Next Article in Journal
Geochemical Overprinting and Secondary Placer Crystal Formation in the La Cholla District, Quartzsite, Arizona, USA: Evidence from Copper Isotopes, Morphology, and Trace Elements
Next Article in Special Issue
Geochemical Evidence for Genesis of Nb–Ta–Be Rare Metal Mineralization in Highly Fractionated Leucogranites at the Lalong Dome, Tethyan Himalaya, China
Previous Article in Journal
Characteristics and Controlling Factors of Pores in Different Shale Lithofacies Reservoirs of Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation, Southwestern Sichuan Basin, China
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Minerals
Volume 13
Issue 11
10.3390/min13111443
minerals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sources of Metallogenic Materials of the Saima Alkaline Rock-Hosted Niobium–Tantalum Deposit in the Liaoning Region: Evidence from the Sr-Nd-Pb and Li Isotopes

by
Yue Wu
1,
Nan Ju
1,2,*,
Xin Liu
1,
Lu Shi
1,
Yuhui Feng
3 and
Danzhen Ma
2
1
Shenyang Center of China Geological Survey, Shenyang 110034, China
2
School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
3
College of Paleontology, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang 110034, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2023, 13(11), 1443; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13111443
Submission received: 26 September 2023 / Revised: 29 October 2023 / Accepted: 13 November 2023 / Published: 15 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metallogenic Regularity and Metallographic Prediction of Strategic Deposits)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The Saima alkaline rock-hosted niobium–tantalum deposit (hereafter referred to as the Saima Deposit) is situated in the Liaodong Peninsula, which constitutes the eastern segment of the northern margin of the North China Craton. The rock types of the Saima Deposit include phonolite, nepheline syenite, and aegirine nepheline syenite, which hosts niobium–tantalum ore bodies. In this study, the primary niobium-bearing minerals identified include loparite, betafite, and fersmite. The Saima pluton is characterized as a potassium-rich, low-sodium, and peraluminous alkaline pluton. Trace element characteristics reveal that the metallization-associated syenite is enriched in large-ion lithophile elements (LILEs) such as K and Rb but is relatively depleted in high-field strength elements (HFSEs). As indicated by the rare earth element (REE) profile, the Saima pluton exhibits a high total REE content (∑REE), dominance of light REEs (LREEs), and scarcity of heavy REEs (HREEs). The Sr-Nd-Pd isotopic data suggest that aegirine nepheline syenite and nepheline syenite share consistent isotopic signatures, indicating a common origin. The Saima alkaline pluton displays elevated ISr values ranging from 0.70712 to 0.70832 coupled with low εNd(t) values between −12.84 and −11.86 and two-stage model ages (tDM2) from 1967 to 2047 Ma. These findings indicate that the metallogenic materials for the Saima Deposit derive from both an enriched mantle source and some crustal components. The lithium (Li) isotopic fractionation observed during the genesis of the Saima pluton could be attributed to the differential diffusion rates of 6Li and 7Li under non-equilibrium fluid–rock interactions.

1. Introduction

Alkaline rocks account for about 1% of the total magmatic rocks on earth. They are known for their complex mineral composition, containing more than 50% of the total minerals discovered so far [1]. Alkaline rock is rich in large-ion lithophile elements, rare earth and high field strength elements. It is a heavy ore body containing REE, Zr, Nb and Ta, which has a huge economic value [2]. For example, the Kvanefjeld uranium polymetallic deposit related to the lujarite complex in southern Greenland not only contains tens of thousands of tons of uranium oxide (U3O8) but also millions of tons of rare earth oxides (TREO). It is also associated with a large number of Nb, Ta and other rare metals [3]. The Thor Lake rare earth polymetallic deposit related to the aegirine nepheline syenite complex in Canada contains a large amount of strategic metal resources such as zirconium, niobium, and heavy rare earth (HREE) [4].
China’s alkaline rocks, which occupy a limited outcrop area, are scattered across Xinjiang, the Panxi Rift Valley, Qinba, and the Liaodong Peninsula. The alkaline pluton in the Saima area of Liaoning province stands out due to its pronounced differentiation and evolution, complex lithologies, alkali pegmatite exposures, rich mineral diversity, and a plethora of rare metal resources, including U, Th, Zr, Nb, and REEs. Consequently, the Saima pluton serves as an exemplary case for examining the petrology, mineralogy, genesis, magmatic evolution, and rare metal enrichment and mineralization mechanisms associated with alkaline rocks and their rare metal–rare earth element deposits. The Saima alkaline complex is mainly composed of potassic magmatites such as early hornblenite syenite and aegirine nepheline syenite, and late soditic lujarite with high magmatic evolution and obvious magmatic hydrothermal activity traces. It provides a unique research window for exploring the geochemical behavior of uranium, thorium and rare earth elements during the evolution of alkaline magma [5,6,7]. Based on a detailed study of the chemical composition of the rinkite, Wu [8] found that not only is the rinkite continuously enriched, but also the contents of high-field strength elements such as Nb, Zr and REE (especially HREE) are continuously increased from nepheline syenite through aegenite nepheline syenite pegmatite to late lujarite.
Integrating the previous studies on the Saima alkaline pluton, the genesis of the niobium–tantalum deposit is not clear, and there is no direct lithological evidence of the niobium–tantalum mineral. Strengthening and deepening the relevant research can reveal the formation mechanism of alkaline rocks and related deposits and have certain enlightenment for guiding regional prospecting. Based on the characteristics of Sr-Nd-Pb isotope and Li isotope, the source of metallogenic materials and the metallogenic mechanism of the niobium–tantalum element in the Saima niobium–tantalum deposit are studied systematically by petrography and mineralogy.

2. Regional Geological Setting

The Saima deposit is located to the south of the Taizihe–Hunjiang paleodepression and to the north of the Yingkou–Kuandian uplift (Figure 1) [5,9]. It forms a segment of the Saima alkaline pluton within the northeastern part of the North China Craton. The E–W trending Saima pluton spans an outcrop area of approximately 200 km2, with the primary ore-controlling structure oriented to the northeast. Overlying strata in this region encompass the Lower Proterozoic Gaxian and Dashiqiao formations, the Upper Proterozoic Xihe Group, the Paleozoic Cambrian and Ordovician strata, and the Mesozoic Jurassic strata. These strata present complex lithologies, transitioning from nepheline syenite in the initial phase to lujavrite in the subsequent phase. The Saima pluton’s main petrogenic minerals comprise potassium feldspar, nepheline, biotite, aegirite, and eudialyte. Distinctive accessory minerals within the pluton include zircon, potassium zircon, stratosilica-cerium titanite, and eudialyte. The nepheline syenite comprises the main body (70%) of the pluton [5]. The aegirine syenite rich in green, grass green and taupe aegirine has better mineralization, while the mineralization degree of pegmatite formed in late evolution is higher. The boundary between nepheline syenite and aegirine nepheline syenite is transitional, indicating that their formation was contemporaneous. Multiple alteration types, such as those involving microplagioclase, nepheline, sodium zeolite, and gannetite, as well as carbonation, are evident in the Saima pluton. Its niobium–tantalum mineralization is closely associated with aegirine nepheline syenite [10]. The primary magma of the Saima alkaline rock was initially rich in niobium [11]. The eastern Liaoning area is positioned within the Liaodong rift tectonic belt, and the Mesozoic rift reactivation transpired during the Indosinian intracontinental fault orogeny amidst a backdrop of crustal thickening.
The Saima alkaline pluton exhibits complex lithologies, with its ages determined using a range of methods. The U-Pb ages of eudialyte from nepheline syenite, obtained through laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS), were 224 ± 4 Ma [12]. The zircon U-Pb ages from aegirine nepheline syenite, as determined via LA-ICP-MS, were 231.9 ± 3.7 Ma and 229.5 ± 2.2 Ma [9,10] and 230–224 Ma using SIMS [13]. The 40Ar-39Ar ages for biotite from altered nepheline syenite and nepheline syenite pegmatite were 234.3 ±6.3 Ma and 230.08 ±2.75 Ma, respectively [11]. The Saima Deposit experienced mineralization during the Late Triassic within the Late Indosinian post-collisional continental rifting or extensional setting. Wu [14,15] found two new minerals from the Saima alkaline complex, fluorsigaiite-Ca2S3(PO4)3F and gysinite-(La), PbLa(CO3)2(OH)·H2O.
Prior experimental studies have categorized the petrogenetic models of alkaline rocks into two primary types. The first suggests that alkaline rocks derive from the continual crystallization differentiation of alkaline basaltic magma, potentially with crustal assimilation [16,17]. The second posits that these rocks arise from the partial melting of metasomatized ultramafic rocks within the subcontinental lithospheric mantle, enriched in large-ion lithophile and light rare earth elements (LILEs and LREEs) [18,19,20]. Zhu [13] proposed that both silica-saturated and silica-undersaturated rocks in the Saima area shared a similar age and originated from low-degree partial melting of a mantle source rich in clinopyroxene lithosphere with contributions from carbonatite and amphibolite within the garnet stability field. Approximately 60% of the continental components were implicated in the source of the Saima alkaline rocks. Ju [9] argued that the niobium-rich aegirine nepheline syenite was a product of crust-mantle interaction and crystallized within a post-collisional continental rift setting. Fu [21] concluded that alkaline magmatic evolution is controlled by fluid-unsaturated pure magmatic systems, while hyperalkaline magmatic rocks are formed in a fluid-supersaturated magmatic system.

3. Analytical Methods

3.1. Mineral Compositions

Six pristine aegirine nepheline syenite samples enriched in niobium and tantalum minerals were chosen, pulverized, and polished into thin sections for backscatter image observation and EPMA. Backscattered electron images of these minerals were acquired, and a qualitative assessment of their compositions was conducted using a JOEL JAX-IT500 scanning electron microscope at the MLR Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences. The quantitative compositional analysis was performed using a JOEL JXA-8100 electron probe at the laboratory of the Shenyang Center, China Geological Survey. Operating parameters for the electron probe were an accelerating voltage of 15 kV, a beam current of 20 nA, and a beam diameter of 2 μm. Distinctive spectral lines of various elements were differentiated using four spectroscopic crystals: LIF, TAP, PETH, and PETJ. Standard samples employed to calibrate REE measurements were synthetic rare-earth phosphates, while standards for elements like Ti, Si, Nb, and Ta comprised rutile, microcline, niobium, tantalum, and scheelite. For major elements such as Si, Al, Mg, Ca, Fe, Na, and K, the measurement and background measurement times for their characteristic peaks were 10 s and 5 s, respectively. For trace elements, including P, Nb, Ti, Zr, Cr, Y, Mn, Sr, Ba, and REEs, these times were 20 s and 10 s, respectively. All data underwent ZAF correction, achieving an accuracy better than ±0.5 wt%.

3.2. Major- and Trace-Element Geochemistry

Eleven rock samples were collected from the surface exploratory trenches and the surrounding rocks of the TCG-11 ore body within the Saima Deposit. Samples SMK-1 through SMK-6 were aegirine nepheline syenite exhibiting grass-green exteriors, whereas samples SMW-1 through SMW-5 were characterized as light flesh-red nepheline syenites. Petrographic examinations of these samples were conducted at the laboratory of the Shenyang Center, China Geological Survey, with mineral structures and compositions ascertained using an Olympus BX51 polarized light microscope.
Primarily sourced from the surface exploratory trenches of the Saima Deposit, these samples showed negligible mineralization and alteration. They were subsequently crushed and ground using an agate mill. Comprehensive analyses for major and trace elements, as well as REEs, were undertaken at the Shenyang Center laboratory, employing an ARL-PERFORM’X wavelength dispersive XRF for the first two and an ICP-MS analyzer for REEs. A total of 50 mg of powdered sample was dissolved in 0.01 mL of HClO4. A combination of 1.5 mL of HF and 1.5 mL of HNO3 was sealed in a Teflon bomb and heated on a 140 °C plate until dry. Following this, the dried mixture was sealed and incubated within a steel jacket in an oven at 195 °C for 48 h. Post-evaporation, 3 mL of HNO3 was added and heated until dried. An additional 3 mL of HNO3 was then introduced, and the new mixture was sealed and reheated in an oven at 140 °C for 12 h. Upon cooling, the resultant solution was decanted and diluted to a 100 g volume. One gram of rhodium was integrated into the diluted solution as an internal standard, facilitating the tracking of potential drifts during mass spectrometric evaluations. Analytical precisions for the major and trace elements predominantly surpassed 5% and 10%, respectively.

3.3. Sr-Nd-Pb Isotopic Analyses

The Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic analyses were conducted using a Neptune Plus MC-ICP-MS, produced by Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA), at Beijing Createch Testing Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). A 120 mg sample of whole-rock powder was digested in a steel-jacketed Teflon bomb with 2.5 mL of HF, 0.2 mL of HNO3, and HClO4. The bomb was then placed in an oven at 195°C for one week. Post-dissolution, the mixture was dried with fuming HClO4 on a hot plate. Subsequently, 6 mL of HCl was added and evaporated to complete dryness. To transform fluorides into chlorides, an additional 6 mL of HCl was introduced. The isotopic ratios of Sr, Nd, and Pb were corrected using exponential normalization with values of 88Sr/86Sr = 8.375209, 146Nd/144Nd = 0.7219, and 203Tl/205Tl = 0.418922, respectively. The detailed laboratory protocols for Sr, Nd, and Pb isotopic determinations and analyses can be found in Yang [22,23].

3.4. Li Isotopes in Whole Rocks and Minerals

Li isotope testing in minerals was conducted at Nanjing FocuMS Technology Co., Ltd. Detailed procedures for Li isotope analysis are outlined in the referenced literature [24,25,26]. Initially, a 30–40 mg sample of 200-mesh powder was placed in a PFA open dissolution bottle, followed by the addition of HNO3 and HF in a 1:5 ratio, ensuring thorough mixing by shaking. The dissolution bottle underwent ultrasonic oscillation for 10 min and was then placed on a heating plate at 100–120 °C for 24 h until granulated residues formed. Afterward, the bottle was uncapped and heated until complete acid evaporation. Post-dryness, HNO3 was added 2–4 times, and the bottle was reheated at 100–120 °C for another 24 h. Lastly, 1 mL of concentrated HCl was added and heated for 24 h until dried.
Li isotopes were analyzed using the Nu Plasma II multi-collector MC-ICP-MS from the UK’s Nu Instruments Ltd. and the ASI RESOlution LR 193 nm ArF excimer laser from Australian Scientific Instruments. The internal precision, external precision, and accuracy surpassed 0.005%, 0.05%, and 0.05%, respectively. Both the 6Li and 7Li isotopes were simultaneously measured using the low-mass and high-mass Faraday cups (i.e., L4 and H4, respectively). For the Li isotopes, plasma sources produced notable isotopic discrimination, particularly for ions with relatively low atomic masses (about 25% of Li isotope mass fractionation). However, these effects can be accurately corrected using standard samples [27]. The test sequence was blank sample 1 → standard sample 1 → blank sample 2 → sample 1 → blank sample 3 → standard sample 2 → blank sample 4 → sample 2.

4. Analytical Results

4.1. Petrographic Characteristics

4.1.1. Aegirine Nepheline Syenite

The petrographic analysis reveals that the aegirine nepheline syenite comprises aegirine (30%), nepheline (15%), and potassium feldspar (55%). The grass-green aegirine displays pronounced pleochroism, presenting as euhedral to subhedral elongated, needle-like crystals with grain sizes ranging from 0.4–3.6 mm. The nepheline, which occupies the interstices and spaces between potassium feldspar grains, exhibits grain sizes of 0.3–2.2 mm. The grain size of the potassium feldspar varies from 1.6–4.0 mm (Figure 2).

4.1.2. Nepheline Syenite

The coarse- to medium-grained biotite nepheline syenite is composed of potassium feldspar, biotite, and nepheline. These minerals exhibit grain sizes between 2.6–10 mm, with nepheline occurring at the margins and interstices of the potassium feldspar grains.

4.2. Mineralogical Features

Based on EPMA results for mineral composition, the primary minerals identified are loparite, fersmite, and betafite. Owing to the substitution of many REEs by isomorphism, the rare earth oxides can have two types of cations, termed group A and group B, which exhibit subtle differences. Detailed analysis of mineral occurrence and variations in chemical composition across different lithologies can shed light on the geochemical behaviors and metallogenic processes of REEs during the evolution of alkaline magma. Quantitative EPMA results are provided in Table 1.
A.
Fersmite
Fersmite, a pneumatolytic-hydrothermal mineral, can replace pyrochlore and be substituted by niobite with a determined chemical formula of CaNb2O6. In sample SMK-3, fersmite appeared as xenomorphic granular formations within fractures (Figure 3a,b), with particle sizes between approximately 10–30 μm. In sample SMW-4, fersmite was found in potassium feldspar fissures due to metasomatic events, exhibiting an automorphic–hypidiomorphic texture and particle sizes from 15–80 μm. The backscattered electron images indicated that larger fersmite particles displayed high automorphic characteristics and rhythmic zonings of varying brightness, centered by zircon. Fersmite in both aegirine nepheline syenite and biotite nepheline syenite primarily consisted of CaO (12.148–14.622 wt%), TiO2 (7.604–8.777 wt%), and Nb2O5 (51.552–56.827 wt%), with consistent primary chemical components and minor REE variations.
B.
Betafite
The deduced chemical formula for betafite is (Ca,U)2(Ti,Nb,Ta)2O6(OH). With its high titanium and uranium contents, betafite can be differentiated from pyrochlore. It presented an automorphic-hypidiomorphic granular texture in the Saima Deposit, sporadically distributed on potassium feldspar surfaces (SMK-2, SMK-4; Figure 3c,d) and coexisting with zircon. The particle size ranged widely from about 5–50 μm, suggesting ample space for automorphic growth. The backscattered electron images showed that betafite grains had consistent surfaces without any compositional zoning due to localized alterations and different chemical compositions. The betafite in the aegirine nepheline syenite primarily consisted of TiO2 (12.726–16.283 wt%), Nb2O5 (32.682–53.716 wt%), and UO2 (12.636–18.833 wt%), indicating largely consistent primary chemical elements with minor REE variations.
C.
Loparite
The chemical formula of loparite, (Ce,Na,Ca) (Ti,Nb)O3, was determined based on mineral composition analysis. Loparite in the Schryburt Lake carbonate complex, northwest of Lake Ontario, Canada, continuous interaction with fluorine-rich fluids resulted in a local environment rich in Ti, Na, Nb, and rare earths [28]. Loparite was found only sporadically in some aegirine nepheline syenite samples. Under the optical microscope, it exhibited a xenomorphic granular texture, with particle sizes between approximately 15–35 μm. Most loparite in the samples localized on the surface of altered potassium feldspar, near zircon (SMK-1), and within pores or reticular fissures on feldspar surfaces resulting from metasomatism (SMK-6). Interactions between hydrothermal fluids and surrounding rocks induced chemical changes and replacements, leading to new mineral formations in vacant spaces. Thus, loparite formed during later metasomatism. Backscattered electron images indicated that loparite grains had consistent surfaces devoid of compositional zoning caused by localized alterations and different chemical compositions (Figure 3e,f). As detailed in Table 1, the loparite in aegirine nepheline syenite primarily comprised TiO2 (33.783–35.394 wt%), Nb2O5 (6.234–8.698 wt%), Ce2O3 (18.92–21.842 wt%), Y2O5 (7.813–10.29 wt%), and La2O3 (8.77–13.978 wt%), showing largely uniform primary chemical constituents with minor REE variations.
Within niobium-rich alkaline rocks, the primary diagenetic mineral was potassium feldspar. Transitioning from rare-earth-rich to niobium–tantalum-rich alkaline rocks, titanium-bearing minerals progressively decreased, with rock textures evolving from coarse-grained to intermediate and fine-grained structures.

4.3. Lithogeochemical Characteristics

4.3.1. Major Elements

The major elemental composition of aegirine nepheline syenite from the Saima Deposit is presented in Table 2, revealing specific characteristics. Six aegirine nepheline syenite samples displayed SiO2, TiO2, P2O5, and A12O3 contents ranging from 46.8–54.0 wt%, 0.68–1.37 wt%, 0.016–0.035 wt%, and 16.9–21.2 wt%, respectively. The ore-forming pluton was characterized by elevated total alkali contents (K2O + Na2O) between 12.00%–17.04%, high potassium ratios (K2O/Na2O = 1.41–3.90), and Rittmann indices (σ = [ω(K2O + Na2O)]2/ [ω(SiO2-43)]) ranging from 26.47–37.92, indicative of alkaline rocks. All six samples were positioned within the nepheline syenite zone on the total alkali-silica (TAS) diagram (Figure 4a), classifying them within the alkaline rock series. Additionally, they predominantly resided in the peraluminous rock zone in the A/NK-A/CNK discrimination plot (Figure 4b) and the alkaline granite zone in the w(K2O)-w(SiO2) rock series discrimination plot (Figure 4c).
The major elemental composition of nepheline syenite from the Saima Deposit revealed distinct characteristics. Five biotite nepheline syenite samples displayed SiO2, TiO2, P2O5, and A12O3 contents of 51.7%–54.6%, 0.24%–1.12%, 0.0079%–0.050%, and 19.4%–21.1%, respectively, highlighting pronounced metaluminous properties. The surrounding rocks exhibited elevated total alkali contents (K2O + Na2O) in the range of 14.66%–16.79%, high potassium ratios (K2O/Na2O = 1.45–3.53), and Rittmann indices (σ = [ω(K2O + Na2O)]2/ [ω(SiO2-43)]) primarily between 18.54–27.60, confirming the alkaline nature of these samples. All five samples were positioned within the nepheline syenite zone on the TAS diagram (Figure 4a), categorizing them within the alkaline rock series. Additionally, they were located in the peraluminous rock zone in the A/NK-A/CNK discrimination plot (Figure 4b) and the alkaline granite zone in the w(K2O)-w(SiO2) rock series discrimination plot (Figure 4c).

4.3.2. Trace Elements

The REE analytical data (Table 2) indicate that the Saima Deposit possesses exceptionally high ∑REE values and pronounced REE fractionation. The aegirine nepheline syenite and nepheline syenite samples from the Saima Deposit exhibited ∑REE values primarily in the range of 563.06 × 10−6–1436.56 × 10−6 and 83.00 × 10−6–373.77 × 10−6, respectively. Consequently, the ∑REE values for the aegirine nepheline syenite samples were roughly fivefold compared to those of the nepheline syenite samples. Furthermore, the individual REE contents in the ore-forming pluton exceeded those in the adjacent rocks by up to a factor of ten.
The aegirine nepheline syenite samples from the Saima Deposit had LREE (such as La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, and Eu) contents ranging from 547.84 × 10−6–1377.11 × 10−6 and heavy rare earth element (HREE, such as Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, and Lu) contents ranging from 15.21 × 10−6–176.16 × 10−6. Hence, their LREE/HREE ratios were between 5.08–36.01, averaging 17.42. REE analyses (Figure 5) indicate that the syenite from the Saima Deposit displays pronounced LREE enrichment and HREE depletion, with LaN/YbN ratios spanning 4.74–85.44, averaging 36.27 > 10 [33,34,35], and distinctly rightward REE distribution curves, signifying notable LREE and HREE fractionation. The ore-forming pluton did not display significant Sr and Eu anomalies (δEu = 2EuN/(SmN + GdN); 0.85–1.15). The nepheline syenite samples from the Saima Deposit had LREE and HREE contents ranging from 78.52 × 10−6–394.39 × 10−6 and 4.48 × 10−6–17.39 × 10−6, respectively. Therefore, their LREE/HREE ratios were from 9.36–29.62, averaging 20.44. The nepheline syenite samples had LaN/YbN ratios ranging from 8.28–65.34 and δEu = 2EuN/(SmN + GdN) values between 0.86–1.16 [36,37].

4.4. Sr-Nd-Pb Isotopes

The aegirine nepheline syenite and nepheline syenite samples from the Saima deposit displayed consistent Sr-Nd isotopic characteristics (Table 3). They had 87Sr/86Sr and 143Nd/144Nd ratios ranging from 0.708528843–0.710648378 and 0.511816536–0.511941865, respectively. Based on the rock age of 224 Ma [9], their ISr, εNd (t), fSm/Nd, and tDM values calculated were 0.70712–0.70832, −12.84–−11.86, −0.61–−0.18, and 1967–2047 Ma, respectively. The high ISr values and low εNd (t) values imply that the source rocks originated primarily from the crustal materials.
These samples from the Saima deposit demonstrated consistent Pb isotopic characteristics (Table 3). They had 206Pb/204Pb, 207Pb/204Pb, and 208Pb/204Pb ratios ranging from 16.945133–17.983013, 15.505977–15.540079, and 36.996076–37.859821, respectively. Their initial (206Pb/204Pb)i, (207Pb/204Pb)i, and (208Pb/204Pb)i ratios calculated were 16.603–17.798, 15.491–15.531, and 36.947–37.63, respectively.

4.5. Whole-Rock and Mineral Li Isotopic Compositions

The Li contents and isotopic compositions of the whole rocks and specific minerals from the Saima alkaline pluton are detailed in Table 4. The nepheline syenite sample from the Saima region had Li content of 39.0 ppm, notably lower than the 94.3 ppm observed in the aegirine nepheline syenite sample. Conversely, the δ7Li value of the nepheline syenite sample (2.2‰) exceeded the 2.04‰ of the aegirine nepheline syenite sample. Ore-forming minerals such as mica, potassium feldspar, and aegirine in the aegirine nepheline syenite displayed varied Li contents and isotopic compositions. The nepheline’s Li isotopic composition was not measured due to its exceedingly low Li content (0.37 ppm). Potassium feldspar exhibited Li content of 17.9 ppm and a notably low Li isotopic composition, with a δ7Li value of −22.44‰. Aegirine presented Li content of 27.3 ppm and a δ7Li value of −0.35‰. Contrasting with potassium feldspar and aegirine, mica registered a remarkably high Li content of 542 ppm and a δ7Li value of 1.49‰. Beyond the Li isotopes of aegirine, the Li isotopes in syenite, aegirine nepheline syenite, mica, and potassium feldspar all aligned with the mid-oceanic ridge basalt (MORB) range.

5. Discussion

5.1. Material Sources

The genesis of syenite remains debated. Prior comprehensive research has identified three potential origins: crust-derived magma, mantle-derived magma, and a combination of both crust- and mantle-derived magma [33,39]. Spidergrams of primitive mantle-normalized trace elements present rightward curves, suggesting the syenite from the Saima deposit is LILE-rich and HFSE-depleted, pointing towards a mantle-derived origin [40]. These spidergrams also illustrate that Ba has conspicuous troughs when contrasted with Rb and Th, aligning with continental crust rock traits outlined by Zhou [41]. The trace element partitioning in the aegirine nepheline syenite resembles the shadow patterns in REE data presented by Ju [9], underscoring a shared source. In addition, the syenite from the Saima deposit exhibited Rb/Sr ratios between 0.16–1.41, surpassing the continental crust’s value of 0.15 [42,43]. Such features advocate for the blending of magmatic sources with crustal constituents. Collectively, the REE and trace element profiles of the syenite from the Saima align with the stance of Zhao [44] regarding the combined crust- and mantle-derived magma. Thus, the magmatic genesis of the Saima pluton can be attributed to mantle sources intermixed substantially with crustal components during its ascent or emplacement.
Typically, magma inherits the isotopic composition of its progenitor rocks, achieving isotopic equilibrium at high temperatures. This equilibrium persists even when a later-formed closed system undergoes differentiation. Hence, examining igneous rocks offers insights into the isotopic signatures of the deep earth. Furthermore, Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes are potent tracers for delineating rock material origins. The syenite from the Saima deposit exhibited elevated ISr values between 0.70712–0.70832, reduced εNd(t) values from −12.84–−11.86, and tDM2 values spanning 1967–2047 Ma, suggesting a source predominantly influenced by crust-derived materials. All samples positioned themselves within the crust-mantle transition zone (B-C zone; Figure 6a) in the ISr-εNd (t) plot, indicating a commingling of the magma with mantle-derived constituents. Furthermore, the 207Pb/204Pb-206Pb/204Pb and 208Pb/204Pb-206Pb/204Pb plots (Figure 6b,c) reveal that all samples align closely with the lower crust and enriched mantle I domains and Pb isotope sources were influenced by enriched mantle I end-members, inferring interactions between mantle-derived magma and crustal materials [45]. Yan [46] and Ren [47] posited that the material sources of Mesozoic Indosinian alkali-rich intrusive rocks in the North China Craton correlate with an enriched mantle (akin to enriched mantle I) amalgamated with crustal components. The derived conclusions indicate that the material sources of the aegirine nepheline syenite and nepheline syenite align with the regional sources of the Saima deposit [48].

5.2. Li Isotopic Characteristics of the Saima Alkaline Pluton and Their Implications

The rare-metal alkaline rocks of Saima have experienced pronounced magmatic differentiation, which is pivotal for the diversity of their mineralization [4,52]. Consequently, comprehending magmatic differentiation is essential to further elucidate the enrichment of rare metal elements and the ultimate mineralization processes within rare-metal alkaline rocks. Li plays an indispensable role as a volatile element during magmatic differentiation, and the accumulation patterns of Nb and, notably, Ta [53] vary within the magmatic differentiation of rare-metal alkaline rocks [54]. The Li isotopic composition can act as a potent geochemical tracer for this differentiation. The nepheline syenite and aegirine nepheline syenite at Saima exhibited markedly diverse Li isotopic compositions. Likewise, the mica, potassium feldspar, and aegirine in the aegirine nepheline syenite displayed varied Li isotopic profiles, suggesting Li isotope fractionation during the Saima pluton’s genesis. Typically, the mechanisms triggering Li isotope fractionation correlate with magmatic evolutionary stages, encompassing crystallization differentiation and fluid dynamics, which include water-rock interactions and ion diffusion in fluids.

5.2.1. Li Isotope Fractionation during the Magmatic Differentiation

Magmatic differentiation impacts whole-rock Li isotopes predominantly through fractional crystallization and Li isotopic shifts within certain lithium-rich minerals, principally mica, followed by feldspar, quartz, pyroxene, and amphibole. Mica serves as the primary Li-bearing mineral in alkaline rocks due to its Li partition coefficient being substantially higher than those of other minerals, such as feldspar and aegirine. Experimental evidence indicates that Li exhibits slight compatibility in biotite (DLi biotite/melt = 0.8–1.67; [55]) and is moderately incompatible in feldspar (DLi feldspar/melt = 0.1–0.68; [55]). Consequently, pronounced crystallization differentiation of these minerals, especially biotite, can influence the Li content in silicate melts. The Li isotope fractionation is governed by Li’s coordination within mineral structures and the solid/melt partition coefficients [56]. 7Li is preferentially incorporated into lower coordination phases, while 6Li is more favored in higher coordination phases [57]. Typically, Li occupies the octahedral coordination site in most diagenetic minerals (e.g., pyroxene, amphibole, feldspar, and mica [58]). In contrast, tetrahedral coordination is predominant in silicate melts. Thus, if mica is the main fractionating mineral during differentiation, the remaining melts will exhibit a relatively heavy Li isotopic composition.
Crystal-melt fractionation is a pivotal mechanism for the genesis of pegmatite melts. While the aegirine nepheline syenite and nepheline syenite share analogous mineral assemblages, the aegirine nepheline syenite, characterized by extremely elevated alkali content (such as Li and Cs) and diminished rare earth content, cannot form solely from equilibrium crystallization of conventional nepheline syenite melts. Maneta [59] posited that spodumene in lithium-cesium-tantalum (LCT) pegmatite could crystallize from a Li-supersaturated residual melt enriched in H2O and fluxing agents (e.g., F, B, and P). Such a residual melt might undergo upwards of 80% crystallization differentiation, incorporating minerals like feldspar and quartz [60]. Yet, this is not observed in the Saima deposit’s aegirine nepheline syenite, which is more differentiated than nepheline syenite and exhibits higher Nb/Ta ratios (Figure 7a). Within the Saima pluton, the Li content in aegirine nepheline syenite markedly surpasses that in nepheline syenite. Furthermore, mica in aegirine nepheline syenite has anomalously elevated Li content compared to the surrounding matrix. Mica exhibits the most pronounced Li content in aegirine nepheline syenite, succeeded by aegirine, potassium feldspar, and nepheline. Therefore, the remarkable Li enrichment in aegirine nepheline syenite reflects its advanced differentiation and is consistent with the elevated Li content in mica. However, the nepheline syenite and aegirine nepheline syenite display subtle disparities in their whole-rock δ7Li values (Figure 7b), ranging between 2.20‰ and 2.04‰. This implies that unless mica serves as the primary fractionating mineral, magmatic differentiation does not induce pronounced Li isotope fractionation. The δ7Li values of the two rock types exhibit an inverse relationship with magmatic differentiation: the more evolved aegirine nepheline syenite possesses lower δ7Li values than its less evolved counterpart, the nepheline syenite. The Li isotopic variations in the Saima deposit cannot be rationalized by mere crystal-melt fractionation, as the differentiation of diagenetic minerals should lead to a heavier Li isotopic composition in the residual melt. The divergence between whole-rock Li isotope fractionation and magmatic differentiation might stem from potent fluid–rock interactions.

5.2.2. Diffusion-Driven Li Isotope Fractionation

The aegirine nepheline syenite sample from the Saima pluton exhibited a notably lower δ7Li value of 2.04‰ compared to the nepheline syenite sample (2.20‰). This discrepancy may predominantly arise from mica crystallization. However, this is incongruent with the observed upward trend in Li content within mica during differentiation. Certain biotite samples from the Saima pluton, marked by indistinct boundaries, were metasomatized by natrolite and hydromuscovite, hinting at a restricted fluid–rock interaction. Consequently, Li isotope fractionation between the mica and fluid phases does not seem to elucidate the δ7Li values observed in samples from the Saima pluton.
Given the considerable mass disparity between Li isotopes, 6Li diffuses approximately 3% more rapidly than 7Li in melts, fluids, minerals, and rocks. Diffusion experiments have shown that mica can experience swift and significant alterations in its Li isotopic composition due to interactions with Li-rich fluids. Moreover, mica generally possesses higher δ7Li values than its adjacent fluids, as 6Li transitions from mica to fluids more efficiently than 7Li. This phenomenon suggests that the preferential diffusion of lighter 6Li isotopes from mica into fluids results in elevated δ7Li values within rocks. Li displays rapid diffusion in minerals. Minerals within the Saima pluton’s aegirine nepheline syenite exhibit non-equilibrium Li partitioning (Figure 7), with marked disparities in Li contents (542, 17.9, and 27.3, respectively) and isotopes (δ7Li values: 1.49, −22.44, and −0.35, respectively) between mica, potassium feldspar, and nepheline. Consequently, the differential diffusion velocities of Li isotopes during non-equilibrium fluid–rock interactions contribute to the Li isotope fractionation observed in the Saima pluton.

5.2.3. Indications for the Mineralization of Rare Metals

The mineralization of niobium, zirconium, and rare earth elements is intricately tied to magmatic differentiation, and achieving saturation of rare metals and Li-bearing minerals in alkaline melts demands substantial magmatic fractionation [61]. Various magmatic processes can give rise to distinct metallogenetic mechanisms in rare-metal alkaline rocks [62]. The Saima alkaline pluton stands as a representative rare-metal deposit, featuring mineralization of rare earth elements, zirconium, and niobium, while showcasing pronounced Li isotopic variations. The Saima pluton presents marked differences in Li contents and Nb/Ta and Zr/Hf ratios; however, the δ7Li values in the nepheline syenite and aegirine nepheline syenite samples show only modest reductions. This suggests that extensive magmatic differentiation may result in only minor Li isotope fractionation. The Li isotope fractionation within the Saima pluton might arise from fluid–rock interactions. Nevertheless, petrographic observations indicate that only a subset of biotite exhibits blurred boundaries, undergoing replacement by natrolite and hydromuscovite. This observation infers that the volume of fluid exsolution was insufficient to trigger significant lithium isotope fractionation, and Li leaching had a negligible impact on the Li isotope fractionation in nepheline syenite and aegirine nepheline syenite samples. The diffusion rate of 6Li surpasses that of 7Li by 3%. Notable variances in the Li contents and isotopic shifts among minerals in the aegirine nepheline syenite sample might stem from the differential diffusion rates of the two Li isotopes.
Hence, the Li isotope fractionation in samples from the Saima pluton might be ascribed to fluid diffusion. In summary, the Li isotope fractionation in the Saima pluton can be traced back to diverse magmatic differentiation processes, which play a pivotal role in the unique mineralization of rare earth elements, zirconium, and niobium in rare-metal alkaline rocks.

6. Conclusions

(1)
The Saima deposit, located within potassium-rich, low-sodium peraluminous alkaline rocks, is dominated by aegirine nepheline syenite and nepheline syenite. The electron probe results show that the main niobium-bearing minerals in the Saima deposit are loparite, betafite, and fersmite, which are mainly found in the aegirine nepheline syenite, while only fersmite is identified within the biotite nepheline syenite. Additionally, as one transitions from REE-rich to niobium–tantalum-rich alkaline rocks, the presence of titanium-bearing minerals diminishes, and the texture shifts from coarse-grained to intermediate and fine-grained structures.
(2)
All samples display a pronounced, indicative of LREE enrichment and HREE depletion. Such patterns suggest that deep hydrothermal fluids from both the crust and mantle contributed to the crystallization of these samples. Both the aegirine nepheline syenite and nepheline syenite in the Saima Deposit exhibit consistent Sr-Nd-Pd isotopic characteristics, encompassing elevated ISr values, negative εNd (t) values, and two-stage model ages spanning 1967–2047 Ma. From these data, it can be deduced that the material sources of the Saima Deposit are tied to an enriched mantle with some degree of crustal material mixing. The material sources of the aegirine nepheline syenite and nepheline syenite align with the broader regional sources of the Saima Deposit.
(3)
The Li isotope fractionation observed during the Saima pluton’s formation can likely be attributed to the faster diffusion rate of 6Li compared to 7Li during non-equilibrium fluid–rock interactions. Distinct magmatic differentiation impacts on Li isotope fractionation emerge as a crucial mechanism, driving the varied mineralization of rare earth elements, zirconium, and niobium in rare-metal alkaline rocks.

Author Contributions

Methodology, Y.W.; Writing-original draft, Y.W.; Investigation, N.J.; Funding acquisition, N.J.; Data curation, X.L.; Formal analysis, L.S.; Visualization, Y.F.; Supervision, Y.F.; Resources, D.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number [42102087], China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, grant number [2022M712966], National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number [U2244201], Major project of the Ministry of Science and Technology, grant number [2021QZKK0304]. And The APC was funded by [42102087].

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data generated or analyzed during this study are provided in full within the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Li Xiaowei from the China University of Geosciences for the help with the data processing, as well as the reviewers for their valuable comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Yue Wu has received research grants from the foundation [42102087].

References

  1. Yang, Z.; Giester, G.; Ding, K.; Tillmanns, E. Hezuolinite, (Sr, REE)4Zr(Ti, Fe3+, Fe2+)2Ti2O8(Si2O7)2, a new mineral species of the chevkinite group from Saima alkaline complex, Liaoning Province, NE China. Eur. J. Mineral. 2012, 24, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wooley, A.R. Alkaline Rocks and Carbonatites of the World. Part3: Africa; The Geological Society Publishing House: London, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  3. Greenland Minerals and Energy LTD. Greenland Minerals 2021 AGM Presentation. Available online: http://wcsecure.welink.com.au/pdf/GGG/02504612.pdf (accessed on 20 March 2022).
  4. Sheard, E.R.; Williams-Jones, A.E.; Heiligmann, M.; Pederson, C.; Trueman, D.L. Controls on the concentration of zirconium, niobium, and the rare earth elements in the Thor Lake rare metal deposit, Northwest Territories, Canada. Econ. Geol. 2012, 107, 81–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, Z.B.; Fan, J.; Guo, Z.T.; He, Z.Q.; Wang, S.L.; Ren, K.C. Saima Alkaline Rocks and Metallogenesis; Atomic Energy Press: Beijing, China, 1996; pp. 1–19, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, C.; Zhang, S.; Sun, X.; Yang, Z.; Liang, W. Geochemical and mineralogical characteristics of weathered ore in the Dalucao REE deposit, Mianning-Dechang REE Belt, western Sichuan Province, southwestern China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015, 71, 437–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, B.; Wang, R.C.; Yang, J.H.; Wu, F.Y.; Zhang, W.L.; Gu, X.P.; Zhang, A.C. Zr and REE mineralization in sodic lujauvrite from the Saima alkaline complex, northeastern China: A mineralogical study and comparison with potassic rocks. Lithos 2016, 262, 232–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, B.; Wang, R.C.; Guo, G.L.; Song, Z.T. Compositional variations of rinkite in the Saima alkaline complex, Liaoning Province, and its implications for alkaline magma evolution. Earth Sci. 2020, 45, 467–478, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  9. Ju, N.; Ren, Y.-S.; Zhang, S.; Bi, Z.-W.; Shi, L.; Zhang, D.; Shang, Q.-Q.; Yang, Q.; Wang, Z.-G.; Gu, Y.-C.; et al. Metallogenic Epoch and Tectonic Setting of Saima Niobium Deposit in Fengcheng, Liaoning Province, NE China. Minerals 2019, 9, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cheng, X.; Xu, J.; Zhang, H.; He, B. U-Pb Geochronology and Geochemistry of Zircon from the Saima-Bailinchuan Alkaline Intrusion in Eastern Liaoning, China. Acta Geol. Sin. Engl. Ed. 2014, 88, 959–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ma, D.Z.; Liu, Y. Nb mineralization in the nepheline syenite in the Saima area of the North China Craton, China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2023, 152, 105247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, F.Y.; Yang, Y.H.; Marks, M.A.; Liu, Z.C.; Zhou, Q.; Ge, W.C.; Yang, J.S.; Zhao, Z.F.; Mitchell, R.H.; Markl, G. In situ U–Pb, Sr, Nd and Hf isotopic analysis of eudialyte by LA-(MC)-ICP-MS. Chem. Geol. 2010, 273, 8–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, Y.S.; Yang, J.H.; Sun, J.F.; Zhang, J.H.; Wu, F.Y. Petrogenesis of coeval silica-saturated and silica-undersaturated alkaline rocks: Mineralogical and geochemical evidence from the Saima alkaline complex, NE China. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2016, 117, 184–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, B.; Gu, X.P.; Rao, C.; Wang, R.C.; Xing, X.Q.; Zhong, F.J.; Wan, J.J.; Bonnetti, C. Fluorsigaiite, Ca2S3(PO4)3F, a new mineral of the apatite supergroup from the Saima alkaline complex, Liaoning Province, China. Mineral. Mag. 2022, 86, 940–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, B.; Gu, X.P.; Rao, C.; Wang, R.C.; Xing, X.Q.; Wan, J.J.; Bonnetti, C. Gysinite-(La), PbLa(CO3)2(OH)·H2O, a new rare earth mineral of the ancylite group from the Saima alkaline complex, Liaoning Province, China. Mineral. Mag. 2023, 87, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Z.; Qin, J.; Lai, S.; Long, X.; Ju, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhu, Y. Origin of Late Permian amphibole syenite from the Panxi area, SW China: High degree fractional crystallization of basaltic magma in the inner zone of the Emeishan mantle plume. Int. Geol. Rev. 2020, 62, 210–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abdel-Karim, A.A.; Azer, M.; Sami, M. Petrogenesis and tectonic implications of the Maladob ring complex in the South Eastern Desert, Egypt: New insights from mineral chemistry and whole-rock geochemistry. Int. J. Earth Sci. 2021, 110, 53–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, H.; Lai, S.C.; Qin, J.F.; Zhu, R.Z.; Zhao, S.W.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, F.Y.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Wang, X.Y. Early Palaeozoic alkaline trachytes in the North Daba Mountains, South Qinling Belt: Petrogenesis and geological implications. Int. Geol. Rev. 2021, 63, 2037–2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Choi, E.; Fiorentini, M.L.; Giuliani, A.; Foley, S.F.; Maas, R.; Graham, S. Petrogenesis of Proterozoic alkaline ultramafic rocks in the Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia. Gondwana Res. 2021, 93, 197–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moghadam, H.S.; Hoernle, K.; Hauff, F.; Garbe-Schönberg, D.; Pfänder, J. Geochemistry and petrogenesis of alkaline rear-arc magmatism in NW Iran. Lithos 2022, 412, 106590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fu, R.X.; Li, N.B.; Niu, H.C.; Shan, Q.; Zhao, X.; Liu, K. Magmatic evolution and rare earth element enrichment of Saima alkaline complex, Liaoning, China. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2023, 39, 2951–2967, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, Y.H.; Zhang, H.F.; Chu, Z.Y.; Xie, L.W.; Wu, F.Y. Combined chemical separation of Lu, Hf, Rb, Sr, Sm and Nd from a single rock digest and precise and accurate isotope determinations of Lu-Hf, Rb-Sr and Sm-Nd isotope systems using Multi-Collecter ICP-MS and TIMS. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2010, 290, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, Y.H.; Wu, F.Y.; Liu, Z.C.; Chu, Z.Y.; Xie, L.W.; Yang, J.H. Evaluation of Sr chemical purification technique for natural geological samples using common cation-exchange and Sr-specific extraction chromatographic resin prior to MC-ICP-MS or TIMS measurement. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2012, 27, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Su, A.N.; Tian, S.H.; Li, Z.Z.; Hou, Z.Q.; Hou, K.J.; Hu, W.J.; Gao, Y.G.; Yang, D.; Li, Y.H.; Yang, Z.S. MC-ICP-MS high precision determination of Li isotope analysis method. Earth Front. 2011, 18, 304–314, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  25. Tian, S.H.; Hu, W.J.; Hou, Z.Q.; Mo, X.X.; Yang, Z.S.; Zhao, Y.; Hou, K.J.; Zhu, D.C.; Su, A.N.; Zhang, Z.Q. Mantle source region and petrogenesis of the Miocene Selip superpotassic volcanic rocks in the western part of Lhasa Block: Li isotopic restriction. Depos. Geol. 2012, 31, 791–812, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  26. Tian, S.; Hou, Z.; Mo, X.; Tian, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Hou, K.; Yang, Z.; Hu, W.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y. Lithium isotopic evidence for subduction of the Indian lower crust beneath southern Tibet. Gondwana Res. 2020, 77, 168–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Millot, R.; Guerrot, C.; Vigier, N. Accurate and high-precision measurement of lithium isotopes in two reference materials by MC ICP-MS. Geostand. Geoanalytical Res. 2004, 28, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Garth, P.R. Perovskites, niobium perovskites, and Ba-Fe manganites from the Schryburt Lake carbonate complex in northwestern Ontario, Canada. J. Geosci. Transl. 1995, 12, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  29. Middlemost, E.A.K. Naming Materials in the Magma/Igneous Rock System. Earth-Sci. Rev. 1994, 37, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Streckeisen, A. To each plutonic rock its proper name. Earth-Sci. Rev. 1976, 12, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Middlemost, E. Magmas and Magmatic Rocks; Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd.: Boston, MA, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  32. Frost, C.D.; Frost, B.R. On Ferroan (A-Type) Granitoids: Their Compositional Variability and Modes of Origin. J. Petrol. 2011, 52, 39–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Barth, M.G.; McDonough, W.F.; Rudnick, R.L. Tracking the budget of Nb and Ta in the continental crust. Chem. Geol. 2000, 165, 197–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, C.B.; Hou, G.S.; Xiang, S.H. Characteristics of Yuchi Syenites from East Qinling and the Rare Metal Elements, Rare Earth Element Mineralization. Geol. Sci. Technol. Inf. 2017, 36, 58–64, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  35. Shi, Y.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Shi, S.; Wei, M.; Yang, J.; Gao, T. Late Paleozoic-Early Mesozoic southward subduction-closure of the Paleo-Asian Ocean: Proof from geochemistry and geochronology of Early Permian-Late Triassic felsic intrusive rocks from North Liaoning, NE China. Lithos 2019, 346, 105165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Linnen, R.L.; Samson, I.M.; Williams-Jones, A.E. Geochemistry of the Rare-Earth Element, Nb, Ta, Hf and Zr Deposits. In Treatise on Geochemistry, 2nd ed.; Holland, H.D., Turekian, K.K., Eds.; Elsevier Science Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; Volume 13, pp. 543–568. [Google Scholar]
  37. Guo, D.X.; Liu, Y. Occurrence and geochemistry of bastnasite in carbonatite-related REE deposit, Mianning-Dechang REE belt, Sichuan Province, SW China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2019, 107, 266–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sun, S.S.; McDonough, W.F. Chemical and Isotopic Systematics of Oceanic Basalts: Implications for Mantle Composition and Processes; Geological Society, Special Publications: London, UK, 1989; Volume 42, pp. 313–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hou, Z.; Liu, Y.; Tian, S.; Yang, Z.; Xie, Y. Formation of carbonatite-related giant rare-earth-element deposit by the recycling of marine sediments. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, S.; Fan, H.R.; Yang, K.F.; Hu, F.F.; Rusk, B.; Liu, X.; Li, X.C.; Yang, Z.Y.; Wang, Q.W.; Wang, K.Y. Fenitization in the giant Bayan Obo REE-Nb-Fe deposit: Implication for REE mineralization. Ore Geol. Rev. 2018, 94, 290–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhou, H.S.; Ma, C.Q.; Zhang, C.; Chen, L.; Zhang, J.Y.; She, Z.B. Yanshanian aluminous A-type granitoids in the Chunshui of Biyang, south margin of North China Craton: Implication from petrology, geochronology and geochemistry. Acta Pet. Sin. 2008, 24, 49–64, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  42. Yang, J.H.; Chung, S.L.; Wilde, S.A.; Wu, F.Y.; Chu, M.F.; Lo, C.H.; Fan, H.R. Petrogenesis of postorogenic syenites in the Sulu Orogenic Belt, East China: Geochronological, geochemical and Nd-Sr isotopic evidence. Chem. Geol. 2005, 214, 99–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, Y.; Chakhmouradian, A.R.; Hou, Z.; Song, W.; Kynický, J. Development of REE mineralization in the giant Maoniuping deposit (Sichuan, China): Insights from mineralogy, fluid inclusions, and trace-element geochemistry. Miner. Depos. 2019, 54, 701–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhao, J.X.; Shiraishik, A.; Ellis, D.J.; Sheraton, J.W. Geochemical and isotopic studies from the Yamato mountains, East Antarctica: Implication for the origin of syenitic magmas. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1995, 59, 1363–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yang, F.; Pang, X.; Li, B.; Chen, J.; Han, J.; Liu, M.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Shi, Y. Geological, fluid inclusion, H-O-S-Pb isotope constraints on the genesis of the Erdaogou gold deposit, Liaoning Province. J. Earth Sci. 2021, 32, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yan, G.H.; Xu, B.L.; Mu, B.L. Nd, Sr and Pb Isotopic characteristics and significance of Mesozoic alkali-rich intrusions in northern China. Bull. Mineral. Petrol. Geochem. 2001, 20, 234–236. [Google Scholar]
  47. Ren, K.X.; Yan, G.H.; Cai, J.H.; Mu, B.L.; Li, F.T.; Chu, Z.Y. Nd, Sr and Pb isotopic geochemistry of Paleo-Mesoproterozoic alkaline-rich intrusions from the northern part of the North China Craton: Evidence of the lithospheric mantle enrichment. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2006, 22, 2933–2944, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  48. Ju, N.; Zhang, S.; Bi, Z.W.; Ren, Y.S.; Shi, L.; Zhang, D.; Gu, Y.C.; Sun, Q.S. Geochemical characteristics and geological significance of metallogenic rock bodies of Saima niobium deposit in Fengcheng, Liaoning. Glob. Geol. 2019, 38, 130–139, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Xiong, X.L.; Li, C.D. Adakite and Grantie: Challenge and Opportunity; Chian Land Pres: Beijing, China, 2008; pp. 107–129, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  50. Zartman, R.E.; Doe, R. Plumbotectonics—The model. Tectonophysics 1981, 75, 135–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zindler, A.; Hart, S.R. Chemical geodynamics. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 1986, 14, 493–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Williams-Jones, A.E.; Vasyukova, O.V. Niobium, Critical Metal, and Progeny of the Mantle. Econ. Geol. 2022, 118, 837–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Van Lichtervelde, M.; Holtz, F.; Hanchar, J.M. Solubility of manganotantalite, zircon and hafnon in highly fluxed peralkaline to peraluminous pegmatitic melts. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2010, 160, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Barnes, E.M.; Weis, D.; Groat, L.A. Significant Li isotope fractionation in geochemically evolved rare element-bearing pegmatites from the Little Nahanni Pegmatite Group, NWT, Canada. Lithos 2012, 132, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Icenhower, J.; London, D. An experimental study of element partitioning among biotite, muscovite, and coexisting peraluminous silicic melt at 200 MPa (H2O). Am. Mineral. 1995, 80, 1229–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Magna, T.; Novák, M.; Cempírek, J.; Janoušek, V.; Ullmann, C.V.; Wiechert, U. Crystallographic control on lithium isotope fractionation in Archean to Cenozoic lithium-cesium-tantalum pegmatites. Geology 2016, 44, 655–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wunder, B.; Meixner, A.; Romer, R.L.; Feenstra, A.; Schettler, G.; Heinrich, W. Lithium isotope fractionation between Li-bearing staurolite, Li-mica and aqueous fluids: An experimental study. Chem. Geol. 2007, 238, 277–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sartbaeva, A.; Wells, S.A.; Redfern, S.A.T. Li+ ion motion in quartz and β-eucryptite studied by dielectric spectroscopy and atomistic simulations. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2004, 16, 8173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Maneta, V.; Baker, D.R.; Minarik, W. Evidence for lithium-aluminosilicate supersaturation ofpegmatite-forming melts. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2015, 170, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Maneta, V.; Baker, D.R. Exploring the effect of lithium on pegmatitic textures: An experimental study. Am. Mineral. 2014, 99, 1383–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Weng, Q.; Yang, W.B.; Niu, H.C.; Li, N.B.; Shan, Q.; Fan, G.Q.; Jiang, Z.Y. Two discrete stages of fenitization in the Lizhuang REE deposit, SW China: Implications for REE mineralization. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 133, 104090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, J.; Huang, X.L.; He, P.L.; Li, W.X.; Yu, Y.; Chen, L. In situ analyses of micas in the Yashan granite, South China: Constraints on magmatic and hydrothermal evolutions of W and Ta–Nb bearing granites. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015, 65, 793–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Minerals 13 01443 g001
Figure 1. Geotenctonic location map. (A) Geological sketch map (modified from reference [9]). (B) Distribution map of rare earth deposits in northeast China (Modified from reference [9]). (C) Geological map of the Saima deposit (Modified from reference [5]). 1. Quaternary alluvium; 2. Jurassic Beimiao formation; 3. Huaziyu formation of Liaohe group; 4. Late Triassic Saima diamictite; 5. Late Triassic nepheline syenite; 6. Late Triassic biotite–nepheline syenite; 7. Angular unconformity; 8. parallel displacement fault; 9. Nb ore body and number; 10. Jurassic Zhuanshanzi formation; 11. Wangjiagou rockbody of the Liaohe group; 12. Late-Triassic brown ijolite syenite; 13. Late Triassic aegirine syenite; 14. Late Triassic grass—green aegirine ijolite syenite; 15. Late Triassic intrusive rock (nepheline phonolite); 16. Supposed fault; 17. Sample location.
Figure 1. Geotenctonic location map. (A) Geological sketch map (modified from reference [9]). (B) Distribution map of rare earth deposits in northeast China (Modified from reference [9]). (C) Geological map of the Saima deposit (Modified from reference [5]). 1. Quaternary alluvium; 2. Jurassic Beimiao formation; 3. Huaziyu formation of Liaohe group; 4. Late Triassic Saima diamictite; 5. Late Triassic nepheline syenite; 6. Late Triassic biotite–nepheline syenite; 7. Angular unconformity; 8. parallel displacement fault; 9. Nb ore body and number; 10. Jurassic Zhuanshanzi formation; 11. Wangjiagou rockbody of the Liaohe group; 12. Late-Triassic brown ijolite syenite; 13. Late Triassic aegirine syenite; 14. Late Triassic grass—green aegirine ijolite syenite; 15. Late Triassic intrusive rock (nepheline phonolite); 16. Supposed fault; 17. Sample location.
Minerals 13 01443 g001
Minerals 13 01443 g002
Figure 2. Field and photomicrographs of the Saima deposit. (a) Coarse medium-grained biotite nepheline syenite. (b) Aegirine nepheline syenite. (c) Aegirine nepheline syenite. (d) Biotite nepheline syenite.
Figure 2. Field and photomicrographs of the Saima deposit. (a) Coarse medium-grained biotite nepheline syenite. (b) Aegirine nepheline syenite. (c) Aegirine nepheline syenite. (d) Biotite nepheline syenite.
Minerals 13 01443 g002
Minerals 13 01443 g003
Figure 3. Backscatter images of niobium-bearing minerals. (a,b) Fersmite; (c,d) Betafite; (e,f) Loparite.
Figure 3. Backscatter images of niobium-bearing minerals. (a,b) Fersmite; (c,d) Betafite; (e,f) Loparite.
Minerals 13 01443 g003
Minerals 13 01443 g004
Figure 4. Geochemical diagrams showing the major elements of aegirine nepheline syenite and nepheline syenite in the Saima Deposit. (a) TAS diagram (after [29]). (b) A/NK-A/CNK diagram (after [30]). (c) K2O-SiO2 diagram (after [31]). (d) FeOt/(FeOt + MgO)-SiO2 diagram of ore-forming plutons of the Saima and Baerzhe deposits (after [32]).
Figure 4. Geochemical diagrams showing the major elements of aegirine nepheline syenite and nepheline syenite in the Saima Deposit. (a) TAS diagram (after [29]). (b) A/NK-A/CNK diagram (after [30]). (c) K2O-SiO2 diagram (after [31]). (d) FeOt/(FeOt + MgO)-SiO2 diagram of ore-forming plutons of the Saima and Baerzhe deposits (after [32]).
Minerals 13 01443 g004
Minerals 13 01443 g005
Figure 5. Primitive mantle-normalized trace element spider diagrams (a) and chondrite-normalized REE patterns (b) of the aegirine nepheline syenite and nepheline syenite in the Saima deposit [38]. The grey field is the data from Ju [9].
Figure 5. Primitive mantle-normalized trace element spider diagrams (a) and chondrite-normalized REE patterns (b) of the aegirine nepheline syenite and nepheline syenite in the Saima deposit [38]. The grey field is the data from Ju [9].
Minerals 13 01443 g005
Minerals 13 01443 g006
Figure 6. Magmatic source area diagrams of ore-forming rock plutons in the Saima (a) modified from [49]; (b,c) modified from [50]) (EMI, EMII, HIMU and Primitive Mantle after [51]; lower crust, mature arc and upper crust after Zartman et al. [50]).
Figure 6. Magmatic source area diagrams of ore-forming rock plutons in the Saima (a) modified from [49]; (b,c) modified from [50]) (EMI, EMII, HIMU and Primitive Mantle after [51]; lower crust, mature arc and upper crust after Zartman et al. [50]).
Minerals 13 01443 g006
Minerals 13 01443 g007
Figure 7. Plots of Li isotope fractionation: Nb/Ta-Zr/Hf (a), whole-rock δ7Li versus Li content (b), whole-rock δ7Li-Nb/Ta (c), and whole-rock δ7Li-Zr/Hf plots (d).
Figure 7. Plots of Li isotope fractionation: Nb/Ta-Zr/Hf (a), whole-rock δ7Li versus Li content (b), whole-rock δ7Li-Nb/Ta (c), and whole-rock δ7Li-Zr/Hf plots (d).
Minerals 13 01443 g007
Table 1. EPMA-derived compositions of representative niobium-bearing minerals in nepheline syenite (wt%).
Table 1. EPMA-derived compositions of representative niobium-bearing minerals in nepheline syenite (wt%).
SampleSMK-1-1SMK-1-2SMK-6-1SMK-6-2SMK-2-1SMK-2-2SMK-4-1SMK-4-2SMK-3-1SMK-3-2SMW-4-1SMW-4-2
MineralsLopariteBetafiteFersmite
Al2O30.98 1.67 1.64 2.11 0.36 0.33 1.46 0.57 1.34 0.61 0.10 0.16
SiO22.55 3.94 4.21 3.98 5.13 3.27 6.02 5.43 3.65 2.87 2.05 2.34
TiO234.69 33.78 34.60 35.39 16.28 13.84 13.06 12.73 7.86 7.60 7.61 8.78
CaO0.94 0.87 1.88 1.87 2.12 2.65 12.46 10.79 12.15 14.62 14.46 14.72
K2O0.94 0.79 1.31 1.74 4.33 1.51 ——0.54 0.62 1.39 1.59
Nb2O58.70 8.59 6.59 6.23 50.36 53.72 32.80 34.68 51.55 52.64 56.83 53.54
Y2O37.81 9.94 10.29 9.79 ————0.79 0.83 ——
Ce2O321.84 20.61 18.92 18.94 ——5.73 5.92 2.44 2.54 2.65 2.73
MnO2.04 3.92 ——————————
La2O313.98 10.60 9.32 8.77 ————2.35 2.77 1.43 1.73
Pr2O33.74 3.68 ——————————
PbO——3.80 3.66 6.08 8.89 1.90 2.16 ——1.21 1.25
ThO2——1.78 1.59 ————————
ZrO2——3.55 3.53 ————2.07 1.91 3.57 4.01
UO2————12.64 13.99 18.67 18.83 8.19 7.56 3.59 3.74
Na2O————0.96 -——————
SrO——————3.92 5.58 3.13 2.72 2.96 3.29
MgO——————0.12 -————
Ta2O5——————1.14 0.86 ——0.62 0.52
ThO2————————0.44 0.98 ——
BaO————————4.05 1.89 ——
Total98.21 98.40 97.9 97.6 98.25 98.19 96.14 96.69 99.76 99.33 98.49 98.40
Calculated in units of 2 oxygen atoms
Al0.03 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.10 0.04 0.09 0.04 0.01 0.01
Si0.08 0.12 0.13 0.12 0.29 0.19 0.34 0.31 0.21 0.16 0.12 0.13
Ti0.78 0.76 0.78 0.80 0.70 0.59 0.56 0.54 0.34 0.33 0.33 0.38
Ca0.03 0.03 0.12 0.06 0.13 0.16 0.76 0.66 0.74 0.89 0.88 0.90
K0.04 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.31 0.11 ——0.04 0.05 0.10 0.12
Nb0.12 0.12 0.09 0.08 1.29 1.38 0.84 0.89 1.33 1.36 1.46 1.38
Y0.12 0.16 0.16 0.16 ————0.02 0.03 ——
Ce0.24 0.23 0.21 0.21 0.00 —0.12 0.12 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06
Mn0.05 0.10 ——————————
La0.15 0.12 0.10 0.10 ————0.05 0.06 0.03 0.04
Pr0.04 0.04 ——————————
Pb——0.03 0.03 0.09 0.14 0.03 0.03 ——0.02 0.02
Th——0.01 0.01 ————————
Zr——0.05 0.05 ————0.06 0.05 0.10 0.11
U————0.16 0.18 0.24 0.24 0.10 0.19 0.05 0.05
Na————0.11 ——— ——
Sr——————0.13 0.18 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.11
Mg——————0.01 -————
Ta——————0.02 0.01 ——0.01 0.01
Th————————0.01 0.01 ——
Ba————————0.09 0.04 ——
Table 2. Contents of major elements (wt%) and trace elements (ppm) of the aegirine nepheline syenite and nepheline syenite in the Saima Deposit.
Table 2. Contents of major elements (wt%) and trace elements (ppm) of the aegirine nepheline syenite and nepheline syenite in the Saima Deposit.
SampleSMK-1SMK-2SMK-3SMK-4SMK-5SMK-6SMW-1SMW-2SMW-3SMW-4SMW-5
Rock NameAegirine nephline syeniteNepheline syenite
SiO251.151.549.753.354.0 46.853.651.754.654.553.2
Al2O315.215.916.921.220.320.419.420.37.3420.621.1
TFe2O312.611.68.624.244.7413.0 7.468.3820.94.094.71
MgO0.440.20 2.050.280.60 0.050.050.030.040.370.01
CaO1.031.00 2.590.550.610.05 0.740.940.140.361.24
Na2O10.0 9.822.984.413.744.976.216.029.773.635.66
K2O5.986.4911.612.213.37.039.028.834.8912.811.1
MnO0.460.430.290.230.220.450.230.240.450.230.17
TiO21.371.313.490.680.751.430.240.241.120.541.10
P2O50.020.020.450.040.110.010.010.030.010.050.01
LOI1.721.671.622.841.465.563.00 3.120.70 2.80 1.51
Ba4584842187191836612466647501972017970
Cr27.232.221.0 31.326.321.721.329.521.0 26.428.3
Li12482.313354.651.0 83.0 52.0 27411.856.17.60
Be21.618.66.1815.88.8829.225.818.412.0 11.48.58
Sc9.659.095.651.072.897.743.122.672.292.293.96
Co7.2511.221.96.299.313.934.373.665.665.90 3.38
Ni4.182.365.642.212.496.011.911.545.30 2.472.50
Ga50.650.922.524.620.557.0 39.247.666.819.623.3
Rb152131460517453240255241204585296
Sr6412693929712759228362171675814522691275
Zr11,90011,600722140041385008749532800962588
Nb34037594.565.337.824416.318.953.142.0 51.5
Hf86.0 21420.729.28.40 16124.127.773.821.116.4
Ta19.618.311.34.312.9911.35.564.472.142.833.88
Pb1800200072.0 14042.884068.728847.958.468.7
Th55.0 51.421.312.931.236.721.928.930.913.711.3
U25.321.25.9716.712.720.55.757.585.395.80 2.25
La20621327316914122621.248.830.710577.1
Ce41942566526829861038.889.463.0 180193
Pr43.746.0 71.322.429.652.73.848.837.0817.324.5
Nd17017431076.0 10221312.324.125.850.983.8
Sm43.541.0 46.29.30 13.845.61.90 3.844.596.8812.9
Eu13.212.611.82.814.6311.40.591.181.172.333.43
Gd41.439.631.37.4211.0 37.0 1.473.263.785.50 8.57
Tb8.197.683.730.831.335.820.220.390.60 0.661.07
Dy48.845.313.93.155.6129.10.961.573.352.774.05
Ho9.248.771.890.520.934.750.180.260.70 0.480.60
Er28.226.94.861.452.6513.20.530.742.281.30 1.46
Tm4.914.620.550.220.40 2.10 0.110.130.420.190.20
Yb31.229.42.851.422.4513.20.861.092.661.151.26
Lu4.223.980.30 0.210.321.690.160.210.350.160.20
Table 3. Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic compositions of the Saima deposit.
Table 3. Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic compositions of the Saima deposit.
SampleSMK-1SMK-3SMK-4SMK-5SMK-6SMW-1SMW-2SMW-4
Rock NameAegirine nephline syeniteNepheline syenite
t(Ma)224224224224224224224224
87Rb/86Sr0.066751 0.437760 0.529536 0.560739 1.090988 1.005113 0.899047 0.728126
87Sr/86Sr0.708529 0.709622 0.709802 0.709842 0.710648 0.710324 0.710058 0.710271
147Sm/144Nd0.160598 0.093791 0.076910 0.084378 0.134784 0.097483 0.100186 0.084921
143Nd/144Nd0.511942 0.511846 0.511821 0.511839 0.511912 0.511884 0.511850 0.511817
ISr0.708320.708230.708120.708060.707170.707120.707190.70795
εSr(t)5856.755.154.341.740.941.952.7
fRb/Sr−0.194.295.45.7812.1911.159.877.8
INd0.5117060.5117090.5117080.5117150.5117150.5117420.5117030.511692
tDM220122019202120102005196720272047
εNd(t)−12.56−12.5−12.52−12.39−12.39−11.86−12.62−12.84
fSm/Nd−0.18−0.52−0.61−0.57−0.31−0.5−0.49−0.57
206Pb/204Pb16.945133 17.059080 17.112741 17.246771 17.018350 17.983013 16.994215 17.100560
207Pb/204Pb15.505977 15.514526 15.517586 15.523648 15.515068 15.540079 15.508530 15.516513
208Pb/204Pb36.996076 37.155187 37.053145 37.489011 7.034726 37.859821 37.068329 37.160730
(206Pb/204Pb)i16.91516.8816.85716.60316.96617.79816.93716.886
(207Pb/204Pb)i15.50415.50515.50515.49115.51215.53115.50615.506
(208Pb/204Pb)i36.97536.94736.98936.97237.00437.6336.99836.995
Table 4. Li isotopic compositions of the Saima alkaline pluton.
Table 4. Li isotopic compositions of the Saima alkaline pluton.
Rock/mineralSampleLiδ7Li2SD
Nepheline syeniteSM-21-3239.02.20.07
Aegirine nepheline syeniteSM-21-2894.32.040.27
Mica in aegirine nepheline syeniteSM-21-28-15421.490.25
Nepheline in aegirine nepheline syeniteSM-21-28-20.375
Feldspar in aegirine nepheline syeniteSM-21-28-317.9−22.440.19
Aegirine in aegirine nepheline syeniteSM-21-28-427.3−0.350.14
REE(ppm)NbTaZrHfLi
SM-21-2837.82.994138.439
SM-21-3216.35.5687424.194.3
SM-21-28-218.94.4795327.7542
SM-21-28-153.12.14280073.80.375
SM-21-28-3422.8396221.117.9
SM-21-28-451.53.8858816.427.3
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, Y.; Ju, N.; Liu, X.; Shi, L.; Feng, Y.; Ma, D. Sources of Metallogenic Materials of the Saima Alkaline Rock-Hosted Niobium–Tantalum Deposit in the Liaoning Region: Evidence from the Sr-Nd-Pb and Li Isotopes. Minerals 2023, 13, 1443. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13111443

AMA Style

Wu Y, Ju N, Liu X, Shi L, Feng Y, Ma D. Sources of Metallogenic Materials of the Saima Alkaline Rock-Hosted Niobium–Tantalum Deposit in the Liaoning Region: Evidence from the Sr-Nd-Pb and Li Isotopes. Minerals. 2023; 13(11):1443. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13111443

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Yue, Nan Ju, Xin Liu, Lu Shi, Yuhui Feng, and Danzhen Ma. 2023. "Sources of Metallogenic Materials of the Saima Alkaline Rock-Hosted Niobium–Tantalum Deposit in the Liaoning Region: Evidence from the Sr-Nd-Pb and Li Isotopes" Minerals 13, no. 11: 1443. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13111443

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop