2. Complete recovery occurred after 20 days.

3.4. Anti-Inflammatory Activity

The experimental results on the evolution of edema induced by intraplantar injection of 0.2 mL 10% kaolin suspension are found in Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8 and Table 7.
The administration of the inflammatory agent produced an increase in the volume of the rat paw for all three tested groups. As expected, the most pronounced increase in volume was observed in the case of rats from the control group, treated with B-L, 4 h after kaolin administration (58.2%, p < 0.001). At 4 h after administration of the inflammatory agent, the average increases in rat paws for the ZIZ-L and IND groups were similar (42.24% and 44.33%, respectively, p < 0.001).
When compared to B-L activity, ZIZ-L ointment displays an anti-inflammatory effect, with a difference between average paw volume increases of 13.81% (p < 0.05) at three hours and 15.78% (p < 0.05) at four hours, respectively.
The anti-inflammatory effect of the ZIZ-L ointment occurs about 3 h after the application, whereas the reference product leads to a faster response.
The results of our research indicate that the proposed topical dosage form is of appropriate quality and has demonstrated its efficacy and safety in animal models. From an organoleptic point of view, a clear difference was observed in the aspect and the texture between the base alone and the Ziziphus jujuba Mill. hydrophobic ointment. Still, both displayed adequate characteristics, typical for the corresponding pharmaceutical semi-solid preparations. Even if a high amount of extract was incorporated into the base, a homogenous and stable ointment was obtained. Hydrophobic ointment bases have been reported in the literature also for other healing extracts of herbal origin, such as Urtica simensis Hochst. ex A.Rich. [79], a mixture of herbal extracts from Salvadora persica L., Azadirachta indica A. Juss, and Calendula officinalis L. [80], or an extract from the Acanthus polystachyus Delile leaves [81].
Regarding pH, a slight decrease in the value was observed after including the extract in the base, but of little practical significance, as it is within the limits imposed by the compendial standards [52]. Taking into account the results recorded for cutaneous tolerance, the ointment pH seems proper for the recommended use. Additionally, the pH proved to be stable during the evaluated period.
In terms of spreadability (an important parameter for ointments), a minor difference in the behavior was noticed after adding the extract to the base [82]. The final spreading ability of the ointment was mainly influenced by the base and less by the extract included. The spreading properties displayed by the studied ointment reveal suitable structural and viscoelastic attributes and appropriate viscosity. The rheological behavior remains constant over time, confirming the product’s stability.
Concerning the tolerance of the developed ZIZ-L ointment, the dermal irritation tests proved that it was well accepted, not inducing any reversible or non-reversible skin damage, and not affecting the somatic-motor functions. As animal skin is considered to be very sensitive to most pharmaceutical ingredients [83], the results obtained provided strong evidence for the lack of risk when applying the proposed formulation even for a prolonged time. This is in part due to the selected lipophilic base, as shown by the results, but also to the plant extract. The dried extract of Ziziphus jujuba leaves was included in a high amount and was incorporated by suspension, leading to no deleterious dermal responses, including erythema and edema.
This in vivo experiment confirmed that ZIZ-L ointment treatment significantly accelerated wound healing in Group 2, compared to control Groups 1 (untreated) and 3 (B-L treated). Wound healing resulted in a considerable decrease in the damaged epidermis length compared to controls. Visual examination showed that the epidermis recovery was faster in the wound treated with the ointment containing Ziziphus jujuba Mill. extract than those treated with the lipophilic base, suggesting that the extract owns a potent therapeutic effect in the wound healing process. The wound closure percentage displayed by the ZIZ-L ointment application was similar to the one achieved after the reference product administration, confirming that the proposed formulation has the potential for treating skin wounds. This supports the traditional use of this species leaves for wound healing, as reported in India. Whereas previous research reported wound healing activity for extracts prepared from this species’ fruits, bark or roots, our research was focused on a leaf extract prepared with 70% ethyl alcohol [84,85,86].
Ziziphus jujuba Mill leaves extract enhances skin wound healing through multiple mechanisms. The major active ingredients that were identified in the extract were chlorogenic acid, quercetin and rutin. The mechanisms of action are complex. Chlorogenic acid promoted fibroblastic and remodeling phases of wound healing. It accelerated the wound closure in the presence of keratinocyte [87]. Quercetin improves wound healing by inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases, which are normally inhibited by plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) [88]. Also, it promotes a normal regeneration, not a fibrosis because it influences positive cell migration and proliferation, increases surface αV integrin and decreases β1 integrin in wounds, and increases the production of collagen fibers which are well oriented in sub-epidermal tissue [89,90]. Rutin promotes wound healing by several mechanisms: it enhances the production of antioxidant enzymes in the presence of erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2), inhibits the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and decreases the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). It also induces the expression of the neurogenic-related protein (UCH-L1) [91].
Regarding the in vivo anti-inflammatory effect of Ziziphus ointment, the registered results show its potential properties. Even though the activity proved to be slower than the one displayed by the reference product, it was significantly higher than the lipophilic base action. The results support using the ointment as an herbal remedy for curative purposes in various topical inflammatory processes. Considering the chemical composition of Ziziphus jujuba Mill. leaves extract, its anti-inflammatory effect is due to its major constituents. Chlorogenic acid has antioxidant properties and because of that, it reduces the expression of inflammatory molecules. It inhibits phospholipase A2, cyclooxygenases and lipoxygenases, and reduces the concentrations of prostanoids and leukotrienes, especially PGE2 (Prostaglandin E2), IL-1β (Interleukin 1 beta), interferon-γ, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, and macrophage inflammatory protein-1α [92,93]. Quercetin inhibits cyclooxygenase (COX) and lipoxygenase (LOX) which catalyzes the production of inflammation molecules especially LTB-4 [94,95]. Also, it inhibits lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) production in macrophages and LPS-induced IL-8 production [96,97]. It can also inhibit the production of tryptase and histamine and the downregulation of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) and CD80 expression [98]. Rutin inhibits cytokines (e.g., TNF-a, IL-6) that are highly expressed and secreted by macrophages in inflammations [99]. It also activates nuclear factor-κB and extracellular regulated kinases 1/2 by HMGB1 (High mobility group box 1) [100].
We have several reasons to consider that the wound healing process from this study consists of regeneration and not fibrosis. The injuries that we treated with the Ziziphus ointment are mild and the epithelial tissue that are involved has an important regenerative potential [101]. The time of complete healing was short, less than a month. Furthermore, the stage of inflammation within the healing process is shortened (several days) by phenolic compounds and flavonoids from the Ziziphus extract that have anti-inflammatory properties. This fact may avoid a determination of fibrosis [102,103].
Ziziphus jujuba Mill. leaves’ ointment exhibited pronounced wound-healing effects and moderate anti-inflammatory characteristics, thereby supporting its usefulness as a medicinal therapy.

4. Conclusions

The present evaluated an ointment containing 10% dried ethanolic extract from Ziziphus jujuba Mill., formulated in a hydrophobic base consisting of petrolatum, but also cetyl alcohol, cholesterol, coconut oil and butylhydroxyanisole. The leaf extract used to prepare the ointment contains chiefly rutin (29.836 mg/g), quercetin (15.180 mg/g), and chlorogenic acid (350.96 µg/g); it also contains various amounts of phenolic acids, other flavonoids, fatty acids, organic acids and other compounds.
The formulated ointment has stable organoleptic properties related to those of the extract, is homogeneous, has a slightly acid pH (5.41–5.42), and appropriate rheological properties. It has demonstrated good tolerability following single and repeated administration in rat experiments. In rat wound models, the ointment resembled Cicatrizin in terms of its healing ability; both products accelerated healing, the effect being comparable.
The tested ointment showed an anti-inflammatory effect compared to the control group. In comparison to indomethacin, although the effect was slightly more pronounced for the herbal ointment, the difference was not statistically significant.
Due to its accessibility, good tolerance, and efficacy demonstrated in experimental models, the developed ointment is a promising therapy for wound healing and would be worth further exploring its benefits in a clinical setting.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.-V.H., R.A., E.A.O., E.M. and A.I.A.; methodology, E.A.O., E.M., O.C.Ș. and E.-I.G.; software, R.A.; validation, all authors.; formal analysis, R.A., O.C.Ș., E.M. and E.A.O.; investigation, E.A.O., E.M., O.C.Ș., E.O., A.I.A., C.B., E.-I.G., L.E.D., C.S.S. and E.N.; resources, M.-V.H., R.A.; data curation, R.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.-V.H., R.A., E.O., E.A.O., E.M., O.C.Ș., C.B., C.S.S. and E.N.; writing—review and editing, all authors.; visualization, M.-V.H.; supervision, R.A., E.A.O., E.M. and L.E.D.; project administration, M.-V.H., R.A.; funding acquisition, R.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by UMF Carol Davila—project number 33894/11.11.2014.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Bioethics Commission of the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest (997/7 October 2016).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this article will be shared upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

R.A. received consultancy or speakers’ fees from UCB, Sandoz, Abbvie, Zentiva, Teva, Laropharm, CEGEDIM, Angelini, Biessen Pharma, Hofigal, AstraZeneca, and Stada. All other authors report no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Shedoeva, A.; Leavesley, D.; Upton, Z.; Fan, C. Wound Healing and the Use of Medicinal Plants. Evid.-Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2019, 2019, 2684108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Dorai, A.A. Wound Care with Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Indian J. Plast. Surg. 2012, 45, 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jarić, S.; Kostić, O.; Mataruga, Z.; Pavlović, D.; Pavlović, M.; Mitrović, M.; Pavlović, P. Traditional Wound-Healing Plants Used in the Balkan Region (Southeast Europe). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 211, 311–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kumar, B.; Vijayakumar, M.; Govindarajan, R.; Pushpangadan, P. Ethnopharmacological Approaches to Wound Healing—Exploring Medicinal Plants of India. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 114, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rhoads, D.D.; Cox, S.B.; Rees, E.J.; Sun, Y.; Wolcott, R.D. Clinical Identification of Bacteria in Human Chronic Wound Infections: Culturing vs. 16S Ribosomal DNA Sequencing. BMC Infect. Dis. 2012, 12, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Maxson, S.; Lopez, E.A.; Yoo, D.; Danilkovitch-Miagkova, A.; LeRoux, M.A. Concise Review: Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Wound Repair. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2012, 1, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Reinke, J.M.; Sorg, H. Wound Repair and Regeneration. Eur. Surg. Res. 2012, 49, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Edeoga, H.O.; Okwu, D.E.; Mbaebie, B.O. Phytochemical Constituents of Some Nigerian Medicinal Plants. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 4, 685–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Chen, W.-C.; Liou, S.-S.; Tzeng, T.-F.; Lee, S.-L.; Liu, I.-M. Effect of Topical Application of Chlorogenic Acid on Excision Wound Healing in Rats. Planta Med. 2013, 79, 616–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Maver, T.; Maver, U.; Stana Kleinschek, K.; Smrke, D.M.; Kreft, S. A Review of Herbal Medicines in Wound Healing. Int. J. Dermatol. 2015, 54, 740–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sharma, A.; Khanna, S.; Kaur, G.; Singh, I. Medicinal Plants and Their Components for Wound Healing Applications. Future J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 7, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Appendino, G.; Ottino, M.; Marquez, N.; Bianchi, F.; Giana, A.; Ballero, M.; Sterner, O.; Fiebich, B.L.; Munoz, E. Arzanol, an Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-HIV-1 Phloroglucinol Alpha-Pyrone from Helichrysum Italicum Ssp. Microphyllum. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 608–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, F.; Bian, D.; Xia, Y.; Gong, Z.; Tan, Q.; Chen, J.; Dai, Y. Identification of Major Active Ingredients Responsible for Burn Wound Healing of Centella Asiatica Herbs. Evid.-Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2012, 2012, 848093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Süntar, I.; Akkol, E.K.; Nahar, L.; Sarker, S.D. Wound Healing and Antioxidant Properties: Do They Coexist in Plants? Free. Radic. Antioxid. 2012, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Sen, C.K.; Roy, S. Redox Signals in Wound Healing. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1780, 1348–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Thakur, R.; Jain, N.; Pathak, R.; Sandhu, S.S. Practices in Wound Healing Studies of Plants. Evid.-Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2011, 2011, 438056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Manjunatha, B.; Vidya, S.; Rashmi, K.; Mankani, K.; Shilpa, H.; Singh, S.J. Evaluation of Wound-Healing Potency of Vernonia Arborea Hk. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2005, 37, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shikov, A.N.; Pozharitskaya, O.N.; Makarov, V.G.; Wagner, H.; Verpoorte, R.; Heinrich, M. Medicinal Plants of the Russian Pharmacopoeia; Their History and Applications. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 154, 481–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Dinda, M.; Mazumdar, S.; Das, S.; Ganguly, D.; Dasgupta, U.B.; Dutta, A.; Jana, K.; Karmakar, P. The Water Fraction of Calendula officinalis Hydroethanol Extract Stimulates In Vitro and In Vivo Proliferation of Dermal Fibroblasts in Wound Healing: In Vitro and In Vivo Wound Healing Activity of Calendula officinalis. Phytother. Res. 2016, 30, 1696–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Givol, O.; Kornhaber, R.; Visentin, D.; Cleary, M.; Haik, J.; Harats, M. A Systematic Review of Calendula officinalis Extract for Wound Healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2019, 27, 548–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Quave, C.L. Wound Healing with Botanicals: A Review and Future Perspectives. Curr. Dermatol. Rep. 2018, 7, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wölfle, U.; Seelinger, G.; Schempp, C. Topical Application of St. John’s Wort (Hypericum perforatum). Planta Med. 2013, 80, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Idolo, M.; Motti, R.; Mazzoleni, S. Ethnobotanical and Phytomedicinal Knowledge in a Long-History Protected Area, the Abruzzo, Lazio and Molise National Park (Italian Apennines). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 127, 379–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nayak, B.S.; Raju, S.S.; Rao, A.V.C. Wound Healing Activity of Matricaria recutita L. Extract. J. Wound Care 2007, 16, 298–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Niknam, S.; Tofighi, Z.; Faramarzi, M.A.; Abdollahifar, M.A.; Sajadi, E.; Dinarvand, R.; Toliyat, T. Polyherbal Combination for Wound Healing: Matricaria chamomilla L. and Punica granatum L. DARU J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 29, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shetty, B.S.; Udupa, S.L.; Udupa, A.L.; Somayaji, S.N. Effect of Centella asiatica L (Umbelliferae) on Normal and Dexamethasone-Suppressed Wound Healing in Wistar Albino Rats. Int. J. Low. Extrem. Wounds 2006, 5, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Araújo, L.U.; Reis, P.G.; Barbosa, L.C.O.; Saúde-Guimarães, D.A.; Grabe-Guimarães, A.; Mosqueira, V.C.F.; Carneiro, C.M.; Silva-Barcellos, N.M. In Vivo Wound Healing Effects of Symphytum officinale L. Leaves Extract in Different Topical Formulations. Pharmazie 2012, 67, 355–360. [Google Scholar]
  28. Antunes Viegas, D.; Palmeira-de-Oliveira, A.; Salgueiro, L.; Martinez-de-Oliveira, J.; Palmeira-de-Oliveira, R. Helichrysum Italicum: From Traditional Use to Scientific Data. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 151, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sala, A.; Recio, M.; Giner, R.M.; Máñez, S.; Tournier, H.; Schinella, G.; Ríos, J.-L. Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Properties of Helichrysum Italicum. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2002, 54, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hamedi, S.; Shams-Ardakani, M.R.; Sadeghpour, O.; Amin, G.; Hajighasemali, D.; Orafai, H. Designing Mucoadhesive Discs Containing Stem Bark Extract of Ziziphus Jujuba Based on Iranian Traditional Documents. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2016, 19, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guo, S.; Duan, J.; Qian, D.; Tang, Y.; Wu, D.; Su, S.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Y. Content Variations of Triterpenic Acid, Nucleoside, Nucleobase, and Sugar in Jujube (Ziziphus Jujuba) Fruit during Ripening. Food Chem. 2015, 167, 468–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Preeti; Tripathi, S. Ziziphus Jujuba: A Phytopharmacological Review. IJRDPL 2014, 3, 959–966. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hossain, M.A. A Phytopharmacological Review on the Omani Medicinal Plant: Ziziphus Jujube. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2019, 31, 1352–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hamedi, S.; Sadeghpour, O.; Shamsardekani, M.R.; Amin, G.; Hajighasemali, D.; Feyzabadi, Z. The Most Common Herbs to Cure the Most Common Oral Disease: Stomatitis Recurrent Aphthous Ulcer (RAU). Iran. Red Crescent Med. J. 2016, 18, e21694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Masullo, M.; Cerulli, A.; Montoro, P.; Pizza, C.; Piacente, S. In Depth LC-ESIMSn-Guided Phytochemical Analysis of Ziziphus Jujuba Mill. Leaves. Phytochemistry 2019, 159, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Damiano, S.; Forino, M.; De, A.; Vitali, L.A.; Lupidi, G.; Taglialatela-Scafati, O. Antioxidant and Antibiofilm Activities of Secondary Metabolites from Ziziphus Jujuba Leaves Used for Infusion Preparation. Food Chem. 2017, 230, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hovaneţ, M.-V.; Oprea, E.; Ancuceanu, R.V.; Duţu, L.E.; Budura, E.A.; Şeremet, O.; Ancu, I.; Moroşan, E. Wound Healing Properties of Ziziphus Jujuba Mill. Leaves. Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2016, 21, 11842–11849. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hovaneţ, M.-V.; Ancuceanu, R.V.; Dinu, M.; Oprea, E.; Budura, E.A.; Negreş, S.; Velescu, B.; Duţu, L.; Anghel, I.A.; Ancu, I.; et al. Toxicity and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Ziziphus Jujuba Mill. Leaves. Farmacia 2016, 64, 802–808. [Google Scholar]
  39. Andjić, M.; Božin, B.; Draginić, N.; Kočović, A.; Jeremić, J.N.; Tomović, M.; Milojević Šamanović, A.; Kladar, N.; Čapo, I.; Jakovljević, V.; et al. Formulation and Evaluation of Helichrysum Italicum Essential Oil-Based Topical Formulations for Wound Healing in Diabetic Rats. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Han, X.; Beaumont, C.; Stevens, N. Chemical Composition Analysis and in vitro Biological Activities of Ten Essential Oils in Human Skin Cells. Biochim. Open 2017, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Atzmony, L.; Lim, Y.H.; Hamilton, C.; Leventhal, J.S.; Wagner, A.; Paller, A.S.; Choate, K.A. Topical cholesterol/lovastatin for the treatment of porokeratosis: A pathogenesis-directed therapy. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2020, 82, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Murota, H.; Itoi, S.; Terao, M.; Matsui, S.; Kawai, H.; Satou, Y.; Suda, K.; Katayama, I. Topical cholesterol treatment ameliorates hapten-evoked cutaneous hypersensitivity by sustaining expression of 11β-HSD1 in epidermis. Exp. Dermatol. 2014, 23, 68–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Elder, R.L. Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Cetearyl Alcohol, Cetyl Alcohol, lsostearyl Alcohol, Myristyl Alcohol, and Behenyl Alcohol. J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 1988, 7, 359–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. American Academy of Dermatology. Proper Wound Care. 2017. Available online: https://www.aad.org/public/everyday-care/injured-skin/burns/wound-care-minimize-scars (accessed on 10 November 2022).
  45. Yeap, S.K.; Beh, B.K.; Ali, N.M.; Yusof, H.M.; Ho, W.Y.; Koh, S.P.; Alitheen, N.B.; Long, K. Antistress and Antioxidant Effects of Virgin Coconut Oil in Vivo. Exp. Ther. Med. 2015, 9, 39–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ghani, N.A.A.; Channip, A.-A.; Chok Hwee Hwa, P.; Ja’afar, F.; Yasin, H.M.; Usman, A. Physicochemical Properties, Antioxidant Capacities, and Metal Contents of Virgin Coconut Oil Produced by Wet and Dry Processes. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 1298–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Burnett, C.L.; Bergfeld, W.F.; Belsito, D.V.; Klaassen, C.D.; Marks, J.G.; Shank, R.C.; Slaga, T.J.; Snyder, P.W.; Andersen, F.A. Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Cocos Nucifera (Coconut) Oil and Related Ingredients. Int. J. Toxicol. 2011, 30, 5S–16S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gavriloaia, M.-R.; Budura, E.-A.; Toma, C.C.; Mitu, M.A.; Karampelas, O.; Arama, C.; Lupuleasa, D. In Vitro Evaluation of Diffusion and Rheological Profiles for Dexamethasone Inclusion Complexes with β-Cyclodextrin or Hydroxypropyl β-Cyclodextrin. Farmacia 2012, 60, 895–904. [Google Scholar]
  49. Balaci, T.D.; Ozon, E.A.; Baconi, D.L.; Nițulescu, G.; Velescu, B.; Bălălău, C.; Păunică, I.; Fița, C.A. Study on the Formulation and Characterization of a Photoprotective Cream Containing a New Synthetized Compound. J. Mind Med. Sci. 2020, 7, 193–200. [Google Scholar]
  50. Aiyalu, R.; Govindarjan, A.; Ramasamy, A. Formulation and Evaluation of Topical Herbal Gel for the Treatment of Arthritis in Animal Model. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 52, 493–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Akhtar, N.; Khan, B.; Khan, M.; Mahmood, T.; Khan, H.; Iqbal, M.; Bashir, S. Formulation Development and Moiturising Effects of a Topical Cream of Aloe Vera Extract. World Acad. Eng. Technol. 2011, 51, 172–179. [Google Scholar]
  52. Comisia Farmacopeei Române. Farmacopeea Română (Romanian Pharmacopoeia), 10th ed.; Editura Medicală: Bucharest, Romania, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  53. European Directorate for the Quality of Medicine & Health Care of the Council of Europe (EDQM). European Pharmacopoeia, 10th ed.; EDQM: Strasbourg, France, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  54. Mănescu, O.; Lupuleasa, D.; Miron, D.; Budura, E.; Rădulescu, F. In Vitro Drug Release from Topical Antifungal Pharmaceutical Formulations. Farmacia 2011, 59, 15–23. [Google Scholar]
  55. Kulawik-Pióro, A.; Drabczyk, A.K.; Kruk, J.; Wróblewska, M.; Winnicka, K.; Tchórzewska, J. Thiolated Silicone Oils as New Components of Protective Creams in the Prevention of Skin Diseases. Materials 2021, 14, 4723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Gore, E.; Picard, C.; Savary, G. Spreading Behavior of Cosmetic Emulsions: Impact of the Oil Phase. Biotribology 2018, 16, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cimino, M.C. New OECD Genetic Toxicology Guidelines and Interpretation of Results. In Genetic Toxicology and Cancer Risk Assessment; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2001; pp. 237–262. [Google Scholar]
  58. Dinu, M.; Anghel, A.-I.; Olaru, O.-T.; Şeremet, O.C.; Calalb, T.; Cojocaru-Toma, M.; Negreş, S.; Hovaneţ, V.; Zbarcea, C.E.; Ancuceanu, R. Toxicity Investigation of an Extract of Amaranthus retroflexus L.(Amaranthaceae) Leaves. Farmacia 2017, 65, 289–294. [Google Scholar]
  59. OECD. Test No. 404: Acute Dermal Irritation/Corrosion; OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4; OECD: Paris, France, 2015; ISBN 978-92-64-24267-8. [Google Scholar]
  60. OECD. Test No. 410: Repeated Dose Dermal Toxicity: 21/28-Day Study; OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals; OECD: Paris, France, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  61. Masson-Meyers, D.S.; Andrade, T.A.M.; Caetano, G.F.; Guimaraes, F.R.; Leite, M.N.; Leite, S.N.; Frade, M.A.C. Experimental Models and Methods for Cutaneous Wound Healing Assessment. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2020, 101, 21–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Abdullahi, A.; Amini-Nik, S.; Jeschke, M.G. Animal Models in Burn Research. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2014, 71, 3241–3255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Jassim, R.A.; Mihele, D.; Dogaru, E. Study Regarding the Influence of Vitis Vinifera Fruit (Muscat of Hamburg Species) on Some Biochemical Parameters. Cancer 2010, 1, 6–7. [Google Scholar]
  64. Mihai, D.P.; Seremet, O.C.; Nitulescu, G.; Ivopol, M.; Sevastre, A.-S.; Negres, S.; Ivopol, G.; Nitulescu, G.M.; Olaru, O.T. Evaluation of Natural Extracts in Animal Models of Pain and Inflammation for a Potential Therapy of Hemorrhoidal Disease. Sci. Pharm. 2019, 87, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Negres, S.; Dinu, M.; Ancuceanu, R.; Olaru, T.O.; Ghica, M.V.; Seremet, O.C.; Zbarcea, C.E.; Velescu, B.S.; Stefanescu, E.; Chirita, C. Correlations in Silico/in Vitro/in Vivo Regarding Determinating Acute Toxicity in Non-Clinical Experimental Trial, According to Bioethic Regulations Inforced by the European Union. Farmacia 2015, 63, 877–885. [Google Scholar]
  66. Xue, X.; Zhao, A.; Wang, Y.; Ren, H.; Du, J.; Li, D.; Li, Y. Composition and Content of Phenolic Acids and Flavonoids among the Different Varieties, Development Stages, and Tissues of Chinese Jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.). PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0254058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Saeedi-Boroujeni, A.; Mahmoudian-Sani, M.-R. Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Quercetin in COVID-19 Treatment. J. Inflamm. 2021, 18, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lin, C.-F.; Leu, Y.-L.; Al-Suwayeh, S.A.; Ku, M.-C.; Hwang, T.-L.; Fang, J.-Y. Anti-Inflammatory Activity and Percutaneous Absorption of Quercetin and Its Polymethoxylated Compound and Glycosides: The Relationships to Chemical Structures. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 47, 857–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Choi, J.K.; Kim, S.-H. Rutin Suppresses Atopic Dermatitis and Allergic Contact Dermatitis. Exp. Biol. Med. 2013, 238, 410–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Girsang, E.; Ginting, C.N.; Lister, I.N.E.; Gunawan, K.Y.; Widowati, W. Anti-Inflammatory and Antiaging Properties of Chlorogenic Acid on UV-Induced Fibroblast Cell. PeerJ 2021, 9, e11419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bae, J.; Kim, N.; Shin, Y.; Kim, S.-Y.; Kim, Y.-J. Activity of Catechins and Their Applications. Biomed. Dermatol. 2020, 4, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Patel, N.K.; Jaiswal, G.; Bhutani, K.K. A Review on Biological Sources, Chemistry and Pharmacological Activities of Pinostrobin. Nat. Prod. Res. 2016, 30, 2017–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Cavalcanti, G.R.; Duarte, F.I.C.; Converti, A.; de Lima, Á.A.N. Ferulic Acid Activity in Topical Formulations: Technological and Scientific Prospecting. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2021, 27, 2289–2298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Majnooni, M.B.; Fakhri, S.; Shokoohinia, Y.; Mojarrab, M.; Kazemi-Afrakoti, S.; Farzaei, M.H. Isofraxidin: Synthesis, Biosynthesis, Isolation, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacological Properties. Molecules 2020, 25, 2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Petrônio, M.; Zeraik, M.; Fonseca, L.; Ximenes, V. Apocynin: Chemical and Biophysical Properties of a NADPH Oxidase Inhibitor. Molecules 2013, 18, 2821–2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Jamuna, S.; Karthika, K.; Paulsamy, S.; Thenmozhi, K.; Kathiravan, S.; Venkatesh, R. Confertin and Scopoletin from Leaf and Root Extracts of Hypochaeris Radicata Have Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Activities. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 70, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hovanet, M.-V.; Dociu, N.; Dinu, M.; Ancuceanu, R.; Morosan, E.; Oprea, E. A Comparative Physico-Chemical Analysis of Acer Platanoides and Acer Pseudoplatanus Seed Oils. Rev. Chim. (Buchar.) 2015, 66, 987–991. [Google Scholar]
  78. Shelke, U.; Mahajan, A. Review on: An Ointment. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 4, 170–192. [Google Scholar]
  79. Abeje, B.A.; Bekele, T.; Getahun, K.A.; Asrie, A.B. Evaluation of Wound Healing Activity of 80% Hydromethanolic Crude Extract and Solvent Fractions of the Leaves of Urtica simensis in Mice. J. Exp. Pharmacol. 2022, 7, 221–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Imran, H.; Sohail, T.; Shaukat, S.; Khokar, A. Wound Healing Potential/Activity of Polyherbal Ointment Containing Salvadora persica, Azadirachta indica and Calendula officinalis Extracts: An Experimental Study: Wound Healing Potential: An Experimental Study. Biol. Sci.-PJSIR 2022, 65, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Demilew, W.; Adinew, G.M.; Asrade, S. Evaluation of the Wound Healing Activity of the Crude Extract of Leaves of Acanthus polystachyus Delile (Acanthaceae). Evid.-Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2018, 11, 2047896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Ghosh, S.; Samanta, A.; Mandal, N.B.; Bannerjee, S.; Chattopadhyay, D. Evaluation of the wound healing activity of methanol extract of Pedilanthus tithymaloides (L.) Poit leaf and its isolated active constituents in topical formulation. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 142, 714–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wang, J.; Li, Z.; Sun, F.; Tang, S.; Zhang, S.; Lv, P.; Li, J.; Cao, X. Evaluation of Dermal Irritation and Skin Sensitization Due to Vitacoxib. Toxicol. Rep. 2017, 4, 287–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Aafi, E.; Reza, M.; Mirabzadeh, M. Jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill. (Rhamnaceae)): A review on its pharmacological properties and phytochemistry. Tradit. Med. Res. 2022, 7, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Soni, H.; Malik, J.K. Phyto-pharmacological potential of Zizyphus jujube: A review. Sch. Int. J. Biochem. 2021, 4, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chopda, M.Z.; Nemade, N.V.; Mahajan, R.T. Wound healing activity of root of Ziziphus jujuba mill in rat model. World J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. (WJPPS) 2014, 3, 830–836. [Google Scholar]
  87. Moghadam, S.E.; Ebrahimi, S.N.; Salehi, P.; Moridi Farimani, M.; Hamburger, M.; Jabbarzadeh, E. Wound Healing Potential of Chlorogenic Acid and Myricetin-3-O-β-Rhamnoside Isolated from Parrotia persica. Molecules 2017, 22, 1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Lim, H.; Kim, H.P. Inhibition of mammalian collagenase, matrix metalloproteinase-1, by naturally-occurring flavonoids. Planta Med. 2007, 73, 1267–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Doersch, K.M.; Newell-Rogers, M.K. The impact of quercetin on wound healing relates to changes in αV and β1 integrin expression. Exp. Biol. Med. 2017, 42, 1424–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Osama, M.A.; Tarek, M.; Hala, M.; Hany, H.; Rasha, R.A.; Ebtsam, A. Quercetin and low level laser therapy promote wound healing process in diabetic rats via structural reorganization and modulatory effects on inflammation and oxidative stress. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 101, 58–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chen, L.Y.; Huang, C.N.; Liao, C.K.; Chang, H.M.; Kuan, Y.H.; Tseng, T.J.; Yen, K.J.; Yang, K.L.; Lin, H.C. Effects of Rutin on Wound Healing in Hyperglycemic Rats. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Moreira de Castro, M.E.; Pereira, R.G.F.A.; Danielle Ferreira Dias Gontijo, V.S.; Vilela, F.C.; Isac de Moraes, G.; Giusti-Paiva, A.; Henrique dos Santos, M. Anti-inflammatory effect of aqueous extracts of roasted and green Coffea arabica L. J. Funct. Foods 2013, 5, 466–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Bagdas, D.; Gul, Z.; Meade, J.A.; Cam, B.; Cinkilic, N.; Gurun, M.S. Pharmacologic Overview of Chlorogenic Acid and its Metabolites in Chronic Pain and Inflammation. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2020, 18, 216–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kim, H.P.; Mani, I.; Iversen, L.; Ziboh, V.A. Effects of naturally-occurring flavonoids and biflavonoids on epidermal cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase from guinea-pigs. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 1998, 58, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Lee, K.M.; Hwang, M.K.; Lee, D.E.; Lee, K.W.; Lee, H.J. Protective effect of quercetin against arsenite-induced COX-2 expression by targeting PI3K in rat liver epithelial cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 5815–5820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Manjeet, K.R.; Ghosh, B. Quercetin inhibits LPS-induced nitric oxide and tumor necrosis factor-alpha production in murine macrophages. Int. J. Immunopharmacol. 1999, 21, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Geraets, L.; Moonen, H.J.; Brauers, K.; Wouters, E.F.; Bast, A.; Hageman, G.J. Dietary flavones and flavonoles are inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase-1 in pulmonary epithelial cells. J. Nutr. 2007, 137, 2190–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Kempuraj, D.; Madhappan, B.; Christodoulou, S.; Boucher, W.; Cao, J.; Papadopoulou, N.; Cetrulo, C.L.; Theoharides, T.C. Flavonols inhibit proinflammatory mediator release, intracellular calcium ion levels and protein kinase C theta phosphorylation in human mast cells. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2005, 145, 934–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Kim, J.H.; Park, S.H.; Beak, E.J.; Han, C.H.; Kang, N.J. Anti-oxidant and Anti-inflammatory Effects of Rutin and Its Metabolites. Curr. Res. Agric. Life Sci. 2013, 31, 165–169. [Google Scholar]
  100. Yoo, H.; Ku, S.K.; Baek, Y.D.; Bae, J.S. Anti-inflammatory effects of rutin on HMGB1-induced inflammatory responses in vitro and in vivo. Inflamm. Res. 2014, 63, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Adler, M.; Mayo, A.; Zhou, X.; Franklin, R.A.; Meizlish, M.L.; Medzhitov, R.; Kallenberger, S.M.; Alon, U. Principles of Cell Circuits for Tissue Repair and Fibrosis. iScience 2020, 23, 100841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wynn, T.A. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. J. Pathol. 2008, 214, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Wynn, T.A.; Vannella, K.M. Macrophages in Tissue Repair, Regeneration, and Fibrosis. Immunity 2016, 44, 450–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. TIC chromatogram of Ziziphus jujube leaves extract in negative ionization mode.
Figure 1. TIC chromatogram of Ziziphus jujube leaves extract in negative ionization mode.
Life 12 01947 g001
Figure 2. The Spreadability of Ointment and Base.
Figure 2. The Spreadability of Ointment and Base.
Life 12 01947 g002
Figure 3. Average body weight evolution of the rats in Group 1, with standard deviations. Letters a–c show statistically significant differences between groups.
Figure 3. Average body weight evolution of the rats in Group 1, with standard deviations. Letters a–c show statistically significant differences between groups.
Life 12 01947 g003
Figure 4. Average body weight evolution of the rats in Group 2, with standard deviations. Letters a–c show statistically significant differences between groups.
Figure 4. Average body weight evolution of the rats in Group 2, with standard deviations. Letters a–c show statistically significant differences between groups.
Life 12 01947 g004
Figure 5. The scarring evolution of the animals treated with (a) the lipophilic ointment and (b) Cicatrizin.
Figure 5. The scarring evolution of the animals treated with (a) the lipophilic ointment and (b) Cicatrizin.
Life 12 01947 g005
Figure 6. Kaolin-induced edema values, with standard deviations, for the ZIZ-L group. Letters a–c show statistically significant differences between groups.
Figure 6. Kaolin-induced edema values, with standard deviations, for the ZIZ-L group. Letters a–c show statistically significant differences between groups.
Life 12 01947 g006
Figure 7. Kaolin-induced edema values, with standard deviations, for the B-L group. Letters a–d show statistically significant differences between groups.
Figure 7. Kaolin-induced edema values, with standard deviations, for the B-L group. Letters a–d show statistically significant differences between groups.
Life 12 01947 g007
Figure 8. Kaolin-induced edema values, with standard deviations, for the IND group. Letters a–c show statistically significant differences between groups.
Figure 8. Kaolin-induced edema values, with standard deviations, for the IND group. Letters a–c show statistically significant differences between groups.
Life 12 01947 g008
Table 1. Formulation of the semi-solid pharmaceutical form for cutaneous application.
Table 1. Formulation of the semi-solid pharmaceutical form for cutaneous application.
IngredientsQuantity (g)
Ziziphus jujuba dried ethanolic leaves extract10.00
Cetyl alcohol2.00
Cholesterol2.00
Petrolatum80.70
Coconut oil5.00
Butylhydroxyanisole0.30
TOTAL100.00
Table 2. Dermal reactions classification.
Table 2. Dermal reactions classification.
Dermal Reactions to the ZIZ-L and B-L Application
Erythema or ulcerationScore
No erythema0
Mild erythema (difficult to perceive)1
Well defined erythema2
Medium to severe erythema3
Severe erythema until ulceration is formed4
Edema occurs
No edema0
Very mild edema (difficult to perceive)1
Mild edema2
Medium edema (height approx. 1 mm)3
Severe edema (greater than 1 mm in height and extending beyond the exposed surface)4
A histopathological examination should be performed to clarify an equivocal response
Table 3. Identification and quantification of phenolic bioactive compounds in lyophilized Ziziphus jujuba leaf extract by UHPLC-Q-Exactive high-accuracy analysis of deprotonated precursors and fragment ions of specific components.
Table 3. Identification and quantification of phenolic bioactive compounds in lyophilized Ziziphus jujuba leaf extract by UHPLC-Q-Exactive high-accuracy analysis of deprotonated precursors and fragment ions of specific components.
CompoundRetention Time
[min]
Exact MassAccurate Mass
[M-H]
Experimental Adduct Ion (m/z)Concentration
(µg/g)
Phenolic acids
Gallic acid1.65170.0215169.0142169.013011.72
Syringic acid3.61198.0528197.0455197.044480.42
3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid3.92154.0266153.0193153.018981.03
4-hydroxy benzoic acid6.72138.0316137.0243137.023069.51
p-coumaric acid8.16164.0473163.0400163.038731.39
Ferulic acid8.84194.0579193.0506193.049529.31
Caffeic acid9.40180.0422179.0349179.033724.19
Chlorogenic acid9.749354.0950353.0877353.0871350.96
Cinnamic acid10.18148.0524147.0451147.044020.61
Flavonoids
Catechin8.78290.0790289.0717289.071296.45
Epicatechin10.9320.73
Pinocembrin19.69256.0735255.0662255.06561.29
Pinostrobin15.39270.0892269.0819269.082187.64
Chrysin20.66254.0579253.0506253.04987.66
Apigenin18.89270.0528269.0455269.04501.10
Quercetin17.29302.2357301.0354301.034715180.65
Isorhamnetin18.01316.0582315.0509315.05003.48
Kaemferol18.57286.0477285.0404285.039916.05
Galangin20.93270.0528269.0455269.04502.63
Rutin15.18610.1533609.1460609.144729,836.97
Naringin16.86580.1791579.1718579.17039.79
Quercetin-3-glucoside15.06464.0954463.0881463.0873-
Kaempferol-3-glucoside (astragalin)11.60448.10056447.0932447.0955-
Kaempferol-7-O-glucoside16.11448.10056447.0932447.0923-
Quercetin 3,4′-diglucoside14.04626.1483625.1410625.1401-
Procyanidin C8.51866.2058865.1985865.1974-
Isorhamnetin-3-rutinoside16.41624.1690623.1617623.1609-
Quercetin-3-(6-O-acetyl-beta-glucoside)15.53506.1060505.0987505.0978-
Quercetin-3-D-xyloside15.61434.0849433.0776433.0769-
Kaempferol-3-O-arabinoside16.36418.0899417.0827417.0822-
Kaempferol-O-rhamnoside17.17432.1056431.0983431.0974-
Fatty acids
Trihydroxy octadecadienoic acid19.69328.2249327.2177327.2170-
Trihydroxy octadecenoic acid20.33330.2406329.2333329.2327-
Hydroxy octadecadienoic acid24.10296.2351295.2278295.2271-
Linolenic acid25.89278.2245277.2173277.2166-
Organic acids
Aconitic acid0.90174.0164173.0091173.0077-
Itaconic acid1.26130.0266129.0193129.0177-
Uric acid0.86168.0283167.0210167.0197-
Quinic acid0.69192.0633191.0561191.0549-
Malic acid0.74134.0215133.0142133.0127-
Gluconic acid0.69196.0583195.0510195.0498-
Other compounds
Apocynin10.18166.0629165.0557165.0542-
Scopoletin12.13192.0422191.0349191.0338-
Isofraxidin8.44222.0528221.0455221.0445-
Azelaic acid15.20188.1048187.097587.0963-
3-p-Coumaroylquinic acid12.23338.1001337.0929337.0924-
Table 4. Irritation/corrosion response scores for tested products.
Table 4. Irritation/corrosion response scores for tested products.
SampleErythema/Edema Score
Immediately *1 h *24 h *48 h *72 h *
ZIZ-L00000
B-L00000
* after patches removal.
Table 5. Differences in rats’ body weight and statistical interpretation of the differences.
Table 5. Differences in rats’ body weight and statistical interpretation of the differences.
GroupInitiallyDay 7Day 14Day 21
Group 1 M ± SD231.4 ± 23.22254.6 ± 16.72272.5 ± 21.37294.4 ± 16.47
Δ% vs. initial-10.0317.7627.23
t Student test (p)-***
0.0006
***
<0.0001
***
<0.0001
Group 2 M ± SD236.9 ± 28.52253.9 ± 24.66273.0 ± 20.82287.8 ± 21.06
Δ% vs. initial-7.1815.2421.49
t Student test (p)-***
0.0005
***
<0.0001
***
<0.0001
M = mean; SD = standard deviation; Δ = difference; *** p < 0.001.
Table 6. The evolution of the wound healing effect.
Table 6. The evolution of the wound healing effect.
SampleWound Surface (mm2)
X ¯ ± SD
Group 1—control Day 1Day 2Day 4Day 6Day 8Day 10Day 12
99 ± 1.4182.4 ± 4.3373.6 ± 4.9262.8 ± 4.2049.2 ± 3.2733.8 ± 5.4423 ± 7.81
E%-16.7625.6537.3750.3066.8576.76
Group 2—ZIZ-L 95.6 ± 5.1775 ± 4.1566.6 ± 4.21 *53.6 ± 2.96 *43.8 ± 2.04 *34.4 ± 3.2020 ± 3.24
E%-21.5430.3343.9354.1864.0179.07
Group 3—L-B 96 ± 5.4779.6 ± 4.92 *70.8 ± 7.59 *56.6 ± 3.50 *46.6 ± 1.81240 ± 5.14 *28.2 ± 2.94 *
E% 17.0826.2541.0451.4558.3370.62
Group 4—Cicatrizin 92.6 ± 7.9277 ± 7.81 *61.4 ± 7.30 *47 ± 4.94 *37 ± 4.11 *20.2 ± 4.38 **13.8 ± 5.67 **
E%-16.8433.6949.2460.0478.1885.09
X ¯   ± SD = average ± standard deviation. Group 1—control group, untreated; Group 2—group treated with lipophilic ointment ZIZ-L; Group 3—group treated with lipophilic base L-B; Group 4—group treated with Cicatrizin ointment. Data were analyzed by Student’s test. Statistical significance: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 compared to initial.
Table 7. The effect of ointments application on the inflammatory process induced by intra-plantar administration of kaolin.
Table 7. The effect of ointments application on the inflammatory process induced by intra-plantar administration of kaolin.
GroupMoment of determination
Initial1 h2 h3 h4 h
ZIZ-L (Mean ± SD)1.25 ± 0.091.61 ± 0.121.73 ± 0.121.76 ± 0.091.78 ± 0.10
Paw volume increase (%) # 28.8 ***38.56 ***40.56 ***42.24 ***
B-L (Mean ± SD)1.21 ± 0.071.6 ± 0.061.75 ± 0.11.87 ± 0.121.91 ± 0.14
Paw volume increase (%) # 32.13 ***44.24 ***54.37 ***58.02 ***
IND (Mean ± SD)1.27 ± 0.051.55 ± 0.111.75 ± 0.121.85 ± 0.131.83 ± 0.11
Paw volume increase (%) # 22.05 ***37.64 ***45.33 ***44.33 ***
ZIZ-L vs. B-L (%) a# 3.335.6813.81 *15.78 *
IND vs. B-L (%) b# 10.086.609.0413.69
# t Student’s test; *** p < 0.001; * p < 0.05; a difference between paw volume increase (%) seen for ZIZ-L and B-L; b difference between paw volume increase (%) seen for IND and B-L.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hovaneț, M.-V.; Ozon, E.A.; Moroșan, E.; Șeremet, O.C.; Oprea, E.; Geană, E.-I.; Anghel, A.I.; Bădiceanu, C.; Duțu, L.E.; Stoicescu, C.S.; et al. Wound Healing and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of a Newly Developed Ointment Containing Jujube Leaves Extract. Life 2022, 12, 1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12121947

AMA Style

Hovaneț M-V, Ozon EA, Moroșan E, Șeremet OC, Oprea E, Geană E-I, Anghel AI, Bădiceanu C, Duțu LE, Stoicescu CS, et al. Wound Healing and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of a Newly Developed Ointment Containing Jujube Leaves Extract. Life. 2022; 12(12):1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12121947

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hovaneț, Marilena-Viorica, Emma Adriana Ozon, Elena Moroșan, Oana Cristina Șeremet, Eliza Oprea, Elisabeta-Irina Geană, Adriana Iuliana Anghel, Carmellina Bădiceanu, Ligia Elena Duțu, Cristina Silvia Stoicescu, and et al. 2022. "Wound Healing and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of a Newly Developed Ointment Containing Jujube Leaves Extract" Life 12, no. 12: 1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12121947

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop